Appendix A. Virginia Species of Greatest Conservation Need

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix A. Virginia Species of Greatest Conservation Need APPENDIX A. VIRGINIA SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Taxa Common Scientific Name Tier Cons. Opp. Habitat Descriptive Habitat Notes Name Ranking Amphibians Barking Hyla gratiosa II a Forest Forests near or within The Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information System indicates treefrog shallow wetlands the loss suitable wetlands constitute the greatest threats to this species. DGIF recommends working to maintain or restore forested buffers surrounding occupied wetlands. These needs are consistent with action plan priorities to conserve and restore wetland habitats and associated buffers. Recently discovered populations within its known range, may indicate this species is more abundant than previously believed. An in-depth investigation into its status may warrant delisting. This species will be prioritized as Tier 2a. Amphibians Blue Ridge Desmognathus IV c Forest High elevation seeps, This species' distribution is very limited. Other than limiting dusky orestes streams, wet rock faces, logging activity in the occupied areas, no conservation salamander and riparian forests actions have been identified. Unless other threats or actions are identified, this species will be listed as Tier 4c. Amphibians Blue Ridge Eurycea III a Wetland Mountain streams and The needs of this species are consistent with priorities for two-lined wilderae adjacent riparian areas maintaining and enhancing riparian forests and aquatic salamander with mixed hardwood or habitats. This species will be listed as Tier 3a. spruce-fir forests up to 6000 feet. Amphibians Carpenter Lithobates III a Wetland Freshwater wetlands with The needs of this species are consistent with action plan frog virgatipes sphagnum moss priorities to preserve and restore aquatic and wetland habitats and water quality. This species will be listed as Tier 3a. Amphibians Common Necturus III a Wetland Permanent lakes, ponds, The needs of this species are consistent with action plan mudpuppy maculosus impoundments, streams, priorities to preserve and restore aquatic habitats and maculosus and rivers with suitable water quality. This species will be listed as Tier 3a. hiding cover Amphibians Cow Knob Plethodon I c Forest Site specific - mixed DGIF staff have indicated this species will always face a salamander punctatus hardwood forests in rocky significant threat of extinction due to its limited range. areas in high elevations However, no conservation actions or research have been identified to help conserve this species, most of the habitat is protected via conservation agreements between the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. As such, it is recommended that this species be prioritized as Tier 1c. 26-1 APPENDIX A. VIRGINIA SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Taxa Common Scientific Name Tier Cons. Opp. Habitat Descriptive Habitat Notes Name Ranking Amphibians Cumberland Plethodon IV c Forest Mature hardwood forests This species requires large stands of mature forests. This Plateau kentucki in the vicinity of rocky habitat type appears to be abundant within this species' salamander outcrops distribution. Until additional threats or actions are identified, this species will be listed as Tier 4c. Amphibians Dwarf Necturus III a Wetland Sluggish streams and The needs of this species are consistent with action plan waterdog punctatus blackwater streams with priorities to preserve and restore aquatic habitats and debris water quality. This species will be listed as Tier 3a. Amphibians Eastern Cryptobranchus I a Aquatic Clean streams and rivers DGIF staff have recommended this species be listed as a hellbender alleganiensis with rocky substrates Tier 1a species. The eastern hellbender has been alleganiensis petitioned for protection under the Federal Endangered Species Act. Virginia's populations of hellbenders have been impacted by sedimentation, chemical pollutants, and impoundments in the clear, fast flowing, well oxygenated stream and river habitats they require. Hellbenders are also occasionally caught and killed by anglers fishing for sportfish. Conservation actions identified by DGIF staff include working to maintain and improve water quality, the use of artificial nest boxes, captive propagation, public education, and conducting research to better detect and assess hellbender populations. Amphibians Eastern mud Pseudotriton IV a Wetland Freshwater wetlands with The needs of this species are consistent with action plan salamander montanus sphagnum moss priorities to preserve and restore aquatic habitats, wetland montanus habitats, and water quality. This species will be listed as Tier 4a. Amphibians Eastern Scaphiopus IV c Forest Forest and upland habitat No conservation actions or research needs have been spadefoot holbrookii generalist but require fish identified for this species. This species will be listed as Tier free breeding sites and 4c. soils suitable for digging 26-2 APPENDIX A. VIRGINIA SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Taxa Common Scientific Name Tier Cons. Opp. Habitat Descriptive Habitat Notes Name Ranking Amphibians Eastern tiger Ambystoma II a Forest In the east, habitat needs This species is known from a handful of sites in the Coastal salamander tigrinum are site specific wetlands Plain and the Blue Ridge. The greatest threats include the within pine savanna. The loss of breeding ponds and the adjacent woodlands. mountain population Populations can also be lost if fish are introduced into the utilizes mature forest in breeding ponds. The Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information proximity to seasonally Service indicates efforts to preserve breeding ponds and flooded sinkhole ponds. associated vegetated buffers should continue. Efforts have been established to maintain existing sites. The single greatest conservation action to protect the Coastal Plain population would be the permanent protection of the Cat Ponds. This species will be prioritized as Tier 2a. Amphibians Greater siren Siren lacertina IV a Wetland Tolerates a variety of The needs of this species are consistent with action plan warm aquatic habitats priorities to preserve and restore aquatic and wetland with abundant vegetation habitats and water quality. This species will be listed as Tier 4a. Amphibians Green Aneides aeneus II b Forest Damp, but not wet, The most significant threat to this species involves logging salamander crevices in shaded rock areas that contain occupied rock outcrops. Conservation outcrops and ledges in action includes maintaining forested buffers around forested areas occupied rock outcrops. However, recent investigations indicate this species may be more aboreal than previously believed. These habitats do not appear to be limited within its distribution. Until a more through assessment of its status and habitat usage is completed, a Tier 2b status is warranted. Amphibians Jefferson Ambystoma IV a Forest West of Shenandoah River The needs of this species are consistent with action plan salamander jeffersonianum - high elevation hardwood priorities to preserve and restore forested wetlands. This forests with suitable species will be listed as Tier 4a breeding ponds. Amphibians Lesser siren Siren intermedia III a Wetland Tolerates a variety of The needs of this species are consistent with action plan intermedia warm aquatic habitats priorities to preserve and restore aquatic and wetland with abundant vegetation habitats and water quality. This species will be listed as Tier 3a. 26-3 APPENDIX A. VIRGINIA SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Taxa Common Scientific Name Tier Cons. Opp. Habitat Descriptive Habitat Notes Name Ranking Amphibians Little grass Pseudacris IV a Forest Most abundant in The habitat needs of this species are consistent with action frog ocularis wetlands within pine plan priorities to preserve and restore wetland habitats and savanna habitats vegetated buffers around wetlands. This species will be listed as Tier 4a. Amphibians Mabee's Ambystoma II a Barren Pine and hardwood DGIF indicates the most significant threat to this species salamander mabeei forests with vernal ponds involves urban development, forest loss and the draining of and other water sources vernal ponds. The Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information suitable for breeding System indicates known breeding sites and surrounding forested buffers should be conserved. As this need aligns with the priority to conserve riparian forests and large patches of forest in eastern Virginia, this species will be listed as Tier 2a. Amphibians Many-lined Stereochilus IV a Forest Gum and cypress swamps The needs of this species are consistent with action plan salamander marginatus as well as other wooded priorities to preserve and restore aquatic and wetland wetlands habitats and water quality. This species will be listed as Tier 4a. Amphibians Mole Ambystoma II a Forest Hardwood and mixed DGIF indicates the most significant threat to this species salamander talpoideum forests containing fish- involves forest loss and the draining of vernal ponds. The free breeding ponds Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information System indicates known breeding sites and surrounding forested buffers should be conserved. As this need aligns with the priority to conserve riparian forests and large patches of forest in eastern Virginia, this species will be listed as Tier 2a. Amphibians Mountain Pseudacris II a Aquatic Forested areas up to 3500 DGIF indicates the most significant threat to this species chorus frog brachyphona feet that contain suitable involves the loss of occupied wetlands and surrounding
Recommended publications
  • Succession of Coleoptera on Freshly Killed
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2008 Succession of Coleoptera on freshly killed loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and southern red oak (Quercus falcata Michaux) in Louisiana Stephanie Gil Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Gil, Stephanie, "Succession of Coleoptera on freshly killed loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and southern red oak (Quercus falcata Michaux) in Louisiana" (2008). LSU Master's Theses. 1067. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1067 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SUCCESSIO OF COLEOPTERA O FRESHLY KILLED LOBLOLLY PIE (PIUS TAEDA L.) AD SOUTHER RED OAK ( QUERCUS FALCATA MICHAUX) I LOUISIAA A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Entomology by Stephanie Gil B. S. University of New Orleans, 2002 B. A. University of New Orleans, 2002 May 2008 DEDICATIO This thesis is dedicated to my parents who have sacrificed all to give me and my siblings a proper education. I am indebted to my entire family for the moral support and prayers throughout my years of education. My mother and Aunt Gloria will have several extra free hours a week now that I am graduating.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa,Revision of the Genus Psectrotarsia Dognin, 1907 (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae
    Zootaxa 1637: 1–19 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Revision of the Genus Psectrotarsia Dognin, 1907 (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Heliothinae) MICHAEL G. POGUE Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, c/o Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, NMNH, MRC-168, Washington, DC, 20013-7012, USA; [email protected] Abstract Based on characters of the male and female genitalia, the genus Erythroecia Hampson, 1910 is considered a new syn- onym of Psectrotarsia Dognin, 1907. Psectrotarsia contains five species: P. flava Dognin (type species); P. su av is (H. Edwards), new combination; P. h e ba rd i (Skinner), new combination; P. euposis (Dyar), new combination and revised status; and P. rhodophora (Hampson), new combination. Each species is redescribed and illustrated. Copitarsia fuscir- ena (Hampson), new combination, and C. tamsi (Giacomelli), new combination, are transferred from Psectrotarsia to Copitarsia Hampson, 1906. Psectrotarsia ranges from the northeastern, midwestern, and southwestern United States to Guatemala. Key words: systematics, genitalia, new synonym, new combination, revised status, Erythroecia Introduction Psectrotarsia Dognin, 1907 was used first in combination with the type species, P. f la va Dognin, but a formal description of the genus was not provided. Hampson (1908) used Psectrotarsia in a key to the genera of Acro- nyctinae, but did not include species names (Poole, 1989). Hampson (1910) did not regard Psectrotarsia as formally described, and therefore, redescribed it and designated P. f us c ire n a Hampson as the type species; thus, he created both a junior synonym and homonym of Psectrotarsia Dognin.
    [Show full text]
  • Species of Greatest Conservation Need
    APPENDIX A. VIRGINIA SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Taxa Common Scientific Name Tier Cons. Opp. Habitat Descriptive Habitat Notes Name Ranking Amphibians Barking Hyla gratiosa II a Forest Forests near or within The Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information System indicates treefrog shallow wetlands the loss suitable wetlands constitute the greatest threats to this species. DGIF recommends working to maintain or restore forested buffers surrounding occupied wetlands. These needs are consistent with action plan priorities to conserve and restore wetland habitats and associated buffers. Recently discovered populations within its known range, may indicate this species is more abundant than previously believed. An in-depth investigation into its status may warrant delisting. This species will be prioritized as Tier 2a. Amphibians Blue Ridge Desmognathus IV c Forest High elevation seeps, This species' distribution is very limited. Other than limiting dusky orestes streams, wet rock faces, logging activity in the occupied areas, no conservation salamander and riparian forests actions have been identified. Unless other threats or actions are identified, this species will be listed as Tier 4c. Amphibians Blue Ridge Eurycea III a Wetland Mountain streams and The needs of this species are consistent with priorities for two-lined wilderae adjacent riparian areas maintaining and enhancing riparian forests and aquatic salamander with mixed hardwood or habitats. This species will be listed as Tier 3a. spruce-fir forests up to 6000 feet. Amphibians Carpenter Lithobates III a Wetland Freshwater wetlands with The needs of this species are consistent with action plan frog virgatipes sphagnum moss priorities to preserve and restore aquatic and wetland habitats and water quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Name Here
    RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DEAD WOOD AND ARTHROPODS IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES by MICHAEL DARRAGH ULYSHEN (Under the Direction of James L. Hanula) ABSTRACT The importance of dead wood to maintaining forest diversity is now widely recognized. However, the habitat associations and sensitivities of many species associated with dead wood remain unknown, making it difficult to develop conservation plans for managed forests. The purpose of this research, conducted on the upper coastal plain of South Carolina, was to better understand the relationships between dead wood and arthropods in the southeastern United States. In a comparison of forest types, more beetle species emerged from logs collected in upland pine-dominated stands than in bottomland hardwood forests. This difference was most pronounced for Quercus nigra L., a species of tree uncommon in upland forests. In a comparison of wood postures, more beetle species emerged from logs than from snags, but a number of species appear to be dependent on snags including several canopy specialists. In a study of saproxylic beetle succession, species richness peaked within the first year of death and declined steadily thereafter. However, a number of species appear to be dependent on highly decayed logs, underscoring the importance of protecting wood at all stages of decay. In a study comparing litter-dwelling arthropod abundance at different distances from dead wood, arthropods were more abundant near dead wood than away from it. In another study, ground- dwelling arthropods and saproxylic beetles were little affected by large-scale manipulations of dead wood in upland pine-dominated forests, possibly due to the suitability of the forests surrounding the plots.
    [Show full text]
  • Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): Catalogue
    INVERTEBRATE SYSTEMATICS ADVISORY GROUP REPRESENTATIVES OF LANDCARE RESEARCH Dr D.R. Penman Landcare Research Lincoln Agriculture & Science Centre P.O. Box 69, Lincoln, New Zealand Dr T.K. Crosby and Dr M.-C. Larivière Landcare Research Mount Albert Research Centre Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF UNIVERSITIES Dr R.M. Emberson Ecology and Entomology Group Soil, Plant, and Ecological Sciences Division P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF MUSEUMS Mr R.L. Palma Natural Environment Department Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF OVERSEAS INSTITUTIONS Dr J.F. Lawrence CSIRO Division of Entomology G.P.O. Box 1700, Canberra City A.C.T. 2601, Australia * * * SERIES EDITOR Dr T. K. Crosby Landcare Research Mount Albert Research Centre Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 43 Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): catalogue A. Larochelle and M.-C. Larivière Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand [email protected] [email protected] Manaaki W h e n u a PRESS Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 2001 4 Larochelle & Larivière (2001): Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) catalogue Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2001 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher. Cataloguing in publication LAROCHELLE, André, 1940– Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): catalogue / A. Larochelle and M.-C. Larivière – Lincoln, Canterbury, N.Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Note
    The Coleopterists Bulletin, 61(2):224-226. 2007. SCIENTIFIC NOTE Phloeoxena signata (Dejean): Northern range extensions to Maryland and Tennessee, U.S.A., and the first record for Costa Rica (Coleoptera: Carabidae) The recent discovery of a specimen of Phloeoxena signata (Carabidae: Lebiini: Pericalina) at the Patuxent Research Refuge in Prince Georges County, Maryland prompted a review of the known distribution of this primarily tropical ground beetle. It is the most widespread and variable species of the genus, which includes 32 species and has its center of diversity in Middle America (Shpeley and Ball 2000). Phloeoxena signata has been reported from Panama to North Carolina (Ball 1975; Shpeley and Ball 2000) and southern Virginia (Hoffman 1997) making the Maryland record the first for the state and a noteworthy northward range extension (from Halifax County, Virginia, a distance of about 380 km.). Additional Virginia specimens have now been collected, and several recent Tennessee specimens are reported, also representing a new state record. We also report the first known record for the species in Costa Rica, filling a gap in the known distribution between Nicaragua and central Panama. The specimens are deposited in the USNM, Smithsonian Institution,Washington, the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, and U.S. National Park Service voucher collection at the George Washington Memorial Parkway Headquarters, Virginia. The Maryland specimen (Fig. 1), a female, is labeled: "MARYLAND: Pr. Geo. Co., 10 km NE Bowie (Central Tract Patuxent Res. Ref), 39°03'N, 76°49'W, 24 March 2006, Coll. W. E. Steiner / Under bark of dead standing red maple in open swamp forest." The beetle was found under loose, dry bark about 1.5 m above ground on the north (shaded) side of a trunk about 25 cm in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Section D – Federal Oil and Gas Leasing Availability
    CHAPTER 3 – AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT GEORGE WASHINGTON NATIONAL FOREST AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES SECTION D – FEDERAL OIL AND GAS LEASING AVAILABILITY INTRODUCTION This section of the Final EIS identifies George Washington National Forest lands that could be made available for oil and gas leasing, in accordance with the Mineral Leasing Act, under various leasing alternatives. It also describes the affected environment and discusses reasonably foreseeable impacts of oil and gas activities on the environment resulting from each leasing alternative. Oil and gas leasing is identified as a significant issue in Chapter 1 of the Final EIS. Issues and concerns expressed by the public and government agencies during the public comment period for this EIS have been addressed by the analysis. Additional discussion of specific concerns with gas development is in FEIS, Appendix I- Analysis of Concerns and Risks of Horizontal Drilling and Hydraulic Fracturing. Management of the federal leasable oil and gas resources is a shared responsibility between the Forest Service and the U.S. Department of Interior. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has a major role in issuing and supervising operations on licenses, permits, and leases for federal leasable minerals. BLM cannot issue oil and gas leases for lands administered by the Forest Service without consent from the Secretary of Agriculture. As the agency responsible for federal oil and gas lease issuance and administration, the BLM participated in this EIS as a cooperating agency. This analysis will be used by both agencies as the basis for making oil and gas leasing decisions under their authorities. The responsible officials of the Forest Service and BLM may release separate Records of Decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Noctuidae
    Zootaxa 1637: 1–19 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Revision of the Genus Psectrotarsia Dognin, 1907 (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Heliothinae) MICHAEL G. POGUE Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, c/o Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, NMNH, MRC-168, Washington, DC, 20013-7012, USA; [email protected] Abstract Based on characters of the male and female genitalia, the genus Erythroecia Hampson, 1910 is considered a new syn- onym of Psectrotarsia Dognin, 1907. Psectrotarsia contains five species: P. flava Dognin (type species); P. su av is (H. Edwards), new combination; P. h e ba rd i (Skinner), new combination; P. euposis (Dyar), new combination and revised status; and P. rhodophora (Hampson), new combination. Each species is redescribed and illustrated. Copitarsia fuscir- ena (Hampson), new combination, and C. tamsi (Giacomelli), new combination, are transferred from Psectrotarsia to Copitarsia Hampson, 1906. Psectrotarsia ranges from the northeastern, midwestern, and southwestern United States to Guatemala. Key words: systematics, genitalia, new synonym, new combination, revised status, Erythroecia Introduction Psectrotarsia Dognin, 1907 was used first in combination with the type species, P. f la va Dognin, but a formal description of the genus was not provided. Hampson (1908) used Psectrotarsia in a key to the genera of Acro- nyctinae, but did not include species names (Poole, 1989). Hampson (1910) did not regard Psectrotarsia as formally described, and therefore, redescribed it and designated P. f us c ire n a Hampson as the type species; thus, he created both a junior synonym and homonym of Psectrotarsia Dognin.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Mixed-Oak Forest Ecosystems in Southern Ohio Prior to the Reintroduction of Fire
    United States Department of Characteristics of Mixed-Oak Agriculture Forest Service Forest Ecosystems in Northeastern Research Station Southern Ohio Prior to the General Technical Reintroduction of Fire Report NE-299 Abstract Mixed-oak forests occupied much of the Unglaciated Allegheny Plateau region of southern Ohio at the onset of Euro-American settlement (ca. 1800). Historically, Native Americans used fire to manage the landscape and fire was frequent throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries during extensive forest harvesting and then re-growth. Today, though mixed-oak forests remain dominant across much of the region, oak regeneration is often poor as other tree species (e.g., maples) are becoming much more abundant. This shift has occurred concurrently with fire suppression policies that began in 1923. A multidisciplinary experiment was initiated in southern Ohio to explore the use of prescribed fire as a tool to improve the sustainability of mixed-oak forests. This report describes the experimental design and study areas, and provides baseline data on ecosystem characteristics prior to prescribed fire treatments. Chapters describe forest history, an integrated moisture index, geology and soils, understory light environments, understory vegetation, tree regeneration, overstory vegetation, foliar nutrient status, arthropods, and breeding birds. The use of trade, firm or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by
    [Show full text]
  • Twelve Ground Beetles New to Virginia Or the District of Columbia
    Banisteria, Number 43, pages 40-55 © 2014 Virginia Natural History Society Twelve Ground Beetles New to Virginia or the District of Columbia and an Annotated Checklist of the Geadephaga (Coleoptera, Adephaga) from the George Washington Memorial Parkway Brent W. Steury U.S. National Park Service 700 George Washington Memorial Parkway Turkey Run Park Headquarters McLean, Virginia 22101 Peter W. Messer 4315 W. Riverlake Drive Mequon, Wisconsin 53092 ABSTRACT One-hundred eighty-four species in 70 genera of geadephagan beetles (183 carabids and one rhysodid) were documented during a nine-year field survey of a national park site (George Washington Memorial Parkway) that spans parts of Fairfax and Arlington counties and the City of Alexandria in Virginia, and the District of Columbia. The capture of Elaphropus quadrisignatus (Duftschmid) represents the second record for the New World. Seven species, E. quadrisignatus, Harpalus rubripes (Duftschmid), Microlestes pusio (LeConte), Platynus opaculus LeConte, Pterostichus permundus (Say), P. sculptus LeConte, and Scarites vicinus Chaudoir are documented for the first time from the Commonwealth. Seven species, Anisodactylus dulcicollis (LaFerté-Sénectère), Elaphropus anceps (LeConte), E. saturatus (Casey), Oodes americanus Dejean, P. permundus, S. vicinus, and Tachys potomaca (Erwin) are documented for the first time from the District of Columbia. The study increases the number of geadephagan beetles known from the Potomac River Gorge to 255 species and the number from Virginia to 543 taxa. Hand picking and Malaise traps proved to be the most successful capture methods of the eight methods employed during the survey. Periods of adult activity, based on dates of capture, are given for each species.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) (Including Tiger Beetles) of Florida
    Identification Guide to Florida Carabidae (including tiger beetles, Cicindelini) 1 Pasimachus sublaevis Pasimachus marginatus Pasimachus floridanus Pasimachus subsulcatus Manual for the Identification of the Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) (including tiger beetles) of Florida © P. M. Choate 2001 1. This is an original pre-publication manuscript, not for general dissemination or reproduction. This copy may be used as instructional material in an insect ID laboratory exercise. The Ground Beetles of Florida (Coleoptera: Carabidae) 2 The ground beetles of Florida (Coleoptera: Carabidae) including tiger beetles, tribe Cicindelini ©2003 P. M. Choate1 Dept. Entomology and Nematology University of Florida, Gainesville 32611 email: [email protected] Introduction ic determinations. Works by Lindroth (1961, 1963, One of the most intimidating tasks challenging 1966, 1968, 1969a, 1969b) are useful for many species an aspiring entomologist is the identification of spe- determinations, but must be used with the knowledge cies within a family as diverse as ground beetles. Re- that genera and species occur in Florida that are not gional faunal works have dealt with northeastern covered in his volumes on Canada and Alaska. Species states (Blatchley 1910, Downie and Arnett 1996, and keys for Florida genera are virtually non-existent ex- Lindroth 1961, 1963, 1966, 1968, 1969a, 1969b) and cept as part of recent revisions of some genera. When the northwest (Hatch 1953). Accurate identification relevant such species keys are listed. I have modified of specimens collected south of New England becomes extant keys or manufactured species keys to fit the a challenge, even at the generic level. My intent here Florida fauna. is to provide keys to identify genera of ground beetles Two major checklists have dealt with Florida Car- (including tiger beetles) found or likely to be found in abidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Erwin and Sims 1984 Qev20n4 351 466 CC Released.Pdf
    This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. I • .fT »5 3 ,:s CARABID BEETLES OF THE WEST INDIES (INSECTS: COLEOPTERA): A SYNOPSIS OF THE GENERA AND CHECKLISTS OF TRIBES OF CARABOIDEA, AND OF THE WEST INDIAN SPECIES Terry L. Erwin and Linda L. Sims Department of Entomology Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. 20560 U. S. A. Quaestiones Entomologicae 20:351-466 1984 ABSTRACT The fauna of the Greater Antilles was extensively sampled and studied by P.J. Darlington, Jr., beginning with his early field trips there in 1934 and ending with his paper on tropical island carabids in 1970. The Lesser Antilles and Bahamas have had far less attention; most islands have not yet been sampled. The following tribes are recorded within the geographic area covered by the present study, which includes the Greater and Lesser Antilles, Bahamas, and most smaller islands not on the continental shelf: Carabini; Megacephalini; "Cicindelini; Enceladini; Pseudomorphini; Scaritini; "Clivinini; Ozaenini; Brachinini; 'Rhysodini; Trechini; Pogonini; "Bembidiini; Morionini; *Pterostichini; Panagaeini; Callistini; Oodini; Licinini; 'Harpalini; Ctenodactylini; Perigonini; Lachnophorini; Cyclosomini; Masoreini; Pentagonicini; Odacanthini; 'Lebiini; *Zuphiini; Galeritini. The tribes whose names are marked with an asterisk each have more than a dozen species thus far recorded from the West Indies. The tribes which occur in this area are also extensively distributed in the world, and are well represented in the Neotropical Region.
    [Show full text]