Dr. Alla Bujskikh on a Typical Pottery Deposit of the 6 Century BC from The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Dr. Alla Bujskikh on a Typical Pottery Deposit of the 6 Century BC from The

Polish Archaeological Mission „Tyritake” National Museum in Warsaw Dr. Alla Bujskikh On a typical pottery deposit of the 6th century BC from the Northern Black Sea Region: Olbia Pontica and Tyritake Greek penetration into the Pontic region and following exploration of the northern coast during the last stage of Greek colonization are closely related to the problem of absolute chronology of this process. Written sources concerning the period of colonization are scarce and poor in quality. On the other hand, archaeological sources are numerous already, and their amount can possibly increase with each new campaign. The level of competence of present- day researchers of colonization period, and the organization of the first apoikia in the northwestern and northeastern parts of the Black Sea coast allow comparison of archaeological material from various sites in the region. Moreover, such methods are also used in the process of investigating the foundation of the colonies. Today, the stratigraphy of early archaeological deposits in Olbia is well-known. The category of tableware comprises vessels imported from various centers in the Mediterranean: Southern and Northern Ionia, Chios, Lesbos and mainland Greece – Korinthos, Laconica, and Athens. The island centers and the ones in Ionia are an important source of painted vessels, which are quite similar in Borysthenes and Histria for the end of 7th and the beginning of 6th centuries BC; for Borysthenes, Histria, and Olbia at the turn of the 7th and 6th centuries BC and in the first half of 6th c. BC; for Borysthenes, Histria, Olbia, and Nikonion in the second half and at the end of 6th c. BC. This picture can be applied to some Bosporan sites, like Panticapaion, Panticapaion and Nymphaion, and finally – Panticapaion, Nymphaion, and Tyritake. Each quarter of the 6th c. BC provides very specific amount of painted tableware, which allows distributing them in the whole chronological span. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Monopteros in the Athenian Agora
THE MONOPTEROS IN THE ATHENIAN AGORA (PLATE 88) O SCAR Broneerhas a monopterosat Ancient Isthmia. So do we at the Athenian Agora.' His is middle Roman in date with few architectural remains. So is ours. He, however, has coins which depict his building and he knows, from Pau- sanias, that it was built for the hero Palaimon.2 We, unfortunately, have no such coins and are not even certain of the function of our building. We must be content merely to label it a monopteros, a term defined by Vitruvius in The Ten Books on Architecture, IV, 8, 1: Fiunt autem aedes rotundae, e quibus caliaemonopteroe sine cella columnatae constituuntur.,aliae peripteroe dicuntur. The round building at the Athenian Agora was unearthed during excavations in 1936 to the west of the northern end of the Stoa of Attalos (Fig. 1). Further excavations were carried on in the campaigns of 1951-1954. The structure has been dated to the Antonine period, mid-second century after Christ,' and was apparently built some twenty years later than the large Hadrianic Basilica which was recently found to its north.4 The lifespan of the building was comparatively short in that it was demolished either during or soon after the Herulian invasion of A.D. 267.5 1 I want to thank Professor Homer A. Thompson for his interest, suggestions and generous help in doing this study and for his permission to publish the material from the Athenian Agora which is used in this article. Anastasia N. Dinsmoor helped greatly in correcting the manuscript and in the library work.
[Show full text]
Download Excerpt (Pdf-Format)
Towards Determining the Chief Function of the Settlement of Borysthenes Jaroslav V. Domanskij & Konstantin K. Marcenko The site of Borysthenes, the earliest Greek settlement in the northern Black Sea area, is located on the island of Berezan’ situated at the mouth of the estuaries of the Dnieper and Bug rivers. The large-scale historical and archaeological research currently being carried out there has already yield- ed a number of significant discoveries. Of particular importance is some additional evidence recently obtained on the date of the origin of this colony, its outward appearance, culture, and historical development, as well as its relations with the barbarians of the hinterland.1 Yet the most important result of the excavations of recent years is the discovery of the sacred precinct at the settlement – the temenos with the remains of the Temple of Aphrodite from the second half of the 6th and beginning of the 5th century BC.2 It is possible that this fact may tip the balance, at least for now, in favour of the hypothesis about the polis status of Borysthenes. Nevertheless, it must be acknowledged that the very important question about the causes of and motivation behind the appearance of the first group of colonists in this remote region of the Greek oikoumene – i.e. the question about the basic function of early Borysthenes – has remained extremely con- troversial. In this respect, almost the entire conceivable spectrum of ideas and concepts co-exists comfortably in modern historiography. The question is, indeed, difficult to answer, not only with respect to Borysthenes itself but also to many other Greek settlements in the northern Black Sea area, and although there seem to be answers for the period of the mature and fully developed existence of the Greek cities, the problem becomes extremely complicated when focussing on the period of the formation and initial devel- opment of these cities.
[Show full text]
9 · the Growth of an Empirical Cartography in Hellenistic Greece
9 · The Growth of an Empirical Cartography in Hellenistic Greece PREPARED BY THE EDITORS FROM MATERIALS SUPPLIED BY GERMAINE AUJAe There is no complete break between the development of That such a change should occur is due both to po cartography in classical and in Hellenistic Greece. In litical and military factors and to cultural developments contrast to many periods in the ancient and medieval within Greek society as a whole. With respect to the world, we are able to reconstruct throughout the Greek latter, we can see how Greek cartography started to be period-and indeed into the Roman-a continuum in influenced by a new infrastructure for learning that had cartographic thought and practice. Certainly the a profound effect on the growth of formalized know achievements of the third century B.C. in Alexandria had ledge in general. Of particular importance for the history been prepared for and made possible by the scientific of the map was the growth of Alexandria as a major progress of the fourth century. Eudoxus, as we have seen, center of learning, far surpassing in this respect the had already formulated the geocentric hypothesis in Macedonian court at Pella. It was at Alexandria that mathematical models; and he had also translated his Euclid's famous school of geometry flourished in the concepts into celestial globes that may be regarded as reign of Ptolemy II Philadelphus (285-246 B.C.). And it anticipating the sphairopoiia. 1 By the beginning of the was at Alexandria that this Ptolemy, son of Ptolemy I Hellenistic period there had been developed not only the Soter, a companion of Alexander, had founded the li various celestial globes, but also systems of concentric brary, soon to become famous throughout the Mediter spheres, together with maps of the inhabited world that ranean world.
[Show full text]
A Comparative Study of Ancient Greek City Walls in North-Western Black Sea During the Classical and Hellenistic Times
INTERNATIONAL HELLENIC UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES MA IN BLACK SEA CULTURAL STUDIES A comparative study of ancient Greek city walls in North-Western Black Sea during the Classical and Hellenistic times Thessaloniki, 2011 Supervisor’s name: Professor Akamatis Ioannis Student’s name: Fantsoudi Fotini Id number:2201100018 Abstract Greek presence in the North Western Black Sea Coast is a fact proven by literary texts, epigraphical data and extensive archaeological remains. The latter in particular are the most indicative for the presence of walls in the area and through their craftsmanship and techniques being used one can closely relate these defensive structures to the walls in Asia Minor and the Greek mainland. The area examined in this paper, lies from ancient Apollonia Pontica on the Bulgarian coast and clockwise to Kerch Peninsula.When establishing in these places, Greeks created emporeia which later on turned into powerful city states. However, in the early years of colonization no walls existed as Greeks were starting from zero and the construction of walls needed large funds. This seems to be one of the reasons for the absence of walls of the Archaic period to which lack comprehensive fieldwork must be added. This is also the reason why the Archaic period is not examined, but rather the Classical and Hellenistic until the Roman conquest. The aim of Greeks when situating the Black Sea was to permanently relocate and to become autonomous from their mother cities. In order to be so, colonizers had to create cities similar to their motherlands. More specifically, they had to build public buildings, among which walls in order to prevent themselves from the indigenous tribes lurking to chase away the strangers from their land.
[Show full text]
1 2 3 4 5 a B C D E
STREET REGISTER ARRIVING & GETTING AROUND ARRIVING & GETTING AROUND ARRIVING & GETTING AROUND WHAT TO SEE WHAT TO SEE WHAT TO SEE Amurskaya E/F-2 Krasniy Spusk G-3 Radishcheva E-5 By Bus By Plane Great Mitridat Stairs C-4, near the Lenina Admirala Vladimirskogo E/F-3 Khersonskaya E/F-3 Rybatskiy prichal D/C-4-B-5 Churches & Cathedrals pl. The stairs were built in the 1930’s with plans Ancient Cities Admirala Azarova E-4/5 Katernaya E-3 Ryabova F-4 Arriving by bus is the only way to get to Kerch all year round. The bus station There is a local airport in Kerch, which caters to some local Crimean flights Ferry schedule Avdeyeva E-5 Korsunskaya E-3 Repina D-4/5 Church of St. John the Baptist C-4, Dimitrova per. 2, tel. (+380) 6561 from the Italian architect Alexander Digby. To save Karantinnaya E-3 Samoylenko B-3/4 itself is a buzzing place thanks to the incredible number of mini-buses arriving during the summer season, but the only regular flight connection to Kerch is you the bother we have already counted them; Antonenko E-5 From Kerch (from Port Krym) To Kerch (from Port Kavkaz) 222 93. This church is a unique example of Byzantine architecture. It was built in Admirala Fadeyeva A/B-4 Kommunisticheskaya E-3-F-5 Sladkova C-5 and departing. Marshrutkas run from here to all of the popular destinations in through Simferopol State International, which has regular flights to and from Kyiv, there are 432 steps in all meandering from the Dep.
[Show full text]
Great Waterworks in Roman Greece Aqueducts and Monumental Fountain Structures Function in Context
Great Waterworks in Roman Greece Aqueducts and Monumental Fountain Structures Function in Context Access edited by Open Georgia A. Aristodemou and Theodosios P. Tassios Archaeopress Archaeopress Roman Archaeology 35 © Archaeopress and the authors, 2017. Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78491 764 7 ISBN 978 1 78491 765 4 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the authors 2018 Cover: The monumental arcade bridge of Moria,Access Lesvos, courtesy of Dr Yannis Kourtzellis Creative idea of Tasos Lekkas (Graphics and Web Designer, International Hellenic University) Open All rights Archaeopressreserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by Oxuniprint, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com © Archaeopress and the authors, 2017. Contents Preface �� iii Georgia A. Aristodemou and Theodosios P. Tassios Introduction I� Roman Aqueducts in Greece ��1 Theodosios P. Tassios Introduction II� Roman Monumental Fountains (Nymphaea) in Greece ��10 Georgia A. Aristodemou PART I: AQUEDUCTS Vaulted-roof aqueduct channels in Roman
[Show full text]
Andrea F. Gatzke, Mithridates VI Eupator and Persian Kingship
The Ancient History Bulletin VOLUME THIRTY-THREE: 2019 NUMBERS 1-2 Edited by: Edward Anson ò Michael Fronda òDavid Hollander Timothy Howe ò John Vanderspoel Pat Wheatley ò Sabine Müller òAlex McAuley Catalina Balmacedaò Charlotte Dunn ISSN 0835-3638 ANCIENT HISTORY BULLETIN Volume 33 (2019) Numbers 1-2 Edited by: Edward Anson, Catalina Balmaceda, Michael Fronda, David Hollander, Alex McAuley, Sabine Müller, John Vanderspoel, Pat Wheatley Senior Editor: Timothy Howe Assistant Editor: Charlotte Dunn Editorial correspondents Elizabeth Baynham, Hugh Bowden, Franca Landucci Gattinoni, Alexander Meeus, Kurt Raaflaub, P.J. Rhodes, Robert Rollinger, Victor Alonso Troncoso Contents of volume thirty-three Numbers 1-2 1 Kathryn Waterfield, Penteconters and the Fleet of Polycrates 19 John Hyland, The Aftermath of Aigospotamoi and the Decline of Spartan Naval Power 42 W. P. Richardson, Dual Leadership in the League of Corinth and Antipater’s Phantom Hegemony 60 Andrea F. Gatzke, Mithridates VI Eupator and Persian Kingship NOTES TO CONTRIBUTORS AND SUBSCRIBERS The Ancient History Bulletin was founded in 1987 by Waldemar Heckel, Brian Lavelle, and John Vanderspoel. The board of editorial correspondents consists of Elizabeth Baynham (University of Newcastle), Hugh Bowden (Kings College, London), Franca Landucci Gattinoni (Università Cattolica, Milan), Alexander Meeus (University of Mannhiem), Kurt Raaflaub (Brown University), P.J. Rhodes (Durham University), Robert Rollinger (Universität Innsbruck), Victor Alonso Troncoso (Universidade da Coruña) AHB is currently edited by: Timothy Howe (Senior Editor: [email protected]), Edward Anson, Catalina Balmaceda, Michael Fronda, David Hollander, Alex McAuley, Sabine Müller, John Vanderspoel, Pat Wheatley and Charlotte Dunn. AHB promotes scholarly discussion in Ancient History and ancillary fields (such as epigraphy, papyrology, and numismatics) by publishing articles and notes on any aspect of the ancient world from the Near East to Late Antiquity.
[Show full text]
Crimea______9 3.1
CONTENTS Page Page 1. Introduction _____________________________________ 4 6. Transport complex ______________________________ 35 1.1. Brief description of the region ______________________ 4 1.2. Geographical location ____________________________ 5 7. Communications ________________________________ 38 1.3. Historical background ____________________________ 6 1.4. Natural resource potential _________________________ 7 8. Industry _______________________________________ 41 2. Strategic priorities of development __________________ 8 9. Energy sector ___________________________________ 44 3. Economic review 10. Construction sector _____________________________ 46 of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea ________________ 9 3.1. The main indicators of socio-economic development ____ 9 11. Education and science ___________________________ 48 3.2. Budget _______________________________________ 18 3.3. International cooperation _________________________ 20 12. Culture and cultural heritage protection ___________ 50 3.4. Investment activity _____________________________ 21 3.5. Monetary market _______________________________ 22 13. Public health care ______________________________ 52 3.6. Innovation development __________________________ 23 14. Regions of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea _____ 54 4. Health-resort and tourism complex_________________ 24 5. Agro-industrial complex __________________________ 29 5.1. Agriculture ____________________________________ 29 5.2. Food industry __________________________________ 31 5.3. Land resources _________________________________
[Show full text]
History of Phanagoria
Ассоциация исследователей ИНСТИТУТ АРХЕОЛОГИИ РАН ФАНАГОРИЙСКАЯ ЭКСПЕДИЦИЯ ИА РАН PHANAGORIA EDITED BY V.D. KUZNETSOV Moscow 2016 904(470.62) 63.443.22(235.73) Утверждено к печати Ученым советом Института археологии РАН Edited by V.D. Kuznetsov Text: Abramzon M.G., PhD, Professor, Magnitogorsk State Technical University Voroshilov A.N., PhD, Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences Voroshilova O.N., PhD, Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences Garbuzov G.P., PhD, Southern Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Rostov-on-Don) Golofast L.A., PhD, Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences Gunchina O.L., conservator-restorer, Phanagoria Museum-Preserve Dobrovolskaya E.V., PhD, A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences Dobrovolskaya M.V., PhD, Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences Zhukovsky M.O., Deputy Director of the Phanagoria Museum-Preserve Zavoikin A.A., PhD, Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences Zavoikina N.V., PhD, Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences Kokunko G.V., Historical and Cultural Heritage of Kuban Program Coordinator Kuznetsov V.D., PhD, Director of the Phanagoria Museum-Preserve, Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences Kuzmina (Shorunova) Yu.N., PhD, Curator of the Phanagoria Museum-Preserve, Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences Olkhovsky S.V., Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences Pavlichenko N.A., PhD, Institute of History, Russian Academy of Sciences Saprykina I.A., PhD, Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences Published with financial support from the Volnoe Delo Oleg Deripaska Foundation All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior permission of the copyright owners.
[Show full text]
The Shaping of the New Macedonia (1798-1870)
VIII. The shaping of the new Macedonia (1798-1870) by Ioannis Koliopoulos 1. Introduction Macedonia, both the ancient historical Greek land and the modern geographical region known by that name, has been perhaps one of the most heavily discussed countries in the world. In the more than two centuries since the representatives of revolutionary France introduced into western insular and continental Greece the ideas and slogans that fostered nationalism, the ancient Greek country has been the subject of inquiry, and the object of myth-making, on the part of archaeologists, historians, ethnologists, political scientists, social anthropologists, geographers and anthropogeographers, journalists and politicians. The changing face of the ancient country and its modern sequel, as recorded in the testimonies and studies of those who have applied themselves to the subject, is the focus of this present work. Since the time, two centuries ago, when the world’s attention was first directed to it, the issue of the future of this ancient Greek land – the “Macedonian Question” as it was called – stirred the interest or attracted the involvement of scientists, journalists, diplomats and politicians, who moulded and remoulded its features. The periodical cri- ses in the Macedonian Question brought to the fore important researchers and generated weighty studies, which, however, with few exceptions, put forward aspects and charac- teristics of Macedonia that did not always correspond to the reality and that served a variety of expediencies. This militancy on the part of many of those who concerned themselves with the ancient country and its modern sequel was, of course, inevitable, given that all or part of that land was claimed by other peoples of south-eastern Europe as well as the Greeks.
[Show full text]
Persian Imperial Policy Behind the Rise and Fall of the Cimmerian Bosporus in the Last Quarter of the Sixth to the Beginning of the Fifth Century BC
Persian Imperial Policy Behind the Rise and Fall of the Cimmerian Bosporus in the Last Quarter of the Sixth to the Beginning of the Fifth Century BC Jens Nieling The aim of the following paper is to recollect arguments for the hypotheses of a substantial Persian interference in the Greek colonies of the Cimmerian Bosporus and that they remained not untouched by Achaemenid policy in western Anatolia. The settlements ought to have been affected positively in their prime in the last quarter of the sixth century, but also harmed during their first major crisis at the beginning of the fifth century and afterwards. A serious break in the tight interrelationship between the Bosporan area and Achaemenid Anatolia occurred through the replacement of the Archaeanactid dynasty, ruling the Cimmerian Bosporus from 480 onwards, in favour of the succeeding Spartocids by an Athenian naval expedition under the command of Pericles in the year 438/437.1 The assumption of a predominant Persian influence to the north of the Caucasus mountains contradicts the still current theory of V. Tolstikov2 and the late Yu.G. Vinogradov,3 who favour instead a major Scythian or local impact as a decisive factor at the Bosporan sites.4 To challenge this traditional posi- tion, this paper will follow the successive stages of architectural development in the central settlement of Pantikapaion on its way to becoming the capital of the region. The argumentation is necessarily based on a parallelization of stratigraphical evidence with historical sources, since decisive archaeological data to support either the Persian or the Scythian hypothesis are few.
[Show full text]
Amphora Graffiti from the Byzantine Shipwreck at Novy Svet, Crimea
AMPHORA GRAFFITI FROM THE BYZANTINE SHIPWRECK AT NOVY SVET, CRIMEA A Thesis by CLAIRE ALIKI COLLINS Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Deborah Carlson Committee Members, Filipe Vieira de Castro Nancy Klein Head of Department, Cynthia Werner December 2012 Major Subject: Anthropology Copyright 2012 Claire Aliki Collins ABSTRACT The thesis presents the results of a study of 1005 graffiti on 13th century Byzantine amphorae from a shipwreck in the Bay of Sudak near Novy Svet, Crimea, Ukraine. The primary goals of this thesis are 1) to provide an overview of the excavation and shipwreck, 2) to examine the importance of the Novy Svet wreck in terms of Black Sea maritime trade in the Late Byzantine period, 3) to present the data collected at the Center for Underwater Archaeology at the Taras Shevchenko National University in Kiev, Ukraine (CUA) about the graffiti inscribed on the Günsenin IV amphorae raised from the Novy Svet wreck and 4) to discuss the meaning and importance of the graffiti, both aboard the ship itself and in a more general context. The thesis introduces the results of the 2002-2008 underwater excavation seasons at Novy Svet. Excavators have identified a 13th century shipwreck filled with glazed ceramics and amphorae as a Pisan vessel sunk on August 14, 1277. The majority of the amphorae are Günsenin IV jars and have graffiti inscribed on them. Analysis of the graffiti focuses on the division of the marks into morphological categories, and identifying parallels for the specific forms at other archaeological sites.
[Show full text]