Lecture 13 the First World War and the Emergence of an Independent Polish State 1. Poland at the Outbreak of the War When the Gr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lecture 13 the First World War and the Emergence of an Independent Polish State 1. Poland at the Outbreak of the War When the Gr - 1 - Lecture 13 The First World War and the Emergence of an Independent Polish State 1. Poland at the Outbreak of the War When the great powers of Europe put their alliance systems to the test in 1914 they unwittingly submitted to the arbitrament of war questions which had lain dormant for centuries. With the advent of the Ottoman empire to the war on the side of the Central Powers, the Turkish domination of the Arab world could no longer be taken for granted. The Battle of the White Mountain of 1620, which seemed to have imposed upon the Czechs permanent subjection to, or at the best association with Austria, no longer possessed a final validity. The lands of the Crown of St Stephen, which the Austro-Hungarian ultimatum of 23 July 1914 sought to protect, were now open to partition in the event of an unsuccessful war. Equally Poland, partitioned in the eighteenth century, might in the twentieth once again have an independent existence. The Poles entered the war with some advantages. Their national culture had not been undermined by foreign rule. Their historical sense was strong. They nevertheless suffered from grave handicaps. Separate political existences within three empires had destroyed their own political unity. Among the contending great powers France and Britain had no fundamental interest in promoting the Polish cause. A solution of the Polish Question was not obligatory upon Germany, Austria-Hungary or Russia. Poland was not a European question, nor could its manipulation yield any of the powers particular advantage. The decision to create a - 2 - Czech state in 1918, and therefore to destroy the political unity of the Austro-Hungarian empire, was made because of its obvious utility in the midst of a bitter struggle. The creation of a new Poland would mean merely the loss of frontier provinces by three states, but did not threaten them with destruction. The Polish Question must be seen in its proper perspective. It was one which existed only for the Poles themselves. The only interest which the partitioning powers had in the Poles was the conscription of 1,500,000 of them to serve in their armies, together with the civilian labour which could be employed in their factories and peasants who tilled the soil to provide food. It is therefore understandable that in the first instance the Poles could not respond to the war as a nation. The war was an opportunity. The problem before the Poles was how to use it. The Poles can therefore be excused for inexperience. The Russian state, which embraced most of the territories to which the Poles would lay claim, took some time to define its attitude. On 14 August 1914 the Russian commander-in-chief, the Grand Duke Nikolai Nikolaievich, issued a manifesto declaring that it was Russian policy to join Poland together as a state within the Russian system. This statement was in its very essence equivocal. A commander-in-chief had no authority to make such a declaration on policy and could easily be disavowed. A promise as important as this ought to have been issued in the name of the tsar himself. The terms of the manifesto were, moreover, vague in the extreme, offering freedom of religion, the use of the Polish language and local self-government. This proposal fell far short of the independence which remained the ultimate aspiration of most Poles. Nevertheless, the propertied class had already declared their allegiance to Russia. In the Duma the National Democrat, Wiktor Jaroński, a landowner from Kielce, pledged Polish support in the name - 3 - of the Polish Circle for a War of the Slavs against their eternal enemy, the Germans. In their support for the war the pro-Russian party had the adherence of the clergy in the Kingdom of Poland. The clergy in Poznania and the leading Christian Democrat in Silesia, Adam Napieralski, for their part urged Poles to show their loyalty to the Prussian state and even to say daily prayers to the Lord of Hosts for a German victory. In Galicia most politicians pronounced in favour of Austria On 16 August 1914 he Polish Club in the Austrian Parliament set up the Supreme National Committee (Naczelny Komitet Narodowy) in Kraków, which declared its faith in a victorious war to liberate Poland from the domination of the tsar. Piłsudski, whose plans for an invasion of the Kingdom of Poland received approval from the Austrian military authorities on 26 July I914, sent a small body of some 200 men, drawn from the rifle clubs, into the gubernia of Kielce to disrupt Russian mobilization. On 27 July an announcement was made in Kraków that a ‘National Government’ had been established in Warsaw and that Piłsudski had been appointed commander-in-chief. In that capacity Piłsudski declared that units of the Polish army had entered the Kingdom of Poland and that all Poles had the duty to support it. This initiative failed as the Poles in Kielce, the first town the soldiers entered were clearly hostile and demonstrated their support for the Tsarist government. On 21 November 1914, Roman Dmowski at the head of the National Democrats, together with adherents of the Party of Realpolitik, founded the Polish National Committee (Komitet Narodowy Polski) in Warsaw in order to promote the cause of Poland in association with Russia. The response of the parties to the war was predictable. The upper classes turned to the states under whose rule they lived. The major working-class parties like the SDKPiL and the PPS-Left condemned the imperialist war - 4 - and strove to achieve the social revolution. The war which was to present the Poles with a chance to win their independence found them in disarray. Four years were to elapse before a satisfactory solution could be found. The multiplicity of political parties and their splinter groups reveals the nature of the Polish problem. While all Poles longed for independence they were not likely to be of one mind when they achieved it. As far as the socialists were concerned the struggle for economic and social justice would continue. Independence would not immediately dispose of the question of land hunger for the peasants. The upper classes who feared for supremacy before 1914 might contemplate the future with misgiving. The fight for national self-determination was accompanied, as it had been before in Polish history, by a contest to determine who should rule at home when independence had been won. 2. The First Year of the War The war began in 19I4 with German expectation of a quick victory in the west at least. In fact, the stabilization of the front in France after the Battle of the Marne revealed that the struggle would be a long one. The powers which had partitioned Poland now turned to the question of enlisting Polish support in the conflict which was to extend until 1918. None of the powers had clearly defined aims for Poland at the beginning of the war. The clearest objectives were those of Austria-Hungary, where there was widespread support for the incorporation of the Kingdom of Poland into the Habsburg empire and its union with Galicia as a third constituent portion of the monarchy. The Austrians, however, hesitated to make this aim public. The attempt of the Pole, Leon Biliński, the - 5 - Austro-Hungarian minister of finance, to persuade the emperor Franz Joseph to issue a declaration in favour of the ‘Austro-Polish solution’ was unsuccessful. Nevertheless, on 12 August Berchtold, the Austrian Foreign minister, received a general promise from Germany that an Austro-Polish settlement would be looked upon with favour, a promise repeated, though in vague terms, at a conference between Austrian and German representatives at Poznan in January 1915 . The Germans were on this occasion more interested in the division of the spoils in the Dąbrowa basin which had fallen into the hands of the Central Powers (Germany and Austria-Hungary). The Hungarians objected to the concept. The plan put forward by the Austrian prime minister, Karl Sturgkh, in 1915 proposed only that the new Polish territories within the monarchy should enjoy the same autonomy as Galicia. Eastern Galicia with its predominantly Ukrainian population was to be made into a separate province. As far as the Germans were concerned, they were committed to an Austro-Polish solution, but as early as 31 July Kaiser William II had told Bogdan Hutten-Czapski, a leading pro-German figure among the Polish aristocracy in Prussian Poland, that, if Germany were victorious, he would establish an independent Polish state ‘linked with us’. The annexationist programme set out in September 1914 by the German chancellor, Bethmann-Hollweg, also aflfirmed that among the states participating in the ‘Central European economic association’ would be Poland. A number of factors determined German policy in addition to support of Austria-Hungary. The belief was strong in the German Foreign Office that no decisive actions should be taken on the Polish Question lest it undermine the prospects of a separate peace with Russian or affect the loyalties of Poles in Prussia. The makers of German policy, in particular the military, were - 6 - increasingly concerned to acquire territory at the expense of the Kingdom of Poland, partly for economic reasons, but also to establish an area for German colonization stretching from East Prussia to Upper Silesia to act as a cordon between the Poles in Prussia and the remainder of the Polish nation. The Russian manifesto issued by the Grand Duke Nikolai Nikolaievich on 14 August 1914 encountered strong opposition in reactionary circles in Russia, especially among those who hoped to reach a separate peace with Germany.
Recommended publications
  • Tackling Labour Exploitation in Poland, Bulgaria and Romania
    March 2019 Tackling labour exploitation in Poland, Bulgaria and Romania Author: Suzanne Hoff (La Strada International) RIGHTS AT WORK TACKLING LABOUR EXPLOITATION IN POLAND, BULGARIA AND ROMANIA Colophon Rights at Work Tackling labour exploitation in Poland, Bulgaria and Romania March 2019 This publication has been made possible Author Suzanne Hoff with the financial support of the Dutch (La Strada International) Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Small Human Copy editor Stephanie Ross Rights Fund). It was developed within the Cover photo Shutterstock framework of the project Rights at Work – Layout Frans Schupp Tackling labour exploitaiton in all economic sectors in Poland, Bulgaria and Romania. Acknowledgements La Strada International would like to thank all the organisations that partnered in this project, including: the Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO), FairWork, La Strada Foundation against Trafficking in Persons and Slavery (La Strada Poland), the Association for Legal Intervention (SIP) in Poland, AIDRom in Romania and Animus Association Foundation in Bulgaria. The following people contributed by providing and collecting information and/or reviewing specific sections of this publication. Their input, comments and additions were invaluable: Ilona Hartlief, Katrin Mc Gauran, Joanna Garnier, Irena Dawid, Antoaneta Vassileva, Nadia Kozhouharova, Dobryana Petkova, Katarzyna Slubik, Elena Timofticiuc, Louis Ulrich and Julia Muraszkiewicz. Further special thanks go to those who supported the implementation of the Rights at Work project, including Esther de Haan, Karin Burgerhout and Eline Willemsen, all participants of the final conference of the project held on 28 September 2018 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, as well as all those in Poland, Bulgaria and Romania who attended project activities and were ready to be interviewed during the fact-finding missions in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Generate PDF of This Page
    Institute of National Remembrance https://ipn.gov.pl/en/news/4412,It-was-good-to-fight-for-Poland.html 2021-09-25, 16:52 12.08.2020 “It was good to fight for Poland!” We encourage you to read an article written by President of the IPN Jarosław Szarek, Ph.D. for the "Rzeczpospolita" newspaper. “We have the whole world against us” wrote Stanisław Posner in a report for Józef Piłsudski, submitted end of June 1920, after travelling through Western European countries. During his several-week expedition, he visited a few capital cities and returned with observations free of any hope, on the day preceding the breakout of decisive battles in the east. Posner highlighted that even those who had been siding with Poland, such as French President Alexandre Millerand, assuring of his support for Warsaw in the conflict with the Czechs ,“is siding with them and, in other matters, will always submit to the opinion of England, because he depends on her as a creditor. What can I say about the others? The issue of compensation, the issue of Gdańsk, the issue of the plebiscites – are worse than ever.” The following weeks confirmed these observations. Even among recent sympathisers of Poland’s cause there was no shortage of those observing with indifference our battle with Bolshevism, interested, at most, in taking as much as they could for themselves. The year 1920 did not just mean the struggle with Bolshevism, but also a clash with the indifference and reluctance from the West. Hence the assistance we received from those willing to help us at this dramatic time was even more valuable.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland – Germany – History
    Poland – Germany – History Issue: 18 /2020 26’02’21 The Polish-French Alliance of 1921 By Prof. dr hab. Stanisław Żerko Concluded in February 1921, Poland’s alliance treaty with France, which was intended to afford the former an additional level of protection against German aggression, was the centerpiece of Poland’s foreign policy during the Interwar Period. However, from Poland’s viewpoint, the alliance had all along been fraught with significant shortcomings. With the passage of time, it lost some of its significance as Paris increasingly disregarded Warsaw’s interests. This trend was epitomized by the Locarno conference of 1925, which marked the beginning of the Franco-German rapprochement. By 1933-1934, Poland began to revise its foreign policy with an eye to turning the alliance into a partnership. This effort turned out to be unsuccessful. It was not until the diplomatic crisis of 1939 that the treaty was strengthened and complemented with an Anglo-Polish alliance, which nevertheless failed to avert the German attack on Poland. Despite both France and Great Britain having declared war against the Reich on September 3, 1939, neither provided their Polish ally with due assistance. However, French support was the main factor for an outcome that was generally favorable to Poland, which was to redraw its border with Germany during the Paris peace conference in 1919. It seems that the terms imposed on the Reich in the Treaty of Versailles were all that Poland could ever have hoped to achieve given the balance of power at the time. One should bear in mind that France made a significant contribution to organizing and arming the Polish Army, especially when the Republic of Poland came under threat from Soviet Russia in the summer of 1920.
    [Show full text]
  • Sapieha Przyszedł Na Świat 2 Sierpnia 1881 R
    100 95 75 25 5 0 strony_tyt_konstytucja 17 grudnia 2018 08:59:27 100 95 75 25 5 0 strony_tyt_konstytucja 17 grudnia 2018 08:59:27 100 95 75 25 5 0 strony_tyt_konstytucja 17 grudnia 2018 08:59:28 Projekt graficzny serii MAREK PAWŁOWSKI Projekt okładki IGOR STANISŁAWSKI © Copyright do tekstów E. Sapiehy by spadkobiercy, 2018 © Copyright do tego wydania by Ośrodek Myśli Politycznej, 2018 Dofinansowano ze środków Ministra Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego ISBN 978-83-64753-71-8 OŚRODEK MYŚLI POLITYCZNEJ Adres korespondencyjny: skrytka pocztowa 322, 30-960 Kraków tel. 12 632 33 62 e-mail: [email protected] www.omp.org.pl Spis treści Katarzyna Kwinta, Wstęp . VII Konstytucja racji stanu . 1 Mowa wygłoszona przez księcia Eustachego Sapiehę, polskiego ministra w Londynie, podczas kolacji wydanej na jego cześć przez Grupę Nowych Członków Izby Gmin 17 marca 1920 r. 177 Analiza politycznych stosunków światowych . 199 Wspomnienie z kilku rozmów z Komendantem Piłsudskim . 305 Międzynarodowa sytuacja państwa polskiego . 313 Neo-Monachium . 327 Indeks . 335 Nota bibliograficzna . 339 KATARZYNA KWINTA Wstęp Eustachy Kajetan Sapieha przyszedł na świat 2 sierpnia 1881 r. w posiadłości Sapiehów w Biłce Szlacheckiej nieda- leko Lwowa. Jego rodzicami byli Jan Paweł Aleksander1 i Seweryna z Ursuskich2, zaś dziadkiem Eustachy Kajetan Sapieha3 – działacz niepodległościowy i uczestnik powsta- nia listopadowego, zmuszony po jego upadku do opusz- czenia kraju i wyemigrowania do Wielkiej Brytanii. Dzieciństwo spędził w rodzinnym majątku. Do gim- nazjum uczęszczał we Lwowie, zaś szkołę średnią ukoń- czył w szwajcarskim Ouchy koło Lozanny4. W 1900 r. pod- jął studia z zakresu leśnictwa na Uniwersytecie w Zury- chu.
    [Show full text]
  • Studia Politica 32014
    www.ssoar.info The 2014 European Elections. The Case of Poland Sula, Piotr Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Sula, P. (2014). The 2014 European Elections. The Case of Poland. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 14(3), 395-406. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-445354 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de The 2014 European Elections The Case of Poland PIOTR SULA Introduction This article presents the conduct and consequence of the election to the European Parliament held in Poland on 25 May 2014. It is a commonly accepted view that elections are inherent in the democratic order. Members of the European Parliament are elected following a similar procedure to that governing the elections to national Parliaments. Probably as widespread is the opinion that, since they do not result in the election of the executive branch of government, European elections are of less significance to the competing parties – which appear to prioritise their participation in the future government – than the competition for seats in the national parliament. As a consequence, the lesser impact of the decisions made at the ballot box is also translated into a less intense interest in the European elections expressed by the electorate.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland's 2019 Parliamentary Election
    — SPECIAL REPORT — 11/05/2019 POLAND’S 2019 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION Tomasz Grzegorz Grosse Warsaw Institute POLAND’S 2019 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION Held on October 13, 2019, Poland’s general election is first and foremost a success of democracy, as exemplified by crowds rushing to polling stations and a massive rise in voter turnout. Those that claimed victory were the govern- ment groups that attracted a considerable electorate, winning in more constitu- encies across the country they ruled for the past four years. Opposition parties have earned a majority in the Senate, the upper house of the Polish parliament. A fierce political clash turned into deep chasms throughout the country, and Poland’s political stage reveals polarization between voters that lend support to the incumbent government and those that question the authorities by manifest- ing either left-liberal or far-right sentiments. Election results Poland’s parliamentary election in 2019 attrac- try’s 100-seat Senate, the upper house of the ted the attention of Polish voters both at home parliament, it is the Sejm where the incum- and abroad while drawing media interest all bents have earned a majority of five that has over the world. At stake were the next four a pivotal role in enacting legislation and years in power for Poland’s ruling coalition forming the country’s government2. United Right, led by the Law and Justice party (PiS)1. The ruling coalition won the election, The electoral success of the United Right taking 235 seats in Poland’s 460-seat Sejm, the consisted in mobilizing its supporters to a lower house of the parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Branding a Nation Online: Discourses on Polish Nationalism and Patriotism
    Re-Branding a Nation Online Re-Branding a Nation Online Discourses on Polish Nationalism and Patriotism Magdalena Kania-Lundholm Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Sal IX, Universitets- huset, Uppsala, Friday, October 26, 2012 at 10:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Abstract Kania-Lundholm, M. 2012. Re-Branding A Nation Online: Discourses on Polish Nationalism and Patriotism. Sociologiska institutionen. 258 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 978-91-506-2302-4. The aim of this dissertation is two-fold. First, the discussion seeks to understand the concepts of nationalism and patriotism and how they relate to one another. In respect to the more criti- cal literature concerning nationalism, it asks whether these two concepts are as different as is sometimes assumed. Furthermore, by problematizing nation-branding as an “updated” form of nationalism, it seeks to understand whether we are facing the possible emergence of a new type of nationalism. Second, the study endeavors to discursively analyze the ”bottom-up” processes of national reproduction and re-definition in an online, post-socialist context through an empirical examination of the online debate and polemic about the new Polish patriotism. The dissertation argues that approaching nationalism as a broad phenomenon and ideology which operates discursively is helpful for understanding patriotism as an element of the na- tionalist rhetoric that can be employed to study national unity, sameness, and difference. Emphasizing patriotism within the Central European context as neither an alternative to nor as a type of nationalism may make it possible to explain the popularity and continuous endur- ance of nationalism and of practices of national identification in different and changing con- texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Janusz Jędrzejewicz
    2 Zbigniew Osi ński Janusz J ędrzejewicz – piłsudczyk i reformator edukacji (1885 – 1951) Wydanie drugie, poprawione i uzupełnione. Lublin 2008 Wydanie pierwsze ukazało si ę w 2007 r. nakładem Wydawnictwa UMCS w Lublinie. ISBN 978-83-227-2704-1 Recenzent dr hab. Zenon Jasi ński Spis tre ści SPIS TRE ŚCI ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 WST ĘP................................................................................................................................................................... 6 ROZDZIAŁ I: DZIECI ŃSTWO I MŁODO ŚĆ 1885 – 1914........................................................................... 16 OKRES UKRAI ŃSKI 1885 – 1904 ........................................................................................................................ 16 STUDIA WY śSZE I PIERWSZA PRACA 1904 – 1914.............................................................................................. 25 ROZDZIAŁ II: W OKOPACH PIERWSZEJ WOJNY ŚWIATOWEJ 1914 – 1918................................... 34 W POLSKIEJ ORGANIZACJI WOJSKOWEJ I W LEGIONACH 1914 – 1916.............................................................. 34 W KONSPIRACJI W WARSZAWIE 1916 – 1918.................................................................................................... 43 ROZDZIAŁ III: PIERWSZE LATA NIEPODLEGŁEJ POLSKI 1918 – 1926 ........................................... 60 śOŁNIERZ WOJSKA POLSKIEGO 1918 – 1923
    [Show full text]
  • Organy Polskiej Administracji Państwowej W Królestwie Polskim 1916–1918 : Struktura I Gabinety
    Jacek Goclon Organy polskiej administracji państwowej w Królestwie Polskim 1916–1918 : struktura i gabinety Folia Iuridica Wratislaviensis 3/2, 41-92 2014 Folia Iuridica Wratislaviensis 2014, vol. 3 (2), 41–92 Jacek Goclon Uniwersytet Wrocławski Organy polskiej administracji państwowej w Królestwie Polskim 1916–1918. Struktura i gabinety Polish Administrative Goverment in the Kingdom of Poland 1916–1918. Departments and structure Abstract: The rebirth of the Polish state during World War I was mainly connected with acquisition of fresh recruit soldiers for the armies of Germany and the Habsburg Empire. The goverments in Berlin and Vienna turned their attention to the Polish nation living in the former territories of tsarist Russia, lost to Germany and Austria in 1915 during the war. The only way to convince the Polish nation to cooper- ate was a clear promise of the rebirth of Polish goverment in these territories and of full independence of the new Polish state after the war. The first step, as a proxy solution, was the Temoporary Civil Council, next the State Council, created in 1916. Soon the members of the council (including Józef Piłsudski) have decided to stop their activity, because the German and Austian goverments failed to keep their promises. The next step was a joint announcement of two emperoros, German and Austrian, which on 5 November 1917 proclamed the Kingdom of Poland, with Regency Council as a goverment. During one year of its activity, the Regency Council created three cabinets with the following three Prime Ministers: Jan Kucharzewski, Jan Steczkowski and Józef Świeżyński. The scope of activity and real power of this cabinets were very limited, but they constituted a beginning of the process of crea- tion and rebirth of the Polish independent state and of education of the future administrative team for the first central independent Polish State.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political and Legal Context of the Introduction of Women's Suffrage In
    Maciej Krogel (Uniwersytet Wrocławski) the political and leGal context of the introdUction of women’s sUffraGe in poland abstract polityczno-prawny KonteKst wprowadzenia wyborczych praw Kobiet w polsce W 1918 r. Polskie władze, jako jedne z pierwszych w Europie, wprowadziły wy- borcze prawa kobiet. Celem mojego artykułu jest analiza politycznych i prawnych czynników, które umożliwiły tę zmianę. Przyczyny ustanowienia liberalnego sys- temu wyborczego w odrodzonej Polsce były ściśle związane z rzeczywistością ży- cia politycznego Polaków pod obcymi porozbiorowymi reżimami. W następnych latach wyborcze prawa kobiet przetrwały w polskim systemie prawnym, pomimo burzliwych przemian politycznych w XX wieku. SłOWA KLUCZOWE: sufrażystki, ruchy kobiece w XIX i XX w., prawa polityczne, historia prawa polskiego KEYWORDS: women’s suffrage, women’s movements in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, legal history of Poland, political rights In 1795, the last parts of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth were annexed by Austria, Prussia and Russia. During the next 123 years the nations living in the territories of the former Republic were forced to adapt to the condi- tions imposed by the foreign authorities. Their situation in particular an- nexed parts of Poland was largely dependent on the scale of oppression by the new authorities. In the second half of the nineteenth century tendencies 508 �������������������������������� maciej KroGel toward liberalization of political realm arose in the of whole Europe. Polish people often had to pay a high price for their social or political involvement, including death. However, some of them could participate officially (and very efficiently) in the political life of their new countries. Women’s suffrage became one of the demands of Polish activists in their political struggle with the occupiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Waldemar REZMER – the Coup in Poland in January 1919
    the Coup in poland in january 1919 Waldemar Rezmer Abstract the paper examines a little-known unsuccessful attempt at a military coup in poland in janu- ary 1919. the idea attracted notable members of the polish national Committee, including stanisław Grabski, and members of other right-wing organisations. Colonel marian januszajtis- Żegota took up the leadership at the military level, and eustachy sapieha at the political level. the coup was directed against the government led by the socialist jędrzej edward moraczews- ki. the paper shows the political context of the uprising, the process, and the circumstances of its failure. 43 Key words: coup, poland, army, moraczewski’s government, Colonel marian januszajtis-Źegota. anotacija straipsnyje nagrinėjamas istoriografijoje menkai žinomas nesėkmingas bandymas lenkijoje 1919 m. sausį įvykdyti karinį perversmą. Ši idėja įtraukė žymesnius lenkijos tautinio Komiteto narius, įskaitant stanisławą Grabskį, bei kitas dešiniąsias organizacijas. vadovauti perversmui ėmėsi plk. marianas januszajtis-Żegota kariniu lygmeniu ir eustachijus sapieha politiniu lygme- niu. perversmas buvo nukreiptas prieš socialisto jędrzejaus edwardo moraczewskio vadovau- jamą vyriausybę. straipsnis atskleidžia perversmo politinį kontekstą, eigą ir pučistų nesėkmės aplinkybes. pagrindiniai žodžiai: valstybės perversmas, lenkija, kariuomenė, moraczewskio vyriausybė, plk. marian januszajtis-Źegota. Waldemar rezmer, dr. hab., professor, nicolaus Copernicus university, institute of history and archival sciences, department of military history, ul. Bojarskiego 1, pl-87-100 toruń, poland. e-mail: [email protected] transfers of poWer and the armed forCes in poland and lithuania, 1919–1941 acta historica universitatis Klaipedensis XXXii, 2016, 43–59. issn 1392-4095 (print), issn 2351-6526 (online) doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15181/ahuk.v32i0.1460 Waldemar Rezmer on the first days of november 1918, europe witnessed several milestone events which enabled poland to regain its independence.
    [Show full text]
  • WA303 83582 II11310 Wolsza.Pdf
    ISBN 83-88909-29-0 9788388 909290 http://rcin.org.pl http://rcin.org.pl http://rcin.org.pl Redakcja i korekta Barbara Janicka Indeks zestawi³ Tadeusz Wolsza Opracowanie graficzne i projekt ok³adki Dariusz Górski © Copyright by Tadeusz Wolsza © Copyright by Instytut Historii PAN ISBN 83–88909–29–0 Wydawca Instytut Historii PAN Rynek Starego Miasta 29/31, 00–272 Warszawa tel. 831–02–61 w. 44 e-mail: [email protected] www.ihpan.edu.pl Wydanie I – Warszawa 2005 Objętość 19,5 arkuszy wydawniczych Nak³ad 500 egzamplarzy Druk i oprawa Sowa – Druk na życzenie www.sowadruk.pl, tel. 022 431–81–40 http://rcin.org.pl Wstêp W latach dziewięćdziesiątych XX w. i na początku XXI stulecia świa- t³o dzienne ujrza³o kilkanaście prac z zakresu myśli politycznej polskiej emigracji w Wielkiej Brytanii po zakoñczeniu II wojny światowej. Listê najwa¿niejszych publikacji otwieraj¹ pionierskie rozprawy Mariana S. Wo- lañskiego1. Wroc³awski badacz jest ponadto autorem kilkunastu niezwy- kle wa¿nych artykułów, dotycz¹cych głównie tematyki niemieckiej i za- gadnieñ wschodnioeuropejskich2. Wskazane prace, niekiedy wprawdzie dyskusyjne, lokują go wśród czołowych badaczy w kraju, zajmuj¹cych siê tematyk¹ emigracyjn¹. Z innych historyków badających zagadnienia emi- gracyjnej myśli politycznej oraz podejmuj¹cych problematykê polityki za- granicznej władz RP na obczyźnie w okresie powojennym wskaza³bym w tym miejscu na trzech historyków warszawskich: Andrzeja Friszke, Paw³a Machcewicza i Rafała Habielskiego, autorów głośnej, trzytomowej pracy Druga wielka emigracja 1945–19903 oraz kilku innych wa¿nych studiów 1 M.S. Wolañski, Środowiska emigracyjne w Londynie i Pary¿u a kwestia stosunków polsko-niemieckich (1949–1972), Wroc³aw 1992; idem, Europa Środkowo-Wschodnia w myśli politycznej emigracji polskiej 1945–1975, Wroc³aw 1996.
    [Show full text]