DOCSLIB.ORG

SIMS Version 2.0 Data Standards Handbook for the Massachusetts Student Information Management System Reference Guide Version 3.3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SIMS Version 2.0 Data Standards Handbook for the Massachusetts Student Information Management System Reference Guide Version 3.3 SIMS Version 2.0 Data Standards Handbook for the Massachusetts Student Information Management System Reference Guide Version 3.3 October 1, 2004 Massachusetts Department of Education Page 1–2 SIMS Version 3.3 Student Data Standards October 1, 2004 SIMS Version 2.0 Data Standards Handbook for the Massachusetts Student Information Management System Reference Guide Version 3.3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................................ 1–3 STUDENT INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ..................................................................................1–3 SECTION 2 STATE STUDENT REGISTRATION SYSTEM............................................................................. 2–4 STATE STUDENT REGISTRATION SYSTEM...............................................................................................2–4 System Design....................................................................................................................................2–4 LOCALLY ASSIGNED STUDENT IDENTIFIER ............................................................................................2–5 District Responsibility .......................................................................................................................2–5 SECTION 3 LEGAL ADVISORY .......................................................................................................................... 3–6 I. PURPOSES AND GOALS OF THE STUDENT INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM..............................3–6 II. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE SYSTEM IS DESIGNED ............................................................3–6 III. RELEVANT STATUTORY PROVISIONS...............................................................................................3–8 The Department’s Authority to Establish Student IMS......................................................................3–8 Confidentiality of Student Records ....................................................................................................3–8 IV. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ...........................................................................................................3–10 The Department’s Legal Authority to Establish and Implement the System....................................3–10 Confidentiality of the Student Information Management System.....................................................3–10 The Student Identifier ......................................................................................................................3–12 Race and National Origin................................................................................................................3–13 Income Information .........................................................................................................................3–13 Data Correction...............................................................................................................................3–14 Additional Questions .......................................................................................................................3–15 SECTION 4 DATA STANDARDS ........................................................................................................................ 4–16 SELECTION PROCESS ............................................................................................................................4–16 REPORTING DISTRICTS .........................................................................................................................4–16 DATA STANDARDS DESCRIPTION .........................................................................................................4–18 LIST OF SIMS VERSION 2.0 DATA ELEMENTS ..................................................................................... 4-19 SECTION 5 APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................... 5-77 APPENDIX A CODES FOR MASSACHUSETTS CITIES AND TOWNS .......................................................... 5-77 APPENDIX B LANGUAGE CODES .......................................................................................................... 5-80 APPENDIX C COUNTRY CODES............................................................................................................. 5-81 APPENDIX D PUBLIC SCHOOL AND COLLABORATIVE CODES............................................................... 5-83 APPENDIX E-PRIVATE SCHOOL CODES .............................................................................................. 5-109 APPENDIX E2-PRIVATE SCHOOL AND COLLABORATIVE CODES – ALPAHBETIZED BY NAME............. 5-119 APPENDIX F CHAPTER 74 PROGRAM CODES ...................................................................................... 5-129 APPENDIX G NON CHAPTER 74 PROGRAM CODES ............................................................................. 5-130 APPENDIX H ADVANCED PLACEMENT COURSE CODES...................................................................... 5-131 APPENDIX J DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT DATA STANDARDS ............................................................ 5-132 APPENDIX K ACCEPTABLE ASCII CHARACTERS ............................................................................... 5-136 APPENDIX L SPECIAL EDUCATION DEFINITIONS ................................................................................ 5-137 APPENDIX M - COMPETENCY ATTAINMENT ~ CERTIFICATES AND MILESTONES/ACHIEVEMENTS .........141 Massachusetts Department of Education Page 1–3 SIMS Version 3.3 Student Data Standards October 1, 2004 Section 1 Overview The Massachusetts Department of Education is developing a comprehensive, web-based system to replace the paper-based data collection and information exchange system between the Department and school districts. The new system is being designed, in part, to reduce the administrative burden of data collection and reporting for both the Department and districts while improving the timeliness and accuracy of information. The new system will consist of four strands - student, educator, school/district and internal Department of Education. The strands represent different parts of the education system in Massachusetts and each has particular requirements that will be addressed by the development of software applications. Student Information Management System The cornerstone of this project is the Student Information Management System (SIMS) that will support Education Reform requirements for student assessment and evaluation of school programs. The most significant of these requirements - the student assessment program - creates the need to collect information about individual students since assessment results will be used to certify each student's eligibility for a high school diploma. In addition, the Education Reform requirements that focus on accountability and evaluation of program effectiveness can be met only with information on each student and the program in which the student is involved. Consequently, the SIMS must be able to track individual students across the state over time in order to match students with tests scores accurately and must collect the information necessary to meet the requirements of Education Reform and mandated state and federal reporting. These requirements of the SIMS presented two major questions to address in the design and development process: ♦ How will each student's information be identified over time in order to match records accurately? ♦ What data elements should be collected for each student in Massachusetts Public Schools? The Department of Education has been working on the design and development of the SIMS since May 1996. The approval of the Category 1 Data Standards represents the first step in the implementation of SIMS in all districts in Massachusetts. The Massachusetts Student Information Management System Data Standards Handbook is intended to provide public school districts in Massachusetts with the information needed to implement the SIMS Data Standards. Section 2 describes the design of the State Student Registration System that will be used to track students across the state over time. Section 3 presents a legal advisory that addresses legal issues involved in the development of the Student Information Management System, in particular, confidentiality and privacy. Section 4 provides a detailed description of the required data elements and the standards for collecting, maintaining and reporting them within the SIMS. Section 5 provides appendices that contain code values for data elements and additional information relevant to the SIMS. Massachusetts Department of Education Page 2–4 SIMS Version 3.3 Student Data Standards October 1, 2004 Section 2 State Student Registration System The Student Information Management System requires a “student identifier” in order to track students within and across districts over time. An identifier is “a set of characters used as a proxy for name to identify an individual uniquely.” Using an identifier: • Allows an individual’s record from one submission of data to be linked to the student’s record in other submissions. • Enables the data to be stored and searched efficiently. • Helps to maintain necessary confidentiality and security of student information. In order to meet the requirements of the Education Reform Act, the Student Information Management System must be designed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Best Private High Schools 1 2 3
    2015/10/27 Best Private High Schools in Massachusetts ­ Niche ὐ Best Private High Schools in Massachusetts Best Private High Schools ranks 3,880 high schools based on key student statistics and more than 120,000 opinions from 16,000 students and parents. A high ranking indicates that the school is an exceptional academic institution with a diverse set of high-achieving students who rate their experience very hRigehalyd. more See how this ranking was calculated. National By State By Metro See how your school ranks Milton Academy 1 Milton, MA Show details Deerfield Academy 2 Deerfield, MA Show details Groton School 3 Groton, MA Show details Middlesex School 4 Concord, MA Show details Noble & Greenough School 5 Dedham, MA Show details https://k12.niche.com/rankings/private­high­schools/best­overall/s/massachusetts/ 1/13 2015/10/27 Best Private High Schools in Massachusetts ­ Niche Winsor School 6 Boston, MA Show details Buckingham Browne & Nichols School 7 Cambridge, MA Show details Commonwealth School 8 Boston, MA Show details Boston University Academy 9 Boston, MA Show details James F. Farr Academy 10 Cambridge, MA Show details Share Share Tweet Miss Hall's School 11 Pittsfield, MA Show details The Roxbury Latin School 12 West Roxbury, MA Show details Stoneleigh Burnham School 13 Greenfield, MA Show details Brooks School 14 North Andover, MA Show details Concord Academy https://k12.niche.com/rankings/private­high­schools/best­overall/s/massachusetts/ 2/13 2015/10/27 Best Private High Schools in Massachusetts ­ Niche Concord, MA 15 Show details Belmont Hill School 16 Belmont, MA Show details St.
    [Show full text]
  • Winslows: Pilgrims, Patrons, and Portraits
    Copyright, The President and Trustees of Bowdoin College Brunswick, Maine 1974 PILGRIMS, PATRONS AND PORTRAITS A joint exhibition at Bowdoin College Museum of Art and the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston Organized by Bowdoin College Museum of Art Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/winslowspilgrimsOObowd Introduction Boston has patronized many painters. One of the earhest was Augustine Clemens, who began painting in Reading, England, in 1623. He came to Boston in 1638 and probably did the portrait of Dr. John Clarke, now at Harvard Medical School, about 1664.' His son, Samuel, was a member of the next generation of Boston painters which also included John Foster and Thomas Smith. Foster, a Harvard graduate and printer, may have painted the portraits of John Davenport, John Wheelwright and Increase Mather. Smith was commis- sioned to paint the President of Harvard in 1683.^ While this portrait has been lost, Smith's own self-portrait is still extant. When the eighteenth century opened, a substantial number of pictures were painted in Boston. The artists of this period practiced a more academic style and show foreign training but very few are recorded by name. Perhaps various English artists traveled here, painted for a time and returned without leaving a written record of their trips. These artists are known only by their pictures and their identity is defined by the names of the sitters. Two of the most notable in Boston are the Pierpont Limner and the Pollard Limner. These paint- ers worked at the same time the so-called Patroon painters of New York flourished.
    [Show full text]
  • Lump Sum Settlements – 7/1/99 – 9/30/99
    FUND YEAR 2018 ADMINISTRATOR QUARTERLY REPORT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS [Quarter Ending 3/31/18] June 20, 2018 Administrator 123 Interstate Drive West Springfield, Massachusetts 01089 Toll Free: (855) 874-0123 Fax: (413) 739-9330 The following is prepared for the sole use and information of the Directors, Committee Members, advisors, and consultants of Independent Schools Compensation Corporation. in that it contains information specific to the Members of the Group, it is considered CONFIDENTIAL. Table of Contents MEETING AGENDA………………………………………………………………………………………… 3-4 MINUTES – MARCH 8, 2018…….……………………………………………………………..….. 5-8 INTRODUCTION COMMENTARY………………………………………………………………….. 9-11 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE …………………………………………………………………………………. 12-14 MEMBERSHIP AND MARKETING ………………………………………………………………… 15-21 FINANCIALS ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 22 • Consolidated Financials……………………………………………………………………… 23-24 • Class A Financials….……………………………………………………………………………. 25-31 • Class B Financials……….……………………………………………………………………….. 32-35 INVESTMENTS ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 36 • OPUS Investment Management – Quarterly Summary……………………….. 37-54 CLAIMS AND LOSS CONTROL………………………………………………………………………. 55 • Claims & Loss Control Meeting Agenda …………………………………………….. 56 • Minutes – March 8, 2018 ………………………………………………………………….. 57-59 • Annual Safety Day Debrief ………………………………………………………………… 60-67 • Claims Overview and Charts by Class..……………………………………………….. 68-71 • Large Claim Review…………………………………………………………………………….. 72-77 • Settlement Requests………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • North Shore Secondary School Fair
    NORTH SECONDARY SHORE SCHOOL FAIR The Academy at Penguin Hall Lexington Christian Academy TUESDAY Avon Old Farms School Lincoln Academy TH Belmont Hill School Linden Hall SEPTEMBER 26 Berkshire School Loomis Chaffee School Berwick Academy Marianapolis Preparatory School 6:00-8:30 PM Bishop Fenwick High School Marvelwood School Boston University Academy Middlesex School Brewster Academy Millbrook School FREE & OPEN Brooks School Milton Academy The Cambridge School of Weston Miss Hall’s School TO THE PUBLIC Cate School Miss Porter’s School *Meet representatives CATS Academy New Hampton School Chapel Hill-Chauncy Hall School Noble and Greenough School and gather information Cheshire Academy Northfield Mount Hermon School Choate Rosemary Hall Phillips Academy from day, boarding Christ School Phillips Exeter Academy Clark School Pingree School and parochial schools. Commonwealth School Pomfret School Concord Academy Portsmouth Abbey School Covenant Christian Academy Proctor Academy Cushing Academy The Putney School HOSTED BY: Dana Hall School Saint Mary’s School Deerfield Academy Salisbury School BROOKWOOD SCHOOL Dublin School Shore Country Day School ONE BROOKWOOD ROAD Eaglebrook School Sparhawk School Emma Willard School St. Andrew’s School MANCHESTER, MA 01944 The Ethel Walker School St. George’s School 978-526-4500 Fay School St. John’s Preparatory School brookwood.edu/ssfair The Fessenden School St. Mark’s School Foxcroft Academy St. Mary’s School, Lynn Fryeburg Academy St. Paul’s School Garrison Forest School Stoneleigh-Burnham School
    [Show full text]
  • New England Preparatory School Athletic Council
    NEW ENGLAND PREPARATORY SCHOOL ATHLETIC COUNCIL EXECUTIVE BOARD PRESIDENT JAMES MCNALLY, RIVERS SCHOOL FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT: MARK CONROY, WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL SECRETARY: DAVID GODIN, SUFFIELD ACADEMY TREASURER: BRADLEY R. SMITH, BRIDGTON ACADEMY TOURNAMENT ADVISOR: RICK FRANCIS, F. WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL VICE-PRESIDENT IN CHARGE OF PUBLICATION: KATE TURNER, BREWSTER ACADEMY PAST PRESIDENTS KATHY NOBLE, PROCTOR ACADEMY RICK DELPRETE, F. HOTCHKISS SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL REPRESENTATIVE: MARK JACKSON, DEDHAM COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVES DISTRICT I BRADLEY R. SMITH, BRIDGTON ACADEMY SUSAN GARDNER, GOULD ACADEMY DISTRICT II KEN HOLLINGSWORTH, TILTON SCHOOL DISTRICT III ALAN MCCOY, PINGREE SCHOOL DICK MUTHER, TABOR ACADEMY DISTRICT IV DAVE GODIN, SUFFIELD ACADEMY TIZ MULLIGAN, WESTOVER SCHOOL 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Souders Award Recipients ................................................................ 3 Distinguished Service Award Winners ............................................... 5 Past Presidents ................................................................................. 6 NEPSAC Constitution and By-Laws .................................................. 7 NEPSAC Code of Ethics and Conduct ..............................................11 NEPSAC Policies ..............................................................................14 Tournament Advisor and Directors ....................................................20 Pegging Dates ...................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • "In the Pilgrim Way" by Linda Ashley, A
    In the Pilgrim Way The First Congregational Church, Marshfield, Massachusetts 1640-2000 Linda Ramsey Ashley Marshfield, Massachusetts 2001 BIBLIO-tec Cataloging in Publication Ashley, Linda Ramsey [1941-] In the pilgrim way: history of the First Congregational Church, Marshfield, MA. Bibliography Includes index. 1. Marshfield, Massachusetts – history – churches. I. Ashley, Linda R. F74. 2001 974.44 Manufactured in the United States. First Edition. © Linda R. Ashley, Marshfield, MA 2001 Printing and binding by Powderhorn Press, Plymouth, MA ii Table of Contents The 1600’s 1 Plimoth Colony 3 Establishment of Green’s Harbor 4 Establishment of First Parish Church 5 Ministry of Richard Blinman 8 Ministry of Edward Bulkley 10 Ministry of Samuel Arnold 14 Ministry of Edward Tompson 20 The 1700’s 27 Ministry of James Gardner 27 Ministry of Samuel Hill 29 Ministry of Joseph Green 31 Ministry of Thomas Brown 34 Ministry of William Shaw 37 The 1800’s 43 Ministry of Martin Parris 43 Ministry of Seneca White 46 Ministry of Ebenezer Alden 54 Ministry of Richard Whidden 61 Ministry of Isaac Prior 63 Ministry of Frederic Manning 64 The 1900’s 67 Ministry of Burton Lucas 67 Ministry of Daniel Gross 68 Ministry of Charles Peck 69 Ministry of Walter Squires 71 Ministry of J. Sherman Gove 72 Ministry of George W. Zartman 73 Ministry of William L. Halladay 74 Ministry of J. Stanley Bellinger 75 Ministry of Edwin C. Field 76 Ministry of George D. Hallowell 77 Ministry of Vaughn Shedd 82 Ministry of William J. Cox 85 Ministry of Robert H. Jackson 87 Other Topics Colonial Churches of New England 92 United Church of Christ 93 Church Buildings or Meetinghouses 96 The Parsonages 114 Organizations 123 Sunday School and Youth 129 Music 134 Current Officers, Board, & Committees 139 Gifts to the Church 141 Memorial Funds 143 iii The Centuries The centuries look down from snowy heights Upon the plains below, While man looks upward toward those beacon lights Of long ago.
    [Show full text]
  • (King Philip's War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial
    Connecticut Unscathed: Victory in The Great Narragansett War (King Philip’s War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Major Jason W. Warren, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: John F. Guilmartin Jr., Advisor Alan Gallay, Kristen Gremillion Peter Mansoor, Geoffrey Parker Copyright by Jason W. Warren 2011 Abstract King Philip’s War (1675-1676) was one of the bloodiest per capita in American history. Although hostile native groups damaged much of New England, Connecticut emerged unscathed from the conflict. Connecticut’s role has been obscured by historians’ focus on the disasters in the other colonies as well as a misplaced emphasis on “King Philip,” a chief sachem of the Wampanoag groups. Although Philip formed the initial hostile coalition and served as an important leader, he was later overshadowed by other sachems of stronger native groups such as the Narragansetts. Viewing the conflict through the lens of a ‘Great Narragansett War’ brings Connecticut’s role more clearly into focus, and indeed enables a more accurate narrative for the conflict. Connecticut achieved success where other colonies failed by establishing a policy of moderation towards the native groups living within its borders. This relationship set the stage for successful military operations. Local native groups, whether allied or neutral did not assist hostile Indians, denying them the critical intelligence necessary to coordinate attacks on Connecticut towns. The English colonists convinced allied Mohegan, Pequot, and Western Niantic warriors to support their military operations, giving Connecticut forces a decisive advantage in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogy Edward Wins
    GEN EALOGY E DWA R D WI N S LOW TH E MAYFLOWE R A N D H I S D E S C E N D A N T S FROM 1 620 TO 1 865 MARIA WHITMAN B RYANT D AUGHT E R OF ELI"AB ETH WIN SLOW A ND (JUDGE ) KILB ORN WHITMAN F PE BR KE MASS . O M O , C o pyright 1 91 5 by Herbe rt Pelh am B ry ant A ll Right s Reserved A NTHONY So ns, ' Ne w B e o Mass df rd , . , U . (3 p r y P R E F A C E These biographies are gathered and arranged for the use Of the generations in the direct line Of descent from Edward Winslow as they , n i n i will i ev tably be dispersed in the future , givi g nto their possession , in a compact form , this knowledge Of the incidents in the lives of those who preceded them . They are facts reliable and without embellishment . Adopting the sentim ents expressed in the introduction to the history Of the Otis family by Horatio N . Otis member of the New England Historical and Genealogical Society ,of New York we quote as follows , It i s to be regretted while sketching the external circumstances Of some , the chroniclers , that such a man was born , died , and ran through such a circle Of honors , etc . , that we cannot more carefully trace the history Of mind, those laws which govern in the transmission fi of physical and mental quali cation .
    [Show full text]
  • MASSACHUSETTS TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM Schedule of Nonemployer Allocations and Schedule of Collective Pension Amounts June 30
    MASSACHUSETTS TEACHERS'RETIREMENT SYSTEM Schedule of Nonemployer Allocations and Schedule of Collective Pension Amounts June 30, 2016 (With Independent Auditors' Report Thereon) KPMG LLP Two Financial Center 60 South Street Boston, MA 02111 Independent Auditors' Report Mr. Thomas G. Shack III, Comptroller Commonwealth of Massachusetts: We have audited the accompanying schedule of nonemployer allocations of the Massachusetts Teachers' Retirement System (MTRS) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2016, and the related notes. We have also audited the columns titled net pension liability, total deferred outflows of resources, total deferred inflows of resources, and total nonemploy.er pension expense (specified column totals) included in the accompanying schedule of collective pension amounts of MTRS as of and for the year ended June 30, 2016, and the related notes. Management's Responsibility for the Schedules Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these schedules in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the schedules that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditors' Responsibility Our responsibility is to express opinions on the schedule of nonemployer allocations and the specified column totals included in the schedule of collective pension amounts based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the schedule of nonemployer allocations and the specified column totals included in the schedule of collective pension amounts are free from material misstatement.
    [Show full text]
  • An Open Letter on Behalf of Independent Schools of New England
    An Open Letter on Behalf of Independent Schools of New England, We, the heads of independent schools, comprising 176 schools in the New England region, stand in solidarity with our students and with the families of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. The heart of our nation has been broken yet again by another mass shooting at an American school. We offer our deepest condolences to the families and loved ones of those who died and are grieving for the loss of life that occurred. We join with our colleagues in public, private, charter, independent, and faith-based schools demanding meaningful action to keep our students safe from gun violence on campuses and beyond. Many of our students, graduates, and families have joined the effort to ensure that this issue stays at the forefront of the national dialogue. We are all inspired by the students who have raised their voices to demand change. As school leaders we give our voices to this call for action. We come together out of compassion, responsibility, and our commitment to educate our children free of fear and violence. As school leaders, we pledge to do all in our power to keep our students safe. We call upon all elected representatives - each member of Congress, the President, and all others in positions of power at the governmental and private-sector level – to take action in making schools less vulnerable to violence, including sensible regulation of fi rearms. We are adding our voices to this dialogue as a demonstration to our students of our own commitment to doing better, to making their world safer.
    [Show full text]
  • Vital Allies: the Colonial Militia's Use of Indians in King Philip's War, 1675--1676
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2011 Vital allies: The colonial militia's use of Indians in King Philip's War, 1675--1676 Shawn Eric Pirelli University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Pirelli, Shawn Eric, "Vital allies: The colonial militia's use of Indians in King Philip's War, 1675--1676" (2011). Master's Theses and Capstones. 146. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/146 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VITAL ALLIES: THE COLONIAL MILITIA'S USE OF iNDIANS IN KING PHILIP'S WAR, 1675-1676 By Shawn Eric Pirelli BA, University of Massachusetts, Boston, 2008 THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts In History May, 2011 UMI Number: 1498967 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Dissertation Publishing UMI 1498967 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • South Shore Educational Collaborative
    SOUTH SHORE EDUCATIONAL COLLABORATIVE www.ssec.org ANNUAL REPORT TO THE COLLABORATIVE BOARD of DIRECTORS 2018 - 2019 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Collaborative Board Board of Directors and Administrative Personnel of the South Shore Educational Collaborative Executive Director, Richard Reino 1-6 Director of Student Services, Patricia Mason, Ph.D. 7-14 Ancillary Services, Dawn Flaherty 15-20 Careers High School, Anne Rowland 21-26 Community School, Jon Reynard 27-32 Mini School, Maureen Gattine 33-37 Quest School, Timothy Handorf, Jennie Williams 38-70 South Shore High School, Amy Norton 71-80 STARTS Program, Anne Rowland 81-87 2 SOUTH SHORE EDUCATIONAL COLLABORATIVE BOARD MEMBERS 2018 - 2019 Richard L. Reino, Executive Director Frank Hackett, Ed.D. Braintree Public Schools Superintendent Louise Demas Superintendent Cohasset Public Schools Dorothy Galo, Ph.D. Hingham Public Schools Superintendent, Chairperson Michael Devine Hull Public Schools Superintendent, Vice Chairperson Jeffrey Granatino Marshfield Public Schools Superintendent Mary Gormley Milton Public Schools Superintendent Matthew A. Keegan Norwell Public Schools Superintendent Richard DeCristofaro, Ed.D. Quincy Public Schools Superintendent Thea Stovell Randolph Public Schools Superintendent Ron Griffin Scituate Public Schools Superintendent Jennifer Curtis Whipple, Ed.D. Weymouth Public Schools Superintendent 3 STAFF OF THE SOUTH SHORE EDUCATIONAL COLLABORATIVE 2018 – 2019 Richard L. Reino Executive Director Arthur Sullivan Treasurer Cynthia J. Lindberg Executive Secretary Catherine
    [Show full text]