DOCSLIB.ORG

Tos Site Characterization Report: Domain 18

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tos Site Characterization Report: Domain 18 Title: TOS Site Characterizaon Report: Domain 18 Date: 11/20/2018 NEON Doc. #: NEON.DOC.003901 Author: R.Krauss Revision: B TOS SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT: DOMAIN 18 PREPARED BY ORGANIZATION DATE Rachel Krauss SCI 05/14/2018 Courtney Meier SCI 05/14/2018 Michael Paerson SCI 01/27/2017 Oliver Smith SCI 10/27/2017 APPROVALS ORGANIZATION APPROVAL DATE Kate Thibault SCI 11/14/2018 Mike Stewart SYS 11/14/2018 RELEASED BY ORGANIZATION RELEASE DATE Judy Salazar CM 11/20/2018 See configuraon management system for approval history. The Naonal Ecological Observatory Network is a project solely funded by the Naonal Science Foundaon and managed under cooperave agreement by Baelle. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendaons expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Naonal Science Foundaon. Template_NEON.DOC.004243 Rev H Title: TOS Site Characterizaon Report: Domain 18 Date: 11/20/2018 NEON Doc. #: NEON.DOC.003901 Author: R.Krauss Revision: B CHANGE RECORD REVISION DATE ECO# DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE A 03/05/2018 ECO-05392 Inial Release • Added percent cover of bryophyte to the plant diversity table B 11/20/2018 ECO-05657 • Added range of core depths to BARR Below- ground Biomass Tables Template_NEON.DOC.004243 Rev H Title: TOS Site Characterizaon Report: Domain 18 Date: 11/20/2018 NEON Doc. #: NEON.DOC.003901 Author: R.Krauss Revision: B TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 DESCRIPTION 1 1.1 Purpose .............................................. 1 1.2 Scope ................................................ 1 2 RELATED DOCUMENTS AND ACRONYMS 1 2.1 Applicable Documents ....................................... 1 2.2 Reference Documents ....................................... 1 2.3 Acronyms .............................................. 2 3 DOMAIN 18 OVERVIEW: TUNDRA DOMAIN 3 4 CORE SITE- TOOLIK (TOOL) 4 4.1 TOS Spaal Sampling Design .................................... 6 4.2 Sampling Season Characterizaon: TOOL .............................. 10 4.3 Belowground Biomass ....................................... 12 4.3.1 Site-Specific Methods .................................... 12 4.4 Plant Characterizaon and Phenology Species Selecon ...................... 12 4.4.1 Site-Specific Methods .................................... 12 4.4.2 Results ........................................... 12 4.5 Beetles ............................................... 16 4.5.1 Site-Specific Methods .................................... 16 4.5.2 Results ........................................... 16 4.6 Mosquitoes ............................................. 19 4.6.1 Site-Specific Methods .................................... 19 4.6.2 Results ........................................... 19 4.7 Ticks ................................................ 20 4.7.1 Site-Specific Methods .................................... 20 4.8 Species Reference Lists ....................................... 20 5 RELOCATABLE SITE 1- BARROW ENVIRONMENTAL OBSERVATORY (BARR) 22 5.1 TOS Spaal Sampling Design .................................... 23 5.2 Sampling Season Characterizaon: BARR .............................. 27 5.3 Belowground Biomass ....................................... 29 5.3.1 Site-Specific Methods .................................... 29 5.3.2 Results ........................................... 29 5.4 Plant Characterizaon and Phenology Species Selecon ...................... 31 5.4.1 Site-Specific Methods .................................... 31 5.4.2 Results ........................................... 32 5.5 Species Reference Lists ....................................... 34 6 REFERENCES 35 7 APPENDIX A: DATA PRODUCT NUMBERS 35 i Title: TOS Site Characterizaon Report: Domain 18 Date: 11/20/2018 NEON Doc. #: NEON.DOC.003901 Author: R.Krauss Revision: B LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Table 1 NLCD land cover classes and area within the TOS site boundary at TOOL. ........... 7 Table 2 NLCD land cover classes and TOS plot numbers at TOOL. ................... 8 Table 3 Number of Distributed Base Plots per NLCD land cover class per protocol at TOOL. ...... 8 Table 4 Number of Tower Plots per protocol at TOOL. ......................... 9 Table 5 Average MODIS-EVI greenness dates for the NEON TOOL site, based on data from 2003-2013 (DOY, with MM/DD in parentheses). ................................ 11 Table 6 Site plant characterizaon and phenology species summary at TOOL. ............. 12 Table 7 Per plot breakdown of species richness, diversity, and herbaceous cover at TOOL. ...... 15 Table 8 Beetle idenficaon results at TOOL. ............................. 16 Table 9 Mosquito idenficaon results at TOOL. ........................... 20 Table 10 NLCD land cover classes and area within the TOS site boundary at BARR. ........... 25 Table 11 NLCD land cover classes and TOS plot numbers at BARR. ................... 26 Table 12 Number of Distributed Base plots per NLCD land cover class per protocol at BARR. ...... 26 Table 13 Number of Tower Plots per protocol at BARR. ......................... 27 Table 14 Average MODIS-EVI greenness dates for the NEON BARR site, based on data from 2003-2013 (DOY, with MM/DD in parentheses). ................................ 28 Table 15 Fine root mass per depth increment (cm) at BARR. ...................... 30 Table 16 Cumulave fine root mass as a funcon of depth (cm) at BARR. ................ 30 Table 17 Fine root biomass sampling summary data at BARR. ..................... 31 Table 18 Site plant characterizaon and phenology species summary at BARR. ............. 32 Table 19 Per plot breakdown of species richness, diversity, and herbaceous cover at BARR. ...... 33 Table 20 NEON data product names and descripons. ......................... 36 Figure 1 NEON project map with Domain 18 highlighted in red. .................... 3 Figure 2 Site boundaries within Domain 18. .............................. 4 Figure 3 Phenocamera image for TOOL. The phenocamera is located at the top of the NEON tower and faces north. Phenocamera images are available at hps://phenocam.sr.unh.edu/webcam/network/table/. ...................... 5 Figure 4 Map of TOS plot centroids within the NEON TOS sampling boundary at TOOL. ........ 6 Figure 5 Map of the tower airshed and TOS plot centroids at TOOL. .................. 7 Figure 6 MODIS-EVI greenness (y-axis = EVI rao) as a funcon of me (x-axis = DOY) for the years 2003-2013 at the NEON TOOL site. ................................. 11 Figure 7 Phenocamera image for BARR. The phenocamera is located at the top of the NEON tower and faces north. Phenocamera images are available at hps://phenocam.sr.unh.edu/webcam/network/table/. ...................... 22 Figure 8 Map of TOS plot centroids within the NEON TOS sampling boundary at BARR. ........ 24 Figure 9 Map of the tower airshed and TOS plot centroids at BARR. .................. 25 Figure 10 MODIS-EVI greenness (y-axis = EVI rao) as a funcon of me (x-axis = DOY) for the years 2003-2013 at the NEON BARR site. ................................. 28 Figure 11 Cumulave root mass by core depth at BARR. ........................ 31 ii Title: TOS Site Characterizaon Report: Domain 18 Date: 11/20/2018 NEON Doc. #: NEON.DOC.003901 Author: R.Krauss Revision: B 1 DESCRIPTION 1.1 Purpose Domain and site-specific informaon collected and described here is used to inform the execuon of protocols for the NEON Terrestrial Observaon System (TOS), and complements the official NEON TOS data products generated from each site. In addion, the TOS spaal layout and plot allocaon is described for each site within the domain. 1.2 Scope This document includes any site specific characterizaon methods and the results of characterizaon efforts for each of the two sites in the Tundra domain. For more informaon about the sampling methods, reference the TOS Site Characterizaon Methods Document (RD[06]). The geographic coordinates for all TOS sampling locaons can be found in the Reference Documents area of the NEON Data Portal and are provided with TOS data product downloads. 2 RELATED DOCUMENTS AND ACRONYMS 2.1 Applicable Documents Applicable documents contain informaon that shall be applied in the current document. Examples are higher level requirements documents, standards, rules and regulaons. AD[01] NEON.DOC.004300 EHSS Policy, Program, and Management Plan AD[02] NEON.DOC.050005 Field Operaons Job Instrucon Training Plan AD[03] NEON.DOC.000909 TOS Science Design for Ground Beetle Abundance and Diversity AD[04] NEON.DOC.000910 TOS Science Design for Mosquito Abundance, Diversity and Phenology AD[05] NEON.DOC.000912 TOS Science Design for Plant Diversity AD[06] NEON.DOC.000915 TOS Science Design for Small Mammal Abundance and Diversity AD[07] NEON.DOC.000914 TOS Science Design for Plant Biomass and Producvity AD[08] NEON.DOC.000001 NEON Observatory Design 2.2 Reference Documents Reference documents contain informaon complemenng, explaining, detailing, or otherwise supporng the in- formaon included in the current document. Page 1 of 37 Title: TOS Site Characterizaon Report: Domain 18 Date: 11/20/2018 NEON Doc. #: NEON.DOC.003901 Author: R.Krauss Revision: B RD[01] NEON.DOC.000008 NEON Acronym List RD[02] NEON.DOC.000243 NEON Glossary of Terms RD[03] NEON.DOC.000913 TOS Science Design for Spaal Sampling RD[04] NEON.DOC.011050 TIS Site Characterizaon Report RD[05] NEON.DOC.001671 AIS Site Characterizaon Report RD[06] NEON.DOC.003885 TOS Site Characterizaon Methods RD[07] NEON.DOC.000481 TOS Protocol and Procedure: Small Mammal Sampling RD[08] NEON.DOC.014041 TOS Protocol and Procedure: Breeding Landbird
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wild Species 2010 the GENERAL STATUS of SPECIES in CANADA
    Wild Species 2010 THE GENERAL STATUS OF SPECIES IN CANADA Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council National General Status Working Group This report is a product from the collaboration of all provincial and territorial governments in Canada, and of the federal government. Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council (CESCC). 2011. Wild Species 2010: The General Status of Species in Canada. National General Status Working Group: 302 pp. Available in French under title: Espèces sauvages 2010: La situation générale des espèces au Canada. ii Abstract Wild Species 2010 is the third report of the series after 2000 and 2005. The aim of the Wild Species series is to provide an overview on which species occur in Canada, in which provinces, territories or ocean regions they occur, and what is their status. Each species assessed in this report received a rank among the following categories: Extinct (0.2), Extirpated (0.1), At Risk (1), May Be At Risk (2), Sensitive (3), Secure (4), Undetermined (5), Not Assessed (6), Exotic (7) or Accidental (8). In the 2010 report, 11 950 species were assessed. Many taxonomic groups that were first assessed in the previous Wild Species reports were reassessed, such as vascular plants, freshwater mussels, odonates, butterflies, crayfishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. Other taxonomic groups are assessed for the first time in the Wild Species 2010 report, namely lichens, mosses, spiders, predaceous diving beetles, ground beetles (including the reassessment of tiger beetles), lady beetles, bumblebees, black flies, horse flies, mosquitoes, and some selected macromoths. The overall results of this report show that the majority of Canada’s wild species are ranked Secure.
    [Show full text]
  • Boreal Ground-Beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Assemblages of the Mainland and Islands in Lac La Ronge, Saskatchewan, Canada
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316781970 Boreal ground-beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages of the mainland and islands in Lac la Ronge, Saskatchewan, Canada Article in The Canadian Entomologist · May 2017 DOI: 10.4039/tce.2017.12 CITATIONS READS 2 164 4 authors, including: Aaron J. Bell Iain David Phillips University of Saskatchewan Saskatchewan Water Security Agency 18 PUBLICATIONS 23 CITATIONS 57 PUBLICATIONS 333 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Scott Nielsen University of Alberta 188 PUBLICATIONS 6,015 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Grizzly bear response to disturbance View project Grizzly bear population dynamics in a changing world View project All content following this page was uploaded by Aaron J. Bell on 07 November 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. 1 Boreal ground-beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages of the mainland and islands in Lac la Ronge, Saskatchewan, Canada Aaron J. Bell,1 Iain D. Phillips, Scott E. Nielsen, John R. Spence Abstract—We tested the applicability of the “passive sampling” hypothesis and theory of island biogeography (TIB) for explaining the diversity of forest-dwelling carabid assemblages (Carabidae: Coleoptera) on 30 forested islands (0.2–980.7 ha) in Lac la Ronge and the adjacent mainland in Saskatchewan, Canada. Species richness per unit area increased with distance to mainland with diversity being highest on the most isolated islands. We detected neither a positive species-area relationship, nor significant differences in species richness among island size classes, or between islands and the mainland.
    [Show full text]
  • AKES Newsletter 2016
    Newsletter of the Alaska Entomological Society Volume 9, Issue 1, April 2016 In this issue: A history and update of the Kenelm W. Philip Col- lection, currently housed at the University of Alaska Museum ................... 23 Announcing the UAF Entomology Club ...... 1 The Blackberry Skeletonizer, Schreckensteinia fes- Bombus occidentalis in Alaska and the need for fu- taliella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Schreckensteini- ture study (Hymenoptera: Apidae) ........ 2 idae) in Alaska ................... 26 New findings of twisted-wing parasites (Strep- Northern spruce engraver monitoring in wind- siptera) in Alaska .................. 6 damaged forests in the Tanana River Valley of Asian gypsy moths and Alaska ........... 9 Interior Alaska ................... 28 Non-marine invertebrates of the St. Matthew Is- An overview of ongoing research: Arthropod lands, Bering Sea, Alaska ............. 11 abundance and diversity at Olive-sided Fly- Food review: Urocerus flavicornis (Fabricius) (Hy- catcher nest sites in interior Alaska ........ 29 menoptera: Siricidae) ............... 20 Glocianus punctiger (Sahlberg, 1835) (Coleoptera: The spruce aphid, a non-native species, is increas- Curculionidae) common in Soldotna ....... 32 ing in range and activity throughout coastal Review of the ninth annual meeting ........ 34 Alaska ........................ 21 Upcoming Events ................... 37 Announcing the UAF Entomology Club by Adam Haberski nights featuring classic “B-movie” horror films. Future plans include an entomophagy bake sale, summer collect- I am pleased to announce the formation of the Univer- ing trips, and sending representatives to the International sity of Alaska Fairbanks Entomology Club. The club was Congress of Entomology in Orlando Florida this Septem- conceived by students from the fall semester entomology ber. course to bring together undergraduate and graduate stu- The Entomology Club would like to collaborate with dents with an interest in entomology.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]
  • Late Neogene Insect and Other Invertebrate Fossils from Alaska and Arctic/Subarctic Canada
    Invertebrate Zoology, 2019, 16(2): 126–153 © INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY, 2019 Late Neogene insect and other invertebrate fossils from Alaska and Arctic/Subarctic Canada J.V. Matthews, Jr.1, A. Telka2, S.A. Kuzmina3* 1 Terrain Sciences Branch, Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0E8. Present address: 1 Red Maple Lane, Hubley, N.S., Canada B3Z 1A5. 2 PALEOTEC Services – Quaternary and late Tertiary plant macrofossil and insect fossil analyses, 1-574 Somerset St. West, Ottawa, Ontario K1R 5K2, Canada. 3 Laboratory of Arthropods, Borissiak Paleontological Institute, RAS, Profsoyuznaya 123, Moscow, 117868, Russia. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] * corresponding author ABSTRACT: This report concerns macro-remains of arthropods from Neogene sites in Alaska and northern Canada. New data from known or recently investigated localities are presented and comparisons made with faunas from equivalent latitudes in Asia and Greenland. Many of the Canadian sites belong to the Beaufort Formation, a prime source of late Tertiary plant and insect fossils. But new sites are continually being discovered and studied and among the most informative of these are several from the high terrace gravel on Ellesmere Island. One Ellesmere Island locality, known informally as the “Beaver Peat” contains spectacularly well preserved plant and arthropod fossils, and is the only Pliocene site in Arctic North America to yield a variety of vertebrate fossils. Like some of the other “keystone” localities discussed here, it promises to be important for dating and correlation as well as for documenting high Arctic climatic and environmental conditions during the Pliocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocene Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction Based on Fossil Beetle Faunas from the Altai-Xinjiang Region, China
    Holocene palaeoenvironmental reconstruction based on fossil beetle faunas from the Altai-Xinjiang region, China Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of London By Tianshu Zhang February 2018 Department of Geography, Royal Holloway, University of London Declaration of Authorship I Tianshu Zhang hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: Date: 25/02/2018 1 Abstract This project presents the results of the analysis of fossil beetle assemblages extracted from 71 samples from two peat profiles from the Halashazi Wetland in the southern Altai region of northwest China. The fossil assemblages allowed the reconstruction of local environments of the early (10,424 to 9500 cal. yr BP) and middle Holocene (6374 to 4378 cal. yr BP). In total, 54 Coleoptera taxa representing 44 genera and 14 families have been found, and 37 species have been identified, including a new species, Helophorus sinoglacialis. The majority of the fossil beetle species identified are today part of the Siberian fauna, and indicate cold steppe or tundra ecosystems. Based on the biogeographic affinities of the fossil faunas, it appears that the Altai Mountains served as dispersal corridor for cold-adapted (northern) beetle species during the Holocene. Quantified temperature estimates were made using the Mutual Climate Range (MCR) method. In addition, indicator beetle species (cold adapted species and bark beetles) have helped to identify both cold and warm intervals, and moisture conditions have been estimated on the basis of water associated species.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Wild Species General Status Listing 2010
    Fish & Wildlife Division Sustainable Resource Development Alberta Wild Species General Status Listing - 2010 Species at Risk ELCODE Group ID Scientific Name Common Name Status 2010 Status 2005 Status 2000 Background Lichens Cladonia cenotea Powdered Funnel Lichen Secure Cladonia cervicornis Lichens Ladder Lichen Secure verticillata Lichens Cladonia chlorophaea Mealy Pixie-cup Lichen Secure Lichens Cladonia coccifera Eastern Boreal Pixie-cup Lichen Undetermined Lichens Cladonia coniocraea Common Pixie Powderhorn Secure Lichens Cladonia cornuta Bighorn Pixie Lichen Secure Lichens Cladonia cornuta cornuta Bighorn Pixie Lichen Secure Lichens Cladonia crispata Organpipe Lichen Secure Lichens Cladonia cristatella British Soldiers Lichen Secure Cladonia Lichens Mealy Pixie-cup Lichen Undetermined cryptochlorophaea Lichens Cladonia cyanipes Blue-footed Pixie Lichen Sensitive Lichens Cladonia deformis Lesser Sulphur-cup Lichen Secure Lichens Cladonia digitata Fingered Pixie-cup Lichen May Be At Risk Lichens Cladonia ecmocyna Orange-footed Pixie Lichen Secure Lichens Cladonia fimbriata Trumpeting Lichen Secure Lichens Cladonia furcata Forking Lichen Sensitive Lichens Cladonia glauca Glaucous Pixie Lichen May Be At Risk Lichens Cladonia gracilis gracilis Gracile Lichen May Be At Risk Lichens Cladonia gracilis turbinata Bronzed Lichen Secure Lichens Cladonia grayi Gray's Pixie-cup Lichen May Be At Risk Lichens Cladonia humilis Humble Pixie-cup Lichen Undetermined Lichens Cladonia macilenta Lipstick Powderhorn Lichen Secure Cladonia macilenta Lichens
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Peter W
    30 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 42, Nos. 1 & 2 An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Peter W. Messer1 Abstract A survey of Carabidae in the state of Wisconsin, U.S.A. yielded 87 species new to the state and incorporated 34 species previously reported from the state but that were not included in an earlier catalogue, bringing the total number of species to 489 in an annotated checklist. Collection data are provided in full for the 87 species new to Wisconsin but are limited to county occurrences for 187 rare species previously known in the state. Recent changes in nomenclature pertinent to the Wisconsin fauna are cited. ____________________ The Carabidae, commonly known as ‘ground beetles’, with 34, 275 described species worldwide is one of the three most species-rich families of extant beetles (Lorenz 2005). Ground beetles are often chosen for study because they are abun- dant in most terrestrial habitats, diverse, taxonomically well known, serve as sensitive bioindicators of habitat change, easy to capture, and morphologically pleasing to the collector. North America north of Mexico accounts for 2635 species which were listed with their geographic distributions (states and provinces) in the catalogue by Bousquet and Larochelle (1993). In Table 4 of the latter refer- ence, the state of Wisconsin was associated with 374 ground beetle species. That is more than the surrounding states of Iowa (327) and Minnesota (323), but less than states of Illinois (452) and Michigan (466). The total count for Minnesota was subsequently increased to 433 species (Gandhi et al. 2005). Wisconsin county distributions are known for 15 species of tiger beetles (subfamily Cicindelinae) (Brust 2003) with collection records documented for Tetracha virginica (Grimek 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • (Insecta, Coleoptera) В Фауне Арктики. Сообщение 1
    ЗООЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ ЖУРНАЛ, 2014, том 93, № 1, с. 7–44 ЭКОЛОГИЯ И ЗООГЕОГРАФИЯ УДК 595.76 ОТРЯД ЖЕСТКОКРЫЛЫХ (INSECTA, COLEOPTERA) В ФАУНЕ АРКТИКИ. СООБЩЕНИЕ 1. СОСТАВ ФАУНЫ © 2014 г. Ю. И. Чернов1, О. Л. Макарова1, Л. Д. Пенев2, О. А. Хрулёва1 1 Институт проблем экологии и эволюции им. А.Н. Северцова РАН, Москва 119071, Россия e(mail: [email protected] e(mail: oa([email protected] 2 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, София, Болгария e(mail: [email protected] Поступила в редакцию 01.09.2013 г. Жесткокрылые, крупнейший отряд насекомых, в условиях Арктики уступают двукрылым первен ство в полноте освоения среды. На долю Coleoptera приходится около 13% энтомофауны тундровой зоны, однако несколько семейств жуков сохраняют в высоких широтах значительное видовое раз нообразие и существенную ценотическую роль. В этом сообщении мы даем обзор циркумполярной колеоптерофауны Арктики. На основе оригинальных данных, литературных сведений и фондовых коллекционных материалов с использованием экстраполяций и аналогий отмечены особенности таксономического и экологического разнообразия подотрядов, серий и семейств Coleoptera, про анализированы широтнозональное распределение и северные пределы распространения видов, специфика адаптаций и ценотических связей. Ключевые слова: Арктика, жуки, природная зональность, видовое разнообразие, ареал, адаптации. DOI: 10.7868/S004451341401005X Жесткокрылые (Coleoptera) – самый крупный основных широтных трендов параметров их раз отряд насекомых, включающий почти 386500 ви нообразия. дов (Slipinski et al., 2011). На его долю приходится Накопленные к настоящему времени данные почти 40% видов класса. Доминирование этого свидетельствуют о том, что в фауне Арктики на отряда в энтомофауне наиболее отчетливо в теп долю жесткокрылых приходится около 13% видо лых поясах, в тропиках и субтропиках. В умерен вого богатства насекомых, в северной полосе ном поясе жесткокрылые составляют треть видо тундровой зоны их доля снижается до 4%, а в по вого богатства насекомых.
    [Show full text]
  • 425-438 (Filippov).Pmd
    Russian Entomol. J. 16(4): 425438 © RUSSIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2007 Æèçíåííûå öèêëû íåêîòîðûõ âèäîâ æóæåëèö (Ñoleoptera: Ñarabidae) â þæíîé òóíäðå Life cycles of some species of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the south tundra Á.Þ. Ôèëèïïîâ B.Yu. Filippov Ïîìîðñêèé ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé óíèâåðñèòåò, ïðîñï. Ëîìîíîñîâà 4, Àðõàíãåëüñê 163006, Ðîññèÿ. E-mail: [email protected] Pomor State University, Prosp. Lomonosova 4, Arkhangelsk 163006, Russia. ÊËÞ×ÅÂÛÅ ÑËÎÂÀ: Æóæåëèöû, æèçíåííûå öèêëû, ðàçâèòèå, þæíàÿ òóíäðà, Àðêòèêà. KEY WORDS: carabid beetles, life cycles, development, southern tundra, Arctic. ÐÅÇÞÌÅ. Èçó÷åíû æèçíåííûå öèêëû 20 âèäîâ âðåìåíè ïîêàçàíî, ÷òî ïðè ñîêðàùåíèè äîëè ãåìè- æóæåëèö â òóíäðîâîé çîíå ïîëóîñòðîâà Êàíèí. Ïî ìåòàáîëè÷åñêèõ âèäîâ â çàïîëÿðíûõ ðàéîíàõ [Êóç- ñðàâíåíèþ ñ áîëåå þæíûìè ðåãèîíàìè â òóíäðå íåöîâ, 1938] ó íàñåêîìûõ ïðîÿâëÿþòñÿ äâå àäàï- íàáëþäàåòñÿ ñîêðàùåíèå âàðèàíòîâ æèçíåííûõ òèâíûå ñòðàòåãèè æèçíåííûõ öèêëîâ. Ïåðâàÿ èç öèêëîâ æóæåëèö. Íàèáîëüøåå ÷èñëî âèäîâ â þæ- íèõ çàêëþ÷àåòñÿ â óñêîðåíèè ðàçâèòèÿ, ÷òî îáåñ- íûõ òóíäðàõ èìåþò îäíîãîäè÷íûé âåñåííèé èëè ïå÷èâàåò óñïåøíîå ïðîõîæäåíèå ñòàäèé îíòîãå- äâóõëåòíèé æèçíåííûé öèêë. Ïðè ýòîì îòìå÷àåò- íåçà äî íàñòóïëåíèÿ õîëîäíîãî ïåðèîäà. Âòîðàÿ ñÿ îäèí ïèê àêòèâíîñòè â íà÷àëå âåãåòàöèîííîãî ñîñòîèò â óäëèíåíèè ðàçâèòèÿ äî äâóõ è áîëåå ëåò ñåçîíà, ñâÿçàííûé ñ ðàçìíîæåíèåì. Ó âèäîâ ñ øè- [×åðíîâ, 1978]. Ó æóæåëèö óìåðåííûõ øèðîò âû- ðîêèìè àðåàëàìè è âåñåííèì âàðèàíòîì îäíîãî- äåëåíî äâà òèïà ðàçâèòèÿ ñ ðàçìíîæåíèåì âåñíîé äè÷íîãî æèçíåííîãî öèêëà íà ñåâåðå ñîõðàíÿåòñÿ è çèìîâêîé èìàãî, è ñ ðàçìíîæåíèåì îñåíüþ è èñõîäíûé òèï ðàçâèòèÿ, íî ñîêðàùàåòñÿ ïåðèîä çèìîâêîé ëè÷èíîê [Larsson, 1939; Lindroth, 1992]. ðàçìíîæåíèÿ. Áîëüøèíñòâî îäíîãîäè÷íûõ âèäîâ Íà ñåâåðå, âñëåäñòâèå êîðîòêîãî âåãåòàöèîííîãî ñ îñåííèì ðàçìíîæåíèåì â òóíäðå ïåðåõîäÿò ê ñåçîíà, îòìå÷àåòñÿ ñáëèæåíèå ïåðèîäîâ àêòèâíîñ- äâóõëåòíåìó ðàçâèòèþ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bering Land Bridge: a Moisture Barrier to the Dispersal of Steppe–Tundra Biota?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RERO DOC Digital Library Quaternary Science Reviews 27 (2008) 2473–2483 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev The Bering Land Bridge: a moisture barrier to the dispersal of steppe–tundra biota? Scott A. Elias*, Barnaby Crocker Geography Department, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK article info abstract Article history: The Bering Land Bridge (BLB) connected the two principal arctic biological refugia, Western and Eastern Received 14 April 2008 Beringia, during intervals of lowered sea level in the Pleistocene. Fossil evidence from lowland BLB Received in revised form 9 September 2008 organic deposits dating to the Last Glaciation indicates that this broad region was dominated by shrub Accepted 11 September 2008 tundra vegetation, and had a mesic climate. The dominant ecosystem in Western Beringia and the interior regions of Eastern Beringia was steppe–tundra, with herbaceous plant communities and arid climate. Although Western and Eastern Beringia shared many species in common during the Late Pleistocene, there were a number of species that were restricted to only one side of the BLB. Among the vertebrate fauna, the woolly rhinoceros was found only to the west of the BLB, North American camels, bonnet-horned musk-oxen and some horse species were found only to the east of the land bridge. These were all steppe–tundra inhabitants, adapted to grazing. The same phenomenon can be seen in the insect faunas of the Western and Eastern Beringia.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Forest Productivity Across Alaska Consistent with Biome Shift
    Ecology Letters, (2011) doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01598.x LETTER Changes in forest productivity across Alaska consistent with biome shift Abstract Pieter S. A. Beck,1* Glenn P. Juday,2 Global vegetation models predict that boreal forests are particularly sensitive to a biome shift during the 21st Claire Alix,3 Valerie A. Barber,2 century. This shift would manifest itself first at the biomeÕs margins, with evergreen forest expanding into Stephen E. Winslow,2 Emily E. current tundra while being replaced by grasslands or temperate forest at the biomeÕs southern edge. Sousa,2 Patricia Heiser,2 James D. We evaluated changes in forest productivity since 1982 across boreal Alaska by linking satellite estimates of Herriges4 and Scott J. Goetz1 primary productivity and a large tree-ring data set. Trends in both records show consistent growth increases at the boreal–tundra ecotones that contrast with drought-induced productivity declines throughout interior Alaska. These patterns support the hypothesized effects of an initiating biome shift. Ultimately, tree dispersal rates, habitat availability and the rate of future climate change, and how it changes disturbance regimes, are expected to determine where the boreal biome will undergo a gradual geographic range shift, and where a more rapid decline. Keywords Boreal forests, drought, evergreen forests, global warming, high latitudes, NDVI, productivity, remote sensing, tree rings. Ecology Letters (2011) agreement with model outputs (Forbes et al. 2010). Populations of far INTRODUCTION northern trees in cold marginal environments have sustained positive Over the 21st century, dynamic global vegetation models predict that growth responses to temperature, and in recent decades have grown at the boreal biome is likely to experience forest conversion and losses their greatest recorded rates (Juday et al.
    [Show full text]