DOCSLIB.ORG

+ 1970 News Releases (7.6 Mb PDF File)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NEWS R_A_ _0_ 70-1 Sigurd Sjoberg named Director of Flight Operations 1/2/70 70-2 AC Electronics Division contract 1/6/70 . 70-3 Boeing Company contract 1/6/70 70-4 Raytheon Company contract 1/6/70 ?0-5 Astronauts Bean_ Cunn_n_ham_ and Kerw_ groundinss 1/6/70 70-6 Hamilton Standard contract 1/7/70 _f0-',/ Release of Apollo 12 samples to Principal Investigator_ 1/7/70 70-8 Dale D. Myers named Associate Administrator for Manned!Space flight 1/8/70 70-9 Reseheduling of Apollo 13 to April lh 1/8/70 .... _ 'Release of Surveyor III parts for study 1/16/70 70-11 Announcing Itek contract ,. 1/26/70 70-12 'ALSEP 1 Systems Status report _ 1/23/70 (0-13 Panel discussion_ '_Onl{nnntdthe RoleE::_!tr?+ienof Clinicalof qp_Pathology i_ 1/26 Hts. Dr. yon Braun transferred to Headquarters 1/27 Release of water bag to be used on Apollo 13 //_y 70-15 Organizational changes in S_AD 1/28 70-!5!_ U.N. Committee on Peaceful Uses of Outer Space 1/28 ZO-1T Borman's leaving active duty at NASA 1/29 70-18 Accident report on Rainey 1/29 70-17a STC contract release 1/29 '_ ALSEP 1 status report 2/2 NEWS .r_'_A-_v c_ LOG., ,,I 70-20 Extension of %ia contract at White Sands - Extension of fuel cell operatinE life (by 70-21 Allis-Chalmers) i 70-22 ! Award of S_rvlce Teeb_olo_r eor_or_+.qn_ _ _7_h_ 2/6 70-23 iRelease of study to prepare space environments 2/10 ALSEP Systems status report _ 2fl0 70-24 Apollo 12 lunar sample distribution _ _//_ 70-25 ;Announcement of establishment of Space Shuttle Program 0fc. 2/13 r 70-26 A_nouncement of damage done to Surveyor III by LM 2/13 _O-27 Lunar eclipse announcement 2/17 -_ {8 Viewing of solar eclipse in Mex. by MSC personnel 2./20 AAP changed to Skylab 2/24 White Sands on stand-by status 2/25 DRAFT Apollo 11 lunar material missing from display 3/1 Dr. Berry's participation in international TO-29 medical conference 3/9 Initial complement of personnelDssSgned to 70-30 Space Shuttle Program Office ¢_ %c_ _/9 70-31 GE contract for Spacecraft Checkout_ Reliability and Q%ality 3/9 70-32 Subsystem Test Bed (STB) Test 3/10 Return of stolen lunar material to MSC ZO-33 4i 3/16 ZO-34 Naming of Apollo 15 Crew ,.,'i! 3/26 ;Announcing request of proposals by MSC for a feasibility 70-35 and _lanning study of a lunar orbit station for 1980's ' 3/27 ,,.,, ° =:_6 Retirement of Paul Purser 4/2 .-,-__ ,7 _ _ .. ?i _ - · z , 70-37 . Contract a_ard to Itek for multispeetral _hoto equip 79-38 Space tug release 4/7/70 g ! I 70-_0 C_ntract awar_ to Fairchild Camera and Instrument uorporation mot camera syste_ vo he uses on illrAlre _Do]]os-- 4/9/70 70-41 Contract award to Itek for multispectral photo equip 4/!0/_0 Earth resources data of Texas areas presented to 70-420_ State Committee 4/22/70 (0-43 Astronaut Life Support Assembly _0-44 Wackenhut Services Contract _' _ _O-45 Boeing Contract in Support of Apollo 70-46 Ultraviolet Spectrograph Experiment on 5/26 5/8 HQS Apollo 14 Landing Site & launch slip 5/7 , 70-47 Request for proposals for shuttle cryo system study 5/12 70-48 Lockheed contract for space station solar array evalua 5/13 70-49 9/_y_ Skylab launch site changed t 5/15 70-50 Invitation for proposals for development of a light- i weight intravehicular space suit 5/15 Invitation for bids for a reusable space shuttle J 5/15 70-51 i 70-52 Announcement of Nell Armstrongleaving astro, program 5/18 70-53 D_rop_ hive %_sts_ands on MSC 12.5K Space Orbiter Shuttlecraft at 5/20 _- NL_BEI_ '' 1 TITLE DATE _70-56 [TRW, Inc. contract ............ _/21 i I I II Jl 70-58 ].. Mic.roor_anism fo.und in Surveyor III TV e.a_lera 5f.22 70-5) Discovery of 4.6 billion year old moon rock from Al2 5/26 . _0-60 NRw contract for Phase. , A lunar, · orbit station study 5/27.. 70-60 Hedge release --_, 5/26 70-61 NAR contract for Space Tug , 6/4 ...... 70-62. _,up_lemental agreement w/NA_R for Skylab program .. 6/4 J - . ILC contract for s,_aee suits ._._ simulator for Skylab _. _ 70-64 Contract w/GE a.nd Link for.idevelopmen _ of .¢r_w tra_n_ Z _;/5 70-65.... jContract, , w/Lockheed for, rescue,and· i . safety. techniques · ,6/5 , 6/9 L 70-66 J Contract, w/Pratt&_nitney Di¥. and Direct· ! Energy Con,v_ '_.innB_,_P ,q_ _ J 70-67, , Phase· . A study _ contract w/Grumman, Lockheed,and Chry ;ler _ 6/15 f .. _,, Grtm_man contract for opq?.ating re ch. for spaqe station 6/17. _- ?_ _-. _ _-_-_',a. _..,_. -_,-_,_7/_m_-,' _---/ _- ?/ 1_£_ r_Zcx_.__ .... _'[2 . Service medals --'- 70-73 ModifY_ed contract with BendSx - 6/25 KmWS R_EAS_, , ,, _0_, , . RELEASE , ,w_. --__ -- 70-74 Texas Tech contract _o develop new type electrode for S rtab 70-75 Supplemental Agreeme__t with Gru_r__anfor changes on A~pol_o LM contract 7/1/70 70-76 tTT-FEC contract extension 7/1/70 70-78 UNIVAC contract 7/2 ' 70-79 _SC c_lebration of anniv,e,rsa,yrof moon %%nd/n2 7/10 / 7 R,emo_e sensing ,aircraft ai4.ing Peruvian government 7715 70-81 Fairchild Corp contract..... for _ood s_fsuem" for space stati_,._ 7/, ]5. 70-82 of new..m_iner.al_in Apollo ll sample_ * 7/!6 . 70-83 , .Ap°ll°.,. CSM, Contract Modification . , 7/29 70-_4 Apollo LM Modification Contract 7/29 70-85 Earth resources aircraft flying over Peru 7/31 ' ' ;Ii" 'E-- To-87 MSC open house visiting hours 8/ ____1-_ /::/- _:/-eL, · __ I ..... -_-- / RELEASE ?JMt_ER DATE '2a-I1_._ · "'N-/_ / Zi_£ R_---i-£¸¸-i i / RE!_iASE 172,SEN TiTLZ DATE _'S.,_ .. ,_. ,.P_p_ /I-,,- 7_ ' - - _¥/_ s_ . _r_,_¢_ / ' '" l-EA =I -/' _ - ¥1ONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION _ANNEDSPACECRAFT Houston _CENTER l, Texas 483-5111 MSC 70-1 January 2, 1970 HOUSTON, TEXAS--Sigurd A. Sjoberg was named Director of Flight Operations of the Manned Spacecraft Center effective December 28, 1969. Sjoberg assumes his new duties after having served as Deputy Director, Flight Operations since October 1963. He succeeds Dr. christopher C. Kraft, Jr., who was recently appointed Deputy Director of MSC. Since joining MSC in October 1959, Sjoberg has held successively responsible operations positions. He joined NACA (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics), NASA's predecessor in 1942 as an aeronautical engineer. As Director, Sjoberg will be responsible for the manage- ment and direction of four organizational divisions within FOD. This directorate is responsible for mission planning and for overall direction of flight control and recovery activities associated with all NASA manned space flight activities. -more- MSC 70-1 Add 1 2 Sjoberg was born in Minneapolis, Minnesota in 1919. He holds a BS degree in Aeronautical Engineering from the University of Minnesota, 1942. He received the MSC Superior Achievement Award, November 1966; NASA Exceptional Service Medal, January 1969; and NASA Exceptional Service Medal, October 1969. He is a member of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics and is the United States representative to Federation Aeronautique Internationale (FAI), Paris, France. Sjoberg is married to former Elizabeth Jane Ludwig. They have three children: Eric Sigurd, 21; Stephen Lee, 19; and Robert John, 15. The Sjobergs reside in Seabrook, Texas. I;IIll v v ' 'TIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION AFT CE"NNEDSPACEC TER ,.,de ii:Bt. ' Texas 483-5111 January 6, 1970 _C 70-2 HOUSTON_ TEXA_--The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has awarded a letter contract to AC Electronics Division of General Motors Corporation to provide for primary navigation, guidance and control system support for the Command Modules and Lunar Modules for the Apollo Program. The contract was effective January 1_ in the amount of $3 million to be definitized by April 30, 1970. A cost-plus-award-fee definitive contract is contemplated. Under the proposed contract, AC Electronics will be responsible for analysis of Guidance and Navigation Hardware and Software problems_ perform any required retrofit and/or modifications; manage and operate the Guidance and Navigation Labs at the various field sites; perform a complete checkout and test for all Primary Navigation, Guidance and Control Systems; and analyze_ repair, and test failed Guidance and Navigation Airborne Hardware and Ground Support Equipment. This is a continuation of the services previously performed for the Manned Spacecraft Center by AC Electronics Division in connection with the manufact_lring and testing of Primary Navigation, Guidance and Control Systems Hardware. The majority of the work will be performed by AC Electronics at their Milwaukee, Wisconsin facility. M## ,,,.NNEDSPACECRAFT Tox-.s 483-5111 January 6, 1970 M_C 70-3 HOUSTON_ TEY_S--The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has awarded a letter contract to The Boeing Co. to provide Systems Engineering and Assessment for the Apollo Spacecraft Program. A letter contract was awarded to The Boeing Co. effective January 1, 1970 in the amount of $3 million to be definitized by March 31, 1970. A cost-plus-fixed-fee definitive contract is contemplated. Under the proposed contract, Boeing will provide an integrated assessment of spacecraft and subsystem flight readiness to the Apollo Spacecraft Program Manager, related special studies, and safety engineering analysis of manned spacecraft subsystems and hardware, including modifications to Apollo type hardware utilized in extended Command and Service Module and Lunar Module Missions (CSM's through 119 and LM's through 15).
Recommended publications
  • Why Johnny Can't Write Requirements Any Contractor Who Has Tried to Respond to a Set of Requirements Knows the Difficulty of the Task

    Why Johnny Can't Write Requirements Any Contractor Who Has Tried to Respond to a Set of Requirements Knows the Difficulty of the Task

    Why Johnny Can’t Write Requirements by Ivy Hooks Abstract Program cost overruns and schedule delays are attributed, in large part, to problems associated with requirements. These problems range from incomplete, inconsistent, and incomprehensible requirements to the complexities of the change management process. These problems stem from an inability to write good requirements and a lack of understanding about the importance of requirements. They are compounded by the scope, complexity, and long life cycle of major programs. Education of the people involved and automation and integration of the requirements management process are needed to combat the problem. The Problem with Requirements Requirements problems have been identified as major contributors to program cost overruns and schedule slips. This "problem with requirements" can be attributed to two major factors: 1. The initial requirements were incomplete, inaccurate, and/or misunderstood by the designers/developers. 2. Circumstances changed which resulted in changes to the requirements. There are several reasons why problems exist with requirements: 1. The program total life cycle, including operations, was not well defined at the time that many of the requirements were written. 2. "Johnny can't write requirements" 3. Few people understand the requirements process. 4. Management has not focused sufficient attention on the problem. 5. Changes are required to correct poor assumptions or poorly written requirements or to correct for inconsistencies or mission requirements. 6. Changes are required in response to external factors over which the program has no control. All of the reasons for requirements problems stated above contribute to operations costs and schedules. From an operations perspective, the problem is manifested by the fact that the requirements focus is often on what is to be built without consideration for how it will be operated.
  • Modern Combat Aircraft (1945 – 2010)

    Modern Combat Aircraft (1945 – 2010)

    I MODERN COMBAT AIRCRAFT (1945 – 2010) Modern Combat Aircraft (1945-2010) is a brief overview of the most famous military aircraft developed by the end of World War II until now. Fixed-wing airplanes and helicopters are presented by the role fulfilled, by the nation of origin (manufacturer), and year of first flight. For each aircraft is available a photo, a brief introduction, and information about its development, design and operational life. The work is made using English Wikipedia, but also other Web sites. FIGHTER-MULTIROLE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Lockheed General Dynamics 001 1944 3 011 1964 27 P-80 Shooting Star F-111 Aardvark Republic Grumman 002 1946 5 012 1970 29 F-84 Thunderjet F-14 Tomcat North American Northrop 003 1947 7 013 1972 33 F-86 Sabre F-5E/F Tiger II North American McDonnell Douglas 004 1953 9 014 1972 35 F-100 Super Sabre F-15 Eagle Convair General Dynamics 005 1953 11 015 1974 39 F-102 Delta Dagger F-16 Fighting Falcon Lockheed McDonnell Douglas 006 1954 13 016 1978 43 F-104 Starfighter F/A-18 Hornet Republic Boeing 007 1955 17 017 1995 45 F-105 Thunderchief F/A-18E/F Super Hornet Vought Lockheed Martin 008 1955 19 018 1997 47 F-8 Crusader F-22 Raptor Convair Lockheed Martin 009 1956 21 019 2006 51 F-106 Delta Dart F-35 Lightning II McDonnell Douglas 010 1958 23 F-4 Phantom II SOVIET UNION SOVIET UNION No.

  • Managing Defense, Air, and Space Programs During the Cold War

    Reflections of a Technocrat Managing Defense, Air, and Space Programs during the Cold War DR. JOHN L. MCLUCAS with KENNETH J. ALNWICK AND LAWRENCE R. BENSON FOREWORD by MELVIN R. LAIRD Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama August 2006 Air University Library Cataloging Data McLucas, John L. Reflections of a technocrat : managing defense, air, and space programs during the Cold War / John L. McLucas with Kenneth J. Alnwick and Lawrence R. Benson ; foreword by Melvin R. Laird. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 1-58566-156-2 1. McLucas, John L. 2. Aeronautics—United States—Biography. 3. Aeronautical engineers—United States—Biography. 4. United States. Dept of the Air Force— Biography. 5. United States. Federal Aviation Administration—Biography. 6. Astronautics and state—United States—History. I. Title. II. Alnwick, Kenneth J. III. Benson, Lawrence R. 629.130092—dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. All photographs are courtesy of US Government or family photos except as noted. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii FOREWORD . vii ABOUT THE COAUTHORS . xiii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . xv INTRODUCTION . xix Notes . xxv 1 FROM COUNTRY BOY TO COMPANY PRESIDENT . 1 Whose Son Am I? . 1 Attending Davidson College and Tulane University . 6 Employing Radar in the Navy . 9 Growing a High-Tech Enterprise .
  • Biographical Data Sheet

    Biographical Data Sheet

    IVY F. HOOKS BIOGRAPHICAL DATA SHEET NAME: Ivy F. Hooks ORAL HISTORY: 5 MARCH AND 24 MARCH 2009 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: • Bachelor of Science degree in Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 1963 • Master of Science degree in Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 1965 NASA EXPERIENCE: NASA Manned Spacecraft Center/Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX (1963–1984) • Aerospace Engineer, Space Vehicle Design Branch, Spacecraft Technology Division, Engineering and Development Directorate (1963) • Aerospace Engineer, Flight Worthiness Branch, Spacecraft Technology Division, Engineering and Development Directorate (1963–1964) • Aerospace Engineer, Mission Effectiveness Section, Mission Feasibility Branch, Advanced Spacecraft Technology Division, Engineering and Development Directorate (1964–1966) • Aerospace Engineer, Analytical Aerodynamics Section, Flight Performance & Dynamics Branch, Advanced Spacecraft Technology Division, Engineering and Development Directorate (1966) • Cost Analysis Group, Planning and Cost Support Office, Advanced Spacecraft Technology Division, Engineering and Development Directorate (1966) • Aerospace Engineer, Analytical Aerodynamics Section, Flight Performance & Dynamics Branch, Advanced Spacecraft Technology Division, Engineering and Development Directorate (1966–1969) • Aerospace Engineer, Applied Flight Dynamics Section, Flight Technology Branch, Engineering Analysis Office, Engineering and Development Directorate (1969–1971) • Assistant Director for Advanced Planning and Design, Engineering
  • Know the Past ...Shape the Future

    Know the Past ...Shape the Future

    SUMMER 2021 - Volume 68, Number 2 WWW.AFHISTORY.ORG know the past .....Shape the Future Summer 2021 -Volume 68, Number 2 WWW.AFHISTORY.ORG know the past .....Shape the Future Features Fly High, Fly Low: SAC Photographic Reconnaissance in Southeast Asia William Cahill 7 Gene Deatrick: An Appreciation Jonna Doolittle Hoppes 27 The SA-2 and U-2: Secrets Revealed John A. Schell 33 Mexicans in World War II: America’s Ally of the Air Cynthia Buchanan 43 Book Reviews Balloons and Airships: A Tale of Lighter than Air Aviation By Anthony Burton Review by Joseph Romito 48 Beaufighters:Over Sea, Sand and Steaming Jungles By Jack Colman & Richard Colman Review by Gary Connor 448 Showdown in Western Sahara Volume 2: Air Warfare over the Last African Colony, 1975-1991 By Tom Cooper, Albert Grandolini, & Adrien Fontanellaz Review by George W. Runkle 49 Ho Chi Minh Trail 1964-73: Steel Tiger, Barrel Roll, and the Secret Wars in Vietnam and Laos By Peter E. Davies Review by Joseph D. Yount 50 French Bombers of WWII By José Fernandez and Patrick Laureau Review by Joseph Romito 4550 Arado Ar 234 Bomber and Reconnaissance Units By Robert Forsythe and Nick Beale Review by Gary Connor 51 Luftwaffe Aces in the Battle of Britain By Chris Goss Review by Edward M. Young 52 War in the Far East: Japan Runs Wild 1942-1943 By Peter Harmsen Review by Edward M. Young 52 V2: A Novel of World War II By Robert Harris Review by Robert Huddleston 53 Oswald Boelcke: Germany’s First Fighter Ace and Father of Air Combat By R.
  • Spring2018 Issue-All

    Spring2018 Issue-All

    SPRING 2018 - Volume 65, Number 1 WWW.AFHISTORY.ORG know the past .....Shape the Future The Air Force Historical Foundation Founded on May 27, 1953 by Gen Carl A. “Tooey” Spaatz MEMBERSHIP BENEFITS and other air power pioneers, the Air Force Historical All members receive our exciting and informative Foundation (AFHF) is a nonprofi t tax exempt organization. Air Power History Journal, either electronically or It is dedicated to the preservation, perpetuation and on paper, covering: all aspects of aerospace history appropriate publication of the history and traditions of American aviation, with emphasis on the U.S. Air Force, its • Chronicles the great campaigns and predecessor organizations, and the men and women whose the great leaders lives and dreams were devoted to fl ight. The Foundation • Eyewitness accounts and historical articles serves all components of the United States Air Force— Active, Reserve and Air National Guard. • In depth resources to museums and activities, to keep members connected to the latest and AFHF strives to make available to the public and greatest events. today’s government planners and decision makers information that is relevant and informative about Preserve the legacy, stay connected: all aspects of air and space power. By doing so, the • Membership helps preserve the legacy of current Foundation hopes to assure the nation profi ts from past and future US air force personnel. experiences as it helps keep the U.S. Air Force the most modern and effective military force in the world. • Provides reliable and accurate accounts of historical events. The Foundation’s four primary activities include a quarterly journal Air Power History, a book program, a • Establish connections between generations.
  • Unlimited Horizons: Design and Development of The

    Unlimited Horizons: Design and Development of The

    Unlimited Horizons Design and Development of the U-2 Peter W. Merlin Unlimited Horizons Design and Development of the U-2 Peter W. Merlin Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Merlin, Peter W., 1964– Unlimited horizons : design and development of the U-2 / Peter W. Merlin. pages cm. — (NASA aeronautics book series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-62683-025-7 1. U-2 (Reconnaissance aircraft)—History. 2. U-2 (Reconnaissance aircraft)—Design and construction. I. Title. UG1242.R4M4675 2015 623.74’67—dc23 2014045191 Copyright © 2015 by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The opinions expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the United States Government or of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This publication is available as a free download at http://www.nasa.gov/ebooks National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC Table of Contents Introduction: A Cold War Necessity v Chapter 1: Designing for High Flight ...................................................................1 Chapter 2: Aquatone and Oilstone .................................................................... 27 Chapter 3: Design Evolution ............................................................................. 53 Chapter 4: The Stuff Dreams Are Made Of ..................................................... 101 Chapter 5: Life Above 50,000 Feet .................................................................. 129 Chapter 6:
  • FAA Order JO 7340.2K Contractions

    FAA Order JO 7340.2K Contractions

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2K CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION CHG 1 Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: December 31, 2020 SUBJ: Contractions 1. Purpose of This Change. This change transmits revised pages to Federal Aviation Administration Order季JO季7340.2K, Contractions. 2. Audience. This change applies to all Air Traffic Organization (ATO) personnel and anyone using ATO directives. 3. Where Can I Find This Change? This change is available on the FAA website at http://faa.gov/air_traffic/publications and https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_notices. 4. Distribution. This change is available online and will be distributed electronically to all offices that subscribe to receive email notification/access to it through the FAA website at http://faa.gov/air_traffic/publications. 5. Disposition of Transmittal. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 6. Page Control Chart. See the page control chart attachment. Digitally signed by NATASHA A. NATASHA A. DURKINS Date: 2020.12.18 DURKINS 15:49:13 -05'00' Natasha Durkins Director, Policy$-93 Mission Support Services Air Traffic Organization December 18, 2020 Date: __________________ Distribution: Electronic Initiated By: AJV-0 Vice President, Mission Support Services 12/31/20 JO 7340.2K CHG 1 PAGE CONTROL CHART Change 1 REMOVE PAGES DATED INSERT PAGES DATED CAM 1−1 through CAM 1−5 ............. 9/10/20 CAM 1−1 through CAM 1−3 ............ 12/31/20 3−1−1 through 3−4−1 ................... 9/10/20 3−1−1 through 3−4−1 .................. 12/31/20 Page Control Chart i 12/31/20 JO 7340.2K CHG 1 CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND MODIFICATIONS Chapter 3.
  • NRO Review and Redaction Guide

    NRO Review and Redaction Guide

    2017106120 C05095967 Approved for Release: TOP SECRE'l'/ /IK//R�FN /NOFORN (U) National Reconnaissance Office • eview an e ction Guide For Automatic Declassification Of 25-Year-Old Information Version 1. 0 2015 Edi tion Classif From: INCG dated 20120213 (b)(3) Declassify On: 25Xl, 20631231 TOP SECRET//TH://RS£N/NOFORN 2017106120 C05095967 Approved for Release: 2017106120 C05095967 Approved for Release: TOP SECRE'l'/ /IK//R�FN /NOFORN (U) Table of Contents (U) Preface .................................................. (U) Background. 1 (U) General Methodology ........................................ 4 (U) le Ser s s. 6 (U) Exemption from Declassifi on .................. 6 (U) i on of 25X and SOX ions : ................. 6 (U) on classi cation dance : ........ 7 (U) sys tems- .0. 12951: ............. 7 (U) Declassifi cation of SIGINT and COMM Systems : ............... 8 (U) The Diss ion of Declassification dance to the onal Declassifi cation Center: ....... Error! Bookmark not defined. 1. (U) ion 25Xl: Reveal Sources and Methods ... 10 1.1 (U) General ...... .......................... 11 1.2 (U) About the National Re (NRP) ..... 15 1.2.1 (U) Fact of Satellite Re ssance ................ 15 1.2.2 (U) Nat onal Reconna ssance Informat on ..... 17 1.2. 3 (U) zati Relati . 18 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . ( U) Navy ( C) . 2 2 1.2.3.5. (U) Defense Recon Support (DRSP/DSRP ) . 22 1.3 (U) Satellite ry (IMINT) Sys tems ................... 24 1.3.1 (U) ry Sys tem Information . ..................... 24 1.3.2 (U) Non-Operat onal IMINT Sys tems ................... 27 1.3.3 (U) Current and Future IMINT Operational Systems .... 31 1.3.4 (U) Meteorol cal Forecast . 32 1.3.5 (U) IMINT Sys tem Ground rations .................
  • Scope – Magic by Ivy Hooks and Lou Wheatcraft

    Scope – Magic by Ivy Hooks and Lou Wheatcraft

    Compliance Automation, Inc. http://www.complianceautomation.com/ Scope – Magic By Ivy Hooks and Lou Wheatcraft This paper was written as a result of a presentation to the Alamo Chapter of the Project Management Institute (PMI) by Ivy Hooks of Compliance Automation, Inc. Portions of this paper are excerpts from “Guide for Managing and Writing Requirements”, Ivy Hooks, 1994 and from “Customer-Centered Products: Creating Successful Products Through Smart Requirements Management”, Ivy Hooks and Kristin Farry, 2000. Abstract: A key challenge for project managers is to deliver a quality product to the customer on time, on budget, and meeting or exceeding the customer’s expectations. Only too often, project managers are not able to achieve all of these things for their projects. Why is success so hard to achieve? A major contributor to project failure is the failure to spend the time at the beginning of the project to clearly define the project scope and define the product requirements before beginning product development. Meeting or exceeding stakeholder needs and expectations involves balancing competing demands: scope, time, cost, quality, and stakeholders with differing needs and expectations. This paper covers common scope issues, the benefits of clearly defining scope, and introduces five key tools and techniques you can use to define your project’s scope. Project Scope Management The Project Management Institute (PMI) Project Management Book of Knowledge, defines product scope as “the features and functions that are to be included in
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    CONTENTS Page PART i SESSION 1: INTEGRATED AVIONICS Cochairmen: H. E. Smith, Johnson Space Center W. C. Bradford, Marshall Space Flight Center J. A. Anderson, Kennedy Space Center EVOLUTION OF SHUTTLE AVIONICS REDUNDANCY MANAGEMENT/FAULT TOLERANCE ...... Jack C. Boykin_' Joseph'R_ Thibodeau, and'Henry'E. Schneider SHUTTLE AVIONICS SOFTWARE -- TRIALS, TRIBULATIONS AND SUCCESSES . 19 O. L. Henderson SHUTTLE AVIONICS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT -- TRIALS, TRIBULATIONS, AND SUCCESSES: THE BACKUP FLIGHT SYSTEM ............. 30 Edward S. Chevers FLIGHT SOFTWARE FAULT TOLERANCE VIA THE BACKUP FLIGHT SYSTEM 35 Terry D. Humphrey and Charles R. Price SSME DIGITAL CONTROL DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS ............. 38 Walter T. Mitchell and Richard F. Searle _tAN-MACHINE INTERFACE AND CONTROL OF THE SHUTTLE DIGITAL FLIGHT SYSTEM .......................-.. - 47 Richard D. Burghduff and James L. Lewis, Jr. SPACE SHUTTLE MAIN ENGINE HARDWARE SIMULATION ............ 54 H. G. Vick and P. W. Hampton DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE VERIFICATION PROCESS FOR THE SHUTTLE AVIONICS SYSTEM ................. 64 H. E. Smith, W. B. Fouts, and J. Mesmer GROUND/MAN-MACHINE INTERFACES FOR ORBITER CHECKOUT ......... 76 F. Herb Blackmon INTEGRATION OF GROUND AND ON-BOARD SYSTEM FOR TERMINAL COUNT .... 81 Charles A. Abner and Don H. Townsend INTEGRATED DESIGN CHECKOUT OF SHUTTLE PAYLOAD AVIONICS INTERFACES .................. 87 John F. Muratore'and Kathy K. Whitcomb vii Precedingpageblank Page AUTOMATIONOFCHECKOUTFORTHESHUTTLEOPERATIONSERA 97 Judith A. Anderson and Kenneth O.
  • Dissertation Cost Optimization In

    Dissertation Cost Optimization In

    DISSERTATION COST OPTIMIZATION IN REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT FOR SPACE SYSTEMS Submitted by Tami E. Katz Department of Systems Engineering In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring 2021 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Steve Simske Ron Sega Erika Miller John Macdonald Copyright by Tami E. Katz 2021 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT COST OPTIMIZATION IN REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT FOR SPACE SYSTEMS When producing complex space systems, the transformation of customer needs into a realized system includes the development of product requirements. The ability to generate and manage the requirements can either enable the overall system development or drive significant cost and schedule impacts. Assessing practices in the industry and publications, it is observed that there is a substantial amount of documented approaches to address requirement development and product verification, but only a limited amount of documented approaches for requirements management. A complex system can have tens of thousands of requirements across multiple levels of development which, if not well managed, can lead to hidden costs associated with missed requirements and product rework. With current space system projects being developed at a rapid pace using more cost constrained approaches such as fixed budgets, an investigation into more efficient processes, such as requirements management, can yield methods to enable successful, cost effective system development. To address the optimal approach of managing requirements for complex space systems, this dissertation assesses current practices for requirements management, evaluates various contributing factors towards optimization of project costs associated with this activity, and proposes an optimized requirements management process to utilize during the development of space systems.