DOCSLIB.ORG

Fighting Fake News

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fighting Fake News FIGHTING FAKE NEWS A STUDY OF ONLINE MISINFORMATION REGULATION IN THE ASIA PACIFIC Prepared and Written by ANDREA CARSON ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR (JOURNALISM) DEPARTMENT OF POLITICS, MEDIA & PHILOSOPHY, LA TROBE UNIVERSITY with LIAM FALLON Prepared for FACEBOOK, AUSTRALIA A FACEBOOK RESEARCH PROJECT latrobe.edu.au JANUARY 2021 Fighting Fake News: A Study of Online Misinformation Regulation in the Asia Pacific A First Published 2021 By La Trobe University Crn of Plenty Rd and Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, Melbourne, Australia 3086 © 2021 selection and editorial matter, Andrea Carson This work was funded by Facebook. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. B La Trobe University Table of contents Executive summary ................................................................................................... iv Key findings and conclusions ....................................................................................................................................... v Background ................................................................................................................................................................. vi Thematic findings .......................................................................................................................................................... vi Theme 1: What is online misinformation – and why is it a problem? .............................................................. vi Theme 2: Tackling misinformation online and its challenges .......................................................................... vii Theme 3: Potential remedies ................................................................................................................................... ix Fighting Fake News: A Study of Online Misinformation Regulation in the Asia Pacific . x Overview .......................................................................................................................................................................... xi Aim and report objectives ........................................................................................................................................ xi Background and Australian context....................................................................................................................... xii Method, scope and terminology ............................................................................................................................ xiii Chapter contents ...................................................................................................................................................... xiii About the Authors ........................................................................................................................................................ xvi Background chapters ............................................................................................... xvi Chapter 1 Indonesia’s approach to online misinformation ...........................................1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................2 Background and context ............................................................................................................................................3 The Government’s approach to tackling misinformation ....................................................................................4 Laws and regulations .................................................................................................................................................5 Government bodies ...................................................................................................................................................11 Timeline of Indonesia’s “fake news” laws and policies ......................................................................................12 Conclusion......................................................................................................................................................................13 Chapter 2 Singapore’s approach to online misinformation .........................................14 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................15 Background and context ..........................................................................................................................................15 The Government’s approach to tackling misinformation ..................................................................................16 Laws and regulations ...............................................................................................................................................16 The use of POFMA ...................................................................................................................................................19 Reactions to POFMA ................................................................................................................................................21 Timeline of Singapore’s “fake news” laws and policies .....................................................................................24 Conclusion......................................................................................................................................................................25 Chapter 3 The European Union: Approaches to online misinformation and disinformation ...................................................................................................26 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................27 Background and context ..........................................................................................................................................27 The EU Code of Practice ..........................................................................................................................................28 Action Plan against Disinformation .......................................................................................................................28 Assessments of the Code .......................................................................................................................................29 Reactions to the EU approach ...............................................................................................................................32 Other EU measures to tackle false information online ......................................................................................33 Member States’ initiatives .......................................................................................................................................34 Timeline of Europe’s “fake news” regulations and policies ...............................................................................35 Conclusion......................................................................................................................................................................36 Fighting Fake News: A Study of Online Misinformation Regulation in the Asia Pacific i Chapter 4 Australia’s approach to online misinformation ..........................................37 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................38 Background ACCC Digital Platforms Inquiry ........................................................................................................38 ACMA position paper ................................................................................................................................................39 DIGI draft code: Australian Code of Practice on Disinformation ......................................................................41 Comparing ACMA and DIGI positions on a new code ......................................................................................44 Conclusion......................................................................................................................................................................45 Key Findings: Themes 1-3 ........................................................................................46 Chapter 5 What is online misinformation – and why is it a problem? .........................46 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................47 Definitions: Misinformation, disinformation and malinformation ....................................................................47 Identifying the scale and effects of online misinformation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Singapore's Chinese-Speaking and Their Perspectives on Merger
    Chinese Southern Diaspora Studies, Volume 5, 2011-12 南方華裔研究雜志, 第五卷, 2011-12 “Flesh and Bone Reunite as One Body”: Singapore’s Chinese- speaking and their Perspectives on Merger ©2012 Thum Ping Tjin* Abstract Singapore’s Chinese speakers played the determining role in Singapore’s merger with the Federation. Yet the historiography is silent on their perspectives, values, and assumptions. Using contemporary Chinese- language sources, this article argues that in approaching merger, the Chinese were chiefly concerned with livelihoods, education, and citizenship rights; saw themselves as deserving of an equal place in Malaya; conceived of a new, distinctive, multiethnic Malayan identity; and rejected communist ideology. Meanwhile, the leaders of UMNO were intent on preserving their electoral dominance and the special position of Malays in the Federation. Finally, the leaders of the PAP were desperate to retain power and needed the Federation to remove their political opponents. The interaction of these three factors explains the shape, structure, and timing of merger. This article also sheds light on the ambiguity inherent in the transfer of power and the difficulties of national identity formation in a multiethnic state. Keywords: Chinese-language politics in Singapore; History of Malaya; the merger of Singapore and the Federation of Malaya; Decolonisation Introduction Singapore’s merger with the Federation of Malaya is one of the most pivotal events in the country’s history. This process was determined by the ballot box – two general elections, two by-elections, and a referendum on merger in four years. The centrality of the vote to this process meant that Singapore’s Chinese-speaking1 residents, as the vast majority of the colony’s residents, played the determining role.
    [Show full text]
  • 新加坡华族之多元性国际会议 Diversity and Singapore Ethnic Chinese Communities International Conference
    新 加 坡 华 族 之 多 元 新加坡 性 国 际 华族之多元性 会 议 论 国际会议论文集 文 集 ETHNIC CHINESE COMMUNITIES DIVERSITY AND SINGAPORE DIVERSITY AND SINGAPORE ETHNIC CHINESE COMMUNITIES INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Edited by Koh Khee Heong Ong Chang Woei Phua Chiew Pheng Chong Ja Ian Yang Yan ISBN 978-981-14-5149-2 新加坡 华族之多元性 国际会议论文集 DIVERSITY AND SINGAPORE ETHNIC CHINESE COMMUNITIES INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Edited by Koh Khee Heong Ong Chang Woei Phua Chiew Pheng Chong Ja Ian Yang Yan Copyright © Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre and Department of Chinese Studies, National University of Singapore, 2020 Published by City Book Room 420 North Bridge Road #03-10 North Bridge Centre Singapore 188727 Email: [email protected] ISBN: 978-981-14-4998-7 (paper) ISBN: 978-981-14-5149-2 (e-book) All rights reserved. No part of the publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, without the prior written permission of the publishers of this book. Cover design and layout by Ho Siew Yuen Printed by Ho Printing, Singapore National Library Board, Singapore Cataloguing in Publication Data Name(s): Diversity and Singapore Ethnic Chinese Communities International Conference (1st: 2019: Singapore) | Koh, Khee Heong, editor. | Ong, Chang Woei, 1970- editor. | Phua, Chiew Pheng, editor. | Chong, Ja Ian, editor. | Yang, Yan, editor. Title: Diversity and Singapore ethnic Chinese Communities International Conference = Xinjiapo hua zu zhi duo yuan xing guo ji hui yi lun wen ji / edited by Koh Khee Heong, Ong Chang Woei, Phua Chiew Pheng, Chong Ja Ian, Yang Yan.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review 38TH SESSION of the UPR WORKING GROUP (3 – 14 MAY 2021) Contribu
    United Nations Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review 38TH SESSION OF THE UPR WORKING GROUP (3 – 14 MAY 2021) Contribution by Reporters Without Borders (RSF) an NGO with special consultative status, on press freedom and the freedom to inform in Singapore 1. Summary of the press freedom situation The press freedom situation in Singapore further declined in 2020. According to the World Press Freedom Index established by RSF, in which Singapore now ranks 158 out of 180 countries after dropping seven places in a year’s time, the situation is now classified as “very bad”. This deterioration was largely propelled by the adoption of an “anti-fake news” law that allows the government the power to determine whether statements made online are true or false by ordering media outlets, digital platforms, and ordinary users to publish mandated “corrections”, or to remove access to the content completely. This latest piece of legislation further exacerbates an already poor situation, in which the People’s Action Party government has access to broad powers to censor journalistic content or apply pressure on mainstream media outlets. Powerful politicians have been known to use defamation suits to silence critics and political opponents. Vague and ambiguous “OB markers” (for out-of-bounds markers) keep journalists and Singaporeans in a state of uncertainty, encouraging fear and self-censorship. During its second review in 2016, Singapore accepted one hundred and seventeen (117) recommendations. Among these recommendations, Singapore accepted only a few recommendations related to freedom of expression1, and none affecting specifically the media, despite the fact that several States had made recommendations in direct relation to the freedom of the media2, including the removal of discriminatory media guidelines, the reform of the regime of defamation offences, the elimination of media censorship, and the prevention of self-censorship.
    [Show full text]
  • Appellant's Contact Dr Thum Ping Tjin Email: Pingtjin.Thum@Newnaratif
    Appellant’s Contact Dr Thum Ping Tjin Email: [email protected] 9 May 2018 Mr Heng Swee Keat Minister for Finance #10-01 and #06-03 The Treasury 100 High Street Singapore 179434 By Email, Fax (6337 4134) & Hand Dear Sirs, APPEAL AGAINST REJECTION OF NAME APPLICATION BY “OSEA PTE LTD” 1. We refer to the rejection of the abovementioned name application (transaction no. ) (the “Application”) by the Registrar of Companies, under the purview of the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (“ACRA”) on 11 April 2018. 2. The Application was made by the director designate of OSEA Pte Ltd, Dr Thum Ping Tjin, on 8 February 2018. OSEA Pte Ltd was to be a wholly-owned subsidiary of Observatory Southeast Asia Limited (“OSEA UK”), a company incorporated in the United Kingdom. At present, OSEA UK owns and manages the New Naratif website (www.newnaratif.com). 3. OSEA Pte Ltd’s planned activities would have included organising discussion fora, workshops, and other events in Singapore, such as “Democracy Classroom” sessions. OSEA Pte Ltd would also have provided editorial services to New Naratif. 4. We make our appeal against the rejection of the Application pursuant to Section 27(12C) of the Companies Act. 5. In its rejection email dated 11 April 2018 to the registered filing agent for the Application, ACRA cited Section 27(12A) of the Companies Act as its basis for doing so, in the following terms: “Your application for OSEA PTE. LTD. has been rejected due to s27(12A) of the Companies Act. Thank you.” 6. We note that the Section 27(12A) of the Companies Act states: “The Registrar must refuse to approve an application to reserve a name […] as the name of an intended company if the Registrar is satisfied that — 1 (a) the name is for a company that is likely to be used for an unlawful purpose or for purposes prejudicial to public peace, welfare or Good order in SinGapore; or (b) it would be contrary to the national security or interest for the company to be registered.” 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Representation 83 Name: Thum Ping Tjin Historian and Also the Founder, Managing Director, and Research Director of New N
    Written Representation 83 Name: Thum Ping Tjin Historian and also the founder, Managing Director, and Research Director of New Naratif. Research Fellow in History and Coordinator of Project Southeast Asia at the University of Oxford (2014-present) Received: 28 Feb 2018 Submission to the Select Committee on Deliberate Online Falsehoods, Parliament of Singapore Dr. Thum Ping Tjin 26 February 2018 Summary The definition of deliberate online falsehoods (or “fake news”) is extremely ambiguous. Sources are difficult to trace, difficult to prosecute, and domestic legislation will not stop foreign actors outside of Singapore. New legislation is not necessary as there is already existing legislation which can address “fake news”, and anyway there is already a surfeit of laws in Singapore which suppress free speech. Most of all, “fake news” has not, historically, had much of an impact in Singapore — with one major exception: the People’s Action Party government has, historically, spread “fake news” for narrow party-political gain. Given these problems, any solution to the problem of “fake news” must therefore start with the education of Singaporeans to be more skeptical of all information, regardless of source; the diversification of responsible news sources; and greater transparency in government and accountability for those in official positions. Accordingly, the chief measures recommended to combat “fake news” are: 1. The focusing of media literacy education on teaching Singaporeans to understand how the information industry works, to be politically aware, and to be skeptical of all information, regardless of source; 2. The repeal of the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act 1974, and reform/repeal of other laws which suppress free speech; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Empowering Possibilities with More Reasons to Smile
    EMPOWERING POSSIBILITESPOSSIBILITIES WITHWITH AA SMILESMILE AnnualAnnual ReportReport 2017/182017/18 INFOCOMM MEDIA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EMPOWERING POSSIBILITIES WITH MORE REASONS TO SMILE INFOCOMM MEDIA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ANNUAL REPORT 2O17/18 021 EMPOWERING POSSIBILITESPOSSIBILITIES WITHWITH AA SMILESMILE AnnualAnnual ReportReport 2017/182017/18 INFOCOMM MEDIA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ABOUT IMDA The Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) leads Singapore’s digital transformation with infocomm media. To do this, IMDA will develop a dynamic digital economy and a cohesive digital society, driven by an exceptional infocomm media (ICM) ecosystem – by developing talent, strengthening business capabilities, and enhancing Singapore’s ICM infrastructure. IMDA also regulates the telecommunications and media sectors to safeguard consumer interests while fostering a pro-business environment, and enhances Singapore’s data protection regime through the Personal Data Protection Commission. FOREWORD IMDA’s inaugural annual report captures our achievements and VISION milestones of the past year, and how it has worked to unify Singapore’s digitalisation efforts. Whether it is providing help for A dynamic Digital Economy and a cohesive Digital Society, driven different industries to jumpstart their digitalisation journeys, or by an exceptional infocomm and media ecosystem. creating new ecosystems, opportunities and capabilities for our digital future, IMDA is moving ahead with industries and people, to be a leading global node in Asia for this digital economy. MISSION Drive Singapore’s digital transformation with infocomm media. VALUES • Integrity • Collaboration • Innovation • Care & Respect 022 EMPOWERING POSSIBILITESPOSSIBILITIES WITHWITH AA SMILESMILE AnnualAnnual ReportReport 2017/182017/18 INFOCOMM MEDIA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Creating Opportunities for More, Developing Nurturing digital talent in our community is CHAIRMAN’S the Next Generation of Future-Ready People a key element of being digitally ready.
    [Show full text]
  • China and the “Singapore Model”
    January 2016, Volume 27, Number 1 $14.00 The Authoritarian Threat Christopher Walker Lucan Way Ethiopia’s 100% Election Leonardo R. Arriola and Terrence Lyons Simegnish Yekoye Mengesha What’s Wrong with East-Central Europe? James Dawson and Seán Hanley Ivan Krastev Nancy Bermeo on Democratic Backsliding Stephan Ortmann & Mark R. Thompson on the “Singapore Model” Neil DeVotta on Sri Lanka Alfred Stepan on Leaders of Transitions The Quest for Good Governance Alina Mungiu-Pippidi Alexander Kupatadze Christian Goebel Daniel Buquet and Rafael Pi~neiro Thompson.NEW saved by BK on 11/16/15; 3,907 words, including notes. TXT saved from NEW by TB on 11/23/15; 3,726 words. MP edits added by TB on 11/30/15; 3,769 words. AAS saved from author email by TB on 12/7/15 3,782 words. FIN saved from AAS by TB on 12/7/15 and finalized per author email on 12/8/15. PGS created by BK on 12/8/15. CHINA AND THE “SINGAPORE MODEL” Stephan Ortmann and Mark R. Thompson Stephan Ortmann is assistant professor of political economy at the City University of Hong Kong. His most recent book is Politics and Change in Singapore and Hong Kong: Containing Contention (2010). Mark R. Thompson is acting head of the Department of Asian and In- ternational Studies and director of the Southeast Asia Research Centre at the City University of Hong Kong. In 2007–2008, he was Lee Kong Chian Distinguished Fellow for Southeast Asian Studies at Stanford University and the National University of Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Intelligence Community in Singapore, 1946-1959: Local
    The British intelligence community in Singapore, 1946-1959: Local security, regional coordination and the Cold War in the Far East Alexander Nicholas Shaw Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds, School of History January 2019 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Alexander Nicholas Shaw to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by Alexander Nicholas Shaw in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Acknowledgements I would like to thank all those who have supported me during this project. Firstly, to my funders, the White Rose College of the Arts and Humanities and the Arts and Humanities Research Council. Caryn Douglas and Clare Meadley have always been most encouraging and have never stinted in supplying sausage rolls. At Leeds, I am grateful to my supervisors Simon Ball, Adam Cathcart and, prior to his retirement, Martin Thornton. Emma Chippendale and Joanna Phillips have been invaluable guides in navigating the waters of PhD admin. In Durham, I am indebted to Francis Gotto from Palace Green Library and the Oriental Museum’s Craig Barclay and Rachel Barclay. I never expected to end up curating an exhibition of Asian art when I started researching British intelligence, but Rachel and Craig made that happen.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore Joint Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review 38Th Session of the UPR Working Group
    Republic of Singapore Joint Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review 38th Session of the UPR Working Group 15 October 2020 Submission by CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation, NGO in General Consultative Status with ECOSOC And The Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA) NGO in General Consultative Status with ECOSOC CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen FORUM ASIA Participation FORUM-ASIA Lead, Ahmed Adam CIVICUS UPR Lead, Josef Benedict Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Tel: +66 2 1082643 45 Susan Wilding, Web: www.forum-asia.org Email: [email protected] Tel: +41 22 733 3435 Web: www.civicus.org 1. Introduction 1.1 CIVICUS is a global alliance of civil society organisations (CSOs) and activists dedicated to strengthening citizen action and civil society around the world. Founded in 1993, CIVICUS has members in more than 190 countries throughout the world. 1.2 The Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA) is a network of 81 members in 21 countries that works to promote and protect human rights, including the right to development, through collaboration and cooperation among human rights organisations and defenders in Asia and beyond. 1.3 In this document, CIVICUS and FORUM-ASIA examine the Government of Singapore’s compliance with its international human rights obligations to create and maintain a safe and enabling environment for civil society. Specifically, we analyse Singapore’s fulfilment of the rights to the freedoms of association, peaceful assembly and expression and unwarranted restrictions on human rights defenders (HRDs) since its previous UPR examination in April 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • The People's Action Party and the Singapore Presidency in 2017 : Understanding the Contradictions Between State Discourse and State Practice
    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. The People's Action Party and the Singapore presidency in 2017 : understanding the contradictions between state discourse and state practice Mohamed Nawab Mohamed Osman; Waikar, Prashant 2019 Mohamed Nawab Mohamed Osman, & Waikar, P. (2019). The People's Action Party and the Singapore presidency in 2017 : understanding the contradictions between state discourse and state practice. Asian Survey, 59(2), 382‑405. doi:10.1525/AS.2019.59.2.382 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142254 https://doi.org/10.1525/AS.2019.59.2.382 Mohamed Nawab Mohamed Osman, & Waikar, P. 2019. The People's Action Party and the Singapore presidency in 2017 : understanding the contradictions between state discourse and state practice. Asian Survey, 59(2), 382‑405. https://doi.org/10.1525/AS.2019.59.2.382 © 2019 by the Regents of the University of California/Sponsoring Society or Association. Downloaded on 26 Sep 2021 20:56:15 SGT MOHAMED NAWAB MOHAMED OSMAN AND PRASHANT WAIKAR The People’s Action Party and the Singapore Presidency in 2017 Understanding the Contradictions between State Discourse and State Practice Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/as/article-pdf/59/2/382/79470/as_2019_59_2_382.pdf by guest on 17 June 2020 ABSTRACT While the Singapore government has sought to construct the elected presidency as an institution critical to Singapore’s political system, the result in fact forces the insti- tution to contradict itself. This paradox has important implications for politics in a post–Lee Hsien Loong Singapore. KEYWORDS: People’s Action Party, Singapore presidential election 2017, state praxes, state discourse, post-Lee Singapore INTRODUCTION In September 2017, Singapore elected Halimah Yacob as the country’s first- ever female president.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore | Freedom House
    Singapore | Freedom House https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/singapore Singapore | Freedom House POLITICAL RIGHTS: 19 / 40 A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 4 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 1 / 4 The government is led by a prime minister and cabinet formed by the party that controls the legislature. The current prime minster, Lee Hsien Loong, has been in power since 2004 and secured a new mandate after the 2015 parliamentary elections. While polling-day procedures are generally free of irregularities, numerous structural factors impede the development of viable electoral competition. The president, whose role is largely ceremonial, is elected by popular vote for six-year terms, and a special committee is empowered to vet candidates. Under 2016 constitutional amendments on eligibility, none of Singapore’s three main ethnic groupings (Malays, Chinese, and Indians or others) may be excluded from the presidency for more than five consecutive terms, and presidential candidates from the private sector, as opposed to senior officials with at least three years of service, must have experience leading a company with at least S$500 million (US$370 million) in shareholder equity. Only one candidate—Halimah Yacob, backed by the PAP—was declared eligible for the 2017 presidential election, making her the winner by default. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 2 / 4 The unicameral Parliament elected in 2015 includes 13 members from single-member constituencies and 76 members from Group Representation Constituencies (GRCs). The top-polling party in each GRC wins all of its three to six seats, which has historically bolstered the majority of the dominant PAP.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019 Oneapex Limited Annual Report 2019
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ONEAPEX LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 2019 This annual report has been prepared by the Company and reviewed by the Company’s sponsor, Novus Corporate Finance Pte. Ltd. (the “Sponsor”) in compliance with Rule 226(2)(b) of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (the “SGX-ST”) Listing Manual Section B: Rules of Catalist. This annual report has not been examined or approved by the SGX- ST and the SGX-ST assumes no responsibility for the contents of this annual report, including the correctness of any of the statements or opinions made or reports contained in this annual report. The contact person for the Sponsor is Mr Pong Chen Yih, Chief Operating Officer, at 9 Raffles Place, #17-05, Republic Plaza Tower 1, Singapore 048619, telephone (65) 6950 2188. Corporate Profile 01 CEO's Statement and Financial Review 02 Corporate Structure 05 Board of Directors 06 Executive Officers 09 Corporate Information 11 Financial Highlights 12 Corporate Governance Report 13 Financial Contents 45 Statistics of Shareholdings 113 Notice of Annual General Meeting 115 Appendix 121 Proxy Form IV ONEAPEX LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 2019 CORPORATE PROFILE Chew’s Group Limited (the “Company” and together shareholders of the Company to acquire the remaining with its subsidaries the “Group”) was incorporated on issued and paid-up ordinary shares in the capital of the 30 September 2010 and was listed on the Catalist board Company. At the close of offer on 20 November 2018, of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited Goldhill Trust announced that it owned 78,928,572 (the “SGX-ST”) on 28 February 2011.
    [Show full text]