TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS

DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

Metropolitan Transportation Commission

Association of Bay Area Governments

MARCH 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Commission

Scott Haggerty, Chair Federal D. Glover Hillary Ronen Alameda County Contra Costa County City and County of San Francisco

Alfredo Pedroza, Vice Chair Anne W. Halsted Libby Schaaf Napa County and Cities San Francisco Bay Conservation and Oakland Mayor’s Appointee Development Commission Jeannie Bruins Warren Slocum Cities of Santa Clara County Nick Josefowitz San Mateo County San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Damon Connolly James P. Spering Marin County and Cities Sam Liccardo Solano County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Dave Cortese Jimmy Stracner Santa Clara County Jake Mackenzie Representing US Department of Sonoma County and Cities Housing and Urban Development Carol Dutra-Vernaci Tony Tavares Cities of Alameda County Gina Papan California State Transportation Cities of San Mateo County Dorene M. Giacopini Agency (CalSTA) U.S. Department of David Rabbitt Amy R. Worth Transportation Association of Bay Area Cities of Contra Costa County Governments

Association of Bay Area Governments

Mayor Jesse Arreguin ABAG Supervisor Cindy Chavez John Rahaim, Planning Director President City of Berkeley Santa Clara City and County of San Francisco Councilmember Wayne Lee Supervisor Belia Ramos Supervisor David Cortese City of Millbrae / San Mateo ABAG Vice President Napa Santa Clara Supervisor Erin Hannigan Vice Mayor Rich Garbarino Solano City of South San Francisco / San Representatives Mateo From Each County Supervisor David Rabbitt Sonoma Mayor Lori Wilson Supervisor Scott Haggerty City of Suisun City / Solano Alameda Representatives From Councilmember Jake Mackenzie Supervisor Nathan Miley Cities in Each County City of Rohnert Park / Sonoma Alameda Mayor Barbara Halliday Mayor Liz Gibbons Supervisor Candace Andersen City of Hayward / Alameda City of Campbell / Santa Clara Contra Costa Councilmember Councilmember Chris Clark Supervisor Karen Mitchoff Nikki Fortunato Bas City of Mountain View / Santa Clara Contra Costa City of Oakland / Alameda Councilmember Lan Diep Supervisor Dennis Rodoni Councilmember City of San Jose / Santa Clara Marin Lynette Gibson McElhaney City of Oakland / Alameda Councilmember Maya Esparza Supervisor Matt Haney City of San Jose / Santa Clara San Francisco Councilmember Loren Taylor City of Oakland / Alameda Councilmember Raul Peralez Supervisor Rafael Mandelman City of San Jose / Santa Clara San Francisco Councilmember Dave Hudson City of San Ramon / Contra Costa Supervisor Gordon Mar Councilmember Pat Eklund Advisory Members San Francisco City of Novato / Marin William Kissinger Regional Supervisor Dave Pine Mayor Leon Garcia Water Quality Control Board San Mateo City of American Canyon / Napa

Supervisor Warren Slocum Mayor London Breed San Mateo City and County of San Francisco

Plan Bay Area 2040: Draft Transportation-Air Quality Conformity Analysis for Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and Amended 2019 Transportation Improvement Program

March 2020

Bay Area Metro Center 375 Beale Street San Francisco, CA 94105

(415) 778-6700 phone [email protected] e-mail www.mtc.ca.gov web Project Staff

Matt Maloney Acting Director, Planning

Therese Trivedi Assistant Director

Harold Brazil Senior Planner, Project Manager

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | i Table of Contents Plan Bay Area 2040: ...... 1 List of Tables ...... iii List of Figures ...... iv I. Introduction ...... 1 Purpose of Conformity Analysis...... 1 Status of Regional Transportation Plan ...... 3 Status of Transportation Improvement Program ...... 4 II. Bay Area Air Pollutant Designations ...... 4 National 1-Hour Ozone Standard ...... 4 National 8-Hour Ozone Standard ...... 5

National PM2.5 Standard ...... 6 National 8-Hour Carbon Monoxide Standard ...... 7 Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets and Conformity Tests ...... 8 III. Conformity Analysis & Results ...... 9 Approach to Conformity Analysis ...... 9 Analysis Years...... 10 Consultation Process ...... 11 Comparison of Motor Vehicle Emissions to Budgets ...... 11

Baseline Year Emissions Test for PM2.5 ...... 14 IV. Transportation Control Measures ...... 17 History of Transportation Control Measures ...... 17 Status of Transportation Control Measures ...... 18 V. Response to Public Comments ...... 21 VI. Conformity Findings ...... 22

Appendix A1. List of Projects in the 2019 Amended Transportation Improvement Program Appendix A2. List of Projects in the 2019 Amended Transportation Improvement Program with Updated Conformity Analysis Years Appendix B. List of Projects in Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Appendix C. Travel Modeling Report Appendix D. List of Transportation Control Measures (TCM) Projects Appendix E. Methodology for Bay Area Conformity Determinations Appendix F. SAFE Vehicle Rule Part 1 EMFAC Adjustment Factor Methodology and Correspondence

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | ii List of Tables

Table 1: VOC and NOX Emissions Budgets from 2001 Ozone Attainment Plan (tons/day) ...... 11

Table 2: Vehicle Activity Forecasts ...... 12 Table 3: Emissions Budget Comparisons for Ozone Precursors – Summertime Conditions (tons/day) ..... 13

Table 4: Emission Reductions for Transportation Control Measures A – E in State Implementation Plan (tons/day) ...... 14

Table 5: Vehicle Activity Forecasts for the PM2.5 Baseline Year Test ...... 15

Table 6: Emissions Comparison for the PM2.5 Baseline Year Test ...... 15 Table 7: Transportation Control Measure in the State Implementation Plan ...... 18 Table 8: Implementation Status of Federal Transportation Control Measures for Ozone (A – E) ...... 19

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | iii List of Figures Figure 1: Map of the Non-Attainment Area for the San Francisco Bay Area ...... 2

Figure 2: Emissions Budget Comparisons for Ozone Precursors (VOC) ...... 13 Figure 3: Emissions Budget Comparisons for Ozone Precursors (NOx) ...... 14

Figure 4: Baseline Year Emissions Test for PM2.5 ...... 16

Figure 5: Baseline Year Emissions Test for Wintertime NOX ...... 16

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | iv I. Introduction The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) prepares a transportation-air quality conformity analysis (“conformity analysis”) when it amends or updates its Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), and/or updates its Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), or adds or deletes regionally significant, non-exempt projects into the TIP.

The purpose of this conformity analysis is to conform the Amended RTP (“Plan Bay Area 2040”) and to conform the 2019 TIP in accordance with the latest U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) transportation conformity regulations and the Bay Area Conformity State Implementation Plan (Conformity SIP), which is also known as the Bay Area Air Quality Conformity Protocol (MTC Resolution No. 3757). This conformity analysis addresses the 2008 and 2015 national ambient air quality standard

(NAAQS) for 8-hour ozone and the 2006 national 24-hour fine particulate matter (PM2.5) standard.

This report explains the basis for the conformity analysis and provides the results used by MTC to make a positive conformity finding for the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and the 2019 Amended TIP. This conformity analysis also serves to re-conform the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and 2019 TIP for the federal 2015 ozone NAAQS. Purpose of Conformity Analysis The Federal Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAAA) outlines requirements for ensuring that federal transportation plans, programs, and projects are consistent with (“conform to”) the purpose of the SIP. Conformity to the purpose of the SIP means that transportation activities will not cause new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the relevant national ambient air quality standards. A conformity finding demonstrates that the total emissions projected for a transportation plan (“RTP”) or program (“TIP”) are within the emissions limits ("budgets") established by the SIP, and that transportation control measures (TCMs) are implemented in a timely fashion.

Conformity requirements apply in all non-attainment and maintenance areas for transportation-related criteria pollutants and related precursor emissions. For the Bay Area, the criteria pollutants to be addressed are ground-level ozone, carbon monoxide, and PM2.5; and the precursor pollutants to be addressed include volatile organic compounds (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) for ozone and for PM2.5. EPA’s most recent revisions to its transportation conformity regulations to implement the 1990 Federal Clean Air Act section 176 were published in the Federal Register on March 14, 20121.

Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) such as MTC are required to follow these regulations, and any other procedures and criteria contained in the EPA-approved Conformity SIP (Transportation-Air Quality Conformity Protocol) for the Bay Area. In the Bay Area, procedures were first adopted in September 1994 to comply with the 1990 CAAA. Four subsequent amendments to the transportation conformity procedures in August 1995, November 1995, August 1997, and July 2006 have been adopted by the three co-lead agencies (MTC, Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), and Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)). MTC Resolution 3757 represents the latest San Francisco Bay Area Transportation-Air Quality Conformity Protocol adopted by the three agencies in July 2006. Acting on behalf of the three agencies, the BAAQMD submitted this latest Protocol to California Air Resources Board (CARB) as a revision to the Bay Area Conformity SIP. CARB approved this proposed revision to the

1 The current version of the regulations is available on EPA’s Transportation Conformity website at: https://www.epa.gov/state- and-local-transportation/current-law-regulations-and-guidance-state-and-local-transportation

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 1

Figure 1: Map of the Non-Attainment Area for the San Francisco Bay Area

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 2 Bay Area’s Conformity SIP in December 2006 and transmitted it to EPA for final action. EPA approved the Bay Area Conformity SIP in December 2007 (40 CFR Part 52).

These regulations and resolutions state in part that, MTC cannot approve any transportation plan, program, or project unless these activities conform to the purpose of the federal air quality plan. "Transportation plan" refers to the RTP. "Program" refers to the TIP, which is a financially realistic set of highway and transit projects to be funded over the next four years. A "transportation project" is any highway or transit improvement, which is included in the RTP and TIP and requires funding or approval from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Conformity regulations also affect regionally significant non-federally funded projects which must be included in a conforming transportation plan (“RTP”) and program (“TIP”). Status of Regional Transportation Plan A regional transportation plan, or RTP, is a plan which includes both long-range and short-range strategies and actions that lead to the development of an integrated multimodal transportation system to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of people and goods in addressing current and future transportation demand. State law requires that RTP’s include a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) to identify a forecasted land use development pattern that when integrated with the future transportation system will meet the region’s greenhouse gas reduction target set by CARB. As required by federal and state planning regulations, the RTP covers a minimum planning horizon of 20 years and is updated every four years in areas which do not meet federal air quality standards (“non-attainment”). The RTP is financially constrained to ensure project costs do not exceed regionally expected transportation revenues over the planning horizon. Once adopted, the RTP guides the development of the TIP for the region.

The San Francisco Bay Area’s RTP/SCS-Plan Bay Area 2040 (“the Plan”)- was originally adopted in July 2017 and is an update to Plan Bay Area (2013). Plan Bay Area 2040 sets forth a strategic investment strategy to maintain existing transportation infrastructure, service, and system performance for Bay Area travelers through horizon year 2040. It includes a regional transportation investment strategy and subsequent list of highway, transit, local roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian projects identified through regional and local transportation planning processes. In addition, Plan Bay Area 2040 includes a focused growth land use pattern designed to reduce passenger vehicle travel to achieve the region’s greenhouse gas reduction target set by CARB.

Starting with the current state of the region, Plan Bay Area 2040 describes its goals, a proposed growth pattern and supporting transportation investment strategy, and key actions needed to address ongoing and long-term regional challenges. The Plan also includes supplemental reports for additional details. These documents and the adopted Plan can be found at http://2040.planbayarea.org/reports.

In March 2018, MTC and ABAG amended Plan Bay Area 2040 to modify the scope and project cost of the U.S. Highway 101 Managed Lanes Project in San Mateo County (RTPID 17-06-0007). The amendment aligned the Plan’s project assumptions to those of the preferred alternative in the project’s Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The Commission approved the Transportation-Air Quality Conformity Analysis for Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and Amended 2017 Transportation Improvement Program on March 28, 2018 (MTC Resolution No. 4325). The FHWA and FTA approved MTC’s conformity determination for the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and the Amended 2017 TIP on May 17, 2018.

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 3 MTC and ABAG propose a second amendment to Plan Bay Area 2040 to add the project scope and cost of the Interstate 680 Express Lanes Gap Closure Project in Alameda County. The project will add an express lane to the southbound and northbound travel lanes of Interstate 680 between Alcosta Boulevard and State Route 84, closing the gap between existing and in-progress express lane projects directly to the north and south.

This conformity analysis will serve to demonstrate that the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 conforms to the SIP. Refer to Appendix B for a detailed list of projects included in the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040. Status of Transportation Improvement Program The federally required transportation improvement program, or TIP, is a comprehensive listing of surface transportation projects for the San Francisco Bay Area that receive federal funds, are subject to a federally required action, or are regionally significant. MTC, as the federally designated MPO, prepares and adopts the TIP at least once every four years. The TIP covers a four-year period and must be financially constrained by year, meaning that the amount of dollars committed to the projects (also referred as “programmed”) must not exceed the amount of dollars estimated to be available. Adoption of the TIP must be accompanied by an air quality conformity analysis and finding, and all projects included in the TIP must be derived from and/or be consistent with the RTP. MTC prepared and completed the Transportation Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and the 2019 Amended TIP, which was approved by the Commission in September 2018. FHWA and FTA issued joint approval of this conformity determination in December 2018.

The 2019 Amended TIP contains approximately 800 projects totaling about $15.5 billion over the four- year period from fiscal year 2018-19 to 2021-22. The I-680 Express Lanes Gap Closure Project is now being revised in the TIP through TIP Amendment 2019-38 to be consistent with the changes included in the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040.

The I-680 Express Lanes Gap Closure project as proposed in the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 is expected to be completed outside the analysis years of the Amended 2019 TIP timeframe. This conformity analysis serves to conform the 2019 TIP as amended through TIP Amendment 2019-38 and the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040.

Refer to Appendix A1 for a detailed listing of projects/programs in the 2019 Amended TIP. Note that specific funding sources are identified in the TIP itself. Appendix A2 list the projects in the 2019 Amended TIP with updated conformity analysis years. II. Bay Area Air Pollutant Designations National 1-Hour Ozone Standard The Bay Area was initially designated as nonattainment for ozone on March 3, 1978. On November 6, 1991, the EPA designated the Bay Area as a moderate ozone non-attainment area. Based on “clean” air monitoring data from 1990 to 1992, the co-lead agencies—BAAQMD, MTC, and ABAG— determined that the Bay Area was attaining the 1-hour ozone standard and requested that CARB forward a re- designation request and an ozone maintenance plan to EPA.

On May 25, 1995, after evaluating 1990-1992 monitoring data and determining that the Bay Area had continued to attain the standard, the EPA re-designated the Bay Area as an ozone maintenance area. Shortly thereafter, the area began violating the standard again and on July 10, 1998, the EPA published a

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 4 Notice of Final Rulemaking re-designating the Bay Area back to an ozone non-attainment area. This action became effective on August 10, 1998.

The re-designation to nonattainment triggered an obligation for the State to submit a SIP revision designed to provide for attainment of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS by November 15, 2000. This revision (the San Francisco Bay Area Ozone Attainment Plan for the 1-hour National Ozone Standard – June 1999 or “1999 Plan”) was partially approved and partially disapproved by EPA on September 20, 2001 in conjunction with a determination that the area had failed to attain by the November 2000 deadline. The attainment demonstration and its associated motor vehicle emissions budgets were among the plan elements that were disapproved.

As a result of the EPA’s finding of failure to attain and partial disapproval of the 1999 Plan, the State was required to submit a SIP revision for the Bay Area to EPA by September 20, 2002 that included an updated volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions inventory, new transportation conformity budgets, and provided for attainment of the 1-hour ozone standard no later than September 20, 2006. On November 1, 2001, CARB approved the San Francisco Bay Area 2001 Ozone Attainment Plan for the 1-Hour National Ozone Standard (2001 Plan) as a revision to the SIP. The BAAQMD and its co-lead agencies, (MTC and ABAG) adopted the 2001 Plan on October 26, 2001.

The 2001 Plan contains a control strategy with seven stationary source measures, five transportation control measures (TCMs), and eleven further-study measures. In the 2001 Plan, the District also committed to strengthening the then existing Smog Check program by requesting the State Bureau of Automotive Repair to implement two VOC-reducing program elements. The new measures and on-going programs provided 271 tons per day of combined VOC and NOx emission reductions between 2000 and 2006. The 2001 Plan also included an attainment assessment based on Bay Area data.

On November 30, 2001, ARB submitted the 2001 Plan, which included VOC and NOx motor vehicle emissions budgets (164.0 tons per day (tpd) and 270.3 tpd, respectively) for the 2006 attainment year, to EPA for approval as a revision to the California SIP. To support the on-road motor vehicle emission inventory and transportation conformity budgets in the Plan, CARB also transmitted the San Francisco Bay Area-EMFAC2000 model to EPA for approval for the Bay Area ozone non-attainment area. On February 14, 2002, the EPA found the motor vehicle emissions budgets in the 2001 Plan adequate for transportation conformity purposes, based on its preliminary determination that the plan provided for timely attainment of the 1-hour ozone standard.

On April 22, 2004, based on air quality monitoring data from the 2001, 2002, and 2003 ozone season, EPA determined that Bay Area had attained the national 1-hour ozone standard. Because of this determination, requirements for some of the elements of the 2001 Ozone Attainment Plan, submitted to EPA to demonstrate attainment of the 1-hour standard, were suspended. The determination of attainment did not mean the Bay Area had been re-designated as an attainment area for the 1-hour standard. To be re-designated, the region would have had to submit a formal re-designation request to EPA, along with a maintenance plan showing how the region would continue to attain the standard for ten years. However, this re-designation request was no longer necessary upon the establishment of the new national 8-hour ozone standard. National 8-Hour Ozone Standard In July 1997, EPA revised the ozone standard, setting it to 80 parts per billion (ppb) in concentration- based specifically on the 3-year average of the annual 4th highest daily maximum 8-hour ozone

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 5 concentrations. In April 2004, EPA issued final designations for attainment and non-attainment areas. In June 2004, EPA formally designated the Bay Area as a non-attainment area for national 8-hour ozone and classified the region as “marginal” based on five classes of non-attainment areas for ozone, ranging from marginal to extreme.

In March 2008, EPA lowered the national 8-hour ozone standard from 80 ppb to 75 ppb. On March 12, 2009, CARB submitted its recommendations for area designations for the revised national 8-hour ozone standard. These recommendations were based on ozone air quality data collected during 2006 through 2008. The CARB recommended that the Bay Area be designated as non-attainment for the national 8- hour ozone standard. EPA had one year to review the recommendations and were to notify states by November 12, 2009, if they planned to modify the state-recommended areas. EPA issued final designations by March 12, 2010, based on more up to date monitoring data.

On October 1, 2015, EPA strengthened the NAAQS for ground-level ozone to 70 ppb, based on extensive scientific evidence about ozone’s effects on public health and welfare. The updated standards will improve public health protection, particularly for at-risk groups including children, older adults, people of all ages who have lung diseases such as asthma, and people who are active outdoors, especially outdoor workers. They also will improve the health of trees, plants and ecosystems. The proposed implementation rule for the 2015 ozone standard was published November 17, 2016 and proposed a framework for nonattainment area classifications and SIP requirements. In addition, the proposed rule follows the approach adopted for the previous Classifications Rule and SIP Requirements Rule (SRR) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.

In September 2016, CARB recommended to EPA that the San Francisco Bay Area be designated in nonattainment for the 70 ppb 2015 ozone NAAQS. EPA concurred with CARB’s recommendation and on April 30, 2018, EPA completed area designations for most of the United States (including the San Francisco Bay Area). On June 4, 2018, EPA published a final rule that designated 51 areas as nonattainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. These final designations took effect on August 3, 2018, 60 days after the notice was published in the Federal Register. Nonattainment areas must demonstration conformity of transportation plans and transportation improvement programs (TIPs) to the 2015 ozone NAAQS by August 3, 20192, the end of the grace period.

In addition, because marginal 8-hour ozone areas are not required to submit an attainment demonstration SIP (containing on-road motor vehicle emission budgets required to demonstrate conformity), the conformity finding in this report is based on the approved 1-hour ozone on-road motor vehicle emission budgets contained in the Bay Area’s 2001 Plan.

National PM2.5 Standard In 1987, the EPA established a standard for particle pollution equal to or smaller than 10 micrometers in diameter. A decade later, the 1997 revision to the standard set the stage for change, when a separate standard was set for fine particulate matter (particles that are 2.5 micrometers in diameter and smaller). Citing the link between serious health problems and premature death in people with heart or lung disease, the 1997 revision ultimately distinguished and set forth regulation on particle pollutants known

2 Transportation Conformity Guidance for 2015 Ozone Nonattainment Areas at: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P100UN3X.pdf

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 6 as particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) and particulate matter 10 (PM10). Based on air quality monitoring data, the Bay Area was found to be attaining the 1997 PM2.5 standards.

In 2006, the EPA revised the air quality standards for particle pollution. The 24-hour PM2.5 standard was strengthened by lowering the level from 65 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m³) to 35 µg/ m³. The annual fine particle standard at 15 µg/ m³ remained the same. Also, in 2006, the EPA published a final rule that established transportation conformity criteria and procedures to determine transportation projects that required analysis for local air quality impacts for PM2.5 in non-attainment and maintenance areas. The established criteria and procedures require that those areas designated as nonattainment areas must undergo a regional conformity analysis for PM2.5. Furthermore, the procedures also mandate that areas designated as non-attainment must complete an additional project-level PM2.5 hot-spot analysis of localized impacts for transportation projects of air quality concern.

On December 14, 2009, EPA designated the Bay Area as non-attainment for the national 24-hour PM2.5 standard based upon violations of the standard over the three-year period from 2007 through 2009. Pursuant to the Clean Air Act, the Bay Area and MTC were subject to the requirement (beginning on December 14, 2010) to demonstrate that the RTP and TIP conformed to the SIP. In addition, beginning on December 14, 2010, certain roadway and transit projects that involve significant levels of diesel vehicle traffic needed to prepare PM2.5 hot-spot analyses. National 8-Hour Carbon Monoxide Standard In April 1998, the Bay Area became a “maintenance area” for the national 8-hour carbon monoxide (CO) standard, having demonstrated attainment of the standards. As a maintenance area, the region must assure continued attainment of the CO standard.

Under 40 CFR 93.102(b)(4) of EPA’s regulations, transportation conformity applies to maintenance areas through the 20-year maintenance planning period, unless the maintenance plan specifies that the transportation conformity requirements apply for a longer time period. Pursuant to the CAAA’s section 176(c)(5) and as explained in the preamble of the 1993 final rule, conformity applies to areas that are designated nonattainment or are subject to a maintenance plan approved under the CAAA section 175A. The section 175A maintenance planning period is 20 years, unless the applicable implementation plan specifies a longer maintenance period3. The EPA further clarified this conformity provision in its January 24, 2008 final rule4.

The approved maintenance plan for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose Carbon Monoxide nonattainment area did not extend the maintenance plan period beyond 20 years from re-designation. Consequently, transportation conformity requirements for CO ceased to apply after June 1, 2018 (i.e., 20 years after the effective date of the EPA’s approval of the first 10-year maintenance plan and re- designation of the area to attainment for CO NAAQS). As a result, as of June 1, 2018, transportation conformity requirements no longer apply for the CO NAAQS in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose CO nonattainment area for Federal Highway Administration/Federal Transit Association projects as defined in 40 CFR 93.101.

3 See 58 FR 62188, 62206 (November 24, 1993) 4 See 73 FR 4420, at 4434-5 (January 24, 2008)

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 7 Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets and Conformity Tests

The Bay Area has conformity requirements for national ozone and PM2.5 standards. Under the ozone standard, the Bay Area has to meet an on-road motor vehicle emission “budget” test. Because the Bay

Area does not have on-road motor vehicle emission budgets for PM2.5 that have been determined to be adequate by EPA, it has to meet an emission interim test for the PM2.5 standard. To make a positive conformity finding for ozone MTC must demonstrate that the calculated on-road motor vehicle emissions in the region are lower than the approved budgets. To make a positive “interim” conformity finding for PM2.5, MTC must meet “build not greater than no build” or “build not greater than baseline year” tests based on PM2.5 exhaust, tire wear, and brake wear, and NOX as a PM2.5 precursor, emissions.

On-road motor vehicle emissions budgets for VOC and NOX, which are ozone precursors, were developed for the 2006 attainment year as part of the 2001 1-hour Ozone Attainment Plan. The VOC and NOX budgets were found to be adequate by EPA on February 14, 2002 (67 FR 8017), and were subsequently approved by EPA on April 22, 2004 (69 FR 21717). Note that under EPA’s conformity rule for the national 8-hour ozone standard, the existing 1-hour on-road motor vehicle emission budgets are to be used for conformity analyses until they are replaced.

The on-road motor vehicle emission budgets are listed below:

• VOC: 164 tons per day (2006 and beyond)

• NOX: 270.3 tons per day (2006 and beyond)

For PM2.5, initially the Bay Area was required to prepare a SIP by December 2012 to show how the region would attain the standard by December 2014. In addition, although the Bay Area was designated as non-attainment for the national 24-hour PM2.5 standard based on monitoring data for the 2006-2008 period, the region exceeded the standard by only a slight margin.

Monitoring data shows that the Bay Area currently meets the national standards for both annual and

24-hour PM2.5 levels. However, because the health effects of PM are serious and far-reaching, and no safe threshold of exposure to PM has yet been identified, it is important efforts continue to further reduce PM emissions and concentrations.5

Under US EPA guidelines, a region with monitoring data showing that it currently attains an air quality standard can submit a “re-designation request” and a “maintenance plan” in lieu of a SIP attainment plan. However, the BAAQMD believes that it would be premature to submit a PM2.5 re-designation request for the Bay Area at this time. Instead, the BAAQMD has pursued another option provided by US

EPA guidelines for areas with monitoring data showing that they currently meet the PM2.5 standard. In December 2011, CARB submitted a “clean data finding” request on behalf of the Bay Area. On January 9,

2013, EPA took final action to determine that the Bay Area attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard. EPA’s determination was based on complete, quality-assured, and certified ambient air monitoring data showing that the area monitored attainment based on the 2009-2011 monitoring period. Based on EPA’s determination, the requirements for the Bay Area to submit an attainment demonstration, together with RACMs, an RFP plan, and contingency measures for failure to meet RFP and attainment deadlines are suspended for so long as the region continues to attain the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard.

5 See BAAQMD’s 2017 Clean Air Plan: Spare the Air, Cool the Climate at: http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and- research/plans/2017-clean-air-plan/attachment-a_-proposed-final-cap-vol-1-pdf.pdf?la=en

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 8 Since an approved on-road motor vehicle emissions budget for PM2.5 is not available for use in this conformity analysis, MTC must complete one of the two interim emissions tests:

• the build-no-greater-than-no-build test (“build/no-build test”) found at 40 CFR 93.119(e)(1), or • the no-greater-than-baseline year emissions test (“baseline year test”), described at 40 CFR 93.119(e)(2).

Per the interagency consultation via the Air Quality Conformity Task Force meeting dated May 28, 2015, MTC elected to use the “baseline year test”. In this test, conformity is demonstrated if in each analysis year, the RTP or TIP (the “build” scenarios) on-road motor vehicle emissions are less than or equal to emissions in the “baseline year” emission inventory. The “baseline year” for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard is the year 20086.

Under a determination of conformity, the following criteria are applied:

1. The latest planning assumptions and emission models are used. The transportation plan (“RTP”) and program (“TIP”) pass an emissions budget test using a budget that has been found adequate by EPA or an interim emissions test when budgets have not been established. 2. The transportation plan (“RTP”) and program (“TIP”) provide for the timely implementation of TCMs. 3. Interagency and public consultation is part of the process. III. Conformity Analysis & Results Approach to Conformity Analysis The latest planning assumptions were used when preparing this conformity analysis. Regional estimates of future travel data were estimated using MTC’s land use model (referred to as “Bay Area UrbanSim”) and travel model (referred to as “Travel Model One”). This integrated model framework allows for analysis of how transportation projects affect the surrounding land use pattern, as well as how changes to residential and commercial activity affect transportation demand. Travel Model One (version 0.6) released in July 2016, is calibrated to year 2000 conditions and validated against year 2000, year 2005, and year 2010 conditions. The model generates spatially- and temporally• specific estimates of travel data—roadway usage and speed. This travel data is input into CARB’s latest EMission FACtors (EMFAC2017) model to estimate on-road motor vehicle emissions.

In 2016, MTC updated the method by which Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 programmatic category projects are assessed and represented in Travel Model One in the analysis years between the year 2040 (the Horizon Year for the Amended Plan Bay Area) and the 2019 Amended TIP. Please see Appendix C for the complete approach (for regional conformity modeling purposes) description.

The EMFAC2017 model shows how California on-road motor vehicle emissions have changed over time and are projected to change in the future. This information helps CARB evaluate prospective control programs and determine the most effective, science-based proposals for protecting the environment. EMFAC2017 includes the latest data on California’s car and truck fleets and travel activity. The model also reflects the emissions benefits of CARB’s recent rulemakings, including on-road diesel fleet rules,

6 Additional information is available here: https://www.epa.gov/state-and-local-transportation/baseline-year-baseline-year- test-40-cfr-93119

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 9 Advanced Clean Car Standards, and the Smartway/Phase I Heavy Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Regulation. The model includes updates to truck emission factors based on the latest test data. More details about the updates in emissions calculation methodologies and data are available in the EMFAC2017 Technical Support Document.7

On September 27, 2019, the EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration published the “Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule Part One: One National Program.” (84 Fed. Reg. 51,310 (Sept. 27, 2019.). The SAFE Vehicle Rule Part One impacts some of the underlying assumptions in the EMFAC2017 model. In response, CARB staff developed off-model adjustment factors to account for the impacts of this rule. On March 12, 2020, the EPA confirmed these adjustment factors to be acceptable for use in transportation conformity determinations8.

Bay Area UrbanSim9 and Travel Model One are responsive to numerous inputs, including demographic, pricing, travel behavior, and highway and transit network assumptions. For this conformity analysis, the two models use demographic and highway and transit network assumptions consistent with the Amended Plan Bay Area 204010. Highway and transit networks were updated for each analysis year to reflect investments in the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 (see Appendix B) and the 2019 Amended TIP (see Appendix A1 and A2). Pricing assumptions applied in Travel Model One include projected parking prices, gasoline and non-gasoline auto operating costs, fuel economy, bridge tolls, transit fares, and express lanes. Travel behavior assumptions include trip peaking factors, vehicle occupancy factors, and estimates of interregional commuters. Refer to Appendix D for detailed travel modeling assumptions used in this conformity analysis.11

Regional vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and engine starts (which are needed for emission calculations) are forecasted using a combination of output from Travel Model One and base year (2010) EMFAC2017 default VMT information provided by the CARB. For conformity purposes, MTC continues to employ the agreed to protocol for estimating VMT with updated 2010 base year data.

A separate process was used to develop demographic assumptions for the PM2.5 “baseline year” of 2008. Bay Area UrbanSim generates Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ)-level data set in 5-year increments. The calculation of data for the interim year 2008 requires a multi-stop process. First, regional control totals for each attribute are calculated using straight-line extrapolations between the two adjacent 5-year increments (2005 and 2010). Next, each TAZ's share of the regional total is calculated by extrapolation of the two adjacent 5-year increments. Finally, individual TAZ totals are calculated by multiplying the interim year TAZ share of the regional total by the regional control total. Analysis Years The analysis years for the budget and baseline year tests are to be within five years from the date the analysis is done, the horizon year of the RTP and intermediate years as necessary so that analysis years

7 Additional information is available here: http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/categories.htm 8 Additional information is available here: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/msei/emfac_off_model_adjustment_factors_final_draft.pdf 9 Additional information is available here: http://2040.planbayarea.org/sites/default/files/2017- 07/Land_Use_Modeling_PBA2040_Supplemental%20Report_7-2017.pdf 10 Additional information is available here: http://www.planbayarea.org/2040-plan/final-preferred-scenario 11 Additional information is available here: http://2040.planbayarea.org/sites/default/files/2017- 07/Travel_Modeling_PBA2040_Supplemental%20Report_7-2017_0.pdf This document is part of the Final Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 scenario planning/development effort and the technical methods and assumptions used in this effort are consistent with what is applied in this conformity analysis.

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 10 are not more than ten years apart. For this conformity analysis, the analysis years are 2020, 2030 and

2040 for the 2008 and 2015 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 standards. MTC used Travel Model One to forecast travel data for the 2020, 2030 and 2040 analysis years. The forecasted travel data for each analysis year were then input into the EMFAC2017 model to calculate on-road motor vehicle emissions. Consultation Process MTC has consulted on the preparation of this conformity analysis with the Bay Area’s Air Quality Conformity Task Force. The Conformity Task Force is composed of representatives of EPA, CARB, FHWA, FTA, Caltrans, MTC, BAAQMD, ABAG, the nine county Congestion Management Agencies, and Bay Area transit operators. The Conformity Task Force reviews the analysis assumptions, consults on TCM implementation issues, and reviews the results of the conformity analysis. The task force meetings are open to the public. Consultation with the Air Quality Conformity Task Force related to the preparation of this conformity analysis includes the following:

March 2020 • Review approach to Conformity Analysis for Draft Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and the Amended 2019 TIP

April 2020

• Review responses to comments on Conformity Analysis for Draft Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and the Amended 2019 TIP • Complete the Conformity Determination for Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and the Amended 2019 TIP and respond to public comments Comparison of Motor Vehicle Emissions to Budgets As explained earlier, on-road motor vehicle emissions budgets are established in the SIP for VOCs and

NOX. To make a positive conformity finding, the regional on-road motor vehicle emissions must be equal to or less than these budgets. The results of the vehicle activity forecasts and on-road motor vehicle emission calculations are described in the following section. Ozone Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets

For VOC and NOX, the on-road motor vehicle emission budgets also reflect emission reductions from five Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) incorporated in the 2001 Ozone Attainment Plan (Table 1).

Table 1: VOC and NOX Emissions Budgets from 2001 Ozone Attainment Plan (tons/day) VOC 2006 On Road Motor Vehicle Emissions 168.5 2006 Mobile Source Control Measure Benefits (4.0) 2006 TCM Benefits (0.5) 2006 Emissions Budget 164.0

NOX 2006 On Road Motor Vehicle Emissions 271.0 2006 TCM Benefits (0.7) 2006 Emissions Budget 270.3

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 11 The vehicle activity forecasts by analysis year for the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and the 2019 Amended TIP (the “build” scenarios) are shown in Table 2. Travel data (from MTC’s Travel Model One) was input into CARB’s EMFAC2017 emissions model, thereby generating regional vehicle activity and emissions estimates.

In addition, MTC will use the 1-hour motor vehicle emissions budget from the 2001 Ozone Attainment Plan as the 8-hour motor vehicle emissions budget to demonstrate conformity to both the 2008 and 2015 8-hour ozone standards. The ozone budgets for VOCs and NOx were compared to quantified emissions for analysis years 2020, 2030 and 2040.

EPA designated12 the San Francisco Bay Area as “Marginal” for nonattainment of the 2008 and 2015 ozone standards with the applicable attainment year of 2021. CFR 93.118(d)(2) requires the regional emissions analysis to be performed for the attainment year for the 2015 ozone NAAQS, if it is within the timeframe of the transportation plan and conformity determination – and the CAAA requires areas to attain the national ambient air quality standards as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than specified dates. To demonstrate attainment, an area must predict that emissions during the “season” preceding the attainment date will meet the level of the standard. In general, the attainment dates for 8-hour ozone are in June. Therefore, the relevant ozone season for predicting attainment will be the ozone season in the calendar year preceding the attainment date which means the 2020 year will be the applied attainment date/year (for the 2015 ozone standard only) in this conformity analysis.

Table 2: Vehicle Activity Forecasts 2020 2030 2040 Vehicles in use 4,349,915 5,268,777 6,115,830 Daily VMT (1000s) 156,513 170,448 184,361 Daily Engine Starts 21,679,855 26,213,115 30,299,263

Comparison of Estimated Regional On-Road Motor Vehicle Emissions to the Ozone Precursor Budgets The vehicle activity forecasts for the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and the 2019 Amended TIP, Table 2, are converted to emission estimates by MTC using EMFAC2017. Tables 3 compare the results of the various analyses with the applicable budgets. The analyses indicate that the on-road motor vehicle emissions are substantially below the budget, due in large part to the effects of cleaner vehicles in the California fleet and the enhanced Smog Check program now in effect in the Bay Area and reflected in the EMFAC2017 model.

12 See Nonattainment and Unclassifiable Area Designations for the 2015 Ozone Standards -- April 30, 2018; https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-04/documents/placeholder_1.pdf

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 12 Table 3: Emissions Budget Comparisons for Ozone Precursors – Summertime Conditions (tons/day) VOC Budget1 On-Road Motor Vehicles On-Road Motor Vehicles Year Net VOC Emissions3 Net VOC Emissions with CARB Adjustment Factors3 2020 164.0 32.20 32.20 2030 164.0 21.47 21.54 2040 164.0 17.27 17.45

1 NOX Budget On-Road Motor Vehicles On-Road Motor Vehicles 3 Year Net NOX Net NOX Emissions with CARB Adjustment Factors3 2020 270.3 56.58 56.58 2030 270.3 33.31 33.34 2040 270.3 33.11 33.18 1 2001 Ozone Attainment Plan 2 The transit services for TCM A Regional Express Bus Program were modeled. The emission benefits from TCM A are therefore

included in the On-Road Motor Vehicles VOC and NOX emission inventories for 2006 and beyond. 3 TCM Reduction Benefits of (0.5) tons/day of ROG and (0.7) tons/day of NOx applied to all On-Road Motor Vehicles emission inventories in the Table 3 above

Figure 2: Emissions Budget Comparisons for Ozone Precursors (VOC)

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 13

Figure 3: Emissions Budget Comparisons for Ozone Precursors (NOx)

The estimated effectiveness of the various TCMs, given their current implementation status, is shown in Table 4. TCMs A through E are fully implemented. They have achieved the required cumulative total emission reductions of 0.5 tons per day of VOC and 0.7 tons per day of NOX by 2006.

Table 4: Emission Reductions for Transportation Control Measures A – E in State Implementation Plan (tons/day)

TCM VOC Emission NOX Emission Reductions through Reductions through December 2006 December 2006 TCM A: Regional Express Bus Program 0.20 0.20 TCM B: Bicycle/Pedestrian Program 0.04 0.03 TCM C: Transportation for Livable Communities 0.08 0.12 TCM D: Expansion of Freeway Service Patrol 0.10 0.25 TCM E: Transit Access to Airports 0.09 0.13 Total Reductions 0.5 0.7

Baseline Year Emissions Test for PM2.5

For the baseline year test, emissions for both directly emitted PM2.5 and NOX (as the precursor to PM2.5 emissions) were compared to the analysis years of 2020, 2030 and 2040. The analysis used inputs for the winter season, during which the Bay Area experiences its highest levels of PM2.5 concentrations.

The vehicle activity forecasts by analysis year for the Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 and the 2019 Amended TIP (the “build” scenarios) are shown in Table 5. Travel data (from MTC’s Travel Model One) was input into CARB’s EMFAC2017 emissions model, thereby generating regional vehicle activity and emissions estimates.

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 14 Table 6 presents the results of the Baseline Year test for the PM2.5 emissions and the NOX precursor for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard. Regional conformity analyses must be completed for directly emitted

PM2.5 (40 CFR 93.102(b)(1)). Directly emitted PM2.5 includes exhaust, brake and tire wear emissions.

Table 5: Vehicle Activity Forecasts for the PM2.5 Baseline Year Test 2008 2020 2030 2040 Baseline Year Vehicles in Use 4,631,001 4,349,915 5,268,777 6,115,830 Daily VMT (1000s) 154,100 156,513 170,448 184,361 Engine Starts 29,299,933 21,679,855 26,213,115 30,299,263

Table 6: Emissions Comparison for the PM2.5 Baseline Year Test 2008 2020 20202 2030 20302 2040 20402 Baseline Year

PM2.5 8.26 4.30 N/A 4.10 4.10 4.36 4.36

NOX 194.58 51.72 N/A 27.13 27.13 26.49 26.49 1 Emissions for wintertime only 2 CARB Adjustment Factors applied to years 2030 and 2040 – no CARB Adjustment Factors available for the year 2020

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 15

Figure 4: Baseline Year Emissions Test for PM2.5

Figure 5: Baseline Year Emissions Test for Wintertime NOX

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 16 IV. Transportation Control Measures History of Transportation Control Measures TCMs are strategies to reduce vehicle emissions. They include such strategies as improved transit service and transit coordination, ridesharing services and new carpool lanes, signal timing, freeway incident management, increased gas taxes and bridge tolls to encourage use of alternative modes, etc. The original set of TCMs plus the five most recent TCMs (A-E) have been fully implemented. The TCMs were added over successive revisions to the SIP (see Table 7). For more information on TCMs 1-28, which are completed, see the Transportation-Air Quality Conformity Analysis for the 2001 Regional Transportation Plan and FY 2001 Transportation Improvement Program Amendment 01-32 (February 2002). This report can be found in the MTC/ABAG Library.

• Twelve (12) ozone measures were originally listed in the 1982 Bay Area Air Quality Plan. • In response to a 1990 lawsuit in the federal District Court, sixteen (16) additional TCMs were subsequently adopted by MTC in February 1990 as contingency measures to bring the region back on the “Reasonable Further Progress” (RFP) line. The Federal District order issued on May 11, 1992, found that these contingency TCMs were sufficient to bring the region back on the RFP track anticipated in the SIP. These measures became part of the SIP when EPA approved the 1994 Ozone Maintenance Plan. • Two (2) transportation control measures from the 1982 Bay Area Air Quality Plan apply to Carbon Monoxide control strategies, for which the region is in attainment with the federal standard, and primarily targeted downtown San Jose (which had the most significant CO problem at that time.) MTC also adopted a set of TCM enhancements in November 1991 to eliminate a shortfall in regional carbon monoxide emissions identified in the District Court’s April 19, 1991, order. Carbon monoxide standards have been achieved primarily through the use of oxygenated/reformulated fuels in cars and with improvements in the Smog Check program. • As part of EPA’s partial approval/partial disapproval of the 1999 Ozone Attainment Plan, four (4) TCMs were deleted from the ozone plan (but two of these remain in the Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan). • Five (5) new TCMs were adopted as part of the new 2001 1-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan and were fully funded in the 2001 TIP and 2001 Regional Transportation Plan.

With respect to TCM 2 from the 1982 SIP, there was a protracted debate, leading to a citizens lawsuit in federal court, about the obligations associated with this TCM. On April 6, 2004, MTC prevailed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit which concluded that TCM 2 does not impose any additional enforceable obligation on MTC to increase ridership on public transit ridership by 15% over 1982-83 levels by November 2006 (Bayview Hunters Point Community Advocates v. Metropolitan Transportation Com’n, (2004 WL 728247, 4 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2919, 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4209, 9th Cir.(Cal.), Apr 06, 2004)). Thus TCM 2 has been resolved, and there are no further implementation issues to address in this TCM.

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 17 Table 7: Transportation Control Measure in the State Implementation Plan TCM Description Original TCMs from 1982 Bay Area Air Quality Plan TCM 1 Reaffirm Commitment to 28 percent Transit Ridership Increase Between 1978 and 1983 TCM 2 Support Post-1983 Improvements in the Operators’ Five-Year Plans and, After Consultation with the Operators, Adopt Ridership Increase Target for the Period 1983 through 1987 TCM 3 Seek to Expand and Improve Public Transit Beyond Committed Levels TCM 4 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes and Ramp Metering TCM 5 Support RIDES Efforts TCM 61 Continue Efforts to Obtain Funding to Support Long Range Transit Improvements TCM 7 Preferential Parking TCM 8 Shared Use Park and Ride Lots TCM 9 Expand Commute Alternatives Program TCM 10 Information Program for Local Governments TCM 112 Gasoline Conservation Awareness Program (GasCAP) TCM 122 Santa Clara County Commuter Transportation Program Contingency Plan TCMs Adopted by MTC in February 1990 (MTC Resolution 2131) TCM 13 Increase Bridge Tolls to $1.00 on All Bridges TCM 14 Bay Bridge Surcharge of $1.00 TCM 15 Increase State Gas Tax by 9 Cents TCM 161 Implement MTC Resolution 1876, Revised — New Rail Starts TCM 17 Continue Post-Earthquake Transit Services TCM 18 Sacramento-Bay Area Amtrak Service TCM 19 Upgrade Caltrain Service TCM 20 Regional HOV System Plan TCM 21 Regional Transit Coordination TCM 22 Expand Regional Transit Connection Ticket Distribution TCM 23 Employer Audits TCM 24 Expand Signal Timing Program to New Cities TCM 25 Maintain Existing Signal Timing Programs TCM 26 Incident Management on Bay Area Freeways TCM 27 Update MTC Guidance on Development of Local TSM Programs TCM 28 Local Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Initiatives New TCMs in 2001 Ozone Attainment Plan TCM A Regional Express Bus Program TCM B Bicycle/Pedestrian Program TCM C Transportation for Livable Communities TCM D Expansion of Freeway Service Patrol TCM E Transit Access to Airports 1 Deleted by EPA action from ozone plan 2 Deleted by EPA action from ozone plan, but retained in Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan. Source: Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, 2001.

Status of Transportation Control Measures TCMs A-E were approved into the SIP as part of EPA’s Finding of Attainment for the San Francisco Bay Area (April 2004). The conformity analysis must demonstrate that TCMs are being implemented on schedule (40 CFR 93.113). TCMs A-E have specific implementation steps which are used to determine progress in advancing these TCMs (see Table 8). TCMs A-E are now fully implemented.

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 18 Table 8: Implementation Status of Federal Transportation Control Measures for Ozone (A – E) # TCM Description Ozone Attainment Plan Implementation Status Implementation Schedule A Regional Program includes purchase of FY 2003. $40 million for this program was allocated by the Express Bus approximately 90 low emission buses to Complete once CTC in August 2001. The participating transit Program operate new or enhanced express bus $40 million in operators have ordered and received a total of services. Buses will meet all applicable funding pursuant 94 buses. All buses are currently in operations. CARB standards, and will include to Government particulate traps or filters. MTC will Code Section TCM A is fully implemented. approve $40 million in funding to various 14556.40 is transit operators for bus acquisition. approved by the Program assumes transit operators can California sustain service for a five-year period. Transportation Actual emission reductions will be Commission and determined based on routes selected by obligated by bus operators MTC.

B Bicycle / Fund high priority projects in countywide FY 2004 – 2006. MTC allocated over $20 million in TDA Article 3 Pedestrian plans consistent with TDA funding Complete once funds during FY2004, FY2005, and FY2006. Program availability. MTC would fund only projects $15 million in that are exempt from TDA Article 3 is TCM B is fully implemented. CEQA, have no significant environmental allocated by impacts, or adequately mitigate any MTC. adverse environmental impacts. Actual emission reductions will be determined based on the projects funded.

C Transportation Program provides planning grants, FY 2004 – 2006. In December 2003, the Commission reaffirmed for Livable technical assistance, and capital grants to Complete once its commitment of $27 million annually over 25 Communities help cities and nonprofit agencies link $27 million in years for the TLC program as part of Phase 1 of (TLC) transportation projects with community TLC grant the Transportation 2030 Plan. plans. MTC would fund only projects funding is that are exempt from CEQA, have no approved by MTC and the county Congestion Management significant environmental impacts, or MTC Agencies (CMAs) have approved over $27 million adequately mitigate any adverse in TLC grant funding by FY 2006. In November environmental impacts. Actual emission 2004, MTC approved $500,000 for regional TLC

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 19 reductions will be based on the projects Community Design Planning Program, and in funded. December 2004, MTC approved $18.4 million in TLC funding for the regional TLC Capital program. As of December 2006, CMAs in Alameda, Marin and Sonoma counties approved an additional $12.4 million in their county-level TLC Capital programs for a regional total of $31.2 million.

TCM C is fully implemented.

D Additional Operation of 55 lane miles of new roving FY 2001. FSP continues to maintain the operation of the Freeway Service tow truck patrols beyond routes which Complete by 55 lane miles of new roving tow truck coverage. Patrol existed in 2000. TCM commitment would maintaining This level of service was maintained through be satisfied by any combination for routes increase in FSP 2006. FSP continues to expand its service areas. adding 55 miles. Tow trucks used in service mileage through are new vehicles meeting all applicable December 2006 TCM D is fully implemented. CARB standards. .

E Transit Access Take credit for emission reductions from BART – SFO Service began June 2003. Service adjustments to Airports air passengers who use BART to SFO, as service to start in have been made since start of revenue service. these reductions are not included in the FY 2003. The BART to SFO service has been maintained Baseline. Complete by through 2006 and is continued. maintaining service through TCM E is fully implemented. December 2006

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 20 V. Response to Public Comments To be updated.

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 21 VI. Conformity Findings To be updated.

Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 P a g e | 22 Appendix A-1 List of Projects in the Amended 2019 TIP List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Alameda ALA050014 17-01-0032 ACTC SR 84 Expressway In Livermore: Widen Route 84 from Jack London Blvd. to NON-EXEMPT 2020 Widening Pigeon Pass. Alameda ALA050019 17-01-0031 ACTC I-880 North Safety Oakland: I-880 between 23rd Ave to 29th Ave: Reconfigure NON-EXEMPT 2020 Improvements Interchange, including new ramps. Alameda ALA070009 17-01-0030 ACTC Oakland/Alameda Access Oakland and Alameda: Between Oak Street and Union NON-EXEMPT 2030 Project Street: Reconfigure interchange and intersections to improve connections between I-880, the Posey and Webster tubes and the downtown Oakland Alameda ALA090016 17-01-0036 Hayward Rt 92/Clawiter/Whitesell Hayward: Rt 92/Clawiter Rd: Upgrade existing Clawiter NON-EXEMPT 2030 Interchange interchange. Add ramps and overcrossing for Whitesell St. Improvements extension. Signalize ramp intersections. Alameda ALA090020 17-01-0007 Hayward I-880 Auxiliary lanes at Hayward: I-880 NB between Industrial Pkwy and Alameda NON-EXEMPT 2040 Industrial Parkway Creek; I-808 SB between Industrial Pkwy and Whipple Rd: Construct auxiliary lanes Alameda ALA110002 17-01-0023 Hayward I-880/Industrial Parkway In Hayward: At I-880/Industrial Parkway West: Reconstruct NON-EXEMPT 2030 West Interchange interchange, add on/off-ramp lanes, widen ramp lanes, provide HOV bypass lanes and routine accommodation for bicyclists and pedestrians. Alameda ALA110003 17-10-0064 BART Hayward Shop and Yard BART: Hayward Shop and Yard: Expansion facility to NON-EXEMPT 2040 Expansion accommodate additional rail vehicles for storage, maintenance and repair. Alameda ALA110046 17-01-0016 Oakland Oakland Army Base In Oakland: At former Oakland Army Base: Implementing NON-EXEMPT 2040 Infrastructure Army Base Infrastructure Master Plan including TCIF funded Improvements OHIT improvements implemented by City of Oakland. For the related Port project, see Alameda ALA110104 17-01-0001 MTC Bay Bridge Park Oakland: At the Oakland Touchdown of the new East Span of NON-EXEMPT 2040 the Bay Bridge: Bay Bridge Park (Project previously titled "SFOBB Gateway Park") Alameda ALA130005 17-01-0053 Dublin Dougherty Road widening Dublin: Dougherty Road from Sierra Lane to North City Limit: NON-EXEMPT 2020 Widen from 4 lanes to 6 lanes Alameda ALA130006 17-01-0057 Dublin Dublin Boulevard In Dublin: Dublin Blvd between Sierra Court and Dublin Court: NON-EXEMPT 2020 widening Widenfrom 4 lanes to 6 lanes and install Class II bike lanes

Alameda ALA130014 17-01-0001 Oakland 7th Street West Oakland In Oakland: On 7th Street between Wood Street and Peralta NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Transit Village, Phase II Street: Construct road diet, bicycle lanes, sidewalk Regionally Significant enhancement, pedestrian amenities, traffic signal mods, Project street and pedestrian lights, storm Alameda ALA130025 17-01-0004 Fremont Fremont City Center Multi- Fremont: Capitol Ave from State St to Fremont Blvd: NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Modal Improvements Construct roadway extension; Various locations around Regionally Significant Fremont City Center and Fremont BART Station: Implement Project multi-modal improvements to Alameda ALA130026 17-01-0004 Berkeley Shattuck Complete Berkeley: Shattuck Ave, Shattuck Square and Berkeley NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Streets and De-couplet Square from Allston Way to University Ave intersection: Regionally Significant Reconfigure travel lanes and parking, repair pavement and Project make other improvements

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 1 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Alameda ALA130032 17-10-0005 BART BART Metro Priority Track BART: In Lafayette, Dublin and Millbrae: Provide three critical NON-EXEMPT 2030 Elements track extensions in order to provide the BART system with additional operational flexibility and additional capacity, all within existing right-of- Alameda ALA130034 17-10-0058 ACTC I-680 NB HOV/HOT Lane Route I-680: from South of Auto Mall Parkway to State Route NON-EXEMPT 2020 84 in Alameda County: Construct NB HOV/HOT Lane. Alameda ALA150001 17-01-0029 ACTC Rte 84 Widening, south of In Alameda County, on State Route 84 from south of Ruby NON-EXEMPT 2030 Ruby Hill Dr to I-680 Hill Drive to I-680, upgrade from 2-lane conventional highway to 4-lane expressway, make operational improvements to SR84/I-680 I/C and Alameda ALA150003 17-01-0048 Dublin Dublin Blvd. - North Alameda County, Dublin and Livermore: Dublin Blvd-North NON-EXEMPT 2030 Canyons Pkwy Extension Canyons Parkway from Fallon Rd to Croak Rd: Construct six lane extension; Dublin Blvd-North Canyons Parkway from Croak Rd to Doolan Rd: Alameda ALA150004 17-01-0060 AC Transit AC Transit: East Bay Bus Alameda County: Along Broadway/ International/E 14th NON-EXEMPT 2020 Rapid Transit corridor from Oakland to San Leandro: Implement BRT including 34 stations, transit signal priority, level-boarding, shelters, off-board ticketing, Alameda ALA150008 17-01-0001 ACTC East Bay Greenway Alameda County: Generally along the BART alignment from NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Lake Merritt BART station to South Hayward BART station: Regionally Significant Install a trail facility consisting of Class I & Class IV bikeway Project facilities. Includes 2 road Alameda ALA150042 17-01-0001 Oakland Oakland: Telegraph Ave HSIP7-04-014: In Oakland: Telegraph Ave from 29th to 45th NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Bike/Ped Imps and Road St: Install crosswalk enhancements, painted bulb-outs, and Regionally Significant Diet painted median refuges; from 29th to 41st St: Implement road Project diet with buffered Alameda ALA150043 17-01-0004 Oakland Oakland: Shattuck and HSIP7-04-016 Oakland: On Claremont from Telegraph to NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Claremont Bike/Ped Imps Clifton: Implement road diet with bike lanes; Shattuck at 49th, Regionally Significant 51St, 59th St, Alactraz: Construct crosswalk enhancements, Project RRFBs, bulb-out, Alameda ALA150047 17-01-0004 Oakland Oakland: Telegraph Oakland: on Telegraph Avenue between 20th St and 41st St: NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Avenue Complete Streets Implement complete street project inc. road diet, buffered Regionally Significant bike lanes, ped crossing improvements, bulbouts, bus Project boarding islands, traffic signal Alameda ALA170001 17-01-0020 Fremont State Route 262 (Mission In Fremont: Mission Blvd/I-680 IC: widen Mission Blvd to 3 NON-EXEMPT 2030 Blvd) Improvements lanes each direction through IC, rebuild the NB and SB I-680 on and off ramps Alameda ALA170004 17-01-0041 Hayward I-880/West Winton Hayward: At I-880/West Winton Avenue I/C: Reconstruct I/C NON-EXEMPT 2030 Avenue Interchange including reconfiguration of eastbound to southbound on ramp and new connection to Southland Mall Drive Alameda ALA170005 17-01-0021 ACTC I-880/Whipple Rd In Union City/Hayward: at I-880/Whipple Rd Interchange: NON-EXEMPT 2030 Industrial Pkwy SW I/C Implement full interchange improvements including Imps northbound off-ramp, surface street improvements and realignment, and bike/ped

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 2 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Alameda ALA170006 17-10-0052 BAIFA ALA-880 Express Lanes In Alameda/Santa Clara Counties: On I-880 from NON-EXEMPT 2020 Hegenberger to Dixon Landing (Southbound) and Dixon Landing to Lewelling (Northbound): Convert HOV lanes to express lanes. Project also references Alameda ALA170008 17-01-0028 ACTC I-580/680 Interchange Alameda County: On I-580 between Hacienda Dr. and San NON-EXEMPT 2030 HOV/HOT Widening Ramon/Foothill Road and on I-680 between Stoneridge Dr. and Amado: Widen to add one HOV/HOT lane for WB 580 to SB 680 and NB 680 to EB Alameda ALA170009 17-10-0056 ACTC I-680 Express Lane Gap Alameda County: SB I-680 from SR-84 to Alcosta Blvd: NON-EXEMPT 2030 Closure: SR-84 to Alcosta express lane improvements (Phase 1); NB I-680 from SR-84 to Alcosta Blvd: Widen for express lanes (Phase 2). Project also references the amendment to Plan Bay Area 2040. Alameda ALA170010 17-10-0057 ACTC I-880 NB HOV/HOT: Alameda County: I-880 in the northbound direction from north NON-EXEMPT 2030 North of Hacienda to of Hacienda Ave to Hegenberger Road: Widen to provide one Hegenberger HOV/express lane Alameda ALA170011 17-10-0033 MTC Bay Bridge Forward - In Oakland: Grand Avenue on-ramp: Convert shoulder to NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 West Grand HOV/Bus Bus/HOV only lane Regionally Significant Only Lane Project Alameda ALA170042 17-01-0008 ACE ACE Platform Extensions ACE System: At Fremont, Pleasanton, Livermore, Vasco, NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Tracy, and Manteca stations: Extend existing ACE platforms Regionally Significant to accommodate longer train sets Project Alameda ALA170044 17-10-0005 BART Bay Fair Connection BART: At and near Bay Fair Station: Modify station and NON-EXEMPT 2030 approaches to add one or more additional tracks and one or more passenger platforms for improved train service and operational flexibility Alameda ALA170045 17-01-0038 Dublin I-580 Interchange Imps at Dublin: I580/Fallon Rd IC: Ph 2 - Reconstruct overcrossing to NON-EXEMPT 2030 Hacienda/Fallon Rd, Ph 2 widen to 4 lanes in each direction, reconstruct and widen ramps, add bike/ped imps; I580 Hacienda Dr IC: Reconstruct overcrossing to add NB Alameda ALA170046 17-01-0024 Hayward I-880/A Street Interchange Hayward: I-880/A St. I/C: Reconstruct interchange to widen A NON-EXEMPT 2030 Reconstruction St from 5 to 6 lanes, add bike lanes, and provide additional lane capacity for potential future freeway widening, modify signals and Alameda ALA170049 17-01-0004 Alameda Central Avenue Safety Alameda: On Central Ave from Main St to Sherman St: NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Improvements construct multimodal street improvements including reduction Regionally Significant from 4 to 3 lanes, center turn lane, bike lanes, 2-way Project separated bikeway, 2 traffic Alameda ALA170052 17-01-0004 Oakland Oakland Fruitvale Ave Oakland: Fruitvale Ave from E 10th St to E 23th St: H8-04- NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Bike/Ped Imprvmnts H8- 014 Install crosswalk enhancements, RRFBs, signal Regionally Significant 04-014 upgrades and modifications, signing, striping, markings. Project Implement road diet, parking lane Alameda ALA170086 17-01-0018 ACTC 7th Street Grade Oakland: Within the Port: Implement road and rail NON-EXEMPT 2040 Separation West improvements, realign and grade separate 7th St and Maritime intersection, reconstruct and widen multi-use path; Between Joint Intermodal Terminal and

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 3 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Alameda ALA190018 17-10-0033 MTC Freeway Performance Alameda County: On I-580 westbound approach to the San NON-EXEMPT 2040 Program: Alameda I-580 Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge toll plaza from the SR 24/I- 980 interchange to I-80: Conduct planning and environmental work to convert one Alameda ALA978004 17-01-0047 ACTC East-West Connector in In Fremont & Union City: From I-880 to Route 238 (Mission NON-EXEMPT 2030 Fremont & Union City Blvd): Construct new 4-lane roadway and widen existing roadways. Project is phased. Alameda ALA991081 17-01-0043 Oakland 42nd Ave. & High St. I- Oakland: In the vicinity of the I-880/42nd & High interchange: NON-EXEMPT 2020 880 Access Improv. Widening and re-alignment of local streets Including modified traffic signals and intersection improvements. Contra CC-010023 17-02-0019 CCTA I-680/SR 4 I/C Contra Costa Acounty: I-680/SR4 I/C: Reconstruct I/C, NON-EXEMPT 2030 Costa Reconstruction - Phases1 provide 2 lane direct connector from NB 680 to WB SR4 & 2 w/slip ramps at Pacheco Blvd, and 2 lane direct WB SR4 to SB I-680. Phases 1 and 2. Env Doc Contra CC-030002 17-02-0039 Hercules Hercules Intercity Rail In Hercules: At future train station: Install multi-use trails, NON-EXEMPT 2030 Costa Station utility relocation, track improvements, construct rail station, and parking facility. Contra CC-030004 17-02-0009 Martinez Martinez Intermodal Martinez: At the Martinez Intermodal Station: Expand parking NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Costa Station Parking Expansion from 175 spaces to 600 spaces. Project includes adding a Regionally Significant pedestrian and a vehicular bridge to access the parking lot. Project Contra CC-050025 17-02-0047 BART BART to Antioch - East Pittsburg/Antioch: East Contra Costa County: Extend Rail NON-EXEMPT 2020 Costa Contra Costa Rail Service from the Pittsburg/Bay Point Station into eastern Extension Contra Costa County Contra CC-050028 17-02-0022 CCTA I-680 SB HOV Lane Contra Costa County: I-680 from North Main Street to Livorna NON-EXEMPT 2020 Costa Completion in the southbound direction: Construct a HOV lane Contra CC-050030 17-02-0004 CC County Vasco Road Safety Contra Costa County: Vasco Road from Walnut Blvd to the NON-EXEMPT 2040 Costa Improvements Alameda/Contra Costa County line: widen road and place concrete median barrier for 2.5 miles. Phase 1 completed a 1 mile widening segment. Contra CC-050076 17-02-0026 Richmond I-80/Central Avenue - Richmond: I-80/Central Ave Interchange: Connect Pierce St NON-EXEMPT - Not 2030 Costa Local Portion to San Mateo and relocate signal at Pierce/Central to San Regionally Significant Mateo/Central intersection. Project Contra CC-070008 17-02-0007 Antioch Laurel Road Extension Antioch: On Laurel Road between Kirk Lane and SR4 NON-EXEMPT 2040 Costa Bypass: Construct new 4 lane divided extension with bike lanes, sidewalks, and bus stops. Contra CC-070009 17-02-0007 Antioch Slatten Ranch Road Antioch: Slatten Ranch Road between Hillcrest Avenue to NON-EXEMPT 2040 Costa Extension Phase I Wicklow Road: Phase I - Construct new 4 lane road. Contra CC-070011 17-02-0030 Brentwood Brentwood Boulevard Brentwood: Brentwood Boulevard from Havenwood Avenue NON-EXEMPT 2030 Costa Widening - North (Phase to Homecoming Way: Phase I-Widen from 2 to 4 lanes I) including a new parallel bridge over Marsh Creek, traffic signal modifications, and utilities Contra CC-070024 17-02-0016 Concord SR 242 / Clayton Road Concord: At the SR242/Clayton Rd Interchange: Construct NON-EXEMPT 2030 Costa Interchange NB on-ramp and SB off-ramp Improvements

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 4 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Contra CC-070035 17-02-0021 CCTA Reconstruct I-80/San San Pablo: I-80/San Pablo Dam Rd I/C: Reconstruct I/C- NON-EXEMPT 2030 Costa Pablo Dam Rd relocating WB El Portal on-ramp to the full I/C northwards, Interchange providing access to McBryde through a new road from SPDR I/C, and replacing Riverside Contra CC-070046 17-02-0005 El Cerrito El Cerrito del Norte Area El Cerrito: El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area: Complete NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Costa TOD Complete Street Streets improvements to access, circulation and safety for Regionally Significant Imps bicyclists, pedestrians, local and regional bus, rapid bus, and Project automobile connections Contra CC-070062 17-02-0042 WETA Richmond Ferry Service WETA: Between Richmond and San Francisco: Implement NON-EXEMPT 2020 Costa new ferry transit service Contra CC-070075 17-02-0014 CC County Kirker Pass Road NB Unincorporated Contra Costa County: On Kirker Pass Road NON-EXEMPT 2020 Costa Truck Climbing Lanes from Clearbrook Drive to approximately 1,000 feet beyond the crest of Kirker Pass Road; Construct northbound truck climbing lane and paved Contra CC-070078 17-02-0007 Brentwood John Muir Parkway Brentwood: John Muir Parkway northerly from Briones Valley NON-EXEMPT 2040 Costa Extension: Ph. II Rd to a logical termini on Concord Avenue: Extend roadway(1 lane + 1 bike lane per direction). Contra CC-070081 17-02-0015 CC County Byron Highway - Vasco Contra Costa County: between Byron Highway and Vasco NON-EXEMPT 2040 Costa Road Connection Road: Construct an east-west connection road Contra CC-090019 17-02-0007 San Ramon Bollinger Canyon Road San Ramon: Bollinger Canyon Road between Alcosta Blvd NON-EXEMPT 2040 Costa Widening (Alcosta to and San Ramon Valley Blvd: Widen from six to eight lanes. SRVB) Project is phased. Contra CC-090026 17-02-0032 Concord Ygnacio Valley Road Concord: Ygnacio Valley Road from Michigan Boulevard to NON-EXEMPT 2030 Costa Widening Cowell Road: widen from 4 lanes to 6 lanes Contra CC-130002 17-02-0047 BART eBART Railroad Avenue Pittsburg: on eBART corridor at Railroad Ave: Design and NON-EXEMPT 2020 Costa Station construction of station Contra CC-130006 17-02-0003 Concord Concord BART Station Concord: Near the Downtown Concord BART Station: NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Costa Bike/Ped Access Implement bike/ped access improvements including road Regionally Significant Improvements diets, buffered bike lanes (0.7 mi), Class 2 bike lanes (0.6 Project mi), and Class 3 bike routes (0.1 Contra CC-130039 17-02-0005 Pittsburg Pittsburg Multimodal In Pittsburg: At the Northeast corner of Railroad Ave and NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Costa Transit Station Access California Ave: Construct a Kiss-n-Ride lot, add a right-turn Regionally Significant Imps. lane on California Ave and improve multi-modal access to Project eBART station. Contra CC-130046 17-02-0019 CCTA I-680 / SR 4 Interchange In Pacheco: At the I 680/Route 4 interchange: Widen SR4 in NON-EXEMPT 2030 Costa Reconstruction - Phase 3 the median to provide a third lane in each direction from Morello Avenue to Port Chicago (SR242). Work includes widening of bridges within Contra CC-150009 17-10-0015 CCTA CCTA - Carshare 4 All Contra Costa County: Various locations: Expand carshare NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Costa access at transit locations and conduct outreach Regionally Significant Project Contra CC-150013 17-02-0010 CCTA SR 4 Integrated Corridor Contra Costa County: Along SR 4 between I-80 in Hercules NON-EXEMPT 2030 Costa Management to the SR 4/SR 160 Interchange in the City of Antioch: Implement Integrated Corridor Management along corridor.

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 5 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Contra CC-170001 17-02-0052 Danville San Ramon Valley Blvd In Danville: On San Ramon Blvd between Jewel Terrace and NON-EXEMPT 2020 Costa Lane Addition and Overlay Podva Rd: Lane addition and rehabilitate roadway. Contra CC-170002 17-10-0048 BAIFA CC-680 Northern Contra Costa County: On I-680 Southbound from Benicia- NON-EXEMPT 2030 Costa Segment Express Lane - Martinez Toll Plaza to El Cerro: Convert HOV to express Southbound lanes and add/modify express lane elements. Project also references RTP ID 17-10-0054 Contra CC-170015 17-02-0030 Brentwood Brentwood Boulevard Brentwood: Brentwood Blvd. between Homecoming Way and NON-EXEMPT 2030 Costa Widening - North (Phase Lone Tree Way: Widen existing roadway from 2 to 4 lanes II) Contra CC-170016 17-02-0033 CC County Camino Tassajara Contra Costa County: Camino Tassajara between NON-EXEMPT 2030 Costa Realignment, S of Windemere Parkway and the City of Dublin: Realign curves Windemere Pkwy and widen road to four lanes Contra CC-170017 17-02-0012 CCTA I-680 NB Exp Lane Contra Costa County: NB I680 from Livorna Rd to SR242: NON-EXEMPT 2030 Costa Conversion/HOV Ext & Extend HOV lane; NB I680 from Livorna to Benicia-Martinez Op Imp Bridge: Convert HOV to EL; NB I680 from N Main St to Treat Blvd and from Livorna Rd to Contra CC-170018 17-02-0020 CCTA SR-4 Operational Contra Costa County: On SR-4 between I-680 and Bailey NON-EXEMPT 2030 Costa Improvements - Initial Road: Implement operational improvements including adding Phases general purpose and auxiliary lanes at various locations Contra CC-170019 17-02-0046 Oakley Civic Center Railroad Oakley: Main Street between 2nd Street and O'Hara Avenue: NON-EXEMPT 2030 Costa Platform Park & Ride Build 2 parking lots for multi-modal park, ride, and transit Complex activities. Lots will serve train riders for a future train platform which includes Contra CC-170061 17-02-0051 CCTA I-680 Bus On Shoulder In Contra Costa County: On I-680 between Ygnacio Valley NON-EXEMPT 2030 Costa Rd and Alcosta Blvd: Increase bus service efficiency by implementing bus operations on shoulder (BOS) Contra CC-190001 17-02-0007 San Ramon Crow Canyon Road San Ramon: Crow Canyon Rd from Alcosta Blvd to Indian NON-EXEMPT 2040 Costa (Alcosta to Indian Rice) Rice Rd: Widen to three lanes in each direction Widening Contra CC-190002 17-02-0046 SJRC Oakley Station Platform Oakley: North of Main Street between 2nd St and O'Hara NON-EXEMPT 2030 Costa Ave: Construct a new train station platform for the Amtrak San Joaquins inter-city rail service. Marin MRN050034 17-03-0006 TAM US 101 HOV Lanes - Marin and Sonoma Counties: From SR 37 in Novato to Old NON-EXEMPT 2030 Marin-Sonoma Narrows Redwood Highway in Petaluma; Convert expressway to (Marin) freeway and widen to 6 lanes for HOV lanes. Marin MRN070006 17-03-0011 Novato Novato Boulevard Novato: Novato Blvd between Diablo and Grant Ave.: NON-EXEMPT 2030 Widening, Diablo to Grant Improvements to roadway including including widening existing two/three lanes to four lanes and adding turn lanes, bike lanes, curbs, and sidewalks. Marin MRN110032 17-10-0024 San Anselmo San Anselmo - Center San Anselmo: Center Blvd Bridge over San Anselmo Creek, NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Blvd Bridge Replace at Sycamore Ave: Replace existing 2 lane bridge with 3 lane Regionally Significant (27C0079) bridge Project

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 6 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Marin MRN110035 17-10-0024 Marin County Mountain View Rd Bridge Marin County: On Mountain View Rd. over San Geronimo NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Replacement - 27C0154 Creek (Bridge No. 27C0154) near the intersection with Sir Regionally Significant Francis Drake Blvd: Replace existing one-lane bridge with a Project new two-lane bridge. Toll Marin MRN130001 17-03-0014 GGBHTD Larkspur Ferry Terminal In Larkspur: At the Larkspur Ferry Terminal (LFT): Planning NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Parking Garage studies for a new three story parking structure Regionally Significant Project Marin MRN150009 17-10-0036 MTC Richmond-San Rafael In Contra Costa and Marin Counties: On I-580/Richmond-San NON-EXEMPT 2020 Bridge Access Rafael Bridge: Convert existing shoulders to an automobile Improvements travel lane (EB) and a bike/ped path, construct bike/ped path in Contra Costa Marin MRN190001 17-10-0010 GGBHTD Golden Gate Ferry: New GGBHTD: 1 vechicle: Purchase a new, 500-passenger, high- NON-EXEMPT 2030 Vessel speed ferry vessel to continue to provide expanded commute service from Larkspur and Tiburon to San Francisco. Marin MRN190003 17-03-0005 Novato Novato Downtown Novato: At Grant Ave and Railroad Ave: Install track NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 SMART Station Phase 2 switching electronics and platform amenities to allow for the Regionally Significant station to operate and serve SMART passengers Project Napa NAP050009 17-04-0006 NVTA Park & Ride Lots in Napa Napa County: American Canyon, and Calistoga/St. NON-EXEMPT 2040 County Helena/Yountville: Construct Park and Ride Lots. Various existing Park and Ride Lots: Construct improvements Napa NAP090003 17-04-0009 NVTA SR 12/29/221 Soscol In Napa County: At SR-221/SR-29 Soscol Ferry Road: NON-EXEMPT 2040 Junction Interchange Construct improvements Imps. Napa NAP110029 17-04-0004 American Eucalyptus Drive American Canyon: Eucalyptus Dr. from Theresa Rd to Hwy NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Canyon Realignment Complete 29: Extend roadway and reconfigure intersection of Regionally Significant Streets Eucalyptus Dr and Hwy 29 and Eucalyptus Drive and Project Theresa Road. Create complete street Napa NAP130006 17-04-0004 American Devlin Road and Vine American Canyon: Devlin Road from the southern terminus NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Canyon Trail Extension 2,500 feet south to Green Island Road: Construct roadway Regionally Significant extension and Class I multipurpose path Project Napa NAP170003 17-04-0006 NVTA NVTA- Vine Transit Bus Napa County: At an 8 acre site in south Napa County: NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Maintenance Facility Construct a new transit maintenance facility for Vine Transit Regionally Significant operations Project Regional MTC050027 17-10-0042 WETA Ferry Service - Berkeley WETA: Berkeley: Provide ferry service from Berkeley to San NON-EXEMPT 2030 / Multi- Francisco. County Regional MTC050029 17-05-0018 WETA SF Ferry San Francisco: At the Ferry Terminal: Construct additional NON-EXEMPT 2040 / Multi- Terminal/Berthing ferry docking/berthing facilities in the South Basin to improve County Facilities ferry access and support WETA berthing/maintenance operational needs. Project is Regional REG090003 17-10-0033 MTC Freeway Performance SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Design, implement and maintain NON-EXEMPT 2040 / Multi- Initiative (FPI) ramp metering, Traffic Operation Systems (TOS), and other County Freeway Performance Initiative (FPI) projects on major congested freeways throughout

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 7 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Regional REG090037 17-10-0026 BART BART: Railcar BART: Procure 790 Railcars (includes the replacement of NON-EXEMPT 2040 / Multi- Procurement Program 669 Railcars) County Regional REG130004 17-10-0054 BAIFA Regional Express Lane SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Program-level project costs to NON-EXEMPT 2040 / Multi- Network support the Regional Express Lane Network deployment County including program (planning, coordination, & management), centralized toll system, Regional REG150001 17-01-0026 Caltrans Oakland to San Jose Between Oakland and San Jose: On UPRR Niles subdivision NON-EXEMPT 2040 / Multi- Double Track (Segment from MP 6 to MP 35, and the Coast subdivision MP 13 to MP County 2A) 35, and on the Caltrain Right of Way MP 44 to MP 48: Construct a second mainline Regional REG170004 17-10-0033 MTC Bay Bridge Forward - Albany and Oakland: At I-80/Buchanan Ave, I-880/High St, I- NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 / Multi- Commuter Parking 880/Fruitvale: Establish commuter parking in East Bay Regionally Significant County Initiative including parking management technologies, to encourage Project carpool and express bus Regional REG170005 17-10-0033 MTC Bay Bridge Forward - SF Bay Area: Region-Wide: Provide on-demand transit NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 / Multi- Flexible On-Demand services between East Bay and San Francisco, including Regionally Significant County Transit related supportive transportation demand management Project strategies. Regional REG170012 17-10-0033 MTC Shared Use Mobility SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Implement innovative projects & NON-EXEMPT 2040 / Multi- initiatives that promote shared forms of technology-based County transportation options, may include pilot microtransit programs of no more than five Regional REG170015 17-10-0033 MTC Innovative Deployments SF Bay Area: Region-wide: Deploy advanced technologies NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 / Multi- to Enhance Arterials Ct along arterial to enhance mobility and safety across all Regionally Significant County 1&2 modes, including Connected/Automated vehicles, Project demonstration/pilot queue jump lanes no Regional REG170017 17-10-0006 BART BART Transbay Core BART: Systemwide: Implement communication-based train NON-EXEMPT 2040 / Multi- Capacity Improvements control (CBTC) system, expand rail car fleet by 306 vehicles, County add traction power substations (5); At Hayward Maintenance Complex; Expand Regional SON090002 17-09-0018 SMART Sonoma Marin Area Rail Between Sonoma and Marin Counties: On NWP rail line: NON-EXEMPT 2020 / Multi- Corridor Implement passenger rail service and non-motorized County pathway. Project also references RTP ID 17-03-0015 Regional VAR170003 17-10-0053 BAIFA ALA/CC-80 and Bay In Alameda/Contra Costa counties: On I-80 from the NON-EXEMPT 2030 / Multi- Bridge Approach Express Carquinez Bridge to Powell and the Bay Bridge Approaches: County Lanes Convert HOV lanes to express lanes. Project also references RTP ID 17-10-0045. Regional VAR170013 17-10-0033 MTC Bay Bridge Forward - San Francisco and the East Bay: Along I-80 corridor: NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 / Multi- Casual Carpool Establish and improve casual carpool pick-up locations at key Regionally Significant County locations in San Francisco and along I-80 and in East Bay. Project Regional VAR170021 17-10-0033 MTC Freeway Performance Alameda & Santa Clara Counties: I-880 from I-280 to I-80: NON-EXEMPT 2040 / Multi- Program: I-880 Corridor Deliver operational strategies including adaptive ramp County metering, advanced tech, arterial/transit priority signal upgrades & higher vehicle

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 8 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Regional VAR170023 17-10-0033 MTC Freeway Performance Alameda & San Mateo Counties; SR-84 from I-880 to US- NON-EXEMPT 2040 / Multi- Program: SR-84 101; Deliver operational strategies including adaptive ramp County metering, advanced technologies, arterial/transit priority signal upgrades, & higher San SF-010015 17-10-0039 TBJPA Transbay Term/Caltrain San Francisco: Transbay Transit Center; Replacement and NON-EXEMPT 2020 Francisc Downtown Ext - Ph.1 expansion of the terminal at the present site. o San SF-010037 17-05-0041 SFMTA SF Muni Third St LRT San Francisco: North-south alignment under 4th St. to NON-EXEMPT 2020 Francisc Phase 2 - New Central Market, then under Geary to Stockton & under Stockton to o Subway Clay St; Extend the Light Rail line project includes procurement of four LRVs. San SF-010038 17-05-0008 SF DPW Bayview Transportation In San Francisco: From US 101 to the Hunters Point NON-EXEMPT 2040 Francisc Improvements Shipyard along: 25th, I280-Illinois; Cesar Chavez, US101- o Illinois; Illinois, 25th-Cargo; Cargo, Illinois-Jennings; Jennings, Cargo-Evans; Evans, Cesar San SF-050002 17-10-0038 TBJPA Transbay San Francisco: From Fourth/Townsend to new Transit NON-EXEMPT 2030 Francisc Terminal/Caltrain Center: Extend Caltrain commuter rail service o Downtown Ext: Ph. 2 San SF-070003 17-05-0042 SFMTA Historic Streetcar San Francisco: From Fisherman''s Wharf through National NON-EXEMPT 2030 Francisc Extension to Fort Mason Park Service lands in Aquatic Park to Fort Mason: Extend the o E-line or the current F-line service. San SF-070004 17-05-0021 SFMTA Geary Bus Rapid Transit San Francisco: Along the Geary corridor between 34th NON-EXEMPT 2030 Francisc Avenue and Market Street: Design and implement transit o performance and safety improvements San SF-070005 17-05-0033 SFMTA Van Ness Avenue Bus Muni: On Van Ness Avenue from Mission to Lombard; Design NON-EXEMPT 2020 Francisc Rapid Transit and implement a BRT project. Project is phased. Project also o references RTP IDs 240745 and 240471 San SF-090004 17-05-0008 SF DPW Harney Way Roadway San Francisco: Harney Way from US 101 to Jamestown: NON-EXEMPT 2040 Francisc Widening Improvements including right-of-way engineering, land o acquisition for future widening of roadway, design, landscaping and sidewalk improvements, San SF-090012 17-10-0026 SFMTA Light Rail Vehicle SFMTA: Fleet-wide: Procure 219 light rail vehicles with an NON-EXEMPT 2040 Francisc Procurement option for an additional 45 vehicles to replace existing fleet o and expand service San SF-090016 17-05-0031 SFMTA Transit Center in Hunters Muni:Transit Center in Hunters Point; Construct 10 bays, Low- NON-EXEMPT 2040 Francisc Point level platform, Operator restroom, bus shelters,Electrical o ductbank for MUNI power,etc San SF-090018 17-05-0010 SFMTA Oakdale-Palou Interim San Francisco: On the Palou Ave corridor: Implement Transit NON-EXEMPT 2040 Francisc High-Capacity Bus Preferential improvements, including bus bulbs, up to six o Corridor traffic signals with transit signal priority, new bus shelters and pedestrian safety San SF-090020 17-05-0032 SFMTA Geneva Harney BRT SFMTA: From Executive Park/Harney Way under US 101 to NON-EXEMPT 2030 Francisc Infrastructure: Central SF/Daly City line on Geneva Avenue: Construct bus rapid o Segment transit facilities

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 9 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year San SF-090023 17-05-0032 SFMTA Geneva Harney BRT SFMTA: Bayview and Hunters Point: from Executive NON-EXEMPT 2030 Francisc Infrastructure - Eastern Park/Harney Way to Hunters Point Transit Center via o Segment Candlestick/Hunters Pt. Shipyard development: Construct extension of Geneva Harney BRT San SF-110006 17-05-0027 SF DPW Hunters Pt Shipyard and In San Francisco: Hunters Point Shipyard and Candlestick NON-EXEMPT 2040 Francisc Candlestick Pt Local Point: Implement new local streets to support multi-modal o Roads mixed use development. The project is phased. San SF-110049 17-05-0030 SF County TA Treasure Island San Francisco: Treasure Island: Implement Congestion NON-EXEMPT 2030 Francisc Congestion Pricing Pricing Program. project is phased o Program San SF-130001 17-05-0016 SF DPW SF- Better Market Street In San Francisco: Market St from Steuart St to Octavia Blvd: NON-EXEMPT 2030 Francisc Transportation Elements improve roadway, including resurfacing, sidewalk and transit o boarding improvements, transit connections, traffic signals, transportation San SF-130004 17-05-0030 SF County TA Treasure Is/Yerba Buena San Francisco: On Treasure Island: Implement Treasure NON-EXEMPT 2030 Francisc Is Street Improvements Island/Yerba Buena Island street network Project includes a o new street network, traffic calming, bike & pedestrian improvements, streetscape and San SF-130005 17-05-0030 SF County TA Treasure Island Pricing San Francisco: On Treasure Island: Pricing Program Mobility NON-EXEMPT - Not 2030 Francisc Mobility Improvements Improvements including Transit Capital and maintenance Regionally Significant o improvements. The project is phased Project San SF-130006 17-05-0031 SF DPW Southeast Waterfront San Francisco: Between HP Shipyard and Candlestick Pt: NON-EXEMPT 2040 Francisc Transportation improve roadways to facilitate 5-mile, multi-modal corridor, o Improvements connecting project area with the Bayshore Intermodal Station. Project development and San SF-130007 17-05-0008 SF DPW HOPE SF Street Network - San Francisco: Hunters View in Southeast: Realign streets NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Francisc Hunters View and add new streets at public housing sites with new Regionally Significant o affordable housing units to improve transit, walking, and Project biking. Project is phased. Phase I San SF-130008 17-05-0020 SF County TA HOV/HOT Lanes on San Francisco: On US 101 from SF/SM County line to I-280 NON-EXEMPT 2030 Francisc U.S.101 and I-280 in SF interchange and on I-280 from US 101 interchange to 6th o Street offramp: Convert an existing mixed traffic lane and/or shoulder/excess ROW in San SF-130011 17-05-0004 SF DPW SF- Second Street In San Francisco: On Second Street between Market and NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Francisc Complete Streets and King; Design and construct a complete streets project Regionally Significant o Road Diet including the removal of a vehicular travel lane from Market to Project Townsend San SF-130017 17-05-0029 SF County TA SF Downtown Congestion San Francisco: In the downtown area: Implement a NON-EXEMPT 2030 Francisc Pricing demonstration value pricing (tolls and incentives) program o San SF-130021 17-05-0008 Port of SF Pier 70 19th Street & San Francisco: 19th St to 20th St (via Georgia St): Extend NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Francisc Illinois Street Sidewalk roadway and install bike/ped improvements. Regionally Significant o Project

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 10 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year San SF-150008 17-05-0008 SF County TA Quint-Jerrold Connector San Francisco: From Oakdale Ave to Jerrold Ave: Provide an NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Francisc Road alternate access route between Oakdale and Jerrold Regionally Significant o Avenues and across the Caltrain tracks, to be coordinated Project with Caltrain's Quint Street Bridge San SF-170001 17-05-0019 Port of SF Mission Bay Ferry San Francisco: At the eastern terminus of 16th St: Construct NON-EXEMPT 2030 Francisc Terminal new ferry landing to service San Francisco Mission Bay and o Central Waterfront as a part of the Bay area ferry transit system San SF-170013 17-05-0008 SF DPW HOPE SF Street Network - San Francisco: Sunnydale and Potrero neighborhoods: NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Francisc Sunnydale and Potrero Construct new and realigned street networks throughout the Regionally Significant o two remaining HOPE SF sites, including traffic calming Project pedestrian and bike network, and San SF-991030 17-10-0025 SF County TA US 101 Doyle Drive San Francisco: US 101 (Doyle Drive) from Lombard NON-EXEMPT 2040 Francisc Replacement Street/Richardson Avenue to Route 1 Interchange; o Replace/rehabilitate roadway. San SM-050027 17-06-0010 Redwood City US 101 / Woodside Redwood City: US101/Woodside Rd Interchange: NON-EXEMPT 2030 Mateo Interchange Improvement Reconstruct and reconfigure interchange including direct- connect flyover ramp to Veterans Blvd; Seaport Blvd and SR84 from US101/SR84 separation to San SM-070008 17-07-0065 Caltrain Caltrain South Terminal San Jose: Just north of Diridon Station: Phase II - Construct NON-EXEMPT 2040 Mateo Phase II and III an additional mainline track and new signal controls; Just south of Diridon Station: Phase III - install an additional mainline track and signal San SM-090004 17-06-0021 Brisbane US 101/Candlestick I/C In San Mateo County: U.S. 101/Candlestick Point NON-EXEMPT 2040 Mateo Reconfiguration Interchange: Planning and environmental studies for interchange reconfiguration to allow for safer and better flow of traffic San SM-090007 17-06-0040 Redwood City Blomquist Street In Redwood City: On Blomquist Street from Seaport Blvd to NON-EXEMPT 2030 Mateo Extension Bair Island Road: Extend roadway. Project may be phased. San SM-090008 17-06-0017 San Carlos US101/Holly St I/C Mod San Carlos: At Holly St/ US-101 Interchange: Widen east NON-EXEMPT 2020 Mateo and Bike/Ped bound to north bound ramp to two lanes and eliminate north Overcrossing bound to west bound loop and construct a grade-separated multipurpose path that San SM-090009 17-06-0008 SMCTA US 101 Aux lanes from San Mateo County: On US 101 from Sierra Point to SF NON-EXEMPT 2030 Mateo Sierra Point to SF Co. County Line; Construct auxiliary lanes or managed lanes. Line Project also references RTP ID 240060 for managed lanes San SM-090014 17-06-0009 San Mateo Improve US 101 City of San Mateo: On US 101 near Route 92: Operational NON-EXEMPT 2040 Mateo operations near Rte 92 improvements San SM-090015 17-06-0023 Half Moon Bay Route 1 improvements in Half Moon Bay: On SR-1: Improve safety, including adding NON-EXEMPT 2030 Mateo Half Moon Bay protected turn lanes, adding through lanes, and new ped/bike path; SR-1 from N. Main to Kehoe: Extend four lane configuration; Frontage Rd and San SM-110002 17-06-0030 Redwood City Redwood City Ferry SF Bay Area: Between Redwood City and San Francisco: NON-EXEMPT 2040 Mateo Service Environmental clearance and design of ferry transit service

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 11 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year San SM-110003 17-06-0011 SSF US 101/Produce Avenue South San Francisco: On US Highway 101 from Utah Avenue NON-EXEMPT 2030 Mateo New Interchange on the east side to the vicinity of Produce Avenue on the west side: Construct a local interchange San SM-130021 17-06-0003 Burlingame Carolan Ave Complete Burlingame: Carolan Ave between Broadway and Oak Grove NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Mateo Streets and Road Diet Ave: Implement road diet by converting a 4-lane roadway into Regionally Significant a 2-lane roadway with a center turn lane, Class II bike lanes, Project and intersection San SM-150017 17-06-0007 CCAG US101 Managed Lanes: San Mateo County: On US101 from 2 mi. S. of the Santa NON-EXEMPT 2030 Mateo Santa Clara Co-S of Clara County Line to 0.3 mi. S. of Grand Ave I/C: Install Grand Ave Express Lanes. Use existing aux lanes where possible and add aux lanes where needed for San SM-170004 17-06-0004 Pacifica Manor Drive Overcrossing In Pacifica: Hwy 1 and Manor Drive I/C: Widen the existing NON-EXEMPT 2040 Mateo and Milagra On Ramp overcrossing; Hwy 1 and Milagra: Construct a new on-ramp; Both intersections: install signals San SM-170011 17-06-0012 San Mateo US 101/Peninsula Avenue San Mateo: US-101 at Peninsula Ave and East Poplar Ave: NON-EXEMPT 2030 Mateo Interchange Convert a partial interchange to a full interchange by adding Improvements new southbound on- and off-ramps and closing the southbound on- and off-ramps San SM-190002 17-07-0065 Caltrain Peninsula Corridor Caltrain: Electric Multiple Unit (EMU) fleet: Expand fleet NON-EXEMPT 2040 Mateo Electrification Expansion through procurement of an additional 40 vehicles. San SM-190003 17-10-0033 SamTrans SamTrans Express Bus San Mateo, San Francisco and Santa Clara Counties: On the NON-EXEMPT 2040 Mateo Service US-101 Corridor: Implement a network of four express bus routes Santa BRT030001 17-07-0012 VTA BART - Berryessa to San In San Jose: From Berryessa Station to San Jose and Santa NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara Jose Extension Clara: Extend BART line Santa SCL030006 17-07-0038 San Jose US 101/Blossom Hill San Jose: At US101/Blossom Hill I/C: Reconstruct I/C NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara Interchange including the widening of Blossom Hill Rd, signal upgrades Improvements and other modifications to eliminate congestion caused by merge and weave problems and Santa SCL050009 17-07-0061 VTA Eastridge to BART San Jose: At the Eastridge Transit Center: Ph I (completed) ¿ NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara Regional Connector Improve and expand transit center; Capitol Expwy Light Rail from Alum Rock Transit Center to Eastridge Transit Center: Ph II - Extend light rail, Santa SCL070004 17-07-0027 San Jose US 101 / Mabury New San Jose: US 101/Mabury interchange at the location of the NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara Interchange existing Talyor St overpass: Construct full interchange. Santa SCL090016 17-07-0022 VTA SR 152 New Alignment Santa Clara/ San Benito counties: SR152 between US101 NON-EXEMPT 2040 Clara and SR156: Complete PA&ED for new alignment the highway. Santa SCL090017 17-07-0005 Santa Clara Montague Expwy Santa Clara County: Montague Expressway between Trade NON-EXEMPT 2040 Clara Co Widening - Trade Zone-I- Zone and I-680: Widen roadway to 8 lanes 680 Santa SCL090030 17-07-0074 VTA SR 85 Express Lanes In Santa Clara County: On SR 85 carpool lane from US 101 NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara in San Jose to US 101 in Mountain View including the US 101/SR 85 HOV direct connectors and approaches: Install ETS and implement roadway

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 12 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Santa SCL090040 17-07-0062 VTA LRT Extension to Vasona Campbell and San Jose: From the existing Winchester NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara Junction and Double Station to a new Vasona Junction Station, near Route 85: Track Extend the light-rail line and double-track single-track sections of the Vasona line Santa SCL110002 17-07-0075 VTA Santa Clara County - US In Santa Clara County: From Cochrane Rd. in Morgan Hill to NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara 101 Express Lanes San Mateo County line in Palo Alto: Implement roadway pricing on US 101 carpool lane Santa SCL110005 17-07-0077 VTA BART - Warm Springs to Santa Clara County: From Warm Springs to the Berryessa NON-EXEMPT 2020 Clara Berryessa Extension Station in San Jose: Extend BART Santa SCL110006 17-07-0005 San Jose San Jose - Autumn Street In San Jose: Autumn St between Julian Street and San NON-EXEMPT 2040 Clara Extension Carlos Street: Widen, partially realign, and extend Autumn Street to adequately accommodate projected traffic demand. Santa SCL110007 17-07-0078 Santa Clara San Tomas Expressway Santa Clara County: San Tomas Expressway between El NON-EXEMPT 2020 Clara Co Widening Camino Real and Homestead Road: Phase I widening; San Tomas Expressway between Homestead Road and Stevens Creek Blvd: Phase II widening Santa SCL110008 17-07-0070 VTA SR 237 Express Lanes: In Santa Clara County: On SR-237 from Mathilda Ave to NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara North 1st St to Mathilda North 1st St.: Implement roadway pricing carpool lane; On Ave SR-237 from I-880 to Mathilda Avenue: Operational Improvements in terms of restriping Santa SCL130001 17-07-0033 VTA SR 237/US 101/Mathilda In Sunnyvale: US 101/Mathilda and SR 237/Mathilda NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara Interchange Modifications interchanges: Modify interchanges to relieve congestion and improve traffic operations for all modes Santa SCL150018 17-10-0015 VTA Peery Park Rides In Sunnyvale: Peery Park area: Implement flexible transit NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Clara service as part of a trip reduction strategy. Regionally Significant Project Santa SCL190001 17-07-0039 San Jose US 101/Old Oakland Oakland Rd - Commercial St to US 101: Widen to 8 lanes; NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara Road Interchange Commercial St - Oakland Rd to Berryessa Rd: Add turn improvements lanes; Commercial St - Berryessa Rd to Mabury Rd: Extend roadway: US 101 ramps: Widen Santa SCL190002 17-07-0079 VTA I-280/Foothill Expressway Santa Clara County: NB I-280/Foothill Expressway NON-EXEMPT 2040 Clara Off Ramp Improvement interchange: Widen off ramp to add one additional lane Santa SCL190004 17-07-0028 VTA I-280 HOV - San Mateo Santa Clara County: On I-280 in both directions from NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara County line to Magdalena Magdalena Avenue in Los Altos Hills to the San Mateo Ave County Line: Construct new HOV lane Santa SCL190005 17-07-0068 VTA SR 237 WB Auxiliary Santa Clara County: SR 237 between McCarthy Boulevard NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara Lane fr McCarthy to North and North First Street: Add westbound auxiliary lane 1st Santa SCL190006 17-07-0044 VTA Double Lane Southbound Santa Clara: Southbound US 101 to Southbound Route 87: NON-EXEMPT 2020 Clara US 101 off-ramp to SB Widen the existing connector ramp to add one additional SR 87 traffic lane and construct and install Traffic Monitoring Station (TMC)

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 13 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Santa SCL190007 17-07-0023 VTA US 101/Zanker Road- San Jose: US101 at Zanker Rd/Skyport Dr./N. 4th St: NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara Skyport Drive-N. Fourth Construct a new overcrossing over US 101 connecting St. Imp Zanker Rd to Skyport Dr-N. Fourth St to create a new north- south corridor parallel to N. First St Santa SCL190008 17-07-0031 VTA US 101/De L Cruz Blvd - Santa Clara: At the US101/De La Cruz Blvd/Trimble Rd IC: NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara Trimble Road I/C Imp Modify interchange into a partial cloverleaf. Santa SCL190009 17-07-0051 VTA Calaveras Boulevard Milpitas: Calaveras Blvd. overpass at UPRR tracks from Abel NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara Widening St to Town Center Blvd: Widen from 4 to 6 lanes and modify signing, striping and signals Santa SCL190010 17-07-0035 VTA US 101/Buena Vista Gilroy: At Buena Vista Ave. overcrossing at US 101: NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara Avenue Interchange Construct a complete interchange by widening the Improvement overcrossing structure and adding new northbound and southbound on and off ramps. Santa SCL190011 17-07-0026 VTA I-280/Wolfe Road Cupertino: I-280/Wolfe Road Interchange: Modify to relieve NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara Interchange Improvement congestion and improve local circulation. Santa SCL190014 17-07-0067 VTA SR 17 Corridor Los Gatos: On both directions of SR 17 from Lark Ave to NON-EXEMPT 2030 Clara Congestion Relief in Los south of SR 9 IC: Construct aux lanes including modifications Gatos to on-ramps and off-ramps to improve operations and relieve congestion; Along SR- Solano SOL030002 17-08-0015 Fairfield Fairfield/Vacaville In Fairfield: Capitol Corridor: Construct train station with NON-EXEMPT 2030 Intermodal Rail Station passenger platforms, pedestrian undercrossing, highway overcrossing, park and ride lot,bike and other station facilities. Project is phased. Solano SOL050009 17-08-0007 Dixon Parkway Blvd/UPRR In Dixon: Parkway Blvd from Valley Glen Dr. to Pitt School NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 Grade Separation Rd: Construct new 4 lane roadway and overcrossing of Regionally Significant UPRR & Porter Rd; Pitt School Rd from south of Hillview Project Drive to Porter Rd: widen shoulders Solano SOL070020 17-08-0009 STA I-80/I-680/SR 12 Fairfield: I-80/I-680/Route 12 IC: Ph-1 Improve IC, including NON-EXEMPT 2040 Interchange connecting I-80 to SR 12 W, I-680 NB to SR 12W (Jameson Improvements Canyon), I-80 to I-680 (+ Express Lane Direct connectors), build local IC and build Solano SOL090015 17-08-0010 Solano County Redwood-Fairgrounds Dr Solano County: I-80 Redwood St. I/C and SR-37/Fairgrounds NON-EXEMPT 2030 Interchange Imps Dr. I/C: Implement I/C and safety improvements; Fairgrounds Dr. from Redwood St. to SR-37: Remove left turn lane and widen to add one lane Solano SOL110001 17-10-0044 MTC I-80 Express Lanes - I-80 in Solano County from Red Top Rd to I-505: Convert NON-EXEMPT 2030 Fairfield & Vacaville Ph existing HOV to HOT & Construct new HOT lanes from Air I&II Base Parkway to I-505. Project also references RTP ID 17- 10-0059 Solano SOL110004 17-08-0012 STA Jepson: Walters Rd Ext - Solano County: Jepson Parkway segment: Walters Road NON-EXEMPT 2030 Peabody Rd Widening Extension, Peabody Widening. Solano SOL110005 17-08-0012 STA Jepson: Leisure Town Jepson Parkway segment: Leisure Town Road from Vanden NON-EXEMPT 2030 Road from Vanden to Road to Commerce. Project is phased Commerce

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 14 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Solano SOL110006 17-08-0012 STA Jepson: Leisure Town Vacaville: (Phase 1B) Leisure Town Rd from Elmira Rd to NON-EXEMPT 2030 Road Phase 1B and 1C Sequoia and (Phase 1C) from Sequoia Dr to Horse Creek: Widen to 4 lanes with multiuse sidewalk and safety improvements Solano SOL110007 17-08-0015 Fairfield Fairfield Transportation In Fairfield: Fairfield Transportation Center: Construct second NON-EXEMPT 2030 Center - Phase 3 parking structure with approximately 600 automobile parking spaces and access improvements. Sonoma SON070004 17-09-0006 Son Co TA US 101 Marin/Sonoma Marin and Sonoma Counties (Sonoma County Portion): From NON-EXEMPT 2030 Narrows (Sonoma) SR37 in Novato to Old Redwood Highway in Petaluma: convert expressway to freeway; Between Lakeville Highway and East Washigton Street: Sonoma SON150006 17-09-0010 Santa Rosa US 101 Hearn Ave Santa Rosa: US 101/Hearn Avenue over- NON-EXEMPT 2030 Interchange crossing/interchange: Replace the US 101/Hearn Avenue over-crossing/interchange with a new over crossing/interchange including bike lanes, sidewalks, and re- Sonoma SON150010 17-10-0015 Son Co TA Santa Rosa Car Share Santa Rosa: Various locations: Establish nine car share NON-EXEMPT - Not 2040 vehicles at four pods. Regionally Significant Project Alameda ALA010034 17-10-0026 AC Transit AC Transit: Facilities AC Transit: Systemwide: Agency's facilities & equipment EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Upgrade upgrades. Reconstruction or renovation of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail Alameda ALA010056 17-01-0008 ACE ACE Track ACE: From Stockton to San Jose: Corridor improvements for EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Improvements. signaling, grade crossing, track and other cost associated Rehabilitation or reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in Alameda ALA030030 17-10-0026 LAVTA LAVTA: Preventive LAVTA: Systemwide: Preventive Maintenance Program for EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Maintenance Agency Fleet. Rehabilitation of transit vehicles Alameda ALA050002 17-01-0007 San Leandro SR 185- E. 14th St/ San Leandro: 150th/E. 14th/Hesperian: Construct NB left turn EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Hesperian Blvd/150th Ave Ln from Hesperian to E.14th, EB left turn Ln from E.14th to Intersection channelization 150th Av & SB Ln from Hesperian to 150th and other traffic projects circulation Alameda ALA050035 17-01-0004 Alameda Cherryland/Ashland/Castr Cherryland, Ashland, Castro Valley, Fairview, San Lorenzo EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 County oValley/Fairview BikePed and other Unincorporated Areas of Alameda County: Various Bicycle and pedestrian Locations: Sidewalk, bike lanes and other safety facilities improvements in the vicinity of Alameda ALA050079 17-01-0040 ACTC I-80 Gilman Interchange Berkeley: On Gilman Avenue at I-80: Reconfigure EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Improvements interchange providing dual roundabout at the entrance & exits Changes in vertical and from I-80 as well as the Eastshore Highway and West horizontal alignment Frontage Rd and bike/ped

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 15 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Alameda ALA090022 17-10-0024 Alameda Estuary Bridges Seismic Oakland: 3 Oakland Estuary bridges: Seismic retrofit and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 County Retrofit and Repairs repairs Widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel Alameda ALA090023 17-10-0024 Alameda Fruitvale Ave Roadway Alameda County: Fruitvale Roadway Bridge: Retrofit bridge to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 County Bridge Lifeline a lifeline facility Widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel Alameda ALA090065 17-10-0026 BART BART: Fare Collection BART: Systemwide: Acquire and install fare collection EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Equipment equipment. Purchase of operating equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, Alameda ALA090068 17-01-0004 BART MacArthur BART Plaza Oakland: MacArthur BART Station: Renovate the entry plaza EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Remodel Reconstruction or renovation of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail Alameda ALA110032 17-01-0004 BART Downtown Berkeley In Berkeley: Area around Downtown Berkeley BART Station: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 BART Plaza/Transit Area Streetscape improvements; design/construction of custom Transportation enhancement Imps. bus shelter, canopy design for 5 secondary BART entries and activities (except construction of one; rehabilitation and operation Alameda ALA110033 17-01-0003 ACTC Alameda County Safe Alameda County: Countywide: SR2S Program including EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Routes to School education & outreach in various K-12 schools, ridesharing, & Grants for training and project development. research programs Alameda ALA110072 17-01-0004 Oakland Lake Merritt Improvement In Oakland: Adjacent to Lake Merritt: Reconfigure roadways EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Project and construct paths, walls, structures, lighting, parking and Bicycle and pedestrian landscaping; no added capacity facilities Alameda ALA110099 17-10-0026 ACE ACE Preventative ACE Rail: Systemwide: Preventative maintenance activities EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Maintenance for ACE service and associated equipment, functions, and Operating assistance to facilities. transit agencies Alameda ALA130001 17-01-0006 Fremont Widen Kato Rd from Fremont: Kato Road from Warren Avenue to Milmont Drive: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Warren Avenue to Widen to provide left turn pockets, median island Intersection channelization Milmont Drive improvements, bike lanes on both sides of the roadway, and projects modify traffic signal at Kato Alameda ALA130003 17-01-0001 Oakland Lake Merritt to Bay Trail Oakland: Over Embarcadero and UPRR tracks under I880 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Bike/Ped Bridge between the Estuary and Lake Merritt along the Channel: Bicycle and pedestrian Construct ADA accessible bicycle pedestrian bridge to link facilities Bay Trail to Lake Merritt. Alameda ALA130018 17-10-0022 Alameda Alameda Co-Various Unincorporated Alameda County: Various roadways: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 County Streets and Roads Rehabilitate pavement Pavement resurfacing Preservation and/or rehabilitation Alameda ALA130024 17-01-0001 Oakland Lakeside Complete Oakland: Along Harrison Street and Lakeside Drive between EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Streets and Road Diet 19th Street and Grand Avenue: implement road diet and Projects that correct, install bike and pedestrian facilities improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 16 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Alameda ALA130028 17-01-0004 Berkeley Hearst Avenue Complete In Berkeley: Hearst St from Shattuck Ave to Gayley/La Loma: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Streets Implement access and safety improvements to Downtown Projects that correct, Berkeley PDA for all modes, includes a road diet from improve, or eliminate a Shattuck Ave to Euclid Ave hazardous location or feature Alameda ALA130030 17-01-0001 MTC Improved Bike/Ped In Oakland: In the vicinity of the East Span of the San EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Access to East Span of Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge: Construct improved bicycle Bicycle and pedestrian SFOBB and pedestrian access. Project is phased. facilities Alameda ALA130035 17-01-0001 Berkeley Bay Trail Shoreline Berkeley: Berkeley Marina: Construct segment 3 of Bay Trail EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Access Staging Area Extension, construct new public restroom, and renovate Bicycle and pedestrian existing public parking area and windsurf staging area. facilities Alameda ALA150002 17-01-0003 Alameda Niles Canyon Rd (SR In Sunol Area: At Niles Canyon Rd(SR 84), Pleasanton Sunol EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 County 84)/Pleas-Sunol Rd Inter. Rd and Paloma Rd intersection: intersection improvements at Intersection signalization Imps the four corners includeing installation of a traffic signal, projects at individual shoulder improvements intersections Alameda ALA150007 17-01-0001 Alameda Cross Alameda Trail City of Alameda: Between Webster St and Sherman St: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 (includes SRTS Construct a new trail with an on-street portion. Bicycle and pedestrian component) facilities Alameda ALA150010 17-01-0001 Oakland International Boulevard Oakland: International Boulevard (1st Ave to Durant) and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Improvement Project East 12th Street (1st Ave to 14th Ave): Install pedestrian Lighting improvements scale lighting along the corridor, repair sidewalk damage, and install curb ramps. Alameda ALA150012 17-01-0007 Oakland Laurel Access to Mills, Oakland: MacArthur Boulevard from High St to Simmons St: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Maxwell Park and Implement bicycle and pedestrian improvements Intersection channelization Seminary projects Alameda ALA150020 17-01-0007 AC Transit AC Transit: South County AC Transit: South Alameda County Major Corridors: Travel EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.128) - 2040 Corridors time improvements including Adaptive Traffic Control Traffic signal Systems, corridor-wide Transit Signal Priority, signal synchronization projects coordination and relocation of key bus Alameda ALA150031 17-10-0026 LAVTA LAVTA: Replacement (11) LAVTA: 11 40' hybrid buses: Purchase buses to replace EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 40' Hybrid Buses diesel buses that have exceeded their useful life Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Alameda ALA150032 17-10-0026 LAVTA LAVTA: Replacement (9) LAVTA: 9 vehicles: Purchase nine (9) 30' hybrid buses to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 30' Hybrid Buses replace diesel buses that have exceeded their useful life Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Alameda ALA150035 17-10-0028 LAVTA LAVTA: Farebox LAVTA: New Buses: Install farebox devices compliant with EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Replacement Clipper technology Purchase of operating equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, Alameda ALA150038 17-10-0026 AC Transit AC Transit: Purchase (10) AC Transit: (10) Double-Deck Diesel Buses: Purchase buses EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Double-Deck Diesel to replace buses in existing fleet Purchase of new buses and Buses rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 17 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Alameda ALA150039 17-10-0026 AC Transit AC Transit: Purchase (10) AC Transit: 10 vehicles: Replace 10 40ft urban diesel buses EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 40' Buses-Fuel Cell ZEB with Zero-emission fuel cell buses Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Alameda ALA150044 17-01-0004 Oakland 19th St BART to Lake In Oakland: Between Broadway and Harrison Street: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Merritt Urban Greenway Improvements include sidewalk widening and bulbouts, ped Intersection signalization crossing improvements, bikelanes, new traffic signals and projects at individual signal mods, street/ped lighting, intersections Alameda ALA150045 17-10-0026 AC Transit AC Transit: PM - AC Transit: Preventive maintenance program, including EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Exchange for 40ft Fuel maintenance of buses and facilities. Project is in exchange Rehabilitation of transit Cell ZEB for local funds to replace 10 (of 102 in sub-fleet) 40ft urban vehicles diesel buses with Zero- Alameda ALA150046 17-10-0026 Union C Union City Transit Rehab Union City Transit: Two (2) compressed natural gas (CNG) EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Transit Two (2) Transit Buses buses from 2008 that are now at their mid-life service Rehabilitation of transit expectancy: Rehabilitate vehicles: The vehicles have the vehicles potential to serve the transit agency Alameda ALA150048 17-01-0001 Berkeley 9th St Bicycle Blvd In Berkeley: Between the 9th Street Bicycle Boulevard (south EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Extension Pathway Ph II of Heinz Avenue) and Murray Street: Install a shared-use Bicycle and pedestrian path facilities Alameda ALA150049 17-01-0002 Berkeley goBerkeley Residential In Berkeley: In residential areas adjacent to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Shared Parking Pilot Southside/Telegraph and Elmwood goBerkeley program Grants for training and areas: Implement parking pricing pilot; In pilot areas: research programs Implement TDM strategies and outreach focused on Alameda ALA150050 17-01-0002 Oakland Oakland Parking and Oakland: Montclair and select areas of Downtown: Implement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mobility Management demand-responsive parking management and transportation Grants for training and demand management initiatives research programs Alameda ALA150052 17-10-0033 AC Transit AC Transit: SFOBB AC Transit: 14 replacement and 5 new buses: Rehab buses EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Forward and purchase 5 new double-decker buses to expand transbay Purchase of new buses and service. Includes 1 year of operating funding; at the Oakland rail cars to replace existing Maintenance Facility: vehicles or for Alameda ALA170002 17-01-0037 ACTC I-80/Ashby Avenue Alameda County: I-80/Ashby IC: Reconstruct the interchange EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Interchange including constructing new bridge, two roundabouts and Interchange reconfiguration Improvements bike/ped improvements projects Alameda ALA170007 17-10-0023 MTC Regional Planning Alameda: Regional Planning Activities and Planning, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Activities and PPM - Programming and Monitoring (PPM) Planning and technical Alameda studies Alameda ALA170012 17-01-0003 MTC Bay Bridge Forward- Albany and Oakland: Adjacent to Park and Ride lots at I- EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Commuter Parking 80/Buchanan Ave, I-880/High St, I-880/Fruitvale: Bicycle and pedestrian Access Imps. Bicycle/pedestrian/bus stop improvements to facilitate safer facilities access to and from lots; toll credits Alameda ALA170013 17-01-0007 Union C Union City Transit Travel Union City: South Alameda County Major Corridors: Travel EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.128) - 2040 Transit Time Improvements time improvements including Adaptive Traffic Control Traffic signal Systems, corridor-wide Transit Signal Priority, signal synchronization projects coordination and relocation of key bus

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 18 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Alameda ALA170014 17-10-0026 Union C Union City Paratransit Union City Transit: Six (6) 2009 compressed natural gas EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Transit Van Procurement (CNG) vans: Replace as they have reached the end of their Purchase of new buses and useful life. rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Alameda ALA170015 17-10-0026 Union C Union City Transit: Union City Transit: 1 vehicle: Replace one (1) Union City EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Transit Replace Paratransit Paratransit sedan with one (1) van Purchase of new buses and Sedan rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Alameda ALA170027 17-10-0026 AC Transit AC Transit: Purchase 10 AC Transit: 10 Double-Decker Buses: Purchase buses for EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Double-Decker Buses transbay service Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Alameda ALA170028 17-10-0026 AC Transit AC Transit: Purchase (35) AC Transit: 35 40-ft Diesel Buses: Purchase replacement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 40ft Diesel Buses buses to keep AC Transit's fleet in a state of good repair Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Alameda ALA170029 17-10-0026 AC Transit AC Transit: Preventive AC Transit: Systemwide: Preventive Maintenance (federal EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Maintenance (Swap) funding is provided for this project in exchange for AC Rehabilitation of transit Transit's commitment to Replace 5 40' Urban Buses - Battery vehicles using local funds) Alameda ALA170030 17-10-0026 AC Transit AC Transit: Preventive AC Transit: Systemwide: Preventive Maintenance (funding is EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Maintenance (Deferred incentive for delaying bus purchases) Rehabilitation of transit Comp) vehicles Alameda ALA170031 17-10-0026 AC Transit AC Transit: Replace (27) AC Transit: (27) 40ft Urban Buses - Hybrid: Purchase EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 40ft Urban Buses - Hybrid replacement buses Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Alameda ALA170032 17-10-0026 AC Transit AC Transit: Purchase 19 AC Transit: 19 vehicles: Purchase 19 60-ft Articulated Urban EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 60-ft Artic Urban Buses Buses Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Alameda ALA170038 17-10-0026 AC Transit AC Transit: Replace (6) AC Transit: (6) 24ft Cut-Away Vans: Replace vans EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 24ft Cut-Away Vans Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Alameda ALA170039 17-01-0002 Union C Union City: ADA Union City Transit: Systemwide: ADA Paratransit Operating EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Transit Paratransit Operating Assistance Operating assistance to Subsidy transit agencies Alameda ALA170040 17-10-0013 MTC I-880 Integrated Corridor Alameda County: I-880 corridor from I-880/I-980 IC to I- EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Management North 880/Davis St. IC: Install intelligent transportation system Traffic control devices and Segment infrastructure to facilitate the active management of traffic operating assistance other that naturally diverts onto than signalization

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 19 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Alameda ALA170041 17-10-0026 AC Transit AC Transit: 5 Battery AC Transit: 5 buses: Purchase 5 New Flyer battery electric EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Electric Bus purchase buses with 5 depot charging stations and installation. Purchase of new buses and Includes consulting PM support from CTE. rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Alameda ALA170043 17-01-0004 Oakland Oakland - 14th Street In Oakland: On 14th St between Brush St and Oak St: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Safe Routes in the City Reduce travel lanes from 4 to 2, add paved Class IV Projects that correct, protected bicycle lanes; transit boarding islands; improve ped improve, or eliminate a facilities including refuges, crossings, hazardous location or feature Alameda ALA170047 17-01-0002 Alameda Active Oakland: A Oakland: In Oakland Unified School District's most EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 County Comprehensive SR2S disadvantages schools: Promote walking and cycling Grants for training and Program research programs Alameda ALA170048 17-10-0027 ACE ACE Fixed Guideway ACE: Along ACE Corridor: Capital Lease payments required EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 (Capital Lease) to operate along Union Pacific corridor Operating assistance to transit agencies Alameda ALA170050 17-01-0001 Emeryville Emeryville Greenway Emeryville: Greenway trail crossings at 65th, 66th, and 67th: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Crossing Improvements Improve crossings with raised crosswalks, RRFBs, parking Bicycle and pedestrian adjustments and signage and add bike share station facilities Alameda ALA170051 17-01-0001 Oakland Fruitvale Alive Bike/Ped In Oakland: On Fruitvale Ave between Alameda Ave and E. EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Gap Closure 12th: Install class 4 cycle tracks and landscaped buffers, Intersection channelization widen sidewalks, improve ped crossings, add ped scale projects lighting, reconfigure conflicting Alameda ALA170053 17-01-0004 Oakland Oakland 35th Ave Oakland: 35th Ave from San Leandro St to Sutter St: H8-04- EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Bike/Ped Improvements 015 Install crossing enhancements, HAWKs, RRFBs, signal Projects that correct, H8-04-015 upgrades/modifications, signing, striping, markings; 35th Ave improve, or eliminate a from Int Blvd to E 12th hazardous location or feature Alameda ALA170054 17-01-0001 Berkeley John Muir Safe Routes to Berkeley: Along Claremont south of Ashby near John Muir EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 School School: Install speed feedback signs; At the intersection of Bicycle and pedestrian Claremont and Claremont Crescent: Implement crossing facilities improvements Alameda ALA170055 17-10-0063 BART 19th Street BART Station In Oakland: At the 19th Street BART Station and adjacent EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Modernization-GO public realm: Implement station and streetscape Reconstruction or renovation Uptown improvements of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail Alameda ALA170056 17-10-0026 ACE ACE - Locomotive ACE: Systemwide: Purchase four locomotives to replace EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Procurement existing equipment Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Alameda ALA170057 17-10-0013 MTC I-880 Integrated Corridor Alameda County: I-880 Corridor from Davis St in San EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Management - Central Leandro to Whipple Rd in Union City: Identify how existing Traffic control devices and and planned incident management strategies and operations operating assistance other can be better coordinated and than signalization

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 20 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Alameda ALA170058 17-10-0033 MTC Bay Bridge Forward: West In Oakland: Various locations on the West Grand Ave EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Grand TSP Corridor between Maritime and Northgate; Implement transit Traffic control devices and signal priority for AC Transit vehicles. operating assistance other than signalization Alameda ALA170059 17-10-0003 AC Transit San Pablo and Telegraph AC Transit: Various locations on the San Pablo and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2030 Ave Rapid Bus Upgrades Telegraph Ave Corridors: Implement rapid bus improvements Projects that correct, including TSP upgrades, signal coordination, the relocation of improve, or eliminate a key bus stops; On Telegraph hazardous location or feature Alameda ALA170060 17-10-0033 Caltrans GL: Alameda County - Alameda County: Various Locations: Projects are consistent EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 TOS-Mobility with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and 40 CFR Part Projects that correct, 93.127 Table 3 categories improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Alameda ALA170061 17-01-0064 Newark Thornton Avenue Newark: On Thornton Ave between Spruce and Hickory St: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Pavement Rehabilitation Rehabilitate pavement Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Alameda ALA170062 17-01-0064 Dublin Dublin Blvd Rehabilitation Dublin: Segments of Dublin Boulevard from Scarlet Drive to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Hacienda Drive: Rehabilitate pavement Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Alameda ALA170063 17-01-0004 Oakland Lakeside Family Streets In Oakland: On Harrison St between 20th St and 27th St, and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 along Grand Ave from west of Harrison to east of Bay Place: Projects that correct, install cycle track, parking protected bikeways and protected improve, or eliminate a intersection; On hazardous location or feature Alameda ALA170064 17-01-0064 Oakland Oakland Various Streets In Oakland: Citywide: Implement paving Improvements EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Improvements including pavement resurfacing, bicycle transportation, curb, Pavement resurfacing gutter, drainage, sidewalks, pedestrian safety, and ADA and/or rehabilitation compliant curb ramps Alameda ALA170065 17-01-0004 Hayward Hayward - Main Street Hayward: Main St from Mc Keever to D St: Reduce roadway EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Complete Street from 4 to 2 lanes, construct bike lanes, widen sidewalks and Projects that correct, add complete street elements improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Alameda ALA170066 17-01-0004 Hayward Winton Ave Complete Hayward: On Winton Ave from Hesperian Blvd to Santa Clara EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Street St: Rehabilitate pavement, upgrade curb ramps and Pavement resurfacing streetlights; On Winton Ave just east of Santa Clara St: and/or rehabilitation Landscape median Alameda ALA170067 17-01-0004 Berkeley Southside Complete Berkeley: Various locations south of UC Berkeley: Construct EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Streets & Transit two-way cycle tracks, signal mods, transit imps and TSP, Projects that correct, Improvement loading zone imps, pedestrian safety imps, and repaving; On improve, or eliminate a Telegraph from Channing hazardous location or feature

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 21 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Alameda ALA170068 17-01-0064 Livermore Livermore Pavement Livermore: Various Locations: Repair and/or rehabilitate EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Rehabilitation - MTS pavement Pavement resurfacing Routes and/or rehabilitation Alameda ALA170069 17-01-0064 Fremont City of Fremont Pavement Fremont: Various Locations: Rehabilitate pavement and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Rehabilitation implement bike/ped improvements Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Alameda ALA170070 17-01-0064 Pleasanton Pavement Rehabilitation Pleasanton: Various locations near the Hacienda Business EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Hacienda Business Park Park: Pavement rehabilitation and bike/ped improvements Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Alameda ALA170071 17-01-0064 Union City Union City-Dyer Street Union City: On Dyer St from Alvarado Blvd to Deborah Dr: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Pavement Rehabilitation Rehabilitate pavement Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Alameda ALA170072 17-01-0064 Emeryville Frontage Rd, 65th St and Emeryville: Various Locations on Frontage Road, 65th St, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Powell St Pavement Maint Powell St: Pavement maintenance Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Alameda ALA170073 17-01-0004 Alameda Clement Avenue Alameda: On Clement Avenue between Broadway and Grand EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Complete Streets St: Complete street improvements including Class II bike Bicycle and pedestrian lanes, curb extensions, flashing beacons, bus shelters, facilities sidewalk/curb ramp Alameda ALA170074 17-10-0022 Alameda Alameda City-Wide Alameda: Buena Vista Ave from Willow St to Park St and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Pavement Rehabilitation Kofman Pkwy from Tralee Ln to Aughinbaugh Way: Pavement resurfacing Resurface and rehabilitate pavement and/or rehabilitation Alameda ALA170075 17-10-0022 San Leandro San Leandro Washington San Leandro: Washington Ave from W. Juana Ave to Castro EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Avenue Rehabilitation St: Reconstruct roadway Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Alameda ALA170076 17-01-0004 Fremont Complete Streets Fremont: Thornton Ave (Blacow Rd to Fremont Blvd), EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Upgrade of Relinquished Fremont Blvd (Alder Ave to Mattos Dr) and Peralta Blvd Projects that correct, SR84 (Fremont Blvd to Sequoia Rd): Implement complete streets improve, or eliminate a improvements; On Peralta Blvd hazardous location or feature Alameda ALA170077 17-01-0001 EB Reg Park Doolittle Drive Bay Trail Oakland: Along Doolittle Dr. from the MLK Regional Shoreline EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Dis Center near Langley Street 2,300 feet to the north end of the Bicycle and pedestrian existing SF Bay Trail at the fishing dock, north of Swan Way: facilities Construct SF Bay Alameda ALA170078 17-01-0003 Oakland Oakland - Crossing to Oakland: At Park Blvd/Excelsior Ave-Grosvenor Place and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Safety Park Blvd/13th Ave-East 38th St: Provide sidewalks and Projects that correct, shorter pedestrian crossings; At the Park Blvd intersection improve, or eliminate a near Edna Brewer Middle School: hazardous location or feature Alameda ALA170079 17-10-0026 ACE ACE: Railcar Midlife ACE: System-wide: Perform midlife overhaul of existing ACE EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Overhaul railcars to extend useful life. Rehabilitation of transit vehicles

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 22 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Alameda ALA170080 17-10-0026 AC Transit AC Transit: Purchase (10) AC Transit:(10) 24ft Cut-away vans: Purchase vehicles to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 24ft Cut-aways replace existing fleet at end-of-life. Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Alameda ALA170081 17-10-0026 AC Transit AC Transit: Purchase (24) AC Transit: 24 vehicles: Purchase (24) 60ft Artic Hybrid EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 60ft Artic Hybrid Buses Buses. Replace existing bus fleet to keep fleet in state of Purchase of new buses and good repair. rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Alameda ALA170082 17-10-0026 AC Transit AC Transit: Purchase (59) AC Transit: Purchase (59) 40-ft Diesel Buses: Purchase EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 40ft Diesel Buses buses to keep AC Transit's fleet in a state of good repair. Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Alameda ALA170084 17-10-0022 Piedmont Piedmont - Oakland Piedmont: Oakland Ave between Grand Ave and western city EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Avenue Improvements limits: Pavement rehabilitation and installation of bicycle and Projects that correct, pedestrian safety improvements improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Alameda ALA170085 17-01-0015 ACTC 7th Street Grade Oakland: 7th St and rail tracks between I880 and Maritime St EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Separation East in the Port of Oakland: Reconstruct the existing 7th St Changes in vertical and underpass on an adjacent alignment, rail tracks, and other rail horizontal alignment infrastructure. No through Alameda ALA170087 17-01-0026 ACTC Freight Intelligent Oakland: In the Port of Oakland and surrounding areas: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Transportation System Implement ITS improvements, signal systems, and other Intersection signalization (FITS) technologies to cost-effectively manage truck arrivals and projects at individual improve incident response intersections Alameda ALA170088 17-10-0022 Albany San Pablo Ave & Albany: Various Locations on Buchanan St and San Pablo EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Buchanan St Pedestrian Ave: Streetscape improvements including medians, bulb Projects that correct, Imps. outs, signal modifications, striping of high visibility improve, or eliminate a crosswalks. Project is phased. hazardous location or feature Alameda ALA170091 17-01-0008 LAVTA Livermore Transit Center LAVTA: Downtown Livermore Transit Center: Rehabilitate EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Rehab and Improvement and improve the center by replacing or rehabilitating assets Reconstruction or renovation past their useful life including failed pavement, area security of transit buildings and lighting, passenger structures (e.g., rail Alameda ALA170092 17-10-0026 Union C Union City Replace Heavy-Union City Transit: 2 vehicles: Replace two (2) Heavy-Duty EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Transit Duty Transit Vehicles Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Transit Vehicles and Purchase of new buses and procure associated equipment rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Alameda ALA170093 17-01-0026 Emeryville Emeryville Quiet Zone Emeryville: At three at-grade crossings just east of EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Safety Engineering Shellmound Street: Install four-quadrant gates at the at-grade Projects that correct, Measures crossings, amongst other safety engineering improvements. improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 23 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Alameda ALA170094 17-01-0001 Berkeley Berkeley - Sacramento St Berkeley: On Sacramento Street at 4 intersections (Virginia, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Complete Streets Imps Delaware, University, & Addison): Construct bike/ped Bicycle and pedestrian crossing improvements; On Acton between Virginia & facilities Delaware and on Delaware between Alameda ALA190004 17-01-0001 BART Alameda Regional Access Alameda: Running parallel to and south of Ralph Appezzato EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Phase II Municipal Pkwy, between Main St and Constitution Way: Bicycle and pedestrian Construct 0.8 miles of walking and biking trails, streetscaping facilities and signal modification Alameda ALA190005 17-10-0026 LAVTA Hybrid Bus Battery Pack LAVTA: Fleetwide: Replace hybrid battery packs on EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Replacement Diesel/Electric hybrid buses Rehabilitation of transit vehicles Alameda ALA190006 17-01-0003 Alameda Alameda County - Vasco Alameda County: Vasco Rd between Dalton and MM.3.05: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 County Road Safety Rehabilitate pavement and install centerline and edgeline Projects that correct, Improvements rumble strips and striping markings improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Alameda ALA190014 17-10-0032 BART BART-Elevator BART: Various locations system-wide: Renovate or EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Renovation program rehabilitate elevators Reconstruction or renovation of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail Alameda ALA190015 17-01-0002 Alameda Active and Safe Oakland Oakland: At various schools citywide: Promote walking and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 County biking through education, encouragement, and enforcement Bicycle and pedestrian activities facilities Alameda ALA190016 17-01-0001 Albany Ohlone Greenway Trail Albany: Various locations along the Ohlone Greenway: Install EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Safety Improvements safety improvements including new protected left turn phase Projects that correct, which would eliminate potential conflicts between trail users improve, or eliminate a and vehicles turning hazardous location or feature Alameda ALA190019 17-01-0004 Alameda Alameda County Alameda County: Various locations: Bicyle and ped safety EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 County Complete Street improvements Bicycle and pedestrian Improvements facilities Alameda ALA990052 17-10-0026 AC Transit AC Transit: Paratransit AC Transit: Paratransit fleet: Amortized cost of replacing EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Van Replacement vans used for paratransit service. Vans are operated and Purchase of support replaced by paratransit contractor. FTA funds programmed vehicles annually in lieu of Alameda ALA990076 17-01-0002 AC Transit AC Transit: ADA AC Transit: Systemwide: ADA Paratransit Operating Subsidy. EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Paratransit Assistance Operating assistance to transit agencies Alameda ALA990077 17-01-0002 LAVTA LAVTA: ADA Paratransit LAVTA: ADA Paratransit Operating Subsidy EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Operating Subsidy Operating assistance to transit agencies Contra CC-030025 17-10-0026 WCCTA WCCTA: Preventive WestCat: Systemwide: Operating assistance to aid agency EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Maintenance Program with preventive maintenance activities of its fleet. Operating assistance to transit agencies

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 24 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Contra CC-030035 17-02-0001 ECCTA Tri-Delta: ADA Operating Tridelta: Systemwide: Operating assistance to fund ADA Set EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Assistance Aside requirement Operating assistance to transit agencies Contra CC-070013 17-02-0035 Brentwood Lone Tree Way Brentwood: On Lone Tree Way at the UPRR track: Construct EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2030 Costa Undercrossing 4-lane grade separation undercrossing. Railroad/highway crossing Contra CC-070067 17-02-0003 CCTA Mokelumne Trail Bike/Ped Brentwood: Near the Mokelumne Trail at State Route 4 in EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Overcrossing Brentwood: Construct a pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Contra CC-070092 17-10-0026 ECCTA ECCTA: Transit Bus Tri-Delta Transit: Fleetwide: Replacement Revenue Vehicles EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Replacements and associated farebox equipment Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Contra CC-090001 17-02-0008 Danville Diablo Road Imps. - Danville: Diablo Rd at Clydesdale Dr: add EB left turn pocket; EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Costa Green Valley to Avenida Diablo Rd from Green Valley to Avenida: Drainage Intersection channelization Neuva improvements, replace 1300 LF retaining wall, overlay projects roadway, replace guardrail Contra CC-110066 17-02-0017 CCTA SR 239 - New State SR 239 between SR4 in Brentwood and I-205 in Tracy: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Highway Study Conduct environmental and design studies to create a new Planning activities alignment for SR239 and develop corridor improvements conducted pursuant to titles from Brentwood to Tracy. 23 and 49 U.S.C Contra CC-110082 17-02-0043 BART Walnut Creek BART TOD Walnut Creek: In the vicinity of the Walnut Creek BART EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Access Improvements Station: construct public access improvements that are part Transportation enhancement of the proposed transit-oriented development activities (except rehabilitation and operation Contra CC-130001 17-02-0020 CC County Bailey Road-State Route In Bay Point: At the Bailey Road-State Route 4 interchange; EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2030 Costa 4 Interchange modify ramps and Bailey Road to improve bicycle and Interchange reconfiguration pedestrian circulation. Project is phased. projects Contra CC-130003 17-02-0003 CC County Bailey Road Bike and Bay Point: Bailey Rd from Willow Pass Rd to SR 4: Improve EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Pedestrian Improvements bicycle and pedestrian accessibility. Improvements will Bicycle and pedestrian expand sidewalks and construct uniform bike lanes to create facilities a corridor conducive to all Contra CC-130023 17-10-0022 Danville Danville Various Streets Danville: Sycamore Valley Road from Camino Ramon to San EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa and Roads Preservation Ramon Valley Boulevard including the bus loop within the Pavement resurfacing adjoining Park-and-Ride Lot, and El Cerro Boulevard from El and/or rehabilitation Pintado Road to just east Contra CC-130024 17-02-0003 El Cerrito Ohlone Greenway Station El Cerrito: On Ohlone Greenway at El Cerrito del Norte & EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Area Bike/Ped Plaza BART Stations & at intersections of Hill, Cutting, Bicycle and pedestrian Improvements Central & Fairmount, widen path & improve ped & bike facilities facilities. Contra CC-130025 17-10-0022 Martinez Martinez Various Streets Martinez: Various Streets and Roads: Rehab and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa and Roads Preservation reconstruction of roadways, modify curb ramps to meet Pavement resurfacing current ADA standards, including constructing bulb-outs and/or rehabilitation where there is insufficient room and

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 25 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Contra CC-130027 17-02-0005 CC County Port Chicago Hwy/Willow Bay Point: Near the intersection of Port Chicago Hwy and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Costa Pass Rd Bike Ped Willow Pass Rd: Install bike lane, sidewalk, curb and gutter, Intersection channelization Upgrades bike/ped access improvements, and intersection projects channelization Contra CC-130032 17-02-0003 San Pablo San Pablo Avenue Bicycle San Pablo and Richmond: San Pablo Ave from Rumrill Blvd EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Costa and Ped Improvements to La Puerta Rd: Reconfigure travel lanes, install sidewalks, Intersection signalization bike lanes, lighting, medians, signals, modify existing projects at individual medians and traffic signals, build intersections Contra CC-130038 17-02-0003 Danville Vista Grande Street Danville: Vista Grande Street between Camino Tassajara and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Pedestrian Diablo Road/Vista Grande Elmentary School: Construct Bicycle and pedestrian Improvements/SR2S separated asphalt concrete pathway and safety facilities enhancements to provide direct ped/bike Contra CC-130045 17-02-0003 CCCTA CCCTA: Access CCCTA: Various bus stops system-wide: Implement bicycle EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Improvements and pedestrian access improvements identified in County Bicycle and pedestrian Implementation Connection's Access Improvement Study. facilities Contra CC-130047 17-02-0004 Richmond 37th Street Bicycle & Richmond: On 37th St from Cerritto Ave to Center Ave: Install EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Pedestrian Improvements bike lanes and pedestrian countdown heads and upgrade Projects that correct, traffic signals; On 37th from Barrett to Center: Implement improve, or eliminate a road diet with one lane hazardous location or feature Contra CC-130050 17-02-0003 EB Reg Park SF Bay Trail, Pinole Pinole: Between Pinole Shores and Bayfront Park, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Dis Shores to Bay Front Park approximately 0.5-mile: Construct a section of the San Bicycle and pedestrian Francisco Bay Trail. Project is phased facilities Contra CC-150006 17-10-0026 CCCTA CCCTA: Replace 18 30' CCCTA: 18 vehicles: Replace 18 30' Heavy Duty Diesel EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Buses buses that have reached the end of their useful life, four (4) Purchase of new buses and of the diesel buses will be replaced with four (4) electric rail cars to replace existing buses. vehicles or for Contra CC-150007 17-10-0026 CCCTA CCCTA: Replace 13 35' CCCTA: 13 vehicles: Replace 13 35' Heavy Duty Diesel EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Buses Buses that have reached the end of their useful life. Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Contra CC-150010 17-02-0003 CC County CC County - Rio Vista Contra Costa County: On Pacifica Avenue between Mariners EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Elementary Ped Cove Drive and Wharf Drive: Install sidewalks, bike lanes, Bicycle and pedestrian Connection flashing beacons, speed feedback sign, retaining wall and facilities drainage improvements and Contra CC-150012 17-02-0009 CCCTA REMIX Software County Connection: Systemwide: Integrate REMIX mapping EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Implementation Project software into County Connection's planning process. Purchase of office, shop, and operating equipment for existing facilities Contra CC-150015 17-02-0009 WCCTA WestCAT: Purchase (1) WestCAT: 1 vehicle: Purchase and Install (1) FastFare EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Fast Fare Electronic Electronic Farebox for (1) 40 ft Revenue Vehicle Purchase of operating Farebox equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts,

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 26 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Contra CC-150016 17-02-0003 Richmond The Yellow Brick Road in Richmond: Various locations outlined in the the Yellow Brick EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Richmond's Iron Triangle Road Plan: Implement bike/ped improvements Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Contra CC-150017 17-02-0005 San Pablo Rumrill Blvd Complete San Pablo: Along Rumrill Boulevard between San Pablo EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Streets Improvements Avenue to the North and Costa Avenue to the South: Projects that correct, Complete Streets Improvements and road diet. Project is improve, or eliminate a phased. hazardous location or feature Contra CC-150018 17-02-0008 Walnut Creek Walnut Creek-Parking Walnut Creek: Downtown core area: Implement Parking EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Guidance System Pilot Guidance System connected to all public parking in Directional and informational downtown core area. signs Contra CC-150019 17-10-0026 BART Concord Yard Wheel BART: Concord Yard: Construct a wheel truing facility which EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Truing Facility will house a dual-guage wheel truing machine to service both Purchase of office, shop, BART and eBART vehicle wheels. and operating equipment for existing facilities Contra CC-150020 17-02-0001 ECCTA ECCTA: Non-ADA ECCTA: Systemwide: Use outreach, travel training and fare EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Paratransit to FR incentives to move non-ADA paratransit users to on demand, Transportation enhancement Incentive Program alternative transportation services. activities (except rehabilitation and operation Contra CC-150021 17-02-0009 WCCTA WestCAT - AVL System Western Contra Costa Transit Authority (WestCAT): EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa with APC Element. Systemwide: Purchase and install a new AVL system Purchase of operating including automatic passenger counting (APC) equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, Contra CC-170004 17-10-0023 MTC Regional Planning Contra Costa: Regional Planning Activities and Planning, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Activities and PPM - CC Programming and Monitoring (PPM) Planning activities County conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.C Contra CC-170006 17-10-0026 WCCTA WestCAT: Replace (2) WestCAT: 2 vehicles: Replace (2) 2002 40 ft Revenue EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa 2002 40ft Revenue Vehicles with similar vehicles Purchase of new buses and Vehicles rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Contra CC-170007 17-02-0009 WCCTA WestCAT: Purchase 2 WestCAT: 2 vehicles: Purchase and Install (2) FastFare EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Fast Fare Electronic Electronic Fareboxes Purchase of operating Fareboxes equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, Contra CC-170008 17-10-0026 WCCTA WestCAT Replace (6) WCCTA: (6) 2008 Revenue Vehicles: Purchase replacement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa 2008 35ft Revenue vehicles Purchase of new buses and Vehicles rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Contra CC-170009 17-10-0026 WCCTA WestCAT: Purchase (6) WestCAT: For (6) replacement 2008 35 ft revenue veicles: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Electronic Fareboxes Purchase (6) Electronic Fare boxes Purchase of operating equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts,

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 27 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Contra CC-170010 17-10-0026 WCCTA WestCAT Replace 5 35ft WestCAT: (5) 2007 35ft and (4) 2002 40 ft Revenue vehicles: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa and 4 40ft Vehicles Purchase replacement vehicles Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Contra CC-170011 17-10-0026 WCCTA WestCAT: Purchase (9) WestCAT: 9 vehicles: Purchase of (9) Electronic Fareboxes EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Electronic Fareboxe Purchase of operating equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, Contra CC-170012 17-10-0026 WCCTA WestCAT - Replace (2) WestCAT: 2 vehicles: Replace MiniVans (2007) with Cut EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa DAR MiniVans Away DAR vehicles Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Contra CC-170013 17-10-0026 WCCTA WestCAT: Purchase of WestCat: Radio systems: Purchase of (2) Radio systems for EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa (2) Radio Systems (2) Cut Away Van's Purchase of operating equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, Contra CC-170014 17-02-0003 San Ramon Iron Horse Trail Bike and San Ramon: At the intersections of Bollinger Canyon Road EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Pedestrian Overcrossing and the Iron Horse Trail: Construct bicycle/pedestrian Bicycle and pedestrian overcrossing facilities Contra CC-170020 17-02-0003 CC County Fred Jackson Way First In Richmond: On Fred Jackson Way from Grove Avenue to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Mile/Last Mile Connection Wildcat Creek Trail: Construct ADA accessible sidewalks Bicycle and pedestrian with street trees; and from Wildcat Creek to Brookside Dr: facilities Construct pedestrian path and Contra CC-170021 17-02-0003 CC County Pacheco Blvd Sidewalk In Martinez: Adjacent to Las Juntas Elementary School and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Gap Closure Phase 3 across Vine Hill Creek on Pacheco Boulevard: Close a gap in Bicycle and pedestrian sidewalk infrastructure and extend a 6' x 8' concrete culvert facilities Contra CC-170022 17-02-0005 Concord Commerce Ave Complete Concord: Along Commerce Ave: Upgrade street to Complete EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Streets Streets standards including installing a Class III bike route, Pavement resurfacing reconstruct asphalt pavement , ADA compliant sidewalk and/or rehabilitation improvements, improved Contra CC-170024 17-10-0032 BART El Cerrito del Norte BART BART: El Cerrito del Norte BART Station: Modernize the EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Station Modernization station including expanding the station to relieve crowding, Reconstruction or renovation improve accessibility, reduce fare evasion, and enhance the of transit buildings and customer experience. structures (e.g., rail Contra CC-170025 17-10-0022 Walnut Creek Walnut Creek-N. Main St Walnut Creek: North Main Street between the Interstate 680 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Rehab - I680 to California Overpass and California Boulevard: Rehabilitate Roadway Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Contra CC-170026 17-02-0003 San Ramon San Ramon Valley Street San Ramon Valley: At elementary, middle and high schools: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Smarts Bicycle, Pedestrian and traffic safety education Grants for training and research programs Contra CC-170027 17-10-0022 CC County Local Streets and Roads Contra Costa County: Various local streets and roads: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Preservation Project - Pavement preservation Pavement resurfacing CCC and/or rehabilitation

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 28 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Contra CC-170028 17-10-0022 CC County Kirker Pass Road Open Contra Costa County: On Kirker Pass Rd from the Concord EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Grade Overlay City Limits to approximately 140 feet east of the driveway to Pavement resurfacing 6141 Kirker Pass Rd: Pavement rehabilitation and/or rehabilitation Contra CC-170029 17-02-0003 CC County West County Walk and Contra Costa County: At 7 high schools in West Contra EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Bike Leaders Costa: Provide comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian Grants for training and education, encouragement, and engagement activities to research programs foster a walk-and-bike-to-school Contra CC-170030 17-10-0022 El Cerrito Carlson Blvd and Central In El Cerrito: On Central Ave from Santa Clara Ave to San EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Ave Pavement Rehab Pablo Ave and Carlson Blvd from Central Ave to the northern Pavement resurfacing city limits: Rehabilitate roadway including existing Class II and/or rehabilitation bike lanes and pedestrian Contra CC-170031 17-10-0022 San Pablo San Pablo - Giant Road San Pablo: Giant Rd between Brookside Dr to Trenton Blvd: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Pavement Rehabilitation Rehabilitate roadway Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Contra CC-170032 17-10-0022 Orinda Orinda Way Pavement Orinda: Orinda Way between cul de sac near Santa Maria EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Rehabilitation Way and Camino Pablo through the Orinda Village downtown Pavement resurfacing district: Perform pavement rehabilitation/maintenance and/or rehabilitation including required upgrades for Contra CC-170033 17-10-0022 Lafayette Pleasant Hill Rd In Lafayette: On Pleasant Hill Rd between Mt Diablo Blvd and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Pavement Rehab & Taylor Blvd: Rehabilitate roadway, including adjacent ramp, Pavement resurfacing Maintenance curb, gutter, and sidewalk repairs. and/or rehabilitation Contra CC-170034 17-10-0022 Brentwood Brentwood Various In Brentwood: Various locations: Pavement preservation EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Streets and Roads Pavement resurfacing Preservation and/or rehabilitation Contra CC-170035 17-02-0003 Antioch Antioch - L Street Antioch: On L Street from Hwy 4 to Antioch Marina: Widen EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Pathway to Transit street in various locations and restripe to provide continuous Bicycle and pedestrian bike lanes and sidewalks, upgrade existing traffic signals, facilities install new bus shelters Contra CC-170036 17-10-0022 Antioch Antioch Pavement In Antioch: On various roadways: Pavement Rehabilitation EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Rehabilitation (Grind/overlay, plug pavement base failures, and/or cape Pavement resurfacing seal) replace concrete curb ramps, curbs and sidewalks, and/or rehabilitation replace traffic signal loops, place Contra CC-170037 17-10-0022 Concord Concord Willow Pass In Concord: On Willow Pass Rd between Galindo St and San EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Road Repaving and 6th St Vincente Dr: Rehabilitate pavement, repair sidewalk, and Pavement resurfacing SRTS install ADA curb ramps; On 6th Street between Concord Blvd and/or rehabilitation and nearly Willow Pass Contra CC-170038 17-10-0022 Walnut Creek Ygancio Valley Road Walnut Creek: Ygnacio Valley Rd from Civic Dr to San Carlos EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Rehabilitation Dr: Rehab pavement, striping, adjust covers, ADA upgrades Pavement resurfacing and install video detection at select intersections. and/or rehabilitation Contra CC-170039 17-02-0003 Concord Monument Boulevard In Concord: Monument Blvd from Systron Dr to Cowell Rd EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Class I Path and Cowell Rd from Monument Blvd to Mesa St: Install a Bicycle and pedestrian Class I path and related improvements at signalized facilities intersections

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 29 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Contra CC-170040 17-02-0005 Pittsburg Pittsburg BART In Pittsburg: On California Ave, Bliss Ave, and Railroad Ave EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Pedestrian and Bicycle in the vicinity of the Pittsburg Center eBART station: Bicycle and pedestrian Connectivity Construct Class I and IV bikeways and associated facilities improvements Contra CC-170041 17-10-0022 Oakley Oakley Street Repair and Oakley: Vintage Parkway: Rehabilitate including new curb EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Resurfacing ramps and striping Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Contra CC-170042 17-10-0022 Pittsburg City of Pittsburg In Pittsburg: On West Leland Rd from Woodhill Rd to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Pavement Improvements Railroad Ave and on Loveridge Rd from Buchanan Rd to Pavement resurfacing Pittsburg-Antioch Highway: Rehabilitate roadway and/or rehabilitation Contra CC-170043 17-10-0022 Hercules Hercules - In Hercules: Sycamore Ave from Civic Dr to Willow/Palm Ave EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Sycamore/Willow and Willow Ave from Mariners Pointe to the SR4 Pavement resurfacing Pavement Rehabilitation overcrossing: Pavement rehabilitation and/or rehabilitation Contra CC-170044 17-02-0005 Pleasant Hill Pleasant Hill Road In Pleasant Hill: Along Pleasant Hill Rd between Taylor Blvd EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Improvements and Gregory Ln: Pavement rehabilitation, install new bike Pavement resurfacing lanes, repair sidewalk, modify signals, and landscape and/or rehabilitation medians Contra CC-170045 17-10-0022 San Ramon Alcosta Boulevard In San Ramon: On Alcosta Blvd (southbound and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Pavement Rehab northbound) from Montevideo Drive to Fircrest Lane: Pavement resurfacing Rehabilitate roadway including stripping for class 3 bike path and/or rehabilitation Contra CC-170046 17-10-0022 Moraga Moraga Way and Moraga: Moraga Way from Moraga Rd to Ivy Dr: Resurface, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Canyon/Camino Pablo close sidewalk gap, and improve bike facilities; Canyon Rd & Projects that correct, Improvements Camino Pablo intersection: Install crosswalk improvements; improve, or eliminate a Canyon Rd from hazardous location or feature Contra CC-170047 17-10-0022 Clayton Clayton Neighborhood In Clayton: On various neighborhood streets: Pavement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Street Rehab maintenance and rehabilitation including replacing pavement Pavement resurfacing markings and/or rehabilitation Contra CC-170048 17-10-0022 Pinole Pinole - San Pablo In Pinole: On San Pablo Avenue from City Limits to Pinole EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Avenue Rehabilitation Shores Dr: Rehabilitate roadway and make accessibility Pavement resurfacing upgrades as warranted and/or rehabilitation Contra CC-170049 17-02-0003 Pittsburg Pittsburg Active Transp. Pittsburg: Citywide: Identify and prioritize citywide bicycle and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa and Safe Routes Plan pedestrian improvements that would increase safety, Planning activities accessibility, and connectivity between housing, schools, conducted pursuant to titles transit, parks, community 23 and 49 U.S.C Contra CC-170050 17-02-0003 Concord Downtown Corridors Concord: Various locations:Implement bicycle and pedestrian EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Bike/Pedestrian safety improvements to three corridors connecting Downtown Projects that correct, Improvements Concord to regional transit, senior housing, and low income improve, or eliminate a communities. hazardous location or feature Contra CC-170051 17-10-0026 CCCTA CCCTA Replace 42 Ford CCCTA: 42 Ford Cutaways - 22': Replace vehicles EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Cutaways - 22" Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 30 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Contra CC-170053 17-10-0026 CCCTA CCCTA Replace 3 CCCTA: Fleetwide: Replace paratransit vehicles that have EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Gasoline 7-Year reached the end of the their useful life. Purchase of new buses and Paratransit Vans rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Contra CC-170056 17-02-0003 Richmond Lincoln Elementary SRTS Richmond: Along Chanslor, 5th St and 6th St near Lincoln EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Pedestrian Enhancements School and at Chanslor Ave and 4th St: Pedestrian Projects that correct, enhancements to improve the safety for school children by improve, or eliminate a adding median refuges, curb hazardous location or feature Contra CC-170057 17-10-0022 Richmond Richmond: Roadway Richmond: Various locations: Pavement rehabilitation, and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Preservation and ADA drainage, ADA, bicycle facility, pedestrian safety, and Pavement resurfacing Improvement vehicular efficiency improvements and/or rehabilitation Contra CC-170058 17-10-0022 Danville Camino Ramon In Danville: On Camino Ramon between Kelley Lane and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Improvements Fostoria Way: Rehabilitate roadway Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Contra CC-170059 17-10-0023 Martinez Martinez Downtown Martinez: Various streets in the Downtown Core Area (in or EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Streets Rehabilitation adjacent to the Downtown PDA): Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Contra CC-170060 17-10-0032 BART Concord BART Station Concord: In and around the Concord BART Station: Make EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Modernization capacity, access, placemaking, and state-of-good repair, Reconstruction or renovation improvements based on BART's 2016 Station Modernization of transit buildings and Plan. structures (e.g., rail Contra CC-170062 17-02-0051 CCTA I-680 Advanced Contra Costa County: I-680 from the Solano County line to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2030 Costa Techologies the Alameda County line: Deploy a suite of technology-based Traffic control devices and solutions to maximize the efficiency of I-680. operating assistance other than signalization Contra CC-990045 17-02-0001 WCCTA WestCat: ADA Paratransit WestCAT: Systemwide: ADA Paratransit Operating Subsidy EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Operating Subsidy Operating assistance to transit agencies Contra CC-99T001 17-10-0027 CCCTA CCCTA: ADA Paratransit CCCTA: Systemwide: ADA Paratransit Assistance to transit EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Costa Assistance agency. Operating assistance to transit agencies Marin MRN030010 17-10-0026 GGBHTD GGBHTD: Fixed Golden Gate Ferry: Systemwide: Replace/rehab fixed EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Guideway Connectors guideway connectors such as floats, floating barges, ramps, Reconstruction or renovation and gangways of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail Marin MRN050018 17-10-0009 GGBHTD Golden Gate Bridge SF/Marin County: Golden Gate Bridge; Seismic retrofit of the EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Seismic Retrofit, Phase Golden Gate Bridge - construction of suspension span, south Widening narrow pavements 3B pier and fender. or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel Marin MRN050019 17-10-0009 GGBHTD Golden Gate Bridge- Golden Gate Bridge: Build suicide deterrent system. Including EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Suicide Deterrent design & Environmental analysis, plus analysis of alternatives Safer non-Federal-aid SafetyBarrier & wind tunnel tests to ensure the feasibility of designs and system roads build deterrent

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 31 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Marin MRN050025 17-10-0026 GGBHTD GGBHTD: Facilities GGBHTD: Systemwide: Rehabilitate agency's maintenance EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Rehabilitation and operating facilities and replace heavy duty operating and Reconstruction or renovation maintenance equipment. of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail Marin MRN110010 17-03-0001 Sausalito Sausalito - Bridgeway/US Sausalito: Highway 101 Off Ramp/Bridgeway/Gate 6 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 101 Off Ramp Bicycle Intersection: Implement bicycle improvements Bicycle and pedestrian Imps facilities Marin MRN110040 17-10-0026 MCTD MCTD Preventive Marin Transit: Systemwide: Bus Transit Preventative EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Maintenance maintenance Rehabilitation of transit vehicles Marin MRN110041 17-10-0027 MCTD Marin Transit Low Income Marin Transit: Systemwide: Provide low-income youth free EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Youth Pass Program bus passes. Other local funds are made available for this Continuation of ride-sharing project by applying STP/CMAQ funding available through the and van-pooling promotion TPI program to activities at Marin MRN110045 17-10-0026 GGBHTD GGBHTD: Replace 7 - 40' GGBHTD: Seven (7) 40' Diesel Buses: Replace vehicles EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Diesel Buses Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Marin MRN110047 17-10-0027 MCTD MCTD: ADA Paratransit MCTD: Systemwide: ADA Paratransit Assistance to transit EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Assistance agency. Operating assistance to transit agencies Marin MRN130005 17-03-0016 San Rafael San Rafael Transit Center San Rafael: In the vicinity of the Bettini Transit Center and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Pedestrian Access Imps. the future SMART station: Upgrade existing traffic signal Intersection signalization equipment to be compliant with rail and improve pedestrian projects at individual facilities intersections Marin MRN130009 17-03-0005 Fairfax Parkade Circulation and Fairfax: Between Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, Pacheco EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Safety Improvements Avenue, Claus Drive and Broadway: Improve bicycle, Bus terminals and transfer pedestrian, transit, and vehicular circulation and safety points around and through the Parkade in Marin MRN130013 17-03-0001 San Anselmo Sunny Hill Ridge and Red In San Anselmo: Near Sunny Hill and Red Hill: Construct EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Hill Trails three miles of hiking trails Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Marin MRN130015 17-03-0005 GGBHTD GGBHTD - Transit GGBHTD: Systemwide: systems, technology and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Systems Enhancements communication enhancements to transit fleet and facilites. Transportation enhancement activities (except rehabilitation and operation Marin MRN150003 17-03-0005 MCTD MCTD: On Board Vehicle MCTD: Farebox: Install fareboxes on 62 paratransit vehicles EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Equipment and Dial-A-Ride vehicles. Replace fareboxes on 18 fixed Purchase of operating route vehicles vehicles equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, Marin MRN150005 17-10-0026 GGBHTD MS Sonoma Ferry Boat GGBHTD: MS Sonoma: Refurbish 38-year old ferry vessel EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Refurbishment and lease replacement vessel to continue service while the Rehabilitation of transit vessel is in dry dock. vehicles

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 32 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Marin MRN150008 17-03-0001 San Rafael Grand Avenue Bicycle San Rafael: Grand Ave accross the San Rafael Canal: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Pedestrian Improvements Construct bridge and sidewalk improvements for bicyclists Bicycle and pedestrian and pedestrians facilities Marin MRN150010 17-10-0026 MCTD MCTD - Relocate Transit In North Eastern Marin County: Relocate contractor EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Maintenance Facility maintenance facilities in a centralized location, including bus Construction of new bus or parking and three maintenance bays. rail storage/maintenance facilities categorically Marin MRN150011 17-10-0026 MCTD MCTD- Replace Shuttle MCTD: 12 shuttle buses: Purchase buses to replace ones EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Vehicles that are beyond their useful life Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Marin MRN150012 17-10-0026 MCTD MCTD - Replace 13 -40ft MCTD: 13 40ft vehicles: Replace vehicles that are beyond EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Buses their useful life Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Marin MRN150013 17-10-0026 MCTD MCTD - Emergency Radio MCTD: Fleetwide: Replace radio system on fixed route EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 System shuttles and rural service to meet emergency radio Purchase of operating requirements. equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, Marin MRN150014 17-10-0026 GGBHTD GGBHTD Ferry Major GGBHTD: Systemwide: Ferry Rehab, replace major ferry EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Components Rehab components such as navigation systems, dry-dock, hull, Rehabilitation of transit interior, life saving equipment, propulsion and other ferry vehicles components. Marin MRN150015 17-10-0026 GGBHTD GGBHTD Ferry GGBHTD: Systemwide: Ferry propulsion systems- EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Propulsion Systems replacement of power distribution systems, propellers, Rehabilitation of transit Replacement engines, generators, gear boxes, etc. for Golden Gate Ferry vehicles vessels. Marin MRN150016 17-10-0022 Novato Vineyard Road Novato: Vineyard Road from Wilson Avenue to Sutro EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Improvements Avenue: Perform pavement rehabilitation, install bicycle Pavement resurfacing lanes, and property owner-funded frontage improvements and/or rehabilitation Marin MRN170001 17-10-0023 MTC Regional Planning Marin: Regional Planning Activities and Planning, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Activities and PPM - Marin Programming and Monitoring (PPM) Planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.C Marin MRN170003 17-10-0026 MCTD MCTD: Replace MCTD: 19 Paratransit Vehicles: Replace vehicles EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Paratransit Vehicles Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Marin MRN170004 17-10-0026 MCTD MCTD: Replace MCTD: 3 vehicles: Replace two Paratransit Vehicles with EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Paratransit Vehicles with Vans and purchase a third vehicle as a non-revenue support Purchase of new buses and Vans vehicle rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 33 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Marin MRN170005 17-10-0026 MCTD MCTD: Replace Rural MCTD: Four (4) Rural Cutaway Vehicles: Purchase EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Cutaway Vehicles replacement vehicles Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Marin MRN170006 17-10-0026 MCTD MCTD: Replace MCTD: System-wide: Replace Articulated Vehicles EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Articulated Vehicles Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Marin MRN170007 17-10-0026 MCTD MCTD-Replace diesel MCTD: 2- 2008 35ft diesel vehicles: Replace vehicles EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 vehicles Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Marin MRN170008 17-10-0026 GGBHTD GGBHTD: Replace 67 GGBHTD: Systemwide: Routine replacement of 67 standard EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Diesel Buses with Hybrid diesel-powered revenue vehicles that have reached end of Purchase of new buses and Buses useful life with diesel-electric hybrid buses rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Marin MRN170009 17-10-0026 GGBHTD GGBHTD: Replace GGBHTD: Fleetwide: Replace paratransit vehicles EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Paratransit Vehicles Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Marin MRN170010 17-10-0026 GGBHTD GGBHTD: Purchase 7 GGBHTD: 6 diesel 45' buses: Replace with hybrid 40' buses; EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Hybrid Buses purchase 1 additional hybrid 40' bus. Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Marin MRN170011 17-03-0001 TAM North-South Greenway Marin County: Northern Segment: US101 off-ramp over Corte EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Gap Closure Madera Creek and along Old Redwood Highway to US101 Bicycle and pedestrian overcrossing: widen to add bike/ped path. Southern Segment: facilities From Northern Marin MRN170012 17-03-0001 San Rafael Francisco Boulevard East In San Rafael: Francisco Blvd East and Grand Ave from EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Sidewalk Widening Vivian St to Grand Avenue Bridge: Widen existing sidewalk Bicycle and pedestrian and provide streetscape elements facilities Marin MRN170013 17-03-0013 GGBHTD San Rafael Transit Center In San Rafael: San Rafael Transit Center: Relocate the EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Relocation existing San Rafael Transit Center (SRTC) to accommodate Bus terminals and transfer the extension of SMART service to Larkspur points Marin MRN170016 17-09-0018 San Rafael Francisco Blvd West Multi- San Rafael: On Francisco Blvd West between Second St. EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2020 Use Pathway and Anderson Dr.: Construct a multi-use path. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Marin MRN170018 17-10-0033 Various GL: Marin County - TOS- Marin County: Various Locations: Projects are consistent with EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mobility 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and 40 CFR Part Projects that correct, 93.127 Table 3 categories improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Marin MRN170019 17-03-0001 Corte Madera Corte Madera-Paradise Corte Madera: Along Paradise Dr. between San Clemente Dr. EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Drive Multiuse Path and Seawolf Passage: Extend multiuse pathway Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 34 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Marin MRN170020 17-03-0001 San Anselmo San Anselmo Bike Spine San Anselmo: In the vicinity of St. Anselm School, Wade EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Thomas ES, Sir Francis Drake HS, and Brookside ES: Install Bicycle and pedestrian shared lane markings, roadway striping, school bike route facilities signs, crossing enhancements Marin MRN170021 17-10-0022 San Anselmo Sir Francis Drake Blvd In the Town of San Anselmo: On Sir Francis Drake Boulevard EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Pavement Rehabilitation between Center Boulevard/Red Hill Avenue (The Hub) and Pavement resurfacing Bolinas Avenue: Rehabilitate existing roadway pavements and/or rehabilitation and install intersection Marin MRN170022 17-10-0022 Novato Novato-Measure A Group In the City of Novato: Nave Dr from Alameda Del Prado to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 10 Pavement Bel Marin Keys Blvd and Bel Marin Keys Blvd from Nave Dr Pavement resurfacing Rehabilitation to Galli Dr: Pavement Rehabilitation and/or rehabilitation Marin MRN170023 17-03-0001 Corte Madera Central Marin Regional Corte Madera: On the west side of US 101 along Nellen Ave EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Pathway Gap Closure and Wornum Dr: separated pedestrian and bicycle facilities Bicycle and pedestrian including protected bikeway, sidewalk and a pedestrian facilities refuge island with walkway, Marin MRN170024 17-10-0026 GGBHTD Replace 14 - 22' Gas GGBHTD: 14 paratransit vehicles: Routine replacement of EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Body-on-Chassis Vehicles paratransit vehicles that have reached end of useful life Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Marin MRN170026 17-03-0001 Novato Hill Recreation Area Novato: At the Hill Recreation Area: Add a network of bicycle EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Improvements and pedestrian walkways and multi-purpose pathways to Bicycle and pedestrian preserve and enhance an existing park to increase facilities recreational opportunities Marin MRN170027 17-10-0022 Marin County Hicks Marin County: Hicks Valley Rd from Point Reyes-Petaluma EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Valley/MarshallPetaluma/ Rd to Marshall-Petaluma Rd, Wilson Hill Rd from Marshall- Pavement resurfacing Wilson Hill Rd Rehab Petaluma Rd to Chileno Valley Rd, Marshall-Petaluma Rd and/or rehabilitation from Hicks Valley Rd (milepost Marin MRN170028 17-03-0001 Natl Park Svc Fort Baker's Vista Point Golden Gate National Recreation Area: Between the Dana EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Trail Bowers Vista Point Parking Area and both Fort Baker and Bicycle and pedestrian Sausalito: Construct the Vista Point Trail, a new multi-use facilities segment of the Bay Trail. Marin MRN170029 17-03-0003 Novato Carmel Open Space Novato: Within the Carmel Open Space: Acquire a private EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Acquisition parcel for use as a Priority Conservation Area Acquisition of scenic easements Marin MRN190002 17-10-0023 Novato Novato Annual Pavement Novato: Various streets and roads: Rehabilitate pavement, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Rehabilitation upgrade pedestrian facilities to meet current accessibility Pavement resurfacing requirements, include striping for Class 2 and Class 3 bicycle and/or rehabilitation facilities. Project is phased. Marin MRN190011 17-03-0001 Larkspur Old Redwood Highway Larkspur: Along Old Redwood Highway from the Greenbrae EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Multi-Use Path Pedestrian Overcrossing up to the southern terminus of the Bicycle and pedestrian pathway in state right-of way: Construct a multi-use pathway facilities Marin MRN970016 17-10-0009 GGBHTD Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco /Marin Counties: Golden Gate Bridge; Seismic EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Seismic Retrofit, Ph: 1-3A retrofit of the Golden Gate Bridge - construction on north and Widening narrow pavements south approach viaducts, and Ft. Point Arch. or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 35 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Marin MRN990017 17-10-0026 GGBHTD GGBHTD: Ferry Channel Golden Gate Ferry: From San Francisco to Marin County: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 & Berth Dredging Dredge ferry channel and berth. Reconstruction or renovation of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail Napa NAP030004 17-10-0027 NVTA NVTA: ADA Operating Napa: Systemwide: ADA operating assistance for paratransit EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Assistance service Operating assistance to transit agencies Napa NAP090005 17-10-0026 NVTA NVTA: Replace Rolling NVTA: Fleetwide: Replace rolling stock for fixed-route, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Stock paratransit, and community shuttle fleet. Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Napa NAP090008 17-10-0026 NVTA NVTA Equipment NVTA: Napa Vine service area: Replacement and upgrades EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Replacement and to transit equipment Purchase of office, shop, Upgrades and operating equipment for existing facilities Napa NAP110014 17-04-0001 NVTA Napa Valley Vine Trail Napa County: Various locations: Design and construction of EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Design and Construction individual segments of Vine Trail. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Napa NAP110026 17-10-0024 Napa County Hardin Rd Bridge Napa County: On Harding Rd at Maxwell Creek, 1.6M SE of EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Replacement - 21C0058 Pope Cyn Rd: Replace existing one lane bridge with new 2- Projects that correct, lane bridge to meet standards. Toll credits are used in lieu of improve, or eliminate a match for all phases. hazardous location or feature Napa NAP110027 17-10-0024 Napa County Loma Vista Dr Bridge Napa County: Loma Vista Dr over Soda Creek, 1.4 miles EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Replacement - 21C0080 north of Silverado Trail: replace existing one lane bridge with Projects that correct, new two lane bridge to meet standards. Toll credits are used improve, or eliminate a in lieu of match for all hazardous location or feature Napa NAP110028 17-04-0005 Napa California Boulevard City of Napa: At First Street/ California Blvd. and Second EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Roundabouts Street/ California Blvd: Construct roundabouts Caltrans: Intersection channelization Construct roundabout at Northbound off-ramp of SR 29 and projects First Street Napa NAP130004 17-04-0001 Napa State Route 29 Bicycle & Napa: On the North side of Napa Creek under Highway 29: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Pedestrian Undercrossing Construct a Class 1 bicycle and pedestrian path Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Napa NAP130008 17-04-0001 Yountville Hopper Creek Pedestrian Yountville: Along Hopper Creek from Oak Circle Open Space EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Bridge and Path Project to Mission St: Construct multi-use pathway and a pedestrian Bicycle and pedestrian bridge across Hopper Creek facilities Napa NAP150001 17-04-0002 Calistoga SR 128 and Petrified In Calistoga: On SR 128 and Petrified Forest Road, convert 4- EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Forest Intersection Imp way stop controlled intersection to a traffic signal. Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections Napa NAP150003 17-04-0001 NVTA Napa Valley Vine Trail In Napa County: From Calistoga to St. Helena: Construct EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Calistoga-St. Helena Seg. multi-use trail Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 36 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Napa NAP170001 17-10-0023 MTC Regional Planning Napa: Countywide: Regional Planning Activities and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Activities and PPM - Napa Planning, Programming and Monitoring (PPM) Planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.C Napa NAP170002 17-10-0022 Napa County Napa County: 2014 In Napa County: On various federal-aid system roads: Repair EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Earthquake Pavement pavement damage caused by 2014 earthquake. Repair of damage caused by Repair natural disasters, civil unrest, or terrorist acts, Napa NAP170004 17-04-0001 NVTA Napa County Safe Routes Napa County: County-wide: Safe Routes to Schools Program, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 to Schools Non-Infrastructure Grants for training and research programs Napa NAP170005 17-04-0003 Saint Helena Main Street St. Helena Saint Helena: Along Main Street (SR29) from Mitchell Dr to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Pedestrian Improvements Pine St: Replace and upgrade pedestrian facilities and install Projects that correct, traffic calming devices improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Napa NAP170006 17-04-0001 American Green Island Road Class I American Canyon: Green Island Road in the Green Island EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Canyon Industrial District (GRID): Construct new Class 1 multi-use Bicycle and pedestrian trail. facilities Napa NAP170007 17-04-0001 Napa Vine Trail Gap Closure - Napa: Between Third St and Vallejo St in Downtown Napa: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Soscol Avenue Corridor Construct a Class I multi-use trail to close a gap in the Napa Bicycle and pedestrian Valley Vine Trail facilities Napa NAP170008 17-10-0022 Napa County Silverado Trail Phase L Napa County: On Silverado Trail from Oak Knoll Ave to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Rehab Hardman Ave: Rehabilitate existing asphalt concrete Pavement resurfacing pavement, retain existing Class II bicycle lanes, replace and/or rehabilitation existing rumble dots (audible pavement Napa NAP170009 17-04-0005 Napa Silverado Trail Five-Way In City of Napa: At the intersection of Silverado Trail, Third St, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Intersection Coombsville Rd, and East Ave: Construct roundabout Intersection channelization Improvements projects Napa NAP970010 17-10-0027 NVTA Napa Vine Operating Napa Vine: Systemwide: Operating assistance to support EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Assistance transit routes and services. Operating assistance to transit agencies Regional BRT030004 17-10-0005 BART BART Train Control BART: Systemwide: Replace obsolete elements and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2030 / Multi- Renovation subsystems of the train control system. Reconstruction or renovation County of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail Regional BRT030005 17-10-0005 BART BART: Traction Power BART: Systemwide: Replace obsolete elements and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2030 / Multi- System Renovation subsystems of the traction power system to maintain and Reconstruction or renovation County improve reliability and safety of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail Regional BRT97100B 17-10-0026 BART BART: Rail, Way and BART: Systemwide: Replace worn out mainline rail and make EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Structures Program other timely reinvestments in way. Rehabilitation or County reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 37 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Regional BRT99T01B 17-10-0005 BART BART:ADA Paratransit BART: At various stations: Capital Access Improvements EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2030 / Multi- Capital Accessibility Program including, station elevator improvements, installation Operating assistance to County Improve of hands-free emergency telephones, and tactile stair tread transit agencies replacement Regional MTC050001 17-10-0015 MTC Bay Area Commuter San Francisco Bay Area: Region wide: Implement the Bay EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Benefits Program Area Commuter Benefits Program. Toll credits applied in lieu Continuation of ride-sharing County of match and van-pooling promotion activities at Regional REG050020 17-10-0026 BART BART Car Exchange BART: Systemwide: Preventive maintenance program, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- (Preventive Maintenance) including maintenance of rail cars and other system Rehabilitation of transit County components in exchange for local funds to the BART car vehicles replacement reserve. Regional REG090039 17-10-0022 MTC Regional Streets and SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Regional Streets and Roads EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Roads Program Program including providing assistance to Bay Area agencies Planning activities County to implement & maintain computerized pavement conducted pursuant to titles management system (PMS), 23 and 49 U.S.C Regional REG090042 17-10-0029 MTC 511 Traveler Information SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Provides multimodal, accurate, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- reliable, and accessible traveler information on multiple Directional and informational County dissemination platforms, serves as the go-to source during signs major disruptions and Regional REG090045 17-10-0028 MTC Clipper Fare Collection San Francisco Bay Area: Regionwide: Design, build, operate EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- System and maintain the Clipper fare collection system. Note: Purchase of operating County Translink became Clipper on 6/16/10. equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, Regional REG090051 17-10-0026 Caltrain Caltrain: Revenue Vehicle Caltrain: Systemwide: Provide overhauls and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Rehab Program repairs/replacements to key components of the Caltrain Rehabilitation of transit County rolling stock to maintain it in a state of good repair. vehicles Regional REG090054 17-10-0026 WETA WETA: Ferry Channel & WETA: Various service areas: Dredge ferry channel, ferry EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Berth Dredging basin and berth Rehabilitation or County reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in Regional REG090055 17-10-0026 WETA WETA: Ferry Propulsion WETA: Fleetwide: A mid-life overhaul is scheduled when a EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- System Replacement ferry reaches approximately 12.5 years of service life. Rehabilitation of transit County Equipment service hours and specific vessel needs may vehicles affect the timing of the projects. Regional REG090057 17-10-0026 WETA WETA: Ferry Major WETA: Fleetwide: Rehabilitate and/or replacement major EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Component ferry components including shafts, propellers, navigation Rehabilitation of transit County Rehab/Replacement systems, onboard monitoring and alarm systems, interior vehicles components, boarding Regional REG090067 17-10-0026 WETA WETA: Fixed Guideway WETA: Various locations: This project will replace/rehab fixed EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Connectors guideway connectors such as floats, floating barges, ramps Reconstruction or renovation County and gangways throughout the system. of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 38 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Regional REG110020 17-10-0026 WETA WETA: Facilities WETA: Various Locations: Rehabilitate ferry facilities in order EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Rehabilitation to maintain existing transit services. Reconstruction or renovation County of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail Regional REG110030 17-10-0008 Caltrain Caltrain Positive Train Caltrain: Systemwide: Implement PTC, an advanced train EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2030 / Multi- Control System control system that allows for automated collision prevention, Construction or renovation County and improved manual collision prevention. of power, signal, and communications systems Regional REG110039 17-10-0011 MTC GL: 5307 JARC Set-aside GL: 5307 JARC Set-aside FY13 Large UA. Various 5307 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- FY13-FY14 Large UA (former JARC) projects in large urbanized areas. Project is Operating assistance to County consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126, 127, 128, Exempt transit agencies Tables 2 & 3. Regional REG110041 17-10-0027 Caltrans GL: FTA Non-Urbanized GL: FTA Section 5311 Non-Urbanized Formula Program, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Formula Program Non-ITS portion. Projects include capital and operating Operating assistance to County assistance, capital and preventive maintenance. Projects transit agencies consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126, Regional REG110044 17-10-0026 ACE ACE Positive Train ACE: System-wide: Install an advanced train control system EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Control that allows for automated collision prevention, improved Construction or renovation County manual collision prevention, and improved headways. of power, signal, and communications systems Regional REG130001 17-10-0024 MTC Toll Bridge Maintenance Region-wide: Seven state-owned toll bridges: routine EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- maintenance of bridge facilities Widening narrow pavements County or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel Regional REG130002 17-10-0024 MTC Toll Bridge Rehabilitation Bay Area: On 7 state-owned toll bridges: Rehabilitation EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Program program Widening narrow pavements County or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel Regional REG130005 17-10-0011 MTC Bay Area Housing SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Establish land acquisition and land EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Initiatives banking financing fund and Bay Area Preservation Pilot to Grants for training and County maximize the production and preservation of affordable research programs housing near transit stations; Regional REG150002 17-10-0027 Caltrans GL: FTA 5311 Rural Area GL: FTA Section 5311 Rural Area Program, Non-ITS portion. EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- FY15 Projects include capital and operating assistance. Projects Operating assistance to County consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 transit agencies Regional REG150004 17-10-0011 MTC GL: Lifeline Cycle 4 5307 GL: 5307 JARC Set-aside FY13 Small UA and FY14-FY16 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- JARC Large and Small UA. Various 5307 (former JARC) projects in Operating assistance to County large and small urbanized areas. Project is consistent with 40 transit agencies CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Regional REG150005 17-10-0011 BART Transit-Oriented Oakland and San Francisco: Around BART Stations: Develop EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Development Pilot a comprehensive TOD strategy that fills the remaining gaps Planning and technical County Planning Progra in transportation management and development studies implementation in the Transbay

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 39 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Regional REG170001 17-10-0023 MTC Regional Planning Regional: Regional Planning Activities and Planning, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Activities and PPM - MTC Programming and Monitoring (PPM) Planning activities County conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.C Regional REG170002 17-10-0013 MTC Connected Bay Area SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Implement a collective approach EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- to freeway operations and management, including Traffic control devices and County communications network building, and traffic management operating assistance other systems and software; Along the I- than signalization Regional REG170003 17-10-0029 MTC 511 Carpool and Vanpool SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Operate Carpool and Vanpool EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Programs Programs. Toll credits applied in lieu of match; non-federal Continuation of ride-sharing County funds are non-participating and van-pooling promotion activities at Regional REG170006 17-10-0015 MTC Spare the Air Youth Regional: Education and Outreach: Program designed to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- reduce greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle miles traveled Grants for training and County through education and encouragement programs for youth research programs and families. Regional REG170007 17-10-0013 MTC Incident Management SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Manage congestion by EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Program implementing strategies to enhance mobility and safety, and Traffic control devices and County reduce the impacts of traffic incidents, including advanced operating assistance other transportation management than signalization Regional REG170008 17-01-0002 BART BART Integrated Carpool BART: Systemwide: Program to better integrate carpool EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- to Transit Access access to public transit by matching carpools through an app. Continuation of ride-sharing County Program The app facilitates carpool matching, payment, and parking and van-pooling promotion space reservation at the activities at Regional REG170009 17-10-0005 BART BART Train Seat BART: On up to 360 existing BART cars: Remove 7 seats to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2030 / Multi- Modification provide immediate relief for passengers in the peak period Rehabilitation of transit County commute hours vehicles Regional REG170010 17-10-0033 MTC Reg. Prog. for Arterial SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Develop plans to guide arterial EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.128) - 2040 / Multi- System Synchronization system integration and operations investments, and provide Traffic signal County project management and traffic engineering/tech assistance synchronization projects (including procuring traffic Regional REG170013 17-10-0029 MTC 511 Next Gen SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Provide free multi-modal traveler EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- information via multiple platforms. Given the public's Directional and informational County increasing reliance on private sector services, 511 will focus signs on being a data provider to Regional REG170014 17-10-0033 MTC Active Operations SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Planning and design assessments EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Management of various multi-modal operational projects and policies. Traffic control devices and County operating assistance other than signalization Regional REG170016 17-10-0021 MTC Regional Planning - PDA SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Planning Assistance to support EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Implementation transportation investments and improve their performance in Planning activities County priority development areas. conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.C

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 40 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Regional REG170018 17-10-0033 MTC Connected & Automated SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Deploy demonstration CV/AV EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Vehicles technologies to prepare the region for future connected and Grants for training and County automated vehicles and support strategies, including research programs technical assistance. Toll credits Regional REG170019 17-10-0015 BAAQMD Spare the Air San Francisco Bay Area: Region-wide: Spare the Air EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Campaign - Inform/educate the public about ozone problems, Operating assistance to County notify when Spare the Air days are called and encourage use transit agencies of transit, ridesharing, etc Regional REG170020 17-10-0015 BAAQMD Electric Vehicle Programs San Francisco Bay Area: Inform/educate the public about EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- and Outreach electric vehicles, infrastructure and purchasing programs. Grants for training and County research programs Regional REG170021 17-10-0015 BAAQMD Electric Vehicle SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Install EV charging stations along EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Infrastructure/Vehicle transportation corridors, at workplaces, MUDs and park and Transportation enhancement County Buyback ride lots. Scrap operable 1994 and older vehicles and provide activities (except funding for EV rehabilitation and operation Regional REG170022 17-10-0028 MTC Clipper® 2.0 Fare SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Implement a wholesale EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Payment System replacement of the Clipper backend system and all customer Purchase of office, shop, County facing fare devices, modernization of retail and customer and operating equipment for service, and expansion of ways to existing facilities Regional REG170023 17-10-0016 MTC TCP Financing SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Repayment of principal balance EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Repayment Obligations and interest costs associated with securitization of future FTA Purchase of new buses and County formula fund apportionments. Also references RTP IDs 17-10-rail cars to replace existing 0006 and 17-10- vehicles or for Regional REG170024 17-10-0033 MTC Bay Bridge Forward- Albany and Oakland: I-80/Buchanan Ave, I-880/High St, and I-EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Commuter Parking 880/Fruitvale: operations and maintenance of commuter Continuation of ride-sharing County Initiative O&M parking facilities and van-pooling promotion activities at Regional REG170025 17-10-0011 MTC Community Based SF Bay Area: Regionwide: Develop and/or update locally-led EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Transportation Planning plans to address the mobility needs of low-income Planning and technical County household's in the region's 35 Communities of Concern studies (CBTP) Regional REG170027 17-10-0015 MTC Targeted Transportation SF Bay Area: Region-wide: Implement a digitally-based EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Alternatives personalized travel assistance program that provides Grants for training and County targeted audiences with travel information to shift from solo research programs driving to sustainable forms of Regional REG170028 17-10-0015 MTC Regional Car Sharing SF Bay Area: Region-wide: Implement strategies to grow EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- carsharing in the Bay Area including developing policies and Grants for training and County regulations, increasing the number of carshare vehicles, research programs developing incentives and Regional SM-050041 17-10-0026 Caltrain Caltrain: Caltrain: Systemwide: Rehabilitate existing signal system and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Signal/Communication upgrade/replace communication equipment. Construction or renovation County Rehab. & Upgrades of power, signal, and communications systems

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 41 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Regional VAR150001 17-10-0027 MTC GL: FTA 5311 Rural Area GL: FTA Section 5311 Rural Area Program, Non-ITS portion. EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- FY16 Projects include capital and operating assistance. Projects Operating assistance to County consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 transit agencies Regional VAR170002 17-10-0025 Caltrans GL: Highway Safety GL: Safety Imprv - Highway Safety Improvement Program: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Improvement Program Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Highway Safety County Tables 2 and Table 3 categories. Improvement Program implementation Regional VAR170004 17-10-0025 Caltrans GL: Pavement GL: Pavement Resurf/Rehab State Highway System - EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Resurfacing/Rehab SHS - Highway Maintenance. Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Pavement resurfacing County Highway Maint Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories - and/or rehabilitation Pavement resurfacing and/or Regional VAR170005 17-10-0013 Caltrans GL: Safety Improvements - SF Bay Area: Various Locations: Projects are consistent with EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- SHOPP Mobility Program 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories Traffic control devices and County operating assistance other than signalization Regional VAR170006 17-10-0025 Caltrans GL: Pavement Regionwide: Various Locations: Projects consistent with EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Resurf./Rehab - SHOPP 40CFR93.126 Exempt Tables 2 categories - Pavement Pavement resurfacing County Roadway Presv. resurfacing and/or rehabilitation, Emergency relief (23 U.S.C. and/or rehabilitation 125), Widening narrow Regional VAR170007 17-10-0025 Caltrans GL: Safety Imprv. - Regionwide: Various Locations: Projects are consistent with EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- SHOPP Collision 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories Guardrails, median barriers, County Reduction crash cushions Regional VAR170008 17-10-0025 Caltrans GL: Emergency Repair - Regionwide: Various Locations: Projects are consistent with EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- SHOPP Emergency 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 categories Repair of damage caused by County Response natural disasters, civil unrest, or terrorist acts, Regional VAR170009 17-10-0025 Caltrans GL: Safety Improvements - Regionwide: Various Locations: Projects are consistent with EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- SHOPP Mandates 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories Bicycle and pedestrian County facilities Regional VAR170010 17-10-0025 Caltrans GL: Bridge Rehab and Regionwide: Various Locations: Projects are consistent with EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Reconstruction - SHOPP 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 categories - Widening Widening narrow pavements County narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional or reconstructing bridges (no travel lanes). additional travel Regional VAR170011 17-10-0025 Caltrans GL: Shoulder Imprv - Regionwide: Various Locations: Projects are consistent with EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- SHOPP Roadside 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 categories - Plantings, landscaping, etc County Preservation Fencing,Safety roadside rest areas Regional VAR170012 17-10-0024 Caltrans GL: Bridge Rehab/Recon. -GL: Local Bridge Rehab/Recon. - Local Highway Bridge EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Local Hwy Bridge Program(HBP) or Highway Bridge Replacement and Widening narrow pavements County Program Rehabilitation (HBRR). Projects are consistent with 40 CFR or reconstructing bridges (no Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 categories. additional travel Regional VAR170014 17-10-0033 MTC Bay Bridge Forward - Alameda County: Deploy ITS that integrate with SFOBB toll EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Integrated Bridge Corridor bridge metering lights system and Smart I-80 to improve Traffic control devices and County traffic flow and information dissemination for users of the I- operating assistance other 80, I-580, and I-880 bridge than signalization

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 42 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Regional VAR170017 17-10-0025 Caltrans GL: Railroad-Highway GL: Railroad/Highway Crossings. Projects are consistent with EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Crossing 40 CFR 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 categories - Railroad/highway crossing County Railroad/highway crossing Regional VAR170018 17-10-0026 MTC GL: FTA 5311 Rural Area GL: FTA Section 5311 Rural Area Program, Non-ITS portion. EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- FY17 Projects include capital and operating assistance. Projects Operating assistance to County consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 transit agencies Regional VAR170019 17-10-0026 MTC GL: FTA 5311 Rural Area SF Bay Area: Regionwide: GL FTA Section 5311 Rural Area EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- FY18 Program, Non-ITS portion. Projects include capital and Operating assistance to County operating assistance. Projects consistent with 40 CFR Part transit agencies 93.126 Exempt Table 2 Regional VAR170020 17-10-0027 MTC GL: FTA Section 5310 Region-Wide: Eld. & persons with Disabilities. Prog Lump EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Program FY15, FY16 and Sum Listing; Project incl. Veh. replacements, minor Operating assistance to County FY17 expansion & office equip. Consist with 40 CFR Part 93.126 transit agencies Regional VAR170024 17-01-0001 MTC Bike Share Capital Fremont, Richmond, and Marin and Sonoma Counties, along EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Program the SMART Corridor: Various Locations: Implement bike / Bicycle and pedestrian County bicycle sharing facilities Regional VAR170025 17-10-0011 MTC GL: Lifeline SF Bay Area: Region-wide: 5307 Lifeline set-aside from FY17 EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 / Multi- Transportation Program and FY18 Large and Small UA. Various 5307 Lifeline projects Bus terminals and transfer County Cycle 5 in large and small urbanized areas. Project is consistent with points 40 CFR Part 93.126 Regional VAR170026 17-10-0026 MTC GL: FTA 5311 Rural Area GL: FTA Section 5311 Rural Area Program, Non-ITS portion. EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- FY19 and FY20 Projects include capital and operating assistance. Projects Operating assistance to County consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 transit agencies Regional VAR190001 17-10-0025 Caltrans GL: Pvmt Resurf/Rehab GL: Pavement Resurf/Rehab State Hwy System - SHOPP EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- State Hwy Sys - SHOPP Minor. Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Pavement resurfacing County Minor Exempt Tables 2 and Table 3 categories and/or rehabilitation Regional VAR190002 17-10-0021 BART BART: TOD Alameda, Contra Costa, San Francisco Counties: On BART EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 / Multi- Implementation property in BART station areas: Planning assistance to Planning and technical County support transit oriented development studies San SF-030013 17-10-0026 SFMTA SFMTA: Wayside Fare SFMTA: Systemwide: Replacement of life-expired fare EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Collection Equipment collection equipment. Purchase of operating o equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, San SF-050014 17-05-0010 BART BART/MUNI Direct BART/MUNI: Powell Street Station: Provide a direct EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Connection Platform connection between BART & MUNI. Bicycle and pedestrian o facilities San SF-050024 17-10-0026 SFMTA SFMTA:Train Control & SFMTA: Systemwide: Rehabilitate or replace elements of the EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Trolley Signal ATCS Wayside/Central Train Control & Rail/Bus Signal Rehabilitation or o Rehab/Replace Systems. reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in San SF-070027 17-10-0024 SF County TA Yerba Buena Island (YBI) San Francisco: Existing on and off ramps at the Yerba Buena EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Francisc Ramp Improvements Island (YBI) interchange at US I-80: Reconst ramps; On the Interchange reconfiguration o west side of the Island: Rehabilitate existing deficient bridges. projects

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 43 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year San SF-070029 17-10-0017 TBJPA Transbay Transit Center - San Francisco, Transbay Transit Center: TIFIA Loan debt EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc TIFIA Loan Debt Service service for Phase 1 & 2. Update annual debt service amounts Planning and technical o based on TIFIA loan agreement. studies San SF-090011 17-05-0028 SF County TA Oakdale Caltrain Station San Francisco: Oakdale near Palou: Planning, preliminary EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc engineering, and environmental work for a new Caltrain Planning activities o station and transit service adjustments to serve station. conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.C San SF-090035 17-10-0026 SFMTA SFMTA: Paratransit SFMTA: Paratransit service across San Francisco: preserve EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Vehicle Replacements service and replace 84 paratransit vehicles Purchase of new buses and o rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for San SF-110005 17-10-0022 SF DPW Great Highway San Francisco: Great Highway From Sloat to Skyline Hwy: Ph EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Restoration 1. Restore and stabilize roadway, stop bluff slides, and Pavement resurfacing o protect infrastructure. Phase 2. Implement road diet by and/or rehabilitation closing remaining SB lane and San SF-110053 17-10-0026 WETA WETA: Replace Ferry WETA: All existing ferry vessels for WETA: Replace vessels EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Vessels when they reach the end of their useful life of 25 years Purchase of new buses and o rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for San SF-130010 17-05-0030 SF County TA Construct Treasure Island San Francisco: Treasure Island: Construct Treasure Island EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2030 Francisc Bus Terminal Facility Bus Terminal Facility Bus terminals and transfer o points San SF-150001 17-05-0003 SF DPW John Yehall Chin Safe In San Francisco: 5 intersections near 350 Broadway Street: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Routes to School Construct curb extensions. Bicycle and pedestrian o facilities San SF-150005 17-10-0026 SFMTA SFMTA - Replacement of SFMTA: 40' Neoplan Buses: Replace 40' Neoplan Buses EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc 40' Motor Coaches originally in service in 2002 with (85) 40'hybrid buses. Purchase of new buses and o rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for San SF-150006 17-10-0026 SFMTA SFMTA Replacement of SFMTA: 60' Neoplan Buses: Replace 98 60' Neoplan Buses EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc 60' Motor Coaches diesel buses originally in service in 2002 with 98 60' hybrid Purchase of new buses and o buses. rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for San SF-150007 17-10-0026 SFMTA SFMTA Farebox SFMTA: Systemwide: Refurbish or purchase existing EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Replacement fareboxes and necessary support equipment to improve Purchase of operating o reliability, functionality, and the overall customer experience. equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, San SF-150013 17-05-0009 SF County TA SB I-280 Off-Ramp at San Francisco: I-280/Ocean Avenue Interchange: Realign the EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Francisc Ocean Ave Realignment southbound I-280 off-ramp to Ocean Avenue into a T Interchange reconfiguration o intersection with a new signal on Ocean Avenue projects San SF-150017 17-05-0003 SFDPH SF Safe Routes to School San Francisco: Citywide: Implement a pilot proposal that EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc 2017-2019 includes innovative educational, encouragement, and Grants for training and o evaluation activities and deliverables to increase safe research programs walking and biking by schoolchildren

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 44 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year San SF-170002 17-10-0023 MTC Regional Planning San Francisco: Regional Planning Activities and Planning, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Activities and PPM - SF Programming and Monitoring (PPM) Planning activities o County conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.C San SF-170003 17-10-0033 MTC Bay Bridge Forward- Sterling/Bryant St. and Regionwide: Pilot Vehicle Occupancy EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Sterling/Bryant St Detection (VOD) technology and increased CHP enforcement Traffic control devices and o Managed Lane at Sterling and other pilot sites, support planned HOV lanes operating assistance other to bridge; convert HOV than signalization San SF-170004 17-10-0026 SFMTA SFMTA: Replacement of SFMTA: Systemwide: Purchase 40' replacement trolley EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc 40' Trolley Coaches coaches for the existing aging coaches. Purchase of new buses and o rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for San SF-170006 17-05-0001 SFMTA SFMTA: Station-area Ped SFMTA: Citywide: Reconfigure station areas to provide EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc and Bike Access pedestrians and bicyclists more space to improve access Bicycle and pedestrian o Improvemnt facilities San SF-170008 17-10-0026 SFMTA SFMTA: Replace 35 SFMTA: 35 vehicles: Replace 35 paratransit cutaway vans EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Paratransit Cutaway Vans Purchase of new buses and o rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for San SF-170012 17-05-0014 Port of SF Cargo Way and Amador In San Francisco: On Cargo Way from Jennings to 3rd Street EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2030 Francisc Street Improvements and Amador Street from Illinois Street to 2,300 ft. east: Pavement resurfacing o design and construct a complete street project. and/or rehabilitation San SF-170014 17-05-0001 SFMTA SF - Powell Street Safety In SF: Powell Street from Ellis to Post: Improve pedestrian EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Improvement safety and reduce sidewalk crowding to encourage more Bicycle and pedestrian o people to walk, especially to jobs. facilities San SF-170016 17-10-0005 BART Embarcadero Stn: New San Francisco: Embarcadero BART: Procure and install a EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2030 Francisc North-Side Platform new elevator on the east end of the station, expand paid area Purchase of office, shop, o Elevator to include the new elevator, dedicate existing elevator to Muni and operating equipment for use 100%, project is existing facilities San SF-170017 17-05-0003 SFMTA Vision Zero SF: Safer San Francisco Citywide: Education and outreach program EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Intersections targeting unsafe left turns in intersections. Projects that correct, o improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature San SF-170018 17-10-0026 SFMTA SFMTA: 60' Motor Coach SFMTA: Existing 60' New Flyer motor coaches: Mid-life EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Mid-Life Overhaul overhaul Rehabilitation of transit o vehicles San SF-170019 17-10-0026 SFMTA SFMTA: 40' Motor Coach SFMTA: Existing New Flyer 40' motor coaches: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Mid-Life Overhaul Rehabilitate/conduct mid-life overhaul. Rehabilitation of transit o vehicles San SF-170020 17-10-0026 SFMTA SFMTA: Replacement of SFMTA: Fleetwide: Replace the Orion 30' renewable diesel EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc 30' Motor Coaches electric hybrid vehicles that were procured in year 2007. Purchase of new buses and o rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 45 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year San SF-170021 17-10-0026 SFMTA SFMTA: Rehab Historic SFMTA: Fleet of historic streetcars: Rehabilitate vehicles EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Streetcars Rehabilitation of transit o vehicles San SF-170022 17-10-0026 GGBHTD GGBHTD: Replace 2 GGBHTD: 2 Paratransit Vehicles: Purchase replacement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Paratransit Vehicles vehicles Purchase of new buses and o rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for San SF-170023 17-05-0003 SFMTA SF Safe Routes to School San Francisco: Citywide: Coordinate school transportation EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Non-Infrastructure services, including planning, operations, education and Grants for training and o outreach, and capital improvement. It will reduce automobile research programs trips and improve the safety San SF-190001 17-05-0010 SFMTA Woods Bus Facility San Francisco: Woods Bus Facility: Modernize and upgrade EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Modernization a 43-year old facility that houses and maintains vehicles. Purchase of office, shop, o and operating equipment for existing facilities San SF-190002 17-05-0007 SFMTA L-Taraval - SGR Project SFMTA: Along L Taraval Line from near West Portal to La EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Elements Playa: Replace track and related way infrastructure Rehabilitation or o reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in San SF-190003 17-05-0007 SFMTA Muni Metro East Facility - SFMTA: At the Muni Metro East Facility: Replace the boiler EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Boiler Replacement and air-conditioning units Purchase of office, shop, o and operating equipment for existing facilities San SF-190004 17-05-0007 SFMTA SFMTA-Facilities SFMTA: Facilities Systemwide: Implement Facilities Deferred EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Condition Assessment Maintenance Program repairs to address backlogged State of Reconstruction or renovation o Repairs Good Repair investments of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail San SF-190005 17-05-0004 SFMTA 6th Street Pedestrian San Francisco: On 6th St between Market St and Harrison St: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Safety Improvements Implement pedestrian safety improvements in the corridor Projects that correct, o including removing one lane of vehicle travel improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature San SF-190006 17-05-0030 TIMMA Treasure Island Ferry San Francisco: On Treasure Island at the new Treasure EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2030 Francisc Terminal Landside Island Intermodal Terminal: Construct land-side Construction of small o Imprvmnts improvements passenger shelters and information kiosks San SF-95037B 17-10-0026 SFMTA SF Muni Rail SFMTA: Systemwide: Phased design and replacement of EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Replacement Program trackway, rail replacement, grinding, ultrasonic testing, track Rehabilitation or o fastener, special trackwork, and related systems serving light reconstruction of track rail and cable car lines. structures, track, and trackbed in San SF-970073 17-10-0026 SFMTA SFMTA: Cable Car SFMTA: Cable car fleet: Overhaul and reconstruct the cable EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Vehicle Renovation car fleet to maintain system reliability and productivity. Project Rehabilitation of transit o Program is phased. vehicles

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 46 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year San SF-970170 17-10-0026 SFMTA SFMTA: Overhead Line SFMTA: Systemwide: Improve Trolley Poles, Overhead EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc Recon. & Traction Power Contact System, Rail Traction Power that provides power to Reconstruction or renovation o Prog Muni, based on evaluation of the Muni Track and Traction of transit buildings and Power Condition Assessment, structures (e.g., rail San SF-990022 17-05-0002 SFMTA SFMTA: ADA Paratransit Muni: ADA Paratransit Operating Subsidy.; provides funding EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc operating support for increased van/taxi services to people with disabilities who Operating assistance to o are prevented from using Muni's fixed route services. transit agencies San SF-99T002 17-10-0026 SFMTA Cable Car Traction Power SFMTA: Cable Car System: Traction power and guideway EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Francisc & Guideway Rehab rehab-repair various guideway, track curves, frogs, sheaves, Rehabilitation or o replace Barn 12KV, switchgear, DC Motor, mechanical and reconstruction of track infrastructure to improve the structures, track, and trackbed in San SF-010028 17-10-0008 Caltrain Caltrain Electrification Caltrain: From San Francisco to Gilroy: Electrification of the EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2030 Mateo caltrain corridor from San Francisco to Tamien, including Construction or renovation caternary poles, wires, power supply, track and signals, and of power, signal, and Electric Multiple Units communications systems San SM-010047 17-06-0014 Menlo Park US 101 / Willow Road Menlo Park: US 101 at Willow Road Interchange: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2020 Mateo Interchange Reconstruct and reconfigure interchange (No additional travel Changes in vertical and Reconstruction lanes). horizontal alignment San SM-030023 17-10-0026 SamTrans SAMTRANS: Preventive SamTrans: Fleetwide: Preventative maintenance program EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Maintenance Rehabilitation of transit vehicles San SM-03006B 17-10-0026 Caltrain Caltrain: Systemwide Caltrain: Systemwide: Rehabilitate and replace existing track, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Track Rehab & Related track structures and related civil infrastructure Rehabilitation or Struct. reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in San SM-050005 17-10-0026 BART BART: Preventive BART: Systemwide: Preventive Maintenance EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Maintenance Rehabilitation of transit vehicles San SM-050040 17-10-0027 Caltrain Caltrain: ADA Operating Caltrain: Systemwide: Set-aside for ADA needs EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Set-aside Operating assistance to transit agencies San SM-050053 17-06-0001 Millbrae US 101 Millbrae Ave Millbrae: Across US 101 north of and adjacent to the existing EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Bike/Ped Bridge Millbrae Avenue bridge; Construct a new 10-ft wide Class 1 Bicycle and pedestrian mixed-use bike/ped overcrossing. facilities San SM-070002 17-06-0006 CCAG San Mateo Countywide San Mateo County: County-wide; ITS improvements at EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo ITS Improvements various locations in San Mateo County. Traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization San SM-070004 17-06-0003 East Palo Alto Bay Rd Bicycle/Ped E. Palo Alto: On Bay Rd btw Clarke/Illinois & Tara Rd (Ph II) EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Improvements Phase II & & btw Tara Rd & Bay Trail (Ph. III);Improvements including Pavement resurfacing III resurface, streetscape, bike lanes, & other and/or rehabilitation improvements.HPP #706 (remainder

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 47 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year San SM-070006 17-06-0005 East Palo Alto US 101 University Ave E. Palo Alto: On University Ave across US 101 btw Woodland EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Interchange Ave and Donahoe St: Construct Bike Lane, modify NB and Bicycle and pedestrian Improvements SB off-ramps and intersections with overcrossing with no new facilities lanes for off-ramps. HPP San SM-070049 17-10-0026 SamTrans SAMTRANS SAMTRANS: Systemwide: Operating/maintenance EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Facility/Equipment facility/equip rehab/replacement, including the provision of Purchase of operating Rehab/Replacement facility improvements for admin, maintenance, and operations equipment for vehicles (e.g., at the Central Administrative radios, fareboxes, lifts, San SM-110022 17-06-0002 CCAG San Mateo County SR2S San Mateo County: Countywide: Provide modularized safe EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Program routes to school programs and projects that focuses on Grants for training and education, encouragement, evaluation and enforcement research programs components to all interested San SM-110047 17-06-0019 San Mateo SR92/El Camino Real San Mateo: At the SR92/El Camino Real (SR82) interchange: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2020 Mateo (SR82) Ramp Modify existing on/off rampsto improve the ingress and Interchange reconfiguration Modifications egress of the interchange. projects San SM-110065 17-06-0005 Redwood City Middlefield Rd and In Redwood City: At the intersection of Middlefield Rd and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Mateo Woodside Rd Intersection Woodside Rd: modify intersection to provide pedestrian Intersection channelization Improv facilities. projects San SM-130003 17-06-0001 SSF SSF Citywide Sidewalk South San Francisco: Various Streets: closes gaps in the EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Gap Closure Project existing pedestrian infrastructure Bicycle and pedestrian facilities San SM-130013 17-06-0003 SSF SSF Grand Blvd Chestnut SSF: El Camino Real between Chestnut Ave/Westborough EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo to Arroyo Blvd to Arroyo Ave: Design and construct improved Bicycle and pedestrian pedestrian crossings with corner bulbouts, median refuges, facilities expanded bus stop areas and new San SM-130016 17-06-0003 Pacifica Palmetto Avenue Pacifica: Palmetto Avenue from Bella Vista Avenue to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Streetscape Clarendon Road: Pavement rehabilitation and pedestrian Bicycle and pedestrian sidewalk improvements. facilities San SM-130019 17-06-0001 San Bruno San Bruno Ave Street San Bruno: San Bruno Ave from Elm Ave to I-280: Implement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Medians Improvements pedestrian improvement including curb ramps, speed radar Bicycle and pedestrian display signs, demolish existing landscape and replace and facilities replace existing spray San SM-130020 17-06-0001 San Mateo San Mateo Citywide City of San Mateo: Various locations citywide: Install new EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Crosswalk Improvements high visibility crosswalks or upgrade existing crosswalks Bicycle and pedestrian facilities San SM-130022 17-06-0003 Redwood City Middlefield Road Bicycle / In Redwood City: on Middlefield Road between Main Street EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Ped Improvements and Woodside Road: Modify roadway and utilities as needed Bicycle and pedestrian to widen sidewalks and improve bike and pedestrian facilities amenities. No vehicle travel San SM-130026 17-10-0026 Caltrain Caltrain Control Point Caltrain: On the mainline in San Carlos: Install a new control EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Installation point (rail crossover) Rehabilitation or reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 48 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year San SM-130028 17-06-0001 East Palo Alto US-101 East Palo Alto: Between Clarke Avenue and Newell Road: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Pedestrian/Bicycle Install a Pedestrian/Bicycle Overcrossing of US-101 to Bicycle and pedestrian Overcrossing connect the west-side with the east-side of East Palo Alto for facilities safe pedestrian/bicycle access. San SM-130029 17-06-0002 BART Daly City BART Station Daly City: At Daly City BART Station: Improve transit EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Mateo Intermodal Improvements operations; pedestrian & bicycle access; and safety & patron Bus terminals and transfer experience points San SM-130030 17-06-0003 SSF SSF Grand Blvd South San Francisco: Along El Camino Real between Kaiser EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Improvements Kaiser Way and McLellan Drive: Implement bike and pedestrian Transportation enhancement Way to McLellan enhancements, street trees, rain gardens and median activities (except landscaping as well as rehabilitation and operation San SM-130031 17-06-0001 SF City/County Southern Skyline Blvd. San Mateo County: On the east side of SR-35 "Upper Skyline EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Ridge Trail Extension Blvd" between the intersection of Hwy 92 and Hwy 35 Bicycle and pedestrian southward approximately 6 miles to the SFPUC Peninsula facilities Watershed: Construct Southern San SM-130032 17-06-0001 San Mateo Co Midcoast Multi-Modal Trail San Mateo County: On Highway 1 from Mirada Road in EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Miramar to Coronado Street in El Granada: Construct 4,537 Bicycle and pedestrian feet of multi-use trail. facilities San SM-150002 17-06-0002 San Mateo City of San Mateo SR2S City of San Mateo: Within a 0.1 to 0.5 mile radius around EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Program each of the 15 elementary and middle schools in the City: Bicycle and pedestrian Develop and Implement a Safe Routes to School Program facilities San SM-150010 17-10-0026 SamTrans SamTrans - Replacement SamTrans: Readi-Wheels Paratransit service: Purchase EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo of Cutaway Buses replacement cutaway buses Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for San SM-150011 17-10-0026 SamTrans SamTrans - Purchase of SamTrans: Purchase ten new replacement minivans used for EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Replacement Minivans ADA Paratransit service Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for San SM-150012 17-06-0001 Daly City Daly City Central Corridor In Daly City: On Junipero Serra Blvd and Eastmoor Ave/San EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Bike/Ped Safety Imprmnt Pedro Rd/E Market St/Guad Cyn Pkwy: Install bike and ped Bicycle and pedestrian improvements; In Daly City/Uninc San Mateo County: On facilities west side of Mission St/El San SM-150013 17-06-0002 San Mateo Co RWC 2020 Sustainable San Mateo County: In and around Redwood City: Safe EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Transportation Routes to School walk and bike audits, encouragement and Grants for training and Encouragement education programs and community-wide transportation research programs mode share change evaluation. San SM-150014 17-06-0002 San Mateo Safe Routes to School for San Mateo County: Countywide: Implement a non- EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo County Health and Wellness infrastructure educational program to increase the number of Grants for training and children who bike and walk to school with a focus on long research programs term sustainability. Other State San SM-150015 17-06-0001 SSF SSF Linden/Spruce Ave In South San Francisco: On Linden Avenue from California EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Traffic Calming Ave to Miller Avenue and on Spruce Ave from Maple Ave to Bicycle and pedestrian Improvements Lux Ave: install pedestrian/bicycling safety improvements facilities including a class 3 bikeway.

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 49 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year San SM-150016 17-10-0015 San Mateo San Mateo Downtown In San Mateo: Various Locations Downtown: Replace EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Parking Tech existing parking meters, and pay stations and install parking Directional and informational Implementation availability signs at City facilities. signs San SM-170001 17-06-0020 San Mateo Co Hwy 1 Congestion & In San Mateo County along 7 miles of Highway 1 between EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2020 Mateo Safety improvements Pacifica in the north and Half Moon Bay in the south; Install Intersection channelization raised medians, left turn lanes, acceleration lanes, and projects pedestrian crossings. San SM-170002 17-10-0023 MTC Regional Planning San Mateo: Regional Planning Activities and Planning, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Activities and PPM - San Programming and Monitoring (PPM) Planning activities Mateo conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.C San SM-170005 17-10-0026 Caltrain South San Francisco South San Francisco: SSF Caltrain Station: Demolish and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Caltrain Station reconstruct the existing station with a new ADA compliant Reconstruction or renovation Improvements station that meets current Caltrain standards of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail San SM-170006 17-06-0001 San Mateo East Hillsdale Boulevard City of San Mateo: Over US 101 at the US 101/Hillsdale EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Ped/Bike Overcrossing Boulevard Interchange: Construct pedestrian and bicycle Bicycle and pedestrian overcrossing facilities San SM-170008 17-06-0029 SamTrans El Camino Real Traffic San Mateo County: On El Camino Real (State Route 82) from EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Signal Priority Project the Palo Alto Caltrain Station to the Daly City BART Station: Traffic control devices and Install Traffic Signal Priority system operating assistance other than signalization San SM-170009 17-06-0001 Woodside Woodside School Safety Woodside: Along SR-84 from Woodside Elementary to west EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Pathway Phase 3 of the intersection with Canada Rd: Create a pathway, paved Bicycle and pedestrian shoulders for bikes and extend the current multi-use pathway facilities improvements; near San SM-170010 17-10-0026 Caltrain Caltrain TVM Rehab and Caltrain: Systemwide: 45 existing TVM machines: Refurbish EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Clipper Functionality and incorporate Clipper functionality. Purchase of office, shop, and operating equipment for existing facilities San SM-170012 17-10-0022 San Mateo Co Canada Road and San Mateo County: Edgewood Rd between 0.17 mi west of EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Edgewood Road Crestview Dr to Cervantes Rd and Canada Rd between the Pavement resurfacing Resurfacing NB and SB 280 off- and on-ramps: Resurface pavement and/or rehabilitation including overlay, pavement San SM-170013 17-06-0003 Half Moon Bay Half Moon Bay - Poplar Half Moon Bay: On Poplar St from Main St to Railroad Ave: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Complete Streets Implement complete street improvements Bicycle and pedestrian facilities San SM-170014 17-10-0022 San Mateo Co San Mateo Countywide San Mateo County: Various streets and roads county-wide: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Pavement Maintenance Pavement maintenance Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation San SM-170015 17-06-0002 Burlingame Hoover School Area Burlingame: Summit Dr from Hillside Circle to Easton Dr and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Sidewalk Impvts (Summit immediately adjacent to the new Hoover Elementary School: Bicycle and pedestrian Dr.) Construct sidewalk and bicycle improvements facilities

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 50 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year San SM-170016 17-06-0003 SSF SSF Grand Boulevard South San Francisco: El Camino Real from Arroyo Dr to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Complete Streets (Phase Kaiser Way: Implement Grand Boulevard Complete Streets Bicycle and pedestrian III) improvements facilities San SM-170017 17-06-0003 San Bruno Huntington Transit San Bruno: On Huntington Ave from San Bruno Ave to the EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Corridor Bike/Ped entrance of the Centennial Way Trail: Implement pavement Bicycle and pedestrian Improvements preservation and bike/ped facilities including converting the facilities rightmost lane on San SM-170019 17-10-0022 Brisbane Brisbane - Tunnel Ave Brisbane: Tunnel Ave from northern city limits (N/O Beatty EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Rehabilitation Ave) to 1700 ft. south: Rehabilitate pavement Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation San SM-170020 17-06-0003 Burlingame Burlingame: Broadway Burlingame: Along the Broadway corridor within the business EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo PDA Lighting district: Replace aging pedestrian street lighting with new, Lighting improvements Improvements safer, brighter lighting San SM-170021 17-10-0022 Burlingame Burlingame Street Burlingame: Various streets and roads: Roadway resurfacing EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Resurfacing Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation San SM-170022 17-06-0001 Colma Colma - Mission Road Colma: Mission Rd between El Camino Real and Lawndale EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Bike/Ped Improvements Blvd: Implement safety related improvements for pedestrians, Bicycle and pedestrian bicyclists and vehicles facilities San SM-170023 17-10-0022 Daly City Daly City Street Daly City: Various streets and roads: Pavement preservation EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Resurfacing and Slurry Pavement resurfacing Seal and/or rehabilitation San SM-170024 17-10-0022 East Palo Alto East Palo Alto Citywide East Palo Alto: Various streets and roads: Rehabilitate EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Street Resurfacing roadway Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation San SM-170025 17-10-0022 Foster City Foster City - Pavement Foster City: Various streets and roads: Pavement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Rehabilitation rehabilitation Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation San SM-170026 17-10-0022 Hillsborough Hillsborough Street Hillsborough: Various roadways: Resurfacing and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Resurfacing preventative maintenance Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation San SM-170027 17-10-0022 Menlo Park Menlo Park - Santa Cruz Menlo Park: Santa Cruz Ave between Olive St and Orange EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo and Middle Avenues Ave and Middle Ave between Olive St and San Mateo Dr: Pavement resurfacing Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation and installation of rectangular rapid and/or rehabilitation flashing beacon San SM-170028 17-10-0022 Millbrae Millbrae Street Millbrea: Various streets and roads: Pavement rehabilitation EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Rehabilitation Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation San SM-170029 17-06-0001 Pacifica Pacifica - Palmetto Pacifica: Along the coastal west side of Palmetto Ave from EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Sidewalk Extension Westline Dr. to 1,400 feet south: Construct new concrete Bicycle and pedestrian sidewalk. facilities

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 51 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year San SM-170030 17-10-0022 Pacifica Pacifica Citywide Curb Pacifica: At various locations throughout the city: Install new EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Ramps curb ramps Projects that correct, improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature San SM-170031 17-10-0022 Pacifica Pacifica Pavement Pacifica: Various streets and roads: Rehabilitate pavement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Rehabilitation Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation San SM-170032 17-10-0022 Redwood City Redwood City Pavement Redwood City: Twin Dolphin Parkway from Marine Parkway EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Preservation to Redwood Shores Parkway: Pavement preservation Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation San SM-170033 17-10-0022 San Bruno Huntington/San Antonio San Bruno: Huntington Ave between San Mateo Ave and San EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Street Rehabilitation Felipe Ave, and San Antonio Ave between San Felipe Ave Pavement resurfacing and Santa Inez Ave: pavement rehabilitation and preventive and/or rehabilitation maintenance San SM-170034 17-06-0001 San Carlos Ped Enhancements San Carlos: At the intersections of Arroyo Ave and Cedar St EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Arroyo/Cedar & and Hemlock St and Orange Ave and the Postman Walkway: Bicycle and pedestrian Hemlock/Orange Implement safety improvements facilities San SM-170035 17-10-0022 San Carlos Cedar and Brittan Ave San Carlos: On Cedar Street, between San Carlos Avenue EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Pavement Rehab and the City of Belmont, and Brittan Avenue, between Elm Pavement resurfacing Street and El Camino Real: Rehabilitate pavement and install and/or rehabilitation ADA compliant facilities San SM-170036 17-10-0022 SSF SSF Pavement South San Francisco: Various locations: Pavement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation San SM-170037 17-10-0022 Woodside Road Rehabilitation - Woodside: Various Streets and Roads: Pavement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Town of Woodside Resurfacing Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation San SM-170038 17-06-0001 San Mateo North San Mateo Drive San Mateo: on San Mateo Dr from Peninsula Ave to Baldwin EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Sustainable Streets Ave: Install Class II bike lanes, curb extensions, enhanced Projects that correct, striping & signage, upgraded traffic signals with ped improve, or eliminate a countdown, ped scale lighting, hazardous location or feature San SM-170039 17-06-0001 San Mateo Laurie Meadows Ped/Bike San Mateo: Various locations in the Laurie Meadows EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Safety Improvements neighborhood: Implement bike/ped safety improvements; On Projects that correct, Laurie Meadows Dr from near Pacific Blvd to Woodbridge improve, or eliminate a Circle: Implement road diet hazardous location or feature San SM-170040 17-10-0022 San Mateo San Mateo Street San Mateo: Various streets and roads: Resurface and/or EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Rehabilitation rehabilitate the roadway, implement bicycle elements and Pavement resurfacing upgrade ADA ramps and/or rehabilitation San SM-170041 17-06-0001 Brisbane Crocker Trail Commuter Brisbane: On Crocker Trail bounded by Bayshore Blvd, S Hill EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Connectivity Upgrades Dr, W Hill Dr and Mission Blue Dr: Resurface trail Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 52 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year San SM-170042 17-06-0001 Belmont Ralston Avenue Corridor Belmont: Ralston Ave from South Rd to Alameda de las EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Bike-Ped Imps Pulgas: Bicycle, pedestrian and pavement improvements. Bicycle and pedestrian The pavement work is not federally participating. facilities San SM-170043 17-10-0022 Belmont Belmont Pavement Belmont: Various streets and roads: Pavement preservation EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Preservation Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation San SM-170044 17-10-0022 Portola Valley Portola Valley Street Portola Valley: Various streets and roads: Pavement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Preservation preservation Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation San SM-170045 17-06-0001 Redwood City US 101/Woodside Road Redwood City: East of Union Pacific Railroad between the EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Class 1 Bikeway intersections of Chestnut St/Veterans Blvd and Blomquist Bicycle and pedestrian St/Seaport Blvd: Construct approximately 1,800 linear feet of facilities new Class 1 path San SM-170046 17-06-0006 CCAG ITS Improvements in San San Mateo County: Along the US 101 corridor from Smart EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Mateo County Northern Corridors Ph 1 limits to the SF County line, and on I-280 from Traffic control devices and Citi I-380 to the San Francisco County Line: Implement ITS operating assistance other Improvements in San Mateo than signalization San SM-190001 17-06-0004 San Carlos Brittan Ave. Widening San Carlos: At the intersection of Brittan and Industrial Road: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Mateo Widen to accommodate three new left turn pockets Intersection channelization projects San SM-190004 17-10-0033 MTC FPP: US 101 Adaptive San Mateo & Santa Clara Counties: US 101 from SR 85 in EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Ramp Metering San Jose to San Mateo/San Francisco County Line: Upgrade Traffic control devices and existing freeway ramp meters to adaptive ramp meters to operating assistance other smooth traffic flow onto than signalization San SM-190008 17-10-0022 Atherton Atherton Street Atherton: Various streets and roads: Pavement preservation EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Preservation Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation San SM-990026 17-10-0027 SamTrans SAMTRANS: ADA SamTrans: Systemwide: ADA Paratransit Operating Subsidy. EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Mateo Paratransit Operating Operating assistance to Subsidy transit agencies Santa SCL050001 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Standard & Small VTA: Fleetwide: Standard and Small Bus Replacement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Bus Replacement Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Santa SCL050002 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Rail Replacement VTA: Throughout the Light Rail system: Replace rails (no rail EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Program expansion). Rehabilitation or reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in Santa SCL050046 17-10-0027 VTA VTA: ADA Operating Set VTA: Systemwide: ADA operating assistance set aside. EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Aside Operating assistance to transit agencies

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 53 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Santa SCL050049 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Rail Substation VTA: Guadalupe Light Rail Corridor: Rehabilitate electrical EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Rehab/Replacement elements (such as disconnect switches, DC breakers, etc.) of Construction or renovation traction power substations. of power, signal, and communications systems Santa SCL050082 17-07-0001 San Jose Bay Trail Reach 9 & 9B San Jose: From the existing San Francisco Bay Trail/HWY EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara 237 Bikeway Trail to the Bay Trail designated parking spaces Bicycle and pedestrian (adjacent to the publicly accessible Marriott property): facilities Construct 1.1 miles of Santa SCL050083 17-07-0001 San Jose Coyote Creek Trail (Hwy San Jose: From Highway 237 to Story Road: Master plan EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara 237-Story Rd) entire system, design and construction of the trail. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Santa SCL090004 17-07-0001 San Jose Almaden Ave & Vine St In San Jose: Almaden Ave and Vine St: Construct pedestrian EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Safety Improvements safety improvements. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Santa SCL090044 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: TP OCS Rehab & VTA: Systemwide: Rehabilitate and replace overhead EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Replacement catenary system (OCS) and associated components Construction or renovation of power, signal, and communications systems Santa SCL110029 17-07-0001 San Jose San Jose: Los Gatos In San Jose: Los Gatos Creek Trail between Auzerais Ave EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Creek Reach 5 and Montgomery/Bird Ave: Construct Los Gatos Creek Trail Bicycle and pedestrian Underpass (Reach 5b/c). facilities Santa SCL110099 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Light Rail Bridge VTA: Various Locations: Light rail bridge and structure defect EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara and Structure - SG Repair investigation and repair. Stabilization measures to address Rehabilitation or Hamilton structure settlement. reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in Santa SCL110104 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Light Rail Track VTA: In the light rail system: Add light rail crossovers and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Crossovers and Switches switches to priority areas where crossovers are not currently Rehabilitation or available to enhance operational flexibility. reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in Santa SCL110108 17-10-0024 Santa Clara Isabel Bridge In Santa Clara County: Isabel Bridge (Bridge No. 37C0089) EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Co Replacement (37C0089) on San Antonio Valley Road, 8.3 miles east of Kincaid Rd: Projects that correct, Replace existing one lane bridge with a two-lane bridge improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Santa SCL110125 17-10-0021 VTA Local PDA Planning - Santa Clara County: Various Agencies: Planning assistance EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Santa Clara pass through to local jurisdictions to support transportation Planning activities investments and improve their performance in Priority conducted pursuant to titles Development Areas (PDAs). 23 and 49 U.S.C Santa SCL130004 17-07-0003 San Jose San Jose - Better San Jose: Various locations in downtown: Implement a EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Bikeways network of bikeways Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 54 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Santa SCL130016 17-07-0001 San Jose East San Jose Bikeways East San Jose: Various locations: make improvements to the EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara bikeway network including the installation of new bikeways, Bicycle and pedestrian traffic calming features, bike-friendly signal detection and facilities pavement markings. Toll Santa SCL130026 17-07-0003 Saratoga Prospect Rd Complete Saratoga: Prospect Road between Saratoga/Sunnyvale Rd EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Streets and Lawrence Expressway and on Saratoga Ave between Bicycle and pedestrian Highway 85 to the City Limits to the north (Lawrence facilities Expressway): Reduce roads width to Santa SCL130040 17-07-0001 VTA Montague Expy Ped Milpitas: At Milpitas BART Station over Montague EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Bridge at Milpitas BART Expressway: Construct a pedestrian bridge. Project is Bicycle and pedestrian phased. facilities Santa SCL130041 17-07-0001 Palo Alto Adobe Creek/ Highway Palo Alto: Where US 101 crosses Adobe Creek: Construct EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara 101 Bicycle Pedestrian Bike/Ped Bridge. Bicycle and pedestrian Bridge facilities Santa SCL130044 17-10-0025 VTA I-880 Stevens Creek San Jose: at the I-880/Stevens Creek interchange: Provide EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Landscaping landscaping. Plantings, landscaping, etc Santa SCL150001 17-07-0064 VTA I-680 Soundwalls - Capitol In San Jose: On I-680 between Capitol Expressway and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Expwy to Mueller Ave Mueller Avenue: Construct soundwalls Noise attenuation Santa SCL150005 17-10-0026 VTA VTA Train to Wayside VTA: Communications: Upgrade the existing DOS based EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Communication System train-to-wayside communications (TWC) system to a Purchase of operating Upgrade Windows based system while keeping the original system's equipment for vehicles (e.g., operational functionality. radios, fareboxes, lifts, Santa SCL150006 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Back-up Power for VTA: Various elevated stations: Replace the generators and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Elevated Stations automatic power bypass switch for elevated stations on the Construction or renovation Guadalupe Light Rail line. of power, signal, and communications systems Santa SCL150008 17-10-0026 VTA VTA Track Intrusion VTA: Various locations along trackway: Installation of fencing, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Abatement barriers, signage, flashing signs, and pavement markings. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in Santa SCL150014 17-07-0025 VTA I-280/Winchester Blvd San Jose: I-280/Winchester Interchange: Construct EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2030 Clara Interchange Improvement improvements at the Winchester Blvd. interchange and I- Interchange reconfiguration 280/I-880/SR 17 freeway connectors including the addition of projects ramps and a fly-over and the Santa SCL170001 17-10-0023 MTC Regional Planning Santa Clara: Regional Planning Activities and Planning, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Activities and PPM - Programming and Monitoring (PPM) Planning activities Santa Clara conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.C Santa SCL170002 17-10-0032 VTA VTA BART Phase II TOD In Santa Clara County: In the vicinity of planned BART EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara and Station Access stations: Perform study of TOD and Station Access Planning. Planning and technical Planning studies

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 55 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Santa SCL170003 17-10-0015 Palo Alto Palo Alto: Bay Area Fair In Palo Alto: Reduce Bay Area SOV commute share by using EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Value Fair Share Commuting (FVC), consisting of: Enterprise Grants for training and CommutingMoDSandbox Commute Trip Reduction (ECTR) software; Mobility research programs Aggregation (MobAg); parking feebate; Santa SCL170005 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Paratransit Vehicle VTA: Paratransit Fleet: Procure vehicles and associated EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Procurement equipment for paratransit services. Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Santa SCL170006 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Replace Fault VTA: On Light Rail Vehicle Fleet: Upgrade Fault Monitoring EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Monitoring System on System (FMS) Network that is no longer supported by the Purchase of operating LRVs original equipment manufacturer (OEM) equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, Santa SCL170007 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Pedestrian Swing VTA: At various pedestrian crossing locations along the light EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Gates Replacement rail system: Replace spring-hinge pedestrian swing gates Projects that correct, improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Santa SCL170008 17-07-0064 VTA VTA: Vasona Pedestrian VTA: At several Vasona Light Rail Corridor crossings: Install EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Back Gates pedestrian gates. Scope includes installation of automatic Projects that correct, pedestrian gates, swing gates and railings, minor civil improve, or eliminate a improvements and related signal hazardous location or feature Santa SCL170009 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Chaboya Yard Well VTA: At the Chaboya Bus Operating Division: Obtain case EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Removal closure and demolish the ground water remediation system Reconstruction or renovation and wells of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail Santa SCL170010 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Guadalupe Train VTA: Guadalupe Light Rail Division: Replace train wash. EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Wash Replacement Reconstruction or renovation of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail Santa SCL170011 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Upgrade Rail Grade VTA: Various Locations: Replace existing rail grade crossing EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Crossing Control equipment; such as controllers, relays, and surge panels; that Construction or renovation Equipment have become obsolete. of power, signal, and communications systems Santa SCL170017 17-07-0003 Sunnyvale Sunnyvale SNAIL In Sunnyvale: Various locations: Implement bike/ped EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Clara Neighborhood improvements, close slip lanes, add bulbouts, install Intersection channelization Improvements detection systems, ADA compliant ped signals, enhance projects existing bike lanes to include green bike Santa SCL170019 17-07-0004 Santa Clara Uvas Road Pavement Santa Clara County: On the County maintained portions of EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Co Rehabilitation Uvas Rd: Pavement rehabilitation Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Santa SCL170020 17-07-0001 Sunnyvale Bernardo Avenue Bicycle Sunnyvale: Between North and South Bernardo Avenue EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Underpass under the Caltrain tracks: Construct bicycle underpass Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 56 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Santa SCL170021 17-10-0021 Palo Alto North Ventura Palo Alto: In proximity to the California Avenue Caltrain EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Coordinated Area Plan station, the California Avenue business district, El Camino Planning and technical Real and the Stanford Research Park: Develop a studies comprehensive planning document similar Santa SCL170022 17-07-0001 Sunnyvale Java Dr Road Diet and Sunnyvale: On Java Dr from Mathilda to Crossman: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Bike Lanes Construct approximately 5,000 linear feet of Class II bike Bicycle and pedestrian lanes each side via a road diet facilities Santa SCL170023 17-07-0003 Sunnyvale Peery Park "Sense of Sunnyvale: Various locations in the Peery Park Specific Area: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Place" Improvements Implement bike, pedestrian, and transit improvements Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Santa SCL170024 17-07-0003 Sunnyvale East Sunnyvale Area Sunnyvale: Various locations in the East Sunnyvale Sense of EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara "Sense of Place" Place Plan Area: Implement bike, pedestrian and transit Bicycle and pedestrian access improvements facilities Santa SCL170025 17-07-0001 Sunnyvale Fair Oaks Avenue Sunnyvale: Fair Oaks Ave from SR237 to Reed Ave: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Bikeway - Phase 2 Reconfigure to install Bikeway/routes enhancements and Bicycle and pedestrian close bikeway gaps facilities Santa SCL170026 17-07-0001 Sunnyvale Lawerence Station Area Sunnyvale: In the general area of the Lawrence Station Area EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Sidewalks & Bike Plan: Install bike and pedestrian improvements Bicycle and pedestrian Facilities facilities Santa SCL170027 17-10-0022 Sunnyvale Sunnyvale Traffic Signal Sunnyvale: Various intersections: Upgrade traffic signals and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Upgrades/Replacements intersections to have pedestrian-friendly designs and Traffic control devices and improved bicycle detection for the traffic signals. operating assistance other than signalization Santa SCL170028 17-07-0001 Los Gatos Los Gatos Creek Trail to In Los Gatos: The Los Gatos Creek Trail to the north and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Hwy 9 Trailhead south sides of Highway 9 between the Highway 17 Bicycle and pedestrian Connector interchange and University Ave: Construct bike and facilities pedestrian connector Santa SCL170029 17-07-0064 San Jose Tully Road Safety In San Jose: Tully Road between Monterey Road and Capital EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Improvements Expressway: Implement safety elements Projects that correct, improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Santa SCL170030 17-07-0064 San Jose McKee Road Safety San Jose: On McKee Road between Route 101 and Toyon EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Improvements Ave and On Gridley St at the intersection with Mckee Rd: Projects that correct, Implement safety improvements improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Santa SCL170031 17-07-0064 San Jose Mt Pleasant Ped & Bike San Jose: Various locations in the Mount Pleasant Area: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Traffic Safety Implement traffic safety improvements to serve student Projects that correct, Improvements populations of seven schools improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Santa SCL170032 17-07-0004 Santa Clara McKean Rd Pavement Santa Clara County: On the County maintained portions of EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Co Rehabilitation McKean Road: Pavement rehabilitation Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 57 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Santa SCL170033 17-07-0004 Santa Clara Capitol Expressway Santa Clara County: Capitol Expressway between EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Co Pavement Rehabilitation Copperfeild Ave to McLaughlin Avenue: Pavement Pavement resurfacing rehabilitation and/or rehabilitation Santa SCL170035 17-10-0022 Campbell Campbell - Winchester Campbell: On Winchester Blvd from northern city limit near EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Blvd Overlay Rosemary Ln to southern city limit at Knowles Dr and Pavement resurfacing Campbell Ave from Jeffers Way to Winchester Blvd: Install and/or rehabilitation asphalt concrete overlay Santa SCL170037 17-10-0022 Cupertino Cupertino Pavement Cupertino: Various Locations: Rehabilitate pavement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Maintenance Phase 2 Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Santa SCL170038 17-10-0022 Los Altos Los Altos: Fremont Ave Los Altos: Fremont Ave between Grant Rd and Stevens EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Pavement Preservation Creek (City Limit): Rehabilitate roadway Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Santa SCL170039 17-10-0022 Milpitas Milpitas Street Milpitas: Various streets and roads: Street rehabilitation, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Preservation upgrade ADA facilities, striping and signage, including bicycle Pavement resurfacing facilities, and concrete work. and/or rehabilitation Santa SCL170040 17-10-0022 Mountain View West Middlefield Road Mountain View: W. Middlefield Rd between Rengstorff Ave EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Improvements and N. Shoreline Blvd: Resurface roadway and reconstruct Pavement resurfacing the median island and/or rehabilitation Santa SCL170041 17-10-0022 Palo Alto Palo Alto Street In Palo Alto: Various streets and roads: Resurface roadways EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Resurfacing Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Santa SCL170042 17-10-0022 Santa Clara Santa Clara Streets and Santa Clara: Various streets and roads: Rehabilitate and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Roads Preservation reconstruct pavement Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Santa SCL170043 17-01-0001 Sunnyvale Homestead Rd at Sunnyvale: Various locations on Homestead Rd near EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Homestead High School Homestead HS: Install safety improvements and upgrade Projects that correct, Improvements signals; On Homestead Rd from McKenzie Dr to Mary Ave improve, or eliminate a (south side) and from Mary Ave to hazardous location or feature Santa SCL170044 17-10-0022 San Jose San Jose Pavement San Jose: Various streets and roads: Pavement maintenance EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Maintenance and rehabilitation and build pedestrian facilities Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Santa SCL170045 17-07-0001 Santa Clara Saratoga Creek Trail Santa Clara: Saratoga Creek Trail between Homeridge Park EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Phase 1 and Central Park: Build a class I bicycle and pedestrian trail Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Santa SCL170046 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Systemwide VTA: Systemwide: Implement safety improvements EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Security Improvements Projects that correct, improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Santa SCL170047 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Non-Revenue VTA: Systemwide: Acquire non-revenue vehicles to replace EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Vehicle Procurement existing units that have reached the end of their useful life Purchase of support vehicles

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 58 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Santa SCL170048 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Light Rail Roadway VTA: On the VTA Light Rail System: Explore and implement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Protection System Roadway Worker Protection System technologies to meet Projects that correct, regulatory requirements improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Santa SCL170049 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: SCADA Middleware VTA: Systemwide: Replace existing obsolete middleware EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Replacement software with updated software to ensure compatibility with Purchase of office, shop, other upgraded SCADA software and SCADA components and operating equipment for existing facilities Santa SCL170050 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: SCADA Control VTA: Systemwide: Provide upgrades to the Supervisory EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Center System Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System hardware and Construction or renovation Replacement software; At the Control and Data Center: Facility expansion of power, signal, and communications systems Santa SCL170051 17-07-0001 Palo Alto Palo Alto-El Camino Real In Palo Alto: On El Camino Real between Stanford Ave and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Ped Safety & Streetscape Grant Ave: Install complete streets improvements focused on Projects that correct, pedestrian safety, enhanced bus operations, and new urban improve, or eliminate a design amenities. hazardous location or feature Santa SCL170052 17-07-0001 Santa Clara San Tomas Aquino Creek In Santa Clara: San Tomas Aquino Creek Trail between EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Trail Underpass Tasman Dr and 1/4 mile south of Tasman Dr: Construct Bicycle and pedestrian bike/ped underpass. facilities Santa SCL170053 17-07-0001 Palo Alto Waverley, E. Meadow & Palo Alto: Waverley Multi-Use Path: Widen and upgrade EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Fabian Enhanced path; E Meadow Dr from Alma to Fabian: Protected bike Projects that correct, Bikeways facility; Fabian Way from East Meadow Dr to E Charleston: improve, or eliminate a Reconfigures roadway with a travel hazardous location or feature Santa SCL170054 17-07-0001 Saratoga Saratoga Village In Saratoga: Along Big Basin Way between 6th street and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Crosswalks and Sidewalk Hwy 9: Install curb bulbouts and crosswalk and rehabilitate Bicycle and pedestrian Rehab sidewalk. facilities Santa SCL170055 17-07-0001 Santa Clara Hetch-Hetchy Trail Phase Santa Clara: On the Hetch-Hetchy right-of-way from Stars EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara 1 and Stripes Dr to San Tomas Aquino Creek and along the Bicycle and pedestrian east bank of San Tomas Aquino Creek from Hetch-Hetchy facilities right-of-way to Agnew Rd: Santa SCL170056 17-07-0001 Santa Clara Santa Clara School Santa Clara: Various locations around Santa Clara Schools: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Access Improvements Implement bicycle and pedestrian access improvements Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Santa SCL170057 17-07-0001 Sunnyvale Sunnyvale Ped and Bike Sunnyvale: At various locations city-wide: Add improvements EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Infrastructure to Bike/Ped infrastructure including enhancing and/or Bicycle and pedestrian Improvements installing signs, striping, ADA compliant curb ramps and facilities crossing safety treatments Santa SCL170059 17-07-0001 Sunnyvale Sunnyvale Safe Routes to Sunnyvale: In the vicinity of Bishop Elementary School: Install EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara School Improvements bike lanes, high visibility crosswalks, raised crosswalks, and Projects that correct, curb extensions; Provide bicycle and pedestrian education improve, or eliminate a and encouragement hazardous location or feature

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 59 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Santa SCL170060 17-07-0003 San Jose DTSJ Mobility San Jose: Downtown PDA/Frame: Develop PDA EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Streetscape and Public implementation plan Planning and technical Life Plan studies Santa SCL170061 17-07-0001 San Jose W San Carlos Urban San Jose: West San Carlos St between I-880 and McEvoy EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Village Streets St: Implement safety improvements Projects that correct, Improvements improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Santa SCL170062 17-07-0003 San Jose Eastside Alum Rock (East San Jose: On Alum Rock Avenue and east of I-680: Develop EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara of 680) Urban Village multi-modal transportation implementation plan Planning and technical studies Santa SCL170063 17-07-0004 Morgan Hill Dunne Avenue Pavement Morgan Hill: E Dunne Ave between lower Thomas Grade and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Rehabilitation Flaming Oaks Dr and between upper Thomas Grade and Pavement resurfacing Holiday Dr, and Holiday Drive from E Dunne Ave to 2,500 and/or rehabilitation linear feet east toward Santa SCL170064 17-07-0064 VTA I-280 Soundwalls - SR-87 In San Jose: Along I-280 on both sides between SR 87 and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara to Los Gatos Creek Los Gatos Creek Bridge: Construct soundwalls. Modifying the Noise attenuation Bridge existing irrigation system, landscaping, and traffic control will be required for this Santa SCL170065 17-10-0033 VTA IDEA Cat 2: Valley Palo Alto: At the Vetrans Administration Hospital: Implement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Transportation Authority an automated micro-transit feeder pilot project Grants for training and research programs Santa SCL190003 17-07-0010 VTA Hwy. Transp Operations Santa Clara County: At various locations: Implement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara System/FPI Phase 1 & 2 Transportation Operations System/Freeway Performance Traffic control devices and Initiative projects operating assistance other than signalization Santa SCL190012 17-07-0034 VTA US 101/San Antonio Mountain View and Palo Alto: US 101 interchanges at San EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2030 Clara Rd/Charleston/Rengstorff Antonio and Charleston Road/Rengstorff Avenue: Construct Interchange reconfiguration IC Imp interchange improvements include adding new auxiliary lane. projects Santa SCL190013 17-07-0069 VTA US 101/SR 25 Santa Clara County: US 101 and SR 25 Interchange: Phase EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2030 Clara Interchange - Phase 1 1 Reconfigure a portion of the overall interchange re- Interchange reconfiguration construction, focusing on improving the movement from projects southbound US 101 to southbound Santa SCL190015 17-07-0029 VTA I-280/Saratoga Avenue San Jose: I-280/ Saratoga Ave Interchange: Modify EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2030 Clara Interchange Improvement interchange to relieve congestion and improve local Interchange reconfiguration circulation projects Santa SCL190016 17-07-0030 VTA I-280 NB Braided Ramps Santa Clara County: On northbound I-280 between Foothill EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2030 Clara btw Foothill Expwy & SR Expressway and Route 85: Improve braided ramps Interchange reconfiguration 85 projects Santa SCL190017 17-07-0032 VTA I-680/ Alum Rock/ McKee San Jose: At the I-680/ Alum Rock and I-680/ McKee Road EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2030 Clara Road Interchange Imp interchanges: Reconfigure interchanges, improve access for Interchange reconfiguration all modes of transportation, improve traffic operations and projects relieve congestion; In the

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 60 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Santa SCL190023 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Bus CCTV VTA: Fleetwide: Replace CCTV system on buses EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Replacement Purchase of operating equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, Santa SCL190024 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Transit Center Park VTA: Various transit centers and park & ride facilities EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara and Ride Rehab systemwide: Rehabilitate and repair facilities Reconstruction or renovation of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail Santa SCL190025 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Gigabit Ethernet VTA: Systemwide: Replace Ethernet switch equipment EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Network Construction or renovation of power, signal, and communications systems Santa SCL190026 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: HVAC Replacement VTA: At various facilities system-wide: Replace heating, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara ventilation and cooling equipment Purchase of office, shop, and operating equipment for existing facilities Santa SCL190027 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: SCADA Hardware, VTA: Systemwide: Update three related Supervisory Control EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Software, Network and Data Acquisition (SCADA) subsystems. 1) Hardware 2) Construction or renovation Upgrade Software 3) Network of power, signal, and communications systems Santa SCL190028 17-07-0003 San Jose Willow-Keyes Complete San Jose: At various locations on the Willow-Keyes corridor: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Streets Improvements Construct bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements Bicycle and pedestrian including road diets to construct Class IV protected bike lanes facilities

Santa SCL190029 17-07-0001 San Jose Better Bikeway San Jose - San Jose: On San Fernando St from Almaden Blvd to 11th EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara San Fernando Street St: Construct bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Santa SCL190031 17-07-0064 VTA Santa Clara Countywide Santa Clara County: Countywide: Implement noise reduction EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Noise Abatement projects, project is phased Noise attenuation Program Santa SCL190032 17-07-0002 Mountain View Rengstorff Grade Mountain View: At the intersection of Rengstroff Ave and the EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Separation Caltrain right-of-way: Grade separate Caltrain at Rengstorff Projects that correct, Avenue improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Santa SCL190033 17-07-0003 Los Gatos Shannon Road Complete Los Gatos: On the north side of Shannon Road between Los EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Streets Gatos Blvd and Cherry Blossom Lane: Construct a Class I Bicycle and pedestrian multi-use path. facilities Santa SCL190034 17-10-0025 Caltrans SCL-SM I-280 Roadway Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties: On I-280 from from EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Preservation Foothill Blvd (PM 11.5 in Santa Clara County) to to 0.5 mile Pavement resurfacing north of Sand Hill (PM 2.1 in San Mateo County): Pavement and/or rehabilitation rehabilitation Santa SCL990046 17-10-0026 VTA VTA: Preventive VTA: Preventive Maintenance of agency's fleet. EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Clara Maintenance Rehabilitation of transit vehicles

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 61 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Solano SOL010006 17-10-0027 Fairfield City of Fairfield Operating Fairfield: Systemwide: Transit operating assistance EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Assistance Operating assistance to transit agencies Solano SOL010007 17-10-0027 Vacaville Vacaville Transit: Vacaville Transit: System-wide: Operating Assistance EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Operating Assistance Operating assistance to transit agencies Solano SOL070032 17-10-0026 SolTrans SolTrans: Preventive SolTrans: Systemwide: Preventive maintenance of vehicles EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Maintenance and equipment necessary for the maintenance of federally Rehabilitation of transit funded assets. vehicles Solano SOL090034 17-10-0026 SolTrans SolTrans: Bus SolTrans: Eight 45' MCI commuter coaches: Replace EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Replacement (Alternative vehicles as they reach their useful life. Purchase of new buses and Fuel) rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Solano SOL110019 17-08-0004 STA Solano Safe Routes to In Solano County: Countywide: Implement Countywide EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 School Program Solano Safe Routes to School Program, including Planning, Transportation enhancement Education, and Encouragement events and materials. activities (except rehabilitation and operation Solano SOL110025 17-10-0027 SolTrans SolTrans: ADA SolTrans: Systemwide: ADA Paratransit Operating Subsidy EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Paratransit Operating Operating assistance to Subsidy transit agencies Solano SOL110035 17-08-0002 Vallejo Vallejo Downtown Vallejo: Various streets in the downtown area: Pedestrian EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Streetscape enhancements including traffic calming, restriping, parking, Transportation enhancement signs, brick pavers, street furniture and art. Project is phased activities (except rehabilitation and operation Solano SOL110037 17-08-0004 Vallejo Sonoma Boulevard Vallejo: Sonoma Blvd. between York St. and Kentucky St: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Improvements HSIP5-04- Implement road diet-reduce travel lanes from 4 to 2, add a Projects that correct, 031 two-way left turn lane or median, and add bike lanes. improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Solano SOL110040 17-10-0027 SolTrans SolTrans: Operating Solano County Transit: System-wide: Operating Assistance EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Assistance Operating assistance to transit agencies Solano SOL110041 17-10-0026 Fairfield Fairfield-Suisun Fairfield: Systemwide: Replace local/intercity buses that have EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Intercity/Local Bus exceeded their expected useful life. Purchase of new buses and Replacement rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Solano SOL130007 17-08-0001 Solano County Suisun Vallley Bicycle and Solano County: At Mankas Corner: Construct staging area EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Pedestrian Imps with bicycle and pedestrian improvements; At Various Bicycle and pedestrian Locations in Solano County: Add a Class II bike lane to facilities enhance bike access to areas Solano SOL130017 17-10-0027 Vacaville Transit Marketing and Vacaville: Citywide: Marketing and public outreach of City EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Public Outreach Coach transit benefits Grants for training and research programs

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 62 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Solano SOL150003 17-08-0005 STA SR12/Church Rd Rio Vista: At SR12/Church Rd. Intersection: Add Standard EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Intersection Shoulders, EB Left Turn Lane, WB Acceleration Lane (720 ft) Intersection channelization Improvements and Deceleration Lane (300 ft), Remove Trees in Clear projects Recovery Zone Solano SOL150004 17-08-0004 STA STA SR2S Infrastructure Solano County: At 7 schools: Implement pedestrian EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 & Non-infrastructure infrastructure improvements; At 26 schools throughout the Bicycle and pedestrian Cities of Benicia, Rio Vista & Vallejo: Providing education facilities outreach Solano SOL170001 17-10-0023 MTC Regional Planning Solano County: County-wide: Regional Planning Activities EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Activities and PPM - and Planning, Programming and Monitoring (PPM) Planning activities Solano conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.C Solano SOL170002 17-10-0026 SolTrans SolTrans: Data SolTrans: Systemwide: Procure data management systems EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Management Technology and software Purchase of office, shop, Enhancements and operating equipment for existing facilities Solano SOL170003 17-10-0026 SolTrans Soltrans: Facilities and Soltrans: Systemwide: Facility and passenger amenities EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Amenities Improvements improvements Construction of small passenger shelters and information kiosks Solano SOL170006 17-08-0002 Fairfield East Tabor Tolenas SR2S In Fairfield: On East Tabor Avenue (north side); Construct EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Sidewalk Gap Closure sidewalk across the railroad tracks including slight roadway Bicycle and pedestrian widening. On Tolenas Avenue (east side); widen the existing facilities sidewalk. Solano SOL170007 17-08-0002 Suisun City McCoy Creek Trail - In Suisun City: Along the west bank of the McCoy Creek EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Phase 2 canal and the north bank of the Laurel Creek canal between Bicycle and pedestrian Pintail Dr and Worley Rd: Construct a Class I concrete facilities pedestrian/bicycle trail with a Solano SOL170008 17-08-0002 Vallejo Vallejo Bay Trail / Vine In Vallejo: Between the existing Bay Trail to the south and the EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Trail Gap Closure Bay Trail and Napa Vine Trail in American Canyon: Build Bicycle and pedestrian multi-use path to close the gap between the existing trail facilities segments Solano SOL170009 17-10-0027 STA Solano Mobility Call Solano County: County-wide: Operate call center featuring in- EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Center person assistance for customers related to transit, Operating assistance to commuting, and mobility services, including ADA, Clipper, transit agencies and ride matching, among others Solano SOL170010 17-08-0004 Fairfield Grange Middle School In Fairfield: On East Tabor Avenue, at the intersections of EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Safe Routes to School Falcon Drive and blossom Avenue: enhance bicycle and Projects that correct, pedestrian safety mobility. improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Solano SOL170011 17-08-0002 Benicia Benicia - Park Road Benicia: Park Road between I-780 and Bayshore Road: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Improvements Resurface roadway and construct Class II/IV bicycle lane Pavement resurfacing facilities and storm drain improvements and/or rehabilitation

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 63 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Solano SOL170012 17-10-0022 Vacaville Vacaville - Pavement Vacaville: Various streets and roads: edge grind, overlay or EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Preservation CIR, perform curb ramp replacements and striping Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Solano SOL170013 17-08-0008 Vacaville Vaca Valley/I505 Vacaville: On Vaca Valley Parkway at E Monte Vista Ave and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Multimodal Improvements I-505 ramps: Install roundabouts and construct Intersection channelization bicycle/pedestrian facilities over I-505 connecting to existing projects facilities and ADA improvements Solano SOL170014 17-10-0022 Suisun City New Railroad Avenue Suisun City: Railroad Ave from Sunset Ave to Birchwood Ct: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Pavement Rehabilitation Rehabilitate roadway on eastbound lanes; Railroad Ave from Pavement resurfacing Sunset Ave to Marina Blvd: Restripe existing Class 2 bicycle and/or rehabilitation lanes on both sides of Solano SOL170015 17-10-0022 Solano County Solano County Roadway Solano County: On Midway Road from I80 to HWY 113: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Preservation Apply Asphalt Rubber Chip Seal and Micro Surface treatment Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Solano SOL170016 17-08-0002 Solano County Solano County Farm to Solano County: Various locations in Suisun Valley: Construct EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Market Phase 3 bike lanes Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Solano SOL170017 17-08-0015 STA SolanoExpress Capitol Solano County: At the Fairfield Transit Center: Construct slip- EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2030 Improvements ramp; At Fairgrounds Dr off-ramp: add express stop; At Interchange reconfiguration Vallejo Transit Center: Expand center onto York St. projects Solano SOL190001 17-08-0015 STA SolanoExpress Corp Yard Solano County: At FAST and SolTrans Corp yards: Construct EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2030 Elec and upgrade electric infrastructure. Purchase of office, shop, and operating equipment for existing facilities Solano SOL190002 17-08-0015 STA SolanoExpress Bus Solano County: Countywide: Purchase electric over-the-road EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2030 Electrification coaches for long-haul SolanoExpress routes. Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Solano SOL190003 17-10-0026 F-S Transit Fairfield - Electric Bus Fairfield: Systemwide: Procure all-electric, zero-emission EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Fleet and Infrastructure buses and supporting charging infrastructure Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Solano SOL190004 17-08-0002 Vallejo Vallejo - Sacramento St Vallejo: Sacramento St from Tennessee St to Capitol St: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Streetscape Implement streetscape improvements Projects that correct, improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Sonoma SON030005 17-10-0026 Son Co Transit Sonoma Co Transit: Sonoma County Transit: Preventive maintenance program for EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Preventive Maintenance agency fleet. Rehabilitation of transit Program vehicles Sonoma SON030012 17-10-0026 SantaRosa Santa Rosa City Bus: Santa Rosa: Various Locations: Upgrade and improve transit EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Bus Transit Enhancements facilities including amenities, accessibility, ADA compliance, Construction of small pedestrian and bicycle access, and technology upgrades passenger shelters and including transit system information kiosks

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 64 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Sonoma SON070020 17-10-0026 SantaRosa Santa Rosa City Bus Santa Rosa CityBus: 9 vehicles: Purchase 5 Hybrid Electric EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Bus Replacement Bus Replacement Buses and 4 clean diesel buses to replace Rehabilitation of transit Purchase aging fixed route buses to replace fixed route buses vehicles Sonoma SON090023 17-10-0027 SantaRosa Santa Rosa CityBus: Santa Rosa CityBus: System-wide: Operating Assistance to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Bus Operating Assistance Transit Agency Operating assistance to transit agencies Sonoma SON090024 17-10-0026 SantaRosa Santa Rosa CityBus: Santa Rosa CityBus: Preventative Maintenance program for EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Bus Preventative Maintenance agency fleet Rehabilitation of transit vehicles Sonoma SON110025 17-10-0024 Sonoma Replace Hauser Bridge In Sonoma: Bridge No.20C0240,Hauser Road Bridge over EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 County over Gualala River over South Fork Gualala River, 5 Mi east of Seaview Road. Projects that correct, 20C0240 Replace existing one-lane bridge with a new two-lane bridge improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature Sonoma SON110050 17-09-0001 Son Co Reg Central Sonoma Valley In the unincorporated area of Sonoma County: Near City of EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Park Trail Sonoma from Larson Park to Flowery Elementary School and Bicycle and pedestrian along Verano Avenue from Sonoma Creek to Main Street: facilities construct 0.42 miles of a Sonoma SON130010 17-10-0022 Sonoma Sonoma County Various Sonoma County: Various locations: Rehabilitate pavement EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 County Streets & Roads Pavement resurfacing Preservation and/or rehabilitation Sonoma SON130012 17-09-0005 Windsor Conde Ln/Johnson St In Town of Windsor: At the intersection of Conde Lane and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Pedestrian Improvements Johnson Street: Realign intersection to eliminate stop signs Intersection signalization on Conde Lane. Johnson Street becomes right in and right projects at individual out only. Add RRFB intersections Sonoma SON130013 17-09-0001 Windsor Bell Rd/Market In Windsor: At the intersection of Bell Road-Market Street EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 St/Windsor River Rd Ped and Windsor River Road: Install a traffic signal and install Intersection signalization Improvement pedestrian and bicycle signal equipment. projects at individual intersections Sonoma SON130015 17-10-0022 Sonoma Bodega Highway Bodega Hwy: Beginning at the intersection of Sexton Lane EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 County Pavement Rehabilitation and ending at the Sebastopol City Limits: The Project length Pavement resurfacing is approximately 2 miles. The scope of work will includes and/or rehabilitation pavement rehabilitation, Sonoma SON130016 17-09-0001 Cloverdale Cloverdale - Safe Routes Cloverdale: Various Locations: Construct sidewalks and add EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 to School Phase 2 Class II bike lanes Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Sonoma SON150003 17-09-0001 Santa Rosa Jennings Ave Bike & Ped In Santa Rosa: At Jennings Ave and SMART railroad tracks: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 RR Crossing Corridor Construct a bicycle and pedestrian crossing and develop a Bicycle and pedestrian Safe Routes to School service program focusing on facilities education and awareness for the Sonoma SON150007 17-10-0027 Petaluma Petaluma Transit: ADA Petaluma Transit: Annual ADA Set-Aside EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Set-Aside Operating assistance to transit agencies

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 65 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Sonoma SON150008 17-10-0026 SantaRosa SantaRosa Bus: Bus SantaRosa Bus: 40' Fixed Route Vehicle: Replace three EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Bus Replacement Purchase aging 40' fixed route diesel buses for operation purposes. Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Sonoma SON150009 17-09-0005 Son Co TA Highway 116/121 Sonoma County: Southwest of the City of Sonoma at the EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.127) - 2040 Intersection Improvement intersection of State Routes 116, and 121, and Bonneau Intersection signalization Project Road: Improve intersection projects at individual intersections Sonoma SON150011 17-10-0015 Sonoma Sonoma SRTS High In Sonoma County: Countywide: Safe routes to school high EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 County School Pilot school pilot program to shift mode away from single family Grants for training and vehicular trips to bicycle/pedestrian/carpooling/bussing. research programs Sonoma SON150012 17-10-0026 Son Co Transit Sonoma County Transit: Sonoma County Transit: two vehicles: Replace two 40-foot EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Replacement CNG Buses compressed natural gas (CNG)-fueled buses. Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Sonoma SON150013 17-10-0026 Son Co Transit Sonoma County Transit: Sonoma County Transit: 5 vehicles: Replace five 40-foot EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Replace 2006 CNG CNG-fueled buses. Purchase of new buses and Buses rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Sonoma SON150017 17-10-0026 SantaRosa SRCityBus Non-Revenue Santa Rosa City Bus: At Transit Mall: Implement transit EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Bus Vehicle and Capital enhancements, purchase a replacement non-revenue Purchase of support Equipmnt vehicle, and rehab/renovate bus stops for ADA compliance vehicles Sonoma SON150019 17-10-0027 SantaRosa Implementation of Santa Rosa CityBus: Systemwide: Operating Assistance for EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Bus Reimagining CityBus implementing Reimagining CityBus Operating assistance to transit agencies Sonoma SON170001 17-09-0018 Windsor Windsor River Windsor: At the Windsor River Road/Windsor Road/SMART EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2020 Road/Windsor Road intersection: Construct rail crossing safety improvements, Railroad/highway crossing Intersection Imps multi-use path, pedestrian and vehicle traffic improvements. Sonoma SON170002 17-10-0023 MTC Regional Planning Sonoma County: Regional Planning Activities and Planning, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Activities and PPM - Programming and Monitoring (PPM) Planning activities Sonoma conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.C Sonoma SON170003 17-10-0027 SantaRosa Santa Rosa CityBus- Santa Rosa CityBus: Provide operating assistance to Santa EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Bus paratransit operations Rosa Paratransit. Operating assistance to transit agencies Sonoma SON170005 17-10-0026 Petaluma Petaluma: Transit Yard & Petaluma: Transit Yard and Facility: Improvements to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Facilities Improvements enhance security and maintain a state of good repair, Reconstruction or renovation including pavement repair and upgrades, video surveillance of transit buildings and system, office security, yard lighting, structures (e.g., rail Sonoma SON170006 17-10-0026 Son Co Transit Sonoma County Transit: Sonoma County Transit: Three 40-foot CNG-Fueled Buses: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Replace 2009 CNG Replace with similar buses Purchase of new buses and Buses rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 66 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Sonoma SON170009 17-09-0001 Son Co TA Sonoma County - County- Sonoma County: Countywide: Safe Routes to Schools EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Wide SRTS Program Education Program in schools, while encouraging schools to Grants for training and lead their own ongoing programs, with a goal of increasing research programs active or shared modes of Sonoma SON170010 17-10-0022 Sonoma Sonoma County - River Sonoma County: River Rd from Trenton-Healdsburg Rd to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 County Road Pavement Rehab just west of the SMART right-of-way (PM 19.77 to 24.60): Pavement resurfacing Rehabilitation of pavement and striping for bike lanes and/or rehabilitation Sonoma SON170011 17-09-0001 Petaluma Petaluma Blvd South Petaluma Blvd from E St to Crystal Ln: Rehab pavement, EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Road Diet at E Street reconfigure lanes for smoother traffic flow, add class 2 bike Projects that correct, lanes and signal modifications: Petaluma Blvd from E St to improve, or eliminate a Mountain View Ave: Reduce hazardous location or feature Sonoma SON170012 17-09-0001 Santa Rosa Highway 101 Bicycle and Santa Rosa: Over Highway 101 in the vicinity of the Santa EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Pedestrian Bridge Rosa Junior College and the Coddingtown Mall: Construct a Bicycle and pedestrian Class I shared-use ADA accessible bicycle and pedestrian facilities bridge Sonoma SON170013 17-10-0022 Sonoma Rehabilitaiton of Various Sonoma County: Various streets and roads: Preserve and EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 County Roads in Sonoma County rehabilitate pavement and improve pedestrian and bike Pavement resurfacing access and/or rehabilitation Sonoma SON170014 17-09-0001 Sonoma Crocker Bridge Bike and Sonoma County: On existing north piers of Crocker Bridge: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 County Pedestrian Passage Construct a Class 1 bicycle and ped facility Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Sonoma SON170015 17-10-0022 Cotati E. Cotati Avenue Street Cotati: E. Cotati Avenue from the railroad tracks east to the EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Rehabilitation Project City limits: Repave street, landscape the median, update Pavement resurfacing traffic signs, and repair and restore sidewalks to ADA and/or rehabilitation compliance Sonoma SON170016 17-10-0022 Rohnert Park Rohnert Park Various Rohnert Park: On State Farm Drive from Rohnert Park EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Streets Rehabilitation Expressway to approximately 200 feet north of Professional Pavement resurfacing Center Drive: Rehabilitate roadway and/or rehabilitation Sonoma SON170017 17-10-0026 Petaluma Petaluma AVL Equipment Petaluma: Systemwide: Purchase and maintain AVL system EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 equipment for fixed route vehicle. Purchase of operating equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, Sonoma SON170018 17-10-0026 Petaluma Petaluma Purchase 1 Petaluma: 1 bus: Purchase replacement remanufactured 40' EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Remanufactured Fixed Fixed Route Bus Purchase of new buses and Route Bus rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Sonoma SON170020 17-10-0026 Petaluma Petaluma: Replace 2 Petaluma: Petaluma Paratransit: Replace two (2) paratransit EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Paratransit Cutaways vans Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Sonoma SON170021 17-09-0001 Sebastopol Bodega Avenue Bike Sebastopol: Bodega Ave from Pleasant Hill Ave to High St: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Lanes and Pavement Rehabilitate pavement, fill in sidewalk gaps, widen pavement, Pavement resurfacing Rehab add bike lanes, and implement pedestrian safety and/or rehabilitation improvements

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 67 of 68 List of 2019 TIP Projects by County Attachment A-1

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Sonoma SON170022 17-09-0001 Sonoma City Fryer Creek Pedestrian Sonoma: At Newcomb Street over Fryer Creek: Construct a EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 and Bicycle Bridge new bicycle and pedestrian bridge and path as well as Bicycle and pedestrian circulation and accessibility improvements to Newcomb facilities Street and Fryer Creek Drive. Sonoma SON170023 17-10-0022 Santa Rosa Santa Rosa Pavement In Santa Rosa: Various locations: Pavement rehabilitation; EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Rehab of Various Streets Various locations: Restripe roadways to add Class II bike Pavement resurfacing lanes and/or rehabilitation Sonoma SON170024 17-09-0005 Healdsburg Healdsburg Avenue Healdsburg: On Healdsburg Ave from Powell Ave to EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Complete Streets Passalaqua Rd: Implement complete streets improvements Projects that correct, Improvements for all modes of travel including reducing travel lanes from 5 improve, or eliminate a to 3 hazardous location or feature Sonoma SON170025 17-09-0001 Son Co Reg Joe Rodota Trail Bridge Sonoma County: On the Joe Rodota Trail near the City of EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Park Replacement Sebastopol: Remove and replace two deteriorating bicycle Bicycle and pedestrian and pedestrian bridges facilities Sonoma SON170026 17-10-0026 SantaRosa Santa Rosa CityBus: Santa Rosa CityBus: Four 40-foot local transit buses: EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2040 Bus Electric Bus Replacement Replace with Four 40-foot electric buses and purchase Purchase of new buses and related charging equipment rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Sonoma SON190004 17-09-0017 Petaluma Petaluma: Purchase Petaluma: Systemwide: Replace paratransit vehicles which EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2020 Replacement Paratransit have reached the end of their useful life. Purchase of new buses and Van rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for Sonoma SON190005 17-09-0017 Petaluma Petaluma Transit: Security Petaluma: Systemwide: Upgrade audio-visual on-board EXEMPT (40 CFR 93.126) - 2020 Systems Upgrade surveillance system in order to replace an aging system Purchase of operating equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts,

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 68 of 68 Appendix A-2 List of Projects in the Amended 2019 TIP with Updated Conformity Analysis Years Projects in the Amended 2019 TIP with Updated Conformity Analysis Years Attachment A-2

Conformity Analysis County TIP ID RTP ID Sponsor Project Title Project Descripion Air Quality Descripion Year Alameda ALA170009 17-10-0056 ACTC I-680 Express Lane Gap Alameda County: SB I-680 from SR-84 to Alcosta Blvd: NON-EXEMPT 2030 Closure: SR-84 to Alcosta express lane improvements (Phase 1); NB I-680 from SR-84 to Alcosta Blvd: Widen for express lanes (Phase 2). Project also references the amendment to Plan Bay Area 2040.

*Projects with conformity analysis year 2040 reference programatic projects or projects with a completion date after 2030 in Plan Bay Area 2040 1 of 1 Appendix B List of Projects in Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP Projects in this category are new bicycle (on-street and off-street) and pedestrian facilities, and facilities that connect existing network gaps, including but not limited to projects that would implement these components on the following 17-01-0001 Alameda Bicycle and Pedestrian Program facilities: Alameda Point Trail, Bay Trail Connections and Gap Closures, East Bay Greenway, Iron Horse Trail Crossing, Union Yes City Boulevard, Pierce Street, Shattuck Avenue, 7th Street Transit Village, Lake Merritt BART, Lakeside Complete Streets, Peralta and MLK Boulevard Projects in this category implement strategies and programs that reduce emissions, encourage alternative transportation Climate Program: TDM and Emission Reduction 17-01-0002 Alameda modes, and manage transportation demand including but not limited to projects such as TDM program implementation, Yes Technology parking management, local area shuttle and paratransit services Projects in this category address safety, security and other needs, including but not limited to projects such as Central 17-01-0003 Alameda County Safety, Security and Other Yes Avenue Overpass, BART Security Program Projects in this category implement multimodal or complete streets elements, including but not limited to projects such as 17-01-0004 Alameda Multimodal Streetscape Grimmer Boulevard Greenway, Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets, West Grand Avenue Complete Streets, Hearst Avenue Yes Compete Streets This category includes planning studies supporting the region’s PDA framework and connecting transportation and land 17-01-0005 Alameda PDA Planning use This category includes roadway capacity increasing projects (new roadways or widening/extensions of existing roadways) 17-01-0006 Alameda Minor Roadway Expansions Yes on minor roads such as Clement Avenue, Mariner Square, Mitchell Street, Scarlett Drive, Stoneridge Drive, Kato Road This category includes projects that improve roadway, intersection, or interchange operations, ITS, as well as other 17-01-0007 Alameda Roadway Operations Yes transportation system management This category includes minor projects that improve or complement existing transit operations including but not limited to 17-01-0008 Alameda Minor Transit Improvements projects such as rapid bus service in Alameda Point, the Bernal Park and Ride, Line 51 project completion and capital Yes replacement, Newark Transit Station improvements, and Dumbarton Corridor Area Transportation Improvements 17-01-0009 Alameda New Alameda Point Ferry Terminal Provide for new ferry terminal at Seaplane Lagoon Yes Yes Yes I-680 Southbound Express Lanes (SR-237 to SR- To upgrade the existing toll system for the I-680 southbound express lane project. Additionally, it would also result in 17-01-0014 Alameda 84) Upgrades upgrades to the existing pavement for a near continuous access express lanes facility. Project replaces the substandard 7th St. roadway & pedestrian underpass at the north end of Railport Oakland Intermodal 17-01-0015 Alameda 7th Street Grade Separation East Yard (RO-IY). The new, depressed roadway allows for new rail crossings to improve connections to the future OHIT IY and Yes project completes a missing segment of the Bay Trail. Constructs public improvements for trade, logistics and ancillary maritime services that promote cleaner modes of Oakland Army Base transportation infrastructure 17-01-0016 Alameda transportation, efficient goods movement, congestion relief on countywide freight corridors, new jobs, and fulfills a improvements mandate to reduce truck trips through the West Oakland community. OHIT consists of 3 phases. Phase 1, for the lead, support and manifest tracks, is under construction. Phase 2 has two Outer Harbor Intermodal Terminal (OHIT) Phases 17-01-0017 Alameda intermodal tracks; Phase 3 has six intermodal tracks and electric cranes. The Project enables a shift of cargo from truck to Yes 2 and 3 rail to maximize the Port’s operational potential. The Project creates a new elevated intersection at 7th & Maritime Streets, and provides new rail access between the 17-01-0018 Alameda 7th Street Grade Separation West Oakland Army Base and the Oakland International Gateway. The Project shifts cargo from truck to rail, reduces truck Yes congestion and emissions, and improves public access. This project implements multiple traffic operation systems and strategies that will address the challenges of traffic 17-01-0019 Alameda I-580 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) congestion in the corridor. The project will install new and upgrade existing corridor management elements along Interstate Yes Yes Yes 580. Full ICM depends on extending North Canyons Parkway to Dublin Boulevard (RTPID 17-01-0048) This project will increase mobility between I-680 and I-880 by widening Mission to 3 lanes in each direction throughout SR-262 Mission Boulevard Cross Connector 17-01-0020 Alameda the I-680 interchange, rebuild the NB and SB 680 on and off ramps, and potentially grade separate Mission Blvd. from Yes Yes Yes Yes Improvements Mohave Dr. and Warm Springs Blvd. Full interchange improvements at Whipple Road/I-880, including northbound off-ramp, surface street improvements and 17-01-0021 Alameda I-880 Whipple Road Interchange Improvements Yes Yes Yes Yes realignment The project will upgrade the existing Outer Harbor Turning Basin (OHTB) at the Port of Oakland from 1,650' to 1,920' in 17-01-0022 Alameda Outer Harbor Turning Basin diameter to handle ships up to 1.320' long. I-880 Industrial Parkway Interchange Reconstruct the I-880/Industrial Parkway interchange to provide a northbound off-ramp and a southbound HOV bypass 17-01-0023 Alameda Yes Yes Yes Yes Reconstruction lane on the southbound loop off-ramp. Reconstruct the bridge over I-880. Reconstruct interchange to widen A Street from 5 lanes to 6 lanes and add bike lanes, and provide additional lane capacity 17-01-0024 Alameda I-880 A Street Interchange Reconstruction for potential future freeway widening. Project also involves modifying signals and reconfiguring intersections to improve Yes Yes Yes Yes truck-turning maneuvers. This project will upgrade and improve the 4.5 mile long dike protecting OAK, terminal and other facilities, roadways, transit 17-01-0025 Alameda Oakland International Airport Perimeter Dike services & trails connecting Alameda and San Leandro. Includes seismic stabilization, FEMA compliance, and protection against climate change and sea level rise.

1 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP This program includes projects that improve freight operations and reduce impacts of freight activity. This includes but is not limited to railroad quiet zones, multimodal safety projects at crossings, freight corridor upgrades, ITS improvements, 17-01-0026 Alameda Minor Freight Improvements Programmatic Yes terminal lighting, seismic monitoring, rail connections between Oakland and Niles Subdivisions, truck parking facilities, rail platforms, and other projects that would implement the Alameda CTC Goods Movement plan. This project identifies & implements solutions to the traffic circulation issues on Middle Harbor Rd. Solutions may include 17-01-0027 Alameda Middle Harbor Road Improvements dedicated queue or turn lanes, signalization, and relocation or reconfiguration of terminal gates and recommendations for Adeline St. Bridge reconfiguration as appropriate. I-580/I-680 Interchange: Project Development Improve capacity, operations and safety at the interchange, primarily in the westbound direction approaching the 17-01-0028 Alameda and Phase 1 Short-term Operational Yes Yes Yes Yes interchange. This project includes the Phase 1 short-term operational improvements. Improvements SR-84/I-680 Interchange Improvements and SR- Construct interchange improvements for the Route 84/I-680 Interchange, widen Route 84 from Pigeon Pass to I-680 and 17-01-0029 Alameda Yes Yes Yes Yes 84 Widening construct aux lanes on I-680 between Andrade and Route 84. I-880 Broadway/Jackson Interchange The project proposes to improve connectivity between I-880/I-980 and Alameda and Oakland. Improvements include 17-01-0030 Alameda Yes Yes Yes Yes Improvements reconfiguration of existing ramps, demolition of existing ones, and construction of new ramps. Provide improvements to NB I-880 at 23rd and 29th Avenue interchange by improving the freeway on- and off-ramp I-880 at 23rd/29th Avenue Interchange 17-01-0031 Alameda geometrics, replacing the overcrossings, and modifying local streets, landscape enhancement, and construction of a Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Improvements soundwall. SR-84 Widening (Ruby Hill Drive to Concannon The Route Expressway - South Segment involves widening a 2.4 mile section of SR 84 (Isabel Ave) from Ruby Hill Drive to 17-01-0032 Alameda Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Boulevard) Concannon Boulevard from two lanes to four lanes. Modify I-580/Vasco Rd interchange. Widen I-580 overcrossing and add new loop ramp in southwest quadrant. Includes 17-01-0033 Alameda I-580 Vasco Road Interchange Improvements Yes Yes Yes widening Vasco Road to 8 lanes between Northfront Road and Las Positas Road and other local roadway improvements.

Construct a new interchange at I-580/Greenville Road to replace the existing interchange. Project will include widening the 17-01-0034 Alameda I-580 Greenville Road Interchange Improvements Yes Yes Yes undercrossing to provide six lanes, and constructing ramps to achieve a modified partial cloverleaf interchange design. Reconstruct and modify the I-580/First Street interchange into partial cloverleaf design with 6-lanes on First Street over I- 17-01-0035 Alameda I-580 First Street Interchange Improvements Yes Yes Yes 580. The project would reconstruct the SR-92/Clawiter Rd interchange to create the SR-92/Whitesell St interchange, addressing SR-92/Clawiter Road/Whitesell Street Interchange 17-01-0036 Alameda truck traffic access needs by: reconfiguring Clawiter/SR 92 interchange, creating new access to SR 92 at Whitesell St, and Yes Yes Yes Yes Improvements consolidating access for these two local roads. Ashby I-80 Interchange with Bicycle and Reconstruct the Ashby Avenue interchange, including construction of a new bridge to replace existing bridges, a 17-01-0037 Alameda Yes Pedestrian Ramps roundabout interchange, and bicycle/pedestrian access over the I-80 freeway at the Ashby-Shellmound interchange. I-580 Interchange Improvement at 1-580/Fallon Rd I/C Improvements (Phase 2): Reconstruct overcrossing to add lanes I-580 Hacienda Dr I/C Improvements: 17-01-0038 Alameda Yes Yes Yes Yes Hacienda/Fallon Road - Phase 2 Reconstruct overcrossing to add lanes I-580 SR-84/Isabel Interchange Improvements Complete ultimate improvements at I-580/Isabel/State Route 84 Interchange to provide 6-lanes over I-580 at the 17-01-0039 Alameda Yes Yes Yes Phase 2 Isabel/State Route 84 Interchange and 4-lanes over I-580 at the Portola Avenue flyover. The proposed project is located in northwest Berkeley and will reconfigure the I-80/Gilman interchange. The limits for the 17-01-0040 Alameda I-80 Gilman Street Interchange Improvements Yes freeway and ramp traffic operations would include I-80 from east of Buchanan Street to west of University Avenue. This project proposes to modify the existing Winton Avenue/I-880 cloverleaf interchange to a partial cloverleaf 17-01-0041 Alameda I-880 Winton Avenue Interchange Improvements Yes Yes Yes Yes interchange, implement Complete Street per Caltrans HDM and provide direct access to Southland Mall. I-680 Overcrossing Widening and Improvements 17-01-0042 Alameda Widen Stoneridge Drive overcrossing at I-680 constructing third westbound lane Yes Yes Yes (at Stoneridge Drive) Adjacent I-880/High St, project will widen and extend existing local roads; improve vehicles level of service, pedestrian & 42nd Ave & High St Access Improvement at I-880 17-01-0043 Alameda ADA accessibility, access to ramps/Alameda; expand the region’s bike route; eliminate circuitous traffic and congestion Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes On/Off Ramp near I-880, promote redevelopment in the Estuary Area. 17-01-0044 Alameda I-680 Sunol Interchange Modification Signalize Sunol @ I-680 Interchange ramps and widen Southbound on ramp Yes Yes Yes Yes Widen Southbound Santa Rita Road overcrossing at I-580 constructing third southbound through lane at Pimlico Drive 17-01-0045 Alameda Santa Rita Road I-580 Overcrossing Widening Yes Yes Yes and second on ramp lane to I-580 eastbound. The project is a consolidated multi-modal transit hub at the existing Coliseum BART station and Amtrak Station for patrons 17-01-0046 Alameda Coliseum City Transit Hub of the future Coliseum City Transit-Oriented Development. Includes pedestrian concourse and replacement for 1000 BART parking spaces which may be shared with other uses. Improved east-west connection between I-880 and Route 238 (Mission Blvd.) comprised of a combination of new 17-01-0047 Alameda I-880 to Mission Boulevard East-West Connector roadways along preserved ROW and improvements to existing roadways and intersections along Decoto Road, Fremont Yes Yes Yes Yes Boulevard, Paseo Padre Parkway, Alvarado-Niles Road and Mission Boulevard.

2 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP

This project will update the currently planned project by incorporating multimodal travel, and construct the street Dublin Boulevard - North Canyons Parkway 17-01-0048 Alameda extension to connect Dublin Blvd. in Dublin with North Canyons Parkway in Livermore at Doolan Road. The existing RTP Yes Yes Yes Yes Extension project lacks the current State, regional, and local priorities. This project was carried forward from RTPIDs 21473, 240392. Fruitvale Avenue (Miller Sweeney) Lifeline Bridge Replace the existing vehicular bridge with one structure that can provide the only Lifeline access from Alameda. Provide 17-01-0049 Alameda Project dedicated transit lanes, bike lanes, median and sidewalks. SR-84 Mowry Avenue Widening (Peralta Blvd to Widen Mowry Ave from Peralta Blvd to Mission Blvd (State Route 84) from two to four lanes and install bike lanes and 17-01-0050 Alameda Yes Yes Yes Mission Blvd) sidewalks on both sides of the street. This project will widen Tassajara Road from existing 2 lanes to 4 lanes between N/ Dublin Ranch Drive to City limit with C C Tassajara Road Widening from N. Dublin Ranch 17-01-0051 Alameda County. It would add new bike lanes, construct/upgrade bus stops, and add missing sidewalks, ADA ramps, curb and Yes Yes Yes Drive to City Limit gutter. Traffic signals will be upgraded. Widen Auto Mall Parkway from four lanes to six lanes between I880 and I680 including intersection improvements and 17-01-0052 Alameda Auto Mall Parkway Widening and Improvements Yes Yes Yes widening of the Auto Mall bridge over UPRR. This project will complete 1.83 mile of widening of Dougherty Rd. from 4 lanes to 6 lanes from Dublin Blvd. to the county 17-01-0053 Alameda Dougherty Road Widening line. Some of the improvements include; class II bike lanes, landscaped median islands, street lighting, traffic signal Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes modifications, and 1.4 miles of Bike/Ped. Class I trail. Union City Boulevard Widening (Whipple to City 17-01-0054 Alameda Widen Union City Boulevard to three travel lanes in each direction from Whipple Road to the City limits with Hayward. Yes Yes Yes Limit) SR-84 Peralta Boulevard Widening (Fremont Blvd This project will widen Peralta Blvd (State Route 84) to four lanes with continuous bike lanes and sidewalks on both sides 17-01-0055 Alameda Yes Yes Yes to Mowry Ave) of the road from Fremont Blvd to Mowry Ave. Thornton Avenue Widening (Gateway Boulevard 17-01-0056 Alameda The project will widen this undivided two-lane section of Thornton Avenue to a four-lane divided arterial street. Yes Yes Yes to Hickory Street) Dublin Boulevard Widening - Sierra Court to This project proposes to widen Dublin Boulevard from Sierra Court to Dublin Court in the westbound direction from two 17-01-0057 Alameda Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Dublin Court to three lanes in the City of Dublin. This project also includes the construction of Class II bike lanes. Construct a new BART station in Irvington PDA in Fremont on Osgood Road near Washington Boulevard as called for in 17-01-0058 Alameda Irvington BART Station Yes Yes Yes the 2014 Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Phase 4 is an at grade intermodal station to serve both AMTRAK, ACE and future Dumbarton Rail with elevated tracks and 17-01-0059 Alameda Union City Intermodal Station Phase 4 passengers platforms. A 9.5 mile BRT line from downtown Oakland to the San Leandro BART station on International Blvd and East 14th St. with 17-01-0060 Alameda East Bay BRT 80% dedicated lanes; 27 new hybrid buses; 34 level-boarding platform stations; real time arrival information; and transit Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes signal priority. It also includes parking mitigations. To create BRT infrastructure between Webster Street and the Alameda Point PDA, connecting future residents and workers 17-01-0061 Alameda Ralph Appezzato Memorial Parkway BRT on the former base (as well as existing Alameda residents) to downtown Oakland and BART via Webster Street Tube. The Yes Yes Yes Yes BRT's Alameda term

3 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP BART is preparing a project-level Environmental Impact Report evaluating five alternatives for the BART to Livermore BART to Livermore/ACE Project Development and 17-01-0062 Alameda Extension Project. BART extension to Isabel Avenue, DMU/EMU to Isabel Avenue, Express Bus/BRT, Enhanced Bus, and No- Yes Construction Reserve build. Planning and environmental analysis of the Broadway Shuttle Expansion project which seeks to extend the shuttle route 17-01-0063 Alameda Broadway Shuttle Expansion and service hours, and upgrade the project to an Enhanced Bus or Electric Streetcar line to enhance transit circulation and mobility, and catalyze mixed-use TOD and economic develop Additional funding for local streets and roads maintenance in Oakland from the City of Oakland Measure KK (Nov. 2016 17-01-0064 Alameda Additional Local Road Preservation/Rehab ballot measure) Add an express lane to the southbound and northbound travel lanes of Interstate 680 between Alcosta Boulevard and 17-01-0065 Alameda I-680 Express Lanes Gap Closure Yes Yes Yes Yes State Route 84. This category includes projects that improve access and mobility for people with disabilities, low-income residents, and Contra seniors, such as West County Low-Income School Bus Program, paratransit through Contra Costa County, information 17-02-0001 Access and Mobility Program Yes Costa and outreach projects, dial-a-ride, guaranteed ride home, non-operational transit capital enhancements (i.e. bus shelters), local shuttles, lighting and security projects, and discounted transit passes. Contra This category includes projects that would implement technological advances for transportation such as connected 17-02-0002 Innovative Transportation Technology Costa vehicle, autonomous vehicle, and other innovations. Projects in this category are new bicycle (on-street and off-street) and pedestrian facilities, and facilities that connect Contra 17-02-0003 Bicycle and Pedestrian Program existing network gaps, such as Lamorinda Bicycle and Pedestrian Program, Wildcat Creek Trail, and Contra Costa County's Yes Costa Safe Routes to School Program Projects in this category address safety, security and other needs such as Lone Tree Way Undercrossing, Marsh Creek Contra 17-02-0004 County Safety, Security and Other Road Curve Realignment, Cutting/Carlson grade crossing improvements, San Pablo Avenue overcrossing, Vasco Road Yes Costa safety improvement, and Viera Avenue Realignment Contra Projects in this category implement complete streets improvements to roadways throughout Contra Costa County, such 17-02-0005 Multimodal Streetscape Yes Costa as on San Pablo Avenue, near the Del Norte and Concord BART stations, and in PDAs. Funds future widening and extensions of non-regionally significant roadways such as John Muir Parkway, Slatten Ranch Contra 17-02-0007 Minor Roadway Expansions Road, James Donlon Blvd, Hillcrest Avenue, Sand Creek Road, San Jose Avenue and other roads throughout Contra Costa Yes Costa County Projects in this category improve roadway operations through technology and management systems on roads throughout Contra 17-02-0008 Roadway Operations Contra Costa County such as Clayton Road, Treat Boulevard, Contra Costa Boulevard, St. Mary's Road, Alhambra Avenue, Yes Costa Mt. Diablo Boulevard, roads in downtown Lafayette and Gateway/Lamorinda Traffic Program Projects in this category improve or complement existing transit operations through rolling stock, park and ride lots, Contra 17-02-0009 Minor Transit Improvements express bus service expansion, technology upgrades, bus transit preferential measures, eBART support service and school Yes Costa bus programs Contra SR4 Integrated Corridor Mobility from I-80 to SR160, including adaptive ramp metering, advanced traveler information, 17-02-0010 SR4 Integrated Corridor Mobility Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa arterial management system, freeway management system, connected vehicle applications I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Operations and Management - Local Portion - Maintenance in Contra Contra 17-02-0011 I-80 ICM Project Operations and Maintenance Costa; This project will implement Adaptive Ramp Metering (ARM) and Active Traffic Management (ATM) strategies will be Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa employed to reduction congestion and provide incident management capabilities. I-680 Northbound Managed Lane Completion Contra 17-02-0012 through 680/24 and Operational Improvements I-680 carpool lane completion thru 680/24 interchange and operational Improvements between N. Main and Treat Blvd Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa between N. Main and Treat Blvd Contra I-680 Northbound HOV lane extension between Provides an HOV lane in the northbound direction between N. Main and SR242, which will shorten a gap in the HOV 17-02-0013 Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa N. Main and SR-242 network which currently exists between Livorna and SR242. Kirker Pass Road Northbound Truck Climbing This project will add NB truck climbing lane from Clearbrook Drive in the City of Concord to a point 1,000 beyond the crest Contra 17-02-0014 Lane, Clearbrook Drive to Crest of Kirker Pass of Kirker Pass Road. The addition will include a 12-foot dedicated truck climbing lane and a Class II bike lane within an 8- Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa Road foot paved shoulder. Contra New road between Vasco Road and Byron Highway that increases access to the Byron Airport. Road will be 1 lane per 17-02-0015 Vasco Road Byron Highway Connector Road Yes Yes Yes Costa direction with at grade intersections at both end. Project is formerly named: SR-239: Airport Connector Contra 17-02-0016 Construct SR 242/Clayton Road on and off-ramps Construct on and off-ramp for SR 242 at Clayton Road Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa Contra SR-239 Feasibility Studies and Project Environmental and design study to construct a new State Route connecting SR4 to Interstates 205/580 near Tracy. Route 17-02-0017 Yes Costa Development alignment is not yet defined. Improve I-680/SR4 interchange by implementing: direct connectors for NB I-680 to WB SR4 (Ph1) & WB SR4 to SB I-680 Contra I-680/SR4 Interchange Improvements - Phases 1- 17-02-0019 (Ph2), & widening SR4 btw SR242 & Morello from 2 to 3 lanes per direction (Ph3). The 2-lane direct connectors will Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa 3 replace a single lane loop ramp & a single lane diagonal ramp, respectively.

4 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP Contra Various operational improvements on SR-4 between SR-242 and Bailey Road, including adding auxiliary lanes in strategic 17-02-0020 SR-4 Operational Improvements - Initial Phases Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa locations along this corridor Phase 1 includes relocating El Portal Dr. on-ramp to WB I-80 to the north, extending the auxiliary lane along WB I-80 Contra Reconstruct I-80/San Pablo Dam Road between San Pablo Dam Rd off-ramp and El Portal Dr on-ramp, and reconstructing the Riverside Ave pedestrian 17-02-0021 Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa Interchange overcrossing. Phase 2 includes modifications to McBryde and SPDR I/C & Includes provisions for bicyclists and pedestrians on San Pablo Dam Rd. Contra I-680 Southbound HOV Lane between N. Main Through the I-680/SR 24 Interchange, this project adds an HOV lane on I-680 SB, through minor widening and restriping 17-02-0022 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa and Livorna to narrower lanes. Existing number of mixed flow lanes will be kept the same. Contra State Route 4 Widening and Balfour Road IC 17-02-0023 Construct SR4 Bypass interchange at Balfour Rd and Widen SR4 from 2 to 4 lanes. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa Construction Contra I-80/SR-4 Interchange Improvements - New 17-02-0024 New SR4 eastbound offramp and onramp at Willow north of Palm Avenue and removal of Willow Hook Ramps Yes Yes Yes Costa Eastbound Willow Avenue Ramps Construct new signals and changeable message signs to redirect I-80 westbound on-ramp traffic during weekend peak Contra I-80/Central Avenue Interchange Modification - 17-02-0026 periods to I-580, connect Pierce Street to San Mateo Street to relocate the traffic signal at Pierce Street/Central Avenue to Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa Phases 1 & 2 the San Mateo Street/Central Avenue intersection, and construct other necessary improvements. Additional I-680 NB and SB auxiliary lanes south of I-680/SR 24 Interchange, including the following locations: Alcosta Contra Construct Additional Auxiliary Lanes on I-680 - 17-02-0027 Road to Bollinger Canyon Road; El Cerro Blvd to El Pintado Road; El Pintado Road to Stone Valley Road; Stone Valley Road Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa South of I-680/SR-24 Interchange to Livorna Road; and Livorna Road to Rudgear Road. Contra I-80 Eastbound and Westbound Pinole Valley Improve conditions for merging onto the I-80 mainline from the eastbound and westbound Pinole Valley Road on-ramps 17-02-0028 Yes Yes Yes Costa Road On-ramp Improvement to address vehicles accelerating uphill after stopping at ramp meter. Contra Eastbound SR-24: Construct Auxiliary Lane, Construct auxiliary lane along eastbound Highway 24 from on-ramp at Wilder Road to downtown Orinda off-ramp at 17-02-0029 Yes Yes Yes Costa Wilder Road to Camino Pablo Moraga Way/Camino Pablo/Brookwood Road Contra Widen Brentwood Boulevard - Havenwood Way Project would widen Lone Tree Way from 2 to 4 lanes for approximately 2400 linear feet. It also includes bike lanes, 17-02-0030 Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa to north city limit; and Chestnut to Fir median islands, curb, gutter, sidewalk street lights and landscaping. Contra Widen Willow Pass Road from Lynwood Drive to State Route 4 from two lanes to four lanes and implement Complete 17-02-0031 Widen Willow Pass Road, Lynwood Drive to SR 4 Yes Yes Yes Costa Streets Improvements Contra Widen Ygnacio Valley Road-Kirker Pass Road, Widen Ygnacio Valley Road from Michigan Blvd to Cowell Road from four lanes to six lanes and implement Complete 17-02-0032 Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa Cowell to Michigan Streets improvements Contra Widen Camino Tassajara Road, Windemere to Widen Camino Tassajara Road from 2-lanes to 4-lanes, including 8-foot paved shoulders and Class II bike lanes in both 17-02-0033 Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa County Line directions from Windemere Parkway to the Alameda/Contra Costa County Line. Contra Construct new 4-lane arterial roadway with raised median, class 2 bike lanes, and sidewalks from San Marco Boulevard to 17-02-0034 West Leland Road Extension Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa Willow Pass Road, with a design speed of 55 mph. Contra 17-02-0035 Lone Tree Way Widening Widen Lone Tree Way to 4-lanes in order to match section west of O'Hara Avenue. Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa Contra 17-02-0036 Pittsburg-Antioch Highway Widening Widen existing 2-lane arterial roadway to 4-lane arterial with turning lanes at appropriate locations. Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa Contra 17-02-0037 Widen Main St, SR 160 to Big Break Rd Widen Main Street from Highway 160 to Big Break Road from 4 lanes to 6 lanes. Yes Yes Yes Costa Contra 17-02-0038 Main Street Bypass Construct Main Street Downtown Bypass road between Vintage Parkway and 2nd Street. Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa Implement all phases of the Hercules Train Station including extending John Muir Parkway with box culvert over North Contra Channel and Bayfront Boulevard with bridge over Refugio Creek, eliminating gap in the Bay Trail West Segment by installing 17-02-0039 Hercules Train Station - All Phases Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa new trail connecting to new rail station, relocating fuel oil & fiber optic lines, constructing transit loop promenade and civic plaza, constructing parking structure, and conducting track/signal work Contra Constructs Martinez Intermodal Station (Phase 3), which includes an additional 425 spaces and auto/ped bridges (on top 17-02-0040 Martinez Intermodal Project: Phase 3 Costa of planned 200 interim spaces). Privately Run Ferry Service including Small-Scale Implement new ferry service from Antioch, Martinez, and Hercules to San Francisco. Project cost includes landside Contra (non-WETA complying) Landside Improvements 17-02-0041 improvements and privately run ferry service, which would be provided at a lower cost than standard WETA service. Ferry Yes Yes Yes Costa from Antioch, Martinez, and Hercules to San service is only included in the Plan from 2020 to 2035. Francisco Contra Implements ferry service from Richmond to San Francisco as identified in the Water Transit Authority's Implementation 17-02-0042 Richmond-San Francisco Ferry Service Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa and Operations Plan. Contra Includes projects that improve BART station capacity and implement access and parking improvement at Contra Costa 17-02-0043 BART Capacity, Access and Parking Improvements Yes Costa BART station Contra Landside Improvements for Richmond Ferry 17-02-0044 Construct landside improvements for Richmond ferry service, including expanded parking. Costa Service

5 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP Project will provide improvements including, but not limited to: expansion of the paid area of the station, including a new Contra El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Modernization, station agent booth and new fare gates 17-02-0045 Costa Phase 1 new elevators and stairwells within the paid area providing access to the platform new passenger restrooms, new public art installations The proposed project is the construction of an approximately 800-foot train platform along the San Joaquin Service line, Contra Civic Center Railroad Platform Park & Ride which would be located north of Main Street in Oakley, between 2nd Street and O’Hara Avenue. Approximately 300 surface 17-02-0046 Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa Complex parking spaces, distributed in two parking lots to avoid one large surface lot off Main Street, will be included to support Park & Ride activities as well as future train riders. Contra Construction of rail extension eastward from Pittsburg-Bay Point BART station with Phase 1 terminus at Hillcrest Avenue 17-02-0047 East County Rail Extension (eBART), Phase 1 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa in Antioch. Contra West County High Capacity Transit Investment 17-02-0049 Environmental, engineering and initial implementation work associated with the recommendations from the study. Costa Study Implementation - Phase 1 This project is a PNR facility in the City of Brentwood providing a transit connection to the current eBART terminus in Contra 17-02-0050 Brentwood Intermodal Transit Center Antioch. Tri-Delta transit would provide direct bus service from this facility which could serve as a future eBART station Yes Yes Yes Costa site in the future. Contra I-680 Transit Improvements including Express Bus I-680 Transit Improvements including Express Bus Service, ITS components, and Park & Ride Lots along the I-680 corridor 17-02-0051 Yes Yes Yes Costa Service, ITS components, and Park & Ride Lots from Dublin to Martinez Contra Widen San Ramon Valley Boulevard from 2 to 4 17-02-0052 Widen San Ramon Valley Boulevard from 2 to 4 lanes - Jewel Terrace to Podva Road Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Costa lanes - Jewel Terrace to Podva Road Projects in this category are new bicycle (on-street and off-street) and pedestrian facilities, and facilities that connect 17-03-0001 Marin Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Yes existing network gaps throughout Marin County Projects in this category implement strategies and programs that reduce emissions, encourage alternative transportation Climate Program: TDM and Emission Reduction 17-03-0002 Marin modes, and manage transportation demand including but not limited to projects such as TDM program implementation, Technology parking management, local area shuttle and paratransit services Projects in this category address safety and security needs including safe routes to school and coastal flood mitigation 17-03-0003 Marin County Safety, Security and Other projects Projects in this category improve roadway operations through technology and management systems on roads throughout 17-03-0004 Marin Roadway Operations Yes Marin County including Sir Francis Drake and other local corridor enhancements Projects in this category improve or complement existing transit operations through transit management systems, bus 17-03-0005 Marin Minor Transit Improvements maintenance facility relocation, local bus and ferry service expansion, countywide bus stop improvements and access Yes improvements to SMART stations, among other bus transit capital and facility projects Extend US 101 HOV lane from Atherton Avenue to Marin/Sonoma County line in the northbound direction and from Implement Marin Sonoma Narrows HOV Lane and 17-03-0006 Marin Rowland Boulevard to Marin/Sonoma County line in southbound direction. This project will complete the HOV lane Yes Yes Yes Yes corridor improvements Phase 2 (Marin County) system in Marin County from Richardson Bay Bridge to Marin/Sonoma County line. Study, design and connection for a two lane direct connector northbound US 101 to eastbound HWY 580. The project 17-03-0007 Marin US 101/580 Interchange Direct Connector - PAED would entail PSR, PAED and construction of a direct freeway to freeway interchange instead of local arterials. Study includes 580 westbound to south US 101. 17-03-0008 Marin Tiburon East Blithedale Interchange - PAED Planning and environmental assessment of alternatives to improve the US 101/Tiburon Boulevard interchange Shift eastbound lane reduction 1,000 feet to the east on SFD and Improve shoulders from Larkspur Landing Circle to Access Improvements to Richmond San Rafael Anderson Drive. Improve bicycle access from Anderson Drive to Main Street. Add additional thru capacity at Bellam 17-03-0009 Marin Yes Yes Yes Yes Bridge Boulevard off ramp from northbound 101 eastbound Interstate 580. Widen northbound Bellam off-ramp from US 101 to two lanes. Operational and capacity enhancement studies to address safety, sea level rise, and congestion on US 101, HWY 1 and 17-03-0010 Marin Highway Improvement Studies HWY 37. primarily focused on Interchange and ramp modifications as well as mainline improvements. PSRs level studies are funded, PAED and advanced outreach flexibility. Widen Novato Boulevard between Diablo Avenue Widen Novato Blvd. between Diablo Ave. and Grant Ave. to accommodate future growth and enable roadway system to 17-03-0011 Marin Yes Yes Yes Yes and Grant Avenue operate safely and efficiently, per City's General Plan. Sir Francis Drake Boulevard/Red Hill Alternatives analysis, environmental and design of interchange improvements to this congested intersection. This study 17-03-0012 Marin Avenue/Center Boulevard (known as "The Hub") - will include the study of a potential roundabout and improvements to this major arterial. project development This project involves the full or partial relocation of the Bettini Transit Center/San Rafael Transit Center (SRTC). Relocating San Rafael Transit Center (SRTC) Relocation 17-03-0013 Marin the existing transit center is necessary because SMART rail bi-sects the transit center, which eliminates one existing bus Project platform and renders the remaining platforms of the transit service unusable in whole or in part.

6 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP This project would provide environmental, design, engineering and construction of a parking garage to augment existing Larkspur Ferry Terminal Parking Garage - Planning inadequate parking at the Larkspur Ferry Terminal (LFT) and improve parking, traffic and pedestrian circulation around and 17-03-0014 Marin Yes Study within LFT. The parking garage would increase parking capacity from by approximately 36%, from 1,800 to 2,450 parking spaces. SMART Downtown San Rafael to Larkspur Rail 17-03-0015 Marin Extend rail from Downtown San Rafael 2.2 miles to Larkspur SMART Station. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Extension 17-03-0016 Marin Multimodal Streetscape Projects in this category implement multimodal or complete streets elements Yes Countywide bicycle network expansion, countywide bicycle network maintenance & rehabilitation, countywide pedestrian 17-04-0001 Napa Bicycle and Pedestrian Program network enhancements, maintenance, rehabilitation and expansion. Also, includes countywide SRTS infrastructure and Yes non-infrastructure projects/programs. 17-04-0002 Napa County Safety, Security and Other Railroad crossing safety upgrades, corridor and Safety Improvements Yes 17-04-0003 Napa Multimodal Streetscape Complete streets implementation and street reconstruction. Additional road capacity and extensions including bridge construction throughout Napa County and including along 17-04-0004 Napa Minor Roadway Expansions Yes Devlin Road and Eucalyptus Drive Intersection improvements and modifications, roadway capacity enhancements, including SR 221 and Soscol Avenue, and 17-04-0005 Napa Roadway Operations Yes other City of Napa intersection improvements Enhanced and expanded transit services, improved commuter amenities, Vine transit maintenance and fueling station, 17-04-0006 Napa Minor Transit Improvements Yes transit fleet expansion, new transit and vehicle technology, improved signage and enhanced transit stops. Countywide Intelligent Transportation Systems 17-04-0007 Napa Technology and signalization integration, coordination and improvements. Program Construct SR29 to a 6-lane Parkway with improved conditions for all travel modes from Napa Junction Road to South Kelly Road and increase capacity in SR-29 from 4 lanes to 6 lanes in unincorporated Napa County, between South Kelly Road 17-04-0008 Napa State Route 29 Improvements Yes Yes Yes and SR 12 Jameson Canyon Road, as well as other operational and intersection improvements along the SR 29 corridor countywide. 17-04-0009 Napa Soscol Junction Improvements at SR-29/SR-221/ Soscol Ferry Road. Yes Construct SR29 to 6-lanes for cars and improved conditions for other travel modes from American Canyon Road to Napa 17-04-0010 Napa SR29 Gateway Yes Yes Yes Junction Road San Projects in this category are new bicycle (on-street and off-street) and pedestrian facilities, and facilities that connect 17-05-0001 Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Yes Francisco existing network gaps, including Second Street Complete Streets project Projects in this category implement strategies and programs that reduce emissions, encourage alternative transportation San Climate Program: TDM and Emission Reduction 17-05-0002 modes, and manage transportation demand including but not limited to projects such as TDM program implementation, Yes Francisco Technology parking management, local area shuttle and paratransit services San Projects in this category address safety and security needs including Vision Zero improvements at ramps, local road safety 17-05-0003 County Safety, Security and Other Yes Francisco and security, India Basin roadway transportation improvements, and transit safety and security San 17-05-0004 Multimodal Streetscape Projects in this category implement multimodal or complete streets elements in San Francisco Yes Francisco San This category includes planning studies supporting the region’s PDA framework and connecting transportation and land 17-05-0005 PDA Planning Francisco use San This project provides additional funding to transit capital preservation and rehabilitation beyond what is included in the 17-05-0007 Transit Preservation/Rehabilitation Francisco regional transit capital project (RTPID 17-10-0026) This project implements roadway capacity changes to minor roads throughout San Francisco including Transit Center San District Plan, Transbay Redevelopment Plan Street Network, Balboa Reservoir Street Network, Central SoMa Plan Network 17-05-0008 Minor Roadway Expansions Yes Francisco Changes, Central Waterfront/Pier 70 Street Network, Harney Way, HOPE SF Street Networks, Mission Bay, Mission Rock, Parkmerced, Schlage Lock, Treasure Island, Bayview, Rincon Hill, and along the Great Highway San 17-05-0009 Roadway Operations This project includes local road intersection improvements Yes Francisco San This project includes the transit performance initiative, transit management systems, minor transit improvements, Muni 17-05-0010 Minor Transit Improvements Yes Francisco fare programs, maintenance facility projects, and transit preferential improvements San San Francisco Late Night Transportation New routes and increased frequency for all-night regional and local bus service, including Muni, AC Transit, Golden Gate 17-05-0011 Yes Francisco Improvements Transit, and SamTrans routes. This is a pilot for 5 years. SFgo™ is San Francisco's Citywide ITS program. It identifies signalized and non-signalized intersections located along San SFgo Integrated Transportation Management arterials and the Muni transit system and prioritizes them for ITS upgrades, such as controllers, cabinets, transit signal 17-05-0012 Yes Francisco System priority, fiber optic or wireless communications, traffic cameras, and variable message signs. Also improves arterial safety and pedestrian safety.

7 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP This project entails future expansion of the SFMTA transit fleet and needed facilities to house and maintain transit vehicles. The purpose is to meet projected future transit demand, as indicated in the SFMTA Transit Fleet Plan. It will San 17-05-0013 Expand SFMTA Transit Fleet facilitate the future provision of additional service through the procurement of transit vehicles as well as the development Yes Yes Yes Francisco of needed modern transit facilities. This also includes the expansion vehicles for Geary BRT (RTPID 17-05-0021) and does not include expansion vehicles for Central Subway, which are in RTPITD 17-05-0041. San Includes transit priority improvements along Rapid and High Frequency transit corridors, service increases, transfer and 17-05-0014 Muni Forward (Transit Effectiveness Project) Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco terminal investments, overhead wire changes, and street improvements in support of Vision Zero. Rail capacity long term planning and conceptual design for Muni, BART, and Caltrain. Planning and conceptual engineering San Rail Capacity Long Term Planning and Conceptual 17-05-0015 phase for study of major corridor and infrastructure investments along existing and potential expansion rail corridors that Yes Francisco Design - All either expand the system or provide significant increases in operating capacity to the existing rail system. Improve Market Street between Steuart Street and Octavia Boulevard. Includes resurfacing, sidewalk improvements, way- San 17-05-0016 Better Market Street - Transportation Elements finding, lighting, landscaping, transit boarding islands, transit connections, traffic signals, transportation circulation Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco changes, and utility relocation and upgrade. Advance planning and evaluation of recommendations that emerge from the Core Capacity Transit Study. Examples of San Core Capacity Implementation - Planning and projects under consideration include HOV lanes on the Bay Bridge for buses and carpools; BART/Muni/Caltrain tunnel 17-05-0017 Francisco Conceptual Engineering turnbacks, crossover tracks, grade separations, or other operational improvements; and a second transbay transit crossing. San Downtown San Francisco Ferry Terminal 17-05-0018 Expansion of berthing facilities along North Basin of Downtown San Francisco Ferry Terminal. Yes Francisco Expansion - Phase II San Establish new ferry terminal at Mission Bay 16th 17-05-0019 Establish New Ferry terminal to serve Mission Bay and Central Waterfront neighborhoods Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco Street Phase 1 (full implementation): Convert an existing mixed traffic lane and/or shoulder/excess ROW in each direction to HOV 3+ lanes on US 101 from SF/SM County line to I-280 interchange and on I-280 from US 101 interchange to 6th Street San HOV/HOT Lanes on U.S. 101 and I-280 in San off ramp to enhance carpool and transit operations during peak periods. 17-05-0020 Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco Francisco Phase 2 (planning and environmental review only): Convert Phase 1 HOV lanes to HOT/Express Lanes. Express transit to be funded with HOT lane revenues.

Implement Geary Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) to improve service between Market Street and Point Lobos Avenue. This proposal San includes dedicated bus lanes, enhanced platforms, new bus passing zones, adjustments to local bus stops, turn lane 17-05-0021 Geary Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco restrictions, new signalization with Transit Signal Priority, real-time arrival information, low-floor buses, and safety improvements in support of Vision Zero. Expansion vehicles are included in RTPID 17-05-0013. Reconstruct Doyle Drive with standard lane widths, shoulders, and a median barrier. Reconstruct interchange at State Route 1 and State Route 101 and add an auxiliary lanes between this interchange and Richardson Avenue. Transit access San 17-05-0022 Presidio Parkway will be improved through the provision of extended bus bays near Gorgas Avenue to accommodate multiple transit Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco providers, and well defined pedestrian routes. Post 2017 costs reflect annual SHOPP contributions for operations and maintenance. Includes two major components: 1) On the east side of the island, the I-80/YBI Ramps project will construct new San Yerba Buena Island (YBI) I-80 Interchange 17-05-0023 westbound on- and off- ramps to the new Eastern Span of the Bay Bridge; 2) On the west side of the island, the YBI West- Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco Improvement Side Bridges Retrofit project will seismically retrofit the existing bridge structures. San Balboa Park Station Area - Southbound I-280 Off- This project will realign the existing uncontrolled southbound I-280 off-ramp to Ocean Avenue into a T-intersection and 17-05-0024 Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco Ramp Realignment at Ocean Avenue construct a new traffic signal on Ocean Avenue to control the off-ramp. This project would study and implement closure of the northbound I-280 on-ramp from Geneva Avenue to improve San Balboa Park Station Area - Closure of Northbound 17-05-0025 safety. Closure of the ramp would initially be a pilot project, if possible, depending on the results of traffic studies. The Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco I-280 On-Ramp from Geneva Avenue linked on-ramp from Ocean Avenue would remain open. Planning, Preliminary Engineering, and Environmental Review to re-locate the Bayshore Caltrain station and potentially San 17-05-0026 Bayshore Station Multimodal Planning and Design extend the T-Line to the station. The project would also include inter-modal facilities and additional supporting structures Francisco and utilities. San Hunters Point Shipyard and Candlestick Point 17-05-0027 Build new local streets within the Hunters Point Shipyard and Candlestick Point area. Yes Yes Yes Francisco Local Roads Phase 1 San Southeast San Francisco Caltrain Station - Planning and environmental analysis of Caltrain infill station to replace Paul Ave Station in Southeast San Francisco (e.g. 17-05-0028 Yes Francisco Environmental Oakdale). San Downtown Value Pricing/Incentives - Pilot, Transit A set of street improvements to support transit operations and cycling and pedestrian safety and comfort to support the 17-05-0029 Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco Service, Supportive Infrastructure anticipated mode shift due to the implementation of congestion pricing. Treasure Island Mobility Management Program: San New ferry service between San Francisco and Treasure Island; AC Transit service between Treasure Island and Oakland; 17-05-0030 Intermodal Terminal, Congestion Toll, Transit Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco shuttle service on-Island; bike share on-Island; priced-managed parking on-Island; Travel Demand Management program. Service, Transit Capital

8 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP Create a 5 mile multi-modal corridor of streets, transit facilities, pedestrian paths, and dedicated bicycle lanes to link the Candlestick/Hunters Point Shipyard project area to BART, T-Third light rail, Caltrain, local bus lines and future ferry service. San Southeast Waterfront Transportation 17-05-0031 A BRT system (included in a RTPID 17-05-0032) would use exclusive transit right-of-way, station and shelter facilities, and Yes Yes Yes Francisco Improvements - Phase 1 transit signal priority infrastructure. This project also includes express bus and enhances transit service between the Southeast Waterfront and downtown San Francisco. Provides exclusive bus lanes, transit signal priority, and high-quality stations along Geneva Avenue (from Santos St to Executive Park Blvd), Harney Way, and Crisp Avenue, and terminating at the Hunters Point Shipyard Center. The project San 17-05-0032 Geneva-Harney Bus Rapid Transit includes pedestrian and bicycle improvements in support of Vision Zero and connects with Muni Forward transit priority Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco improvements west of Santos Street. This is the near-term alternative that does not rely on the full extension of Harney Way across US 101. Implement Van Ness Avenue Bus Rapid Transit (Van Ness BRT) to improve approximately two miles of a major north-south San urban arterial in San Francisco. Project would include a dedicated lane for BRT buses in each direction between Mission 17-05-0033 Van Ness Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco and Lombard Streets. There will be nine BRT stations, with platforms on both sides for right-side passenger boarding and drop-off. Identifies transit improvements needed to accommodate growth in Mission Bay. Improvements might include track San crossovers to allow for trains to be staged; a 6-inch raised area along existing tracks; a platform extension to accommodate 17-05-0034 Arena Transit Capacity Improvements Francisco crowds; other trackway modifications; and a traction power study to ensure that the power grid can accommodate a large number of idling vehicles. Implement streetscape improvements on Folsom Street between 5th and 11th Streets and on Howard Street between 4th San 17-05-0035 EN Trips: All Components and 11th Streets. On Folsom Street, a bi-directional cycle track, new transit bulbs and bus bulbs at intersections, and new Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco signals would be A 5-year regional/local express bus pilot to provide service to/from downtown San Francisco to/from San Francisco San Regional/Local Express Bus to Support Express neighborhoods, Marin, Contra Costa, Alameda, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties to complement other freeway corridor 17-05-0036 Yes Francisco Lanes in SF management strategies. Some service to be funded with HOT lane revenues. See HOV/HOT Lanes on U.S. 101 and I-280 in San Francisco project. Includes vehicles. San Implements transportation improvements for the Parkmerced development including enhanced transit service, pedestrian 17-05-0037 Parkmerced Transportation Improvements Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco and bicycle facilities, intersection improvements, parking management, carshare and bikehare stations Planning and environmental analysis of extension of light rail track 2.7 miles along Geneva Avenue from the Green Railyard San Geneva Light Rail Phase I: Operational to Bayshore Boulevard and then to the existing T-Third terminus at Sunnydale Station. Project would increase operational 17-05-0039 Francisco Improvements, Planning and Environmental flexibility, system resiliency, and provide a southern east west rail connection. Phase included in Plan Bay Area 2040 is for non-revenue service. Connect the rail turnouts from the existing tracks on Third Street at 18th and 19th Streets with additional rail and San overhead contact wire system on 18th, Illinois and 19th Streets. The loop would allow trains to turn around for special 17-05-0040 T-Third Mission Bay Loop Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco events and during peak periods to accommodate additional service between Mission Bay and the Market Street Muni Metro. Extends the Third Street Light Rail line north from King Street along Third Street, entering a new Central Subway near Bryant San Street and running under Geary and Stockton Streets to Stockton & Clay Streets in Chinatown. New underground stations 17-05-0041 T-Third Phase II: Central Subway Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco will be located at Moscone Center, Third & Market Streets, Union Square, and Clay Street in Chinatown. Includes procurement of four LRVs. The project would extend historic streetcar service by extending either the E-line or the F-line service from Fisherman’s San Historic Streetcar Extension - Fort Mason to 4th & Wharf to Fort Mason, using the historic railway tunnel between Van Ness Ave. and the Fort Mason Center. The project will 17-05-0042 Yes Yes Yes Yes Francisco King seek non-transit specific funds and will seek to improve the historic streetcar operation as an attractive service for tourists and visitors. Projects in this category are new bicycle (on-street and off-street) and pedestrian facilities, and facilities that connect 17-06-0001 San Mateo Bicycle and Pedestrian Program existing network gaps, including but not limited to new multi-purpose pedestrian/bicycle bridges over US 101 and Yes sidewalk gap closures Projects in this category address safety and security needs of San Mateo County including county-wide implementation of 17-06-0002 San Mateo County Safety, Security and Other Yes Safe Routes to School Program Projects in this category implement multimodal or complete streets elements, including but not limited to projects along 17-06-0003 San Mateo Multimodal Streetscape facilities such as El Camino Real, Bay Road, Ralston Avenue, University Avenue, Middlefield Road, Palmetto Avenue, Yes Mission Street, Geneva Avenue, and Carolan Avenue

This category includes roadway capacity increasing projects (new roadways, widening or extensions of existing roadways) 17-06-0004 San Mateo Minor Roadway Expansions Yes on minor roads such as Blomquist Street, California Drive, Railroad Avenue, Manor Drive, and Alameda de las Pulgas

9 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP County-wide Implementation of non-capacity Increasing local road Intersection modifications and channelization 17-06-0005 San Mateo Roadway Operations countywide Yes County-wide implementation of local circulation improvements and traffic management programs countywide County-wide Intelligent Transportation System Installation of transportation system management improvements such as Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) elements 17-06-0006 San Mateo Yes (ITS) and Traffic Operation System Improvements and TOS equipment throughout San Mateo County. Modify US 101 to accommodate an Express Lane from approximately 2 miles south of the Santa Clara County Line to Modify existing lanes on U.S. 101 to 17-06-0007 San Mateo Grand Avenue interchange near the I-380 interchange. Work may include shoulder modification, ramp modifications, and Yes Yes Yes accommodate a managed lane interchange modifications to accommodate an extra lane. Work will be phased. Add northbound and southbound modified auxiliary lanes and/ or implementation of Add northbound and southbound modified auxiliary lanes and/or implementation of managed lanes on U.S. 101 from I- 17-06-0008 San Mateo Yes Yes Yes Yes managed lanes on U.S. 101 from I-380 to San 380 to San Francisco County line. Francisco County line Improve operations at U.S. 101 near Route 92 - 17-06-0009 San Mateo US 101 operational improvements near Route 92. Project may have phased construction. Yes Phased 17-06-0010 San Mateo Improve U.S. 101/Woodside Road interchange Modifies the Woodside Road Interchange at US 101. Yes Yes Yes Yes Construct a new interchange on US 101 at Produce Avenue, connecting Utah Avenue on the east side of US 101 to San Mateo Avenue on the west side of US 101. This will allow for reconfiguration of the existing southbound ramps at 17-06-0011 San Mateo US 101 Produce Avenue Interchange Yes Yes Yes Yes Produce Ave and Airport Blvd, as well incorporation of the northbound off- and on- ramps at S. Airport Blvd into the interchange design. 17-06-0012 San Mateo U.S. 101 Interchange at Peninsula Avenue Construct southbound on and off ramps to US 101 at Peninsula Ave to add on and off ramps from southbound 101. Yes Yes Yes 17-06-0013 San Mateo Reconstruct U.S. 101/Broadway interchange Reconstructs the US 101/Broadway interchange. Yes Yes Yes Yes The project proposes to reconstruct the existing US 101/Willow Road (Route 114) Interchange within the existing 17-06-0014 San Mateo Reconstruct U.S. 101/Willow Road interchange Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes alignment to a partial cloverleaf interchange. Project includes class I bike paths and class II bike lanes. Construct auxiliary lanes (one in each direction) 17-06-0015 San Mateo on U.S. 101 from Marsh Road to Embarcadero Add northbound and southbound auxiliary lanes. Yes Yes Yes Yes Road Improve access to and from the west side of Improve access to /from the west side of Dumbarton Bridge (Route 84 connecting to U.S. 101) per Gateway 2020 Study 17-06-0016 San Mateo Dumbarton Bridge on Route 84 connecting to Yes Yes Yes (Phased implementation of short term projects. Environmental phase only for long term projects). U.S. 101 per Gateway 2020 Study - Phased The proposed project would convert the existing full cloverleaf configuration to a partial cloverleaf design by eliminating Route 101/Holly St Interchange Access two of the existing loop off-ramps of the interchange, and realign the diagonal on- and off-ramps into signalized T- 17-06-0017 San Mateo Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Improvements intersections with local streets. A new pedestrian and bicycle over crossing will be constructed in the south side of Holly Street Interchange. Improve local access at I-280/I-380 from Sneath Environmental assessment of local access improvements at the existing I-280 / I-380 interchange located in the City of San 17-06-0018 San Mateo Lane to San Bruno Avenue to I-380 - Bruno. The project would provide access to I-380 from the two main east-west secondary roads of Sneath Lane and San Environmental only Bruno Avenue. State Route 92-82 (El Camino) Interchange Widen the existing ramps and reconfigure the existing interchange from a full cloverleaf to a partial cloverleaf. Pedestrian 17-06-0019 San Mateo Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Improvement and bicycle improvements would be included as part of the project. Hwy 1 operational & safety improvements in Operational and safety improvements for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians, along the Highway 1 corridor between Half County Midcoast (acceleration/deceleration lanes; 17-06-0020 San Mateo Moon Bay and Pacifica. This could include acceleration lanes, deceleration lanes, turn lanes, bike lanes, enhanced Yes Yes Yes Yes turn lanes; bike lanes; pedestrian crossings; and crossings, and trail network improvements. trails) Planning and environmental analysis of the reconstruction of 101/Candlestick Interchange to full all-directional Environmental Studies for 101/Candlestick interchange with a single point cross street connection. Project would provide all-direction ramp movements controlled by 17-06-0021 San Mateo Yes Interchange new signalized intersections at the cross street connections. Interchange would join an improved Harney Way to the east, and would join the Geneva Avenue Extension to the west. Accommodate E/W crossing of planned BRT facility. Westbound slow vehicle lane on Route 92 17-06-0022 San Mateo between Route 35 and I-280 - Environmental Planning and environmental analysis of a westbound slow vehicle lane on Route 92 between Route 35 and I-280 Phase In Half Moon Bay, On Route 1: Improve safety and reduce congestion by providing protected left and right turn lanes, 17-06-0023 San Mateo Route 1 Improvements in Half Moon Bay warranted traffic signals, two through lanes only at signalized intersections, bike lanes, pathways, bus stops, traffic signal Yes Yes Yes Yes interconnects, safety lighting, median and channelization improvements. Reconstruct U.S. 101/Sierra Point Parkway Reconstruct a partial interchange and provide improved access to Brisbane, Bayshore Blvd and proposed Brisbane 17-06-0024 San Mateo interchange (includes extension of Lagoon Way to Baylands project. Lagoon Way extension connects to the reconstructed interchange and provides improved access to Yes Yes Yes U.S. 101) Brisbane, Daly City, and the pending 600-acre Brisbane Baylands development.

10 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP On University Avenue across US-101, between Woodland Avenue and Donohoe Street; Add bike lanes and sidewalk and 17-06-0025 San Mateo US 101/University Ave. Interchange Improvements modify the NB and SB off-ramps to eliminate pedestrian/bicycle conflicts and improve traffic operations. Implement incentive programs to support transit- 17-06-0026 San Mateo Implement an incentive programs to support transit-oriented developments in San Mateo County. oriented development Implement supporting infrastructure and Automated Transit Signal Priority to support This project will institute necessary infrastructure and Automated Transit Signal Priority necessary to accommodate 17-06-0027 San Mateo SamTrans express rapid bus service along El express rapid bus service along the length of El Camino Real from Palo Alto to Daly City. Camino Real Make incremental increase in SamTrans Expansion of curb-to-curb paratransit fleet and service for eligible users, compliant with ADA requirements, based on 17-06-0028 San Mateo paratransit service - Phase projected future demand. Add new rolling stock and infrastructure to 17-06-0029 San Mateo support SamTrans bus rapid transit along El This project will institute new rolling stock and infrastructure necessary to accommodate BRT along El Camino Real Yes Yes Yes Camino Real- Phase Environmental Clearance and Design of the Planning and environmental analysis of the construction of a new ferry terminal, purchase of 3 new high-speed ferry 17-06-0030 San Mateo Yes Redwood City Ferry Terminal and Service vessels, and operation of new ferry service between Redwood City and San Francisco. Implement Redwood City Street Car - Planning 17-06-0031 San Mateo Planning and environmental analysis of Redwood City Street Car Construction and Implementation Phase Route 1 San Pedro Creek Bridge Replacement and Replace San Pedro Creek Bridge on CA 1 with a longer bridge and widen the creek channel for 100 year storm flow capacity. 17-06-0032 San Mateo Yes Yes Yes Yes Creek Widening Project Provide for a class 1 multi-purpose trail on the eastern side. Widen Route 92 between SR 1 and Pilarcitos 17-06-0033 San Mateo Creek alignment, includes widening of travel lanes Widens shoulders and travel lanes to standard widths. Straighten curves at few locations. Yes Yes Yes Yes and shoulders Construct Route 1 (Calera Parkway) northbound The Calera Parkway project will widen Highway 1 from four lanes to six lanes, from approximately 1,500 feet south of 17-06-0034 San Mateo and southbound lanes from Fassler Avenue to Fassler Avenue to approximately 2,300 feet north of Reina Del Mar Avenue, a distance of 1.3 miles, and will add a 16€™ Yes Yes Yes Yes Westport Drive in Pacifica wide landscaped median between concrete barriers from San Marlo Way to Reina Del Mar Avenue 17-06-0035 San Mateo I-280 improvements near D Street exit Improve the on and off-ramps and approaches for I-280 near the D Street exit in Daly City Widen Skyline Boulevard (Route 35) to 4-lane Widens Skyline Blvd. (SR 35) between I-280 and Sneath Lane. It is currently the last portion of what is otherwise a four lane 17-06-0036 San Mateo Yes Yes Yes Yes roadway from I-280 to Sneath Lane - Phased roadway along Skyline Blvd. The project widens approximately 1.3 miles of the roadway into four lanes. Widen Millbrae Avenue between Rollins Road and Widen Millbrae Avenue between Rollins Road and US101 Southbound On Ramp and resurface the intersection of Millbrae 17-06-0037 San Mateo U.S. 101 soutbound on-ramp and resurface Yes Yes Yes Yes Avenue and Rollins Road. intersection of Millbrae Avenue and Rollins Road Construct a 6-lane arterial from Geneva Planning and environmental analysis of a 6-lane arterial from the Geneva Avenue at Bayshore Boulevard to Avenue/Bayshore Boulevard intersection to U.S. 101/Candlestick Interchange. Grade separation at the Caltrain and Tunnel Ave, Class II bike lanes, on-street parking (travel 17-06-0038 San Mateo 101/Candlestick Point interchange - lanes during peak periods), and sidewalks. Sections will be reserved for an exclusive lane BRT facility that connects to the Environmental phase Bayshore Multimodal Station and provides through service to BART Balboa Station. This project includes grade separations of the Caltrain right of way at approximately 2 to 3 high priority locations in San 17-06-0039 San Mateo Grade Separations Mateo County, including 25th Avenue. This project is based on San Mateo County’s Measure A grade separation category. Extend Blomquist Street over Redwood Creek to 17-06-0040 San Mateo Redwood City Blomquist Street Extension and Blomquist Bridge over Redwood Creek Yes Yes Yes Yes East Bayshore and Bair Island Road Projects in this category are new bicycle (on-street and off-street) and pedestrian facilities, and facilities that connect 17-07-0001 Santa Clara Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Yes existing network gaps, including downtown San Jose Bike Lanes 17-07-0002 Santa Clara Caltrain Grade Separations This project includes grade separations of the Caltrain right of way at priority locations throughout Santa Clara County Projects in this category implement multimodal or complete streets elements throughout Santa Clara County including but not limited to Los Gatos Boulevard, Monterey Road, Shoreline Boulevard, Stevens Creek Road, Downtown Sunnyvale 17-07-0003 Santa Clara Multimodal Streetscape Yes Complete Streets, Wedgewood Avenue, West San Carlos, and Winchester Boulevard. This category also includes intersection improvements for non-expressways in Santa Clara County. This project provides additional funding to local streets and roads preservation and rehabilitation beyond what is included 17-07-0004 Santa Clara Additional Local Road Preservation/Rehab in the regional local roads maintenance project (RTPID 17-10-0022) This category includes roadway capacity increasing projects (new roadways or widening/extensions of existing roadways) on minor roads throughout Santa Clara County such as Buena Vista Avenue, bridges over US 101 in Gilroy, Blossom Hill 17-07-0005 Santa Clara Minor Roadway Expansions Road, Lark Avenue, Pollard Road, Union Avenue, Butterfield Road, San Antonio Road, Charcot Avenue, King Road, Yes Montague Expressway, San Carlos Street, Zanker Road, Coleman Avenue, Autumn Street, Winchester Boulevard, Center Avenue, DeWitt Avenue, Hill Road, Wastonville Road, Mary Avenue, and Wildwood Avenue Program objective is to increase ridership by reducing the cost of transit services for low-income populations including 17-07-0007 Santa Clara Affordable Fare Program seniors, persons with disabilities, youth and students.

11 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP Implement System Operations and Management This program includes projects that use technology to improve operation and management of the overall transportation 17-07-0008 Santa Clara Yes Program for Santa Clara County system. These new technologies are collectively referred as Intelligent Transportation Systems. Improvements in San Jose to address mainline congestion and system reliability through the implementation of 17-07-0009 Santa Clara SR 87 Technology-based Corridor Improvements technology-based operational improvements to the freeway. Implement Freeway Performance Initiative projects for Santa Clara County, which includes freeway ITS infrastructure, Hwy. Transportation Operations System/Freeway 17-07-0010 Santa Clara arterial management, incident management, emergency preparedness, and operations and maintenance of ITS Performance Initiative Phase 1 & 2 infrastructure. The Berryessa Station to San Jose Extension Project would physically extend BART from the future BART Berryessa Station BART Silicon Valley Extension - San Jose 17-07-0012 Santa Clara in San Jose to Downtown San Jose and then into Santa Clara. Project includes four new stations - Alum Rock, Downtown Yes Yes Yes Yes (Berryessa) to Santa Clara San Jose, Diridon, and Santa Clara. Project cost includes operating expenses - escalated capital cost is $5.175 billion. Implement Rapid line 522 improvements in the El Camino Real/The Alameda corridor including: dedicated guideways, signal 17-07-0013 Santa Clara Implement El Camino Rapid Transit Project prioritization, low-floor boarding, ticket vending machines, premium stations, real-time information, and specialized Yes Yes Yes Yes vehicles. Provide double track section on the UPRR Coast Subdivision from the Alameda County line to the vicinity of State Route 17-07-0021 Santa Clara Alviso Wetlands Doubletrack Yes Yes Yes 237. The improvements are expected to include double-tracking the segment running over the Alviso Wetlands. Project includes further environmental and planning studies for the SR-152 corridor, including a new alignment and 17-07-0022 Santa Clara Environmental Studies for SR-152 New Alignment Yes potential toll options. US 101/Zanker Rd./Skyport Dr./Fourth St. 17-07-0023 Santa Clara Construct a new interchange at U.S. 101/Zanker Road/Skyport Drive/Fourth Street Yes Yes Yes Interchange Improvements 17-07-0024 Santa Clara Lawrence/Stevens Creek/I-280 Interchange Lawrence/Stevens Creek/I-280 Interchange: Provide direct connections between Lawrence Expressway and I-280 Yes Yes Yes 17-07-0025 Santa Clara I-280/Winchester Blvd Interchange Improvements Improve I-280/ Winchester Blvd Interchange to relieve congestion and improve operations and local circulation. Yes Yes Yes Yes 17-07-0026 Santa Clara I-280/Wolfe Road Interchange Improvements Modify I-280/Wolfe Road Interchange to relieve congestion and improve local circulation. Yes Yes Yes US 101/Mabury Rd./Taylor St. Interchange 17-07-0027 Santa Clara Construct interchange at U.S. 101/Mabury Road/Taylor Street Yes Yes Yes Yes Improvements I-280 New HOV Lane from San Mateo County line New HOV lane added to I-280 from existing HOV lane at Magdalena Avenue to the San Mateo County Line. Requires 17-07-0028 Santa Clara Yes Yes Yes to Magdalena Avenue constructing a new lane. 17-07-0029 Santa Clara I-280/Saratoga Avenue Interchange Improvements Modify I-280/ Saratoga Avenue Interchange to relieve congestion and improve local circulation Yes Yes Yes I-280 Northbound Braided Ramps between 17-07-0030 Santa Clara Improve braided ramps on northbound I-280 between Foothill Expressway and Route 85. Yes Yes Yes Foothill Expressway and SR 85 US 101 Southbound/Trimble Rd./De La Cruz 17-07-0031 Santa Clara Blvd./Central Expressway Interchange Improve interchange at U.S. 101 southbound Trimble Road/De la Cruz Boulevard/Central Expressway. Yes Yes Yes Improvements Reconfigure interchange, improve access for all modes of transportation, improve traffic operations and relieve congestion I-680/ Alum Rock/ McKee Road Interchange 17-07-0032 Santa Clara at the I-680/ Alum Rock and I-680/ McKee Road interchanges. Construct an Express Bus Station in the Median of I-680 to Yes Yes Yes Improvements connect buses using HOV or Express Lanes with Santa Clara Alum Rock BRT Station. The project proposes to improve local road operations on Mathilda Avenue in the City of Sunnyvale from Almanor Avenue SR 237/Mathilda Ave. and US 101/Mathilda Ave. 17-07-0033 Santa Clara to Innovation Way, including on- and off-ramp improvements at the State Route (SR) 237/Mathilda Avenue and US Yes Yes Yes Yes Interchange Improvement 101/Mathilda Avenue interchanges. US 101 Interchanges Improvements: San Antonio 17-07-0034 Santa Clara Improve U.S. 101 interchanges at San Antonio Road to Charleston Road/Rengstorff Avenue including new auxiliary lane. Yes Yes Yes Rd. to Charleston Rd./Rengstorff Ave. US 101/Buena Vista Ave. Interchange Construct a full interchange at US 101 and Buena Vista Avenue in Gilroy. The interchange includes a flyover southbound 17-07-0035 Santa Clara Yes Yes Yes Improvements on-ramp to braid with the existing truck exit at the CHP Inspection Station. Off-ramp diagonal ramps will be constructed. SR 85 Northbound to Eastbound SR 237 Widen off-ramp from Northbound SR 85 to SR 237 Eastbound to two lanes; construct auxiliary lane on Eastbound SR 237 17-07-0036 Santa Clara Connector Ramp and Northbound SR 85 Auxiliary Yes Yes Yes between SR 85 on-ramp to Middlefield Rd.; construct braid off-ramp on Eastbound SR 237 between SR 85 and Dana St. Lane 17-07-0037 Santa Clara SR 85/El Camino Real Interchange Improvements Improve SR 85 auxiliary lanes between El Camino Real and SR 237, and SR 85/El Camino Real interchange. Yes Yes Yes US 101/Blossom Hill Rd. Interchange 17-07-0038 Santa Clara Widen interchange at U.S. 101/Blossom Hill Road. Yes Yes Yes Yes Improvements US 101/Old Oakland Rd. Interchange 17-07-0039 Santa Clara Improve interchange at U.S. 101/Old Oakland Road. Yes Yes Yes Improvements 17-07-0040 Santa Clara US 101/Shoreline Blvd. Interchange Improvements Interchange improvements at Shoreline Boulevard. Yes

12 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP SR 237/Great America Parkway WB Off- Ramps Modify WB off-ramps at the SR 237/Great America Parkway interchange to improve traffic operations and relieve 17-07-0042 Santa Clara Yes Yes Yes Improvements congestion. Widen Westbound SR 237 within the existing median to extend both of the left-turn lanes; lengthen the Northbound El SR 237/El Camino Real/Grant Rd. Intersection Camino Real right-turn lane onto SR 237 starting the lane at Yuba Drive; widen the Southbound El Camino Real left-turn 17-07-0043 Santa Clara Yes Yes Yes Improvements lane within the existing median; and construct a right-turn lane on Southbound El Camino Real for traffic accessing Westbound Grant Rd. Double Lane Southbound US 101 off-ramp to 17-07-0044 Santa Clara Widen Southbound US 101 freeway connector to Southbound SR 87 to add a second lane and install TOS. Yes Yes Yes Yes Southbound SR 87 Replaces the existing four lane bridge, which currently has a single sidewalk and no bicycle lane over the Union Pacific (UP) 17-07-0051 Santa Clara Widen Calaveras Blvd. overpass from 4 to 6 lanes Yes Yes Yes Railroad tracks, to a six lane bridge. Project will also add sidewalks and bicycle lanes in both directions. 17-07-0056 Santa Clara Bus Stop Improvements Enhance transit waiting environments by improving accessibility and amenities at VTA bus stops. 17-07-0057 Santa Clara Frequent Core Bus Network - 15 minutes Provide 15-minute all day bus service on VTA's highest ridership routes Yes Yes Yes Yes This program will fund corridor transit studies that improve transit connectivity and reduce traffic congestion in this 17-07-0058 Santa Clara SR 85 Corridor Improvements - reserve amount corridor. It also includes a reserve amount for future projects along SR 85 that would be funded with Measure B sales tax revenue. Implement Rapid Transit improvements in the Stevens Creek corridor including: dedicated guideways, signal prioritization, 17-07-0059 Santa Clara Implement Stevens Creek Rapid Transit Project Yes Yes Yes Yes low-floor boarding, ticket vending machines, premium BRT stations, real-time information, and specialized vehicles. This project would improve light rail service and reliability along North First Street. Some of the problems in this area include signal timing issues, slow speeds (maximum speed currently restricted to 35mph), and unscheduled stops. 17-07-0060 Santa Clara North First Street light rail speed Improvements Yes Yes Yes Fencing along this corridor would allow maximum speeds to increase to 45 mph combined with improvements to signal timing. Extend Capitol Expressway light rail to Eastridge Extends the Capitol Avenue light rail line 2.6 miles from the existing Alum Rock Transit Center to a rebuilt Eastridge Transit 17-07-0061 Santa Clara Yes Yes Yes Yes Transit Center - Phase II Center. Includes the removal of HOV lanes on Capitol Expressway between Capitol Avenue and Tully Road in San Jose. Extend light-rail transit from Winchester Station 17-07-0062 Santa Clara Extends light rail from Winchester Station to Route 85 (Vasona Junction). Yes Yes Yes Yes to Route 85 (Vasona Junction) Mineta San Jose International Airport APM Conduct planning and design work on a proposed project that would provide a transit link to San Jose International 17-07-0063 Santa Clara Yes connector - planning and environmental Airport using automated People Mover (APM) technology. Noise abatement program countywide - This project will implement noise reduction projects throughout Santa Clara 17-07-0064 Santa Clara County Safety, Security, Noise and Other Yes County. Projects to improve Caltrain service, system performance and stations including full EMU conversion, longer vehicles, 17-07-0065 Santa Clara Caltrain Station and Service Enhancements longer platforms, level boarding, parking improvements, bike facilities, transit connectivity, other station enhancements Yes and track reconfigurations. 17-07-0066 Santa Clara Future Transit Corridor Studies This program includes future transit corridor studies throughout Santa Clara County. Operational improvements for the SR 17 Corridor, including upgrading Highway 17/Highway 9 interchange to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety, mobility, and roadway operations; deploying advanced transportation technology to reduce 17-07-0067 Santa Clara SR 17 Corridor Congestion Relief in Los Gatos Yes Yes Yes freeway cut thru traffic in Los Gatos, including traffic signal control system upgrades in Los Gatos, traveler information system, advanced ramp metering systems and multi-modal congestion relief solutions 237 WB Additional Lane from McCarthy to North Corridor Improvements in the cities of San Jose, Santa Clara and Milpitas to address mainline congestion and regional 17-07-0068 Santa Clara Yes Yes Yes First connectivity by the addition of SR 237 westbound auxiliary lane between McCarthy Boulevard and North First Street The project consists of reconfiguring the interchange at US 101 and SR 25 just south of the City of Gilroy in Santa Clara 17-07-0069 Santa Clara US 101/SR 25 Interchange County, connecting SR 25 and Santa Teresa Boulevard, and widening the existing freeway from 4 to 6 lanes from the Yes Yes Yes Monterey Street interchange to the US 101/SR 25 interchange. SR 237 Express Lanes: North First St. to Mathilda 17-07-0070 Santa Clara Convert HOV to express lane in both directions Yes Yes Yes Yes Ave. SR 85 typically has 1 HOV lane and 2 general purpose lanes in both directions with auxiliary lane in some segments. SR 85 Express Lanes: US 101 (South San Jose) to 17-07-0074 Santa Clara Project will convert existing HOV lane to express lane and add a second express lane between SR 87 and I-280 in both Yes Yes Yes Yes Mountain View directions. US 101 Express Lanes: Whipple Ave. in San Mateo 17-07-0075 Santa Clara Convert HOV Lanes to express lane and add a second express lane in some segments. Yes Yes Yes Yes County to Cochrane Road in Morgan Hill Santa Clara County Express Lanes Operations and 17-07-0076 Santa Clara This program includes operations and maintenance for the Santa Clara County (VTA) Express Lanes. Maintenance The project entails design, ROW, construction, equipment and Rolling Stock procurements necessary to extend BART to BART – Warm Springs to Berryessa Extension 17-07-0077 Santa Clara the future Berryessa Station in San Jose. Improvements will include track, bridges, traction electrification, stations, parking Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes (SVBX) areas, fare vending equipment and other ancillary operating and/or maintenance equipment.

13 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP Various operational and capacity improvements to expressways in Santa Clara County comprising the Tier 1 investments from the Santa Clara County Expressway Plan. These projects include capacity improvements for Almaden Expressway, Envision Expressway (Tier 1 Expressway Plan) Capitol Expressway, Foothill Expressway, Lawrence Expressway, Montague Expressway, Oregon-Page Mill Expressway, San 17-07-0078 Santa Clara VARIES Yes Yes Yes Yes Major and Minor Projects Tomas Expressway, Santa Teresa Boulevard. This project also includes the following ITS/Signal upgrades: Replace/upgrade/add fiber optic lines; upgrade equipment for new technologies; systemwide pedestrian sensors; enhance/replace bicycle and vehicle detection with new technologies on the County expressways Includes: 1-280 NB Second exit lane to Foothill Expressway; SR 17 SB/Hamilton Ave Off-Ramp widening; San Tomas 17-07-0079 Santa Clara Envision Highway Minor Projects expressway at SR-17 Improvements; US101/SR 152 10th Street Ramp and Intersection Improvements; and Charcot Avenue Extension over I-880 Implement Rapid Transit improvements in the Santa Clara/Alum Rock route, including: dedicated guideways, signal 17-07-0080 Santa Clara Alum Rock/Santa Clara Street Bus Rapid Transit Yes Yes Yes Yes prioritization, ticket vending machines, premium stations, real-time information, and specialized vehicles. 17-07-0081 Santa Clara I-880 Express Lanes: SR-237 to US-101 Convert existing HOV lane to an express lane in both directions between SR 237 and US 101 Yes Yes Yes 17-07-0082 Santa Clara SR-87 Express Lanes: I-880 to SR-85 Convert existing HOV lane to an express lane in both directions between I-880 and SR-85 Yes Yes Yes 17-07-0083 Santa Clara I-680 Express Lanes: SR-237 to US-101 Convert existing general purpose lane to an express lane in both directions between SR-237 and US-101 Yes Yes Yes I-280 Express Lanes: US-101 to Magdalena 17-07-0084 Santa Clara Convert existing HOV lane to an express lane in both directions between US 101 and Magdalena Avenue Yes Yes Yes Avenue Santa Clara County Express Lanes - Environmental This program includes environmental and design phases for future express lane segments in Santa Clara County, including 17-07-0085 Santa Clara and Design Phase for Future Segments along I-880, US 101 south of Morgan Hill, and for Highway 17 17-07-0086 Santa Clara Santa Clara County Express Lanes - Reserve This program includes future revenue from express lanes in Santa Clara County Widen San Tomas Expressway to 8 Lanes from 17-07-0087 Santa Clara Widen San Tomas Expressway from 6 to 8 Lanes from Stevens Creek Blvd to Campbell Ave. Yes Yes Yes Stevens Creek Blvd to Campbell Ave Widening Senter Road between Umbarger Rd. and Lewis Rd. from 4 to 6 lanes with improved bicycle/ped facilities and 17-07-0088 Santa Clara Senter Road Widening from Umbarger to Lewis Yes Yes Yes install median landscaping. On South Bascom Ave. from Parkmoor Ave. to Southwest Expressway reduce the road to two lanes and make bicycle and 17-07-0089 Santa Clara South Bascom Complete Streets Yes Yes Yes pedestrian improvements in the corridor. 17-07-0090 Santa Clara Widen Brokaw Bridge over Coyote Creek Widen north side of the bridge to add on additional through traffic lane on westbound Brokow Road. Widen Oakland Road from 4-lanes to 6-lanes Widens Oakland Rd. from 4 to 6 lanes between US 101 and Montague Expwy. Also provides median island landscaping 17-07-0091 Santa Clara Yes Yes Yes between U.S. 101 and Montague Expressway and operational improvements in roadway corridor. This category includes projects that improve access and mobility for people with disabilities, low-income residents, and 17-08-0001 Solano Access and Mobility Program seniors, including providing Lifeline transit service countywide and providing transit service to seniors and individuals with Yes disabilities separate from Lifeline Projects in this category are new bicycle (on-street and off-street) and pedestrian facilities, and facilities that connect 17-08-0002 Solano Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Yes existing network gaps Projects in this category implement strategies and programs that reduce emissions, encourage alternative transportation Climate Program: TDM and Emission Reduction 17-08-0003 Solano modes, and manage transportation demand including but not limited to projects such as TDM program implementation, Yes Technology parking management, local area shuttle and paratransit services Projects in this category address safety, security and other needs. This project includes safety improvements to state 17-08-0004 Solano County Safety, Security and Other Yes highways throughout Solano County. This also includes countywide Safe Routes to School projects. 17-08-0005 Solano Multimodal Streetscape Projects in this category implement multimodal or complete streets elements Yes This category includes planning studies supporting the region’s PDA framework and connecting transportation and land 17-08-0006 Solano PDA Planning use This category includes roadway capacity increasing projects (new roadways or widening/extensions of existing roadways) 17-08-0007 Solano Minor Roadway Expansions Yes on minor roads throughout Solano County This category includes projects that improve roadway, intersection, or interchange operations, ITS, as well as other 17-08-0008 Solano Roadway Operations Yes transportation system management. This project also includes a realigning SR 113 around downtown Dixon to I-80. Packages 2-7 provide direct connectivity from I-680 NB to SR12 WB, widens I-680 and I-80 near the interchange, and 17-08-0009 Solano I-80/I-680/SR12 Interchange (Packages 2-7) Yes Yes improves connections to Red Top road off-ramp. Express lane direct connectors are included in RTPID 17-10-0061. Improve interchanges and widen roadways serving Improvements to interchanges and widening of roadways serving the Solano County Fairgrounds, including Redwood 17-08-0010 Solano Solano County Fairgrounds, including Redwood Yes Yes Yes Yes Parkway. Parkway Provide auxiliary lanes on I-80 in eastbound and Project provides Auxiliary Lanes on I-80 in the EB & WB directions from I-680 to Airbase Parkway; and removes the I- 17-08-0011 Solano westbound directions from I-680 to Airbase Yes Yes Yes 80/Auto Mall hook ramps and C-D road slip-ramp; Parkway Construct 4-lane Jepson Parkway from Route 12 Constructs phase 2,3,4,6,7,8 and 10. Road costs only - bike and other special enhancements assumed from other 17-08-0012 Solano Yes Yes Yes Yes to Leisure Town Road at I-80 programs (i.e. Regional Bicycle Program).

14 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP Conduct planning and design studies along SR-12 17-08-0013 Solano Conduct planning and design studies related to improvements from I-80 to the Rio Vista Bridge corridor in Solano County Construct train station building and support 17-08-0014 Solano facilities at the new Fairfield / Vacaville multimodal Construct train station building and expanded bicycle access for the new multimodal center serving the Capitol Corridor. Yes Yes Yes Yes station Construct projects and operate programs to support implementation of the MLIP. Projects include expansion of transit 17-08-0015 Solano Solano MLIP Support Projects centers, including in Vallejo and Fairfield, and new bus stops served by Solano Express; construction or expansion of Park Yes Yes Yes Yes and Ride facilities; and, replacement and maintenance of intercity buses. Vallejo: Baylink Ferry Terminal; Construct two phased parking structure to consolidate surface parking for ferry patrons; 17-08-0016 Solano Vallejo Station Parking Structure Phase B create a pedestrian link between bus transit facility and existing ferry terminal building adjacent to ferry parking structure. Project upgrades existing truck scales on WB I-80 in Solano County. Existing westbound truck scales are located on the most congested freeway segment of I-80 in Solano County. Scales are outdated and cannot process the current and future 17-08-0017 Solano I-80 WB Truck Scales truck volumes on WB I-80. Trucks are slow to enter and leave the scales because of short ramps, adding to existing traffic congestion and safety issues on I-80. Projects in this category are new bicycle (on-street and off-street) and pedestrian facilities, and facilities that connect 17-09-0001 Sonoma Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Yes existing network gaps Improvements along publicly-owned SMART rail right-of-way to accommodate rail freight services and expansions. 17-09-0002 Sonoma SMART Rail Freight Improvements Programmatic category that could include freight spurs, Positive Train Control/systems and crossing upgrades, track and sidings expansions and bridge improvements. 17-09-0003 Sonoma Multimodal Streetscape Projects in this category implement multimodal or complete streets elements. Yes This category includes roadway capacity increasing projects (new roadways or widening/extensions of existing roadways) 17-09-0004 Sonoma Minor Roadway Expansions on minor roads such as Airport Boulevard, Caulfield Lane, Bodway Parkway, Brickway Blvd/Laughlin Rd, Corby Avenue, Yes Dowdell Avenue, Fulton Road, Old Redwood Highway, River Road, Snyder Lane, and Jaguar Way This category includes projects that improve roadway, intersection, or interchange operations, ITS, as well as other transportation system management. This project also includes landscaping along US 101 HOV lanes, intersection 17-09-0005 Sonoma Roadway Operations Yes improvements at Route 116/Route 121, local circulation in Penn Grove, Sonoma Boulevard Improvements, among other operational improvements throughout Sonoma County. Implement Marin Sonoma Narrows Phase 2 Adds 1 HOV lane in each direction to US 101 from Old Redwood Highway in Petaluma to the Marin/Sonoma County line 17-09-0006 Sonoma Yes Yes Yes Yes (Sonoma County) making the freeway 6 lanes wide. It includes widening and replacing the Hwy 116 separation bridges. Construction of the Northbound on-ramp to US 101 will complete the Arata Lane interchange with US 101. This project 17-09-0008 Sonoma Arata Lane Interchange also includes the relocation of a portion of Los Amigos Road north of Arata Lane. Rights of way have been obtained in Yes Yes Yes prior phases. This project is the creation of a new south bound off ramp and north bound on ramp at Railroad Avenue. There continues Cotati US 101/Railroad Avenue Improvements to be growth outside of Cotati and Penngrove that will exacerbate traffic in both Penngrove and in downtown Cotati, as 17-09-0009 Sonoma Yes Yes (incl. Penngrove) these are the only options to access US 101. Improvements would include safety improvements on Railroad Avenue from Petaluma Hill to US 101. The project would replace the existing Hearn Avenue overcrossing bridge with a new bridge to accommodate four traffic lanes with bike lanes and sidewalks on both sides of the roadway. The project would also increase the bridge height 17-09-0010 Sonoma Hearn Avenue Interchange Yes Yes clearance and improve ramp connections to US 101 and provide continuous bike lanes and sidewalks between Corby Avenue and Santa Rosa Avenue Reconstruct the Shiloh Road/US 101 interchange to provide two lanes in each direction. It is anticipated that the existing 17-09-0011 Sonoma Shiloh Road Interchange Reconstruction over crossing will be replaced and ramps reconfigured. It is expected that 60% of project costs will come from federal, state Yes Yes or regional funds. This project is a widening of Highway 116 between US 101 and Stony Point Road, including phased closure of driveway 17-09-0012 Sonoma Cotati Highway 116 Cotati Corridor Improvements access to 116, the addition of signalized intersections, new bike lanes, and new sidewalk to improve the vehicle LOS, Yes Yes Yes Yes improve the safety of 116 for all modes of transportation, and create safe new corridors for pedestrian and bicyclists. Extend Rainier Avenue from current terminus at McDowell Boulevard westerly with a bridge crossing over the railroad Petaluma Crosstown Connector and Rainier 17-09-0013 Sonoma tracks and the Petaluma River to a terminate at Petaluma Boulevard North. A second phase of work will construct a new Yes Yes Yes Interchange interchange with the 101. Farmers Lane extension between Bennett Valley Construct new road with travel lanes, bike lanes and sidewalks. Expand bike, pedestrian, transit, and vehicle improvements 17-09-0014 Sonoma Yes Yes Yes Rd and Yolanda Avenue in Southeast Santa Rosa. Reduce Petaluma Boulevard from E-Street to Crystal Lane (Roundabout) from 4 through lanes to 2 through lanes and a 17-09-0015 Sonoma Road Diet Extension - Petaluma Boulevard South Yes Yes Yes Yes two-way-left-turn-lane 17-09-0016 Sonoma SMART Petaluma Infill Station Construct a second SMART station in the City of Petaluma including associated amenities. Yes Yes Yes Yes

15 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP Enhance bus service frequencies in Sonoma Enhance transit to achieve a 50% increase in bus service countywide - this includes Sonoma County Transit, Santa Rosa 17-09-0017 Sonoma Yes Yes Yes Yes County CityBus, Petaluma Transit. Project also includes BRT-like facilities in Santa Rosa. SMART Rail Extension to Windsor + Environmental Project extends SMART from the Sonoma Airport to Windsor, implements the SMART bike path, and includes additional 17-09-0018 Sonoma Yes Yes Yes Yes to Cloverdale + Bike Path environmental/planning assessment of extending SMART to Healdsburg and Cloverdale. 17-10-0001 AC Transit AC Transit Fleet Expansion and Major Corridors Purchases rolling stock for enhanced transbay, local, or express services. Yes Yes Yes Project implements BRT along San Pablo Avenue in Alameda and Contra Costa counties. This includes a bus-only lane from 20th Street to Ashby Avenue in Alameda County and from Richmond Parkway Center to Central Avenue in Contra Costa 17-10-0003 AC Transit San Pablo Avenue BRT Yes Yes Yes County. Project also includes enhanced real-time info, queue jump lanes where bus-only lane is not proposed, new buses and on-board equipment, and passenger amenities. This project includes further environmental and planning studies for the proposed Bay Bridge Contraflow lane, which Environmental Studies for Bay Bridge Contraflow 17-10-0004 AC Transit would convert an EB lane on the bottom deck of the Bay Bridge into a peak-period WB lane in the AM period. This lane Lane would likely be used by buses and carpool vehicles. Investments in support of the region's Sustainable Communities Strategy, including studies of a future Transbay Corridor rail crossing. Capital: Turnbacks/crossovers/tail track extensions (24th St, Lafayette, Glen Park, Millbrae, Dublin, Daly City, Richmond, South Hayward); Station capacity improvements (platform doors at 4 downtown SF stations, additional 17-10-0005 BART BART Metro Program + Bay Fair Connector stairs/escalators/elevators Yes Yes Yes Yes Operating: 12-minute headways on all lines in the peak period (instead of current 15-minutes) Bay Fair Connector: Modify BART Bay Fair Station and approaches to add one or more additional tracks and one or more passenger platforms for efficient train service and operational flexibility. Includes station modernization, modifications to switches, tracks, crossovers, train control, signaling, traction power, etc. The Transbay Corridor Core Capacity Project is a multi-pronged effort to address capacity issues in the Transbay corridor and is in coordination with the BART Metro Program project. The project elements are: • Communication-based train control (CBTC) system to safely enable closer headways and allow BART to operate more frequent service (12 minute frequencies); • Expansion of the rail car fleet by 306 vehicles to add cars to existing trains and operate more frequent trains; 17-10-0006 BART BART Transbay Core Capacity Project Yes • Added traction power substations to allow more frequent service; • Expansion of the Hayward Maintenance Complex (HMC) to provide storage and maintenance capability for the expanded fleet; • Other (Unallocated contingency) Financing cost is included in RTPID 17-10-0016. 17-10-0007 CAHSR California HSR in the Bay Area This project implements the segment of California High Speed Rail that is in the Bay Area. Yes Yes Yes The Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP) includes the electrification of the Caltrain corridor between San Francisco and San Jose, the procurement of new, Electric Multiple Unit rolling stock, and an increase in the Caltrain service 17-10-0008 Caltrain Caltrain Electrification Phase 1 + CBOSS Yes Yes Yes Yes levels. This project also includes CBOSS, which is the Communications Based Overlay Signal System (CBOSS) Positive Train Control necessary to monitor and control train movements as well as increase safety. 17-10-0009 GGBHTD Golden Gate Bridge Capital and Operations This program includes operations and maintenance for the Golden Gate Bridge. Yes This program includes planned bus and ferry expansion projects such as new express bus service between East Santa Rosa 17-10-0010 GGBHTD Bus and Ferry Service Expansion and San Francisco; between Richmond and San Rafael; and between Central Marin and West San Francisco. This program Yes Yes Yes also includes off-site parking and an additional Larkspur Ferry crossing. The Lifeline Transportation Program funds priority projects identified by residents in MTC’s Communities of Concern through locally crafted Community-Based Transportation Plans. Projects can include community shuttles, transit services, Multi- Lifeline, Community Based Transportation 17-10-0011 streetscape improvements and bus stop amenities. Additionally, this program includes $90 million for a future mobility Yes County Program, and Mobility Management management program. Mobility management enables communities to monitor transportation needs and to link individuals to appropriate, cost-efficient travel options This program would implement the recommendations from MTC's Means-Based Fare Study, which launched in 2015 to Multi- determine if a transit fare program based on household income would be feasible and effective. This study will identify 17-10-0012 Means-Based Fare Study Implementation County possible fare structures and payment methods, eligible recipients, overall program costs, and potential technical challenges. This program replaces and rehabilitates the physical ramp meters, induction loops and cameras used to manage traffic real- Multi- time and to collect traffic data for planning purposes. This program also maintains and replaces telecommunication 17-10-0013 Transportation Management Systems Yes County networks connecting all field devices with potential to transition from copper lines to fiber optics. Related to the SHOPP program (RTPID 17-10-0025) Multi- This program would complete the Bay Trail along the shoreline. This program does not include the segments of the Bay 17-10-0014 Bay Trail - non toll bridge segments County Trail that would cross the Bay via toll bridges.

16 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP MTC’s Climate Initiatives Program includes transportation demand management (TDM) strategies, car sharing, vanpool Multi- Climate Program: TDM and Emission Reduction 17-10-0015 incentives, alternative fuel/vehicle initiatives, targeted transportation alternatives, trip caps and commuter benefits Yes County Technology ordinances. Multi- This program includes future financing costs for capital projects such as for BART's Transbay Core Capacity Project (RTPID 17-10-0016 Cost Contingency and Financing County 17-10-0006). It also would cover contingency for major capital projects, if needed. Multi- This program includes on-going payments to debt service resulting from past financing of revenue, especially for bridge 17-10-0017 Capital Projects Debt Service Yes County toll and sales tax revenue sources. Multi- Goods Movement Clean Fuels and Impact Program for implementing recommendations of the Freight Emission Reduction Action Plan and developing programs for 17-10-0018 County Reduction Program impact reduction in neighborhoods with high levels of freight activity. Multi- Program for deploying communications infrastructure to increase active traffic management along freight corridors and 17-10-0019 Goods Movement Technology Program County to/from the Port of Oakland Multi- This is a reserve for future FTA funds (Section 5309) that are referred to as New Starts, Small Starts, or Core Capacity 17-10-0020 New/Small Starts Reserve County funding. This reserve is for future transit projects eligible for these funds and that serve the North or East Bay. Multi- 17-10-0021 Priority Development Area (PDA) Planning Grants This program includes Priority Development Area (PDA) Planning Grants and associated programs Yes County Multi- This program includes local streets and roads maintenance throughout the region, including pavement and non-pavement 17-10-0022 Local and Streets and Roads - Existing Conditions Yes County assets Multi- 17-10-0023 Local Streets and Roads - Operations This program includes on-going operations of the local streets and roads throughout the region Yes County Multi- This program includes operations and maintenance of regional and local bridges. Golden Gate Bridge operations and 17-10-0024 Regional and Local Bridges - Exisiting Conditions Yes County maintenance is in a separate program (RTPID 17-10-0009) Multi- This program includes operations and maintenance of the state highways within the Bay Area. This program generally 17-10-0025 Regional State Highways - Existing Conditions Yes County implements the SHOPP, which also includes minor mobility enhancements and management systems. This program includes capital maintenance and replacement funding for the region's transit operators. Types of projects in Multi- 17-10-0026 Regional Transit Capital - Existing Conditions this category mostly include replacing vehicles and fixed-guideway assets like rail that have a direct impact on service. To a Yes County lesser extent, this program includes station upgrades and replacing other assets that do not directly affect revenue service. Multi- 17-10-0027 Regional Transit Operations This program covers the costs to operate the Bay Area's existing transit service every year through the Plan horizon. Yes County Multi- 17-10-0028 Clipper This program covers annual operating costs of Clipper as well as the upgrade of Clipper to Clipper 2.0. Yes County Multi- This program covers the 511 program in the Bay Area. 511 includes a transit trip planner, real-time transit information, up- 17-10-0029 511 Traveler Information Program Yes County to-the minute traffic information, carpool and vanpool formation services and parking information. Multi- This program covers MTC's Service Authority for Freeways and Expressways, or SAFE, program. MTC-SAFE manages the Bay 17-10-0030 SAFE Freeway Patrol Yes County Area’s fleet of Freeway Service Patrol tow trucks and roadside call boxes. Multi- Regional Transportation Emergency Management This program enhances first responders’ capabilities to clear traffic incidents and respond to major emergencies through 17-10-0031 County Program integrated corridor management. Multi- Regional Rail Station Modernization and Access 17-10-0032 This program includes station modernization and access improvements for rail station throughout the region. Yes County Improvements This program includes a variety of operational and multimodal improvements, including: active traffic management - upgrades to all existing ramp meters to adaptive, implementing hard shoulder running lanes, contra-flow lanes, queue warning, and ramp modifications; arterial operations - implementation of traditional time-of-day signal timing Multi- 17-10-0033 Bay Area Forward coordination, adaptive traffic signal control systems, transit signal priority, real-time traffic monitoring devices, ped/bike VARIES VARIES VARIES Yes Yes County detection, queue-jump lanes, etc; connected vehicles - pilot deployments of vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) strategies; Managed Lanes Implementation Plan - pilot express bus service for routes not currently served by operators; expands park- and-ride facilities throughout the region; and supports pilot deployment of shared-mobility solutions. San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge West Span Multi- This project continues environmental and design work on the proposed bicycle, pedestrian, and maintenance path on the 17-10-0034 Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Maintenance Path - County west span of the Bay Bridge. Environmental Only Project converts the right shoulder of the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge to a third freeway lane from the Sir Francis Drake Multi- Blvd. on-ramp in Marin County to the Marine Street (Richmond Parkway/Point Richmond) exit in Contra Costa County. 17-10-0036 I-580 Access Improvements Project Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes County Project also constructs a path on the north side of I-580, including the upper deck of the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge, with concrete barriers to separate bicyclists and pedestrians from westbound freeway traffic. Multi- Highway 37 Improvements and Sea Level Rise Prepare multi-county study, to PID standard, on improvements to SR 37 to accommodate future sea level rise and existing 17-10-0037 County Mitigation PSR congestion

17 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP

The Downtown Rail Extension (DTX) will extend Caltrain commuter rail from its current terminus at Fourth and King streets and deliver the California High-Speed Rail Authority’s future high-speed service to the new Transit Center. The 1.95-mile rail extension will be constructed principally below grade underneath Townsend and Second streets. The design includes an 17-10-0038 TJPA Caltrain/HSR Downtown San Francisco Extension Yes Yes Yes Yes underground station at Fourth and Townsend streets, utility relocations, rail systems work, and structures for emergency exit, ventilation at six locations along the alignment, and an underground pedestrian bridge connecting the Transbay Terminal to the Embarcadero BART station. Cost includes operating expenses - capital cost is $3.999 billion

The project has 3 components: (1) new Transbay Transit Center built on the site of the former Transbay Terminal in Implement Transbay Transit Center/Caltrain downtown San Francisco serving 11 transportation systems; (2) extension of Caltrain commuter rail service from its 17-10-0039 TJPA Downtown Extension (Phase 1 - Transbay Transit Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes current San Francisco terminus at 4th & King Streets to a new underground terminus; and (3) establishment of a Center) Redevelopment Area Plan with related development projects. Purchase and operate 2 new ferry vessels for WETA North Bay ferry services. Project increases frequency for the Richmond- 17-10-0040 WETA North Bay Ferry Service Enhancement Yes Yes Yes Yes SF and Vallejo-SF ferry lines. Purchase and operate 2 new ferry vessels for WETA Central Bay ferry services. Project increases frequency for the Oakland- 17-10-0041 WETA Central Bay Ferry Service Enhancement Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Alameda-SF ferry line and the Harbor Bay-SF ferry line. Construct a new Berkeley/Albany ferry terminal, purchase 2 new ferry vessels, operate new ferry service between 17-10-0042 WETA Albany/Berkeley Ferry Terminal Yes Yes Yes Yes Berkeley/Albany and San Francisco. This program includes carpool outreach and promotion, supporting vanpools, positioning the program to rely on private Multi- sector ridematching apps, and other services. The Regional Carpool Program will support carpoolers during the launch of 17-10-0043 Regional Carpool Program County Bay Area Express Lanes, promote carpooling and vanpooling along high-priority congested travel corridors, and grow first/last mile carpool solutions to transit, consistent with its annual work plan. Includes MTC staff costs. Multi- I-80 Express Lanes in both directions: Airbase Express Lanes on I-80 in Solano County from Red Top Road to Air Base Parkway - convert existing HOV lanes to express 17-10-0044 Yes Yes Yes Yes County Parkway to Red Top Road lanes Express Lanes on the four westbound SFOBB bridge approaches: (1) I-80 direct connector from Powell Street to SFOBB Multi- I-80 Express Lanes: Westbound Bay Bridge metering lights (1.8 miles); (2) I-580 from I-80 junction to metering lights (1 mile); (3) I-880/880S direct connector from 17-10-0045 Yes Yes Yes County Approaches 14th Street to metering lights (1.5 miles); (4) West Grand Ave/I-880 direct connector to metering lights (0.7 miles) - convert existing HOV lanes to express lanes Multi- I-680 Express Lanes: Northbound from Marina 17-10-0047 Express Lanes on I-680 northbound from SR-242 to Marina Vista. Convert existing HOV lane to express lanes. Yes Yes Yes County Vista to SR 242 Multi- I-680 Express Lanes: Southbound from Marina Express Lanes on I-680 southbound from Marina Vista to Rudgear Rd. Convert existing and future SB HOV lane to express 17-10-0048 Yes Yes Yes Yes County Vista to Rudgear lane. Future SB HOV lane from North Main to Livorna/Rudgear is in RTPID 17-02-0022 Multi- I-680 Express Lanes in both directions: Express lanes on I-680 in Contra Costa County from Alcosta Road to Livorna northbound and to Rudgear southbound - 17-10-0049 Yes Yes Yes Yes County Livorna/Rudgear to Alcosta convert existing HOV lanes to express lanes Multi- SR-84 Express Lanes: Westbound from I-880 to Express Lanes on Route 84 westbound in Alameda County from I-880 through Dumbarton Bridge toll plaza - convert 17-10-0050 Yes Yes Yes Yes County Dumbarton Bridge Toll Plaza existing HOV lane to express lane Multi- SR-92 Express Lanes: Westbound from Hesperian Express Lanes Route 92 WB in Alameda County from Hesperian Boulevard through San Mateo-Hayward Bridge toll plaza - 17-10-0051 Yes Yes Yes Yes County to San Mateo Bridge Toll Plaza convert existing HOV lane to express lane Multi- I-880 Express Lanes in both directions: Express lane on I-880 in Alameda County from Lewelling Blvd to SR 237 Direct Connector in northbound direction, 17-10-0052 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes County Hegenberger/Lewelling to SR-237 Hegenberger Rd to SR 237 Direct Connector in the southbound direction- convert existing HOV lanes to express lanes. Express Lanes on westbound I-80 from Carquinez Bridge Toll Plaza to Powell St Direct Connector on eastbound I-80 from Multi- I-80 Express Lanes in both directions: Carquinez 17-10-0053 Powell St Direct Connector to Cummings Skyway. Add new express lane on eastbound I-80 from Cummings Skyway to Yes Yes Yes Yes County Bridge to Bay Bridge Carquinez Bridge. Multi- Includes non-corridor activities such as centralized toll system activities, start-up program management, contingency and 17-10-0054 MTC Express Lane Program Cost Yes County capitalized O&M. Multi- East and North Bay Express Lanes Operations and 17-10-0055 This program includes on-going operations and maintenance for the express lanes in the East and North Bay counties County Maintenance Multi- 17-10-0056 East and North Bay Express Lanes Reserve This program includes future revenue from express lanes in the East and North Bay counties County I-880 Express Lanes: Northbound from Multi- I-880 Northbound express lane from Lewelling Blvd to Hegenberger Rd. and reconstruct bridges at Davis Street and Marina 17-10-0057 Hegenberger to Lewelling and bridge Yes Yes Yes Yes County Boulevard - widen to add an express lane and reconstruct bridges improvements Multi- I-680 Express Lanes: Northbound from SR-84 to 17-10-0058 Express lanes on I-680 in the northbound direction from SR-84 to SR-237 which involves constructing a new lane. Yes Yes Yes Yes County SR-237 Multi- I-80 Express Lanes in both directions: Airbase 17-10-0059 I-80 Solano Express Lanes from Air Base to I-505-widen to add an express lane in each direction Yes Yes Yes Yes County Parkway to I-505

18 List of Amended Plan Bay Area 2040 Transportation Projects/Programs Appendix B

Complete and Operational By: Referenced County/ Included in RTPID Title Description 2020 2030 2040 in the 2019 Sponsor the Model? TIP Widen I-680 for a new northbound express lane between N. Main Street and Route 242 and implement operational Multi- I-680 Express Lanes: Northbound from Rudgear improvements on I-680 from Rudgear to N. Main. This project complements the NB HOV lane extension through the 17-10-0060 Yes Yes Yes Yes County to SR 242 and operational improvements 680/24 interchange and from N. Main to SR 242 as well as operational improvements included in RTPIDs 17-02-0012 and 17-02-0013. I-680 Express Lanes: I-80 westbound to I-680 Express lanes on I-680/I-80 interchange in Solano County - widen to add express lane direct connectors I-80 westbound Multi- 17-10-0061 southbound and I-680 northbound to I-80 to I-680 southbound and I-680 northbound to I-80 eastbound. This complements the larger interchange project of RTPID Yes Yes Yes Yes County eastbound direct connectors 17-08-0009. Multi- East and North Bay Express Lanes - Environmental This program includes environmental and design phases for future express lane segments in Alameda and Solano counties, 17-10-0062 County and Design Phases for Future Segments including along I-80, I-680, and I-580 Alternatives analysis and design associated with the Berkeley Hills Tunnel plus design of the A-Line structural 17-10-0063 BART BART Seismic Safety Augmentation augmentation / improvement to operability standards. This project increases maintenance capacity as part of its Fleet of the Future program as well as to support increased service for the Berryessa Extension. This Phase I project involves constructing an outdoor storage area for maintenance 17-10-0064 BART Hayward Maintenance Complex Phase 1 Yes and engineering materials and equipment, building track access to new maintenance facilities from the existing mainline, and improving access for BART maintenance operations.

19 Appendix C Travel Modeling Report (Plan Bay Area 2040: Final Supplemental Report) TRAVEL MODELING REPORT

FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

Metropolitan Transportation Commission

Association of Bay Area Governments

JULY 2017 Metropolitan Transportation Commission

Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County

Association of Bay Area Governments

Councilmember Julie Pierce Supervisor David Cortese Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG President Santa Clara City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Clayton Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Supervisor David Rabbitt Solano City of Palo Alto / Santa Clara ABAG Vice President Mayor Len Augustine County of Sonoma Representatives From City of Vacaville / Solano Cities in Each County Mayor Jake Mackenzie Representatives Mayor Trish Spencer City of Rohnert Park / Sonoma From Each County City of Alameda / Alameda Councilmember Supervisor Scott Haggerty Mayor Barbara Halliday Annie Campbell Washington Alameda City of Hayward / Alameda City of Oakland / Alameda Supervisor Nathan Miley Vice Mayor Dave Hudson Councilmember Alameda City of San Ramon / Contra Costa Lynette Gibson McElhaney Supervisor Candace Andersen Councilmember Pat Eklund City of Oakland / Alameda Contra Costa City of Novato / Marin Councilmember Abel Guillen Supervisor Karen Mitchoff Mayor Leon Garcia City of Oakland / Alameda Contra Costa City of American Canyon / Napa Councilmember Raul Peralez Supervisor Dennis Rodoni Mayor Edwin Lee City of San Jose / Santa Clara Marin City and County of San Francisco Councilmember Sergio Jimenez Supervisor Belia Ramos John Rahaim, Planning Director City of San Jose / Santa Clara Napa City and County of San Francisco Councilmember Lan Diep Supervisor Norman Yee Todd Rufo, Director, Economic City of San Jose / Santa Clara San Francisco and Workforce Development, Supervisor David Canepa Office of the Mayor Advisory Members San Mateo City and County of San Francisco William Kissinger Supervisor Dave Pine Mayor Wayne Lee Regional Water Quality San Mateo City of Millbrae / San Mateo Control Board Supervisor Cindy Chavez Mayor Pradeep Gupta Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / San Mateo

Plan Bay Area 2040: Final Travel Modeling Report

July 2017

Bay Area Metro Center 375 Beale Street San Francisco, CA 94105

(415) 778-6700 phone (415) 820-7900 [email protected] e-mail [email protected] www.mtc.ca.gov web www.abag.ca.gov

Project Staff

Ken Kirkey Director, Planning

Lisa Zorn Assistant Director, Planning

Therese Trivedi Principal Planner

Rupinder Singh Associate Planner

Benjamin Espinosa Associate Planner

Harold Brazil Associate Planner

Krute Singa Climate Initiatives Program Manager

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | i Table of Contents Executive Summary ...... 1 Chapter 1: Analytical Tools ...... 2 Population Synthesizer ...... 2 Travel Model ...... 2 Vehicle Emissions Model ...... 5 Chapter 2: Input Assumptions ...... 5 Land Use ...... 6 Roadway Supply ...... 11 Transit Supply ...... 14 Prices ...... 17 Value of Time ...... 17 Bridge Tolls ...... 18 Express Lane Tolls ...... 20 Transit Fares ...... 25 Parking Prices ...... 25 Perceived Automobile Operating Cost and Gas Tax ...... 26 Cordon Tolls ...... 27 Other Key Assumptions ...... 27 Chapter 3: Key Results ...... 28 Performance Targets and Equity Analysis ...... 28 Automobile Ownership ...... 29 Activity Location Decisions ...... 29 Travel Mode Choice Decisions ...... 31 Aggregate Transit Demand Estimates ...... 33 Roadway Utilization and Congestion Estimates ...... 35 Appendix A: Off-Model Emission Reduction Estimates ...... 38

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | ii List of Tables Table 1: Simulations by Year and Alternative ...... 6 Table 2: Demographic Statistics of Control and Simulated Populations ...... 7 Table 3: Year 2015 Common Peak Period Bridge Tolls† ...... 19 Table 4: Common Peak Period Bridge Tolls for Proposed Plan, Main Streets, Big Cities, and EEJ Alternatives† ...... 20 Table 5: Year 2015 Common Transit Fares ...... 25 Table 6: Perceived Automobile Operating Cost Calculations ...... 27

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | iii List of Figures Figure 1: Historical and Forecasted Person Type Distributions for Proposed Plan Alternative ...... 9 Figure 2: Year 2040 Person Type Distributions ...... 10 Figure 3: Year 2040 Growth in Roadway Lane Miles Available to Automobiles Relative to 2015 ...... 12 Figure 4: Growth in Roadway Lane Miles Available to Automobiles for Proposed Plan Alternative ...... 13 Figure 5: Year 2040 Growth in Transit Passenger Seat Miles from 2015 ...... 15 Figure 6: Year 2040 Growth in Transit Passenger Seat Miles from 2015 for Proposed Plan ...... 16 Figure 7: Value of Time Distribution by Household Income ...... 18 Figure 8: Morning Commute Express Lane Prices for No Project ...... 21 Figure 9: Morning Commute Express Lane Prices for Proposed Plan Alternative ...... 22 Figure 10: Morning Commute Express Lane Prices for Main Streets Alternative ...... 23 Figure 11: Morning Commute Express Lane Prices for Big Cities and EEJ Alternatives ...... 24 Figure 12: Work at Home Observations, Trends and Forecasts ...... 28 Figure 13: Year 2040 Automobile Ownership Results ...... 29 Figure 14: Year 2040 Average Trip Distance ...... 30 Figure 15: Year 2040 Average Trip Distance for Travel on Work Tours ...... 30 Figure 16: Year 2040 Automobile Mode Shares for All Travel ...... 32 Figure 17: Year 2040 Non-Automobile Mode Shares for All Travel ...... 32 Figure 18: Year 2040 Typical Weekday Transit Boardings by Technology ...... 34 Figure 19: Year 2040 Vehicle Miles Traveled per Hour by Time Period ...... 36 Figure 20: Year 2040 Average Vehicle Speeds on Freeways ...... 37

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | iv Executive Summary This supplementary report presents selected technical results from the analysis of alternatives performed in support of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s (MTC’s) and the Association of Bay Area Governments’ (ABAG’s) Plan Bay Area 2040 environmental impact report (EIR). A brief overview of the technical methods used in the analysis, as well as a brief description of the key assumptions made for each alternative, precede the presentation of results.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 1 Chapter 1: Analytical Tools MTC uses an analytical tool known as a travel model (also known as a travel demand model or travel forecasting model) to first describe the reaction of travelers to transportation projects and policies and then to quantify the impact of cumulative individual decisions on the Bay Area’s transportation networks and environment. MTC’s travel model is briefly described below, along with two supporting tools: a population synthesizer and a vehicle emissions model.

Population Synthesizer MTC’s travel model is an agent-based simulation. The “agents” in our case are individual households, further described by the people who form each household. In this way, the travel model attempts to simulate the behavior of the individuals and the households who carry out their daily activities in a setting described by the input land development patterns and input transportation projects and policies. In order to use this type of simulation, each agent must be characterized in a fair amount of detail.

Software programs that create lists of households and persons for travel model simulations are known as population synthesizers. MTC’s population synthesizer attempts to locate households described in the 2000 Decennial Census Public Micro-sample (PUMS) data (i.e., those who responded to the old “long forms” used by the Census Bureau to collect detailed household information) in such a way that when looking at the population along specific dimensions spatially (at a level of detail below which the PUMS data is reported), the aggregate sums more or less match those predicted by other Census summary tables (when synthesizing historical populations) or the land use projections made by our land use modeling tools/procedures (when forecasting populations). For example, if our land use tools project that 60 households containing 100 workers and 45 children will live in spatial unit X in the year 2035, the population synthesizer will locate 60 PUMS households in spatial unit X and will select households in such a way that, when summing across households, the number of workers is close to 100 and the number of children is close to 45.

MTC’s population synthesizer “controls” (i.e., minimizes the discrepancy between the synthetic population results and the historical Census results or the land use forecasts) along the following dimensions:

1. Household “type”, i.e. individual household unit or non-institutionalized group quarters (e.g., college dorm); 2. Household income category; 3. Age of the head of household; 4. Number of people in the household; 5. Number of children under age 17 in the household; 6. Number of employees in the household; and, 7. Number of units in the household’s physical dwelling (one or more than one, as in an apartment building).

Travel Model Travel models are frequently updated. As such, a bit of detail as to which version of a given travel model is used for a given analysis is useful. The current analysis uses MTC’s Travel Model One (version 0.6),

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 2 released in July 2016, calibrated to year 2000 conditions and validated against year 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015 conditions1.

Travel Model One is of the so-called “activity-based” archetype. The model is a partial agent-based simulation in which the agents are the households and people who reside in the Bay Area. The simulation is partial because it does not include the simulation of individual behavior of passenger, commercial, and transit vehicles on roadways and transit facilities (though the model system does simulate the behavior of aggregations of vehicles and transit riders). In regional planning work, the travel model is used to simulate a typical weekday – when school is in session, the weather is pleasant, and no major accidents or incidents disrupt the transportation system.

The model system operates on a synthetic population that includes households and people representing each actual household and person in the nine-county Bay Area – in both historical and prospective years. Travelers move through a space segmented into “travel analysis zones”2 and, in so doing, use the transportation system. The model system simulates a series of travel-related choices for each household and for each person within each household. These choices3 are as follows (organized sequentially):

1. Usual workplace and school location – Each worker, student, and working student in the synthetic population selects a travel analysis zone in which to work or attend school (or, for working students, one zone to work and another in which to attend school). 2. Household automobile ownership – Each household, given its location and socio-demographics, as well as each member’s work and/or school locations (i.e., given the preceding simulation results), decides how many vehicles to own. 3. Daily activity pattern – Each household chooses the daily activity pattern of each household member, the choices being (a) go to work or school, (b) leave the house, but not for work or school, or (c) stay at home. 4. Work/school tour4 frequency and scheduling – Each worker, student, and working student decides how many round-trips they will make to work and/or school and then schedules a time to leave for, as well as return home from, work and/or school. 5. Joint non-mandatory5 tour frequency, party size, participation, destination, and scheduling – Each household selects the number and type (e.g., to eat, to visit friends) of “joint” (defined as two or more members of the same household traveling together for the duration of the tour) non-mandatory (for purposes other than work or school) round trips in which to engage, then

1 Additional information is available here: http://analytics.mtc.ca.gov/foswiki/Main/Development. 2 An interactive map of these geographies is available here: http://analytics.mtc.ca.gov/foswiki/Main/TravelModelOneGeographies. 3 These “choices”, which often are not really choices at all (the term is part of travel model jargon), are simulated in a random utility framework – background information is available here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choice_modelling. 4 A “tour” is defined as a round trip from and back to either home or the workplace. 5 Travel modeling practice use the term “mandatory” to describe work and school travel and “non-mandatory” to refer to other types of travel (e.g., to the grocery store); we use this jargon as well to communicate efficiently with others in our space. We neither assume nor believe that all non-work/school-related travel is non-mandatory or optional.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 3 determines which members of the household will participate, where, and at what time the tour (i.e., the time leaving and the time returning home) will occur. 6. Non-mandatory tour frequency, destination, and scheduling – Each person determines the number and type of non-mandatory (e.g., to eat, to shop) round trips to engage in during the model day, where to engage in these tours, and at what time to leave and return home. 7. Tour travel mode – The tour-level travel mode choice (e.g., drive alone, walk, take transit) decision is simulated separately for each tour and represents the best mode of travel for the round trip. 8. Stop frequency and location – Each traveler or group of travelers (for joint travel) decide whether to make a stop on an outbound (from home) or inbound (to home) leg of a travel tour, and if a stop is to be made, where the stop is made, all given the round trip tour mode choice decision. 9. Trip travel model – A trip is a portion of a tour, either from the tour origin to the tour destination, the tour origin to a stop, a stop to another stop, or a stop to a tour destination. A separate mode choice decision is simulated for each trip; this decision is made with awareness of the prior tour mode choice decision. 10. Assignment – Vehicle trips for each synthetic traveler are aggregated into time-of-day-specific matrices (i.e., tables of trips segmented by origin and destination) that are assigned via the standard static user equilibrium procedures to the highway network. Transit trips are assigned to time-of-day-specific transit networks.

The Travel Model One system inherits without significant modification the representation of interregional and commercial vehicle travel from MTC’s previous travel model system (commonly referred to as BAYCAST or BAYCAST-90). Specifically, commercial vehicle demand is represented using methods developed for Caltrans and Alameda County as part of the Interstate 880 Intermodal Corridor Study conducted in 1982 and the Quick Response Freight Manual developed by the United States Department of Transportation in 1996. When combined, these methods estimate four classes of commercial travel, specifically: “very small” trucks, which are two-axle/four-tire vehicles; “small” trucks, which are two-axle/six-tire vehicles; “medium” trucks, which are three-axle vehicles; and, “combination” trucks, which are truck/trailer combinations with four or more axles.

Reconciling travel demand with available transportation supply is particularly difficult near the boundaries of planning regions because little is assumed to be known (in deference to efficiency – the model must have boundaries) about the land development patterns – the primary driver of demand – or supply details beyond these boundaries. The typical approach to representing this interregional travel is to first estimate the demand at each location where a major transportation facility intersects the boundary and to then distribute this demand to locations either within the planning region (which results in so-called “internal/external” travel) or to other boundary locations (“external/external” travel). MTC uses this typical approach and informs the process with Census journey-to-work flows (from the 2000 Decennial Census, specifically), which are allocated via simple method to represent flows to and from MTC’s travel analysis zones and 21 boundary locations, as well as the flows between boundary locations.

The travel of air passengers to and from the Bay Area’s airports is represented with static (across alternatives), year-specific vehicle trip tables. These trip tables are based on air passenger survey data

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 4 collected in 2006 and planning information developed as part of MTC’s Regional Airport Planning Study6. Similarly, the travel of high speed rail passengers to and from the Bay Area’s expected high speed rail stations is represented with static (across alternatives), year-specific vehicle trip tables. The high speed rail demand estimates are derived from the California High Speed Rail Authority’s 2016 Business Plan7.

Vehicle Emissions Model The MTC travel model generates spatially- and temporally-specific estimates of vehicle usage and speed for a typical weekday. This information is then input into an emissions model to estimate emitted criteria pollutants as well as emitted carbon dioxide (used as a proxy for all greenhouse gases). For the current analysis, MTC used the EMFAC 2014 version of the California Air Resources Board emissions factor software8. Chapter 2: Input Assumptions In total, 12 scenarios were simulated. Selected results are presented and discussed in the remainder of the document. Four categories of scenarios are included, as follows: historical, no action, planned action, and alternative actions. Historical scenarios are labeled by their year and include Year 2005 and Year 2015. The no action alternative is referred to as “No Project”; No Project simulations were performed for a 2040 forecast year. The planned action is referred to as the “Proposed Plan” (often abbreviated as “Plan”) alternative; Proposed Plan Simulations were performed for 2020, 2030, 2035, and 2040. Three separate alternative scenarios are included, and are labeled “Main Streets”, “Big Cities”, and “Environment, Equity, and Jobs” (“EEJ”). Year 2040 simulations were conducted for each of these alternatives. The various simulation years serve different purposes: historical years demonstrate the model’s ability to adequately replicate reality9 and provide the reader data for a familiar scenario; the California Air Resources Board established greenhouse gas targets for 2020 and 2035; the transportation plan, as guided by federal regulations, extends to 2040; and, air quality regulations require a 2030 simulation.

The above scenarios differ across four dimensions, namely: land use, roadway supply, transit supply, and prices. By land use, we mean the locations of households and jobs (of different types). Roadway supply is the physical network upon which automobiles, trucks, transit vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians travel. Transit supply refers to the facilities upon which public transit vehicles travel (the roadway, along rail lines, ferry routes, and other dedicated infrastructure), as well as the stop locations, routes, and frequency of transit service. Prices include the monetary fees users are charged to board transit vehicles, cross bridges, operate and park private vehicles, and use express (also known as high occupancy toll) lanes.

In the remainder of this chapter, each of the six scenarios (the rows in Table 1) are discussed, organized by the above four dimensions; additional notes on “other assumptions” concludes the section. This organization should allow the reader to compare the input assumptions across scenarios.

6 Additional information is available here: http://mtc.ca.gov/our-work/plans-projects/economic-vitality/regional- airport-plan. 7 Additional information is available here: http://hsr.ca.gov/docs/about/business_plans/2016_BusinessPlan.pdf. 8 Additional information is available here: http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/msei.htm. 9 Details of this “validation” process are available here: http://analytics.mtc.ca.gov/foswiki/Main/Development.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 5 Table 1: Simulations by Year and Alternative

Simulation Year Alternative 2005 2015 2020 2030 2035 2040

Historical  

No Project   

Proposed Plan    

Main Streets   

Big Cities   

Environment, Equity, and Jobs   

Land Use Additional information regarding the land development patterns is available in the companion supplementary report, Summary of Predicted Land Use Responses. Here, we provide a handful of details regarding the transformation of these land use inputs into the information needed by the travel model.

Prior to executing the travel model, the land development inputs provided by ABAG (control totals) and the UrbanSim model (distribution details) are run through the MTC population synthesizer as described above. The journey from control totals through UrbanSim and through the population synthesizer introduces very minor inconsistencies between the ABAG-estimated regional control totals, which are carried through UrbanSim, and the totals implied by the synthetic population. These inconsistencies are presented in Table 2.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 6

Table 2: Demographic Statistics of Control and Simulated Populations

Households Population

Alternative Year ABAG Results Synthetic Percent ABAG Synthetic Percent Group Population Difference† Results Population Difference Households Quarters

Historical 2015 2,760,000 133,000 2,875,000 -0.6% 7,571,000 7,571,000 0.0%

No Project 2040 3,427,000 176,000 3,579,000 -0.7% 9,628,000 9,567,000 -0.6%

Proposed 2040 3,427,000 176,000 3,579,000 -0.7% 9,628,000 9,561,000 -0.7% Plan Main 2040 3,427,000 176,000 3,579,000 -0.7% 9,628,000 9,563,000 -0.7% Streets

Big Cities 2040 3,427,000 176,000 3,579,000 -0.7% 9,628,000 9,554,000 -0.8%

EEJ 2040 3,427,000 176,000 3,579,000 -0.7% 9,628,000 9,559,000 -0.7%

† – Individuals living in group quarters are considered individual households in the synthetic population and, subsequently, the travel model.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 7 A key function of the population synthesizer is to identify each member of the representative populous with one of eight “person type” labels. Each person in the synthetic population is identified as a full- time worker, part-time worker, college student, non-working adult, retired person, driving-age student, non-driving-age student, or child too young for school. The travel model relies on these person type classifications, along with myriad other variables, to predict behavior.

Figure 1 shows the distribution of person types for the historical scenarios and the Proposed Plan alternative, from years 2005 to 2040. Interesting aspects of these distributions, which are driven by assumptions embedded in ABAG’s regional forecast, are as follows:

− The share of full-time workers peaks in 2015; − The share of retired workers steadily increases from 2005 to 2040; and, − The person type shares are effectively identical.

Figure 2 shows the distribution of person types across the five forecast year alternatives for year 2040.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 8

Figure 1: Historical and Forecasted Person Type Distributions for Proposed Plan Alternative

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 9

Figure 2: Year 2040 Person Type Distributions

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 10 Roadway Supply The historical scenarios for 2005 and 2015 have a representation of roadways that reflect infrastructure that was in place in 2005 and 2015.

The No Project alternative includes projects that are either in place in 2016 or are “committed” per MTC policy. The Proposed Plan alternative includes the roadway projects included in the transportation investment strategy, which is discussed in detail elsewhere.

The Main Streets and Big Cities alternative roadway projects were detailed to MTC’s Planning Committee in May 201610.

The Environment, Equity, and Jobs alternative starts with the No Project alternative roadway network and then adds the Proposed Plan alternative’s bus rapid transit (BRT) infrastructure and the Columbus Day Initiative intelligent transportation systems scheme. No other uncommitted roadway projects are included in the EEJ alternative.

A graphical depiction of the changes in the roadway network is presented in Figure 3 below. The chart shows the change in lane-miles (e.g., a one-mile segment of a four-lane road is four lane-miles) available to automobiles in year 2040 relative to year 2015. San Francisco County shows a decrease in lane-miles, s some roadway segments are converted to dedicated bus ways. Figure 4 shows the change in lane- miles over time for the Proposed Plan alternative.

10 For additional details, please see https://mtc.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=4446887&GUID=31890CF7- 8A5A-4A54-BA45-4466DEF7831B.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 11

Figure 3: Year 2040 Growth in Roadway Lane Miles Available to Automobiles Relative to 2015

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 12

Figure 4: Growth in Roadway Lane Miles Available to Automobiles for Proposed Plan Alternative

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 13 Transit Supply The historical scenarios for 2005 and 2015 reflect service in these years.

The No Project alternative begins with 2015 service levels and adds projects that are committed per MTC policy. The Proposed Plan alternative begins with 2015 service levels and adds both the committed projects as well as those included in the transportation investment strategy.

The Main Streets and Big Cities alternative transit projects were detailed to MTC’s Planning Committee in May 201611.

The Environment, Equity and Jobs alternative begins with the Proposed Plan transit network and increases transit service frequency in some suburban areas.

A graphical depiction of these changes in transit service is presented in Figure 5 below. The chart shows the change in seat-miles (e.g., a one-mile segment of a bus with 40 seats is 40 seat-miles) in year 2040 compared to year 2015 across alternatives. Figure 6 shows the change in seat-miles over time for the Proposed Plan Alternative.

11 Ibid.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 14

Figure 5: Year 2040 Growth in Transit Passenger Seat Miles from 2015

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 15

Figure 6: Year 2040 Growth in Transit Passenger Seat Miles from 2015 for Proposed Plan

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 16 Prices The travel model system includes probabilistic models in which travelers select the best travel mode (e.g., automobile, transit, bicycle, etc.) for each of their daily tours (round trips) and trips. One consideration of this choice is the trade-off between saving time and saving money. For example, a traveler may have two realistic options for traveling to work: (i) driving, which would take 40 minutes (round trip) and cost $10 for parking; or, (ii) taking transit, which would take 90 minutes (round trip) and cost $4 in bus fare ($2 each way). The mode choice model structure, as estimated in the early 2000s, includes coefficients that dictate how different travelers in different contexts make decisions regarding saving time versus saving money. These model coefficients value time in units consistent with year 2000 dollars, i.e. the model itself – not an exogenous input to the model – values time relative to costs in year 2000 dollars. Because re-estimating model coefficients is “expensive” (in terms of staff time and/or consultant resources), it is done infrequently, which, in effect, “locks in” the dollar year in which prices are input to the travel model. To use the model’s coefficients properly, all prices must be input in year 2000 dollars. In the remainder of this document, prices are presented both in (close to) current year dollars, to give the reader an intuitive sense as to the scale of the input prices, as well as year 2000 dollars, which are the units required by the model coefficients.

Six different types of prices are explicitly represented in the travel model: (i) bridge tolls; (ii) express lane tolls; (iii) transit fares; (iv) parking fees; (v) perceived automobile operating cost and gas taxes; and (vi) cordon tolls. A brief discussion on how the model determines each synthetic traveler’s value of time is presented next, after which the input assumptions across each of these price categories are presented. Value of Time The model coefficients that link the value of time with the other components of decision utilities remain constant between the baseline and forecast years, with the one exception of the coefficients on travel cost. These coefficients are a function of each synthetic individual’s value of time, a number drawn, in both the historical and forecast year simulations, from one of four log-normal distributions (see Figure 7). The means of these distributions are a function of each traveler’s household income. The value of time for children in a household is equal to two-thirds that of an adult. The means and shapes of these distributions remain constant across forecast years and scenarios.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 17

Figure 7: Value of Time Distribution by Household Income

Bridge Tolls The bridge tolls assumed in the year 2015 baseline scenario are shown below in Table 3. Please note that Table 3 includes the price of tolls in year 2015 expressed in both year 2000 and year 2015 dollars.

The No Project alternative assumes the toll schedule in place as of July 1, 201212. This schedule is consistent with the year 2015 tolls presented in Table 3.

The bridge tolls assumed in the Proposed Plan, Main Streets, Big Cities and Equity, Environment, and Jobs alternatives are summarized in Table 4. Again, the price of tolls in year 2040 are expressed in year 2000 and year 2015 dollars.

12 Complete details are available here: http://bata.mtc.ca.gov/getting-around#/.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 18

Table 3: Year 2015 Common Peak Period Bridge Tolls†

2-axle, single Bridge 2-axle, carpool* toll occupant toll

$2000 $2015 $2000 $2015

San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge $4.82 $6.00 $2.01 $2.50

Antioch Bridge $4.02 $5.00 $2.01 $2.50

Benicia/Martinez Bridge $4.02 $5.00 $2.01 $2.50

Carquinez Bridge $4.02 $5.00 $2.01 $2.50

Dumbarton Bridge $4.02 $5.00 $2.01 $2.50

Richmond/San Rafael Bridge $4.02 $5.00 $2.01 $2.50

San Mateo Bridge $4.02 $5.00 $2.01 $2.50

Golden Gate Bridge $4.02 $5.00 $2.41 $3.00

† – The full toll schedule includes off-peak tolls and tolls for 3- or more axle vehicles. * – Carpools are defined as either two-or-more- or three-or-more-occupant vehicles, depending on the bridge, and only receive a discount during the morning and evening commute periods (source: bata.mtc.ca.gov; goldengatebridge.org).

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 19 Table 4: Common Peak Period Bridge Tolls for Proposed Plan, Main Streets, Big Cities, and EEJ Alternatives†

2-axle, single Bridge 2-axle, carpool* toll occupant toll

$2000 $2015 $2000 $2015

San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge $5.72 $8.00 $2.86 $4.00

Antioch Bridge $5.01 $7.00 $2.50 $3.50

Benicia/Martinez Bridge $5.01 $7.00 $2.50 $3.50

Carquinez Bridge $5.01 $7.00 $2.50 $3.50

Dumbarton Bridge $5.01 $7.00 $2.50 $3.50

Richmond/San Rafael Bridge $5.01 $7.00 $2.50 $3.50

San Mateo Bridge $5.01 $7.00 $2.50 $3.50

Golden Gate Bridge $4.47 $6.25 $3.04 $4.25

† – The full toll schedule includes off-peak tolls and tolls for 3- or more axle vehicles. * – Carpools are defined as either two-or-more- or three-or-more-occupant vehicles, depending on the bridge, and only receive a discount during the morning and evening commute periods (source: bata.mtc.ca.gov; goldengatebridge.org).

Express Lane Tolls MTC’s travel model explicitly represents the choice of travelers to pay a toll to use an express lane (i.e., a high-occupancy toll lane) in exchange for the time savings offered by the facility relative to the parallel free lanes. To exploit this functionality, the analyst must assign a travel price by time of day and vehicle class on each express lane link in the network. To efficiently and transparently simulate the impacts of the express lanes on behavior, we segment the express lane network in the scenarios into logical segments, with each segment receiving a time-of-day-specific per mile fee. To illustrate the detail involved in this coding, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, and Figure 11 (abstractly) present the morning commute period price for the year 2040 simulations. Please note that the simulated prices are not perfectly optimal – meaning, MTC did not analyze each corridor iteratively to find the price that maximized a pre-defined operational goal. Rather, the prices are adjusted a handful of times in an attempt to keep congestion low and utilization high. Importantly, the prices are held constant over four-hour morning (6 to 10 am) and evening (4 to 7 pm) commute periods. MTC’s travel model assumes that congestion is uniform over the entire four-hour commute periods. We know this is not true, but make this assumption as a simplification. The peak one-hour within the four-hour commute period would require a higher toll than those simulated in the model.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 20

Low toll price

Medium toll price

High toll price

Figure 8: Morning Commute Express Lane Prices for No Project

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 21

Figure 9: Morning Commute Express Lane Prices for Proposed Plan Alternative

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 22

Low toll price

Medium toll price

High toll price

Figure 10: Morning Commute Express Lane Prices for Main Streets Alternative

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 23

Figure 11: Morning Commute Express Lane Prices for Big Cities and EEJ Alternatives

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 24 Transit Fares The forecast year transit networks pivot off a year 2015 baseline network, i.e. the alternatives begin with 2015 conditions and add/remove service to represent the various alternatives. The transit fares in 2015 are assumed to remain constant (in real terms) in all of the forecast years. We are therefore explicitly assuming that transit fares will keep pace with inflation and that transit fares will be as expensive in the forecast year as they are today, relative to parking prices, bridge tolls, etc. As a simplification, we assume travelers pay the cash fare to ride each transit service. Table 5 includes fare prices in year 2015 expressed in both year 2000 and year 2015 dollars (i.e., the table does not include information about the cost of taking transit in the year 2000).

Table 5: Year 2015 Common Transit Fares

Base fare

Operator $2000 $2015

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (Muni) $1.57 $2.25

Alameda/Contra Costa Transit (AC Transit) – Local buses $1.47 $2.10

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) – Local buses $1.40 $2.00

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) – Express buses $2.80 $4.00

San Mateo County Transit (SamTrans) – Local buses $1.40 $2.00

Golden Gate Transit – Marin County to San Francisco Service $3.67 $5.25

County Connection (CCCTA) $1.40 $2.00

Tri-Delta Transit $1.40 $2.00

Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (Wheels, LAVTA) $1.40 $2.00

Note: this is a sample, rather than an exhaustive list, of Bay Area transit providers and fares.

Parking Prices The travel model segments space into travel analysis zones (TAZs). Simulated travelers move between TAZs and, in so doing, burden the transportation network. Parking costs are applied at the TAZ-level: travelers going to zone X in an automobile must pay the parking cost assumed for zone X.

The travel model uses hourly parking rates for daily/long-term (those going to work or school) and hourly/short-term parkers. The long-term hourly rate for daily parkers represents the advertised monthly parking rate, averaged for all lots in a given TAZ, scaled by 22 days per month, then scaled by 8

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 25 hours per day; the short-term hourly rate is the advertised hourly rate – generally higher than the rate daily parkers pay – averaged for all lots in a given TAZ. Priced parking in the Bay Area generally occurs in greater downtown San Francisco, downtown Oakland, Berkeley, downtown San Jose, and Palo Alto.

When forecasting, we assume that parking prices change over time per a simple model: parking cost increases linearly with employment density. Across the scenarios, therefore, the parking charges vary with employment density. Perceived Automobile Operating Cost and Gas Tax When deciding between traveling in a private automobile or on a transit vehicle (or by walking, bicycling, etc.), MTC assumes travelers consider the cost of operating and maintaining, but not owning and insuring, their automobiles. The following three inputs are used to determine the perceived automobile operating cost: average fuel price, average fleet-wide fuel economy, and non-fuel related operating and maintenance costs.

In an effort to improve consistency among regional planning efforts across the state, the Regional Targets Advisory Committee (formed per Senate Bill 375) recommended that California’s metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) use consistent assumptions for fuel price and for the computation of automobile operating cost in long range planning. Using forecasts generated by the United States Department of Energy (DOE) in the summer of 2013 (and expressed in year 2010 dollars), the MPOs agreed13 to procedures to consistently estimate forecast year fuel and non-fuel-related prices. The average fleet-wide fuel economy implied by the EMFAC 2014 software is used to represent the average fleet-wide fuel economy. A summary of our assumptions are presented below in Table 6. Note that the prices in Table 6 are presented in year 2015 (i.e., current year) dollars, year 2010 dollars (the units used in the above referenced documentation), and year 2000 dollars (units of the travel model).

In all of the year 2040 scenarios save the No Project, a regional gas tax of 10 cents per gallon ($2015 dollars) is assumed.

13 Please see the memorandum titled “Automobile Operating Cost for the Second Round of Sustainable Communities Strategies” dated October 13, 2014.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 26 Table 6: Perceived Automobile Operating Cost Calculations

Analysis Year

Measure 2010 2040

Average fuel price (Year 2000 dollars per gallon) $2.51 $4.21

Average fuel price (Year 2010 dollars per gallon) $3.17 $5.26

Average fuel price (Year 2015 dollars per gallon) $3.61 $6.06

EMFAC-implied fuel economy (miles per gallon) 20.10 42.36

Non-fuel-related operating cost ($2000 per mile) $0.04 $0.07

Non-fuel-related operating cost ($2010 per mile) $0.05 $0.09

Non-fuel-related operating cost ($2015 per mile) $0.06 $0.10

Perceived automobile operating cost ($2000 per mile) † $0.17 $0.17

Perceived automobile operating cost ($2010 per mile) † $0.21 $0.22

Perceived automobile operating cost ($2015 per mile) † $0.24 $0.24

† – Sum of the fuel-related operating cost (fuel price divided by fuel economy) and non-fuel-related operating cost.

Cordon Tolls The Proposed Plan, Big Cities and EEJ scenarios include a cordon toll in San Francisco. The scheme requires all vehicles to pay a $6 (in 2015 dollars) fee to enter or leave the greater downtown San Francisco area during the evening commute period. The cordoned area is bounded by Laguna Street to the west, 18th Street to the south, and the San Francisco Bay to the north and east.

Other Key Assumptions Technology currently allows large numbers of Bay Area residents to work at home. In the forecast years, MTC assumes the trend of workers working at home revealed in Census data from 1980 through 2014 will continue through 2040. Figure 12 presents the historical data, the trend, and the MTC forecasts. These telecommuting assumptions are the same across all year 2040 scenarios, including the No Project.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 27

Figure 12: Work at Home Observations, Trends and Forecasts Chapter 3: Key Results Selected travel model results across a variety of dimensions are summarized and discussed here. The presented results are not exhaustive and are intended only to give the reader a general sense of the expected behavioral changes in response to differing input assumptions across scenarios.

Performance Targets and Equity Analysis The purpose of this document is to describe the response of travelers to the projects and policies implemented in the scenarios described in the previous section. Information from the travel model is also used to help assess the performance of each of the scenarios per agency-adopted targets. This information is described in MTC’s May 2016 Planning Committee memorandum14.

Information from the travel model also is used to analyze how different populations are impacted by the investments and policies included in each alternative. This information is described in MTC’s May 2016 Planning Committee memorandum15.

14 Available here: http://mtc.legistar.com/gateway.aspx?M=F&ID=a78d1547-7db3-4dd2-afdb-2d14fe3aec71.pdf 15 Ibid.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 28 Automobile Ownership Figure 13 presents the automobile ownership rates across the four scenarios in the year 2040 simulations as well as year 2015. The differences across scenarios are not dramatic. A key finding is the general increase in zero automobile households in the Proposed Plan, Big Cities and EEJ scenarios.

Figure 13: Year 2040 Automobile Ownership Results

Activity Location Decisions Figure 14 and Figure 15 present the average trip distance by travel mode for all travel and for trips on work tours, respectively. The key finding here is that the Big Cities scenario brings activities slightly closer together, when compared to the 2015 baseline.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 29

Figure 14: Year 2040 Average Trip Distance

Figure 15: Year 2040 Average Trip Distance for Travel on Work Tours

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 30

Travel Mode Choice Decisions The means by which a traveler gets from point A to point B is referred to as the travel mode. Within MTC’s representation of travel behavior, five automobile-based modal options are considered, specifically:

• traveling alone in a private automobile and opting not to pay to use an express lane (“single occupant, no HOT”), an option only available to those in households who own at least one automobile; • traveling alone in a private automobile and opting to pay to use an express lane (“single occupant, pay to use HOT”), an option only available to those who both own a car and whose journey would benefit from using the express lane facility (e.g., this option is not available to those driving through a residential neighborhood to drop a child at school); • traveling with one passenger in a private automobile and opting not to pay to use an express lane (“two occupants, no HOT) (these travelers can use carpool lanes for which they are eligible), an option available to all households; • traveling with one passenger in a private automobile and opting to pay to use an express lane (“two occupants, pay to use HOT”), an option available to all households provided they would benefit from using an express lane (if the express lane facility which benefits travelers allows two-occupant vehicles to travel for free, than these travelers are categorized as “two occupants, no HOT”); and, • traveling with two or more passengers in a private automobile (“three-or-more occupants”) – these travelers are allowed to travel for free on express lane facilities across all the scenarios (as well as carpool facilities).

The travel model explicitly considers numerous non-automobile options which are collapsed in these summaries into the following four options: transit, getting to and from by foot (“walk to transit”); transit, getting to or from in an automobile (“drive to transit”); walk; and, bicycle.

Figure 16 and Figure 17 present the share of trips made by various travel modes. Figure 16 shows shares of travel in automobiles by occupancy category as well as by willingness to pay to use an express lane. Overall, mode shares shift slightly towards transit in the four project scenarios compared with a slight shift towards auto travel in the No Project scenario. Figure 17 presents companion results for non-automobile travel modes, including public transit, walking, and bicycling. Here, we see a slight increase in walk-to-transit in the Big Cities and EEJ scenarios, which reflects the scenarios’ increase in transit service and increasingly efficient land development patterns.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 31

Figure 16: Year 2040 Automobile Mode Shares for All Travel

Figure 17: Year 2040 Non-Automobile Mode Shares for All Travel

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 32 Aggregate Transit Demand Estimates Bay Area residents choosing to travel by transit are explicitly assigned to a specific transit route. As a means of organizing the modeling results, MTC groups transit lines into the following technology- specific categories:

• Local bus: standard, fixed-route bus service, of the kind a traveler may take to and from a neighborhood grocery store or to work, as well as so-called “bus rapid transit” service. • Express bus: longer distance service typically provided in over-the-road coaches. Golden Gate Transit, for example, provides express bus service between Marin County and Downtown San Francisco. • Light rail: represented in the Bay Area by San Francisco’s Muni Metro and streetcar services (F- Market and E-Caltrain), as well as Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority’s light rail service. • Heavy rail: another name for the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) service. • Commuter rail: longer distance rail service typically operating in dedicated right-of-way, including Caltrain, Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART), Amtrak’s Capitol Corridor, and Altamont Commuter Express.

Figure 18 presents the estimates of transit boardings by these categories on the typical weekday simulated by the travel model. Ridership increases from about 2.3 million daily boardings in 2015 to over 3 million daily boardings in all project scenarios, and over 3.4 million boardings in the 2040 Big Cities scenario.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 33

Figure 18: Year 2040 Typical Weekday Transit Boardings by Technology

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 34 Roadway Utilization and Congestion Estimates Trips made by automobile are first aggregated into matrices identifying each trip’s origin and destination, and then “assigned” to a representation of the Bay Area’s roadway network. The assignment process iteratively determines the shortest path between each origin-destination pair, shifting some number of trips to each iteration’s shortest path, until the network reaches a certain level of equilibrium – defined as a state in which travelers cannot change to a lower “cost” route (where cost includes monetary and non-monetary (time) expenditures). Several measures of interest are generated by the assignment process, including vehicle miles traveled, delay, and average travel speed.

Please note that MTC maintains three separate estimates of the quantity of vehicle miles traveled (VMT), as follows:

(1) the quantity assigned directly to the highway network; (2) the quantity (1) plus so-called “intra-zonal” VMT (i.e., travel that occurs at a geographic scale finer than the travel model’s network representation), which is computed off-line; and, (3) the quantity (2) adjusted to match the VMT the California Air Resources Board (CARB) believes takes place in the Bay Area (a number slightly higher than MTC’s estimate).

In this document, the VMT identified as (1) in the above list is presented.

Figure 19 first segments VMT into five time periods and then scales the VMT by the number of hours in each time period. The result is the intensity of VMT by time of day as well as the increase in VMT from 2015 to 2040. Overall, VMT varies only slightly across the year 2040 alternatives, with the Big Cities and EEJ scenarios having the lowest VMT.

Figure 20 presents the average freeway speed across scenarios. Looking at the speeds during the morning and evening commute periods, we see a reduction in speed (or, said another way, an increase in congestion) from the year 2015 scenario to the year 2040 No Project scenario. Each of the alternatives improves freeway speeds.

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 35

Figure 19: Year 2040 Vehicle Miles Traveled per Hour by Time Period

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 36

Figure 20: Year 2040 Average Vehicle Speeds on Freeways

Plan Bay Area 2040 Page | 37 Appendix A: Off-Model Emission Reduction Estimates Off-Model Emission Reduction Estimates

MTC, with consultant assistance, prepared off-model analyses of various strategies, referred to as climate initiatives, anticipated to produce measurable per-capita greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions. Investments are made in programs that will accelerate the adoption of clean vehicle technologies and promote the use of sustainable travel modes.

The 2013 Plan Bay Area included an analysis of a variety of off-model strategies. In 2015, MTC reassessed the current strategies and explored new ones for inclusion in the update to Plan, Plan Bay Area 2040. This assessment took into account findings from the implemented strategies and review of new and emerging strategies not included in Plan Bay Area.

Based on the ICF assessment, MTC plans to include many of the climate strategies that were included in Plan Bay Area, namely: • Commuter Benefits Ordinance; • Car Sharing; • Vanpools and Employer Shuttles; • Regional Electric Vehicle Charger Network; • Vehicle Buyback and PEV Incentive; • Clean Vehicles Feebate Program; and • Smart Driving.

Strategies not currently captured by MTC’s travel model were added to the Plan update: • Targeted Transportation Alternatives; • Trip Caps; • Bike Share; and • Bicycle Infrastructure.

Each Climate Policy Initiative is summarized in the following pages, including a description of the project objective, contextual background, assumptions and methodology, analytic steps and results. Emission Rates

To calculate the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reductions from the Climate Policy Initiatives, the California Emissions Model (EMFAC) trip end emission rates and exhaust per mile emission rates for light and medium duty vehicles were used. The regional average rates for annual CO2 emissions from light and medium duty vehicles are applied to the calculated trip reductions and VMT reductions, which are summarized in the individual policy descriptions below.

In order to compare results with SB 375’s regional GHG emissions targets derived using EMFAC2007, EMFAC2014 GHG emissions outputs have been converted to EMFAC2007 equivalents by applying an adjustment methodology in accordance with ARB staff’s guidance and consultation for the off-model analysis in order to derive the CO2 emission factors used in the 2020 and 2035 CO2 reduction estimates. Unadjusted EMFAC2014 outputs were used to create emission factors for 2040 CO2 reduction

38

estimates. Table 1 summarizes the CO2 emission factors used for passenger vehicles. Except where otherwise noted, we use these factors throughout our analysis.

Table 1: CO2 emission factors 2020 2035 2040 (based on EMFAC2007 (based on EMFAC2007 (based on EMFAC2014 equivalents) equivalents) outputs) CO2 Exhaust Emission 386.45 389.19 386.75 Rate (grams per mile) CO2 Trip End Emission 80.75 79.09 85.80 Rate (grams per trip)

Commuter Benefits Ordinance

In fall 2012, Senate Bill (SB) 1339 authorized the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Air District) and MTC to adopt and implement a regional commuter benefits ordinance in the San Francisco Bay Area on a pilot basis through December 31, 2016. The goal of the pilot was to promote the use of transit and other sustainable commute modes in order to reduce single‐occupant vehicle commute trips, traffic congestion, GHG and other pollutants. After completion of the pilot, MTC and the Air District achieved bi‐partisan support in the State Legislature, and SB 1128 was signed by Governor Brown on September 22, 2016. SB 1128 extends the provisions of the Commuter Benefits Ordinance (CBO), establishing the pilot program permanently. MTC and the Air District continue to jointly administer the program and implement the law.

The CBO requires employers with 50 or more full‐time employees in the Bay Area to offer their employees incentives to commute to work by modes other than driving alone. Employers can choose to offer one of the following options in order to make sustainable commute modes more attractive to their employees:  Pre‐Tax Benefit ‐ allows employees to exclude their transit or vanpooling expenses from taxable income (IRS Code Section 132 (f));  Employer‐Provided Subsidy ‐ provides a subsidy to reduce or cover employees’ monthly transit or vanpool costs;  Employer‐Provided Transit ‐ provides a free or low‐cost transit service for employees, such as a bus, shuttle or vanpool service; or  Alternative Commuter Benefit ‐ provides an alternative commuter benefit that is as effective in reducing single‐occupancy commute trips as Options 1, 2 or 3.

Off‐model analysis is necessary to capture CO2 reductions from the CBO because MTC’s last household travel survey, which informs its model, was conducted in 2010, and does not capture the impacts of new strategies that change travel behavior such as this one. The CBO might be captured by a future model once it has been implemented to the extent that the options offered through the ordinance influence people’s behavior in a way that can be captured by the travel surveys, and once the model framework has been altered to include inputs that are reflective of the CBO.

39

Assumptions and methodology

In Plan Bay Area, CO2 reductions due to the CBO were projected based on research and evidence from similar efforts, particularly San Francisco’s CBO, which has been in effect in since 2009. In 2015, MTC completed an evaluation of the CBO based on a random sample survey of over 1,400 Bay Area employees.1 In the update to the Plan, Plan Bay Area 2040, the same methodology is applied to estimate

CO2 reductions as in the previous Plan, but the assumptions are based on MTC’s evaluation.

CBOs encourage employees to shift from driving alone to taking transit, carpooling, bicycling or walking by offering incentives to cover the costs of using these modes or by providing shuttle/vanpool service. In order to quantify the benefits, the number of employees covered by the CBO and the corresponding VMT reduction are estimated.

Additionally, the number of employees at businesses that begin to offer benefits due to the CBO are estimated for each of the 34 superdistricts in MTC’s travel model. The total number of employees in each superdistrict for each scenario‐year was also collected and compared to the current Dun and Bradstreet size of business data to identify the percentage of employees in each superdistrict that work at businesses with 50 or more employees subject to the CBO. Region‐wide, slightly over 50 percent of employees work at establishments with 50 or more employees, though the percentages range from 31% to 68 percent for individual superdistricts. Since some employers already offer the types of benefits described in the legislation, the methodology estimated the percentage of employees who do not already receive the benefits, which includes all new employees (i.e., employees added between 2015 and the scenario year) and a percentage of current (2015) employees. In 2009, the City and County of San Francisco enacted a CBO and found that 46 percent of employers already offered one of the required benefits prior to implementation of the city’s ordinance.2 Accordingly, 54 percent of current employees in the Bay Area are assumed to be receiving new benefits as a result of the CBO. This is a conservative estimate when applied to areas outside of San Francisco which is well‐served by transit and other options to driving alone, and has many progressive employers who are more likely to offer their workers benefits to take advantage of these options independent of a CBO. The results were summed across all superdistricts within each of the nine Bay Area counties to estimate the total number of employees that receive benefits due to the CBO at the county level.

From MTC’s evaluation of the CBO, which included a survey of employees, the county‐level estimates of the percentage of employees who are aware that their employer offers a CBO program and the percentage of employees who reduce at least one SOV trip due to the CBO were determined. The methodology assumes that as time passes, all employers will comply with the CBO and all employees will be aware of the benefits available to them. These findings were applied to the average regional reduction in vehicle trips and VMT for employees who respond to the CBO to estimate VMT reductions. Table 2 summarizes the evaluation results used in the analysis.

1 Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program, Report to the California Legislature. February 2016. http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning‐and‐research/commuter‐benefits‐program/reports/commuter‐ benefits‐report.pdf 2 Data supplied by the San Francisco Department of Environment.

40

Table 2: Summary of CBO evaluation findings3

% of eligible % of eligible Average yearly Average yearly employees who % of eligible employees who trip reductions VMT reductions reduce SOV employees who reduce SOV for employees for employees trips due to are aware of trips due to who reduce who reduce County CBO CBO benefits CBO (adjusted) SOV trips SOV trips Alameda 4.5% 51.5% 8.7% 36.0 697.5 Contra Costa 7.6% 43.8% 17.4% 36.0 697.5 Marin 7.0% 32.0% 21.9% 36.0 697.5 Napa 8.8% 42.4% 20.8% 36.0 697.5 San Francisco 7.1% 75.0% 9.5% 36.0 697.5 San Mateo 8.8% 53.8% 16.4% 36.0 697.5 Santa Clara 6.4% 56.2% 11.4% 36.0 697.5 Solano 0.0% 28.0% 0.0% 36.0 697.5 Sonoma 0.0% 21.8% 0.0% 36.0 697.5

Analysis steps

To calculate CO2 reductions due to the CBO, the methodology:

1. Identified the current and future number of employees for each MTC superdistrict. 2. Subtracted current from future employees to calculate the number of new employees for each MTC superdistrict. 3. Multiplied the number of current employees by the estimated percentage of employees who do not currently receive commuter benefits (54%) and added the result to the number of new employees to calculate the total number of employees who do not currently receive commuter benefits. 4. Multiplied the result by the percentage of employees in each superdistrict that are currently employed at businesses with over 50 employees to estimate the total number of employees who are newly eligible for CBO benefits in each superdistrict. 5. Summed results across all superdistricts within each county. 6. Multiplied the result by the adjusted percentage of eligible employees in each county who reduce drive‐alone trips due to the CBO (see Table 2) and summed results across all counties to estimate the total number of employees who change behavior due to the CBO. 7. Multiplied the result by the average annual reduction in vehicle trips and VMT per affected employee (see Table 2) to estimate total annual reduction in vehicle trips and VMT. 8. Summed the product of trip‐end emission rates and daily vehicle trip reductions and the product of exhaust emission rates and daily VMT reductions to calculate total CO2 emission reductions. Results

Table 3 and Table 4 summarize the CO2 reductions due to the CBO.

Table 3: Daily CO2 emissions reductions due to CBO (short tons)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan 296 328 340

3 MTC Climate Initiatives Program Evaluation: Commuter Benefits Ordinance, Prepared for MTC by True North Consulting, 2015. A summary of findings is available at http://mtccms01.prod.acquia‐ sites.com/sites/default/files/CIP%20Evaluation%20Summary%20Report_7‐13‐15_FINAL.pdf.

41

Main Streets 297 329 343 Big Cities 297 327 339 EEJ 297 327 340

Table 4: Per capita CO2 emissions reductions from 2005 baseline due to CBO (percent)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan ‐0.36% ‐0.35% ‐0.34% Main Streets ‐0.36% ‐0.35% ‐0.35% Big Cities ‐0.36% ‐0.35% ‐0.34% EEJ ‐0.36% ‐0.35% ‐0.34%

Car Sharing

Car sharing allows individuals to rent vehicles by the minute or by the hour, thus giving them access to an automobile without the costs and responsibilities of individual ownership. Car sharing is growing rapidly in the Bay Area through traditional for‐profit/non‐profit services (City CarShare/Carma, Zipcar, UHaul Car Share, Enterprise CarShare), peer‐to‐peer car sharing (Getaround, RelayRides) and one‐way car share services (Scoot, some preliminary offerings from Zipcar).

Traditional car sharing businesses operate on a membership basis. Users pay an annual fee in addition to hourly and sometimes per‐mile rates. Gas, maintenance, parking, insurance and 24‐hour access are included in the membership and usage rates. The pricing scheme is set up to encourage the use of the vehicles for errands, airport pickups and other short trips. For trips longer than one day, it is usually less expensive to rent a vehicle through a car rental agency. Traditional car sharing models are most effective for households in neighborhoods that are served by high‐quality transit where vehicles are only infrequently needed. After joining a car sharing program, households in these neighborhoods can sometimes shed one or more vehicles due to the variety of modes accessible to them and the occasional use of a car sharing vehicle. In less dense neighborhoods, car sharing may allow a two‐ or three‐car family to shed one car by making a vehicle accessible for the rare instances that multiple vehicles are needed at the same time. Car sharing can also help to enable and expand the trend of younger generations putting off obtaining licenses at age 16 and purchasing vehicles. In general, car sharing members are required to have a clean driving record and be over the age of 18 in order to join. Businesses can also sign up for business memberships to avoid maintaining or reduce the size of a company fleet of vehicles.

Peer‐to‐peer car sharing (also known as P2P) allows an individual to rent out his/her private vehicle when not in use. Participation in this car sharing model generates income for the owner and provides a wide range of vehicle types and prices to the renter. Peer‐to‐peer is similar to the traditional car sharing model insofar as vehicles need to be returned to the starting location, but differ in that they are more likely to succeed than traditional car sharing in less dense, suburban neighborhoods.4 This is because the service is providing additional income to the vehicle owner, and the usage does not need to be high

4 Hampshire, R. and C. Gaites, Peer‐to‐peer Carsharing: Market Analysis and Potential Growth, Transportation Research Record 2217, 2011.

42

enough to completely offset the vehicle ownership costs. One peer‐to‐peer company, Getaround, was launched in 2011 and has built a rapidly growing network of vehicles, including in the Bay Area cities of San Francisco, Berkeley and Oakland.

One‐way car sharing allows a driver to pick up a vehicle in one location and drop it off at another—in some cases a dedicated pod; in others, wherever is convenient within a set geographic area. This model could allow an individual who takes transit to work to then pick up a vehicle and run errands on her way home. This model also allows vehicles to turn over more frequently since users can drive to an event, park the car, let someone else rent it and then pick up a different vehicle nearby for their return trip, which can lead to higher utilization of vehicles. Some of the more widespread one‐way car sharing services include Car2Go, operated by Mercedes‐Benz, and ZipCar’s one‐way service, both of which currently operate in seven cities. Scoot, a one‐way scooter sharing system, currently operates in San Francisco.

Car sharing has positioned itself to cause a major shift in the market, but it is not captured in MTC’s travel model, and accordingly is accounted for off‐model. Car sharing reduces emissions in two primary ways: by lowering the average VMT of members and by allowing trips to be taken with more fuel‐ efficient vehicles than would have been used without car sharing. While shared transportation modes are becoming ever more popular and car sharing may continue to increase absent any intervention by MTC, MTC will be helping to accelerate expansion through this program. MTC could offer grants to fund a variety of efforts to encourage car sharing, potentially including opening new traditional car sharing offices or pods in underserved communities, developing parking codes that remove barriers to one‐way car sharing and marketing and outreach programs. Assumptions and methodology

CO2 reductions due to car sharing are based on the number of Bay Area residents who are in the age groups likely to adopt car sharing and who live in communities that are compact enough to promote shared use. Research shows that adults between the ages of 20 and 64 are most likely to adopt car 5 6 sharing, and estimates that between 10 percent and 13 percent of the eligible population in more compact areas when car sharing is available. With the introduction of one‐way and peer‐to‐peer car sharing, as well as the implementation of regional strategies to support car sharing, adoption rates are assumed to reach 14 percent of the eligible population in dense urban areas (i.e., areas with at least ten people per residential acre) by 2035, while three percent of the eligible population could adopt car sharing by 2035 in suburban areas. Table 5 below summarizes the assumptions with respect to adoption rates.

5 Zipcar. http://www.zipcar.com/is‐it#greenbenefits. Accessed March 20, 2017. 6 Zhou, B., Kockelman, K, and Gao, R. "Opportunities for and Impacts of Carsharing: A Survey of the Austin, Texas Market", TRB, 2009.

43

Table 5: Car sharing adoption rates

Adoption rates in Adoption rates in urban areas (>10 suburban areas (<10 Scenario year people/res acre) people/res acre) 2020 12% 0% 2035 14% 3% 2040 14% 3%

Research by Robert Cervero7 indicates that on average traditional car share members drive seven fewer miles per day than non‐members. This is mostly due to the members who shed a vehicle after joining car sharing. Their daily VMT drops substantially and outweighs the increase in VMT from car share members that previously did not have access to a vehicle. In addition to this reduction in VMT, when members drive in car share vehicles, their per‐mile emissions are lower because car share vehicles are more fuel efficient than the average vehicle. Research by Martin and Shaheen8 shows that the car share fleet uses 29 percent less fuel per mile than the passenger vehicle fleet in general, a difference assumed to persist through 2040. The same paper also shows that on average, members of traditional car sharing programs drive an average of 1,200 miles in car sharing vehicles per year. Also assumed is annual car share mileage will remain constant over time.

Although there are currently no one‐way car sharing programs in the Bay Area, it is expected that this model will emerge over the coming years. Recent research suggest that while one‐way car sharing still reduces CO2 emissions, but not as much as traditional car sharing. For this analysis, it is assumed that one‐way car sharing is not yet widespread in the Bay Area in 2020. However, by 2035, it is assumed that 20 percent of Bay Area car sharing members will be participating in a one‐way car sharing program rather than a traditional program, and by 2040 this figure will increase to 25 percent. Table 6 summarizes these assumptions.

Table 6: One‐way car sharing participation rates

2020 2035 2040 Percent of car share members that participate in one‐way car 0% 20% 25% sharing (rather than traditional programs)

New research by Martin and Shaheen9 indicates that on average one‐way car share members drive 1.07 fewer miles per day than non‐members. Additionally, the one‐way car sharing fleet uses 45 percent less fuel per mile, a difference assumed to persist through 2040. The same paper also shows that on average, members of traditional car sharing programs drive an average of 104 miles in car sharing vehicles per year. This mileage is also assumed to remain constant over time.

7 Cervero, Golub, and Nee, "City CarShare: Longer‐Term Travel‐Demand and Car Ownership Impacts", July 2006, TRB 2007 Annual Meeting paper. 8 Martin, Elliot, and Susan Shaheen, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts of Carshaing in North America,” 2010, Mineta Transportation Institute. MTI Report 09‐11. 9 Martin, Elliot, and Susan Shaheen, "Impacts of Car2Go on Vehicle Ownership, Modal Shift, Vehicle Miles Traveled, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions", July 2016, Working Paper.

44

Analysis steps

To calculate the CO2 emission reductions due to car sharing, the methodology:

1. Calculated the residential density of every TAZ (transportation analysis zone) during the scenario year by dividing the total population by the residential acres. 2. Summed the total car sharing eligible population (between the ages of 20 and 64) for urban areas (TAZs with a population density greater than 10 residents per residential acre) and for suburban areas (TAZs with a population density greater than 10 residents per residential acre). 3. Calculated total future car share membership population by multiplying the factors in Table 5 by the total car sharing eligible population in urban and suburban areas, respectively. 4. Applied the percentages in Table 6 above to determine the number of members in both traditional and one‐way car sharing services. 5. Calculated the daily VMT reduction by multiplying the miles shed per day per member (7 miles in traditional car sharing programs, and 1.07 miles in one‐way car sharing programs) to the number of members of each service type and summed the result across both service types.

6. Multiplied daily VMT reductions by exhaust emission rates to calculate CO2 emission reductions due to car share members driving less. 7. Calculated the total annual miles driven in car share vehicles in the Bay Area by multiplying the car sharing member estimates for traditional and one‐way car sharing by 1,200 annual miles, and 104 annual miles respectively. This was divided by the assumed number of travel days/year (250) to determine daily VMT for vehicles in each car share service type. 8. Multiplied daily VMT for vehicles in each car share service type by the vehicle efficiency gains for each service type (29% for traditional services and 45% for one‐way services) and by exhaust

emission rates to estimate CO2 reductions due to car share members driving more efficient vehicles.

9. Summed CO2 emission reductions due to car share members driving less (Step 6) and CO2 reductions due to car share members driving more efficient vehicles (Step 8) to estimate total

CO2 reductions due to car sharing. Results

Table 7 and Table 8 summarize the CO2 reductions due to car sharing.

Table 7: Daily CO2 emissions reductions due to car sharing (short tons)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan ‐1,713 ‐1,935 ‐1,900 Main Streets ‐1,709 ‐1,936 ‐1,900 Big Cities ‐1,694 ‐1,925 ‐1,895 EEJ ‐1,713 ‐1,936 ‐1,901

45

Table 8: Per capita CO2 emissions reductions from 2005 baseline due to car sharing (percent)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan ‐2.09% ‐2.06% ‐1.92% Main Streets ‐2.09% ‐2.06% ‐1.92% Big Cities ‐2.07% ‐2.05% ‐1.91% EEJ ‐2.09% ‐2.06% ‐1.92%

Vanpools and Employer Shuttles

Vanpool MTC has coordinated a vanpool program since 1981 to encourage alternative commutes and reduce congestion and emissions. To date, MTC’s 511 vanpool program recruitment has consisted of online passenger and driver matching, employer outreach, up to $500 for startup fees, empty seat subsidies to encourage continued participation when a passenger is lost, free bridge tolls, and various other incentives. With these basic incentives there is an operational vanpool fleet in the Bay Area of over 515 vans. Since vanpools are not represented in MTC’s travel model, the travel model cannot be used to assess the impacts of expanding the vanpool program, and therefore is captured off‐model. Employer shuttles In addition to these traditional vanpools, there has been explosive growth in the number of employer‐ provided shuttles in the Bay Area. These shuttles are used as a recruiting tool and they allow for increased worker productivity due to the onboard wireless internet, thus turning commute time into productive time. Rough estimates indicate that the technology company shuttles that operate between San Francisco and Silicon Valley transport close to 17,500 people per workday.10 The Google shuttle alone carried over 9,000 employees to work on peak days in 2015.11 Google’s shuttle system began as a vanpool in 2006 and rapidly grew into the current system. Prior to the SB 375 CO2 emissions baseline year (2005) there were very few employer provided shuttles in the region. For purposes of this analysis there are assumed to have been no shuttles prior to 2005.

There are private shuttles running through all parts of the Bay Area including some that connect the East Bay and San Mateo County to Silicon Valley, some that operate just within San Francisco and San José, and others from BART and Caltrain stations to corporate campuses. These shuttles are not represented in MTC’s travel model, and the 2010 travel survey that informs the model does not reflect the rapid growth in employer shuttles in recent years nor its impact on travel patterns, and therefore shuttles are accounted for off‐model. To be conservative, the 17,500 daily employer operated shuttle riders from

10 Based on Stamen’s estimate that San Francisco shuttles carry approximately equal to 35% of Caltrain ridership levels (https://hi.stamen.com/the‐city‐from‐the‐valley‐57e835ee3dc6#.4ic9o338l). Obtaining shuttle ridership levels is extremely difficult due to the confidential nature of the information since businesses use these shuttles as a recruiting tool. In the month prior to Stamen releasing their work, Caltrain reported ridership levels of 50,000 passengers per weekday. 11 Google. 2016. Environmental Report, https://environment.google/projects/environmental‐report‐2016/. Accessed March 20, 2017

46

San Francisco to the Silicon Valley are assumed to account for all employer operated shuttle riders in the Bay Area.

Figure 1: Employer‐operated shuttles running from San Francisco to Silicon Valley12

12 Source: Stamen Design. The City from the Valley. 2012. https://hi.stamen.com/the‐city‐from‐the‐valley‐ 57e835ee3dc6#.ifn458frg

47

Assumptions and Methodology Vanpools MTC plans to implement a vanpool program similar to programs already in operation in San Diego, Los Angeles, Denver, Arizona and elsewhere. San Diego’s program began in 2001 and saw five to ten percent growth in the vanpool fleet every year through fiscal year 2013. LA Metro began its program in 2007 and the vanpool fleet has grown about 14 percent per year. MTC assumes the incentives these program provided will increase the Bay Area’s vanpool fleet, increasing the number of vans in 2020 to 700 and doubling the 2013 fleet by 2035 (this equates to 1,030 vanpools), after which the number of vanpools would stabilize. The sustained fleet of 1,030 vans is slightly more than the 1996 peak of 900 vans. Accordingly, MTC plans to reevaluate the incentive package to reduce monthly operating costs.

Over time, the vanpool incentive is expected to become self‐funding. This is accomplished by reporting the ridership mileage to the National Transit Database (NTD) which returns funding to the region for transit. Cities such as San Diego, Los Angeles, Denver and Arizona have found that NTD reporting of vanpool data returns more money to a jurisdiction than the amount spent to offset vanpool costs. For example, the Northern Virginia Transportation Commission found that failure to report vanpool data in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area resulted in a $6‐$8 million loss per year, and that each $1 invested would have returned more than $2 in transit funds.13 Los Angeles spends $7 million annually to off‐set vanpool costs and brings back $20 million in additional transit funding.14 While the amount returned varies depending on the number of passenger miles travelled; vanpools that log more miles and carry more passengers have higher returns. MTC estimates that for every $1 spent on vanpools, it could expect a return of about $1.40 in transit funds.

Along with the increased subsidy, the methodology assumes that vanpools have an average of 10.8 passengers and roundtrip distance of 110 miles, both of which are expected to remain constant over time. In order to account for the emissions from the vanpool van itself, the calculations only account for 9.8 passengers in the van. Reducing the vanpool size is a simplified proxy for the emissions from the shared van.

The population that shifts to vanpools is expected to be consistent with the general population’s commute mode share. Emissions reduced from a commuter switching from a single occupancy vehicle (SOV) are assumed to be 100 percent. Emissions reduced from a commuter switching from a two person carpool are assumed to be 50 percent. Emissions reduced from a commuter switching from a 3+ person carpool are assumed to be 33 percent. Shifts from other modes (walking, biking, or transit modes) are not assumed to reduce CO2 emissions, because these modes emit fewer CO2 emissions per mile than vanpools. In reality, it is unlikely that anyone would shift from walking or biking, which are typically short‐distance modes, to a long‐distance vanpool trip, and MTC focuses on providing vanpools for routes that are not currently well‐served by transit. However, assuming consistency with the general commute mode share produces a conservative estimate of CO2 reductions.

13 Northern Virginia Transportation Commission; FTA Section 5307 Earnings Potential from Vanpools in DC Metropolitan Region; Revised: August 7, 2009. 14 MTC October 2014 interview with LA Metro program manager, Jamie Carrington.

48

Since the baseline year for the SB 375 CO2 emissions reduction target is 2005, the current vanpool fleet of 515 vans is not included in the analysis; only growth above and beyond 515 vans is included in the calculations. Employer shuttles Increases in the shuttle fleet from 2013 forward is assumed to be caused by companies meeting the requirements of the Commuter Benefit Ordinance (CBO). However, the benefits of existing shuttles are analyzed as the CBO program evaluation found that 46 percent of employers were already offering a benefit prior to the ordinance. The CBO therefore does not estimate the CO2 reductions associated with these travelers. Some of these commuters take transit, which is captured in MTC’s travel model. However, those who take shuttles are not captured in the model, and for this reason, the benefits of the existing shuttles are analyzed. To be conservative, the 17,500 daily employer operated shuttle riders from San Francisco to the Silicon Valley are assumed to account for all employer operated shuttle riders in the Bay Area.

15 The shuttles are assumed to carry an average of 30 passengers and that the average round trip commute on a shuttle is 40 miles.16 The assumption is if shuttle service was unavailable, the passenger commute mode split would mirror that of the general population. This is a conservative estimate given that some sources suggest shuttle riders would be likely to otherwise drive. For example, San Francisco County’s survey of shuttle riders, which indicated that 63 percent of shuttle riders would have otherwise driven alone to work,17 while the countywide drive‐alone mode share is closer to 43 percent.18

Also accounted for are emissions from shuttle vehicles, assuming that they emit CO2 at the same rate as urban buses. This likely overestimates emissions from shuttles since the shuttle fleet incorporates a range of vehicle sizes and the employers who have taken a proactive approach to sustainable transportation often strive to use the cleanest vehicles and fuels available. The exhaust emission rate extracted from EMFAC and used for 2020 shuttles is 2,265 grams/mile. The 2035 exhaust emission rate is 2,112 grams/mile, and the 2040 rate is 1,988 grams/mile. Analysis steps Vanpool

To calculate the CO2 emission reductions due to vanpools, the methodology:

1. Multiplied the projected increase in vanpools by the number of passengers (minus the driver) to obtain number of vanpool participants. 2. Estimated the number of vehicle round trips reduced by vanpools, accounting for the previous mode selection of the vanpool participants by multiplying the number of vanpool participants by

15 SFCTA Strategic Analysis Report (SAR) 08/09‐2. The Role of Shuttle Services in San Francisco’s Transportation System. http://www.sfcta.org/sites/default/files/content/Planning/Shuttles/Final_SAR_08‐ 09_2_Shuttles_062811.pdf Most shuttles have a capacity of 25 passengers but the large employers operated shuttles that seat 50 to 70 passengers. An average capacity of 30 passengers per shuttle seems reasonable. 16 Many shuttles operate from BART or Caltrain to employers offices. For this analysis the average round trip commute length includes a passenger’s travel on transit since that is part of their low emission commute. 17 SFCTA Strategic Analysis Report (SAR) 08/09‐2. The Role of Shuttle Services in San Francisco’s Transportation System. http://www.sfcta.org/sites/default/files/content/Planning/Shuttles/Final_SAR_08‐ 09_2_Shuttles_062811.pdf 18 See https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk.

49

each of the vehicle mode shares and an adjustment factor that accounts for the number of passengers and summed the results (i.e., vanpool participants * drive alone mode share * 1 + vanpool participants * 2 person carpool mode share * 0.5 + vanpool participants * 3 person carpool mode share * 0.33). 3. Multiplied the number of vehicle round trips reduced by 2 to estimate the daily one‐way vehicle trips reduced. 4. Multiplied the number of vehicle round trips reduced by the round trip vanpool mileage to obtain daily VMT reduced. 5. Summed the product of trip‐end emission rates and daily vehicle trip reductions and the product of exhaust emission rates and daily VMT reductions to calculate total CO2 emission reductions.

Employer Shuttles

To calculate the CO2 emission reductions due to employer shuttles, the methodology:

1. Estimated the number of vehicle round trips reduced by employee shuttles, accounting for the previous mode selection of the shuttle riders by multiplying the number of shuttle riders by each of the vehicle mode shares and an adjustment factor that accounts for the number of passengers and summed the results (i.e., shuttle riders * drive alone mode share * 1 + shuttle riders * 2 person carpool mode share * 0.5 + shuttle riders * 3 person carpool mode share * 0.33). 2. Multiplied the number of vehicle round trips reduced by 2 to estimate the daily one‐way vehicle trips reduced. 3. Multiplied the number of vehicle round trips reduced by the average round trip shuttle mileage to obtain daily VMT reduced. 4. Summed the product of trip‐end emission rates and daily vehicle trip reductions and the product of exhaust emission rates and daily VMT reductions to calculate total CO2 emission reductions due to shuttle riders. 5. Calculated the minimum number of shuttle trips required to transport the shuttle riders by dividing the number of shuttle passengers by the average shuttle capacity. 6. Multiplied the number of shuttle trips by the round trip mileage of the shuttles to calculate the minimum shuttle VMT needed to serve the passengers. 7. Multiplied the shuttle VMT by the EMFAC emission rates for urban buses to obtain the shuttle vehicle emissions. 8. Subtracted the shuttle vehicle emissions (step 7) from the emissions reductions due to shuttle riders (step 4) to obtain the net emissions reduced. Results

Table 9 and Table 10 summarize the combined CO2 reductions due to vanpools and employer shuttles.

50

Table 9: Daily CO2 emissions reductions due to vanpooling and employer shuttles (short tons)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan ‐220 ‐328 ‐332 Main Streets ‐221 ‐347 ‐354 Big Cities ‐222 ‐321 ‐327 EEJ ‐218 ‐322 ‐323

Table 10: Per capita CO2 emissions reductions from 2005 baseline due to vanpooling and employer shuttles (percent)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan ‐0.27% ‐0.35% ‐0.33% Main Streets ‐0.27% ‐0.37% ‐0.36% Big Cities ‐0.27% ‐0.34% ‐0.33% EEJ ‐0.27% ‐0.34% ‐0.33%

Regional Electric Vehicle Charger Program

Plug‐in electric vehicles (PEVs) have the potential to significantly reduce CO2 emissions from motor vehicles. Today, the Bay Area is the leading market for PEV sales, including both plug‐in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and battery electric vehicles (BEVs). PHEVs have a hybridized powertrain which is fueled by chemical energy from a battery or by gasoline/diesel. BEVs are powered exclusively by the chemical energy from a battery. The focus of this strategy is on expanding the charging opportunities for PHEVs by establishing a regional public network of electric vehicle charging stations.

The costs of installing charging infrastructure can be high, and there are other barriers (e.g., on‐site electrical capacity) that may also limit the potential for deploying charging infrastructure at workplaces. This program will be designed to help overcome some of those barriers by providing financial assistance to interested employers, retailers, parking management companies and others that qualify. PG&E received approval to install up to 7,500 charging stations in its service territory with a minimum of 15 percent in disadvantaged communities; this parallel process will support this program’s goal of expanding charging opportunities for PHEV drivers. A regional network of charging infrastructure will provide drivers an opportunity to plug in while at work, which is where most vehicles spend most of their time parked when not at home. This will mean that PHEVs are able to travel more miles using electricity and fewer using gasoline, reducing CO2 emissions.

MTC’s travel model does not account for the mix of passenger vehicle and fuel types (e.g., conventional vehicles, PHEVs, BEVs, hybrids, etc.) in the Bay Area. Instead, the mix of vehicles, as well as the amount of miles that PHEVs travel using gasoline versus electricity, is accounted for in the emissions rates that

MTC draws from EMFAC. This means that CO2 reductions due to strategies that increase the miles that vehicles travel using electricity, like this one, must be captured off‐model, by adjusting the assumptions contained within EMFAC. The assumptions from EMFAC, which fully accounts for the impact of state policies to reduce vehicle emissions, were used as a basis for analyzing this strategy.

51

Assumptions and methodology The Plan Bay Area analysis was revised to account for improved fuel economy estimates, updated vehicle populations, and new vehicle sales in the Bay Area based on data included in EMFAC. PG&E’s expected investment to deploy 7,500 chargers in the Bay Area was also incorporated along with the assumption that MTC would fund additional chargers after PG&E’s initial investment. The analysis assumes a total of 76,000 chargers deployed, roughly one charger for every five PHEVs, which would enable all of these PHEVs to be able to plug in at work if multiple vehicles are able to plug into a single charger over the course of a day).

In the baseline, it was assumed that 40 percent of miles traveled by PHEVs would be in charge‐depleting mode, i.e., electric miles instead of gasoline‐powered miles. This comes from EMFAC, which indicates that:

[CARB] staff modeled PHEVs as having a 25‐mile all‐electric range, which equates to a utility factor of 0.40. For the average commute, this would mean that 40 percent of the VMT could be from all‐electric, and 60 percent would be from gasoline operations.19

This percentage is assumed to increase to 80 percent due to the Regional Charger Program. PHEVs have what is referred to as an all‐electric range of between ten and fifty miles. For instance, the Ford C‐MAX Energi has an all‐electric range of 21 miles; the first‐generation Chevrolet Volt has an all‐electric range of 38 miles; and the second‐generation Volt has a range of 53 miles. Data from The EV Project20 and a paper from GM engineers21 indicate that drivers of the Chevrolet Volt, a proxy for a PHEV with a 40‐mile range (PHEV‐40), are able to drive about 74 percent of their total miles in EV‐mode without support from the internal combustion engine. Data from Ford Motor Company22 indicate that vehicles in their Energi line, including the C‐Max and Fusion, both of which are proxies for a PHEV with a 20‐mile range (PHEV‐20), travel about 33 percent of miles using electricity. ICF estimates that the current market is about 50/50 for PHEV‐20/PHEV‐40 today. Note that these values represent driver behavior during the early stages of charging infrastructure deployment, during which there has been no substantial dedicated effort to maximize eVMT. In other words, absent any concerted effort to deploy charging infrastructure to maximize electric miles, the average PHEV is likely traveling about 54 percent of its miles using electricity.

A network of regional charging infrastructure will further increase the percentage of miles that PHEVs travel in electric mode and the methodology assumes:

 Each charger deployed through the Regional Charger Network serves multiple vehicles each day over the course of a four‐hour charging shift  The chargers deployed are Level 2 chargers that deliver electricity with a rating of 5 kW; and  The average electric vehicle consumes 0.35 kWh/mi.

19 California Air Resources Board, EMFAC2014 Volume III – Technical Documentation v1.0.7, May 2015. Available online at http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/downloads/emfac2014/emfac2014‐vol3‐technical‐documentation‐ 052015.pdf. 20 EV Project, Quarterly Reports e.g., http://www.theevproject.com/cms-assets/documents/127233-901153.q2-2013-rpt.pdf. 21 Duhon, A., Sevel, K., Tarnowsky, S., and Savagian, P., "Chevrolet Volt Electric Utilization," SAE Int. J. Alt. Power. 4(2):269‐276, 2015. 22 Proceedings EVS29, Montreal.

52

A ratio of approximately one charger for every five vehicles over the program years is assumed, consistent with charger‐to‐vehicle ratios estimated by Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) for workplace and public charging opportunities and research conducted by ICF regarding charging optimization.23

These assumptions mean that these chargers would provide enough electricity to power 57 electric miles per day. Given that there are expected to be 420,000 PHEVs in the Bay Area in 2035 and 76,000 chargers funded through this program, this is equivalent to ten electric miles per PHEV per day. According to EMFAC, the average vehicle travels an average of 31 miles per day, so this additional electricity amounts to 32 percent of miles traveled. Given that the charger program is designed to fill gaps in charging opportunities, this is added to the baseline of 54 percent eVMT, which equals 86 percent. Even though there is the potential for improvements in the parameters that form the basis for the assumptions used to derive the additional eVMT potential of the regional charger network—battery sizing, vehicle efficiency, charger utilization, power delivered—over the next several decades, a conservative 80 percent eVMT assumption is used.

It is conceivable that the increased availability of chargers could increase the sales of BEVs in addition to increasing the percentage of electric miles for PHEVs, but this effect is not included in the calculations to be conservative. Analysis steps

To determine the CO2 emission reductions from charging infrastructure deployment throughout the region, the methodology:

1. Modified the percentage of miles traveled in charge depleting mode from the baseline 40% to 80%. 2. Determined the CO2 emissions reduction. a. The CO2 emissions attributable to PHEVs are based on how many miles each vehicle spends in each mode (charge depleting or gas/diesel). b. The CO2 emission reductions are determined as the difference between the emissions attributable to the PHEV versus the emission that would have otherwise occurred using an average conventional gasoline vehicle. 3. Made no changes to the VMT.

Results

Table 11 and Table 12 summarize the CO2 reductions due to the Regional Charger Program.

23 D. Bowermaster, EPRI. How Much Electric Vehicle Charging is Needed? California Plug‐in Electric Vehicle Collaborative Meeting, August 2012.

53

Table 11: Daily CO2 emissions reductions due to the Regional Charger Program (short tons)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan ‐252 ‐1,188 ‐1,287 Main Streets ‐252 ‐1,188 ‐1,287 Big Cities ‐252 ‐1,188 ‐1,287 EEJ ‐252 ‐1,188 ‐1,287

Table 12: Per capita CO2 emissions reductions from 2005 baseline due to the Regional Charger Program (percent)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan ‐0.35% ‐1.42% ‐1.46% Main Streets ‐0.35% ‐1.42% ‐1.46% Big Cities ‐0.35% ‐1.42% ‐1.46% EEJ ‐0.35% ‐1.42% ‐1.46%

Emission reductions are consistent across all EIR alternatives since the analysis does not rely on inputs from MTC’s travel model.

Vehicle Buyback & PEV Incentive

Plug‐in electric vehicles (PEVs) are being adopted at significant levels today in the Bay Area, and the Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Program and the Low‐Carbon Fuel Standard in California are regulatory drivers for advanced vehicle technologies and alternative fuels. However, despite the near‐term success of PEVs in the Bay Area, PEV sales are still relatively small, representing just 3.5 percent of total new light‐duty vehicle sales. There is also some uncertainty regarding the medium‐ to long‐term availability of PEV purchase incentives; for example, California’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program changed in 2016 to adjust incentives based on household income, and the federal tax credit could change in future tax reform. Furthermore, one of the main drivers today for PEV sales, particularly for PHEVs, is HOV lane access: PHEVs are eligible for the green sticker and BEVs are eligible for the white sticker and qualify for HOV lane access through January 1, 2019. Although the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has continued to expand the number of HOV stickers for PEVs, it is likely that they will be limited and eventually discontinued, as they were for non‐plug‐in hybrid vehicles.

This program can provide a combination of an incentive of up to $2,500 to purchase a PEV along with the buyback of older, less efficient vehicles. This is intended to extend the market for PEVs into a broader range of income classes. Most analysts agree that the first adopters of PEVs are generally higher income individuals who own their homes, and in many cases, own or have owned a hybrid electric vehicle (e.g., a Toyota Prius). The higher purchase price of PEVs makes it difficult for middle and low income consumers to purchase them. Older and wealthier individuals tend to buy more new vehicles than other cross‐sections of the population. This demographic also tends to buy newer cars more frequently. Furthermore, research from IHS Markit has shown that owners of both new and used vehicles are holding on to their vehicles longer, the scrappage rate has flattened, and the average age of vehicles has increased; the researchers forecast that the population of oldest vehicles (16 or more years)

54

will grow the fastest, increasing by 30% by 2021.24 Additionally, CARB estimates that half of cars live to be 15 years old and one quarter live to be 20 years old. Interestingly, if a vehicle does survive to 20, there is a 40 percent chance it will be on the road for another ten years after that.25 This will impact the turnover of the fleet significantly and may slow the purchase of new vehicles, including plug‐in electric vehicles.

The vehicle buyback program seeks to accelerate fleet turnover while also incentivizing the purchase of advanced vehicle technology. The program will be designed to target older vehicles meeting a certain fuel economy threshold (as measured via miles per gallon, MPG) for scrapping, and will be coordinated with the Air District’s Vehicle BuyBack Program. The consumer is only eligible for the program if the new vehicle being purchased is a PHEV or BEV. The incentive amount will vary with the fuel economy of the vehicle being traded in (measured in MPG) as well as the vehicle type being purchased (e.g., PHEV or BEV). Depending on the fuel economy threshold set by the program, the combination vehicle buyback and incentive program is intended to induce demand in middle and lower income brackets that might otherwise delay car purchasing, purchase a new conventional vehicle or purchase a used vehicle.

MTC’s travel model does not account for the mix of passenger vehicle and fuel types (e.g., conventional vehicles, PHEVs, BEVs, hybrids, etc.) in the Bay Area. Instead, the mix of vehicles is accounted for in the emissions rates that MTC draws from EMFAC. This means that CO2 reductions due to strategies that increase the proportion of clean vehicles in the passenger fleet, like this one, must be captured off‐ model, by adjusting the assumptions contained within EMFAC. The assumptions from EMFAC, which fully accounts for the impact of state policies to reduce vehicle emissions, were used as a basis for analyzing this strategy. Assumptions and Methodology The analysis was updated from Plan Bay Area to account for improved fuel economy estimates, updated vehicle populations, and new vehicle sales in the Bay Area based on data included in EMFAC.

We made the following assumptions in this methodology:

 Implementation of this program will begin in 2020.  94,000 additional PEVs will be on the road by 2035. This is a modest annual increase of about 1.5% in new vehicle sales attributable to the buyback incentive program.  For the initial analysis, the deployed vehicles are evenly split between PHEVs and BEVs.  The average incentive levels are $1,500 per PHEV and $2,500 per BEV. However, the actual incentive will vary based on the MPG of the vehicle being traded in as well as the technology of the vehicle being purchased.

Analysis steps

24 ”Vehicles Getting Older: Average Age of Light Cars and Trucks in U.S. Rises Again in 2016 to 11.6 Year, IHS Markit Says.” Press release from IHS Markit, November 2016. Available online at: http://news.ihsmarkit.com/press‐release/automotive/vehicles‐getting‐older‐average‐age‐light‐cars‐and‐trucks‐us‐ rises‐again‐201 25 Report to the California Legislature, Accelerated Light‐Duty Vehicle Retirement Program. http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/apr/reports/l2070.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2013.

55

To calculate CO2 reductions due to the introduction of PEVs, the methodology:

1. Determined the difference between the daily CO2 emissions attributable to the PEV versus the emissions that would have otherwise occurred using an average conventional gasoline vehicle. For PHEVs this depends on the assumed proportion of time spent in charge depleting mode versus gas/diesel mode. 2. Multiplied the result by the number of new PEVs expected to be deployed due to the program. Results

Table 11 and Table 12 summarize the CO2 reductions due to the Vehicle Buyback and PEV Incentive Program.

Table 13: Daily CO2 emissions reductions due to the Vehicle Buyback and PEV Incentive Program (short tons)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan 0 ‐363 ‐234 Main Streets 0 ‐363 ‐234 Big Cities 0 ‐363 ‐234 EEJ 0 ‐363 ‐234

Table 14: Per capita CO2 emissions reductions from 2005 baseline due to the Vehicle Buyback and PEV Incentive Program (percent)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan 0% ‐0.44% ‐0.27% Main Streets 0% ‐0.44% ‐0.27% Big Cities 0% ‐0.44% ‐0.27% EEJ 0% ‐0.44% ‐0.27%

Emissions reductions will be realized after 2020, which is when program implementation is planned. Emissions reductions are consistent across all EIR alternatives because the analysis does not rely on inputs from the travel model.

Clean Vehicles Feebate Program

Originally coined in the 1990s, feebate programs are envisioned as a revenue‐neutral approach to shift buying habits in the transportation and energy sectors. MTC is proposing to use a feebate program to incentivize consumers to scrap older vehicles and purchase higher performing, cleaner vehicles. A feebate program uses a combination of fees and rebates to change consumer behavior. Consumers purchasing a vehicle that emit more carbon dioxide on a gram per mile basis than a defined standard are assessed a fee at the point of purchase. These fees are used to provide rebates to consumers that purchase vehicles that emit less CO2 on a gram per mile basis than the defined standard.

Feebates have been used with some success in other countries, including Denmark, France, the Netherlands and Norway. The structure of a feebate program for California was studied in considerable

56

detail for CARB.26 In fact, California has come close to implementing a statewide feebate program on multiple occasions through legislative efforts – the first time in the early 1990s and more recently in 2008. Feebate programs have been proposed as a legislative initiative (e.g., AB 493 Ruskin in 2007), whereby implementation authority would be delegated to CARB and the State Board of Equalization, and a feebate program is not dissimilar from the fee that was approved by the Legislature via AB 434 (Sher, Chapter 807, Statutes of 1991) establishing the Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA). Moving forward, MTC will engage with CARB and the Air District to determine how the program would be implemented and how to progress legislation prior to the start of the program. The feebate program would require legislation to provide regional agencies with the authority to implement it.

MTC’s travel model does not account for the mix of passenger vehicle and fuel types (e.g., conventional vehicles, PHEVs, BEVs, hybrids, etc.) in the Bay Area. Instead, the mix of vehicles is accounted for in the emissions rates that MTC draws from EMFAC. This means that CO2 reductions due to strategies that increase the proportion of clean vehicles in the passenger fleet, like this one, must be captured off‐ model, by adjusting the assumptions contained within EMFAC. The assumptions from EMFAC, which fully accounts for the impact of state policies to reduce vehicle emissions, were used as a basis for analyzing this strategy. Assumptions and methodology The analysis draws heavily from results reported by Bunche & Greene’s feebate analysis for CARB. The lower‐end estimate of impact of feebates on average fuel economy (1.6 percent) from their analysis is assumed. The major benefits of the feebate programs are attributable to the first several years of the program. In their report, the authors state, "In later years the level of CO2 emissions reduction relative to the standard diminishes as the standard becomes more stringent."

It is assumed that the feebate program is introduced in 2020 and that there are not any increases in fuel economy standards at the state or national level after 2025. To maintain consistency with the Bunch & Greene study, this analysis assumes a $20 per g/mi feebate rate in a single benchmark system. Based on a sensitivity analysis performed by Bunch & Greene, an increase to $30 per g/mi feebate rate will yield a

50 percent increase in CO2 reductions.

Since Plan Bay Area, the analysis was updated to account for improved fuel economy estimates, updated vehicle populations, and new vehicle sales in the Bay Area based on data included in EMFAC. Analysis steps

To calculate the CO2 emission reductions due to the Clean Vehicles Feebate Program, the methodology:

1. Estimated the improvement in fuel economy (back‐calculated based on grams per mile estimates) of the new vehicle fleet due to the feebate program. Maximum improvement at the outset of the program is about 2.9%; by 2040, the improvement is reduced to 0.1%. 2. Based on vehicle turnover, estimated the modified fuel economy of entire fleet after the change to improved fuel economy of new vehicles as of 2020 due to the feebate program.

26 Greene, David L. & Bunch, David S., “Potential design, implementation, and benefits of a feebate program for new passenger vehicles in California”, Prepared for the California Air Resources Board, Contract UCD 08‐312, February 2011.

57

27 3. Calculated the differential in well‐to‐wheels CO2 emissions of the modified fleet versus baseline fleet.

Results

Table 15 and Table 16 summarize the CO2 reductions due to the Clean Vehicles Feebate Program.

Table 15: Daily CO2 emissions reductions due to the Clean Vehicles Feebate Program (short tons)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan 0 ‐682 ‐446 Main Streets 0 ‐682 ‐446 Big Cities 0 ‐682 ‐446 EEJ 0 ‐682 ‐446

Table 16: Per capita CO2 emissions reductions from 2005 baseline due to the Clean Vehicles Feebate Program (percent)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan 0% ‐0.82% ‐0.51% Main Streets 0% ‐0.82% ‐0.51% Big Cities 0% ‐0.82% ‐0.51% EEJ 0% ‐0.82% ‐0.51% No Project 0% ‐0.82% ‐0.51%

Emission reductions will be realized after 2020, which is when program implementation is planned. Emission reductions are consistent across all EIR alternatives because the analysis does not rely on inputs from the travel model.

Smart Driving

When discussing transportation sector CO2 reduction strategies, experts often refer to a three‐legged stool consisting of vehicle technology, cleaner fuels and driver behavior. California’s state agencies are leading the way on the first two legs, and SB 375 focuses on a key approach to changing driver behavior, reducing VMT by investing in alternatives to driving, locating housing closer to jobs and creating complete communities. In addition to changing how much someone drives, people can change how they drive through training in the techniques of smart driving. Smart driving behaviors are easy‐to‐implement actions (e.g., change in driving style, vehicle maintenance, etc.) that any driver can do. Research shows that it is possible to affect significant and swift reduction in emissions through behavior change.28 MTC’s

27 Well‐to‐wheels (WTW) analysis refers to lifecycle analysis applied to transportation fuels and their use in vehicles. The analysis includes, for instance, resource extraction, fuel production, delivery of the fuel to vehicle, and end use of fuel in vehicle operations. 28 See http://assets.511.org/pdf/drivesmart/Smart‐Driving‐Resource‐Guide.pdf for a MTC’s review of relevant research.

58

Smart Driving campaign reduces CO2 emissions by promoting the driver behaviors that have been shown most effective in improving vehicle efficiency.

This strategy builds on series of previous actions by MTC. From 2013 to 2015, MTC conducted a pilot smart driving campaign that consisted of three core programs, which MTC evaluated to understand 29 which approaches produce the most significant CO2 reductions:

 Fuel economy meters  Smart driving lessons  Smartphone app

In 2015, MTC expanded its smart driving investments into a region‐wide program called Drive Smart Bay Area. The program development and implementation included:

 Selecting a smart driving in‐vehicle device to distribute to drivers  Developing a marketing strategy  Developing a program website and video  Establishing two device purchasing options  Implementing the marketing strategy As part of Plan Bay Area 2040, MTC is assessing the program’s evaluation report prior to further implementation of the Drive Smart Bay Area program. Off‐model analysis is necessary to capture CO2 reductions due to this strategy because most of the behaviors promoted through Drive Smart Bay Area reduce vehicle emission rates, which come from EMFAC, not from MTC’s travel model. Assumptions and methodology Implementation of the smart driving program is assumed to begin in 2020. Gas prices are currently relatively low, which would mean less consumer interest in the program and fewer CO2 reductions if it were implemented today. It is assumed that gas prices will rise again by 2020 to the level that they were at when MTC completed its initial evaluations of the strategies discussed below, and remain at least that level thereafter. Therefore the changes to emission rates due to smart driving behaviors are assumed to be constant over time. Smart driving educational campaign In February 2011, MTC conducted a Baseline Climate Initiatives Survey that asked Bay Area residents about the ease of adopting various smart driving behaviors.30 Of the respondents, 55 percent stated that it would be very easy or easy to practice “smooth acceleration and deceleration and staying at or below the speed limit.” The U.S. Department of Energy reports that rapid acceleration and deceleration, and speeding can lead to fuel economy reductions from five percent on city streets to 33 percent on

29 MTC Climate Initiatives Program Evaluation: Smart Driving, Prepared for MTC by ICF, 2015. A summary of findings is available at: http://mtccms01.prod.acquia- sites.com/sites/default/files/CIP%20Evaluation%20Summary%20Report_7-13-15_FINAL.pdf 30 MTC conducted a Baseline Climate Initiatives Survey in February 2011. It was a 15 minute random digit dial and cell phone sample of Bay Area driving age residents. It was offered in English, Mandarin, and Spanish and had an overall margin of error of ±3.5%

59

freeways,31 but current studies demonstrate a much lower average fuel economy savings of two to four percent32 for smart driving behaviors.33 This analysis assumes a conservative fuel efficiency reduction from smooth acceleration and deceleration of three percent.

60 percent of participants stated that it would be very easy or easy to practice “at least once per week, link several trips together, such as going shopping and to the post office, which you would normally make separately.” For this analysis, this statement is interpreted to mean the driver will link three shopping trips per week due to the campaign (effectively reducing two trips).

The number of people to adopt smart driving behaviors is based on the survey results listed above and other cost effectiveness assumptions related to marketing investments. Preliminary cost estimates indicate that $1 million in advertising and education can purchase 8,000,000 TV views, 5,000,000 radio listeners and 15,000,000 online hits. Since the public needs to see or hear an advertisement multiple times before recognizing the message and being able to practice the requested behavior change; costs 34 assume twelve views are needed for to internalize the message. In order to reduce CO2 emissions, potential adopters must also be capable of and motivated to make a change. For trip linking practices, ten percent of potential adopters are assumed to adopt the behavior. For smooth acceleration and deceleration, a more conservative assumption of five percent is used to avoid double counting the benefits of the fuel economy meter distribution program (see below for more details). Fuel economy meters Under this program, MTC would offer a rebate to consumers who purchase an on‐board diagnostics (OBD)‐connected after‐market device similar to those made by Automatic and provided by MTC under Drive Smart Bay Area and the ones tested in the initial smart driving pilots. Recent studies have demonstrated an average fuel economy savings of two to four percent from smart driving education and devices. The MTC‐funded smart driving pilot found that the installation of OBD‐connected smart driving devices resulted in a 1.6 percent improvement in fuel economy; however the results are not statistically significant because they fall within the background fluctuation in fuel economy that was observed among the participating vehicles.35 MTC also funded a study at UC Davis to test a smart driving app with different types of feedback. The most effective feedback mechanism (presenting the journey fuel

31 US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, US Environmental Protection Agency, Model Year 2005 Fuel Efficiency Guide, DOE/EE‐0302 32 While recent studies have found a range in the potential fuel efficiency improvements from smart driving techniques from zero to 18%, the substantial range in results is likely due to shortcomings in the studies including: insufficient sample sizes, short study periods, variations in the testing environment (simulations or tracks versus real‐world driving conditions), and the lack of statistically significant findings. The 2‐4% range is seen in studies that overcome these issues. 33 Kurani, K., Stillwater, T., and Jones, M., 2013. Ecodrive I‐80: A Large Sample Fuel Economy Feedback Field Test: Final Report. Institute of Transportation Studies Report: ITS‐RR‐13‐15. Available at http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/pdfs/EcoDrive%20I‐80.pdf 34 The estimated number of views needed for the target audience to engage with the message varies dramatically by the medium and quality of the creative, but 12 views is seen as relatively standard conversion rate by marketing firms such as RHDG and Wit Media. 35 ICF. 2015. Climate Initiatives Program: Evaluation Summary Report. Available at: http://mtccms01.prod.acquia‐ sites.com/sites/default/files/CIP%20Evaluation%20Summary%20Report_7‐13‐15_FINAL.pdf

60

economy in the center of the screen) had a statistically discernable effect of a 15.5 percent reduction in fuel consumption; however, the sample size was small with approximately 18 people viewing that version of feedback.36 Given these varied findings, a three percent fuel economy savings from OBD‐ connected devices is used.

The analysis assumes that MTC will distribute 900,000 OBD‐connected devices by 2035, covering roughly 30 percent of all Bay Area registered vehicles. This assumptions does not account for the fact that an increasing number of vehicles, particularly hybrids, come with displays that show information such as real‐time fuel efficiency, five‐minute‐average fuel efficiency, overall trip fuel efficiency, or simple diagrams that indicate relative fuel efficiency.37 This may help to further accelerate the spread of smart driving behaviors beyond the behavior change induced by the devices that MTC distributes. Analysis steps Smart driving educational campaign Smooth acceleration and deceleration

In order to estimate CO2 reductions due to smooth acceleration and deceleration, the methodology:

1. Estimated the total number of media impressions by multiplying the media ad‐buy for smooth acceleration and deceleration by the estimated number of impressions per million dollars of media spend (28 million impressions/$1 million). 2. Estimated the number of residents who internalize the campaign messaging by dividing the total media impressions by the estimated number of views required for engagement (12). 3. Estimated the number of potential adopters by multiplying the total number of residents who internalized the campaign messaging by the percent of Bay Area residents who responded that adopting smooth acceleration and deceleration behaviors would be easy or very easy. 4. Estimated the number of residents who adopt the behavior by multiplying the number of potential adopters by the by the assumed adoption rate (5%). 5. Estimated the total daily VMT affected by the smart driving behavior by multiplying the number of behavior adopters by the regional average daily VMT per capita. 6. Estimated the equivalent quantity of VMT reduced due to smooth acceleration and deceleration by multiplying the total daily VMT affected by the assumed fuel efficiency savings of smooth acceleration and deceleration (3%).

7. Calculate the CO2 emissions reduced by multiplying the equivalent VMT reduced by the EMFAC

exhaust emissions CO2 factor.

Trip linking

In order to estimate CO2 reductions due to trip linking, the methodology:

1. Repeated Steps 1‐4 of the smooth acceleration and deceleration calculations above, substituting using the appropriate assumptions for trip linking, to estimate the number of residents who adopt the behavior.

36 Ibid. 37 Barkenbus, Jack, 2010. Eco‐driving: An overlooked climate change initiative. Journal of Energy Policy, 38 (2010) 762–769.

61

2. Estimated the annual vehicle trips reduced by the behavior adopters by multiplying the total number of behavior adopters by the assumed number of trips reduced per week (2) and the number of weeks per year (52). 3. Calculated the total annual VMT reduced by multiplying the annual vehicle trips reduced by the average length of a shopping trip in the region (approximately 4.6 miles; varies by year and scenario). 4. Divided the results of steps 2 and 3 by the assumed number of driving days per year (300) to calculate total daily trips and VMT reduced. 5. Summed the product of trip‐end emission rates and daily vehicle trip reductions and the product of exhaust emission rates and daily VMT reductions to calculate total CO2 emission reductions.

Fuel economy meters

In order to estimate CO2 reductions due to trip linking, the methodology:

1. Estimated the total number of devices to be distributed by dividing the total investment by the assumed price per device (including program management fees). 2. Calculated the total daily VMT affected by the smart driving behavior by multiplying the number of behavior adopters by the regional average daily VMT per vehicle. 3. Estimated the equivalent quantity of VMT reduced due to fuel economy meters by multiplying the total daily VMT by the assumed fuel efficiency savings of the fuel economy meters (3%).

4. Calculated the CO2 emissions reduced by multiplying the equivalent VMT reduced by the EMFAC

exhaust CO2 emissions factor. Results

Table 17 and Table 18 summarize the CO2 reductions due to MTC’s efforts to promote smart driving.

Table 17: Daily emissions reductions due to smart driving (short tons)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan 0 ‐677 ‐669 Main Streets 0 ‐681 ‐677 Big Cities 0 ‐672 ‐663 EEJ 0 ‐662 ‐655

Table 18: Per capita emissions reductions from 2005 baseline due to smart driving (percent)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan 0% ‐0.72% ‐0.67% Main Streets 0% ‐0.72% ‐0.68% Big Cities 0% ‐0.71% ‐0.67% EEJ 0% ‐0.70% ‐0.66%

62

Targeted Transportation Alternatives

Targeted transportation alternatives programs employ a variety of strategies, including individual travel consultation, organized events, and distribution of outreach and informational materials to encourage people to shift from driving alone to carpooling, transit, biking, or walking for any of their trips. These programs are “targeted” because they tailor activities and materials to focus on the travel needs and transportation options that are available in specific job centers or residential neighborhoods. Several MPOs and large cities in the U.S. administer these programs, partnering with local governments, transit agencies, employers and transportation management associations to customize projects to different communities. Examples from other jurisdictions operating programs for ten years or more with positive results include Portland Metro’s Regional Travel Options program, the City of Portland’s SmartTrips program and the City of Seattle’s InMotion program.

In addition, several public agencies in the Bay Area currently have marketing programs in place. Two of the Climate Initiative Innovative Grant pilot projects funded by MTC from 2011‐13, GoBerkeley and Connect, Redwood City!, include targeted transportation alternatives components. The former involved working with property managers to market travel options and provide free bus passes to residents of multifamily transit‐oriented developments, while the latter included focused outreach to employers with billboard and print advertising to promote alternatives to driving alone. These two projects were among the most effective Climate Initiative projects at reducing CO2 emissions, and the targeted transportation alternatives components of these projects stood out for their cost effectiveness and results.

MTC’s Targeted Transportation Alternatives Program is considering a similar implementation approach to Portland Metro’s Regional Travel Options grant program, which issues grants to public agencies, transportation management associations, and non‐profits to implement projects that make it easier for travelers to get around without driving alone.38

Off‐model analysis is necessary to capture CO2 reductions from targeted transportation alternatives programs. MTC’s last travel survey which informs the travel model, was conducted in 2010, and does not capture the impacts of new strategies that change travel behavior such as this one. These strategies might be captured by a future model once they have been implemented to the extent that they influence people’s behavior and can be captured by the travel surveys, and once the model framework has been altered to include inputs that represent the presence of behavior change strategies. Assumptions and Methodology Data from two community‐based travel marketing programs from the Portland, OR metropolitan area was used to estimate CO2 reductions for a regional targeted transportation alternatives program in the Bay Area. Since travel marketing programs are typically targeted toward employees or households; this strategy includes both workplace and residential components, and uses data from different programs to assess each component. Employee‐focused programs can be more cost‐effective at reaching workers

38 http://www.oregonmetro.gov/tools‐partners/grants‐and‐resources/travel‐options‐grants

63

who are concentrated at large employers, making outreach efficient. However, residential programs can produce greater CO2 reductions per person reached because they affect all trips, not just commute trips.

Evaluation data from employer‐focused projects in Portland Metro’s Regional Travel Options program39 was used to assess the impact of programs that target employers and data from the City of Portland’s SmartTrips program,40 which focuses on households, to assess the impacts of residential programs. These are longstanding programs, and each has conducted multiple rounds of evaluation, with each round covering multiple projects. Information was collected on the cost per year of marketing to an individual household/employee, the percentage of residents/employees receiving program information who change behavior (penetration rate), and the reduction in SOV mode share for those residents/employees from evaluations of these two programs. These were then applied to the daily number and distance of trips for all trips (for households) and for commute trips (for employees) to estimate VMT impacts. Evaluations of targeted transportation alternatives programs typically focus on impacts during the year after programs are implemented; long‐term evaluations that provide information on how long behavior change persists due to marketing programs is not currently available. Therefore, the methodology uses a conservative assumption that behavior change lasts for five years before participants revert to their previous travel patterns. Table 19 summarizes these assumptions.

Table 19: Summary of Targeted Transportation Alternatives assumptions

Households Employees Average cost per year of marketing to a household/employee $3.11 $4.34 Average penetration rate 29% 33% Average reduction in SOV mode share among participants 11% 9% Average daily one‐way driving trips affected 5.47 2 Average one‐way trip length (miles)41 6.4 10.6 Number of years for which behavior change persists42 5 5

MTC’s investment in this strategy is the primary input in the CO2 estimates. Based on the budget available and the amount of CO2 reductions that it needs to achieve, MTC anticipates investing $2.15 million in this strategy per year, with $2 million going to residential programs and $150,000 going to employee programs. Since this is a new strategy, MTC will be working with consultants to develop an approach to implementation.

39 Metro, Regional Travel Options Program Evaluation Report, 2012, http://www.oregonmetro.gov/sites/default/files/appendix_d_rto_evaluation_2012.pdf. 40 Portland Bureau of Transportation, Past SmartTrips 2004‐2010, http://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/56703. 41 This is an output from MTC’s travel model, and the value varies for different scenarios and years. The values shown are for the Proposed Plan in 2035; values for other scenario/year combinations range from 6.2‐6.5 (household) and 10.2‐11.2 (employee) 42 For 2020, we used a value of 3 since the strategy will take effect in 2017, and will only have been in place for 3 years.

64

Analysis steps

The amount of CO2 reductions that MTC realizes through this strategy depends on the amount that it invests. To calculate CO2 reductions based on the amount invested, the methodology:

1. Allocated the investment between household and employee programs. 2. Divided the respective household/employee investments by the average cost per year of marketing to a household/employee and multiplied by the penetration rate in order to calculate the total number of participants. 3. Multiplied the total number of participants by the average reduction in SOV mode share among participants and the average daily one‐way driving trips affected to calculate the average daily number of vehicle trips reduced due to programs funded that year. 4. Multiplied the average daily number of vehicle trips reduced by the number of years for which behavior change persists to estimate the total average daily number of vehicle trips reduced in any given year. This accounts for the fact that programs funded in previous years produce ongoing vehicle trip reductions. 5. Multiplied daily vehicle trips reduced by the average one‐way trip length to calculate the average daily VMT reductions. 6. Summed the product of trip‐end emission rates and daily vehicle trip reductions and the product of exhaust emission rates and daily VMT reductions to calculate total CO2 emission reductions.

Results

Table 20 and Table 21 summarize the CO2 reductions due to Targeted Transportation Alternatives.

Table 20: Daily CO2 emissions reductions due to Targeted Transportation Alternatives (short tons)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan ‐954 ‐1,604 ‐1,578 Main Streets ‐958 ‐1,598 ‐1,586 Big Cities ‐952 ‐1,581 ‐1,553 EEJ ‐948 ‐1,574 ‐1,552

Table 21: Per capita CO2 emissions reductions from 2005 baseline due to Targeted Transportation Alternatives (percent)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan ‐1.17% ‐1.71% ‐1.59% Main Streets ‐1.17% ‐1.70% ‐1.60% Big Cities ‐1.16% ‐1.68% ‐1.57% EEJ ‐1.16% ‐1.67% ‐1.57%

Trip Caps

Trip caps set limits on the number of vehicle trips to and from workplaces, and enforce these limits via regular traffic counts and penalties for non‐complying workplaces. By limiting the number of vehicle trips to a level below unrestricted access, trip caps can reduce CO2 emissions. Local governments have the ability to set trip caps on new development projects through development agreements, but their

65

authority to enact caps on existing development is more limited. Trip caps therefore typically focus on minimizing the traffic impacts of new office or commercial development. Several South Bay cities, including Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Cupertino and Menlo Park, have enacted trip caps,43 as has the City of Los Angeles. Stanford University and Santa Clara County have had a trip cap in effect for over ten years. Most of these caps focus on individual development projects, but Mountain View’s trip cap covers an entire business district, providing a promising template for a program to encourage trip caps in employment centers throughout the Bay Area.44 They are an increasingly popular strategy to reduce vehicle trips in the Bay Area’s high‐growth employment centers, and MTC can promote their use throughout the region, reducing CO2 emissions.

Trip caps complement, but do not duplicate, other commute transportation demand management strategies included in the off‐model analysis, such as the Commuter Benefits Ordinance (CBO). These other strategies act as “carrots” that provide employees incentives to use sustainable commute modes; trip caps are a “stick” that require employers to reduce trips by employees or face fines. Trip caps also apply to different employers than other TDM strategies; for example the CBO applies to all employers with 50+ employees throughout the Bay Area whereas trip caps apply to all new businesses, regardless of size, in designated employment areas. In order to implement trip caps across the region, MTC is considering offering assistance to local governments through its existing planning grant programs.

Off‐model analysis is necessary to capture CO2 reductions from trip caps because MTC’s last travel survey, which informs its model, was conducted in 2010, and does not capture the impacts of new strategies that change travel behavior such as this one. These strategies might be captured by a future model once they have been implemented to the extent that they influence people’s behavior in a way that can be captured by the travel surveys, and once the model framework has been altered to include inputs that represent the presence of behavior change strategies. Assumptions and Methodology

Estimating CO2 reductions due to trip caps involves multiplying the number of employees affected by trip caps by the average reduction in vehicle trips for employees subject to caps, and then converting the result to CO2 reductions.

In order to determine the number of employees affected, two assumptions were made where trip caps can apply:

1. Trip caps generally apply in employment centers where there is a high enough concentration of businesses to justify the effort in adopting a cap. All traffic analysis zones (TAZs) with more jobs than residents are assumed to represent employment centers. 2. Trip caps are feasible in areas where there is a high enough density of jobs and land uses to support transit, carpooling and other sustainable commute options which is assumed to be the case in all TAZs designated as either urban or suburban in MTC’s travel model.

43 For a summary of South Bay trip cap programs, see Cities21, Palo Alto Comp Plan Transport Element, Extended Comments, September 1, 2015, http://www.cities21.org/cms/PA_Transp_Elem_C21.pdf. 44 City of Mountain View, North Bayshore Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan Guidelines, February 2015, http://www.mountainview.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=15164.

66

Trip caps would apply to all new employees located in TAZs that met both of these criteria.

The next step was to determine the reduction in vehicle trips due to the trip cap. The baseline number of vehicle trips per employee in each TAZ where trip caps apply were estimated. To this, the average vehicle trip reduction from the City of Mountain View’s North Bayshore Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan Guidelines was applied, which is based on a target of 45 percent drive‐alone mode share and 10 percent carpool mode share.45 According to MTC’s travel model, the current regional average carpool occupancy is 2.58 people per carpool, and the cap is equivalent to 0.98 vehicle trips per employee per day. This represents a 40 percent decrease from the current level of 1.62 vehicle trips per employee per day, which was calculated based on the current mode share for home‐based work trips to the superdistrict containing the North Bayshore area—76 percent drive alone and 14 percent carpool, according to MTC’s travel model.

The 40 percent reduction in the North Bayshore trip cap represents an average estimate for the effectiveness of trip caps that should apply throughout the region, because it reflects both the opportunities and challenges that will be present in many Bay Area locations. On one hand, the area is experiencing high demand for commercial development and the City of Mountain View took a proactive approach to minimizing the traffic impacts of new development through the trip cap. On the other hand, the North Bayshore area is very challenging to serve with alternatives to driving given that it is cut off from the rest of Mountain View by the Bayshore Freeway and is home to the Shoreline Amphitheatre, the Google campus, and other land uses that are not conducive to walking, bicycling or transit. Analysis steps

To calculate CO2 reductions due to trip caps, the methodology:

1. Identified all TAZs where trip caps are likely to apply: urban and suburban TAZs with more jobs than households. 2. Identified the current drive‐alone and carpool mode share for home‐based work trips to each of the trip‐capped TAZs. 3. Calculated the average number of daily vehicle trips per employee in each trip‐capped TAZ by dividing carpool mode share by current average carpool occupancy, adding the result to the drive‐alone mode share, and multiplying the sum by two to account for round trips to and from work. 4. Estimated the reduction in daily vehicle trips per employee by applying the trip cap reduction factor derived from the Mountain View North Bayshore TDM Plan (40%) to the result of Step 4. 5. Multiplied the result of step 4 by the number of new employees projected for the TAZ between 2015 and the scenario year to estimate the total reduction in daily vehicle trips for each trip‐ capped TAZ. 6. Multiplied the result of step 5 by the average trip distance for home‐based work trips for each trip‐capped TAZ to estimate the total reduction in daily VMT for each trip‐capped TAZ. 7. Summed the total reduction in daily vehicle trips across all trip‐capped TAZs. 8. Summed the total reduction in daily VMT across all trip‐capped TAZs. 9. Summed the product of trip‐end emission rates and daily vehicle trip reductions and the product of exhaust emission rates and daily VMT reductions to calculate total CO2 emission reductions.

45 City of Mountain View 2015, p. 4‐3.

67

Results

Table 22 and Table 23 summarize the CO2 reductions due to Trip Caps.

Table 22: Daily CO2 emissions reductions due to trip caps (short tons)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan ‐120 ‐688 ‐856 Main Streets ‐150 ‐764 ‐1,111 Big Cities ‐143 ‐646 ‐836 EEJ ‐150 ‐622 ‐761

Table 23: Per capita CO2 emissions reductions from 2005 baseline due to trip caps (percent)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan ‐0.15% ‐0.73% ‐0.86% Main Streets ‐0.18% ‐0.81% ‐1.12% Big Cities ‐0.18% ‐0.69% ‐0.84% EEJ ‐0.18% ‐0.66% ‐0.77%

Expanded Bike Share System

Bike share systems provide bicycles that members of the public can borrow and use for limited durations (typically under a day) in exchange for a fee. In most systems, bike share bicycles must be borrowed from and returned to designated docking stations, though some systems have payment technology and locks mounted on bicycles to allow users to leave them anywhere in the service area. In August 2013, in collaboration with MTC, the Air District implemented a bike share system in the Bay Area on a limited pilot basis called Bay Area Bike Share (BABS). BABS consists of approximately 700 bikes deployed across 70 stations; approximately half in San Francisco and the other half in South Bay cities. Stations are located at key destinations such as transit hubs and employment and commercial areas. In 2015, Motivate, a private company, took over management of BABS, and with corporate sponsorship, rebranded and will expand the system tenfold, including new service areas in the inner East Bay.46 MTC will be promoting bike sharing through its existing or new outreach programs.

Bike share reduces CO2 emissions by enabling users to take short‐distance trips by bicycle instead of by car, and in some cases bike share can eliminate longer trips by enabling users to connect to transit. As the bike share system expands, further CO2 reductions will be realized. Motivate’s plans for the bike share system are still evolving, but CO2 reductions are quantified based on information currently available to MTC about the planned system. Assumptions and methodology Based on information from Motivate, the criteria for service area expansion in Berkeley, Emeryville, Oakland, San Francisco and San Jose includes transit‐rich, densely developed areas, in addition to some targeted neighborhoods for equitable access. Since the service areas are still being decided, the priority

46 http://www.bayareabikeshare.com/expansion

68

development areas (PDAs) or areas in which most of the region’s growth is anticipated to occur, were used to identify neighborhoods in each city that met these criteria. A contiguous bike share service area was then mapped that included these neighborhoods. Summarized below are the boundaries of the service area for each city:

 Berkeley: bike share covers the area east of College Ave., south of Cedar St., west of 6th St., and extends south to the city limits for contiguity with the Emeryville/Oakland bike share network.  Emeryville: bike share covers the entire city east of Interstate 80.  Oakland: North of Interstate 580, bike share covers the area west of College/Broadway. South of Interstate 580, the bike share service area is bounded in the southeast by 55th Ave. and in the southwest by 12th St. / San Leandro St., except for the area around Jack London square, where it extends down to the harbor.  San Francisco: bike share covers most of the city, excluding hilly residential neighborhoods around Twin Peaks / Mt. Sutro, the Sunset, industrial lands along the Bayfront, and major parks. Though the Sunset meets the criteria for density and transit service, it was excluded as it is isolated from the rest of the service area.  San Jose: bike share covers downtown and the residential neighborhoods surrounding it. The service area is bounded by Interstates 680 and 101 in the northeast, Tully Rd. in the southeast, Monterey Highway and Meridian Ave. in the west, and Berryessa Rd. and Hedding St. in the northwest.

With these geographic areas mapped, the number of residents and jobs in each using 2010 Census and Longitudinal Employer‐Household Dynamics data were calculated. Information from Motivate on the approximate number of bikes in each city and the number of bikes per station was used to estimate the number of planned stations for each city.

The Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) Bike‐Share Planning Guide includes data on the effectiveness (in terms of the number of trips per 1,000 residents) of different bike share systems and compares effectiveness to different system characteristics.47 ITDP finds that station density best explains bike share usage, and uses linear regression analysis to identify the relationship between station density and effectiveness. ITDP’s data from U.S. systems was used to determine the equation best describing the relationship between station density and daily trips per 1,000 residents for U.S. systems:

Daily trips per 1,000 residents = 1.74 * station density + 17.2

This equation was then applied to the station density and number of residents in each bike share service area to estimate the total number of bike share trips per day. Table 24 summarizes the data and calculations for each service area.

47 Institute for Transportation and Development Policy, The Bike‐Share Planning Guide, Fig. 3, p. 45, https://www.itdp.org/the‐bike‐share‐planning‐guide‐2/.

69

Table 24: Summary of bike share service areas by city

Estimated Estimated daily bike current Bikes Stations share trips Current daily bike Number per Total Area per per 1000 number of share trips City of bikes station stations (km2) km2 residents residents (pop‐based) Berkeley 400 10 40 11.5 3.5 23.1 79,090 1,823 Emeryville 100 10 10 2.6 3.8 23.7 8,596 204 Oakland 850 10 85 34.8 2.4 21.3 207,116 4,401 San Francisco 4,500 15 300 67.0 4.5 24.8 659,773 16,356 San Jose 1,000 10 100 46.3 2.2 20.8 188,213 3,907 Total 6,850 535 162 1,142,788 26,691

The average regional population growth was applied to estimate the number of bike share trips in each scenario year. This results in a conservative estimate of bike share trips since bike share serves many of the Bay Area’s highest‐growth communities.

The bike share trips were then converted to VMT reductions based on results from MTC’s evaluation of BABS, which found that each bike share trip reduced an average of 1.3 VMT.48 Many bike share trips do not reduce any VMT because they do not displace vehicle trips, while others only reduce short trips, but the evaluation found that a significant share of bike share trips enables users to connect to transit, eliminating longer trips. Analysis steps

To calculate CO2 reductions due to bike sharing, the methodology:

1. Identified a service area for each city with planned bike share and collected data on the area, number of planned bike share stations, and population for each service area. 2. Divided the number of bike share stations by the area of each service area to calculate the number of stations per square kilometer. 3. Applied a regression formula derived from ITDP to estimate the number of daily trips per 1,000 residents in each service area. 4. Multiplied the results by the number of residents in each area to estimate the number of daily bike share trips in each service area, and summed results across all service areas. 5. Multiplied total daily bike share trips by average population growth for the scenario year to estimate future total daily bike share trips. 6. Multiplied the result by the average VMT reduced per bike share trip to estimate total VMT reductions due to bike share. 7. Multiplied exhaust emission rates by daily VMT reductions to calculate total CO2 emission reductions.

48 MTC Climate Initiatives Program Evaluation: Pilot Bike‐sharing Program, Prepared for MTC by Eisen‐Letunic, 2015.

70

Results

Table 25 and Table 26 summarize the CO2 reductions due to the expanded bike share system. CO2 reductions do vary slightly between the different EIR alternatives assessed, but the differences between alternatives are not visible at the level of precision shown in the tables.

Table 25: Daily CO2 emissions reductions due to the expanded bike share system (short tons)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan ‐18 ‐21 ‐22 Main Streets ‐18 ‐21 ‐22 Big Cities ‐18 ‐21 ‐22 EEJ ‐18 ‐21 ‐22

Table 26: Per capita CO2 emissions reductions from 2005 baseline due to the expanded bike share system (percent)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan ‐0.02% ‐0.02% ‐0.02% Main Streets ‐0.02% ‐0.02% ‐0.02% Big Cities ‐0.02% ‐0.02% ‐0.02% EEJ ‐0.02% ‐0.02% ‐0.02%

Expanded Bicycle Infrastructure

Bicycle infrastructure makes it safer, more convenient, and more pleasant for people to bike instead of driving. Research has found that many people are interested in bicycling more, but are concerned about being hit by motor vehicles.49 Building new infrastructure allows trips by bicycle instead of driving. As of 2005, the Bay Area had over 6,500 miles of bike lanes and trails, and this number is projected to increase to over 11,300 miles by 2035, significantly increasing the number of bicyclists and reducing

VMT and CO2 emissions as a result. Off‐model analysis is required to account for CO2 reductions due to improving bicycle infrastructure. MTC’s model estimates bicycle trips based on based on trip distance alone, and does not capture the quality of bicycle infrastructure nor how infrastructure affects travel.

MTC’s Regional Bicycle Plan 2009 Update50 estimated the cumulative cost of building out the regional bikeway network as $1.4 billion dollars. Local governments are assumed to fund projects not included in the regional bikeway network.

49 Dill, J., and N. McNeil, Four Types of Cyclists? Testing a Typology to Better Understand Bicycling Behavior and Potential, Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium, August 10, 2012, http://web.pdx.edu/~jdill/Types_of_Cyclists_PSUWorkingPaper.pdf. 50 Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Regional Bicycle Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area 2009 Update. March 2009. http://www.pedbikeinfo.org/pdf/PlanDesign_SamplePlans_Region_SFBayArea2009.pdf

71

Assumptions and methodology

In order to estimate CO2 reductions due to expanded bicycle infrastructure, current and planned bicycle infrastructure in the region data was collected. Data on current infrastructure comes from MTC’s Regional Bicycle Plan, which included an inventory of bicycle lanes and trails in the region. Data on planned infrastructure comes from an inventory of planned local and regional facilities conducted in 2013, and may underestimate future infrastructure because it does not capture facilities included in more recent plans. The impact on bicycle mode share was then estimated based on research conducted by Dill and Carr,51 which estimates the absolute increase in bicycle mode share based on the number of bicycle lane‐miles per square mile of land. Dill and Carr observed that if bike lane density increases by one lane‐mile per square mile, bicycle mode share goes up by an absolute one percent, e.g., if the baseline mode share is two percent, it will increase to three percent. This increase in bicycle mode share was then converted to a reductions in vehicle trips, VMT and CO2 emissions. Analysis steps

To calculate CO2 reductions due to expanded bicycle infrastructure, the methodology:

1. Divided miles of current bicycle lanes by the land area of the region to calculate the current bicycle facility density, in terms of the number of bicycle lanes and trails per square mile. 2. Repeated the step above for the scenario year. 3. Calculated the percent change in bicycle facility density between the current and scenario year. 4. Divided the percent change in bicycle facility density by 100 to estimate the change in bicycle mode share. 5. Multiplied the change in bicycle mode share by the baseline number of daily vehicle trips to estimate the number of daily vehicle trips reduced. 6. Multiplied the result by the average length of bicycle trips for the scenario year to estimate the average daily VMT reduced. 7. Summed the product of trip‐end emission rates and daily vehicle trip reductions and the product of exhaust emission rates and daily VMT reductions to calculate total CO2 emission reductions. Results

Table 27 and Table 28 summarize the CO2 reductions due to expanded bicycle infrastructure.

Table 27: Daily CO2 emissions reductions due to expanded bicycle infrastructure (short tons)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan ‐24 ‐50 ‐52 Main Streets ‐24 ‐51 ‐54 Big Cities ‐22 ‐48 ‐51 EEJ ‐24 ‐51 ‐53

51 Dill, J., and T. Carr. 2003, Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them – Another Look, Transportation Research Board 1828, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.

72

Table 28: Per capita CO2 emissions reductions from 2005 baseline due to expanded bicycle infrastructure (percent)

EIR Alternative 2020 2035 2040 Proposed Plan ‐0.03% ‐0.05% ‐0.05% Main Streets ‐0.03% ‐0.05% ‐0.05% Big Cities ‐0.03% ‐0.05% ‐0.05% EEJ ‐0.03% ‐0.05% ‐0.05%

73

Appendix D List of Transportation Control Measures (TCM) Projects TCM A: Regional Express Bus Regional Express Bus Program Vehicle Deployment Throughout the Bay Area 1 February 18, 2009

Transit Operator Vehicle Type Serial Registration2 Funds Obligated Operating Agency Route Weekday Service Hours Weekend Service Hours Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA43P055640 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA63P055641 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA83P055642 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPAX3P055643 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road IM8PDMPA33P055645 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA53P055646 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA73P055647 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA93P055648 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA73P055650 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA93P055621 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA03P055652 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA23P055653 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA43P055654 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA63P055655 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPAX3P055657 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA13P055658 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA33P055659 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPAX3P055660 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA13P055661 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road IM8PDMPA73P055664 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road IM8PDMPA83P055656 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road IM8PDMPA03P055666 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road IM8PDMPA93P055665 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM AC Transit3 Over-The-Road IM8PDMPA53P055663 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road IM8PDMPA33P055662 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road IM8PDMPA23P055667 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road IM8PDMPA03P055649 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPAX3P055674 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA43P055668 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road IM8PDMPA63P055669 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA23P055670 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA43P055671 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA63P055672 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road IM8PDMPA83P055673 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA33P055676 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA53P055677 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road IM8PDMPA73P055678 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA93P055679 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA13P055675 3/25/2001 AC Transit Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM AC Transit - Transferred from 15GCD201531111916 Suburban 1/27/2003 SamTrans4 Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM AC Transit - Transferred from 15GCD201731111917 Suburban 1/27/2003 SamTrans4 Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM AC Transit - Transferred from 15GCD201931111918 Suburban 1/27/2003 SamTrans4 Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM AC Transit - Transferred from 15GCD201031111919 Suburban 1/27/2003 SamTrans4 Transbay - Bay, San Mateo, and Dumbarton Bridges 5:00 AM - 12:45 AM 5:30 AM - 12:50 AM Suburban 15GDD271X21111662 3/25/2002 CCCTA 960B & 960C Mitchell Drive Park & Ride/Bishop Ranch 960B 5:15 AM - 7:51 PM 960C 6:15 AM - 7:50 PM Suburban 15GDD271X21111663 3/25/2002 CCCTA 960B & 960C Mitchell Drive Park & Ride/Bishop Ranch 960B 5:15 AM - 7:51 PM 960C 6:15 AM - 7:50 PM Suburban 15GDD271X21111664 3/25/2002 CCCTA 960B & 960C Mitchell Drive Park & Ride/Bishop Ranch 960B 5:15 AM - 7:51 PM 960C 6:15 AM - 7:50 PM Suburban 15GDD271X21111665 3/25/2002 CCCTA 960B & 960C Mitchell Drive Park & Ride/Bishop Ranch 960B 5:15 AM - 7:51 PM 960C 6:15 AM - 7:50 PM Suburban 15GDD271X21111666 3/25/2002 CCCTA 960B & 960C Mitchell Drive Park & Ride/Bishop Ranch 960B 5:15 AM - 7:51 PM 960C 6:15 AM - 7:50 PM Suburban 15GDD271X21111667 3/25/2002 CCCTA 960B & 960C Mitchell Drive Park & Ride/Bishop Ranch 960B 5:15 AM - 7:51 PM 960C 6:15 AM - 7:50 PM CCCTA Suburban 15GDD271X21111668 3/25/2002 CCCTA 960B & 960C Mitchell Drive Park & Ride/Bishop Ranch 960B 5:15 AM - 7:51 PM 960C 6:15 AM - 7:50 PM Suburban 15GDD271X21111669 3/25/2002 CCCTA 960B & 960C Mitchell Drive Park & Ride/Bishop Ranch 960B 5:15 AM - 7:51 PM 960C 6:15 AM - 7:50 PM Suburban 15GDD271X21111670 3/25/2002 CCCTA 960B & 960C Mitchell Drive Park & Ride/Bishop Ranch 960B 5:15 AM - 7:51 PM 960C 6:15 AM - 7:50 PM Suburban 15GDD271X21111671 3/25/2002 CCCTA 960B & 960C Mitchell Drive Park & Ride/Bishop Ranch 960B 5:15 AM - 7:51 PM 960C 6:15 AM - 7:50 PM Suburban 15GDD271X21111672 3/25/2002 CCCTA 960B & 960C Mitchell Drive Park & Ride/Bishop Ranch 960B 5:15 AM - 7:51 PM 960C 6:15 AM - 7:50 PM Suburban 15GDD271X21111673 3/25/2002 CCCTA 960B & 960C Mitchell Drive Park & Ride/Bishop Ranch 960B 5:15 AM - 7:51 PM 960C 6:15 AM - 7:50 PM Suburban 15GDD271X21111674 3/25/2002 CCCTA 960B & 960C Mitchell Drive Park & Ride/Bishop Ranch 960B 5:15 AM - 7:51 PM 960C 6:15 AM - 7:50 PM

February 19, 2009 Page 1 of 2 TCM A: Regional Express Bus Regional Express Bus Program Vehicle Deployment Throughout the Bay Area 1 February 18, 2009

Transit Operator Vehicle Type Serial Registration2 Funds Obligated Operating Agency Route Weekday Service Hours Weekend Service Hours Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA13P055949 11/14/2002 Fairfield-Suisun 40 Vacaville/Fairfield to Pleasant Hill/Walnut Creek BART 5:00 AM - 9:57 AM & 3:01 PM - 8:31 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA83P055950 11/14/2002 Fairfield-Suisun 40 Vacaville/Fairfield to Pleasant Hill/Walnut Creek BART 5:00 AM - 9:57 AM & 3:01 PM - 8:31 PM

15GCD201731111920 Fairfield-Suisun - Transferred Fairfield-Suisun Suburban 1/27/2003 from SamTrans4 30 Fairfield to Davis/Sacramento 6:08 AM - 7:05 PM Sat Only 8:03 AM - 4:43 PM

15CGD201931111921 Fairfield-Suisun - Transferred Suburban 1/27/2003 from SamTrans4 30 Fairfield to Davis/Sacramento 6:08 AM - 7:05 PM Sat Only 8:03 AM - 4:43 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA53PO55680 11/8/2002 Golden Gate 71 Novato/San Rafael/Marin City/San Francisco 6:35 AM - 8:27 PM Sat Only 6:59 AM - 7:28 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA73P055681 11/8/2002 Golden Gate 71 Novato/San Rafael/Marin City/San Francisco 6:35 AM - 8:27 PM Sat Only 6:59 AM - 7:28 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA93PO55682 11/8/2002 Golden Gate 72 Santa Rosa/Rohnert Park/Cotati/San Francisco 3:54 AM - 8:59 AM & 2:12 PM - 8:05 PM Golden Gate Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPAO3PO55683 11/8/2002 Golden Gate 72 Santa Rosa/Rohnert Park/Cotati/San Francisco 3:54 AM - 8:59 AM & 2:12 PM - 8:05 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA23PO55684 11/8/2002 Golden Gate 75 Santa Rosa/Rohnert Park/Cotati · Petaluma /Marin Civic Center/San Rafael 5:02 AM - 8:35 AM & 2:59 PM - 7:18 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA43PO55685 11/8/2002 Golden Gate 75 Santa Rosa/Rohnert Park/Cotati · Petaluma /Marin Civic Center/San Rafael 5:02 AM - 8:35 AM & 2:59 PM - 7:18 PM Suburban 15GDD271521110872 3/25/2002 LAVTA 70X Pleasanton - Walnut Creek Express 5:09 AM - 9:16 AM & 3:19 PM - 7:42 PM Suburban 15GDD271721110873 3/25/2002 LAVTA 70X Pleasanton - Walnut Creek Express 5:09 AM - 9:16 AM & 3:19 PM - 7:42 PM LAVTA Suburban 15GDD271921110874 3/25/2002 LAVTA 70X Pleasanton - Walnut Creek Express 5:09 AM - 9:16 AM & 3:19 PM - 7:42 PM Suburban 15GDD271021110875 3/25/2002 LAVTA 70X Pleasanton - Walnut Creek Express 5:09 AM - 9:16 AM & 3:19 PM - 7:42 PM SamTrans Transfering to 15GCD201631111911 Suburban 1/27/2003 NCPTA on 2/28/09 June 2009 - Calistoga/Yountville/Napa/American Canyon/Baylink Ferry Terminal 5:00 AM-6:30 PM; Peak Only NCTPA SamTrans Transfering to 15GCD201831111912 Suburban 1/27/2003 NCPTA on 2/28/09 June 2009 - Calistoga/Yountville/Napa/American Canyon/Baylink Ferry Terminal 5:00 AM-6:30 PM; Peak Only Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA63P055686 11/8/2002 Tri-Delta 300 Express Commuter Service Brentwood/Pittsburg BART 4:15 AM - 9:07 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA63P055687 11/8/2002 Tri-Delta 300 Express Commuter Service Brentwood/Pittsburg BART 4:15 AM - 9:07 PM Tri-Delta Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA63P055688 11/8/2002 Tri-Delta 300 Express Commuter Service Brentwood/Pittsburg BART 4:15 AM - 9:07 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA63P055689 11/8/2002 Tri-Delta 300 Express Commuter Service Brentwood/Pittsburg BART 4:15 AM - 9:07 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA13P055627 11/14/2002 Leased to Fairfield-Suisun5 90 Fairfield/El Cerrito Del Norte BART 4:55 AM - 10:35 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA33P055628 11/14/2002 Leased to Fairfield-Suisun5 90 Fairfield/El Cerrito Del Norte BART 4:55 AM - 10:35 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA53P055629 11/14/2002 Vallejo 78 Vallejo/Benicia/Pleasant Hill BART/Walnut Creek BART 5:00 AM - 8:38 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA13P055630 11/14/2002 Leased to Fairfield-Suisun5 90 Fairfield/El Cerrito Del Norte BART 4:55 AM - 10:35 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA33P055631 11/14/2002 Leased to Fairfield-Suisun5 90 Fairfield/El Cerrito Del Norte BART 4:55 AM - 10:35 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA53P055632 11/14/2002 Vallejo 78 Vallejo/Benicia/Pleasant Hill BART/Walnut Creek BART 5:00 AM - 8:38 PM Vallejo Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA73P055633 11/14/2002 Vallejo 78 Vallejo/Benicia/Pleasant Hill BART/Walnut Creek BART 5:00 AM - 8:38 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA93P055634 11/14/2002 Vallejo 78 Vallejo/Benicia/Pleasant Hill BART/Walnut Creek BART 5:00 AM - 8:38 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA03P055635 11/14/2002 Vallejo 78 Vallejo/Benicia/Pleasant Hill BART/Walnut Creek BART 5:00 AM - 8:38 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA23P055636 11/14/2002 Leased to Fairfield-Suisun5 90 Fairfield/El Cerrito Del Norte BART 4:55 AM - 10:35 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA43P055637 11/14/2002 Leased to Fairfield-Suisun5 90 Fairfield/El Cerrito Del Norte BART 4:55 AM - 10:35 PM Over-The-Road 1M8PDMPA83P055639 11/14/2002 Leased to Fairfield-Suisun5 90 Fairfield/El Cerrito Del Norte BART 4:55 AM - 10:35 PM Suburban 15GCD211121111974 3/7/2002 WestCat 30Z Hercules Transit Center/Martinez/BART 5:59 AM - 8:03 PM Suburban 15GCD211521111975 3/7/2002 WestCat 30Z Hercules Transit Center/Martinez/BART 5:59 AM - 8:03 PM Suburban 15GCD211121111976 3/7/2002 WestCat 30Z Hercules Transit Center/Martinez/BART 5:59 AM - 8:03 PM WestCat - Transferred from WestCat 15GCD201X31111913 Suburban 1/27/2003 SamTrans4 LYNX Rodeo/Hercules/San Francisco Transbay Terminal 5:00 AM - 9:45 AM & 3:30 PM - 8:33 PM WestCat - Transferred from 15GCD201131111914 Suburban 1/27/2003 SamTrans4 LYNX Rodeo/Hercules/San Francisco Transbay Terminal 5:00 AM - 9:45 AM & 3:30 PM - 8:33 PM Suburban 15GCD201331111915 1/27/2003 SamTrans4 LYNX Rodeo/Hercules/San Francisco Transbay Terminal 5:00 AM - 9:45 AM & 3:30 PM - 8:33 PM 1. Please note: MTC does not currently have information compiled on cumulative operating hours for all of the TCRP buses. For projects where the buses have been assigned to routes receiving operating funds that are tied to required performance measures, MTC has data compiled on the annual performance of those routes. 2. Each vehicle may be deployed on any of the approved routes listed for each operator. 3. Vehicles are deployed as needed for various routes on weekdays and weekends. All transbay service does not operate on weekends, but all vehicles may be deployed on weekend transbay service. 4. SamTrans REX service was discontinued in 2007 due to low ridership; all 11 TCRP vehicles purchased for the REX service were reallocated to AC Transit, Fairfield-Suisun Transit, WestCat, and NCTPA. 5. Route 90 service was transferred from Vallejo to Fairfield-Suisun Transit in 2006.

February 19, 2009 Page 2 of 2 TCM B: Bicycle/Pedestrian Program TDA ARTICLE 3 [Transportation Development Act Funds for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects]

SPONSOR PROJECT NAME AMOUNT FY 2003-04 Alameda County ADA Compliant Accessible Ramps $ 105,767 FY 2003-04 Alameda County Tesla Road Bicycle Lanes $ 51,000 FY 2003-04 City of Albany Manor Way Pedestrian Improvements $ 22,706 FY 2003-04 City of Berkeley Bicycle Safety Education $ 30,000 FY 2003-04 City of Berkeley Prepare plan for implementing future $ 31,033 FY 2003-04 City of Fremont Bike Detectors, Bike Logo on Pavement, $ 128,989 FY 2003-04 City of Hayward Installation of Wheelchair Ramps $ 84,198 FY 2003-04 City of Livermore Complete Portion of S. Livermore Valley $ 97,301 FY 2003-04 City of Newark Silliman Activity Center Pedestrian/ $ 59,158 FY 2003-04 City of Oakland Bancroft Ave. Bike Lanes (96th - Durant) $ 96,000 FY 2003-04 City of Oakland Citywide Ped. Curb Ramp Program - $ 295,266 FY 2003-04 City of Oakland Lake Merritt 12th St. Dam Ped/Bike $ 116,000 FY 2003-04 City of Oakland Pedestrian Bulb Outs-Highland & $ 100,000 FY 2003-04 City of Oakland Walk/Bike Calif. Conf. - Alameda Co. $ 30,000 FY 2003-04 City of Oakland West City of Oakland Bay Trail $ 289,000 FY 2003-04 City of Piedmont Sidewalk Extension and Curb Cuts $ 6,506 FY 2003-04 City of Pleasanton ADA Compliant Wheelchair Accessible $ 38,627 FY 2003-04 City of San Leandro Install New Curb Cuts & Upgrade $ 40,000 FY 2003-04 City of Brentwood Installation of Wheelchair Ramps $ 30,000 FY 2003-04 City of Concord Iron Horse Trail Rte 242 Undercrossing $ 36,000 FY 2003-04 City of Concord Wren Avenue Ped. Improvements $ 45,000 FY 2003-04 Contra Costa County Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety Education $ 21,500 FY 2003-04 Contra Costa County Olympic Blvd. Ped. Path Phase II $ 115,000 FY 2003-04 City of Lafayette Hough Avenue Sidewalk $ 37,000 FY 2003-04 City of Moraga Rheem Blvd./Moraga Rd. Intersection $ 66,100 FY 2003-04 City of Pittsburg Polaris Drive Bike Facility $ 77,500 FY 2003-04 City of San Ramon Dougherty Road Sidewalk $ 25,000 FY 2003-04 Marin County Bicycle/Pedestrian Bridge $ 140,000 FY 2003-04 Mill Valley Signage Project $ 7,200 FY 2003-04 City of Novato Commuter Bikeway Connection $ 402,286 FY 2003-04 City of Novato Hill Road Path Connection $ 60,000 FY 2003-04 City of San Anselmo Purchase & Install Bicycle Racks $ 15,000 FY 2003-04 Napa County Yountville Cross Rd. Bike Lane $ 150,000 FY 2003-04 Yountville Yountville Cross Rd. Bike Lane $ 47,000 FY 2003-04 City of Campbell Westmont Ave. Improvement Project $ 43,192 FY 2003-04 City of Los Altos Fremont Ave. Sidewalk Phase III $ 15,781 FY 2003-04 Los Altos Hills Paseo Del Roble Pedestrian Bridge $ 9,554 FY 2003-04 City of Milpitas Calaveras Blvd. Sidewalk & Bike Path $ 36,895 FY 2003-04 Mountain View Access Ramp Installation $ 24,905 FY 2003-04 Mountain View Audible Ped. Signal Installations $ 16,500 FY 2003-04 Mountain View Bicycle Path Construction $ 13,113 FY 2003-04 Palo Alto Baffle Replacements: Calif. Ave. $ 15,993 FY 2003-04 Palo Alto Homer Ave. Ped. Bicycle Undercrossing $ 293,000 FY 2003-04 Palo Alto Ped. Walkway Lighted Warning System $ 20,000 FY 2003-04 City of San Jose ADA Wheel Chair Curb & Ramp Install. $ 100,000 FY 2003-04 City of San Jose Certified TDA Fiscal Audit $ 9,000 FY 2003-04 City of San Jose Murdock Park Bridge over San Tomas $ 100,000 FY 2003-04 City of San Jose Ped & Bike Facility Signing & Striping $ 100,000 FY 2003-04 City of San Jose Ped & Bike Safety Education $ 50,000 FY 2003-04 City of San Jose Pedro Street Sidewalk Improvement $ 124,434 FY 2003-04 City of San Jose Street Sidewalk Improvement $ 147,435 FY 2003-04 City of Santa Clara Certified TDA Fiscal Audit $ 5,000 FY 2003-04 City of Santa Clara Install Bike & Ped. Improvements $ 61,815 FY 2003-04 City of Santa Clara Update City's Existing Bike Plan & $ 3,900 FY 2003-04 Santa Clara County Bike Detector @ various Intersections $ 58,118

TCM B 1 of 8 TCM B: Bicycle/Pedestrian Program TDA ARTICLE 3 [Transportation Development Act Funds for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects]

SPONSOR PROJECT NAME AMOUNT FY 2003-04 Santa Clara County Path along McKee Rd. bet Staples Ave. $ 50,000 FY 2003-04 City of Saratoga Saratoga Avenue Walkway Project $ 17,254 FY 2003-04 City of Sunnyvale Calabazas Creek Trail $ 50,152 FY 2003-04 San Francisco City and County Bicycle Projects $ 404,000 FY 2003-04 San Francisco City and County Pedestrian Projects $ 300,000 FY 2003-04 City of Half Moon Bay Construct Rt. 92 Bicycle Lanes and $ 485,146 FY 2003-04 City of Pacifica Milagra Drive Overcrossing at State $ 240,000 FY 2003-04 City of San Bruno Crystal Springs Rd. Traffic Signal $ 20,000 FY 2003-04 City of San Mateo Bikeway Detection Units $ 30,000 FY 2003-04 City of San Mateo Regional Bayfront Trail Upgrade $ 150,000 FY 2003-04 South San Francisco Construct San Francisco Bay Trail $ 100,000 FY 2003-04 South San Francisco Orange Avenue Intersection Improve. $ 100,000 FY 2003-04 City of Benicia Park Road Bike/Ped Improvements $ 160,000 FY 2003-04 Solano County Dixon to Davis Bike Route $ 125,000 FY 2003-04 City of Suisun City Central County Bikeway $ 25,000 FY 2003-04 City of Healdsburg Foss Creek Northwestern Pacific Multi- $ 99,695 FY 2003-04 City of Petaluma Washington Creek Multi-Use Path $ 175,000 FY 2003-04 City of Santa Rosa Sonoma Ave. Bike Lanes Phase II $ 50,000 FY 2003-04 Sonoma County Old Redwood Highway Class II Bike Lanes $ 350,000 FY 2004-05 Alameda County Conduct a planning study & develop $ 38,000 FY 2004-05 Alameda County Conduct bicycle plan study $ 59,650 FY 2004-05 Alameda County Sign & stripe 0.6 miles of 6-foot wide $ 100,000 FY 2004-05 City of Berkeley Contract with a qualified consultant $ 34,281 FY 2004-05 City of Berkeley Educate children about bicycle safety $ 30,000 FY 2004-05 City of Fremont Stripe bike lanes, modify bike lane $ 121,168 FY 2004-05 City of Hayward Design & construct ADA wheel chair $ 88,925 FY 2004-05 City of Newark Design & construct ADA wheel chair $ 27,009 FY 2004-05 City of Piedmont Design & construct ADA wheel chair $ 6,852 FY 2004-05 City of Pleasanton Preserve Golf Course $ 75,000 FY 2004-05 City of San Leandro Install curb ramps, accessible ped. $ 41,438 FY 2004-05 City of San Leandro Install curb ramps, accessible ped. $ 50,024 FY 2004-05 City of San Leandro Install curb ramps, accessible ped. $ 8,000 FY 2004-05 City of Antioch Improve curbs, ramps, crosswalk, signs $ 80,000 FY 2004-05 City of Brentwood Install lighted crosswalk and flashing lights $ 31,500 FY 2004-05 City of Concord Construct 500 ft of 4-to 6-foot wide bike/ped path $ 45,000 FY 2004-05 City of El Cerrito Conduct a planning study for bicycle/ped needs $ 26,500 FY 2004-05 City of Lafayette Construct 125 feet of 5-foot wide $ 10,000 FY 2004-05 City of Martinez Replace the two existing unsafe bridges $ 90,000 FY 2004-05 City of Orinda Develop a Lamorinda Trail Map & install $ 28,500 FY 2004-05 City of Pittsburg Construct Class II and Class III $ 51,000 FY 2004-05 City of Pittsburg Sign & stripe 3600 feet of 13-foot wide $ 52,000 FY 2004-05 City of San Pablo Install bike/ped friendly lighting $ 45,100 FY 2004-05 City of Walnut Creek Construct 2040 feet of asphalt walkway $ 95,000 FY 2004-05 Contra Costa County Construct 344 feet of 4.5-foot wide bike/ped path $ 201,000 FY 2004-05 Contra Costa County Construct 402 feet of 5-foot wide bike/ped path $ 158,928 FY 2004-05 Contra Costa County Provide bicycle & pedestrian safety $ 20,000 FY 2004-05 City of San Rafael Construct 6' wide sidewalk & stripe $ 207,710 FY 2004-05 City of Sausalito Construct 6' wide sidewalk & stripe $ 186,290 FY 2004-05 City of Calistoga Construct 1.0 miles of Class I bike-ped path $ 270,881 FY 2004-05 City of Napa Construct 2.0 miles of Class I bikeway $ 149,727 FY 2004-05 City of Campbell Construct Class II bike lockers at J.D. $ 24,308 FY 2004-05 City of Campbell Widen & regrade bicycle/Pedestrian $ 515,600 FY 2004-05 City of Cupertino Construct 1030' bike path $ 107,622 FY 2004-05 City of Gilroy Complete 881' of Uvas Creek Class I $ 50,000 FY 2004-05 City of Gilroy Refurbish & replace bikeway signs, etc $ 10,611

TCM B 2 of 8 TCM B: Bicycle/Pedestrian Program TDA ARTICLE 3 [Transportation Development Act Funds for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects]

SPONSOR PROJECT NAME AMOUNT FY 2004-05 City of Gilroy Rehabilitate, resurface & stripe 2.5 mile path $ 60,666 FY 2004-05 City of Los Altos Construct approx. 300' of concrete bike path $ 27,354 FY 2004-05 City of Los Altos Replace approx. 2,800 lineal feet of bike path $ 17,580 FY 2004-05 City of Los Gatos Design & construct solution to restore path $ 35,000 FY 2004-05 City of Morgan Hill Install bicycle sensitive detector $ 36,000 FY 2004-05 City of Mountain View Install countdown pedestrian signals $ 30,000 FY 2004-05 City of Mountain View Install curb access ramps at Showers $ 2,381 FY 2004-05 City of Mountain View Install curb access ramps at various $ 15,696 FY 2004-05 City of Mountain View Purchase & install 14 bicycle lockers $ 14,506 FY 2004-05 City of Palo Alto Construct raised pavement pedestrian path $ 50,000 FY 2004-05 City of San Jose Construct 0.66 miles of Class I paved path $ 712,131 FY 2004-05 City of San Jose Design & construct ADA wheel chair improvement $ 176,068 FY 2004-05 City of San Jose Design & construct sidewalk for school $ 36,000 FY 2004-05 City of San Jose Design & install 12' wide asphalt path $ 136,821 FY 2004-05 City of San Jose Install median island ped. Refuge $ 185,000 FY 2004-05 City of San Jose Install sidewalk, ADA curb ramps $ 90,000 FY 2004-05 City of San Jose Provide bicycle & pedestrian safety $ 50,000 FY 2004-05 City of San Jose Stripe crosswalks, paint pavements $ 100,000 FY 2004-05 City of Santa Clara Perform an annual transportation $ 5,000 FY 2004-05 City of Santa Clara Stripe crosswalks & paint pavements $ 62,148 FY 2004-05 City of Saratoga Install continuous curb & gutter $ 19,357 FY 2004-05 City of Sunnyvale Provide gates, signs, fencing and ramps $ 27,550 FY 2004-05 Santa Clara County Construct a 3,300' by 5' walkway $ 63,403 FY 2004-05 Santa Clara County Sign & restripe 8" stripe on shoulders $ 121,105 FY 2004-05 SF City/County Bicycle safety brochures, maps, public education $ 31,500 FY 2004-05 SF City/County Prelim. engineering (plan & design) of bike path $ 200,000 FY 2004-05 SF City/County Purchase & install bicycle racks $ 95,000 FY 2004-05 SF City/County Repair public sidewalks at various locations $ 115,000 FY 2004-05 SF City/County Stripe & sign Class II bike lanes $ 188,500 FY 2004-05 City of Benicia Final design plans, specs & estimate $ 124,573 FY 2004-05 City of Suisun City Constr. 10' wide concrete bike path $ 86,000 FY 2004-05 City of Vacaville, Transit Construct 3400 feet of Class I bike/Ped path $ 148,738 FY 2004-05 Solano Transportation Authority (STA) Build bridge adjacent to existing path $ 76,000 FY 2004-05 City of Petaluma Construction of pedestrian & bicycle path $ 54,876 FY 2004-05 City of Rohnert Park Install 80' long bicycle & pedestrian path $ 160,000 FY 2004-05 City of Santa Rosa Install directional signage & ADA signs $ 18,900 FY 2004-05 County of Sonoma Construct 1.5 miles of Class I Bikeway $ 160,000 FY 2004-05 County of Sonoma Conduct bicycle safety education workshop $ 10,000 FY 2004-05 County of Sonoma Install 27 "Share Road" bicycle sign $ 15,000 FY 2004-05 County of Sonoma Purchase 37 front loading bicycle $ 5,000 San Carlos Class II bike lanes on Alameda de Las Pulgas and on $ 20,000 Brittan Avenue; Class III bike lanes on Old County FY 2005-06 Road San Mateo $ 100,000 Design of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge in the vicinity FY 2005-06 of the Hillsdale interchange of highway U.S. 101 South San Francisco Bicycle and pedestrian crosswalk and signals at $ 150,000 intersection of Spruce Ave. and South San Francisco FY 2005-06 Linear Park Half Moon Bay Construct 6600 foot Class I trail in the right of way of $ 220,000 Highway 1 between Highway 92 and Higgins Purisima FY 2005-06 Rd. Brisbane Install 45 feet by 8 feet asphalt cement path adjacent to $ 25,739 Shoreline Court; sign and restripe existing Class II FY 2005-06 bikeway

TCM B 3 of 8 TCM B: Bicycle/Pedestrian Program TDA ARTICLE 3 [Transportation Development Act Funds for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects]

SPONSOR PROJECT NAME AMOUNT South San Francisco Construct 363 feet by 12 feet asphalt bicycle and $ 36,000 FY 2005-06 pedestrian trail near the Oyster Point Marina San Bruno $ 60,000 Construct a Class II bike lane in both directions of FY 2005-06 Sneath Lane from El Camino Real to Skyline Boulevard Daly City Install bike lanes on Callan Blvd from King Dr to $ 82,000 FY 2005-06 Serramonte Blvd and along Serramonte Boulevard Burlingame $ 17,400 Install bike lane directional signs at 52 locations along FY 2005-06 north-south bicycle routes throughout the city Burlingame Install an in-pavement lighted crosswalk system across $ 30,000 Carolan Avenue at Morrell Avenue, including new push FY 2005-06 buttons Menlo Park Install video detection for bikes at 3 intersections: $ 44,000 Willow at Middlefield, Marsh at Bohannon, Marsh at FY 2005-06 Bay San Mateo $ 50,000 Install bridge railing fencing on the north side of the FY 2005-06 Nineteenth Avenue Bridge over highway U.S. 101 Menlo Park Create bicycle lanes on Bay Road between Berkeley $ 13,600 FY 2005-06 Avenue and Willow Road, plus signage San Mateo Install bike detection loops at: 3rd + Claremont, 3rd + $ 40,000 FY 2005-06 Delaware, 4th + Claremont, 4th + Delaware Daly City Install in-pavement lights and warning signs: Park $ 120,000 Plaza Dr. north of Belmar, and Mission St. at Evergreen FY 2005-06 Ave. San Mateo $ 50,000 Install pedestrian countdown signal heads at 27 FY 2005-06 existing signalized intersections throughout the city Daly City Install pedestrian countdown signal heads at 15 $ 20,000 signalized intersections; and audible warnings at 11 of FY 2005-06 them Burlingame $ 30,900 Install pedestrian countdown signal heads with audible FY 2005-06 pedestrian warnings at 8 signalized intersections Menlo Park Create bicycle lanes on Middlefield Road between $ 2,400 FY 2005-06 Willow Road and San Francisquito Creek San Mateo Install in-pavement lighted crosswalks: 5th Ave. at $ 110,000 Central Park; Bovet Rd. betw. Borel Ave. and El FY 2005-06 Camino Real South San Francisco $ 22,000 Install pedestrian countdown signal heads at 12 FY 2005-06 existing signalized intersections throughout the city County of San Mateo $ 80,509 Bike detection loops, countdown signal heads with FY 2005-06 audible warnings, upgrade pedestrian signal actuators Sebastopol $ 51,356 Construct .5 mile Class I trail between Joe Rodota trail FY 2005-06 and Sebastopol Avenue and Morris Street intersection Santa Rosa $ 350,000 Construct connector ramp between Joe Rodota trail FY 2005-06 and Pierson Reach of Prince Memorial Greenway trail Windsor $ 112,000 Construct a 950 foot Class I trail within Keiser Park, FY 2005-06 including brdige crossing a tributary of Starr Creek

TCM B 4 of 8 TCM B: Bicycle/Pedestrian Program TDA ARTICLE 3 [Transportation Development Act Funds for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects]

SPONSOR PROJECT NAME AMOUNT Contra Costa County, Health Services $ 20,000 Provide bicycle and pedestrian safety education to low- FY 2005-06 income county residents, particularly children Concord $ 60,000 Constr't 500 foot Class I trail adjacent to Galindo Crk. + FY 2005-06 Ygnacio Valley Rd betw. Alberta Way + Pebble Glen Dr Lafayette 1030 feet x 5 feet sidewalk Sweet Dr. betw Walnut + $ 110,000 Woodview; Woodview Dr. betw. St Mary's + Sweet FY 2005-06 Drive Antioch Construct curb ramps and sidewalks at Hillcrest $ 110,000 Avenue, Somersville Road, "G" Street, and Dallas FY 2005-06 Ranch Road Brentwood Install pedestrian countdown signal heads + large $ 66,000 diameter pedestrian push buttons at 12 signalized FY 2005-06 intersections Contra Costa County, Public Works Construct 240 feet x 5 feet sidewalk and curb ramps on $ 20,000 FY 2005-06 Camino Tassajara and on Hansen Lane Orinda Replace 12 existing non-compliant curb ramps in $ 45,000 FY 2005-06 downtown Orinda with ADA compliant ramps San Pablo Install in-pavement lighted crosswalks: Market Avenue $ 180,000 at 21st St.; 23rd St. at Wilcox Ave.; 23rd St. at Stanford FY 2005-06 Ave. Brentwood Restripe Minnesota Ave. bike lane; install lighted $ 31,000 crosswalk; construct 1300 feet of sidewalk, curb and FY 2005-06 gutter FY 2005-06 San Francisco Public sidewalk repair and reconstruction $ 180,000 FY 2005-06 San Francisco Preliminary engineering of curb ramps $ 270,000 San Francisco Safety brochures, maps, public outreach concerning $ 45,000 bicycle pavement arrows, hotline, and bicycle safety FY 2005-06 advertising San Francisco $ 100,000 Purchase and install bicycle racks at various locations FY 2005-06 in San Francisco as requested by the public San Francisco Stripe and sign bike lanes: Conservatory Drive East, $ 305,000 San Jose Avenue ramps, Townsend Street, and FY 2005-06 elsewhere FY 2005-06 Berkeley Bicycle & Pedestrian Injury Prevention Program $ 30,000 Berkeley Ninth Street Bicycle Boulevard extension (Project from $ 135,000 FY 2005-06 FY01/02) Oakland ADA Compliant Wheelchair Accessible Ramps (Project $ 294,548 FY 2005-06 Completed FY01/02) Oakland Laurel Pedestrian Project, Phase I (Project Completed $ 200,000 FY 2005-06 FY01/02) Oakland MacArthur Blvd. Bicycle Lane Design (Project $ 55,000 FY 2005-06 Completed FY01/02) Oakland Grand Avenue Transit and Pedestrian Improvements $ 245,847 FY 2005-06 (Project from FY 04/05) Oakland ADA Compliant Wheelchair Accessible Ramps $ 121,144 FY 2005-06 Program FY 2005-06 Oakland Market Street Bikeway $ 165,000 FY 2005-06 Oakland Bancroft Bikeway Gap Closures $ 25,000 Piedmont ADA Wheelchair Accessible Ramps and Pedestrian $ 8,353 enhancements at Rose/Arroyo & Grand Ave FY 2005-06 FY 2005-06 Hayward ADA Wheelchair Accessible Ramps $ 109,309

TCM B 5 of 8 TCM B: Bicycle/Pedestrian Program TDA ARTICLE 3 [Transportation Development Act Funds for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects]

SPONSOR PROJECT NAME AMOUNT San Leandro Pedestrian Accessibility Improvements & Sidewalk Gap $ 74,177 FY 2005-06 Closures Fremont Citywide ADA Compliant Wheelchair Accessible $ 158,067 FY 2005-06 Ramps Newark History Center Complex Sidewalks and ADA $ 33,072 FY 2005-06 Wheelchair Accessible Ramps Union City San Francisco Bay Trail Specific Plan (Project $ 63,585 FY 2005-06 Completed FY01/02) FY 2005-06 Dublin Bicycle Master Plan $ 45,144 FY 2005-06 Livermore Chestnut and N. P Street Bicycle Lanes $ 113,044 Alameda Co. Congestion Management Alameda Countywide Bicycle Master Plan $ 20,000 FY 2005-06 Agency County of Alameda Pedestrian Safety Improvements in the vicinity of $ 75,775 FY 2005-06 Schools County of Alameda Pedestrian Safety Improvement Projects - Sidewalk $ 75,600 FY 2005-06 Improvements County of Alameda Restriping Bicycle Lanes Along Various Roadways $ 30,000 FY 2005-06 Benicia Stripe and sign bike lanes: Military East between East $ 25,000 FY 2005-06 5th Street and Park Road Fairfield Design McGary Road segment of Solano Bikeway $ 100,000 FY 2005-06 Extension and complete extension feasibility study Suisun City Construct curb ramps and sidewalks at Whispering Bay $ 5,400 FY 2005-06 Lane and Francisco Dr. Suisun City Replace existing non-compliant curb ramps in $ 11,856 FY 2005-06 downtown Suisun City with ADA compliant ramps Solano County Reconstruct deck and railings, seismic retrofit, lighting $ 180,000 and pathways to railroad trestle bridge over Putah FY 2005-06 Creek Campbell Implement bike lanes on Harriet Ave and Union Ave, $ 27,859 Replace Los Gatos creek bridge, and widen Campbell FY 2005-06 Ave bridge Campbell Design and construct sidewalk and bike lanes and edge $ 39,992 striping, curb and gutter along Westmont Avenue FY 2005-06 Campbell Widen Campbell Ave. bridge over Los Gatos Creek for $ 240,000 bike lane and sidewalk; and reconstruct sidewalk under FY 2005-06 SR 17 Cupertino Construct pedestrian and bicycle bridge across $ 38,361 Interstate 280 along Mary Avenue between Homestead FY 2005-06 Rd and Meteor Dr Los Altos Hills Replace pedestrian bridge adjacent to the Foothill $ 11,310 College entrance road connecting to El Monte Road FY 2005-06 Los Gatos Replace existing College Avenue sidewalk and fencing; $ 20,000 and repair Los Gatos Creek Trail footbridge decking FY 2005-06 Milpitas Install ADA pedestrian ramps with truncated dome $ 47,112 FY 2005-06 landings along suggested routes to schools Morgan Hill Identify where additional bicycle and pedestrian trails $ 32,000 can be established adjacent to creeks and streams FY 2005-06 Mountain View Bicycle boulevard from Mayfield Mall area to Stevens $ 25,000 Creek Trail, including signs, markings and signal FY 2005-06 modifications

TCM B 6 of 8 TCM B: Bicycle/Pedestrian Program TDA ARTICLE 3 [Transportation Development Act Funds for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects]

SPONSOR PROJECT NAME AMOUNT Mountain View ADA Compliant Wheelchair Accessible Ramps $ 17,000 FY 2005-06 Program Mountain View Produce bicycle and pedestrian education and $ 5,000 awareness materials, and a new bike map and FY 2005-06 multilingual flyers Mountain View Install "bikes wrong way" signs on existing poles along $ 5,217 FY 2005-06 California Street and adjacent streets Palo Alto Bicycle boulevard along Maybell Ave and Donald Dr.: $ 75,000 signs, markings, speed tables, & median refuge islands FY 2005-06 San Jose Install sidewalk, curb and gutter to improve access to $ 90,000 FY 2005-06 Lynhaven Elementary School San Jose Install sidewalk, curb and gutter to fill gap on Borina $ 70,000 FY 2005-06 Ave. at Saratoga Ave. San Jose Install sidewalk, curb and gutter to improve access on $ 47,000 both sides of Yerba Buena Road at Thompson Creek FY 2005-06 San Jose Install sidewalk, curb, gutter and ADA ramps on Carola $ 110,000 FY 2005-06 Avenue at Clarita Avenue San Jose Install sidewalk, curb, gutter, pedestrian crossing and $ 62,000 median island to provide access to Penitencia Creek FY 2005-06 County Park San Jose Install sidewalk, curb and gutter on Senter Road at $ 58,000 FY 2005-06 Burke Street San Jose Install sidewalk, curb and gutter to improve access to $ 45,000 FY 2005-06 Toyon Elementary School San Jose Citywide ADA Compliant Wheelchair Accessible $ 100,000 FY 2005-06 Ramps San Jose Sign and stripe bicycle and pedestrian facilities, $ 58,397 including bike lanes, bike routes, crosswalks, and bike FY 2005-06 paths San Jose Provide bicycle and pedestrian safety education to $ 35,000 elementary school children and adults, purchase FY 2005-06 educational material Santa Clara Install and maintain bicycle and pedestrian facilities, $ 78,180 including bike lanes, bike routes, crosswalks, and bike FY 2005-06 paths Saratoga Acquire right-of-way to upgrade UPRR railroad crossing $ 95,000 in a bulb configuration to allow bicycles to cross at 90 FY 2005-06 degrees Sunnyvale Improve Calabazas Creek Trail with additional gates, $ 182,048 signs, fences, ramp modifications, and a bridge across FY 2005-06 creek County of Santa Clara Restripe four co. expressways' shoulders with 8 inch $ 50,000 stripes and sign to allow functioning as bicycle shoulder FY 2005-06 Brentwood Crosswalk and sidewalk improvements on Minnesota $ 31,000 Avenue between Deer Creek and Sand Creek FY 2005-06 Union City Construct 1750 feet by 15 feet textured decorative $ 53,142 concrete sidewalks plus 5 foot bike lanes on both sides FY 2005-06 of 11th Street TAM Update and complete bicycle and pedestrian master $ 160,000 plans countywide and for cities and towns in Marin FY 2005-06 County

TCM B 7 of 8 TCM B: Bicycle/Pedestrian Program TDA ARTICLE 3 [Transportation Development Act Funds for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects]

SPONSOR PROJECT NAME AMOUNT Campbell Construct bike lanes on Harriet Avenue north of $ 24,308 Westmont Avenue and on Union Avenue south of FY 2005-06 Campbell Avenue Larkspur Design + construct 13 ft wide Class I bike/pedestrian $ 136,668 path and modify signals on Magnolia Ave. + Doherty Dr FY 2005-06 County of San Mateo Develop bike route data for GIS, integrate into $ 40,000 countywide GIS files, and maintain bike route GIS data FY 2005-06 City of Napa Class I path along Napa Valley Wine Train right of way $ 85,271 between Redwood Rd/SR 29 and Vallejo St/Soscol Av FY 2005-06 American Canyon Construct bike lanes and Class I trail adjacent to $ 34,729 FY 2005-06 Commerce Boulevard Total $ 21,785,915

TCM B 8 of 8 TCM C: Transportation for Livable Communities

FY 2004-05 MTC TLC Planning Program Project Sponsor Project Title TLC Grant Alameda County Revitalizing Foothill / Seminary: A Model for Oakland's City of Oakland Regional Transit Streets $ 75,000 City of Berkeley Downtown Berkeley BART Plaza and Transit Area $ 75,000 Contra Costa County

City of Lafayette BART-Downtown Lafayette Pedestrian Linkages Project $ 20,000 San Francisco County San Jose/Guerrero Coalition to Save Our Streets The San Jose/Guerrero Neighborhood Plan $ 75,000 San Mateo County Redwood City Transit Station Sub-area Precise Plan $ 71,760 Transforming the El Camino Real to Link Caltrain Stations with Vibrant Downtowns in Redwood City, San Carlos and SamTrans Belmont $ 63,840 Santa Clara County City of Sunnyvale Murphy Avenue Streetscape Revitalization $ 75,000 Sonoma County City of Santa Rosa Downtown Pedestrian Linkages Study $ 44,400 Total $ 500,000

FY 2004-05 MTC TLC Capital Program Project Sponsor Project Title TLC Grant City of Oakland, CEDA Revive Chinatown – Phase 1 $ 2,200,000 City of Union City Union City Intermodal Station –Pedestrian connections and $ 1,124,000 Public Works Dept. New East Plaza Richmond Redevelopment Agency Richmond Transit Village: Intermodal Transit Station $ 1,581,000 County of Marin Cal-Park Hill Tunnel Rehab and Class I Bikeway $ 1,500,000 City of Gilroy Monterey Streetscape Improvements – Fourth Street to $ 2,500,000 Sixth Street City of Morgan Hill Morgan Hill – Depot Street Capital Improvements $ 2,627,000 Bay Area Rapid Transit District Daly City BART- St. Charles Pedestrian & Bike Project $ 501,000 City & Co. of San Francisco Broadway Streetscape Improvements Project – Phase II $ 2,000,000 Dept. of Public Works City of South San Francisco BART Linear Park-Huntington Avenue to Orange Avenue $ 1,933,000

City of Vallejo Vallejo Station Pedestrian Links $ 2,071,000 City of Petaluma/Eden Housing Inc. Downtown River Apts Riverwalk and Streetscape $ 358,000 Improvements Total $ 18,394,000

Contingency Projects City of Union City Union City Intermodal Station – West Plaza Enhancements $ 1,713,500 Public Works Dept. City of Oakland, CEDA MacArthur Transit Hub Streetscape Improvement Project $ 1,918,000

Town of Los Gatos Streetscape & Gateway $ 2,400,000 Parks & Public Works Dept. City of San Leandro East 14th Street South Area Revitalization Project – La $ 1,600,000 Community Dev. Dept. Palma District County of Contra Costa Redevelopment North Richmond Third Street Upgrades $ 1,966,000 Agency

TCM C 1 of 2 TCM C: Transportation for Livable Communities

FY 2005-06 Marin County TLC Capital Program Project Sponsor Project Title TLC Grant Town of Fairfax Center Boulevard Streetscape Redesign Project $ 500,000 County of Marin Fireside Pedestrian and Traffic Safety Project $ 198,906 Town of Corte Madera Bayside Trail Improvement Project $ 371,826 Total $ 1,070,732

FY 2005-06 Alameda County TLC Capital Program Project Sponsor Project Title TLC Grant City of Oakland Coliseum BART Streetscape $ 500,000 City of Oakland Oakland Coliseum Pedestrian Walkway $ 885,000 City of Oakland W. Oakland Transit Village Streetscape Project $ 1,300,000 City of Oakland MacArthur Entry Plaza & 40th Streetscape Project $ 1,147,000 City of Berkeley Ashby/Ed Roberts Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements $ 1,200,000 City of Union City Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvements $ 2,000,000 Total $ 7,032,000

FY 2005-06 Sonoma County TLC Capital Program Project Sponsor Project Title TLC Grant City of Petaluma Petaluma Blvd. Pedestrian Enhancements $ 485,000 City of Rohnert Park Rohnert Park City Center Drive Improvements $ 1,150,000 Town of Windsor Windsor Pedestrian Enhancements & Traffic Calming $ 235,000 Sonoma County Reg'l Parks Sonoma County Santa Rosa Creek Trail $ 550,000 Town of Windsor Windsor Old Redwood Hwy Pedestrian Linkages $ 338,000

Sonoma County Reg'l Parks Sonoma County Bodega Bay Bicycle & Pedestrian Trail $ 535,000 Santa Rosa Courthouse Square Off-Site Improvements & City of Santa Rosa Gateway Street $ 1,000,000 Total $ 4,293,000

Grand Total $ 31,289,732

TCM C 2 of 2 TCM D: Additional Freeway Service Patrol

The Bay Area FSP is a joint project of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission Service Authority for Freeways and Expressways (MTC SAFE), the California Highway Patrol (CHP) and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The service is provided by private tow truck companies, selected through a competitive bid process, under contract to MTC SAFE. During the hours of operation, the vehicles and drivers are exclusively dedicated to patrolling their freeway beat. The program is intended to augment the MTC SAFE network of motorist-aid call boxes in the nine Bay Area counties.

Current Profile (as of February 2009) A fleet of 83 trucks patrols some 550 miles of the Bay Area's freeways. Patrol routes are selected based on several factors, including a high rate of traffic and congestion, frequent accidents or stalls, and lack of shoulder space for disabled vehicles.

The FSP tow trucks operate primarily during morning and afternoon commute hours, generally from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. or 10 a.m. and from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m. or 7 p.m., Monday through Friday. Weekend service is provided in Napa, as well as seasonally along Highway 17, and in some other locations on Sunday.

FSP tow trucks are equipped for nearly any contingency. In addition to the standard auto repair and towing equipment, they carry 5 gallons of diesel fuel, 5 gallons of unleaded gasoline, and 5 gallons of water, as well as an external speaker and public address system.

Funding The tow trucks are financed with federal, state and local moneys. Local funds come from the MTC SAFE, which is financed by a $1 annual vehicle registration fee in participating counties. The service costs approximately $7 million a year to operate. Another $2 million is invested in sophisticated communications equipment, including an automatic vehicle location system that enables CHP and Caltrans to monitor the location of the trucks and improve dispatching efficiency.

Implementation Plan See the attached Implementation Plan, which is also available at: http://www.fsp-bayarea.org/implementation_plan/Iplan.pdf BAY AREA FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL PROGRAM Revised 06/01/07 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CALTRANS BEAT LOCATION BEAT ONE WAY START ENDING WEEKDAYS SUNDAY # OF # OF # OF # OF NOTES TOTAL BEAT ID CONTRACTOR COUNTY ROUTE LIMITS LENGTH DATE DATE AM MIDDAY PM PM TOW PICKUP FLATBED BACKUP CONTRACT ID (IN MILES) SHIFT SHIFT SHIFT SHIFT TRUCKS TRUCKS TRUCKS TRUCK HOURS

1 Redhill Towing ALA 980 Interstate 580 to Interstate 880 2.03 07/01/07 07/26/09 6:00-10:00 15:00-18:30 13:00-19:00 2 1 b 12,395 1 ALA 880 7th Street to Jackson Street 2.04 ALA 24 Interstate 580 to Contra Costa County Line 4.39 CC 24 Contra Costa County Line to Oak Hill Road 6.25 CC/ALA 13 State Route 24 to Redwood Avenue (4.23) e 2 A-One Towing Service ALA 80 Powell Street to Contra Costa County Line 4.25 07/01/07 07/26/09 6:00-10:00 10:00-15:00 15:00-19:00 13:00 - 19:00 2 1 1 a, b, c 15,755 2 CC 80 Alameda County Line to San Pablo Dam Road 4.34 ALA/CC 580 Interstate 80 to Western Drive/Pt. Molate 6.01 3 Palace Garage ALA 880 Alvarado-Niles Road to State Route 238 7.66 06/25/07 06/26/11 06:00-10:00 15:00-19:00 13:00-19:00 2 b,c 17,132 3 ALA 92 Interstate 880 to Clawiter Road 1.91 4 Palace Garage ALA 880 Broadway to State Route 238 10.55 07/01/07 07/26/09 6:00-10:00 15:00-19:00 13:00-19:00 2 1 b 13,170 4 ALA 238 Interstate 880 to Interstate 580 2.11 5 K&S Tow CC 680 Stone Valley Road to Marina Vista Road 13.89 07/02/07 07/04/11 06:00-09:00 14:00-18:30 2 1 1 b 22,523 5 CC 24 Oak Hill Road U/C to Interstate 680 2.87 6 B&A Body Works & Towing SM 101 State Route 92 to SF City Limit/101 to Foster City Boulevard 14.23 07/01/07 07/05/09 6:00-10:00 10:00-15:00 15:00-19:00 22 1 a, b 18,754 6 SM 92 Interstate 101 to Foster City Boulevard 1.47 7 Redhill Towing MRN 101 Alexander to 3rd Street/Irwin Street (Central San Rafael Exit) 10.28 07/03/05 07/06/08 6:00-10:00 15:00-19:00 13:00 - 19:00 2 1 b, c 13,090 7 MRN 580 Highway 101 to Interstate 580 San Quetin 1.60 8 Campbell's Towing SCL 101 Blossom Hill Road to Ellis Street 18.40 07/01/07 07/05/09 6:00-10:00 15:00-19:00 13:00 - 19:00 2 2 1 b, c 16,808 8 SCL 237 Highway 101 to Lawrence Expressway 2.12 9 Campbell's Towing SCL 280 Interstate 680/Highway 101 to Foothill Exp. 11.45 06/11/07 06/10/11 6:00-10:00 15:00-19:00 3 1 1 b 32,032 9 SCL 85 Junction Route 280 to El Camino Real 3.3 SCL 87 State Route 85 to Hwy. 101 9.22 10 Sunrise Enterprise 87 SCL-SM 101 Ellis Street to State Route 92 17.44 06/11/07 06/10/11 6:00-10:00 15:00-19:00 2 1 a, b 24,024 10 SCL 92 Junction Route 101 to El Camino Real 0.93 11 B&A Body Works & Towing SF 101 Cesar Chavez to San Mateo Co. Line 2.92 06/11/07 06/12/11 6:00-10:00 10:00-15:00 15:00-19:00 10:00-16:00 2 a, b,c 22,473 11 SF 280 San Mateo Co. Line to Highway 101 4.34 SM 101 Harney Way to San Francisco Co. Line 0.41 SM 280 Geneva/Ocean Avenue to San Francisco Co. Line 1.77 (Bridge Tow Coverage) SF 280 Highway 101/Interstate 280 Interchange to Sixth Street (3.2) e (Bridge Tow Coverage) SF 80 Cesar Chavez to Interstate 80/Fourth Street (1.5) e 12 Ken Betts Towing CC 80 San Pablo Dam Road to Cummings Skyway 8.39 07/09/07 07/10/11 6:00-10:00 10:00-15:00 15:00-19:00 13:00-19:00 2 a, b, c 22,473 12 13 Bill's Towing MRN 101 Interstate 580 to Junction Route 37 9.13 06/25/07 06/26/11 6:00-10:00 14:30-18:30 13:30-18:30 2 b, c 17,282 13 14 All Ways Tow & Transport ALA 880 Mowry Avenue to Alvarado Niles Road 5.84 07/01/07 07/24/09 6:00-10:00 15:00-19:00 2 b 8,272 14 ALA 84 Thornton Avenue to Interstate 880 2.26 15 Yarbrough Bros. Towing SON 101 Wilfred Avenue to River Road 10.8 07/02/07 07/01/11 6:30-9:30 15:30-18:30 1 6,006 15 See separate beat 16 Lima Tow SCL 17 Junction Route 9 to Summit Road 7.07 07/09/07 07/10/11 6:30-9:30 15:30-18:30 16/SC schedule 1 b, c, f 7,974 16 8:00-16:30 Sat. & 2.95 07/23/07 07/24/11 6:00-10:00 15:00 -19:00 1 wkdy, 2 wknd 1 wkdy 15,573 17 Sierra Hart SOL 12 Interstate 80 to Napa Co. Line Sun. 17 NAP 12 Napa Co. Line to Sonoma Co. Line 11.60 NAP 29 State Route 37 to Oakville Cross Road 24.0 SON 12 Sonoma Co. Line to Junction 116 4.90 NAP 29 Oakville Cross Road to State Route 128 (1.8) e 18 All Ways Tow & Transport SCL 880 Junction Route 237 to Alameda County Line 2.08 07/01/07 07/10/09 6:00-10:00 15:00-19:00 2 b 8,112 18 ALA 880 SCL County Line to Mowry Avenue 7.18 19 Lima Tow SCL 880 Junction Route 237 to Junction Route 17 8.42 07/01/07 07/10/09 6:00-9:00 15:00-19:00 2 1 b 10,647 19 SCL 17 Junction Interstate 880 to Junction Route 9 6.88 SCL 237 Junction Interstate 880 to Lawrence Expressway 4.70 20 Nelson's Tow SM 280 Geneva/Ocean Avenue to Interstate 380 8.18 07/01/07 07/10/09 6:30-9:30 15:00-18:00 2 b 6,084 20 SM 380 Interstate 280 to Highway 101 1.67 21 Matos Towing & Transport ALA 680 Scott Creek to Alcosta Boulevard 21.35 07/01/07 07/10/09 5:30-9:30 15:00-19:00 1 1 1 1 b 12,168 21 22 Palace Garage ALA 580 Vasco Road to Santa Rita 8.25 07/23/07 07/24/11 5:30-9:30 15:30-19:00 13:00-19:00 2 1 b, c, d 25,685 22 ALA 580 Grant Line Road to Vasco Road 8.23 23 Campbell's Towing SCL/ALA 680 Highway 101 to Scott Creek Road 10.17 07/01/07 07/10/09 5:30-9:30 15:00-19:00 2 b 8,112 23 24 Roadrunner Tow SOL 680 Interstate 80 to Junction 780 14.30 07/23/07 07/22/11 6:00-9:00 15:30-18:30 1 g 6,036 24 SOL 780 Junction 680 to Junction 80 6.42 25 B&D Towing CC 4 Hillcrest Avenue to Pacheco Blvd. 20.39 07/01/07 07/17/09 5:30-9:30 15:30-19:00 2 1 b 11,520 25 CC 242 State Route 4 to Interstate 680 3.4 26 A-One Tow Service ALA 580 Harrison Street/Oakland Avenue to Junction Route 238 13.47 07/01/07 07/17/09 6:30-9:30 15:30-18:30 1 1 b 6,144 26 ALA 13 Redwood Avenue to Interstate 580 (0.0) e 27 Palace Garage ALA 580 Santa Rita Road to Junction 238 12.86 06/25/07 06/26/11 6:00-9:30 15:30-18:30 13:00-19:00 2 1 b,c 21,020 27 28 Bill's Towing MRN/SON 101 State Route 37 to East Washington Boulevard 13.1 07/01/07 07/17/09 5:30-9:30 15:30-18:30 1 b 3,584 28 29 Roadrunner Tow SOL 80 Magazine Street to Abernathy Road 14.04 07/09/07 07/10/11 6:00-9:00 15:30-18:30 13:00-19:00 2 b, c, h 15,020 29 0 30 Nelson's Tow SM 92 State Route 1 to Highway 280 8.03 07/23/07 07/22/11 6:00-9:30 15:30-18:30 2 b 13,013 30 SM 280 Interstate 380 to State Route 92 10.20 SM 92 Interstate 280 to Highway 101 4.83 31 Campbell's Towing SCL 101 Blossom Hill Road to East Dunne Avenue 12.6 07/01/07 07/19/09 6:00-9:00 16:00-19:00 13:00 - 19:00 2 b, c 6,900 31 32 Dick's Automotive Transport SCL 85 Interstate 280 to Cottle Road 16.48 07/01/07 07/17/09 6:00-9:00 16:00-19:00 2 b 6,144 32 33 Yarbrough Bros. Towing SON 101 East Washington Boulevard to Wilfred Avenue 10.26 07/24/05 07/20/08 6:00-9:00 15:30-18:30 1 b 4,482 33 34 Vacaville Tow SOL 80 Abernathy Road to I-505 Vaca Valley Road 12.54 07/09/07 07/10/11 6:00-9:00 15:30-18:30 13:00-19:00 2 b, c, h 15,020 34 35 Palace Garage CC 680 Alcosta Boulevard to Stone Valley Road 10.36 07/09/07 07/08/11 6:00-9:00 15:00-18:30 1 b 6,507 35 36 Ken Betts Towing CC 4 Interstate 80 to Pacheco Blvd. 11.8 07/23/07 07/22/11 6:00-9:30 15:30-19:00 1 7,007 36 37 Vacaville Tow SOL 80 Junction I-505 to Richards Blvd. 16.4 07/23/07 07/24/11 6:00-9:00 15:30-18:30 13:00-19:00 2 b, c, h 15,032 37 539.67 65 wkdy, 66 wknd 15 2 8 wkdy, 7 wknd 493,973 TCM E: Transit Access to Airports

BART to San Francisco International Airport: S. San Francisco: From Colma BART station to the new SFO station; Extend BART system to the San Francisco International Airport.

BART Fares and Schedules The latest BART fares and schedules (as of January 2008) can be found at: http://www.bart.gov/guide/brochures.aspx

Service Adjustments See attached document for service adjustments overtime since June 2003 through December 2006. SFO Service Changes Over Time

Below is a list and description of service changes that have been implemented since the San Francisco Extension opening on June 22, 2003 through December 31, 2006. Some of these changes are major system changes. Other changes are more minor involving train sizing.

June 22, 2003 - SFO Initial Service Bay Point trains provide service to Millbrae during all hours of operation, all week. Dublin trains provide service to the San Francisco Airport (SFO) during all hours of operation, all week. These routes operate on 15 minute headways during the weekday, and on 20 minute headways during evenings and on weekends. A shuttle train provides service between Millbrae and SFO on 20 minute headways during all hours of operation, all week. In addition to the base 15 minute service, three AM peak period rush trains provide service from Bay Point to Daly City, then operate express from Daly City to SFO. These three trains return during the evening peak period and operate express from SFO to Daly City, then on to Bay Point.

1. Direct service to/from Millbrae and direct service to/from SFO 2. Peak rush trains provide Bay Point line passengers direct service to/from SFO during the peak periods 3. 20 minute shuttle does not synch with the 15 minute base service during the day

February 9, 2004 Bay Point trains provide direct service to SFO, then continue to Millbrae. On the return trip these trains follow the same route back to Bay Point. This service route has been called the "Reverse L" service because the shape of the service on the SFO extension resembles a backward or reverse "L" shape. During the 3-1/2 hour AM and PM peak period on weekdays, Richmond trains provide direct service to Millbrae, then continue to SFO. On the return trip these trains follow the same route back to Richmond. This service route is referred to as the "L" service. The Richmond trains do not operate on the weekend. When the Richmond trains are operating on the extension during the week the Bay Point trains terminate at SFO and do not continue to Millbrae. At all other times (off-peak, evenings and weekends) the Bay Point trains complete the "Reverse L" service pattern. There are no other direct peak period rush trains. Service during the day (and during the peak rush) is 15 minutes, while evenings and weekends operate at 20 minute headways.

1. Provides for direct service on all extension routes to Millbrae and SFO, no need to transfer 2. 20 minute shuttle (during normal 15 minute service) replaced by 15 minute direct trains 3. During off-peak, evenings and weekends, direct service to Millbrae is through the SFO station

March 8, 2004 Train sizing adjustments: Train 361 increased from 4 to 5-car train off-peak. Train 441 changed to 10-car peak size for all PM trips instead of breaking to 5-car train on last trip. Other minor adjustments were made to the 200s and 500s.

September 13, 2004 Bay Point trains provide direct service to SFO, then continue to Millbrae. This service provides "Reverse L" service and operates during all hours of operation, all week. During the 3 hour AM and PM peak period on weekdays, Richmond trains provide direct service to SFO, then continue to Millbrae in a "Reverse L" service configuration. During the 3 hour AM and PM peak period (weekdays only) the Richmond and Bay Point trains both provide service directly to and from Millbrae/SFO. The Richmond trains do not operate on the weekend. Service during the day on each route (and during the peak rush) is 15 minutes, while evenings and weekends operate at 20-minute headways.

1. Provides for direct service on all extension routes to Millbrae and SFO, no need to transfer

2. During all hours, direct service to Millbrae is through the SFO station (but is effectively every 7.5 minutes during the 3 hour AM and PM peak periods)

December 13, 2004 Train sizing adjustments were made to better match capacity with demand, generally to shorter trains.

April 23, 2005 Train sizing adjustments: The 300 series trains on Saturday were increased from 8 to 9-car trains.

June 13, 2005 Train lengths were generally shortened to an 8-car plan in two phases, in June and August, 2005, with peak size trains running all day on the Bay Point line.

August 15, 2005 Second phase of implementing the “8-car” plan.

September 12, 2005 Dublin trains provide direct service to SFO, then continue to Millbrae in a “Reverse L” service configuration. Only the Dublin trains will provide service to the extension on weekdays and weekends. Richmond and Bay Point trains will truncate at Daly City. Service during the day (and during the peak rush) is 15 minutes, while evenings and weekends operate at 20-minute headways. Although direct service from Bay Point has been replaced with this new service, the transfer time from a Bay Point base train to SFO train (from Dublin) is only 3-4 minutes in each direction.

September 22, 2005 Extend service from Richmond and lengthen trains. Up to six consists will be lengthened from 4 to 8-car trains. Richmond trains to Daly City will be extended to Colma for two hours in the morning and two hours in the evening.

October 10, 2005 The following adjustments were made:

Weekday 100s - three trains lengthened 200s - one train lengthened, Make/Break timing changed 300s - several trains lengthened with a few trains reduced in size 400s - one train lengthened 500s - No change since September 22, 2005 (Make/Break timing)

Saturday 300s - some trains lengthened

Sunday 300s - some trains lengthened

December 5, 2005 The following adjustments were made:

Weekday 100s – 115 becomes the last AM Break train 300s – Train 323 and 363 increased from 8-car to 9-car trains

Saturday 200s – All trains are now 6-car trains during the day

January 30/31, 2006e The following adjustments were made:

Weekday 100 Series Trains (net +1) Train 101 +1 (9 to 10 cars) peak increase Train 115 off peak increase 4 to 5 cars

200 Series Trains (net 0) No change

300 Series Trains (net –2) Train 365 off peak decrease only on dispatches of 20:58, 22:19, and 23:38 Train 367 +1 (9 to 10 cars) off peak decrease only on dispatches of 21:18, 22:39, and 24:00 Train 371 –1 (10 to 9 cars) Train 377 –1 (10 to 9 cars) Train 381 –1 (10 to 9 cars) Train 331 -2 (10 to 8 cars) Train 335 +2 (8 to 10 cars)

400 Series Trains (net +2) Train 443 –1 (9 to 8 cars) for AM peak period only Train 445 +1 (8 to 9 cars) Train 453 –1 (9 to 8 cars) for PM peak period only Train 455 +2 (8 to 10 cars) and off peak increase 4 to 5 cars

500 Series Trains (net +10) Train 501 +1 (8 to 9 cars) peak increase and off peak increase 4 to 5 cars Train 503 +1 (8 to 9 cars) peak increase and off peak increase 4 to 5 cars Train 505 +1 (8 to 9 cars) peak increase Train 507 +1 (8 to 9 cars) peak increase Train 509 +1 (8 to 9 cars) peak increase Train 511 +1 (8 to 9 cars) peak increase Train 513 +1 (8 to 9 cars) peak increase and off peak decrease 8 to 5 cars Train 519 +1 (8 to 9 cars) peak increase Train 521 +1 (8 to 9 cars) peak increase and off peak increase 4 to 5 cars Train 523 +1 (8 to 9 cars) peak increase

Saturday 100s – no change 200s – no change 300s – All 8-car trains are now 9-car trains 400s – no change 500s – Four trains increased from 4 to 5-cars (501, 505, 511, and 515)

Sunday 200s – no change 300s – no change 500s – All trains 9-car midday and some offpeak increased from 4 to 5-cars (503, 505, and 515)

Appendix E Methodology for Bay Area Conformity Determinations Air Resources Board Alan C. Lloyd, Ph.D. Winston H. Hickox Chairman Gray Davis Agency Secretary 1001 I Street • P.O. Box 2815 • Sacramento, California 95812 • www.arb.ca.gov Governor

November 30, 2001

Mr. Wayne Nastri Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105

Dear Mr. Nastri:

The Air Resources Board (ARB/Board) hereby transmits the Bay Area emission factor model (SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000) to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) for approval and use in the 2001 San Francisco Bay Area State Implementation Plan (Bay Area SIP) and subsequent Bay Area conformity determinations.

SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 is tailored specifically to the San Francisco Bay Area. The emission factors contained in SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000, along with updated activity data from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), provide the basis for the mobile source emissions budgets in the 2001 Bay Area SIP. SF Bay Area- EMFAC 2000 will be used for subsequent Bay Area conformity determinations. At a public meeting on November 1, 2001 the ARB Board approved SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 for these purposes following a 30-day public notice. At the time the Bay Area SIP was being developed, this model was the most current emission factor model available. SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 was based on EMFAC2000. The documentation for EMFAC2000 was publicly available beginning in May 2000 and made available for use by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District when it began developing the 2001 Bay Area SIP in November 2000.

The three Bay Area co-lead agencies responsible for developing the Bay Area SIP have committed to do a mid-course review of the Bay Area SIP by December 31, 2003 and revise the 2001 SIP by March 2004. ARB has committed to submit the revised Bay Area SIP to U.S. EPA by April 15, 2004. The mid-course review will use the most current emission factor model available at that time to develop the mobile source emissions budgets. This model will be EMFAC2001 or its successor.

The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Website: http://www.arb.ca.gov. California Environmental Protection Agency

Printed on Recycled Paper This transmittal provides documentation of the emission factors and activity data used in SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 to develop the 2001 Bay Area SIP. In addition, it includes the methodology ARB will be using to conduct Bay Area conformity determinations.

SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 Emission Factor Model Documentation

Comparison between MVEI7F/7G and SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000

The emission factors used in the SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 emission factor model represent a major improvement over emission factors used in older models such as MVEI7F and MVEI7G. SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 exhaust hydrocarbon emission rates are significantly higher than the emission rates included in the older models. The increase in exhaust hydrocarbon rates is mainly a result of the following changes: • More accurately reflecting real-world driving by using the Unified Cycle (UC) driving cycle rather than the Federal Test Procedure (FTP); • Using new speed adjustment factors to better reflect how emissions change as average driving speeds change; • Representing 45 model years, rather than only 35; and • Incorporating new vehicle test data.

Evaporative hydrocarbon emission rates in SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 are also significantly higher than the older models’ emission rates. The most important changes causing the increase in evaporative hydrocarbon emission rates include: • Higher hot soak emission rates, especially for older catalyst-equipped vehicles; • Higher running loss emission rates, based on new data; and • Including emissions for vehicles with liquid fuel leaks.

Emission rates for oxides of nitrogen (NOx) are also significantly higher in SF Bay Area- EMFAC 2000 than in the older models. The increased estimates of NOx emission rates are primarily due to the following changes: • Inclusion of “off-cycle NOx” (i.e., NOx emissions that were not represented in the certification driving cycle); and • Incorporation of new vehicle test data for catalyst equipped passenger cars and light trucks.

Incorporation of Latest Standards

SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 also includes the effects of recently adopted standards on the emissions of the on-road fleet. The future year emission rates in SF Bay Area- EMFAC 2000 reflect the adopted standards described below.

Supplemental Federal Test Procedure Two supplemental test procedures to the FTP were adopted by the Board in July of 1997. These new standards are applicable to passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles weighing 8,500 pounds or less. These standards require the control of excess emission of hydrocarbon and oxides of nitrogen during “off-cycle” operations (high speed and hard acceleration), and excess emissions associated with the use of air conditioning. The new standards are to be phased-in between 2001 and 2005.

Low Emission Vehicles (LEVII) The second phase of Low Emission Vehicle Standards (LEVII) was adopted by the Board in November of 1998. This action imposed more stringent hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide, NOx and exhaust particulate matter emissions standards for passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty vehicles up to 14,000 pounds sold in California beginning in 2003.

Near Zero Evaporative Standards Also in November 1998, the Board adopted new standards for the emissions of evaporative hydrocarbons (diurnal, hot soak and resting loss). The standards were reduced from 2 grams per test (hot soak plus diurnal) for passenger cars, to 0.5 grams per test.

New On-Road Motorcycle Standards In December of 1998, the Board adopted lower exhaust emission standards for on-road motorcycles. These standards, which may require future motorcycles to utilize catalytic converters, are applicable to new motorcycles sold in California beginning in 2004.

Off-Cycle NOx Mitigation In a settlement reached between the federal government, the Air Resources Board and heavy-duty engine manufacturers, several mitigation measures were agreed to regarding off-cycle NOx emissions. In addition to ending the practice of defaulting to an advanced timing condition during extended cruise operation, several manufacturers have agreed to perform “low emission” rebuilds for in-use engines. These rebuilds will lower the emissions of the in-use fleet.

New Exhaust Emissions Standards for Urban Transit Buses In February of 2000, the Board adopted a regulation that allows transit agencies the choice between either a diesel or alternative fuel “path” to lower emissions. Beginning in 2002, over the course of 10 years, this regulation requires increased introduction of cleaner engine buses in transit agencies’ fleets, use of cleaner diesel fuel, retrofits to reduce exhaust particulate matter (PM) emissions from older diesel buses, and use of zero-emission buses (ZEBs).

Public Review

The emission factors used in SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 were developed in a 3-year process and were subject to public review and comment during three workshops held in 1998, 1999, and 2000. Throughout the comment period, ARB received a number of written and verbal comments, which were addressed in the development of the emission factor model.

Further detail regarding the development of the SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 emission factor model may be found in the attached Technical Support Documentation. The Technical Support Documentation refers to broader work on the statewide EMFAC2000 emission factor model, but also applies to the region specific SF Bay Area-EMFAC2000.

Activity Data Documentation

The Bay Area vehicle miles traveled (VMT), VMT growth rates, and VMT-speed distributions incorporated into SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 represent the best current activity data estimates available. The derivation of these estimates are explained below.

Vehicle Miles of Travel

Bay Area VMT estimates for calendar year 2000 are based on the ARB VMT estimation methodology using mileage accrual rates derived from Smog Check odometer data and Department of Motor Vehicle vehicle populations (see Section 7 of the attached Technical Support Documentation for further detail on the ARB VMT estimation methodology).

The decision to use ARB's VMT estimate instead of the VMT estimate from MTC's BAYCAST-90 travel demand model for calendar year 2000 was made in an agreement between MTC and ARB. As Table 1 illustrates, MTC's 2000 VMT estimate for the region is about 22 percent lower than both ARB and Caltrans' estimates. The ARB and Caltrans1 methods for estimating VMT were developed independently of each other, yet fall within 1 percent of each other. Additional justification for using the ARB VMT estimation methodology is found in the estimate of the number of miles driven by each vehicle per day (i.e., the mileage accrual

1 Caltrans' VMT estimate was taken from the annual “Motor Vehicle Stock, Travel, and Fuel Forecast” (MVSTAFF) report. The MVSTAFF report forecasts statewide VMT based on statewide vehicle population data from the DMV, fuel consumption estimates from the Board of Equalization, and fuel economy estimates derived from the national fuel economy standards. Statewide VMT estimates are then disaggregated to the county level using county auto registration and road system mileage ratios. rate). Table 2 compares mileage accrual rates from various data sources. MTC’s estimates appear too low to be consistent with odometer readings collected in the Smog Check program. MTC's mileage accrual estimates are 11 percent lower than both Caltrans' ARB's estimates for the Bay Area.

For the purposes of the 2001 Bay Area SIP, MTC agreed to use ARB's 2000 VMT estimate. It was also agreed that the difference in VMT between ARB's and MTC's calendar year 2000 VMT estimates would be used as a "correction" for all future analysis years.

Table 1 Bay Area Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) Year 2000

180,000,000 162,778,600 159,642,000 160,000,000

140,000,000 124,687,465 120,000,000

100,000,000

80,000,000 Total VMT

60,000,000

40,000,000

20,000,000

-

Caltrans MVSTAFF (2000) 2001 Bay Area SIP

Data Source MTC (4/01 data) Table 2 Mileage Accrual Rate Year 2000

33.00

32.11 32.14 32.00

31.00

30.00

29.00 VMT/Veh-day 28.46

28.00

27.00

26.00 Caltrans MVSTAFF (2000) 2001 Bay Area SIP MTC (2/01 data) Data Source

VMT Growth Rates

In the agreement between ARB and MTC, ARB agreed to use MTC's VMT growth rate as implied by the VMT estimates produced by BAYCAST-90. The rationale for this is that while ARB questions the level of travel in calendar year (CY) 2000 as estimated by MTC's travel demand model, ARB is not questioning future year growth projections included in the travel demand model.

VMT-Speed Distributions

The final pieces of activity data provided by MTC and incorporated into SF Bay Area- EMFAC 2000 are the VMT-speed distributions for two calendar years (2000 and 2005). Based on consultation between MTC and ARB staff, ARB incorporated the VMT-speed distributions into SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 by applying CY2000 speed distributions to CYs 2000-2003, and CY2005 speed distributions to CYs 2004+. Methodology for Bay Area Conformity Determinations

For all Bay Area conformity determinations based on the mobile source emissions budgets set in the Bay Area SIP (using SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000), the following step- wise methodology will be followed:

1. MTC will submit to ARB updated VMT-speed distributions and updated VMT estimates by county for all relevant analysis years. ARB will follow the procedures below for analysis years for which MTC does not submit new activity data (i.e. for which activity data does not change from MTC’s original SIP submittal): • ARB will use the speed distributions submitted by MTC for the most recent calendar year prior to the analysis year of interest. For example, if MTC submits new VMT-speed distributions for 2005 and 2010, but not for the 2006 analysis year, the 2006 analysis year will use the speed distributions submitted for 2005. VMT-speed distributions will not be interpolated. • The VMT estimate for each county will be interpolated using county-specific compounded growth rates.2 The interpolated VMT will then be used for the following steps.

2. ARB will calculate VMT for the portions of Sonoma and Solano Counties that fall in the San Francisco (S.F.) Air Basin. This is necessary since the SIP budgets are based on the S.F. Air Basin (which covers only the southern portions of Solano and Sonoma Counties), while the MTC VMT estimates include the full nine Bay Area counties. The county portions will be calculated by multiplying the full county VMT submitted by MTC by the VMT ratio (partial county/county) derived from SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000.3 In year 2000, about 71 percent of Solano County, and 77 percent of Sonoma County VMT occurred in the S.F. Basin.

3. ARB will calculate the year 2000 difference in VMT between the VMT estimate included in the SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 runs4 and the VMT estimate submitted by MTC for conformity.5 The resulting differences by county represent the VMT “correction” between ARB and MTC’s VMT estimates.

4. The VMT correction will be added by county to the submitted VMT for all analysis years, resulting in the “target” VMT estimate that will be used for the conformity modeling runs.6

2 For example, 2006 VMT is interpolated from 2005 and 2010 VMT estimates submitted by MTC by the 0.2 following equation: VMT2006 = (VMT2010 / VMT2005) * VMT2005 3 For the S.F. Basin portions of Solano and Sonoma County VMT: S.F. Basin County Portion VMTMTC = [S.F. Basin County Portion VMTSFBayArea-EMFAC2000 / Total County VMT SFBayArea-EMFAC2000] * Total County VMTMTC 4 SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 calculates VMT based on Smog Check odometer readings and DMV vehicle registration data for light duty vehicle classes, and instrumented truck data for the truck classes. 5 VMT correctioncounty a = SIP VMTCY2000 – MTC VMTCY2000 6 Target VMTcounty a = MTC VMTcounty a + VMT correctioncounty a 5. The county-specific target VMT in the conformity modeling runs will be achieved in SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 by modifying the county-specific vehicle populations in SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 using the What-if-Scenario (WIS) option. Since vehicle population and VMT are linearly related in SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000, to obtain the “target” vehicle population, ARB staff will take the ratio between the SIP VMT estimates and the target VMT for each analysis year and apply them to the SIP vehicle population estimates for each respective analysis year.7

6. Once the target vehicle populations have been calculated, ARB staff will run SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 using the WIS option to adjust vehicle populations by county, and incorporate any updated speed distributions.

7. ARB staff will then apply control factors to the model output to adjust for emission reduction measures not included in the SF Bay Area-EMFAC 2000 emission factor model or changed since the model was developed.

8. Finally, ARB staff will compare the results to the SIP budgets for the conformity demonstration.

If you have questions regarding this submittal, you may contact me at (916) 445-4383, or have your staff contact Ms. Cynthia Marvin, Chief of the Air Quality and Transportation Planning Branch, at (916) 322-7236.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael P. Kenny Executive Officer

Enclosures cc: See next page.

7 Target Veh Pop = [((Target VMT – SIP VMT) / SIP VMT) * SIP Veh Pop] + SIP Veh Pop cc: (w/o Enclosures) Mr. Jack Broadbent, Director Air Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105

Ms. Ellen Garvey, Executive Officer Bay Area Air Quality Management District 939 Ellis Street San Francisco, California 94109

Mr. Steve Heminger, Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission 101 Eighth Street Oakland, California 94607

Mr. Eugene Leong, Executive Officer Association of Bay Area Governments 101 Eighth Street Oakland, California 94607

Ms. Cynthia Marvin Air Resources Board

January 2003

Recommended Methods for Use of EMFAC2002 To Develop Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets and Assess Conformity

As the agency charged with estimating motor vehicle emissions for air quality plans, the Air Resources Board (ARB) has improved the EMFAC modeling tool for use in combination with estimates of vehicle population and activity to develop motor vehicle emissions budgets and assess transportation conformity. The most recent version of this tool, EMFAC2002, has been transmitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) for approval for use in State Implementation Plans (SIPs) and conformity assessments. This paper describes the recommended practices for ARB, air districts, metropolitan planning agencies (MPOs) and regional transportation planning agencies (RTPAs) to use vehicle activity in conjunction with EMFAC2002 emission rates to calculate emissions budgets and conduct conformity assessments.

The vehicle activity indicators commonly used to develop emissions inventories are vehicle trips and vehicle miles of travel (VMT) by speed, vehicle class and time of day. Though not a direct measure of travel activity, vehicle population may also be a variable for these purposes, as described below.

Vehicle trips. In California, MPOs and RTPAs use demographic forecasts and travel demand models to develop estimates of current and future daily VMT, daily vehicle trips and average travel speeds for links in the transportation network. ARB separately estimates daily vehicle trips, but defines trips as the number of times a vehicle is started, rather than a number of specific daily destinations. This distinction is important; ARB and U.S. EPA studies find that vehicles are started five to six times per day, while trips associated with destinations as reported through travel surveys and predicted in travel demand models occur three to four times per day. Because start emissions and the duration of time between starts are crucial to emissions estimation, ARB equates vehicle trips with vehicle starts. Though EMFAC2002 permits model users to alter estimates of vehicle trips used to estimate emissions, ARB recommends that the model’s default estimates of vehicle trips (starts), developed from instrumented vehicle studies, be used for air quality planning and conformity purposes.1 Alternatively, for vehicle classes where appropriate local data are made available for review through the interagency consultation process, use of trip factoring or other methods to fully account for vehicle starts may be employed. Such alternative approaches should be discussed in the interagency consulation process.

1 An exception would occur when a user chooses to factor these start-based trips to account for trip reduction programs. EMFAC2002 start-based trips rather than destination-based trips should serve as the baseline for this adjustment. The adjustment would be made through the What-If Scenario (WIS) function of EMFAC2002 as follows, where TRS denotes the trip reduction scenario:

WIS Input TRS Trips = EMFAC Default Trips * (RTPA TRS Trips / RTPA Baseline Trips)

1 Vehicle speeds. Most travel demand models provide output of estimated average speed by time period and link that may be summarized for use in EMFAC2002. For each major vehicle class and up to 24 hourly time periods, total VMT is divided into 13 different speed “bins” (5 mph through 65 mph) and used as input to EMFAC2002. ARB recommends continuation of this current practice to develop emissions budgets and assess conformity. Travel from intrazonal trips should be assigned to the appropriate speed bin based on the speed assigned to that travel in the travel demand model. VMT for each speed bin and time period can be used as input through the WIS function of EMFAC2002. It is also possible to input this data specific to vehicle class if adequate and defensible local data are available.

Vehicle population. Vehicle trips (starts) in EMFAC2002 are estimated as a function of the number of vehicles, or vehicle population, by county. The population of each class of motor vehicle is estimated and forecast from Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) registration data. EMFAC2002 assumes there is a relationship between vehicle population and VMT, carried through mileage accrual rates.2 In the default case, the model assumes vehicle population * mileage accrual = VMT. ARB-preferred practice is to maintain this internal consistency, for reasons explained below.

Vehicle miles of travel. Daily VMT is both an emissions model input usually provided by MPOs/RTPAs and a model output used to estimate exhaust emissions. ARB staff reviews MPO/RTPA estimates of VMT and vehicle speeds, and supports these estimates for use in air quality plans whenever we agree they are reasonable and defensible. Use of the latest estimates of MPO/RTPA VMT and speeds in plan development facilitates the subsequent federal transportation conformity process. This is particularly important for any year for which the plan creates emissions budgets, as conformity rules allow no emissions budget exceedance, regardless of how small. As there may be some variance between default EMFAC2002 VMT and more recent MPO/RTPA estimates to be used for SIP development, we are recommending a procedure to more exactly incorporate into emissions budgets revised VMT estimates for emissions budget analysis years.

Although it is possible to directly input VMT into EMFAC2002 through the model’s WIS function, it is generally not recommended to do this independent of vehicle population because of the desire to properly estimate start and evaporative emissions tied to the size of the vehicle fleet. A change in total forecasted miles of travel implies a change either in the number of vehicles traveling those miles or in mileage accrual rates. For future years, we generally recommend making vehicle population the variable, rather than mileage accrual. Thus, VMT adjustment would usually occur through vehicle population adjustment in the model’s WIS function, according to this formula:

WIS Input Population = EMFAC Default Population * (RTPA VMT / EMFAC Default VMT)

2 Accrual rates are miles traveled per year as a function of vehicle age, derived from the Bureau of Automotive Repair Smog Check database as described in Section 7.1 of the EMFAC2000 Technical Support Document, found via http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/on-road/latest_revisions.htm#pcaccrual.

2 The result of this modification is that emissions estimates more precisely incorporate the daily VMT provided by each MPO/RTPA to calculate exhaust emissions, and vehicle population is adjusted for consistency with this assumption of higher or lower VMT, providing similarly modified start and evaporative emissions.3 Though the emissions impact of using this approach will often be small, we believe the approach is appropriate given the desire to fully reflect the impacts of changes in travel activity on all emissions processes. Use of consistent methods in air quality plans and conformity assessments will both reduce potential conformity problems and preserve the integrity of the SIP and conformity processes.

Alternatively, local data may indicate that changes in VMT are tied more closely to changes in household or business rates of travel than to changes in vehicle ownership. Or, improved travel demand modeling may project auto ownership rates with a high degree of confidence. In such cases it may be appropriate to adjust total mileage accrual rather than vehicle population. It is also possible to derive a modified VMT forecast from adjustments to both variables in EMFAC2002. Planning agencies are encouraged to present alternative approaches for consideration in the interagency consultation process.

Recommendations

1. ARB recommends that the EMFAC2002 default estimates of vehicle trips, based on starts per day, be used for SIP development and conformity purposes. Model defaults for trips may be factored to account for trip reduction scenarios, but should not be replaced with estimates that do not account for all vehicle starts. Alternative approaches, such as the factoring of travel demand model trip outputs for appropriate classes to account for additional starts, may be considered through interagency consultation.

2. We recommend continuation of current practices for input of latest speed distributions for SIPs and conformity assessments. Travel from intrazonal trips should be assigned to the appropriate speed bin based on the speed assigned to that travel in the travel demand model.

3. To fully reflect the impacts of modified VMT forecasts on all emissions processes, in the calculation of SIP emissions budgets, and in the assessment of conformity with those budgets, vehicle population should be adjusted in EMFAC2002 proportional to the estimated VMT change. Local circumstances may alternatively support adjustment of mileage accrual rates, subject to interagency consultation.

3 After adjusting VMT through use of the population variable in the WIS function of EMFAC, a user who desires to match VMT even more exactly (to the mile instead of the tens of miles) can then adjust VMT in the WIS without disturbing the population adjustment. This is unlikely to have a discernible impact on emissions, however.

3 Appendix F SAFE Vehicle Rule Part 1 EMFAC Adjustment Factor Methodology and Correspondence

EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Part One November 20, 2019

Summary

Staff at the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) have estimated the vehicle tailpipe and evaporative emissions impacts from the “Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule Part One: One National Program” adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The SAFE Vehicle Rule Part One impacts some of the underlying assumptions in the EMFAC2014 and EMFAC2017 models. This document provides the off-model adjustment factors that can be used to adjust emissions output from EMFAC model (only EMFAC2014 and EMFAC2017) to account for the impacts of this rule.

What is the SAFE Vehicle Rule Part One?

On September 27, 2019, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) published the “Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule Part One: One National Program.” (84 Fed. Reg. 51,310 (Sept. 27, 2019.) The Part One Rule revokes California’s authority to set its own greenhouse gas emissions standards and set zero- emission vehicle mandates in California. California expects Part Two of these regulations to be adopted later in the Fall of 2019. We will not know the full impacts of these rules until Part Two is released.

How Does the SAFE Vehicle Rule Impact Criteria Emissions?

As CARB has previously stated1, both the GHG emission standards and the ZEV sales standards reduce criteria pollutants. As a result of the loss of the ZEV sales requirements, there may be fewer ZEVs sold and thus additional gasoline-fueled vehicles sold in future years. This would increase criteria pollutant emissions in multiple ways. A ZEV inherently has zero evaporative emissions of hydrocarbons in the form of gasoline vapors, which escape from the tank and fuel lines during operation and while parked. A gasoline-fueled vehicle with evaporative emissions is assumed to take the place of each ZEV that will not be sold. This leads to an overall increase in hydrocarbon emissions. Additionally, tailpipe emissions of NOx, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter also increase as a result of each additional gasoline- fueled vehicle. This increase occurs for several reasons despite the presence of a criteria pollutant “fleet average” standard2 that CARB has in place for hydrocarbons

1 https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/carbs-comments-safe-proposal 2 The Low Emission Vehicle III program requires manufacturers to average emissions from all vehicles in their fleet to meet the standard. In theory, the elimination of some ZEVs (which are counted in such an

California Air Resources Board 1

and NOx. First, the fleet average does not apply to particulate matter and carbon monoxide, meaning each incremental gasoline-fueled vehicle generates additional tailpipe emissions of both pollutants. Second, because the fleet average is based on a single test cycle and does not fully capture all operating conditions, additional tailpipe emissions of all criteria pollutants occur for every incremental gasoline-fueled vehicle. Third and most significantly, both tailpipe and evaporative criteria pollutant emissions substantially increase over time due to deterioration of the emission controls on gasoline-fueled vehicles. ZEVs have no such deterioration. Thus, even with the fleet- average standard offsetting a portion of the tailpipe emissions by starting some gasoline-fueled vehicles at lower emission levels early in their life, this slight difference is overwhelmed by the increase in emissions from deterioration over the life of the vehicle.

More stringent ZEV and GHG standards are critical to reach attainment of air quality standards and meet climate needs. If standards cannot become more stringent, these mandates will be very difficult to meet. ZEV technologies, in particular, are needed in both light-duty and heavy-duty fleets to help commercialize this technology. As a result, the long-term threat to air quality is substantial as cleaner technologies, especially ZEVs, do not penetrate the fleet at the scale necessary and emissions are not reduced as needed.

What is EMFAC?

EMission FACtors (EMFAC) is California’s federally-approved on-road mobile source emission inventory model that reflects California-specific driving and environmental conditions, fleet mix, and most importantly the impact of California’s unique mobile source regulations such as the Low-Emission Vehicle (LEV) program including the LEV II and LEV III standards, California inspection and maintenance programs, and its in-use diesel fleet rules. The EMFAC model supports CARB's regulatory and air quality planning efforts and fulfills the federal Clean Air Act and the Federal Highway Administration's transportation planning requirements. The U.S. EPA has approved both EMFAC2014 and EMFAC2017 for use in state implementation plan (SIP) and transportation conformity analyses. For more information on EMFAC, please visit: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/mobile-source-emissions-inventory/msei- modeling-tools.

How Did CARB Analyze the SAFE Vehicle Rule Part One’s impact on vehicle emissions?

CARB estimated the change in vehicle emissions of the California light-duty vehicle fleet using its EMission FACtor (EMFAC) model. Both EMFAC2014 and EMFAC2017 default models, with an “annual average” setting, were run to estimate statewide vehicle emissions by calendar year, vehicle category, fuel type, and model year

average as zero emissions) would cause some of the remaining or increased number of gasoline-fueled vehicles to need to be certified to lower (cleaner) levels in order to still meet the same fleet average.

California Air Resources Board 2

projected to occur under the existing Federal and CARB GHG standards and CARB ZEV requirements that were in place at the time of the analysis. These default results were then adjusted in a post-processing step to reflect the proposed SAFE Vehicle Rule3. As a result of freezing new ZEV sales at model year 2020 levels, the projected fleet for 2021 and beyond was modified to reflect a lower number of future ZEVs and a corresponding greater number of future gasoline internal combustion engine vehicles (and thus, a higher portion of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by gasoline vehicles). The increased number of gasoline vehicles were put into appropriate criteria pollutant certification categories under CARB’s Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) III criteria pollutant standards to maintain compliance with the required fleet average.

How is EMFAC impacted by the SAFE Vehicle Rule Part One?

Generally, after the SAFE Vehicle Rule Part One becomes effective on November 26, 2019, EMFAC2014 and EMFAC2017 will not accurately estimate future transportation emissions until they are updated with new assumptions reflecting the SAFE Vehicle Rule Part One in off-model adjustment factors provided by CARB.

What are Off-Model Adjustment Factors and how should they be applied?

CARB has prepared off-model adjustment factors for both the EMFAC2014 and EMFAC2017 models to account for the impact of the SAFE Vehicle Rule Part One. These adjustments provided in the form of multipliers can be applied to emissions outputs from EMFAC model to account for the impact of this rule. The adjustment factors are provided in Table 1 for EMFAC2014 and Table 2 for EMFAC2017 (Note these factors do not include upstream emissions associated with fuel demand, as EMFAC only estimates tailpipe and evaporative emissions).

3 More details can be found in CARB’s letter submitted to US EPA and NHTSA on November 6, 2019 available at: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=NHTSA-2018-0067-12447

California Air Resources Board 3

Table 1. Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle4 Emissions in EMFAC2014

Adjustment Factors for EMFAC2014 Gasoline Light Duty Vehicles Year NOx Exhaust TOG Evaporative TOG Exhaust PM Exhaust CO Exhaust 2021 1.0001 1.0001 1.0001 1.0012 1.0004 2022 1.0002 1.0004 1.0001 1.0034 1.0013 2023 1.0005 1.0008 1.0003 1.0066 1.0026 2024 1.0010 1.0014 1.0005 1.0105 1.0041 2025 1.0016 1.0021 1.0009 1.0149 1.0058 2026 1.0022 1.0030 1.0012 1.0183 1.0076 2027 1.0029 1.0039 1.0016 1.0208 1.0095 2028 1.0036 1.0050 1.0020 1.0224 1.0116 2029 1.0044 1.0063 1.0025 1.0241 1.0139 2030 1.0052 1.0078 1.0030 1.0260 1.0162 2031 1.0061 1.0095 1.0036 1.0279 1.0186 2032 1.0071 1.0114 1.0042 1.0299 1.0210 2033 1.0081 1.0134 1.0050 1.0320 1.0235 2034 1.0091 1.0156 1.0059 1.0341 1.0260 2035 1.0103 1.0179 1.0070 1.0362 1.0285 2036 1.0114 1.0202 1.0082 1.0382 1.0309 2037 1.0125 1.0224 1.0096 1.0400 1.0332 2038 1.0137 1.0247 1.0111 1.0418 1.0353 2039 1.0148 1.0269 1.0126 1.0435 1.0372 2040 1.0158 1.0290 1.0141 1.0449 1.0389 2041 1.0167 1.0309 1.0154 1.0461 1.0404 2042 1.0176 1.0326 1.0168 1.0471 1.0418 2043 1.0183 1.0340 1.0180 1.0480 1.0429 2044 1.0190 1.0352 1.0190 1.0487 1.0439 2045 1.0195 1.0364 1.0199 1.0494 1.0448 2046 1.0200 1.0373 1.0206 1.0499 1.0454 2047 1.0204 1.0384 1.0213 1.0504 1.0461 2048 1.0208 1.0393 1.0218 1.0508 1.0467 2049 1.0209 1.0400 1.0221 1.0510 1.0470 2050 1.0210 1.0406 1.0224 1.0512 1.0472

4 LDA, LDT1, LDT2 and MDV vehicle categories in EMFAC

California Air Resources Board 4

Table 2. Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle Emissions in EMFAC2017

Adjustment Factors for EMFAC2017 Gasoline Light Duty Vehicles Year NOx Exhaust TOG Evaporative TOG Exhaust PM Exhaust CO Exhaust 2021 1.0002 1.0001 1.0002 1.0009 1.0005 2022 1.0004 1.0003 1.0004 1.0018 1.0014 2023 1.0007 1.0006 1.0007 1.0032 1.0027 2024 1.0012 1.0010 1.0011 1.0051 1.0044 2025 1.0018 1.0016 1.0016 1.0074 1.0065 2026 1.0023 1.0022 1.0020 1.0091 1.0083 2027 1.0028 1.0028 1.0024 1.0105 1.0102 2028 1.0034 1.0035 1.0028 1.0117 1.0120 2029 1.0040 1.0042 1.0032 1.0129 1.0138 2030 1.0047 1.0051 1.0037 1.0142 1.0156 2031 1.0054 1.0061 1.0042 1.0155 1.0173 2032 1.0061 1.0072 1.0047 1.0169 1.0189 2033 1.0068 1.0083 1.0052 1.0182 1.0204 2034 1.0075 1.0095 1.0058 1.0196 1.0218 2035 1.0081 1.0108 1.0063 1.0210 1.0232 2036 1.0088 1.0121 1.0069 1.0223 1.0244 2037 1.0094 1.0134 1.0074 1.0236 1.0255 2038 1.0099 1.0148 1.0079 1.0248 1.0265 2039 1.0104 1.0161 1.0085 1.0259 1.0274 2040 1.0109 1.0174 1.0090 1.0270 1.0281 2041 1.0113 1.0186 1.0095 1.0279 1.0288 2042 1.0116 1.0198 1.0099 1.0286 1.0294 2043 1.0119 1.0207 1.0103 1.0293 1.0299 2044 1.0122 1.0216 1.0106 1.0299 1.0303 2045 1.0124 1.0225 1.0109 1.0303 1.0306 2046 1.0125 1.0233 1.0111 1.0308 1.0309 2047 1.0127 1.0240 1.0113 1.0311 1.0311 2048 1.0128 1.0246 1.0115 1.0314 1.0313 2049 1.0128 1.0252 1.0116 1.0316 1.0315 2050 1.0129 1.0257 1.0117 1.0318 1.0316

California Air Resources Board 5

The off-model adjustment factors need to be applied only to emissions from gasoline light duty vehicles (LDA, LDT1, LDT2 and MDV). Please note that the adjustment factors are by calendar year and includes all model years. For example, the Custom Activity Mode of EMFAC2014 and 2017 is designed to perform emissions assessments for determining conformity with the state implementation plan. These types of assessments are most often done by various transportation planning agencies and air districts throughout California which require the user to create custom activity data files containing vehicle miles travelled (VMT) and/or speed profile data. This customized activity data will then be used for scaling the default vehicle emissions produced by EMFAC model. The off-model adjustment factors provided in this document can be applied to gasoline light duty vehicle emissions outputs of the EMFAC Custom Activity Mode, as illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 1. Process to apply EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors

Step #1: Run EMFAC Custom Activity Mode of EMFAC model as described in EMFAC User’s Guide

Step #2: Depending on the version of the model (2014 or 2017), select the appropriate off-model adjustment factors for pollutants of interest from Table 1 and 2

Step #3: Multiply emissions (tpd) of gasoline light duty vehicles (i.e., LDA, LDT1, LDT2, and MDV) by the off- model adjustment factors to calculate the adjusted emissions Emissions Adjusted = Emissions output from EMFAC x Adjustment Factor

Step #4: Replace the adjusted emissions with original outputs

from EMFAC model Contact For questions regarding the EMFAC off-model adjustment factors, please contact us at: [email protected]

California Air Resources Board 6

,€O Sr

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX t PRO 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

1AR 12 ZO OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR

Vincent Mammano Division Administration, California Division Federal Highway Administration 650 Capitol Mall, Suite 4-100 Sacramento, California 95814

Raymond Tellis Regional Administrator, Region 9 Federal Transit Administration 90 7th Street San Francisco, California 94103

Subject: Appropriate Model for Transportation Conformity in California

Dear Mr. Mammano and Mr Tellis:

I am responding to your letter of March 2, 2020, requesting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to confirm that the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) should continue to use EMFAC2O14 and EMFAC2O17 for transportation conformity determinations in California.

Clean Air Act section 176(c)(1) requires that the latest emissions estimates be used in transportation conformity analyses. The EPA’s last approval of an update to the EMFAC model was on August 15, 2019 when EPA approved EMFAC2O17, the last major update to EMFAC 2014, the previous version of EMFAC.’ In our approval action we initiated a two-year grace period for transition to EMFAC2O17 for regional transportation conformity analyses and a one-year grace period for project level conformity analyses. The EPA-approved models in California continue to be EMFAC2O17, and, during the EMFAC2O17 conformity grace periods, EMFAC2OY4.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has developed and recently submitted to the EPA certain EMFAC adjustment factors.2 We understand these off-model adjustment factors to be multipliers that would be applied to gasoline vehicle emissions modeled by EMFAC2O14 and EMFAC2O17. EPA considers these factors to be acceptable for use because the effect of their application is more conservative than necessary. Therefore, EPA has informed CARB that these factors may be used in transportation conformity determinations and state implementation plan development.

84FR41717. 2 Letter dated March 5, 2020 from Steven S Cliff, Ph.D., Deputy Executive Officer, CARB to Elizabeth Adams, Director, Air and Radiation Division, EPA, Region 9.

Printed on 100% Postconsumer Recycled Paper - Process Chlorine Free If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at (415) 947-4235 or Elizabeth Adams at (415) 972-3183.

Sincerely,

J,i/John W. Busterul ) Regional Administrator, Region IX.

cc Richard Corey, California Air Resources Board Steven Cliff, California Air Resources Board Kurt Karperos, California Air Resources Board