Motility in a Test Tube

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Motility in a Test Tube Motility in a Test Tube By Ronald Vale A Key Experiment produced by The Explorer’s Guide to Biology 2 Th e Explorer’s Guide to Biology https://explorebiology.org/ Motility in a Test Tube Ronald Vale, University of California, San Francisco Ronald (Ron) Vale Ronald (Ron) Vale is a professor at the University of California, San Francisco and an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Ron received his Ph.D. in Neuroscience from Stanford University in 1985. His honors include the Lasker Award in Basic Medical Research, the Shaw Prize in Life Sciences, and the Canada Gairdner Award; he was elected to the US National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Medicine. Ron believes in the free dissemi- nation of scientifi c knowledge throughout the world. He is the founder of iBiology, a non-profi t organization that produces free videos of talks by leading scientists, and the founder and executive producer of The Explorer’s Guide to Biology. Published on September, 2019 3 Motility in a Test Tube What’s the Big Deal? Cities bustle with the motion of people and commercial goods. Just as goods must be transported from one point to another within a city, molecules also need to be transported within cells to the des- tinations where they are needed. Accordingly, cells have developed roadways (cytoskeletal filaments), engines (protein motors), and cargo containers (membrane organelles) to physically transport mole- cules. These biological transport systems are essential for all cells, but they play especially important roles in neurons, which must transport molecules over very long distances. A failure of the biological transport system can lead to diseases of the nervous system as well as other organs. A cell is about a billion times smaller than a city. How can one study such a miniaturized transport system? Powerful microscopes can be used to visualize small subcellular objects, and the videos in this “Key Experiment” provide a peek at the busy highways inside a nerve cell. In addition, this experiment uses biochemistry to re-build a cell’s transportation system in a test tube. These simplified methods for studying motility led to the discovery of a new motor protein (kinesin) and became powerful tools for understanding how biological motility works. This “Key Experiment” also explains “assays” and “controls” (core concepts in biology) and reveals how unexpected twists and turns can shape research projects and careers. Learning Overview Big Concepts Cells contain thousands of proteins performing many processes. Biochemists try to reduce the complexity in understanding these processes by studying a biological activity outside of the cell (in vitro) and with a minimal number of components. In this “Key Experiment,” the complex process of membrane organelle transport in a nerve cell was rebuilt in vitro from its molecular parts, pro- viding new insights and tools for understanding the basis of biological motility. Terms and Concepts Used Electron microscope (EM), enzyme, gel electrophoresis, fractionation, light microscope, lipid, mem- branes, mitochondria, model organism, neuron, neuron cell body, nucleus, plasma membrane, pro- tein, protein domain, protein purification, sucrose, stem cell Terms and Concepts Explained Actin, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), assay, ATPases, axon, axoplasmic transport, buffer, cyto- skeleton, gel electrophoresis, kinesin, in vitro reconstitution, microtubule, motor neuron, motor pro- tein, organelles, ultracentrifuge, variable Key Experiment Motility in a Test Tube 4 Motility in a Test Tube Introduction Neurons have long, narrow tubes called axons that connect the cell body to the nerve terminal. Membrane organelles move within the axons to transport goods between the cell body and nerve terminal through a process called axonal transport. At the time of this experiment (1984), the mechanism of axonal transport was not known. What Events Preceded the Experiment? It is important to pick a good organism to study a biological problem. For studying axonal trans- port, squid was a good choice because it has a “giant axon” that can be easily dissected out of the squid. In the early 1980s, Allen, Brady, and Lasek observed organelles moving inside of the axon using a video microscope, one of the first occasions in which video cameras and computers were used to record images from a microscope rather than just looking with the naked eye. The cytoskeleton is a network of protein filaments inside of cells. Two main cytoskeletal systems found in all eukaryotic cells are actin filaments and microtubules. Electron microscopy studies revealed that microtubules serve as tracks for long-distance transport of organelles in axons. Setting up the Experiment To learn more about how axonal transport works, the investigators isolated the components that they thought were needed for transport and then recombined them in a test tube. They then used a microscope to examine the combined mixture to observe if organelles were transported along microtubules. This type of experiment is called in vitro reconstitution (taking a system apart and putting it back together in a test tube). The isolated components were: A) Microtubules (the tracks for movement) made from a purified protein called tubulin. B) Adenosine triphosphate (ATP; the chemical energy source). C) Membrane organelles (the cargo) from the giant axon, which were isolated by the method of sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation. An ultracentrifuge spins samples at high speeds, allowing biological materials to be separated on the basis of both size and density. D) Soluble protein fraction (free proteins that are neither associated with organelles nor the cytoskeleton) were also isolated from the giant axon. Doing the Key Experiment The in vitro reconstitution experiment involved mixing various combinations of the components described above and then looking through a microscope to observe if the isolated organelles would move along the microtubule tracks. 5 Motility in a Test Tube The scientists first combined 1) microtubules, 2) membrane organelles, and 3) ATP. They thought that this combination might work as it was expected that the motors are bound to organelles. However, no movement was observed. Then, they thought that a component might be missing and hence added the soluble protein fraction. Now the organelles started moving along microtubules, suggesting that this fraction contained a key ingredient needed for the movement. The key ingredient in the soluble protein fraction proved to be a motor protein itself. When they combined microtubules, the soluble protein fraction, and ATP (but no organelles), surprisingly, they observed microtubules moving over the surface of a glass microscope slide. A follow-up experiment showed that the motor protein stuck onto the glass and the glass-bound motor pro- teins propelled the microtubules along the surface. Small plastic beads also could bind to the unknown motor protein from the soluble protein frac- tion. The motor protein would transport the beads along the microtubules in a manner that looked similar to the transport of membrane organelles inside of axons. This experiment demonstrated that axonal transport could be reconstituted from isolated compo- nents. It also led to new experimental strategies (called “assays”) for studying motor proteins— the movement of microtubules across a glass surface and the movement of plastic beads along stationary microtubules. These new assays, which did not involve membrane organelles (complex objects themselves), provided new and simple ways of measuring the activity of motor proteins. What Happened Next? The simplified in vitro motility assays provided means to isolate a new motor protein from the axon, which was named “kinesin.” In addition to helping in the identification of a new motor protein, these assays provided powerful tools for understanding how motor proteins convert chemical energy from ATP into movement. Closing Thoughts Serendipity plays a big role in scientific research. The in vitro motility assays of microtubules mov- ing across a glass surface and plastic beads moving along stationary microtubules were unantic- ipated at the start of the experiment and proved to be the biggest advancement. Guided Paper Vale, R.D., Schnapp, B.J., Reese, T.S., and Sheetz, M.P. Organelle, bead and microtubule translocations pro- moted by soluble factors from the squid giant axon. Cell 1985;40:559–569. 6 Motility in a Test Tube Introduction Could a single evening in the laboratory change the course of one’s life? This is the story of such an evening. I was a 25-year-old student in a combined PhD/MD training program at Stanford University. At the time of this story, I was wrapping up the research for my PhD degree and, in 3 weeks, was scheduled to stop my research and transition to the final phase of my MD training. I had already completed enough work to obtain my PhD. But I wanted to end my research work with a bang and not a whimper. But I was not getting any results. Were the experiments too difficult? Or was I just clumsy? As my experiments were not going well, it was tempting to give up. However, my fascination with the research kept me going. Lying in front of me was a great puzzle that I wanted to solve. The clock was ticking; my scientific research would come to halt for at least 2 years after I returned to medical school. It was now or never. I was studying how neurons transport materials (proteins and membranes) from the location where they are made to the destinations where they are needed. Most biomolecules are made in the cell body, where the nucleus is located. However, some of these molecules have to be shipped to the nerve terminal. Although all cells need to transport materials, the distance between the cell body and nerve terminal can be much greater than the distance across most other cells in the body. A motor neuron, for example, has its cell body in the spinal cord and its nerve terminal could be located at a muscle in your foot, a distance of around 1 m (Figure 1).
Recommended publications
  • 2017-IMSA-Fund-Annual-Report.Pdf
    1 from the fund board president Jacob Plummer ’96 IMSA Fund Board President A few years ago, a past president of the IMSA Fund Board, John Hoesley, called After joining the board, I learned for the first time of thousands of professional me and said “I’d like you to join us.” I told him “I’ve never heard of the Board – development workshops led by Dr. Storm Robinson’s outreach division at what do you do?” And he said, “We raise money, we open doors, and we support IMSA - impacting students and teachers across Illinois. IMSA.” Like all of us, I am grateful for the funding the State of Illinois provides It was easy to say yes. As an alum, many of my closest friends are people I met for IMSA. Carl Sagan said IMSA was a gift from the people of Illinois on campus. And, IMSA gave me opportunities I hadn’t even imagined. I joined to the human future – and it is. But our community has a role too. The the Board out of gratefulness. However, I’ve stayed on the board for two other contributions of all our donors, our Chicago companies and foundations reasons and these are reasons that might also matter to you. – great supporters like Ball Horticultural Company, Boeing, BP, Caterpillar Foundation, ComEd, Dart Foundation, EcoLab, Hansen-Furnas Foundation, The best thing about joining the board was having a way to connect with the Harris Family Foundation, Nicor Gas, NOAA, Pentair, Sodexo, and Tellabs Academy. Today, I regularly meet students and faculty who have incredible Foundation to name just a few.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report
    BECKMAN CENTER 279 Campus Drive West Stanford, CA 94305 650.723.8423 Stanford University | Beckman Center 2019 Annual Report Annual 2019 | Beckman Center University Stanford beckman.stanford.edu 2019 ANNUAL REPORT ARNOLD AND MABEL BECKMAN CENTER FOR MOLECULAR AND GENETIC MEDICINE 30 Years of Innovation, Discovery, and Leadership in the Life Sciences CREDITS: Cover Design: Neil Murphy, Ghostdog Design Graphic Design: Jack Lem, AlphaGraphics Mountain View Photography: Justin Lewis Beckman Center Director Photo: Christine Baker, Lotus Pod Designs MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR Dear Friends and Trustees, It has been 30 years since the Beckman Center for Molecular and Genetic Medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine opened its doors in 1989. The number of translational scientific discoveries and technological innovations derived from the center’s research labs over the course of the past three decades has been remarkable. Equally remarkable have been the number of scientific awards and honors, including Nobel prizes, received by Beckman faculty and the number of young scientists mentored by Beckman faculty who have gone on to prominent positions in academia, bio-technology and related fields. This year we include several featured articles on these accomplishments. In the field of translational medicine, these discoveries range from the causes of skin, bladder and other cancers, to the identification of human stem cells, from the design of new antifungals and antibiotics to the molecular underpinnings of autism, and from opioids for pain
    [Show full text]
  • National Centre for Biological Sciences
    Cover Outside Final_452 by 297.pdf 1 16/01/19 10:51 PM National Centre for Biological Sciences Biological for National Centre National Centre for Biological Sciences Tata Institute of Fundamnetal Research Bellary Road, Bangalore 560 065. India. P +91 80 23666 6001/ 02/ 18/ 19 F +91 80 23666 6662 www.ncbs.res.in σ 2 ∂ NCBSLogo — fd 100 ∂t rt 100 fd 200 10-9m 10-5m 10-2m 1m ANNUAL REPORT 2017-18 REPORT ANNUAL National Centre for Biological Sciences ANNUAL REPORT 2017-18 Cover Inside Final_452 by 297.pdf 1 12/01/19 7:00 PM National Centre for Biological Sciences ANNUAL REPORT 2017-18 A cluster of gossamer-winged dragonflies from Dhara Mehrotra’s exhibition “Through Clusters and Networks”, as a part of the TIFR Artist-in-Residence programme PHOTO: DHARA MEHROTRA CONTENTS Director’s Map of Research 4 7 Note Interests Research Theory, Simulation, New Faculty 8 and Modelling of 88 Reports SABARINATHAN RADHAKRISHNAN 8 Biological Systems SHACHI GOSAVI · MUKUND THATTAI · SANDEEP KRISHNA · MADAN RAO · SHASHI THUTUPALLI Biochemistry, Biophysics, 20 and Bioinformatics JAYANT UDGAONKAR · M K MATHEW R SOWDHAMINI · ASWIN SESHASAYEE RANABIR DAS · ARATI RAMESH · ANJANA BADRINARAYANAN · VINOTHKUMAR K R Cellular Organisation 38 and Signalling SUDHIR KRISHNA · SATYAJIT MAYOR · RAGHU PADINJAT · VARADHARAJAN SUNDARAMURTHY 48 Neurobiology UPINDER S BHALLA · SANJAY P SANE · SUMANTRA CHATTARJI · VATSALA THIRUMALAI · HIYAA GHOSH 60 Genetics and Development K VIJAYRAGHAVAN · GAITI HASAN P V SHIVAPRASAD · RAJ LADHER · DIMPLE NOTANI 72 Ecology and Evolution MAHESH
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Microtubules Into Microshuttles for Advanced Immunoassay Applications
    Transforming Microtubules into Microshuttles for Advanced Immunoassay Applications by Jenna Marie Campbell A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Mechanical Engineering) in the University of Michigan 2014 Doctoral Committee: Professor Edgar Meyhöfer, Chair Assistant Professor Barry Grant Assistant Professor Ajit P. Joglekar Professor Katsuo Kurabayashi © Jenna Campbell 2014 All Rights Reserved For Lisa Orr and Vivek Tomer— For pushing me forward every time I wanted to take a step back. Your love, support, and guidance have been invaluable. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is the culmination of many years of work, which would not have been possible without the guidance of my advisor, Edgar Meyhöfer. He challenged me, taught me how to ask questions, and how to “do science.” Always having an open door, your support and expertise has been invaluable academically, professionally, and personally. I would also like to acknowledge Katsuo Kurabayashi for your expertise and support. Our meetings gave me a broader perspective on our projects, which played a large role in shaping my academic and professional goals. Committee members Ajit Joglekar and Barry Grant have always been generous with their time, and I am thankful for the advice and expertise they have given throughout my graduate career. My co-workers Charles Jiang and Neha Kaul played a critical role in this work. Thank you for bringing laughter along with great insight into my work. I would like to acknowledge Professor James Gole for encouraging me to continue my education, which brought me to the University of Michigan. I would not have discovered my love of science and research if it were not for your passion to inspire undergraduates and educate young scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Notices of the American Mathematical Society
    OF THE 1994 AMS Election Special Section page 7 4 7 Fields Medals and Nevanlinna Prize Awarded at ICM-94 page 763 SEPTEMBER 1994, VOLUME 41, NUMBER 7 Providence, Rhode Island, USA ISSN 0002-9920 Calendar of AMS Meetings and Conferences This calendar lists all meetings and conferences approved prior to the date this issue insofar as is possible. Instructions for submission of abstracts can be found in the went to press. The summer and annual meetings are joint meetings with the Mathe· January 1994 issue of the Notices on page 43. Abstracts of papers to be presented at matical Association of America. the meeting must be received at the headquarters of the Society in Providence, Rhode Abstracts of papers presented at a meeting of the Society are published in the Island, on or before the deadline given below for the meeting. Note that the deadline for journal Abstracts of papers presented to the American Mathematical Society in the abstracts for consideration for presentation at special sessions is usually three weeks issue corresponding to that of the Notices which contains the program of the meeting, earlier than that specified below. Meetings Abstract Program Meeting# Date Place Deadline Issue 895 t October 28-29, 1994 Stillwater, Oklahoma Expired October 896 t November 11-13, 1994 Richmond, Virginia Expired October 897 * January 4-7, 1995 (101st Annual Meeting) San Francisco, California October 3 January 898 * March 4-5, 1995 Hartford, Connecticut December 1 March 899 * March 17-18, 1995 Orlando, Florida December 1 March 900 * March 24-25,
    [Show full text]
  • Lasker Interactive Research Nom'18.Indd
    THE 2018 LASKER MEDICAL RESEARCH AWARDS Nomination Packet albert and mary lasker foundation November 1, 2017 Greetings: On behalf of the Albert and Mary Lasker Foundation, I invite you to submit a nomination for the 2018 Lasker Medical Research Awards. Since 1945, the Lasker Awards have recognized the contributions of scientists, physicians, and public citizens who have made major advances in the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of disease. The Medical Research Awards will be offered in three categories in 2018: Basic Research, Clinical Research, and Special Achievement. The Lasker Foundation seeks nominations of outstanding scientists; nominations of women and minorities are encouraged. Nominations that have been made in previous years are not automatically reconsidered. Please see the Nomination Requirements section of this booklet for instructions on updating and resubmitting a nomination. The Foundation accepts electronic submissions. For information on submitting an electronic nomination, please visit www.laskerfoundation.org. Lasker Awards often presage future recognition of the Nobel committee, and they have become known popularly as “America’s Nobels.” Eighty-seven Lasker laureates have received the Nobel Prize, including 40 in the last three decades. Additional information on the Awards Program and on Lasker laureates can be found on our website, www.laskerfoundation.org. A distinguished panel of jurors will select the scientists to be honored with Lasker Medical Research Awards. The 2018 Awards will
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Sheetz, James Spudich, and Ronald Vale Receive the 2012 Albert Lasker Basic Medical Research Award
    Molecules in motion: Michael Sheetz, James Spudich, and Ronald Vale receive the 2012 Albert Lasker Basic Medical Research Award Sarah Jackson J Clin Invest. 2012;122(10):3374-3377. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI66361. News The Albert and Mary Lasker Foundation honors three pioneers in the field of molecular motor proteins, Michael Sheetz, James Spudich, and Ronald Vale (Figure 1), for their contribution to uncovering how these proteins catalyze movement. Sheetz and Spudich developed the first biochemical assay to reconstitute myosin motor activity and showed that myosin and ATP alone were sufficient to direct transport along actin filaments. Fueled by this discovery, Vale and Sheetz examined transport in giant squid axon extracts and discovered a new motor, kinesin, that moves along microtubules. Cumulatively, their work opened the door for understanding how motor proteins drive transport of a host of molecules involved in numerous cellular processes, including cell polarity, cell division, cellular movement, and signal transduction. Muscle movement Much of the early research on cellular movement focused on understanding muscle contraction. Filaments of actin and myosin form a banding pattern in muscle that is readily visible by light microscopy, with a characteristic striated appearance. The functional unit of muscle, termed a sarcomere, repeats at regular intervals along the muscle fibers. Measurements from contracted, resting, and stretched muscle using high-resolution light microscopy supported the notion that contraction was due to the sliding of actin and myosin filaments (1, 2). In 1969, preeminent British scientist Hugh Huxley proposed that crossbridges that connect actin and myosin generate the sliding […] Find the latest version: https://jci.me/66361/pdf News Molecules in motion: Michael Sheetz, James Spudich, and Ronald Vale receive the 2012 Albert Lasker Basic Medical Research Award The Albert and Mary Lasker Founda- James Spudich joined the Huxley labora- motility along actin.
    [Show full text]
  • HHMI Bulletin Winter 2013: First Responders (Full Issue in PDF)
    HHMI BULLETIN W INTER ’13 VOL.26 • NO.01 • 4000 Jones Bridge Road Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815-6789 Hughes Medical Institute Howard www.hhmi.org Address Service Requested In This Issue: Celebrating Structural Biology Bhatia Builds an Oasis Molecular Motors Grid Locked Our cells often work in near lockstep with each other. During • development, a variety of cells come together in a specific www.hhmi.org arrangement to create complex organs such as the liver. By fabricating an encapsulated, 3-dimensional matrix of live endothelial (purple) and hepatocyte (teal) cells, as seen in this magnified snapshot, Sangeeta Bhatia can study how spatial relationships and organization impact cell behavior and, ultimately, liver function. In the long term, Bhatia hopes to build engineered tissues useful for organ repair or replacement. Read about Bhatia and her lab team’s work in “A Happy Oasis,” on page 26. FIRST RESPONDERS Robert Lefkowitz revealed a family of vol. vol. cell receptors involved in most body 26 processes—including fight or flight—and Bhatia Lab / no. no. / earned a Nobel Prize. 01 OBSERVATIONS REALLY INTO MUSCLES Whether in a leaping frog, a charging elephant, or an Olympic out that the structural changes involved in contraction were still sprinter, what happens inside a contracting muscle was pure completely unknown. At first I planned to obtain X-ray patterns from mystery until the mid-20th century. Thanks to the advent of x-ray individual A-bands, to identify the additional material present there. I crystallography and other tools that revealed muscle filaments and hoped to do this using some arthropod or insect muscles that have associated proteins, scientists began to get an inkling of what particularly long A-bands, or even using the organism Anoploductylus moves muscles.
    [Show full text]
  • BGI Founder and President Visits EMBO the Stars of Biomedicine The
    AUTUMN 2012 ISSUE 22 encounters The 4th EMBO Meeting PAGES 3 AND 10 –12 The stars of biomedicine PAGE 8 ©Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) ©Karlsruhe (KIT) Institute of Technology Eric | Côte d’Azur | Vence Zaragoza PAGE 4 Focus on partnerships BGI founder and President visits EMBO INTERVIEW Gunnar von Heijne, Director of FEATURE The Milan-based Institute of INTERVIEW Sir Paul Nurse discusses the Center for Biomembrane Research at Molecular Oncology Foundation is expanding science, society, and his new venture, The Stockholm University, explains why life would into Asia to recruit top research talent to Italy. Francis Crick Institute, in an interview at be impossible without biological membranes. The 4th EMBO Meeting in Nice, France. PAGE 9 PAGE 6 PAGE 12 www.embo.org COMMENTARY Inside scientific publishing Scooping protection and rapid publication arlier in the year, we started a series of arti- These and other key procedures have been various steps to ensure rapid handling of the cles in EMBOencounters to inform readers included in a formal description of The EMBO manuscript and to avoid protracted revisions. Eabout some of the developments in scientif- Transparent Publishing Process for all four EMBO EMBO editors rapidly respond to submissions. ic publishing. The previous article described the publications (see Figure 1 and journal websites). The initial editorial decision ensures that only ‘Transparent Review’ process used by The EMBO Here, I describe the processes developed and those manuscripts enter full peer review that Journal, EMBO reports, Molecular Systems Biology used by the EMBO publications that allow have a high chance of acceptance in a timely and EMBO Molecular Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytoplasmic Dynein Nomenclature • Pfister Et Al
    JCB: COMMENT Cytoplasmic dynein nomenclature K. Kevin Pfister,1 Elizabeth M.C. Fisher,2 Ian R. Gibbons,3 Thomas S. Hays,4 Erika L.F. Holzbaur,5 J. Richard McIntosh,6 Mary E. Porter,4 Trina A. Schroer,7 Kevin T. Vaughan,8 George B. Witman,9 Stephen M. King,10 and Richard B. Vallee11 1Department of Cell Biology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908 2Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK 3Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 4Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 5Department of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 6Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 7Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 8Department of Biological Science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 9Department of Cell Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655 10Department of Molecular, Microbial, and Structural Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030 11Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032 A variety of names has been used in the literature for the and axonemal dynein complexes (King et al., 1996a,b, 1998; subunits of cytoplasmic dynein complexes. Thus, there is Bowman et al., 1999; Wilson et al., 2001). Also, it is now a strong need for a more definitive consensus statement known that there are two distinct cytoplasmic dynein com- Downloaded from plexes: the originally characterized complex with six subunits on nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESIDENT's Column the Art and Science of Cell Biology (ASCB2)
    The American Society PRESIDENT’S Column for Cell Biology 8120 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 750 Bethesda, MD 20814-2762, USA Tel: 301-347-9300 The Art and Science of Cell Fax: 301-347-9310 Biology (ASCB2) [email protected], www.ascb.org This President’s Column was written by guest columnists Janet Iwasa and Graham Johnson. 2) How can we better engage the public and Officers maintain their interest in cell biology? Ronald Vale President Captivating imagery has always complemented The Scientist as Artist: Tools to Don W. Cleveland President-Elect cell biology. Two new events at the ASCB 2012 Enhance Research and Creativity Sandra L. Schmid Past President Annual Meeting in San Francisco will explore Visualizations of biological data range from Thoru Pederson Treasurer Kathleen J. Green Secretary issues at the interface 2D bar graphs and charts of science and art that to intricate molecular Council increasingly affect our animations encapsulating Sue Biggins field: decades of research. A well- David Botstein 1) From Histograms conceived, well-executed A. Malcolm Campbell to Animations, a presentation can be a Raymond J. Deshaies Working Group powerful, lasting tool— Benjamin S. Glick Akihiro Kusumi focusing on not only to communicate Inke Näthke visualization, will results and theories but also Mark Peifer delve into ways for to bring about new ideas. James H. Sabry researchers to clarify Janet Iwasa Graham Johnson As scientific illustrators, David L. Spector JoAnn Trejo complex data for we frequently see that Yixian Zheng analysis and communication. researchers gain new insights and testable 2) A scientific art show will serve as a theories during the course of their collaboration The ASCB Newsletter prototype for a traveling gallery intended to with us, ultimately leading to detailed models is published 11 times per year immerse the public in the visual language of cell and animations.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/432328/Data/May2015redis- Tributionofrenureracksusmedicalschoolfacultypart1.Pdf
    UC Berkeley UC Medical Humanities Press Book Series Title Follow the Money: Funding Research in a Large Academic Health Center Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/59p124ds ISBN 97809963324229 Authors Bourne, Henry Vermillion, Eric Publication Date 2016-05-16 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Follow the money Funding Research in a Large Academic Health Center Henry R. Bourne & Eric B.Vermillion Perspectives in Medical Humanities Perspectives in Medical Humanities publishes scholarship produced or reviewed under the auspices of the University of California Medical Humanities Consortium, a multi-campus collaborative of faculty, students and trainees in the humanities, medicine, and health sciences. Our series invites scholars from the humanities and health care professions to share narratives and analysis on health, healing, and the contexts of our beliefs and practices that impact biomedical inquiry. General Editor Brian Dolan, PhD, Professor of Social Medicine and Medical Humanities, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Recent Titles Health Citizenship: Essays in Social Medicine and Biomedical Politics Dorothy Porter (Winter 2012) Patient Poets: Illness from Inside Out Marilyn Chandler McEntyre (Fall 2012) (Pedagogy in Medical Humanities series) Bioethics and Medical Issues in Literature Mahala Yates Stripling (Fall 2013) (Pedagogy in Medical Humanities series) Heart Murmurs: What Patients Teach
    [Show full text]