Newsletter No 29 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Newsletter No 29 2019 Keston Newsletter No. 29, 2019 Photograph of a desecrated and vandalised church from Religion in Communist Lands, vol.16 no.3, Autumn 1988, taken to mark the Millennium of the Baptism of Kievan Rus’. In this issue: Keston at 50 ............................................ p.3 Diplomacy and Religion ......................... p.7 South Ossetia ........................................ p.11 Atheist Archives .................................... p.18 Keston Newsletter No 29, 2019 Bonhoeffer’s Legacy ............................. 1 p.26 Trials in Crimea ................................... p.37 Mavis Perris Remembered .................... p.44 50 Years The Editor of the Keston Newsletter that there were many millions of people writes: who did have faith and who were still This year Keston College celebrates its suffering for it, many years after the anti- fiftieth anniversary. Founded in response religious campaigns of the Soviet Union to a real and pressing need - “Be Our had lost some of their virulence. Voice” - for repressed believers of all faiths, suffering under Khrushchev’s attempt to In this issue of the Newsletter our wipe out religion in the secular Soviet President, Michael Bourdeaux, illustrates Union, it has collected evidence and this in his recollections of the many reported on the fate of believers not just in inspiring figures of the Russian Orthodox the Soviet Union, but also in Eastern Church and other churches he met during Europe and China. Its journal, Religion in his work. Approaching the subject from a Communist Lands, was for many years the different angle, Roland Smith principal vehicle for reporting in depth and demonstrates why diplomats should not for making known cruelties and injustices ignore religion. There follow two historical that would otherwise have passed pieces, on Soviet anti-religious propaganda unnoticed in the rest of the world. Our posters and the influence of Dietrich cover photograph, taken from Religion in Bonhoeffer’s writings in the DDR, Communist Lands, reminds us of the Czechoslovakia and Poland. We also have desolation wrought by Soviet repression. an important glimpse into Orthodox church life and politics in South Ossetia. As the West increasingly lost faith in Finally, there is an update on the organised religion and turned to exotic tribulations of believers in Crimea, faiths and none, there were many who annexed illegally by Russia in 2014 and could not see the point of an institution like now subject to Russian “anti-extremism” Keston, and did not read its publications. laws. Had they done so, they would have realised Two major celebrations of Keston’s jubilee will take place this year: in June a plaque will be unveiled on the building in which Keston College worked from 1972 to 1992 ; in November the AGM will be addressed by Rowan Williams, who is one of our Patrons. We hope all members who can will attend these events: Unveiling of the plaque: Thursday 20 June 2019 at 16.00, Keston, Bromley, Kent. Talk by Rowan Williams and AGM: Saturday 9 November 2019 at 12.00, the Royal Foundation of St Katharine, Limehouse, London. Keston Newsletter No 29, 2019 2 Keston at Fifty – A Retrospective by Michael Bourdeaux There is a widespread belief that the First, the State forced the Baptist collapse of communism led to a religious leadership to adopt new statutes in 1960, revival in Russia. Although officially the under which local pastors were instructed Russian Orthodox Church, by and large, not to appeal for “conversions” in sermons maintains this position, it is wrong. You and even to keep young people out of cannot understand the Russian Orthodox church. Gennadii Kryuchkov and Alexei Church today without considering the Prokofiev (soon replaced by Georgii Vins) heroism of many who were inspired by led a movement to summon a congress their new-found faith for a quarter of a where state interference in church affairs century after 1959, the beginning of Nikita would be condemned. Khrushchev’s persecution. Second, the government I entered the fray at this Council for Russian point, being a member of Orthodox Church Affairs the first-ever British similarly enforced student exchange with the measures at a State- USSR and spending the controlled “Synod of academic year 1959-60 at Bishops” in 1961: parish Moscow University. Only priests were banned from gradually did I become their own church councils, aware of the extent of the handing over their renewed persecution of the administration in many Church – indeed, of all instances to atheists religions – harking back to appointed by the local the worst days of Stalin. A leader of the Communist prolonged series of Party. In 1965 two Moscow experiences led to the priests, Frs Nikolai founding, ten years later, of Keston Eshliman and Gleb Yakunin, gathered College. copious information about the persecution and addressed strong and detailed appeals Once we established the reliability of our to the State and the Moscow Patriarchate, work, information (samizdat – the latter begging Patriarch Alexii I to act unpublished documents) began to reach us more strongly in defence of the faith. in a flood. We read official sources, the Soviet press, as well and established At this time, significant members of the original work by cross-referencing articles intelligentsia began to show an interest in – attacking individual believers to the sometimes a commitment to – the documents which showed what they were traditional faith. Alexander Solzhenitsyn really doing or saying. No one had ever wrote a published essay, ‘Along the Oka’, done that before. We discovered that there in which he bewailed the desecration of was a two-pronged attack against believers, village churches throughout the land. A as well as a comprehensive condemnation religious revival was already underway in of all religion. the 1960s. Keston Newsletter No 29, 2019 3 The extent of this and the role of political support for the Putin regime. individuals in it became the main focus of There is room to spare for those who, Keston throughout the next twenty years. resurrecting the Keston tradition, wish to No overall Russian-based assessment of study this devolution in detail. these events seems to have taken place and the archive of Keston, now being carefully There was, indeed, a short-lived attempt by maintained by Baylor University at Waco, the Russian Orthodox Church to examine Texas, is the sole repository of this key its past. A former Keston researcher, movement in twentieth-century church Geraldine Fagan, has studied this and history. writes it up in Chapter 10 of Dominic Erdozain’s book, The Dangerous God Even in a recent study of the Russian (2017). Orthodox Church, an American academic, John Burgess, fails at this point, though he She quotes the case of Bishop Khrizostom otherwise writes impressively. His Holy of Vilnius, known to be a good and faithful Rus’ (2017) informs us, rather too blandly pastor. Even he admitted in 1992 that he (p.3): “I had read that religion was coming had collaborated with the KGB and he back to life in this part of the world”. He publicly begged forgiveness. He also dismisses the Khrushchev purge in one named Archbishop Mefodi of Voronezh as paragraph (p.167), simply missing out all a “KGB officer”. From his London the “confessors” (those who suffered for cathedral, Metropolitan Anthony Bloom their faith) for the next quarter of a century. (who died in 2003) recommended that the Russian Church should follow the example Much more serious is the way in which the of South Africa and set up a “Truth and Moscow Patriarchate skews its own history Reconciliation Commission”. In a way, this by passing directly from the fate of the tens did happen and there was a response. of thousands of martyrs under Stalin to its Khrizostom challenged the Bishops’ freedom when communism collapsed. Council “to purify ourselves from all this”. There is an elision here and a most serious The response was to form a “Commission one. What of its own role in justifying for Investigation into the Activities of the Stalin’s policies after its creation near the Security Services within the Russian end of World War II? What of its later Orthodox Church” (Erdozain, p.200). attacks against those who reproduced the Over a period of eleven years, Fr Georgii words of the persecuted? This omission, Edelshtein, a friend of Keston from sadly, coloured its attitude to Keston, and Kostroma, wrote to his bishop, Aleksandr, this hostility to some extent persists even who was chair of the commission. He today. repeatedly asked for a report on its progress – but Fr Vsevolod Chaplin, The Russian Orthodox Church claimed spokesman for the Patriarchate, told Ms that it enjoyed “freedom of religion” in Fagan in 2000 that it had long ago such forums as the World Council of completed its enquiry, but results would Churches (which it joined in 1961) and not be released. So ended that story. this, in turn and in some instances, affected Keston’s own relations with the churches of The collapse of communism opened up the Western democracies. Rather too new perspectives for Keston, despite easily, the old ways of Orthodox Church, dwindling financial support. We helped which always supported its government at a inaugurate Oxford’s Theological Exchange time of persecution, dovetailed into Programme and funded the first Russian Keston Newsletter No 29, 2019 4 Orthodox student to benefit from it. We Moscow Patriarchate proclaimed that established a small Moscow team which, priests were debarred from political joined by Xenia Dennen, our chairman, activity, and he was stripped of his began travelling to all corners of Russia to priesthood. record developments in religious life. A whole generation of “Confessors” was I had, for the first time, the opportunity to airbrushed out of official history. The work for the BBC in Russia and to present Keston legacy, however, gives these men something of the richness of the Russian and women a continuing voice, having Orthodox heritage to the Western and documented their activities with care and worldwide public.
Recommended publications
  • Economic Rehabilitation Works Issue 2 March 2009 a Unique Initiative
    Economic Rehabilitation Works Issue 2 March 2009 A unique initiative When launching the Economic Rehabilitation Programme, the Sides* of the conflict settlement process agreed unanimously that projects for the economic rehabilitation of the conflict zone (and adjacent areas) would provide an effective mechanism for confidence-building and, ultimately, for a resolution of the conflict. It was also understood that economic rehabilitation could: • create opportunities for developing regional trade and transit, using the potential of the Trans Caucasian Highway (TRANSCAM) • improve the investment climate • help strengthen peace and security in the whole region. The first milestone in developing the programme came in November 2005, when the OSCE Mission to Georgia launched a major new initiative – a Needs Assessment Study. This yielded a mutually-agreed list of urgent projects for socio-economic infrastructure in the zone of conflict and surrounding areas. The international community responded to this initiative by funding the study, and by pledging – at a specially convened conference in Brussels in June 2006 – some €8 million for implementation of the projects upon which the Sides agreed. Once established, the programme enjoyed some important successes, particularly on the ground with communities. However the deteriorating political and security situation created a very challenging environment, and the outbreak of fighting in August had a severely adverse effect on the programme. After ERP assessment of the circumstances of farmers and SMEs in accessible communities the donors wished to continue with economic rehabilitation in the area. At this stage, access for all involved communities, as originally envisaged for the ERP, was impossible. Therefore as an effective interim solution, the Transitional Economic Rehabilitation Programme (TERP) was launched.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in Georgia: 2015 Country Commercial Guide for U.S
    Doing Business in Georgia: 2015 Country Commercial Guide for U.S. Companies INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 2010. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. • Chapter 1: Doing Business In Georgia • Chapter 2: Political and Economic Environment • Chapter 3: Selling U.S. Products and Services • Chapter 4: Leading Sectors for U.S. Export and Investment • Chapter 5: Trade Regulations, Customs and Standards • Chapter 6: Investment Climate • Chapter 7: Trade and Project Financing • Chapter 8: Business Travel • Chapter 9: Contacts, Market Research and Trade Events • Chapter 10: Guide to Our Services Chapter 1: Doing Business in Georgia • Market Overview • Market Challenges • Market Opportunities • Market Entry Strategy Market Overview Return to top Market Overview Georgia is a small transitional market economy of 3.7 million people with a per capita GDP of $3,681 (2014). Georgia is located at the crossroads between Europe and Central Asia and has experienced economic growth over the past twelve years. In June 2014, Georgia signed an Association Agreement (AA) and Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) with the European Union. Through reduced tariffs and the removal of technical barriers to entry, the DCFTA gives Georgian products access to over 500 million people in the EU. Reciprocally, products from the EU now enjoy easier access to the Georgian market. Following the launch of the U.S.-Georgia Strategic Partnership Commission (SPC) in 2009, the U.S. Department of State holds regular meetings with its Georgian counterparts across various working groups. One of these dialogues is the Economic, Energy, and Trade Working Group which aims to coordinate Georgia’s strategy for development in these areas and to explore ways to expand bilateral economic cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Report, on Municipal Solid Waste Management in Georgia, 2012
    R E P O R T On Municipal Solid Waste Management in Georgia 2012 1 1 . INTRODUCTION 1.1. FOREWORD Wastes are one of the greatest environmental chal- The Report reviews the situation existing in the lenges in Georgia. This applies both to hazardous and do- field of municipal solid waste management in Georgia. mestic wastes. Wastes are disposed in the open air, which It reflects problems and weak points related to munic- creates hazard to human’s health and environment. ipal solid waste management as related to regions in Waste represents a residue of raw materials, semi- the field of collection, transportation, disposal, and re- manufactured articles, other goods or products generat- cycling. The Report also reviews payments/taxes re- ed as a result of the process of economic and domestic lated to the waste in the country and, finally, presents activities as well as consumption of different products. certain recommendations for the improvement of the As for waste management, it generally means distribu- noted field. tion of waste in time and identification of final point of destination. It’s main purpose is reduction of negative impact of waste on environment, human health, or es- 1.2. Modern Approaches to Waste thetic condition. In other words, sustainable waste man- Management agement is a certain practice of resource recovery and reuse, which aims to the reduction of use of natural re- The different waste management practices are ap- sources. The concept of “waste management” includes plied to different geographical or geo-political locations. the whole cycle from the generation of waste to its final It is directly proportional to the level of economic de- disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Humanitarian Dimension” of Russian Foreign Policy TOWARD GEORGIA, Moldova, Ukraine, and the Baltic States
    THe “HUMANITARIAN DIMENSION” OF RUSSIAN FOREIGN POLICY TOWARD GEORGIA, MOLDOVA, UKRAINE, AND THE BALTIC StATES The 2nd, supplementary edition Riga, 2010 EDK: 327(470) The 2nd, supplementary edition Hu 451 This book is work of six think tanks from Baltic States, Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. Centre for East European Policy Studies (Latvia) had a leading role in the im- plementation of this research project. Contributors include the International Centre for Defence Studies (Estonia), the Centre for Geopolitical Studies (Lithuania), the School for Policy Analysis at the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (Ukraine), the Foreign Policy Association of Moldova (Moldova), and the International Centre for Geopolitical Studies (Georgia). The research project was implemented with the support of the Konrad Ad- enauer Foundation and of the East - East: Partnership Beyond Borders Program of the Soros Foundation – Latvia. Editor: Gatis Pelnēns Project Director: Andis Kudors Authors of the study: Juhan Kivirähk, Nerijus Maliukevičius, Dmytro Kon- dratenko, Olexandr Yeremeev, Radu Vrabie, Nana Devdariani, Mariam Tsatsanash- vili, Nato Bachiashvili, Tengiz Pkhaladze, Gatis Pelnēns, Andis Kudors, Mārtiņš Pa- parinskis, Ainārs Dimants, Ainārs Lerhis. English translation editor: Rihards Kalniņš Design of the cover and layout: Toms Deģis © Authors of the study (text), 2010 © Centre for East European Policy Studies, International Centre for Defence Studies, Centre for Geopolitical Studies, School for Policy Analysis at the National university of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Foreign Policy Association of Moldova, Interna- tional Centre for Geopolitical Studies, 2010 © SIA Apgāds Mantojums (design concept), 2010 ISBN: 978-9984-39-989-8 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface to Second Edition . 8 4.4.2. Russian Support of Compatriots Living in Lithuania .
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Kosovo: a Critical Geopolitics of the August 2008 War Over South
    Toal.fm Page 670 Monday, December 22, 2008 10:20 AM Russia’s Kosovo: A Critical Geopolitics of the August 2008 War over South Ossetia Gearóid Ó Tuathail (Gerard Toal)1 Abstract: A noted political geographer presents an analysis of the August 2008 South Ossetian war. He analyzes the conflict from a critical geopolitical perspective sensitive to the importance of localized context and agency in world affairs and to the limitations of state- centric logics in capturing the connectivities, flows, and attachments that transcend state bor- ders and characterize specific locations. The paper traces the historical antecedents to the August 2008 conflict and identifies major factors that led to it, including legacies of past vio- lence, the Georgian president’s aggressive style of leadership, and renewed Russian “great power” aspirations under Putin. The Kosovo case created normative precedents available for opportunistic localization. The author then focuses on the events of August 2008 and the competing storylines promoted by the Georgian and Russian governments. Journal of Eco- nomic Literature, Classification Numbers: H10, I31, O18, P30. 7 figures, 2 tables, 137 refer- ences. Key words: South Ossetia, Georgia, Russia, North Ossetia, Abkhazia, genocide, ethnic cleansing, Kosovo, Tskhinvali, Saakashvili, Putin, Medvedev, Vladikavkaz, oil and gas pipe- lines, refugees, internally displaced persons, Kosovo precedent. he brief war between Georgian government forces and those of the Russian Federation Tin the second week of August 2008 was the largest outbreak of fighting in Europe since the Kosovo war in 1999. Hundreds died in the shelling and fighting, which left close to 200,000 people displaced from their homes (UNHCR, 2008b).
    [Show full text]
  • Georgian-South Ossetian Conflict: Researching Peace
    Georgian-South Ossetian Conflict: Researching Peace Collection of South Ossetian Papers 2011 The preparation and publication of this work was made possible thanks to support from a variety of organizations and funds, including the Peacebuilding fund at George Mason University. Assistance with translation was provided by: Phil Gamaghelyan, Manana Gnolidze-Swanson, Olga Guschina, Dina Konysheva, and Nina Selwan. Project Coordinator: Kosta Dzugaev Editor: Susan Allen Nan Design: Artem Melik-Nubarov Copies printed: 250 © School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University; Center for Information Technology: Intellectual Resources. C O N T E N T S INTRODUCTION Susan Allen Nan ... .. 4 FOREWORD TO THE SOUTH OSSETIAN COLLECTION Kosta Dzugaev ... 5 ECONOMIC REHABILITATION OF SOUTH OSSETIA: CURRENT PROBLEMS AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Batradz Kharebov ... 6 SOME ASPECTS OF SOLVING THE PROBLEMS OF REFUGEES AND INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS IN LIGHT OF GEORGIAN-OSSETIAN RELATIONS Merab Chigoev .... 33 LENINGOR REGION: ITS POLITICAL PECULIARITY, DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS, ECONOMY, AND BOUNDARY PROBLEMS Maria Kotaeva 52 INTRODUCTION The two sets of papers presented here were once simply an idea that seemed perhaps crazy. Without an introduction, the reader may find this volume schizophrenic. Holding the book in one direction, the reader will find three articles by Georgian researchers. Holding the book in another direction, the reader will find three articles by South Ossetian researchers. To read the other perspective, the reader must
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of War Prospects for Peace
    Georgian Orthodox Church Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung CAUSES OF WAR PROS P E C TS FOR PEA C E Tbilisi, 2009 1 On December 2-3, 2008 the Holy Synod of the Georgian Orthodox Church and the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung held a scientific conference on the theme: Causes of War - Prospects for Peace. The main purpose of the conference was to show the essence of the existing conflicts in Georgia and to prepare objective scientific and information basis. This book is a collection of conference reports and discussion materials that on the request of the editorial board has been presented in article format. Publishers: Metropolitan Ananya Japaridze Katia Christina Plate Bidzina Lebanidze Nato Asatiani Editorial board: Archimandrite Adam (Akhaladze), Tamaz Beradze, Rozeta Gujejiani, Roland Topchishvili, Mariam Lordkipanidze, Lela Margiani, Tariel Putkaradze, Bezhan Khorava Reviewers: Zurab Tvalchrelidze Revaz Sherozia Giorgi Cheishvili Otar Janelidze Editorial board wishes to acknowledge the assistance of Irina Bibileishvili, Merab Gvazava, Nia Gogokhia, Ekaterine Dadiani, Zviad Kvilitaia, Giorgi Cheishvili, Kakhaber Tsulaia. ISBN 2345632456 Printed by CGS ltd 2 Preface by His Holiness and Beatitude Catholicos-Patriarch of All Georgia ILIA II; Opening Words to the Conference 5 Preface by Katja Christina Plate, Head of the Regional Office for Political Dialogue in the South Caucasus of the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung; Opening Words to the Conference 8 Abkhazia: Historical-Political and Ethnic Processes Tamaz Beradze, Konstantine Topuria, Bezhan Khorava - A
    [Show full text]
  • Land, Community, and the State in the North Caucasus: Kabardino-Balkaria, 1763-1991
    Land, Community, and the State in the North Caucasus: Kabardino-Balkaria, 1763-1991 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ian Thomas Lanzillotti Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Professor Nicholas Breyfogle, Advisor Professor Theodora Dragostinova Professor David Hoffmann Professor Scott Levi Copyright by Ian Thomas Lanzillotti 2014 Abstract The Caucasus mountain region in southern Russia has witnessed many of post- Soviet Eurasia’s most violent inter-communal conflicts. From Abkhazia to Chechnya, the region fractured ferociously and neighboring communities took up arms against each other in the name of ethnicity and religion. In the midst of some of the worst conflict in Europe since 1945, the semiautonomous, multiethnic Kabardino-Balkar Republic in the North Caucasus remained a relative oasis of peace. This is not to say there were no tensions—there is no love lost between Kabardians, Balkars, and Russians, Kabardino- Balkaria’s principal communities. But, why did these communities, despite the agitation of ethno-political entrepreneurs, not resort to force to solve their grievances, while many neighboring ones did? What institutions and practices have facilitated this peace? What role have state officials and state structures played in, on the one hand, producing inter- communal conflict, and, on the other hand, mediating and defusing such conflict? And why has land played such a crucial rule in inter-communal relations in the region over the longue durée? More than enhancing our knowledge of a poorly-understood yet strategically important region, the questions I ask of Kabardino-Balkaria are windows on larger issues of enduring global relevance.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgian Wine Infographics
    SHIDA KARTLI WINE MAP G E O R GIA vazis gavrcelebis areali Abkhazia Winegrowing Centre Svaneti H mevenaxeoba - meRvineobis kera Racha-Lechkhumi ** White Sparkling Wine Kvemo Svaneti TeTri cqriala Rvino Tskhinvali Samegrelo Mtskheta ! Region Mtianeti South Ossetia KUTAISI ! Imereti Guria Shida Kartli TELAVI Kakheti BATUMI Ajara Samtskhe ! TBILISI Javakheti Kvemo ! R! ! kartli R! ! ! ! Kvemo roka ! ! Edisa ! ! Kvaisa ! ! ! Vaneli ! o !Kemulta 0 5 10 20 ! ! KM R!JAVA ! R! Tskhinvali Region Kekhvi ! ! Kurta Vakhtana ! Largvisi ! ! ! TSKHINVALI !(Eredvi !H ! Gdu Mereti ! KORNISI Avnevi R! ! Korinta ! Tkviavi Kanchaveti ! ! Mejvriskhevi Shindisi !( ! Akhalgori !Dirbi !( Ali !Abisi Bershueti ! Breti ! ! Variani !( Karaleti ! ! Zeghduleti Agara ! Sakorintlo ! Kheltubani !( !( Surami Gomi Ruisi ! !( ! KARELI ! Kvemo Chala! R! Lamiskana ! !( !( KHASHURI Zemo Samtavisi Kvishkheti R! Khvedureti GORI Tezi !( ! !H !( !( Zghuderi Khidistavi Okami ! Kvakhvreli !( !( ! ! ! Gverdzineti Ateni !( Doesi KASPI ! Shida Kartli ! Metekhi R! !( ma ! Dza ** Kvemo Khovle Tana ! !( !( Boshuri Akhalkalaki Tkemlovana ! Kavtiskhevi ! ! ATENI PROTECTED DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN ! ! ! MAJOR GRAP! ES OF SHIDA KARTLI yvelaze gavrcelebuli vazis jiSebi ! White: Chinuri, Goruli Mtsvane, Budeshuri Tetri TeTri: Cinuri, goruli mwvane, budeSuri TeTri Red: Tavkveri wiTeli: Tavkveri White: Chinuri, Goruli Mtsvane, Rkatsiteli TeTri: Cinuri, goruli mwvane, rqawiTeli Red: Tavkveri, Shavkapito wiTeli: Tavkveri, Savkapito sxva jiSebi White: Jvari, Gorula, Melikuda, Kishura, Shaba TeTri: jvari, gorula, melikuda, qiSuri, Saba Red: Buza, Danakharuli, Chrogha Kartlis, Ghrubela Kartlis, Kharistvala Kartlis wiTeli: buza, danaxaruli, WroRa qarTlis, Rrubela qarTlis, xarisTvala qarTlis Authors: Zaza Gagua, Paata Dvaladze, Malkhaz Kharbedia Design: Paata Dvaladze Author of Project: Malkhaz Kharbedia © Georgian Wine Club © GEORGIAN WINE INFOGRAPHICS.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA: Ethnic Cleansing of Ossetians 1989-1992
    Regional Non-Governmental Organisation for the protection and development of national culture and identity of the people of the Republic of North Ossetia and the Republic of South Ossetia «VOZROZHDENIE» - «SANDIDZAN» Profsoyuznaya str., 75-3-174, 117342, Moscow, Russia теl.: +7 (495) 642-3553, e-mail: [email protected] , www.sandidzan.org СОВЕЩАНИЕ 2011 ГОДА ПО ЧЕЛОВЕЧЕСКОМУ ИЗМЕРЕНИЮ В ВАРШАВЕ РАБОЧЕЕ ЗАСЕДАНИЕ 11 Беженцы и перемещенные лица. GEORGIA: Ethnic Cleansing of Ossetians 1989-1992 Inga Kochieva, Alexi Margiev First published in Russia in 2005 by Europe Publishing House as GEORGIA: Ethnic Cleansing of Ossetians ISBN: 5-9739-0030-4 Table of Contents [Main Text] ................................................................................................................... 1 Geographical Index ................................................................................................... 74 Toponymical Reference Table for South Ossetia ...................................................... 78 Introduction As a result of the armed conflict between Georgia and South Ossetia in 1989-1992, a huge part of the Ossetian population in South Ossetia and in Georgia, became refugees, or forcibly displaced people. Significant numbers were forced to resettle in North Ossetia, while the remainder dispersed in Tskhinval and the Ossetian villages of South Ossetia. Since then a plethora of government agencies and non-governmental organisations have wrestled with the refugee problem, but what they have achieved is incommensurate with the
    [Show full text]
  • Minamata Initial Assessment Report
    Minamata Initial Assessment Report GEORGIA 2017 Minamata Initial Assessment Report GEORGIA 2017 Acknowledgements The Ministry of Environment and Natural Resource Protection of Georgia and United Nations Development Programme in Georgia appreciate the contributions and commitment of the project Steering Committee and all organizations and individu- als who participated in the implementation of the project “Strengthen national decision making towards ratification of the Minamata Convention and build capacity towards implementation of future provisions” (referred as MIA project). The project would not have been possible with the dedication of these organizations and individuals. Disclaimer The report was prepared and published with assistance from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Global Environment Facility (GEF) and the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia. The views expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of UNDP, GEF, the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia, or the interim Secretariat of the Minamata Convention on Mercury. Georgia 2017 Table of Contents Glossary..........................................................................................................................7 Foreword by Government Official ........................................................................................8 Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Givi Gavardashvili Гиви Гавардашвили 55
    saqarTvelos ganaTlebisa da mecnierebis saministro saqarTvelos teqnikuri universiteti wyalTa meurneobis instituti garemos dacvis ekocentri MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF GEORGIA GEORGIAN TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF WATER MANAGEMENT ECOCENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION МИНИСТЕРСТВО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ И НАУКИ ГРУЗИИ ГРУЗИНСКИЙ ТЕХНИЧЕСКИЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ ИНСТИТУТ ВОДНОГО ХОЗЯЙСТВА ЭКОЦЕНТР ОХРАНЫ ОКРУЖАЮЩЕЙ СРЕДЫ mecnieris savizito baraTi SCIENTIST’S BUSINESS CARD ВИЗИТНАЯ КАРТОЧКА УЧЕНОГО givi gavardaSvili Givi Gavardashvili Гиви Гавардашвили 55 Tbilisi – Tbilisi – Тбилиси 2013 redaqtori: oTar naTiSvili, saqarTvelos mecnierebaTa erovnuli akademiis vice-prezidenti, akademikos-mdivani Editor: Otar Natishvili, Vice-Prezident of Georgian National Academy of Sciences, Academician-secretary Редактор: Отар Натишвили, Вице-Президент Национальной Академии Наук Грузии, Академик-секретарь 0162, Tbilisi, i. WavWavaZis gamz. 60 saqarTvelos teqnikuri universitetis wyalTa meurneobis instituti I. Chavchavadze av. 60 0162, Тбилиси, Грузия 0162, Tbilisi, Georgia пр. И. Чавчавадзе 60 Institute of Water Management of Институт Водного Хозяйства Georgian Technical University Грузинского Технического университета saqarTvelos teqnikuri universitetis wyalTa meurneobis instituti, 2013 garemos dacvis ekocentri 2013 tiraJi 300 gamomcemloba `universali~, 2013 Tbilisi, 0179, i. WavWavaZis gamz. 19. tlf.: 222 36 09, 599 17 22 30 E-mail: [email protected] SBN 978-9941-12-526-3 S i n a a r s i 1. givi gavardaSvili – 55 ...........................................................
    [Show full text]