DOCSLIB.ORG

TANK Transit Network Study FINAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TANK Transit Network Study FINAL TRANSIT NETWORK STUDY | FINAL Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky TANK Transit Network Study FINAL December 2013 TRANSIT NETWORK STUDY | FINAL Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky Table of Contents Page 1 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................1-1 2 Existing Transit Services ..................................................................................................2-1 System Overview ................................................................................................................................... 2-1 Frequency and Span ............................................................................................................................. 2-4 Historical Trends ..................................................................................................................................... 2-7 Productivity Measures ........................................................................................................................... 2-8 3 Document Review ............................................................................................................3-1 TANK Documents .................................................................................................................................... 3-1 External Documents................................................................................................................................ 3-2 4 Land Use and Demographic Characteristics .....................................................................4-1 Population and Employment Density .................................................................................................. 4-1 Demographic Characteristics ............................................................................................................. 4-10 5 Travel Demand Analysis .................................................................................................5-1 6 Route Profiles ..................................................................................................................6-1 7 Community Survey ..........................................................................................................7-1 8 Short Term Recommendations .........................................................................................8-1 Guiding Principals for Service Recommendations ........................................................................... 8-1 Route Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 8-1 Service Implementation ....................................................................................................................... 8-23 Short-Range Capital Improvements ................................................................................................. 8-26 9 Long Range Recommendations .......................................................................................9-1 Multi-Hub System ................................................................................................................................... 9-1 Service Types and Branding................................................................................................................ 9-5 Neighborhood Circulators .................................................................................................................... 9-6 Service Levels on Enhanced Bus Corridors ........................................................................................ 9-8 Frequency and Span Enhancements ................................................................................................... 9-9 Table of Figures Page Figure 1 Description and Service Type of TANK Bus Routes ........................................................ 2-2 Figure 2 TANK System Map ............................................................................................................... 2-3 Figure 3 TANK Downtown Map ......................................................................................................... 2-3 Figure 4 Span and Frequency by Time Period .............................................................................. 2-5 Figure 4 Span and Frequency by Time Period (cont’d) ................................................................ 2-6 Figure 5 Ridership 2011 – 2012 by Route: Local Routes ............................................................. 2-7 Figure 6 Ridership 2011 – 2012 by Route: Express Routes ........................................................ 2-7 Figure 7 2012 Total System Ridership by Month ........................................................................... 2-8 Figure 8 2012 Operating Statistics – All Routes ............................................................................ 2-9 Figure 9 Boardings per Service Hour by Route ............................................................................ 2-10 Figure 10 Boardings per Service Mile .............................................................................................. 2-10 TRANSIT NETWORK STUDY | FINAL Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky Figure 11 Boardings per Trip ............................................................................................................. 2-11 Figure 12 On-Time Percentage by Route* ....................................................................................... 2-11 Figure 13 On-Time Performance by Route ...................................................................................... 2-12 Figure 14 Campbell County Transportation Plan: Public Transportation ..................................... 3-3 Figure 15 Metro Rail Plan Transit Map ............................................................................................... 3-5 Figure 16 Corridor Service Types and Supportive Densities .......................................................... 4-2 Figure 17 Total Population and Population of Seniors by County (2010 – 2040) ................... 4-3 Figure 18 Population of Seniors by County (2010 - 2040) ........................................................... 4-4 Figure 19 2010 Population Density by Census Block ....................................................................... 4-5 Figure 20 Children (10-14 Years Old) Population Density by Census Block .............................. 4-6 Figure 21 College Age (18 to 24 Years Old) Population Density by Census Block .................. 4-7 Figure 22 Seniors (65 and Older) Population Density by Census Block ...................................... 4-8 Figure 23 2005 Employment Density by TAZ .................................................................................... 4-9 Figure 24 Percentage of Households Below Poverty Level by Census Block Group ............... 4-11 Figure 25 Percentage of Households Without Access to a Vehicle by Census Block Group . 4-12 Figure 26 Northern Kentucky University Students by Zip Code (2012 – 2013 Academic Year)...................................................................................................................................... 4-13 Figure 27 Northern Kentucky University Faculty by Zip Code (2012 – 2013 Academic Year)...................................................................................................................................... 4-14 Figure 28 Major Travel Patterns – All Trip Types - 2005 .............................................................. 5-4 Figure 29 Major Travel Patterns – All Trip Types - 2040 .............................................................. 5-5 Figure 30 Major Travel Patterns – Home-Based Other & Non Home-Based Trips - 2005 ..... 5-6 Figure 31 Major Travel Patterns – Home-Based Other & Non Home-Based Trips - 2040 ..... 5-7 Figure 32 Major Travel Patterns – Home-Based Work/University Trips - 2005 ....................... 5-8 Figure 33 Major Travel Patterns - Home-Based Work/University Trips - 2040 ....................... 5-9 Figure 34 Prior Use of TANK Transit ................................................................................................... 7-1 Figure 35 Transit Service Used ............................................................................................................. 7-2 Figure 36 Reasons for Riding Transit ................................................................................................... 7-3 Figure 37 Effectiveness of TANK Service ........................................................................................... 7-3 Figure 38 Reasons for Not Riding Transit ........................................................................................... 7-4 Figure 39 Factors that would encourage transit usage ................................................................... 7-4 Figure 40 Views on transit service priorities ...................................................................................... 7-5 Figure 41 Preferred service improvements ........................................................................................ 7-6 Figure 42 Rating of existing TANK transit service ............................................................................ 7-7 Figure 43 Preference of improving frequency or expanding service .......................................... 7-8 Figure 44 Preference of expanding service or improving existing routes .................................. 7-8 Figure 45
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FINANCING REGIONAL RAIL TRANSIT WITHOUT RAISING TAXES April 2018
    FINANCING REGIONAL RAIL TRANSIT WITHOUT RAISING TAXES April 2018 SLIDE 1: Title Slide Let me first take this opportunity to thank you for inviting me to speak to you. When I first introduced the idea of financing rail transit lines without raising taxes to Mayor Cranley 18 months ago, he of course expressed dubious skepticism, but then said “Who could be against that?” Since then, I have launched a new website, growsmartplanet.org, to encourage cities like ours to plan transit-oriented, sustainable growth throughout their regions and finance the new rail and bus rapid transit lines that make it possible – without raising taxes or waiting years for scarce federal funds. I hope you will find this idea compelling and will help me spread the word to everyone needed to help make this new funding approach feasible here. Cincinnati once had 222 miles of streetcar lines that were built much faster – with local funds - than the short downtown streetcar line opened in 2016. If we look closely at why voters did not support the 2002 MetroMoves regional rail and bus transit plan, you will see why I think we should try again now with an even better plan that provides fast, frequent service to all parts of the region. SLIDE 2: Questions that Impact Transit Plans Public officials and transportation planners should seek consensus from diverse groups on questions like these when planning transportation systems. Their answers all impact what modes of transportation they will most likely support. Most people easily agree on just two things: they want someone else to pay for new highways or public transit lines, and they want lower taxes.
    [Show full text]
  • Building on Excellence
    2015 Report to Stakeholders BUILDING ON EXCELLENCE. OHIO CAPITAL CORPORATION FOR HOUSING TABLE OF CONTENTS INVESTMENT: OHIO EQUITY FUNDS ....................................................................................... 2 Investment ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Ohio & Kentucky Investment & Portfolio Maps ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Development Update .............................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Financial Statements ............................................................................................................................................................................. 10 OCCH Board of Directors ...................................................................................................................................................................... 11 OCCH Staff ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 Featured Projects .................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mill Creek Watershed Scenario Project Report
    Comprehensive Planning Workshop Spring 2010 Niehoff Urban Studio 2008-2010 Mill Creek Watershed Scenario Project Spring 2010 Executive Summary This report is a collective presentation of the studio process undertaken by the University of Cincinnati’s School of Planning 2010 Spring Comprehensive Workshop. The focus of the workshop was the Mill Creek Watershed, a 166 square mile area in southwestern Ohio. The Watershed has reached a critical state due to a multitude of both internal and external factors including industrial flight, environmental degradation, building vacancies, unemployment, auto dependence, and a worsening national economy. While numerous organizations construct and implement plans for the future of the Watershed, a lack of regional collaboration often results in little progress. Over the past century, the Mill Creek brought industry and increased population to the Watershed area. Today, the Mill Creek still remains a valuable natural asset. Urbanization has taken its toll, however, and both water quality and riparian corridor health have suffered. Another area of concern is the loss of population in the City of Cincinnati, and corresponding redistribution to the suburbs. Limited transportation options have worsened this outmigration by encouraging auto dependence. Social and environmental justice issues coincide with declining economic and environmental conditions in the Mill Creek Watershed. Due to its uncertain future, planning in the Mill Creek Watershed requires the consideration of multiple possibilities for how the area will transform. This Workshop used the scenario planning approach to establish four plausible outcomes for the Watershed. Scenario planning seeks to open discussions about how things may unfold, providing the opportunity for individuals and organizations to look beyond their individual plans and concerns for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Mt. Adams Neighborhood Strategic Plan
    MT. ADamS NEIGHBORHOOD STRATEGIC PLAN March 2009 table of contents Credits ii 1 Executive Summary 2 2 Introduction 5 3 History 8 4 Demographics 12 5 Community Life 16 6 Development & Preservation 22 7 Views & Hillsides 34 8 Business District 41 9 Parking 47 10 Clean, Safe, & Attractive 52 11 Infrastructure & Utilities 56 12 Action Plan 60 Appendices Mt. Adams Neghborhood Strategc Plan March 2009 credits Steering Committee City Staff - Department of City Planning and Buildings David Brecount, Chair Neil Bortz Charles Graves III, Director Manoj Desai Margaret Wuerstle, Chief Planner Judy Finn Katherine Keough-Jurs, Senior City Planner Bill Frantz Adrienne Cowden, Senior City Planner Meghan Fronduti Valerie Daley, City Planner Amy Goetz Kathleen Hueneman Luke Robinson City Staff Tina Russo Bill Fischer, Department of Community Ed Schultz Development Marlene Schultz Jack Martin, Department of Transportation and Pat Sheppard Engineering Jerry Tokarsky Michael Moore, Department of Alex Quintaba Transportation and Engineering Dave Zimmerman Jan Ober, Cincinnati Recreation Commission Ed Ratterman, Department City Planning Commission of Community Development Milton Dohoney, Jr., City Manager Steve Schuckman, Cincinnati Park Caleb Faux, Chair Board Donald Mooney Michaele Pride Roxanne Qualls, Councilmember John Schneider Rainer vom Hofe Mt. Adams Neghborhood Strategc Plan March 2009 Ths page ntentonally left blank. This page intentionally left blank. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Mt. Adams Neighborhood Strategic Plan establishes a common vision for the future of Mt. Adams. It provides a practical roadmap for the community and policy direction for City of Cincinnati officials. Every facet of the Mt. Adams community has been involved in developing this collective vision for the neighborhood - including families, the elderly, young professionals, homeowners, renters, business owners, land owners, churches, arts organizations, and City departments.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Rules Cincinnati?
    Who Rules Cincinnati? A Study of Cincinnati’s Economic Power Structure And its Impact on Communities and People By Dan La Botz Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Published by Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Copyright ©2008 by Dan La Botz Table of Contents Summary......................................................................................................... 1 Preface.............................................................................................................4 Introduction.................................................................................................... 7 Part I - Corporate Power in Cincinnati.........................................................15 Part II - Corporate Power in the Media and Politics.....................................44 Part III - Corporate Power, Social Classes, and Communities......................55 Part IV - Cincinnati: One Hundred Years of Corporate Power.....................69 Discussion..................................................................................................... 85 Bibliography.................................................................................................. 91 Acknowledgments.........................................................................................96 About the Author...........................................................................................97 Summary This investigation into Cincinnati’s power structure finds that a handful of national and multinational corporations dominate
    [Show full text]
  • U R B a N LIFE And
    URBAN LIFE and URBAN LANDSCAPE SERIES CINCINNATI'S OVER-THE-RHINE AND TWENTIETH-CENTURY URBANISM Zane L. Miller and Bruce Tucker OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS Columbus Copyright © 1998 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Miller, Zane L. Changing plans for America's inner cities : Cincinnati's Over-The-Rhine and twentieth-century urbanism / Zane L. Miller and Bruce Tucker. p. cm. — (Urban life and urban landscape series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8142-0762-6 (cloth : alk. paper).—ISBN 0-8142-0763-4 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Urban renewal—Ohio—Cincinnati—History. 2. Over-the-Rhine (Cincinnati, Ohio)—History. I. Tucker, Bruce, 1948­ . 11. Title. III. Series. HT177.C53M55 1997 307.3'416'0977178—dc21 97-26206 CIP Text and jacket design by Gary Gore. Type set in ITC New Baskerville by Wilsted & Taylor Publishing Services. Printed by Thomson-Shore. The paper in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48-1992. 98765432 1 For Henry List of Illustrations ix Acknowledgments xi Introduction: Why Cincinnati, Why Over-the-Rhine? xv Prologue: 1850s-1910s 1 PART ONE ZONING, RAZING, OR REHABILITATION Introduction: From Cultural Engineering to Cultural Individualism 9 1 Social Groups, Slums, and Comprehensive Planning, 1915-1944 13 2 Neighborhoods and a Community, 1948-1960 29 PART TWO NEW VISIONS AND VISIONARIES Introduction: Community Action and
    [Show full text]
  • Avondale's Quality of Life Movement
    AVONDALE QOL Avondale’s Quality of Life Movement Approved by Avondale Community Council November 19, 2019 Approved by Cincinnati City Council January 23, 2020 The Avondale QOL was made possible by many Avondale residents, partners, and stakeholders. Special thanks to the following organizations: Avondale Community Council Table of Contents 1 Acknowledgments 4 Executive Summary 7 Intro 15 Engagement 18 Data Snapshot 24 Vision 25 Recommendations 26 Goals 28 Increasing Safety 35 Sharing Success 43 Connecting Residents & Building Partnerships with Institutions 51 Improving Housing 58 Future Land Use 66 Recommendation Action Plan 91 Appendix Acknowledgments Steering Committee Working Group Arnessa Allen, Resident Leader Leadership Jennifer Foster, Resident Leader Henry Brown, Avondale Development Belinda Tubs Wallace, Principal, Rockdale Corporation Board Chair Academy Toni Selvy-Maddox, Resident Leader Yvonne Howard, Resident Leader Morag Adlon, Cincinnati Development Fund Reginald Harris, The Community Builders Mark Fisher, Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Wade Johnston Tri-State Trails, Green Gardens Umbrella Steve Sherman, City of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Candra Evans, Greater Community Church Initiative to Reduce Violence (CIRV) Pastor Ron Evans, Greater Community Royce Sutton, Fifth Third Church Trudy Spalding, Resident Leader Audrey Scott, Resident Leader Noel Beyer, Neighborhood Allies Anita Brentley, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Brooke Duncan, Uptown Consortium Kristen Zook, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
    [Show full text]
  • Evanston News - July 2018
    Evanston News - July 2018 Photo above of Evanston resident and internationally known Philip Paul of King Records https://vimeo.com/21932862 Celebrate Cincinnati’s rich music history in this world premiere musical Cincinnati King about King Records! Cincinnati King shines a spotlight on the revolutionary King Records music label and its Queen City roots. It will run from Nov. 3-Dec. 23 in the Shelterhouse Theatre, Playhouse in the Park 2018 Season. Tickets can be purchased online starting July 16th or by calling 513-421-3888. Based on hundreds of interviews, the story traces the groundbreaking rise of music pioneer Syd Nathan and the artists he produced, the music he created and the enemies he made along the way. The show shares behind-the- scenes tales of King Records hits including “The Twist,” “Blues Stay Away From Me,” “Fever” and “Need Your Love So Bad.” Playhouse in the Park is located in Eden Park on the edge of Mt. Adams, if you’re utilizing a GPS device, the street address is 962 Mt. Adams Circle, 45202. Convenient parking is available in the Playhouse garage and can be reserved in advance by calling the Box Office at 513.421.3888. This is strongly recommended as parking may be sold out on the day of the show, and parking space is extremely limited in Mt. Adams. Garage parking is $8.50 when reserved in advance ($10 in December) and $10 on the day of the show (if available). https://www.cincyplay.com/ Save the Date Evanston Gala, Sat., Oct. 13 Xavier University, Cintas Center Overview 11am ● Check-In opens ● Reception for Awards
    [Show full text]
  • Revive Cincinnati: Lower Mill Creek Valley
    revive cincinnati: neighborhoods of the lower mill creek valley Cincinnati, Ohio urban design associates february 2011 STEERING COMMITTEE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Revive Cincinnati: Charles Graves, III Tim Jeckering Michael Moore Emi Randall Co-Chair, City Planning and Northside Community Council Chair, Transportation and OKI Neighborhoods of the Lower Buildings, Director Engineering Dave Kress Tim Reynolds Cassandra Hillary Camp Washington Business Don Eckstein SORTA Mill Creek Valley Co-Chair, Metropolitan Sewer Association Duke Energy Cameron Ross District of Greater Cincinnati Mary Beth McGrew Patrick Ewing City Planning and Buildings James Beauchamp Uptown Consortium Economic Development PREPARED FOR Christine Russell Spring Grove Village Community Weston Munzel Larry Falkin Cincinnati Port Authority City of Cincinnati Council Uptown Consortium Office of Environmental Quality urban design associates 2011 Department of City Planning David Russell Matt Bourgeois © and Buildings Rob Neel Mark Ginty Metropolitan Sewer District of CHCURC In cooperation with CUF Community Council Greater Cincinnati Waterworks Greater Cincinnati Metropolitan Sewer District of Robin Corathers Pat O’Callaghan Andrew Glenn Steve Schuckman Greater Cincinnati Mill Creek Restoration Project Queensgate Business Alliance Public Services Cincinnati Park Board Bruce Demske Roxanne Qualls Charles Graves Joe Schwind Northside Business Association CONSULTANT TEAM City Council, Vice Mayor City Planning and Buildings, Director Cincinnati Recreation Commission Urban Design Associates Barbara Druffel Walter Reinhaus LiAnne Howard Stefan Spinosa Design Workshop Clifton Business and Professional Over-the-Rhine Community Council Health ODOT Wallace Futures Association Elliot Ruther Lt. Robert Hungler Sam Stephens Robert Charles Lesser & Co. Jenny Edwards Cincinnati State Police Community Development RL Record West End Community Council DNK Architects Sandy Shipley Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Can OTR Defeat the Pitfalls of Gentrification and Create an Economically Diverse Community?
    Freedom Center Journal Volume 2019 Issue 1 Identity Crisis Article 5 2020 Development in Over The Rhine: Can OTR Defeat the Pitfalls of Gentrification and Create an Economically Diverse Community? Madeline High University of Cincinnati College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/fcj Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Law and Race Commons, and the Law and Society Commons Recommended Citation High, Madeline (2020) "Development in Over The Rhine: Can OTR Defeat the Pitfalls of Gentrification and Create an Economically Diverse Community?," Freedom Center Journal: Vol. 2019 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/fcj/vol2019/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications. It has been accepted for inclusion in Freedom Center Journal by an authorized editor of University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications. For more information, please contact [email protected]. High: Development in Over The Rhine: Can OTR Defeat the Pitfalls of Gentrification and Create an Economically Diverse Community? DEVELOPMENT IN OVER-THE-RHINE: CAN OTR DEFEAT THE PITFALLS OF GENTRIFICATION AND CREATE AN ECONOMICALLY DIVERSE COMMUNITY? MADELINE HIGH* INTRODUCTION With respect to race, “many of us are white supremacists yet at the same time yearn to transcend white supremacy.”1 Many people believe they are not racist because they do not personally discriminate against people of different races, despite endorsing systems in society that create barriers among races. An example of this dichotomy between personal refutation of racism and endorsement of societal barriers is gentrification, defined here as the movement of affluent individuals into a low-income, low-wealth neighborhood.
    [Show full text]
  • The Towers of Rivercenter Covington, Kentucky Rivercenter I & Ii Space Available
    THE TOWERS OF RIVERCENTER COVINGTON, KENTUCKY RIVERCENTER I & II SPACE AVAILABLE Brett Lowery 859.292.5548 office • 937.974.5631 cell • [email protected] THE TOWERS OF RIVERCENTER CLASS A OFFICE SPACE WITH BREATHTAKING VIEWS OF DOWNTOWN CINCINNATI RiverCenter, the premiere office complex in Northern Kentucky has transformed the riverfront and Greater Cincinnati business. It is an active commerce center that some of Greater Cincinnati’s most influential companies call home. The RiverCenter complex has earned a prestigious reputation for unparalleled convenience, elegance and quality service for Tri-State business leaders. Situated directly across from downtown Cincinnati, along the tranquil banks of the Ohio River in Covington, Kentucky, RiverCenter includes three magnificent office towers, Embassy Suites and the Marriott hotel. The RiverCenter complex is distinguished by its dramatic, panoramic views of the downtown Cincinnati skyline and the Ohio River. The two RiverCenter Towers and the Madison Place office building provide an unprecedented 800,000 square feet of Class A office space. The construction of the 19-story Tower I launched the RiverCenter project in 1990. The second tower debuted in 1998. Both buildings are optimally suited for the office user seeking suburban convenience in a downtown setting. In 2001, the complex was complemented by Madison Place, a 15-floor showplace with 11 floors of premium office space topped with four floors of the area’s first luxury penthouse/condominiums, rivaling the opulence of Chicago’s Lake Shore Drive. RIVERCENTER I & II Brett Lowery 859.292.5548 office • 937.974.5631 cell • [email protected] PROPERTY DESCRIPTION RIVERCENTER I RIVERCENTER II Address: 50 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Cincinnati Downtown
    |1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10 | 11 | _ _ 20 73 57 85 79 71 25 18 39 A A 16 35 4 60 41 32 CincyUSA.com _ 34 _ 42 What to do in Downtown Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky 55 Locations on grid listed in ( ) 2 Entertainment Districts Shopping 101 B 49 B 1. The Banks (F-6) 12. Carew Tower Complex/Mabley Place (E-5) 24 8 31 23 81 2. Broadway Commons (B-7) 61. Saks Fifth Avenue (E-4) 3. Fountain Square (D & E-5) (A & B-6) 98 Jack 4. Main Street Hotels 30 _ 96 Casino _ 5. Mount Adams (B & C-10) 62. AC Hotel Cincinnati at the Banks (F-6) 5 6. Mainstrasse Village (J-2) 63. Aloft Newport-Cincinnati (H-10) (H-9 & 10) 17 7. Newport on the Levee 64. Best Western Plus Cincinnati Riverfront (I-1) 28 8. Over-The-Rhine Gateway Quarter (A & B-4 & 5 & 6) 65. Cincinnati Marriott at RiverCenter (I-4) C C 66. Cincinnatian Hotel (D-5) 27 Area Attractions 28 Public 67. Comfort Suites Newport (G-11) 91 Library 9. Aronoff Center for the Arts (D-6) 10. BB Riverboats Inc. (H-8) 68. Courtyard by Marriott Covington (I-2) 89 69. Embassy Suites at RiverCenter (I-5) _ 102 97 Belterra Park _ 11. Bicentennial Park (F-9) 75 Gaming 12. Carew Tower Complex 70. Extended Stay America – Covington (I-1) Observation Deck (E-5) 71. Farfield Inn & Suites Cincinnati/Uptown (See other side) (A-5) 88 13.
    [Show full text]