DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Issue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PILGRIM HOPKINS HERITAGE SOCIETY ATLANTIC CROSSINGS ENGLAND ~ BERMUDA ~ JAMESTOWN ~ ENGLAND ~ PLYMOUTH Mayflower Sea Venture VOLUME 7, ISSUE 2 www.pilgrimhopkins.com DECEMBER 2013 The Maker/Macors and Hopkins by Judith Brister lively genealogical debate swirls Forum.” Recently developed DNA tools with that town, as were all of the A around the Maker or Macor family are, of course, game-changers in ascer- Makers on Cape Cod at that time; of Cape Cod, which married into many taining Native American ancestry. (2) the existence of no other Mary of the old, intertwined Cape families – The Hopkins/Maker Link Hopkins, either single or wid- including the Hopkins. Driving this Sticking with the paper trail and owed, has been discovered in that debate is circumstantial evidence point- circumstantial evidence, it is likely that region in 1714: (3) Bursel Maker, ing to the Makers’ Native American on 5 November, 1714, Mary Hopkins a son of this couple, witnessed the heritage. While this would raise few (born about 1692) of Harwich, Massa- 20 Jan. 1747 will of Judah Hop- eyebrows today, a 1705 Massachusetts chusetts, daughter of Stephen Hopkins kins, son of Stephen (Austin law, not repealed until 1843, banned and Mary Merrick, granddaughter of 1995,199-100). marriages between whites and Native Giles Hopkins and great grand-daughter This book indicates that John Maker Americans or blacks. of Pilgrim Stephen Hopkins, married was born about 1692, the son of James Despite this law, unions between John Maker. and Rachel ? Maker. He was admitted to whites and Native Americans (and Na- tive Americans who had inter-married with blacks) most likely did take place on Cape Cod in the early years, espe- cially when white settlers were a distinct minority population in the region. Due to fear of legal and social repercussions, it seems that inter-racial unions were rarely acknowledged as such. The sup- pression of this information from offi- cial records, and the reluctance to admit- ting to non-white ancestry long after the anti-miscegenation law had been re- pealed, made for incomplete records and local histories. In this context, discover- ing whether ancestors from this early period may have had mixed racial heri- tage has been hugely complicated. Nonetheless, some dogged descendants of possible inter-racial unions are begin- ning to tract their Native Americans lines. In their efforts, they are reaching out to cousins through books and arti- cles, as well as through on-line genea- The General Society of Mayflower the Brewster Church on 31 July, 1720, logical exchanges, such as “Gen Descendant’s “Silver” book on Stephen and all of John and Mary’s children Hopkins records this event cautiously, were baptized there, “the first four to- Also in this issue: however: gether on 21 Aug. 1720.” It notes that Governor’s Message ................. 2 No direct proof has been found John was a resident of the “Third Re- move” of Harwich in 1726, and finally, Rachel's MtDNA ...................... 4 that the wife of John Maker was this dau. of Stephen Hopkins: Membership Profile .................. 6 however, (1) Stephen Hopkins continued on page 3 PHHS Contest ............................ 7 moved to Harwich after 1694, and all of his children were associated ATLANTIC CROSSINGS Message from the Governor his last September the PHHS met in New Orleans. We using Family Tree DNA to do their DNA testing, T meet once a year and follow the meetings of the Gen- http://www.familytreedna.com/. The GSMD has a web- eral Society of Mayflower Descendants. Our next meeting site that includes the results for Y-DNA and for MtDNA will be scheduled during the weekend of 6-8 September of Mayflower Descendants. A new test by the same com- 2014 in Plymouth, MA. Save the date and join us if possi- pany, Family Finder, is now available. This test uses auto- ble. We will focus on election of officers. If anyone is inter- somal DNA which is inherited from both parents to within ested in becoming an officer, please contact the correspond- approximately the last 5 generations. If we carry DNA on ing secretary: [email protected] our Mayflower lineage it may connect us on the website. I I would like give a special welcome to our three new would like to encourage all the members to think about volunteers: Deon Mattson, Melissa Tricoli and Sarah DNA testing. Abanor. Great to have them join in and help the PHHS! For those of you interested in researching MtDNA Good progress is being made on our lineage page. please, see details in this issue on a fun contest. Kenneth Whittemore has entered all the data from the Planning is underway to visit Hopkins sites applications into a genealogy program and this was up- in England in the fall. Please contact me, loaded to our website in September. For those of you who [email protected], if you would like to turned in your applications, your lines should be on the learn about the trip. If there are enough responses, details website. Kenneth has also provided us with membership will be in the June newsletter. information. California has the most PHHS members, Warmest holiday greeting to you and your family. while twelve States have no PHHS members. The General Society of Mayflower Descendants is Susan Abanor, Governor PHHS Attendees at the 2013 PHHS meeting in New Orleans, LA were (from left): Ren Cushing , Kenneth Whittemore, Harold Woolley, Rick Denham, Muriel Cushing, Susan Abanor. Irene Harvey (not shown). New PHHS Volunteers Two Secretaries New Plaque Team Leader The duties of secretary for the PHHS will be divided Starting in January Melissa Tricoli will be our new into corresponding and recording secretary. The corre- Plaque Team Leader. sponding secretary will do all the member contact and the Deon and Melissa are daughters of Kenneth Whittemore, recording secretary will handle the membership informa- our steadfast secretary and historian. Sarah is the daughter tion. These two positions will be filled by Deon Mattson as of Susan Abanor, Governor and Harold Woolley, sometime Corresponding Secretary and Sarah Abanor as Recording secretary pro tem and great supporter of the PHHS. Secretary. Deon is a new PHHS member and Sarah is a Welcome to our new volunteers and thank you for charter member of the PHHS. helping our wonderful society! PAGE 2 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 2 Reproduced with permission from from with permission Lani Reproduced Maker/Macors and Hopkins Indian, we only From page 1 have to look at his descendants’ pic- states that no probate records have been found for John or tures, such as that of Mary Maker in Barnstable Co. Hezekiah Nickerson The “Third Remove” was a school district lying “eastward in this book, and and southward of the Brewster meeting house.” Mary Hop- note his definite kins’ brothers Samuel, Stephen, Judah, Nathaniel and Joseph Indian characteris- also lived in this neighborhood in 1726 (her father Stephen tics. Several other pictures of his de- had died in 1718). Residing in the “Fourth Remove” (now - Gail Nickerson Gail Nickerson East Brewster) were Benjamin Maker and the “Widow scendants have Maker” (Paine 1937, 378). shown the same The “Silver” book lists the nine children of John and Mary definite Indian (Hopkins) Maker as: Peleg (bp. 21 Aug. 1720); Thankful (b. traits…” (Nickerson 25 May 1716); Mary (b. 13 July 1718); Jonathan (b. 13 June 1970, 19). 1720; bp. 21 Aug. 1720); Elizabeth (b. 22 June 1722); Joshua Whether or not the (b. 16 Sept. 1725), who married Zerviah Covell in 1754 and rest of their case on the Native American Thankful Doane in 1763; Bursel (b. 6 Dec. 1727 (also called Capt. Hezekiah Eldridge Nickerson (1816- “Buzzel or Bussell); David (b. 26 July 1731), who probably origins of James Maker holds up, pic- 1871) had two lines to Rachel (?) Maker: married Phebe ?, and Hannah (b. 11 Dec. 1734). 1. Henry, Silas Nickerson, Jane, James Maker tures in this book of Other mentions of the Maker/Macor family in the Ply- Jr., Rachel (?) Maker; 2. Henry, Silas, Silas th mouth Colony Records, and in widely-referenced 19 century both Hezekiah Nicker- Nickerson, Lydia Maker, Rachel (?) Maker and early 20th century Cape Cod histories, including those by son (1816-1871) and Frederick Freeman, Simeon Deyo, Josiah Paine and C.W. his wife Mehitable Crosby (1816-1892) do show clear Native Swift, will be explored below. It is a more recent source, how- American traits. Interestingly, Mehitable’s unnamed grand- ever, which most emphatically makes the case that both the mother and wife of Enoch Crosby, according to this source, father-in-law and the mother-in-law of Mary Hopkins – James was also a Native American (Nickerson 1970, 3). and Rachel Maker – were Native Americans. …and counter claims Nickerson claims Countering the view of the above family history, Nicker- In their family history and genealogy, From Pilgrims and son Family Association member and Dennis historian Burton Indians To Kings and Indentures Servants, brothers Clinton El- N. Derick, in his article “James Maker, Non-Indian,” cites wood Nickerson and Vernon Roscoe Nickerson, and their cous- numerous records and early Cape Cod histories that have con- ins, brothers James Elwin Nickerson and Leighton Ainsworth vinced him that James Maker was not a Native American. Nickerson, cite “ancient family tradition” to claim that the first Derick traces records on James Maker, who lived in Yar- James Maker was probably born in the Elizabeth Islands, and mouth, Chatham, Eastham and Harwich, from his early years was a Native American. They in fact embrace this heritage, and when he had his share of trouble with the law. The Plymouth offer the following explanation for the Maker surname: Colony Records first mention him on October 29, 1668, when “Let every man be answerable to his MAKER and to his he and Edward Crowell, most likely still minors (given the date MAKER alone for his thoughts in Religious Maters”.
Recommended publications
  • Winslows: Pilgrims, Patrons, and Portraits

    Winslows: Pilgrims, Patrons, and Portraits

    Copyright, The President and Trustees of Bowdoin College Brunswick, Maine 1974 PILGRIMS, PATRONS AND PORTRAITS A joint exhibition at Bowdoin College Museum of Art and the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston Organized by Bowdoin College Museum of Art Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/winslowspilgrimsOObowd Introduction Boston has patronized many painters. One of the earhest was Augustine Clemens, who began painting in Reading, England, in 1623. He came to Boston in 1638 and probably did the portrait of Dr. John Clarke, now at Harvard Medical School, about 1664.' His son, Samuel, was a member of the next generation of Boston painters which also included John Foster and Thomas Smith. Foster, a Harvard graduate and printer, may have painted the portraits of John Davenport, John Wheelwright and Increase Mather. Smith was commis- sioned to paint the President of Harvard in 1683.^ While this portrait has been lost, Smith's own self-portrait is still extant. When the eighteenth century opened, a substantial number of pictures were painted in Boston. The artists of this period practiced a more academic style and show foreign training but very few are recorded by name. Perhaps various English artists traveled here, painted for a time and returned without leaving a written record of their trips. These artists are known only by their pictures and their identity is defined by the names of the sitters. Two of the most notable in Boston are the Pierpont Limner and the Pollard Limner. These paint- ers worked at the same time the so-called Patroon painters of New York flourished.
  • "In the Pilgrim Way" by Linda Ashley, A

    "In the Pilgrim Way" by Linda Ashley, A

    In the Pilgrim Way The First Congregational Church, Marshfield, Massachusetts 1640-2000 Linda Ramsey Ashley Marshfield, Massachusetts 2001 BIBLIO-tec Cataloging in Publication Ashley, Linda Ramsey [1941-] In the pilgrim way: history of the First Congregational Church, Marshfield, MA. Bibliography Includes index. 1. Marshfield, Massachusetts – history – churches. I. Ashley, Linda R. F74. 2001 974.44 Manufactured in the United States. First Edition. © Linda R. Ashley, Marshfield, MA 2001 Printing and binding by Powderhorn Press, Plymouth, MA ii Table of Contents The 1600’s 1 Plimoth Colony 3 Establishment of Green’s Harbor 4 Establishment of First Parish Church 5 Ministry of Richard Blinman 8 Ministry of Edward Bulkley 10 Ministry of Samuel Arnold 14 Ministry of Edward Tompson 20 The 1700’s 27 Ministry of James Gardner 27 Ministry of Samuel Hill 29 Ministry of Joseph Green 31 Ministry of Thomas Brown 34 Ministry of William Shaw 37 The 1800’s 43 Ministry of Martin Parris 43 Ministry of Seneca White 46 Ministry of Ebenezer Alden 54 Ministry of Richard Whidden 61 Ministry of Isaac Prior 63 Ministry of Frederic Manning 64 The 1900’s 67 Ministry of Burton Lucas 67 Ministry of Daniel Gross 68 Ministry of Charles Peck 69 Ministry of Walter Squires 71 Ministry of J. Sherman Gove 72 Ministry of George W. Zartman 73 Ministry of William L. Halladay 74 Ministry of J. Stanley Bellinger 75 Ministry of Edwin C. Field 76 Ministry of George D. Hallowell 77 Ministry of Vaughn Shedd 82 Ministry of William J. Cox 85 Ministry of Robert H. Jackson 87 Other Topics Colonial Churches of New England 92 United Church of Christ 93 Church Buildings or Meetinghouses 96 The Parsonages 114 Organizations 123 Sunday School and Youth 129 Music 134 Current Officers, Board, & Committees 139 Gifts to the Church 141 Memorial Funds 143 iii The Centuries The centuries look down from snowy heights Upon the plains below, While man looks upward toward those beacon lights Of long ago.
  • (King Philip's War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial

    (King Philip's War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial

    Connecticut Unscathed: Victory in The Great Narragansett War (King Philip’s War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Major Jason W. Warren, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: John F. Guilmartin Jr., Advisor Alan Gallay, Kristen Gremillion Peter Mansoor, Geoffrey Parker Copyright by Jason W. Warren 2011 Abstract King Philip’s War (1675-1676) was one of the bloodiest per capita in American history. Although hostile native groups damaged much of New England, Connecticut emerged unscathed from the conflict. Connecticut’s role has been obscured by historians’ focus on the disasters in the other colonies as well as a misplaced emphasis on “King Philip,” a chief sachem of the Wampanoag groups. Although Philip formed the initial hostile coalition and served as an important leader, he was later overshadowed by other sachems of stronger native groups such as the Narragansetts. Viewing the conflict through the lens of a ‘Great Narragansett War’ brings Connecticut’s role more clearly into focus, and indeed enables a more accurate narrative for the conflict. Connecticut achieved success where other colonies failed by establishing a policy of moderation towards the native groups living within its borders. This relationship set the stage for successful military operations. Local native groups, whether allied or neutral did not assist hostile Indians, denying them the critical intelligence necessary to coordinate attacks on Connecticut towns. The English colonists convinced allied Mohegan, Pequot, and Western Niantic warriors to support their military operations, giving Connecticut forces a decisive advantage in the field.
  • Genealogy Edward Wins

    Genealogy Edward Wins

    GEN EALOGY E DWA R D WI N S LOW TH E MAYFLOWE R A N D H I S D E S C E N D A N T S FROM 1 620 TO 1 865 MARIA WHITMAN B RYANT D AUGHT E R OF ELI"AB ETH WIN SLOW A ND (JUDGE ) KILB ORN WHITMAN F PE BR KE MASS . O M O , C o pyright 1 91 5 by Herbe rt Pelh am B ry ant A ll Right s Reserved A NTHONY So ns, ' Ne w B e o Mass df rd , . , U . (3 p r y P R E F A C E These biographies are gathered and arranged for the use Of the generations in the direct line Of descent from Edward Winslow as they , n i n i will i ev tably be dispersed in the future , givi g nto their possession , in a compact form , this knowledge Of the incidents in the lives of those who preceded them . They are facts reliable and without embellishment . Adopting the sentim ents expressed in the introduction to the history Of the Otis family by Horatio N . Otis member of the New England Historical and Genealogical Society ,of New York we quote as follows , It i s to be regretted while sketching the external circumstances Of some , the chroniclers , that such a man was born , died , and ran through such a circle Of honors , etc . , that we cannot more carefully trace the history Of mind, those laws which govern in the transmission fi of physical and mental quali cation .
  • SIMS Version 2.0 Data Standards Handbook for the Massachusetts Student Information Management System Reference Guide Version 3.3

    SIMS Version 2.0 Data Standards Handbook for the Massachusetts Student Information Management System Reference Guide Version 3.3

    SIMS Version 2.0 Data Standards Handbook for the Massachusetts Student Information Management System Reference Guide Version 3.3 October 1, 2004 Massachusetts Department of Education Page 1–2 SIMS Version 3.3 Student Data Standards October 1, 2004 SIMS Version 2.0 Data Standards Handbook for the Massachusetts Student Information Management System Reference Guide Version 3.3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................................ 1–3 STUDENT INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ..................................................................................1–3 SECTION 2 STATE STUDENT REGISTRATION SYSTEM............................................................................. 2–4 STATE STUDENT REGISTRATION SYSTEM...............................................................................................2–4 System Design....................................................................................................................................2–4 LOCALLY ASSIGNED STUDENT IDENTIFIER ............................................................................................2–5 District Responsibility .......................................................................................................................2–5 SECTION 3 LEGAL ADVISORY .......................................................................................................................... 3–6 I. PURPOSES AND GOALS OF THE STUDENT INFORMATION
  • Vital Allies: the Colonial Militia's Use of Indians in King Philip's War, 1675--1676

    Vital Allies: the Colonial Militia's Use of Indians in King Philip's War, 1675--1676

    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2011 Vital allies: The colonial militia's use of Indians in King Philip's War, 1675--1676 Shawn Eric Pirelli University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Pirelli, Shawn Eric, "Vital allies: The colonial militia's use of Indians in King Philip's War, 1675--1676" (2011). Master's Theses and Capstones. 146. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/146 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VITAL ALLIES: THE COLONIAL MILITIA'S USE OF iNDIANS IN KING PHILIP'S WAR, 1675-1676 By Shawn Eric Pirelli BA, University of Massachusetts, Boston, 2008 THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts In History May, 2011 UMI Number: 1498967 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Dissertation Publishing UMI 1498967 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC.
  • The Diary of Ebenezer Parkman 1719-1728 EDITED by FRANCIS G

    The Diary of Ebenezer Parkman 1719-1728 EDITED by FRANCIS G

    The Diary of Ebenezer Parkman 1719-1728 EDITED BY FRANCIS G. WALETT PREFACE rpHE REVEREND Ebenezer Parkman (Harvard 1721) X was the minister of Westborough, Massachusetts, from 1724 until 1782. Even before he came to this young town, Parkman began to keep a detailed journal or diary which he continued throughout his long pastorate. Although Parkman destroyed an early part of the diary himself, and some of his descendants lost other parts, the great bulk of the manu- script is preserved in the libraries of the American Anti- quarian Society and the Massachusetts Historical Society. Through the cooperation of these two institutions this virtually unequalled record of the social history of a typical eighteenth century New England town will be printed and made accessible. A small segment owned privately and published in 1899 by the Westborough Historical Society will be incorporated in this work. Parkman sometimes failed to record events in the diary but certain of these gaps have been filled by material from his "Natalitia," a small book of birthday reflections, owned by The American Antiquarian Society. The diary is important for a variety of reasons. In the first place, it illuminates in unique detail the life of a country parson and the history of the general area in which he lived in the colonial period. Parkman recorded a mass 94 AMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY [April, of facts about the routine of work and play, the problems and vexations as well as the joys of everyday life. Oc- casionally great figures are mentioned in the diary, a fact that will interest various scholars.
  • Atoll Research Bulletin No. 311 a Bibliography of Plant

    Atoll Research Bulletin No. 311 a Bibliography of Plant

    ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 311 A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PLANT CONSERVATION IN THE PACIFIC ISLANDS: ENDANGERED SPECIES, HABITAT CONVERSION, INTRODUCED BIOTA BY ROBERT A. DEFILIPPS ISSUED BY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S.A. October 1987 @ COPYKTGHT 1.987 by IIAIJP~I' J GECIGRAPIITC SOCIETY & HAWAIIAN TELEPHONE COMPANY - -a]. 1 r i.~htsreserved Permission to use or reprint must be obtained in writing from ~awai'iGeographic Society .5A*.* Northern / I .LYCU." An 18 x 25" (45 x 62 cm) en- .I.. "l-*ln i Y",W Mariana 1.................................................................. I I rour* rrc,rr courllllor I ........ I largement of this map is avail- able postpaid for $5; the same size, deluxe edition, sent rolled in a tube via airmail is $10. A complete list of available maps will be sent on request. Send orders, requests for informa- tion, and suggestions to: Hawai'i Geographic Society Post Office Box 1698 Honolulu, 96806-1698, HAWAII 2oS-53&-3S52 ......... 80U-323-3723-~h5~......... I i I A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PLANT CONSERVATION IN THE PACIFIC ISLANDS: ENDANGERED SPECIES, HABITAT CONVERSION, INTRODUCED BIOTA BY ROBERT A. DEFILIPPS Introduction To plant conservationists who must fervently gather botanical intelligence against a time-frame of rapidly dwindling plant populations and habitats, the following statements expressed by M.-H. Sachet and F.R. Fosberg (1955, 1971) are both pertinent and self-explanatory: "The great unsolved problem of modern scientific methodology is that of bibliography, that of knowing what has been accomplished already. In starting any line of investigation the scientist is faced with the choice of ignoring his predeces- sors, possibly wasting much time on work that has already been done and missing valuable information and ideas, or of spending a large proportion of his time in study of current and past literature on the field.
  • A Partial Guide to Old Colony Deeds

    A Partial Guide to Old Colony Deeds

    A Partial Guide to Old Colony Deeds and to other Plymouth Colony Land Records 1621-1699 Compiled by, and Copyright © 2020 by Dale H. Cook This file is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material directly from plymouthcolony.net, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact [email protected] so that legal action can be undertaken. Any commercial site using or displaying any of my files or web pages without my express written permission will be charged a royalty rate of $1000.00 US per day for each file or web page used or displayed. [email protected] Revised January 9, 2021 A partial guide to the images of the manuscript volumes of original Colony records available online in the Historical Records Collection at FamilySearch.org, along with miscellaneous land records in Plymouth Colony Records, and other published transcriptions and abstracts of Plymouth Colony land records This file contains a partial guide to the contents of these manuscript volumes: Old Colony Deeds - Images at FamilySearch.org (as Plymouth County: Deeds 1620-1651 vol 1, Deeds 1651-1681 vol 2-4, Deeds 1686-1699 vol 5-6) (Images of the rebound original Plymouth Colony Land Records 1620-1699) and a few records in these manuscript volumes of probate records: Old Colony Wills - Images at FamilySearch.org (as Plymouth Colony Records: Wills) (Images of the rebound original Plymouth Colony Probate Records 1633-1686) as well as these sources of published transcriptions and abstracts: Nathaniel B. Shurtleff (Vols. 1-8) and David Pulsifer (Vols.
  • Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 11, No

    Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 11, No

    BULLETIN OF THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY . VOL. XI NO.3 ,APRIL 1950 CONTENTS Historical Approach to Titicut Maurice Robbins ••••••••• 48 Typology of the Heard Pond Site William S. Fowler. ••••••• 74 o PUBLISHED BY THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Douglas S. Byers, f;ditor, Box 71, Andover, Mass. William S. Fowler, Secretary, Attleboro Museum, Attleboro, Mass. Winthrop F, Barden, Treasurer, 18 North Main Street t Attleboro, Mass. I lHE CLEMENT C. MftJeWELL LIBRARY . STATE COllEGE JRIDGEWATER, MAsSACHIISfm This journal and its contents may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. ©2010 Massachusetts Archaeological Society. HISTORICAL APPROACH TO TITICUT Maurice Robbins FOREWORD The writer is rully aware that there is territory about Titicut. Mr. Ralph Davol or much controversial material in this discuss­ Taunton, a man in his eighties who walked ion or historic events and land transactions. rrom old COhannet over the Rhode Island Path There are many possible interpretations other to Titicut severai times to sit with us be­ than those arrived at here. Many, rar more neath the trees by the Titicut River and UUk able, historians have written many volumes about those times when Indians roamed the about this place and period, and they are, by land, helped more than he knows to develop no means, in agreement. this paper. To him we are indebted ror the note about the town or Tetecut in England. Herein has been included all or the data available to the writer which seemed perti­ We owe a special debt to Mr.
  • Palmetto Log the Society of Mayflower Descendants in the State of South Carolina

    Palmetto Log the Society of Mayflower Descendants in the State of South Carolina

    Palmetto Log The Society of Mayflower Descendants in the State of South Carolina Volume 78 Issue 2 Fall 2015 ____________________________________________________________ In This Issue Well fall is already upon us and I’m left wondering where in the world the last Governor's Message .............................. 1 six months went! I am happy the heat of summer is dissipating and the Board of Assistance .............................. 2 beautiful southern fall and cool winter weather are upon us. Fall also means Mayflower Commemorative Coin......... 2 Thanksgiving and an opportunity to teach people about our ancestors and all SC Mayflower Survey Link .................. 2 they’ve done to pave the way for us, even today. Take pride in your New Members ....................................... 3 Mayflower history and teach others. Tell your children and your Life & Times of Carroll Eve ................. 3 grandchildren about your rich heritage. You can contact your local schools or GBOA Meeting Update......................... 5 even the library and ask if you could volunteer to come in and tell the students Scholarship Winners ............................. 6 about the Pilgrims and the voyage they took on the Mayflower. We all share a 2016 Dues Notice .................................. 9 responsibility to perpetuate the memory of them. We have taken the time, Luncheon Reservation ........................... 10 energy and funds to prove that we are indeed Mayflower descendants so we Luncheon Information ........................... 11 need to share our ancestors legacy with others. It may be as simple as telling Dates to Remember ............................... 13 just one person about being a Mayflower Descendant and sharing a story about your lineage. I would love to hear about your experiences teaching others about our ancestors.
  • THE PLYMOUTH COLONY PATENT: Setting the Stage by Peggy M

    THE PLYMOUTH COLONY PATENT: Setting the Stage by Peggy M

    THE PLYMOUTH COLONY PATENT: setting the stage by Peggy M. Baker, Director & Librarian Pilgrim Society & Pilgrim Hall Museum 2007 The legal arrangements under which the Pilgrims journeyed to America and established their colony, and which, ultimately, resulted in the colony’s demise in 1692 are among the most confusing aspects of the Plymouth experience. The “correct” way to proceed, as outlined in the surviving documents (and many documents do not survive), did not always reflect how affairs were actually conducted. And the entire system of establishing and governing colonies was so new and experimental that rules were often changed to meet new circumstances (and information on how and why these changes occurred is generally incomplete). As a result, scholars frequently disagree about what actually did happen! What follows is, therefore, not a definitive answer but the scenario that seems most likely. First, let’s set the stage. In the 16th century, Europe expanded its boundaries as voyages of exploration brought increased geographical knowledge and an interest in faraway lands. At the same time, an increase in personal wealth and the development of capitalism led to the rise of both a very wealthy landed aristocracy and a rich merchant class possessing money (and, therefore, political clout) and the ambition to make even more money. The marriage of these factors resulted in new “financial opportunities” - schemes by which adventuresome aristocrats and rich merchants would make a profit on their money by investing in colonies. Making money in colonies required a lot of money to begin with, more than even the richest aristocrats or merchants had.