DOCSLIB.ORG

Modern Combat Aircraft (1945 – 2010)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modern Combat Aircraft (1945 – 2010) I MODERN COMBAT AIRCRAFT (1945 – 2010) Modern Combat Aircraft (1945-2010) is a brief overview of the most famous military aircraft developed by the end of World War II until now. Fixed-wing airplanes and helicopters are presented by the role fulfilled, by the nation of origin (manufacturer), and year of first flight. For each aircraft is available a photo, a brief introduction, and information about its development, design and operational life. The work is made using English Wikipedia, but also other Web sites. FIGHTER-MULTIROLE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Lockheed General Dynamics 001 1944 3 011 1964 27 P-80 Shooting Star F-111 Aardvark Republic Grumman 002 1946 5 012 1970 29 F-84 Thunderjet F-14 Tomcat North American Northrop 003 1947 7 013 1972 33 F-86 Sabre F-5E/F Tiger II North American McDonnell Douglas 004 1953 9 014 1972 35 F-100 Super Sabre F-15 Eagle Convair General Dynamics 005 1953 11 015 1974 39 F-102 Delta Dagger F-16 Fighting Falcon Lockheed McDonnell Douglas 006 1954 13 016 1978 43 F-104 Starfighter F/A-18 Hornet Republic Boeing 007 1955 17 017 1995 45 F-105 Thunderchief F/A-18E/F Super Hornet Vought Lockheed Martin 008 1955 19 018 1997 47 F-8 Crusader F-22 Raptor Convair Lockheed Martin 009 1956 21 019 2006 51 F-106 Delta Dart F-35 Lightning II McDonnell Douglas 010 1958 23 F-4 Phantom II SOVIET UNION SOVIET UNION No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Mikoyan-Gurevich Mikoyan-Gurevich 020 1947 55 026 1975 73 MiG-15 Fagot MiG-31 Foxhound Mikoyan-Gurevich Mikoyan-Gurevich 021 1954 59 027 1977 75 MiG-19 Farmer MiG-29 Fulcrum Mikoyan-Gurevich Sukhoi 022 1955 61 028 1977 79 MiG-21 Fishbed Su-27 Flanker Sukhoi Sukhoi 023 1962 65 029 1985 81 Su-15 Flagon Su-33 Flanker-D Mikoyan-Gurevich Sukhoi 024 1964 67 030 1990 83 MiG-25 Foxbat Su-34 Fullback Mikoyan-Gurevich Sukhoi 025 1967 71 031 2010 85 MiG-23 Flogger PAK FA T-50 II EUROPEAN MULTINATIONAL EUROPEAN MULTINATIONAL No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Panavia Eurofighter 032 1974 87 034 1994 93 Tornado IDS/ECR EF-2000 Typhoon Panavia 033 1979 91 Tornado ADV FRENCH FRENCH No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Dassault Dassault 035 1955 97 038 1978 103 Super Mystere Mirage 2000 Dassault Dassault 036 1956 99 039 1986 105 Mirage III Rafale Dassault 037 1966 101 Mirage F1 SWEDISH SWEDISH No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. SAAB SAAB 040 1955 107 041 1988 109 J-35 Draken JAS-39 Gripen ISRAELI CHINESE No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. IAI Shenyang 042 1973 111 043 1969 113 Kfir J-8 Finback Chengdu 044 1998 115 J-10 Vigorous Dragon JAPANESE INDIAN No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Mitsubishi HAL 045 1975 117 047 2001 121 F-1 Tejas Mitsubishi 046 1995 119 F-2 ATTACK UNITED STATES UNITED STATES No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Grumman Lockheed 048 1960 125 051 1981 133 A-6 Intruder F-117A Nighthawk Ling-Temco-Vought McDonnell Douglas 049 1965 127 052 1986 137 A-7 Corsair II F-15E Strike Eagle Fairchild-Republic 050 1972 129 A-10 Thunderbolt II III SOVIET UNION SOVIET UNION No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Sukhoi Sukhoi 053 1966 141 055 1975 145 Su-17 Fitter-C Su-25 Frogfoot Sukhoi 054 1971 143 Su-24 Fencer EUROPEAN MULTINATIONAL FRENCH No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. SEPECAT Dassault-Breguet 056 1968 149 057 1974 151 Jaguar Super Etendard SWEDISH CHINESE No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. SAAB Nanchang 058 1967 153 059 1965 155 J-37 Viggen Q-5 Fantan BOMBER UNITED STATES UNITED STATES No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Boeing Rockwell 060 1952 157 062 1974 163 B-52 Stratofortress B-1 Lancer North American Northrop 061 1958 161 063 1989 167 A-5 Vigilante B-2 Spirit SOVIET UNION SOVIET UNION No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Ilyushin Tupolev 064 1948 169 066 1952 173 Il-28 Beagle Tu-95 Bear Tupolev Tupolev 065 1952 171 067 1981 175 Tu-16 Badger Tu-160 Blackjack BRITISH BRITISH No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Vickers Handley-Page 068 1951 177 070 1952 183 Valiant Victor Avro 069 1952 181 Vulcan IV TRAINER UNITED STATES UNITED STATES No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Beechcraft McDonnell Douglas 071 1948 185 074 1988 191 T-34 Mentor T-45 Goshawk Cessna Beechcraft 072 1954 187 075 1992 193 T-37 Tweet T-6 Texan II Northrop 073 1959 189 T-38 Talon SOVIET UNION SOVIET UNION No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Yakovlev Yakovlev 076 1946 195 077 1976 197 Yak-18 Yak-52 EUROPEAN MULTINATIONAL BRITISH No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Dassault-Dornier British Aerospace 078 1973 199 079 1974 201 Alpha Jet Hawk ITALIAN CZECHOSLOVAK No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Aermacchi Aero 080 1976 203 081 1959 205 MB-339 L-29 Delfin Aero 082 1969 207 L-39 Albatros BRAZILIAN No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Embraer 083 1980 209 EMB 312 Tucano TRANSPORT UNITED STATES UNITED STATES No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Lockheed Lockheed 084 1954 211 087 1968 217 C-130 Hercules C-5 Galaxy Boeing Boeing 085 1956 213 088 1991 219 KC-135 Stratotanker C-17 Globemaster III Lockheed 086 1963 215 C-141 Starlifter V SOVIET UNION SOVIET UNION No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Antonov Ilyushin 089 1957 221 091 1971 225 An-12 Cub Il-76 Candid Antonov Antonov 090 1959 223 092 1982 227 An-24 Coke An-124 Ruslan EUROPEAN MULTINATIONAL EUROPEAN MULTINATIONAL No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Transall Airbus 093 1963 229 094 2009 231 C-160 A400M ITALIAN SPANISH No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Alenia CASA 095 1999 233 096 1997 235 C-27J Spartan C-295 RECONNAISSANCE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Lockheed Lockheed 097 1955 237 099 1964 243 U-2 Dragon Lady SR-71 Blackbird Lockheed 098 1959 241 P-3 Orion ELECTRONIC WARFARE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Grumman Boeing 100 1960 249 101 1976 251 E-2 Hawkeye E-3 Sentry VTOL UNITED STATES SOVIET UNION No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Bell-Boeing Yakovlev 102 1989 253 103 1971 257 V-22 Osprey Yak-38 Forger BRITISH No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Hawker Siddeley 104 1967 259 Harrier VI HELICOPTER UNITED STATES UNITED STATES No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Bell Bell 105 1956 263 110 1965 275 UH-1 Iroquois AH-1 Cobra Sikorsky Bell 106 1959 267 111 1966 279 SH-3 Sea King OH-58 Kiowa Boeing-Vertol Sikorsky 107 1961 269 112 1974 281 CH-47 Chinook UH-60 Black Hawk Boeing-Vertol Hughes Helicopters 108 1962 271 113 1975 283 CH-46 Sea Knight AH-64 Apache Sikorsky 109 1964 273 CH-53 Sea Stallion SOVIET UNION SOVIET UNION No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Mil Mil 114 1961 287 117 1977 293 Mi-8 Hip Mi-26 Halo Mil Kamov 115 1969 289 118 1982 295 Mi-24 Hind Ka-50 Hokum Kamov Mil 116 1973 291 119 1988 299 Ka-27 Helix MI-28 Havoc EUROPEAN MULTINATIONAL EUROPEAN MULTINATIONAL No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Eurocopter NHIndustries 120 1984 301 123 1995 309 AS565 Panther NH90 AgustaWestland Eurocopter 121 1987 303 124 2000 311 AW101 Merlin EC725 Super Cougar Eurocopter 122 1991 307 EC665 Tiger FRENCH FRENCH No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Aerospatiale Aerospatiale 125 1959 313 127 1965 317 SA 316 Alouette III SA 330 Puma Aerospatiale 126 1962 315 SA 321 Super Frelon BRITISH ITALIAN No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Westland Agusta 128 1971 319 129 1983 321 Lynx A129 Mangusta © SCM 2010 1 2 "You live only once, but if you live right once is enough" 3 Lockheed P-80 SHOOTING STAR Role Fighter Powerplant one Allison J33-A-35 centrifugal compressor turbojet 24 kN – 5,400 lbf First flight 1944 Main operators United States Air Force United States Navy Number built 1,715 The Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star was the first jet fighter used operationally by the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF), and saw extensive combat in Korea with the United States Air Force (USAF) as the F-80. As one of the world's first successful turbojet-powered combat aircraft, it helped usher in the "jet age" in the USAF and other air forces worldwide. One of its claims to fame is in training a new generation of pilots, especially in its closely-related T-33 Shooting Star trainer development. Development Concept work began on the XP-80 in 1943 with a design being built around the blueprint dimensions of a British de Havilland H-1 B turbojet, a powerplant to which the design team did not have actual access.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Visiting 2Nd Marine Air Wing
    Visiting 2nd Marine Air Wing February 14, 2019 2ND MARINE WING AT TRIDENT JUNCTURE 2018: THE CASE OF MAG-31 ............ 3 Col. Matthew H. Phares, MAG-31 Commanding Officer ................................................................. 7 Lt. Col. Joshua M. Pieczonka, VMFA(AW)-224 .............................................................................. 8 2ND MARINE WING AT TRIDENT JUNCTURE 2018: THE CASE OF MAG-26 ........... 10 Colonel Chris Boniface .................................................................................................................. 14 Lt. Col. Mark C. Fowler ................................................................................................................. 15 THE OSPREY AT 2ND MARINE AIR WING: AN UPDATE FROM COLONEL BONIFACE ......................................................................................................................... 16 THE USMC AND A NEW CHAPTER IN HEAVY LIFT: THE CH-53K LOGS DEMO AT NEW RIVER ........................................................................................................ 19 PREPARING FOR EFFECTIVE FLEET SUPPORT: THE CH-53K LOG DEMO AT NEW RIVER ................................................................................................................ 23 WORKING THE LOGISTICS CON-OPS AS THE CH-53K ENTERS THE FORCE ........ 28 2 2nd Marine Wing at Trident Juncture 2018: The Case of MAG-31 02/12/2019 By Robbin Laird Last year during my visit to Norway, I had a chance to visit several airbases and talk with a wide variety of Norwegian
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperation Forms in the Aeronautics Industry
    Cooperation Forms in the Aeronautics Industry Daniela MOCENCO*,1 *Corresponding author *Bucharest University of Economic Studies Piața Romană 6, Bucharest 010374, Romania 1INCAS – National Institute for Aerospace Research “Elie Carafoli” B-dul Iuliu Maniu 220, Bucharest 061126, Romania [email protected] DOI: 10.13111/2066-8201.2016.8.3.8 Received: 25 July 2016/ Accepted: 20 August 2016/ Published: September 2016 © Copyright 2016, INCAS. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Abstract: The development of the world economy and the globally accelerated diversification of production led to the need of widening the economic cooperation. The need of cooperation increased in various sectors of the global economy, such as the transport industry, IT and commercial sector. The aeronautics industry is a representative sector of cooperation, where the exchange of knowledge and technology, the cooperation between universities, industries, research organizations, small and medium enterprises (SMEs), etc. and the free flow of ideas are crucial factors for the implementation and sustainability of a unique innovation system. The main objective of this paper is to identify the main forms of cooperation in the aircraft industry. The paper includes two important parts: the first part contains an analysis of the US and Europe aeronautics industry evolution, highlighting the cooperation forms and fields that emerged over time; and the second part comprises an analysis of the Romanian aircraft industry cooperation. Key Words: Cooperation, aeronautic industry, market structure, Firm strategy 1. INTRODUCTION The development of the world economy and the globally accelerated diversification of production led to the need to broaden the economic cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact of Arizona's Principal Military Operations
    Economic Impact Of Arizona’s Principal Military Operations 2008 Prepared by In collaboration with Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter One INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND AND STUDY 1 METHODOLOGY Chapter Two DESCRIPTIONS OF ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL 11 MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Three EMPLOYMENT AND SPENDING AT ARIZONA’S 27 PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Four ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL 32 MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Five STATE AND LOCAL TAX REVENUES DERIVED FROM 36 ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Six COMPARISONS TO THE MILITARY INDUSTRY IN 38 ARIZONA Chapter Seven COMPARISONS OF THE MILITARY INDUSTRY IN FY 43 2000 AND FY 2005 APPENDICES Appendix One HOW IMPLAN WORKS A-1 Appendix Two RETIREE METHODOLOGY A-6 Appendix Three ECONOMETRIC MODEL INPUTS A-7 Appendix Four DETAILED STATEWIDE MODEL OUTPUT A-19 Appendix Five REGIONAL IMPACT INFORMATION A-22 The Maguire Company ESI Corporation LIST OF TABLES Page Table 3-1 Summary of Basic Personnel Statistics 27 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 3-2 Summary of Military Retiree Statistics 28 Arizona Principal Military Operations Table 3-3 Summary of Payroll and Retirement Benefits 30 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 3-4 Summary of Spending Statistics 31 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 4-1 Summary of Statewide Economic Impacts 34 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 5-1 Summary of Statewide Fiscal Impacts 37 Arizona’s Military Industry Table 5-2 Statewide Fiscal Impacts 37 Arizona’s Military Industry Table 6-1 Comparison of Major Industries / Employers in Arizona 41 Table 7-1 Comparison of Military Industry Employment in 43 FY 2000 and FY 2005 Table 7-2 Comparison of Military Industry Economic Output in 43 FY 2000 and FY 2005 The Maguire Company ESI Corporation Arizona’s Principal Military Operations Acknowledgements We wish to acknowledge and thank the leadership and personnel of the various military operations included within this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the 90 YEARS of the RAAF
    90 YEARS OF THE RAAF - A SNAPSHOT HISTORY 90 YEARS RAAF A SNAPSHOTof theHISTORY 90 YEARS RAAF A SNAPSHOTof theHISTORY © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission. Inquiries should be made to the publisher. Disclaimer The views expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defence, the Royal Australian Air Force or the Government of Australia, or of any other authority referred to in the text. The Commonwealth of Australia will not be legally responsible in contract, tort or otherwise, for any statements made in this document. Release This document is approved for public release. Portions of this document may be quoted or reproduced without permission, provided a standard source credit is included. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry 90 years of the RAAF : a snapshot history / Royal Australian Air Force, Office of Air Force History ; edited by Chris Clark (RAAF Historian). 9781920800567 (pbk.) Australia. Royal Australian Air Force.--History. Air forces--Australia--History. Clark, Chris. Australia. Royal Australian Air Force. Office of Air Force History. Australia. Royal Australian Air Force. Air Power Development Centre. 358.400994 Design and layout by: Owen Gibbons DPSAUG031-11 Published and distributed by: Air Power Development Centre TCC-3, Department of Defence PO Box 7935 CANBERRA BC ACT 2610 AUSTRALIA Telephone: + 61 2 6266 1355 Facsimile: + 61 2 6266 1041 Email: [email protected] Website: www.airforce.gov.au/airpower Chief of Air Force Foreword Throughout 2011, the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) has been commemorating the 90th anniversary of its establishment on 31 March 1921.
    [Show full text]
  • Finest Five Choppers Our Favorite Rotorcraft to Get You to Work
    Finest Five Choppers Our favorite rotorcraft to get you to work By Mark Huber jets—and a quiet, jet-smooth ride. More than 250 have been produced since 2004, mostly to service deepwater oil rigs. Highly modified S-92s are slated S GOES THE PRICE OF OIL, SO GOES THE CIVILIAN HELICOPTER to become the new presidential Marine One at the end of the decade, and market. That’s because a good portion of new-chopper production they already convey the leaders of 10 other countries. The blue-and-white goes to satisfy demand from the offshore oil-and-gas industry, Fat Hawk you regularly see over New York is whisking billionaire investor and the continued depressed price of crude has put a damper on Ira Rennert to his $248 million Sagaponack, N.Y., manse. Athings—and created the best buyer’s market for new rotorcraft in nearly a decade. But which helicopter is right for you and your commute? Here SUPER-MEDIUM: Airbus H175 are our finest-five picks: Price: $19 million Passengers: 8-16 Top speed: 184 mph Range: 690 miles Runner-up: AgustaWestland AW189 LARGE-CABIN: Sikorsky S-92A Helibus Price: $32 million (with typical executive interior) Airbus Helicopters (formerly Eurocopter) delivered its first H175 Passengers: 9-19 Top speed: 190 mph Range: 620 miles twin-engine last year, and it’s winning accolades, thanks to its low vibra- Runner-up: AgustaWestland AW101 tion and exterior-noise levels, long range, and reliability. The H175 tips the scales at a 16,535-lb. maximum takeoff weight, which translates into a Want a conveyance fit for a head of state or an uber-billionaire? This 423.8-cu.-ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Sea-Level Along the North Coast of Kuwait Bay
    Durham E-Theses Changing sea-level along the north coast of Kuwait bay Al-Asfour, Taiba Abdulmuhsen How to cite: Al-Asfour, Taiba Abdulmuhsen (1975) Changing sea-level along the north coast of Kuwait bay, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8119/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk CHANGING SEA-LEVEL ALONG THE NORTH COAST OF KUWAIT BAY by Taiba Abdulmuhsen Al-Asfour B.A. (Cairo) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Geography; at the University of Durham 1975 I I TO MY PARENTS i ABSTRACT Field investigations have been carried out to study the changes of sea level-along the north coast of Kuwait Bay. Four zones have been studied in detail viz: Kathma, Ghidhai, Mudairah and Al-Bahra.
    [Show full text]
  • United St a Tes Air Force Aircraft Accident
    UNITED STA TES AIR FORCE AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION BOARD REPORT F-16CJ, TIN 91-0340 480TH FIGHTER SQUADRON 52D FIGHTER WING SPANGDAHLEM AIR BASE, GERMANY -~- -- ~ ~ , . ~ .. '" .. •. .. -• ... ' . ·- ... _... ~· · ' • · ~ · L.. ~- r~... ~ ..• •l. ,:. •. ,.. .1-;., ~- .... •' :... ~ ·:• ..,.. • : •· · . ' • LOCATION: SPANGDAHLEM AIR BASE, GERMANY DATE OF ACCIDENT: 8 OCTOBER 2019 BOARD PRESIDENT: COLONEL JOHN C. STRATTON Conducted IAW Air Force Instruction 51-307 ACTION OF THE CONVENING AUTHORITY • The report of the accident investigation board, conducted under the provisions of AFI 51- 307, that investigated the 8 October 2019 mishap near Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany, which resulted in the destruction ofF-16CJ, TIN 91-0340, assigned to the 480th Fighter Squadron, 52nd Fighter Wing, Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany, complies with the applicable regulatory and statutory guidance and on that basis is hereby approved. £6 1/./-4.- STEVEN L. BASHAM Lieutenant General, USAF Deputy Commander l.J United States Air Force Accident Investigation Board Report Class A Mishap, Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany EXECUTIVE SUMMARY UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION F-16CJ, TIN 91-0340 SPANGDAHLEM AIR BASE, GERMANY 8 OCTOBER 2019 On 8 October 2019, the mishap pilot (MP), flying a F-16CJ, tail number (TIN) 91-0340, assigned to the 480th Fighter Squadron, "the Warhawks," 52d Fighter Wing, Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany, conducted a routine training sortie as part of the wing's local readiness exercise SABER FURY. Shortly after take-off, at 15:10:42 hours local (L) time, the MP ejected from the mishap aircraft (MA) with no injuries. The MA was destroyed upon impact in a forested area at 15: 11 :24L 8 nautical miles (nm) south of the base.
    [Show full text]
  • 'They Flew Into Blazing Flames'
    COLLEGE FOOTBALL MILITARY FACES Big 12 teams are Report: Navy pushing Drew Barrymore smarting after 3 for more unmanned tackles talk show losses to Sun Belt ships to diversify fleet amid pandemic Back page Page 4 Page 14 Spangdahlem’s F-16s are not leaving Germany for Italy just yet » Page 3 stripes.com Volume 79, No. 108 ©SS 2020 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2020 50¢/Free to Deployed Areas ‘They flew into blazing flames’ Distinguished Flying Crosses awarded to Calif. guardsmen for rescue efforts BY CHAD GARLAND wind — and it was raging — and blinding For the Army air crews’ efforts on Sept. President Donald Stars and Stripes smoke to rescue families who were trapped 5, Trump honored seven soldiers with Dis- Trump participates in a by the massive Creek Fire,” President Don- tinguished Flying Crosses during the event ceremony recognizing he air crews were told to turn back, ald Trump said during an awards ceremony at a hangar in McClellan Park, Calif., near the California National but they flew into the fire anyway. Monday. Sacramento. It is one of the military’s high- Guard at Sacramento McClellan Airport, in They were told not to return, but Despite the calls to abort the mission, est decorations, ranking above the Soldier’s McClellan Park, Calif., Twent twice more to rescue about 240 they “decided to continue anyway, knowing Medal. on Monday after being people trapped by wildfire at a campground The award recognizing acts of heroism they might not return,” Trump said. “They briefed on wildfires. in California’s Sierra National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Kunsan Air Base
    Welcome to Kunsan Air Base "Home of the Wolf Pack" Dear Guest, Welcome to Wolf Pack Lodge, the newest AF Lodging facility in the ROK. Kunsan Air Base is home to the 8th Fighter Wing, also known as the "Wolf Pack," a nickname given during the command of Colonel Robin Olds in 1966. Our mission is; "Defend the Base, Accept Follow on Forces, and Take the Fight North," the warriors here do an amazing job ensuring mission success. Kunsan AB plays host to many personnel, in all branches of the service, in support of our numerous peninsula wide exercises each year. We are proud to serve all the war fighters who participate in these exercises and ensure our "Fight Tonight" capability. To ensure you have a great stay with us, I would ask that you report any problem with your room to our front desk staff immediately, so we can try to resolve the issue, and you can focus on your mission here. If any aspect of your stay is less than you would hope for, please call me at 782-1844 ext. 160, or just dial 160 from your room phone. You may also e-mail me at [email protected] , I will answer you as quickly as possible. We are required to enter each room at least every 72 hours, this is not meant to inconvenience you, but to make sure you are okay, and see if there is anything you need. If you will be working shift work while here and would like to set up a time that is best for you to receive housekeeping service, please dial 157 from your room phone, and the Housekeeping Manager would be happy to schedule your cleaning between 0800 and 1600.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockets Hit Ain Al-Asad Military Base Housing US Forces in Western Iraq; No Casualties Reported [Last Update: Monday, 05 July 2021 9:31 PM]
    Rockets hit Ain al-Asad military base housing US forces in western Iraq; no casualties reported [Last Update: Monday, 05 July 2021 9:31 PM] US soldiers stand at the site of a retaliatory missile strike by Iran at Ain al-Asad Airbase in Anbar, western Iraq, on January 13, 2020. (Photo by Reuters) An airbase in Iraq’s western province of Anbar, where American military forces and trainers are stationed, has reportedly come under attack by a barrage of rockets. An Iraqi security source, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Arabic-language al-Sumaria television network that three Katyusha rockets targeted the vicinity of Ain al-Asad Air Base, located about 160 kilometers (100 miles) west of the capital Baghdad, on Monday afternoon. He added that there were no casualties as a result of the rocket attack on the military base. “At approximately 2:45 PM local time (1145 GMT), Ain al-Assad Air Base was attacked by three rockets. The rockets landed on the base perimeter. There are no injuries and damage is being assessed,” Colonel Wayne Marotto, spokesman for Combined Joint Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve, wrote in a post published on his official Twitter page on Monday. Meanwhile, Sabereen News, a Telegram news channel associated with Iraqi Popular Mobilization Units – better known by the Arabic name Hashd al-Sha’abi –, reported that eight 107mm rockets had targeted Ain al-Asad Air Base, and four of the projectiles had landed inside the military installation. No group has claimed responsibility for the attack yet, which is the latest in a series of assaults that have targeted US occupation forces over the past few months.
    [Show full text]
  • Garmin Reveals Autoland Feature Rotorcraft Industry Slams Possible by Matt Thurber NYC Helo Ban Page 45
    PUBLICATIONS Vol.50 | No.12 $9.00 DECEMBER 2019 | ainonline.com Flying Short-field landings in the Falcon 8X page 24 Regulations UK Labour calls for bizjet ban page 14 Industry Forecast sees deliveries rise in 2020 page 36 Gratitude for Service Honor flight brings vets to D.C. page 41 Air Transport Lion Air report cites multiple failures page 51 Rotorcraft Garmin reveals Autoland feature Industry slams possible by Matt Thurber NYC helo ban page 45 For the past eight years, Garmin has secretly Mode. The Autoland system is designed to Autoland and how it works, I visited been working on a fascinating new capabil- safely fly an airplane from cruising altitude Garmin’s Olathe, Kansas, headquarters for ity, an autoland function that can rescue an to a suitable runway, then land the airplane, a briefing and demo flight in the M600 with airplane with an incapacitated pilot or save apply brakes, and stop the engine. Autoland flight test pilot and engineer Eric Sargent. a pilot when weather conditions present can even switch on anti-/deicing systems if The project began in 2011 with a Garmin no other safe option. Autoland should soon necessary. engineer testing some algorithms that could receive its first FAA approval, with certifi- Autoland is available for aircraft manu- make an autolanding possible, and in 2014 cation expected shortly in the Piper M600, facturers to incorporate in their airplanes Garmin accomplished a first autolanding in followed by the Cirrus Vision Jet. equipped with Garmin G3000 avionics and a Columbia 400 piston single. In September The Garmin Autoland system is part of autothrottle.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices Study 2014
    Military Installation and Mission Support Best Practices (25 States / 20 Communities) Prepared for: Florida Defense Support Task Force (FDSTF) Submitted: December 23, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... iii BEST PRACTICES REPORT Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 1 States/ Communities ........................................................................................................... 1 Project Participants ............................................................................................................. 2 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2 Sources ................................................................................................................................ 3 Findings ............................................................................................................................... 4 STATES 1. Florida .............................................................................................................................. 18 2. Alabama ............................................................................................................................ 26 3. Alaska ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]