FM 30-103 Aggressor Order of Battle 1951

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FM 30-103 Aggressor Order of Battle 1951 ffl DtPA OF TIE ANY TECBNICAI MANIAL AGGRESSOR ORDER OF BATTLE UNCLASSIFIED BY DOD DIR. 5200.1 R REFERENCE USE ONLY NOT TO BE TAKEN FROM LIBRARY DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY • MAY 1951 WARNING Authority for re/ease of this document fo a forelgi government must be secured from fne Asiisfanf Ch/e yf Staff, G-2. When this document is released to a foreign govern nent, it is released subject to the following con litions: This information is furnished with the under itanding that it will not be released to another natioi vithcut specific approval of the United States o America, Department of the Army; that it will not b< ised for other than military purposes; that individua >r corporation rights originating in the informatioi vhether patented or not will be respected; and tha he information will be afforded substantially the sami legree of security as afforded by the United States o America, Department of the Army. DM©ARTMP.M© Ol Tilt: ARMY TW.IIMCAL MAM A I. 1M W.HH Thin manual su/>«-rv//*-i I-©M M-HH, II June l©HV AGGRESSOR ORDER OF BATTLE DEPARTMK\T OF THE ARMY MAY 1951 United States Government I©rinting Office Washington : 1951 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WASHINGTON 25, D. C., 21 May 1951 FM 30-103 is published for the information and guidance of all con cerned. [AG 370.2 (22 Jan 51)] BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: OFFICIAL: J. LAXVTON COLLINS Wm. E. BERGIN Chief oj Staff, United States Army Major General, USA Acting The Adjutant General DISTRIBUTION: GSUSA (5) except G-2 (50); SSUSA (5); Adm Svc (10); Tech Svc (10); Arm & Svc Bd (2); AFF (60); AA Comd (5); OS Maj Comd (40); Base Comd (10); MDW (5); A (40); CHQ (50); D (12); B (10); R (10); Bn (6); C (1);FC (2); Sch (15);PMS&T(3). For explanation of distribution formula see SR 310-90-1. FOREWORD All new Order of Battle information should be forwarded immediately to the Aggressor War Room, Army General School, Fort Riley, Kans. CONTENTS paragraphs Past CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ........................... 1-4 1 CHAPTER 2. MAJOR GROUND ORGANIZATIONS Section I. Discussion .......................................................... 5-6 6 //. Army groups .................................................... 7-10 8 HI. Armies .............................................................. 11-19 9 IV. Corps ................................................................ 20-57 13 V. Rifle divisions .................................................. 58-116 25 VI. Airborne divisions ...........................................117-122 65 VII. Tank divisions .................................................. 123-130 70 VIII. Mechanized divisions ........................................ 131-148 76 I.. Cavalry divisions ..............................................149-151 88 X. Artillery divisions ............................................152-167 90 CHAPTER 3. IDENTIFIED GROUND UNITS, DIVISIONAL Section I. Rifle units ..........................................................168-171 103 //. Airborne units .................................................. 172-173 105 ///. Armored units ..................................................174-177 106 IV. Artillery units ....................................................178-193 107 V. Reconnaissance units ........................................194-195 112 VI. Engineer units ..................................................196-197 112 VII. Signal units ........................................................198-199 113 Vlll. Service units ......................................................200-201 114 IX. Headquarters units ............................................202-204 114 X. Cavalry units and medical units ......................205-206 115 CHAPTER 4. IDENTIFIED UNITS, NONDIYISIONAL (GHQ) Section I. Rifle units ..........................................................207-211 116 //. Tank units ..........................................................212-215 117 ///. Artillery units ....................................................216-231 119 IV Paragraph* Fate IV. Engineer units ..................................................232-236 122 V. Reconnaissance, smoke, and motor trans port battalions ............................................237-239 123 VI. Signal units ........................................................240-241 124 Vil. Propaganda units ..............................................242-243 125 Vlll. Medical units ....................................................244-248 126 CHAPTER 5. MAJOR AIR ORGANIZATIONS Section I. Discussion ..........................................................249-251 127 //. Air armies ........................................................252-254 128 ///. Air Corps ..........................................................255-263 129 IV. Fighter divisions ................................................264-272 132 V. Bomber divisions ..............................................273-282 137 VI. Ground attack divisions ....................................283-293 142 CHAPTER 6. IDENTIFIED AIR UNITS Section 1. Divisional identified units ................................294-296 149 //. Nondivisional (GHQ) identified units..............297-310 150 CHAPTER ©?. INDEX OF AGGRESSOR OFFICERS 311-312 154 CHAPTER 8. ARMED FORCES POSTAL SYSTEM Section I. Description of the postal system ....................313-315 197 //. Field post office numbers ..............................316-317 198 CHAPTER 9. REFERENCE DATA Section I. Tactical components ........................................318-323 200 //. Divisional stations ............................................324-326 207 ///. Home centers ....................................................327-329 208 IV. Home designations ..........................................330-332 211 V. Code names and code numbers ......................333-334 231 APPENDIX REFERENCES .................... ........................................ 308 INDEX .......................................................................................... 309 This manual supersedes FM 3&-W3, 14 June 1949 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1. PURPOSE This manual presents all Order of Battle information pertinent to the Aggressor Armed Forces up to 31 December 1950. 2. SCOPE The manual presents information in two general classifications: identi fications, of types likely to be significant as indicators of Aggressor ground and air strength and dispositions (pars. 5-317 incl.); and reference data, a collection of information arranged by subject (pars. 318-334 incl.). a. Identifications. Types of identifications with detailed information concerning each, are grouped as follows: (1) Major ground organizations (pars. 5-167 incl.). These army units are army groups, armies, corps, and divisions of all types. Components and commanders, where known, plus history of the units, are included. (2) Identified ground units (pars. 168-248 incl.). Army ground units smaller than division size are listed in this section by type of organization under two main headings divisional and nondivisional (GHQ). Rifle, airborne, tank, artillery, signal, cavalry, rocket, supply, propaganda, and other types of units are assembled in order. In the case of units assigned to major organizations, such details as code numbers, home designations, and home centers are omitted from these paragraphs, but may be found in paragraphs 5-167 incl. 1 (3) Major air organizations (pars. 249-293 incl.). These air units are air armies, corps, and divisions of all types. Components and commanders, where known, plus history of the units, are in cluded. (4) Identified air units (pars. 294 310 incl.). Air units smaller than division size are listed in this section by type of organiza tion under two main headings divisional and nondivisional (GHQ). (5) Index of aggressor officers (pars. 311 and 312). This section consists of an alphabetical roster of selected commanders of the Aggressor Armed Forces, with data regarding their age, branch, rank, command, decorations, and past history. (6) Armed forces postal system (pars. 313-317 incl). This section contains the latest available data concerning the postal system employed by Aggressor. Captured letters have been invaluable as an aid in identifying Aggressor code numbers. b. Reference Data. (1) This portion of the manual (pars. 318-334 incl.) contains com pilations found to be helpful in the identification and location of Aggressor units. Tables show the tactical organization of the St. Lawrence campaign and the units assigned to occupa tion duties in the Caribbean area; other tables show the latest known assignments of major units in the Aggressor nation. In formation regarding the expansion of Aggressor and changes in territorial organization since its formation are shown on succes sive maps of the Aggressor Nation. It is stressed that if the numbering of the tactical components coincides with the num bering of the territorial organization, it is the exception rather than the rule. (2) Lists of corps areas, divisional stations, and home centers for the Armed Forces are keys to Aggressor security and mobiliza tion, and to the origin of units. More specific keys to the origin, however, are the lists of home centers and home designations. The latter are often identified through captured documents and prisoner of war interrogations. Actually, one of the most direct keys to the identity of units is the list of codes both names and numbers. 3. KEYS TO IDENTIFICATION Order of battle is concerned with the strength, equipment, location, dis position, organization, and movement of armed forces. The
Recommended publications
  • Military History Anniversaries 01 Thru 14 Feb
    Military History Anniversaries 01 thru 14 Feb Events in History over the next 14 day period that had U.S. military involvement or impacted in some way on U.S military operations or American interests Feb 01 1781 – American Revolutionary War: Davidson College Namesake Killed at Cowan’s Ford » American Brigadier General William Lee Davidson dies in combat attempting to prevent General Charles Cornwallis’ army from crossing the Catawba River in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Davidson’s North Carolina militia, numbering between 600 and 800 men, set up camp on the far side of the river, hoping to thwart or at least slow Cornwallis’ crossing. The Patriots stayed back from the banks of the river in order to prevent Lieutenant Colonel Banastre Tartleton’s forces from fording the river at a different point and surprising the Patriots with a rear attack. At 1 a.m., Cornwallis began to move his troops toward the ford; by daybreak, they were crossing in a double-pronged formation–one prong for horses, the other for wagons. The noise of the rough crossing, during which the horses were forced to plunge in over their heads in the storm-swollen stream, woke the sleeping Patriot guard. The Patriots fired upon the Britons as they crossed and received heavy fire in return. Almost immediately upon his arrival at the river bank, General Davidson took a rifle ball to the heart and fell from his horse; his soaked corpse was found late that evening. Although Cornwallis’ troops took heavy casualties, the combat did little to slow their progress north toward Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BATTLE of BARDI a U RING the 2Nd January General Mackay
    CHAPTER 8 THE BATTLE OF BARDI A U RING the 2nd January General Mackay visited each of the six attack- D ing battalions . Outwardly he was the most calm among the leaders, yet it was probably only he and the other soldiers in the division who ha d taken part in setpiece attacks in France in the previous war who realise d to the full the mishaps that could befall a night attack on a narrow fron t unless it was carried out with clock-like precision and unfailing dash . The younger leaders were excited, but determined that in their first battle the y should not fail . To one of them it was like "the feeling before an exam" . Afterwards their letters and comments revealed how sharply consciou s many of them were that this was the test of their equality with "the old A.I.F." in which their fathers had served, and which, for them, was the sole founder of Australian military tradition. "Tonight is the night," wrote the diarist of the 16th Brigade . `By this time tomorrow (1700 hrs) the fate of Bardia should be sealed. Everyone is happy, expectant, eager . Old timers say the spirit is the same as in th e last war. Each truck-load was singing as we drove to the assembly point i n the moonlight . All ranks carried a rum issue against the bleak morning . At 1930 hrs we passed the `I' tanks, against the sky-line like a fleet o f battle-cruisers, pennants flying . Infantry moving up all night, rugged , jesting, moon-etched against the darker background of no-man's land .
    [Show full text]
  • (June 1941) and the Development of the British Tactical Air Doctrine
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 14, ISSUE 1, FALL 2011 Studies A Stepping Stone to Success: Operation Battleaxe (June 1941) and the Development of the British Tactical Air Doctrine Mike Bechthold On 16 February 1943 a meeting was held in Tripoli attended by senior American and British officers to discuss the various lessons learned during the Libyan campaign. The focus of the meeting was a presentation by General Bernard Montgomery. This "gospel according to Montgomery," as it was referred to by Air Chief Marshal Arthur Tedder, set out very clearly Monty's beliefs on how air power should be used to support the army.1 Among the tenets Montgomery articulated was his conviction of the importance of air power: "Any officer who aspires to hold high command in war must understand clearly certain principles regarding the use of air power." Montgomery also believed that flexibility was the greatest asset of air power. This allowed it to be applied as a "battle-winning factor of the first importance." As well, he fully endorsed the air force view of centralized control: "Nothing could be more fatal to successful results than to dissipate the air resource into small packets placed under the control of army formation commanders, with each packet working on its own plan. The soldier must not expect, or wish, to exercise direct command over air striking forces." Montgomery concluded his discussion by stating that it was of prime importance for the army and air 1 Arthur Tedder, With Prejudice: The war memoirs of Marshal of the Royal Air Force, Lord Tedder (London: Cassell, 1966), p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The
    Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover.
    [Show full text]
  • Service in the United States Military 1909 William Q. Reno, Sr. Army
    MEN FOR OTHERS Service in the United States Military 1909 William Q. Reno, Sr. Army Lieutenant Veteran World War I 1923 Neal E. Fitzgerald Lieutenant Veteran World War II 1925 Joseph A. Mendryga KIA World War II Killed in action 1928 Paul J. Schafer Army Retired World War II Somewhere in 1929 Adam B. Kronk Army Lieutenant Veteran France "suffered injuries to his legs" World War II Battalion Surgeon 1931 Stephen M. Gillespie Army Major Veteran with the 1st Army on the Wetern Front; Bronze Star World War II Participated in D- Day with the 18th Infantry 1931 William M. Moynihan Army Major Veteran Regiment of the 1st Infantry Division 1932 James G. Andary Veteran World War II 1932 Raymond M. Andries Veteran World War II 1932 Elmer J. Barton Veteran World War II Updated: January 30, 2018 Page 1 of 114 MEN FOR OTHERS Service in the United States Military 1932 James C. Berg Veteran World War II World War II Dental Corps; Served in European Theater " … 1932 Robert E. Coleman Army Captain Veteran from the Beaches of Normandy to ... Bremen, as my four battle stars will attest." 1932 C. Creedon Veteran World War II 1932 William Janecek Army Veteran World War II Dental Corps Lieutenant 1932 William R. Mulleavy Veteran World War II Colonel 1932 Casimir J. Rozak Veteran World War II 1932 Ralph S. Sharkey Army Veteran World War II 1932 F. Sward Veteran World War II World War II Decorated Naval 1932 Dawson Taylor Navy Veteran Officer "radar school before he went to sea." 1932 W.
    [Show full text]
  • La Bataille De Leipzig Scénarios
    La Bataille de Leipzig Scénarios Pour le Règlement de l’An XXX et Le Règlement des Marie-Louise 2 La Bataille de Leipzig December 19, 2013 • French Victory: Hold all hexes of Güldengossa, the Auenhain Farm, Markkleeberg, Dölitz and Connewitz, one hex each of All rules herein take precedence over any rules in the series rules, Gross Pössna and Seifertshain, and place Meerveldt’s II Corps which they may contradict. on Morale Level Three by the end of the scenario. Rules marked with an eagle or are shaded with a gray • French Tactical Victory: Hold one hex of Güldengossa, the background apply only to players using the Règlements de Auenhain Farm, all hexes of Markkleeberg, Dölitz, and l’An XXX. Connewitz and place Klenau’s IV Corps and Meerveldt’s II Corps on Morale Level Two by the end of the scenario. NOTE: All references to Artillery Ammunition Wagons (AAWs), Ammunition Supply, Artillery Ricochet, Cavalry Skirmishers and • Draw: Any result that is not a victory for either side. Grand Charges apply only to players using the Règlements de l’An XXX. • Coalition Tactical Victory: Hold all hexes of Güldengossa, the Manor House at Dölitz and place Lauriston’s V Corps on Morale Level Two by the end of the scenario. 1.0 INTRODUCTION La Batallie de Leipzig is a game of one day, the 16th, of the battle • Coalition Victory: Hold all hexes of Markkleeberg, that took place from October 14-19. Güldengossa, the Auenhain Farm, Gross Pössna, the Manor House at Dölitz and Dölitz or Connewitz by the end of the scenario.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation and Inculcation of Martial Masculinity During the Franco Regime in Spain (1939–1975)
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository History ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 6-9-2016 Hombres Normativos: The rC eation and Inculcation of Martial Masculinity during the Franco Regime in Spain (1939—1975) Ian Kent Winchester Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/hist_etds Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Winchester, Ian Kent. "Hombres Normativos: The rC eation and Inculcation of Martial Masculinity during the Franco Regime in Spain (1939—1975)." (2016). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/hist_etds/84 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in History ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ian Kent Winchester Candidate History Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Enrique A. Sanabria, Chairperson Eliza E. Ferguson Melissa K. Bokovoy Rajeshwari Vallury i HOMBRES NORMATIVOS: THE CREATION AND INCULCATION OF MARTIAL MASCULINITY DURING THE FRANCO REGIME IN SPAIN (1939–1975) by IAN K. WINCHESTER B.A., History, University of San Francisco, 2005 M.A., History, University of New Mexico, 2008 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy History The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico May, 2016 ii HOMBRES NORMATIVOS: THE CREATION AND INCULCATION OF MARTIAL MASCULINITY DURING THE FRANCO REGIME IN SPAIN (1939–1975) by Ian K. Winchester B.A., HISTORY, UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 2005 M.A., HISTORY, UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO, 2008 PH.D., HISTORY, UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO, 2016 ABSTRACT This dissertation investigates the Franco dictatorship’s construction of normative masculinity through mandatory military service in Spain from 1939–1975.
    [Show full text]
  • Aggressor Order of Battle
    .il* VJ DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FIELD MANUAL AGGRESSOR ORDER OF BATTLE i or*' DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ■ JUNE 1955 < FOREWORD The country, peoples, forces, or individuals described herein are fictitious. Any resemblance to existing countries, forces, or indi-., viduals is inadvertent and coincidental. *FM 30-103 FIELD MANUAL DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 30-103 WASHINGTON 25, D. C., 23 June 1955 AGGRESSOR ORDER OF BATTLE Paragraphs Page PART ONE. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1,2 3 2. GENERAL — 3-6 5 PART TWO. IDENTIFIED GROUND ORGANIZATIONS CHAPTER 3. MAJOR GROUND UNITS Section I. Army Groups - 7-11 12 II. Armies 12-28 14 III. Corps 29-69 20 IV. Rifle Divisions 70-129 35 V. Mountain Divisions 130-134 69 VI. Airborne Divisions 135-141 72 VII. Mechanized Divisions 142-163 78 VIII. Tank Divisions 164-171 90 IX. Cavalry Divisions 172-176 95 X. Artillery Divisions 177-192 98 XI. Antiaircraft Divisions 193-206 108 CHAPTER 4. GROUND UNITS, DIVISIONAL Section I. Rifle Units 207-214 114 II. Airborne Units 215-230 117 III. Armored and Cavalry Units 231-240 120 IV. Field Artillery Units 241-257 123 V. Antiaircraft and Antitank Units 258-269 126 VI. Mortar and Rocket Units 270-281 129 VII. Engineer Units 282-287 131 VIII. Signal Units 288-292 133 IX. Service Units 293-804 134 CHAPTER 5. GROUND UNITS, NONDIVISIONAL (GHQ) Section I. Rifle Units 305-312 136 II. Armored and Cavalry Units 313-317 187 III. Field Artillery Units 318-330 138 IV. Antiaircraft and Antitank Units 331-337 141 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Heinrich Ulrichs
    Hubert Kennedy Karl Heinrich Ulrichs Pioneer of the Modern Gay Movement Peremptory Publications San Francisco 2002 © 2002 by Hubert Kennedy Karl Heinrich Ulrichs, Pioneer of the Modern Gay Movement is a Peremtory Publica- tions eBook. It may be freely distributed, but no changes may be made in it. An eBook may be cited the same as a printed book. Comments and suggestions are welcome. Please write to [email protected]. 2 3 When posterity will one day have included the persecution of Urnings in that sad chapter of other persecutions for religious belief and race—and that this day will come is beyond all doubt—then will the name of Karl Heinrich Ulrichs be constantly remembered as one of the first and noblest of those who have striven with courage and strength in this field to help truth and charity gain their rightful place. Magnus Hirschfeld, Foreword to Forschungen über das Rätsel der mannmännlichen Liebe (1898) Magnus Hirschfeld 4 Contents Preface 6 1. Childhood: 1825–1844 12 2. Student and Jurist: 1844–1854 18 3. Literary and Political Interests: 1855–1862 37 4. Origins of the “Third Sex” Theory: 1862 59 5. Researches on the Riddle of “Man-Manly” Love: 1863–1865 67 6. Political Activity and Prison: 1866–1867 105 7. The Sixth Congress of German Jurists, More “Researches”: 1867–1868 128 8. Public Reaction, The Zastrow Case: 1868–1869 157 9. Efforts for Legal Reform: 1869 177 10. The First Homosexual Magazine: 1870 206 11. Final Efforts for the Urning Cause: 1871–1879 217 12. Last Years in Italy: 1880–1895 249 13.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BATTLE of the SAMBRE 4 NOVEMBER 1918 By
    THE BATTLE OF THE SAMBRE 4 NOVEMBER 1918 by JOHN DEREK CLAYTON 669689 A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY College of Arts & Law Department of History University of Birmingham September 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Acknowledgements The completion of a PhD thesis can be at times a solitary occupation: the completion of this one would never have been possible, however, without help from a number of sources on the way. My thanks go particularly to my supervisor, Dr John Bourne, for his direction, support, encouragement and unfailingly wise counsel. I would also thank Professor Peter Simkins who supervised my MA dissertation and then suggested the Battle of the Sambre as a subject ripe for further study. He then kindly supplied data on the performance of divisions in the Hundred Days and permitted me to use it in this work. Thanks must also go to the staffs of the National Archive, the Imperial War Museum and the Bundesarchiv – Militärarchiv in Freiburg. Fellow PhD students have been a constant source of friendship and encouragement: my grateful thanks to Geoff Clarke, who allowed me to use some of his doctoral research on logistics, and to Trevor Harvey, Peter Hodgkinson, Alison Hine and Michael LoCicero.
    [Show full text]
  • Service in the United States Military 1909 William Q. Reno, Sr. Army
    MEN FOR OTHERS Service in the United States Military 1909 William Q. Reno, Sr. Army Lieutenant Veteran World War I 1923 Neal E. Fitzgerald Lieutenant Veteran World War II 1925 Charles C. Creedon Veteran World War II 1928 Paul J. Schafer Army Retired World War II Somewhere in 1929 Adam B. Kronk Army Lieutenant Veteran France "suffered injuries to his legs" 1929 Joseph A. Mendryga KIA World War II Killed in action World War II Battalion Surgeon 1931 Stephen M. Gillespie Army Major Veteran with the 1st Army on the Wetern Front; Bronze Star World War II Participated in D- Day with the 18th Infantry 1931 William M. Moynihan Army Major Veteran Regiment of the 1st Infantry Division 1932 James G. Andary Veteran World War II 1932 Raymond M. Andries Veteran World War II Updated: May 23, 2019 Page 1 of 118 MEN FOR OTHERS Service in the United States Military 1932 Elmer J. Barton Veteran World War II 1932 James C. Berg Veteran World War II World War II Dental Corps; Served in European Theater " … 1932 Robert E. Coleman Army Captain Veteran from the Beaches of Normandy to ... Bremen, as my four battle stars will attest." 1932 Albert B. Gregory Veteran World War II 1932 William Janecek Army Veteran World War II Dental Corps Lieutenant 1932 William R. Mulleavy Veteran World War II Colonel 1932 Casimir J. Rozak Veteran World War II 1932 Ralph S. Sharkey Army Veteran World War II 1932 Francis L. Sward Veteran World War II World War II Decorated Naval 1932 Dawson Taylor Navy Veteran Officer "radar school before he went to sea." Updated: May 23, 2019 Page 2 of 118 MEN FOR OTHERS Service in the United States Military 1932 William W.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowville Road) Widening Project VDOT Project Number 0010-020-632, (UPC #101020) (VDHR File No
    Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowville Road) Widening Project VDOT Project Number 0010-020-632, (UPC #101020) (VDHR File No. 1995-2174) Phase I Architectural Identification Survey Chesterfield County, Virginia Phase I Archaeological Identification Survey for the Route 10 Project (Bermuda Triangle to Meadowville) Chesterfield County, Virginia VDOT Project No. 0010-020-632, UPC #101020 Prepared for: Prepared for: Richmond District Department of Transportation 2430VDOT Pine Richmond Forest Drive District Department of Transportation 9800 Government Center Parkway Colonial2430 Heights, Pine Forest VA Drive23834 9800 Government Center Parkway Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Colonial804 Heights,-524-6000 Virginia 23834 Chesterfield, VA 23832 804-748-1037 Prepared by: March 2013 Prepared by: McCormick Taylor, Inc. North Shore Commons A 4951 McCormickLake Brook Drive, Taylor Suite 275 NorthGlen ShoreAllen, VirginiaCommons 23060 A 4951 Lake Brook Drive, Suite 275 Glen Allen, VA 23060 May 2013 804-762-5800 May 2013 Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowville Road) Widening Project VDOT Project Number 0010-020-632, (UPC #101020) (VDHR File No. 1995-2174) Phase I Architectural Identification Survey Phase I ArchaeologicalChesterfield County,Identification Virginia Survey for the Route 10 Project (Bermuda Triangle to Meadowville) Chesterfield County, Virginia VDOT Project No. 0010-020-632, UPC #101020 Prepared for: Prepared for: Richmond District Department of Transportation 2430VDOT Pine Richmond Forest Drive District Department of Transportation 9800 Government Center Parkway Colonial2430 Heights, Pine Forest VA Drive23834 9800 Government Center Parkway Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Colonial804 Heights,-524-6000 Virginia 23834 Chesterfield, VA 23832 804-748-1037 Prepared by: March 2013 Prepared by: McCormick Taylor NorthMcCormick Shore Commons Taylor, Inc.
    [Show full text]