CMHC Infection Control Policy Manual B-14.21 Appendix A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CMHC Infection Control Policy Manual B-14.21 Appendix A Precautions I Appendix A I Isolation Precautions I Guidelines Library IInfection Control I CDC Page 1 of 35 1'~Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1~ CDC 24/7: Saving Lives, Protecting People™ Infection Control Type and Duration of Precautions Recommended for Selected Infections and Conditions1 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Healthcare Settings (2007) ··················- -·················---··························································· - Appendix A Updates [September 2018] Changes: Updates and clarifications made to the table in Appendix A: Type and Duration of Precautions Recommended for Selected Infections and Conditions. ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWYZ A Type of Duration of Infection/Condition Precaution Precaution Precautions/Comments Abscess Contact+ Duration of illness Until drainage stops or can be contained by Draining, major Standard dressing. Abscess Standard nla If dressing covers and contains drainage. Draining, minor or limited Acquired human Standard nla Postexposure chemoprophylaxis for some immunodeficiency syndrome blood exposures [866]. (HIV) Actinomycosis Standard nla Not transmitted from person to person. Adenovirus infection (see n/a nla nla agent-specific guidance under Gastroenteritis, Conjunctivitis, Pneumonia) Amebiasis Standard nla Person-to-person transmission is rare. Transmission in settings for the mentally challenged and in a family group has been reported [1045]. Use care when handling diapered infants and mentally challenged persons [1046]. https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/isolation/appendix/type-duration-precautions.html 8/17/2020 Precautions I Appendix A I Isolation Precautions I Guidelines Library I Infection Control I CDC Page 2 of 35 Type of Duration of lnfection/Cond ition Precaution Precaution Precautions/Comments Anthrax Standard nla Infected patients do not generally pose a transmission risk. Anthrax Standard nla Transmission through non-intact skin contact Cutaneous with draining lesions possible, therefore use Contact Precautions if large amount of uncontained drainage. Handwashing with soap and water preferable to use of waterless alcohol-based antiseptics since alcohol does not have sporicidal activity [983]. Anthrax Standard n/a Not transmitted from person to person. Pulmonary Anthrax n/a Until environment Until decontamination of environment Environmental: completely complete [203]. Wear respirator (N95 mask or aerosolizable spore­ decontaminated PAPRs), protective clothing; decontaminate containing powder or other persons with powder on them (Notice to substance Readers: Occupational Health Guidelines for Remediation Workers at Bacillus anthracis- Contaminated Sites - United States, 2001 -2002 accessed September 2018). Hand hygiene: Handwashing for 30-60 seconds with soap and water or 2% chlorhexidine gluconate after spore contact (alcohol hand rubs inactive against spores [983].) Postexposure prophylaxis following environmental exposure: 60 days of antimicrobials (either doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, or levofloxacin) and postexposure vaccine under IND. Antibiotic-associated colitis (see n/a n/a n/a C/ostridium difficile) Arthropod-borne Standard nla Not transmitted from person to person except • viral encephalitides rarely by transfusion, and for West Nile virus (eastern, western, by organ transplant, breastmilk or Venezuelan equine transplacentally [530, 1047]. Install screens in encephalomyelitis; St windows and doors in endemic areas. Louis, California Use DEET-containing mosquito repellants and encephalitis; West Nile clothing to cover extremities. Virus) and • viral fevers (dengue, yellow fever, Colorado tick fever) https ://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontro I/guidelines/isolation/ appendix/type-duration-precauti ans.html 8/1 7/2 020 Precautions IAppendix A IIsolation Precautions IGuidelines Library IInfection Control ICDC Page 3 of 35 Type of Duration of Infection/Condition Precaution Precaution Precautions/Comments Ascariasis Standard 11/a Not transmitted from person to person. Aspergillosis Standard n/a Contact Precautions and Airborne if massive soft tissue infection with copious drainage and repeated irrigations required [154]. Avian influenza (see influenza, n/a n/a n/a avian below) B Type of Duration of Infection/Condition Precaution Precaution Precautions/Comments Babesiosis Standard n/a Not transmitted from person to person, except rarely by transfusion. Blastomycosis, North Standard n/a Not transmitted from person to person. American, cutaneous or pulmonary Botulism Standard n/a Not transmitted from person to person. Bronchiolitis (see Respiratory Contact+ Duration of Use mask according to Standard Precautions. Infections in infants and Standard illness young children) Brucellosis (undulant, Malta, Standard n/a Not transmitted from person to person, except rarely Mediterranean fever) via banked spermatozoa and sexual contact [1048, 1049]. Provide antimicrobial prophylaxis following laboratory exposure [1050]. C Type of Duration of Infection/Condition Precaution Precaution Precautions/Comments Campy!obacter n/a 11/a n/a gastroenteritis (see Gastroenteritis) Candidiasis, all forms Standard 11/a n/a including mucocutaneous https :/ /www.cdc.gov/infectioncontro I/guidelines/isolation/appendix/type-duration-precautions.html 8/ I 7/2020 Precautions I Appendix A IIsolation Precautions I Guidelines Library IInfection Control I CDC Page 4 of 35 Type of Duration of Infection/Condition Precaution Precaution Precautions/Comments Cat-scratch fever (benign Standard n/a Not transmitted from person to person. inoculation lymphoreticulosis) Cellulitis Standard n/a n/a Chancroid (soft chancre) Standard n/a Transmitted sexually from person to person. (H. ducrey~ Chickenpox (see Varicella) n/a nla n/a Chlamydia trachomatis Standard nla n/a Conjunctivitis Chlamydia trachomatis Standard n/a n/a Genital (lymphogranuloma venereum) Chlamydia trachomatis Standard n/a n/a Pneumonia (infants ~3 mos. of age) Chlamydia pneumoniae Standard n/a Outbreaks in institutionalized populations reported, rarely [1051, 1052]. Cholera (see n/a n/a nla Gastroenteritis) Closed-cavity infection Standard n/a Contact Precautions if there is copious uncontained Open drain in place; drainage. limited or minor drainage Closed-cavity infection Standard n/a nla No drain or closed drainage system in place Clostridium botulinum Standard nla Not transmitted from person to person. Clostridium difficile (see Contact+ Duration of nla Gastroenteritis, C difficile) Standard illness Clostridium perfringens Standard nla Not transmitted from person to person. Food poisoning https ://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/isolation/ appendix/type-duration-precautions.html 8/1 7/2 020 Precautions I Appendix A IIsolation Precautions I Guidelines Library IInfection Control ICDC Page 5 of 35 Type of Duration of Infection/Condition Precaution Precaution Precautions/Comments Clostridium perfringens Standard nla Transmission from person to person rare; 1 outbreak in a Gas gangrene surgical setting reported [1053]. Use Contact Precautions if wound drainage is extensive. Coccidioidomycosis (valley Standard 11/a Not transmitted from person to person except under fever) extraordinary circumstances, because the infectious Draining lesions arthroconidial form of Coccidioides immitisis not produced in humans [1054]. Coccidioidomycosis (valley Standard nla Not transmitted from person to person except under fever) extraordinary circumstances, (e.g., inhalation of Pneumonia aerosolized tissue phase endospores during necropsy, transplantation of infected lung) because the infectious arthroconidial form of Coccidioides immitisis not produced in humans [1054, 1055]. Colorado tick fever Standard nla Not transmitted from person to person. Congenital rubella Contact+ Until 1 yr of Standard Precautions if nasopharyngeal and urine Standard age cultures repeatedly negative after 3 mos. of age. Conjunctivitis Standard nla n/a Acute bacterial Conjunctivitis Standard nla nla Acute bacterial Chlamydia Conjunctivitis Standard n/a n/a Acute bacterial Gonococcal Conjunctivitis Contact+ Duration of Adenovirus most common; enterovirus 70 [1056], Acute viral (acute Standard illness Coxsackie virus A24 [1057] also associated with hemorrhagic) community outbreaks. Highly contagious; outbreaks in eye clinics, pediatric and neonatal settings, institutional settings reported. Eye clinics should follow Standard Precautions when handling patients with conjunctivitis. Routine use of infection control measures in the handling of instruments and equipment will prevent the occurrence of outbreaks in this and other settings. [460, 461,814, 1058-1060]. Corona virus associated nla n/a nta with SARS (SARS-CoV) (see Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) https :/ /www.cdc. gov/infectioncontrol/ guidelines/isolation/ appendix/type-duration-precautions .html 8/1 7 /2 02 0 Precautions I Appendix A I Isolation Precautions I Guidelines Library I Infection Control I CDC Page 6 of 35 Type of Duration of Infection/Condition Precaution Precaution Precautions/Comments Coxsackie virus disease n/a n/a n/a (see enteroviral infection) Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease Standard n/a Use disposable instruments or special (CJD, vCJD) sterilization/disinfection for surfaces, objects contaminated with neural tissue if CJD or vCJD suspected and has not been R/O; No special burial procedures. [1 061 l Croup (see Respiratory n/a 11/a n/a Infections in infants and young children) Crimean-Congo Fever (see Standard n/a n/a Viral
Recommended publications
  • Vaccinia Belongs to a Family of Viruses That Is Closely Related to the Smallpox Virus
    VACCINIA INFECTION What is it? Vaccinia belongs to a family of viruses that is closely related to the smallpox virus. Because of the similarities between the smallpox and vaccinia viruses, the vaccinia virus is used in the smallpox vaccine. When this virus is used as a vaccine, it allows our immune systems to develop immunity against smallpox. The smallpox vaccine does not actually contain smallpox virus and cannot cause smallpox. Vaccination usually prevents smallpox infection for at least ten years. The vaccinia vaccine against smallpox was used to successfully eradicate smallpox from the human population. More recently, this virus has also become of interest due to concerns about smallpox being used as an agent of bioterrorism. How is the virus spread? Vaccinia can be spread by touching the vaccination site before it has fully healed or by touching clothing or bandages that have been contaminated with the live virus during vaccination. In this manner, vaccinia can spread to other parts of the body and to other individuals. It cannot be spread through the air. What are the symptoms of vaccinia? Vaccinia virus symptoms are similar to smallpox, but milder. Vaccinia may cause rash, fever, headache and body aches. In certain individuals, such as those with weak immune systems, the symptoms can be more severe. What are the potential side effects of the vaccinia vaccine for smallpox? Normal reactions are mild and go away without any treatment.These include: Soreness and redness in the arm where the vaccine was given Slightly swollen, sore glands in the armpits Low grade fever One in approximately three people will feel badly enough to miss school, work or recreational activities Trouble sleeping Serious reactions are not very common but can occur in about 1,000 in every 1 million people who are vaccinated for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • Cidofovir Activity Against Poxvirus Infections
    Viruses 2010 , 2, 2803-2830; doi:10.3390/v2122803 OPEN ACCESS viruses ISSN 1999-4915 www.mdpi.com/journal/viruses Review Cidofovir Activity against Poxvirus Infections Graciela Andrei * and Robert Snoeck Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KULeuven, Minderboredersstraat 10, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-16-337372; Fax: +32-16-337340. Received: 10 November 2010; in revised form: 9 December 2010 / Accepted: 10 December 2010 / Published: 22 December 2010 Abstract: Cidofovir [(S)-1-(3-hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl)cytosine, HPMPC] is an acyclic nucleoside analog approved since 1996 for clinical use in the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in AIDS patients. Cidofovir (CDV) has broad-spectrum activity against DNA viruses, including herpes-, adeno-, polyoma-, papilloma- and poxviruses. Among poxviruses, cidofovir has shown in vitro activity against orthopox [vaccinia, variola (smallpox), cowpox, monkeypox, camelpox, ectromelia], molluscipox [molluscum contagiosum] and parapox [orf] viruses. The anti-poxvirus activity of cidofovir in vivo has been shown in different models of infection when the compound was administered either intraperitoneal, intranasal (aerosolized) or topically. In humans, cidofovir has been successfully used for the treatment of recalcitrant molluscum contagiosum virus and orf virus in immunocompromised patients. CDV remains a reference compound against poxviruses and holds potential for the therapy and short-term prophylaxis of not only orthopox- but also parapox- and molluscipoxvirus infections. Keywords: cidofovir; poxviruses; acyclic nucleoside analog 1. Introduction The antiviral activity of (S)-1-(3-hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl)cytosine (HPMPC, cidofovir, CDV) (Figure 1) against human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and other DNA viruses was first Viruses 2010 , 2 2804 reported in 1986 [1].
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0009150 A1 WEBER Et Al
    US 2012O009 150A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0009150 A1 WEBER et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jan. 12, 2012 (54) DIARYLUREAS FORTREATINGVIRUS Publication Classification INFECTIONS (51) Int. Cl. (76) Inventors: Olaf WEBER, Wulfrath (DE); st 2. CR Bernd Riedl, Wuppertal (DE) ( .01) A63/675 (2006.01) (21) Appl. No.: 13/236,865 A6II 3/522 (2006.01) A6IP 29/00 (2006.01) (22) Filed: Sep. 20, 2011 A6II 3/662 (2006.01) A638/14 (2006.01) Related U.S. Application Data A63L/7056 (2006.01) A6IP3L/2 (2006.01) (63) Continuation of application No. 12/097.350. filed on A6II 3/44 (2006.01) Nov. 3, 2008, filed as application No. PCTAEPO6/ A6II 3/52 (2006.01) 11693 on Dec. 6, 2006. O O (52) U.S. Cl. .......... 424/85.6; 514/350; 514/171; 514/81; (30) Foreign Application Priority Data 514/263.38: 514/263.4: 514/120: 514/4.3: Dec. 15, 2005 (EP) .................................. 05O274513 424/85.7; 514/43 Dec. 15, 2005 (EP). ... O5O27452.1 Dec. 15, 2005 (EP). ... O5O27456.2 Dec. 15, 2005 (EP). ... O5O27458.8 The present invention relates to pharmaceutical compositions Dec. 15, 2005 (EP) O5O27.460.4 for treating virus infections and/or diseases caused by virus Dec. 15, 2005 (EP) O5O27462.O infections comprising at least a diary1 urea compound option Dec. 15, 2005 (EP). ... O5O27465.3 ally combined with at least one additional therapeutic agent. Dec. 15, 2005 (EP). ... O5O274.67.9 Useful combinations include e.g. BAY 43-9006 as a diaryl Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Here, There, and Everywhere: the Wide Host Range and Geographic Distribution of Zoonotic Orthopoxviruses
    viruses Review Here, There, and Everywhere: The Wide Host Range and Geographic Distribution of Zoonotic Orthopoxviruses Natalia Ingrid Oliveira Silva, Jaqueline Silva de Oliveira, Erna Geessien Kroon , Giliane de Souza Trindade and Betânia Paiva Drumond * Laboratório de Vírus, Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais: Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-901, Brazil; [email protected] (N.I.O.S.); [email protected] (J.S.d.O.); [email protected] (E.G.K.); [email protected] (G.d.S.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The global emergence of zoonotic viruses, including poxviruses, poses one of the greatest threats to human and animal health. Forty years after the eradication of smallpox, emerging zoonotic orthopoxviruses, such as monkeypox, cowpox, and vaccinia viruses continue to infect humans as well as wild and domestic animals. Currently, the geographical distribution of poxviruses in a broad range of hosts worldwide raises concerns regarding the possibility of outbreaks or viral dissemination to new geographical regions. Here, we review the global host ranges and current epidemiological understanding of zoonotic orthopoxviruses while focusing on orthopoxviruses with epidemic potential, including monkeypox, cowpox, and vaccinia viruses. Keywords: Orthopoxvirus; Poxviridae; zoonosis; Monkeypox virus; Cowpox virus; Vaccinia virus; host range; wild and domestic animals; emergent viruses; outbreak Citation: Silva, N.I.O.; de Oliveira, J.S.; Kroon, E.G.; Trindade, G.d.S.; Drumond, B.P. Here, There, and Everywhere: The Wide Host Range 1. Poxvirus and Emerging Diseases and Geographic Distribution of Zoonotic diseases, defined as diseases or infections that are naturally transmissible Zoonotic Orthopoxviruses. Viruses from vertebrate animals to humans, represent a significant threat to global health [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Localized to Vaccination Site (3-12-2003 Version) Low
    Legend Tool 1 Morbidity and Mortality Risk Clinical Evaluation Tool for Smallpox Vaccine Adverse Reactions based on clinical presentation. Dermatologic Reactions/ Localized to Vaccination Site (3-12-2003 Version) Low www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/smallpox/vaccination/clineval Moderate NO YES Go to Dermatologic Reactions/ Nontoxic Appearance, Distant from High Close Contact of Vaccine Recipient? Vaccine Recipient? Vaccination Site (or in a Contact) Clinical Evaluation Tool. YES Erythematous Vaccination Normal Vaccination Reaction Severe Vaccination Reaction Reaction of Concern Typical reaction timeline Common signs/symptoms Tape sensitivity Rapid progressive painless extension of Day Description after vaccination Try different tape. Erythema present along lines of central vaccination lesion or progression YES 0 Vaccination - Pruritus Change bandage adhesive tape and no or mild without apparent healing after 15 days. 3-4 Papule - Soreness at frequently, rotate systemic symptoms? Lesion often necrotic. Initially little or no 5-6 Vesicle with surrounding vaccination site bandage, or take a inflammation. May present with few or no erythema - vesicle with - Intense erythema judicious bandage systemic symptoms. depressed center ringing the “holiday” 8-9 Well-formed pustule vaccination site remembering to use NO 12+ Pustule crusts over and - Small papules or other means (e.g. becomes a scab vesicles around long sleeves) to Early Progressive vaccinia (Vaccinia 17-21 Scab detaches revealing scar vaccination lesion prevent contact Erythema with induration, warmth, necrosum, Vaccinia gangrenosum) Timeline may be accelerated (satellite lesions) transmission. Use and pain. May also have regional Go to Clinical Evaluation Tool for in persons with history of prior - Headache antihistamines PRN; lymphadenopathy and fever. Dermatologic Reactions/Toxic smallpox vaccination.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Book (PDF)
    Abstract Book and Program 7th European Seminar in Virology (EuSeV) “Vaccines and antibodies against viral infections” June 14-16, 2019 Botanical Garden University of Padova 1 7th European Seminar in Virology (EuSeV) “Vaccines and antibodies against viral infections” June 14-16, 2019 Organizers: Gabriella Campadelli-Fiume, University of Bologna Dana Wolf, Hebrew University Jerusalem Michael Kann University of Gothenburg Thomas Mertens, Ulm University Medical Centre Giorgio Palù University of Padova Organizing Secretariat: Arianna Calistri, Ilaria Frasson, Michela Nandi, Marta Trevisan 2 7th. European Seminars in Virology (EuSeV) 2019 Program FRIDAY 14.06.2019 13:45-14:00 Welcome Dana Wolf, Gabriella Campadelli-Fiume, Thomas Mertens, Michael Kann Giorgio Palù Session on Ethical and technological issues about antiviral vaccine and antibodies development Chair: Giorgio Palù 14:00-14:40 Andrea Grignolio, Cognitive bases for vaccine hesitancy Medical Humanities & Bioethics, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy [email protected] 14:40-15:20 Rino Rappuoli, Reverse vaccinology 2.0 GSK, Siena, Italy [email protected] 15:20-16:00 Melvin Kohn, MSD’s Investigational Ebola Vaccine Regional Director of Medical Affairs Lead for Vaccines, MSD. [email protected] 16:00-16:30 Discussion 16:30-17:30 Selected oral presentations Francesco Santoro, Human transcriptomic response to vaccination with recombinant VSV expressing Ebola virus Glycoprotein Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology (LAMMB), Dept. of Medical Biotechnologies,
    [Show full text]
  • New Smallpox Vaccine Found Safer Than Existing Vaccines
    APRIL 2009 • WWW.SKINANDALLERGYNEWS.COM INFECTIOUS DISEASES 37 Gardasil Prevents Warts, HPV Misunderstood, Feared HPV Infection in Males In One Border Community BY PATRICE WENDLING diagnosis of HPV as a diagnosis of BY MIRIAM E. TUCKER ACIP from the American Academy of Fam- cancer. They expressed their fears of ily Physicians. ispanic men and women liv- cancer and their belief that, once di- ATLANTA — The human papillomavirus In the randomized, double-blind, placebo- Hing on the United States–Mex- agnosed, it is “essentially a death vaccine was efficacious in preventing persis- controlled trial, three doses of Gardasil or ico border have little understanding sentence.” The women said they tent infections and genital warts caused by placebo were given at 0, 2, and 6 months. about the human papillomavirus would be reluctant to disclose their HPV strains 6, 11, 16, and 18 in a Merck-spon- Mean follow-up for this analysis was 30 and its role in the etiology of cer- HPV status to their partners be- sored study of 4,065 males aged 16-26 years. months of a planned total of 36. The study vical cancer, according to a small cause they believed they would be The findings were presented by Dr. Richard population, which came from 18 different prospective study. accused of infidelity. Men initially M. Haupt at a meeting of the Centers for Dis- countries, included 3,463 heterosexual males Not only were there very low lev- expressed anger at the possibility of ease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Com- aged 16-23 years and 602 males aged 16-26 who els of knowledge among these res- an HPV diagnosis, attributing it to mittee on Immunization Practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7. Developments in Vaccination and Control Between
    CHAPTER 7 DEVELOPMENTS IN VACCINATION AND CONTROL BETWEEN 1900 AND 1966 Contents Page Introduction 277 Vaccine production and quality control before 1967 278 Production of vaccine lymph 279 Preparation of liquid vaccine 282 Preparation of dried vaccine 283 Quality control 289 Vaccination techniques before 1967 291 Vaccination site 291 Methods of vaccination 292 Age for primary vaccination 293 Interpretation of the results of vaccination 294 Complications of vaccination 296 Types of complication 299 Frequency of complications 302 Contraindications to vaccination 307 Prevention and treatment of complications 308 Reconsideration of vaccination policies in non-endemic countries 309 Complications : the overall picture 310 Programmes for vaccination and revaccination 311 Vaccination and revaccination of the general public 311 Simultaneous vaccination with several antigens 311 Vaccination of international travellers 312 INTRODUCTION The latter half of the 19th century saw the emergence of microbiology and immunology By the year 1900 vaccination was in as scientific disciplines . Because of their widespread use throughout the industrialized familiarity with vaccination, many of the countries as well as in some cities in what were pioneers in these new sciences used vaccinia then the colonies of various European virus for their studies (see Chapter 2) . In powers . Although variolation was no longer consequence, the empirical practices of Jenner practised in Europe and North America, it and his early followers were placed on a more was still widely employed in many parts of scientific basis . Vaccine production was no Africa and Asia . Smallpox persisted as an longer the province of the local physician, endemic disease in virtually every country of who had maintained the virus by arm-to-arm the world (see Chapter 8, Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • (Vaccinia) Adverse Reactions
    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Recommendations and Reports February 3, 2006 / Vol. 55 / No. RR-1 Surveillance Guidelines for Smallpox Vaccine (vaccinia) Adverse Reactions INSIDE: Continuing Education Examination department of health and human services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention MMWR CONTENTS The MMWR series of publications is published by the Introduction......................................................................... 1 Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Reporting Guidelines ........................................................... 2 Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA 30333. Case Definition and Classification ....................................... 2 Localized Reactions ........................................................... 3 SUGGESTED CITATION Unintentional Transfer of Vaccinia Virus ............................ 3 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surveillance guidelines for smallpox vaccine (vaccinia) adverse reactions. Diffuse Dermatologic Complications ................................. 4 MMWR 2006;55(No. RR-1):[inclusive page numbers]. Progressive Vaccinia ......................................................... 6 Rare Reactions .................................................................. 6 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cardiac ............................................................................ 7 Julie L. Gerberding, MD, MPH Case Classification ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccines Could Halt Third World Health Crisis Vaccines by Anita Manning 2 Human Beings Are Born with the Bare Minimum of Defenses Against Infectious Diseases
    THE NATION’S NEWSPAPER PTK2003-04 Collegiate Case Study www.usatodaycollege.com Vaccines could halt Third World health crisis Vaccines By Anita Manning 2 Human beings are born with the bare minimum of defenses against infectious diseases. It is the job of a healthy immune system to strengthen itself over Vaccine use spreading time by recognizing and adapting to new threats. When a new, potentially harmful microbe enters the body, the immune system provides defense By Gary Mihoces 2 against it in the form of antibodies. More importantly, the body will remember the attacker and remember how to kill it. This secondary response provides immunity from future infection. Vaccines increase our protection by stimulating the immune system to generate antibodies against specific antigens. Large-scale vaccination of the population, called herd immunity, also provides an important defense against infectious disease. Herd immunity limits outbreaks because there are not enough susceptible people to support an epidemic. Well before the development of vaccines, humans knew that prior infection to a disease could protect a person from getting that disease again. Recorded history provides many examples of vaccination techniques being used without a full understanding of the mechanisms that allow them to work. As early as the 10th century, Chinese physicians had children inhale dried and powdered smallpox scabs. In 18th Century England, a similar procedure was used when Photo by Tim Dillon, USA TODAY small pox scabs were scratched into children's skin. Unfortunately, in some cases the procedure did backfire and kill the recipient. However, the 1% Cancer vaccine shows mortality rate was a vast improvement over the 50% mortality of smallpox.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccinating Against Monkeypox in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Antiviral Manuscript Author Res. Author manuscript; Manuscript Author available in PMC 2019 May 01. Published in final edited form as: Antiviral Res. 2019 February ; 162: 171–177. doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.11.004. Vaccinating against monkeypox in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Brett W. Petersena,*,1, Joelle Kabambab,1, Andrea M. McColluma, Robert Shongo Lushimac, Emile Okitolonda Wemakoyd, Jean-Jacques Muyembe Tamfume, Beatrice Ngueted, Christine M. Hughesa, Benjamin P. Monroea, and Mary G. Reynoldsa aU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA bU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo cHemorrhagic Fever and Monkeypox Program, Ministry of Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo dKinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo eNational Institute for Biomedical Research, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo Abstract Healthcare-associated transmission of monkeypox has been observed on multiple occasions in areas where the disease is endemic. Data collected by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from an ongoing CDC-supported program of enhanced surveillance in the Tshuapa Province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where the annual incidence of human monkeypox is estimated to be 3.5–5/10,000, suggests that there is approximately one healthcare worker infection for every 100 confirmed monkeypox cases. Herein, we describe a study that commenced in February 2017, the intent of which is to evaluate the effectiveness, immunogenicity, and safety of a third-generation smallpox vaccine, IMVAMUNE®, in healthcare personnel at risk of monkeypox virus (MPXV) infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Boards Fodder Vaccines in Dermatology by Caroline A
    boards fodder Vaccines in dermatology By Caroline A. Nelson, MD LIVE INACTIVATED/KILLED TOXOID SUBUNIT/ CONJUGATE Adenovirus Hepatitis A virus Diphtheria, tetanus, and Anthrax Cholera (oral) Influenza (injection) pertussis Haemophilus influenzae Influenza (intranasal) Japanese encephalitis Hepatitis B virus Measles, mumps, rubella Polio (injection) Human papillomavirus Polio (oral) Rabies Influenza (injection) Rotavirus Meningococcus Smallpox Pneumococcus Tuberculosis Typhoid (injection) Typhoid (oral) Zoster (Shingrix) Varicella zoster virus Yellow fever Zoster (Zostavax) VACCINE ROUTINE INDICATIONS SKIN REACTIONS/ COMPLICATIONS* NOTES† Viral Infections Hepatitis B Infants at 0-, 2-, and 6-months of Anetoderma, granuloma annulare, lichen Patients without evidence of disease or immunity virus (HBV) age and at-risk adults planus, lichen nitidus, lichen striatus, on serologic testing and with risk factors should papular acrodermatitis of childhood be offered vaccination prior to immunosuppression (Gianotti-Crosti syndrome), polyarteritis nodosa, and pseudolymphoma Human papil- Gardasil and Gardasil-9: Patients Localized lipoatrophy Vaccines contain L1 capsid protein of specific HPV lomavirus 9-26 years of age with a second types: Cervarix has 16 and 18; Gardasil has 6, 11, (HPV) dose after 6-12 months (patients 16, and 18; and Gardasil-9 has 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 15-26 years of age should receive 45, 52, and 58 a second dose after 1-2 months and a third dose after 6 months) Can be administered regardless of history of abnor- mal PAP smear
    [Show full text]