DOCSLIB.ORG

More Miles to Go for Rail and Highway Jobs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
More Miles to Go for Rail and Highway Jobs May 7, 2012 REGION AL MALAYSIA CONSTRUCTION SHORT TERM (3 MTH) LONG TERM SINGAPORE INDONESIA THAILAND PHILIPPINES CHINA, HONG KONG Conviction Notes from the Field More miles to go for rail and highway jobs The local construction scene remains buoyant as a slew of rail and highway projects are set to be awarded in the medium term. A couple of other projects could also come onstream if they pass feasibility tests and if political factors are favourable. Sharizan Rosely T (60) 3 20849864 Figure 1: Major transport infra jobs E [email protected] Projects Total cost/est. Status MRT SBK line RM20bn Awards in progress “The PDP will speed up MRT 2 (circle line) & MRT 3 c.RM40bn Detailed feasibility study in 2H12 West Coast Expressway (WCE) RM7.1bn Pending signing of CA the award of the Suke - highway RM1.6-2.4bn Under study remaining elevated Dash - highway RM1-1.6bn Under study Kidex- highway RM2.2bn Under study packages of MRT SBK line High Speed Rail (KL-S'pore) RM30bn Detailed feasibility study in 2H12 from Oct-12 to early SOURCES: CIMB, COMPANY REPORTS 3Q12.” Job awards will continue to be led by ─ A source in PDP Indications of timing the MRT SBK line packages. We Feasibility studies for MRT 2 & 3 and expect newsflow to be good in 2H12. the high speed rail (HSR) will be in This continues to anchor our Trading full swing in 2H12 and decisions are Buy stance on the sector, which is not likely by year-end. MRT Corp will an Overweight because of political award the remaining elevated risk. Gamuda and IJM Corp are still packages for the SBK line by early our top picks. 3Q12. Driven by the MRT, job awards Transport infrastructure goes in 2012 could total RM20bn-25bn compared to RM8.7bn in 2010 and beyond KVMRT RM8.1bn last year. Of the total In this report, we focus on the outlook RM13.2bn awards YTD, 81% or for large-scale rail and highway RM10.7bn was for rail-related works. projects and show that traffic alleviation/dispersal initiatives under Potential winners the 10MP and ETP go beyond the Potential winners of the remaining KVMRT. Working on either the cost packages of the elevated portion of Highlighted Companies quoted in the press or the benchmark the MRT SBK line are the 28 IJM Corp cost/km, we estimate the highway prequalifiers, 13 of which are listed IJM Corp is among the main beneficiaries of and rail jobs to be worth c.RM95bn in contractors. Among the 13, we gather large-scale projects including the RM7.1bn West total. The rollout of job awards will Coast Expressway (WCE), RM1bn extension of that TRC Synergy, Mudajaya, Sunway, New Pantai Expressway (NPE) and KVMRT. It could focus on the MRT SBK line over the Fajarbaru, Gadang, WCT and Loh & still win another MRT elevated package. next few months. Loh stand a good chance of bagging Gamuda Our checks indicate that three urban the viaduct and station packages. Key The group is the winner of the RM8.3bn winners of the WCE remain IJM Corp underground works for MRT SBK line and the highways – Sg. Besi-Ulu Kelang frontrunner for the RM8bn Gemas-JB double Expressway (Suke), Damansara-Shah and KEuro. For Kidex, Bina Puri and tracking project. It could be one of the beneficiaries Mudajaya were reportedly among the of the HSR given its rail expertise. Alam Highway (Dash) and Kinrara-Damansara Expressway contenders. We continue to believe Mudajaya (Kidex) – are already at the planning that the MMC-Gamuda JV has a good Mudajaya has access capacity to undertake large chance of emerging as the main scale highway jobs. The group is vying for two stage. subcontract packages from WCE, and was winner of MRT 2 & 3. reportedly one of the frontrunners of another urban elevated highway worth RM2.2bn. IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES. INCLUDING ANY REQUIRED RESEARCH CERTIFICATIONS, ARE PROVIDED AT THE END OF THIS REPORT. Designed by Eight, Powered by EFA Sources: CIMB. COMPANY REPORTS CONSTRUCTION May 7, 2012 KEY CHARTS Major incoming Klang Valley jobs to focus on transport infra – highways and rail Projects Total cost/est. Status We estimate that RM95bn worth of highway and rail jobs MRT SBK line RM20bn Awards in progress could come onstream from this year onwards and buoy construction activities. The rollout of job awards will MRT 2 (circle line) & MRT 3 c.RM40bn Detailed feasibility study in 2H12 focus on the MRT SBK line over the next few months. In West Coast Expressway (WCE) RM7.1bn Pending signing of CA the short term, at least three more packages (v1, v4 and Suke - highway RM1.6-2.4bn Under study v7) of the SBK line, each worth an estimated RM800m-1bn, will be awarded. Dash - highway RM1-1.6bn Under study Kidex- highway RM2.2bn Under study High Speed Rail (KL-S'pore) RM30bn Detailed feasibility study in 2H12 RM20bn-25bn contracts could be awarded RM m this year 30,000 We expect the total value of local job awards in 2H12 to 25,000 be double the RM13.2bn achieved in 1H12. Driven by the 25,000 MRT, job awards in 2012 could total RM20bn-25bn 20,000 compared to RM8.7bn in 2010 and RM8.1bn last year. Of the total RM13.2bn awards YTD, 81% or RM10.7bn 15,000 13,154 was for rail-related works. 10,000 8,650 8,100 5,000 0 2010 2011 1H12 2012E Identifying the potential winners 28 companies have prequalified for the remaining packages of the elevated portion of the MRT SBK line. Projects Potential winners Among the 13 that are listed companies, TRC Synergy, MRT SBK line : 13 listed contractors - see chart Mudajaya, Sunway, Fajarbaru, Gadang, WCT and Loh & MRT 2 (circle line) & MRT 3 : MMC-Gamuda has a good chance Loh stand a good chance of bagging the viaduct and West Coast Expressway (WCE) : IJM Corp, KEuro, WCT, Mudajaya station packages. Key winners of the WCE remain IJM Corp and Keuro. Recent press reports on Kidex indicated Suke - highway : Various/unknown that Bina Puri and Mudajaya are among the likely Dash - highway : Various/unknown winners. The MMC-Gamuda JV has a good chance of Kidex - highway : Mudajaya, Bina Puri emerging as the main winner of MRT 2 & 3. High Speed Rail (KL-S'pore) : YTL Corp (the original proposer) Order book and potential top-ups Contractors under our coverage are looking at 9,000 RM1bn-4bn worth of new contracts by end-2012. Their current outstanding order books of RM2bn-6bn should 7,500 6,000 1,000 last for at least two years. 4,000 4,500 1,500 1,500 1,000 3,000 5,800 1,000 1,000 3,500 4,000 1,500 2,840 3,100 2,200 2,500 0 Gamuda IJM Corp MRCB Muhibbah Mudajaya Sunway WCT Outstanding order book YTD (RM m) Potential replenishment by end 2012 (RM m) SOURCE: CIMB, COMPANY REPORTS 2 CONSTRUCTION May 7, 2012 Figure 2: Sector Comparisons Bloomberg Price Target Price Market Cap Core P/E (x) 3-year EPS P/BV (x) Recurring ROE (%) EV/EBITDA (x) Dividend Yield (%) Company Recom. Ticker (local curr) (local curr) (US$ m) CY2011 CY2012 CAGR (%) CY2011 CY2012 CY2011 CY2012 CY2013 CY2011 CY2012 CY2011 CY2012 Gamuda GAM MK Trading Buy 3.61 4.55 2,465 15.4 12.8 23.7% 3.85 3.62 24.8% 29.2% 30.2% 21.3 15.7 3.1% 3.2% IJM Corp Bhd IJM MK Trading Buy 5.58 6.55 2,535 18.3 14.6 29.4% 3.08 2.90 17.1% 20.5% 21.4% 12.7 10.5 2.0% 2.1% Malaysian Resources Corp MRC MK Trading Buy 1.74 2.40 793 30.9 26.9 19.4% 2.80 2.54 9.8% 9.7% 11.1% 19.5 11.8 1.1% 1.4% MTD ACPI Engineering ACP MK Underperform 0.36 0.44 27 na na na 0.49 0.53 -9.6% -6.3% -6.2% 76.1 16.4 1.9% 1.9% Muhibbah Engineering MUHI MK Trading Buy 1.27 1.60 170 8.3 7.2 37.7% 0.84 0.82 10.1% 11.5% 12.6% 7.1 7.0 3.9% 3.9% Mudajaya Group MDJ MK Trading Buy 2.80 3.45 506 6.6 5.7 16.6% 1.62 1.28 28.7% 24.5% 23.8% 3.5 2.5 2.9% 3.0% Sunway Bhd SWB MK Neutral 2.31 2.65 982 8.1 8.4 -14.8% 1.07 0.87 14.1% 11.2% 10.8% 13.9 7.3 0.0% 3.9% WCT Bhd WCT MK Trading Buy 2.46 3.00 664 12.0 11.1 13.9% 1.42 1.29 12.7% 12.1% 13.3% 13.6 8.7 4.0% 4.0% Malaysia average 17.7 14.4 26.8% 2.99 2.82 17.1% 20.1% 21.2% 15.2 11.9 2.4% 2.5% Adhi Karya ADHI IJ Outperform 1,060 1,100 207 10.5 9.9 13.4% 1.94 1.68 19.6% 18.3% 21.6% 4.0 3.3 2.3% 2.2% Pembangunan Perumahan PTPP IJ Outperform 760.0 760.0 399 15.3 14.5 21.8% 2.58 2.29 18.4% 16.4% 20.6% 6.2 6.3 1.6% 1.7% Total Bangun Persada TOTL IJ Outperform 570.0 675.0 211 15.6 11.5 31.7% 3.07 2.67 20.4% 24.8% 22.0% 7.5 5.7 2.2% 3.3% Wijaya Karya WIKA IJ Outperform 1,100 1,200 720 18.7 15.0 24.7% 3.20 2.76 15.5% 16.6% 17.8% 11.6 11.0 0.9% 1.4% Indonesia average 15.6 13.3 22.0% 2.78 2.42 17.6% 17.9% 19.8% 7.2 6.6 1.4% 1.8% CH.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Perak Development Experience: the Way Forward
    International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences December 2013, Vol. 3, No. 12 ISSN: 2222-6990 The Perak Development Experience: The Way Forward Azham Md. Ali Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Management and Economics Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v3-i12/437 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v3-i12/437 Speech for the Menteri Besar of Perak the Right Honourable Dato’ Seri DiRaja Dr Zambry bin Abd Kadir to be delivered on the occasion of Pangkor International Development Dialogue (PIDD) 2012 I9-21 November 2012 at Impiana Hotel, Ipoh Perak Darul Ridzuan Brothers and Sisters, Allow me to briefly mention to you some of the more important stuff that we have implemented in the last couple of years before we move on to others areas including the one on “The Way Forward” which I think that you are most interested to hear about. Under the so called Perak Amanjaya Development Plan, some of the things that we have tried to do are the same things that I believe many others here are concerned about: first, balanced development and economic distribution between the urban and rural areas by focusing on developing small towns; second, poverty eradication regardless of race or religion so that no one remains on the fringes of society or is left behind economically; and, third, youth empowerment. Under the first one, the state identifies viable small- and medium-size companies which can operate from small towns. These companies are to be working closely with the state government to boost the economy of the respective areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Sendayan Techvalley
    BANDAR SRI SENDAYAN a first-class township where home is for you and your loved ones. Located within the Greater Klang Valley Conurbation in Seremban on 5,233 acres of freehold land, Bandar Sri Sendayan is planned and designed with one thing in mind; comfortable living & business friendly. A premier integrated development made complete with ample facilities and amenities, BANDAR SRI SENDAYAN is without a doubt a sanctuary of tranquil tropical living, wholesome values and most importantly, a sense of community. Families find it an oasis of fulfillment; businesses see it as a world of promising opportunities. Being Part of the Greater Klang Valley Conurbation, along the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia, where it is merely a 20-minute drive to THE MASTER PLAN OF BANDAR SRI SENDAYAN Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) and a 35-minute journey to Kuala Lumpur (KL). Located within very close proximity to existing and progressing town centres such as Cyberjaya and Putrajaya, the North-South and the proposed Senawang-KLIA Expressways offer from smoother and faster alternatives to major destinations. KUALA LUMPUR / PUTRAJAYA New Seremban Toll ( Approved New Alignment ) DESTINATION 1 KUALA LUMPUR 70 KM MALACCA 75 KM KLIA 22 KM GEORGETOWN, PENANG 369 KM PUTRAJAYA / CYBERJAYA 60 KM ISKANDAR M’SIA, JOHOR 261 KM PORT KLANG 95 KM WOODLANDS, SINGAPORE 270 KM PORT DICKSON 20 KM 21km 22km 23km SEREMBAN North South Hig 2 from NILAI KPJ LANG VALLEY Specialist Hospital hway UALA LUMPUR Seremban Toll CONURBATION & BANDAR SRI SENDAYAN Taman S2 Heights
    [Show full text]
  • P R O Je C T Op T Io N S
    04 PROJECT OPTIONS Section 4 PROJECT OPTIONS SECTION 4 : PROJECT OPTIONS 4.1 INTRODUCTION Various alignment options were identified and evaluated in the process of selecting the preferred, optimum alignment for the Project. The options varied according to the physical characteristic, socio-economic constraints and transport network design requirements of each alignment options. In addition to the alignment options, two options for railway gauge were also considered, namely standard gauge and meter gauge. 4.2 PLANNING & DESIGN BASIS During the Feasibility Study for the ECRL Phase 2, a set of planning guidelines were used to develop the design concept for the ECRL Phase 2 corridor and the alignment (Table 4-1). Table 4-1 : Planning Guidelines for ECRL Phase 2 Aspect Description Strategic position Enhancing existing railway stations close to town centers to provide connectivity for freight transport Future development To avoid encroaching on areas committed for future development Connectivity Provide connectivity to: Major urban centers Industrial clusters Sea ports and internal container depot Tourism zones Integrated transport terminals Environment Minimize encroaching to Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) such as swamp forest, river corridors, forest reserves, ecological linkages and wildlife habitats wherever possible Additionally, a set of criteria will also be used to evaluate alignment options and to determine the preferred alignment ( Table 4-2). Section 5 Project Description 4-1 Table 4-2 : Alignment Criteria for ECRL
    [Show full text]
  • CADP 2.0) Infrastructure for Connectivity and Innovation
    The Comprehensive Asia Development Plan 2.0 (CADP 2.0) Infrastructure for Connectivity and Innovation November 2015 Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, its Governing Board, Academic Advisory Council, or the institutions and governments they represent. All rights reserved. Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted with proper acknowledgement. Cover Art by Artmosphere ERIA Research Project Report 2014, No.4 National Library of Indonesia Cataloguing in Publication Data ISBN: 978-602-8660-88-4 Contents Acknowledgement iv List of Tables vi List of Figures and Graphics viii Executive Summary x Chapter 1 Development Strategies and CADP 2.0 1 Chapter 2 Infrastructure for Connectivity and Innovation: The 7 Conceptual Framework Chapter 3 The Quality of Infrastructure and Infrastructure 31 Projects Chapter 4 The Assessment of Industrialisation and Urbanisation 41 Chapter 5 Assessment of Soft and Hard Infrastructure 67 Development Chapter 6 Three Tiers of Soft and Hard Infrastructure 83 Development Chapter 7 Quantitative Assessment on Hard/Soft Infrastructure 117 Development: The Geographical Simulation Analysis for CADP 2.0 Appendix 1 List of Prospective Projects 151 Appendix 2 Non-Tariff Barriers in IDE/ERIA-GSM 183 References 185 iii Acknowledgements The original version of the Comprehensive Asia Development Plan (CADP) presents a grand spatial design of economic infrastructure and industrial placement in ASEAN and East Asia. Since the submission of such first version of the CADP to the East Asia Summit in 2010, ASEAN and East Asia have made significant achievements in developing hard infrastructure, enhancing connectivity, and participating in international production networks.
    [Show full text]
  • For Promoting Private Sector Investment in Infrastructure
    ADB DEVELOPING BEST PRACTICES FOR PROMOTING PRIVATE SECTOR INVESTMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE ROADS Asian Development Bank The views, conclusions, and recommendations presented here are those of the study consultants, and should not be considered to represent the official views of the Asian Development Bank or its member governments. © Asian Development Bank 2000 ISBN No. 971-561-280-6 Stock No. 010300 Published by the Asian Development Bank P.O. Box 789, 0980 Manila, Philippines For more information on ADB, visit http:\\www.adb.org FOREWORD This report is one of a series of five commissioned by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to identify and recommend best practices to be followed and specific steps to be taken, by ADB’s developing member countries in order to encourage both private sector investment and competition in infrastructure development. The study was financed through a $600,000 regional technical assistance grant - RETA 5753: Developing Best Practices for Promoting Private Sector Investment in Infrastructure. This report focuses on the road sector; the other reports cover the power, water supply, airport and air traffic control, and port sectors. Transport is central to achieving prosperity and the quality of life, to which all countries aspire. Transport policy has pervasive impacts: on economic performance; on the shape and structure of human settlements through its impact upon physical development and economic structures; on the distribution of income; and on the environment. This report develops best practices for promoting private sector investment in the road sector. It defines the objectives of private sector participation, reviews experiences of private sector participation in Asia and elsewhere, examines the degree of success that has been achieved to date, and identifies the key issues that provide the basis for determining best practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Malaysia Country Report
    Chapter 5 Malaysia Country Report Saadiah Mohammad Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia November 2014 This chapter should be cited as Mohammad, S. (2014), ‘Malaysia Country Report’, in Zen, F. and M. Regan (eds.), Financing ASEAN Connectivity, ERIA Research Project Report FY2013, No.15.Jakarta: ERIA, pp.167-218. CHAPTER 5 Malaysia Country Report Saadiah Mohammad Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia Introduction As a country, Malaysia represents one of the success stories in the ASEAN in terms of its top-down political commitment to the five-year economic plans. For one, a sizeable government budget is allocated every year for its infrastructure activities. Malaysia is now an upper middle-income country served in most parts by good quality roads and expressways and a system of communication comparable to that of any developed, high-income country in the world. Many of its indicators on infrastructure have reached world-class standards, although there are still disparities in terms of total coverage and quality of infrastructure especially between West Peninsular Malaysia and its eastern counterpart states of Sabah and Sarawak. For years, Malaysia had not relied much on external sources of infrastructure financing since the government for many years had always managed to source funds internally. However, this also meant that government expenditure has increased tremendously over the years as population, urbanisation, and economic growth continue to put increasing demands on infrastructure. Since the 1980s, the government has considered the privatisation option—i.e., inviting the private sector as its partner in public-private partnership (PPP) projects—in its attempt to reduce government's burden in sourcing.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Infrastructure Investment Opportunities in Islamic Countries
    Private Infrastructure Investment Opportunities in Islamic Countries Kumi Harischandra Ryan J. Orr Working Paper #54 April 2009 | Collaboratory for Research on Global Projects The Collaboratory for Research on Global Projects at Stanford University is a multidisciplinary center that supports research, education and industry outreach to improve the sustainability of large infrastructure investment projects that involve participants from multiple institutional backgrounds. Its studies have examined public-private partnerships, infrastructure investment funds, stakeholder mapping and engagement strategies, comparative forms of project governance, and social, political, and institutional risk management. The Collaboratory, established in September 2002, also supports a global network of scholars and practitioners—based on five continents—with expertise in a broad range of academic disciplines and in the power, transportation, water, telecommunications and natural resource sectors. Collaboratory for Research on Global Projects Yang & Yamazaki Energy & Environment (Y2E2) Bldg 473 Via Ortega, Suite 242 Stanford, CA 94305-4020 http://crgp.stanford.edu 2 About the Authors Kumi Harischandra is a graduate student in the International Policy Studies Program at Stanford University. She was formerly a Research Economist in the Fraser Institute’s Fiscal Studies Department. She holds a Bachelor of Social Sciences (Honors) degree in Economics from the National University of Singapore and a Master of Arts degree in Economics from Simon Fraser University. Her research has examined subjects such as taxation, government spending, foreign investment, poverty, charitable giving and business attitudes. Her recent co-publications at Fraser Institute include The Impact and Cost of Taxation in Canada and Canadian Government Debt 2008: A Guide to the Indebtedness of Canada and the Provinces .
    [Show full text]
  • Sime Darby Property Profile
    SIME DARBY PROPERTY BERHAD Citi Asia Pacific Property Conference 2018 Investor Presentation 28 – 29 June 2018 2 Presentation Outline 1 Sime Darby Property Profile Key Growth Areas and Recent 2 Developments 3 Growth Strategies 4 Financial and Operational Highlights 5 Megatrends & Market Outlook 6 Appendices 1 Sime Darby Property 3 4 Shareholding Structure RM1.16 Share Price 55.6% Share Price Movement (RM) 1.78 As at 22 June’18 1.16 1.11 Foreign Shareholdings 14.8% 10.0% RM7.9bn 4.7% Market Capitalisation Other Domestic Shareholdings 14.9% 6,800,839 Number of Ordinary and the public Shares (000’) Source: Tricor 5 The Largest Property Developer in Malaysia In terms of land bank size RM1.7bn RM637mn RM593mn 1,602 9MFY18 Revenue 9MFY18 PBIT 9MFY18 PATAMI Employees UNITED KINGDOM Property Development THAILAND Active townships, integrated and KEDAH 23 niche developments Helensvale, Acres of remaining Queensland developable land bank to be GEORGETOWN, 65 acres 20,695 developed over 10 -25 years PENANG PENINSULA MALAYSIA AUSTRALIA Estimated Remaining Gross RM96bn Development Value (GDV) Average trading discount to 45% Realised Net Asset Value (RNAV) SELANGOR 3,291 acres Property Investment 3,187 acres Sq. ft. of net commercial 2,826 acres NEGERI space in Malaysia and SEMBILAN 1.4mn Singapore 1,462 acres JOHOR Hospitality & Leisure BANDAR UNIVERSITI PAGOH Assets across 4 countries 3,297 acres Key Developments including 2 golf courses (36-hole 6 & 18-hole respectively) and a North-South Expressway Singapore convention center 6 Sustainable Growth With remaining developable land over 10 to 25 years By Remaining By Remaining Gross Developable Land Development Value (GDV) 7.6 1,461 21.0 (9%) (12%) 3,451 (26%) (28%) O 334 N (3%) G 12,265 28.2 RM81.5 O (35%) 2,826 5.5 I (23%) acres 871 billion (7%) N (7%) G 5.3 (6%) 3,322 13.9 (27%) (17%) Legend: 2,036 F (24%) U 3,092 T 8,430 (37%) RM14.4 U acres billion R for Guthrie Corridor only E 3,302 (39%) Notes: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Viability Framework for Privatized Highway Projects in Malaysia
    PROJECT VIABILITY FRAMEWORK FOR PRIVATIZED HIGHWAY PROJECTS IN MALAYSIA AZMI BIN MOHAMED @ MOHD. ADNAN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA PROJECT VIABILITY FRAMEWORK FOR PRIVATIZED HIGHWAY PROJECTS IN MALAYSIA AZMI BIN MOHAMED @ MOHD. ADNAN A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Quantity Surveying) Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying Universiti Teknologi Malaysia AUGUST 2018 iii For my lovely wife, ‘Ateeq Maisurah Hj. Mahmud, big thanks for the love, patient, support and understanding of my destination. For my mother and family, thanks for the encouragement and support. Thanks for Everything Granted iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere thankfulness to my ex supervisor, Assoc. Prof. Sr Dr. Rosli Bin Abdul Rashid, current supervisor - Assoc. Prof. Sr Dr. Zakaria Bin Yusoff and Assoc. Prof. Sr Dr. Fahdlin Binti Abdullah for their guidance and assistance to complete this research. My appreciation also goes to Assoc. Prof. Sr Dr. Sarajul Fikri Bin Mohamed and Assoc. Prof. Dr. Saidin Bin Misnan for their support. A big thank goes to En. Mohd. Imri from Ministry of Finance, the representatives from concessionaires and others who are involved directly and indirectly in interview session and data collection to complete my research. Last but not least, my deepest gratitude goes to all my family members for their love and encouragement. AZMI BIN MOHAMED @ MOHD. ADNAN JULY, 2018 v ABSTRACT The construction sector is one of the indicators of national economic growth and contributed in average of 4% annually to Malaysia ’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and 6% to the national economy between 1995 - 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • COVER-Geo Capability Statement
    GEOTECHNICAL CAPABILITY STATEMENT e u q G i e n n e U r > a QUALITY t e SYSTEM QUALITY i v v MANAGEMENT e t i SIRIM > C r e a MS ISO 9001 : 2000 REG. NO. AR 4335 GCU Capability Statement GCU KL Office (Main) GCU Consultants Sdn Bhd 3F-09, IOI Business Park, Bandar Puchong Jaya, 47170 Puchong, Selangor Darul Ehsan Tel : +603 – 8070 5501 Fax : +603 – 8070 5503 Contact Person : Ir. EG Balakrishnan / Ir. Mohd Redzuan H/P No : +6012 – 201 0434 / 019 – 281 3018 C&S Office GCU Consultants (C&S) Sdn Bhd 1F-28, IOI Business Park, Bandar Puchong Jaya, 47170 Puchong, Selangor Darul Ehsan Tel : +603 – 8070 5502 Fax : +603 – 8070 5503 Contact Person : Ir. S Vijayakumar / Ir. R Thinagaran H/P No : +6012 – 390 0966 / 012 – 385 6706 M&E Office GCU Consultants (M&E) Sdn Bhd E3A-03A, Neo Damansara, Jalan PJU 8/11, Bandar Damansara Perdana, 47820 Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan Contact Person : Ir. Narendran Naidu H/P No : +6012 – 278 7974 Fax : +603 – 7729 0654 Johor Office GCU Consultants (Johor) Sdn Bhd No.12-02, Jalan Molek 1/5C, Taman Molek, 81100 Johor Bahru, Johor Darul Takzim Tel : +607 – 350 7391 Fax : +607 – 350 7392 Contact Person : Ir. Lee Kai Ming H/P No : +6012 – 232 3806 Sabah Office GCU Consultants (Sabah) Sdn Bhd Lot B-11A-2, Block B, Pavilion Bundusan, Lorong Pavilion Bundusan 3, Jalan Bundusan, 88300 Penampang, Sabah Tel / Fax : +6088 – 739 755 Contact Person : Ir. Amarjit Singh H/P No : +6017 – 339 8479 Y:\1.0 CAPABILITY STATEMENT\1.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019 CORPORATE STRUCTURE
    CONTENTS O1 02 03 04 Corporate Corporate Corporate Profile of Profile Structure Information Directors O9 10 13 14 Profile of Chief Profile of Key Financial Management Discussion Executive Officer Senior Management Highlights and Analysis 18 28 35 37 Corporate Sustainability Additional Statement on Governance Overview Statement Compliance Risk Management and Statement Information Internal Control 40 44 45 141 Audit Committee Statement of Directors’ Reports and List of Report Responsibilities for Financial Properties the Preparation of Statements Financial Statements 143 144 147 Statement on Analysis of Notice of Proxy Directors’ and Chief Shareholdings Annual General Form Executive Officer’s Meeting Interest Incorporated in December 2000 and listed on 17 November 2003, WCE Holdings Berhad is focused on the execution of West Coast Expressway Project by its 80%-owned subsidiary, West Coast Expressway Sdn Bhd, an ISO9001:2015 and ISO14001:2015 company. This build-operate-transfer privatisation project involves the development of a 233km highway from Banting in Selangor to Taiping in Perak. To-date, the percentage of the overall construction of the Project is 63% and the construction is still on-going. On 31 May 2019, Section 8 (Hutan Melintang - Teluk Intan) opened for traffic. In the property sector, the Group has also enjoyed success in the launches of its 1,879-acre Bandar Rimbayu mixed development project located next to Kota Kemuning, Shah Alam. The development which commenced in March 2013 has a total expected gross development value of RM11,500 million and it is to be developed over a period of approximately 20 years. Moving forward, the Group is confident that its ventures in infrastructure and properties will position itself positively on a sustainable growth path.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Quarter 2020
    WCT Holdings Berhad INVESTOR BRIEFING – 3rd Quarter 2020 Updated: 25/11/2020 Strictly Private & Confidential Financial Highlights Strictly Private & Confidential Segmental Results Q3 2020 (3 months) E&C PD PI&M Consolidated RM’mil RM’mil RM’mil RM’mil Revenue from external customers 296.6 86.1 40.7 423.4 Profit from operations 36.9 14.6 20.1 71.6 Share of results of associates 3.1 Share of results in joint ventures 0.5 (2.4) (7.3) (9.2) Finance costs (29.1) Taxation (11.8) Profit after taxation 24.6 Holders of Perpetual Sukuk (24.3) Non-controlling interest 1.6 Net profit 1.9 E&C – Engineering & Construction Division PD – Property Development Division PI&M – Property Investment & Management Division Strictly Private & Confidential Page 2 Segmental Results YTD 2020 (9 months) E&C PD PI&M Consolidated RM’mil RM’mil RM’mil RM’mil Revenue from external customers 803.8 229.6 128.1 1,161.5 Profit from operations 40.8 64.1 61.4 166.3 Share of results of associates 9.0 Share of results in joint ventures 0.9 (7.1) (6.7) (12.9) Finance costs (92.7) Taxation (22.7) Profit after taxation 47.0 Holders of Perpetual Sukuk (42.5) Non-controlling interest 4.7 Net profit 9.2 E&C – Engineering & Construction Division PD – Property Development Division PI&M – Property Investment & Management Division Strictly Private & Confidential Page 3 Debt to Equity (DE) Ratio As at As at 30 Sep 2020 31 Dec 2019 RM’mil RM’mil Total bank borrowing 2.8 3.1 Cash & bank balances & FD (0.6) (0.6) Net borrowings 2.2 2.4 Shareholders equity (including Perpetual 3.9 3.7 Sukuk
    [Show full text]