DOCSLIB.ORG

Tribal Historic Preservation Officers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tribal Historic Preservation Officers ^ NATIONAL PARK SERVICE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FUND Tribal Historic Preservation Officers Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPOs) are officially designated by federally-recognized Native American tribes to direct preservation programs approved by the National Park Service (NPS). The THPO assumes some or all of the functions and responsibilities of State Historic Preservation Officers on tribal lands. The NPS distributes Historic Preservation Fund grants, which are typically matched by Tribes, to Barnaby Lewis, an Akimel Odham Elder and Tribal Historic THPOs by apportionment formula. Preservation Officer for the Gila River Indian Community, at Robbins Butte in southwest Arizona. PHOTO BY ELIAS BUTLER Background For many years, THPOs have received insufficient federal funding to fully implement their federally mandated FY 2022 Appropriations Request responsibilities. There were only 12 federally recognized THPOs when the program began in 1996, with $79,875 going to each. In FY 2021, by contrast, 198 THPOs received Please support $24 million for Tribal Historic an average of $69,369 in funding. Preservation Officers in the FY 2022 Interior Collectively, Tribes with NPS-recognized THPOs exercise Appropriations bill. responsibilities over a land base that exceeds 50 million acres in 30 states. THPOs review federal undertakings— including projects using federal funding or requiring federal APPROPRIATIONS BILL: Interior, Environment, approval—for their impacts on tribal historic resources and Related Agencies (Section 106 review). THPOs also survey and maintain AGENCY: National Park Service inventories of tribal historic resources, prepare preservation ACCOUNT: Historic Preservation Fund plans, and provide technical assistance and funding for ACTIVITY: Grants to Tribes preservation activities. THPOs also facilitate nominations to the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) and Tribal Registers. Along with local, state, and federal law Recent Funding History: enforcement, THPOs work to prosecute looters of Indian FY 2019 Enacted Funding: $11.735 million remains and sacred objects. They also provide oversight for repatriation per the Native American Graves Protection and FY 2020 Enacted Funding: $13.735 million Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). FY 2021 Enacted Funding: $15.000 million In FY 2021, THPOs: FY 2022 President’s Budget Request: TBD • Reviewed more than 45,000 federal undertakings, FY 2022 NTHP Recommendation: $24.000 million providing 3,500 National Register eligibility opinions • Surveyed approximately 75,000 acres for cultural JUSTIFICATION: Tribal Historic Preservation Officers are in resources and inventoried, evaluated, or designated over great need of federal funding as the number of THPOs has 2,600 significant historical and archeological properties grown dramatically since the creation of the program. Currently, there are nearly 200 THPOs. Increased funding would help • Nominated more than 1,1000 properties to Tribal Registers address significant shortfalls in THPO funding needs. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE^ HISTORIC PRESERVATION FUND Recognized Tribal Historic Preservation Officers* ALABAMA United Auburn Indian Community Fort Belknap Indian Community The Confederated Tribes of Grand Poarch Band of Creek Indians Wilton Rancheria Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Ronde Community of Oregon Wiyot Tribe Tribes Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation ALASKA Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Northern Cheyenne Tribe Confederated Tribes of the Warm Organized Village of Kake Yurok Tribe NEBRASKA Springs Reservation of Oregon Coquille Indian Tribe ARIZONA COLORADO Omaha Tribe of Nebraska Colorado River Indian Tribes Ponca Tribe of Nebraska Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Ute Mountain Ute Tribe Indians Gila River Indian Community Santee Sioux Nation Hopi Tribe of Arizona CONNECTICUT Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska RHODE ISLAND Hualapai Tribe Mashantucket Western Pequot Tribal Nation NEVADA Narragansett Indian Tribe The Navajo Nation Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Duckwater Shoeshone Tribe of the Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona Connecticut Duckwater Reservation SOUTH CAROLINA Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Catawba Indian Nation Community FLORIDA Reno-Sparks Indian Colony San Carlos Apache Tribe SOUTH DAKOTA Seminole Tribe of Florida Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California Tohono Nation Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe White Mountain Apache Tribe IDAHO NEW MEXICO Crow Creek Sioux Tribe Coeur d’Alene Tribe Jicarilla Apache Nation Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe CALIFORNIA Nez Perce Tribe Mescalero Apache Tribe Oglala Sioux Tribe Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians The Navajo Nation Rosebud Sioux Tribe of Indians Bear River Band of the Rohnerville KANSAS Pueblo of Acoma Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate Rancheria Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska Big Pine Paiute Tribe of the Owens The Pueblo of Isleta Yankton Sioux Tribe Valley LOUISIANA Pueblo of Jemez UTAH Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana Pueblo of Laguna The Navajo Nation Bishop Paiute Tribe Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana Pueblo of Pojoaque Blue Lake Rancheria Tribe of Indians Pueblo of San Felipe Jena Band of Choctaw Indians WASHINGTON Bridgeport Indian Colony Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of Louisiana Pueblo of San Ildefonso Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Pueblo of Santa Ana Yakama Nation Indians MAINE Pueblo of Santa Clara Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Cahuilla Band of Indians Aroostook Band of Micmacs Pueblo of Tesuque Reservation Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians Pueblo of Zia Confederated Tribes of the Colville the Trinidad Rancheria Passamaquoddy Tribe Zuni Pueblo Reservation Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Penobscot Nation Hoh Indian Tribe Indians NEW YORK Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe Elem Indian Colony MASSACHUSETTS The Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe Lummi Nation Elk Valley Rancheria Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head- Seneca Nation of Indians Makah Tribe Enterprise Rancheria of Maidu Indians Aquinnah Nooksak Indian Tribe Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria NORTH CAROLINA MICHIGAN Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe Fort Independence Paiute Indians Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians Quinault Indian Nation Habematolel Band of Pomo Indians Bay Mills Indian Community Samish Indian Nation Hoopa Valley Tribe Keweenaw Bay Indian Community NORTH DAKOTA Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe Hopland Band of Pomo Indians Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Mandan, Hidatsa & Arikara Nation Superior Chippewa Indians Skokomish Indian Tribe Jamul Indian Village Spirit Lake Tribe of Fort Totten Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Standing Rock Sioux Tribe Spokane Tribe of Indians Kashia Band of Pomo Indians of Indians Stewarts Point Rancheria Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Squaxin Island Tribe Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians Karuk Tribe Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan OKLAHOMA Suquamish Tribe Manzanita Band of Diegueno Mission Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Indians Potawatomi Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Mechoopda Band of Chico Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians Caddo Nation WISCONSIN Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Cherokee Nation Indians of California Michigan Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribes Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of the Chippewa Morongo Band of Mission Indians Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Pala Band of Mission Indians MINNESOTA Forest County Potawatomi Citizen Potawatomi Nation Community Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Bois Forte Band of Chippewa Indians Comanche Nation Indians The Ho-Chunk Nation Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Chippewa Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Indians Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin Pinoleville Pomo Nation Chippewa Muscogee Creek Nation Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Osage Nation Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Pit River Tribe Superior Chippewa Indians Lower Sioux Indian Community Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Oklahoma Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin Indians Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma Oneida Nation of Wisconsin Round Valley Indian Tribes Prairie Island Indian Community of Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma Minnesota Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Chippewa San Pasqual Band of Diegueno Indians Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma (O-Gah- Pah) Stockbridge-Munsee Community Band Sherwood Valley Band of Pomo Upper Sioux Community of Mohican Indians Indians of California White Earth Nation of Minnesota Seminole Nation of Oklahoma Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians Chippewa Seneca Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma WYOMING Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Thlopthlocco Tribal Town Shoshone Tribe of the Wind River Stewarts Point Rancheria Kashia Band MONTANA Wichita and Affiliated Tribes Reservation of Pomo Indians The Blackfeet Nation Wyandotte Nation Northern Arapaho Tribe Susanville Indian Rancheria Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Timbisha Shoshone Tribe Boy’s Reservation OREGON Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation Confederated Salish and Kootenai Burns Paiute Tribes *As of December 20, 2020: Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Confederated Tribes of the Coos, https://www.nathpo.org/thpo-search/ Indians The Crow Tribe of Indians Lower Umpqua & Siuslaw Indians For additional information, contact Shaw Sprague, Vice President of Government Relations and Policy, SSprague@ ^ savingplaces.org, (202) 588-6339 or Tom Cassidy, Senior Advisor, [email protected], (202) 588-6078..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download This PDF File
    A Political Ecology of Healing 1 Elisabeth Middleton University of California, Davis, USA. The concept of historical unresolved grief has powerful implications not only for healing from our past, but for giving us the strength and commitment to save ourselves and future generations. Maria Yellow Horse Brave Heart and Lemrya DeBruyn2 1. Introduction On June 29, 2004, the Pacific and Watershed Lands Stewardship Council convened a public meeting in Chester, California, in the northeastern Sierra Nevada mountains. The Board members and staff introduced the Council's purpose—to oversee the planning and divestiture of approximately 140,000 acres (56,656 ha.) of former Pacific Gas & Electric Company land around California—and then opened the floor to public comments and suggestions. One after another, representatives from Mountain Maidu groups including the Honey Lake Maidu, the Roundhouse Council Indian Education Center, and the Maidu Cultural and Development Group, and their allies, stood up and requested the formal inclusion of a Native American representative on the Stewardship Council Board. All of the lands to be divested, and, particularly for Maidu participants, much of the 53,185 acres (21,523 ha.) within the Feather River Planning Unit lie within the Mountain Maidu homeland. To not have an official representative of Native American interests on the Board to oversee the planning efforts for these lands seemed to indicate a blatant disregard for the historical and contemporary Native presence. In his 1998 review of political ecology,
    [Show full text]
  • California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A
    California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Written and Designed by Nicole Mullen Contributors: Ira Jacknis, Barbara Takiguchi, and Liberty Winn. Sources Consulted The former exhibition: Food in California Indian Culture at the Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology. Ortiz, Beverly, as told by Julia Parker. It Will Live Forever. Heyday Books, Berkeley, CA 1991. Jacknis, Ira. Food in California Indian Culture. Hearst Museum Publications, Berkeley, CA, 2004. Copyright © 2003. Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology and the Regents of the University of California, Berkeley. All Rights Reserved. PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Table of Contents 1. Glossary 2. Topics of Discussion for Lessons 3. Map of California Cultural Areas 4. General Overview of California Indians 5. Plants and Plant Processing 6. Animals and Hunting 7. Food from the Sea and Fishing 8. Insects 9. Beverages 10. Salt 11. Drying Foods 12. Earth Ovens 13. Serving Utensils 14. Food Storage 15. Feasts 16. Children 17. California Indian Myths 18. Review Questions and Activities PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Glossary basin an open, shallow, usually round container used for holding liquids carbohydrate Carbohydrates are found in foods like pasta, cereals, breads, rice and potatoes, and serve as a major energy source in the diet. Central Valley The Central Valley lies between the Coast Mountain Ranges and the Sierra Nevada Mountain Ranges. It has two major river systems, the Sacramento and the San Joaquin. Much of it is flat, and looks like a broad, open plain. It forms the largest and most important farming area in California and produces a great variety of crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Enrollment Update News February 2012 Proposed Changes in the Tribal Enrollment Ordinance
    [email protected] Enrollment Update News February 2012 Proposed Changes in the Tribal Enrollment Ordinance In October 2011, the Bishop Tribal Council held the 1st of a series of Pub- lic Hearings regarding proposed changes in the enrollment ordinance. The pro- posed changes would be to amend the ordinance to add new criteria such as: blood quantum, a residency clause, and having a contin- ual generational enrollment of descendents. Question: How did we arrive at Each meeting scheduled has discussed a “proposing” a blood quantum different topic. The most recent meeting on Janu- or enrollment changes? ary 25, 2012, the Bishop Tribal Council had invited On December 17, 2009 a tribal ENROLLMENT survey was taken asking if COMMITTEE representatives from the Bureau of Indian Affairs Tribal members would like to in Sacramento, California to give a presentation include a blood quantum in the LAURINE NAPOLES and answer any questions regarding blood quan- tum and when it is used or if it is still used. The current Tribal Enrollment Ordi- RUTH CHAVEZ nance. (134 people responded) meeting with the Bureau of Indian Affairs was in- PATTY MANRIQUEZ This lead to proposed changes formative for both the Enrollment Committee and and public hearings. GERALD HOWARD the community. ROBIN HOWARD The importance of these Public Hearings is for the community to become informed and be involved in the decision making process. Hopefully, the Enrollment Committee and Department can answer some ENROLLMENT DEPARTMENT of the misconceptions that have been mentioned during the Public Hearings. (i.e., GERTRUDE BROWN, We have members coming out of the “wood works”.
    [Show full text]
  • National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) Winter Session in Washington DC- During the Week of February 11Th -14Th, 2019 Two M
    The Bishop Indian Tribal Council encourages the community to continue to stay updated with the good things happening in our community by continuing to read all of the monthly newsletter articles and attend tribal meetings. For suggestions and comments on how to improve this newsletter article contact Brian Poncho @ (760)873-3584 ext. 1220. Council Member Brian Poncho and Vice Chairman Tilford Denver with Vice Chairman Tilford Denver and Council Member Brian Poncho Representative Charice Davids (KS) after meeting with Senator Dianne Feinstein’s Office National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) Winter Session in Washington DC- During the week of February 11th -14th, 2019 two members of the BPTC attended the 2019 NCAI Executive Winter Session as representatives from the Bishop Paiute Tribe. Vice-Chairman Denver, newly appointed as a Co-Chair of the NCAI TANF Task Force lead the discussion in the TANF Taskforce meeting on Monday, February 11th. Council Member Poncho, newly elected to the NCAI Executive Board as the Pa- cific Region Vice-President participated in Executive Meetings starting Sunday February 10th and through- out the week. In between meetings and the NCAI General Sessions, both BPTC members went to Capital Hill and met with Congressional Leaders as well as Senior Staff Members (20 offices total including our Congressmen Paul Cook) on Tribal issues affecting the Bishop Paiute Tribe. Topics included: Hunting and Fishing Rights, Tribal Police Concerns with Inyo County Sheriffs Department, and Tribal TANF. Vice- Chairman Denver and Council member Poncho also had a chance to meet with the Office of Tribal Justice Director Tracy Toulou (DOJ) and Deputy Solicitor Eric Shephard (DOI) specifically on issues the Tribe has with the Inyo County Sheriff Department and in getting our Tribal Police SLEC Certified.
    [Show full text]
  • Drought and Equity in California
    Drought and Equity in California Laura Feinstein, Rapichan Phurisamban, Amanda Ford, Christine Tyler, Ayana Crawford January 2017 Drought and Equity in California January 2017 Lead Authors Laura Feinstein, Senior Research Associate, Pacific Institute Rapichan Phurisamban, Research Associate, Pacific Institute Amanda Ford, Coalition Coordinator, Environmental Justice Coalition for Water Christine Tyler, Water Policy Leadership Intern, Pacific Institute Ayana Crawford, Water Policy Leadership Intern, Pacific Institute Drought and Equity Advisory Committee and Contributing Authors The Drought and Equity Advisory Committee members acted as contributing authors, but all final editorial decisions were made by lead authors. Sara Aminzadeh, Executive Director, California Coastkeeper Alliance Colin Bailey, Executive Director, Environmental Justice Coalition for Water Carolina Balazs, Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley Wendy Broley, Staff Engineer, California Urban Water Agencies Amanda Fencl, PhD Student, University of California, Davis Center for Environmental Policy and Behavior Kelsey Hinton, Program Associate, Community Water Center Gita Kapahi, Director, Office of Public Participation, State Water Resources Control Board Brittani Orona, Environmental Justice and Tribal Affairs Specialist and Native American Studies Doctoral Student, University of California, Davis Brian Pompeii, Lecturer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Tim Sloane, Executive Director, Institute for Fisheries Resources ISBN-978-1-893790-76-6 © 2017 Pacific Institute. All rights reserved. Pacific Institute 654 13th Street, Preservation Park Oakland, California 94612 Phone: 510.251.1600 | Facsimile: 510.251.2203 www.pacinst.org Cover Photos: Clockwise from top left: NNehring, Debargh, Yykkaa, Marilyn Nieves Designer: Bryan Kring, Kring Design Studio Drought and Equity in California I ABOUT THE PACIFIC INSTITUTE The Pacific Institute envisions a world in which society, the economy, and the environment have the water they need to thrive now and in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Used in Basketry by the California Indians
    PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS BY RUTH EARL MERRILL PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS RUTH EARL MERRILL INTRODUCTION In undertaking, as a study in economic botany, a tabulation of all the plants used by the California Indians, I found it advisable to limit myself, for the time being, to a particular form of use of plants. Basketry was chosen on account of the availability of material in the University's Anthropological Museum. Appreciation is due the mem- bers of the departments of Botany and Anthropology for criticism and suggestions, especially to Drs. H. M. Hall and A. L. Kroeber, under whose direction the study was carried out; to Miss Harriet A. Walker of the University Herbarium, and Mr. E. W. Gifford, Asso- ciate Curator of the Museum of Anthropology, without whose interest and cooperation the identification of baskets and basketry materials would have been impossible; and to Dr. H. I. Priestley, of the Ban- croft Library, whose translation of Pedro Fages' Voyages greatly facilitated literary research. Purpose of the sttudy.-There is perhaps no phase of American Indian culture which is better known, at least outside strictly anthro- pological circles, than basketry. Indian baskets are not only concrete, durable, and easily handled, but also beautiful, and may serve a variety of purposes beyond mere ornament in the civilized household. Hence they are to be found in. our homes as well as our museums, and much has been written about the art from both the scientific and the popular standpoints. To these statements, California, where American basketry.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes
    National Plant Data Team August 2012 Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes and the Klamath Tribe of Oregon in the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology Collections, University of California, Berkeley August 2012 Cover photos: Left: Maidu woman harvesting tarweed seeds. Courtesy, The Field Museum, CSA1835 Right: Thick patch of elegant madia (Madia elegans) in a blue oak woodland in the Sierra foothills The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its pro- grams and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sex- ual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Acknowledgments This report was authored by M. Kat Anderson, ethnoecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Jim Effenberger, Don Joley, and Deborah J. Lionakis Meyer, senior seed bota- nists, California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Pest Diagnostics Center. Special thanks to the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum staff, especially Joan Knudsen, Natasha Johnson, Ira Jacknis, and Thusa Chu for approving the project, helping to locate catalogue cards, and lending us seed samples from their collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Central California Agency
    Tolowa Northern California Elk Valley Agency Resighini Karuk q Yurok Quartz Valley Big Lagoon Trinidad Hoopa Valley Fort Bidwell Blue Lake Pit River Tribe Northern Calif Agency Table Bluff Alturas Cedarville Rohnerville 364 Knollcrest Drive, Ste 105 Redding, CA 96002 Pit River Tribe 530-223-7960 Central CalIifD AAgeHncOy Redding Laytonville 650 Capitol Mall, Ste 8-500 Sherwood Valley Sacramento, CA 95814 916-930-3680 Redwood Valley Susanville Round Valley Coyote Valley Southern Calif Agency Pinoleville Paskenta Greenville Guidiville Grindstone 1451 Research Park Dr, Ste 100 Riverside, CA 92507 Potter Valley ! Berry Creek 951-276-6624 Robinson Mechoopda Scotts Valley Enterprise Manchester-Point Arena Upper Lake Colusa Mooretown Palm Springs Agency Hopland Elem Indian Colony PO Box 2245 Big Valley Cortina Stewarts Point Palm Springs, CA 92263 Middletown Auburn 760-416-2133 Yocha Dehe Pacific Regional Office ^ Cloverdale Koi Nation Graton Shingle Springs 2800 Cottage Way Dry Creek Washoe Sacramento, CA 95825 Wilton ^Ione 916-978-6000 Jackson Lytton Buena Vista Sheep Ranch Bridgeport Chicken Ranch Tuolumne Central California C A L I F O R N I A Western Regional Office Agency Benton Picayune North Fork Bishop Table Mountain Big Sandy Cold Springs Big Pine Timbisha Shoshone Fort Independence Santa Rosa Rancheria Lone Pine Timbisha Shoshone Tule River 0 50 100 ^Tejon Miles Santa Ynez ^ TRIBAL OFFICES TRIBAL LANDS Public Domain Allotments Palm Springs Fort Mojave Agency Datum: NAD83 Southern California San Manuel Agua Caliente The boundaries depicted on this map Santa Rosa Reservation Chemehuevi are for display purposes only. This data Morongo Twenty-Nine Palms does not address encroachments or Agency Cabazon questions of location, boundary, and area Soboba which an accurate survey may disclose.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 72, No. 106/Monday, June 4, 2007/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 106 / Monday, June 4, 2007 / Notices 30823 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR cm. The unio shells measure from 5 cm where the items were likely collected. to 8.5 cm in length. The shell bead, Geographic location is consistent with National Park Service which is perforated with three holes, is the traditional and post–contact roughly rectangular, and measures 2.5 territory of the Confederated Tribes of Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural cm by 3 cm. The sculpted human head the Umatilla Reservation, Oregon. Items: American Museum of Natural is a single stone, which appears to be Officials of the American Museum of History, New York, NY granite and weighs approximately 6.8 kg Natural History have determined that, AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. (or 15 lbs), and features a human face. pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (3)(B), the 67 Mr. Terry acquired the 1 shell or cultural items are reasonably believed to ACTION: Notice. chalk bead, 2 remaining strings of beads have been placed with or near Notice is here given in accordance of mixed composition, 47 serpentine individual human remains at the time of with the Native American Graves beads, and 1 seal head sculpture from death or later as part of the death rite Protection and Repatriation Act Mrs. Kunzie of Umatilla, OR. Mrs. or ceremony and are believed, by a (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3005, of the intent Kunzie had collected the seal head preponderance of the evidence, to have to repatriate cultural items in the sculpture and one string of beads of been removed from a specific burial site possession of the American Museum of mixed composition from the vicinity of of a Native American individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnohistory and Ethnogeography of the Coast Miwok and Their Neighbors, 1783-1840
    ETHNOHISTORY AND ETHNOGEOGRAPHY OF THE COAST MIWOK AND THEIR NEIGHBORS, 1783-1840 by Randall Milliken Technical Paper presented to: National Park Service, Golden Gate NRA Cultural Resources and Museum Management Division Building 101, Fort Mason San Francisco, California Prepared by: Archaeological/Historical Consultants 609 Aileen Street Oakland, California 94609 June 2009 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report documents the locations of Spanish-contact period Coast Miwok regional and local communities in lands of present Marin and Sonoma counties, California. Furthermore, it documents previously unavailable information about those Coast Miwok communities as they struggled to survive and reform themselves within the context of the Franciscan missions between 1783 and 1840. Supplementary information is provided about neighboring Southern Pomo-speaking communities to the north during the same time period. The staff of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) commissioned this study of the early native people of the Marin Peninsula upon recommendation from the report’s author. He had found that he was amassing a large amount of new information about the early Coast Miwoks at Mission Dolores in San Francisco while he was conducting a GGNRA-funded study of the Ramaytush Ohlone-speaking peoples of the San Francisco Peninsula. The original scope of work for this study called for the analysis and synthesis of sources identifying the Coast Miwok tribal communities that inhabited GGNRA parklands in Marin County prior to Spanish colonization. In addition, it asked for the documentation of cultural ties between those earlier native people and the members of the present-day community of Coast Miwok. The geographic area studied here reaches far to the north of GGNRA lands on the Marin Peninsula to encompass all lands inhabited by Coast Miwoks, as well as lands inhabited by Pomos who intermarried with them at Mission San Rafael.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide and the Indians of California, 1769-1873 Margaret A
    University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston Graduate Masters Theses Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses 5-1993 Genocide and the Indians of California, 1769-1873 Margaret A. Field University of Massachusetts Boston Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/masters_theses Part of the Native American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Field, Margaret A., "Genocide and the Indians of California, 1769-1873" (1993). Graduate Masters Theses. Paper 141. This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses at ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GENOCIDE AND THE INDIANS OF CALIFORNIA , 1769-1873 A Thesis Presented by MARGARET A. FIELD Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies and Research of the Un1versity of Massachusetts at Boston in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS MAY 1993 HISTCRY PROGRAM GENOCIDE AND THE I NDIAN S OF CALIFORNIA, 1769-187 3 A Thesis P resented by MARGARET A. FIELD Approved as to style and content by : Clive Foss , Professor Co - Chairperson of Committee mes M. O'Too le , Assistant Professor -Chairpers on o f Committee Memb e r Ma rshall S. Shatz, Pr og~am Director Department of History ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank professors Foss , O'Toole, and Buckley f or their assistance in preparing this manuscri pt and for their encouragement throughout the project .
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 98/Monday, May 24, 2021/Notices
    27892 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 98 / Monday, May 24, 2021 / Notices 225. Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of 273. Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation Commission (‘‘Commission’’) Michigan 274. Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 226. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian 275. Tonto Apache Tribe 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the Community 276. Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla countervailing duty and antidumping 227. Samish Indian Tribe Indians duty orders on certain steel grating from 228. San Carlos Apache Tribe 277. Tulalip Tribes of Washington China would be likely to lead to 229. San Manual Band of Mission 278. Tule River Tribe continuation or recurrence of material Indians 279. Tunica-Biloxi Indians of Louisiana injury to an industry in the United 230. San Pasqual Band of Diegueno 280. Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk States within a reasonably foreseeable Mission Indians Indians time. 231. Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut 281. Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Tribe Indians Background 232. Santa Ynez Band of Chumash 282. Twenty-Nine Palms Band of The Commission instituted these Mission Indians Mission Indians reviews on October 1, 2020 (85 FR 233. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe 283. United Auburn Indian Community 61981) and determined on January 4, 234. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa 284. Upper Sioux Community 2021 that it would conduct expedited Indians 285. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe of reviews (86 FR 19286, April 13, 2021). 235. Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians Washington The Commission made these 236. Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 286. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe determinations pursuant to section 237.
    [Show full text]