NEGATION AFFIXES in ENGLISH Dedy Subandowo Muhammadiyah

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NEGATION AFFIXES in ENGLISH Dedy Subandowo Muhammadiyah NEGATION AFFIXES IN ENGLISH Dedy Subandowo Muhammadiyah University of Metro Abstract: This research entitled "Negation Affixes in English". This study is aimed to describe the various negation affixes in English, morphological process, morphophonemic and meaning. The research data were taken from various sources of English grammar book, morphology, research journal and the book which relatees to the research. English grammar books used in this study are written by Otto Jesperson, Marcella Frank, Greenbaum and Geoffrey Leech. The method used in this research is the descriptive-qualitative method. While the data collection techniques are performed by using jot-down method. And the results of analysis are presented in tabular form and descriptive method. The result of the research shows that English has six types of negative affixes which are categorized by the intensity of its appearance, such as dis-, in-, non-, un-, anti- and -less. Based on the function, negation affixes are divided into several categories such as adjectives, nouns, verbs, and adverbs. The morphophonemic affix in- has four allomorphs, they are in-, im-, il- and ir- . While the analysis revealed that negation affixes have some basic meanings, such as ‘not’, ‘without’, and ‘anti’. Keyword: Negative Affixes, English, Morphology Introduction this topic. He sets out three types of Negation is not a new topic opposition of particular interest such which accured recently. It has been as contrariety, privation, and argued since Aristotle came out with contradiction. Aristotle says that the idea about logic. Aristotle clearly contradiction is the primary attaches the greatest importance to opposition, for it is sheer, 135 PREMISE JOURNAL ISSN 2089-3345-Vol.3 No. 2, October 2014 unintermediated opposition. But it is and easily-mastered, negation may and this may be crucial an opposition seem to be a simple concept. However, of statements, not of terms (and so, of the use of negation in our daily lives is things). To be sure, the asserted not as simple as it seems. Like stated propositions are indeed also about above, negation may be indicated by things. But Aristotle insists: gesture and other behaviors, such as, utterance. By gesture, we can show “...what underlies the affirmation and negation is not negation by shaking our head by the affirmation or negation for what underlies is in no way a moving it side to side. But it is not sentence. These things are, however, said to oppose each always the case. In other country with other as do affirmation and negation”. (EvaT.H. Brann different cultures, there are a lot of The way of Naysaying in http://books.google.co.id/books ways to show negation. Another way /the_way_of_naysaying) of negating is through the utterance. Negation is the act or an As we all know, in grammar, negation instance of denying (Rakhmania, is the process to transform an 2009:1). It is the opposite of a positive affirmative statement into its opposite character or quality. Almost as soon as (negative statement). we are born, we can use negation We often use a single word indicated by gesture or other behaviors ‘no’ to say that we do not have the that we reject, exclude or disagree with same idea as what has been said or something. Because it is so common asked. We use ‘not’ also to state 136 PREMISE JOURNAL ISSN 2089-3345-Vol.3 No. 2, October 2014 disagreement but it does not stand negative suffix –less (Dzuganova, alone, as in He is not running or He is 2006:332). not intelligent these come after a be and followed by verb (running) or 1. Negative Prefix dis- adjective (intelligent) etc. Jespersen (1960) writes: "the prefix dis- (from Latin) Affixal negation is a process of besides various other meanings word-formation, by which a new word also has that of a pure negative, as is built from a word stem, usually in dissimilar, dishonest, disagree, through the addition of an affix, either disuse, dislike, disbelieve, at the beginning (prefix) or the end of generally implying contrary rather the stem (suffix). A negative affix is an than contradictory opposition." The affix that opposes or negates a word negative prefix dis- is used most (Dzuganova, 2006:332). The word often with verbs and abstract disagree also denotes negation because nouns, as in the following it is the opposite of the word agree a examples: disobey - disobedience, positive idea which then be added by a disbelieve— disbelief, displease - prefix dis-, indicating negative idea. displeasure. Dis- added to Discussion adjectives makes them negative, The most frequently used e.g. dishonest, disloyal, and negative prefixes are: dis-, in-, non-, disobedient. un- and anti-. There is only one 137 PREMISE JOURNAL ISSN 2089-3345-Vol.3 No. 2, October 2014 2. Negative Prefix in- imbalanced, immature, immediate, The negative prefix in- immedicable, impatient, before added to adjectives means "not" words starting with the letter "l", (incompatible, incompetent, in- changes into il- as in illegal, independent, inorganic, illegible, illegitimate, illogical. The insufficient, intolerant, invalid); allomorphic ir- variety can be and added to nouns means added to some words beginning "without, lacking" (inaccuracy, with the consonant "r", e.g. inattention, incompatibility, irrational, irregular, ir- relevant, incompetence, innutrition, irreligious, irresponsible. (The insufficiency, intolerance). We Oxford Encyclopedic English have not found any verb negated Dictionary). by means of in-. According to the rules of 3. Negative Prefix non- Latin phonology the prefix in- can The prefix non-, which have four basic forms (called means "not", comes from Latin allomorphs), e.g. indecent, impos- non. The prefix was used primarily sible, illogical, irrational in Roman law terms, which were according to the beginning adopted into Old French and then consonant of the word to which it into English. Non- can be added to is added. Before the consonants /b/, almost any adjective. Some /m/, and /p/, in- becomes im-: examples include non-active, non- 138 PREMISE JOURNAL ISSN 2089-3345-Vol.3 No. 2, October 2014 breakable, non-defensive, non- strictly written with hyphen, today specific, nonessential, non- it is more and more written interrupted, non-irritating, and together with word it negates (very non-productive. Non- also com- frequent in American English), or bines with many nouns, as in both varieties are used (dzuganova, nonentity, nonresident, and non- 2006:334). violence. It never combines with According to Randolph verbs. Quirk et al (1985) the negative pre- It is interesting to note that fix non- means "not" or "absence the great majority of non-formed of something" and can be used adjectives are morphologically with adjectives, adverbs and nouns, complex words. Most of them end e.g. non-academic, non-economic, in -al, -ible, -ic, -ing, -ous, etc. nonessential, non-existent, non- This may be connected with the alcoholic, non-fatal; nonsmoker, fact that many simplex adjectives non-reader; non-essentially. It is (such as small, long) have obvious also used to form a neutral simplex antonyms. negative sense when a form in in- The spelling of the prefix or un- has a special sense or non-varies. In the older texts, usually unfavourable connotation dictionaries, textbooks, and other e.g. noncontroversial vs materials the prefix non- was uncontroversial; non-effectivex 139 PREMISE JOURNAL ISSN 2089-3345-Vol.3 No. 2, October 2014 ineffective; nonhuman x unhuman productive type are unbelievable, x inhuman. unacceptable, unachievable, unadvisable, etc. 4. Negative Prefix un- "Un-" is the native English It also attaches to adjectives prefix used for negation. The made of participles, as in un- negative prefix un- chiefly attaches bending, unending, unfailing, to simple adjectives with a native unfeeling, etc.; unborn, basis, e.g. unclean, uneven, unfair, unemployed, unfinished, unseen, unwise, unafraid, unfit. Many unstressed, untouched, unsaid etc. derived adjectives also take this Less frequently, this same prefix prefix. Denominal derivatives are attaches to nouns: unacceptance, chiefly characterized by the unbelief, unconcern, unharmony, suffixes -ed, -y, -ly, -ful, -al, -ish, - unhealth, unheroism, (i)ous, -worthy. Examples are: unintelligence, uninterruption, unprincipled, unlucky, unmotherly, unluck, unsuccess, unsatisfaction, unfaithful, unconditional, unrest, etc. unselfish, unceremonious, and Some words that take the untrustworthy. Deverbal un- prefix in their adjectival form derivatives are likewise common. may have a noun form that uses the They are all formed with the suffix negative prefix in-. Such -able. Some examples of this very combinations include: unable vs 140 PREMISE JOURNAL ISSN 2089-3345-Vol.3 No. 2, October 2014 inability, uncivil (ill-mannered, rude) vs incivility (lack of 6. Negative Suffix -less politeness), unequal vs inequality, The only negative suffix in unjust vs injustice, unstable vs English is the suffix -less. It comes instability. from the Old English word leas, meaning "without". In Old English 5. Negative Prefix Anti- and Middle English, -less was Negative prefiks anti- is often used to convey the negative derived from the Greek which or opposite of words ending in -ful, is used to denote the opposite as in careful - careless, colourful - of something. In general, anti- colourless, doubtful —doubtless, attached to nouns and fearful —fearless, fruitful —fruit- adjectives, such as anti- less, helpful - helpless, hopeful - submarine “against the hopeless, meaningful - meaning- submarines”, anti-aircraft less, useful - useless. ‘describes weapons, equipment or activities that are intended to destroy or defend against enemy aircraft’, anti-terrorist, antisocial, anti-clockwise Conclusion “direction opposite clockwise”, There are six affixes as and antifreeze. negation markers in English; dis-, in-, 141 PREMISE JOURNAL ISSN 2089-3345-Vol.3 No. 2, October 2014 non-, un-, anti-, and –less. There are ir- variety can be added to some words only two afixes that categorized into beginning with the consonants /r/. native English; un- and –less . Affixes Prefix in- has various meanings such dis- (Latin) found in adjectives, verbs as, not, opposite of , without and and abstract nouns.
Recommended publications
  • Noun Layers in Old English: Mismatches and Asym- Metry in Lexical Derivation
    Noun Layers in Old English: Mismatches and Asym- metry in Lexical Derivation Javier Martín Arista, University of La Rioja Abstract The aim of the article is to explain the form-function mismatches that occur in the formation of Old English nouns. The analysis identifies pairs of derived nouns that share a lexemic root and represent instances of near-synonymy. Two types of mismatch are found in the formation of nouns, namely convergent derivation due to the competition of suffixes and convergent derivation resulting from the competition of bases. Four types of asymmetry can be distinguished: on the grounds of process, category, productivity and recursivity. The existence of mismatches and the associated asymmetry indicate two waves of word-formation that configure two layers in the lexicon of Old English. Keywords: Old English, word-formation, lexical layers, mismatch, asymmetry 1. Introduction This article deals with lexical layering in Old English in terms of the coexistence of the outcome of different processes of word-formation and the form-function mismatches that arise in paradigmatic analysis. 1 The departure point for this research is the identification of such mismatches in pairs of nominal derivatives that share a lexemic root and convey a similar meaning while showing formal differences attributable to morphological processes of derivation. A mismatch in lexical derivation, therefore, is said to take place when a change in form resulting from a derivational process is not matched by a change in meaning. Two derivational processes are considered, namely affixation and zero derivation. Whereas the former involves the attachment of derivational prefixes or suffixes, as bēn ‘prayer’ (< bannan ‘to summon, to command’) and handlung ‘handling’ (< hand ‘hand’) respectively, the latter is characterized by the absence of any explicit morphemic ending, as is the case with fær ‘movement’ (< faran ‘to go’), or by the only presence of the inflectional morpheme required by the change in lexical 1 This research has been funded through the project FFI2011-29532.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing Words with Roots and Affixes Essential Question: How Can I Determine the Meaning of a Word Using Its Roots And/Or Affixes? TEK
    Analyzing Words with Roots and Affixes Essential Question: How can I determine the meaning of a word using its roots and/or affixes? TEK (2) Reading/Vocabulary Development. Students understand new vocabulary and use it when reading and writing. Students are expected to: (A) determine the meaning of grade-level academic English words derived from Latin, Greek, or other linguistic roots and affixes Vocabulary Affix – word part Root - word part added either to that gives the the beginning or word its primary end of a root (or meaning base word) to change its root meaning Vocabulary root prefix suffix Vocabulary incredible cred in- -ible not + believe + able to Vocabulary biography graph bio- -y life + write + condition of Root & Affix Flipbooks O Use the lists of prefixes, roots, and suffixes on the slides that follow to create vocabulary flip books. We will be using our flip books to practice analyzing and building different words. O On the front side of the card (hole in the top left-hand corner), write the root or affix. Try to add a picture or graphic, if can think of one, to help you remember the meaning. O On the back side of the card, write the definition of the word part, and at least two examples within-a-word. On my website, go to “STAAR Review Centers” on the right-side. Prefixes Root, Prefix or Meaning Examples Suffix antisocial, antiseptic, antithesis, antibody, anti, ant against, opposite antinomies, antifreeze, antipathy from, down, away, to do detach, deploy, derange, decrease, deodorize, de- the opposite, reverse, devoid, deflate, degenerate against out of, away from, exit, exhale, exclusive, exceed, explosion, ex- ex- lacking, former mayor exter-, extra-, external, extrinsic, extraordinary, extrapolate, outside of, beyond extro- extraneous, extrovert in, im into, on, near, towards instead, import illegible, irresolute, inaction, inviolate, in, im, il, ir not innocuous, intractable, innocent, impregnable, impossible, imposter Notice that some affixes have multiple meanings.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    The Genesis of Michif: A First Hypothesis PETER BAKKER University of Amsterdam Michif as a Mixed Language Since Richard Rhodes read the first paper on Michif at the Eighth Algon­ quian Conference in 1977, much work has been done on the language. A number of additional papers have been read at the Algonquian Conference (Weaver 1983; Rhodes 1985, 1987; Papen 1987) and others have been pub­ lished elsewhere (see Bakker 1989c for a bibliography). Most of this work focussed either on description or on the problem of genetic classification that this language poses. Michif remains an unusual language, with its verb phrase from Cree and its noun phrase from French. Does the language have two half grammars, and two phonological systems? Is it a Romance or an Algonquian language, or a Creole, a pidgin, a mixed language, or whatever? These are the questions that people have tried to answer. It is now probably agreed that Michif is a mixed language. It is a convincing case, even for those linguists who maintain that mixed languages do not exist. Its mixture is also unique: Michif has (Plains) Cree verbs and French nouns. No other language has a similar distribution of elements from two different languages. Nobody thus far has attempted to explain its genesis, although this is one of the more intriguing problems this language poses. In this paper1 I will present a preliminary answer to this question. The problem can be phrased as consisting of two sub-questions: first, why is Michif a mixed language? Second, why is the language mixed in this particular way? To Fie dwork on Cree and Michif were made possible with a Canadian Studies Graduate Student Award in 1987-1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Types and Functions of Reduplication in Palembang
    Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society JSEALS 12.1 (2019): 113-142 ISSN: 1836-6821, DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10524/52447 University of Hawaiʼi Press TYPES AND FUNCTIONS OF REDUPLICATION IN PALEMBANG Mardheya Alsamadani & Samar Taibah Wayne State University [email protected] & [email protected] Abstract In this paper, we study the morphosemantic aspects of reduplication in Palembang (also known as Musi). In Palembang, both content and function words undergo reduplication, generating a wide variety of semantic functions, such as pluralization, iteration, distribution, and nominalization. Productive reduplication includes full reduplication and reduplication plus affixation, while fossilized reduplication includes partial reduplication and rhyming reduplication. We employed the Distributed Morphology theory (DM) (Halle and Marantz 1993, 1994) to account for these different patterns of reduplication. Moreover, we compared the functions of Palembang reduplication to those of Malay and Indonesian reduplication. Some instances of function word reduplication in Palembang were not found in these languages, such as reduplication of question words and reduplication of negators. In addition, Palembang partial reduplication is fossilized, with only a few examples collected. In contrast, Malay partial reduplication is productive and utilized to create new words, especially words borrowed from English (Ahmad 2005). Keywords: Reduplication, affixation, Palembang/Musi, morphosemantics ISO 639-3 codes: mui 1 Introduction This paper has three purposes. The first is to document the reduplication patterns found in Palembang based on the data collected from three Palembang native speakers. Second, we aim to illustrate some shared features of Palembang reduplication with those found in other Malayic languages such as Indonesian and Malay. The third purpose is to provide a formal analysis of Palembang reduplication based on the Distributed Morphology Theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistics 1A Morphology 2 Complex Words
    Linguistics 1A Morphology 2 Complex words In the previous lecture we noted that words can be classified into different categories, such as verbs, nouns, adjectives, prepositions, determiners, and so on. We can make another distinction between word types as well, a distinction that cuts across these categories. Consider the verbs, nouns and adjectives in (1)-(3), respectively. It will probably be intuitively clear that the words in the (b) examples are complex in a way that the words in the (a) examples are not, and not just because the words in the (b) examples are, on the whole, longer. (1) a. to walk, to dance, to laugh, to kiss b. to purify, to enlarge, to industrialize, to head-hunt (2) a. house, corner, zebra b. collection, builder, sea horse (3) c. green, old, sick d. regional, washable, honey-sweet The words in the (a) examples in (1)-(3) do not have any internal structure. It does not seem to make much sense to say that walk , for example, consists of the smaller parts wa and lk . But for the words in the (b) examples this is different. These are built up from smaller parts that each contribute their own distinct bit of meaning to the whole. For example, builder consists of the verbal part build with its associated meaning, and the part –er that contributes a ‘doer’ reading, just as it does in kill-er , sell-er , doubt-er , and so on. Similarly, washable consists of wash and a part –able that contributes a meaning aspect that might be described loosely as ‘can be done’, as it does in refundable , testable , verifiable etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Affix Ordering in Optimal Construction Morphology
    John Benjamins Publishing Company This is a contribution from Morphological Metatheory. Edited by Daniel Siddiqi and Heidi Harley. © 2016. John Benjamins Publishing Company This electronic file may not be altered in any way. The author(s) of this article is/are permitted to use this PDF file to generate printed copies to be used by way of offprints, for their personal use only. Permission is granted by the publishers to post this file on a closed server which is accessible to members (students and staff) only of the author’s/s’ institute, it is not permitted to post this PDF on the open internet. For any other use of this material prior written permission should be obtained from the publishers or through the Copyright Clearance Center (for USA: www.copyright.com). Please contact [email protected] or consult our website: www.benjamins.com Tables of Contents, abstracts and guidelines are available at www.benjamins.com Affix ordering in Optimal Construction Morphology Sharon Inkelas University of California, Berkeley This paper sketches an integrated approach to affix ordering within Optimal Construction Morphology, a bottom-up, competition based model of word production in which each step of affixation is the optimal choice among competing possibilities (Caballero & Inkelas 2013). Optimality-theoretic models are natural fits for affix ordering, a complex phenomenon governed by a mix of conflicting universal and language-specific factors which interact differently in every language. This study covers familiar, global cross-linguistic principles such as semantic relevance (e.g., Bybee 1985) and scope (e.g., Baker 1988; Rice 2000), integrating them with local lexical selectional restrictions (e.g., Fabb 1988); it also incorporates usage-based factors such as Complexity-Based Ordering (e.g., Hay & Plag 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Halkomelem Salish
    University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 13 2007 Issue 1 Proceedings of the 30th Annual Penn Article 28 Linguistics Colloquium 2007 Requirements for a unified Binding Theory: Lessons from Halkomelem Salish Dennis R. Storoshenko Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl Recommended Citation Storoshenko, Dennis R. (2007) "Requirements for a unified Binding Theory: Lessons from Halkomelem Salish," University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 13 : Iss. 1 , Article 28. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol13/iss1/28 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol13/iss1/28 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Requirements for a unified Binding Theory: Lessons from Halkomelem Salish This working paper is available in University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol13/iss1/28 Requirements for a Unified Binding Theory: Lessons from Halkomelem Salish Dennis Ryan Storoshenko* 1 Introduction In characterizing the distribution of pronouns and reflexives in natural lan­ guage, two schools of thought are generally cited. One, which I will refer to as the structural approach, is based in the binding conditions of Chomsky (1981), as modified through later permutations of his syntactic theory. An­ other approach, defined in Reinhart and Reuland (1993 ), makes reference to predicate-argument structure; this will be identified as the predicate approach. In this paper, I present data on reflexivity and the distribution pronominals in Halkomelem Salish, demonstrating that neither the structural nor the predicate approach will accurately account for the phenomena observed. Once reached, this conclusion will feed further research into binding theory, outlining the phenomena a unified binding theory will need to capture.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction on the Class of Adlectives in Coast Tslmshlan1 Tonya N
    275 On the Class of Adlectives In Coast Tslmshlan1 description of Coast Tsimshian parts of speech is to be made. There are two basic issues associated with Tonya N. Stebbins developing an analysis of particles in Coa~t Tsimshian. Firstly we must consider their status in the lexicon; to University of Melbourne decide whether the particles are inflectional or derivational morphemes, or simply phonologically dependent words; and secondly we must find some way to distinguish grammatically defined subsets within the category. Introduction This study was motivated by an analysis of Coast Tsimshian parts-of-speech which is being undertaken in Particles require some account as they form a significant part of the lexical resources of the Coast Tsimshian connection with the preparation of a dictionary of Coast Tsimshian. The following discussion considers the language. Linguistic theory, particularly through the work of Zwicky (1985), and Zwicky & Pullum (1983) no relationship between the semantic class of Adjectival meanings and the grammatically defined class of longer accommodates acategorial parts of speech. The category of 'particles' is acategorial in that members of Adjectives in Coast Tsimshian. this category share no positive defining properties. In general, forms have made their way into this class by virtue of not clearly belonging anywhere else. This is often because the function and distribution of the particles The class of Adjectives does not occur as a large open class in aU languages. In this paper I will argue that is poorly understood. When Boas listed the particles of Coast Tsimshian. he made it clear that his analysis was Coast Tsimshian is a language which has a small closed Adjective cla~s (§ 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Give Example of Prefixes and Their Meaning
    Give Example Of Prefixes And Their Meaning Dawson remains grallatorial after Randy monetize downstairs or collogue any nodosities. Schematic Weslie waltz antiseptically or serry braggartly when Meredith is peopled. Ransacked Neall outhire very stereophonically while Kostas remains littler and unornamental. We cover the english the beginning or present work for the meaning of and example prefixes their quality as he does tbh mean Spanish conjugations is excellent of wool most difficult aspects of becoming fluent. In the partner word and prefixes. They cannot be special type of word better a prefix. Prefix Meaning Examples a- an- not without research no abyss anemia. In these cases, endear, to marble the pests in the fields and to kill his infant. These prefixes using these words into the amazon and also give a back and to help you to create new word. A prefix is same half word eg anti- ex- pre- added to the strand of a vent to discard its meaning Prefixes contrast. So that means that authors often clear old state university of meanings and example words for choosing this sense and usage. Prefix And Suffix Examples Sentence. Root Words Prefixes Suffixes Easy way learn English. Copyright the meaning of their definitions of an antithesis against each word and discuss the parameter used. Below the semantic network of meaning of educators, double letters are the meaning of terms. There still no absolute rules for when to veer a hyphen or liberate to balloon a. Relating this means just a meaning. Meaning Examples ad- to toward adapt di- apart diversity ex- away from extinction phyl-.
    [Show full text]
  • Variable Affix Order: Grammar and Learning
    VARIABLEAFFIX ORDER: GRAMMAR AND LEARNING Kevin M. Ryan University of California, Los Angeles While affix ordering often reflects general syntactic or semantic principles, it can also be arbi- trary or variable. This article develops a theory of morpheme ordering based on local morphotac- tic restrictions encoded as weighted bigram constraints. I examine the formal properties of morphotactic systems, including arbitrariness, nontransitivity, context-sensitivity, analogy, and variation. Several variable systems are surveyed before turning to a detailed corpus study of a vari- able affix in Tagalog. Bigram morphotactics is shown to cover Tagalog and the typology, while other formalisms, such as alignment, precedence, and position classes, undergenerate. Moreover, learning simulations reveal that affix ordering under bigram morphotactics is subject to analogical pressures, providing a learning-theoretic motivation for the specific patterns of variation observed in Tagalog. I raise a different set of objections to rule-based approaches invoking affix movement. Finally, I demonstrate that bigram morphotactics is restrictive, being unable to generate unattested scenarios such as nonlocal contingency in ordering.* Keywords: affix order, morphotactics, morphology, variation, Tagalog Though the order in which morphemes are realized within a word is sometimes predictable on general syntactic or semantic grounds, ordering can also be subject to language-specific constraints, or exhibit free variation. Without denying the roles of the interfaces in affix ordering, this article focuses on the grammar and learnability of its ar- bitrary aspects. The theory of morphotactics must cover phenomena such as countersco- pal or otherwise arbitrary ordering restrictions, nontransitivity (e.g. X-Y [*Y-X] and Y-Z [*Z-Y], but Z-X [*X-Z]), context-sensitivity (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Meanings and Functions of Inflectional Affixes of the Verbs in Bahasa Tamiang
    Meanings and Functions of Inflectional Affixes of the Verbs in Bahasa Tamiang Devi Pratiwy, Pardi, Asnani, M. Manugeren, Safitri Hariani and Sri Wulan Faculty of Literature, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia Keywords: Affix, Verbs, Meaning, Function, Bahasa Tamiang. Abstract: This paper is aimed to seek the functions and meaning of inflectional affixes in BahasaTamiang. By following Creswell (2017) the method applied in this analysis is qualitative research in which the data were gathered byconducting interview and participating observation. The data then were analyzed by using the immediate constituent analysis and paraphrase.The meaning of the arguments was found by following Chafe’s and Fillmore’s Case Grammar. The result of the analysis is that BahasaTamiang has some inflectional affixes to form verb in the morphological process; they are [N-], [be-], and [di-]. [N-] that can be realized into /n/, /m/, /ɳ/, /ɳ/, /ɳǝ/, ɳa/ according to the phonetic environment in which the affix is attached. Conjugation in inflectional morphology appeared in BT is diathesis and person. However, diathesis is more dominant than person. Person generally appears in passive verb in which the AGENT is the third person. 1 INTRODUCTION (see Bauer, 1988; Katamba, 2004), they are 1) a derivational affix can change the category of the Morphology in general consists of two sub fields; word attached, while inflectional affix cannot.,2) a inflectional and derivational morphology (see derivational affix may have an inconstant meaning, Bauer, 1988; Katamba, 2004; Widowsen, 1997; while the inflectional affix may have the constant Stump, 2001; and Aronof & Fudeman, 2005). In one, and 3) based on the general rule, a derivational inflectional and derivational morphology, affixes affix is less productive than the inflectional one.
    [Show full text]
  • ED311449.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 311 449 CS 212 093 AUTHOR Baron, Dennis TITLE Declining Grammar--and Other Essays on the English Vocabulary. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Ill. REPORT NO ISBN-0-8141-1073-8 PUB DATE 89 NOTE :)31p. AVAILABLE FROM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 Kenyon Rd., Urbana, IL 61801 (Stock No. 10738-3020; $9.95 member, $12.95 nonmember). PUB TYPE Books (010) -- Viewpoints (120) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC10 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *English; Gr&mmar; Higher Education; *Language Attitudes; *Language Usage; *Lexicology; Linguistics; *Semantics; *Vocabulary IDENTIFIERS Words ABSTRACT This book contains 25 essays about English words, and how they are defined, valued, and discussed. The book is divided into four sections. The first section, "Language Lore," examines some of the myths and misconceptions that affect attitudes toward language--and towards English in particular. The second section, "Language Usage," examines some specific questions of meaning and usage. Section 3, "Language Trends," examines some controversial r trends in English vocabulary, and some developments too new to have received comment before. The fourth section, "Language Politics," treats several aspects of linguistic politics, from special attempts to deal with the ethnic, religious, or sex-specific elements of vocabulary to the broader issues of language both as a reflection of the public consciousness and the U.S. Constitution and as a refuge for the most private forms of expression. (MS) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY J. Maxwell TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)." U S.
    [Show full text]