DOCSLIB.ORG

Battle of Plattsburgh Bay/La Bataille De La Baie De Plattsburgh

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Battle of Plattsburgh Bay/La Bataille De La Baie De Plattsburgh Battle of Plattsburgh Bay/La Bataille de la Baie de Plattsburgh Chambly Canal Throughout the War of 1812, British Tout au long de la Guerre de 1812, forces targeted Lake Champlain les forces britanniques envisagèrent as an invasion route. United d'utiliser le lac Champlain comme States Navy Lieutenant Thomas route d'invasion. Le lieutenant de Macdonough was able to confine vaisseau, Thomas Macdonough, de Quebec them in the Richelieu River of la Marine américaine, parvint, Quebec throughout the summer pendant tout l'été de 1813, à les Canada of 1813. American shipbuilders spent contenir dans la rivière Richelieu, United States the following winter, spring and Courtesy the U.S. Naval Academy Museum. Artist unknown. / Gracieuseté du U.S. Naval Academy Museum. Artiste inconnu. au Québec. Les constructeurs navals Thomas Macdonough, summer feverishly building a promoted to Commodore américains mirent à profit l'hiver, United States Naval war fleet after the battle, became le printemps et l'été suivants pour a popular hero celebrated in Vergennes, Vermont. in poetry and song. construire à toute vitesse une force de combat navale à Vergennes, dans Promu au grade de You Are Here Macdonough’s fleet was built none commodore après la l'État du Vermont. Plattsburgh too soon as American General bataille, Thomas Macdonough devient Alexander Macomb faced reinforced un héros populaire que La flotte de Macdonough avait été British forces gathering for a land célèbrent nombre de construite à point nommé, car New York poèmes et de chansons. invasion of Plattsburgh. On the le général américain Alexander morning of September 11, 1814, Macomb devait affronter les forces British Captain George Downie britanniques qui, une fois renforcées, brought his warships around préparaient une offensive terrestre Cumberland Head to aid in the sur Plattsburgh. Au matin du 11 invasion and found Macdonough’s septembre 1814, le capitaine britan- warships already anchored upwind nique George Downie conduisit ses in the bay. The ensuing battle took vaisseaux autour de Cumberland place in close quarters which gave Head afin d'appuyer les forces Macdonough’s carronade-equipped d'invasion. Il y trouva ceux de vessels an advantage over the Macdonough déjà ancrés au vent Vermont British ships’ heavier guns. dans la baie. La bataille qui s'ensuivit fut livrée à faible distance, donnant Courtesy the U.S. Naval Academy Museum. Artist unknown. / Gracieuseté du U.S. Naval Academy Museum. Artiste inconnu. The Battle lasted about two and a The battle was fought at close quarters; carronades, firing iron shot, produced a smoky blast. / La bataille est livrée à courte distance: des caronades, tirant à boulet plein, émettent flammes et fumées. aux caronades des vaisseaux de half hours and cost the lives of 143 Macdonough un net avantage sur men who were buried together on les canons plus lourds qui équip- nearby Crab Island. Its decisive The Battle of Plattsburgh Bay is Macdonough directs his men through aient les vaisseaux britanniques. outcome effectively ended the war. commemorated each September with the confusion of a battle deck strewn Champlain Canal re-enactments, historical tours, exhibits, with the dead and dying as the gun N period entertainment and other events. crews maintain constant fire. La bataille dura environ deux heures et demi, et elle coûta la vie à 143 La bataille de la baie de Plattsburgh Macdonough conduisant ses hommes est commémorée chaque année, en sur le pont couvert de morts et de hommes que l'on enterra ensemble septembre, par des reconstitutions blessés pendant que les équipes de sur l'île de Crab adjacente. Son historiques, des visites guidées, des Lake Champlain pièce maintiennent un feu constant. résultat décisif mit favorablement Historic Landings expositions, des spectacles d'époque et d'autres événements. fin à la guerre. John Wayne Photographix John Wayne Heritage Trail On loan to the Battle of Plattsburgh Interpretive / Prèt du Battle of Plattsburgh Center. Artiste inconnu. Interpretive Center. For information: 1-800-468-5227, www.lcbp.org.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crucial Victory on Lake Champlain – “9/11” 1814 America’S Second War for Independence (1812 – 1815)
    Crucial Victory on Lake Champlain – “9/11” 1814 America’s Second War for Independence (1812 – 1815) The War of 1812, also known as America’s Second War for Independence, was a contest to see if a free, republican form of government could survive. The Irish in America again rallied to the colors – the rapid fortification, by the Irish, of the Battery in New York City being but one example. Thomas Addis Emmet raised the Irish Republican Greens, which participated with the US Army for the duration of the war, including in the 1813 invasion of Canada. [See: Washington’s Irish by Derek Warfield.] England does not recognize expatriation, i.e., that someone born in the United Kingdom could ever renounce being a “British subject” and acquire American (or any other) citizenship. This resulted in the impressment of American merchant seamen into the Royal Navy, one of the causes of the war. During the course of the war it also gave rise to an English threat to hang any captured Irish-born members of the American forces. American General Winfield Scott countered by promising to hang two English prisoners of war for every Irishman hanged. No one was hanged. In essence, England’s war aims in North America during 1812-1815, were similar to those of 1775-1783, but with a strategy based on lessons learned from the former conflict. After the defeat of Napoleon in 1814, the Duke of Wellington sent sixteen of his best veteran infantry regiments, plus cavalry and artillery, to North America to attempt the partitioning of the United States by driving down the Champlain and Hudson Valleys, as intended by “Gentleman Johnny” Burgoyne in 1777, to cut off New England from the rest of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • 1913-06-20, [P ]
    — 1 WEATHER- F For Delaware! Overcast, ij Circulation Î4,349| I warm; probably thunder- I; Yesterday »bowers tonight or Satur* 11 day; light south wind The Evening Journal GUARANTEED te ^TWENTY-SIXTH YEAR-NO. 28 WILMINGTON. DELAWARE, FRIDAY. JUNE 20, 1913 16 PAGES ► ONE CENT STATES MUSI O.M.D. CAMP SEN. DUPONT Happy? Certainly! Mme. Rappold, ... ah . lfmnM Prima Donna, Gets Divorce and $150,000 FOR RECEIVER ENFORCE WEBB IN HONOR OF LAUDSPLÄNTO Will Wed Tenor of Early Dreams STREETS; NONE ASKED FOR LIQUOR LAW MACDONOUGH BOOM CITY FOR PlAYFIELD LUMBER CO. Attorney General M’Reynolds Governor Calls State Defend­ Regrets That He Cannot At­ / Council Defeats Mr. Haney's Philadelphians Seek Order Gives Interpretation of ers to Field Instruction tend Chamber of Com­ Tenth Ward Improvement From Local Court After Conviction of Inter­ Anti-Shipment Act July 19-26 « merce Dinner to Plan by One Vote v national Heads HO FEDERAL PENALTY* AND FIRST GENERAL Editors SOLON PLEADS FOR CHANCELLOR ISSUES STATES HAVE JURISDICTION ORDER IS ISSUED SEES MUCH GOOD IN TOTS’ OUTING PLACE RULE IN THE CASK Many Wllralngtonlsns are Intereat- Oeneral orders were issued today CLOSER PENINSULA TIES City Council by -.unanimous vote K In the announcement fromWashlag- by command of Governor Charles R. last night passed the ordinance pro­ Chancellor Charles M. Curtis has Is­ n yesterday that the Webb-Ke.iyon Miller, through adjutant General 1. ! Regretting that he will be unable, viding a bond isiuo of $150.000 for sued a rule returnable on Monday, Maw, forbidding interstate shipments Pusey Wiokersham, chief of staff, for jbecause of official duties, to attend July 20, In the case of Coverly-Haakina •f liquor Into “dry” States Is not a street ,«nd sewer Improvements, and et al„ vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Review and Archaeological Assessment of Selected Areas from the Revolutionary War and War of 1812
    American Battlefield Protection Program Grant 2287-16-009: Document Review and Archaeological Assessment Document Review and Archaeological Assessment of Selected Areas from the Revolutionary War and War of 1812. Plattsburgh, New York PREPARED FOR: The City of Plattsburgh, NY, 12901 IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF GRANT FUNDING PROVIDED THROUGH: American Battlefield Protection Program Heritage Preservation Services National Park Service 1849 C Street NW (NC330) Washington, DC 20240 (Grant 2287-16-009) PREPARED BY: 4472 Basin Harbor Road, Vergennes, VT 05491 802.475.2022 • [email protected] • www.lcmm.org BY: Cherilyn A. Gilligan Christopher R. Sabick Patricia N. Reid 2019 1 American Battlefield Protection Program Grant 2287-16-009: Document Review and Archaeological Assessment Abstract As part of a regional collaboration between the City of Plattsburgh, New York, and the towns of Plattsburgh and Peru, New York, the Maritime Research Institute (MRI) at the Lake Champlain Maritime Museum (LCMM) has been chosen to investigate six historical Revolutionary War and War of 1812 sites: Valcour Island, Crab Island, Fort Brown, Fort Moreau, Fort Scott, and Plattsburgh Bay. These sites will require varying degrees of evaluation based upon the scope of the overall heritage tourism plan for the greater Plattsburgh area. The MRI’s role in this collaboration is to conduct a document review for each of the six historic sites as well as an archaeological assessment for Fort Brown and Valcour Island. The archaeological assessments will utilize KOCOA analysis outlined in the Battlefield Survey Manual of the American Battlefield Protection Program provided by the National Park Service. This deliverable fulfills Tasks 1 and 3 of the American Battlefield Protection Program (ABPP) Grant 2887-16-009.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Gold Medals: Background, Legislative Process, and Issues for Congress
    Congressional Gold Medals: Background, Legislative Process, and Issues for Congress Updated April 8, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45101 Congressional Gold Medals: Background, Legislative Process, and Issues for Congress Summary Senators and Representatives are frequently asked to support or sponsor proposals recognizing historic events and outstanding achievements by individuals or institutions. Among the various forms of recognition that Congress bestows, the Congressional Gold Medal is often considered the most distinguished. Through this venerable tradition—the occasional commissioning of individually struck gold medals in its name—Congress has expressed public gratitude on behalf of the nation for distinguished contributions for more than two centuries. Since 1776, this award, which initially was bestowed on military leaders, has also been given to such diverse individuals as Sir Winston Churchill and Bob Hope, George Washington and Robert Frost, Joe Louis and Mother Teresa of Calcutta. Congressional gold medal legislation generally has a specific format. Once a gold medal is authorized, it follows a specified process for design, minting, and presentation. This process includes consultation and recommendations by the Citizens Coinage Advisory Commission (CCAC) and the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts (CFA), pursuant to any statutory instructions, before the Secretary of the Treasury makes the final decision on a gold medal’s design. Once the medal has been struck, a ceremony will often be scheduled to formally award the medal to the recipient. In recent years, the number of gold medals awarded has increased, and some have expressed interest in examining the gold medal authorization and awarding process. Should Congress want to make such changes, several individual and institutional options might be available.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of Plattsburgh, September 11, 1814
    History of the War of 1812 – Battle of Plattsburgh, September 11, 1814 (Referenced to National Education Standards) Objectives: Students will be able to cite the basic facts relating to the land and water battles at Plattsburgh, New York on September 11, 1814 and be able to place the location and events into the chronological framework of the War of 1812. Time: 3 to 5 class periods, depending on extension activities. Skills: Reading, chronological thinking, map-making. Content Areas: Language Arts – Vocabulary, Language Arts- Reading, Social Studies – Geography, Social Studies - United States history. Materials: - Poster board - Colored markers/crayons - Pencils - Copies of reading materials Standards: NCHS History Standards K-4 Historical Thinking Standards 1A: Identify the temporal structure of an historical narrative or story. 1F: Create timelines. 5A: Identify problems and dilemmas confronting people in historical stories, myths, legends, and fables, and in the history of their school, community, state, nation, and the world. 5B: Analyze the interests, values, and points of view of those involved in the dilemma or problem situation . K-4 Historical Content Standards 4D: The student understands events that celebrate and exemplify fundamental values and principles of American democracy. 4E: The student understands national symbols through which American values and principles are expressed. 5-12 Historical Thinking Standards 1A: Identify the temporal structure of an historical narrative or story. 1B: Interpret data presented in time lines and create time lines. 5-12 History Content Standards Era 4: Expansion and Reform (1801-1861) 1A: The student understands the international background and consequences of the Louisiana Purchase, the War of 1812, and the Monroe Doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Histori9 Places Received Inventory—Nomination
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (3-82) Exp. 10-31-84 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only National Register of Histori9 Places received Inventory—Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections_____________________________ 1. Name historic Pittsburgh Bay National Historic Landmark and or common Cumberland Bay______________ 2. Location street & number Cumberland Bay and two sites in Pittsburgh not for publication city, town PlattSburgh_____________ __ vicinity of________ state New York code 036 county Clinton code 019 3., Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district X public occupied agriculture museum _ building(s) private x unoccupied commercial park _ structure both work in progress educational private residence X site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious ^X__ object in process yes: restricted government scientific being considered _£~ yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military x other: see Descr 4. Owner of Property name Multiple; see continuation sheet 4-1 street & number city, town __ vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Clinton County RecnrdPr nf street & number Clinton County Courthouse city, town P1 attsburgh state New York 6. Representation in Existing Surveys titie Historic Sites Survey has this property been determined eligible? yes no date i960 federal state county _._ local depository for survey records National Park Service (sge continuation sheet 6-1) city, town Washing ton___ __________ 7. Description Condition Check one Check one __ excellent __ deteriorated __ unaltered __ original site __ good __ ruins __ altered __ moved date __ fair __ unexposed « Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance The Plattsburgh Bay National Historic Landmark, in the City and Town of Plattsburgh, Clinton County, New York consists of three sites, all linked to the naval and land engagements of September 11, 1814.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battles of Plattsburgh and Lake Champlain (1814)
    The Battles of Plattsburgh and Lake Champlain (1814) In 1814, the British decided on a multi-prong attack on the United States; they intended to take advantage of warships and troop units freed up by the apparent end of the conflict against Napoleon and France. One offensive would seek to revenge the sacking of York, modern day Toronto, by threatening Washington, DC, and Baltimore, Maryland, home base for many American privateers; another offensive would threaten the Gulf Coast, especially Mobile and New Orleans. The third offensive would operate down Lake Champlain to divide New York from Vermont and New England. British military strategists had learned the lesson of Burgoyne’s failed campaign during the American Revolution. In 1777, General John Burgoyne had marched his men down the lakes, largely devoid of naval support and logistics, and eventually found himself cut off around Saratoga; winter’s approach left him few alternatives-- he could not advance against the ever- increasing American army, could not retreat into the harsh winter, and lacked the logistical “tail” to survive in Saratoga. He surrendered, and that surrender secured, outright, French support for the infant United States and victory against Great Britain. General Sir John Prévost intended to improve on Burgoyne’s flawed advance. He would combine a strong naval force built late the previous summer at Ile aux Noix, Quebec, with a strong ground force, to advance down the Richelieu River to Lake Champlain, to batter his way if necessary down the New York side of the lake system, while continuing to secure support from Vermonters whose loyalty to the United States was unclear in this war.
    [Show full text]
  • Few Americans in the 1790S Would Have Predicted That the Subject Of
    AMERICAN NAVAL POLICY IN AN AGE OF ATLANTIC WARFARE: A CONSENSUS BROKEN AND REFORGED, 1783-1816 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jeffrey J. Seiken, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor John Guilmartin, Jr., Advisor Professor Margaret Newell _______________________ Professor Mark Grimsley Advisor History Graduate Program ABSTRACT In the 1780s, there was broad agreement among American revolutionaries like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton about the need for a strong national navy. This consensus, however, collapsed as a result of the partisan strife of the 1790s. The Federalist Party embraced the strategic rationale laid out by naval boosters in the previous decade, namely that only a powerful, seagoing battle fleet offered a viable means of defending the nation's vulnerable ports and harbors. Federalists also believed a navy was necessary to protect America's burgeoning trade with overseas markets. Republicans did not dispute the desirability of the Federalist goals, but they disagreed sharply with their political opponents about the wisdom of depending on a navy to achieve these ends. In place of a navy, the Republicans with Jefferson and Madison at the lead championed an altogether different prescription for national security and commercial growth: economic coercion. The Federalists won most of the legislative confrontations of the 1790s. But their very success contributed to the party's decisive defeat in the election of 1800 and the abandonment of their plans to create a strong blue water navy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Naval War of 1812, Volume 3, Chapter 2
    The Naval War of 1812: A Documentary History Volume III 1814–1815 Chesapeake Bay, Northern Lakes, and Pacific Ocean Part 5 of 7 Naval Historical Center Department of the Navy Washington, 2002 Electronically published by American Naval Records Society Bolton Landing, New York 2011 AS A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THIS PUBLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. 532 NORTHERN LAKES THEATER JANUARY 1814-JUNE 1815 533 left to guard the vessel and property retreated upon the approach of our Boats- as soon as the vessel was intirely consumed Lieutenant Gregory reem­ as ,:e have nothing to oppose so overwhelming a force and as this class of ves­ barked his Men without having permitted one of them to enter a House.- On sel IS so much beyond any thing which the Government contemplated when I finding the alarm so general he thought it prudent to cross the Lake immedi­ had th~ honor of your instructions in January last, I should not feel myself ately- he stopped one day at Oswego for refreshment and arrived here last authOrIzed even to prepare to build any thing to oppose Such a vessel without evening having performed a most difficult service with his usual gallantry and Special authority.- good conduct Mter I have been a sufficient length of time on the Lake to ascertain Lieutenant Gregory speaks in the highest terms of commendation of Sailing whether th.e. Enemy will fight me without his 84 Gun Ship and there should be Master Vaughan and Mr. Dixon, as well as the Men under his command for no probabIlIty .of a Peac~ ~th England it will
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks at the Rededication of the Thomas Macdonough Memorial On
    Remarks at the Rededication of the Thomas MacDonough Memorial th On the Occasion of the 200 Anniversary of the Battle of Plattsburgh By Steven Engelhart, Executive Director, Adirondack Architectural Heritage Plattsburgh, New York September 12, 2014 I’ve been asked to say a few things about the history of the building this memorial, this monument, which was finished and dedicated in 1926. In 1913 the Plattsburgh Centenary Commission was created for two purposes. The first was to plan and carry out a Battle of Plattsburgh centennial celebration the following year and this it did with great success with help from about $50,000 appropriated by New York State and the federal government. The second purpose was to plan and erect a suitable monument to commemorate the American victory at Plattsburgh. The first step in this process was to choose a suitable site and, very quickly, the Commissioners saw the potential of erecting a monument here, near the mouth of the Saranac River, where the visitor could take in Plattsburgh Bay, the site of MacDonough’s victory, and where, right on this site itself, some of the “sharpest fighting that occurred between land forces” had taken place. Offering this site as a blank canvas, the Commission then invited twenty architects to submit design proposals and, after reviewing them, unanimously selected the plan presented by John Russell Pope from New York City, a plan that included a towering obelisk for the site. You’ll hear more about Pope and his design in a minute. But mind you, there were two city blocks here at the time, on what was then called North River Street, so to build the monument here, the Commission had to condemn and acquire eleven parcels of land, and this they did by about 1916 at a cost of $62,400.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving America's Battlefields
    CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Information for Parks, Federal Agencies, Indian Tribes, States, Local Governments, and the Private Sector CRM VOLUME 20 NO. 5 1997 Altogether Fitting and Proper Saving America's Battlefields U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Cultural Resources PUBLISHED BY THE CRM CELEBRATING 20 YEARS OF PUBLICATION NATIONAL PARK SERVICE VOLUME 20 NO. 5 1997 To promote and maintain high standards Contents ISSN 1068-4999 for preserving and managing cultural resources Altogether Fitting and Proper ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR Saving America's Battlefields CULTURAL RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP AND PARTNERSHIPS Katherine H. Stevenson Foreword 3 Edwin C. Bearss EDITOR Ronald M. Greenberg Working Together 4 Tanya M. Gossett PRODUCTION MANAGER Karlota M. Koester Catalyst for Battlefield Preservation The Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Study 7 GUEST EDITOR Jan Townsend Tanya M. Gossett Planning Partnerships Work ADVISORS The Chattanooga Area Civil War Sites Assessment 11 David Andrews Patrick Reed, James Ogden III, and Chris Abbett Editor, NPS Joan Bacharach Takings Law Museum Registrar. NPS Fact and Fiction 15 Randall J. Biallas Historical Architect NPS Catharine M. Gilliam Susan Buggey An Uphill Battle for Recognition 19 Director, Historical Services Branch Parks Canada Tersh Boasberg John A. Bums Architect, NPS Treatments for Historic Battlefield Landscapes 21 Harry A. Butowsky Charles A. Birnbaum Historian, NPS Pratt Cassity Preserving Civil War Sites Executive Director. Maryland's Voluntary Easement Strategy 23 National Alliance of Preservation Commissions H. Grant Dehart Muriel Crespi Cultural Anthropologist, NPS Lee vs. Grant Mark R. Edwards Battlefields and Tourism in Virginia 28 Director, Historic Preservation Division, State Historic Preservation Officer, Georgia David Ruth and Mike Andrus Roger E.
    [Show full text]
  • The War of 1812 Was Crucial in the Standards Development of the Still Young United States
    Research Topic- War of 1812 Research Topic War of 1812 Grade Level 4th – 5th Grade Time Required 1 class period (60 minutes) Ohio’s Learning American History – Heritage: The War of 1812 was crucial in the Standards development of the still young United States. It also heavily impacted History Strand the people living in the new state of Ohio. Common Core CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.4.3 Standards Explain events, procedures, ideas, or concepts in a historical, scientific, or technical text, including what happened and why, based on specific information in the text. CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.5.3 Explain the relationships or interactions between two or more individuals, events, ideas, or concepts in a historical, scientific, or technical text based on specific information in the text. Objective Students will learn what happened during the War of 1812 and its impact on the United States. Students will understand the role Ohio played in the War of 1812. Students will analyze the factors that lead to the war. Research The War of 1812 was fought between the United States, Great Britain, Statement and their respective allies, from June 1812 to February 1815. Neither side ever gained a significant advantage and the war resulted in a return to the status quo. Veterans Service U.S. Military Personnel Before War: ~ 7,000 U.S. Military Personnel by the End of the War: ~ 493,000 - Regulars: ~ 35,000 - Militia: ~ 458,000 U.S. Military Deaths: ~ 15,000 Native American Impact: ~ 15% of the Creek population were killed - It is uncertain how many Native Americans died as a result of the War of 1812.
    [Show full text]