NOTES and CORRESPONDENCE High-Resolution Airborne Radar Observations of Mammatus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NOTES and CORRESPONDENCE High-Resolution Airborne Radar Observations of Mammatus JANUARY 2001 NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE 159 NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE High-Resolution Airborne Radar Observations of Mammatus NATHANIEL S. WINSTEAD,J.VERLINDE,S.TRACY ARTHUR,FRANCINE JASKIEWICZ, MICHAEL JENSEN,NATASHA MILES, AND DAVID NICOSIA Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 14 January 2000 and 20 June 2000 ABSTRACT High-resolution Doppler radar observations of mammatus clouds coupled with soundings of the preanvil and anvil environments provide a unique opportunity to examine previously reported observations of, and evaluate various hypotheses of, mammatus formation. These observations con®rm the general hypothesis for mammatus formation advanced by Ludlam and Scorer, and provide detail of the cloud interior structure. Speci®cally, the radar observations indicate that mammatus elements are reminiscent of eddy circulations with a weak downdraft core ¯anked by horizontal convergence and divergence at the top and base of the cloud, respectively. Doppler spectral width measurements, however, yielded values of only 2±3 m s21, indicating only weak turbulent motions within individual mammatus elements. Re¯ectivity analyses of mammatus elements indicate a ®rm link to the parent anvil. A dual-Doppler analysis of the parent anvil indicates that the larger-scale environment where the mammatus exist is characterized by the existence of gravity waves or shear overturning. It is hypothesized that these circulations might play a role in the initiation of this particular outbreak of mammatus. 1. Introduction matus clouds. However, studies to verify these hypoth- Mammatus are one of the most striking cloud features eses have been hard to come by. Some studies, such as seen in the atmosphere. Often observed beneath the an- those by Hlad (1944), Martner (1995), and Stith (1995), vils of thunderstorms, these clouds have served as a even presented observations that, on ®rst appearance, visual warning to pilots that turbulence is likely to be seem to bring into question some aspects of the early present (Lankford 1990). Early hypotheses of the pro- hypotheses. Martner presented observations indicating cesses leading to the development of mammatus were that individual clouds have their root deep in the anvil, presented by Wagner (1948), Ludlam and Scorer (1953), while Stith observed positive temperature perturbations and Scorer (1958), and our understanding has not inside the cloud. changed signi®cantly since that time. Three related pro- In this paper, we report results from high-resolution, cesses were identi®ed: subsidence of a cloud interface airborne, radar observations of a large ®eld of mam- layer, fallout of precipitation, and evaporation of pre- matus clouds taken in a severe thunderstorm outbreak cipitation (Scorer 1958). These three processes render during the Veri®cations of the Origins of Rotation in the (stable) subcloud layer slightly unstable and result Tornadoes Experiment (VORTEX95; Rasmussen et al. in downward convection with smooth, usually less 1994). As with several of the previous mammatus stud- sharply outlined, surfaces. In the years since these stud- ies, these observations are from a target of opportunity. ies, additional hypotheses, mostly based on isolated ob- The aircraft was in transit between two severe thun- servational studies, have furthered our understanding of derstorms in the Oklahoma±Texas region when it passed the details of both the environment and structure of beneath a large ®eld of mammatus clouds. The obser- mammatus. Clarke (1962) suggested that gravity waves vations from this single transect are the focus of the produced the vertical motion destabilizing cloud base. study. Martner (1995) provided further evidence that gravity The high spatial resolution within individual mam- waves play an important role in the initiation of mam- matus elements, coupled with the along-track mesoscale view offered by the airborne platform and two Cross- chain Linked Atmospheric Sounding System (CLASS) soundings, allow us to evaluate results reported in pre- Corresponding author address: Nathaniel S. Winstead, Space De- partment, Applied Physics Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins Univer- vious papers. In particular, these radar observations are sity, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd., Laurel, MD 20723. used to examine the different hypotheses presented in E-mail: [email protected] previous studies of mammatus and to address questions q 2001 American Meteorological Society Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/27/21 09:51 PM UTC 160 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 129 point separation is 400 m in the horizontal and 500 m in the vertical. Each individual radar scan was time± space adjusted with the propagation speed of the storm. A Cressman ®lter (Cressman 1959) was used in the interpolation process with a radius of in¯uence of 500 m in the horizontal and 600 m in the vertical. Horizontal velocities were calculated using Custom Editing and Display of Reduced Information in Cartesian Space soft- ware (Mohr and Miller 1983). These horizontal veloc- ities were smoothed using a two-pass, ®ve-point ®lter (Liese 1982), which damped wavelengths up to 1.8 km and eliminated those less than 1.2 km. The vertical ve- locities were obtained through downward integration of the anelastic continuity equation starting half a grid- point above the last detectable re¯ectivity at cloud top. Following Hildebrand et al. (1996), the vertical veloc- ities were not corrected for hydrometeor fall speed un- der the assumption that the fall speeds of the mostly ice particles are small. All horizontal velocities are presented as anvil-relative velocities with an anvil- mean wind vector of 15.4 m s21 from 2548 subtracted. Data from two CLASS radiosonde launches are also presented. Both radiosondes were released from the FIG. 1. Composite re¯ectivity derived from the ELDORA re¯ec- same location, also indicated in Fig. 1. The ®rst sound- tivities as the NCAR Electra was ¯ying along the anvil containing ing, launched at 2112 UTC, is representative of the pre- the mammatus clouds. The locations of the two CLASS soundings storm environment while the second sounding, launched are indicated by the 3. The box on the plot indicates the dual-Doppler at 2144 UTC, passed directly through the anvil of the analysis domain. observed storm. While there is no ®rm evidence that the second sounding passed directly through the mam- that have arisen from aircraft measurements of mam- matus ®eld (it passed through the anvil approximately matus. 50 km from the aircraft track), it does pass through the anvil of the same storm and thus is representative of the anvil environment. Comparisons with aircraft as- 2. Data and methods cend±descend temperature pro®les con®rmed that this The radar data analyzed in this study were obtained sounding was representative of the larger anvil region. by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Electra Doppler radar (ELDORA). The design 3. Overview and capabilities of the radar can be found in Hildebrand et al. (1994, 1996). Important to this study is the high On 8 June 1995, a cluster of severe thunderstorms spatial resolution that can be achieved with the ELDORA. over northern Texas and the Oklahoma panhandle were For the case presented here, the VORTEX Convective observed by the ELDORA during VORTEX. These I scanning mode (Wakimoto et al. 1996) was used to storms consisted of a line of convection in the northern collect the data. In this mode, the along-track resolution Texas panhandle and a supercell storm in the Oklahoma (as de®ned by the antenna rotation rate) was approxi- panhandle. The out¯ow anvils of the Texas line merged mately 330 m, with a 150-m gate spacing along the with the Oklahoma storm, creating a mesoscale precip- beam. The crossbeam resolution, in the sweep plane, is itation region of stratiform rain between the two con- approximately 125 m at a distance of 5 km from the vective regions. An extensive ®eld of mammatus clouds radar (where most of the mammatus were observed) and protruded from the base of this anvil between the two 620 m at 25 km from the radar. storms. These mammatus clouds were observed with Re¯ectivity and Doppler velocity measurements ELDORA along the southeastern edge of the anvil as were edited in radar space [using Solo; Oye et al. the Electra ¯ew from the cell in Oklahoma toward the (1995)] to remove ground clutter and sidelobe returns cells in Texas. A photograph (Fig. 2) showing some of before being interpolated onto a Cartesian grid [using these elements was taken from the Electra during this REORDER; Oye (1994)]. Figure 1 shows the location ¯ight leg. of this grid (labeled mesoscale box in Fig. 1) in relation Figure 3 shows re¯ectivity contours on the horizontal to the track of the aircraft and the location of the anvil. slice through the base of the anvil (Z 5 7 km), the slope It covers a large section of that region of the anvil in of which is upward toward the south. The southern part which the mammatus clouds were embedded. The grid- of this domain is below cloud. A cut through the domain Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/27/21 09:51 PM UTC JANUARY 2001 NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE 161 FIG. 2. Photograph from the ELECTRA of the bottom of the anvil containing the mammatus (courtesy W.-C. Lee, NCAR). from south to north ®rst shows the mammatus layer and then the deeper parts of the anvil. Small-scale cellular features, varying in sizes between 1 and 3 km, char- acterize the mammatus layer. Deeper into the anvil these cellular structures gradually merge into a more uniform re¯ectivity pattern (shown in Fig. 6 later in the paper). Some suggestion of a mesoscale organization in the ar- rangement of the cells can be seen. The dashed lines in FIG. 3. Horizontal crosssection at Z 5 7 km through the anvil Fig. 3 indicate an orientation approximately parallel to showing the mammatus elements.
Recommended publications
  • Final Exam December 16, 2004 Name (Print, Last first): Signature: on My Honor, I Have Neither Given Nor Received Unauthorized Aid on This Examination
    21111 21111 Instructor(s): Prof. Seiberling PHYSICS DEPARTMENT MET 1010 Final Exam December 16, 2004 Name (print, last ¯rst): Signature: On my honor, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this examination. YOUR TEST NUMBER IS THE 5-DIGIT NUMBER AT THE TOP OF EACH PAGE. (1) Code your test number on your answer sheet (use 76{80 for the 5-digit number). Code your name on your answer sheet. DARKEN CIRCLES COMPLETELY. Code your UFID number on your answer sheet. (2) Print your name on this sheet and sign it also. (3) Do all scratch work anywhere on this exam that you like. Circle your answers on the test form. At the end of the test, this exam printout is to be turned in. No credit will be given without both answer sheet and printout with scratch work most questions demand. (4) Blacken the circle of your intended answer completely, using a #2 pencil or blue or black ink. Do not make any stray marks or some answers may be counted as incorrect. (5) The answers are rounded o®. Choose the closest to exact. There is no penalty for guessing. (6) Hand in the answer sheet separately. There are 33 multiple choice questions. Clearly circle the one best answer for each question. If more than one answer is marked, no credit will be given for that question, even if one of the marked answers is correct. Guessing an answer is better than leaving it blank. All questions are worth 3 points except 1, marked 4 points. Good Luck! 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Contained in a METAR Example METAR Codes
    METAR METAR is a format for reporting weather information. A METAR weather report is predominantly used by pilots in fulfillment of a part of a pre-flight weather briefing, and by meteorologists, who use aggregated METAR information to assist in weather forecasting. Raw METAR is the most common format in the world for the transmission of observational weather data. [citation needed] It is highly standardized through the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), which allows it to be understood throughout most of the world. Information contained in a METAR A typical METAR contains data for the temperature, dew point, wind speed and direction, precipitation, cloud cover and heights, visibility, and barometric pressure. A METAR may also contain information on precipitation amounts, lightning, and other information that would be of interest to pilots or meteorologists such as a pilot report or PIREP, colour states and runway visual range (RVR). In addition, a short period forecast called a TRED may be added at the end of the METAR covering likely changes in weather conditions in the two hours following the observation. These are in the same format as a Terminal Aerodrome Forecast (TAF). The complement to METARs, reporting forecast weather rather than current weather, are TAFs. METARs and TAFs are used in VOLMET broadcasts. Example METAR codes International METAR codes The following is an example METAR from Burgas Airport in Burgas, Bulgaria. It was taken on 4 February 2005 at 16:00 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). METAR LBBG 041600Z 12003MPS 310V290 1400 R04/P1500 R22/P1500U +S BK022 OVC050 M04/M07 Q1020 OSIG 9949//91= • METAR indicates that the following is a standard hourly observation.
    [Show full text]
  • Metar Abbreviations Metar/Taf List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
    METAR ABBREVIATIONS http://www.alaska.faa.gov/fai/afss/metar%20taf/metcont.htm METAR/TAF LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS $ maintenance check indicator - light intensity indicator that visual range data follows; separator between + heavy intensity / temperature and dew point data. ACFT ACC altocumulus castellanus aircraft mishap MSHP ACSL altocumulus standing lenticular cloud AO1 automated station without precipitation discriminator AO2 automated station with precipitation discriminator ALP airport location point APCH approach APRNT apparent APRX approximately ATCT airport traffic control tower AUTO fully automated report B began BC patches BKN broken BL blowing BR mist C center (with reference to runway designation) CA cloud-air lightning CB cumulonimbus cloud CBMAM cumulonimbus mammatus cloud CC cloud-cloud lightning CCSL cirrocumulus standing lenticular cloud cd candela CG cloud-ground lightning CHI cloud-height indicator CHINO sky condition at secondary location not available CIG ceiling CLR clear CONS continuous COR correction to a previously disseminated observation DOC Department of Commerce DOD Department of Defense DOT Department of Transportation DR low drifting DS duststorm DSIPTG dissipating DSNT distant DU widespread dust DVR dispatch visual range DZ drizzle E east, ended, estimated ceiling (SAO) FAA Federal Aviation Administration FC funnel cloud FEW few clouds FG fog FIBI filed but impracticable to transmit FIRST first observation after a break in coverage at manual station Federal Meteorological Handbook No.1, Surface
    [Show full text]
  • Thunderstorm Anatomy and Dynamics
    THUNDERSTORM ANATOMY AND DYNAMICS An Overview Prepared by LCDR Bill Nisley MR 3421 • Cloud Physics Naval Postgraduate School • Monterey, California [email protected] Photo credits: Thunderstorm Cell and Mammatus Clouds by: Michael Bath; Tornado by Daphne Zaras / NSSL; Supercell Thunderstorm by: AMOS; Wall Cloud by: Greg Michels 1. Introduction The purpose of this paper is to present a broad overview of the various cloud structures displayed during the life cycle of a thunderstorm and the atmospheric dynamics associated with each. Knowledge of atmospheric dynamics provides for a keener understanding of the physical processes related to the “why and how” certain cloud features form. Accordingly, observation of cloud features presents visual queuing of changes in the atmosphere. 2. Thunderstorm Formation and Stages of Development Thunderstorm development is dependent on three basic components: moisture, instability, and some form of lifting mechanism. 2.1 Moisture – As air near the surface is lifted higher in the atmosphere and cooled, available water vapor condenses into small water droplets which form clouds. As condensation of water vapor occurs, latent heat is released making the rising air warmer and less dense than its surroundings (figure 1). The added heat allows the air (parcel) to continue to rise and form an updraft within the developing cloud structure. 2.1.1 In general1, low level moisture increases instability simply by making more latent heat available to the lower atmosphere. Increasing mid level moisture can decrease instability in the atmosphere because moist air is less dense than dry air and therefor is unable to evaporate • Figure 1 – Positive buoyancy / instability as a result of precipitation and cloud droplets as condensation and release of latent heat.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Clouds
    Chapter 6 Clouds Chapter overview • Processes causing saturation o Cooling, moisturizing, mixing • Cloud identification and classification • Cloud Observations • Fog Why do we care about clouds in the atmosphere? Cloud Development Clouds form when air becomes saturated. How can unsaturated air become saturated? • Cooling • Adding moisture • Mixing Cooling and moisturizing The amount of cooling needed for air to become saturated is given by ΔT = Td - T The amount of additional moisture needed for air to become saturated is given by Δr = rs - r The change in temperature (ΔT) or the change in moisture (Δr) can be determined by evaluating the heat or moisture budget of an air parcel. Most clouds form as a result of rising air. How does the temperature and relative humidity of an air parcel change as it rises adiabatically? What processes are responsible for causing air to rise? Cumuliform clouds form in air that rises due to its buoyancy. Stratiform clouds form in are that is forced to rise. Mixing Mixing of two unsaturated air parcels can result in a saturated mixture. Why can the mixing of unsaturated air result in air becoming saturated? What are some examples of air becoming saturated in this way? The temperature and mixing ratio of the mixture can be calculated using: mx = mB + mC mBTB + mCTC Tx = mx mBrB + mCrC rx = mx Where the m is the mass of the air parcel, subscripts B and C indicate the two original air parcels, and subscript X indicates the mixture. Vapor pressure or specific humidity can be used in place in mixing ratio.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Clouds
    Clouds National Meteorological Library and Archive Fact sheet 1 — An introduction to clouds The National Meteorological Library and Archive Many people have an interest in the weather and the processes that cause it, which is why the National Meteorological Library and Archive are open to everyone. Holding one of the most comprehensive collections on meteorology anywhere in the world, the Library and Archive are vital for the maintenance of the public memory of the weather, the storage of meteorological records and as aid of learning. The Library and Archive collections include: • around 300,000 books, charts, atlases, journals, articles, microfiche and scientific papers on meteorology and climatology, for a variety of knowledge levels • audio-visual material including digitised images, slides, photographs, videos and DVDs • daily weather reports for the United Kingdom from 1861 to the present, and from around the world • marine weather log books • a number of the earliest weather diaries dating back to the late 18th century • artefacts, records and charts of historical interest; for example, a chart detailing the weather conditions for the D-Day Landings, the weather records of Scott’s Antarctic expedition from 1911 • rare books, including a 16th century edition of Aristotle’s Meteorologica, held on behalf of the Royal Meteorological Society • a display of meteorological equipment and artefacts For more information about the Library and Archive please see our website at: www.metoffice.gov.uk/learning/library Introduction A cloud is an aggregate of very small water droplets, ice crystals, or a mixture of both, with its base above the Earth’s surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Weather Observations and Reports
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE/ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL COORDINATOR FOR METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES AND SUPPORTING RESEARCH FEDERAL METEOROLOGICAL HANDBOOK No. 1 Surface Weather Observations andReports FCM-H1-1995 Washington, D.C. December 1995 FEDERAL COORDINATOR FOR METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES AND SUPPORTING RESEARCH 8455 COLESVILLE ROAD, SUITE 1500 SILVER SPRING, MARYLAND 20910 FEDERAL METEOROLOGICAL HANDBOOK NUMBER 1 SURFACE WEATHER OBSERVATIONS AND REPORTS FCM-H1-1995 Washington, D.C. December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
    [Show full text]
  • 1455189355674.Pdf
    THE STORYTeller’S THESAURUS FANTASY, HISTORY, AND HORROR JAMES M. WARD AND ANNE K. BROWN Cover by: Peter Bradley LEGAL PAGE: Every effort has been made not to make use of proprietary or copyrighted materi- al. Any mention of actual commercial products in this book does not constitute an endorsement. www.trolllord.com www.chenaultandgraypublishing.com Email:[email protected] Printed in U.S.A © 2013 Chenault & Gray Publishing, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Storyteller’s Thesaurus Trademark of Cheanult & Gray Publishing. All Rights Reserved. Chenault & Gray Publishing, Troll Lord Games logos are Trademark of Chenault & Gray Publishing. All Rights Reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS THE STORYTeller’S THESAURUS 1 FANTASY, HISTORY, AND HORROR 1 JAMES M. WARD AND ANNE K. BROWN 1 INTRODUCTION 8 WHAT MAKES THIS BOOK DIFFERENT 8 THE STORYTeller’s RESPONSIBILITY: RESEARCH 9 WHAT THIS BOOK DOES NOT CONTAIN 9 A WHISPER OF ENCOURAGEMENT 10 CHAPTER 1: CHARACTER BUILDING 11 GENDER 11 AGE 11 PHYSICAL AttRIBUTES 11 SIZE AND BODY TYPE 11 FACIAL FEATURES 12 HAIR 13 SPECIES 13 PERSONALITY 14 PHOBIAS 15 OCCUPATIONS 17 ADVENTURERS 17 CIVILIANS 18 ORGANIZATIONS 21 CHAPTER 2: CLOTHING 22 STYLES OF DRESS 22 CLOTHING PIECES 22 CLOTHING CONSTRUCTION 24 CHAPTER 3: ARCHITECTURE AND PROPERTY 25 ARCHITECTURAL STYLES AND ELEMENTS 25 BUILDING MATERIALS 26 PROPERTY TYPES 26 SPECIALTY ANATOMY 29 CHAPTER 4: FURNISHINGS 30 CHAPTER 5: EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS 31 ADVENTurer’S GEAR 31 GENERAL EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS 31 2 THE STORYTeller’s Thesaurus KITCHEN EQUIPMENT 35 LINENS 36 MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL METEOROLOGICAL HANDBOOK No. 12
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE/ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL COORDINATOR FOR METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES AND SUPPORTING RESEARCH FEDERAL METEOROLOGICAL HANDBOOK No. 12 United States Meteorological Codesand Coding Practices Academia General Public Codes Private Federal FCM-H12-1998 Industry Government Washington, D.C. December 1998 THE FEDERAL COMMITTEE FOR METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES AND SUPPORTING RESEARCH (FCMSSR) DR. D. JAMES BAKER, Chairman MR. MONTE BELGER Department of Commerce Department of Transportation MR. ALBERT PETERLIN MR. MICHAEL J. ARMSTRONG Department of Agriculture Federal Emergency Management Agency MR. JOHN J. KELLY, JR. DR. GHASSEM R. ASRAR Department of Commerce National Aeronautics and Space Administration CAPT DAVID MARTIN, USN Department of Defense DR. ROBERT W. CORELL National Science Foundation DR. ARISTIDES PATRINOS Department of Energy MR. BENJAMIN BERMAN National Transportation Safety Board DR. ROBERT M. HIRSCH Department of the Interior MS. MARGARET V. FEDERLINE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MR. RALPH BRAIBANTI Department of State MR. FRANCIS SCHIERMEIER Environmental Protection Agency MR. RANDOLPH LYON Office of Management and Budget MR. SAMUEL P. WILLIAMSON Federal Coordinator MR. JAMES B. HARRISON, Executive Secretary Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research THE INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES AND SUPPORTING RESEARCH (ICMSSR) MR. SAMUEL P. WILLIAMSON, Chairman DR. JONATHAN M. BERKSON Federal Coordinator United States Coast Guard Department of Transportation DR. RAYMOND MOTHA Department of Agriculture MR. FRANCIS SCHIERMEIER Environmental Protection Agency MR. JOHN E. JONES, JR. Department of Commerce DR. FRANK Y. TSAI Federal Emergency Management Agency CAPT DAVID MARTIN, USN Department of Defense DR. RAMESH KAKAR National Aeronautics and Space MR.
    [Show full text]
  • Meteorology Practice Exam 3: Chapters 11-14
    Name: ______________________ Class: _________________ Date: _________ ID: A Meteorology Practice Exam 3: Chapters 11-14 Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. ____ 1. Squall lines most often form ahead of a: a. cold front. b. warm front. c. cold-type occluded front. d. warm-type occluded front. e. stationary front. ____ 2. The origin of cP and cA air masses that enter the United States is: a. Northern Siberia. b. Northern Atlantic Ocean. c. Antarctica. d. Northern Canada and Alaska. ____ 3. Which of the following statements is most plausible? a. In winter, cP source regions have higher temperatures than mT source regions. b. In summer, mP source regions have higher temperatures than cT source regions. c. In winter, cA source regions have lower temperatures than cP source regions. d. In summer, mT source regions have lower temperatures than mP source regions. e. They are all equally plausible. ____ 4. Compared to an mP air mass, mT air is ____. a. warmer and drier b. warmer and moister c. colder and drier d. colder and moister ____ 5. One would expect a cP air mass to be: a. cold and dry. b. cold and moist. c. warm and dry. d. warm and moist. ____ 6. What type of air mass would be responsible for refreshing cool, dry breezes after a long summer hot spell in the Central Plains? a. mP b. mT c. cP d. cT ____ 7. Generally, the greatest lake effect snow fall will be on the ____ shore of the Great Lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Classifications and Characteristics
    By Ted Funk Science and Operations Officer Cloud Classifications and Characteristics Clouds are classified according to their height above and appearance (texture) from the ground. The following cloud roots and translations summarize the components of this classification system: 1) Cirro-: curl of hair, high; 2) Alto-: mid; 3) Strato-: layer; 4) Nimbo-: rain, precipitation; and 5) Cumulo-: heap. Cirrus clouds (above) High-level clouds: High-level clouds occur above about 20,000 feet and are given the prefix “cirro.” Due to cold tropospheric temperatures at these levels, the clouds primarily are composed of ice crystals, and often appear thin, streaky, and white (although a low sun angle, e.g., near sunset, can create an array of color on the clouds). The three main types of high clouds are cirrus, cirrostratus, and cirrocumulus. Cirrus clouds are wispy, feathery, and composed entirely of ice crystals. They often Cirrostratus clouds (above) are the first sign of an approaching warm front or upper-level jet streak. Unlike cirrus, cirrostratus clouds form more of a widespread, veil-like layer (similar to what stratus clouds do in low levels). When sunlight or moonlight passes through the hexagonal- shaped ice crystals of cirrostratus clouds, the light is dispersed or refracted (similar to light passing through a prism) in such a way that a familiar ring or halo may form. As a warm front approaches, cirrus clouds tend to thicken into cirrostratus, which may, in turn, thicken and lower into altostratus, stratus, and even nimbostratus. Cirrocumulus clouds (above) Finally, cirrocumulus clouds are layered clouds permeated with small cumuliform lumpiness.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on “The Mysteries of Mammatus Clouds: Observations and Formation Mechanisms”
    MARCH 2008 NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE 1093 Comments on “The Mysteries of Mammatus Clouds: Observations and Formation Mechanisms” CHARLES A. DOSWELL III Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, Norman, Oklahoma (Manuscript received and in final form 22 January 2007) In an intriguing paper, Schultz et al. (2006, hereafter fingers comes to produce a layered, steplike profile of S06) have reviewed observations of mammatus clouds the constituents (Turner 1973, 270–273; Gregg 1973). in the scientific literature and offered some candidate The detailed view of stepped temperature profiles (pro- mechanisms for the formation of mammatus. This rea- ducing very shallow superadiabatic lapse rates in the sonably comprehensive review is both interesting and temperature profiles) in Fig. 10 of S06 could be consid- stimulating. I concur with the authors that although ered compatible with the oceanographic observations. mammatus cloud formations have little or no direct so- Turner (1973, p. 270) is careful to point out that layer- cietal impact, they are a fascinating enigma, certainly ing need not be the result of double-diffusive convec- worthy of careful scientific scrutiny. tion, but this observation is at least consistent with the One candidate mechanism they did not mention, hypothesis of the presence of double-diffusive convec- however, is what is known in oceanography as “double- tion. diffusive convection” (Turner 1973, p. 251 ff.). Its most How might this process be associated with mamma- well-known application is to the thermohaline flows tus clouds? The presence of particulates that are heavi- known as “salt fingers.” The physical mechanism is that er than air in a “colloidal” solution would play a role the fluid has two constituents that contribute in oppos- comparable to that of salinity—acting to increase the ing ways to buoyancy; increased salinity makes the wa- overall density of the air-particulate mixture.
    [Show full text]