Short Range Transit Plan

Home , Geary Boulevard, Junipero Serra Boulevard

SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN

SFMTA.COM

Fiscal Year 2017 - Fiscal Year 2030

Federal transportation statutes require that the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), in partnership with state and local agencies, develop and periodically update a long-range Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), and a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) which implements the RTP by programming federal funds to transportation projects contained in the RTP. In order to effectively execute these planning and programming responsibilities, MTC requires that each transit operator in its region which receives federal funding through the TIP, prepare, adopt and submit to MTC a Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP).

The preparation of this report has been funded in part by a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) through section 5303 of the Federal Transit Act. The contents of this SRTP reflect the views of the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, and not necessarily those of the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) or MTC. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency is solely responsible for the accuracy of the information presented in this SRTP.

SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP Anticipated approval by the SFMTA Board of Directors: Middle of 2017 1. OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM1. SFMTA THE OF OVERVIEW TRANSIT CONTENTS OF TABLE PROJECTS EXPANSION MAJOR 6. PLAN 5. CAPITAL FINANCIAL &BUDGET PLAN OPERATIONS 4. &SYSTEM EVALUATION3. SERVICE SFMTA &STANDARDS2. GOALS, OBJECTIVES Existing Overview oftheRevenue Fleet Transit Facilities Governance Brief Services 18 History 8 12 7 Van Ness BusRapid Transit Project Central Subway SFMTA 10-Year CapitalFinancialPlan SFMTA CapitalPlanningGoals,Policies &Processes 89 Operations Operations Budget Plan FTA Title VI Analysis &Report Paratransit TriennialMTC Community-Based 49 Transportation47 PlanningProgram Equipment Services Muni Service EquityPolicy Review Muni Transit Service Structure & Current Systemwide Performance 43 Facilities SFMTA Performance Measures 44 FY 2013 -FY2018 StrategicPlanElements The SFMTA StrategicPlan 42 Other SFMTA CapitalPrograms Transit CapitalPrograms 17 93 84 60 57 57 44 42 41 40 35 30 29 27 7 89 57 47 35 27

SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS DATA TABLES & FIGURES CURRENT SYSTEMWIDE PERFORMANCE Table 11. Transit Performance Indicators – National Transit Database audited annual data 36 BRIEF HISTORY Table 12. Additional Transit Performance Indicators - unaudited average annual data 37 Figure 1. Key Transportation Milestones and Events in San Francisco 7 Figure 8. Annual Boardings in Millions 38 GOVERNANCE Figure 9. Percent of Scheduled Trips Delivered 38

DATA TABLES & FIGURESDATA Figure 10. Mean Distance Between Failures 38 Figure 2. SFMTA Organization Chart 9 Figure 11. Percent On-Time Performance 38 Table 1. Budgeted Positions by Division 10 Table 13. FY 2016 Muni Fixed Route Weekday Boardings by Line 39 Table 2. SFMTA Collective Bargaining Agreements and Memorandums of Understanding 11 MUNI TRANSIT SERVICE STRUCTURE TRANSIT SERVICES Table 14. On-Time Performance Definition 40 Figure 3. FY 2016 San Francisco Mode Split 12 Table 15. Muni Service Plan Standard, by Route Type 40 Figure 4. San Francisco Municipal Railway Service Map 13 Table 16. Muni Policy Headways, by Route Type 40 Table 3. Muni Transit Service Type and Areas 14 Table 17. Muni Stop Spacing Standards, by Vehicle Type 40 Table 4. Regional Transit Service Type, Areas, and Transfer Structure 15 Table 18. Muni Passenger Load Standards, by Vehicle Type 40 Table 5. Muni Fare Changes 16 Table 19. Average Maximum and Crowding Loads for Rubber Tire Fleet 41 Table 6. Paratransit Fares 16 FTA TRIENNIAL REVIEW 4 EXISTING FACILITIES Table 20. 2016 FTA Triennial Review, Summary of Findings Figure 5. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Facilities Map 18 and Corrective Action Status 44 Table 7. SFMTA Administrative, Operations, Maintenance, Fueling, Vehicle Storage and Staging Facilities 19 OPERATIONS PLAN Table 8. SFMTA Stations and Stops 22 Table 21. Planned Levels of Service Systemwide 48 Figure 6. San Francisco Municipal Railway Service Map 23 Figure 7. San Francisco Bikeway Network Map 24 OPERATIONS BUDGET Table 22. Summary of Revenues for FY 2016 Amended Budget SFMTA PERFORMANCE MEASURES and the FY 2017 and FY 2018 Proposed Budget 49 Table 9. Strategic Plan Key Performance Indicators 31 Table 23. Summary of Expenditures for FY 2016 Amended Budget and the FY 2017 and FY 2017 Proposed Budget 49 Table 10. Transit Sustainability Project Annual Monitoring Process 32 Figure 12. SFMTA Operating Expenses (in millions) 51 Figure 13. SFMTA Operating Revenues (in millions) 51

SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP Table 24. SFMTA Operating Financial Plan (in $ 1,000s) 52 Table 38. Table 37. Table 36. Table 35. Table 34. Table 33. Table 32. Table 31. Table 30. Table 29. Table 28. Figure 22.Subway ExpansionProject Area Figure 21. MissionBayLoop Project Area Figure 20. Twin Peaks Tunnel Rail Replacement Project Area Figure 19. Sunset Tunnel Rail Replacement Project Area Figure 18. Geneva-HarneyRapid Transit Project Area Figure 17. GearyBusRapid Transit Project Area Figure 16. Better StreetProject Market Area Table 27. Figure 15. MuniForward Transit Priority Projects CAPITAL PROGRAMS TRANSIT by Table 26. by Program Table 25. 59 Figure 14. FY2017 –FY2021CapitalImprovement Program Map Source 59 SFMTA 10-YEAR PLAN CAPITAL FINANCIAL 40-foot Trolley Coach infixedrouteservice SFMTA FleetReplacement &Expansionthrough2030, 60-foot Trolley Coach infixedrouteservice SFMTA SpareRatio Program through 2030, 60-foot Trolley Coach infixedrouteservice SFMTA FleetReplacement &Expansionthrough2030, 32-foot MotorCoach infixedrouteservice SFMTA SpareRatio Program through2030, 32-foot MotorCoach infixedrouteservice SFMTA FleetReplacement &Expansionthrough2030, 40-foot MotorCoach infixedrouteservice SFMTA SpareRatio Program through2030, 40-foot MotorCoach infixedrouteservice SFMTA FleetReplacement &Expansionthrough2030, 60-foot MotorCoach infixedrouteservice SFMTA SpareRatio Program through2030, 60-foot MotorCoach infixedrouteservice SFMTA FleetReplacement &Expansionthrough2030, SFMTA HistoricStreetcarFleetInventory SFMTA Transit FleetInventory Ongoing andFuture MuniForward Projects FY 2018 –FY2027PlannedCapitalInvestment FY 2018 –FY2027Summaryof Anticipated CapitalFunding 78 77 77 76 76 75 75 74 74 73 72 69 68 67 66 64 63 62 61 60 58 Table 43. Table 42. Table 41. Table 40. Table 39. Table 49. Table 48. Table 47. Figure 26. Van NessBusRapid Transit Project Area PROJECT VAN TRANSIT BUS RAPID NESS Figure 25.CentralSoMa Project Area Figure 24.CentralSubway Project Schedule and Table 46. Table 45. Cash Figure 23.Mapof T Third Phase2(CentralSubway) SUBWAYCENTRAL on Table 44. Hand SFMTAOTHER CAPITAL PROGRAMS 90 Non-Revenue Vehicle FleetInventory Paratransit Vehicle FleetInventory Motor Coaches Scheduled forRehabilitation Light Rail Vehicles infixedrouteservice SFMTA FleetReplacement &Expansionthrough2030, 40-foot Trolley Coach infixedrouteservice SFMTA SpareRatio Program through2030, Projected Van NessBRT OperatingCost Van NessBusRapid Transit Project Schedule Van NessBusRapid Transit Project CapitalCosts Central Subway Funding Sources, Expenditures, Central Subway CapitalCosts the SFMTA Enterprise Asset ManagementSystem Projected DevelopmentandImplementation for Timeline 81 81 80 79 78 94 93 93 93 92 91 90 89 85

SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP 5 DATA TABLES & FIGURES CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), a department of the City and County of San Francisco, is responsible for the management of all ground transportation in the city. The SFMTA keeps people connected through the San Francisco Municipal Railway (Muni), the nation’s eighth largest public transit system. The agency’s additional responsibilities include managing parking and traffic, bicycling, walking and the regulation of taxis. With a staff of more than 5,800, the SFMTA’s diverse team of employees is one of the city’s largest with representation by 18 labor organizations. SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP 1875 Charter to merge Muniwiththe city’s Department of Parking and Traffic (DPT). In 1999, San Francisco approved voters Proposition E,which amendedtheCity of alltransitserviceinSan Francisco. acquisition oftheCaliforniaStreetCableRailroad resultedinmunicipalownership Street Railwaythe Market Company totriplethesize ofitssystem,andthe1952 and werestillinoperationSan Francisco atthetime.In1944, Munimergedwith privately-run transitsystemshadoperatedinSan Francisco followingtheCivil War publicly-ownedfirst andoperatedtransitsystemsintheUnitedStates. Several The San Francisco MunicipalRailway (Muni)began servicein1912 asoneofthe HISTORY BRIEF SYSTEM TRANSIT SFMTA THE OF OVERVIEW Figure 1. Key Transportation MilestonesandEventsinSan Francisco 1873 in service. streetcars streetcars The first The first electric San Francisco. operations in of cablecar Introduction 1892 1900 1906 1912 and Fires. Earthquake Francisco 1906 San The Great Francisco. start ofMuni serviceinSan St. and33rd Ave. marks the Geary St.betweenMarket on the A andBlines on Inaugural streetcarservice 1925 Railroad. California StreetCable Street Railway andthe withtheMarket Mergers 1944 &1952 Passage Transit policy. of the First First 1973 cable cars, historic streetcars, motorcoaches, historic streetcars, cable cars, trolleycoaches, andlight railvehicles. transittripseach weekdayonitsfleetof seven daysaweek,providing over 700,000 to servethegrowingcity. The SFMTA currently aday, runstransitservice24hours days ofMuni,thefleetandfacilitieshave changed andexpanded over theyears thePresidiohavebeeninusesinceearly While someofthefacilitieslike Division has continuedtoevolve bymergingwiththe Taxi CommissioninMarch 2009. and advancethecity’s Transit Policy First (Section 8A.115). Sincethen,theSFMTA multimodal transportation agencytooperatetransitservice,managecitystreets, Integration ofthetwoorganizations intotheSFMTA creatinga tookplacein2002, 1950 of MunifromtheauthoritySF Commission &Department; removal Passage ofProp Mandthecreation Public UtilitiesCommission. of thePublic Transportation Traffic (DPT). of Parking & Department of theSan Francisco Creation 1989 1975 1994 Francisco Taxi Commission. Merger with the San 1999 2000 2009 SFMTA. to formthe Muni &DPT the mergerof Prop Eand Passage of

SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP 7 CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM 8 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM CURRENT MEMBERS AND TERMS OF THE SFMTA THE OF BOARD DIRECTORS TERMS OF AND MEMBERS CURRENT professional experiencein,oneormoreofthefields must possesssignificantknowledgeof,directors or duringtheirterms. continue toberegularriders The ofpublictransitandmust must beregularriders when the term expires. At least four of the Directors continue toserveuntiltheyresign,arereplaced,or up tothreefour-year, fixed,staggeredterms,and after serve Supervisors a public hearing. Directors mayor andconfirmedbythe San Francisco Boardof The SFMTA isappointedbythe BoardofDirectors oftheSanmembers Francisco Parking Authority. Director of Transportation andservesasex-officio SFMTA Boardalsohastheauthoritytoappoint and proposedchanges of fares,feesandfines. The agency, includingapproval ofitsbudget,contracts, that provides forthe policy oversight of Directors in 1999, itisgoverned byaseven-memberBoard of San Francisco. As establishedinProposition E The SFMTA isa department of the City and County GOVERNANCE Elected Vice-Chair in2017. Appointed totheBoardin2008. Vice-Chair of theBoard HeinickeMalcolm A. Elected Chairin2017. Appointed totheBoardin2010; Chair oftheBoard Cheryl Brinkman week. regularmeetingoftheSFMTAAt thefirst Board required toridethesystemonaverageofoncea transportation. are During their terms, all directors of, orprofessionalexperiencein,thefieldofpublic mustpossesssignificantknowledge of thedirectors of government, finance,orlaborrelations. Atleasttwo Customer Service. & Safety, Finance& Administration, and Operations & three CAC subcommittees: Engineering,Maintenance by the Mayor andthe Board ofSupervisors. There are agency. Itiscomposedoffifteen appointed members with respecttoany matter withinthejurisdictionof recommendations tostaff andtheBoardofDirectors Proposition E. The CAC meets monthly to provide advisory bodytotheSFMTA andwas createdby The SFMTA Citizens’ Advisory Council (CAC) is an COUNCIL ADVISORYSFMTA CITIZENS’ and vice-chair. of theboardelectfromamongtheirnumberachair after the15th dayofJanuary each year, themembers Board in2014. Appointed tothe Member oftheBoard Gwyneth Borden Board in2017. Appointed tothe Member oftheBoard Art Torres

Board in2011. Appointed tothe Member oftheBoard Joél Ramos Board in2012. Appointed tothe Member oftheBoard Cristina Rubke information technology, managingfacilitiesand finances, collectingfarerevenues,leveraging isresponsible formanagingtheagency’sFIT Division Finance &Information Technology (FIT).The Division engineering andconstructionprojects. large-scale infrastructure bydesigninganddelivering improves thecity’sThe CP&CDivision transportation Capital Programs(CP&C). &ConstructionDivision directly totheDirectorof Transportation. Affairs, andtheCentralSubway Program alsoreport Government addition, Communications&Marketing, Safety, Taxis & Accessible Services, and Transit. In Human Resources, SustainableStreets,System & Construction,FinanceInformation Technology, CapitalProgramsconsists ofsevenmaindivisions: parking and traffic services. The SFMTA currently oftransit,street design,planning, improve delivery SFMTA underwentfurther reorganization in2012 to occurred withthemergerofMuniandDPT, the In additiontotheorganizational change that STRUCTURE ORGANIZATIONAL

Board in2016. Appointed tothe Member oftheBoard Lee Hsu,

Streets Division provides multimodaltransportationStreets Division (SSD). Sustainable StreetsDivision The Sustainable compensation. workers’ wellness, equalemployment opportunity, and organizational developmentandtraining,employee hiring, employmentandlaborrelations,payroll, necessary support servicesthatinclude:recruitment, the agencytoaccomplishitsgoalsbysupplying Human Resources(HR).SFMTA Division HRenables ability andcapacityoftheSFMTA. maximize thefinancial,technological, andphysical real property, andeffectively utilizingresourcesto Figure 2.SFMTA Organization Chart, asof April 2017 Project Delivery Job OrderContracting Engineering Contract Administration Management Construction Capital Controls Assurance Capital Quality SIEW-CHIN YEONG Capital Programs & Construction SALINA VAVIA-JOHNSON EEO Officer Finance &Information Management Performance Technology & Sales Revenue Collection Real Estate Financial Services Procurement Contracts & Budgeting Capital Finance& Administrative Hearings Operating Budget Accounting & Communications &Marketing Technology SONALI BOSE Government Affairs CANDACE SUE KATE BREEN Workers’ Compensation Wellness Training &Instruction Talent Management Development &Training Organizational Industrial Safety HR Operations&Payroll Relations Employee &Labor ADA Human Resources DONALD ELLISON LEE HSU ART TORRES CRISTINA RUBKE JOÉL RAMOS GWYNETH BORDEN Vice-Chair MALCOLM HEINICKE Chair CHERYL BRINKMAN Director ofTransportation Engineering Transportation SSD Administration & Enforcement Security, Investigations Planning Parking Livable Streets Innovation Field Operations EDWARD D.REISKIN Sustainable Streets Board ofDirectors TOM MAGUIRE Director Director Director Director Director of San Francisco. It maintains a safety program that employees, and the citizens of the City and County for providing asafeenvironment forriders, System Safety Division. isresponsible This division Francisco Police Department Traffic Division. thededicatedservicesprovidedoversees bytheSan compliance oftransitfarepayment. also The Division Francisco’s parkingregulations,andenforces also manages38parkingfacilities,enforcesSan community andeconomicdevelopment.SSD transportation system and support sustainable planning andengineeringtoimprove San Francisco’s Transportation Safety TransitSafe DriveCam System Safety MELVYN HENRY Central SubwayProgram ROBERTA BOOMER Board Secretary JOHN FUNGHI Taxi Services Accessible Services Taxi &Accessible KATE TORAN Services Transit Services Transit Management Transit Administration Project (TEP) Transit Effectiveness Service Planning& Rail Maintenance Maintenance ofWay Bus Maintenance JOHN HALEY Transit infrastructure needed to deliver Muni services. infrastructure neededtodeliver alsomaintainsthefleet,facilities, and this division oftransitoperationsandservices, and delivery Francisco. Inaddition totheplanning,scheduling, convenient public transitservicethroughoutSan provides safe,reliable,clean,accessible,and Transit (Muni). Division The Transit (Muni) Division required toparticipate intheSFParatransit Program. of Paratransit services. All taxisinSan Francisco are Discount Card(RTC) theprovision officeand oversees operates San Francisco’s Regional Transit Connection and pedestrianprojects. Accessible Services also fixed routetransit,capitalprojects,parking,bicycle, on accessibilitytoallareasoftheagency’s work,e.g. the entireagencyandproviding technical assistance Americans withDisabilities Act (ADA) compliancefor Accessible Services ischarged withensuring meet transportation demand. and thatthereisanadequatesupplyoftaxicabsto and accessibletolow- andfixed-incomecustomers, discrimination, atpricesthataretransparent,uniform regardless oftriporiginordestination,withoutillegal accessible ensures thattaxiserviceisuniversally andvehicles. the ridingpublic,drivers, TAS also taxi industrytoensurethesafetyof the private Taxi Services ischarged withlicensingandregulating mode oftransportation. that substantiallyoverlap intheregulationoftaxi combination oftwodistinctfunctionstheSFMTA Taxis & Accessible Services (TAS). TAS representsa and mandatedsafetycertifications. corrective actionplans;andperforminginspections safety auditsandvehiclereviews;developing collision, incidentsandhazards;conductinginternal compliance, including:maintainingrecordsforall attains anoptimumlevelofsafetyandenvironmental

SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP 9 CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM 10 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM The largestgroupsofemployeesatSFMTA arein funded positions, budgeted for FY 2014 – FY 2018. employees ineach SFMTA includinggrant- Division, Table 1provides abreakdownofthenumber Table 1. BudgetedPositions byDivision * NOTE: ExcludesunfundedpositionsFY2015 49FTEsandFY2016 53FTEs Human Resources Government Affairs Finance &Information Technology Director Executive Communications Capital Programs &Construction Board OfDirectors SFMTA DIVISION System Safety Transit Sustainable Streets GRAND TOTAL* Taxis & Accessible Services Contracted transportation servicevan FY 2014 3,363 4,854 335 773 135 169 22 25 18 3 5 6 FY 2015 5,008 3,554 358 687 156 111 23 27 76 5 7 4 personnel, respectively.personnel, andenforcement they includethetransitoperators the Transit as andSustainableStreetsDivisions, FY 2016 5,256 3,801 367 689 159 155 26 29 14 5 7 4 FY 2017 4,091 5,670 200 396 708 168 43 31 19 5 5 4 FY 2018 5,700 4,109 700 398 169 214 44 20 31 6 5 4 taxi trips. who areissuedadebitcardtopay fortheirparatransit A user-side subsidyisprovided toParatransit clients, in theSFParatransit programbyCityordinance. companies inSan Francisco arerequired toparticipate In additiontothesecontractedservices,alltaxi 2022: the followingparatransitservicesthroughendof Self HelpfortheElderly, andKimochi) tooperate Transportation, (CentroLatino, andsubcontractors a contractwith Transdev, formerlycalled Veolia currently provides SFParatransit Services through Muni transit service in San Francisco. The SFMTA also The SFMTA Transit operatesallfixedroute Division SERVICES CONTRACTED TRANSPORTATION • • • • with disabilities. andpeople reduce socialisolationofseniors events in San Francisco. This service aims to people withdisabilitiestosocialandcultural Van Gogh–ashuttle and service forseniors disabilities togrocerystores. service thattransports andpeoplewith seniors Shop-a-Round – A groceryshoppingshuttle must be ADA eligible. scheduled withtheagency/center andriders be goingtothesameagency/center. Trips are up anddropsoff whowill groupsofindividuals – SpecializedGroup vanservicethatpicks Van seven daysinadvance. mustscheduleservice whereriders tripsoneto (ADA)-mandated, door-to-door, sharedridevan – SF Access Americans withDisabilities Act

Table 2.SFMTA Bargaining Collective Agreements andMemorandumsofUnderstanding www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/labor-relations/mouscbas bargaining fortheselaborunionsareavailableonline:http:// agreementsandmemorandumsofunderstanding SFMTA Service-Critical and10 Citywidelaboragreementsfor18 bargaining unitswithintheSFMTA. All collective employees. determine theworkrulesandcompensationpackages forapproximately 5,000 There areeight The SFMTA Employee&LaborRelations teamworkswiththeLaborUnionstonegotiateagreementsthat UNIONS LABOR established workingschedules, conditionsofemployment, andmethodsofpayment,effective July 1,2013. For thoseemployeesinjobclassificationsnotrepresentedbya labor unionoremployeeorganization, Section A8.409-1oftheCityCharter has United andPipefitters Association ofPlumbers Teamsters Stationary Engineers Service EmployeesInternationalUnion(SEIU) Painters Operating Engineers InternationalUnion Laborers (IFPTE) Engineers International Federation ofProfessional & Technical Consolidated Crafts Citywide Collective Bargaining Agreements/Memorandums ofUnderstandingapplicableto SFMTA Municipal Executives Association (MEA) Service EmployeesInternationalUnion(SEIU) International Association ofMachinists (IAM) International BrotherhoodofElectrical Workers (IBEW) Transport Union(TWU) Workers’ SFMTA Service-Critical Collective Bargaining Agreements/Memorandums ofUnderstanding LABOR UNION Local 38 Local 856Multi-Unit Local 39 Local 1021 San Francisco City Workers United Local 3 Local 261 Local 21 Municipal Executives Association (MEA) Local 1021 Local 1414 Local 6 Local 200 ServiceLocal 250-A(Automotive Workers 7410) Local 250-A(Transit Fare 9132) Inspectors Local 250-A(Transit 9163) Operators • • • • Teamsters, Local 853 Local 104 Sheet Metal Workers InternationalUnion, Workers, Local 718 Glaziers, Architectural MetalandGlass Regional Council,Local 22 The Northern California Carpenters LOCAL BRANCH July 1,2014 –June 30,2017 July 1,2014 –June 30,2017 July 1,2014 –June 30,2017 July 1,2014 –June 30,2017 July 1,2014 –June 30,2017 July 1,2014 –June 30,2017 July 1,2014 –June 30,2017 July 1,2014 –June 30,2017 July 1,2014 –June 30,2017 July 1,2016 -June 30,2017 July 1,2015 -June 30,2017 July 1,2014 -June 30,2017 July 1,2014 -June 30,2017 July 1,2014 -June 30,2017 July 1,2014 -June 30,2017 July 1,2014 -June 30,2017 July 1,2014 -June 30,2017 LENGTH OFCURRENT CONTRACT Planners conducting communityoutreachPlanners atapublicworkshop. Mechanics, Operators, The CableCarDivision andShopCrew. Paint ShopCrewpaintingPedestrian Safety Zoneon16th andMarket. 11 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM 12 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM Forward’s routechanges, serviceimprovements, and community input, Muni Goals 2 & 3, and extensive Transit Effectiveness Project, SFMTA Strategic Plan Francisco safer and more reliable.Informed by the Muni Forward getting aimstomake aroundSan FORWARD MUNI intheworld,featuring: is amongthemostdiverse annually.million passengers The agency’s transitfleet nation basedonboardings,carrying morethan230 addition, itistheeighthlargesttransitsystemin close to45percentofalltransittripsintheregion.In transit systemintheSan Francisco Bay Area, providing The SFMTA operatesMuni,theoldestandlargest regional transitsystems. San Francisco werebytransit,includingthoseon Decision Survey, 24%ofalltripsto,fromandwithin County ofSan Francisco. Basedonthe2015 Travel that meetstheneedsofpeoplewithinCityand reliable, accessibleandsafetransportation system excellent travelchoices throughaconvenient, As part ofitsmission,theSFMTA toprovide strives SERVICES TRANSIT • • • • • • A fleetofparatransitvehicles. U.S. National HistoricLandmark The nation’s listedasa onlyoperatingcablecars, and aroundtheworld from the U.S.A historic collection of streetcars Modern lightrailvehicles Electric trolleycoaches Clean Dieselandhybrid electricmotorcoaches incorporates servicechanges thatbetter reflectcurrent In addition to capital improvements, Muni Forward also excellent transitservice: resources where they areneededmosttoprovide transit priorityprojectswillhelpreallocatelimited • • • Figure 3.FY2016 San Francisco ModeSplit smarter, andmorereliable. are making our transit system to our customers signals andbringingmorereal-timeinformation the integrationofourtransitsystemwithtraffic Using technology moreeffectively byimproving all ourcustomers. disabilities, andenhancecomfort andsafetyfor and people with the needsoffamilies, seniors, are helpingtheagencybetter accommodate the city, combinedwiththe WalkFirst projects, important safety andaccessibilityprojectsacross Updating Muni’s transitfleetandmaking isproviding morereliabletrips. of allriders Network of core routes serving nearly 70 percent The ImplementationofaRapid & Transit Priority

Private Non-Private Auto Auto 24 % Transit 30 % Drove alone the city: routes intosixprincipletypes oftransitservicein service frameworkorganizes alltheMunitransit In additiontoidentifyingRapid routes,theMuni FRAMEWORK SERVICE FORWARD MUNI activities. andotherSanevents, largefestivals Francisco service, andspecialeventtripstoservesporting services includingexpressservice,lateevening “Owl” service. Muniwillcontinuetoprovide specialized framework todefinethesixtypesofMunitransit routes, theSFMTA hasrecentlyupdated theservice more efficienttotravelonourmostheavilyused To iteasiertonavigate make thetransitsystemand reach ofashort walk orminimalnumberoftransfers. and linestogetanywhere inthecity, mostlywithin tocombinetripsonroutes service allowscustomers San Francisco resident. This accesstobusand rail city thatputsaMunistopwithinquarter mileofevery travel patterns. Munioffers end-to-end coverage of the 16 % 16 Drove withothers 5 % andothermodes Companies, Carshare, Bicycling, Taxi, Network Transportation 25 % Walk • • • • • • activities. andotherSanevents, largefestivals, Francisco service, andspecial event tripstoservesporting commute service,owlweekend-only to special events. They include AM and PM specific need,orservetraveldemandrelated service duringspecifictimesofdaytoservea Specialized: andCableCars. Historic: HistoricStreetcars tomajortransithubs. customers filling in gaps incoverage andconnecting Francisco’s hillsideresidentialneighborhoods, bus routespredominantlycirculatethroughSan Connector (Over30minutesservice): These than theRapid Networkroutes. demand, theytypicallyoperatelessfrequently short walk, oraseamlesstransfer. Depending on get totheirdestinationswithnomorethana core systemthatletscustomers an expansive routes combine with the Rapid Network to form Grid stops alongtheroute. quality, frequentservicebutwithmore Bus createtheRapid network. They provide high- routes combinedwithMuniMetroandRapid Frequent simply travelingafewblocks. are heading across town, or whether customers speedandreliability the Rapid networkdelivers transit priorityenhancementsalongtheroutes, system. With vehiclesarriving frequentlyand and raillinesformthebackbone oftheMuni & skipstop service): These heavilyused bus Muni Metro &RapidBus (12 -30minutesservice): These citywide (10 minutesorlessservice): These These routesaugmentexisting (10 minutesorless

Figure 4.San Francisco MunicipalRailway Service Map,asofJune 2016 a mileofMunibus orraillinestop. All residentialneighborhoods inSanFrancisco are withinaquarterof San Francisco Transit Map Note: Frequencieslistedabovearefordaytimeserviceonly.

Historic Streetcar Limited hours Peak Service Every 20-30minutes Every 10-20minutes 10 minutesorless 10 minutesorless Muni RapidBus 10 minutesorless Muni MetroRail Cable Car

Ocean a

Beach t

h w a y Merrie Merrie

El Camino

del Mar

5R operates to Ocean Beach weekdays 7AM to 7PM 5 operates to Ocean Beach all other times La Playa Playa La

M Great Highway Great

48th Ave Ave 48th La Playa Playa La Sutro Heights Seal Rock Lower Great Highway Great Lower a r

i V

n e

48th Ave Ave 48th P

Geary t

Alta Mar Alta 47th Ave Ave 47th e

Peak hrs. term.

L o

u r i a

Vet. Admin. Ctr.

t n n

h Ave 46th

t s

e Ft. Miley

Cutler

X r D

o K r 47th Ave Ave 47th b

46th Ave Ave 46th i

n o

45th Ave Ave 45th s g

46th Ave Ave 46th Legion of Honor San Francisco Zoo 0 44th Ave Ave 44th

Palace of

45th Ave Ave 45th 44th Ave Ave 44th 43rd Ave Ave 43rd

Legion of

Lincoln

Fort Funston Ave 42nd

Honor

43rd Ave Ave 43rd

42nd Ave Ave 42nd

41st Ave Ave 41st

Armory Wawona a

Herbst L

k e s 40th Ave Ave 40th Library Hospital Point ofInterest Market St.Elevator School Sk (Not Accessible) Metro/Rapid Stops (Accessible) Metro/Rapid Stops Underground Nonstop One way Line Terminals PresidiGo Shuttle BART/Caltrain

ylin West Sunset

e Ave 41st John F. Kennedy

40th Ave Ave 40th B e

39th Ave Ave 39th

l i v o

d n

Plgd

S o

H 38th Ave Ave 38th

o C

a r o

Berkshire

e m

39th Ave Ave 39th

i n 38th Ave Ave 38th e r

Lake MercedLake Ave 37th

w o

r L

C Yorba

l u k

36th Ave Ave 36th

b e H

u a

n 0.5 mi

t S

37th Ave Ave 37th r

Lake MercedLake g h

t o Sunset Blvd Sunset n o

r Ave 36th e Ave 35th

Olympic CountryClub

Marvel 34th Ave Ave 34th

Polo Field

35th Ave Ave 35th

34th Ave Ave 34th

33rd Ave Ave 33rd

o Gellert

32nd Ave Ave 32nd

h Sea View

n evening service

Daytime term.

to Point Lobos

32nd Ave Ave 32nd

M o r n i n g s i d e t a G n e d l o G

e u

33rd Ave Ave 33rd

32nd Ave Ave 32nd

Clear eld Escondido

31st Ave Ave 31st Lake

Harding Park

Golf Course Westmoorland M 30th Ave Ave 30th

M c

Sea Cliff

Havenside

Lake Merced Blvd Merced Lake s

id a c M

31st Ave Ave 31st

d Ave 29th r o

30th Ave Ave 30th l e l

t e n Constanso a a Everglade

r D El Camino del Mar

Rec. Center

C t

i W Ave 28th

Spring eld r Ortega n

e Pacheco Sunset e Quintara

s Ave 30th L s

t u t

29th Ave Ave 29th Riverton t N. 25th Ave k Ave 27th 28th Ave Ave 28th h Lincoln Way Scenic

e Irving e Judah

Kirkham r Beach

Lawton Baker

Middle eld K El Mirasol El Moraga Noriega

i Ave 26th

Sylvan Rivera

Sunset Reservoir

Santiago

Palos Taraval

25th Ave Ave 25th Parkside Ave 27th

Square Ave 2th

Lake Merced Blvd Meadowbrook k r a p t s e W W

Acevedo Vale

Higuera Blvd Font Vidal 24th Ave 24th C

Forestview l

a L a k e v i e

w C

Goleta

e M

e k a l L

r r

State Bo

d 23rd Ave 23rd 25th Ave Ave 25th w

o l H

Inverness e 24th Ave 24th i l s

l y

r s

Paraiso s Garces Arballo

l N. State N.

Gonzalez 22nd Ave 22nd

C O

Pinto

26th Ave 26th i

f f

s i d

e v

Gabilan Ulloa Golden Gate e

Eucalyptus Ocean Pershing

Vicente

McCoppin

Wawona

25th Ave Ave 25th e

m Rivas o S

Tapia University State Sloat t T

Square Ave 21st

San Francisco GolfClub Ave 23rd r

San Francisco San t

a Bridge Pavilion/

P i

Bucareli Ave 22nd n

e v Bridge

22nd Ave 22nd r

r e 24th Ave 24th

e l Golden Gate

l Lake Forest Lake

20th Ave 20th

Stern Grove n L

t s e r c d l e i

F Grijalva i

g n

c Toll Plaza

23rd Ave 23rd oln

u a

J Arellano Holloway n

W B

W B W

19th Ave 19th

B C

L a u 21st Ave 21st

e o

s P

a e i u

c s Serrano Ave 20th

l r s

Melba

s every 60to90minutesMarinHeadlands 76X –Weekend andHolidayservice

N v

s t

k e

t r

i a

John Daly h

e l Lake s

. d

22nd Ave 22nd California a i

i n

M t r t a Clement

Vi w r

Winston Winston

h 18th Ave 18th Geary

h Fuente

a g e k l

a n Anza

s i

h Balboa e

n Harrison

y t Mer Josepha

a P

Cabrillo c

a Ave 21st

f S g

r W h

Fulton e a m

e a m t r t h Cardenas

i e n 76X –Weekend service to Montgomery/Market o

y t

r Crespi o 17th Ave 17th e e

w n o

s Ralston

Kobbe

o 19th Ave 19th

18th Ave 18th Tacoma

Diaz Ave 20th

i t

Battery Caul eld Battery c

d d Varela Varela

Hays h k

o Compton

i c

e S W h

e f w o 16th Ave 16th e l d

D Castelo c

17th Ave 17th B a

k a r

k y

Anglo e

p Ave 15th

Cambon

16th Ave 16th

R Beachmont U

Banbury Denslowe r p s W

s o t e

r t

c o e

n n

L o R t E

S s

Felix Avon

y s

s S

n u

16th Ave 16th

m Ave 14th

a t

P P

Stratford

Lagunitas

d a

Thomas More r c k

k o

Lomita

o P 15th Ave 15th

r r e e C

s s

h k

i i Broadmoor d d

u u r o s i i m o

Galindo 1 o m

r a

5 e N m i r

s t

h h n

e s i y

r Woodacre Grand

A a s

o t c

r View

15th Ave 15th v i Funston t

i e n n e e

g L a

1 g

14th Ave 14th

Junipero Serra Junipero a A

4 d

l t

Lu i o

n P h

a n

d M W Ave 15th

o Ave 12th n

a e Beverly e e J

J s u u Golden Gate

l t n

Ortega o i i P Funston

M Ave 14th DeYoung p p n Museum

e e r r o o

o S S m e e N r r

r r

a a St. Francis

City c r Wawona R F

t Heights u e Rafael San

a a o o n

Daly a

Monticello

s s other times to

11th Ave 11th r Funston c d

e t

ced l o r

k n daytime term.

a Ocean Beach Non-peak i

12th Ave 12th

R P

a Amatury

Park

A Fernando San

l term. i h

v a

Byxbee is o o d e

c Weekday

West Portal g o w

12th Ave 12th

e Ave 10th

Niantic e

s 11th Ave 11th San Leandro San

Ralston Bor Cedro Forest Side i Entrada Cerritos

ca Darien

Gar eld Shields McDowell

Sargent Randolph

9th Ave 9th

Willits Ana Santa P Vernon 10th Ave 10th Mason

C C a

oron S Madrone SecondL

a i t

a a n

Aptos o i d i s e r P c t

n s Ave 8th San Benito San o S M e

Arch l Woodrow

DeLong t First Academy of

A e a Sciences n n 9th Ave 9th

Vista Grande

D n e

San Diego San n

e Cortes n

S s n

Westgate

o Clara Santa

e a M Terrace d

o Urbano d osa Ramsell

l M

7th Ave 7th

San Diego m a a Main

J 9

Pinehurst o

S c

t Ave 8th

h a

t C

n a r

u V a

z i Alton

c o A

S a Montalvo

W t Buena Yerba v

oh o a S a n

B u u e n a v e n n t e

H r North s r Aleso a

n L

Victoria ia Manor enox r

t t a

l Ave 6th

C Sa i

Miriam lar n L n

S D t i

n e a s

M r Ave 7th

S R

S D n a m o a H

a a

n e i

e Lakewood n n r t

t o a h

a r Crissy Field a o

V L

Head a

n S C

e s d B o

A n n

a t e r o

Kenwood

l N n

s u

i t

r Lo c

r t a L o b o n i e

e p n

n Magellan Ave 5th

M c e t a

h a

d S z s s z t

Upland r o e g

as u

Santa Barbara r

Fair eld a

y e

P h

Legion a n

n t

a l

r o s t

Locksley J

6th Ave 6th s Darien c a e

c c Bright Santa Paula Santa a i n n

c e

e t L L t Belper o e o

r a t Dewey e l e y

r na

d Forest Hill

a a y r

G a e

n Presidio

l P

Keystone S

Terrace Shakespeare

g y g

R Ave 4th

a e

a Merced

Orizaba K

Orizaba

n P

Mission n

a l

Orizaba

u u San Pablo San

5th Ave 5th o I

n S

e M Flournoy v p f

i a

l i i

s J M

n h

l n n

e l

o n

Ashton

Vasquez t e a

e r i

e Cornwall y

a r y

n a Cornwall i

n g

M d

g Ave 3rd

Hillside Wilson

Oakhurst

s a r

o a

DeMontfort

w h

Holloway

Grafton i

Broad H r H

Minerva Lakeview Montgomery e

Montana n

Lobos Thrift F Farallones

B n Sagamore Sadowa

e c

t Miraloma

4th Ave 4th

r l

Dorado o D n

o o n e l r A

Jules a

E w o

Wildwood

e o o l n

n e

l n a n

n o d L v r d V d C F

R a o C

a g a a 2nd Ave 2nd

e t d l

Elmwood o k n .

w o

r s r l e s St. Elmo a

e h

a a c

w n

F Ave 3rd

ir Main Post

n o

o E

o e

Faxon e o UCSF s

Faxon d a r

d C

o C e

o e l

C e l a C

g r e

W Moraga

W s o

s l C e

Pizarro h

d i a

Plgd & Rec Center e t t r n

n r Arguello s

h Graham

a v The

e i

H a

S e i

s n a B

2nd Ave 2nd

l s

d O

e Mt Sutro a r

n l t Marne

d N

W o t o i

o d

Capitol r e o Edward e

w d t r s

t m o Keyes

t a n

Ocean View d

o r a

s n

u Ocean a

R e p

o r

n Palm k d

n r

r Arguello

y Almaden

n d t o

t r n h a Golden Gate

Rossi

Goethe n

h U Mesa h a

y & Pool

c P t

McAllister n e

Plgd.

w l W Kezar w k

Miramar l G r

Upper Service Road Q P d

Miramar o a

a u

a o

o a

l Funston

o a e r

Cherry r

y Wigmus r

Rice w

c y

k Loraine l o

C o

m z e N. Willard N.

k o Jordan

d o

u Balceta a Presidio AM term.

t r w h Johnstone

Woodhaven Transit

r d Center

w t e o

s L o o

y o

s a

Granada Rossi Polin Loop Polin o

Hillway

o Farnsworth R

t n d

a s

s MacArthur

E Mt. Davidson D West Paci c

a Juanita i

Midtown Terrace

v V b

Commonwealth

e Stanyan d

Greenwood l

a Liebig

Montecito Parsons d

Hill Point Hill M

Irvington i

i Maple

a l e

r s F e

e e o z

L r B Plymouth e

e s

l a t

t Macrae

Presidio n w

Rec. Center K Belmont

e H

r a n Edgewood

c H

W D o H Behr

u s ll Portola

o o s A a

e k Beaumont

l n c l

Hanover z

i o

o r

n l

s Plaza a

Unity l

Peoria a t

w Carl

d O

c d h

Rodriguez w o S

n u Brighton o Parnassus

d m

h M r

Bellevue l

i u

c y Adolph Sutro Stanyan

e o St.

Mary’s

r Spruce

S D Parker L m r

s k s el r

i l

a i

Alexander Summit b t c n

Chaves t Girard

p r S e Spruce o

o c

B m

Lee o u l

Woodland Templeton n

r Sherwood i k o

Roosevelt a m l Heather

u n s Josiah a

r E

Sears n

l v L Waller

w R Templeton e

M M F

Ridgewood a San Francisco

PM term. Hillcrest University of Sibley o

Beulah San Francisco Torney La Bicao

A Cook Edie l

e o w

Harold y y v

Margaret a Temescal

c G Grattan University Iris

l l n

o Locust

z Shrader

r r e a

n da Liggett

Alma

o k Edie A

C a r

d r Rivoli

v e e

L d

s y r n t Phelan Phelan

g Panorama L

a e

Niagara e a C

Mayfair e

w Majestic u n

Belgrave t

l Chabot Marina

of Blake Gorgas

r e v l a

e L

L Manzanita

Mtn. Spring

Taylo Starview Crocker B rview a

Mountain- i

a Acton

e e

o S r

Howth l

t s a a i

Palo Alto Shrader c

Mt. Vernon Mt.

V M w r m

olim n F Clark PresidiGo service

r o

K t i n

e Caine ol City College of l

San Francisco v

a ie

t w e .

F g a

view O’Reilly I y

Carmel a Laurel Kittredge a Moneta s Cole

Gennessee v C r G n v Collins

o S

r l v n

a i

r Louisburg l

i a e e i Simonds

a e

Gladeview h

O e i w d

g Reposa

w r Frederick

’ w

S e v to downtown

P u m

t S o

a Sky a

Omar v i

t i r e l n L w Roselyn

e Loyola

fo Lupine a

r a Laurel m

d H Cole

t o s. c n

a w

i Wood

s e

n a

Oliver

Hemway

P A Ewing n

i qu Panhandle

rc g Midcrest a Walnut p

Do as Bella Vista P vista Clayton M

a E Tamalpais

p Twin Peaks

l n a N

Huron w

m Peaks r

Emerson

i i

S T o a c e Twin

a Roger

equoi v Foerster T

e Atalaya

o Belvedere l Tank

i w l

r r

e s n Hill

Sunnyside

e Annapolis Crown M

Cayuga Verna e e

Rae e t R

s n

Richardson s Richardson

o Masonic

G o a

av i

T o

t F

l t Graystone

Partridge a

Ashbury

o a

e c

e a

Foote l

Havelock

Marston o r

l Downey r o

Whittier

a P e D t A o e

l Villa

A e

S a

Edna

r a s

r u n

o m a Vega

yo l

n Cre

Presidio Presidio

e s

v Nido k

t t

e l t Moe

D i o

a Q

n n

Monk s

A e e n

Balboa Park

a t n

l e P

a u Deming

v a

n Mangels r

Hearst Monterey

Staples

Flood

Judson Joost

a P Delmar Roemer v r

o i w

Anza Vista Anza

i Masonic

l E

Ellington T

i r Leona

s i r e

Clifford

Rome t

e t Ter Ashbury u

e d e

z t g

o e

w a n a

r Lyon Lyon

Rio u U

w s d

S Vista Verde Vista

m i

Washington

s R

m Clay

e A M

a Upper Balboa Baker

r Ottawa

Domaliamy

e o

Lowell Sacramento

r b Bur Gardens o o

Glen Canyon n B

e i California d a

e r Morse e c Niagara e e r s n l o a n a e e Masonic g r P t

o t e t

Pine n

v Bush

n Lyon

Terra Vista

o e

Sutter

Mt. Vernon Mt.

Central Marina Encanto C l

C Anza Vista a y m M

e C

San Jose Detroit a t Java Post

r D

Arco Jefferson

o k

Melrose o

a o Geary Beach

High

e n

Stillings r

r v

b Temple

Oneida

F b North Point

e l Circular r

o t

Frankfort s t r

Arago a e Raycliff Bay

e Bue

E na l

V Fortuna

t Francisco

Lower

t i Foundation

t s

M t Chestnut i

a t

n Levant

g e a

Guttenberg

Paulding Kaiser Lombard

Raleigh Grandview

e S W Greenwich Prado a Lyon

Seneca Yukon

18th a B e Filbert Baker Broderick Broderick

Nantucket r s Union

Cross Re Sta t u Buena t

d nton k u Green

Congo Vista

C e

Allison C r St. Joseph’s St.

C Morgan

e Vallejo

Concord Colonial o n Fountain

R Ct Ord n a l Broadway

n o i G 17th

r Garden p a

t a r

g n

c d Grove Paci c

vie States Santa Ynez Santa n w

Normadnie k p o Roosevelt

V Hayes Avila Marina Green

Jackson

Thorp Hattie

e e i Fell

Museum s Pope

M r Blvd Cervantes

Rolph l t Oak Divisadero Divisadero

Nordhoff a Capra Cayuga a

Ocean i

Hoffman Page C

a Seward Erkson St r

Pope Haight Ord St Ord

Rico o

Onondaga

t n Acme Storrie

Dia Crags

Santa Ysabel Santa m

Douglass C h

G r

o Caselli Lamson Worth A

o w

n T

a l Curtis l

Otsego E d o Casa

lk d h r Baden

i P Plgd.

Homestead s

n E l a Broderick

Diamond Heights Diamond

a S e

H St

o a

Corona m Heights

r d u a

e s

n i

Mission Ter Vista b d Newton Burnside

Scott

n t Scott

i Douglass o

A r

Waller Beideman g

Mizpah

Geneva Duncan a

s s

l Bellevue e

r Plaza l

h Mt. Zion

e Alta o

Buena b

Angel O‘Farrell

s c

Duboce Seymour Ellis

e Polaris

Hammerton r Eureka Valley S Capistrano

Amazon

O Eddy

Eureka Eureka i r r s Rec. Center Divisadero

s Randall

Castro Jr. Museum Turk B k

Alpine Golden Gate

Acadia e Leo

C McAllister o

Italy Perine

Pierce

l Pierce

Flint

h A Ch

Fulton

S e

ilton s T London Juan San

e Henry

t Ruth

e Diamond y p w

P u n

h a Norton

France

v z Harrington

n e r Elk

e Paris S

B C d

i onra

Lippard o

a l r

i a Lloyd Kimbell

l n a

c y Scott n

g e r

s Wilmot

h t

t Cordova

t u Collingwood Plgd

Lisbon a Brompton

Square Alamo h Castro

Alta Vista Alta Steiner Steiner

A e Rec. Center m

R Moscone

r o

S C o Francis W. Hass d Russia s Newburg Madrid Kornquist Paci c

a Med Center

o r Davies Campus

e a Castro

Glen Park Glen

n Kern

u Plgd.

n Beaver Moulton y D i a

m Peak hrs. term. W o Zircon

Carmelita

t o n

d Cotter d

h Edinburgh Pierce Pixley n Duboce

i F Billy Goat Fillmore Fillmore

Diamond a Magnolia

l r H Theresa

n e d Persia u Poppy

Ahlers C m

i i

l n Hartford

l h

Naples M g Naylor Hill Tingley

i Wilder

c o

Orben

a f

d Co

ttage Row ttage

d E

g t

Potomac v

t Brazil

Steiner

Vienna i Noe o s

Webster Webster

Castro

Cumberland Walter

s Hancock Market Pond

n Byington i o

g Ford

Athens b Hill

Alvarado

n y Natick

Rayburn 19th St B

Liberty Charltion

Elizabeth

Prosper Roanoke e Excelsior

Lyell Jersey

a Clipper c

Moscow o Fort Mason Harris Fillmore

Bemis n

Buchanan Buchanan South Hill South

Southridge

Laidley Boynton Sanchez

Munich Avalon Hollis

Dorland Dehon Belcher

Rousseau Chenery

Sharon

a Mateo

Bosworth Harper Grove

k Laidley

M Prague Germania

Arlington Hayes

Webster Blanche

Lapham

30th St Harlow i

d Rosa Parks Milton

r Hermann Senior Center Willow

Laguna Lafayette a g Comerford

Sanchez

Vicksburg

V Dublin

Church M i Laussat

Cuvier San Jose

Nellie

i t Cleary g

Church Mission

Dolores a

u DoloresDolores

Trumbull weekend

Silver e

Maynard Ney

Peru College

Buchanan Evening L l a Whitney n d e r

Randall s Ellis

Fairmount Alert Octavia St. Mary’s St.

Daytime term.

Severn Jefferson term. St. Mary’s

U.S.

Mint Cathedral

Hidalgo

Church Square Chattanooga S 14th St

Birch

27th St

15th St

Duncan

a 28th St

16th St

Valley Charles Ivy

29th St Octavia

d 17th St

Day Mersey Dolores Ter Linden

Fell

Dolores 18th St

d Dorland Hickory Gough

Rosemont Oak

C l

Chenery Lily

e 20th St 21st St

e Ramona

b 22nd St Austin

a s 23rd St

Oakwood

Genebern Spen Fern Carter 24th St cer c

Benton 25th St Quane

Murray a k Justin

26th St Peter Yorke Clinton Park

Valmar Brosnan Oaks Fair Franklin

C Ness Van Octavia

College

Brook Camp Pearl

A h mes

a Guerrero

Albion

encer D

Madison v e a Martin

Cielito r Linda b McCoppin o Richland Cunningham r n Myrtle

Park Willow Pioche S Highland Gladys e

Van Ness

to Appleton Olive

Es z

Parque n Larch

Stevenson

quina Lapidge e A Juri Santa Marina Santa

Gamb y

Palace Blythdale b

Carrizal ro Rec. Center Mission St. Mary’s

ier ok l Sycamore

Jessie

Julian

Felton e Kingston Clarion

San Jose San

Cow Caledon

B Ti

Eve/wknd term. S Valencia

ffany ia t Jessie

o Eugenia

Holly Park Circle Car Cable Powell/Hyde Rondel

r ne m Colton

Woodwar

Harvard y Col

fo Brady Brady

o rd

Polk Polk

Poplar

Santos Odeus

o Le

xington Otis ton G Virginia Jefferson

k a Hof

l f Beach

a Wiese

d Elm d Holly Elsie

sto Murray North Point

n Redwood

e Carlos San a n Bay

Oxford Coleridge Hemlock l

Orange Francisco

JohnMcLaren Pasadena e Cedar

y Chestnut

City

13th St 13th Lombard

Hall

Lundy’s Bartlett

Fair Greenwich Larkin

Larkin Filbert

Cam

Castillo Benton Minna

Prospect Powers Union Osage Pine

bridge Newmann Bush Green

Win eld Mission Vallejo

16th St Sutter Wharf Fisherman’s Mission Center Sweeny Natoma

Pueblo Ellert Civic Broadway Post

Plaza Paci c Bennington B Elgsie Coso Geary

o Jackson O’Farrell

nv Washington

Capp Yale Ellis i 24th St

e Mission Clay Hyde Partridge Bocana w Eddy Hyde

Calg Lillac Sacramento

Mir Turk

Velasco California

ary Crescent Golden Gate

Montezuma

South Van Ness Van South McAllister Capp Sunrise Wool

Ellsworth abel St 12th Fulton

Amherst

Ottilia Rio Verde Andover Hahn Cypress

Aztec

Cortland

Eugenia

P Bernal Heights Shotwell Leavenworth Moultrie Leavenworth

Pri Ogden Acca o

ncet e

cia w

r Virgil

Sawyer on Anderson Division

n h

Enterprise St 11th

a a Folsom Oriente Shotwell Shotwell

University U.N. Plaza

t l

Sunnydale Ellsworth H

10th St 10th Jones e Jones Visitacion n

i Horace Garr Manchester

Gates g Mistral

Tr Civic Schwerin Center ea

ison t

V h Colby

i t Dore

s s

Folsom Lucky C

i Folsom Cable Car Cable

t St 9th h

a Gar eld

Jarboe Treat a Precita

Bacon Dartmouth Banks

c Precita Harrison

Rey p Taylor Taylor

Allan i Gaven Powell/Mason

Geneva o Sweeny Balmy 15th St

n Prentiss Treat Pier 41 a

Alabama

MacDonald Norwich n

Woolsey Bowdoin Hale Nevada Ripley

California Leland

B St 8th Cable Car Harrison

Powell e Powell Putn Pier 39 Raymond a

Tompkins m r Market

& Rec CenterPortola Plgd n Mission Florida

Arleta

Delta Boylston Brice Washington

a Sumner

Valley Plgd Valley Mason

Bronte Mason

Teddy

Alabama Hamilton H Visitacion

Franklin Rausch

Square t

Bradford Bryant

Cora s E Langton

s M

. M R

Talbert m Florida

Holyoke u

o Howard

Merri Powell Powell e St 7th Minna

Madison l l n

l r ll Rutland York

Silliman e e

Stevenson Columbus

Peral e t Natoma t n a d

c Moss

Delta l

Somerset g Jessie

d a Peralta

Campbell e l

a m Russ Peabody Hampshire

Square

Union

Tucker F

Goettingen ranconia Franconia

Tioga

York

Ba Harriet

Talbert rnevel Folsom Stockton

Bayshore Stockton d

Burrows Brussels Brewster

6th St 6th

Desmond Bay Rolph Hampshire s Portsmouth

h Pier 35

Utah Potrero

o Bruno San

Girard r Harrison

Wayland Tehama

Grant e Grant Coit Square

Waterloo Tower Ankeny Powell Boutwell I n McKinley Clementina

Daytime term. Ho

d lla

Loo day Square

Dwight m Del Sol Potrero Alameda

u i Utah 15th St

s Bruno San

Chart San Bruno Bruno San San Flower er Oak er

Charter Oak Charter

s Bruno San

Olmstead Patterson Bryant Flower t St 5th

r Apparel Kearny Kearny

Mansell Augusta i Bruno San

Silver Ter a Vermont Elmir

Alpha a Dorman Ordway Elmira l Bayshore Vermont

Plgd Shafter

Ward Elmira

Kansas Brannan

Marin Levi Plaza Montgomery

Yerba Montgomery W

Harkness aterville Barneveld

Waterville Buena 4th St 4th

Ledyard Gardens

Wilde

Rhode Island Rhode Shipley

Fitzgerald Conkling Conkling

Scotia Egbert S

Kansas Moscone

Bayshore Bancroft

Clara Cruise Terminal James R.Herman Pier 27-29

Mercury Upton

Townsend Center

The Embarcadero The New Montgomery Montgomery New New

Phelps u

Santa Fe Santa

7th St St 7th

Silver St 7th t Donner Tunnel Haro De

h Berry

Sansome

Cesar Chavez Sansome

Wheat r

Lathrop

Peninsula n

Thomas SFMOMA

C Wheeler t Carroll

Little eld

Jackson

Quint h

H Montgomery

Revere

Vesta

e McKinnon Carolina

r Paul

Toland o

Crane a

i i t

Salinas Plgd Maddux g

r C H Battery Battery

3rd St 3rd

Robblee h

B e

Quesada t

Beatty K 16th St

Selby s

r Key

s Bluxome

l Bridgeview Quint a i Hooper

t c Wisconsin

Exeter Palou

m Apollo

e e

Madera

Williams Milton Ross Lydia a

r Kirkwood

Front Front

Tocoloma n

Irwin Exploratorium Pier 15

Gould Oakdale

o Blanken

Nueva Arkansas

Thornton

v Venus Meade

Keith o

i Napoleon

Davis

t Newcomb p 2nd St 2nd

Orsi

z & Rec Ctr Hubbell

e 26th St

Hill Plgd Innes Le Conte Le

Potrero Hawthorne

Gillette Carr Caltrain k Neptune a

Connecticut Welsh Hudson Daggett Key

Alan Drumm

n Diana Freelon Terminal Transbay

a Embarcadero

Rankin Galvez

Missouri Connecticut Connecticut 17th St

Herman

Mariposa Zoe Mendell Dakota Justin

Drummond Sierra

Plaza Ritch O

22nd St e Jerrold 4th &King

Jamestown Marin Reddy n

3rd St s

SE Campus

Texas

Essex

Missouri Dunshee a

SF Comm. t c

n h a

Bayview m

detours thru2017 Palou subjectto Service on

Ingerson (Davis &Pine) Exp. TerminalsRichmond

College

T (Steuart &Market) Ferry Plaza

r r e

Ceres Flora n Taber

Texas Long Bridge

Hollister Quint

Bay View Mississippi South Building Ferry Gilman Varney 1st St 1st Pomona Missippippi

Lucy San Francisco Univ. of Calif.

Thomas Mellon Mission Bay

Redondo Nelson Rising Fitzgerald

Plgd Pennsylvani

Carroll Cal

Newcomb train

Executive Park Executive Channel

Rankin a Campus

Latona Fremont

Merrimac Steuart Bancroft Egbert

McKinnon Phelps Berry

Armstrong Donner

Lasalle Harriet Beale

18th St

20th St

Hawes Yosemite 19th St Iow

Lane Kirkwood Esprit King

H Embarcadero

4th St 4th Indiana Davidson

Main

Wallace X a Grif th Delancey

Jerrold

Stanford

Van Dyke Van

Custer Tubbs

23rd St Spear Rincon Gilroy 24th St Minnesota y

AT&T

25th St

Park

Underwood 26th St

Lee Rec Ctr Rec Lee

I Keith

g Marin J Tulare

Thomas

a Gilman

Mission Rock m

c Mission &Main i China Basin Tennessee o e

s Mission Bay

t o

Shafter

w Plgd South Nichols

n Giants Double Rock Double

Revere Mendell Caltrain Station

Jennings

Cameron

G Quesada Hudson

Illinois

r St 3rd

Palou

f T e

r Galvez Vista Agua r y

22nd St r

t Innes Humboldt

Arelious Walker a

h Ingalls n

c Transbay Terminal

Fairfax Transbay Tube

o Burke

i s

Coleman Plgd Coleman

Evans N

Youngblood Front e

Michigan Bay

W D

h h a

Hilltop t

n e

a s

e d

h l Way Cargo

Hawes l

Amador n e

L r

u e

Marylan

S d

Hunters Point Expressway Point Hunters n a

l g Bowman

Access R e

Grif th b

H e

Candlestick c Oakdale

a e n

San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge

I P

n o

Point

g n a t ll

s Middle Point

K Hare a

N Wills i

s Jennings

r k

i d

s p

Basin

India

Innes

Jerrold

Kirkwood

L Arelious Walker

a Heron’s Head S

l J St J l 6 e th

A Cleo Rand Cleo Earl G

ve ate

Ave B Ave ie

I I St

Donohue 13th

Spear

Treasure Hudson

Ave D Ave Galvez Island

H St H Treasu

Manseau re Isl

and R 9th d H Ave Hussey

Horne

Hill Yerba Buena Lockwood Mahan Cochrane Hunters 4th

Point Robinson M Ave Island

F Morell ish California

er E St E

Van Keuren 0

Nimitz 0.25 mi 13 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM 14 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM areas servedforallMuniservice. fares. Table 3detailstheroutes,typesofservices,and the few exceptions of the cable car and special event remains consistentacrossalltypesofservice,with by frequency and type of service,thecost to ride Although theMunirouteshavebeencategorized the transitlinesthatworkbestforthem. navigateto helpcustomers thenetworkandidentify service, theSFMTA updatedthetransitservicemap In conjunctionwiththismodernizationoftransit available onwww.sfmta.com. Route-by-route maps,stops,descriptions,andrelatedprojects Table 3.Muni Transit Service Type and Areas, asofMarch 2017 Muni Metro &RapidBus Fixed Route Service Transit Service Americans withDisabilities Act (ADA) including servicerequired underthe Seniors andfor peoplewithdisabilities, Demand Responsive Transit Service Accommodation ofbicycles Owl Service(latenighttransitservice) Supplemental Service events) (commuter express,shuttles &special Specialized Historic Connector Grid Frequent TYPE OF TRANSIT SERVICE OF TYPE Noriega Rapid, 9RSan BrunoRapid, 14R MissionRapid, 28R19th Avenue Rapid, 38RGearyRapid J Church, KTIngleside/ThirdStreet,L Taraval, MOcean View, NJudah, 5RFulton Rapid, 7RHaight/ San Francisco willbeservedbySan Francisco Paratransit. mirroring theMuni76X-Marin Headlandsline. ADA-certified peoplewho arevisitingfromoutside to thenorthernmost part ofDalyCityinSan MateoCounty, andtoMarinHeadlandsonweekends a disabilityordisablinghealthcondition.Service isprovided withinSan Francisco, to Treasure Island, 365 daysayearcitywideforpeopleunabletoindependentlyuseoraccesspublictransit becauseof San Francisco Paratransit aday, isacontractedvanandtaxiserviceprovided 24hours 7daysaweek, There isnoextracharge forbicyclesontransitvehicles. However, asofMay24,2011, foldingbicyclesareallowedinsideallMunivehicles exceptcablecars. arenotallowedinsideanyNon-folding bikes Munibus,streetcar, orothertransitvehicleatany time. Specialized, andOwlserviceroutesareequippedwithexternalbicycleracks onthefrontofvehicle. All hybrid, motor, andtrolleycoaches thatrunontheRapid Frequent, Connector, CommuterExpress, Quintara/24th Street,90San BrunoOwl,9125 Treasure Island L Owl,N5Fulton, 14 38Geary, Mission,22Fillmore,24Divisadero, 44O’Shaughnessy, 48 Buses start atschools andcontinueonregularlyscheduled routes. Supplemental Muniservicetomiddleandhighschools intheCityandCountyofSan Francisco. Express,88BART83X Mid-Market Shuttle 41 Union,76X MarinHeadlandsExpress,81XCaltrain82XLevi PlazaExpress, 31AX Balboa A Express,31BXBalboaB38AXGeary A Express,38BXGearyB 8AX Bayshore A Express,8BXBayshoreB14X MissionExpress,30XMarina NX Judah Express,1AXCalifornia A Express, 1BXCaliforniaBExpress,7XNoriega Express, Wharves California CableCar, Powell/Hyde CableCar, Powell/Mason CableCar, & EEmbarcadero,FMarket Park Merced,66Quintara,67BernalHeights 25 Treasure 36 Island,35Eureka, Teresita, 37Corbett, 39Coit,52Excelsior, 5516th Street,56 Rutland, 57 O’Shaughnessy, 45Union/Stockton, 48Quintara/24thStreet,54Felton 19 Polk, 21Hayes,23Monterey, 27Bryant,29Sunset,31Balboa,33 Ashbury/18th, 43Masonic,44 2 Clement,3Jackson, 5Fulton, 6Haight/Parnassus, 10 Townsend, 12 Folsom/Pacific, 18 46th Avenue, Avenue, 30Stockton, 38Geary, 47 Van Ness, 49 Van Ness/Mission 1 California,7Haight/Noriega, 8Bayshore,9San Bruno,14 2819th Mission,22Fillmore,24Divisadero, MUNI ROUTES&AREASSERVED Table 4.Regional Transit Service Type, Areas, and Transfer Structure All connectingservicesusetheClipperCard,andinsomecasesprovide adiscountedtransfertotheirsystem. intheBay coordinates withothertransitserviceoperators Area toprovide connectionstoregionaldestinations. transitservicesin In additiontooperatingfixedrouteanddemandresponsive San Francisco, theSFMTA SamTrans Ferry Vallejo/Baylink Ferry San Francisco Bay and Transit Golden Gate Ferry Caltrain Transit (BART) Rapid Bay Area (AC Transit)District Costa Transit Alameda Contra- $0.50 discountoff Adult Munisingleride fares paidonaClipperCard are available to allconnectingservicesprovided by ourpartners. PROVIDER TRANSIT TRANSIT Mateo County. operates fromSan Francisco toSan SamTrans inSan MateoCounty Ferry Terminal.Vallejo Building inSan Francisco andthe departures/arrivals) andtheFerry daily servicebetweenPier41(limited The Vallejo/Baylink ferry operates locations aroundthebay. seasonal servicestovariousterminal weekday, holiday, weekend, and The San Francisco BayFerry provides andLarkspur.Tiburon StreettoSausalito,the footofMarket operate fromtheFerry Buildingat Counties. GoldenGate Transit ferries destinations inMarinandSonoma Golden GateBridgetoavarietyof run fromSan Francisco over the Golden Gate Transit buslines Gilroy. weekday commute-hourserviceto San Francisco andSan Jose, with Baby Bullettrainservicebetween Caltrain provides local,limitedand San Francisco International Airport. counties, includingdirectserviceto San Mateo,andSan Francisco service in Alameda, ContraCosta, BART provides regionaltransit East Bay. Terminal inSan Francisco andthe bus servicebetweenthe Transbay AC Transit operatesaccessible AREAS SERVED ride MunifarewhenpaidusingClipper transferringCustomers fromSamTrans a$0.50discountonadult single receive single rideMunifarewhenpaidusingClipper transferringCustomers from Vallejo/Baylink a$0.50discountonadult receive their service. transferringprovides areciprocal$0.50singleridediscountforMunicustomers to adult singlerideMunifarewhenpaidusingClipper. San Francisco BayFerry also transferringCustomers fromSan Francisco BayFerry a$0.50discount on receive service. transferringa reciprocal$0.50singleridediscountforMunicustomers totheir single rideMunifarewhenpaidusingClipper. GoldenGate Transit alsoprovides transferringCustomers fromGoldenGate Transit a$0.50discountonadult receive Muni farewhenpaidusingClipper. transferring a$0.50discountonadultsingleride Customers fromCaltrainreceive on adultsinglerideMunifarewhenpaidusingClipper. Inter-Agency Transfer: andtravelbetweenBARTincluding cablecars, stationswithinSan Francisco. Muni+BART Monthly “A” Pass ($91): Provides unlimitedridesonallMuniservice, BART station. for twofreeridesonMuniroutes14R, ofexitingthe 28,28Rand54within24hours transferringCustomers fromtheBART DalyCitystationtoMunilinesareeligible Transferring from theDaly CityBART stationto MuniusingClipper: Muni farewhenpaidusingClipper. transferringCustomers from AC Transit a$0.50discountonadultsingleride receive Customers transferringCustomers fromBART a$0.50discount receive TRANSFER STRUCTURE (as ofJanuary 1,2017)

Plaza entrancetothe16th StreetMissionBART station atTransbay Temporary loading Terminal AC Transit Bus Transbay San Francisco BayFerry arriving fromtheEastBay 15 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM 16 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM *Effective January 1,2017, Youth Discount ageextendedtoinclude18 yearolds. Table 5.MuniFare Changes p.m. toa.m. 7:00 People with DisabilitiesOnly)from 9:00 Off-Peak CableCarFare (Seniorsand Tokens (pack of10) Seven-Day Passport Three-Day Passport One-Day Passport Cable CarSingleRide Adult Lifeline MonthlyPass (Low Income) Disabilities) MonthlyPass (MuniOnly) Discount (Youth/Senior/People with Social Service Agencies Social Adult “M” MonthlyPass for NonProfit Adult “M” MonthlyPass (MuniOnly) (Includes BART withinSF) Adult “A” MonthlyPass Enrollment Required) Disabilities (SFResidents- Income Youth, Seniors, People with Free MuniProgram –Low/Moderate Agencies Tokens for NonProfit SocialService Disabilities) (CashandLimited Use Ticket) years, SeniorsandPeople with Discount SingleRideFare (Youth to 17* ties) (Clipper®andMobile Ticketing) years, SeniorsandPeople withDisabili- Discount SingleRideFare (Youth to 17* UseTicket) Limited Adult SingleRideFare (Cashand Mobile Ticketing) Adult SingleRideFare (Clipper®and FARE TYPE FY 2016FARES $22.50 $3.00 $0.00 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $1.00 $1.00 $7.00 $40 $31 $20 $35 $24 $70 $70 $83 EFFECTIVE 9/1/16 $22.50 $3.00 $0.00 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $1.00 $1.00 $7.00 $40 $31 $20 $36 $25 $73 $73 $86 EFFECTIVE 1/1/17 $22.50 $3.00 $0.00 $2.50 $2.25 $1.00 $1.25 $1.25 $7.00 $42 $32 $21 $36 $36 $36 $73 $91 EFFECTIVE 7/1/17 $3.00 $0.00 $2.75 $2.50 $1.35 $1.35 $1.25 $7.00 $25 $42 $32 $21 $38 $36 $38 $75 $94 EFFECTIVE 1/1/18 $3.00 $0.00 $2.75 $2.50 $1.35 $1.35 $1.25 $7.00 $25 $43 $33 $22 $38 $38 $38 $75 $94 Table 6.Paratransit Fares discount appliesfor agenciesthatprovide theirown vehicles. ** Fare appliestoallParatransit Van fares. For groupvan a$0.25pertrip disabled riders whouseaClipper disabled riders School (ages65+),and Districtprograms,seniors 19 -22-year-olds enrolledinSan Francisco Unified Muni forlowandmoderateincomeyouth(ages5-18), expand thisprogram. The SFMTA nowprovides free health oftheagency, theSFMTA Boardvoted to In January 2015, basedonanevaluationofthefiscal extended thedefinitionofyouthfrom 17 to 18. FY 2016. Additionally, in May 2014 theSFMTA Board Google, theprogramwas continuedforFY2015 and through avarietyofgrants. As aresultofgift from to provide freeMuniforlowincomeyouthfunded In FY2013 andFY 2014, theSFMTA ranapilotprogram PROGRAM MUNI FREE and FY2018. list offaresapproved bytheSFMTA BoardforFY2017 (CPI-U)andlaborcosts.Seeconsumers Table 5fora of theBay Area ConsumerPrice Indexforallurban charges. The formulaisbasedonacombination predictable andtransparentmechanism forsetting by theSFMTA tocreateamore BoardofDirectors Muni fareincreasesarebasedonaformulasetin2009 FARE CHANGES Taxi Services Van Services** SERVICE TYPE OF value $30 oftaxi $5.50 for $2.25 CURRENT FY 2016 FARES value $30 oftaxi $5.50 for $2.25 EFFECTIVE 9/1/16 ® card. value of taxi $6 for$30 $2.50 EFFECTIVE 7/1/17 Service: Historic Service: Milan, andotheruniquework vehicles. Type of including Presidents’ Conference Committee (PCC), Vehicle count:43vehicles operational,asofJune 2016, a day. passengers of-kind vehiclescarry about21,000 Fisherman’s Wharf toCaltrainat4th&King. The one- travel fromtheCastrotoFisherman’s Wharf and Restored fromaroundtheworld historicstreetcars Vehicle count:40cablecars; Type Historic ofService: about threepercentofsystemriders. of thecity. currently Cablecars provide servicefor on three lines, San Francisco’s are an icon cable cars Invented inSan Francisco in1873 andstillinoperation expansion andtransitioningtoreplacementaroundtheendofdecade. Muni’sto make fleet,alreadyoneofthegreenestinnation, even cleaner. starting Thelightrailvehiclesreplacementandexpansionprogramspansmultipleyears, with tire fleettoimprove transitservice,improve the overall customerexperience,andbringclean,newvehiclesthatusestate-of-the-art hybrid andrenewable dieseltechnologies vehiclefleetsintheworld.diverse Theinformation belowshowsavehiclecountasofDecember2016. theSFMTA Overthenextfouryears willbereplacingits entirerubber electrictrolleycoaches, historicstreetcars, Comprised ofcablecars, renewable dieselandhybrid buses,lightrailvehicles,andparatransitvans,Munihasoneofthemost FLEET REVENUE THE OF OVERVIEW HISTORIC STREETCARS CABLE CARS Express, Specialized Type Rapid, Frequent, ofService: Grid,Connector, Vehicle count:610 vehicles fromvarious manufacturers; 40 percentofthesystem’s riders. fleet isthebackbone ofMuniserviceandcarries over school, homeandothertrips. The motorcoach sub- connect peoplethroughoutSan Francisco –towork, diesel andrenewable diesel-hybrid buseshelp The SFMTA’s 32-foot, 40-foot, and 60-foot renewable Vehicle count:149 vehicles; Type Rapid ofService: percent ofsystemriders. below ground. The sixlightraillinesserveabout20 The all-electriclightrailtrainsrunbothabove and MOTOR COACHES RAIL VEHICLES LIGHT demand-responsive paratransitservice 5 wheelchair accessibleminivans; Type ofService: Vehicle count:112 22-foot vans, 525-foot vans, and riders. active 13,000 tripsformore than completed approximately 775,000 2015, SFMTA-owned wheelchair accessible vehicles independently ridetheMunifixedroutesystem.InFY and peoplewithdisabilitieswhoareunable to The SFMTA provides paratransitservicetoseniors Frequent, Owl (33 morewillbeinproduction); Type Rapid, ofService: Vehicle count:20240-foot and6060-foot trolley coaches carry about27percentofsystemriders. fleet inNorth America. These zero-emission vehicles The SFMTA operatesthesecond-largesttrolleycoach PARATRANSIT VEHICLES COACHES ELECTRIC TROLLEY 17 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM 18 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM metered parkinglots. SFMTA controlare19 publicparkinggarages and19 transit andtrafficenforcementvehicles. Alsounder maintenance, fueling,storage,andstagingofthe majority ofthe29facilitiesarededicatedto transportation systeminSan Francisco. The enforcement, andadministrationofthecomplex the operation, maintenance, planning, engineering, buildings, grounds,andinfrastructurethatenables The SFMTA ownsandleasesawidevarietyof FACILITIES EXISTING Muni MetroEastlightrailfacility Figure 5.San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Facilities Map Parts, Storage,&Support Shops Trolley Coach Facilities Motor Coach Facilities Light Rail &Historic Vehicle Facilities Agencywide Facilities Parking Garages Parking Lots Towed Facilities Cars Parking EnforcementFacilities Non-Vehicle Maintenance Facilities N Table 7. SFMTA Operations,Maintenance,Fueling,Administrative, Vehicle StorageandStagingFacilities Islais CreekMotorCoach Division TROLLEY LIGHT RAIL MOTOR COACH AGENCYWIDE COACH & HISTORIC Potrero Division Flynn Division Cable CarBarn SFMTA Headquarters Presidio Division Kirkland Yard Islais Creek Muni MetroEast &Green Green Division Annex Beach-Geneva Yard Power ControlCenter Central Control Center Transportation Management Woods Division FACILITY NAME Bryant Street,Mariposaand17th Street 15th StreetandHarrison Street Mason Streetand Washington Street 1 South Van Ness Avenue, 3,6,7, Floors and8 Geary Boulevardand Presidio Avenue North Point StreetandPowell Street Cesar ChavezStreetandIndiana Cesar Chavez/25thStreetandIllinois Geneva Avenue, San Jose Avenue, andI-280 Geneva Avenue, San Jose Avenue, andI-280 Undisclosed 131 Lenox Way, West Portal Station 1455 Street Market 22nd StreetandIndiana LOCATION Flynn MotorCoach Division Under Construction 1887; rebuiltand reopened 1984 YEAR OPEN 1977 &1987 2003 1977 1982 2015 2008 1989 1950 1907 1912 1914 1974 CCSF owned, under CCSF owned, under CCSF owned, under CCSF owned, under Leased byCCSFon CCSF owned, under CCSF owned, under CCSF owned, under CCSF owned, under jurisdiction ofSFMTA jurisdiction ofSFMTA jurisdiction ofSFMTA jurisdiction ofSFMTA jurisdiction ofSFMTA jurisdiction ofSFMTA jurisdiction ofSFMTA jurisdiction ofSFMTA jurisdiction ofSFMTA jurisdiction ofSFMTA jurisdiction ofSFMTA jurisdiction ofSFMTA SITE OWNERSHIP CCSF owned,under CCSF owned,under CCSF owned,under CCSF owned,under behalf ofSFMTA CCSF Owned 25 40-ft Trolley Coaches; 107 60-ft Trolley Coaches 125 60-ft Articulated MotorCoaches 40 cablecars Services, Transit Administration andOperationsPlanning&Schedules offices Sustainable StreetsPlanningandEngineeringoffices, System Safety, Taxis & Accessible Finance&Information Communications &Marketing, Technology, HumanResources, Office oftheDirector Transportation, Capital Programs &Construction, 165 40-ft Trolley Coaches 56 40-ft MotorCoaches; 111 60-ft MotorCoaches (whencompleted) 91 75-ft LRVs; 25historicstreetcars 36 75-ft LRVs; undercanopy 5550-ft and24historicstreetcars historic streetcars; Central facilitytomonitorelectricalsystemforallSFMTA operations Current Transit OperationsControlCenter Transit Operations& Traffic SignalOperationsControlCenters 125 75-ft LRVs 30 32-ft MotorCoaches; and212 40-ft MotorCoaches 132 40-ft Motor Coaches; currently over capacityat135 40-ft MotorCoaches SFMTA Headquarters at1South Van Ness Avenue FACILITY CAPACITY 19 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM 20 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM Table 7. (Continued)SFMTA Operating, Maintenance,Fueling,Administrative, Vehicle StorageandStagingFacilities Muni MetroEastDivision TOWED PARKING NON-VEHICLE PARTS STORAGE & CARS ENFORCEMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SHOPS Parking Enforcement Traffic SignalShop Parking Enforcement Burke Scott Penn 700 Marin Division Towed (short Cars term) Parking Enforcement Overhead Lines Parking EnforcementOffice Shops Sign, Meter, & Temporary Sign Paint &MeterParking Parking Enforcement Towed (long term) Cars Non-Revenue Track Duboce Parking Enforcement FACILITY NAME 6th Streetand Townsend Street 2650 BayshoreBoulevard 2323 CesarChavezStreet 1570-1580 Burke AvenueBurke 1570-1580 Street 15th StreetandDivision Pennsylvania Avenue 700 1399 MarinStreet 450 7thStreet 571 10th Street 1401 BryantStreet 505 7thStreet 1508 Bancroft Street 58Ysmt Street 1538 Yosemite 450 7thStreet 2650 BayshoreBlvd., DalyCity andChurchDuboce, betweenMarket Scott Lot (Harrison &15th) LOCATION Woods MiniPark Division Playgroundconstructedin2014 1969; occupiedby 1893; acquiredby SFMTA in2005 YEAR OPEN Muni in1944 2000 2002 2008 1990 1947 1990 1990 2013 2012 2012 2012 n/a n/a n/a n/a CCSF owned, under jurisdiction CCSF owned,underjurisdiction Leased fromCaltransbyCCSF Leased fromCaltransbyCCSF jurisdiction ofthePort ofSan Francisco; MOUwithSFMTA Leased byCCSFonbehalf Leased byCCSFonbehalf Leased byCCSFonbehalf Leased byCCSFonbehalf of DPW, SFMTA Occupied SF Public Works; leased jurisdiction ofSFMTA jurisdiction ofSFMTA jurisdiction ofSFMTA jurisdiction ofSFMTA jurisdiction ofSFMTA Leased fromCaltrans SITE OWNERSHIP CCSF owned,under CCSF owned,under CCSF owned,under CCSF owned,under CCSF owned,under CCSF owned,under on behalfofSFMTA on behalfofSFMTA leased bySFMTA by SFMTA of SFMTA of SFMTA of SFMTA of SFMTA Caltrans; n/a Video Shop,Professional and Technical Shop Administration officeandstorageof4passengervehicles Paint ShopsandSSDShops’ Trucks library typevan 1-12Storage of208GO-4vehicles,18 passengercars, passengervan;1mobile Storage andMaintenanceofNon-Revenue Vehicle Fleet Technical andProfessional MaintenanceShops,Storage,and Administration New Bus Acceptance, Track Maintenance,andStorage Required to have at least 300 spacesforpolicetows,100 ofwhichRequired tohaveatleast300 mustbeindoors Storage of10 GO-4’s, 2passengervehicles,4bootvans&pickup trucks Storage ofParts andService Vehicles dedicatedtoOverheadLines Professional and Technical Shops Storage of43GO-4’s &2passengercars Central StorageandFuture SiteofOverheadLines vehicles duringpeaktimes. Primary Storageoftowedabandonedandillegally vehiclesaveraging300 parked Temporary StorageofLightRail Vehicles LightMaintenance andHistoricStreetcars; Storage of18 passengercars Storage of14 GO-4’s Cameron Beach Division FACILITY CAPACITY 3 2 1 Table 7. (Continued)SFMTA Operating,Maintenance,Fueling,Administrative, Vehicle StorageandStagingFacilities SFUSDowned, siteimprovements ownedbyCCSF, underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSFowned,underjurisdiction oftheSFParking Authority, pendingtransfertoSFMTA SFUSDowned,siteimprovements ownedbyCCSF, under jurisdictionofSFParking Authority, pendingtransfertoSFMTA

PARKING LOTS PARKING GARAGES 18thLot Ave./Geary 16th &Hoff Garage Lombard Garage Japan CenterGarage Golden Gateway Garage 5th andMission/Yerba BuenaGarage Ellis-O’Farrell Garage CenterGarage Civic Castro/18th St.Lot 7th St./Harrison Lot Vallejo StreetGarage Union SquareGarage Sutter-Stockton Garage St. Mary’s SquareGarage Center Garage San Francisco GeneralHospitalMedical Portsmouth SquareGarage Polk-Bush Garage Pierce StreetGarage PerformingGarage Arts North Beach Garage Moscone CenterGarage Mission-Bartlett Garage 18th St./Collingwood Lot Felton/San Bruno Lot Lot8th Ave./Clement 19thLot Ave./Ocean Geary/21st Ave. LotGeary/21st Ave. Lot9th Ave./Clement 20th Ave./Irving Lot20th Ave./Irving Lilac/24th St.Lot Lot9th Ave./Irving 24th St./NoeLot Norton/Mission Lot California/Steiner Lot 7th Ave./Irving Lot7th Ave./Irving Ocean/Junipero Serra Lot Ulloa/Claremont Lot West Portal/14th Ave. Lot FACILITY NAME 421 18th Avenue421 2055 Lombard Street 1610 GearyBoulevard 250 ClayStreet 833 MissionStreet 123 O’Farrell Street 355 McAllisterStreet 42 Hoff Street 457 CastroStreet 415 7thStreet 766Street Vallejo 333 Post Street 444 Stockton Street 433 Kearny Street 24thStreet 2500 733 Kearny Street 1399 BushStreet 3252 PierceStreet 360 Grove Street Street 735 Vallejo 255 3rdStreet 3255 21stStreet 4116 18th Street 25 Felton Street 8th Avenue 324 3000 19th Avenue 3000 5732 GearyBoulevard 9th Avenue 330 1275 20th Avenue1275 1 LilacStreet 9th Avenue1325 4061 24thStreet 20 Norton Street 2450 CaliforniaStreet 1340 7th Avenue1340 2500 Ocean Avenue 2500 807 UlloaStreet 174PortalAvenue West LOCATION YEAR OPEN 1987 1965 1965 1957 1964 1958 1986 1969 1941 1959 1952 1996 1960 1990 1970 1983 1997 1984 1983 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdictionofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdiction ofSFMTA CCSF owned,underjurisdiction ofSFMTA SITE OWNERSHIP SFUSD owned SFUSD owned CCSF owned CCSF owned CCSF owned CCSF owned CCSF owned CCSF owned 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 920 parkingspaces 1095 parkingspaces 2585 parkingspaces 950 parkingspaces 843 parkingspaces 98 parkingspaces 163 parkingspaces 985 parkingspaces 1865 parkingspaces 414 parkingspaces 504 parkingspaces 116 parkingspaces 350 parkingspaces 48 meteredspaces 36 meteredspaces 1657 parkingspaces 129 parkingspaces 598 parkingspaces 203 parkingspaces 732 parkingspaces 205 parkingspaces 34 meteredspaces 20 meteredspaces 205 meteredspaces 28 meteredspaces 10 meteredspaces 26 meteredspaces 20 meteredspaces 21 meteredspaces 21 meteredspaces 24 meteredspaces 18 meteredspaces 41 meteredspaces 16 meteredspaces 28 meteredspaces 20 meteredspaces 23 meteredspaces 19 meteredspaces FACILITY CAPACITY 21 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM 22 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM Table 8.SFMTA StationsandStops finding and at Rapid to make and Metro shelters additional signageandtransitservicebranding theSFMTAyears, andits partners willinstall: ofthenextseveral transit stops.Overthecourse SFMTA adoptedanewpolicyfortheRapid Network transit stopsinSan Francisco. In April 2015, the service, theSFMTA maintainsapproximately 3,500 In addition to the facilities needed to operate transit STATIONS & STOPS Frequent, Grid, Historic Muni Metro & Rapid Bus Connector, Specialized Car Stops Historic Street F Market Transit Stops Stations Muni Metro Bus Stops Surface Rapid Cable CarStops Flag Stops Light Rail Stops Other Surface Stations Surface T Third TYPE Street andCastroStreet. Stops along StreetbetweenSteuartThe Embarcadero andonMarket commercial andindustrialareas. At mostsurfacetransitlocationsinSan Francisco inresidential, are BART-owned. Muni MetrostationswereconstructedinconjunctionwithBART and platform atthelowestlevel. With theexceptionofForest Hill,all level,aMuniboardingplatformatmid-levelandBARTconcourse Rapid Transit District(BART). These stationsaremulti-level,witha Center and The Embarcadero)aresharedbyMuniandtheBay Area are underground. The downtownsubway stations(betweenCivic The MuniMetrostationsfrom West Portal to The Embarcadero commercial andindustrialareas. At mostsurfacetransitlocationsinSan Francisco inresidential, Placed alongthethreecablecarlines. stop inthestreetratherthanpulltocurb. In residentialareasandotherlowtrafficlocationswhereMuniwill Tunnel, thelightrailvehiclesoperateon surface. StreetSubway,Outside oftheMarket Twin Peaks Tunnel andSunset Third Street,andBayshoreBoulevard. Surface stopsalongthe T Third lineon The Embarcadero,KingStreet, LOCATIONS front andreardoors. distribute waiting moreevenlybetweenthe riders will allowfortheconvenience ofPark &Rideandhelp it asaRapid stop.Newbicycleracks atRapid stops details; andbrightredchevron-style decalstoidentify namesandreal-timearrival information, intersection night; redesignedflagsignstobetter identifyroute outfitted withsolarpoweredlanternsvisibledayor navigating theMuninetworkeasier;transitpoles and KingStreetstations); 2000 (TheEmbarcadero) 2000 Bayshore Blvd.stations) 1998 (TheEmbarcadero 2007 (ThirdStreetand 2007 1980 (allexceptForest Hill); 1918 (Forest Hill) 1995 Street), (Market YEAR INUSE Varied Varied Varied Varied 2015 decals tosignalaRapid stop;newbicycleracks namesandreal-timearrival details;brightredchevron-styleroute information,intersection SFMTA red “wave” shelter;transitpolesoutfitted withsolarpoweredlanterns;flagsignsfor 1st streets,andattheoutboundstopadjacent toHallidiePlaza. andChurch and located atinboundstopsMarket and5th streets andMarket streets,Market Way, Drumm,Kearny and Hydestreetsand Van Ness Avenue (outbound). Accessible lifts are at 7th,3rdandMainstreetsDonChee Way (inbound);wayside platformsareatDonChee Street:wayside locations alonglowerMarket platforms Street accessiblestopsarelocatedatkey All includeanaccessiblewayside boardingplatform.Between Van Ness Avenue andSteuart solar poweredlanternsandflagsignsforrouteinformation. In 2015, the SFMTA anditspartners alsostarted the installationoftransitpolesoutfitted with arrival timesdisplayedonthedigitalsign. also have “push-to-talk” buttons that,whenpressed,provide avoice announcementofthe are equippedwithdigitalsignsthatprovide real-timearrival information.Many oftheseshelters Stops with125 dailyboardingshaveashelterwithin environmental constraints.Many shelters station. Digitalsignsthatprovide real-timearrival informationareavailableatMetrostations. accessible byelevator. and/oranescalatorarelocatedateach Stairs endofeverydowntown designation andarrival timeofapproaching andarriving trains. All undergroundstationsare Castro, Forest Hilland West Portal), adigitalvoice announcementsystemannouncestheroute In theundergroundstations(Embarcadero,Montgomery, Powell, Center, Civic Van Ness,Church, equipped with transit shelters withdigitalsignsthatprovide real-timearrivalequipped withtransitshelters information. All stationsweredesignedinlinewiththedistinctive T Third branding. They areallaccessibleand cable carsignisposted. canboard atanyRiders cablecarturntable(thebeginning/endofeach route)oranywhere a with solarpoweredlanternsandflagsignsforrouteinformation. stop. In2015, theSFMTA anditspartners alsostarted theinstallationoftransitpolesoutfitted withyellowpaintonanearbypoleandinthestreetwherebuswill The busstopismarked the leveloftrainfloorforboardingandexiting. stop atSan Jose andGenevaavenueshasamechanical wayside lift to thatelevatescustomers stops provide rampstofacilitatewheelchair access.OntheMOcean View line,theaccessible In additiontothestandardRapid surfacelightrail NetworkStopamenitieslisted above, key Muni Forward Rapid BusStopBranding BASIC AMENITIES Figure 6.San Francisco MunicipalRailway Service Map,asofDecember2016 transit prioritystreetsinSan Francisco. has identifiedapproximately 40additionalmilesof Geary Boulevard,and22Fillmoreon16th Street)and transit way projects(including Van Ness Avenue, the planninganddesignphasesforseveralbusrapid In additiontothelightrailtrack way, theSFMTA isin eighty-seven surfacestops. subway stations,twenty-four surfacestationsand gauge track, sixlightraillines,threetunnels,nine system consistsof71.5 miles(115.1 km)ofstandard a fleetof 149 lightrailvehicles(LRV). TheMuniMetro rail systemafter BostonandLos Angeles, operating third-busiest light Muni Metro is theUnitedStates’ boardings on fixed route transit inFY 2015,150,000 ofmorethan With anaverageweekdayridership INFRASTRUCTURE GUIDEWAY FIXED METRO MUNI CHURCH INGLESIDE TARAVAL OCEAN VIEW JUDAH THIRD STREET THIRD JUDAH OCEANVIEW TARAVAL INGLESIDE CHURCH All MuniRoute &Schedule Information:311 orvisitsfmta.com BART Station

Shared Station Outbound Inbound METRO atanDpt BallPark Caltrain Depot tp Stop Map NottoScale.10/2016 Other Stop & Geneva San Jose Sunnydale Beach Ocean SF Zoo Balboa Park Plymouth Broad & Arleta College City & Sunset Judah Light railintheForest Hillstation Le Conte Ocean & Lee Randolph &Arch & 28thAve Gilman/Paul Judah & Jules Dorado & Randall San Jose Taraval &Sunset & 19thAve Carroll Church & SF State Judah 30th St Williams Junipero Serro Stonestown & Ocean Church & & 9thAve 24th St St. Judah Sloat & Revere/ Shafter Francis Taraval &22ndAve Oakdale/ Palou Portal West Parnassus Forest UCSF Kirkwood/ Church &18thSt Hill La Salle Castro Hudson/ Innes Church Carl &Cole Duboce &Noe Duboce & Church Evans Van Ness Marin Civic Center 23rd St Future Central Subway Line 20th St Powell Montgomery Medical Center Mission Bay Embarcadero UCSF/ Mission Folsom Rock Brannan 2nd &King 4th &King 23 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM 24 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM As ofMay2016, theSFMTA hadinstalled: transportation choices inSan Francisco. and complementsoneanothertoprovide excellent bicycle networkandthetransitcoordinates is comfortable Itwillalsoensurethatthe forallusers. further thecity’s ultimategoaltocreateanetworkthat this methodologytoidentifyfutureprojectswill when navigating thestreetsofSan Francisco. Using of trafficstress”thatpeopleonbicyclesexperience life goals. factorinthisanalysisisthe A key “level investments tohelptheagencyreach itsqualityof efficient assetmanagementandcost-effective new in the2013 SFMTA BicycleStrategywhich combines based ontherecommendationsandmethodology orontransit. Bicycle projects aredeveloped driving, whether they are on bicycles, walking,road users, the city safer for all and infrastructure to make isimplementing on-andoff-streetDivision facilities ongoing work,theSFMTA SustainableStreets of everydaylifeinSan Francisco. As part ofthis The SFMTA bicycling a part is working to make BICYCLE FACILITIES • • • • • 35 bikesharing stations 35 bikesharing lockers 48 bike parkingspaces bike 72 on-street corrals with 402 bicycleracks, 804 4,053 sidewalk racks, 8,106 parkingspaces bike 434.32 milesofbicyclefacilities Figure 7. San Francisco BikewayNetworkMap,asofJuly 2016 The 2013 SFMTA Bicycle Strategycanbefound ontheSFMTA website at:http://sfmta.com/sites/default/files/BicycleStrategyFinal_0.pdf keyed lockers. keyed serve uptotentimesmorepeople thantraditional lockers areon-demand e-lockers operated bike that mainly downtown. As of2016, alloftheSFMTA- lockers insixcity-owned garages andparking lots, The SFMTA andmaintains48 bicycle administers and movement. with customermovement, orblock wheelchair access and mustnotbeplacedonorblock seats,interfere cars). withtheir owner,They must be folded and kept inside allMunivehicles(withtheexceptionofcable on thosevehicles.Onlyfoldingbicyclesareallowed racks andfull-size bicyclesarenotcurrently permitted and MuniMetrolightrailvehiclesdonothavebike each. to holdtwobikes cablecars, Historicstreetcars, racksbuses inregularservicehaveexternalbike able addition tomultimodalstreetenhancements,allMuni to transitincorridors thatareatornearcapacity. In supports accesstotransitandprovides analternative toSanand visitors Francisco. The bicyclenetwork provide travel choices for the residents, workers, transit, walking, andbicyclinginfrastructureto The SFMTA isamultimodalagencyandintegrates STOPS AT TRANSIT AND VEHICLES TRANSIT ON BICYCLES BIKE LOCKERS IN SFMTA GARAGES &PARKING LOTS

bus zones. SFMTA hasinstalledseveralcorrals indiscontinued as transit service has been updated, the several years, general parkingandloading lane. Overthepast bicycle corrals parkingon-street in the provide bike Often requested byareamerchants andresidents, riders more evenly between the front and rear doors. moreevenly betweenthefrontandreardoors. riders as anti-clusteranchors –helpingtodistributewaiting racks allowfortheconvenience ofPark &Rideandserve outside thetransitshelteratRapid stops,newbicycle different typesoftransitserviceisaccessible.Just service brandingtohelpconveywhere tocustomers The Rapid Networkwillincludenewsignageandtransit ON-STREET BICYCLE CORRALS BICYCLE PARKING AT MUNI RAPID TRANSIT STOPS service charge orpermitisneeded. perrack.served basis,withalimitoftwo bikes No come, first of operation, on a first during all hours racksBike onmotorandtrolleycoaches areavailable with at least 320 stations and 4,500 bikes. with atleast320stationsand4,500 should ultimatelycover approximately 23squaremiles in Spring2017. InSan Francisco, theexpandedsystem the programinSan Francisco andSan Jose beginning Share planstoextendservicetheEastBayandexpand support ofatitlesponsor, theoperatorofBay Area Bike in fourotherPeninsula andSouth Baycities. With the areas ofSan Francisco andalongtheCaltraincorridor system inthedense,transit-rich DowntownandSoMa partnership, launched private share apilotregionalbike In 2013, Bay Share,amulti-agencypublic- Area Bike BICYCLES ONMUNI BAY AREA BIKESHAREIN TRANSIT RICH AREAS 25 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THE SFMTA TRANSIT SYSTEM 26 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 2: SFMTA GOALS, OBJECTIVES & STANDARDS federal funding. Transportation andaidingintheprioritizationprogramming ofstateand Commission(MTC),clarifying objectives range transportation plansrequired by theUnited States Department of Transportation (USDOT) andtheMetropolitan transportation system. This updated plan better elements and performance metrics defined in the long- integrates the key In 2011-2012, theSFMTA updatedtheagency’s StrategicPlananddevelopedanewvisionforSan Francisco’s

link fromtheplan’s broaderpoliciestotheday-to-day workforSFMTA staff. creating a continuous leads the implementation of at least one strategic objective, plan inordertoensureconsistencyandaccountability. Each Directoralso Division define performancemeasuresforeach employeethroughaperformanceevaluation usestheStrategicPlantoprioritizedivision workproducts, setmilestones,and andfinancialsustainability.delivery Aseverytwo-yearbudgetisapproved, each fortheagencytomeetitsmid-andlong-termgoals forservice Plan definesacourse Within theframeworkofregionalandstatepolicies,six-year SFMTA Strategic PLAN STRATEGIC SFMTA THE congestion, maintainaffordability, ourinfrastructureingoodcondition. andkeep guide investment inthetransportation networktoimprove travelchoices, reduce growth intheregion,SFMTA hasestablishedasix-year StrategicPlanto at 35percent. To prepareforandrespondtothisgrowthalongwiththe projected swell toover onemillionpeoplewhilegrowthinbothjobsandhousingisprojected ayear.customers San Inthenext25years, Francisco’s populationisexpectedto San Francisco’s transit system, Muni, currently carries approximately 230 million policycommitmentstoreality.in seekingtobringthesetransformative Climate Protection San FranciscoAct of2008, standsattheforefrontinnovation Solutions andSenate Bill375,theSustainableCommunitiesand Act of2006, embodiedin policy objectives Assembly Bill32,theCaliforniaGlobal Warming As Californiacitiesmove forward inpartnership withtheStatetoimplement &STANDARDS OBJECTIVES SFMTA GOALS, agencies theopportunity toparticipate inthedevelopment processaswell. SFMTA allSFMTA facilitiesaroundthecitytogive staff, andpartner stakeholders, timeframe. Additional outreach presentations,workshops andsurveyswereheldat develop theplanandgetbuy-in oneach elementfromalargegroupinveryshort on each. This cyclicalapproach todevelopmentandvetting allowedtheSFMTA to revised theelementunderdiscussionandmoved tothenext,achieving consensus than 60SFMTA staff fromeverypart members oftheagency. The Executive Team then so thateach oftheplanelementswereconsideredanddiscussedindepthbymore presentedtheproposedplanelementstoSFMTAthe directors Group Stakeholder arching goalswiththeirrelatedobjectives. After every SFMTA workshop, Executive their owntobrainstormanddraft anewvision,missionstatement,andthefourover- theSFMTAstakeholders, Executive Team participated inaseriesofworkshops of Using the information gathered from the workshops with internal and external STAFF ENGAGEMENT how theSFMTA focusesitsattention, resources, andstaff. themes evolved intothefouroverarching goalsoftheStrategic Planthatshapes and capitalfinancialsustainability;5.Organizational development.key These communications; 3. Transportation networkimprovements forallmodes;4.Operating as thehighestpriorities:1. Customerserviceforallmodes; 2.Internalandexternal opportunities, andthreats(SWOT)key themesconsistentlyemerged analysis,five from initial surveyswith the general public and a focused strengths, weakness, determine themostimportant areastofocustheagency’s futureefforts. Derived SFMTA Executive Team, with input from SFMTA to staff and external stakeholders The FY 2013 – FY 2018 strategic goals were developed through a processled by the PROCESS STRATEGIC PLANNING THE 27 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 2: SFMTA GOALS, OBJECTIVES & STANDARDS 28 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 2: SFMTA GOALS, OBJECTIVES & STANDARDS weave together the guiding principles and policies Similar tothecurrent StrategicPlan,thenextonewill establish the agency’s priorities for the next plan. groundwork tobuilduponthecurrent planand FY 2018 andtheSFMTA isbeginningto lay the The current Strategic Plansunsetsattheendof STRATEGIC PLAN NEXT THE OF DEVELOPMENT meeting theStrategicPlan’s targets. Plan andoutlinetheimpactofproposedactionsin contract directlyadvancesthegoalsofStrategic to includeadescriptionofhowtheproject,policy, or project proposedtotheSFMTA Boardarerequired with theStrategicPlan. The summariesoftheissueor decision broughttotheSFMTA Boardforconformance the Strategic Plan, SFMTA staff will also assess each In additiontodevelopingstaff workplanstoimplement achievement ofourgoals. will leadtofullaccountabilityatalllevelsandthe each section of the agency. This closed loop process workplansfor andindividual inform thedivisional in theStrategicPlan. andactionswill These initiatives progress madetowards meetingeach listed objective this list each into account the budget cycle to take achieve updating itsstrategicgoals andobjectives, policies, andprocessesthatwouldhelptheagency the SFMTAtwo years, willdevelopalistofactions, Every of sixyears. and projectsover thecourse the agencywilldevelopspecificpolicies,programs, The Strategic Plan serves as the foundation on which &EVALUATIONMONITORING . sfmta-strategic-plan Strategic Plan,visit:http://www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/ For acompletediscussionoftheFY2013 –FY2018 SFMTA safety, reliability, andmodernizationoftheSFMTA in the transportation sector and expand to include addition, thePlanwillrespondtomajorchanges alreadyunderway.safety andreliabilityinitiatives In Strategic Plan will also continue to support the major into one strategicdirection for the agency. The next of the local, regional, state, and federal agencies Cover fromFY2013-2018 SFMTA StrategicPlan Fiscal Year 2013 -Fiscal Year 2018 Strategic Plan SFMTA P S S processes tomeetitsstrategicgoals. that willaligntheagency’s people,resources,and and itwillbeaconciseimpactfuldocument developed in-housebySFMTA andstaff, leadership campus. Ultimately, thenextStrategicPlan will be communities. connectto partners, our with network, transportation theand maintain regulate, operate, build, plan, to W STATEMENT: SF choices. transportation excellent city, great Sa VISION: SFMTA e work together e work n Francisco: Francisco: n MTA MISSION

vision. the SFMTA doesandhowtheagency willrealize the city whiletheconcisemissionstatement details what to enablearangeofchoices inhowtogetaroundthe vision statementconveys theagency’s commitment to bepowerfulstatementsguidetheagency. The Team, the visionandmissionstatementareintended the endofFY2018. DevelopedbytheSFMTA Executive wants todoasanagencyandprovide forthecityby The visionfortheSFMTA identifieswhattheSFMTA STATEMENT SFMTA &MISSION VISION andactions aspartinitiatives ofthetwo-yearbudget. and timeframesguidesSFMTA todevelop divisions withspecifictargets strategic goalsandobjectives to achieve thisvision. The developmentofstrong needed for theagencyandgoalsobjectives Strategic Planfocusesonanewvisionandmission The frameworkfortheFY2013 –FY2018 SFMTA of thelastplanin2008. opportunities, andchallenges sincethedevelopment to better addressitsbroadenedresponsibilities, previous plan,allelementsoftheplanwereupdated SFMTA StrategicPlanremainsconsistentwiththe Although thegeneralintentofFY2013 –FY2018 ELEMENTS PLAN STRATEGIC 2018 -FY 2013 FY connect communities. the transportation network,withour partners, to to plan,build,operate,regulate, andmaintain SFMTA MissionStatement: We worktogether transportation choices. SFMTA Vision: San Francisco: greatcity, excellent in San Francisco. just a viable option, but thepreferred means of travel automodesoftransportationmaking non-private not automobiles. on private The SFMTA is committed to withoutrelying andvisitors for residents,workers agency acknowledges the need for increased mobility the growthofcityandBay Area region,the As the city looks towards the future and estimates TRAVEL OF MEANS PREFERRED AND ATTRACTIVE MOST THE CARSHARING AND RIDESHARING TAXI, BICYCLING, WALKING, TRANSIT, MAKE 2: GOAL which towork. programs, aswellsafefacilitiesandvehiclesin ofalltransportationfor users modesandSFMTA for everyonemeansasecureandcomfortable system the agency. Creatingasafertransportation experience SFMTA employeesareoftheutmostimportance to The safetyofthetransportation and system,itsusers EVERYONE FOR EXPERIENCE TRANSPORTATION ASAFER CREATE 1: GOAL aresummarizedgoals andobjectives below: ways theagencywillaccomplishgoals. These that arethespecific strategic goalsare16 objectives which to focus agency efforts. Supporting these four SFMTAkey areason identifiedfour stakeholders As aresultofthestrategicplanningprocess, OBJECTIVES GOALS &STRATEGIC PLAN transportation system 1.3:Objective Improve thesafetyof security 1.2:Objective Improve workplacesafetyand system users 1.1:Objective Improve securityfortransportation for San Francisco. outstanding Inordertodeliver agency tosupport arangeoftransportation choices challenged the SFMTA to come together as one Commission intoonetransportation agency has Department ofParking and Traffic, andthe Taxi The combinationoftheMunicipalRailway, the SERVICE OUTSTANDING OF DELIVERY SUPPORT TO ENVIRONMENT ACOLLABORATIVE CREATE 4: GOAL for peopleandbusinesses. connectivity while maintainingasystemthatwillreliablyprovide more effectively and reducing the structural deficit The agencyisalsocommitted toallocatingresources the needs of those that use the system. understanding in theStrategicPlan,SFMTA iscommitted to transportation system. With theinclusion of thisgoal a green,clean,efficient,affordable andcost-effective toagoodqualityoflifeisaccess One ofthekeys FRANCISCO SAN IN LIFE OF QUALITY AND ENVIRONMENT THE IMPROVE 3: GOAL structural deficits 3.5:ReduceObjective capitalandoperating servicesefficiently 3.4:Deliver Objective 3.3: Objective Allocate capitalresourceseffectively impacttotheeconomypositive 3.2:IncreasethetransportationObjective system’s emissions, waste, andnoise transportation system’s resourceconsumption, 3.1:ReduceObjective theagency’s andthe manage parkingdemand 2.4:Improve parkingutilizationand Objective modes auto 2.3:Increase useofallnon-private Objective 2.2:Improve transitperformance Objective communications 2.1:Improve customer service& Objective 29 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 2: SFMTA GOALS, OBJECTIVES & STANDARDS 30 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 2: SFMTA GOALS, OBJECTIVES & STANDARDS other andtheagencyaccountable. and supports its staff at all levels, while holding each engaging workenvironment thattrains,encourages services, theSFMTA and mustcreate a collaborative objectives. in determining the next steps for the agency to meet its goals and two-yearbudgetcycle.the first Thisstaff assessment was critical SFMTA staff assessedthe implementation of the StrategicPlanduring important areastofocustheagency’s futureefforts andresources. internal andexternalSFMTA todeterminethemost stakeholders twoinformation The first gatheringworkshopsbroughttogether partnerships withourstakeholders 4.4:Improve relationshipsand Objective 4.3:Improve employeeaccountability Objective workenvironmentinnovative and 4.2:Create acollaborative Objective 4.1:Improve internalcommunications Objective were included in the Strategic Plan to underscore the were includedintheStrategicPlan tounderscore (KPIs)foreachperformance indicators budgetcycle metrics fortheagency.key Specifictargetsforthe Performance Metrics Team revisedtheperformance 2012, theSFMTA Leadership Team and theSFMTA After theupdate totheStrategicPlanelementsin INDICATORS PERFORMANCE KEY PLAN STRATEGIC Transit SustainabilityProject. and those stipulated through the regional objective, directly tothe achievement ofeach StrategicPlan Plan Key Performance (KPIs)thatrelate Indicators including: theCityCharter mandates,theStrategic listofperformancemeasures a comprehensive service, andsustainability. The SFMTA hasdeveloped system performance,staffingcustomer adoptstandardsforsystemreliability,of Directors The CityCharter alsostipulatesthattheSFMTA Board standards fortransitservice: SFMTA is required to meet the following minimum Sec. 8A.103, Service Standardsand Accountability, the Under theCityandCountyofSan Francisco Charter, MEASURES PERFORMANCE SFMTA • • service atthescheduled time. 98.5 percentofscheduled vehiclesmustbegin and at least must be delivered, service hours Service 98.5percentofscheduled delivery: points; and against apublishedschedule thatincludestime minute earlyorfourminuteslateasmeasured considered on-timeifitisnomorethanone vehicles must run on-time,whereavehicleis On-time performance:atleast85percentof consideration ofthePAG. to performancemetricsandtheirtargetsforthe SFMTA proposedrevisions willperiodicallymake in part on recommendations from the audit, the recommendations forimproved reporting. Based accurately collectedandreported, andtomake toensurethatitisbeing data everytwoyears auditor performthereviewofperformance The CityCharter alsorequiresthatanindependent inthe agency’sprojects and initiatives Annual Report. the SFMTA reports and ongoing on these indicators agency tracks. Inaddition tomonthlyreports toPAG, the KPIsandotherperformancemetricsthat the generalpublicchance toreviewanddiscuss agency staff,meetings give thePAG and members and Governance Committee (PAG). These monthly reporting ontheKPIstoSFMTA Board’s Policy meeting thesetargetsistheregularmonitoringand methodinregularlyevaluatingtheprogress A key reporting fortheagency. importance of implementation, accountability, and refer to Table 12 and supportingmetricsover thelastthreefiscal years, please SFMTA performance towards Key Performance Indicators Targets for each oftheObjectives intheStrategic Plan.For Table 9provides asnapshotoftheKey Performance Indicator http://www.sfmta.com/annualreport. The current SFMTA Annual Report isavailable online: webpage: http://www.sfmta.com/performance performance measures,visittheSFMTA’s performance For moreinformationreportsonallagency andmonthlydata 1 Table 9.StrategicPlanKey Performance Indicators These metricsortargetsweremodifiedin August2016 3.4: Passengers perRevenue Hour process andcommunications.Scale of1(low)to5(high) rating:Satisfaction4.4: Stakeholder withSFMTA decision-making performance plans of fiscalyear;%employeeswithannualappraisalsbasedontheir 4.3: %ofemployeeswithperformanceplanspreparedbythestart to 5(high) 4.2: Employeerating:Overallemployeesatisfaction.Scale of 1(low) and current events?Scale of1(low)to5(high) to doyourjob?Doyoufeelinformedaboutagencyissues,challenges 4.1: Employeerating:Doyoufeelhavetheinformationneed Goal 4: Create a collaborative environment to support delivery ofoutstandingservice deficit 3.5: Operatingandcapital(StateofGoodRepair) structural budget on-timeandon-budgetbyphase 3.3: %ofprojectsdelivered 3.2: Muniaverageweekdayboardings 3.1: SFMTA carbonfootprint(metrictonsC02e) Goal 3: Improve theenvironment andqualityoflife inSanFrancisco (“gaps”) way bymorethan5minuteslineandrouteontheRapid Network Percent oftransittripswheregaps inserviceexceedscheduled head- between vehiclesbylineandrouteontheRapid Network(“bunches”) 2.2: Percent oftransittripsthathavelessthana2-minutespacing to 5(high) 2.1: Customerrating:Overallcustomersatisfaction.Scale of1(low) Goal 2: Make transit, walking, bicycling, taxi, ridesharing andcarsharing the mostattractive andpreferred meansoftravel 1.3: miles #ofMunicollisions/100,000 (100 FTEs) hours 1.2: #ofworkplaceinjuries/200,000 miles thefts, etc.)/100,000 1.1: #ofSFPD-reported transitsystemrelatedcrimes(i.e.assaults, Goal 1: Create asafer transportation experience for everyone KEY PERFORMANCEINDICATORS 2.4: % of metered hours withnoratechange2.4: %ofmeteredhours inSFparkpilotareas 2.3: ModeShare Establish baselineandreach 10% improvement over baselineeach budget FY 2018 automodes:50% auto:50%;non-private modesplitgoal-private Improve satisfaction ratingby0.2pointsover baselineeach budgetcycle Improve satisfactionratingby0.2pointsover baselinebyendofFY2018 Reduce SFMTA greenhousegas emissions80%below1990 levelsbyend 100% ofemployeeswithperformanceplansatthestart ofthefiscalyear; 100% ofemployeeswithannualperformanceappraisalscompletedand Reduce gaps by25% Improve employeeratingby0.2pointsover baselinebyendofFY2018 Improve employeeratingby0.2pointsover baselinebyendofFY2018 Achieve perrevenuehourbyendofFY2018 3%growthinpassengers Make progresstowardsMake closingoperating andStateofGoodRepair submitted toHumanResources bycompletionofthefiscalyear FY 2014 Achieve 10% reductioninincidentseach budgetcycle Achieve 10% reductioninincidentseach budgetcycle Achieve 10% reductioninincidentseach budgetcycle Achieve withnoratechange 65%ofmeteredhours Increase MuniRidership Reduce gaps by45% structural deficits FY 2016 TARGETS of 2018 cycle 1 1 1 Reduce gaps by65% FY 2018 1 1 1 1 31 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 2: SFMTA GOALS, OBJECTIVES & STANDARDS 32 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 2: SFMTA GOALS, OBJECTIVES & STANDARDS the ConsumerPrice Index(CPI)thereafter: Fiscal Year (FY)2017, withnogrowthbeyond thatof least oneofthefollowingperformancemeasuresby Area mustachieve a 5 percent real reduction in at Project, thesevenlargesttransitagenciesin Bay Within theframeworkof Transit Sustainability recommendations for the Bay Area’s transit operators. developed performancemeasuresandinvestment thisgroup environmental andequitystakeholders, bodies, labororganizations, businesses, and fromtransitagencies,government representatives TSP processesandrecommendations.Madeupof MTC formedasteeringcommittee toguidethe interest inattracting tothesystem, newriders the needtoimprove transitperformance,and projected capitalandoperatingbudgetshortfalls, Bay Area’s the significant Given transit operators. and institutionalframeworksoftheSan Francisco focus on the financial health,service performance, Transit SustainabilityProject (TSP)was developedto Commission’s (MTC)Resolution 4060in2012, the Established by the Metropolitan Transportation PROJECT SUSTAINABILITY TRANSIT Table 10. Transit SustainabilityProject Annual MonitoringProcess FY 2016 FY 2015 FY 2014 FY 2013 YEAR • • • Cost Per Passenger Mile Cost Per Passenger Cost Per Service Hour achieving theperformancetarget funds administeredbyMTCtoprogresstowards MTC linksexistingandnewoperatingcapital MTC analyzes agencyprogressinmeetingtargets an annualbasis mance measuredataonallthreetargetstoMTC Starting thisyear, thetransitagenciessubmitperfor one ormoreofthetargetsandsubmittoMTC. Transit agenciesaretoadoptastrategicplanmeet ACTION - increase ridership, and contain operating costs andcontainoperating costs increase ridership, The SFMTA planstoaddressthesechallenges, which mayrequirehigherfundinginvestments. the demandforpublictransportation will increase As San Francisco’s populationand employmentgrow, inflation-adjusted unitoperatingcostswilldecrease. Over thelongterm,SFMTA doesnot anticipatethat and bolsteredsystemmaintenance. implemented asignificant 10 percentservice increase or lessannually)consideringthat the agency has Mile andperUnlinked Trip stable(0.5percent relatively adjusted increasesinOperatingCostsperPassenger inflation- in unitoperatingcosts,theagencyhaskept While theSFMTA hasnotyetachieved arealreduction trips. unlinked passengermilesor the increaseinvehiclehours, trips. Costscanstillincreasebutnotasquickly as passengermiles,and/orunlinked vehicle hours, lower inflation-adjustedcostsinrelationtorevenue In ordertoachieve the TSP targets,theSFMTA must TARGETS PROJECT SUSTAINABILITY & TRANSITMONITORING ACHIEVING the cityandthroughlabornegotiations. implement transportation improvements throughout Muni Forward, identifyingnewrevenuesourcesto and/or containoperatingcosts,including ridership thattheagencyistakingtoincrease major initiatives under Statelaw. The report alsodescribesthe Improvement Project (PIP)forSFMTA asrequired of the TSP Cost Reduction Metrics as the Productivity reports onitsgood-faithefforts tomeetoneormore intheBay transit operators Area. The SFMTA regularly annual monitoringprocessforthesevenlargest MTC alsohasdevelopedthefollowingstructured andFY2011.highest costyearbetweenFY2008 The For thesemeasures,thebaselineyearissetat and lightrailvehicleprocurement contract negotiations,andmotorcoach, trolleycoach, Transportation balancedandfairlabor 2030initiatives, transit infrastructureprojects,thesupport ofthe through the implementation of the Muni Forward • rubber tireandlightrailfleets. Looking atfuture to investments related to the replacement ofour fiscal year (June 30, 2017). This is primarily due annual expendituretargetby theendof upward andareonpacetoexceedthe$250M towards a state of good repair are trending December 2016, SFMTA’s expendituresmade replacement needsandinvestments. Through analysis oftheagency’s rehabilitationand Repair Report thatprovides acomprehensive the SFMTA issuedanupdatetotheState ofGood needs andtheSGRbacklog of$2.4billion.In2016, and arealsodistributedbetweenupcomingSGR towards “Transit Service Critical”investments projects. These fundsareprimarilydirected of $250millionannuallyonStateGoodRepair SFMTA hascommitted to investing anaverage Agreement fortheCentralSubway project,the ACTION: As part oftheFull-Funding Grant budget willnotberealized beforeFY2017. and theirbeneficialimpactsontheoperating new fundingoptions,many improvements City andCountyofSan Francisco arepursuing within 20years. Though theSFMTA andthe of $586millionperyeartoeliminatethebacklog at $2.41billion,theSFMTA requiresaninvestment equipment andfacilities. With abacklog estimated translates intohigheroperatingcostsduetoolder assets toensuresafeandreliableservice. This transit systemhassignificantneedstorestoreits with over acenturyofservice,San Francisco’s Large State ofGoodRepairneeds– As asystem

• • frequency and ease crowding on popular routes. frequency andeasecrowdingonpopularroutes. projects, theSFMTA ischanging servicetoincrease ACTION : Through theMuniForward portfolio of increased serviceandcosts. inthefuturewillnecessitate Increasing ridership growth. the capacityforlong-termridership to customercomfort andultimatelyprovides Unlinked Trip –buthasasignificantbenefit Operating CostsperPassenger Mileorper customer loadspervehicle,which increases crowdingreductionresultsinlower perspective, adding service.From aperformanceaccounting nation. To reducecrowding,theSFMTA hasbeen buses aresomeofthemostcrowdedin capacity atcertain timesofthedayandMuni However, theMunirailsystemisalreadyat capacity onvehiclestoabsorbnewcustomers. can lower unit costs if there is sufficient ridership Limited System and Vehicle Capacity–Increasing maintenance andoperatingcosts. will improve transitreliabilityandreduceunit into service. This investment inthetransitfleet entire rubbertirefleetandbegintoputnewLRVs ACTION: maintenance andoperatingcosts. operating oldervehicles,which impacts rail vehiclefleet.Inthemeantime,itcontinues of modernizingitsentirerubber tire and light Fleet –TheSFMTA iscurrently intheprocess annual target. the agency’s averageabove the$250million facilities relatedprojectswhich willhelpsustain thereareplannedinvestments fiscal years, in By mid-2019 theSFMTA willreplacethe Sustainability Project. success inmeetingtheintent oftheMTC’s Transit However, they are criticaltotheagency’s long-term to increasesinoperatingcosts intheshort term. investment in the transit system and maylead Several oftheactionslistedhererequiresubstantial • • • beyond thefive-year TSPtimeframe. costs butisnecessarytoimprove reliability maintenance support increasesunitoperating and maintenance-of-wayInvesting activities. in increased busmaintenance,railmaintenance system reliability, theSFMTA isfocusingon reduce mechanical breakdownsandimprove Increasing maintenance needs–Inorderto parties involved. and enter into labor contracts that are fair to all ACTION: The SFMTA willcontinue tonegotiate the SFMTA willbeabletoachieve thesetargets. have asignificantimpactontheextenttowhich operating costs.Changestolaborcontractswill and benefitsareamajorfactorindetermining Labor Contract Negotiations –Employeewages measure. transportation fundingforapotential2018 ballot transportation taskforcetoevaluateoptionsfor ACTION: The Mayorhasreconvened a the funding(Proposition K). rejected thesalestaxthatwouldhaveprovided transportation improvements (Proposition J)but Funding Sources –Voters in2016 supported maintenance needsarereduced. lead toanoverall reductioninoperatingcostsas investment inreplacingtheMuni fleetshould breakdowns. Also, theplannedcapital costly of on theroadandreducelikelihood thefleet in atimelymannerwillhelpkeep ACTION: Performing therecommendmaintenance

capital-improvement-program. https://www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/reports/fy-2017-2021- the agencymeetits Transit Project’s Sustainability (TSP)goals: investmentsfleet procurement,andothercapital thatwillhelp has moreinformation ontheplannedinfrastructure upgrades, The SFMTA FY2017 Improvement – FY2021Capital Program state-good-repair-report-february-2015. and investments: http://www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/reports/ analysis oftheagency’s andreplacementneeds rehabilitation The ofGoodRepair State Report provides acomprehensive http://visionzerosf.org http://visionzerosf.org at Zero Vision about Read more vehicles. and safe people safe streets, safe with system transportation a safer build will we users, road vulnerable most our protect to working by and preventable, are fatalities all traffic believes Francisco San eachcrashes Francisco. year San in traffic in hospitalized are more 500 and killed are people 30 average, On 2024. by fatalities related all traffic- eliminate to commitment Francisco’s San is policy Zero Vision ZERO VISION GUIDING POLICY: 33 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 2: SFMTA GOALS, OBJECTIVES & STANDARDS 34 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 3: SERVICE & SYSTEM EVALUATION and resolvethechallenges thatimpactMuni. processes –theagency bringstogethertechnology, technical expertise, anddeepcommunityinsight tobetter understand In order to meet the needsof the city’s current the SFMTA andfuturesystemusers, hasupdateditstransitserviceplanning quality, thestreetsthroughincreasedpedestrianactivities. reducing congestion,andactivating transportation helpsallSan byreducinggreenhousegas Francisco residentsandvisitors emissionsimproving air behind and use transit, taxi, bicycle, and pedestrian routes to get around the city. This shift towards more sustainable San Francisco isatransit-rich, multimodalcitywheremoreandSan Franciscans arechoosing to leavetheircars of theMuniForward program. goals, andreallocatelimitedresources wheretheyareneededmostisthepurpose will improve the transit system, enable the agency to meet its service standards and Route changes, serviceimprovements, andcomfort andsafetyenhancementsthat FORWARD PROGRAM MUNI THE program, which isimplementingprojectsinformedbythe TEP. experiencewithitslaunchseamlessness ofourcustomers’ oftheMuniForward is nowtakingadditionalstepstopreserveandenhancethequality, consistency, and SFMTABehind these system-wide statistics are real people—our customers—and tripsaday. their way acrossa49square-mileservicearea, andserving700,000 system ofover 75bus,trolley, rail,cablecar, andstreetcarlines, togetherweaving The changes—some major, someminor—aredistributedacrossanextensive of which was fundedinthetwoyearbudgetcycle). this planningprocess,includinganoverall 12 percentserviceincrease(10 percent approved themajorityofrecommendationsthatemergedfrom Board ofDirectors InMarch major evaluation oftheMunisystemin30years. the first 2014, theSFMTA better solvetheproblemsaffecting San Francisco’s transitnetwork,andrepresented technical expertise, anddeepcommunityinsighttobetter andthus understand The TEP was anin-depthplanningprocessthatbroughttogethertechnology, Transit Effectiveness Project (TEP). In 2014, the SFMTA evaluation of its system under the concluded an extensive PERFORMANCE SYSTEMWIDE CURRENT EVALUATION SYSTEM & SERVICE Increasing ServiceFour Times in16Months and legislatedmilesofsafetytransitprioritycapitalprojects including: To date, MuniForward hasimplementedanumberoftransitserviceimprovements reliable. is making our transit system smarter,information to our customers safer, and more the integrationofourtransitsystemwithtrafficsignalsandbringing morereal-time with theCity’s Vision Zerogoals.Usingtechnology moreeffectively byimproving disabilities, and enhance comfort while aligning and safety for all our customers helping us to better and people with accommodate the needs of families, seniors, accessibility improvements acrossthecity, combinedwiththe WalkFirst projects, is and reliable service. Updating our transit fleet and making important safety and isproviding awholenewlevelofmorefrequent serving nearly70%ofallriders are needed most. Implementation and expansion of aRapid Network of core routes improvements are being implemented to reallocate limited resources where they Informed bythe Transit Effectiveness Project, routechanges andservice the longlistofprojectsandplanningefforts underway toachieve thisvision. reliable experiencebothonandoff transit.MuniForward bringstogetherinoneplace As such, workingonmultiplefrontstocreateasaferandmore theprogramisactively • • • on severallines, includingnewconnectionstoBART on the 35,28R,57, and29 We alsomadeseveral routetweakstoprovide newandimproved connections onourbusyExpressroutes,andboosted frequencyonallMuniMetrolines hours 48 Owl),rolledoutalldayRapid serviceonthe28R19th Ave, expandedservice We launched fourbrandnewroutes(EEmbarcadero, 55 16th Street,44Owl and service) onMunilinesofallshapesandsizes, spanning theentirecity additionalannualized (or10%We service hours more addedover 330,000 35 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 3: SERVICE & SYSTEM EVALUATION 36 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 3: SERVICE & SYSTEM EVALUATION primary sourceforinformationandstatisticson The National Transit Database (NTD) is the nation’s INDICATORS PERFORMANCE TRANSIT SYSTEMWIDE Transit Reliability Advancing Key Infrastructure Upgrades to Improve . planning/projects/muni-forward-implementation-plan plans:http://www.sfmta.com/projects-implementation SFMTA workbook haspreparedadetailed thatdiscusses • • installed alongcongestedtransitcorridors Over 7milesoftransit-onlylaneshavebeen consolidation toimprove traveltimeandreliability transit-only lanes, transitbulbsandstop like transit-priority projects,which includestreatments The SFMTA Boardhaslegislatedover 36milesof Train ControlSystem. This change alsoaffected service by theagency’s CentralControllogand Automatic service resultingfrominterruptions asreported calculating Revenue byexcludingundelivered Hours the FTA, theSFMTA modifieditsmethodologyfor performance metrics. In FY 2014 at the request of changes tothemethodology usedtocalculatethese MTC’s adoptionofthe TSP targets,therehavebeen revenue servicemileshavegraduallydeclined.Since havefluctuated,whilethe revenue servicehours have shownasteadyincrease. Additionally, the From FY2012 –FY2015, passengertrips unlinked Transportation Agency’s fundinginurbanized areas. NTD alsoinformstheapportionment oftheFederal service planningpractices. The datasubmitted to the basis fortheassessmentofagencyandits The SFMTA submitsdata to theNTD on anannual the transitsystemsoperatinginUnitedStates. and efficiency over thepastseveralyears. metricstrackinga snapshotofkey Munieffectiveness The tables and charts on the following pages provide issues withtransitserviceearly andeffectively. SFMTAgiving staff theopportunity toaddressany metrics toassessitsperformanceonamonthlybasis decision-making purposes. The agency usesthese other significantdatapointsthatwouldinformfuture Strategic Plan’s Key Performance and Indicators of thetransitsystem. These metricsincludethe new metricstotrack theefficiencyandeffectiveness section ofthis document, theSFMTA adoptedseveral andStandards As discussedintheGoals,Objectives, Ad service qualityandreliability. these metricscloselyinordertomaintainandimprove and employment,theSFMTA willcontinuetomonitor San Francisco continuestogrowth,inbothpopulation system andimproved conditionsforourriders. As increase. This hasdecreasedcrowdingontheMuni andstarteddelivery toimplementa10 percentservice In FY15, theSFMTA alsosignificantlyimproved service mileage calculations. 2. Unaudited beyond hasresultedinlower reportedrevenuehoursandmiles. service 1. A new federally-mandated countingmethodologyusedfor FY2014 and 2012 –FY2015. Table 11. Transit Performance –National Indicators Transit Database,FY Passenger Trips Unlinked Service Miles Revenue Service Hours Revenue METRIC ditional Transit Performance Indicators 222,125,944 24,304,903 3,182,574 FY 2012 222,991,006 24,247,011 3,205,867 FY 2013 227,977,367 23,440,702 3,091,554 FY 2014 1 229,442,770 23,046,459 3,172,582 FY 2015 2 Table 12. Additional Transit Performance Indicators, Targets andResults -unauditedaverageannualdata,FY2014 –FY2016 Mode Share(non-privateautotrips) Percentage ofdaysthatescalatorsareinfulloperation Percentage ofdaysthatelevatorsareinfulloperation Ridership (faregateentries,averageweekday) Ridership (rubbertire,averageweekday) Scale of1(low)to5(high) Customer rating:Overallcustomersatisfaction; Goal 2: Make transit, walking, bicycling, taxi, ridesharing andcarsharing the mostattractive andpreferred meansoftravel Muni fallsonboard/100,000miles Muni collisions/100,000miles Average annualtransitcostperrevenuehour Projects deliveredon-budgetbyphase Projects deliveredon-timebyphase SFMTA carbonfootprint (metrictonsC02e) Goal 3: Improve theenvironment andqualityoflife inSanFrancisco Metered hourswithnoratechangeinSFparkpilotareas Percentage oftransittripswith+5minutegapsonRapidNetwork Estimated economicimpactofMuniservicedelays(Monthly$M) Cost perunlinkedtrip Passengers perrevenuehourforbuses Percentage ofscheduledservicehoursdelivered Mean distancebetweenfailure(Bus) pm, outbound)atmaxloadpoints Percentage ofbustripsovercapacityduringPMpeak(5:00pm-5:59 am, inbound)atmaxloadpoints Percentage ofbustripsovercapacityduringAMpeak(8:00am-8:59 Percentage ofon-timeperformance Percentage ofon-timedeparturesfromterminals Percentage ofscheduledtripsdelivered Percentage ofon-timeperformancefornon-RapidNetworkroutes Percentage oftransittripswith<2minutebunchingonRapidNetwork Workplace injuries/200,000hours(100FTEs) etc.)/100,000 miles SFPD-reported transitsystemrelatedcrimes(i.e.assaults,thefts, Goal 1: Create asafer transportation experience for everyone Mean distancebetweenfailure(Historic) Mean distancebetweenfailure(LightRailVehicle) Mean distancebetweenfailure(Cable) METRIC 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1,515,000 FY 13-14 Target 85.0% 85.0% 98.5% 85.0% 14.6% 2.9% $202 50% 14.6 4.5 3.4 ------FY Target 17,434 85.0% 85.0% 98.5% 85.0% 10.7% 2.1% $192 50% 13.1

4.1 3.5 3.1 15-16 ------(Adjusted) (Adjusted) (Nominal) (Nominal) FY 2014 504,205 $224.88 $237.37 75,322 45,244 93.8% 94.4% 96.2% 66.2% 58.9% 73.9% 96.3% 59.6% 18.6% $3.05 $3.22 4,632 2,045 4,734 3,164 4.0% 8.3% 7.4% 54% $2.8 12.0 4.3 5.9 3.0 9.4 68 - - $3.29 (Nominal) (Adjusted) (Adjusted) (Nominal) FY 2015 $233.99 512,817 $227.69 43,499 74,522 93.3% 59.2% 65.6% 60.3% 72.2% 91.9% 97.7% 57.0% 97.7% 57.4% 17.2% 5,200 $3.38 5,650 1,797 4,517 4.8% 5.6% 4.7% 52% $1.9 1 0 11. 4.2 6.4 3.1 8.2 64 FY 2016 $229.37 519,477 69,646 24,146 86.5% 94.4% 99.0% 64.7% 75.3% 59.8% 98.9% 60.5% $3.38 16.9% 4,412 81.3% 97.8% 5,436 5,547 1,971 5.3% 4.1% 3.5% 54% 12.8 $1.7 63 4.3 6.4 3.2 6.4 3 2 3 3 4 3 2 1 employeesatisfactionsurvey. rewordedto “I feelasthoughtheagencycommunicatescurrent events,issues,challenges andaccomplishmentsclearly”inthe2016 Employeeratingof “I haveaccesstoinformationaboutagencyaccomplishments,current events,issuesandchallenges” hasbeen FY16 andarebasedonpreliminaryunauditedfinancials. figuresareadjustedforinflationtoreflect FY16 dollars Current throughMarch 2016 Key Performance Indicators events, issues,challengesandaccomplishmentsclearly; Employee rating:Ifeelasthoughtheagencycommunicatescurrent 5 (high) Employee rating:Overallemployeesatisfaction.Scaleof1(low)to Structural operatingbudgetdeficit your job?Scaleof1(low)to5(high) Employee rating:Doyoufeelhavetheinformationneedtodo Goal 4: Create acollaborative environment to support delivery ofoutstandingservice year Employees withperformanceplanspreparedbythestartoffiscal (high) to5(low) Unscheduled absenceratebyemployeegroup(Transit Operators) Farebox recoveryratio challenges andcurrentevents?Scaleof1(low)to5(high) Employee rating:Doyoufeelinformedaboutagencyissues, Structural capitalbudgetdeficit(SOGR) and communications.Scaleof1(low)to5(high) Stakeholder rating:SatisfactionwithSFMTA decision-makingprocess Employees withannualappraisalsbasedontheirperformanceplans METRIC 1 1 1 online: Board ofDirectors’ Policy &Governance Committee. These reportsarealsoavailable metrics listedin Additionally, reportsontheSFMTA’s Key Performance Indicators(includingthose on agency goals and objectives, found online at The SFMTA hasdeveloped interactive itsperformance publicdashboardsdetailing http://sfmta.com/about-sfmta/reports/strategic-plan-progress-reports. 1 1 Table 12) areissuedmonthlyanddiscussed indepthattheSFMTA 1 1 4 scale of 1 scaleof1 1 1 FY 13-14 Target $260M $70M 100% 100% ------FY Target $130M http://sfmta.com/performance. $35M 100% 100%

3.9 3.9 3.9 4.0 15-16 - - - FY 2014 $260M 62.5% 62.5% $35M 9.4% 30% 3.4 3.5 3.5 - - FY 2015 54.2% 31.3% 7.7% 30% 2.9 3.4 3.6 3.5 - FY 2016 $232M 58.9% 59.1% 26% 8.6% 3.3 3.4 3.5 - 3 37 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP Figure 8. Annual Boardings in Millions, FY 2011 to FY 2016 Figure 9. Percent of scheduled trips delivered, FY 2012 - FY 2016

235 99.5 99.1% 99 232 M 230 98.5 229 M 228 M 225 98

223 M 222 M 97.5 220 97.1% 97.7% 97

215 96.5 Annual Boardings (millions) 96.3% 214 M 96.8% 96 210 95.5 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016

TRANSIT RIDERSHIP GROWING. Since FY 2011, transit ridership has been growing and SCHEDULED SERVICE DELIVERED HAS IMPROVED AND REMAINS HIGH. Between recovering from a dip that started in FY2010. Throughout FY2015 and FY2016, the SFMTA FY 2012 and FY 2016, scheduled service delivery improved from around 97 percent to 99 implemented a series of service increases and route changes under the Muni Forward program. percent. By delivering over 99 percent of scheduled service, SFMTA is currently exceeding its CHAPTER 3: SERVICE & SYSTEM EVALUATION The agency will continue to monitor ridership to evaluate the effectiveness of its service as well target as it has expanded service and hired new operators. Fewer missed runs have improved as improve service quality and reliability to generate long-term ridership gains. service reliability for customers.

Figure 10. Mean distance between failures, FY 2012 - 2016 Figure 11. Percent On-Time Performance, FY 2013 - FY 2016

6,000 light rail vehicles rubber tire fleet 58.2% 59.8% 38 60% 57.9% 56.8%

5,250

40% 4,500

20% 3,750

3,000 0% FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016

MEAN DISTANCE BETWEEN VEHICLE FAILURES IS IMPROVING. Vehicle maintenance WORKING TO IMPROVE ON-TIME PERFORMANCE. Between 2012 and 2015, San Francisco’s and reliability has improved significantly since FY 2012. For light rail vehicles, the mean population increased by over 35,000 (4.5 percent) while employment mushroomed by over distance between failures has lengthened by about 75 percent even though the existing Breda 86,000 (14.8 percent). Even with this rapid growth and stress on the transportation network,

SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP vehicles are four years older. For the rubber tire fleet (both motor and trolley coaches), the mean the SFMTA has maintained an on-time performance rate of approximately 60 percent. The distance between failures has lengthened by about 67 percent due to increased maintenance SFMTA is working to improve on-time performance by reassessing schedules and supervision and the beginning of the replacement of older transit vehicles. deployment, implementing red lanes reserved for transit and taxis and implementing a new radio communications system to improve real-time responsiveness to traffic and service delays. Table 13. FY2016 MuniFixedRoute Weekday BoardingsbyLine(roundedtonearest100) Grid Frequent Muni Metro & Rapid Bus 23 Monterey 21 Hayes 19 Polk 46th Avenue18 12 Folsom/Pacific 10 Townsend 6 Haight/Parnassus 5 Fulton 3 Jackson 2 Clement 1 California J Church 27 Bryant 29 Sunset 31 Balboa KT Ingleside/ThirdStreet 7 Haight/Noriega 14 Mission 9 San Bruno 8 Bayshore 43 Masonic 33 Ashbury/18th 44 O’Shaughnessy 54 Felton 48 Quintara/24thStreet 45 Union/Stockton L Taraval 22 Fillmore M Ocean View M 30 Stockton 19th28 Avenue 24 Divisadero N Judah 47 Van Ness 47 Van 38 Geary 49 Van Ness/Mission 49 Van 7R Haight/Noriega Rapid 5R Fulton Rapid 9R San BrunoRapid 38R GearyRapid 28R 19th Avenue Rapid 14R MissionRapid ROUTE MUNI Light Rail Vehicle Light Light Rail Vehicle Light Light Rail Vehicle Light Light Rail Vehicle Light Light Rail Vehicle Light Trolley Coach Trolley Coach Trolley Coach Trolley Coach Trolley Coach Trolley Coach Trolley Coach Trolley Coach Trolley Coach Trolley Coach Trolley Coach Trolley Coach Trolley Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach VEHICLE TYPE 33,000 23,000 23,800 23,300 42,500 24,300 30,600 21,800 49,200 29,300 22,400 16,200 16,400 12,400 16,200 18,200 10,500 10,800 10,400 18,100 13,100 11,000 11,300 11,800 3,600 5,400 6,300 9,700 4,800 6,600 9,800 9,200 2,600 3,100 4,100 6,100 2,100 7,200 7,400 7,800 7,400 7,900 WEEKDAY BOARDINGS

Owl Specialized Historic Connector 67 BernalHeights 66 Quintara 57 Park Merced 56 Rutland 55 16th Street 52 Excelsior 39 Coit 37 Corbett 36 Teresita 35 Eureka Island 25 Treasure 91 Owl 90 San BrunoOwl 41 Union 38BX GearyBExpress 38AX Geary A Express 31BX BalboaBExpress 31AX Balboa A Express 30X MarinaExpress 14X MissionExpress 8BX BayshoreBExpress 8AX Bayshore A Express 7X Noriega Express 1BX CaliforniaBExpress 1AX California A Express NX Judah Express & F Market Wharves Powell/Hyde CableCar Powell/Mason CableCar California CableCar 88 BART Shuttle Express 83X Mid-Market 82X Levi PlazaExpress 81X CaltrainExpress ROUTE MUNI Historic Streetcar Trolley Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach Motor Coach VEHICLE Cable Car Cable Car Cable Car TYPE 19,800 2,000 1,000 1,000 4,000 1,500 1,500 1,800 1,500 2,200 6,200 5,700 1,400 1,600 1,200 1,200 6,600 4,500 3,500 2,100 3,100 5,100 800 400 500 700 800 300 900 900 400 300 600 100 WEEKDAY BOARDINGS 39 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 3: SERVICE & SYSTEM EVALUATION 40 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 3: SERVICE & SYSTEM EVALUATION Table 14. Performance On-Time Definition service routes. schedule, ratherthaninformingthefleetplanningand accordingtothe It measuresMuniservicedelivery in Propositionvoters E when the SFMTA was formed. is aservicestandardmandatedbytheSan Francisco Performance:On-Time On-timeperformance(OTP) and transitoperatoravailability. and grades,requiredheadways, vehicleavailability physical routecharacteristics such asstreetwidths routetype, criteria includingpeakloadfactors, and low-income technical communitiesandconsiders in amannerthatpreventsdiscriminationtominority Vehicle Assignment: Muni busstoporraillinestop. Francisco shouldbewithinaquarter ofamile Coverage: planned capacityandpassengerloads. type, transit shelter placement, stop spacing, and performance, servicespan,headways foreach route for: servicecoverage, vehicleassignment,on-time in Proposition E. These standardsdefinepolicies needs, systemperformance,andmandateslisted in responsetodevelopmentpatterns, customer a setofdesignstandardsdevelopedbySFMTA staff The SFMTA operatesMunitransitservicebasedon STRUCTURE SERVICE TRANSIT MUNI Owl Specialized Connector Grid Local Frequent Rapid & ROUTE TYPE All residential neighborhoods inSan DEFINITION the scheduled time to fourminuteslateof within oneminuteearly % oftimepointsserved headway above thescheduled gap offiveminutes % oftripswithaservice The SFMTA assignsvehicles OTP STANDARD (schedule adherence) 85% on-time with aservicegap Less than14% oftrips Table 15. MuniService PlanStandard,byRoute Type type aslistedbelow. byroute service fortheminimumnumberofhours Service Span: needed. constraints. may be installed as Additional shelters minimum of 125 daily boardings within environmental installed attransitstops(both busandrail)witha Transit ShelterInstallation:Transit are shelters Table 16. MuniPolicy Headways, byRoute Type routes maybehigherbasedondemand. Muni routetype.However, frequenciesofindividual weekday headways fortransitserviceestablishedby Policy Headways: Thefollowingaretheminimum * Rapid routes run as a local service duringlatenighttransitservice. * Rapid routesrun asalocalservice Rapid Weekend Specialized Grid Connector Local Frequent Connector Local Frequent Rapid & Weekday ROUTE TYPE Owl Specialized Connector Grid Local Frequent Rapid & ROUTE TYPE Muni serviceisplannedtooperate SERVICE SPAN STANDARD 5:00 am(minimum30minuteheadways) 5:00 am– Late nightservice,generallybetween1:00 Based ondemand Based ondemand 18 hours 18 hours DAY 30 20 30 20 12 10 based ondemand EVENING 30 20 30 20 15 15 LATE NIGHT 20* 30 20 30 -- -- to CableCar. * Rail technology limitsoperationtogradesunder10 percent.Notapplicable Table 18. MuniRail Passenger Load Standards,by Vehicle Type (established byvehicletype). of thecombinedseatingandstandingcapacity peak directionloadfactordoesnotexceed85percent planned tooperateservicesuch thatthepeakhour, Passenger Loads-Rail:Munirailserviceshouldbe Table 17. MuniStopSpacingStandards,by Vehicle Type topography andmajortripgenerators. transit transfer points, land uses, major streets, key of trafficcontrolstohelppeople walking cross influenced bymanyincludingthelocation factors, The placementoftransitstopswillcontinuetobe street grids and grades in San Francisco.the diverse developed sothattheycanbemeaningfully applied to Stop Spacing:Thefollowingguidelineswere *Crush loadisapproximately 125% ofplanningcapacity Cable Car Streetcar Rail Vehicle Light VEHICLE TYPE Surface Rail* Bus VEHICLE TYPE STOP SPACING STANDARD Approximately 900 to 1,500 feet to1,500 Approximately 900 case-by-case basis Rapid andSpecialized stopstobespacedona feetongradesover 10%500 than orequalto10%; stopsmaybeasclose to1,360feetongradesless Approximately 800 PLANNING CAPACITY 119 63 60 STANDARD 85% LOAD 101 54 51 Table 19. Average MaximumandCrowdingLoads forRubber fleet Tire bus tobefull. wouldconsidera to representwhenmostcustomers standee, which the Transit CapacityManualconsiders crowding perbusandassumes3.0squarefeet capacity ofeach vehicle. The secondmetricevaluates standee todeterminethetotalseatedandstanding this analysis,SFMTA assumed4.5squarefeetper bythe numberofscheduleddivided buses.For point oftherouteover a30or60minuteinterval how many peoplepassthroughthemostcrowded load, which is used to schedule service and evaluates tire passengerloads. isaveragemaximum The first Two distinct guidelines were developed for rubber restrict standeesto1.0 to1.6 timestheseatedloads. better alignwithindustrystandards,which typically to reflecttheshift tonewlow-floor vehiclesandto recently updateditsrubbertirepassengerloads Passenger Loads-Rubber TheSFMTATire: has % ofstandeestoseats standing passengers) (total seatedand Crowding perbus % ofstandeestoseats passengers) seated andstanding Maximum load(total VEHICLE TYPE 32FT BUS 160% 140% 38 33 40FT BUS 165% 145% 51 44 60FT BUS 155% 185% 81 69 POLICY EQUITY SERVICE MUNI community forfurther inputinthefall of2017. Staff willbringthesedraft strategiesback tothe will informdraft strategiesfortheFY2019-2020 cycle. of 2017. Communityfeedback andperformancedata roundofpublicoutreachfirst willbegininthespring andthe neighborhoodleaders, of meetingwithkey progress oftheEquityStrategy. Staff isintheprocess SFMTA Boardinthefallof2016 regarding the planned through2018. Staff reported back tothe Various strategieswereimplemented, withmore are includedintheSFMTA’s FY2017 –FY2018 budget. major challenges. The strategy’s recommendations outreach, anddevelopsstrategiestoaddressthe neighborhoods throughcommunitystakeholder Muni transit-related challenges impacting selected neighborhoods throughdataanalysis,identifiesmajor performance inselectlowincomeandminority Equity Strategy, which assessesMuniservice In April 2016, theSFMTA Boardapproved thefirst process. toinform the SFMTA’syears biennialbudget approval the SFMTA tocreateanEquityStrategyeverytwo of San Francisco mostinneed. This policycallsfor policy inFY2014 toimprove Muni service intheareas disability community, theSFMTA adoptedanequity Working withsocialjusticeadvocates andthe service performsequallyacrossallneighborhoods. service quality across San Francisco and ensuring that SFMTA iscommitted tocontinuallyimproving Muni Cover frommostrecentMuniService EquityStrategyReport April 2016 Fiscal Year 2016-17 and2017-18 San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency MUNI SERVICE EQUITY STRATEGY REPORT 41 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 3: SERVICE & SYSTEM EVALUATION 42 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 3: SERVICE & SYSTEM EVALUATION accommodated onthesites. joint developmentafter transitprioritiesare conditionsforpotential and consideringmarket and transitoperationalmaintenanceneeds, based on fleet storage various scenarios to pursue The Facilities Framework provides theSFMTA to addressSFMTA’s facilityneedsthrough2040. flexible anddynamictoolthatprovides alternatives In 2017, theSFMTA drafted aFacilities Framework, a needs totheSFMTA’s existingfacilitiescampus. Assessment, to identify the state of good repair transit fleetgrowthneeds,anda Facilities Condition specific programofprojectstoaddressimmediate the developmentofaFacilities CapitalProgram, a issues identified in the Vision Report. This included which generatedrecommendations toaddressthe Report, theSFMTA formedaFacilities Task Force, In 2015, basedon therecommendationsin Vision (Vision Report). Estate andFacilities Vision forthe21stCenturyReport findings and recommendations of the SFMTA Real In 2013, theSFMTA acceptedthe BoardofDirectors &FACILITIES EQUIPMENT PLANNING PROGRAM PLANNING TRANSPORTATION BASED COMMUNITY- MTC speeds, cutthroughtraffic,andhasbeenidentified neighborhood isalsochallenged withhighvehicle residents strugglingwithcity’s highcostofliving. The income housingandlargepopulationofminority of Concern (COC) with a high concentration of low- Addition continuestobedefinedasaCommunity existing conditionsstudyrevealedthatthe Western effort inthe Western Addition neighborhood. The In late 2014, the SFMTA began leading the CBTP Broadway-Chinatown (October2014). (June 2010), Western South(March ofMarket 2012), and Point BayviewHunters Mission-Geneva (April2007), and completedCBTPsinthefollowingcommunities: With funding from Proposition K, SFCTA planned Francisco Country Transportation Authority (SFCTA). San Francisco hastraditionallybeenledbytheSan Planning Program (CBTP)fortheCityandCountyof Commission’s (MTC’s) Community-based Transportation I nvolvement in the Metropolitan Transportation Outreach for Western Addition Community-Based Transportation Plan network calledthe Walkable Western Addition, which term improvements alsoincludeapedestrianlighting Buchananrecreational assetslike StreetMall.Long- projects toenhancesafetyand accesstocommunity Community Connectionsprojects,which arecapital flashing beacons. Long-term improvements include pedestrian countdownsignalsandrectangularrapid Street as well as signal enhancements in the form of corridor treatments onGoldenGate Avenue and Turk Mid-termimprovements include41 intersections. address immediatepedestriansafetyconcernsat continentalcrosswalkslike anddaylighting,to consist oflow-cost, quick andeffective treatment, recommendations. Neartermrecommendations team refinedconceptualdesignsandproducedfinal analyzing thecommunity’s feedback, theproject assessed designsusingascorecardexercise. After street designoptions,wherethecommunity feedback, theprojectteam developedandpresented hosting atotalof11 events.Basedoncommunity process began andwas completedinMay2016, August 2015, thethree-phased communityoutreach community based organization (CBO) Mo’MAGIC. In Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) andcontracted Transportation Authority (SFCTA), theproject’s 5 SupervisorBreed,theSan Francisco County project, theSFMTA closelywithDistrict hasworked During thepreliminaryplanningandthroughout design (CPTED). but alsocrimepreventionthroughenvironmental project tonotonlyfocusontransportation safety, After initialoutreach, theprojectteamrefined community’s walking, biking,andtransitexperience. improvements withanemphasisonenhancingthe on neighborhood-leveltransportation safety SFMTA initiatedtheplanningprocesswithafocus program asahigh-injuryarea. With thisknowledge, by thecity’s Vision Zeropolicyand WalkFirst remaining demand-responsive transportation remaining demand-responsive services. also subcontractswithvanandtaxicompaniesforthe as theparatransitbroker, thethirdparty contractor transportation demand-responsive services.Initsrole overall SFParatransit program,andaportion ofthe services, includingmanagementofthe brokerage contracts withathirdparty contractorforparatransit SFMTA owns122 vehiclesintheparatransitfleetand services since1978. disabled people.Munihasprovided paratransit agencies toprovide paratransitservicestoeligible Disabilities Act (ADA) has required all public transit health condition. Since 1990, the Americans with public transitbecauseofadisabilityordisabling for peopleunabletoindependentlyuseoraccess San Francisco Paratransit isavanandtaxiprogram SERVICES PARATRANSIT identify additionalfundingsources. funded. The SFMTA isworkingwiththeSFCTA to the long-termrecommendationsarecurrently 25% for the near- and mid-term recommendations, while when travelingatnight.Funding isprogrammed addresses resident’s safetyandsecurityconcerns aarni ai Services Paratransit Taxi The “Shop-a-Round” Shuttle isavanservicethat with disabilitiestoandfrom thegrocerystores. uses vans and taxis to transport and people seniors service throughthe “Shop-a-Round” programwhich In addition,SFMTA provides specialized paratransit service: San Francisco Paratransit provides three typesof Capital FinancialPlansectionofthisdocument. in the description of the SFMTA transit fleet in the information onthevehicleprocurementcanbefound 47 in FY 2017 and approximately 16 in FY 2018). More vehicles toreplaceexisting(approximately the SFMTA willprocureapproximately 63Paratransit 76X-Marin Headlandsline.InFY2017 andFY2018, mirroringMarin Headlandsonweekends theMuni part ofDalyCityinSan MateoCounty, andto Francisco, to Treasure Island,tothenorthernmost The SFMTA provides paratransitservicewithinSan • • • Health Care, senior centers, orworksites. Health Care,seniorcenters, specific agencyprogramssuch as AdultDay to groupsof ADA-eligible attending customers van serviceproviding door-to-door transportation Group Van Service -Group Van isapre-scheduled transportation needs. many findthatitbetter customers meetstheir public. This isnotan ADA mandatedservice,but to-curb taxiservicethatisavailabletothegeneral Taxi Services -Paratransit taxiisthesamecurb- pick-up time. is provided withinonehouroftherequested seven daysbeforethedayoftrip,andservice areservationfromoneto mustmake customers SF Access isashared-rideservice.SF Access pre-scheduled, door-to-door ADA vanservices. SF Access Vanprovides Service -SFAccess and publictransportation system. expanding theaccessibilityofSan Francisco’s streets MAAC isdedicatedtomaintaining,improving, and provide inputonaccessibility-related projects. disabilities whoregularlyuseSFMTA servicesand with (MAAC) andcustomers isagroupofseniors Committee Multimodal AccessibilityAdvisory the input totheSFMTA onparatransitservices. Also, the PCCmeetsregularlytodiscussandprovide paratransit program. CommitteeThe Executive of toprovide input on the andothers representatives, socialserviceagency serviceproviders, customers, Coordinating Council(PCC)isanadvisorybodyfor with paratransitservices. The Paratransit SFMTA has a longhistoryofcommunityinvolvement disabilities inaneffort to reducesocialisolation. andpeoplewith and culturaleventsforseniors services toinclude Van Goghshuttle servicetosocial SFMTA expandedthenetworkofparatransit in goingtoandfromthegrocerystore. designated allotmentoftaxidebitcardvalueforuse withabased shoppingservicesprovide passengers from preselectedstoresonaweeklybasis. Taxi- toand groupsofuptosevenpassengers takes SF Paratransit website: http://www.sfparatransit.com/. canbefoundMore information onthe onparatransitservices 43 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 3: SERVICE & SYSTEM EVALUATION 44 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 3: SERVICE & SYSTEM EVALUATION Table 20.2016 FTA Triennial Review, SummaryofFindingsandCorrective Action Status (Section 2),asrequiredbyFTA C4702.1B. (Section 1)and “Program-Specific Requirements” compliance withboththe “General Requirements” SFMTA’s 2013 Title VI Program anddetailstheSFMTA’s 2016 deadline. The program provided anupdatetothe Program was submitted toFTA bytheDecember1, Officer everythreeyears. TheSFMTA’s 2016Title VI Transit Administration’s (FTA) RegionalRights Civil to submitanupdated Title VI Program totheFederal As arecipientoffederalfunds,theSFMTA isrequired &REPORT ANALYSIS VI TITLE D.149 Maintenance Review Area: D.79 D.208 D.122 Area: TechnicalReview Capacity D.276 D.783 Review Area: FinancialManagement andCapacity FINDING nance mainte- Late facility/equipmentpreventative grants/untimelycloseouts Inactive contractor/ lessees ofsubrecipient/ third-partyInadequate oversight Incorrect FFRreporting Ineligible expensescharged togrant No financialpoliciesandprocedures DEFICIENCY three consecutive months. three consecutive maintenance ontimefor demonstrates ithasconductedatleast80 percentofitsfacilitypreventive maintenanceresultsuntilthedata officer orotherseniormanagementdesignee onitspreventive The granteemustsubmittotheFTA regional officeamonthlyreport signedbythe chief executive actions employed. accurate closeoutschedulekey causesofdelayandcorrective withspecificinformationrelatedto for grantadministrationtoenableitclosegrantsmoretimely. The granteemustsubmitan The granteemustsubmittotheFTA regionalofficemoreeffective proceduresandastaffingplan monitor itsparatransitcontractorformeetingFTA requirements. The granteemustsubmitimplementedproceduresandastaffingplantotheFTA regionalofficeto FTA beforehand. indirect ratesafter July 1,2016 unlesstheFY2016 and2017 Cost Allocation Plansareapproved by validating FFRdata,includingindirectrates,totheFTA regionaloffice.SFMTA willnotreport the appropriatelyapproved indirectrateexpenditures forallopengrants,andprocedures The granteemustsubmitcorrected FFRsin TrAMS forthenextreporting periodthatwouldreflect FTA. 2016and thecostallocationplansforfiscalyears and2017 havebeensubmitted andapproved by costs beginningJuly 1,2016 untiltheoverbilling amounthasbeenreconciledandrefundedtoFTA indirect rateamountscharged togrants.Inaddition,SFMTA willnotbepermitted tocharge indirect The granteemustdocumentandworkwiththeFTA FTA regionalofficetoreimburse forincorrect that demonstratestheprocedureshavebeenimplemented. and indirectratemanagement. The granteemustsubmittotheFTA regionalofficedocumentation procedures mustincorporateaprocessforperformingvarianceanalysisofoperatingfinancials, throughouttheorganization.grant implementationandareunderstood The financialmanagement The granteemustsubmittotheFTA regionalofficefinancialpoliciesandproceduresthat govern CORRECTIVE ACTION Update isduetotheFTA onDecember1,2019. inNovember 2016.of Directors The next Title VI Program monitoring report wereapproved bytheSFMTA Board minority andnon-minorityroutes. The updateand wide transitservicestandardstotheperformanceof of themonitoringprogramwhich comparessystem- In additiontothe2016 Update,SFMTA provided results was conductedinMay2016. Deficiencieswere The most recent FTA Triennial Review of the SFMTA REVIEW TRIENNIAL FTA available uponrequest). remaining itemsareclosed(copiesoftheReview are As ofMarch 2017, twofindingsarependingandthe and includedinthefinalreport, issuedin July 2016. was createdinordertoaddressthesedeficiencies Opportunity (EEO). A schedule forcorrective actions Drug and Alcohol Program; andEqualEmployment and MajorService Reductions; Drug-Free Workplace / Continuing Control; Public Comment on Fare Increases Maintenance; ADA; Title VI; Procurement; Satisfactory Management andCapacity; Technical Capacity; identified inthefollowingreviewareas:Financial Finding closed. Finding closed. Finding closed. Finding closed. Pending. Finding closed. STATUS Table 20.(Continued)2016 FTA Triennial Review, SummaryofFindingsandCorrective Action Status D.225 D.204 Review Area: EqualEmployment Opportunity (EEO) D.28 Review Area: Drug-Free Workplace/ Drug and Alcohol Program D.27 Review Area: PublicCommentonFare Increases andMajorServiceReductions D.161 Review Area: Satisfactory ContinuingControl D.340 D.271 ProcurementReview Area: D.11 Area:VI Title Review D.109 D.73 (ADA) Disabilities Act Review Area:with Americans FINDING EEO monitoring/reporting systemdeficiencies EEO utilizationanalysis/goaldeficiencies ments Drug andalcoholpolicylacking requiredele- defined Deficiencies inpubliccommentprocessas fixedroutebusspareratio Excessive Lacking independentcostestimate Lacking requiredcost/priceanalysis persons Lacking assessmentorprovisions forLEP mentary paratransitservice Limits orcapacityconstraintson ADA comple - ciencies ADA complementaryparatransitservicedefi- DEFICIENCY system. The granteemustdevelopandsubmittotheFTA RCROadetailedmonitoringand reporting byemployeeclassification. last threeyears, The granteemustprovide justificationtotheFTA RCROwherepriorgoalswerenotmet over the forts documentationfornewhirepreviousemployerchecks. The granteemustsubmittotheFTA regionalofficeanamendedpolicyaddressing goodfaithef- will beconsidered. public commentspriortoafareincreaseormajorservicereductionthataddresses howcomments The granteemustsubmittotheFTA regionalofficeawritten policyforsolicitingandconsidering Milestone Progress Reports. its spareratiothatcannotbecompletedwithin90days,thegranteemustreport progressin TrAMS grantee mustsubmitanupdatedfleetmanagementplan.Ifthesubmitsaplanforreducing inwhichplan shouldincludedetailedjustificationsforyears spareratiosexceed20percent. The number ofbusestobeadded,theprojectedpeakrequirement,andspareratio. The for each yearuntilthespareratioreaches 20percent,thenumberofbusestobedisposed of, the cent. The planshouldincludeaspreadsheetlisting,foreach bustype,thenumberofbuses,and, The granteemustsubmittotheFTA regionalofficeaplanforreducingthespareratioto20per tation thattherequiredprocesswas implemented. proposals. For thenextprocurement,granteemustsubmittoFTA regionalofficedocumen- ment processtoincludedevelopmentofindependentcostestimatespriorreceiptbidsor The granteemustprovide theFTA regionalofficedocumentationthat ithasupdateditsprocure- that therequiredanalysiswas implemented. contract modifications. For thenext change order, thegranteemust submittoFTA documentation ment processtoincludeperformingcostandpriceanalysisforeveryprocurementaction,including The granteemustprovide theFTA regionalofficedocumentationthat ithasupdateditsprocure- included inthe Title VI plan. intheLAP The granteemustsubmittotheRCROevidenceofoperatortrainingforcontractors of theprocesstobeusedreview ADA paratransitcontractorforcapacityconstraints. its definitionofmissedtripsandaccuratelytrack callabandonmentdata,andsubmitadescription transit servicereservationandscheduling systemforcapacityconstraints. The granteemustupdate The granteemustsubmittotheFTA RCROproceduresformonitoringits ADA complementarypara- requirements. no-show policyincludedonitswebsiteandallpublicfacingdocumentsiscompliantwith ADA The granteemustupdateandsubmittotheFTA RCROevidencethatinformationregarding the CORRECTIVE ACTION - Finding closed. Finding closed. Finding closed. Finding closed. Finding closed. Finding closed. Finding closed. Finding closed. Finding closed. Pending. STATUS 45 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 3: SERVICE & SYSTEM EVALUATION CHAPTER 4: OPERATIONS PLAN & BUDGET

The Operations Plan and Budget included in the Short Range Transit Plan outlines the projected revenues and expenses for Muni transit service as well as other transportation services provided by SFMTA. It provides a 15-year look ahead for the fixed and demand-responsive services, including the service enhancements that are a significant part of the Muni Forward initiative to make transit faster and more reliable for Muni customers. It also includes other efforts under the purview of SFMTA that are supportive of the entire transportation system in San Francisco. SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2030 SRTP transit, andexpandcapacityonheavy-ridership routes. segments inordertoaddconnectionsbetweenneighborhoods andtoregional the SFMTA tofocusinvestment wheredemandishigh,discontinuelow-ridership discussed inprevioussectionsofthedocument. This serviceframeworkenables Under Muni Forward, the SFMTA the fixed route service as will continue to deliver MUNI SERVICE OPERATIONS FRAMEWORK city’s multimodaltransportation system. toimprove thesafety,agencywide initiatives reliability, andeffectiveness ofthe Muni Forward, Vision Zero,andtheStrategicPlan,SFMTA hasstarted several bicycling, ridesharing,andautomobilemovement. Through theimplementationof plan andsupporting acrossallmodes–transit,walking, budgetincludesdelivery The SFMTA is responsible for all surface transportation in the city, and the operations PLAN OPERATIONS BUDGET & PLAN OPERATIONS • • along theroute. Rapid network. They provide high-quality, frequentservicebut withmorestops Frequent: few blocks. areheadingacrosstown,orsimplytraveling a reliability whethercustomers speedand priority enhancementsalongtheroutes,Rapid networkdelivers backbone oftheMunisystem. With vehiclesarriving frequentlyandtransit Muni Metro &RapidBus:: These heavilyusedbusand raillinesformthe These routescombinedwithMuni MetroandRapid Buscreatethe and investments. guidance forthetransitplanningprocess.Second, itguidesfuturetransitevaluation ofthedifferentunderstanding rolesthattransitroutesplayinthecityandsets This Service Policy Frameworkitprovides aclear servesmultiplepurposes.First, http://muniforward.com/. For moreinformation ofMuniForward, pleasecheck andrecentupdatesonthe implementation • • • • Francisco activities. and specialeventtripstoservesporting andotherSan events,largefestivals They include service, AM andPMcommuteservice,owlweekend-only day toserveaspecificneed,ortraveldemandrelated specialevents. Specialized: andCableCars. Historic: HistoricStreetcars tomajortransithubs. customers hillside residentialneighborhoods,fillingin gaps incoverage andconnecting Connector: These busroutespredominantlycirculatethroughSan Francisco’s typically operatelessfrequentlythantheRapid networkroutes. more thanashort walk, oraseamlesstransfer. Dependingondemand,they gettotheirdestinationswithno core systemthatletscustomers expansive Grid: These citywideroutescombinewiththeRapid networktoforman These routesaugmentexistingserviceduringspecifictimes of 47 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 4: OPERATIONS PLAN & BUDGET 48 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 4: OPERATIONS PLAN & BUDGET * Table 21. PlannedLevels ofService Systemwide, FY2016 –FY2030 three percentincreaseintransitserviceFY2015 January 2015, approved a theBoardof Directors After theSFMTA’s determination offiscalhealthin agency’s financialconstraints. state’s legal andregulatoryrequirementsthe Forward staywithinthecity’s, initiatives region’s, and projects andoperationsplanwillensurethattheMuni engagement involved inthedevelopmentofthese planning, environmental assessment, and community performance onitsfixedrouteservice. Theextensive customer service,communications,andtransit for theagencytoachieve toimprove itsobjectives The MuniForward operationsplanisthepathforward IMPROVEMENTS MUNI FORWARD SERVICE stakeholders. andotherkey with customers potential serviceincreases–inclosecoordination it wouldbeevaluatedforimprovements –such as route is performing better than its category average, routes intheirservicecategory. For example,ifa across thesystem,routeswillbecomparedtosimilar on aroutinebasis.Rather thancomparingroutes The SFMTA evaluatestheperformanceofitsroutes Scheduled increasefor CentralSubwayinFY2020 3percentservice service Revenue Service Miles SERVICE Revenue Service Hours All Transit Modes INCREASES Central Subway Muni Forward 23,046,459 3,172,582 (actual) FY 2015 24,659,711 3,394,663 FY 2016 + 7% 24,659,711 3,394,663 FY 2017 24,659,711 3,394,663 FY 2018 document. be foundintheCapitalFinancialPlansectionofthis brief description of these capital investments can such fleetfacilityreconstruction andexpansion. A the servicechanges require capitalinvestments, without physical infrastructurechanges, someof Though many ofthesesystemupdatesweredelivered transit inSan Francisco by: implemented resultinginmajorimprovements to the approved 10 percent service increase has been and asevenpercentincreaseinFY2016. To date, • • • • • • • Expanding Rapid services. Connector, andSpecialized services. Changing themixofRapid, Frequent, Grid, Introducing largerbusesoncrowdedroutes. Eliminating underutilized routesorroutesegments. Changing existingroutealignments. Creating newroutes. heavily usedcorridors. Increasing frequencyoftransitservicealong 24,659,711 3,394,663 FY 2019 25,399,502 FY 2020 3,496,503 + 3% * 25,399,502 3,496,503 FY 2021 25,399,502 3,496,503 FY 2022 25,399,502 3,496,503 FY 2023 25,399,502 3,496,503 FY 2024 25,399,502 the week. pmevery dayof service between10:00 amand7:00 summer of2015, theEEmbarcaderonowprovides AT&T Park and the CaltrainStation.Launched inthe established toconnectthenortheast waterfront to E Embarcadero: Anewhistoricstreetcarlinehasbeen Improvements. in conjunction with the Muni Forward Service enhancements to these lines will be implemented as part ofthe Transit Effectiveness Project and The historicstreetcartransitrouteswereanalyzed SERVICE TRANSIT STREETCAR HISTORIC scheduled tostart inFY2020. below, T Third serviceintheCentralSubway is Central Subway revenue service starts. As noted three percentincreaseintransitservicewhenthe and serviceupgrades,theSFMTA willimplementa In additiontotheMuniForward portfolio ofprojects 3,496,503 FY 2025 planning/projects/muni-forward-implementation-plan plans:http://www.sfmta.com/projects-implementation SFMTA workbook haspreparedadetailed thatdiscusses androutechangesfor improvements, service andcapital For an in-depthreview tools,proposals oftheimplementation 25,399,502 3,496,503 FY 2026 25,399,502 3,496,503 FY 2027 25,399,502 3,496,503 FY 2028 25,399,502 3,496,503 FY 2029 25,399,502 3,496,503 FY 2030 for theagency. services, regulatory, andcommunicationsoperations projects aswelltheadministration,financial the predevelopment, planning, and review of capital Financial Plan supports these operations by funding improve thetransportation network. The Operating and implementscommunity-based projectsto bicycling andwalking, regulatestaxis,and plans SFMTA managesparkingandtraffic, facilitates nation’s eighthlargestpublictransitsystem,the In additiontooperatingandmaintainingthe AGENCYWIDE OPERATIONS Gogh Service toculturalandrecreationalactivities. grocery storesandshoppingdistricts;the Van to-door services;theShop-a-Round servicetolocal paratransit vanandtaxiprogramthatprovides door- disability have several options available to them: a who cannotaccessthefixedroutesystemduetotheir in detailChapter3ofthisdocument,customers people with disabilities inSan Francisco. As described and services willcontinuetobeavailableseniors Disabilities Act (ADA)-compliant transportation that theappropriate,accessible, Americans with The SFMTA Accessible Services Program ensures DEMAND RESPONSIVE SERVICES PARATRANSIT & frequency wouldincreasefrom6to5minutes. by thenewEEmbarcaderoLine,thoughmid-day in themorningduetoadditionalcapacityprovided proposed forthisline.Frequencies wouldbereduced F Market & Wharves: No route changes are currently Table 23.SummaryofExpendituresforFY2016 Amended Budget andFY2017 andFY2018 Adopted Budget County ofSan Francisco GeneralFund. operating grants;andthetransferfromCity andgarages;permits; revenuesfromparkingmeters fares (bothfixedroute¶transit);fines,fees,and projections fromthefollowingsources:passenger The SFMTA OperatingBudgetisbasedonrevenue to submitabalanced,agencywidetwo-yearbudget. The San Francisco CityCharter requiresthe SFMTA BUDGET OPERATIONS Table 22.SummaryofRevenues forFY2016 Amended BudgetandFY2017 andFY2018 Adopted Budget Capital Projects Funded byOperatingRevenues Services fromCityDepartments Insurance, Claims&Payments toOther Agencies Rent &Building Equipment &Maintenance Use of Available Fund Balance Capital Projects Funded byOperatingRevenues General Fund Transfer (BasedonCityCharter) Other (Advertising, Interest, Taxi, andService Fees) Parking and Traffic Fees andFines Operating Grants Materials &Supplies Contracts &OtherServices Salaries &Benefits Transit Fares TOTAL Subtotal Operating Budget TOTAL Subtotal Operating Budget BUDGET CATEGORY (inmillions) BUDGET CATEGORY (inmillions) AMENDED BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET FY 2016 FY 2016 $1,017.9 $1,017.9 $946.9 $599.1 $959.9 $272.0 $292.1 $132.0 $201.0 $114.6 $62.1 $69.5 $80.3 $58.0 $20.0 $42.8 $14.5 $71.0 The CityCharter requiresthatSFMTA submitatwo- holds severalmeetingstoconsiderthebudget. as mailandemail. The Citizens’ Advisory Councilalso collection ofpubliccommentviaothermeanssuch and presentations totheBoardofSupervisors, Hall meetings,publichearingsbeforetheBoard, the budgetprocess.Outreach includes Town the publicisengaged toprovide inputthroughout As part ofthedevelopmenttwo-yearbudget, $6.8 ADOPTED BUDGET ADOPTED BUDGET FY 2017 FY 2017 $1,034.3 $1,060.7 $1,181.9 $1,181.9 $644.4 $324.5 $205.9 $150.5 $145.7 $291.5 $121.2 $147.6 $45.0 $48.1 $16.1 $76.5 $67.5 $67.5 $11.8 ADOPTED BUDGET ADOPTED BUDGET FY 2018 FY 2018 $1,254.1 $1,086.1 $1,254.1 $1,111.6 $168.0 $154.0 $299.3 $676.2 $142.5 $148.5 $337.9 $207.9 $69.2 $68.0 $78.4 $12.8 $71.0 $27.5 $47.0 49 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 4: OPERATIONS PLAN & BUDGET 50 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 4: OPERATIONS PLAN & BUDGET Specifically, thefollowingassumptionsweremade: operating needsandexpectedrevenues. current and aprojectionoffuture Board ofDirectors, Operating BudgetthroughFY2016, asapproved bythe the OperatingFinancialPlanreflectsabalanced theprojectedfinancialpicture.understand Therefore, year, butinsteadhelptheagencyanditsstakeholders designed tobeanaccurateforecastforany specific expenses fortheagency. These projectionsarenot term trends,andestimatesofprojectedrevenues financial planisbasedonhistoricalinformation,long projections forthetwo-yearbalancedbudget. This The OperatingFinancialPlangoesbeyondthe EXPENSES AND REVENUES OPERATIONS LO in itsentiretybyseventh-eleventhvote. without any action on its part or may reject the budget may allowtheSFMTA’s effect entirebudgettotake over the SFMTA Budget. The Board of Supervisors donothavelineitemauthority Board ofSupervisors byMay1.Board ofSupervisors The Mayorandthe andissubmittedBoard ofDirectors totheMayorand amending. The budgetisapproved bytheSFMTA ifthesecondyearrequires in odd-numberedyears submit budgetamendmentsforthesecondfiscalyear anditmay fiscal yearbudgetineven-numberedyears, fiscal-years-2017-and-2018 https://www.sfmta.com/projects-planning/projects/budget- 2018 OperatingBudgetandwhatitfundscanbefound here: informationDetailed on the development of the FY 2017 – FY • N FY 2020. These projectionsarebasedontheFY in operatingexpensesbetween FY2017 and FY 2020)assumesa3percent annualincrease The SFMTA 5-Year Operating Plan(FY2016 – G-TERM PROJECTED percent MuniForward transitserviceincrease. Ten On March 28, 2014, the Board approved up to a 12 SERVICE TRANSIT IN &CHANGES OPERATIONS SFMTA FUNDING • • future years basedonfeedbackfuture years fromMTC). Bridge Tolls which are assumed to be flat for all annually andrevenueby3-4percent(exceptfor expenses areprojectedtoincreaseby3-4percent Between FY2021through2040,operating additional serviceincreaseshighlightedabove. revenues foroperationsandfare revenue fromdevelopmentfees,capandtrade basedon feedbackyears fromMTC),additional are assumedtobeaflatamountforallfuture for operatinggrants(exceptBridge Tolls which 2 percent(insteadof3percent)annualincrease decline in Taxi medallionsales,assumption ofa of certain expected adjustments. These include a operating budgetasthestarting baseandconsist projections arebasedontheFY2016 approved revenues betweenFY2017 andFY2020. These a 3percentannualincreaseinoperating The SFMTA 5-Year OperatingPlanalsoassumes part oftheFY2016 baseyear. percent approved increaseintransitserviceis labor negotiations,andotherbenefits. A 10 adjustmentsper hiring, 3percentcostofliving salaries andbenefitsincludes8percentadditional facility maintenance.Specifically, anincreasein negotiated laborincreases,andinvestments in increase, Central Subway service, known year, includingbutnotlimitedto,transitservice base andincludescertain costsabove thebase 2016 approved operatingbudget asthestarting extended thedefinitionofyouth from 17 to 18. In FY 2016. Additionally, inMay2015 theSFMTA Board Google, theprogramwas continuedforFY2015 and through a variety of grants. As a result of a gift from to provide free Muni for low income youth funded In FY2013 andFY2014, theSFMTA ranapilotprogram increase intheOperatingFinancialPlan. increases infarerevenueareincludedasaconsistent (CPI-U)andlaborcosts. consumers The projected of theBay Area ConsumerPrice Indexforallurban charges. The formulaisbasedonacombination predictable andtransparentmechanism forsetting by theSFMTA tocreateamore BoardofDirectors Muni fareincreasesarebasedonaformulasetin2009 REVENUES FARE IN CHANGES PROJECTED of revenuemeasuresandexpenditurereductions. toclose thatgap throughacombination policy makers During each budgetcycle,theSFMTA workswith projected fundinggap forFY2017 throughFY2030. The lastlineoftheOperatingFinancialPlanshows materials andsupplies,professionalservices,etc. and benefits,fuel(electricity, diesel,andbiodiesel), calculated by the SFMTA O&M model: staff wages and maintenance(O&M)costsforthisservice,as Plan. These expendituresincludetheannualoperating (both laborandnon-labor)intheOperating Financial project areincludedintheOperatingExpensessection well asthoseassociatedwiththeCentralSubway These approved MuniForward serviceincreasesas FY 2016. increase inFY2015 anda7percentserviceincreasein the FY 2016 two-year budget cycle – a 3 percent service percent ofthisoverall increaseistobeimplementedin Free MuniProgram Figure 12. SFMTA OperatingExpenses,FY2012- FY2017 (inmillions) REVENUES AND EXPENSES OPERATING OF HISTORY RECENT to laborandservicecontractsmaychange. Increased will end in fiscal year 2017 at which point expenses due The current laboragreements,negotiatedin2014-5, EXPENSES CONTRACT AND LABOR this programcanbefoundatwww.sfmta.com/freemuni. Clipper® card.Moreinformationandapplicationsfor whousea anddisabledriders programs, seniors, olds enrolledinSan Francisco Unified School District for low and moderate income 18-year-olds, 19 - 22-year- this program. The SFMTA nowalsoprovides freeMuni health oftheagency, theSFMTA Boardvoted toexpand January 2015, based on an evaluation of the fiscal $1000.0 $1200.0 $200.0 $400.0 $600.0 $800.0 Operating Expenses(inmillions) Professional Services/WorkOrders Salaries FY 2012 FY 2013 Benefits FY 2014 Fuel, Lubricants,Materials&Supplies FY 2015 Other FY 2016 Plan. local fundingsourceslistedintheOperatingFinancial services, arefundedthroughthemixoffederaland Act (ADA) serviceandnon-ADA demand-responsive Paratransit Services, both Americans withDisabilities FUNDING SOURCES PARATRANSIT increase shownintheOperatingFinancialPlan. labor andcontractexpensesareincludedasanannual FY 2017 (Projected) Figure 13. SFMTA OperatingRevenues, FY2012- FY2017 (inmillions) $1000.0 $1200.0 $200.0 $400.0 $600.0 $800.0 Operating Revenues(inmillions) FY 2012 Fines, Fees,&Permits Passenger Fares FY 2013 Muni Metro Transit Service atPowell StreetStation General Fund FY 2014 Operating Grants FY 2015 Parking Meters&Garages FY 2016 Other Revenue FY 2017 (Projected) 51 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 4: OPERATIONS PLAN & BUDGET 52 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 4: OPERATIONS PLAN & BUDGET f. FY2019 toFY2022projectionsarebasedonOperating5-Year Planfigures. e. CountysalestaxsunsetsinFY2022. d. Non-Fare revenueincludesadvertising, rentalandsupports fromotherSFMTA functionssuch asparkingandtaxi. c. The SFMTA 5-Year OperatingPlanalsoassumes a2.36-3.10% annualincreaseinoperatingrevenuesbetweenFY 2019 andFY2022. These projectionsarebasedontheFY2018 approved operatingbudgetasthestarting basebetween b. The SFMTA 5-Year OperatingPlanassumesa3.1%annualincreaseinoperatingexpensesbetweenFY2019 andFY2022,exceptRetirement CityMisc.andHealth&Dentalat5%. These projectionsarebasedontheFY2018 approved a. FY2017 &FY2018 arebasedonapproved SFMTA 2-year AAO budget.Budgetdataexcludescapitalproject(CPF)includedinannualappropriationordinance. Table FY2015 24.SFMTA -FY2032 OperatingFinancialPlan(in$1,000s), FY 2023through2032,operatingexpenses areprojectedtoincreasebasedonFY2022rates. operating budgetasthestarting base. TSP Impact(%expensereductionstarting FY2018) Operating ContributionsforCapitalProjects, Future OperatingBudgetandReserves Professional Services & Work Orders TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES(b) CATEGORIES Planned Committed Projects (c) TOTAL OPERATIONAL NEEDS Other OperatingExpenses Materials andSupplies Fringe Benefits Salaries FY 2014-15 ACTUALS 956,854.0 906,060.1 374,486.3 196,893.2 106,574.9 137,975.8 50,793.9 90,129.9 0 0 FY 2015-16 ACTUALS 982,338.1 950,792.5 150,120.9 401,340.2 199,426.9 101,593.7 31,545.6 98,310.8 0 0 BUDGET (a) FY 2016-17 1,096,364.8 1,033,299.9 426,205.0 179,206.4 115,484.9 217,479.6 63,064.9 94,923.9 0 0 BUDGET (a) FY 2017-18 1,123,644.6 1,085,052.9 243,273.5 108,418.8 179,761.2 121,497.5 432,101.9 38,591.7 0 0 5-YR PLAN(f) FY 2018-19 1,119,275.3 1,117,325.0 242,664.8 455,429.6 129,738.3 101,494.6 187,997.7 1,950.3 0 0 5-YEAR PLAN(f) FY 2019-20 1,155,504.7 1,157,515.5 254,092.4 132,858.3 104,640.9 194,365.1 469,547.9 2,010.8 0 0 5-YEAR PLAN (f) FY 2020-21 1,195,046.8 1,192,973.7 200,752.0 200,752.0 266,069.5 134,163.6 484,103.9 107,884.8 2,073.1 0 0 5-YEAR PLAN(f) FY 2021-22 1,233,174.0 1,235,311.4 206,790.4 278,622.8 137,420.4 111,229.2 499,111.2 2,137.4 0 0 f. FY2019 toFY2022projectionsarebasedonOperating5-Year Planfigures. e. CountysalestaxsunsetsinFY2022. d. Non-Fare revenueincludesadvertising, rentalandsupports fromotherSFMTA functionssuch asparkingandtaxi. c. The SFMTA 5-Year OperatingPlanalsoassumesa2.36-3.10% annual increaseinoperatingrevenuesbetweenFY2019 andFY2022. These projectionsarebasedontheFY2018 approved operatingbudgetasthestarting basebetween b. The SFMTA 5-Year OperatingPlanassumesa3.1%annualincreaseinoperatingexpensesbetweenFY2019 andFY2022,exceptRetirement CityMisc.andHealth&Dentalat5%. These projectionsarebasedontheFY2018 approved a. FY2017 &FY2018 arebasedonapproved SFMTA 2-year AAO budget.Budgetdataexcludescapitalproject(CPF)includedinannualappropriationordinance. Table FY2015 24.(Continued)SFMTA -FY2032 OperatingFinancialPlan(in$1,000s), FY 2023through2032,operatingexpenses areprojectedtoincreasebasedonFY2022rates. operating budgetasthestarting base. TSP Impact(%expensereductionstarting FY2018) Operating ContributionsforCapitalProjects, Future OperatingBudgetandReserves Professional Services & Work Orders CATEGORIES Planned Committed Projects (c) TOTAL OPERATIONAL NEEDS OPERATING EXPENSES(b) Other OperatingExpenses Materials andSupplies Fringe Benefits Salaries FY 2022-23 1,278,025.4 1,275,821.7 291,780.7 213,099.7 141,680.4 514,583.6 114,677.3 2,203.7 0 0 FY 2023-24 1,322,192.1 1,319,920.1 305,572.4 530,535.7 146,072.5 118,232.3 219,507.3 2,272.0 0 0 FY 2024-25 1,365,621.6 1,367,964.0 150,600.7 150,600.7 320,029.0 546,982.3 226,112.1 121,897.5 2,342.4 0 0 FY 2025-26 1,415,304.6 1,412,889.6 232,822.2 563,938.7 155,269.4 335,182.9 125,676.3 2,415.0 0 0 FY 2026-27 1,464,460.6 1,461,970.7 239,826.6 351,068.3 581,420.8 160,082.7 129,572.3 2,489.9 0 0 FY 2027-28 1,515,409.9 1,512,842.8 599,444.9 165,045.3 133,589.0 247,042.8 367,720.8 2,567.1 0 0 FY 2028-29 1,568,221.5 1,565,574.9 385,178.0 170,161.7 254,477.2 137,730.3 618,027.7 2,646.7 0 0 FY 2029-30 1,620,239.0 1,622,967.7 403,479.4 175,436.7 262,136.4 141,999.9 637,186.5 2,728.7 0 0 FY 2030-31 1,679,723.3 1,676,910.0 422,666.1 656,939.3 180,875.2 270,027.4 146,401.9 2,813.3 0 0 FY 2031-32 1,738,566.3 1,735,665.8 186,482.4 150,940.4 442,781.5 677,304.4 278,157.1 2,900.5 2,900.5 0 0 23,621,638.9 23,833,810.8 9,468,690.2 3,880,178.3 2,141,033.1 5,523,981.6 2,607,755.7 18 Year TOTAL 212,172.0 0 0 53 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 4: OPERATIONS PLAN & BUDGET 54 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 4: OPERATIONS PLAN & BUDGET g. SFMTA’s shareingasbytheSan taxrevenuereceived Francisco Department ofPublic Works which istransferedtoSFMTA annually. f. FY2019 toFY2022projectionsarebasedonOperating5-Year Planfigures. e. CountysalestaxsunsetsinFY2022. d. Non-Fare revenueincludesadvertising, rentalandsupports fromotherSFMTA functionssuch asparking andtaxi. c. The SFMTA 5-Year OperatingPlanalsoassumesa2.36-3.10% annualincrease inoperatingrevenuesbetweenFY2019 andFY2022. These projectionsarebasedontheFY2018 approved operatingbudgetasthestarting basebetween b. The SFMTA 5-Year Operating Plan assumesa3.1%annualincreaseinoperatingexpensesbetweenFY2019 andFY2022,exceptRetirement CityMisc.andHealth &Dentalat5%. These projectionsarebasedonthe FY2018 approved a. FY2017 &FY2018 arebasedonapproved SFMTA 2-year AAO budget.Budgetdataexcludescapitalproject(CPF)includedinannualappropriationordinance. Table FY2015 24.(Continued)SFMTA -FY2032 OperatingFinancialPlan(in$1,000s), REVENUE FOROPERATIONS FY 2023through2032,operatingexpensesareprojectedtoincreasebasedonFY2022 rates. operating budgetasthestarting base. Regional Measure2Operating-49104 Other (CityGeneralFund Transfer) 5% StateGeneralFund Revenues OPERATING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) CATEGORIES 5307 -10% ADA Operating Other Revenue Sources Non-Fare Revenue (d) eea rni Grants Federal Transit Regional Paratransit County Sales Tax (e) Article 4/8and4.5 BART-49103 ADA Population-Based TOTAL REVENUE Revenue-Based AB 1107 -47101 Fund Balance Bridge Tolls a a (g) Gas Tax Fares TDA STA FY 2014-15 ACTUALS $ 1,010,607.4 272,340.0 356,962.5 214,698.3 20,000.0 20,000.0 45,099.3 53,753.4 40,508.4 38,810.5 1,499.1 9,670.0 3,783.6 3,621.9 2,687.5 926.3 FY 2015-16 ACTUALS 1,015,582.4 284,730.0 360,832.1 206,757.5 44,230.6 40,262.4 33,244.3 36,379.7 20,010.0 10,193.0 1,578.2 3,990.7 3,098.5 2,687.5 832.2 BUDGET (a) FY 2016-17 1,096,364.8 292,540.0 205,880.0 412,767.8 45,000.0 45,000.0 48,000.0 48,000.0 41,230.7 29,676.4 1,000.0 1,000.0 3,800.0 3,800.0 3,200.0 2,700.0 2,700.0 9,670.0 900.0 900.0 BUDGET (a) FY 2017-18 1,123,644.6 299,310.0 420,941.4 207,936.1 41,653.1 36,740.0 48,740.0 47,000.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 3,800.0 3,800.0 3,200.0 9,670.0 2,754.0 900.0 900.0 5-YR PLAN(f) FY 2018-19 1,119,275.3 $ 28,012.8 391,278.2 214,313.2 313,710.4 20,000.0 20,000.0 42,636.1 49,890.3 37,607.1 1,023.6 9,898.2 3,889.7 3,275.5 2,819.0 921.2 5-YEAR PLAN(f) FY 2019-20 $1,157,515.5 402,582.4 220,888.1 332,951.4 20,000.0 20,000.0 25,546.8 43,642.3 38,494.6 10,131.8 51,067.7 3,352.8 2,885.5 3,981.5 1,047.8 943.0 5-YEAR PLAN (f) FY 2020-21 1,195,046.8 349,598.9 414,184.2 227,666.7 20,000.0 20,000.0 24,379.2 44,672.2 39,403.1 52,272.9 10,370.9 1,072.5 4,075.4 2,953.6 3,431.9 965.2 5-YEAR PLAN(f) FY 2021-22 1,235,311.4 234,655.5 426,128.1 367,078.9 20,000.0 20,000.0 24,473.5 45,726.5 40,333.0 53,506.5 10,615.7 3,023.3 3,512.9 4,171.6 1,097.8 988.0 g. SFMTA’s shareingasbytheSan taxrevenuereceived Francisco Department ofPublic Works which istransferedtoSFMTA annually. f. FY2019 toFY2022projectionsarebasedonOperating5-Year Planfigures. e. CountysalestaxsunsetsinFY2022. d. Non-Fare revenueincludesadvertising, rentalandsupports fromotherSFMTA functionssuch asparking andtaxi. c. The SFMTA 5-Year OperatingPlanalsoassumesa2.36-3.10% annual increaseinoperatingrevenuesbetweenFY2019 andFY2022. These projectionsarebasedontheFY2018 approved operatingbudgetasthestarting basebetween b. The SFMTA 5-Year Operating Planassumesa3.1%annualincreaseinoperatingexpensesbetweenFY2019 andFY2022,exceptRetirement CityMisc.and Health &Dentalat5%. These projectionsarebasedonthe FY2018 approved a. FY2017 &FY2018 arebasedonapproved SFMTA 2-year AAO budget.Budgetdataexcludescapitalproject(CPF)includedinannualappropriationordinance. Table FY2015 24.(Continued)SFMTA -FY2032 OperatingFinancialPlan(in$1,000s), REVENUE FOROPERATIONS FY 2023through2032,operatingexpensesareprojectedtoincreasebasedonFY2022 rates. operating budgetasthestarting base. Regional Measure2Operating-49104 Other (CityGeneralFund Transfer) 5% StateGeneralFund Revenues OPERATING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) CATEGORIES 5307 -10% ADA Operating Other Revenue Sources Non-Fare Revenue (d) eea rni Grants Federal Transit Regional Paratransit County Sales Tax (e) Article 4/8and4.5 BART-49103 ADA Population-Based TOTAL REVENUE Revenue-Based AB 1107 -47101 Fund Balance Bridge Tolls a a (g) Gas Tax Fares TDA STA $ 1,278,025.4 FY 2022-23 385,432.8 438,424.3 241,860.9 20,000.0 20,000.0 41,284.8 46,805.6 54,769.3 36,351.9 4,270.1 3,595.8 3,094.7 1,123.7 1,011.3 - FY 2023-24 1,322,192.1 404,704.5 451,083.5 249,289.7 20,000.0 20,000.0 42,259.2 56,061.8 37,478.5 47,910.3 4,370.8 3,680.7 1,035.2 1,150.2 3,167.7 - FY 2024-25 1,367,964.0 424,939.7 256,948.8 464,116.4 20,000.0 20,000.0 38,555.7 43,256.5 49,040.9 57,384.9 1,059.6 3,242.5 4,474.0 1,177.4 3,767.6 - FY 2025-26 1,415,304.6 264,845.4 446,186.7 477,534.4 20,000.0 20,000.0 39,478.5 58,739.2 50,198.3 44,277.3 4,579.6 3,856.5 1,084.6 1,205.2 3,319.0 - FY 2026-27 1,464,460.6 468,496.0 491,348.9 272,986.7 20,000.0 20,000.0 40,422.0 45,322.3 51,383.0 60,125.4 1,233.6 4,687.7 3,947.5 1,110.2 3,397.3 - FY 2027-28 1,515,409.9 491,920.8 281,380.4 505,571.9 20,000.0 20,000.0 41,289.2 61,544.4 52,595.6 46,391.9 4,798.3 4,040.7 1,262.7 1,136.4 3,477.5 - FY 2028-29 1,568,221.5 290,034.3 520,215.7 516,516.9 20,000.0 20,000.0 62,996.8 53,836.9 42,071.4 47,486.7 3,559.6 1,292.5 4,136.0 1,163.3 4,911.5 - FY 2029-30 1,622,967.7 542,342.7 535,292.8 298,956.5 20,000.0 20,000.0 42,759.0 64,483.5 48,607.4 55,107.4 4,233.6 3,643.6 1,323.0 1,190.7 5,027.4 - FY 2030-31 1,679,723.3 569,459.9 550,816.3 308,155.3 20,000.0 20,000.0 66,005.3 66,005.3 49,754.5 56,408.0 43,341.8 4,333.5 3,729.6 1,354.2 1,218.8 5,146.1 - FY 2031-32 1,738,566.3 566,799.6 597,932.8 317,639.2 20,000.0 20,000.0 43,809.0 50,928.8 67,563.1 57,739.2 4,435.8 1,386.2 5,267.5 1,247.6 3,817.6 - 23,926,183.6 4,514,892.7 8,186,880.4 7,360,192.5 18 Year TOTAL 992,223.9 869,915.9 412,010.0 758,711.5 507,969.1 92,372.8 79,025.6 56,959.4 18,633.8 80,219.6 66,721.5 21,827.7 - - 55 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 4: OPERATIONS PLAN & BUDGET CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s (SFMTA) Capital Improvement Program (CIP) matches projected funding to fleet procurements, infrastructure, and facility investments prioritized in the 20-year Capital Plan to improve the safety, reliability and efficiency of the transportation system. SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP and improving theprojectsinCIPprior totheirimplementation. and publicengagement willcontinuetoserveanessentialroleinfurther defining Significant communityinputisanintegralpart ofdevelopmentthefive-yearCIP, that planningworkareassignedfundingandinitiatedona predefined schedule. other plans and strategies, ensuring that the actions and recommendations from The CIPalsoservesasanimplementationtoolfortheSFMTA StrategicPlanand barrier toproject delivery. topreventfundingaccessibilityfrombeing a prioritization andfunding,strives Francisco. The CIPalsodevelopsaStrategicInvestment/Value Analysis forproject constrained five-yearprogramofprojectsforthetransportation systemin San with projected funding availability. This matching process results in a financially- from the 20-year Capital Plan and matchesplans, strategies, and initiatives them The five-yearCapitalImprovement theprioritizedProgram (CIP)takes projects, and determinedbytheSFMTA Executive Team. prioritized basedonperformancecriteriainformedbytheSFMTA StrategicPlan and provides an unconstrained list of capital needs. These capital needs are goals. The 20-year Capital Plan brings the elements of these strategies together city’s transportation capitalneedsandallocateresourceseffectively tomeetits The SFMTA developsmultimodalandmode-specificstrategiestodeterminethe &PROCESSES POLICIES GOALS, PLANNING CAPITAL SFMTA CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN to theCIParemadeonanongoingbasis. Recent expenditure updatesanddetailed projectionsareonlineat:https://www.sfmta.com/about-sfmta/reports/fy-2017-2021-capital-improvement-program The FY2017 Improvement –FY2021Capital Program (CIP)matches projects’ fundingsourcestospecificprojects for thefirsthalfofthis 10-year lookahead.Itisalivingdocument andtechnical adjustments Program thatincludedfundingforthefollowing: In July 2016, theSFMTA Boardapproved the FY2017 -FY2021CapitalImprovement recent revenueprojections. based on forecasts made from the 2015 SFMTA 20-Year Capital Plan and the most tax projections. of the10-YearThe remaining six years Capital FinancialPlan are 2017 -FY2021CIPincludingthevoter rejectionofProposition Kandrevisedsales These assumptionsreflecteventsthathaveoccurred sincethepublication oftheFY and includeupdatedspendingprojectionsbasedonrevisedrevenueassumptions. ofthe10-Yearyears CapitalFinancialPlanarebasedontheFY2017 -FY2021CIP Capital Improvement Program covering FY2018 throughFY2027. four The first The 10-year CapitalFinancialPlanisacombinationoftheSFMTA’s CapitalPlanand PLAN FINANCIAL CAPITAL 10-YEAR SFMTA • • • articulated (60-foot)busfleets. Muni Forward projects, along with an increase in the light rail vehicle and of Vision Zero(BicycleandPedestrian Strategies);and Street-related improvements, includingsignificantfundingforimplementation and increasedfundingforinfrastructurefacilities; replacement oftheMunibusfleet,anongoingtransitfleet overhaulprogram, State ofGoodRepair atanaverageof$345 million peryear, includingfull 57 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN 58 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN Figure 14. FY2017 –FY2021CapitalImprovement Program Map and infrastructure forpeoplewalking andbicycling. projects also have elements that will improve accessibility or program. For example, many transit enhancement investment in that type oftransportation infrastructure by-line amountforeach programdoesnotreflectthetotal the multimodalnatureofmostSFMTA projects,theline- generally reflectthetypeofinvestment. However, dueto capital projectsaresorted intocapitalprogramsthat For budgeting and capital planning purposes, SFMTA’s PROGRAMS CAPITAL SFMTA year thantheformer TIDF revenues. fee isestimatedtogenerateabout$14 millionmoreper to thesize anduseoftheproposeddevelopment. The exempt. The fee amounts are assessed in proportion residential developmentswith20orfewerunitsare projects. Affordable housing,smallbusinessesand residential of usecitywide,includinglarge,market-rate the TSF appliestomostnewdevelopmentandchanges TIDF onlyappliedtonon-residentialdevelopment,while approved andwentintoeffect onDecember26,2015. The Development Fee (TIDF)fornewdevelopments,was which replacesandenhances theexisting Transit Impact Additionally, the Transportation Sustainability Fee (TSF), Program ifandwhenapproved bySan Francisco voters. as aseparatelineitemintheCapitalImprovement for 2024,isnotyetprogrammedandwillbeincluded in the Capital Financial Plan. The next bond, anticipated approved in 2014, by voters and has been programmed ofthe twogeneralobligationThe first bonds was sales taxdedicatedtotransportation. license feeto2percent,andimplementingahalf-cent general obligation bonds,restoringthestatevehicle Task million Force recommendedissuingtwo$500 transportation funding. The 2013 Mayor’s Transportation undertaken anumberofstrategiestoaddress SFMTA andtheCityCountyofSan Francisco have In aneffort toshowlocalsupport fortransportation, FUNDING SOURCES CAPITAL Table 26.FY2018 -FY2027PlannedCapitalInvestment byProgram, asofDecember2016 Table 25.FY2018 -FY2027Summaryof Anticipated CapitalFunding bySource, asofDecember2016 Other Local Revenue Bond Ballot Initiatives Revenue fromFuture General Obligation Bond &Trade Cap State Federal Expansion Transit Optimization& Facility TOTAL Transit FixedGuideway Streets Parking Fleet Infrastructure Communications/IT Traffic &Signals Taxi Security FUNDING SOURCE PROGRAMS/ PROJECTS TOTAL FY 2018 FY 2018 $ 240,760,623 $337,244,684 $ 247,679,671 $127,711,857 $660,133,911 $ 78,550,000 78,550,000 $ $28,452,045 $56,158,059 $10,070,567 $ 78,099,669 15,043,948 $ $ 660,133,911 $47,003,918 $47,742,781 $ 5,000,000 $5,000,000 – – $ 400,000 $400,000 $ 350,000 $350,000 FY 2019 FY 2019 $239,931,562 $149,995,870 $ 585,409,339 $585,409,339 $ 272,157,995 $ 147,519,704 $ 10,000,000 $10,000,000 $ 73,334,000 73,334,000 $ $15,206,250 $23,614,650 $85,271,910 $ 91,072,640 $57,289,097 $ 3,000,000 $3,000,000 – – $ 1,325,000 $ 1,325,000 $700,000 $ 400,000 $400,000 FY 2020 FY 2020 $165,204,719 $415,288,717 $215,876,396 $ 415,288,717 $ 133,501,612 $ 21,435,000 $ 21,435,000 $93,499,436 $51,789,817 34,947,798 $ $ 87,356,386 $ 3,000,000 $3,000,000 – – $ 1,666,000 $ 1,666,000 $ 6,125,000 $ 6,125,000 $7,080,000 $7,995,270 $ 700,000 $700,000 $ 400,000 $400,000 FY 2021 FY 2021 $306,191,837 $ 306,191,837 $ 75,000,000 75,000,000 $ $ 42,080,000 $42,080,000 $ 48,449,000 $48,449,000 $ 42,870,000 $ 42,870,000 $93,804,634 $ 12,509,000 $ 12,509,000 70,441,129 $ $35,476,917 $ 75,833,461 $ 86,452,903 $ 13,526,473 $11,840,157 $ 3,000,000 $3,000,000 – – $ 700,000 $700,000 $ 400,000 $400,000 FY 2022 FY 2022 $264,131,738 $ 264,131,738 136,680,254 $ $135,637,960 $ 42,870,000 $ 42,870,000 $30,559,298 $35,212,358 $ 79,581,484 $50,119,409 – – $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 1,580,000 $1,580,000 – – – $9,922,714 $ 700,000 $700,000 $ 400,000 $400,000 FY 2023-27 FY 2023-27 $1,861,205,167 1,861,205,167 $ $ 1,045,311,371 $ 100,000,000 100,000,000 $ $302,253,709 $996,596,507 $185,042,706 $ 214,350,000 381,543,797 $ $242,767,888 $ 15,000,000 $15,000,000 $ 68,900,000 $68,900,000 $ 95,000,000 95,000,000 $ $45,144,358 $ 2,000,000 $2,000,000 – $ 3,500,000 $3,500,000 – 25,000,000 25,000,000 TOTAL REVENUE PLAN TOTAL $4,092,360,709 $1,783,415,586 4,092,360,709 $ 1,828,848,622 $ 1,183,378,971 $ $1,010,137,456 $ 250,000,000 250,000,000 $ $394,972,794 $534,556,082 $ 321,525,000 321,525,000 $ 365,055,168 $ $118,560,793 $190,997,431 $ 30,000,000 $30,000,000 $19,070,567 $ 78,550,000 78,550,000 $ $ 65,002,948 65,002,948 $ $ 4,000,000 $4,000,000 $ 6,650,000 $6,650,000 DEFERRED BACKLOG $2,206,172,733 159,555,634 $ $880,694,708 $931,361,819 $509,192,902 $224,013,417 $186,439,117 $68,283,567 40,937,500 $ $9,196,933 59 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN 60 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN traffic signalandstopsign changes, transitstop changes, Priority Features (TPF)andincludelanemodifications, times. These elementsarereferred toasthe Transit close together, narrow travellanes, andslowboarding traffic congestion,transitstops thatare spaced too causes ofdelayandpassengerfrustration,including engineering featuresthatspecificallyaddresstheroot include avariety of standard roadway andtraffic along themostheavilyusedRapid routes. The TPPs and increase the safety and comfort of customers designed toaddresstransitdelay, improve reliability, also known as Transit Priority Projects (TPPs)— Muni Forward includesengineering improvements— IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL FORWARD MUNI Subway andthe Van NessBusRapid Transit Project. ongoing majorinfrastructureprojects,theCentral document hasamoredetailedupdateontwoother trips. The Major Expansion Projects section of this and support theuseofsustainablemodesforall optimize transportation infrastructureandoperations, programs, services,andfacilityupgradesthathelp is alsoimplementingacombinationofpolicies, planning andpublicoutreach efforts. The SFMTA Project’s ofdatacollection,intensive (TEP)years CIP wereplannedthroughthe Transit Effectiveness projects inthe Transit Optimization&Expansion system forfuturegrowth.Many oftheMuniForward –andwillhelppreparethe dailypassengers 700,000 efficient, reliable,safeandcomfortable foritsexisting Muni Forward. Munimore willmake These initiatives to modernize called andexpandMuni,collectively SFMTA iscurrently embarkingonanambitiousplan EXPANSION & OPTIMIZATION TRANSIT PROGRAMS CAPITAL TRANSIT offs. The precise components of each Muni Forward limited roadway space, each balancingdifferent trade- was alternative typicallyproposed atlocationswith space forelementsthatprioritize transit,morethanone scarce roadway space amongdifferent byutilizing users for anadditionalsix. As the TPPs affect theallocationof corridors andconceptualproposals weredeveloped Detailed proposalshavebeendevelopedforeleven and many others. parking andturnrestrictions,pedestrianimprovements, Figure 15. MuniForward Transit Priority Projects, statusasofJune 2016 and have funding strategies identified for construction. and havefundingstrategiesidentified forconstruction. are inthepreliminaryplanning and engineeringstages 2016, more than ten projects (40 miles of investment) based onfundingandresources available. As ofMay Muni Forward Transit Priority Projects willbeimplemented outreach foreach Muniroute. individual of theenvironmental impactanalysis,following public details oftheprojectproposalsaswellresults by the SFMTA who will consider the Board of Directors, Transit Priority Project tobeimplementedwilldecided Construction isunderway onmany projects. cleared throughthe TEP planningeffort inMarch 2014. Network Capital Improvements were environmentally Construction Timeline: to the General Obligation Committee. Bond Oversight Program document and the periodic Status Reports in theSFMTA FY2017 –FY2021Capital Improvement specific project costs andfunding sourcesisavailable will implement in the near term.Moreinformationon list ofthe Transit Optimizationprojects thattheSFMTA Estimated Project Cost: Thefollowingisonlyapartial improving transitserviceforallcustomers. andimprove thenetworkasawhole, thereby diverse all over thecity. These projectsaregeographically of coreroutesservesnearly70percentallriders Project Area: to improve safeandeasyaccesstotransit. coordination withMuniForward Transit Priority Projects and accessibilitycapitalimprovements willbebuiltin Zero improvements, includingbicycle,pedestrian, for acombinedtotalfundingof$230million. Vision projects. Future fundingisexpectedfromothersources $150 millioninfundingtodesignandbuildMuniForward Francisco approved voters Proposition A which included many MuniForward projects.OnNovember 4,2014, San Bond (GOBond)fundingfordesignandconstructionof (T2030) havebothrecommendedGeneralObligation and theSan Francisco 2030 Transportation Task Force The CityandCountyofSan Francisco’s 2014 CapitalPlan projects willbeimplementedinsegments. minimize customerdisruptionandoptimize financing, either underconstructionorwillbeinthenearfuture. To Of theseprojects21mileshavebeenapproved andare planning/projects/muni-forward-implementation-plan Workbook postedon:http://www.sfmta.com/projects- individual routepagesintheMuniForward Implementation online-by-lineMore detail enhancements canbefound onthe The Rapid & Transit Priority Network The MuniForward Rapid Table 27. OngoingandFuture MuniForward Projects Transit SignalPriority Installation (BusandRail) E/F -Pier39PlatformRelocation M Line/19th Avenue Subway Geneva HarneyBusRapid Transit Project Central Subway Phase3PlanningandOutreach California CableCarSafety Improvements Geary BRT Phase2:CER&Preliminary DetailDesign Improvements Geary BRT Phase1:DesignandConstructionofNear-Term Better Street Market N Judah -CarlandCole Transit andStreetscapeEnhancements L Taraval -SurfaceRoute Rapid Project 8 Bayshore-San Bruno Ave 8 Bayshore-Geneva& Visitacion Valley Transit Priority Project Project 7 Haight-Noriega -Stanyan toMasonic+Signals Transit Priority 31 Balboa Transit Priority andPedestrian Accessibility Improvements Priority Project 30 Stockton - Van Ness&Bay(coordinatedwith Van NessBRT) Transit 30 Stockton -Stockton (Broadway to Tunnel) Transit Priority Project 30 Stockton -OCSMarina Terminal Upgrades Broadway Transit Priority Project 30 Stockton -North Point, Columbus,andNorthern Stockton to Transit Priority Project 30 Stockton -North Point &Polk (coordinatedwithPolk Streetscape) 30 Stockton -Chestnut Transit Priority Project 28 19th Ave -South ofGoldenGatePark Rapid Project 27 Bryant Tenderloin Transit Reliability Project 22 Fillmore-OCSonChurch/Duboce Transit Priority Project 22 Fillmore-16th Street Transit Priority Project Street between30thandCortland 14 MissionOverheadContactSystem (OCS)Improvements onMission 14 Mission-Spearto11th St(Downtown)Rapid Project 14 Mission-Randall to Terminal (Outer)Rapid Project 14 Mission-11th SttoRandall (Inner)Rapid Project West Portal Transit Safety andReliability Project Turnback Pocket Track atHarrison SurfaceSignalingonEmbarcaderoand Third Street PROJECT NAME Near-Term Rail Safety andCapacity Near-Term Rail Safety andCapacity Near-Term Rail Safety andCapacity Other Transit Safety &Reliability Other Transit Safety &Reliability Other Transit Safety &Reliability Other Transit Safety &Reliability Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Muni Forward/Equity Projects Citywide Corridor Projects Citywide Corridor Projects Citywide Corridor Projects Citywide Corridor Projects Citywide Corridor Projects Improvements Improvements Improvements Improvements CATEGORY TOTAL BUDGET $160,122,000 $160,122,000 $20,698,000 $20,698,000 $22,965,000 $22,965,000 $14,171,000 $14,171,000 $11,348,000 $22,800,000 $30,665,000 $31,304,000 $32,780,000 $32,780,000 $67,065,000 $21,100,000 $10,120,000 $10,120,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $63,589,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,440,000 $1,440,000 $8,705,000 $6,890,000 $6,890,000 $8,550,000 $8,550,000 $4,076,000 $4,076,000 $6,510,000 $6,510,000 $3,000,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $3,320,000 $3,320,000 $1,629,000 $1,629,000 $4,307,000 $8,307,000 $404,000 $404,000 $372,000 $372,000 $946,000 $946,000 $450,000 61 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN 62 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN Mission Street. 3wouldalsoincludeimprovements on Alternative between OctaviaBoulevard and Steuart Street. Project Area: and theCounty Transportation Authority. the OfficeofEconomicand Workforce Development, lead), thePlanningDepartment (urbandesignlead), Utilities Commission(sewer, water, andauxiliarywater staff from:the SFMTA (transportation lead),thePublic substantial input from the design team consisting of effort ledbytheDepartment ofPublic Works with The Better Street project isaninteragency Market transitsafer,make faster, andmorereliable. pedestrian safety, improve thebicyclefacilities,and have elementsthatwillenhancethesidewalks and specific designvaries,but each ofthealternatives included intheenvironmental reviewdocuments. The There arecurrently threedesignoptionsthatwillbe optimize mobility, andfostereconomicdevelopmentby: boulevard. This projectwillcreateasenseofplace, and economic the street as the premier cultural, civic Octavia Boulevard to Steuart Street and reestablish Street, withthegoaltorevitalize Streetfrom Market improvements onMarket This projectwilldeliver BETTER MARKET STREET • • • • diversity ofpeopleanduses. diversity public spaces that attractCreating thriving a people onfootandbicycles. Improving safety, comfort andmobilityfor for allusers. Providing fasterandmorereliabletransitservice growth andeconomicdevelopment. Supporting theCityofSan Francisco’s planned

P 48th Ave Ave 48th Great Highway Great o The project encompasses Market Street The projectencompassesMarket

b o

Judah s

Taraval Ulloa

Wawona

Geary

Cabrillo Fulton

19th Ave 19th

construction wouldbe2022,pending funding. continuingthrough2021.likely The earlieststart for to continuethrough2018, withdetailed design NEPA review. The environmental review is expected under CEQAreviewandisdeveloping thescopefor Construction Timeline: the endof2017. and updatedcostestimatesshouldbeavailablenear Preliminary engineeringhasbegunontheproject, millionproject. fully fundthisapproximately $400 the othercitydepartments willdevelopastrategyto environmental review, Public Works, theSFMTA, and goes throughthein-depthanalysisassociatedwith scope ofworkandastheprojectdevelops However,five years. this was based on a preliminary contribution tothismulti-agencyprojectover thenext initially programmed $124 million as the SFMTA’s the SFMTA’s Transit Optimization & Expansion CIP many coordinatingprojectswithinitsscope.In2014, Estimated Project Cost:Better Streethas Market Presidio Park Junipero Serra We Ave 15th Figure 16. Better StreetProject Market Area st Po rt al

Irving

P o r W

Ocean t

o o

la o

Carl Stanyan

e The projectiscurrently Cole

McAllister

17th St

Market

Bosworth

Divisadero

Geneva

Mission Diamond

Castro Lombard

Noe Market Fillmore Bush

24th St Golden Gate

26th St 30th St Church 16th St

Silver found onlineat:http://www.bettermarketstreetsf.org/. More information ontheBetter Market Streetproject canbe

and Polk Street,October2014 Street, betweenOverhead view of traffic on Market Van Ness Avenue BETTER MARKET STREET PROJECT AREA

Van Ness Van

C Santos e Valencia

Cortland r A Mission

l North Point

11th St 11th m Columbus a

v Mission a Ness Van S. n e

y z

Visitacion

Mason Arleta

Folsom

Stockton B Potrero

ays h St 5th I o

n re

d Kansas San Bruno San Townsend u s 23rd St

t r St 3rd i

l 25th St

Connecticut

18th St Fremont

20th St 22nd St Main

3rd St King

Tennessee Illinois

Evans Cargo Way Cargo BAY LOOP THE MISSION LOCATION OF Yerba Buena

Gat Island Ave B Ave e v i

e w

9th

California H Ave 0 Treasure

Island 0.5 mi such asbulbouts. treatments new surfacecrossingsandintersection and (TSP) infrastructure,high-quality busshelters, improvements andadvanced Transit SignalPriority bus lanes,stopoptimizationandconsolidation,signal The proposedprojectelementsinclude:dedicated streetscape toprovide amorecompletestreet. conditions, andupdatetheexistinginfrastructure manage increasingtrafficcongestion,improve safety are tooffer more efficientandreliabletransitservice, goals oftheGearyBusRapid Transit (BRT) Project collision rateeighttimesthecitywideaverage. The the city’s Vision Zero high-injury network and has a dailyriders. 52,000 The Gearycorridor isalsopart of corridors in the westernUnitedStateswithover Geary isoneofthemostheavilyusedsurfacetransit PROJECT TRANSIT RAPID BUS GEARY Figure 17. GearyBusRapid Transit Project Area

P 48th Ave Ave 48th Great Highway Great o

b o

Judah s

Taraval Ulloa

Wawona

Geary

Cabrillo Fulton

19th Ave 19th

Park Presidio Presidio Park Junipero Serra We Ave 15th st Po rt al

Irving

GEARY BUS RAPID TRANSIT ALIGNMENT

P o r W

Ocean t

o o

la o

Carl Stanyan

e Cole

cost willberefinedasneeded. defined after theenvironmental reviewprocess,this grant of up to $100 million. As the project is further will thenpreparetocompeteforanFTA smallstarts Final Environment ImpactStatement(EIS)in2017 and 2017. The project willcontinuetoworkcompletea Transportation Authority BoardoccuredinJanuary (LPA)alternative bytheSan Francisco County (EIR) certification andselectionofalocallypreferred Environmentalover thenextfiveyears. Impact Report approximately $40millionforinitialprojectphases Transit Optimization&Expansion CIPhasprogrammed million. project isapproximately $300 The SFMTA’s Estimated Project Cost: Thecostestimateforthefull including GearyBoulevard,andO’Farrell streets. Geary corridor Streetto34th fromMarket Avenue, Project Area: McAllister

17th St

Market

Bosworth

Divisadero

Geneva

Mission Diamond

Castro Lombard

Noe Fillmore Bush

The GearyBRT the projectareacovers Market

24th St Golden Gate

26th St 30th St Church 16th St

Silver

C Ness Van Santos e Valencia

Cortland r A Mission

l North Point

11th St 11th m Columbus a

v Mission a Ness Van S. n e

y z

Visitacion

Mason Arleta

Folsom

Stockton B Potrero

ays h St 5th I o

n re

d Kansas San Bruno San Townsend u s 23rd St

t r St 3rd i

l 25th St

Connecticut

18th St Fremont

20th St 22nd St Main

3rd St King

Tennessee

Illinois

Evans Cargo Way Cargo BAY LOOP THE MISSION LOCATION OF Yerba Buena begin constructionnosoonerthan2019. new lighting,landscaping,andutilities,would street to construct center-running bus onlylaneswith Improvement Project. Itwouldincluderedesignofthe from Stanyan westiscalledthe Geary Boulevard Construction ofthesecondphaseimprovements improvements inphases,tobecompletedby2020. approval. After approval, theSFMTA wouldrollout be presentedtotheSFMTA for BoardofDirectors segments. After outreach, theseimprovements will andupgradeutilitiesalongsome 40 streetcorners bus-only lanestoStanyan, widenthesidewalk atover Rapid project,wouldextendtheexistingside-running improvements eastofStanyan, calledtheGeary distinct projects. setoftransitandsafety The first will beimplementedintwophasesaspart oftwo on thecorridor inthenear-term, Geary BRT proposals and offer transitandsafetybenefitstopeopletraveling Construction Timeline:

bulbouts toimprove pedestriansafetyalongthecorridor Geary BRT newcrosswalks willincorporateenhancementslike and http://sfmta.com/projects-planning/projects/geary-bus-rapid-transit. BusRapid More information onGeary Transit canbefound onlineat: Gat Island Ave B Ave e v i

e w

9th

e California H Ave 0 Treasure Island 0.5 mi To streamlineprojectdelivery, 63 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN Figure 18. Geneva-Harney Bus Rapid Transit Project Area From Harney Way at Thomas Mellon Drive, the BRT route will travel on a mix of an exclusive transit guideway and mixed-flow operations east through the Candlestick Point and The Shipyard at Hunters Point developments, ending at the future Hunters Point Transit Center.

Estimated Project Cost: The SFMTA’s Transit Optimization & Expansion CIP has programmed $31.3 million for the environmental review, preliminary engineering, final design and initial construction phases through 2021. An order of magnitude estimate for total project costs is approximately $100

CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN N million and an updated project cost estimate will be developed during the environmental review process. Capital costs for Phase 2 have not been defined at this time. GENEVA-HARNEY BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT interchange and Geneva Avenue extension projects. The US 101 interchange project will Construction Timeline: The current project timeline The Geneva-Harney BRT project closes a critical east- be led by the San Mateo County Transportation anticipates completing environmental review and west gap in San Francisco’s rapid transit network. Authority (SMCTA) or their designee agency. preliminary engineering for the Phase 1 BRT project The seven mile project will provide exclusive bus The City of Brisbane has been identified as at the end of 2019, followed by SFMTA Board action lanes, transit signal priority, high-quality stations, the Sponsor Agency for the Geneva Avenue on a recommended project alternative. Completion low floor buses and pedestrian and bicycle amenities extension project. of detailed project design is expected by 2021, with 64 between Balboa Park and the future Hunters Point completion of Phase 1 BRT construction by the end Transit Center in the Candlestick Point - Hunters • Phase 2: Implement the US 101 interchange and of 2023. Point Shipyard redevelopment area. High capacity, Geneva extension projects and operate BRT high frequency bus service will be provided to the service on the newly constructed infrastructure. No timeline has been set for construction of the communities of Outer Mission, Crocker-Amazon, The final definition of this second phase of the Phase 2 BRT project by San Mateo County. Funding Visitacion Valley, Executive Park and newly developed project is subject to change pending the results for environmental review for the US 101 interchange areas of Candlestick Point and The Shipyard at Hunters of future studies, commitments for completing has been proposed in the San Mateo County Point. The project will also provide BRT service to the funding commitments for these projects and transportation project list for Plan Bay Area 2040. Bayshore neighborhood of Daly City. approvals by the SFMTA and SMCTA Boards.

SFMTA is currently undertaking a pre-environmental Project Area: The Geneva-Harney BRT project area analysis of the first phase of this two-phase project: consists of Geneva Avenue from San Jose Avenue More information on the Geneva-Harney Bus Rapid Transit to Bayshore Boulevard and Bayshore Boulevard to project can be found online at: http://www.sfcta.org/geneva- • Phase 1: BRT implementation serving Southeast harney-bus-rapid-transit-feasibility-study. Arleta Way / Blanken Avenue. From Blanken Avenue San Francisco and Daly City using existing east to Harney Way at Thomas Mellon Drive, several right of way, and performing planning and potential alignment routes are currently under review.

SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP environmental review work on the US 101 in theExpansionProjects sectionofthisdocument. information ontheCentralSubway projectcanbefound as aseparateprograminthis five-yearCIP. More and scopeoftheproject,CentralSubway was designated Caltrain StationtoChinatown.Duethelargebudget Subway, will extend the T Third Line from the 4th Street populated 3rdStreetcorridor. Phase2,theCentral constructed a5.4-milelight-raillinealongthedensely 1 oftheproject,which was completedin April 2007, SFMTA’s Third StreetLightRail Transit Project. Phase The CentralSubway Project isthe secondphaseofthe to apremiercommercialdistrictandtouristattraction. technology anddigital-mediahub,improve access country, provide arapidtransitlinktoburgeoning of the most densely populated neighborhoods in the vastly improve transitoptionsfortheresidentsofone Union SquareandChinatown,theCentralSubway will With stopsinSouth(SoMa), ofMarket Yerba Buena, opportunities andotheramenitiesthroughoutthecity. while efficientlytransporting peopletojobs,educational connections tomajorretail,sporting andculturalvenues extension ofMuni’s T Third Linewillprovide direct transportation inSan Francisco. This new1.7-mile efficient lightraillinethatwillimprove public The CentralSubway Project willconstructamodern, SUBWAYCENTRAL upgrades maybeconstructedat thesametime. Tunnels railreplacementsothatallinfrastructure scheduled duringtheshutdownsfor Twin Peaks the replacementofbluelightphonesystemis avoid additionaldisruptionstoservice.For example, of theprojectsarecoordinatedasmuch aspossibleto Infrastructure capitalprogramandtheimplementation to theCommunications&Information Technology This capitalprogramisalsoverycloselyrelated Muni’s over 150 milesofoverhead wires. maintenance facilityupgrades;andmaintaining new traincontroltechnology; track replacement; to stationimprovements, including:investing in sources andcanspaneverythingfromrailgrinding combination oflocal,regional,statewideandfederal enhance theseservices.Projects aresupported bya of capitalprojectstomaintain,replace,and Muni’s FixedGuideway abroadspectrum CIPcovers of dailyMuniridership. Fixed Guideway rights-of-way carry nearly30percent vehiclesonMuni’s dailycustomers, track and189,000 transportation inSan Francisco. With over 70milesof historic cablecarservicesareacrucialcomponentof Muni’s Transit FixedGuideway lightrail,streetcarand GUIDEWAY FIXED TRANSIT Transportation Plan. Core CapacityStudyaswell as thenextRegional Transportation Commission(MTC)led Transbay resiliency. The strategyalsoinformstheMetropolitan extending thelightrailsystem,andbuildingsystem bottlenecks, improving thevehiclefleet,expandingor needs. Recommended strategies include alleviating infrastructure or transit servicewillhelpmeet those rail capacityisneeded,andwhich improvements to developed the Rail Capacity Strategy to identify where capacity needsofthelightrailsystem. The SFMTA has Strategy, astrategicplanningeffort inassessingthe The SFMTA recentlycompletedthe Rail Capacity Mission BayLoop. at the Twin Peaks Tunnel Rail Replacement andthe operations andmaintaintheagency’s infrastructure term fixedguideway upgradesthatwillimprove Stanyan route. Additionally, there are major near- phase IIoftheoverhead wirereplacementonthe33 Metro Turnback subway replacementwiring;and to Embarcadero stations, Van Ness Station and Muni and Rossmoor; phaseIofrailgrindingfromCastro Wharves line,andtheMOceanview Lineat19th Ave city; track ontheL repairs Taraval Line,theFMarket/ systems atupto38criticallocationsthroughoutthe term includeinvestments innewtrack switching Muni FixedGuideway projectsplannedforthenear 65 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN 66 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN Judah MetroLine: following improvements tothetunnelandN inside theSunset Tunnel. The projectwillbringthe Judah Linebyreplacing track andotherinfrastructure aims toimprove thesafetyandreliabilityofN The Sunset Tunnel Trackway Improvement Project SUNSET TUNNEL REPLACEMENT RAIL Figure 19. Sunset Tunnel Rail Replacement Project Area

• • • • •

P 48th Ave Ave 48th Great Highway Great o priority for rail cars atnineintersections priority forrailcars Traffic signalupgrades: Additionoftransitsignal foundations Sunset Tunnel portal retainingwalls andtheir Seismic upgrades:Structuralretrofitofthe water valves Fire safetysystemupgrades:Refurbishing fire safety andreliabilityoftheNJudah Line An improved overhead wiresystemtoenhance Overhead ContactSystem (OCS)replacement: faster rideonMuni Rail replacement:Newtrack forasmoother,

b o

Judah s

Taraval Ulloa

Wawona

NEW ACCESSIBLE PLATFORMS

TRANSIT SIGNAL UPGRADES

Geary

Cabrillo Fulton

19th Ave 19th

Park Presidio Presidio Park Junipero Serra We Ave 15th st Po rt al

Irving to besubstantiallycompletedby Summer2017. began inFall 2014. The constructionworkisanticipated awarded inJanuary 2014, construction and weekend Construction Timeline: Replacement projectisexpectedtocost$29.3million. Estimated Project Cost: TheSunset Tunnel Rail constructed at28th Avenue. Stanyan Street. The newaccessibleplatformswillbe along theNJudah corridor from19th Avenue to and Irving Street/SunsetBoulevardintersection Duboce Triangle, upgradethetransitsignalsat infrastructure locatedbetweenCole Valley and Improvement Project willimprove the tunnel SunsetTunnel TrackwayProject Area: The •

P o safe boardingsforallcustomers accessible platformsat28th Avenue toprovide Accessible platforms:Constructionoftwo r W

Ocean t

o o

la o

Carl Stanyan

e Cole

SUNSET TUNEL TRACKWAY IMPROVEMENTS

McAllister

17th St

Market The constructioncontractwas

Bosworth

Divisadero

Geneva

Mission Diamond

Castro Lombard

Noe Market Fillmore Bush

24th St Golden Gate

26th St 30th St Church 16th St

Silver

C Ness Van Santos e Valencia

s N

Cortland r A Mission

l North Point

11th St 11th m Columbus a

v Mission a Ness Van S. n e

y z

Visitacion

Mason Dragging newrailpiecesintotheSunset Tunnel, May2015 Arleta N Judah onJudah StreetintheSunsetDistrict N Judah turningat9th Avenue

Folsom

Stockton B Potrero

ays h St 5th I o

n re

d Kansas San Bruno San Townsend u s 23rd St

t r St 3rd i

l 25th St

Connecticut

18th St Fremont

20th St 22nd St Main

3rd St King

Tennessee

Illinois

Evans Cargo Way Cargo BAY LOOP THE MISSION LOCATION OF Yerba Buena

Gat Island Ave B Ave e v i

e w

9th

e California H Ave 0 Treasure Island 0.5 mi West Portal Station Forest HillStation Castro Station

P 48th Ave Ave 48th Great Highway Great o

b o

Judah s

Taraval Ulloa

Wawona Figure 20. Twin Peaks Tunnel Rail Replacement Project Area system. This projectincludes: improving thesafetyandreliabilityofMuniMetro bring thetunnelintoastateofgoodrepair, thereby The railupgradestothe Twin Peaks Tunnel will REPLACEMENT RAIL TUNNEL PEAKS TWIN • • • • • • •

Geary

Inspecting andcleaningtunnel’s drainagesystems Repairing areas on concrete walls and reinforcements Installing firealarmsystemat West Portal Station and Forest Hillstations Improving structuresupport between West Portal station (Eureka Valley Station) Seismic upgradestoanexistingabandoned switching mechanisms Replacing themachines which operatethetrack fittings Replacing theexistinglightrailtracks andtrack Cabrillo Fulton

19th Ave 19th

Park Presidio Presidio Park Junipero Serra We Ave 15th st P TWIN PEAKS TUNNEL & TRACKWAY o IMPROVEMENTS rt al

Irving

P o r W

Ocean t

o o

la o

Carl Stanyan

e Cole

McAllister

17th St by lateSummer2018. anticipated thatthecontractworkwillbecompleted Construction should begin in Summer 2017, and it is Peaks Tunnel 21timesasindicatedinthecontract. delayed duetoconcernswithshutting downthe Twin Construction Timeline: Replacement projectisexpectedtocost$62million. Rail Peaks Estimated Project Cost:TheTwin center ofthecity. West Portal and the Castro Stations, the geographic will improve thetunnelinfrastructurelocatedbetween Project Area:

Market

Bosworth

Divisadero

Geneva

Mission Diamond

Castro Lombard The Twin Peaks Tunnel Rail Replacement

Noe Market Fillmore Bush

24th St Golden Gate

26th St 30th St Church 16th St

Silver

Construction hasbeen

C Ness Van Santos e Valencia

Cortland r A Mission

l North Point

11th St 11th m Columbus a

v Mission a Ness Van S. n e

y z

Visitacion

Mason Arleta

Folsom

Stockton B Potrero

ays h St 5th I o

n re

d Kansas San Bruno San Townsend u s 23rd St

t r St 3rd i

l 25th St

Connecticut 67 Fremont

18th St

SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL20th St PLAN 22nd St Main

3rd St King

Tennessee

Illinois

Evans Cargo Way Cargo BAY LOOP THE MISSION LOCATION OF Yerba Buena

Gat Island Ave B Ave e v i

e w

9th

e California H Ave 0 Treasure Island 0.5 mi

P 48th Ave Ave 48th Great Highway Great o

b o

Judah s

Taraval Ulloa

Wawona

Geary

Cabrillo Fulton

19th Ave 19th

Park Presidio Presidio Park Junipero Serra We Ave 15th st Po rt al 68

SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITALIrving FINANCIAL PLAN

P o r W

Ocean t

o o Figure 21. MissionBayLoop Project Area of San Francisco, oncityroadsandrights-of-way in theCentral Waterfront areaoftheCityandCounty Project Area: secured. underway andthefederal TIGER Grant fundingwas when CentralSubway constructionwas significantly of theMissionBayLoop was deferred until2013 However, duetobudgetconstraints,construction to turntrainsforspecialeventsandserviceincreases. the removal ofdisabledtrains,andprovide ameans opens in2019. The Mission BayLoop willalsoenable operate additionalservicewhentheCentralSubway around capabilities for the T Third and is required to opened forservicein2007. The Loop willprovide turn- 1998 aspart ofthe Third StreetLightRail Project that The proposed Mission BayLoop was designedin MISSION BAY LOOP

la o

Carl Stanyan

e Cole

McAllister

The proposedLoop would beconstructed 17th St

Market

Bosworth

Divisadero

Geneva

Mission Diamond

Castro Lombard

Noe Market Fillmore Bush

24th St Golden Gate

26th St 30th St Church 16th St

Silver

C Ness Van Santos e Valencia

Cortland r A Mission

l North Point

11th St 11th m Columbus a

v Mission a Ness Van S. n e

y z

Visitacion

Mason Arleta

Folsom

complete inSummer2017. Construction began in 2016 and is expected to be lawsuit questioningtheprojectsCEQAclearance. to start in 2015. Construction was delayedbya has beencompletedandconstructionwas scheduled Construction Timeline: expected tocost$6.8millionover thenextyear. Estimated Project Cost: TheMissionBayLoop is 18th andIllinoisStreets19th andIllinoisStreets. of train signalswouldbeinstalledattheintersections Street to complete theLoop. Traffic, pedestrian, and Third and Illinois Streets would be extended to Illinois existing trackway on18th and19th Streetsbetween on theblocks of18th, Illinois,and19th Streets. The Stockton B Potrero

ays h St 5th I o

n re

d Kansas San Bruno San Townsend u s 23rd St

t r St 3rd i

l 25th St

Connecticut

18th St Fremont

20th St 22nd St Main

3rd St King Tennessee

The environmental review

Illinois

Evans Cargo Way Cargo BAY LOOP THE MISSION LOCATION OF Yerba Buena

Gat Island Ave B Ave e v i

e w

9th

e California H Ave 0 N Treasure Island 0.5 mi image: GoogleEarth caption and 19th streets,viaIllinoisStreetonthe easternsideoftheblock. Construction oftheLoop wouldconnectthepartial tracks on18th Aerial viewofthepartial track laidon Third, 18th, and19th streets. during the T Third Phase1construction. Street viewofthepartial track laidat18th Streetat Third Street N line’s current capacity. to accommodatefour-car lightrailtrains,doublingthe entire system. Newsubway stations would be built to improve MuniMetroperformancethroughout the Avenue. The project wouldintroducerouting changes capacity, reduce crowding, and improve safety on 19th Muni Metrospeedandreliability, increasesubway underground. This projectisintendedtoimprove to Parkmerced inordertolocatetheentireM-Line build a new 2 mile subway tunnel from West Portal The MuniSubway ExpansionProject proposesto PROJECT EXPANSION SUBWAY MUNI Figure 22.Subway ExpansionProject Area Eucalyptus Drive toJuniperoEucalyptus Drive Serra Boulevard. would alsore-designthesurface of19th Avenue from rail tracks usedbytheM-Line. The proposedproject subway tunnel would be built under the existing light Boulevard, withaspurextension toParkmerced. The of19ththe intersection Avenue andJunipero Serra subway tunnelfrom West Portal Stationtosouthof Project Area: The proposed project would construct a safety andattractiveness ofthe streetforallusers. providing saferaccesstotransitaswellimproving to Juniperofrom Eucalyptus Drive Serra Boulevard, The projectwouldalsocompletelyre-design19th Avenue strategy hasbeenconfirmed. would be established at a laterdate after afunding 2018. A projectschedule fordesignandconstruction commencing environmental review, potentiallyin Transportation PlanningProgram (ConnectSF)before a priorityaspart ofSan Francisco’s Long Range planning stagesandwillneedtobeconfirmedas Construction Timeline: This projectis stillintheearly billion in2016 dollars. Project planning-levelcostestimateis$2.5to$3 Estimated Project Cost: The MuniSubway Expansion Boarding platformforM-Line 69 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN FLEET

The Fleet Capital Improvement Program ensures that Muni’s over 1,000 service vehicles across 75 transit lines are safe, comfortable, clean, and reliable for San Francisco passengers. In recent years, the SFMTA has prioritized renovating or replacing vehicles as they near the end of their useful life to avoid service interruptions caused by vehicle failures and costly repairs. The SFMTA is also increasing investment in modern transit facilities to professionally maintain the modern fleet. The SFMTA has prioritized adding more vehicles to the fleet to alleviate overcrowding on busy routes and enable the transit system to carry more passengers CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN as the city grows. These initiatives all contribute to SFMTA’s long-term goals of increasing Muni service on key routes to meet growing demand and eliminating delays caused by outdated vehicles and infrastructure.

CURRENT SFMTA REVENUE VEHICLE FLEET INVENTORY

The SFMTA operates the oldest and largest transit system in the San Francisco Bay Area, accounting for 70 close to 45 percent of all transit trips in the region each New Muni Metro Light Rail Vehicle that arrived in early 2017 day. In addition, it is one of the top ten transit systems in the nation based on boardings, carrying more than 230 million passengers annually. The agency’s transit fleet Transportation Authority‘s (SFCTA) travel demand In addition to the ridership projections, the TFMP also is among the most diverse in the world and features forecast estimates that the SFMTA will need to carry over outlines the changes to the fleet and additional vehicles the landmarked cable cars, historic streetcars, modern one million daily transit boardings by 2040, an increase needed to operate the expected service increases for the light rail vehicles, diesel-hybrid motor coaches, diesel of more than 40 percent than the approximately 700,000 Muni Forward programs in early 2015 and the opening motor coaches, and electric trolley coaches. The tables carried today. Much of this growth in ridership occurs of Central Subway in 2019. Identifying and scheduling on the following pages inventory the Muni transit fleet. along planned routes serving major developments and the procurement of these vehicles has allowed the in the eastern portion of the city. Although many of SFMTA to spread procurements more evenly to ensure SFMTA REVENUE FLEET PLANNING FOR these projects were included in the previous Transit Fleet major maintenance investments are not needed all at REPLACEMENT AND EXPANSION Management Plan to varying degrees, the magnitude the same time. Additionally, the detailed fleet planning and timing of these changes in land use, population, in the TFMP has made the procurement process more The 2014 SFMTA Transit Fleet Management Plan (TFMP) and employment have been further refined. The TFMP efficient by allowing the agency to partner with agencies maps out a systematic approach to planning for the translates this increase in transit ridership into a service on procurements where possible to reduce unit costs replacement and expansion of the SFMTA’s fleet of plan and associated vehicle demand projection. and create a shared demand for future parts. Lastly, SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP transit vehicles through 2040. The San Francisco County will beoffset bydecreasingthenumberof40’ coaches. purchase ofatleast12 expansion60’coaches, which eligible forreplacement. The contract will alsoallowfor Federal Transit Administration (FTA) lifespanandwillbe fleet. Thesecoaches willhavereached theendoftheir 60’ trolleycoaches and175 40’trolleycoaches inits with KingCountyMetro,theSFMTA willreplace93 As part of a multi-year joint procurement contract Replacement ofthe40-ft and60-ft Trolley Coaches: the continuationoftransitoperations. makingthisreplacementcriticalto the nextfiveyears, (FTA) lifespanandwillbeeligiblefor retirement over reached theendoftheirFederal Transit Administration SFMTA’s current fleetofmotorcoaches willhave 124 60’motorcoaches and26140’motorcoaches. The SFMTA willutilize amulti-yearcontracttoreplace motor coaches that will have reached retirement age. will bereplacedtophaseoutSFMTA’s fleetofdiesel Coaches: Replacement ofthe32-ft, 40-ft, and60-ft Motor age shouldbeapproximately 3.28years. the entirerubbertirefleet,atwhich pointtheaverage service tothecity. Bymid-2019 theSFMTA willreplace these vehiclesinorderto adequately provide transit life and are retired,the SFMTA willneedtoreplace As Muniservicevehiclesreach theendoftheiruseful Near-termReplacement Vehicle programmed bytheSFMTA duringtheirstandardfiscalyear. expansion vehiclesdetailedonthefollowingpagesare calendar yearcycle.Funding forthereplacementand Per MTCpolicy, theSFMTA plansprocurementsona facilities programs. CIP tojump-start theimplementationoffleetand positioned theagencytodevelopadetailedfive-year long-term storage and maintenance facility’s needs and the longrangereviewoffleetneedshasinformed Over the next five years, themotorcoachOver thenextfiveyears, fleet will conductmid-lifeoverhauls onSFMTA’s transit Establishment of Vehicle project Overhaul Program: This of repairprioritized. state on a rolling basis, with those vehicles in a worse performance. All typesofvehicleswillberehabilitated rehabilitation/retrofits inordertoimprove their a programbywhich itsfleetwillundergoextensive the revenuevehicles,SFMTA has alsoestablished expansion vehiclesbasedontheacceptedlifecycleof In additiontotheprojectedneedforreplacementand Rehabilitation Revenue Vehicle in thefuture. greater allotmentoffederalfundingtoreplacebuses a long-termbenefitofmakingSFMTA eligiblefora investment innew60’motorcoaches alsocarries andonevehicle. needing onedriver The up-front the capacityofstandard40’buseswhilestillonly demands, as they have 1.5meeting ridership times buses areacost-effective andefficientmethodof articulated busesover thenextyear. Articulated 60’ SFMTA willalsopurchase anadditional4460’ Expansion of the 60-ft Motor Coach Fleet:The throughout thecity. jobs, educationalopportunities andotheramenities venues whileefficientlytransporting peopleto connections tomajorretail,sporting andcultural extension of Muni’s T Third Line will provide direct demand onexistingraillines. The new1.7-mile serve thefutureCentralSubway routeandgrowing expand itslightrailfleetby64vehiclesinorderto Expansion oftheLightRailFleet: The SFMTA will growing demand. proposed undertheMuniForward tomeet initiative the expandedlightraillineandserviceincreases The fleetisalsoprojectedtoexpandinorderserve Near-termExpansion Vehicle cars peryearareoverhauled. cars CPUC and ADA requirements.Onaverage,about four performing bodywork,andensuring systemsmeet including upgradingelectricaland mechanical systems, condition, to rehabilitatethehistoricfleet tolike-new theSFMTAfleet. Overthenextfiveyears, willcontinue rehabilitation critical to the long-term operation of the on aregularschedule, makingaprogramofregular its historicnature,thestreetcarfleetisnotreplaced vehicles fromtheU.S. andaroundtheworld.Dueto routeareelectricrail used ontheFMarket/Wharves Rehabilitate Historic Streetcars: The historicstreetcars extend thelifeofacablecarbyabout30-35years. amajorrehabwill car isapproximately 60-70years; and productivity. Itisestimatedthatthelifeofacable enhancing cablecarvehiclesandthesystem’s reliability the phasedrehabilitationofMuni’s cablecarfleet, Cable CarRenovation: The SFMTA planstofund interruptions andcostlyrepairs. help toeliminatebreakdowns,andpreventservice trucks willsignificantly improve vehiclereliability, show thatrehabilitationofthelightrailvehicle comfortable Maintenancedata rideforpassengers. systems thatsupport vehicleloadsandprovide a trucks andonetrailertruck--that serveassuspension of which isequippedwith threetrucks--two motor operates a fleet of 149 light railvehicles(LRVs), each Light Rail SFMTAVehicle (LRV) Overhauls: The reliability. overhauls forallvehicletypestohelpimprove service the SFMTA has setasideafunding reserve formid-life disruption oftransitservice.IntherecentCIP, however, and more frequentbreakdowns,costlyvehiclerepairs challenging terrain, andlongdutycycles,resultingin funds formid-lifeoverhauls despitehighridership, state ofgoodrepair. Traditionally SFMTA hasnothad a vehicles asavitalpart thetransitfleetin ofkeeping 71 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN 72 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN Table 28.FY2017 SFMTA Transit FleetInventory California cars Neoplan (2002) 40-foot motor coach (323) Orion (2007) 32-foot motor coach (30) New Flyer(2015) 60-foot articulated trolley coach (93) ETI (2004) ETI (2003) ETI (2002) Neoplan (2003) Hyde andMasoncars Cable Car(40) Breda (2003) Breda (2002) Breda (2001) Breda (2000) Breda (1999) Breda (1998) Breda (1997) Light rail vehicles (149) New Flyer(2016) Neoplan (2002) -overhauled Neoplan (2002) New Flyer(2016-17) New Flyer(2014) New Flyer(2013) Orion (2007) Neoplan (2003) Neoplan (2002) 60-foot articulated motor coach (124) ETI (2001) 40-foot trolley coach (240) New Flyer(2016) New Flyer(2015) MANUFACTURER (YEARINSERVICE) 2. Due to the nature of the historic vehicles, they are not retired. Instead, these vehicles are rehabilitated to a like-new conditionastheyage. 2. Duetothenatureofhistoricvehicles, theyarenotretired.Instead,thesevehiclesrehabilitatedto alike-new 1. Coach reflectamulti-yearvehicleprocurement. identification numbers 6500-6554, 6560-6628 6500-6554, 6226-6299, 6401-6424 8160-8235, 8301-8304 5401-5640 5401-5640 5401-5640 5401-5640 6200-6225 6700-6730 8305-8371 7212-7260 1535-1550 1509-1534 1400-1424 1482-1507 1452-1475 1425-1451 8501-8530 8701-8750 8601-8662 8401-8456 1476-1481 8801-8901 8101-8159 7201-7211 ID # n/a n/a 1 1 1 1 PERSON CAPACITY 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 63 45 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 79 48 63 63 63 63 94 94 56 79 48 WHEELCHAIR CAPACITY Varies n/a 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 MODE OFPOWER LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid Electric Electric Electric Electric Electric Electric Electric Electric Electric Electric Electric Electric Electric Electric Electric Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel RETIRE YEAR 2015-2016 2016-2019 2016-2019 2016-2019 2016-2019 2018-2019 2027 2026 2024 2023 2022 2021 2028 2025 2027 2025 2026 2028 2028 2027 2018 2016 2017 2017 2017 n/a n/a 2 2 Table 29.SFMTA HistoricStreetcarFleetInventory, asofDecember2016 1 San Francisco Historic Streetcars 130 162 578 798 C-1 106 Unique Historic Streetcars 151 189 228 233 351 496 586 578-j 737 913 916 952 3557 1893, 1895 1856, 1859, 1888, 1815, 1818, 1834, 1807, 1811, 1814, Peter Witt Class–the “Milan Cars” 1015 1006 –1011, 1014, Presidents’ Conference Committee (PCC)Streetcars 1034, 1038, 1039 1028, 1031, 1033, 1023, 1026, 1027, 1040 1050 -1063 1070 -1080 1168, 1704 1140, 1158, 1160, 1125, 1130, 1139, 1108, 1103, 1106, 2133, 2147 4008, 4009 4008, CAR NUMBER Note: Due to the nature of the historic vehicles, they are not retired. Instead, these vehicles are rehabilitated to a like-new conditionastheyage. Note: Duetothenature ofthehistoricvehicles,theyare notretired.Instead,thesevehicles arerehabilitatedtoalike-new San Francisco MunicipalRailway (1912) San Francisco MunicipalRailway (1914) San Francisco MunicipalRailway (1914) Market StreetRailwayMarket Company (1896) Market StreetRailwayMarket Company (1924) Muni MotorFlatNo.C-1(1916) Moscow/Orel, Russia (1912) Osaka, JapanOsaka, Porto, Portugal (1929) Blackpool Tramways, England(1934) Blackpool Tramways, England(1934) Johnstown Traction Company, Pennsylvania (1926) Melbourne &Metropolitan Tramways Board, W2 Class(1928) Melbourne &Metropolitan Tramways Board, W2 Class(1929) Kobe CityRailways, Kobe, Japan (1927) Brussels, Belgium(1952) New OrleansPublic Service, Inc.(1923) Melbourne &Metropolitan Tramways Board,SW6Class(1946) New OrleansPublic Service, Inc.(1923) Hamburger Hochbahn Aktiengesellschaft (1954) Milan, Italy(1928) San Francisco MunicipalRailway (1948) San Francisco MunicipalRailway (1951-52) San Francisco MunicipalRailway (1952) Philadelphia Transportation Company (1946-1948) Twin CityRapid Transit Company (1946-1947) St. Louis Public Service Company (1946) SEPTA-Philadelphia Pittsburgh ORIGINAL CITY/TRANSITCOMPANY (YEARBUILT) San Francisco MunicipalRailway World War II-erablueandgoldlivery San Francisco MunicipalRailway Market StreetRailwayMarket Company Market StreetRailwayMarket Company San Francisco MunicipalRailway n/a n/a Porto, Portugal Blackpool, England Blackpool, England Johnstown, Pennsylvania City ofMelbourne, Australia n/a Kobe &Hiroshima,Japan Zurich, Switzerland n/a City ofMelbourne, Australia New Orleans,Louisiana Hamburg, Germany (3); Current (6) orangeMilanlivery Original 1920s (2);1930s-1970s Milanyellowandwhitelivery Milantwo-tonegreenlivery Municipal Railway (1950s); Illinois Terminal Railroad Municipal Railway StreetRailway“Magic Carpets;” Market Company; San Francisco Francisco MunicipalRailway “Wings;” DallasRailway & Terminal Company; San Francisco San Francisco MunicipalRailway (1950s); Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.;San n/a San Francisco MunicipalRailway (1950s) Transit Company; Pacific Electric; Louisville, Kentucky; Baltimore,Maryland Kansas; Cincinnati,Ohio;Chicago,Illinois;BostonElevatedRailway; PhiladelphiaRapid Angeles Railway; Brooklyn,New York; Philadelphia,Pennsylvania (2);Kansas City, Missouri- San Francisco MunicipalRailway (1950s); San Francisco MunicipalRailway (1960s); Los Diego, California;Detroit,Michigan; Los Angeles Transit Lines Mexico; Toronto, Canada; Cleveland,Ohio; Washington, D.C.;Birmingham, Alabama; San Newark, NewJersey;Minneapolis-St.Paul, Minnesota;MexicoCity;ElPaso, Texas &Juarez, San Francisco MunicipalRailway; vehicle1704 isinSt.Louis livery n/a n/a CURRENT LIVERY Operational Operational Out ofService Operational Undergoing Restoration maintenance/construction Operational; performs Awaiting Restoration Non-serviceable Undergoing Restoration Operational Completing renovation Awaiting Restoration Operational Non-serviceable Undergoing Restoration Operational Awaiting Restoration Undergoing Restoration Operational Awaiting Restoration Service (1) restoration (1);Outof Repair (2);Undergoing Operational (7);Under Permanently Retired (1) Operational (7); Class: “Big Ten” Storage; retired1982 (9) “Baby Ten” Class:In Repair (1) “Baby Ten” Class:Under Permanently Retired (1) Awaiting Restoration (1); (10); UnderRestoration (2); 1050 Class:Operational (11) 1070 Class:Operational retired 1982 (11) 1100 Class:InStorage; In Storage In Storage OPERATIONAL STATUS 48 seats 50 seats 50 seats 26 seats 50 seats passengers Does notcarry n/a n/a 23 seats 44 seats 44 seats 44 seats 52 seats n/a 36 seats 35 seats n/a 52 seats 54 seats 31 seats n/a 60 seats n/a 58 seats 47 seats 50 seats n/a n/a n/a PASSENGER CAPACITY 73 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN 74 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN Table 31. SFMTA SpareRatio Adjustment Program through2030,60-footMotorCoach infixedrouteservice Table 30.SFMTA FleetReplacement &Expansionthrough2030,60-footMotorCoach infixedrouteservice Peak vehicledemand Add’l Peak Demand(motorization) Maintenance demand(20%) TotalDemand Vehicle Midlife Overhaul/Campaigns Total FleetSize Spare Ratio PLANNED EXISTING FLEET STATISTICS PROCUREMENT FLEET 6548-6585, 6226-6299, 6700-6730 6500-6547 6200-6225 6401-6424 NUMBER 60 ftMotorCoach COACH FACTURER New Flyer New Flyer New Flyer New Flyer Neoplan Neoplan MANU- TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD SERVICE YEAR IN 2003 2002 2030 2024 2023 2026 2028 2029 2029 2030 2016 2015 2018 2017 Total Vehicles atStart ofFiscal Year Average Vehicle Age (Years)Average VehicleAge LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid MODE OF Winter 2017 POWER Diesel Diesel Expansion/Contraction 25% 124 181 174 21 29 Vehicles Replaced ORIGINAL Total Fleet QTY. 98 26

2016 181 168 5.2 79 48 44 76 10

3 Fall 2018 20% 224 151 224 36 37 2017 203 181 1.9 79 48 76 76 2018 224 203 2.7 21 21 79 48 76 2019 224 224 3.7 21 79 48 76 Fall 2019 20% 224 172 224 37 15 2020 224 224 4.7 21 79 48 76 2021 224 224 5.7 21 79 48 76

2022 224 224 6.7 21 79 48 76 Fall 2020 20% 224 187 224 37 2023 249 224 .0 7. 25 21 25 79 48 76 2024 269 249 .5 7. 25 21 20 20 79 48 76 2025 269 269 8.5 25 21 20 79 48 76

2025 20% 225 270 269 45 2026 269 269 .5 7. 25 21 20 48 79 48 76

2027 269 269 5.3 25 21 20 48 79 79 76 2028 269 269 3.2 25 21 20 48 79 76 76 2030 20% 2029 271 325 324 304 269 54 3.8

25 21 20 48 79 35 35 76 2030 324 304 3.8 20 21 25 20 48 79 35 20 21 76 Table 33.SFMTA SpareRatio Adjustment Program through2030,40-footMotorCoach infixedroute service Table 32.SFMTA FleetReplacement &Expansionthrough2030,40-footMotorCoach infixedrouteservice Peak vehicledemand Add'l Peak Demand(motorization) Maintenance demand(20%) Midlife Overhaul/Campaigns TotalDemand Vehicle Total FleetSize Spare Ratio PLANNED EXISTING FLEET STATISTICS PROCUREMENT FLEET 8160-8235, 8601-8662, 8800-8855 8305-8371 8731-8750 8701-8730 8401-8456 8301-8304 8101-8159 NUMBER 40 ftMotorCoach COACH FACTURER New Flyer New Flyer New Flyer New Flyer New Flyer Neoplan Neoplan Neoplan MANU- hauled) (over Orion TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD - SERVICE YEAR IN 2007 2002 2003 2002 2020 2025 2024 2023 2027 2029 2030 2016 2013 2018 2017 2014 2019 Total Vehicles atStart ofFiscal Year Average Vehicle Age (Years)Average VehicleAge LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid MODE OF Winter 2017 POWER Diesel Diesel Diesel Expansion/Contraction 19% 292 372 372 21 63 Vehicles Replaced ORIGINAL Total Fleet QTY. 92 56 80 67 59

2016 399 373 9.0 56 20 92 56 64 63 56 48 Fall 2018 20% 262 324 324 54 8 2017 392 399 .0 7. 56 20 92 56 29 63 76 76 2018 324 392 3.7 56 20 92 68 68 12 76

2019 342 324 4.0 30 56 20 30 92 68 76 Fall 2019 20% 341 342 276 55 10 2020 357 342 4.9 30 56 20 92 68 15 15 76 2021 357 357 5.9 30 56 20 92 68 15 76 2022 357 357 6.9 30 56 20 92 68 15 76 Fall 2020 19% 285 357 357 57 15 2023 357 357 5.6 30 80 56 20 68 80 15 12 76 2024 365 357 6.5 30 80 56 20 68 15 12 76 8 8 2025 365 365 6.5 30 80 32 56 68 32 15 76 8 2025 19% 292 365 365 58 15 2026 365 365 .5 7. 30 80 32 56 68 15 76 8 2027 350 365 .1 7. 30 80 32 41 68 56 15 76 8 2028 350 350 8.1 30 80 32 41 68 15 76 8 2030 19% 2029 291 364 365 365 350 58 6.2 15 30 80 32 41 91 68 15 76 8 2030 365 365 5.0 30 80 32 41 91 68 68 15 8 75 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN 76 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN Table 35.SFMTA SpareRatio Adjustment Program through2030,32-footMotorCoach infixedroute service Table 34.SFMTA FleetReplacement &Expansionthrough2030,32-footMotorCoach infixedrouteservice Peak vehicledemand Maintenance demand(30%) Add'l Peak Demand(motorization) TotalDemand Vehicle Midlife Overhaul/Campaigns Total FleetSize Spare Ratio PLANNED EXISTING FLEET STATISTICS 1. 10 maintenancefundsinFY2006. vehiclestradedforpreventative Vehicles eligibletoreturnfleetinFY2019. PROCUREMENT FLEET 8501-8530 NUMBER 32 ftMotorCoach COACH FACTURER MANU- Orion TBD TBD SERVICE YEAR IN 2007 2031 2019 Total Vehicles atStart ofFiscal Year Average Vehicle Age (Years)Average VehicleAge LF Hybrid LF Hybrid LF Hybrid MODE OF Winter 2017 POWER Expansion/Contraction 43% 21 Vehicles Replaced 21 30 4 ORIGINAL Total Fleet QTY. 30

2016 10.0 30 30 30

Fall 2018 43% 21 23 30 4 2 2017 1 0 11. 30 30 30 2018 12.0 30 30 30

2019 30 1.0 30 30 30 Fall 2019 1 30% 23 23 30 5 2020 2.0 30 30 30

2021 3.0 30 30 30 2022 4.0 30 30 30 Fall 2020 30% 23 28 30 5 2023 5.0 30 30 30 2024 6.0 30 30 30 2025 .0 7. 30 30 30 2025 30% 23 28 30 2026 5 8.0 30 30 30

2027 9.0 30 30 30 2028 10.0 30 30 30 2030 30% 2029 1 0 11. 23 28 30 30 30 30 5 2030 12.0 30 30 30

Table 37. SFMTA SpareRatio Adjustment Program through2030,60-foot Trolley Coach infixedrouteservice Table 36.SFMTA FleetReplacement &Expansionthrough2030,60-foot Trolley Coach infixedrouteservice Peak vehicledemand Maintenance demand(20%) Add'l Peak Demand(motorization) TotalDemand Vehicle Midlife Overhaul/Campaigns Total FleetSize Spare Ratio EXIST- PLANNED FLEET STATISTICS ING PROCUREMENT FLEET 7212-7260 7261-7293 7201-7211 NUMBER 60 ftTrolley Coach COACH FACTURER New Flyer New Flyer New Flyer New Flyer MANU- TBD TBD SERVICE YEAR IN 2030 2031 2018 2016 2015 2017 Total Vehicles atStart ofFiscal Year Average Vehicle Age (Years)Average VehicleAge MODE OF LF Trolley LF Trolley LF Trolley LF Trolley Winter 2017 POWER Expansion/Contraction TBD TBD 33% 45 54 Vehicles Replaced 60 9 ORIGINAL Total Fleet QTY.

2016 1.2 48 60 45 48 12 Fall 2018 29% 72 86 93 14 2017 1.9 20 80 60 48 20 12 2018 2.6 93 80 48 20 13 13 12 2019 3.6 93 93 48 20 13 12 Fall 2019 21% 77 92 93 15 2020 4.6 93 93 48 20 13 12 2021 5.6 93 93 48 20 13 12 2022 6.6 93 93 48 20 13 12 Fall 2020 21% 77 92 93 15 2023 .6 7. 93 93 48 20 13 12 2024 8.6 93 93 48 20 13 12 2025 9.6 93 93 48 20 13 12 2025 21% 77 92 93 15 2026 10.6 93 93 48 20 13 12 2027 1 6 11. 93 93 48 20 13 12 2028 12.6 93 93 48 20 13 12 2030 21% 2029 13.6 77 92 93 15 93 93 48 20 13 12 2030 12.7 93 93 48 20 13 12 12 77 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN 78 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN Table 39.SFMTA SpareRatio Adjustment Program through2030,40-foot Trolley Coach infixedrouteservice Table 38.SFMTA FleetReplacement &Expansionthrough2030,40-foot Trolley Coach infixedrouteservice Peak vehicledemand Maintenance demand(20%) Add'l Peak Demand(motorization) TotalDemand Vehicle Midlife Overhaul/Campaigns Total FleetSize Spare Ratio PLANNED EXISTING FLEET STATISTICS PROCURE- 1. Coach reflectamulti-yearvehicleprocurement identificationnumbers FLEET MENT 5482-5640 5482-5640 5401-5481 5401-5640 NUMBER 40 ftTrolley Coach COACH 1 1 1 1 FACTURER MANU- TBD TBD TBD ETI ETI ETI ETI SERVICE YEAR IN 2002 2003 2004 2001 2018 2017 2019 Total Vehicles atStart ofFiscal Year Average Vehicle Age (Years)Average VehicleAge MODE OF LF Trolley LF Trolley LF Trolley Winter 2017 POWER Trolley Trolley Trolley Trolley Expansion/Contraction 38% 202 175 146 29 Vehicles Replaced ORIGINAL Total Fleet QTY. 108 21 94 17

2016 14.5 239 222 93 94 17 18

Fall 2018 37% 135 162 185 27 2017 15.2 200 222 87 94 17 2 2

2018 200 104 104 193 .7 7. 70 17 2

2019 Summer 2019 185 104 193 1.6 79 79

21% 153 184 185 31 2020 185 185 104 2.6 79

2021 185 185 104 3.6 79

2022 185 185 104 4.6 79

Fall 2020 21% 153 184 185 31 2023 185 185 104 5.6 79

2024 185 185 104 6.6 79

2025 185 185 104 .6 7. 79

2025 21% 153 184 185 31 2026 185 185 104 8.6 79

2027 185 185 104 9.6 79

2028 10.6 185 185 104 79

2030 21% 2029 153 184 185 1 6 11. 185 185 104 31 79

2030 12.6 185 185 104 79

Table 40.SFMTA FleetReplacement &Expansionthrough2030,LightRail Vehicles infixedrouteservice

PLANNED EXISTING FLEET STATISTICS 1. Total returntoserviceby2016. LRV Major repairs fleetadjustedformajorrepairs. Two vehicleswillnotreturnto service untilreplacedin2021. PROCUREMENT FLEET 1535-1550 1509-1534 1400-1424 1482-1507 1452-1475 1425-1451 1476-1481 NUMBER COACH FACTURER Siemens Siemens Siemens Siemens Siemens Siemens Siemens Siemens Siemens Siemens Siemens Siemens Siemens MANU- Breda Breda Breda Breda Breda Breda Breda SERVICE YEAR IN 2000 2003 2002 2025 2024 2023 2026 2027 2028 2029 2021 2022 2020 2001 1999 1998 1997 2018 2017 2019 Total Vehicles atStart ofFiscal Year Average Vehicle Age (Years)Average VehicleAge MODE OF POWER Expansion/Contraction LRV 4 LRV 4 LRV 4 LRV 4 LRV 4 LRV 4 LRV 4 LRV 3 LRV 4 LRV 4 LRV 3 LRV 4 LRV 3 LRV 2 LRV 4 LRV 2 LRV 2 LRV 2 LRV 4 LRV 4 Peak Service Demand Maintenance Spares Vehicles Replaced Spare Ratio Total Fleet ORIGINAL QTY. 26 27 24 27 25 16 6 1 2016 32% .1 7. 1 147 149 113 26 27 24 25 25 36 16 6 2017 42% 16.9 +12 161 149 113 26 27 24 25 25 48 16 12 6 2018 64% 15.7 +24 161 185 113 26 27 24 25 25 24 72 16 12 6 2019 31% 14.9 +24 209 185 160 26 27 24 24 25 25 24 49 16 12 6 2020 20% 15.6 209 177 213 +4 26 27 24 24 25 25 24 36 16 12 4 6 2021 20% 15.3 213 179 215 26 27 24 24 25 24 36 16 12 15 12 12 4 6 2022 20% 13.6 215 179 215 24 26 27 24 24 24 36 24 16 12 16 12 4 6 2023 20% 1 8 11. 215 179 215 24 24 26 27 24 24 36 24 16 12 16 12 4 6 2024 20% 10.1 215 179 215 24 24 24 26 25 24 24 36 24 16 12 12 4 2025 15% 215 187 215 8.4 24 24 24 24 26 24 24 28 24 16 12 12 4 1 2026 15% 215 187 215 6.7 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 28 24 16 12 12 3 4 2027 18% 220 215 187 5.5 +5 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 33 12 12 19 4 2028 25% +24 220 244 195 6.0 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 49 12 12 4 2029 33% +16 244 260 195 6.6 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 65 16 12 12 4 2030 33% 260 260 195 .6 7. 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 65 16 12 12 4 79 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN 80 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN Transportation Task Force identifiedapproximately for fleetreplacementandexpansion. TheMayor’s is workingwithitspartners tofindnewfunding of theneedsidentifiedin TFMP, theSFMTA Potential NewSources ofFunding: the extent Given funds. provided theprimarysourceoflocalmatch tofederal administered bytheSFCTA have traditionally Local funding: Proposition K sales tax revenues to beidentifiedforvehicleexpansion. SFMTA assumesadditionalfundingsources willneed placing alowerpriorityonvehicleexpansion. The for anumberoffederalfundingsourcesitallocates, prioritize vehiclereplacementasthehighestpriority Regionally-programmed funds:MTCpolicies will befundedthroughthesesourcesinthefuture: allow theSFMTA toassumeallvehiclereplacements met theregionalneedsforvehiclereplacementand Capital Improvement Program. These sourceshave reasonably anticipatedintheneartermaspart ofthe The SFMTA regularlyforecastsfundingthatcanbe FUNDING EXPANSION AND VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FLEET REVENUE Table 41. MotorCoaches Scheduled forRehabilitation 8401 -8456 8701 -8750 8501 -8530 8601 -8662 COACH NO. FACTURER New Flyer New Flyer New Flyer MANU- Orion Orion LENGTH OF VEHICLE 60 ft. 40 ft. 40 ft. 40 ft. 30 ft. SERVICE YEAR IN 2006 2007 2015 2013 2014 Hybrid Diesel Hybrid Diesel Hybrid Diesel Hybrid Diesel Hybrid Diesel MODE OF POWER plans asmoreinformationbecomes available. vehicle expansionandadjustprocurement will continuetoinvestigate funding opportunities for expansion light rail vehicles. Additionally, the SFMTA The SFMTA isusingsomeofthesesources toprocure Core Capacityfunds,andCap Trade Revenues. sources such asFTA formulafunds,FTA NewStarts potential fundingforvehicleinvestments through millionof has alsoidentifiedapproximately $400 The MTC Core Capacity Challenge Grant Program transportation network. improving andmaintainingtheMunifleetcity’s toensure astable,long-termcommitmentto pursued future, additionalnewrevenuesourceswillbe complete streetsafetyandpavingprojects.Inthe funds, theCitywillpurchase Munivehiclesand each year based on population growth. With these requires theCitytoadjustfundingfortransportation passed Propositionvoters B in November 2014 that taxes, andvehiclelicensefees. Also, San Francisco investments throughgeneralobligation bonds,sales $270 millionofpotentialfundingforvehicle YEAR OFPLANNED REHABILITATION 2021 2020 2012 2013 2019 ESTIMATED COST (in 2014 dollars) (in 2014 dollars) (2017 dollars) (2017 dollars) (2017 dollars) $539,000/bus $382,000/bus $382,000/bus $371,100/bus $371,100/bus service atall. inreserveandwhichbe kept shouldnotbeusedfor the maintenanceteamdetermineswhich vehiclescan removed fromserviceentirelyonarollingbasis,as short term. The paratransit fleet vehicles willthen be vehicles thatareretiredintothereservefleetfor theSFMTAare delivered, planstoshift allthose spares intheparatransitfleet. Asthenewvehicles in service. The SFMTA currently doesnothaveany All ofthevehicleslistedinfollowingtableare demand. FTA-defined inorderto meetservice usefullives inservicebeyondtheir vehicles thathavebeenkept expansion vehicleswillallowtheagencytoretire over thenext few years. Class Dminivans These additional 13 ClassBvehiclesandanadditional32 SFMTAend oftheirusefullives, willpurchase an In additiontoreplacingparatransitvehiclesatthe 35 ClassBvehiclesin2019. with limitedmobility. The agencywillreplaceanother These vehicles provide critical service for customers andonewheelchairthat holdstwopassengers user. life in2018. A ClassDvehicleisalow-floor minivan that willhave reachedminivans theendof their useful The agencywillalsoreplacefiveClassDparatransit withlimitedmobility.critical serviceforcustomers two wheelchair positions. These vehiclesprovide and van thatholdsaminimumof12 passengers in 2017. A Class B or Type II vehicleisa22’ cutaway vans thatwillhavereached theendoftheirusefullife The SFMTA planstoreplace27ClassBparatransit PLANNING FLEET VEHICLE PARATRANSIT DEMAND-RESPONSIVE Table 43.Non-Revenue Vehicle FleetInventory, asofJune 2016 Table 42.Paratransit Vehicle FleetInventory TOTAL Maintenance Vehicles Transit OperationsHeavy-Duty Facilities and Transit StreetOperations Vehicles Track Maintenance Vehicles Transit OverheadLines& OperationsDivision Transit OperationsPool Light-Duty Vehicles Taxi Services Investigations Vehicles System Safety VehiclesSystem PoolSustainable StreetsDivision Vehicles Custodial Vehicles Capital Projects &ConstructionDivision Vehicles Sustainable StreetsShops Vehicles SFMTA SFPDK-9 Unit Vehicles Proof-of-Payment Vehicles Security, Investigations, Enforcement,and Revenue &Collections Vehicles Parking ControlOfficer Vehicles Building andGrounds Vehicles Human Resources, etc.) InformationTechnology,(Communications, Functions Agency Administrative El Dorado(2006) CLASS B Bus West (2008) Bus West El Dorado(2012) Elkhart (2012) Glaval (2014) Braun (2014) CLASS D MANUFACTURER/VENDER (vehicle year) DIVISION SUBFLEET NUMBER OF VEHICLES 20 35 26 35 1 5 VEHICLES NO. OF 877 271 127 133 38 67 68 67 29 15 17 14 11 2 7 6 5 PERSON CAPACITY 2000-2007 2000-2012 1992-2013 1996-2016 1996-2013 1999-2015 1986-2013 1988-2016 1981-2013 1981-2015 1982-2010 1998-2010 1986-2010 1987-2016 1987-2014 1987-2010 MODEL RANGE YEAR 12 12 12 12 12 2 Van, Car, Pick-ups, Cargo Van, Super- SUV, Van, Pick-up, Cargo Van, Super- SUV, Van, Pick-up, Super-Duty Truck Car, SUV, Pick-up, Super-Duty Track Sweeper, Cargo Van, Super-Duty Car, Cargo Minivan, Van, Pick-up Car, SUV, Van, Pick-up Minivan, Pick-up, Cargo Minivan, Van Truck, Tanker Freight Truck, Super-Duty Freight Truck, Car, SUV, Pick-up, Van Car, SUV, Cargo Van VEHICLE TYPE(S) WHEELCHAIR Car, Cargo VanCar, CAPACITY Van, Pick-up Duty Truck Duty Truck Car, SUV Cart Car 2 2 2 2 1 2 MODE OFPOWER Gas/ Hybrid MODE OFPOWER Gasoline, Biodiesel Gasoline, Biodiesel Gasoline, Biodiesel Gasoline Gasoline Gasoline Gasoline Hybrid, Gasoline Hybrid, Gasoline Hybrid, Gasoline Hybrid, Gasoline Hybrid, Gasoline Hybrid, Gasoline Hybrid, Gasoline Hybrid, Gasoline Diesel Gasoline, CNG Gasoline Gasoline Gasoline Gasoline implementation. Waivers weregrantedforvehicles to reduce vehicle usage and a Transit report First on it wouldimplementthevarious sustainableoptions required todevelopa Transit planoutlininghow First implement thisordinance,each citydepartment was possible and,whenitisnot,tousegreenvehicles. To single-occupancy vehicletransportation asmuch as transit, walking, ridesharing, or biking) to minimize modes for trips made for work (such as public and departments use sustainable transportation reduction goalsbymandatingthatallcityemployees city inachieving itsairpollutionandgreenhousegas city’s Environment Code.Itwas intendedtoassistthe and Clean Transportation Ordinance(HACTO) tothe In 2010, San Francisco addedthe Healthy voters Air Ordinance San Francisco Healthy Air andClean Transportation reduction andretirementgoals. accommodate itsneedswhilemeetingthecity’s the managementofnon-revenuefleetto currently developingastrategythatwillimprove old. vehicles olderthan12 years The SFMTA is Per city policy, all city departments must retire around thecity. engineering, andconstructionofSFMTA projects andassisttheplanning, between operatingdivisions the city. Other vehicles are used to transport materials respond toincidentsandtransport equipmentaround that requireslight-andheavy-duty vehiclesto the security response teams, and Transit Operations and including vehiclesfortheparkingcontrolofficers the SustainableStreetsDivision’s Enforcementunits, vehicles. The largest subfleetssupport theworkof transit servicecriticalandSFMTA operationssupport The SFMTA owns and maintains just under 900 PLANNING FLEET VEHICLE NON-REVENUE 81 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN 82 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN fares/fees/fines, parking meters, etc. fares/fees/fines, parkingmeters, variety ofsources,including the SFGeneralFund, locally-generated operatingfundsthatcome froma heavy-duty vehicles,arefundedthroughthe pooled The SFMTA non-revenuefleet,boththelight-dutyand Non-Revenue Vehicle FleetFunding Sources vehicle GPSstatistics. deployment inthisway throughtheuseofnon-revenue possible). The SFMTA hasalreadybeenoptimizingfleet cleanest vehiclestothehighestmileagetaskswherever vehicles is a secondary strategy (e.g. assigning the internal departmental redeploymentofunderutilized high mileageyetarenecessaryforthejob). The cases (e.g.SFMTA paintshopvansdo notaccumulate the originalHACTO, aregrantedforspecial waivers miles peryearorless)ineach citydepartment. As with retirement of underutilized light duty vehicles (3,000 ofHACTOThe nextversion forFY2018 focusesonthe data. requirements thatarebasedonusagethroughGPS Office toimplementvehiclereduction Administrators transferred fromSFEnvironment oversight totheCity’s also amendedtheHACTOSupervisors legislationwhich requires GPSinnon-revenuevehicles. The Boardof passedlegislationinFY2016Board ofSupervisors that for safety, efficiencyandenhancedmaintenance. The allow theSFMTA totrack andmonitorvehicleusage System (GPS)devicesinallnon-revenuevehicleswhich Also inFY2015, the SFMTA installedGlobalPositioning did soinFY2015. size by20percentfromthe2010 baseline. The SFMTA (non-revenue andnon-servicecriticalvehicles)fleet were requiredtoreducetheremaininglightduty theSFMTA,manage theirownfleetofvehicles,like vehicles subjecttoHACTO in2010. Departments that SFMTA for422oftheagency’s waivers received 559 that wererequiredtoperformjob-criticaltasks. The projects foreach facilityareinitiated,theestimates preliminary engineeringphases fortheindividual for San Francisco conditions. As theplanning and possible, withanappropriatecontingency toaccount and areappliedonaunitorsquare-foot basiswhere The costestimatesarebasedon industry standards construction management,surveying,andtesting). (construction) and soft costs (e.g., planning, design, The costestimatesintheCIPincludehardcosts IMPROVEMENTS FUNDING FACILITIES vehicles of40’and60’lengths. charge, and maintain motor, trolley and electric of modernbusfacilitieswillbeabletostore,fuel/ vehicle technology. Inaddition,thisnextgeneration and changing fleetbothintermsofvehiclesize and infrastructure andthespaceneededforgrowing fleet facilities,theagencywillincorporate As theSFMTA modernizes andexpandsits Transit Plan. CIP, andfurther discussedinthenextShort Range formally incorporatedintotheFY2019 -FY2023 recommended intheFacilities Framework willbe still underway. The near-term programofprojects this Plan,finalizationofthe Facilities Framework is important tonotethat,atthetimeofpublication facilities toaccommodatefleetgrowth.Itis The CIPalsoassignedprojectedfundingtoexpand safe, efficient,andabletoservicemodernvehicles. themmodernization ofoutdatedfacilitiestomake Capital Improvement Program (CIP)supports the Vision Report and Facility Framework, the Facilities fleet isinastateofgoodrepair. Informedbythe ensuring reliable transit service and that SFMTA’s fueling, storage,andstagingfacilitiesarevitalto Efficient andwell-functioningmaintenance, FACILITIES rebuild ofSFMTA’s existingfacilities. 1) anewfacility, or 2)increasingcapacityduring overarching scenarios toaccommodatethisgrowth: fleet. The Facilities Framework hasidentified two to adequately store and maintain the expansion additionalbusstoragewillberequired numbers, from themostrecent Transit FleetManagementPlan vehicle acquisitionandfleetexpansionprojections (Estimated initialinvestment: $430million):Due to Additional BusStorage andMaintenance Yard request themostrecentupdatestothisCIP. areencouragedtoviewor adoption, soreaders the ongoingFacilities Framework sinceitsoriginal 2017 -FY2021CIP. This documenthasevolved with each oftheseprojectsis availableintheSFMTA FY on theimplementationschedule andfundingplanfor modernization of SFMTA’s facilities. More information schedule. stepsinthe thefirst These projectstake fleet andthe2017 updatedFleetPlanexpansion term projectsneededtoaccommodatetheexisting The projectssummarized inthissectionarethenear- FACILITIES EXPANDED AND NEW MAJOR FUTURE critical capitalimprovement program. federal partners todevelopafundingstrategyforthis SFMTA isworkingcloselywithitsregional,state,and recommended bytheFacilities CapitalProgram. The needed tocompletetheconstructionofprojects projects, asubstantialamountoffundingisstill construction ofthefollowingfacilitiesandequipment the planning,preliminaryengineering,designand amount of projectedfunding in the near termto start Although theSFMTA hasprogrammedasignificant available. will beupdatedasadditionalinformationbecomes a whole.Moreinformationon theimplementation operations of the facilities and the transit system as facilities upgradesthatwillimprove maintenanceand The SFMTA hasidentifiedthefollowing listofsmaller PROJECTS FACILITIES SHORT-TERM AND GENERAL MAINTENANCE before 2020. acquire theSFMTA portion oftheproperty on or is beingamendedtoincludeapurchase optionto currently occupying thisleasedfacility. The lease PaintSustainable Streets’ andMeterShopsare of Magnitudeinvestment: $15 million): The SFMTA YosemitePurchase Warehouse is needed. rebuild ofotherfacilitiesbeforeLRV storagecapacity potential forinterimbusstorageonthesiteduring and plannedrailservicegrowthto2040,withthe Light Rail FleetfortheopeningofCentralSubway construct storagetracks to accommodatethegrowing initial investment: $160 million): This projectwill Muni Metro East (MME) Facility Expansion service timelineofearly2018. is currently underconstructionwithanexpectedin- room, locker rooms and training space. The project gilley operations andmaintenanceoffices,showers, and heavymaintenancebays,warehouse space, maintenance andoperationsbuildingincludinglight million): squarefootmotorcoach The new65,000 Islais Creek (Estimatedinitialinvestment: $130 Maintenance. Warehouse and Transit OverheadLines Division forcentral renovation andreconfigurationofBurke Burke (Estimated initialinvestment: $39million): The (Estimated Order (Estimated in theSFMTA FY2017 -FY2021CIP. funding planforeach ofthesepurchases isavailable Improvement Program. Moreinformationonthe projects havebeenincludedinthefive-yearCapital smaller equipment purchases and renovation reconfiguration oftheSFMTA facilities,thefollowing In additiontothestructuralchanges and PURCHASES &EQUIPMENT TOOLS is availableintheSFMTA FY2017 -FY2021CIP. schedule and funding plan for each of these projects • • • • • • • • Kirkland, IslaisCreek, Woods, Potrero and Presidio. million): The followingyardswillgetatester:Flynn, Electric DiagnosticStation(EstimatedCost:$6 Kirkland andIslaisCreek)willgetatester. Each SFMTA motor coach yard (Woods, Flynn, Alternator Testers (EstimatedCost:$0.5million): investment Beach, andGreen: $3millionestimatedinitial Wash Racks atFlynn, Potrero, Presidio, Kirkland, estimated initialinvestment SFMTA Tow Facility Vehicle Stackers: $2million Replacement: $6millionestimatedinitialinvestment Kirkland DivisionUnderground Storage Tank million estimatedinitialinvestment Lift Upgrades atFlynn, Potrero, andPresidio: $12 estimated initialinvestment Scott, Metro Green, andPotrero: $5million Life &Fire Safety Systems atFlynn, Kirkland, million estimatedinitialinvestment Operator Convenience Facilities Phases I-III:$6 issue fortheSFMTA andtheParatransit contractors. dispatching isalsoneeded. To date,thisisstillanopen by theSFMTA. Officespace foradministrationand street parkinggarages currently ownedandoperated the vanheightsaretoohightofitintoany of the off- sitesinSan Franciscocontractors’ andBrisbane,as vans arecurrently andmaintainedatvarious parked accommodate growthofthefleetto 125 vehicles. The owned paratransit vans. Ideally this location would facility, which wouldaccommodatethe87SFMTA- The SFMTA isworkingtofind aparatransitoperating FACILITIES VEHICLE PARATRANSIT • • • • • • Kirkland andPotrero Divisions of the vehicle vacuum systems at Woods, Flynn, million): This projectwillfundthereplacement VehicleSystems Vacuum (EstimatedCost:$0.8 Each ofthesixtransityards willgetonetug. Pusher TugsShop (Estimated Cost: $0.4 million): pressure washer. Each ofthesixbusmaintenance yardswillgeta Pressure Washers (EstimatedCost:$0.1million): a unitortwobasedontheshop. motor ortrolleycoachsix division yardswillget Parts Cleaners(EstimatedCost:$1.2 million): All islands andshopstalls. shops and yards will get new reels for the fuel (Estimated Cost:$0.5million):Each ofthesix Fluid DispensingReels, Hoses, andPlumbing andaprons. work stalls,floors, toclean andscrubbers get onetotwosweepers $0.7 million):Each ofthesixtransityardswill Floor Sweepers &Scrubbers (EstimatedCost: 83 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN 84 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN for all users is a key elementofallSFMTA isakey for allusers work. in thescopeofwork.Inthisway, improving transitaccess pedestrian countdownandaccessible pedestriansignals & Signalsprogramhaveincorporated theinstallationof mobility. Additionally, many oftheprojects inthe Traffic and rampstofacilitateeasierboardingforthoseoflimited Rail Replacement stops includetheconstruction ofkey Transit Fixed Guideway Program the Sunset like Tunnel theprojectsin Likewise, stops andbusyintersections. sidewalkto thetransitsystemlike extensionsattransit Expansion programhaveelementsthatenhanceaccess the projectsin all Transit example, Optimization and of many projectsintheotherCapitalPrograms. For this program,butareincorporatedintothedesign Program andarenotlimitedtotheprojects listed in are atthecoreofSFMTA’s CapitalImprovement totransit stops. streetcars Accessibility improvements of the transportation system accessible - from buses to (ADA) mostmodesandaspects requirementstomake go above andbeyond Americans withDisabilities Act The Accessibility Program is dedicated to projects that consistent accesstothetransportation network. who relyonawheelchair orothermobilityaidrequire access. Additionally, peoplewith disabilitiesandthose temporarily disabledfromaninjurywillenjoyeasier transit vehiclesandstationsthosewhomaybe for example,canmoreeasilyboard in strollers, Familiesand visitors. travelingwithsmallchildren benefit abroadspectrumof San Francisco residents boarding islandsandplatforms. These improvements attransitstationsorconstructing installing elevators the accessibilityoftransportation system,such as designing, andconstructingcapitalprojectstoenhance inSanto everyperson Francisco. This requiresplanning, SFMTA publictransportation tomake accessible strives ACCESSIBILITY PROGRAMS CAPITAL SFMTA OTHER projects include: customer experience.Key transitcommunications investments innewtechnology toimprove theMuni The CommunicationsandITProgram alsosupports tools fasterandmoreusableforthepublic. our communication improve bandwidth,andmake core fibernetwork. Theseupgradeswillreducecosts, non-fiber SFMTA facilitieswithalinktotheSFMTA system. SFMTA iscurrently replacingthe remaining internal communicationbackbone oftheMetro maintaining thefibernetworkthatprovides the of usethetransportation system. This includes IT infrastructuretoimprove theefficiencyandease Program supports thedesignandimplementationof The CommunicationsandInformation Technology (IT) AND COMMUNICATIONS IT INFRASTRUCTURE IT • • of vehiclelocations. on-board systemsthatdepend uponknowledge track vehicles in real time and interface with other responds tounexpectedservice disruptions, Management Center(TMC),improve how Muni andthe between Munioperators Transportation radio systemwillimprove communications Vehicle Location (CAD/AVL) system. The new new Computer Aided Dispatch/Automatic outdated radiosystemandintroducinga communications, SFMTA is upgrading its As part of a system-wideupgradetoMuni Radio Replacement and CAD/AVL Upgrade: disaster ormedicalemergency. emergency servicesinacrisis,such asanatural subway. These phones arecrucialforcontacting and newphonesaddedthroughouttheMuni The existingemergencyphonewillbeupgraded Blue LightEmergency Telephone Replacement:

upgrades and new Clipper Card readers on Muni vehicles. onMunivehicles. upgrades andnewClipperCardreaders neartermprojectsincludeadditional safety Other key • • • stations andotherlocations. route arrivals, as well as informational kiosks at as real-timeserviceupdatesandconnecting additional informationon-boardvehicles,such is exploringthelatesttechnologies toprovide useoftheirtime. travel andmake The SFMTA betterof formatstohelpcustomers plantheir accurate expectedwaiting timesinavariety Customer InformationSystem willprovide more Real-Time Vehicle Arrival Predictions System/ Customer Information System: SFMTA’s new Real-Time Vehicle Arrival Predictions System/ service strategiestoimprove operations identify overcrowding inrealtimeanddevelop the Transportation ManagementCenter(TMC)to planning purposes,thesenew APCs willallow accuracy ofcurrent countsforservice ridership by stop. In addition to improving the ridership coaches andlightrailvehicles inordertotrack (APCs)onallnewbuses,trolley Counters installing state-of-the-art Automatic Passenger Automatic Passenger Counters: TheSFMTA is receipts. on-demand real-timeprintingoftransfers/fare printed papertear-off receiptswith transfers/fare The newfarebox systemwillreplacecurrent pre- farebox transactionswithroutesandlocations. and integration with the CAD/AVL system to link Room, adatacollectionandreporting system and coinsfromfareboxes toSFMTA’s Counting secure revenuecollectionsystemtotransfercash a on alltransitvehicles(exceptcablecars), new systemwhich willconsist ofnewfareboxes replace 25-yearoldfarebox equipmentwitha Farebox System: InFY2017, theSFMTA will Table 44.Projected DevelopmentandImplementation fortheSFMTATimeline Enterprise Asset ManagementSystem and associatedrequirementsunderthe2012 Moving agency comply with the asset management policy Together, the TAM Program andEAMSwillhelpthe asset conditionandmeetstateofgoodrepairtargets. from theEAMStoprioritize investments basedon and planning. The agency’s TAM Program willusedata assets andenablemoreaccuratefinancialforecasting will helpbetter assesstheconditionofagency’s SFMTAand historical state of all active assets. This agency whileproviding fullvisibilityofthecurrent currently disparateassettracking systemswithinthe Once fullydeployed,theEAMSwillintegrate infrastructure inSan Francisco. walking, bicycling,trafficmanagementandparking go beyond the Muni-related transit assets and include billion ofassetsinastategoodrepair. These assets agency’s approach tomaintaintheapproximately $13.2 Asset Management (TAM) Program that definesthe The EAMSwillsupport theSFMTA’s Transportation also intheCommunicationsandITCapitalProgram. an Enterprise Asset ManagementSystem (EAMS)is Funding forthedevelopmentandimplementationof Asset Management system intotheirday-to-day lives. tobetterefficient, andhelpcustomers integratethetransit riding Munieasierandmore allhelptomake initiatives In coordination with the transit and streets projects, these Project Phase 3 Phase 2 Phase 1 Phase Implementation through 2017 early 2017 early 2016 Late 2016 2016 to 2015 to Dates Facilities; Transportation ManagementCenter, andInformation Technology assets. Other Transit assets,revenuevehiclefleetforallmodes,andmaintenance; SFMTA Real Estate and trafficsignsandsignals, streetstripingandpaint,SFgosignaltiming,etc. shops, e.g.parkingmeters, andtheSustainableStreets Streetssubdivision Sustainable Streetsassetsassociatedwith theLivable Custodial, UndergroundStorage Tanks cable carmachinery; Purchasing; and MaterialsManagement.CompletedUnits:BuildingsGrounds, Maintenance of Way/Transit FixedGuideway power, assets:overhead lines,motive track maintenance, and implementationoftheEAMS. below showstheprojectedtimelinefordevelopment andmaterials. managing assets,workorders, The table replacing legacy systemsandprocessesthatinvolve the agency. Deployingateach businessunitwillinclude deployment acrossapproximately 45businessunitsin the EAMS. The SFMTA hasplannedforathreeyear services toassistwithdeployingandconfiguring EAMS andissuedarequestforproposalprofessional 2014, theSFMTA hireddedicatedstaff toimplement the of theconceptualengineeringreport forthesystem.In software toolsstarted inlate2012 withthedevelopment The development of the EAMS and the associated reinvesting inthecity’s transportation network. decisionsonmanagingand well asenabledata-driven Ahead forProgress inthe21stCentury Act (MAP-21) as activity. SFMTA alsoensuresthatparkingstructures are weather and earthquake and can withstand harsh parking garages arestructurallysound,well-ventilated, related topublicparking. This includesensuringthat garages, aswellstreetinfrastructureand facilities rehabilitation, andconstructionofpublicparking The Parking Program supports the planning, design, San Franciscoandbusinesses. residents,visitors, facilities, includingbothon-andoff-street, thatserve SFMTA isresponsibleformaintainingpublicparking PARKING Assets Affected the Mission. Square, andneighborhoodgarages inNorth Beach and Center, MosconeCenter, Performing Arts Center, Union CenterPlaza,GoldenGateway,structures: Civic Japan parking rehabilitation andequipmentupgradesofkey Some oftheneartermparkingprojectsinclude with Disabilities Act (ADA). accessible and meet the requirements of the Americans transit operators. and emergencypreparednesstrainingforstaff and operators. The Security Program security alsocovers security ofthetravelingpublicandMunitransit vulnerabilities countermeasurestoimprove the systems and the installation of threats and investments insite-hardeningoftheMunisubway Some oftheneartermsecurityprojectsinclude against potentialterrorist andsecuritythreats. projects thatprotectvitaltransportation infrastructure Security GrantProgram which provides fundingfor to fundthisprogram,such asthefederal Transit situations. SFMTA grants alsoappliesforcompetitive natural disaster, terrorist attack, orotheremergency in case of a and implement security initiatives Security Program fundsareusedtoplan,design, a safeandreliabletransportation system. The systems iscrucial to providing San Francisco with Developing state-of-the-art emergencysecurity SECURITY com/getting-around/parking available ontheSFMTA website: http://www.sfmta. More information onSFMTA parkingpoliciesandprojectsis 85 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN 86 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN safety andspotimprovements, andsecurebicycle new bicyclelanesandseparatedcycletracks, of San Francisco’s bicycleinfrastructure, including: capital projects to enhance the safety and comfort used fortheplanning,designandconstructionof streets from2013 to2018. BicycleProgram fundsare current bybicyclesonourcity number oftripstaken The agency’s overall goal is tomore than double the city-widecohesive, network ofsafebicycleroutes. The BicycleProgram isdesignedtocreate a Bicycle vibrant andenjoyableplacestowalk andbike. will invest our streets safe, in capital projects to make StreetsProgram that more integratedanddiverse School, and Traffic Calmingcapitalprogramsintoa the SFMTA unifiedtheformerBicycle, Pedestrian, streamline thecapitalfundingprocessforthiswork, and prioritizesInorderto safetyforvulnerableusers. design thataccommodatesalltransportation modes San Francisco isanationalleaderincompletestreets STREETS website: visionzerosf.org pedestrian-focused planningandprojects isavailable onthe More information on Vision Zero, WalkFirst andother . more people-friendly. into CompleteStreetsandmaking busyintersections walking fromcar traffic,turningneighborhoodroads corner bulb-outs.Such projectshelpprotectpeople projects such as refuge islands, speed tables, and planning,design,andimplementationofcapital covers 2015 Travel DecisionSurvey). The Pedestrian Program in San Francisco aremadeby walking alone(Source: is inpart apedestrian trip–and25percentofalltrips car, oralltheway totheirdestination, almosteverytrip city.First Whether peoplearewalking toabusstop, places towalk isintegraltoSFMTA’s goalofa Transit Making the city’s streets safe, vibrantandenjoyable Pedestrian safety programsinlocalelementaryschools. such to asBike Work Dayandbicycleeducation The BicycleProgram intheCIPalsosupports events Francisco forbicyclistscitywide. bicycling conditionsandimprove thesafetyofSan corridors helpstoeliminatethemostdangerous Concentrating infrastructure improvements in these population density, andfrequentcollisionswithcars. corridors thathaveahighrateofbicycletravel, parking. The SFMTAkey BicycleStrategyidentified safety classesinelementaryschools. programs such as Walk toSchool Dayandpedestrian infrastructure, removal ofpedestrianbarriers, and Funded projectsincludestreetredesigns,bicycle for children, includingthosewithdisabilities. modes oftransportation saferandmoreaccessible active projects andprograms that helpto make The StreetsProgram provides fundingforcapital routes toschool oftheSFMTA. isacriticalobjective Providing San Francisco children withsafeanddirect School on thewebsite:www.visionzerosf.org. pedestrian-focused planningandprojectsisavailable More informationon Vision Zero, WalkFirst andother vastly improve thesafetyofSan Francisco asawhole. capitalprojectscan injury corridors andintersections, or fatalpedestrianinjuries.Byfocusingonthesehigh- San Francisco streetsaccountfor70percentofsevere studies and community outreach. Only 12 percent of Advisory Committee toconductrigorous,data-driven as WalkFirst, Vision Zero, and the Pedestrian Safety SFMTA partner isakey incity-wide taskforcessuch infrastructure to create vibrant and livable Complete Streets. infrastructure tocreatevibrantand livable streetscape enhancements,pedestrianprojectsandbicycle being treated. These projectsare often combinedwith arterial, orschool) dependingonthetype ofstreet Traffic calmingprojects fallintothreecategories(local, neighborhoods. bicyclist deaths–especiallyinthecity’s residential car trafficisparamounttoreducingpedestrianand being struck byacarmoving at20mph,slowing todiethanapedestrian 30 mphissixtimesmorelikely shifting. Since apedestrianstruck by acarmoving at pedestrian medianislands,trafficcircles,andlane sidewalks to reduce car speeds), speed humps, (e.g. narrowing‘road diets’ roadsand/orwidening engineer, andconstructcapitalprojectssuch as transit. Program funds are used to plan, design, and visibilityof people walking, bicycling,andusing byslowing cartrafficandincreasingthesafety users Francisco streetswelcomingenvironments forall The Traffic Calming Program helpstomake San Traffic Calming website: http://www.sfmta.com/node/77946 More information ontrafficcalmingis available ontheSFMTA emphasize customerserviceandbestsafetypractices. trainingprogramsthat through annualdriver safety and the customer experience to improve driver technology. Additionally, thisprogramfundsinitiatives use of and programs to encourage the innovative taxi networkthroughtheinstallationofstands vehicles. Italsoincludesprogramstoexpand the thatpurchasemedallion holders fuel newalternative and Air EnergyRebate which tocompanies isgiven environmental impactoftaxiuse,such asataxiClean The Taxi Programtoreducethe includesinitiatives provide a better customer experience for all taxi users. implement improvements tothetaxisystemand the city. Program fundsareusedtoplan,design,and and environmentally friendlytaxisavailablethroughout The Taxi comfortable, Programtomake efficient, strives TAXI website: http://www.sfmta.com/services/taxi-industry More informationprojectsis available ontaxi ontheSFMTA mobility, andincrease thesafetyofroadways. infrastructure willdecrease travel time,improve safety. Upgradingand replacingsignalsandsignal of new and upgraded traffic signals to improve This programalsofundsthedesign andconstruction Management Center (TMC) and remote workstations. signs, acommunicationsnetwork,the Transportation traffic cameras,videodetection,variablemessage ITS toolsincludeadvancedtrafficsignalcontrollers, priority, andexpeditemaintenanceprocedures. The to enhancetrafficanalysis,provide transitsignal with Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)tools SFgo program,SFMTA isreplacingoutdated signals transportation. For example,throughtheinnovative time andmoneyforpeopleacrosseverymodeof traffic flowwillresultinsubstantialsavingsofboth old. Modernizingthesesystemstobetter manage supporting infrastructureisover halfacentury Some ofSan Francisco’s trafficsignalsand and replacingtrafficsignalssignalinfrastructure. Program provides fundingforupgrading,renovating of thetransportation system. The Traffic &Signals Traffic signalsareintegraltothesmoothfunctioning & SIGNALS TRAFFIC 87 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 5: CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN 88 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP No. 3434:1)CentralSubway; 2) Van NessBusRapid Transit Project. projects aspriorityfortransitexpansion intheBay Area. The followingsections provide information onthetwoSFMTA expansion projectsincludedinMTCResolution Under MTCResolution No.3434,theRegional Transit ExpansionProgram, theMetropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)identifiedspecificbus,railandferry 89 SFMTA FY 2015 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 6: MAJOR EXPANSION PROJECTS densely populatedneighborhoods inthecountry, provide arapidtransitlinkto Central Subway will provide reliabletransportation forresidentsofonethemost transit capacity on the entire T Third line, from Chinatown to Sunnydale. The hub. Itwillprovide frequent,clean,pollution-free transitserviceandincrease and help secure the city’scompetitiveness status as a regional, national and global The CentralSubway Project will contributegreatlytoSan Francisco’s economic Four newstationswillbebuiltalongthe1.7-mile CentralSubway Project alignment: and Mission Bay areastoSouth (SoMa), of Market Union Square andChinatown. Caltrain StationtoChinatown,providing adirect,rapidtransitlinkfromtheBayshore Phase 2,theCentralSubway Project, willextendthe T Third Linefromthe4thStreet corridorridership ofSan Francisco timein50 years. forthefirst in opened to customers April 2007, restoring light-rail serviceto a hightransit- the densely populated Third Street corridor. segment oftheThis first T Third Line Rail Transit Project. Phase1oftheprojectconstructeda5.4-milelight-raillinealong The CentralSubway Project isthesecondphaseofSFMTA’s Third StreetLight SUBWAY CENTRAL PROJECTS EXPANSION MAJOR • • • • Chinatown StationatStockton and Washington streets(subway) (subway) Union Square/Market Street StationonStockton StreetatUnionSquare Yerba Buena/MosconeStationat4thandFolsom streets(subway) 4th andBrannan Stationat4thandBrannanstreets(streetlevel) Figure 23.Mapof T Third Phase2(CentralSubway) 89 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 6: MAJOR EXPANSION PROJECTS burgeoning technology and digital-media hub, and Workshops performed a detailed risk analysis of of $942.2 million. An additional $41 million in improve access to a premier commercial district and the project costs, constructability, and schedule. federal funds is designated to the project as part of tourist attraction. Additionally, this project will help At the conclusion of these workshops, the FTA the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Congestion reduce the environmental impact of transportation recommended a capital budget of $1.6 billion and a Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program, in our city, save natural resources, reduce traffic construction completion date of December 2018. which supports environmental efforts for surface congestion and improve transportation options for an transportation and related projects. underserved area of San Francisco. The project map displays the continuous alignment of both phases of CAPITAL FUNDING SOURCES The baseline budget for the Central Subway Project the Third Street Light Rail Program, when completed. remains at $1.6 billion. There has been no increase The Third Street Light Rail Transit Project is the most in the local funding commitment since original voter significant capital investment in public transit in San approval in 2003 of $126 million in Proposition B/K PROJECT CAPITAL COSTS Francisco in generations. About $648 million was sales tax funds. The table below presents Central invested in Phase 1 of the project, and nearly $1.6 Subway funding allocations, use of funds and The Central Subway’s capital budget is $1.6 billion. billion is budgeted for Phase 2. amounts to date by source, and is organized by funding sources, reports the grant funds received and The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) sponsored CHAPTER 6: MAJOR EXPANSION PROJECTS The Central Subway Project is funded by a mixture expended and the cash balance remaining by source. a year-long formal Central Subway Risk Assessment of federal, state and local sources, as shown in the as part of the FTA New Starts Program to complete table below. The majority of funding for the Central There are no significant changes in secured or the preliminary engineering of the project, achieve Subway Project will be provided by the FTA’s New anticipated funding from that listed in MTC Resolution FTA Final Design entry approval, and to identify the Starts program, with a total approved commitment No. 3434. The SFMTA has $100M in commercial total project FTA eligible capital costs. From May 2008 through May 2009, a series of four Risk Assessment

Table 46. Central Subway Funding Sources, Expenditures, and Cash on Hand, as of August 2016 90 Table 45. Central Subway Capital Costs, as of May 2016 COMMITED TOTAL AWARDED ENCUMBRANCES EXPENDITURES REMAINING YOE DOLLARS FUNDING SOURCES PROJECT CAPITAL ELEMENTS FUNDS TO DATE (CURRENT) BILLED TO DATE BALANCE TOTAL FUNDING (Applicable line items only) ($ MILLIONS) Federal 10 Guideway & Track Elements (1.7 miles) $286 Sect. 5309-NS $ 942,200 $ 619,196 $ 90,536 452,170 $ 76,489

20 Stations, Stops, Terminals, Intermodal (4) $574 CMAQ $ 41,025 $ 41,025 $ 0 $ 41,025 $ 0

40 Sitework & Special Conditions $206 Federal Subtotal $ 983,225 $660,221 $ 90,536 $ 493,195 $ 76,489

50 Systems $95 TCRP $ 14,000 $ 14,000 $ 0 $ 14,000 $ 0

Construction Subtotal (10 - 50) $1,161 State RIP $ 88,000 $ 12,498 $ 0 $ 5,992 $ 6,506

60 ROW, Land, Existing Improvements $37 Prop 1B (I-Bond) PTIMSEA $ 307,792 $ 307,792 $ 56,245 $ 238,750 $ 12,797

70 Vehicles (4) $26 Prop 1A (HSR-Bond) $61,308 $ 61,308 $ 0 $ 61,308 $ 0

80 Professional Services (Applies To Cats. 10-50) $329 State Subtotal $471,100 $ 395,598 $ 56,245 $ 320,050 $ 19,303

Subtotal (10 - 80) $1,553 Prop K $ 123,975 $ 123,975 $ 0 $ 123,440 $ 535

90 Unallocated Contingency $25 Local Subtotal $ 123,975 $ 123,975 $ 0 $ 123,440 $ 535

Total Project Cost (10 - 100) $1,578 TOTAL $ 1,578,300 $ 1,179,794 $ 146,781 $ 936,685 $ 96,327 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP include: decade. Inthat time, themajor project milestones design, andconstructionphasesforjustover a The CentralSubway Project hasbeenintheplanning, SCHEDULE PROJECT minimum contingencylevelof$60million. is $19.7 million more than the FTA recommended The Total Project Contingencyis$79.7million, which equals 60%ofthetotalprojectbudget$1.6 billion. project are$941.3 million. This incurred amount As ofMay2016, thetotalnetincurred costsforthe event projectcostsincreaseabove $1.6 billion. Program fundstotheprojectbeaccessedin for $150 millionof(State)Regional Improvement the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) April 26,2011, SFMTA obtainedacommitmentfrom project intheeventthatgrantreceiptsaredelayed.On capacity thatisavailableforusebytheCentralSubway • • • was approved bytheFTA inOctober2012. in NewStarts fundstotheCentralSubway Project advocacy, anagreementdedicating $942.2million 2012: After adecadeofplanning,design and Union SquareandNorth Beach. the Central Subway tunnel commenced in SoMa, will bebuilt.In2012, constructiontopreparefor StreetStation where theUnionSquare/Market Similar workbegan in2011 topreparethesite future siteofthe Yerba Buena/MosconeStation. 2010: Work torelocateutilitylinesbegan atthe from theFTA inNovember 2008. environmentalthe projectreceived clearance publicmeetingswereheldbefore More than200 process fortheCentralSubway Project began. 2005: The supplementalenvironmental review Figure 24.CentralSubway Project Schedule CS Project Schedule October 2012 October Schedule CS Project • • • segment ofthe T Third Lineisslatedtostart. 2019: Revenue serviceintheCentralSubway Engineers. Civil the StateofCaliforniaby American Society of Outstanding Transportation Project oftheyearin The subway tunnelcontractwas awarded the was completedon-timeandunderbudget. 2015: Constructionofthesubway tunnelcontract stations started andwillcontinuethrough2018. 2013: Construction of the subway tunnel and

million incurrent dollars. the subway isprojectedtobeapproximately $57.5 budget by$20.8million.By2030,thecostofoperating expected toincreasetheSFMTA’s overall operating the CentralSubway openstothepublicin2019, itis operating budgetbylessthan0.25percent. When boardings by2030,willincreasetheSFMTA’s annual projecteddaily The CentralSubway, withits35,000 COSTS SUBWAYCENTRAL OPERATING 91 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 6: MAJOR EXPANSION PROJECTS 92 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 6: MAJOR EXPANSION PROJECTS Planning GrantfromCaltrans. The CentralSoMa Plan The Draft Planwas largelyfunded bya Transportation between Townsend andHoward streets (seeFigure). rail corridor, generallybounded by2ndand6thStreets vision forthesouthernportion oftheCentral Subway the processtodevelopanintegratedcommunity In 2011, theSan Francisco PlanningDepartment began SOMA CENTRAL Street,UnionSquare,andChinatown. Market Arena, Yerba Buena/Moscone Convention Center, connect toCaltrain, AT&T Park, theproposed Warriors additional peoplewilldependonthe T Third Lineto residential unitsinMissionBay, anestimated24,000 site and the dramatic growth in businesses and Pointfor Hunters andtheSchlage Lock redevelopment newhousingunitsplanned With theinfluxof 10,000 vehicles andrelyheavilyonpublictransportation. along theCentralSubway alignmentdonotown continue todevelop.Currently 68percentofresidents Valley, Point, Bayview/Hunters andMissionBayareas without overcrowding asthe new ridership Visitacion growth inmindandwillbeabletoaccommodate The T Third Line was designed withpopulation AND POINT MISSION BAY BAYVIEW/HUNTERS projections. along thealignmentandimproved operating-cost of thefuturetravelplanscustomers understanding of thecity. This collaborationhasresultedinabetter projects inMissionBayandthesoutheast quadrant prepare forgrowthassociatedwithdevelopment Transportation Authority (SFCTA) and tounderstand Department andtheSan Francisco County The SFMTA has collaboratedwiththeSF Planning USE CHANGES ASSOCIATED LAND and improve 24-hourlivability. To adopt the Plan, neighborhood’s character, support economicvitality, safer streetsandmorepublicspaces,strengthenthe will also increase accessto jobs andto housing, make environmental sustainability. The CentralSoMa Plan open space),preservationofhistoricbuildingsand policies, thepublicrealm(includingsidewalks and to support thecity’s Vision Zeroand Transit First as landuse,buildingsize andheights,transportation strategythataddressessuchcomprehensive issues social andeconomicmix. The planpresentsa transit spine,whilemaintainingSoMa’s diverse sustainable neighborhoodaroundtheFourth Street provides thevisionandstrategiestocreatea Figure 25.CentralSoMa Project Area component. entrance itself, apublicplazaandsmallretail station willaccommodate,inadditiontothe housing development,andthesiteofChinatown Yerba BuenaStationwillbeusedforanaffordable for construction. The landadjacent to theMoscone/ accommodate themachinery andequipmentneeded property inorderto rights withprivate owners and Chinatownstations,acquiredeasement adjacent to the Moscone/Yerba Buena, Union Square stations. Specifically, the agency has gained lands in ordertoprovide landfortheconstructionof many properties adjacenttothe line andstations for the Central Subway, the SFMTA has acquired constructionprocess In preparationfortheextensive ACQUISITION LAND of adoptingthePlaninSpring2017. Francisco PlanningDepartment willbegintheprocess fortheirapproval. the BoardofSupervisors The San Plan, certify theEIR,andforward thelegislationto the PlanningCommissionwillneedtoapprove the project. funding oroperatingissuesassociatedwiththe There arenocurrent oranticipatedpolicy, planning, OPERATING ISSUES OR POLICY, FUNDING PLANNING,

P 48th Ave Ave 48th Great Highway Great o

b o

Judah s

Taraval Ulloa

Wawona

Geary

Cabrillo Fulton

19th Ave 19th

Park Presidio Presidio Park Junipero Serra We Ave 15th st Po rt al

Irving

P o r W

Ocean t

o o

la o

Carl Stanyan

e Cole

McAllister

17th St Market

day alongthiscorridor by2035. per passengers is expectedtogrow25,000-30,000 perday, passengers andridership of16,000 ridership San Francisco, thecombinedservicehasanaverage service. As oneofthebusiestnorth-south corridors in by Muni routes 47, 49 and 90, and Golden Gate Transit on thissectionofthecorridor iscurrently provided between MissionStreetandLombard Street. Transit and streetscapeelementsto Van Ness Avenue only lanes,transitsignalpriority, high-qualitystations apply busrapidtransitprinciplesincludingtransit- The Van NessBusRapid Transit (BRT) projectwill PROJECT TRANSIT BUS RAPID VAN NESS Figure 26. Van NessBusRapid Transit Project Area Bosworth

Divisadero

Geneva

Mission Diamond

Castro Lombard

Noe Market Fillmore Bush Golden Gate

24th St

26th St 30th St Church 16th St

Silver VAN NESS BRT ALIGNMENT BRT NESS VAN

C Santos e Valencia

Cortland r Mission A

l North Point

h S. Van Ness Van S.

11th St 11th m Columbus a

v Mission a n e

y z

Visitacion

Mason Arleta

Folsom

Stockton B Potrero

ays h St 5th I o

n re

d Kansas San Bruno San Townsend u s 23rd St

t r St 3rd i

l N 25th St

Connecticut

18th St Fremont

20th St 22nd St Main

King travel timesby32percent. infrastructure changes are expected to cut transit corridor. ImplementationofBRT serviceand and morereliabletransitservicetothisimportant When completed, this project will bring faster 2019. service alongthecorridor isanticipatedto beginin Construction began inOctober2016, andrevenue 3rdfinalized thedetailed designoftheprojectin2016. Stenvironmental review phaseinDecember2013 and The Van NessBRT Project completedthe SCHEDULE PROJECT the project. are nochanges insecuredoranticipatedfundingfor half-cent salestaxincrease. As ofMarch 2017, there and $38millionfromProposition K,San Francisco’s Capital Investment Grant and Bus Facilities programs, million ofthisamount,$75issecuredbyFTA’s local, regional,andstateprogramsaccountfor$72.5 Of theapproximately $189.5 million totalprojectcost, funds, regional,andstatewidesources. funded byFTA Formula Funds, San Francisco Prop K streetlights/poles replacement. These projectsare hardware andsoftware, newtransitvehicles, and repaving Van Ness Avenue, newtrafficsignal associated with the Van NessBRT project include Prop Kfunds,anddevelopercontributions.Projects sources includingFTA SmallStarts, San Francisco the Van NessBRT projectcomesfromavarietyof procurement), asofSummer2016. Funding for is approximately $189.5 million(includingbus The cost estimate for the Van Ness BRT Project SOURCES FUNDING CAPITALPROJECT & COSTS

Tennessee

Illinois

Evans Cargo Way Cargo BAY LOOP THE MISSION LOCATION OF Yerba Buena

Gat Island Ave B Ave e v i

e w

9th

e California H Ave 0 Treasure Island 0.5 mi Table 48. Van NessBusRapid Transit Project Schedule Table 47. Van NessBusRapid Transit Project CapitalCosts,asofJune 2016 2019 2016 -2019 2017 -2018 July 2015 April 2015 November 2014 October 2014 April 2014 December 2013 December 2013 September 2013 Total Project Cost(10 -100) 100 FinanceCharges Subtotal (10 -90) 90 UnallocatedContingency Subtotal (10 -80) 80 Professional Services (Applies To 70 Vehicles (4) 60 ROW, Land,ExistingImprovements Construction Subtotal (10 -50) 50 Systems 40 Sitework&SpecialConditions 30 Support Facilities: Yards, Shops, 20 Stations,Stops, Terminals, Intermodal(9) 10 Guideway & Track Elements (2miles) Categories 10-50) Buildings Administrative DATE PROJECT CAPITAL ELEMENTS (Applicable lineitemsonly) Revenue Service Construction period Arrival ofnewtransitvehicles 100% Designcomplete Small Starts Grant Agreement Execution 65% Designcomplete to FTA Submit Draft SmallStarts Grant Agreement 30% Designcomplete Draft 30%Design Final EIR/EIS–Record ofDecision(ROD) CEQA Approval Local MILESTONE YOE DOLLARS ($ MILLIONS) TOTAL $169.1 $189.5 $189.5 $117.4 $96.2 $16.4 $10.4 $51.7 $4.6 $6.2 $0 $4 $0 $0 93 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 6: MAJOR EXPANSION PROJECTS VAN NESS BUS RAPID TRANSIT Each of build alternatives and the LPA would have the Van Ness and Geary campus was approved by OPERATING COSTS a modest incremental maintenance cost over and the Planning Commission and at least twenty high above the no-build scenario. Increased maintenance density residential and office developments along the The table below shows the projected annual costs for costs include repairs to potholes and patches to the corridor are in the planning or construction phase. SFMTA to run vehicles and provide revenue service for runningway; maintenance of the red transit-only the No Build Alternative and initial build alternatives lanes; additional landscaping costs to prune trees There are many city-owned or controlled properties included in the environmental review documentation. under Build Alternatives 3 and 4 due to their proximity adjacent to the Bus Rapid Transit stops. Some of The locally-preferred alternative (LPA) is a combination to the overhead wire system; additional platform these properties include: City Hall, War Memorial of Alternatives 3 and 4, and therefore the costs cleaning and repair; and maintenance of additional Opera House, Davies Symphony Hall, One South associated with the LPA would be similar to these ticket vending machines required to support platform Van Ness, 25 Van Ness Avenue, 30 Van Ness, and the options. The build alternatives would allow SFMTA to proof of payment. The LPA maintenance costs would Goodwill store at 1500 Mission Street (on the corner provide the same amount of service to passengers for a be similar to those of Build Alternative 3B in the table of South Van Ness and Mission). Though outside the 16- to 32-percent lower operating cost, as shown in the below, and the major component of runningway scope of the Van Ness BRT project, some of these table. The LPA operating cost would be similar to that maintenance costs, tree pruning costs, would be city-owned properties along the corridor may be of Build Alternatives 3B and 4B, with 32 percent lower similar to Build Alternative 4B. Incremental costs reviewed as potential development sites at a later CHAPTER 6: MAJOR EXPANSION PROJECTS operating cost compared to the No Build Alternative.This attributed to the build alternatives are based on date, independent of the BRT project. savings is due to the faster speed and shorter running estimates from Public Works and the SFMTA. times, which means maintaining the same frequency of service would require fewer vehicles operating on the POLICY, PLANNING, FUNDING OR corridor at any one time. These operating savings could ASSOCIATED LAND USE CHANGES OPERATING ISSUES be reinvested in the corridor and used to increase the Although there are no local land use policy changes At this time, there are no existing or anticipated policy, frequency of the BRT service, or they could be invested associated with the project, there is a great deal of new planning, funding or operating issues associated with in other parts of the Muni system. development along the Van Ness Avenue corridor. the project. 94 The new California Pacific Medical Center plan for

Table 49. Projected Van Ness BRT Operating Cost

BUILD ALT. 3 BUILD ALT. 4 COSTS NO BUILD ALT. BUILD ALT. 2 BUILD ALT. 3 (with Design BUILD ALT. 4 (with Design Option B) Option B)

Annualized Revenue Hour Vehicles $ 8,300,000 $ 6,900,000 $ 6,100,000 $ 5,600,000 $ 6,100,000 $ 5,600,000 Operating Costs*

Other Incremental Annualized O&M n/a $ 200,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Costs**

TOTAL $ 8,300,000 $7,100,000 $ 6,500,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 6,400,000 $ 5,900,000

* Only includes costs to operate BRT between Mission and Lombard Street. ** Only includes incremental costs associated with BRT. SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. (a) POLICY. TRANSIT-FIRST 8A.115. SEC. and reads as follows: Charter, Francisco San of and County City the in found can be It 2007. in amended Policy, later aTransit-First adopted Supervisors of Board Francisco San the 1973, In FIRST TRANSIT GUIDING POLICY:

encourage travel by foot. by travel encourage to and pedestrians of comfort and safety the improve to possible wherever enhanced be shall areas Pedestrian safety. pedestrian improve to and vanpools) and taxis (including vehicles transit public of movement the expedite to made be shall signalization, improved and streets and lanes transit asdesignated such improvements, priority Transit safety. and health public improve and traffic reduce to strive shall and transit, public and bicyclists, pedestrians, by way of rights public of use the encourage space shall sidewalk and street public limited of use the regarding Decisions automobile. private by travel to alternative an attractive be must foot on and bicycle by transit, public by travel Francisco, San Within automobiles. individual by transportation to alternative sound environmentally and economically an is vanpools, and taxis including transit, Public people and goods. of movement efficient and safe the be must system transportation the of objective primary the Francisco, San in health economic and life of To quality ensure affairs: County’s and City the conducting in principles these implement shall departments and commissions, boards, officers, All County. and City the of Plan General the into incorporated be shall and policy transit-first County’s and City the constitute shall principles following The 10. 9. 8. 7. 6.

Railway. Municipal the by provided service the affect adversely not will service such of provision the where and possible wherever needs transportation public meet to solutions innovative encourage shall County and City The system. transportation public regional reliable, an integrated, of development continued the and transit mass regional of use the promote shall County and City The transportation. public regional of adequacy the on depends congestion traffic reduce to County and City the of ability The developments. residential and commercial private and public new by generated transit public for demand the meet to should be allocated investment New transportation transportation. and alternative transit public by travel encourage to designed be shall transit public by served well areas for policies Parking parking. bicycle secure and lanes, bicycle transit, to access convenient riding, for streets safe encouraging by promoted be shall Bicycling 95 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP CHAPTER 6: MAJOR EXPANSION PROJECTS 96 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP page left blank

CHAPTER 6: MAJOR EXPANSION PROJECTS Siew-Chin Yeong, DirectorofCapitalPrograms &Construction Kate Toran, Director of Taxis & Accessible Services Candace Sue,DirectorofCommunications Tom Maguire,DirectorofSustainableStreets Melvyn Henry, DirectorofSystem Safety John Haley, Directorof Transit John Funghi, DirectorofCentral Subway Program Donald Ellison,DirectorofHumanResources Susan Cleveland-Knowles,GeneralCounsel Kate Breen,DirectorofGovernment Affairs Sonali Bose,DirectorofFinance&Information Technology Edward D.Reiskin, Directorof Transportation SFMTA EXECUTIVE TEAM Roberta Boomer, BoardSecretary Art Torres Cristina Rubke Joél Ramos Lee Hsu Gwyneth Borden Heinicke, Vice-Chair Malcolm Cheryl Brinkman,Chair SFMTA BOARD MEMBERS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS http://sfmta.photoshelter.com/ All imagesandfiguresbythe San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agencyunlessnoted. & FIGURESPHOTOGRAPHY expertise to this planningeffort. We to thank everyone who was wouldlike involved for contributing their time and associated withtheSanindividuals Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency. Development ofthisShort Range Transit Planhasinvolved alargenumberof Chimmy Lee Dana Baker Lucas Woodward Grahm Satterwhite Darton Ito Keith Tanner TEAM DEVELOPMENT SRTP

97 SFMTA FY 2017 - FY 2030 SRTP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 98

SFMTA Fiscal Year 2017 - Fiscal Year 2030 Short Range Transit Plan

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency 1 South Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94103