AKP's National EV Project: Only an Election Promise?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AKP's National EV Project: Only an Election Promise? AKP’s national EV project: only an election promise? Turkey’s history with national technology development and AKP’s 2023 vision Fuat Kirici Master‘s Thesis in Middle Eastern and North African Studies Department of Culture Studies and Oriental Languages – MES4590 (30 credits) UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Spring 2017 1 2 Fuat Kirici 2017 AKP’s national EV project: only an election promise? Turkey’s history with national technology development and AKP’s 2023 vision http://www.duo.uio.no Trykk: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo 3 Abstract What happens when nationalism is the drive-force behind technology development in a country? Development of technology in a modern society is usually perceived as physical developments achieved through scientific research, without any affects on society or the culture of a nation. However, it seems this is not the case for Turkey. Since its foundation two major attempts have been made to develop and produce "national technology," but ending in disappointment, the aircraft factories opened in the 1930s and the Revolution car project in 1960. These technology initiatives that later was discarded by the politicians seems to have formed an understanding on how technology development is understood in Turkey. And this understanding seems to have had an important role for how the AKP has promoted its technology initiatives to the people. AKP has constantly based its politics in an utopian future that they call the 2023 goals or "The New Turkey." By promoting technology projects in the light of the past failures from the mentioned technology initiatives and the utopian future they are argue that Turkey will regain its "lost" glory. One of the initiatives in order to achieve this has been their national EV project. The project was first announced in 2011, but has often been "hot" at election times, something that has caused discussion of it being a tool for AKP to gain popular support, namely populism. This study discusses the implications of nationalist rhetoric on how technology development is perceived in Turkey, through the country's history on technology development and AKP's national EV project. Through the national EV project I discuss how nationalist rhetoric becomes and impetus for technology development in Turkey. I argue that technology development has significant influence on people, but also something leading to it being a tool to be used by politicians to mobilize popular support. 4 Acknowledgments After two hard but pleasant years at this master's degree, I finally submit my thesis. I feel that this master study on Middle East Studies has really enriched me as a person, and widened my understanding of actual events. I almost gave up on my way to finish this thesis, but in the end I managed to finish it and it is a big relief to finally be done. This accomplishment would not have been possible without the help support of persons dear to me. I wish to first of all direct a special thanks to my supervisor, Brynjar Lia, for an incredibly rewarding cooperation when I was writing my Master's thesis. This study would not have been the same without your feedback and guidance. I hope we can continue with the exciting discussions on EVs and renewable technology in the Middle East. Big thanks to both friends and family for their support through this process. Especially my family's moral support has been very valuable through this difficult time. You pushed me, but also encouraged me to finish my thesis. 5 Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 4 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................. 5 Abbreviations: .................................................................................................................. 8 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 10 1.2 Research question ............................................................................................................... 11 2. Theoretical framework ................................................................................................ 12 2.1 Technological nationalism .................................................................................................. 12 3. Methodology-working with sources ............................................................................. 15 3.1 Challenges on working with sources .................................................................................. 16 4. History of technological development and the national car ......................................... 17 4.1 From producer, to consumer: Turkey´s history with high-tech development .................... 17 4.2 The environment in Turkey before the national car project .............................................. 20 4.3 Revolution cars ................................................................................................................... 21 4.3.2 Why was the project discarded, even though the cars were produced? ............................... 23 5. The new national car project during the AKP period ................................................. 25 5.1 AKP .................................................................................................................................... 25 5.1.2 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan ........................................................................................................ 26 5.2 R&D developments and activities, and the Turkish society´s automobile culture ............. 27 5.3 We shall have our own car: AKP´s national car project, 2011-2014 .................................. 28 5.4 From fossil cars to EVs, 2014 - present .............................................................................. 29 5.4.1 Creating a brand or producing the EV? ............................................................................... 31 5.5 The public and opposition´s view on the national EV project ............................................ 33 5.5.2 The disappointment from previous technology projects ...................................................... 34 5.5.3 Would the national EV be bought? Technical difficulties and, economic patriotism ...... 35 5.5.3 Possible policies and incentives: .......................................................................................... 37 5.5.4 Economic patriotism ............................................................................................................ 37 5.5.4 Is the national EV project an example of populism? ........................................................... 39 5.5.5 Private sector on the national EV, the “babayigit” .............................................................. 40 5.6 The environmental and economical factors of an EV for Turkey ...................................... 40 5.6.1 Turkey´s problem with air pollution .................................................................................... 40 5.6.3 Turkey´s price for oil ........................................................................................................... 41 5.7 When technology becomes much more: Technological nationalism and its three functions ................................................................................................................................................. 41 5.7.1 Technology as unifying factor in a politically fragmented society ...................................... 42 5.8 The 2023 vision and “new Turkey”: The utopian future ................................................... 45 5.8.1 Technological projects for 2023 vision: Technological independency ................................ 46 6. Consequences on the use of nationalist rhetoric .......................................................... 47 6.1 Difficulties of producing a national EV .............................................................................. 48 6.2 When ideology forms the research on science and technology ........................................... 49 6.3 Populism? ........................................................................................................................... 50 6.4 An anachronistic understanding of technology development? ........................................... 53 6 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 54 Bibliography .................................................................................................................... 57 Indicators: ................................................................................................................................ 57 Sources: .................................................................................................................................... 57 Attachments ............................................................................................................................. 66 7 Abbreviations: * I have primarily translated the statements of the politicians, as it didn’t exist any official translation. CHP: Republican People's Party (Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi) 8 Economic patriotism: New academic field and many definitions, but in this thesis it is used as a term to explain a type of “financial protectionism” and people’s economic “intervention” for the country. MHP: The Nationalist Movement Party (Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi)
Recommended publications
  • Global Turkey in Europe. Political, Economic, and Foreign Policy
    ISSN 2239-2122 9 IAI Research Papers The EU is changing, Turkey too, and - above all - there is systemic change and crisis all G round, ranging from economics, the spread of democratic norms and foreign policy. LOBAL The IAI Research Papers are brief monographs written by one or N.1 European Security and the Future of Transatlantic Relations, This research paper explores how the EU and Turkey can enhance their cooperation in more authors (IAI or external experts) on current problems of inter- T edited by Riccardo Alcaro and Erik Jones, 2011 URKEY GLOBAL TURKEY national politics and international relations. The aim is to promote the political, economic, and foreign policy domains and how they can find a way out of the stalemate EU-Turkey relations have reached with the lack of progress in accession greater and more up to date knowledge of emerging issues and N. 2 Democracy in the EU after the Lisbon Treaty, IN trends and help prompt public debate. edited by Raaello Matarazzo, 2011 negotiations and the increasing uncertainty over both the future of the European project E after the Eurozone crisis and Turkey’s role in it. UROPE IN EUROPE N. 3 The Challenges of State Sustainability in the Mediterranean, edited by Silvia Colombo and Nathalie Tocci, 2011 A non-profit organization, IAI was founded in 1965 by Altiero Spinel- li, its first director. N. 4 Re-thinking Western Policies in Light of the Arab Uprisings, SENEM AYDIN-DÜZGIT is Assistant Professor at the Istanbul Bilgi University and Senior POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, AND FOREIGN POLICY edited by Riccardo Alcaro and Miguel Haubrich-Seco, 2012 Research Affiliate of the Istanbul Policy Centre (IPC).
    [Show full text]
  • Exports: the Heart of Nep
    How to Export to 2018 Turkey This report includes all the information related to trade basics and detailed data regarding export from Brazil to Turkey. This report is for information purposes only and Tumer Eng. will not be liable to any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential or exemplary damages, including but not limited to, damages for loss of profits, goodwill, use, data, or other intangible losses. Ver:1.0 2018 1 Contents 1 Why Turkey.................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 General Information .............................................................................................................. 12 1.2 Geography ............................................................................................................................. 13 1.2.1 Distances ....................................................................................................................... 18 1.2.2 Climate of Turkey .......................................................................................................... 19 1.2.2.1 Air temperature changes until now .......................................................................... 20 1.2.2.2 Precipitation changes until now ................................................................................ 21 1.2.2.3 Air temperature changes in the 21st century ........................................................... 21 1.2.2.4 Precipitation changes in the 21st century ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Country Report – Update November 2017 [3Rd Edition]
    21 November 2017 (COI up to 11th September 2017) Turkey Country Report – Update November 2017 [3rd edition] Explanatory Note Sources and databases consulted List of Acronyms CONTENTS 1. Main Developments since the attempted Coup d’état (July 2016) a. Overview of major legislative and political developments: i. Recent legislative developments incl. new amendments or decrees 1. State of Emergency 2. Emergency decrees a. Decree of 22 July 2016 (KHK/667) b. Decree of 25 July 2016 (KHK/668) c. Decree of 31 July 2016 (KHK/669) d. Decrees of 17 August 2016 (KHK/670 and 671) e. Decrees of 1 September 2016 (KHK/672, 673 and 674) f. Decrees of 29 October 2016 (KHK/675 and 676) g. Decrees of 22 November 2016 (KHK/677 and 678) h. Decrees of 6 January 2017 (KHK/679, 680 and 681) i. Decrees of 23 January 2017 (KHK/682, 683, 684 and 685) j. Decree of 7 February 2017 (KHK/686) k. Decree of 9 February 2017 (KHK/687) l. Decree of 29 March 2017 (KHK/688) m. Decrees of 29 April 2017 (KHK/689 and 690) n. Decree of 22 June 2017 (KHK/691) o. Decree of 14 July 2017 (KHK/692) p. Decrees of 25 August 2017 (KHK/693 and 694) 3. 2016: Observations by the Council of Europe Committee, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to freedom of opinion and expression and the Council of Europe’s Venice Commission 4. January – September 2017: Observations by the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly, the Council of Europe’s Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe, and the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to freedom of opinion and expression 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Who in Politics in Turkey
    WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY Sarıdemir Mah. Ragıp Gümüşpala Cad. No: 10 34134 Eminönü/İstanbul Tel: (0212) 522 02 02 - Faks: (0212) 513 54 00 www.tarihvakfi.org.tr - [email protected] © Tarih Vakfı Yayınları, 2019 WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY PROJECT Project Coordinators İsmet Akça, Barış Alp Özden Editors İsmet Akça, Barış Alp Özden Authors Süreyya Algül, Aslı Aydemir, Gökhan Demir, Ali Yalçın Göymen, Erhan Keleşoğlu, Canan Özbey, Baran Alp Uncu Translation Bilge Güler Proofreading in English Mark David Wyers Book Design Aşkın Yücel Seçkin Cover Design Aşkın Yücel Seçkin Printing Yıkılmazlar Basın Yayın Prom. ve Kağıt San. Tic. Ltd. Şti. Evren Mahallesi, Gülbahar Cd. 62/C, 34212 Bağcılar/İstanbull Tel: (0212) 630 64 73 Registered Publisher: 12102 Registered Printer: 11965 First Edition: İstanbul, 2019 ISBN Who’s Who in Politics in Turkey Project has been carried out with the coordination by the History Foundation and the contribution of Heinrich Böll Foundation Turkey Representation. WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY —EDITORS İSMET AKÇA - BARIŞ ALP ÖZDEN AUTHORS SÜREYYA ALGÜL - ASLI AYDEMİR - GÖKHAN DEMİR ALİ YALÇIN GÖYMEN - ERHAN KELEŞOĞLU CANAN ÖZBEY - BARAN ALP UNCU TARİH VAKFI YAYINLARI Table of Contents i Foreword 1 Abdi İpekçi 3 Abdülkadir Aksu 6 Abdullah Çatlı 8 Abdullah Gül 11 Abdullah Öcalan 14 Abdüllatif Şener 16 Adnan Menderes 19 Ahmet Altan 21 Ahmet Davutoğlu 24 Ahmet Necdet Sezer 26 Ahmet Şık 28 Ahmet Taner Kışlalı 30 Ahmet Türk 32 Akın Birdal 34 Alaattin Çakıcı 36 Ali Babacan 38 Alparslan Türkeş 41 Arzu Çerkezoğlu
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Implications of Trends in Turkey's Meat Sector with Respect to 2023 Vision Fahri Yavuz ⁎, Abdulbaki Bilgic, Mustafa Terin, Irfan O
    A.1.4 Meat Science 95 (2013) 798–804 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Meat Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/meatsci Policy implications of trends in Turkey's meat sector with respect to 2023 vision Fahri Yavuz ⁎, Abdulbaki Bilgic, Mustafa Terin, Irfan O. Guler Department of Agricultural Economics, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey article info abstract Article history: Turkey has become one of the leading emerging economies in the world being second after China as the Received 14 February 2013 highes ecoonomically growing country with 8.9% economic growth rate in 2010. Forecasting impacts of Accepted 21 March 2013 this development in coming 10 years might have very important policy implications for the meat sector in the framework of 2013 vision of Turkey. In this study, annual time series data which contain several key vari- Keywords: ables of meat sector in last 26 years (1987–2012) are used to forecast the variables of the coming twelve Turkey years (2013–2024) to drive policy implications by considering the impacts of high economic growths, crises Meat industry 2023 vision and major policy changes. Forecasted future values of the variables for 2023 in the sector are assessed and com- Time series pared with recent national and international values to drive policy implications. The results show that the eco- Forecasting nomic growth results in the increase in per capita income and thus increased demand for meat seemed to Economic policy foster the meat sector. Therefore, these macroeconomic indicators need to be better in addition to improvements at micro level for establishing competitive meat sector and thus reaching aimed consumption level of meat.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Global Brands by 2023: a Sweet Fantasy?
    TEN GLOBAL BRANDS BY 2023: A SWEET FANTASY? Over the past decade, ambitious bureaucrats in Ankara have pledged bold goals. Many observers saw these as mere fantasy. In 2012, the mixing of economic and geostrategic aspirations in the same pot was introduced to the Turkish public as the “2023 vision”. This article analyzes one of the ambitious 2023 targets: having 10 Turkish-owned global brands. On its path to create global brands Turkey will have to address the challenges which today’s developed countries have faced in the past. Ergin Hava* Summer 2013 * Ergin Hava is the Business Editor of the Istanbul-based English language daily Today’s Zaman. 139 VOLUME 12 NUMBER 2 ERGİN HAVA ver the past decade of single-party rule, the Turkish economy has branched out into new markets and cultivated sustainable trade rela- tions, becoming more integrated within the global economy than ever O before. This was mainly the result of growing self-confidence bol- stered by political and financial stability at home. During this period, ambitious bureaucrats in Ankara pledged bold goals, which many observers saw as mere fantasy. These goals, in a sense, were the result of the government’s motivation to force the limits of vision and imagination as far as pos- sible, even though some of them seemed very hard to achieve at first. The mixing of economic and geostrategic aspirations in the same pot was introduced in 2012 to the Turkish public as the “2023 vision” – in reference to the centennial anniversary of the foundation of modern Turkey. Among the targets that the 2023 vision introduced, the most prominent is to make Turkey one of the world’s top-10 economies.
    [Show full text]
  • Todays Zaman 2013 2013 Yavuz
    Todays Zaman 2013 2013 Yavuz Turkey's 2013 curve 31 dicembre Baydar 2014- Turkey and developing countries Cemil Ertem 31 dicembre Turkish law -- the best of 2013 Berk Çektyir 31 dicembre Maybe it is nothing… B. Dedeoğlu 31 dicembre How the mighty Erdoğan has faltered Amanda Paul 31 dicembre Destructive politics Nicole Pope 30 dicembre 2014- the year of the rise of Salafism in and H. Kanbolat 30 dicembre around Turkey Why Mr. Gülen was targeted A. Bozkurt 30 dicembre Can the EU be blamed for Erdoğan's Şahin Alpay 29 dicembre authoritarianism? Yavuz A destructive option for Turkey takes shape 29 dicembre Baydar Real danger E. Dumanli 29 dicembre Turkey and the US- the end of a traditional Gökhan 29 dicembre alliance? Bacik Cyprus- four decades of division Amanda Paul 28 dicembre Old wine in a new bottle Doğu Ergil 28 dicembre How long can Erdoğan resist? M. Türköne 28 dicembre Is the Turkish economy resilient to political S. Gürsel 27 dicembre shocks' Orhan The failure of nations or defying the world 26 dicembre Miroğlu A milestone verdict on ‘Armenian genocide' Yaşar Kakiş 25 dicembre 2013- a tough year for Turkish foreign policy S. Kiniklioğlu 25 dicembre The longest day for the AK Party H. Gülerce 25 dicembre Corruption, EU and AKP Cengiz Aktar 25 dicembre A region full of agonies Ali Bulaç 23 dicembre Corruption scandal will consolidate Turkish A. Bozkurt 23 dicembre democracy Yavuz What is this bedlam all about? 22 dicembre Baydar The Islamic roots of the conflict in Turkey O. Taşpinar 22 dicembre What is Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to us? B.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish President's Visit
    THE JAPAN TIMES THURSDAY, OCTOBER 8, 2015 5 Turkish president‘s visit Building Turkey-Japan Biography of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan Recep Tayyip Erdogan was born in Istanbul which was recommended by the National on Feb. 26, 1954. He graduated from Marma- Education Ministry and published by a state ra University’s Faculty of Economics and Ad- agency, being sentenced to prison for read- partnership for the future ministrative Sciences in 1981. ing it, ending his time as mayor. Since his youth, Erdogan has chosen to in- After serving four months in prison, he es- tertwine his social life with politics. From tablished the Justice and Development Party. Both key and in uential players among the top 20 economies of 1969 to 1982, he was also actively interested Erdogan, who was not a candidate for MP in their regions, Turkey and the world, Turkey became a in football, which taught him the signifi cance during the elections in Nov. 3, 2002, joined the Japan are enjoying warm rela- magnet for foreign investments, of teamwork. These years coincided with the deputy renewal election held on March 9, tions on every level, thanks to the as $145 billion dollars of foreign time when the idealistic young Erdogan 2003, in Siirt. Taking 85 percent of the vote, he vision and farsightedness of their direct investment (FDI) poured began to be interested in social and national became a deputy from Siirt for the 22nd term. leaders, H.E. President of Turkey inars all over Japan, ISPAT led into the country over a period problems and stepped into politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy, Trade, and the Kurdish Question in Turkey-EU Relations
    Global Turkey in Europe III Democracy, Trade, and the Kurdish Question in Turkey-EU Relations Edited by Senem Aydın-Düzgit, Daniela Huber, Meltem Müftüler-Baç, E. Fuat Keyman, Michael Schwarz and Nathalie Tocci In cooperation with Edizioni Nuova Cultura Acknowledgments This publication has been generously supported by the Mercator Stiftung. Special thanks to Alessandra Bertino, Sinan Ekim, and Ipek Velioglu for their inva- luable assistance in copy-editing. Series Editor Natalino Ronzitti First published 2015 by Edizioni Nuova Cultura For Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI) Via Angelo Brunetti 9 - I-00186 Roma www.iai.it Copyright © 2014 Edizioni Nuova Cultura - Roma ISBN: 9788868125110 Cover: Chiara Mastrantonio Graphic Composition: Chiara Mastrantonio The unauthorized reproduction of this book, even partial, carried out by any means, including photocopying, even for internal or didactic use, is prohibited by copyright. Table of Contents List of Contributors .....................................................................................................................9 List of Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................11 Foreword Michael Schwarz .........................................................................................................................15 Introduction Daniela Huber, Nathalie Tocci and Ipek Velioglu ........................................................... 17 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eurasian Journal of Educational Research
    Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 87 (2020) 69-100 Eurasian Journal of Educational Research www.ejer.com.tr The Future of Education in Turkey’s 2023 Educational Vision Document: Views of Academicians in the Faculty of Education Cetin SEMERCI1, Cenk HATIPOGLU2, Birsen GUNERI3, Aziz SEVIMBAY4, Mumine AKCAALAN5, Yasemin CENGIZ DEMIR6 A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article History: Purpose: This study was conducted to reveal the Received: 09 Jul. 2019 views of academicians, working in the Faculty of Received in revised form: 03 Dec. 2019 Education, on the 2023 Vision Document of the Accepted: 11 Jan. 2020 Ministry of National Education. Method: Qualitative research method was used in DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2020.87.4 this study. The study group consisted of six faculty Keywords members. In the determination of participants, easily The Ministry of National Education, Turkey’s 2023 educational vision accessible situation sampling, which is one of the document, Views of academicians. purposive sampling methods, was used. A descriptive qualitative research design was used in this study; interview technique and semi-structured interview form were used as data collection tools. Findings: The findings showed that the views of academicians, who participated in this study, about the education system were based on a philosophical foundation that continues from individuality to sociality, from material dimension to spiritual dimension, and emphasizes an original national and spiritual thought system extending from local to universal. Also, results indicated that, firstly, students should gain national and universal values and then should be equipped with 21st-century skills and competencies if the courses are satisfactory concerning quality, the reduction of the course hours can be positive; emphasis can be given on the necessity of giving the pedagogical formation education rather than giving it.
    [Show full text]
  • New Turkey” Narrative and Public Policy Change in Turkey1
    THE “NEW TURKEY” NARRATIVE AND PUBLIC POLICY CHANGE IN TURKEY1 Dr. Fethi Ufuk OZISIK* Introduction AKP and the Evolution of Its Rule since 2002’s Legislative Elections The Justice and Development Party (“Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi”), abbreviated JDP in English and AK PARTİ or AKP in Turkish, is a social conservative political party in Turkey. It has developed from the tradition of Islamism, but has officially abandoned this ideology in favor of "conservative democracy" (Duran, 2008; Akdogan, 2006). The party is the largest in Turkey, with 312 members of parliament. Its leader, Ahmet Davutoglu, is Prime Minister, while former party leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan is President of Republic since 2014. Founded in 2001 by members of a number of existing conservative parties, the party has won three general election victories in 2002, 2007 and 2011, winning 34.3%, 46.6% and 49.8% respectively. Having almost won a two-thirds majority of the 550 parliamentary seats in 2002, the party won 341 seats in 2007 and 327 in 2011. The party currently forms a third- term majority government since 18 November 2002, having had their electoral success mirrored locally in the municipal elections of 2004, 2009 and 2014. Shortly after formation, the AKP portrayed itself as a pro-Western and pro- American2 party in the Turkish political spectrum that advocates a liberal market economy including Turkish membership in the European Union3. The party has been described as a “broad right-wing coalition of Islamist, reformist Islamists, conservatives, nationalists, centre- right, and pro-business groups.” (Soner, 2014). The party has for a long time been supported by the Cemaat Movement of exiled Islamic cleric Fethullah Gulen, whose influence in the judiciary has helped to weaken the opposition against the AKP.
    [Show full text]
  • 34 Chapter Iv the Factors Behind Turkey's
    CHAPTER IV THE FACTORS BEHIND TURKEY’S INCONSISTENCY The inconsistency of Turkish ambition in resolving conflict especially in the Muslim world supposed to be their concern in Islamic democracy values. In the meantime, there was no meaningful action conducted by Erdogan in carrying out many various international agendas on the party's platform related to the Uyghur issue. In this fourth chapter, the researcher will explain why the three influential aspects of Turkish decision-makers have become the pillars that drive its foreign policy towards its partnership with China rather than the Uyghur Issue. A. The Pragmatic Considerations of AKP Towards China In the analysis of foreign policy decision making, the domestic politics of a country have been frequently neglected. Many experts only focused on the international system as the primary explanation, while actually the internal factor also become dominant to actively influence the decision-maker of a country. By referring to the fundamental basis of realism and liberalism, Turkish government under the Erdogan’s leadership is apparently facing the growth of domestic pressure in formulating its foreign policy. In the domestic politics context, Partisan influencers are actually the right type to describe AKP as one of the leading influencers of the decision-maker in arranging the foreign policy. To be known, partisan influencers in here means those individuals that committed to be the members in a political party. As a matter of fact, 34 partisan influencers are not only focusing on domestic policy matters, but also on Turkish foreign policy. That is why AKP as a ruling party in Turkey keeps actively influencing Erdogan to conduct Turkish multidimensional foreign policy (Yılmaz & Özdemir, 2017).
    [Show full text]