Nepal Electricity Authority 1 a YEAR in REVIEW FISCAL YEAR 2016/17

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nepal Electricity Authority 1 a YEAR in REVIEW FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 Nepal Electricity Authority 1 A YEAR IN REVIEW FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 2 Nepal Electricity Authority FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 CONTENTS COMPLIMENTARY COPY Message from the Minister 2 Message from the Chairperson 4 Board of Directors 6 Corporate structure of NEA 7 Deputy Managing Directors 8 Managing Director’s Report 9 Generation Directorate 17 Transmission Directorate 39 Distribution and Consumer Services Directorate 57 Planning, Monitoring and Information Technology Directorate 82 Engineering Services Directorate 87 Project Management Directorate 110 NEA’s Subsidiary & Associate Companies 117 Central Activities 132 Administration Directorate 135 Finance Directorate 137 System Load Curve of Peak Load Day 154 Tariff Rates 155 Appendix 159-169 Maps 170-172 Front cover photo: Newly constructed Chapali Substation NEPAL ELECTRICITY AUTHORITY Head Of¿ ce: Durbar Marg, Kathmandu, Nepal Phone: +977-1-4153007/4153013, Fax: +977-1-4153009 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nea.org.np Nepal Electricity Authority 3 A YEAR IN REVIEW FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 4 Nepal Electricity Authority FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 Nepal Electricity Authority 5 A YEAR IN REVIEW FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 6 Nepal Electricity Authority FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 Nepal Electricity Authority 7 A YEAR IN REVIEW FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 Board of Directors Mr. Anup Kumar Upadhyay Secretary Ministry of Energy, Chairman Dr. Shanta Raj Subedi Mr. Chandra Tandon Secretary Member Ministry of Finance, Member Mr. Umesh Prasad Thani Mr. Bhakta Bahadur Pun Member Member Mr. Chet Raj Joshi Mr. Kul Man Ghising Member Managing Director, NEA Member Secretary 8 Nepal Electricity Authority FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 Organization Structure NEPAL ELECTRICITYNEPAL AUTHORITY Nepal Electricity Authority 9 A YEAR IN REVIEW FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 Deputy Managing Directors Mr. Sunil Kumar Dhungel Mr. Rajeev Sharma Deputy Managing Director Deputy Managing Director Distribution & Consumer Services Directorate Transmission Directorate Mr. Lekha Nath Koirala Ms. Shanti Laxmi Shakya Mr. Jagadishwar Man Singh Acting Deputy Managing Director Acting Deputy Managing Director Acting Deputy Managing Director Finance Directorate Administration Directorate Planning, Monitoring & IT Directorate Mr. Mohan Ratna Shakya Mr. Hara Raj Neupane Mr. Manoj Silwal Off. Deputy Managing Director Off. Deputy Managing Director Off. Deputy Managing Director Engineering Services Directorate Generation Directorate Project Management Directorate 10 Nepal Electricity Authority MANAGING DIRECTOR’S REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 MANAGING DIRECTOR’S REPORT It gives me immense pleasure to state that The À nancial performance of Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA) has successfully the year under review recorded completed thirty-two years of glorious journey positive operating surplus in Power sector. The 32nd Anniversary is an and net loss stood below one billion. We are now opportune event to share our performance and conÀ dent enough on our endeavor to make NEA achievements during last year and reafÀ rm our as a proÀ t earning organization by next year. commitment to lead the organization ahead with It is a matter of great honor for us to receive excellent results by building upon its strengths overwhelming support and recognition from and turning challenges into opportunities. public and institutions for our deeds. It has Under the “Ujjyalo Nepal Abhiyaan” initiative load boosted the morale and conÀ dence of our team shedding mitigation and various other activities and has helped a lot in creating amenable working were introduced. As a result, the year 2016/17 was environment for growth and transformation of the historic one in terms of load shedding management, Organization. loss reduction and À nancial performance. It was our At this annual day, I would also like to pay my great satisfaction to supply 24 hours of continuous sincere tribute to all individuals and employees power to our esteemed consumers, except industrial who lost their lives due to electric hazards and consumers, even in the driest months. The capital shocks in pursuing their duty. city-Kathmandu and city of tourist-Pokhara were With these notes, I now present the highlights of made load shedding free for entire period and the performance and achievements made by the remaining areas of the country also felt minimum organization during FY 2016/17. power cuts during dry season. The industries' supply Operational Performance was curtailed during peak hours only. This became possible due to effective and efÀ cient demand and The total number of consumers increased from supply side management with augmentation of 2.97 million to 3.26 million including community transmission and distribution facilities. and bulk buyers during the year. As in the previous year, the domestic consumer category with 3.06 We feel great pride to state that we have been million consumers remained the largest consumer successful in completing many substations and category with 93.96 % share of the entire transmission lines including Khimti-Dhalkebar consumers. Domestic and Industrial consumer 220 kV Transmission Line, which is the À rst in category contributed 41.85 % and 35.61 % to the its voltage level playing pivotal role in eradicating gross revenue from electricity sales respectively. load shedding in Kathmandu. All generation Rest of the consumer Category accounted for the projects have resumed their construction works in remaining 22.54 % of the gross sales revenue. full swing. Chamelia Hydroelectric Project is at the Only 65% of the population has access to grid À nal stage of completion and will be completed electricity. within next couple of months. Nepal Electricity Authority 11 A YEAR IN REVIEW FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 NEA’s hydropower plants including small power in power purchase cost and staff salary. NEA stations generated a total of 2,305.17 GWh, an achieved an operational proÀ t, after many years, increase of 8.06% from previous year's À gure of amounting to NRs 2,407.38 million as against 2,133.14 GWh. The total energy imported from the operational loss of NRs 3,063.98 million in India has reached 2,175.04 GWh, an increase of previous year. However, NEA incurred Net Loss 22.35% from previous year's À gure of 1,777.68 in the FY 2016/17 amounted to NRs 978.92 GWh. Kaligandaki, Marshyangdi and Middle million whereas the same for the previous year Marshyangdi power plants were run for peaking was NRs 8,890.19 million. Reduction in system operation during the dry season to meet the peak losses, reduction in average rate of power import, demand of the system, which has supported a lot increment in retail tariff, continuous supply of to minimize the load shedding at the peak time. power in major cities and partial endorsement of The average power import for the last year was À nancial restructuring all contributed to decrease about 250 MW through various transmission lines À nancial losses for the year under review. including Dhalkebar-Muzaffarpur transmission The cost for purchasing power has again been line. The total power purchased from Independent the largest component in the total operating Power Producers (IPPs) within Nepal was 1777.24 expenses in the year under review. NEA spent GWh, an increase of 52.39% from previous year's NRs 28,457.34 million in purchasing power from À gure of 1,166.24 GWh. The total energy available the various Independent Power Producers (IPPs) in NEA’s system increased by 23.25 % to 6,257.73 and import from India. GWh over the previous year’s À gure of 5,077.14 GWh. Out of the total available energy, NEA’s own Energy from purchased power amounted to 63.16 generation contributed 36.84 % whereas those % of the total available energy and NEA paid imported from India and local IPPs accounted for 61.67% of the net electricity sales revenue for 34.76 % and 28.40 % respectively. this purpose. The total cost of purchased power increased by 27.43 % in the FY 2016/17 due to A nationwide drive launched to reduce system the increase in the volume of import and domestic losses showed positive results reducing the purchase and to some extent because of normal system losses from 25.78 % in the previous year price escalation for power purchase from IPPs. to 22.90% in the year under review. The amount of loss that still persists is not to the acceptable Other operating expenses for generation, standard and continued drive to minimize it is transmission, distribution and administration in underway nationwide. the last year amounted to NRs. 1,823.98 million, NRs 1,907.15 million, NRs. 7,457.82 million and Financial Performance NRs 1,306.72 million respectively. After many years, NEA has managed to generate Reduction in long term borrowing interest rate operational proÀ t in the À scal year 2016/17. The from 8% to 5% for the GoN funded loans and total revenue generated from energy sales and conversion of some loan into equity shares has other income reached NRs 50,229.48 million reduced interest amount by about NRs. 1,200 as compared to NRs 35,073.54 million in the million. Interest expense for this year is calculated previous year. This is an increase of 43.21 % from as NRs. 3879.39 million as compared to NRs. previous year's À gure. NEA's overall operating 5,079.73 million in the previous year 2015/16. expenses including power purchase increased from NRs 36,087.53 million in the FY 2015/16 The growth in the revenue from energy sales to NRs 45,572.09 million in the FY 2016/17, an should also be attributed to the decrease in the increase of 26.28 %. This is mainly due to increase prevalent load shedding. The main load centers, 12 Nepal Electricity Authority MANAGING DIRECTOR’S REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 the urban areas, have been gradually made 'load site that was made inaccessible by the April 2015 shedding free", hence the increase in the energy earthquake; both the Contractors CGGC and CWE sales.
Recommended publications
  • Code Under Name Girls Boys Total Girls Boys Total 010290001
    P|D|LL|S G8 G10 Code Under Name Girls Boys Total Girls Boys Total 010290001 Maiwakhola Gaunpalika Patidanda Ma Vi 15 22 37 25 17 42 010360002 Meringden Gaunpalika Singha Devi Adharbhut Vidyalaya 8 2 10 0 0 0 010370001 Mikwakhola Gaunpalika Sanwa Ma V 27 26 53 50 19 69 010160009 Phaktanglung Rural Municipality Saraswati Chyaribook Ma V 28 10 38 33 22 55 010060001 Phungling Nagarpalika Siddhakali Ma V 11 14 25 23 8 31 010320004 Phungling Nagarpalika Bhanu Jana Ma V 88 77 165 120 130 250 010320012 Phungling Nagarpalika Birendra Ma V 19 18 37 18 30 48 010020003 Sidingba Gaunpalika Angepa Adharbhut Vidyalaya 5 6 11 0 0 0 030410009 Deumai Nagarpalika Janta Adharbhut Vidyalaya 19 13 32 0 0 0 030100003 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Janaki Ma V 13 5 18 23 9 32 030230002 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Singhadevi Adharbhut Vidyalaya 7 7 14 0 0 0 030230004 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Jalpa Ma V 17 25 42 25 23 48 030330008 Phakphokthum Gaunpalika Khambang Ma V 5 4 9 1 2 3 030030001 Ilam Municipality Amar Secondary School 26 14 40 62 48 110 030030005 Ilam Municipality Barbote Basic School 9 9 18 0 0 0 030030011 Ilam Municipality Shree Saptamai Gurukul Sanskrit Vidyashram Secondary School 0 17 17 1 12 13 030130001 Ilam Municipality Purna Smarak Secondary School 16 15 31 22 20 42 030150001 Ilam Municipality Adarsha Secondary School 50 60 110 57 41 98 030460003 Ilam Municipality Bal Kanya Ma V 30 20 50 23 17 40 030460006 Ilam Municipality Maheshwor Adharbhut Vidyalaya 12 15 27 0 0 0 030070014 Mai Nagarpalika Kankai Ma V 50 44 94 99 67 166 030190004 Maijogmai Gaunpalika
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal: Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program
    Environmental Assessment Document Initial Environmental Examination Grant Number: 0093 NEP February 2010 Nepal: Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program Sildhunga-Jethal-Tauthali-Tekanpur Road Subproject, Sindhupalchowk District Prepared by the Government of Nepal The Environmental Assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Government of Nepal Ministry of Local Development Department of Local Infrastructure Development and Agricultural Roads Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program [ADBGrant 0093NEP] Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Report of Sildhunga-Jethal-Tauthali-Tekanpur Road Subproject, Sindhupalchowk District Submitted to: Ministry of Local Development Government of Nepal Proponent: Office of District Development Committee/ District Technical Office Chautara, Sindhupalchowk Prepared by: Frisa-Iteco Joint Venture (in association with SKAT) District Implementation Support Team (DIST) Chautara, Sindhupalchowk, Nepal Telephone No.: 011-620338 Fax No.: 011-620087 February, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations ………………………………………………………………………….....i Name and Address of Proponent………………………………………………..……...ii Executive Summary in Nepali………………………………………………………….iii Executive summary in English………………………………………………….…… viii Salient Features of the sub-Project………………………………………..………….xiii 1. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………… 1 1.1. Background………………………………………………………………...........1
    [Show full text]
  • Mechi River Bridge - Nepal Section
    Resettlement Plan April 2017 IND: SASEC Road Connectivity Investment Program – Tranche 2 Mechi River Bridge - Nepal Section Prepared by the National Highway and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India for the Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 01 March 2017) Currency unit Indian rupee (Rs) INR1.00 = $ 0.01496 $1.00 = INR 66.8349 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank AH – Asian Highway BPL – Below Poverty Line CoI – Corridor of Impact DH – Displaced Household DM – District Magistrate / District Collector DP – Displaced Person EA – Executing Agency FGD – Focus Group Discussion GRC – Grievance Redress Committee GRM – Grievance Redress Mechanism LA Act – Land Acquisition Act, 1894 MoPIT – Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transportation NGO – Non Governmental Organization PIU – Project Implementation Unit PMU – Project Management Unit RF – Resettlement Framework RO – Resettlement Officer RP – Resettlement Plan R&R – Resettlement and Rehabilitation RoB – Road over Bridge RoW – Right of Way SASEC– South Asia Subregional Economic Cooperation SH – State Highway SPS – Safeguard Policy Statement VDC – Village Development Committee WHH – Women Headed Household WEIGHTS AND MEASURES 1 hectare = 2.47 acre 1 kattha = 720 sq.ft 20 kattha = 1 bigha 1 bigha = 0.3306 acre = 1338 sq.m NOTE In this report, "$" refers to US dollars This resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics Capacity Assessment Nepal
    IA LCA – Nepal 2009 Version 1.05 Logistics Capacity Assessment Nepal Country Name Nepal Official Name Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal Regional Bureau Bangkok, Thailand Assessment Assessment Date: From 16 October 2009 To: 6 November 2009 Name of the assessors Rich Moseanko – World Vision International John Jung – World Vision International Rajendra Kumar Lal – World Food Programme, Nepal Country Office Title/position Email contact At HQ: [email protected] 1/105 IA LCA – Nepal 2009 Version 1.05 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Country Profile....................................................................................................................................................................3 1.1. Introduction / Background.........................................................................................................................................5 1.2. Humanitarian Background ........................................................................................................................................6 1.3. National Regulatory Departments/Bureau and Quality Control/Relevant Laboratories ......................................16 1.4. Customs Information...............................................................................................................................................18 2. Logistics Infrastructure .....................................................................................................................................................33 2.1. Port Assessment .....................................................................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Earthquake District Profile - Rasuwa OSOCC Assessment Cell 10.05.2015
    Nepal Earthquake District Profile - Rasuwa OSOCC Assessment Cell 10.05.2015 This report is produced by the OSOCC Assessment Cell based on secondary data from multiple sources, including the Government of Nepal, UNDAC, United Nations Agencies, non-governmental organisation and media sources. I. Situation Overview Rasuwa is one of the worst affected districts by the 25 April earthquake. As of 8 May, 430 people have been reported killed and 753 injured (MoFA 08/05/2015). Most of those that died in the district were killed in an avalanche that buried inhabtants of Langtang village including tourists in the guesthouses. Some remote areas are yet to be reached or accounted for. More than 63% of the district’s territory is at an elevation of more than 3000 meters. Of the remaining territory, most parts are located at an elevation between 1000 – 3000 meters (University of Copenhagen 2005) and parts of Rasuwa were without road access even before the earthquake, further challenging the relief effort. In the first few days after the earthquake very little information was available from Rasuwa. Field reports have gradually come in that help understand thesituation. Initial estimates based on Government data of damaged buildings in the affected districts, suggests that 82% of the population of Rasuwa have been affected by the earthquake. According to Government data, 8,000 buildings were destroyed in the earthquake. This figure is however unconfirmed and represents a preliminary estimate based on the combination of reports from a range of sources providing information on needs at the VDC level1(Please see map below for an illustration of aggregated number of reported people in need).
    [Show full text]
  • Club Health Assessment MBR0087
    Club Health Assessment for District 325A1 through April 2021 Status Membership Reports Finance LCIF Current YTD YTD YTD YTD Member Avg. length Months Yrs. Since Months Donations Member Members Members Net Net Count 12 of service Since Last President Vice Since Last for current Club Club Charter Count Added Dropped Growth Growth% Months for dropped Last Officer Rotation President Activity Account Fiscal Number Name Date Ago members MMR *** Report Reported Report *** Balance Year **** Number of times If below If net loss If no When Number Notes the If no report on status quo 15 is greater report in 3 more than of officers thatin 12 months within last members than 20% months one year repeat do not haveappears in two years appears appears appears in appears in terms an active red Clubs less than two years old SC 138770 Bansbari 07/12/2019 Active 41 15 0 15 57.69% 26 0 N 1 $600.02 P,MC 138952 Bargachhi Green City 07/12/2019 Active 25 1 0 1 4.17% 24 4 N 5 142398 Biratnagar A One 08/09/2020 Active 32 32 0 32 100.00% 0 2 N 1 M,MC,SC 138747 Biratnagar Birat Medical 07/12/2019 Active 21 1 0 1 5.00% 20 3 N 3 90+ Days P,S,T,M,VP 138954 Biratnagar Capital City 07/12/2019 Active 20 0 0 0 0.00% 20 21 1 None N/R 90+ Days MC,SC M,MC,SC 140415 Biratnagar Entrepreneur 01/06/2020 Active 18 0 0 0 0.00% 20 10 2 R 10 90+ Days M 139007 Biratnagar Greater 07/12/2019 Active 31 8 3 5 19.23% 26 1 4 3 N 3 Exc Award (06/30/2020) VP 139016 Biratnagar Health Professional 07/12/2019 Active 26 4 1 3 13.04% 23 1 0 N 3 Exc Award (06/30/2020) 138394 Biratnagar Mahanagar
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Report
    EVALUATION REPORT Nepal Earthquake Emergency Response Project SEPTEMBER 8, 2017 HURDEC PVT LTD, NEPAL Thasikhel, Lalitpur, Nepal Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 4 A. Evaluation Context and Methodology ........................................................................ 4 B. Project Achievements ................................................................................................ 4 C. Good and Highly Appreciated Practices .................................................................... 6 D. Key Issues and Challenges ....................................................................................... 6 E. Lessons from the Project Experience ........................................................................ 7 F. Major Recommendations ........................................................................................... 7 1. Background and Context ................................................................................................... 9 2. Evaluation Objectives and Methodology .......................................................................... 10 3. Evaluation Findings ......................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Overall Findings ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • ESMF – Appendix
    Improving Climate Resilience of Vulnerable Communities and Ecosystems in the Gandaki River Basin, Nepal Annex 6 (b): Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) - Appendix 30 March 2020 Improving Climate Resilience of Vulnerable Communities and Ecosystems in the Gandaki River Basin, Nepal Appendix Appendix 1: ESMS Screening Report - Improving Climate Resilience of Vulnerable Communities and Ecosystems in the Gandaki River Basin Appendix 2: Rapid social baseline analysis – sample template outline Appendix 3: ESMS Screening questionnaire – template for screening of sub-projects Appendix 4: Procedures for accidental discovery of cultural resources (Chance find) Appendix 5: Stakeholder Consultation and Engagement Plan Appendix 6: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) - Guidance Note Appendix 7: Social Impact Assessment (SIA) - Guidance Note Appendix 8: Developing and Monitoring an Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) - Guidance Note Appendix 9: Pest Management Planning and Outline Pest Management Plan - Guidance Note Appendix 10: References Annex 6 (b): Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) 2 Appendix 1 ESMS Questionnaire & Screening Report – completed for GCF Funding Proposal Project Data The fields below are completed by the project proponent Project Title: Improving Climate Resilience of Vulnerable Communities and Ecosystems in the Gandaki River Basin Project proponent: IUCN Executing agency: IUCN in partnership with the Department of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management (Nepal) and
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal: Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program
    Completion Report Project Number: 40554 Grant Numbers: 0093/0094 August 2014 Nepal: Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program This document is being disclosed to the public in accordance with ADB’s Public Communications Policy 2011. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit – Nepalese rupee(s) (NRe/NRs) At Appraisal At Program and Project Completion (11 October 2007) (30 June 2013) NRs1.00 = $0.0158 $0.0105 $1.00 = NRs63.20 NRs95.24 ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank DDC district development committee DFID Department for International Development of the United Kingdom DOLIDAR Department of Local Infrastructure Development and Agricultural Roads MFALD Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development MOF Ministry of Finance OFID OPEC Fund for International Development PCU project coordination unit SDC Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation VDC village development committee NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Nepal ends on 15 July. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2009 ends on 15 July 2009. (ii) In this report, “$” refers to US dollars. Vice-President W. Zhang, Operations 1 Director General H. Kim, South Asia Department (SARD) Country Director K. Yokoyama, SARD Team leader G. Gewali, Senior Project Officer, SARD Team members R. Bhattarai, Operations Assistant, SARD J. Sharma, Gender Consultant, SARD D. Singh, Senior Environment Officer, SARD B. Sitoula, Project Analyst, SARD L. Subedi, Senior Social Development Officer (Safeguards), SARD In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
    Chapter 3 Project Evaluation and Recommendations 3-1 Project Effect It is appropriate to implement the Project under Japan's Grant Aid Assistance, because the Project will have the following effects: (1) Direct Effects 1) Improvement of Educational Environment By replacing deteriorated classrooms, which are danger in structure, with rainwater leakage, and/or insufficient natural lighting and ventilation, with new ones of better quality, the Project will contribute to improving the education environment, which will be effective for improving internal efficiency. Furthermore, provision of toilets and water-supply facilities will greatly encourage the attendance of female teachers and students. Present(※) After Project Completion Usable classrooms in Target Districts 19,177 classrooms 21,707 classrooms Number of Students accommodated in the 709,410 students 835,820 students usable classrooms ※ Including the classrooms to be constructed under BPEP-II by July 2004 2) Improvement of Teacher Training Environment By constructing exclusive facilities for Resource Centres, the Project will contribute to activating teacher training and information-sharing, which will lead to improved quality of education. (2) Indirect Effects 1) Enhancement of Community Participation to Education Community participation in overall primary school management activities will be enhanced through participation in this construction project and by receiving guidance on various educational matters from the government. 91 3-2 Recommendations For the effective implementation of the project, it is recommended that HMG of Nepal take the following actions: 1) Coordination with other donors As and when necessary for the effective implementation of the Project, the DOE should ensure effective coordination with the CIP donors in terms of the CIP components including the allocation of target districts.
    [Show full text]
  • Gandaki Province
    2020 PROVINCIAL PROFILES GANDAKI PROVINCE Surveillance, Point of Entry Risk Communication and and Rapid Response Community Engagement Operations Support Laboratory Capacity and Logistics Infection Prevention and Control & Partner Clinical Management Coordination Government of Nepal Ministry of Health and Population Contents Surveillance, Point of Entry 3 and Rapid Response Laboratory Capacity 11 Infection Prevention and 19 Control & Clinical Management Risk Communication and Community Engagement 25 Operations Support 29 and Logistics Partner Coordination 35 PROVINCIAL PROFILES: BAGMATI PROVINCE 3 1 SURVEILLANCE, POINT OF ENTRY AND RAPID RESPONSE 4 PROVINCIAL PROFILES: GANDAKI PROVINCE SURVEILLANCE, POINT OF ENTRY AND RAPID RESPONSE COVID-19: How things stand in Nepal’s provinces and the epidemiological significance 1 of the coronavirus disease 1.1 BACKGROUND incidence/prevalence of the cases, both as aggregate reported numbers The provincial epidemiological profile and population denominations. In is meant to provide a snapshot of the addition, some insights over evolving COVID-19 situation in Nepal. The major patterns—such as changes in age at parameters in this profile narrative are risk and proportion of females in total depicted in accompanying graphics, cases—were also captured, as were which consist of panels of posters the trends of Test Positivity Rates and that highlight the case burden, trend, distribution of symptom production, as geographic distribution and person- well as cases with comorbidity. related risk factors. 1.4 MAJOR Information 1.2 METHODOLOGY OBSERVATIONS AND was The major data sets for the COVID-19 TRENDS supplemented situation updates have been Nepal had very few cases of by active CICT obtained from laboratories that laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 till teams and conduct PCR tests.
    [Show full text]