DOCSLIB.ORG

PLEASE RETAIN Original ORDER

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PLEASE RETAIN Original ORDER [1 SiJllC'-f ~wFl-'> ~ n L­ UN ARCHIVES fJe,,/._ b SERIES PLEASE RETAIN BOX ORiGINAL ORDER FILE ACC. L..._ I ~ ·- ... .... - .................... ~--- 010(11 ./ UNITED NATIONS PROTECTION FORCE UNPROFOR Page 1 of 2_ ROUTINE PR!ORITY IMMEDIATE UNCLASSIFIED UN RESTRICTED UN CONFIDENTIAL UN SECRET OUTGOING FAX NO; DATE: _ 21 DECEMBER 1993 TO: STOLTENBERG FROM :~HORNBERRY /; GENEVA UNPROFOR, ZAGREB · ~ I ~ FAX NO: (41-22) 917-0079 FAX NO: 38-41-170 199 I ATTN: DRAFTER: /ls SUBJECT: EL~CTIQNS IN SEB~IA - LATEST :QNOEFI~IAL RE~UL~S INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION: . - AS REQUESTED, ATTACHED PLEASE FIND SELF-EXPLANATORY FAX ON THE ABOVE SUBJECT. DISTRIBUTION: :.w~tr.s ··········-···~- PH .. :: .. £R.... ..... ................ :S,J b. ... .. b_L/.ke... .... _....... .~~ ······ ® . ------· .. ............... .. .... .. .. .... .. .... .... .. ····· -························. ..f'.K ... ...-:.. RADIO ~E:LGRADE, 2l DecQlll):ler 1993 , at 9:45 hours A.~ord.ing to the latest unofficial resu.lts a..TLnounced by -the Republic of Serbia Electoral Cor.rra.ittee based. on statistics (2/3 o"f the ·electoral material ha-ve. bee.i.'1 counted) ana if the election results a.re ll!)t 2l.?1nulled iD :SOJlle election uni.ts because o.f irreguJ.a.rities, the OOl!!position of the Serbian P2.rlirona.T1t will be as £ollc:,ws:: S?S Party {Socialist ~arty 0£ Serbia) - 121 seats DEPOS (Damocratic ?!ove:meut of Serbia1 .;4 seats SRS l S~iail . '.Rad.leal Part".f} - 40 seats DS (De:mocntio Party} - JO seats DSS (Uem.o-cra:tic Pa-Tty of Serbia.) ... i seats :OZVM (De!nocratic union o.f Vojvodi.-ria ID:Ul~ariar.s) 5 seats SDP (Social Democratic Party) l seat Coal.ition of the .Movement. for the Activity of Albanians in Kosovo (:from PeY.lujevo} 2 seats 900~ .. ...,_ "'111,1,1 ......... _ o,o/tl ./ .q:o - 1100 OFFICE OF THE SRSG MOST IMMt=nlATE ROUTINE PRIORITY I~'fir (ONCLASS IFIED) UN RESTRICTED UN CONFIDENTIAL ON SECRET ONLY Otl"I'GOING Fil NO.: DAT!l/TIMlr 17 December 1993 TO: SAS Palace Hoeel, Vienna FROM1 OFF.ICE OF THE SRSG ., ZAGREB FAX NO,: 43-1-512-2216 J'AX: ATTN1 Mr . T, Stoltenberg i'IlsB llEll'. NO.a ~JJ~~~ OR.Ai'TlilR l~ 'coL B m0v~srr MA TC THE SRSG INli'O: BTOLTENBtRG, GENEVA STJBJ:5:CT t SI.RB :E!:EHAVIOT.Jll, MlllTING WI'l'K HVO AND :e:CH INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION': SRSG MESSAGE: 1 . ATTACHED PLEASE FIND MORE INFORMATION ABOUT SERB BEHAVIOUR . 2. THE REPORT FROM GEN. BRIQUEMON'l"S MEETING WITH GEN. PETKOVIC ]!.NO GEN. D~LIC IS ALSO ATTACHE~. ·---· ,.. ~ 0 :·:-:; :.~~ :'-f ' .. - ·• DISTRIBUTION: .. N ···- ··~-,"' ! . .. .. ............................. fl\lfu .... ~ - ., . ·• r- ,'.' . ) ............................. .ESP l1<'.S .. -..· -· , .; .:...:.• - ~· .. ,. r... -, ..... ......................... wS..... .. ............................... Jvh .... ............................... AP ....... .,. A .. AU uu111 e, ~ f ,..,. o ' ~ +w ,..Ii LIL 'ii .S ,f ./,. ~;,,,_ 4o w A-AL··· LJ 1.1 'P r ~ 'i\t H f • t.11. ,...,Mi"~ "4c. fM..&.-/i" j ',./ ~ /f,I ill ti E J'UAI r W ,j._./~ ,.,.,;~, ,.J µSU --t tl•I i)IL.lc. 4 c./,,._, :l:o fA.. ""'/ *"I rw. fti,f.;Wfrr /1111,U oc.d f/,,l s, ')'k..O \- 11 ) "' ~ 1 , '4i I& ..... M j ti r/.J. 1,,1/J..,Q,& CA, -/~ W uf' /II ~ """" fL. " ~c. " ;.t a u,,,.f"""'ui.. •fkt,./ #4,., '8"' ,.;,,... S"-'' II 1J _ Y I IJ.li II lk-0 I ~f'M'~~ A ~'"t.L ~~t:!-}'2, f>Mwt J3Q Ll Z'd 17/ 12 '9:l 12:.28 UNPROFOR-ZAGREB ~-noo UNPROFOR INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: /I ( ~ I l.. 'I ; TO: FROM: Col. C. Corberand · J MA TO FC (> SUBJECT: -rl, e. ,e, 11 ~ c:; ..,,,. "r .. £ +$ - ,,,,,_; I. ~ '"::::J ,_..., • ;wJ. /M. ....,/- l \ "~ l/o., IO £ • ; 6 k g..... .,.J ~" i j .. f ;I,... .I,,._,I, .,/~ ~-d,-UA.. "'-r1 ~ J ? ~ 1JN " f• f'•'-j A:/.,(~ -tr- c>'f,,-o, ~ {u- a~ is • fJ.,. .s ,..~ 4 ~ "If"' _/p,. ....,;, #,.I. .,,r,,,J,. l 5 i f-,-( t , 1,/J" ., J.fj ,,,.u: -» ,.. , ,. I-, ,,., "'"" J ";:j t...· i· .. ) -I-• ,.. ~ (, ,)., i '\,t. 0J.. th ► I 0 ~.. t..1J ~;/,.,,.,, <t> f :f W iii "• i "-1 /o · MI> •~ .,_, ..IS ,i.J.._ ~ .. ,,. I /- .,./ _ f{~ ,,,. • , tu. J 4 /,,. ..... ~j~~i $J c µi;Jt, 1" _,ol p - µ .s ~ ~~( ~ ~ S,t.i~ _ f 1 ., •• .:i..u'-1 i;.:.,, µ .,._._ :r.f 0,.,, i,_a,v '- ..,... .::i ........ ,o< C.." T "'" ... , f 8 wi /I A v., ~1~ r. • ~ .t,c, "" ,:; ~ (f'"-"- J:;3a· L1 '·-: · ,.,. ... - ... ,_, ........-.-! . .I. (I .L;,: . 1:1 iJ .Li: ; :.: ei . , , I ••• , r~ -,,~n TRACKED APCS IN PANCEVO i \ I 8TH M'.EC COY ' I 6 PBV APC 20?vf11CANNON . ) 9TH l\.1EC COY 15 PBV APC 20~CANNON HQ/LOG COY 3 PBV APC 2 AMBULANCE, NO WEAPONS 1 N!AINT, 20 ?vfiv1 CMTN'ON TANKCOY 5 PMW APC 2 TACP, 2 MAlNT, l CO:MMAND APC, ALL WITH 12,J MM HMG NORlvlED 7 M 113 APC 6 AMBULANCE, 1 MAINT .. NOV/EAPONS ..·, 1 DANISH N!AINT J:\PC, 1 DANISH C01vfl.t1AND APC AND 1 NOR \VEGIAN ~DICAL APC ARE SUPPOSED TO GO TOGETHER WITH THE TANKS. I~ ~ A I F " -o µ AI J /I S t, ;,; .t. J-. ;~;J. ,o,,,/1A.Jluo/. fl,, to,,,,., u,w.iuuJ ,,! ...,;/1 :,,o• 1,4' t,,,1.,~1.1~.,J. 11 ~ flu ,>1A.G.t, -ol iJ.e.. /l,,i,..,11, .. ~~ 1.ulll ~t '~''II t J..c..~~( wi~ I•/ !ilL/(UIBJ-UA.11" µ,-~ w,nl11.j wt . ~ ~ ~~~ ... .................. ... __ .. .,,.. _, __ UNPROFOR :MILITARY INFORMATION BRANCH INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM To : cos •-f Stt4iC- ';: .., From l CMIO ~ Drafter: Maj w. Date : 17 Dec 9:3 Subject: ASSESSMENT ON OBSTRUCTIVE BSA BEHAVIOR 'I'OWARDS UNPROFOR IN BH 1. starting !rom the beginning of October '93 UNPROFOR in BH experianoed continuous and escalating obstruction of operations trom the Bosnian Serb authoriti.:!s. Part of this e~calation seems to be linked with ittc~eased military activity of BSA i n Northern and Eastern BH with the aim of blocking con~oys with humanitarian goods and putting ~ore pressure on the Musl i ~ ~ide. However , the increasing tendency of the obstruction directly against UNPR.0F0R is becoming :more clear. The tacts could be evidencei:3 as: - indiraot mortar , arty an~ tank !ire towards convoys and OPSI - retusal of clearances for logistic supplies and troop : ·-""" rotating convoys; - darn~nds o'L datailed inspections of Qupplies beyond established procedures; - attempts to search of personal belongings and equipment of soldiers in TJNPROFOR escorts; - limits on number of convoys per day on particular routes, etc. Most of the events were reported in the a:r:-ea ZVORNIK-'I'UZLA­ SARA..1~VO-GORAZDZE-SR~BRENICA-ZEPA. 2 . The abo~e mean a noteciable change of attitude to~ards UNPROFOR, In the last three month period ot low military activity the BSA behaved more or less properly, demonstrating readiness to cooperate in securing hUlllanitarian aid convoys. In the period of BiH-HVO !ighting in Central Bosnia and intensified. convoy blocking the BSA was trying to show itself, in ternia ot power ana territory, as able to ensure free flow of reliet convoys. This behavior, aimed at changing the attitude of international community towards the Serbs as a first step towards lifting the sanctions, was unsuccessful, 3, The changing ot attitude t~wards UNFROFOR can be related t o gen. R, Mladic abeenae in Geneva peace talks and signing on s ·d E210L16 22 1v ~A3N3~ ~ONn Sv :E1 ES, J 3Q L1 ., _. - - . 29 of November and the joint declaration about unimpeded movement of humanitarian aid in his behalr by Mr. R. Karad~ic. : 4. The decision to putt pressure on UNPROFOR was made tor internal as well as external political reasons. Internally it is a part ot propaganda campaign aimed to lower the confidence towards international community and consolidate the nation living in still worsening aconomicai conditions. Externally it demonstl'."ates, that no peace !Solution 1n BH can be reached without close cooperation with the Serb side as being the most powerful faction. Thia policy compared to the one presented in para 2. didn 1 t change its goals, hut the method is diffsirant and more dasperate. ·· 5. Increased pressure on UNPROFOR seems to be a centrally prepared and coptrolled action. Having nothing to lose it is highly ii~ely that the Serbs could act similarly for a long time. I f they want to win the international community coope.r~tion, they probably do not intend to go too far in threatening 'UNfROFOR. However such a behavior raises the potential risk of unintended tragedy significantly. S210l 16 22 1v ~A3N3~ ~ONn 9v :S1 S6, J 3Q l 1 9 'd .. I . ' I 1~•1~~,. •· I ~t; , J. Of 6 / i ro: 1. MQ t.rn?Roro ' 2. · BH COP.0 M.>. 3. S!CTOR SfJ 4, COMS'R!TFOR 5. BR:tT!>.T v · £.i. S?AB~T 'i _ii~--'-·_c_A.S_F:..h_T_~_i..•~------,-----------------41 A!TN: l. FO~CD CO. N0£R ·rILJ RiJ'.NO I BHCS/ . ( Gi!?n:iU..!J COT) ONLY PRAti!R : .L'l"C MOtJG~D\I 2. cos+ CI !t ATFAl~S '1"I'l'LE : HA 'l'O COMO ~!L~SINCJ OFF,: t'l' EN :n.Hlll7!'... ~,ro 'r ~ . ' , l . Lt Gen S~lQUEI NT, ~ssisf;d by M~ de MELLO, chaired a ~,,ting .i ~twe~n Gen D~L:re, iH, ~nd Gen Roso, M\10 1 in V!so;,,;o, on l 6 Dec' ~9'j', , 2. ·The ~a.in iss\.l ccncern•4 th• LIT~ t:Nz route, bQth p~rtie~ '. decid~d to crd~r a local ceasa fire ~nd a;resd to tae~lit~te the •. ~s;:i;.ac;e cf tH.l.I!lerni a~ian· con,r,,roys bat.ween Hostar and Jablanica, 'accordi~q with ths aeneva aq~e-tna~t.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newell, J. 2004. the Russian Far East
    Industrial pollution in the Komsomolsky, Solnechny, and Amursky regions, and in the city of Khabarovsk and its Table 3.1 suburbs, is excessive. Atmospheric pollution has been increas- Protected areas in Khabarovsk Krai ing for decades, with large quantities of methyl mercaptan in Amursk, formaldehyde, sulfur dioxide, phenols, lead, and Type and name Size (ha) Raion Established benzopyrene in Khabarovsk and Komsomolsk-on-Amur, and Zapovedniks dust prevalent in Solnechny, Urgal, Chegdomyn, Komso- molsk-on-Amur, and Khabarovsk. Dzhugdzhursky 860,000 Ayano-Maysky 1990 Between 1990 and 1999, industries in Komsomolsky and Bureinsky 359,000 Verkhne-Bureinsky 1987 Amursky Raions were the worst polluters of the Amur River. Botchinsky 267,400 Sovetsko-Gavansky 1994 High concentrations of heavy metals, copper (38–49 mpc), Bolonsky 103,600 Amursky, Nanaisky 1997 KHABAROVSK zinc (22 mpc), and chloroprene (2 mpc) were found. Indus- trial and agricultural facilities that treat 40 percent or less of Komsomolsky 61,200 Komsomolsky 1963 their wastewater (some treat none) create a water defi cit for Bolshekhekhtsirsky 44,900 Khabarovsky 1963 people and industry, despite the seeming abundance of water. The problem is exacerbated because of: Federal Zakazniks Ⅲ Pollution and low water levels in smaller rivers, particular- Badzhalsky 275,000 Solnechny 1973 ly near industrial centers (e.g., Solnechny and the Silinka River, where heavy metal levels exceed 130 mpc). Oldzhikhansky 159,700 Poliny Osipenko 1969 Ⅲ A loss of soil fertility. Tumninsky 143,100 Vaninsky 1967 Ⅲ Fires and logging, which impair the forests. Udylsky 100,400 Ulchsky 1988 Ⅲ Intensive development and quarrying of mineral resourc- Khekhtsirsky 56,000 Khabarovsky 1959 es, primarily construction materials.
    [Show full text]
  • 9629582* A/51/563 S/1996/884 English Page 2
    UNITED NATIONS AS General Assembly Distr. Security Council GENERAL A/51/563* S/1996/884* 14 November 1996 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH GENERAL ASSEMBLY SECURITY COUNCIL Fifty-first session Fifty-first year Agenda item 81 REVIEW OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DECLARATION ON THE STRENGTHENING OF INTERNATIONAL SECURITY Letter dated 28 October 1996 from the Chargé d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of Yugoslavia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General I have the honour to transmit, enclosed herewith, the aide-mémoire of the Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia concerning the Prevlaka issue. I should be grateful if you would have the text of the present letter and its annex circulated as an official document of the General Assembly, under agenda item 81, and of the Security Council. (Signed) Vladislav JOVANOVIC Chargé d’affaires, a.i. * Reissued for technical reasons. 96-32383 (E) 191196 /... *9629582* A/51/563 S/1996/884 English Page 2 ANNEX Aide-mémoire issued at Belgrade in October 1996 by the Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia concerning the Prevlaka issue 1. Between the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, namely between the Republic of Montenegro and the Republic of Croatia, there is a territorial dispute over the Prevlaka peninsula (Cape Ostri and a part of its natural hinterland) in the Boka Kotorska bay. This has been clearly noted in the first sentence of article 4 of the Agreement on Normalization of Relations between the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Republic of Croatia of 23 August 1996 (A/51/351-S/1996/744, annex).
    [Show full text]
  • Siberian Expectations: an Overview of Regional Forest Policy and Sustainable Forest Management
    Siberian Expectations: An Overview of Regional Forest Policy and Sustainable Forest Management July 2003 World Forest Institute Portland, Oregon, USA Authors: V.A. Sokolov, I.M. Danilin, I.V. Semetchkin, S.K. Farber,V.V. Bel'kov,T.A. Burenina, O.P.Vtyurina,A.A. Onuchin, K.I. Raspopin, N.V. Sokolova, and A.S. Shishikin Editors: A. DiSalvo, P.Owston, and S.Wu ABSTRACT Developing effective forest management brings universal challenges to all countries, regardless of political system or economic state. The Russian Federation is an example of how economic, social, and political issues impact development and enactment of forest legislation. The current Forest Code of the Russian Federation (1997) has many problems and does not provide for needed progress in the forestry sector. It is necessary to integrate economic, ecological and social forestry needs, and this is not taken into account in the Forest Code. Additionally, excessive centralization in forest management and the forestry economy occurs. This manuscript discusses the problems facing the forestry sector of Siberia and recommends solutions for some of the major ones. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Research for this book was supported by a grant from the International Research and Exchanges Board with funds provided by the Bureau of Education and Cultural Affairs, a division of the United States Department of State. Neither of these organizations are responsible for the views expressed herein. The authors would particularly like to recognize the very careful and considerate reviews, including many detailed editorial and language suggestions, made by the editors – Angela DiSalvo, Peyton Owston, and Sara Wu. They helped to significantly improve the organization and content of this book.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Multilateral Peace Missions
    3. Multilateral peace missions SHARON WIHARTA I. Peace missions in 2002 The trend towards smaller, short-term and mandate-specific peace missions continued in 2002. Several long-standing missions were closed: the United Nations Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina (UNMIBH), the United Nations Mission of Observers in Prevlaka (UNMOP) in Croatia, the United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor (UNTAET), the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Assistance Group to Chechnya, NATO’s Task Force Fox (TFF)1 in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Mace- donia (FYROM), and the Australian-led International Peace Monitoring Team for the Solomon Islands (IPMT). In the case of two of the closed UN missions, smaller missions were set up with clear, credible and achievable mandates. After seven years in operation, UNMIBH ended its tenure at the end of 2002, and the mandate to oversee the development and strengthening of police forces in Bosnia and Herzegovina was handed over to the European Union Police Mission (EUPM).2 UNTAET was succeeded by the United Nations Mission of Support in East Timor (UNMISET). The two other new UN missions—the United Nations Mission in Angola (UNMA) and the United Nations Assis- tance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA)––were of a more political and peace- building nature, acting as adviser to the host governments. Events in both Angola and Afghanistan prompted the reactivation of dormant UN missions. In East Timor, the largely smooth transition to the independent state of Timor- Leste in May 2002 allowed for an appropriately reduced UN engagement there. Several other missions—particularly in the Balkans—were restructured because of the growing political and security stability in these countries and the successful completion of mission mandates.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Indigenous Minority Peoples of the North of Khabarovsk Krai for the Protection of Indigenous Peoples' Rights
    Russia Country Report 2002/2003 102~108 Association of Indigenous Minority Peoples of the North of Khabarovsk Krai For the Protection of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Galina M. VOLKOVA President, Regional Public Organization, Association of Indigenous Minority Peoples of the North of Khabarovsk Krai, Russian Far East* Contents: Introduction. 1. Challenges Faced by Indigenous Peoples in Utilizing Forest Resources. 2. Activities of the Association Directed Towards Improvement of the Position of Indigenous Peoples With Respect to Traditional Wildlife Management Practices. Conclusion. Introduction rights of indigenous peoples with respect to traditional The regional public organization ‘Association of the wildlife management practices is weak and imperious in Indigenous Peoples of the North of Khabarovsk Krai’ nature. Third, the patriarchal/dominant nature of State (hereafter referred to as the Association) was formed by policy in relation to local people has resulted in local the Constituent Conference convened on 26th March communities adopting a dependent mind-set and the re- 1990 in Khabarovsk1. Since this time, the presidency of pression of indigenous rights. Fourth, the indigenous the Association has been held successively by three dif- peoples do not observe State rights regarding participa- ferent persons. The Association was set up to address the tion of the public in forest management. Fifth, there is a following issues: the preservation and revival of the tra- lack of information on the condition of forest resources ditional mode of life of the indigenous minority peoples and the likelihood of industrial exploitation, which to- who inhabit the primordial territories of the North of gether limit the opportunities for local people to partici- Khabarovsk Krai (hereafter referred to as the indigenous pate in inclusive management processes.
    [Show full text]
  • War in the Balkans, 1991-2002
    WAR IN THE BALKANS, 1991-2002 R. Craig Nation August 2003 ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave., Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Publications Office by calling (717) 245-4133, FAX (717) 245-3820, or be e-mail at [email protected] ***** Most 1993, 1994, and all later Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) monographs are available on the SSI Homepage for electronic dissemination. SSI’s Homepage address is: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ssi/ ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please let us know by e-mail at [email protected] or by calling (717) 245-3133. ISBN 1-58487-134-2 ii CONTENTS Foreword . v Preface . vii Map of the Balkan Region. viii 1. The Balkan Region in World Politics . 1 2. The Balkans in the Short 20th Century . 43 3. The State of War: Slovenia and Croatia, 1991-92.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants of the Genus Saxifraga L
    RHODORA, Vol. 116, No. 965, pp. 25–40, 2014 E Copyright 2014 by the New England Botanical Club DOI: 10:3119/13-09; first published online April 9, 2014. INTRODUCING THE SPOTTED SAXIFRAGES: SAXIFRAGA SECT. BRONCHIALES, SECT. NOV. (SAXIFRAGACEAE) ERIC G. DECHAINE Western Washington University, Biology Department, 516 High St., Bellingham, WA 98225 e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Recent molecular phylogenetic analyses have revealed that Saxifraga sect. Trachyphyllum as currently circumscribed is polyphyletic, with the designated type, S. aspera, falling outside of the more speciose clade. Several other lines of morphological, geographic, and ecological evidence also distinguish the two distantly related groups from one another. In combination, these data necessitate the circumscription of a new section, S. sect. Bronchiales, which is described herein. The section is hypothesized to have arisen in the southern Rocky Mountains of North America, followed by northwestward expansion across Beringia and diversification among refugia. Key Words: arctic-alpine, Asia, Beringia, endemism, Haida Gwaii, Japan, Pacific Northwest, Rocky Mountains, Saxifraga sect. Bronch- iales, S. sect. Trachyphyllum, Saxifragaceae, Siberia Plants of the genus Saxifraga L. (Saxifragaceae Juss.) are found primarily in the arctic, montane, and temperate environments of the northern hemisphere, but also in South America and northern Africa. The approximately 400 plus species of saxifrages are defined by a more or less consistent floral structure of five sepals, five petals, ten stamens in two whorls (outer opposite sepals and inner opposite petals), two carpels that are united at least in part, and an absence of a free hypanthium, though vegetative characters vary considerably (Brouillet and Elvander 2009; Gornall 1987; McGregor 2008; Webb and Gornall 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Country Compendium
    Country Compendium A companion to the English Style Guide July 2021 Translation © European Union, 2011, 2021. The reproduction and reuse of this document is authorised, provided the sources and authors are acknowledged and the original meaning or message of the texts are not distorted. The right holders and authors shall not be liable for any consequences stemming from the reuse. CONTENTS Introduction ...............................................................................1 Austria ......................................................................................3 Geography ................................................................................................................... 3 Judicial bodies ............................................................................................................ 4 Legal instruments ........................................................................................................ 5 Government bodies and administrative divisions ....................................................... 6 Law gazettes, official gazettes and official journals ................................................... 6 Belgium .....................................................................................9 Geography ................................................................................................................... 9 Judicial bodies .......................................................................................................... 10 Legal instruments .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plemena U CG | Prezimena U CG Vabić, Baošići, Herceg-Novi
    Program | Uprava | O nama | Reagovanja, pisma... | Plemena u CG | Prezimena u CG V Vabić, Baošići, Herceg-Novi; u Nikšiću Vavis, Podgorica Vavić, u Kruševicama, Herceg-Novi; u Nikšiću Vaga, Herceg-Novi Vagas, i, Kotor 1350. god. Vagner, Herceg-Novi Vadić, Herceg-Novi, po nahočetu Vadotić, Podgorica Vadjon, Berane i Budva Vajat, Nikšić Vajdić, Herceg-Novi Vajzović, Pljevlja 1854. god. Vajmeš, u Šekularima (Vasojevići) Vajmeši u Šekularima (Gornji Vasojevići) su Drobnjaci! Vajmeši i Babići su Ćetkovi potomci. Vajmeši su: Pantovići sa ogrankom Aleksići (prezime), Markovići, Ivovići, Milunovići, Devići, Miloševići sa Nedovićima, Radoševići i Đorđijevići. Vajmeši su i Stijovići (Brunčevići, Brunci) koji su ranije živjeli u Budimlji. Babići su: Babići, Đorovići, Tomovići i Mlađenovići. Slave Đurđevdan, a prislužuju sv. Iliju. Ovim bratstvima su rod Asovići iz Donje Ržanice i Šekularci iz Gornjih Sela. Izvor/ prenijeto iz knjiga: Blaža Ralevića – Kaludra 1676 – 1976, Beograd 1976, i Mirka Raičevića – Gornja sela, naselja i stanovništvo, Beograd 1994. Vajner, Kotor Vakleš, u Kotoru Vaknituki, Kotor Vala, Herceg-Novi Valac Gornjevuk, predak bratstva Gornjevuka u Dobrskom Selu Valengino, Herceg-Novi Valentin, Ulcinj Valentinović, Kotor 1534. god. Valentinčić, Kotor Valenčić, Kotor Valeri, Budva Valetić, Herceg-Novi Vales, Kotor Valijero, Kotor Valosenjori, u Šasu (Ulcinj) Valčić, Kotor; Budva Valšić, Kotor Valjato, u Baošićima, Herceg-Novi Valjari, rod u selu Bioskoj u Užičkoj Crnoj Gori Vamović, Bes, uz Skadarsko jezero, porijeklom su iz Bratonožića Vanacek, Kotor Vandup, kod Mojkovca Vanđević, u Kotoru iz Crne Gore Vanid, Herceg-Novi Vanis, vidi: Vano Vano = Vanis, Bar Vancek, Kotor Vaporić, Kotor Varaga, u Potarju (Mojkovac), potomci su saskih rudara iz 13. v. Varagić = Verović, iz limske doline preselili se oko 1700.
    [Show full text]
  • Illusion of Power: Russia After the South Caucasus Battle
    Illusion of Power: Russia after the South Caucasus Battle CEPS Working Document No. 311/February 2009 Stanislav Secrieru Abstract The war in the South Caucasus sent shockwaves throughout the post-Soviet world, European capitals and across the Atlantic, making more urgent the demand for a re- evaluation of policies towards Russia. The projection of hard power in Georgia generated a number of unintended consequences for the Russian state. The crisis and war unveiled many of Russia’s weaknesses and vulnerabilities across four crucial dimensions: the military, the ‘power vertical’ and federalism, the economy and Russia’s international position. This paper aims at reassessing Russia’s military, political, economic and diplomatic might after the battle in the South Caucasus. The research concludes with proposals for a new Western strategy on Russia and the EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood which would ensure an undivided and sustainable European order. CEPS Working Documents are intended to give an indication of work being conducted within CEPS research programmes and to stimulate reactions from other experts in the field. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are attributable only to the authors in a personal capacity and not to any institution with which they are associated. ISBN 978-92-9079-855-2 Available for free downloading from the CEPS website (http://www.ceps.eu) © Centre for European Policy Studies, 2009 Contents 1. The weakness of power .......................................................................................................... 1 2. The test of war: how reassuring is the military victory?......................................................... 1 2.1 “Hard power” in action ................................................................................................. 1 2.2 Military modernization and reform agenda reloaded.................................................... 4 3. The domestic front: sovereign democracy in action and its perils.........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yugoslav Foreign Policy: Continuity and Changes
    YUGOSLAV FOREIGN POLICY: CONTINUITY AND CHANGES PREDRAG SIMIC Predrag Simic is the Director of the Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade. INTRODUCTION Changes in Yugoslav foreign policy began towards the end of the eighties under the influence of numerous external and internal factors which called for a profound revision of the country’s foreign policy agenda in order to meet the new realities in Europe and the world. Yugoslavia emerged from World War II as a socialist country, but after conflict with the Soviet Union in 1948, it solicited the support of the West, and, finally, in the mid-fifties, it found a comfortable position as a strategic buffer between the East and West, whilst at the beginning of the sixties she likewise became one of the leading countries of the Non-Aligned Movement. The end of the Cold War changed this international position: the changes in Eastern Europe made her lose her position as a strategic buffer and marginalized the significance of the Non-Aligned Movement in international relations. The drastic internal crisis that incited centrifugal aspirations among the Yugoslav republics likewise had its effect, necessitating an immediate revision of her foreign policy towards European integration. Yugoslavia thus cautiously began approaching the European Community, but this process was suddenly shattered when civil war broke out in June 1991 and soon resulted in the secession of four Yugoslav republics and the creation of a new Federal Republic of Yugoslav (FRY) comprised only of Serbia and Montenegro. The events in Slovenia, Croatia (the Krayina) and Bosnia and the international sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council in May 1992 on the new Yugoslavia, condemning her for alleged interference in the war in Bosnia, likewise dictated changes in her foreign political agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia and Montenegro Is to Reap the Full Benefits of Stabilisation and Association
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 26.3.2003 SEC(2003) 343 &200,66,2167$)):25.,1*3$3(5 6HUELDDQG0RQWHQHJUR 6WDELOLVDWLRQDQG$VVRFLDWLRQ5HSRUW >&20 ILQDO@ 6HUELDDQG0RQWHQHJUR 6WDELOLVDWLRQDQG$VVRFLDWLRQ5HSRUW 7$%/(2)&217(176 (;(&87,9(6800$5< 32/,7,&$/6,78$7,21 2.1 Democracy and rule of law......................................................................................................3 2.2. Human rights and protection of minorities............................................................................14 2.3. Regional co-operation............................................................................................................19 2.4. Priority areas needing attention in the next 12 months..........................................................25 (&2120,&6,78$7,21 3.1. Current Economic Situation ..................................................................................................26 3.2. Existence of a Free Market Economy and Structural Reform ...............................................30 3.3. Management of Public Finances............................................................................................32 3.4 Priority areas needing attention in the next 12 months..........................................................34 ,03/(0(17$7,212)7+(67$%,/,6$7,21$1'$662&,$7,21352&(66 4.1. General Evaluation ................................................................................................................34 4.2. Internal market and trade.......................................................................................................36
    [Show full text]