DOCSLIB.ORG

Chronological Table

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chronological Table Chronological Table 1204 March: Partitio Romaniae; agreement between the crusaders and the Venetians for the division of the lands and assets of the Byzantine Empire. 12 April: Constantinople falls to the Fourth Crusade. 8–14 May: Venetian clergy in Constantinople choose 15 canons for St Sophia. They pledge to appoint only Venetians to the cathedral clergy. They also choose the Venetian Tomasso Morosini as the first Latin patriarch. He was a papal subdeacon studying in Ravenna. The pope declared this election uncanonical. 9 May: Baldwin of Flanders elected first Latin emperor of Constantinople. 16 May: Baldwin crowned in St Sophia by Nivelon de Cherissy, bishop of Soissons. September/October: partition of the Byzantine Empire after the March agreement implemented. October/November: Boniface of Montferrat conquers Boeotia and Attica. November/December: Jacques d’Avesnes conquers Euboea and Boniface begins the sieges of Akrocorinth and Nauplia. 1205 21 January: Morosini confirmed as first Latin patriarch of Constantinople by Innocent iii. March: Innocent iii ordains Morosini and consecrates him bishop. Spring: William de Champlitte and Geoffrey de Villehardouin leave Nauplia with a force of 100 knights and 400 sergeants to conquer the north and west of the Peloponnese between Corinth and Messenia. 30 March: Morosini formally consecrated as Latin patriarch in Rome. April: Baldwin of Flanders captured by the Bulgarians near Adrianople. His brother, Henry of Flanders appointed Regent or bailli of the Latin Empire. Many Latins return to the West from Constantinople. May: Innocent iii calls for a crusade to aid the Latin Empire. May: Battle of Koundoura in Messenia; the Franks secure their conquests in the Peloponnese from an Epirote challenge. 15 May: Benedict of Santa Susanna appointed papal legate to the Latin Empire. May: procedure for the election of future Latin patriarchs of Constantinople confirmed by the pope. 1 June: death of Doge Enrico Dandolo, leader of the Venetians on the Fourth Crusade. He is buried in St Sophia. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���5 | doi ��.��63/9789004�84�04_0�3 420 chronological table June: the Venetians in Constantinople choose Marino Geno as their podestà and dominator in Romania. June: Tomasso Morosini, in Venice to take ship for Constantinople, is forced to take the same oath as the 15 Venetian canons of St Sophia. Late in the month he arrives in Constantinople for the first time. August: Euboea divided into triarchies by Boniface of Montferrat. August: Innocent iii offers plenary indulgence for any crusaders going to Constantinople. 19 November: in a letter noting the election of the first Latin archbishop of Patras, the Pope acknowledged William de Champlitte as “princeps totius Achaiae”. 1206 Venetians occupy Modon and Coron in Messenia. 17 March: agreement between the regent and the church authorities in Constantinople that the Latin Church will receive an endowment of one-fifteenth of conquered lands in Romania. April–September: Nivelon de Cherissy recruiting a crusading army for Constantinople in north-eastern France and Flanders. July: death of Baldwin of Flanders in Bulgarian captivity reported in Constantinople. 12 August: archbishop elect of Thebes mentioned for first time. 20 August: Henry of Flanders crowned as second Latin emperor by Morosini. 27 November: first mention of archbishop-elect of Athens. December: Nivelon de Cherissy appointed in absentia as first Latin archbishop of Thessalonica. 1207 July: Venice grants Corfu, which she owned by the terms of the Partitio, to ten Venetian nobles. Naxos and Andros captured by Marco Sanudo and relatives. 4 September: Boniface of Montferrat killed by the Bulgarians near Mosynopolis. September: Nivelon de Cherissy dies at Bari, apparently leading a cru- sading army to aid the Latin Empire. 1208 Early: small crusading army sent by Philip of Namur and lead by Peter of Douai arrives. July: Latin episcopal structure extended to Thessaly. Dispute over the payment of tithes develops between the Latin clergy and Frankish lords. Latin rite to be used in all episcopal consecrations in Romania. September: Emperor Henry defeats Greeks at the battle of Voulae. December: Henry marches to Thessalonica and places Boniface’s young son Demetrios on the throne..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Crisis of the Fourth Crusade in Byzantium (1203-1204) and the Emergence of Networks for Anti-Latin Reaction and Political Action
    The Crisis of the Fourth Crusade in Byzantium (1203-1204) and the Emergence of Networks for Anti-Latin Reaction and Political Action Ilias GIARENIS In spite of a great number of important publications on the relevant issues,1 the Fourth Crusade and its impact in the Eastern Mediterranean are often – even nowadays – neither fully apprehended nor sufficiently explained. Important aspects of the rich scientific debate still are the collapse of the Byzantine state, the formation of smaller political entities, and the processes through which such immense changes took place. As is well known, the two most prominent among those successor polities were the States of Nicaea and of Epirus, which were both established mainly by members of the high Byzantine Constantinopolitan aristocracy;2 neverheless, the empire of Trebizond, where the imperial legacy of the Komnenoi had been considered as a solid ground for the Grand Komnenoi rulership, should also not be neglected in the study of the historical framework.3 The events of 1203/1204 led to the conquest of Constantinople by the Latin Crusaders, the milites Christi of the Fourth Crusade who had reached the Byzantine capital in a “diversion” from the declared original destination of the Crusade, i.e. Jerusalem. The latter, a Sacred *This paper is dedicated to Nikolaos G. Moschonas. 1 See D. E. Queller and Th. F. Madden, The Fourth Crusade. The Conquest of Constantinople, second edition, Philadelphia 1997; M Angold, The Fourth Crusade. Event and Context, [The Medieval World] Harlow 2003; J. Phillips, The Fourth Crusade and the Sack of Constantinople, London 2004; Urbs Capta.
    [Show full text]
  • The World View of the Anonymous Author of the Greek Chronicle of the Tocco
    THE WORLD VIEW OF THE ANONYMOUS AUTHOR OF THE GREEK CHRONICLE OF THE TOCCO (14th-15th centuries) by THEKLA SANSARIDOU-HENDRICKX THESIS submitted in the fulfilment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF ARTS in GREEK in the FACULTY OF ARTS at the RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY PROMOTER: DR F. BREDENKAMP JOHANNESBURG NOVEMBER 2000 EFACE When I began with my studies at the Rand Afrikaans University, and when later on I started teaching Modern Greek in the Department of Greek and Latin Studies, I experienced the thrill of joy and the excitement which academic studies and research can provide to its students and scholars. These opportunities finally allowed me to write my doctoral thesis on the world view of the anonymous author of the Greek Chronicle of the Tocco. I wish to thank all persons who have supported me while writing this study. Firstly, my gratitude goes to Dr Francois Bredenkamp, who not only has guided me throughout my research, but who has always been available for me with sound advice. His solid knowledge and large experience in the field of post-classical Greek Studies has helped me in tackling Byzantine Studies from a mixed, historical and anthropological view point. I also wish to render thanks to my colleagues, especially in the Modern Greek Section, who encouraged me to continue my studies and research. 1 am indebted to Prof. W.J. Henderson, who has corrected my English. Any remaining mistakes in the text are mine. Last but not least, my husband, Prof. B. Hendrickx, deserves my profound gratitude for his patience, encouragement and continuous support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Byzantino-Latin Principality of Adrianople and the Challenge of Feudalism (1204/6–Ca
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ghent University Academic Bibliography The Byzantino-Latin Principality of Adrianople and the Challenge of Feudalism (1204/6–ca. 1227/28) Empire, Venice, and Local Autonomy Filip Van Tricht n the aftermath of the conquest of Constantinople in designated or recognized by Venice as ruler of the city I1204 during the Fourth Crusade, one of many new of Adrianople, the author convincingly argues that political entities that took shape was a relatively short- the principality was no independent state, but a feu- lived principality centered on the city of Adrianople in dal principality within the framework of the (Latin) Thrace. Until recently not much attention had been Empire of Constantinople, a conclusion that for non- devoted to its history or position within the Byzantine Greek authors such as Jean Longnon had been rather space in the first decades of the thirteenth century.1 A self-evident.3 few years ago, however, Benjamin Hendrickx wrote an Along the way Hendrickx also makes some state- article with as starting point the observation that most ments that in my opinion raise new questions and war- Greek scholars until then had always maintained that rant further investigation. First, the author considers the principality in question was an independent state the mentioned Pactum to be an illustration of “Venice’s in the sense of a so-called Territorialstaat or toparchia independent policy in Romania” vis-à-vis the Latin as defined by Jürgen Hoffman.2 Through a renewed emperors.4 I will argue however that there are good rea- analysis of the so-called Pactum Adrianopolitanum sons to challenge this proposition.
    [Show full text]
  • John of Brienne: King of Jerusalem, Emperor of Constantinople, C.1175–1237 Guy Perry Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-04310-7 - John of Brienne: King of Jerusalem, Emperor of Constantinople, c.1175–1237 Guy Perry Frontmatter More information John of Brienne John of Brienne’s progress, from mid-ranking knightly status to king of Jerusalem and, later, Latin emperor of Constantinople, traces one of the most remarkable careers in the entire medieval period. But how and why did he achieve such heights? This biographical study of aristocratic social and geographical mobility in the ‘Age of the crusades’ reassesses John’s fascinating life, and explores how families and dynasticism, pol- itics, intrigue, religion and war all contributed to John’s unprecedented career. John was a major figure in the history of the thirteenth-century Mediterranean, yet very much a product of the workings of the society of his day, and this book reveals how John’s life, and its multifarious con- nections to France, Italy, the German empire and the papacy, can illuminate the broad panorama of the early thirteenth-century world, and the zenith of the crusading movement. guy perry is Lecturer in Medieval History at the University of Leeds. His research focuses on East–West interaction in the central Middle Ages. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-04310-7 - John of Brienne: King of Jerusalem, Emperor of Constantinople, c.1175–1237 Guy Perry Frontmatter More information © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-04310-7
    [Show full text]
  • Empresses' Mediations in the Feuds Between the Palaiologoi (14Th-15™ Centuries)
    Originalveröffentlichung in: Czaja, Roman; Mühle, Eduard; Radzimiński, Andrzej (Hg.), Konfliktbewältigung und Friedensstiftung im Mittelalter. Przezwyciężanie konfliktów i ustanawianie pokoju w średniowieczu, Toruń 2012, S. 211-222 MALGORZATA DABROWSKA (Lodz) EMPRESSES' MEDIATIONS IN THE FEUDS BETWEEN THE PALAIOLOGOI TH (14 -15™ CENTURIES) have selected the example of three Empresses and their role at the court to il­ lustrate the perspective of a Byzantinist analyzing the resolution of conflicts I in the Eastern Empire. I will focus on three eminent female peacemakers: Eirene Asenina Kantakouzena, Helena Kantakouzena Palaiologina and Helena Dragas Palaiologina. The first Empress was of Bulgarian origin, the second came from Byzantium and the third was Serbian. All of them were Orthodox. Their belonging to the "Byzantine Commonwealth"' united by the same religion and culture was of great importance. They knew how to conduct themselves in the world of diplomacy familiar to them from an early age. In comparison with the Imperial spouses who arrived in Constantinople from the West, they were in a better position to assess the political situation and carry out their plans either by force or by trick. The main aim was efficiency. Before telling their stories, I would like to recreate a picture of the Empire after the Fourth Crusade. What happened afterwards is very important in explaining the role of the three ladies in the mixed Byzantine­Latin world on the Bosporus. For many historians, the Fourth Crusade in 1204 represented the end of the 1 Byzantine Empire. The traditional world of the proud medieval Romans was over. The Latins established their rule and they changed Constantinople into a capital of their own ­ a Latin Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shroud in Greece
    THE SHROUD IN GREECE by Noel Currer-Briggs British Society for the Turin Shroud Monograph no. 1 © 1988 Cover: The Sainte Face of Laon (see p.9) THE SHROUD IN GREECE page 2 A few weeks after my book The Shroud and the Grail had gone to press, Father Kim Dreisbach drew my attention to an article by Brother Bruno Bonnet-Eymard entitled "Le Saint Suaire à l'épreuve de la science", of which an English translation was published in The Catholic Counter-Reformation no. 171, September 1984. In this Brother Bruno draws our attention to a paper by Baron Joseph du Teil published in the Proceedings of the National Society of Antiquaries of France in May 1902, in which the baron suggests that the Shroud was brought directly from Greece to Lirey some time between 1316 and 1325 by Agnes de Charpigny, the wife of Dreux de Charny, the elder brother of Geoffrey I de Charny, founder of the church at Lirey. Baron du Teil based this theory on a statement by the Duc de Beauffremont, a descendant of the de Charnys, which in turn was based on the duke's interpretation of a much earlier statement by Philibert Pingonius, the 16th. century historian of the House of Savoy. If Baron du Teil's guess is correct, then the theory advanced by Ian Wilson and myself identifying the Templars' so-called idol with the Shroud must be wrong, since the Order was disbanded in 1307, at least ten years before du Teil says the relic was brought to France from Greece by Dreux de Charny and Agnes de Charpigny.
    [Show full text]
  • Propaganda and Denominations of the Byzantine Successor States and the Crusader States (1204-1261) an Essay on the Political History of the Empire in Exile
    Propaganda and Denominations of the Byzantine Successor States and the Crusader States (1204-1261) An Essay on the Political History of the Empire in Exile Michiya NISHIMURA Introduction In 1204, the fourth crusaders finally captured Constantinople, the capital of the Byzantine Empire. Between 1204 and 1261, the empire was compelled to be in exile. Territory of the former empire was divided into the Crusader states and the Byzantine successor states. During this period, these states were allied and conflicted with each other in several ways.1 Concerning their monetary policy, most states were minting previous Byzantine denominations. These denominations were the gold nomisma hyperpyron, the electrum aspron trachy, the billon aspron trachy, the tetarteron and the half-tetarteron (both copper). These were introduced in the fiscal year of 1092/93 by the emperor Alexius I Comnenus (1081-1118). Prior to 1204, the monetary system with these denominations had been effectively well-balanced.2 Even in the present days, the monetary circulation of this period remains a complicated issue. As there are many written and archeological sources, contradictions between them make it difficult to explain this issue. From different researches, many scholars assume that various denominations (those of the Byzantine successor states, the Crusader states, the former 1 G. Ostrogorsky, History of the Byzantine State, trans. J. Hussey, New Brunswick, 1969, pp.418-450. 2 M. F. Hendy, Coinage and Money in the Byzantine Empire, 1081-1261, Washington D.C., 1969. Idem, Catalogue of the Byzantine Coins in the Dumbarton Oaks Collection and the Whittemore Collection: Vol.4, Alexius I to Michael VIII, 1081-1261, Washington D.C., 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Crusading at the Edges of Europe 1St Edition Kindle
    CRUSADING AT THE EDGES OF EUROPE 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Kurt Villads Jensen | 9781317156703 | | | | | Crusading at the Edges of Europe 1st edition PDF Book The resulting Treaty of Devol , although never implemented, forced Bohemond to acknowledge Alexius as his feudal overlord. Published by William Heinemann Limited, London Succession disputes and dynastic rivalries in Europe, failed harvests and heretical outbreaks, all contributed to reducing Latin Europe's concerns for Jerusalem. The Second Crusade achieved little beyond the capture of Lisbon. How would you compare European and Islamic civilizations during this time? Main article: Northern crusades. Urban, E. Three notable exceptions to this were the military orders, warfare and fortifications. More information about this seller Contact this seller 5. Fine in orginal wrappers with minor wear. Saladin lured the force into inhospitable terrain without water supplies, surrounded the Latins with a superior force, and routed them at the Battle of Hattin. On the other side, Usama Ibn Munqidh tells the story of a Frank, recently arrived to the Holy Land, who harassed him about how he was praying when he was in a Templar chapel. Crusades were directed at the liberation of sacred land considered rightfully Christian, whereas Jihad was about rescuing souls. Categories : Crusades Medieval history of the Middle East Catholicism and Islam Catholicism-related controversies Christianity- related controversies Islam-related controversies Judaism-related controversies. Crusade as a term is applied to church-sanctioned and even non- religious campaigns fought for a variety of reasons including the suppression of paganism and heresy , the resolution of conflict among rival Roman Catholic groups, or for political and territorial advantage.
    [Show full text]
  • 59 the Origins of the Byzantine Empire: Anachronism and Evolution
    The Origins of the Byzantine Empire: Anachronism and Evolution in Modern Historiography Joseph D. Wagner Introduction The modern understanding of the Byzantine Empire, the Roman Empire, which survived in Eastern Europe for over a thousand years, is a fallacy. There is no doubt that the Byzantines existed or that their empire occupied a place in the pantheon of world power. The issue under consideration is not so much when the Byzantine Empire began, but rather when this evolution of the Roman Empire first took place and how modern scholars view Byzantine origins. The term Byzantine Empire is an anachronism because what modern historiography calls “the Byzantines” never existed. Rather, these people considered themselves Roman even until the collapse of their empire in 1453 CE. This is relevant in today’s historiography for many reasons, among them because the Byzantine have not been studied with as much vigor as compared to their Greek and Roman ancestors. This is also an important historical issue because of a recent book detailing how the Byzantines dealt with their neighbors over the centuries. Edward Luttwak, a former political advisor and Johns Hopkins-trained historian, argued in his 2009 book The Grand Strategy of the Byzantine Empire that the Byzantines were skilled diplomats, using money and land transfers to keep invading armies at bay.279 Luttwak proceeded to question whether these same strategies could be applied elsewhere; for example, in the United States. There are three schools of thought that rise from the relevant historiography: The Continuity School, the Discontinuity School, and the Evolution School. All three schools of thought will be discussed with due reference to their authors after an explanation of methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • Rome and Constantinople, Popes and Patriarchs, 1204-1453
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Empires Reshaped and Reimagined: Rome and Constantinople, Popes and Patriarchs, 1204-1453 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Natalie Sherwan 2016 © Copyright by Natalie Sherwan 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Empires Reshaped and Reimagined: Rome and Constantinople, Popes and Patriarchs, 1204-1453 by Natalie Sherwan Doctor of Philosophy, History University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Patrick Geary, Co-chair Professor Claudia Rapp, Co-chair This dissertation discusses the politics of conquest and the strategies of legitimization pursued by Latin, Greek and Slav contenders for hegemonic rule in the northeastern Mediterranean after the collapse of the Byzantine Empire in the wake of the fourth crusade. It reevaluates the relationship between the concepts of empire and Christendom as played out in the process of political realignment, and closely examines the ways in which the key actors claiming to represent these concepts - emperors, popes, patriarchs - fought or cooperated with one another in order to assert regional preeminence. ii The first part of the dissertation focuses on the tension between the Roman/Byzantine ideal of universalism, which entailed a sole holder of imperial power, and the concrete reality of several empires coexisting within the same geographical area. Chapters one and two provide a survey of the main theoretical issues encountered in the study of medieval empires, and an assessment of the relationship between Byzantine basileis, patriarchs, popes and Western emperors prior to 1204. Chapters three and four investigate the competing but interconnected ruling systems which emerged in the Balkans, the Aegean and Asia Minor after 1204, tracing their policies of war and appeasement until the recovery of Constantinople by the Nicene Greeks in 1261.
    [Show full text]
  • To the Ottoman Turks
    DECLINE AND FALL OF BYZANTIUM TO THE OTTOMAN TURKS BY DOUKAS An Annotated Translation of "Historia Turco-Byzantine" by Harry I Magoulias, Wayne State University Wayne State University Press Detroit 1975 C y 2Wa.yAn iuersit ess, Detroit,, Micchigan5482 rightsarereserved No part of this book naybe reproduced without formal permission. Library of Congress Catalogingin Publication Data Ducas, fl. 1455. Decline and fall of Byzantium tothe Ottoman Turks. First ed. published under title:Historia Byzantina. Bibliography: P. Includes index. 1. Byzantine Empire History.2. TurkeyHistory-1288-1453 A2D813Magot949.5 Harry 75 9949 itle. DF631 ISBN 0-8143-1540-2 To Ariadne vuvevvoc KaX4 re Kl 7aO7 CONTENTS Chronology 9 Introduction 23 Decline and Fall of Byzantium to the Ottoman Turks 55 Notes 263 Bibliography 325 Index 331 7 ILLUSTRATIONS Old City of Rhodes 42 John VI Kantakouzenos 43 Manuel II Palaiologos 44 Emperor John VIII Palaiologos 45 Monastery of Brontocheion, Mistra 46 Palace of Despots, Mistra 47 Walls of Constantinople 48 Walls of Constantinople with Moat 49 Mehmed H the Conqueror 50 Emperor Constantine XI 51 MAPS The Byzantine World Before the Fall 1453 52 Greece and Western Anatolia Before the Fall 1453 53 Constantinople 54 8 CHRONOLOGY CHAPTER I page 57 Listing of the years and generations from Adam to the Fourth Crusade, 12 April 1204. CHAPTER II page 59 Reigns of the emperors of Nicaea to the recapture of Constantinople in 1261. Conquests of the Seljuk Turks and appearance of the Ottomans. Reigns of Andronikos II and Michael IX, Andronikos III, John V and John VI Kantakouze- nos. Turks occupy Gallipoli (1354).
    [Show full text]
  • Coins of the CRUSADERS
    Coins of the CRUSADERS The Crusades were a series of military conflicts of a religious character waged by much of Christian Europe against external and internal threats. Crusades were fought against Muslims, pagan Slavs, Russian and Greek Orthodox Christians, Mongols, Cathars, Hussites, and political enemies of the popes.[1] Crusaders took vows and were granted an indulgence for past sins. The Crusades originally had the goal of recapturing Jerusalem and the Holy Land from Muslim rule and were original- ly launched in response to a call from the Eastern Orthodox Byzantine Empire for help against the expansion of the Muslim Seljuk Turks into Anatolia. The term is also used to describe contemporaneous and subsequent campaigns conducted through to the 16th century in territories outside the Levant usually against pagans, heretics, and peoples under the ban of excommunication for a mixture of religious, economic, and political reasons. Rivalries among both Christian and Muslim powers led also to alliances between religious factions against their opponents, such as the Christian alliance with the Sultanate of Rum during the Fifth Crusade. The Crusades had far-reaching political, economic, and social impacts, some of which have lasted into contemporary times. Because of internal conflicts among Christian kingdoms and political powers, some of the crusade expeditions were diverted from their original aim, such as the Fourth Crusade, which resulted in the sack of Christian Constantinople and the partition of the Byzantine Empire between Venice and the Crusaders. The Sixth Crusade was the first crusade to set sail without the official blessing of the Pope, establishing the precedent that rulers other than the Pope could initiate a crusade.
    [Show full text]