DOCSLIB.ORG

THE BATTLE of the SAMBRE 4 NOVEMBER 1918 By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE BATTLE of the SAMBRE 4 NOVEMBER 1918 By THE BATTLE OF THE SAMBRE 4 NOVEMBER 1918 by JOHN DEREK CLAYTON 669689 A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY College of Arts & Law Department of History University of Birmingham September 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Acknowledgements The completion of a PhD thesis can be at times a solitary occupation: the completion of this one would never have been possible, however, without help from a number of sources on the way. My thanks go particularly to my supervisor, Dr John Bourne, for his direction, support, encouragement and unfailingly wise counsel. I would also thank Professor Peter Simkins who supervised my MA dissertation and then suggested the Battle of the Sambre as a subject ripe for further study. He then kindly supplied data on the performance of divisions in the Hundred Days and permitted me to use it in this work. Thanks must also go to the staffs of the National Archive, the Imperial War Museum and the Bundesarchiv – Militärarchiv in Freiburg. Fellow PhD students have been a constant source of friendship and encouragement: my grateful thanks to Geoff Clarke, who allowed me to use some of his doctoral research on logistics, and to Trevor Harvey, Peter Hodgkinson, Alison Hine and Michael LoCicero. 2 Battle of the Sambre 4 November 1918 Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1 Context 13 Chapter 2 XVII Corps 30 Chapter 3 VI Corps 49 Chapter 4 IV Corps 79 Chapter 5 V Corps 119 Chapter 6 XIII Corps 165 Chapter 7 IX Corps 228 Conclusion 277 Bibliography 288 Appendix A Order of Battle 302 Appendix B Commanders‟ Length of Service 314 Appendix C Divisional Fatal Casualties 317 Appendix D Victoria Cross Winners 318 Appendix E Map References for Original Trench Maps & How to Interpret Them 326 Maps & Diagrams Index 327 Maps & Diagrams 328 3 Abbreviations AA Assistant Adjutant BA:MA Bundesarchiv: Militärarchiv BEF British Expeditionary Force BGC Brigadier-General Commanding BGGS Brigadier-General General Staff BGHA Brigadier-General Heavy Artillery CHA Commander Heavy Artillery CRA Commander Royal Artillery CRE Commander Royal Engineers DAQMG Deputy Assistant Quartermaster General DRLS Despatch Rider Letter Service DSO Distinguished Service Order GHQ General Headquarters GOC General Officer Commanding GSO 1 / 2 / 3 General Staff Officer grade 1 / 2 / 3 MC Military Cross MGC Machine Gun Company MGGS Major-General General Staff MGRA Major-General Royal Artillery MM Military Medal OR Other Ranks QMG Quartermaster General RAF Royal Air Force RE Royal Engineers RFA Royal Field Artillery RGA Royal Garrison Artillery 4 Introduction This thesis analyses the first day of the Battle of the Sambre, 4 November 1918,1 with specific reference to the actions of Third and Fourth Armies.2 This was the last large-scale battle fought by the British Expeditionary Force [BEF] on the Western Front. If the battle is known at all in the public domain, it is for the death of the poet Wilfred Owen.3 The battle was on a huge scale: thirteen divisions of the BEF led the assault on a frontage of approximately twenty miles, supported by over a thousand guns, with initial plans presuming an involvement of up to seventy tanks and armoured cars. This engagement was therefore not dissimilar in scale to the attack of 1 July 1916 on the Somme, yet other battles of the summer and autumn of 1918 overshadow this one in current historiography, notably the Battle of Amiens (8 – 11 August), and the Hindenburg Line, including the crossing of the Canal du Nord (27 September - 1 October). Questions to be Addressed Analysis of the last large-scale set-piece attack of the Great War by the BEF raises a number of questions. Was the battle decisive? What had the BEF learnt in the previous four years‟ fighting and therefore where does the Battle of the Sambre fit in the context of the „learning curve‟? To what extent was this engagement an „all-arms‟ battle? This raises the further question of plan versus reality: did the battle go entirely to plan? If objectives were not reached, did it matter? Was it necessary for officers on the spot to adopt a pragmatic 1 The battle ran officially from 4 to 6 November 1918 2 Commanded by General Hon. Sir Julian Byng (Third Army) and General Sir Henry Rawlinson Bt. (Fourth Army) 3 Lieutenant Wilfred Edward Salter Owen, 5th Battalion (attached 2nd Battalion) Manchester Regiment, 32nd Division, was killed in action on the Sambre-Oise Canal, approximately 1,000 yards north of the village of Ors. He is buried in Ors Communal Cemetery, Grave A.3. 5 approach rather than adhere strictly to instructions? The battle cannot be viewed in isolation: what other factors influenced the rapidity of the German Army‟s disintegration and was it necessary for the BEF to fight the battle at all? This work focuses on the level of tactical and operational effectiveness of the BEF at the very end of the „learning curve‟ and shows how it managed to storm a challenging, prepared defensive position without involvement of the much-vaunted Australian and Canadian divisions.4 This assault also gives a fascinating and starring role to the Field Companies of the Royal Engineers who rarely receive the attention and recognition they deserve and is also a battle with immediate strategic and political consequences. The thesis also argues that the British victory was decisive - at the strategic level it expedited the Armistice – and that it was necessary to fight the battle: until the German Army was pushed off its last prepared defensive line, German High Command [OHL5] was still hoping to be able to make a strategic withdrawal to an as yet incomplete line between Antwerp and the Meuse, to hold out through the winter and pursue a more favourable negotiated peace settlement in the spring of 1919. What the BEF had learned in the previous four years‟ fighting is examined and the extent to which this final battle was its ultimate expression analysed. By describing and analysing the fighting methods used, the question to what extent this engagement was an „all-arms‟ battle can also be answered. At the operational level, the dilemma that dogged British High Command was that of which methodology would best lead 4 There were Dominion troops involved: the 3 New Zealand Rifle Brigade and 1 New Zealand Infantry Brigade assaulted the fortified town of Le Quesnoy, and a small contingent of the 1st Australian Tunnelling Company were involved in building a bridge over the Lock near the village of Rejet de Beaulieu at the southernmost point of the attack frontage. 5 OHL – Oberste Heeresleitung 6 to the strategic victory that would defeat the German Army on the field of battle and throw it out of France and Belgium. Breakthrough or attrition? The repeated failure of the former led eventually to an acceptance of the latter in the form of „bite and hold‟ tactics, where attacks would be limited in both time and geographical scope so as to avoid overstretching attacking troops and ensure that ground captured could be held against counter attacks. This thesis explains how this tactic developed and shows how the methods of late 1918 fit into this paradigm. It also demonstrates that the levels of fighting efficiency and of training were not uniform, showing how some units fared better than others. In places the assault went largely to plan. In others, it took improvisation, the adaptation or discarding of original plans, for some units to achieve success in the face of serious initial setbacks. The execution of the battle plan is shown to be far from perfect, with some units underperforming at the tactical level. The nature of the Hundred Days campaign is examined, along with the effect on the German leadership of the collapse of their Allies. The battle of 4 November did not initiate German requests for an armistice. Negotiations had been ongoing since early October 1918, but the effect of the defeat on the Sambre will be shown as pivotal in the process. The concepts of „bite and hold‟, „all-arms battle‟, the „learning curve‟ and an overview of the Hundred Days campaign, including Germany‟s peace negotiations, are dealt with in Chapter 1, “Contexts”. The performance of the German Army is not examined except through the eyes of its 7 opponent. Detailed analysis of this kind is beyond the scope of this work, but an overview can be found in Jonathan Boff‟s Winning and Losing on the Western Front.6 Malcolm Brown‟s The Imperial War Museum Book of 1918, Year of Victory covers the events of 4 November in a little under two pages,7 focusing on the Victoria Cross winners and the unfortunate poet. He does, however, in one sentence, evoke the question of the need for the battle: in quoting an officer present at the time (John Glubb, later Lieutenant-General Sir John Glubb), who commented “The enemy has melted away before us like snow”,8 he raises the matter of whether the battle was necessary at all, with the BEF by now pushing on what was surely an open door with the Armistice an imminent certainty.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The First World War Centenary Sale | Knightsbridge, London | Wednesday 1 October 2014 21999
    ALE S ENARY ENARY T WORLD WAR CEN WORLD WAR T Wednesday 1 October 2014 Wednesday Knightsbridge, London THE FIRS THE FIRST WORLD WAR CENTENARY SALE | Knightsbridge, London | Wednesday 1 October 2014 21999 THE FIRST WORLD WAR CENTENARY SALE Wednesday 1 October 2014 at 1pm Knightsbridge, London BONHAMS ENQUIRIES SALE NUMBER IMPORTANT INFORMATION Montpelier Street 21999 The United States Government Knightsbridge Books, Manuscripts, has banned the import of ivory London SW7 1HH Photographs and Ephemera CATALOGUE into the USA. Lots containing www.bonhams.com Matthew Haley £20 ivory are indicated by the symbol +44 (0)20 7393 3817 Ф printed beside the lot number VIEWING [email protected] Please see page 2 for bidder in this catalogue. Sunday 28 September information including after-sale 11am to 3pm Medals collection and shipment. Monday 29 September John Millensted 9am to 4.30pm +44 (0)20 7393 3914 Please see back of catalogue Tuesday 30 September [email protected] for important notice to bidders 9am to 4.30pm Wednesday 1 October Militaria ILLUSTRATIONS 9am to 11am David Williams Front cover: Lot 105 +44 (0)20 7393 3807 Inside front cover: Lot 48 BIDS [email protected] Inside back cover: Lot 128 +44 (0) 20 7447 7448 Back cover: Lot 89 +44 (0) 20 7447 7401 fax Pictures and Prints To bid via the internet Thomas Podd please visit www.bonhams.com +44 (0)20 7393 3988 [email protected] New bidders must also provide proof of identity when submitting Collectors bids. Failure to do this may result Lionel Willis in your bids not being processed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Moreuil Wood
    The Battle of Moreuil Wood By Captain J.R. Grodzinski, LdSH(RC) On 9 October 1918, Lord Strathcona's Horse (Royal Canadians) fought their last battle of the First World War. Having been in reserve since August 1918, the Strathconas and the other two cavalry Regiments of the Canadian Cavalry Brigade were rushed to the front to exploit a penetration made in the German defences. In just one day, the Brigade advanced ten kilometers on a five kilometer front, capturing four hundred prisoners and numerous weapons. A spirited charge by the Strathconas over 1500 yards of open ground helped clear the village of Clary, southeast of Cambrai. This battle, which commenced at 0930 hours and finished by 1100 hours, assisted in clearing the neighboring Bois de Gattigny and the Bois du Mont-Auxvilles, Where two hundred prisoners were taken and a howitzer and forty machine guns captured. Several squadron-sized charges were made as the Regiments raced forward. The battle moved faster than senior commanders could react to and issue new instructions. This was mobile warfare, the type the cavalry longed for throughout the war. To those in the Canadian Cavalry Brigade and particularly the Strathconas this final action, known as the Battle of Le Cateau, probably brought recollection of a similar, yet more intense fight the previous spring: The Battle of Moreuil Wood on 30 March 1918. January 1918. The war was in its fourth year. Initially a mobile conflict, it quickly became a static slugging match. Intense fighting gave little advantage to either side while the numbers of casualties increased.
    [Show full text]
  • The Western Front the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Westernthe Front
    Ed 2 June 2015 2 June Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 1 The Western Front The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Western Front The Western Creative Media Design ADR003970 Edition 2 June 2015 The Somme Battlefield: Newfoundland Memorial Park at Beaumont Hamel Mike St. Maur Sheil/FieldsofBattle1418.org The Somme Battlefield: Lochnagar Crater. It was blown at 0728 hours on 1 July 1916. Mike St. Maur Sheil/FieldsofBattle1418.org The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 1 The Western Front 2nd Edition June 2015 ii | THE WESTERN FRONT OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR ISBN: 978-1-874346-45-6 First published in August 2014 by Creative Media Design, Army Headquarters, Andover. Printed by Earle & Ludlow through Williams Lea Ltd, Norwich. Revised and expanded second edition published in June 2015. Text Copyright © Mungo Melvin, Editor, and the Authors listed in the List of Contributors, 2014 & 2015. Sketch Maps Crown Copyright © UK MOD, 2014 & 2015. Images Copyright © Imperial War Museum (IWM), National Army Museum (NAM), Mike St. Maur Sheil/Fields of Battle 14-18, Barbara Taylor and others so captioned. No part of this publication, except for short quotations, may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the permission of the Editor and SO1 Commemoration, Army Headquarters, IDL 26, Blenheim Building, Marlborough Lines, Andover, Hampshire, SP11 8HJ. The First World War sketch maps have been produced by the Defence Geographic Centre (DGC), Joint Force Intelligence Group (JFIG), Ministry of Defence, Elmwood Avenue, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 7AH. United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WESTERN FRONT World War
    INTRODUCTORY NOTES movement in their efforts to win. Also there is the opportunity to examine other aspects of life on the By 1907 Europe was divided into two armed camps Western Front which affected the life of the ordinary that involved all the major European powers, the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente. While the alliances soldier, such as living conditions, food, medical problems, army routine, discipline and humour. were meant to increase the security of each country, instead they ensured that a war that involved any of these powers would probably involve all of them. WAR PLANS Between the Anglo-French Cordiale of 1904 and the outbreak of war in 1914, there were a number of There had not been major war in Europe since 1870. Teacher's Notes crises in Morocco and the Balkans, any of which Much had changed since then. Population growth meant could have sparked a war. more men were available to be conscripted, industrial advancements meant armies could be equipped with It was the assassination of the Austrian heir to the more devastating weapons, railways meant armies could throne, the Archduke Franz Ferdinand on June 28, be more easily moved and supplied. Every army had a 1914, that finally ignited the European powder keg. general staff, whose job it was to ensure their nations THE WESTERN Following the declaration of war on Serbia by Austria- army was properly equipped and organised for war and to Hungary on July 28, 1914, the Russian Government prepare plans to cover the most likely scenario. ordered its army to mobilise.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada and the BATTLE of VIMY RIDGE 9-12 April 1917 Bataille De Vimy-E.Qxp 1/2/07 11:37 AM Page 4
    BRERETON GREENHOUS STEPHEN J. HARRIS JEAN MARTIN Bataille de Vimy-E.qxp 1/2/07 11:37 AM Page 2 Bataille de Vimy-E.qxp 1/2/07 11:37 AM Page 1 Bataille de Vimy-E.qxp 1/2/07 11:37 AM Page 3 BRERETON GREENHOUS STEPHEN J. HARRIS JEAN MARTIN Canada and the BATTLE OF VIMY RIDGE 9-12 April 1917 Bataille de Vimy-E.qxp 1/2/07 11:37 AM Page 4 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Greenhous, Brereton, 1929- Stephen J. Harris, 1948- Canada and the Battle of Vimy Ridge, 9-12 April 1917 Issued also in French under title: Le Canada et la Bataille de Vimy 9-12 avril 1917. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-660-16883-9 DSS cat. no. D2-90/1992E-1 2nd ed. 2007 1.Vimy Ridge, Battle of, 1917. 2.World War, 1914-1918 — Campaigns — France. 3. Canada. Canadian Army — History — World War, 1914-1918. 4.World War, 1914-1918 — Canada. I. Harris, Stephen John. II. Canada. Dept. of National Defence. Directorate of History. III. Title. IV.Title: Canada and the Battle of Vimy Ridge, 9-12 April 1917. D545.V5G73 1997 940.4’31 C97-980068-4 Cet ouvrage a été publié simultanément en français sous le titre de : Le Canada et la Bataille de Vimy, 9-12 avril 1917 ISBN 0-660-93654-2 Project Coordinator: Serge Bernier Reproduced by Directorate of History and Heritage, National Defence Headquarters Jacket: Drawing by Stéphane Geoffrion from a painting by Kenneth Forbes, 1892-1980 Canadian Artillery in Action Original Design and Production Art Global 384 Laurier Ave.West Montréal, Québec Canada H2V 2K7 Printed and bound in Canada All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of British Tactical and Operational Tank Doctrine and Training in the First World War
    The evolution of British tactical and operational tank doctrine and training in the First World War PHILIP RICHARD VENTHAM TD BA (Hons.) MA. Thesis submitted for the award of the degree of Master of Philosophy by the University of Wolverhampton October 2016 ©Copyright P R Ventham 1 ABSTRACT Tanks were first used in action in September 1916. There had been no previous combat experience on which to base tactical and operational doctrine for the employment of this novel weapon of war. Training of crews and commanders was hampered by lack of vehicles and weapons. Time was short in which to train novice crews. Training facilities were limited. Despite mechanical limitations of the early machines and their vulnerability to adverse ground conditions, the tanks achieved moderate success in their initial actions. Advocates of the tanks, such as Fuller and Elles, worked hard to convince the sceptical of the value of the tank. Two years later, tanks had gained the support of most senior commanders. Doctrine, based on practical combat experience, had evolved both within the Tank Corps and at GHQ and higher command. Despite dramatic improvements in the design, functionality and reliability of the later marks of heavy and medium tanks, they still remained slow and vulnerable to ground conditions and enemy counter-measures. Competing demands for materiel meant there were never enough tanks to replace casualties and meet the demands of formation commanders. This thesis will argue that the somewhat patchy performance of the armoured vehicles in the final months of the war was less a product of poor doctrinal guidance and inadequate training than of an insufficiency of tanks and the difficulties of providing enough tanks in the right locations at the right time to meet the requirements of the manoeuvre battles of the ‘Hundred Days’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Durham Light Infantry and the Somme 1916
    The Durham Light Infantry and The Somme 1916 by John Bilcliffe edited and amended in 2016 by Peter Nelson and Steve Shannon Part 4 The Casualties. Killed in Action, Died of Wounds and Died of Disease. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License You can download this work and share it with others as long as it is credited, but you can’t change it in any way or use it commercially © John Bilcliffe. Email [email protected] Part 4 Contents. 4.1: Analysis of casualties sustained by The Durham Light Infantry on the Somme in 1916. 4.2: Officers who were killed or died of wounds on the Somme 1916. 4.3: DLI Somme casualties by Battalion. Note: The drawing on the front page of British infantrymen attacking towards La Boisselle on 1 July 1916 is from Reverend James Birch's war diary. DCRO: D/DLI 7/63/2, p.149. About the Cemetery Codes used in Part 4 The author researched and wrote this book in the 1990s. It was designed to be published in print although, sadly, this was not achieved during his lifetime. Throughout the text, John Bilcliffe used a set of alpha-numeric codes to abbreviate cemetery names. In Part 4 each soldier’s name is followed by a Cemetery Code and, where known, the Grave Reference, as identified by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission. Here are two examples of the codes and what they represent: T2 Thiepval Memorial A5 VII.B.22 Adanac Military Cemetery, Miraumont: Section VII, Row B, Grave no.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Violence: the German Army and Politics, 1918-1923
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2015-09-11 Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 Bucholtz, Matthew N Bucholtz, M. N. (2015). Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27638 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/2451 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 By Matthew N. Bucholtz A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HISTORY CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2015 © Matthew Bucholtz 2015 Abstract November 1918 did not bring peace to Germany. Although the First World War was over, Germany began a new and violent chapter as an outbreak of civil war threatened to tear the country apart. The birth of the Weimar Republic, Germany’s first democratic government, did not begin smoothly as republican institutions failed to re-establish centralized political and military authority in the wake of the collapse of the imperial regime. Coupled with painful aftershocks from defeat in the Great War, the immediate postwar era had only one consistent force shaping and guiding political and cultural life: violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Pupils of Gordon's Boys Home Who Died in the Great War 1914-1919
    Pupils of Gordon’s Boys Home who died in the Great War 1914-1919 No. 1920 Arthur Woodage. The Commonwealth War Graves Commission has only one A. Woodage recorded as having died in the First World War. He is named as Arthur, a Lance Corporal in the Yorkshire Regiment, (also known as the Green Howard’s), with the Regimental number 9022 who died on the 17th May 1915 aged 23. His parents are named as Alfred and Elizabeth Woodage of Little Sandhurst, Berkshire. “UK, Soldiers died in the Great War 1914-1919” has his place of birth as Arborfield, Wokingham and his place of residence as |Little Sandhurst. (No Alfred & Elizabeth have been found there.) Arthur was born on the 1st October 1891, his birth being registered in Wokingham in the 4th quarter. (The 1891 census has John and Annie Woodage, with 4 children, the eldest being Martha F, living in Arborfield). Another researcher has his parents as John Alfred Woodage and Mary Ann Stewart (all censuses have his mother born in Nova Scotia, Canada). The 1901 census for Little Sandhurst has Arthur, aged 9 and born in Arborfield, the son of John (died 1904) and Annie Woodage (died 1902). (John, aged 19, had enlisted in the 97th Foot on 21st December 1870 and served in Canada. (Canada, British Regimental Registers of Service, 1756-1900.) He was arrived at Gordon’s in m1905 and left in 1907. His number was allotted in April 1908. In 1911 Arthur Woodage was a 19 year old Private in the 1st Battalion Yorkshire Regiment serving in the Sudan, having enlisted at Aldershot.
    [Show full text]
  • Artillery at the Battle of Hamel, 4 July 1918
    Artillery at the Battle of Hamel, 4 July 1918 By Dr. Meleah Hampton The Battle of Hamel, conducted by battalions of the Australian Corps on 4 July 1918, is remembered as one of the startling successes of the First World War. The first time Australian and American infantry fought together on the Western Front, the meticulously planned operation was scheduled to take 90 minutes and famously took 93. The man who orchestrated the battle, Lieutenant General Sir John Monash said from the outset that ‘the operation [at Hamel] will be primarily a tank operation.’1 Since then, Hamel has been considered as though it was just that, an infantry battle with attendant tanks. But the British offensive method of 1918 was heavily dependent on a systematic application of fire-power to support advancing infantry. And Hamel was no exception. The infantry attack –and the famous 90 minutes – began at 3.10am. The initial barrage lasted for four minutes, following which it moved at a rate of 100 yards every three minutes until it reached a line that bisected the village of Hamel and was roughly three quarters of the way to the final objective line. At this point the barrage paused, and a thick smoke screen was built up to protect the infantry. Each assaulting company had more or less moved straight ahead behind the barrage up to this point, but during the pause began consolidating and mopping up as the next wave from the following battalion leapfrogged through.2 After ten minutes standing barrage on this intermediate halt line, the artillery fire lifted away a little more slowly, crossing the remaining distance to the final objective in four lifts of 100 yards each, one every four minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Frank Percy Caudery Private 31218, 3Rd Battalion, Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire Light Infantry Private 45649, 8 Th Battalion, Royal Berkshire Regiment
    ! Frank Percy Caudery Private 31218, 3rd Battalion, Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire Light Infantry Private 45649, 8 th Battalion, Royal Berkshire Regiment Frank Percy Caudery was born at Wendover on 8 May 1892, the sixth and youngest child of Frederick Caudery, a butcher, and his wife Mary (née Minnie). In the Census Returns of 1901 and 1911, the family was living at Chesham Villas, Amersham. In 1911, Frank was described as a helmet maker, perhaps at the Misbourne Works of William Stone, which had a contract with the War Office for this manufacture in 1915. Frank married Amersham girl Ethel Stokes in 1912 when they were both aged 20. The following year, a daughter Gladys was born. Frank enlisted at Amersham with the Oxford and Buckinghamshire Light Infantry but was then transferred to the Royal Berkshires, 8 th Battalion, (date unknown). The Royal Berkshire Regiment were generally known as ‘The Biscuit Boys ’ because the regimental depot, Brock Barracks was located at Reading, not far from the well known biscuit factory, Huntley and Palmers, who were biscuit suppliers to the British Army for many years. The 8th Battalion of the Royal Berkshire Regiment was a unit of one of Kitchener's New Armies created early in the war. It was in Chesham Villas, White Lion Road, Amersham Kitchener's 5th New Army, known, like the (Photo – H Garas 7 Aug 2014) others, by an abbreviation, in this case K5 "! which came into being on 10 December 1914. For most of their time in England they were linked to the 7th Battalion. They moved to huts at Sutton Veney near Warminster on 7 May 1915 after having spent most of the winter billeted in Reading.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of 119 Infantry Brigade in the Great War with Special Reference To
    The History of 119 Infantry Brigade in the Great War with Special Reference to the Command of Brigadier-General Frank Percy Crozier by Michael Anthony Taylor A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham September 2016 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract 119 Brigade, 40th Division, had an unusual origin as a ‘left-over’ brigade of the Welsh Army Corps and was the only completely bantam formation outside 35th Division. This study investigates the formation’s national identity and demonstrates that it was indeed strongly ‘Welsh’ in more than name until 1918. New data on the social background of men and officers is added to that generated by earlier studies. The examination of the brigade’s actions on the Western Front challenges the widely held belief that there was an inherent problem with this and other bantam formations. The original make-up of the brigade is compared with its later forms when new and less efficient units were introduced.
    [Show full text]