Professionalism Among Novice Teachers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Professionalism Among Novice Teachers Professionalism among novice teachers How they think, act, cope and perceive knowledge Ph.D. thesis Joakim Caspersen 1 In the public debate on school and education in our country, the issue of how to organise general teacher education is one of the most important. This makes sense, as teacher education is one of the central elements in the nation’s schooling. Both men and women are trained to teach at the elementary school that every child attends … no matter what paths they later choose. The effort to create the best possible teachers in elementary school is therefore one of the most important elements in upbringing the citizens and providing opportunities for education to the entire population. It is often said, but nonetheless true, that teacher quality and competence are more decisive for how well elementary schools work than curricula, textbooks, teaching styles and the organisation of schools. (Lange 1947, p.1 own translation). The beginning … teacher starts out … with a fine set of liberal values and a fine set of phrases to accompany them. These ideals … are precarious cargo for the tender-minded teacher; to keep them one must have a considerable power to ignore reality (Hansot 1989, p. 127). 2 Table of contents 1.0. Introduction – novice teachers in schools ............................................................................... 7 1.1. The importance of novice teachers’ coping and competence .......................................... 10 1.2. Qualification of teachers in teacher education and schools ............................................. 11 1.3. The need for comparative research .................................................................................. 12 1.4. The theoretical approach – professionalism and learning ................................................ 14 1.5. Summary ............................................................................................................................ 17 1.6. The structure of the thesis ................................................................................................ 17 2.0. Previous research on novice teachers ................................................................................... 18 2.1. Early research on novice teachers ..................................................................................... 19 2.2. More recent approaches to novice teachers’ experiences ............................................... 25 2.2.1. The different phases of being a novice ..................................................................... 25 2.2.2. How schools accommodate novice teachers ............................................................ 26 2.2.3. Where do novice teachers learn to teach ................................................................. 30 2.2.4. The role of teacher education ................................................................................... 32 2.3. Teachers compared with other professions ...................................................................... 35 2.4. Summary ............................................................................................................................ 41 3.0. Theoretical framework: professionalism and learning ......................................................... 43 3.1. Two lines of approaches to professions ............................................................................ 43 3.2. From professions to professionalism ................................................................................ 46 3.2.1. Professional knowledge and competence ...................................................................... 49 3.2.2. Professional autonomy and service-orientation ............................................................. 51 3.2.3. Education and learning in theories of professions .......................................................... 54 3 3.3. Learning and professional development ........................................................................... 55 3.3.1. Learning in the workplace ......................................................................................... 58 3.3.2. Models for work-place learning ................................................................................ 60 3.3.3. Newer developments in theories of learning ............................................................ 64 3.4. Summary and questions for investigation ......................................................................... 68 4.0. Norwegian teacher education in a comparative perspective ............................................... 73 4.1. Some key points in the historical development of Norwegian teacher education ........... 73 4.2. Norwegian general teacher education in a Nordic context .............................................. 78 4.3. Summary ............................................................................................................................ 82 5.0. Methodological considerations and approaches .................................................................. 84 5.1. Participants, respondents and response rates .................................................................. 84 5.1.1. Paper 1 ....................................................................................................................... 86 5.1.2. Paper 2 ....................................................................................................................... 87 5.1.3. Paper 3 ....................................................................................................................... 87 5.1.4. Paper 4 ....................................................................................................................... 89 5.2. Attrition and validity .......................................................................................................... 91 5.3. Variation between institutions and panels ....................................................................... 93 5.4. Methods and techniques ................................................................................................... 96 5.5. Indexes and items – reliability and validity ....................................................................... 97 5.5.1. Professional knowledge and competence................................................................. 99 5.5.2. Autonomy ................................................................................................................ 101 5.5.3. Service orientation .................................................................................................. 103 5.5.4. School culture and climate ...................................................................................... 104 5.5.5. Coping ...................................................................................................................... 104 4 5.5.6. Bias in the measures ................................................................................................ 105 5.6. Ethical considerations...................................................................................................... 106 6.0. Results and discussion ......................................................................................................... 108 6.1. Summary of the four papers ........................................................................................... 108 6.2. The findings and contributions of the project ................................................................. 114 6.3. Novice teachers’ coping and the “shock” of teaching ..................................................... 115 6.4. Novice teachers’ learning at work ................................................................................... 117 6.5. The role and purpose of teacher education .................................................................... 119 6.6. Autonomy, reforms and teachers in a pinch ................................................................... 122 6.7. Disadvantages and advantages of combining different theoretical perspectives .......... 124 6.8. The way forward – and some limitations ........................................................................ 125 6.9. Concluding remarks ......................................................................................................... 130 References ....................................................................................................................................... 132 Appendix 1. Additional descriptive statistics for teachers in paper 1. Indexes, items, scale, reliability (Chronbach’s alpha), mean, standard deviation. ........................................................ 155 Appendix 2. Additional descriptive statistics for teachers in paper 2. Indexes, items, scale, reliability (Chronbach’s alpha), mean, standard deviation ......................................................... 156 Appendix 3. Additional descriptive statistics for teachers in paper 3. Indexes, items, scale, reliability (Chronbach’s alpha), mean, standard deviation ......................................................... 158 Appendix 4. Additional descriptive statistics for teachers and teacher educators in paper 4. Groups, variables, relative group size, mean, standard deviation .............................................. 160 Appendix 5. The recruitment and development of number of teachers in Norway ................... 161 Paper I: ...........................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Bitstream – Capacity Building for Innovation
    Bitstream – Capacity Building for Innovation Final Report Mikael Söderström, Umeå Universitet Ulf Hedestig, Umeå Universitet Terje Fallmyr, Universitetet i Nordland Kjell Ellingsen, Universitetet i Nordland Hallstein Hegerholm, Høgskolen i Nesna Geir-Tore Klæboe, Høgskolen i Nesna WP-14.01 ISSN:1401-4580 Department of Informatics 1 Acknowledgments The project is financed by the European Interreg Botnia Atlantica and following partners 2 Introduction The report presents the realization of and results from the Botnia Atlantica funded project BitStream – Capacity Building for Innovation. The project started March 15 2013 and ended October 31 2014. Originally the project was scheduled to end April 15 2014, but for several reasons the project applied for and was granted extension until October 31 2014. The coordinating funding receiver has been Umeå University and the other Swedish partners has been the municipalities of Sorsele and Storuman. In Norway the partners has been Nesna University College, University of Nordland, the municipal of Bodø and the Norwegian National Collection Agency in Mo i Rana. In short, Bitstream is based on the starting-point that successful development of public administration requires good understanding of how its activities are conducted and how they are perceived by its citizens/customers. This means that process mapping and subsequent process analysis and impact mapping is a fundamental condition for innovative business development aimed at creating ICT innovations in the form of, for example, mobile apps or web-based services. The main objective of the project was to create a transnational platform for capacity building and exchange of experiences in the area of innovative business development.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing Borders Between Education and Work- Places
    CROSSING BORDERS BETWEEN EDUCATION AND WORK- PLACES Hallstein Hegerholm, Nesna University College, NO, [email protected] Ulf Hedestig, University of Umeå, SE, [email protected] Geir-Tore Klæbo, Nesna University College, NO, [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper presents a case study on workplace learning were Swedish and Norwegian public authorities participated in an academic course in business process modelling. The aim has been to develop an un- derstanding of how partners in a transnational project can build bridges between the academic teaching and the students’ local learning at work. A sociocultural framework was applied in the study focusing on the use of tools, the building of knowledge and learning in the zone of proximal development, the crossing of boarders, and interaction and networking between activities. The source of data consisted of inter- views, surveys, observations, data from learning management system, and student’s reports. Analyse of the data was based on four dialogical learning mechanisms – identification, coordination, reflection and transformation. Our findings show that students’ local cases acted as key drivers for their developmental process, as the course transformed from distribution of information to case based knowledge building process at local work places. A mutual learning process occurred when teacher and students taught each other in a zone of proximal development. Further, the use of business model techniques made the inter- pretation of academic discipline easier, since it created a common language that served as a foundation for shared understanding when they discussed their local cases. Keywords: workplace learning, sociocultural framework. 1 INTRODUCTION The case in this study is the BitStream project where participants move between flexible, organized, aca- demic education and work.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 1.Pdf (1.436Mb)
    Education across borders Towards e-Didactics of International Module in Socio-cultural Aspects of ICT Editors: Beata Godejord Elzbieta Perzycka Pris kr. 120,- ISBN 978-82-7569-197-0 ISSN 1501-6889 2011, nr. 1 Om Fredrikke Tønder Olsen (1856-1931) Fredrikke Tønder Olsen ble født på handelsstedet Kopardal, beliggende i nåværende Dønna kommune. Det berettes at Fredrikke tidlig viste sin begavelse gjennom stor interesse for tegning, malerkunst og litteratur. Hva angår det siste leste hun allerede som ung jente ”Amtmannens døtre”. Kildene forteller at Fredrikke levde et fascinerende og spennende liv til tross for sine handikap som svaksynt og tunghørt. Hun måtte avbryte sin karriere som gravørlærling fordi synet sviktet. Fredrikke hadde som motto: ”Er du halt, er du lam, har du vilje kjem du fram.” Fredrikke Tønder Olsen skaffet seg agentur som forsikringsagent, og var faktisk den første nordiske, kvinnelige forsikringsagent. Fredrikke ble kjent som en dyktig agent som gjorde et utmerket arbeid, men etter 7 år måtte hun slutte siden synet sviktet helt. Fredrikke oppdaget fort behovet for visergutter, og startet Norges første viserguttbyrå. Hun var kjent som en dyktig og framtidsrettet bedriftsleder, der hun viste stor omsorg for sine ansatte. Blant annet innførte hun som den første bedrift i Norge vinterferie for sine ansatte. Samtidig var hun ei aktiv kvinnesakskvinne. Hun stilte gratis leseværelse for kvinner, inspirerte dem til utdanning og hjalp dem med litteratur. Blant hennes andre meritter i kvinnesaken kan nevnes at hun opprettet et legat på kr. 30 000,- for kvinner; var æresmedlem i kvinnesaksforeningen i mange år; var med på å starte kvinnesaksbladet ”Norges kvinder” som hun senere regelmessig støttet økonomisk.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bologna Process and Heis Institutional Autonomy
    Athens Journal of Education - Volume 7, Issue 4, November 2020 – Pages 364-384 The Bologna Process and HEIs Institutional Autonomy By Linda Helén Haukland The Bologna Process has made a strong impact on the development of European higher education, although the greatest impact has not been from the process itself, but from the national reforms introduced along with it. With a relatively young higher education system, Norway was ahead of most European countries in implementing the Bologna Process and reforms indirectly linked to it. Due to path dependencies and the Higher Education Institutions being, to a certain extent, autonomous and carriers of their own culture, we cannot draw conclusions at the local level without empirical studies. Therefore, the case of Nord University shows us how this process directly and indirectly affected Higher Education Institutions in Norway. The Higher Education Institutions (HEI) integrated horizontally in an education system that was increasingly hierarchical and competitive. The need for standardisation in order to secure equality and efficiency, and the demand for greater autonomy in the HEIs was answered by strengthening some and weakening other forms of institutional autonomy along with the establishment of a new accreditation system. Three dimensions of autonomy are touched on in this study. Firstly, the question of who has decision-making power in the HEIs defines whether they are ruled by professional or administrative autonomy. Secondly, the question of the HEIs’ mission is decided either by the HEI itself, representing substantive autonomy, or by external demands on production and external funding, representing what I call beneficial autonomy. Finally, the question of how the HEIs fulfil their mission decides whether they have individual autonomy or procedural autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty for Biosciences and Aquaculture Annual Report 2016
    FACULTY FOR BIOSCIENCES AND AQUACULTURE ANNUAL REPORT 2016 We educate for the future! MILESTONES IN 2016 NEW UNIVERSITY FIRST CLASS TO GRADUATE AS DOCTORS Nord University was established on 1 January 2016 as OF VETERINARY MEDICINE AT UVMP a result of a merger between the former University of The cooperation with the University of Veterinary Nordland, Nesna University College and Nord-Trøn- Medicine and Pharmacy (UVMP) in Slovakia is part of delag University College. It was a big milestone. The FBA’s international profile. The joint degree of Joint Board adopted a new faculty structure with five Bachelor in Animal Science constitutes the corner- faculties in June 2016. The “old FBA” in Bodø and stone of the cooperation. The first 11 veterinarians the “green” sectors in animal science and nature graduated in 2016. They started their studies in Bodø management at Steinkjer became a new Faculty of in 2010 and completed their bachelor’s degree in Biosciences and Aquaculture (FBA). Formally, the 2013. In June 2016 they got their degree in veteri- new faculty was established on 1.1.2017, and gave nary medicine, and were ready to start practice in FBA a solid growth both in number of employees Norway or other countries they wish to work. All and students. graduates had relevant work to go to the day they received their diploma. In the coming years, this Several processes and meetings among new collea- cooperation between FBA and UVMP, with study gues were carried out at both university and faculty starting in Bodø, will educate ± 25 veterinarians - a level during 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Council of the University of the Arctic: Strides in Strategic Development
    Report to the Senior Arctic Officials of the Arctic Council Narvik, Norway November 28-29, 2007 University of the Arctic International Secretariat University of Lapland Report to the Senior Arctic Officials of the Arctic Council November 2007 Introduction The University of the Arctic (UArctic) is a cooperative network of universities, colleges, and other organizations committed to higher education and research in the North. UArctic constitutes 110 members from around the Arctic; 87 higher education institutions and 33 other organizations. It is now 10 years since the early idea of a University of the Arctic came from a small group of individuals at an AMAP meeting, leading to a proposal to the Senior Arctic Officials (SAOs). This proposal envisaged a geographically dispersed institution that would combine the strengths of existing establishments by bringing together students and staff. Benefits would include the sharing of Arctic knowledge, costs of expensive and/or underused facilities, and expanded opportunities for access to education among the region's residents, in particular, for the indigenous peoples of the region. The SAO’s mandated a feasibility study on the University of the Arctic, and the process led to the Iqualuit Declaration of 1998 where the Ministers, "welcome, and are pleased to announce the establishment of the University of the Arctic, a university without walls...". The official Launch of the University of the Arctic occurred in Rovaniemi, Finland, on June 12, 2001, in conjunction with the celebration of the 10th anniversary of the Rovaniemi process. In the years following the Launch, membership has increased steadily and the administrative structures to support governance and programs have been consolidated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bologna Process and Heis Institutional Autonomy
    Athens Journal of Education - Volume 7, Issue 4, November 2020 – Pages 365-384 The Bologna Process and HEIs Institutional Autonomy By Linda Helén Haukland The Bologna Process has made a strong impact on the development of European higher education, although the greatest impact has not been from the process itself, but from the national reforms introduced along with it. With a relatively young higher education system, Norway was ahead of most European countries in implementing the Bologna Process and reforms indirectly linked to it. Due to path dependencies and the Higher Education Institutions being, to a certain extent, autonomous and carriers of their own culture, we cannot draw conclusions at the local level without empirical studies. Therefore, the case of Nord University shows us how this process directly and indirectly affected Higher Education Institutions in Norway. The Higher Education Institutions (HEI) integrated horizontally in an education system that was increasingly hierarchical and competitive. The need for standardisation in order to secure equality and efficiency, and the demand for greater autonomy in the HEIs was answered by strengthening some and weakening other forms of institutional autonomy along with the establishment of a new accreditation system. Three dimensions of autonomy are touched on in this study. Firstly, the question of who has decision-making power in the HEIs defines whether they are ruled by professional or administrative autonomy. Secondly, the question of the HEIs’ mission is decided either by the HEI itself, representing substantive autonomy, or by external demands on production and external funding, representing what I call beneficial autonomy. Finally, the question of how the HEIs fulfil their mission decides whether they have individual autonomy or procedural autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Harald Nilsen, Nesna University/College
    Language learning – additional learning – learning environment – teacher’s role Classroom studies in Czech Republic and Poland Harald Nilsen Pris kr. 70,- ISBN 82-7569-158-1 ISSN 1501-6889 2007, nr. 5 Om Fredrikke Tønder Olsen (1856-1931) Fredrikke Tønder Olsen ble født på handelsstedet Kopardal, beliggende i nåværende Dønna kommune. Det berettes at Fredikke tidlig viste sin begavelse gjennom stor interesse for tegning, malerkunst og litteratur. Hva angår det siste leste hun allerede som ung jente ”Amtmannens døtre”. Kildene forteller at Fredrikke levde et fascinerende og spennende liv til tross for sine handikap som svaksynt og tunghørt. Hun måtte avbryte sin karriere som gravørlærling fordi synet sviktet. Fredrikke hadde som motto: ”Er du halt, er du lam, har du vilje kjem du fram.” Fredrikke Tønder Olsen skaffet seg agentur som forsikringsagent, og var faktisk den første nordiske, kvinnelige forsikringsagent. Fredrikke ble kjent som en dyktig agent som gjorde et utmerket arbeid, men etter 7 år måtte hun slutte siden synet sviktet helt. Fredrikke oppdaget fort behovet for visergutter, og startet Norges første viserguttbyrå. Hun var kjent som en dyktig og framtidsrettet bedriftsleder, der hun viste stor omsorg for sine ansatte. Blant annet innførte hun som den første bedrift i Norge vinterferie for sine ansatte. Samtidig var hun ei aktiv kvinnesakskvinne. Hun stilte gratis leseværelse for kvinner, inspirerte dem til utdanning og hjalp dem med litteratur. Blant hennes andre meritter i kvinnesaken kan nevnes at hun opprettet et legat på kr. 30 000,- for kvinner; var æresmedlem i kvinnesaksforeningen i mange år; var med på å starte kvinnesaksbladet ”Norges kvinder” som hun senere regelmessig støttet økonomisk.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Richness Research Method
    Nina Scott Frisch Ways of talking about drawing practices Nina Scott Frisch Ways of talking about drawing practices Sociocultural views: Gombrich and visually controlled drawing Abstract In this article, I explore how part of the culture historian professor Ernst Gombrich’s vocabulary can be used in two examples of today’s drawing processes among children (age 9–12). His terms are related to their possible theoretical origin and placed in sociocultural understandings of human activity—and contrasted with other possible useful terms in a drawing-teaching context. How terms can encourage various teaching practices is then discussed. Keywords: sociocultural theory, drawing teaching, concepts, Gombrich, visual controlled drawing Introduction The words we use are very often part of concepts, or ways of thinking, that lead to various practices. In the field of drawing teaching, this is also the case, so in this article I will shed light on the need for us as educators in the school-subject art and crafts to sharpen our curiosity about and awareness of the various theoretical origins vocabularies in drawing teaching might have. First, I must acknowledge the vast contribution to the debate on the philosophical and theoretical mysteries of visual expression made by such giants in the field as Rudolf Arnheim (1954/1974/1984, 1962), Brent and Marjorie Wilson (1977; Wilson, 2004), Victor Lowenfeld (1947/1957/1979), Kindler and Darras (1997), Willats (2005) and not least Ernst Gombrich (1960/1992), to whom I will refer throughout this article. These theorists propose possible answers to significant and eternal questions, such as, is the making and understanding of human visual expression individual-centered or culture-centered? They developed such terms as configurational signs, programs (Wilson & Wilson, 1977), initial imagery, iconicity level, hyper-generic tendency (Kindler & Darras, 1997), and drawing systems (Willats, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Young Norwegian Students' Preferences for Learning Activities
    Tom Klepaker is Associate Professor at University of Bergen, Norway. He has a long experience in teacher training educa- tion. He has been involved in several studies of science education in Norwegian schools, mainly studying the effects of new curricula both in primary and secondary schools. He has had a special focus on the importance of practical activities in science teaching and the gender aspect in science. Siv Flæsen Almendingen is Associate Professor at Nesna University College, Norway, where she has a long experience in teacher training education. She has taken a special interest in outdoor education. Almendingen has been a member of the research group evaluating the national curriculum (R97) with respect to the science subject. At present she is engaged in a Ph. D. project exploring young students’ interests in future occupations related to science. Johannes Tveita has a life-long experience in teacher training education at Nesna University College where he holds a position as Professor. He has taken part in several studies with developing and testing teaching programmes based on constructivist learning theory. He has also written textbooks applying constructivist theory in teaching electricity and the kinetic particle model. Tveita was project leader of the national project evaluating the national curriculum (R97) with respect to the science subject. TOM KLEPAKER University of Bergen, Norway [email protected] SIV FLÆSEN ALMENDINGEN Nesna University College Norway, [email protected] JOHANNES TVEITA Nesna University College Norway, [email protected] Young Norwegian students’ preferences for learning activities and the influence of these activities on the students’ attitudes to and performance in science Abstract This study focuses on the use and effects of “Student-active teaching practice” in science in Norwegian schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Education Management and Policy – Volume 18, No. 2
    « Journal of the Programme on Institutional Management Volume 18, Volume No. 2 Higher Education Management and Policy Journal of the Programme in Higher Education on Institutional Management Higher Education Management and Policy in Higher Education Volume 18, No. 2 CONTENTS Managing the Unmanageable: The Management of Research in Research-Intensive Universities Higher Education John Taylor 9 Management and Policy Incorporation and University Governance: A Comparative Perspective from China and Japan Futao Huang 35 The Professional Doctorate: From Anglo-Saxon to European Challenges Jeroen Huisman and Rajani Naidoo 51 Widening Access through Partnerships with Working Life Andrew Casson 65 The Politics of Access: Measuring the Social Returns on Post-secondary Education Michael Conlon 77 Evaluation of the Competence Reform in Norway: Access to Higher Education Based on Non-formal Learning Vibeke Opheim and Håvard Helland 87 Where are the Boys? Gender Imbalance in Higher Education Fred Evers, John Livernois and Maureen Mancuso 103 Promoting a Lifelong Learning Society in China: The Attempts by Tsinghua University Aiyi Wang, Gilsun Song and Feiyu Kang 117 Subscribers to this printed periodical are entitled to free online access. If you do not yet have online access via your institution's network contact your librarian or, if you subscribe personally, send an email to [email protected] www.oecd.org ISSN 1682-3451 2006 SUBSCRIPTION � �� (3 ISSUES) 89 2006 02 1 P -:HRLGSC=XYZUUU: Volume 18, No. 2 Volume 18, No. 2 JOURNAL OF THE PROGRAMME ON INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION Higher Education Management and Policy Volume 18, No. 2 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 30 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Eric Kimathi Political Affairs Officer ISU Norway Universities and University Colleges (State Owned)
    Eric Kimathi Political Affairs Officer ISU Norway Universities And University Colleges (State Owned) University Colleges (20) Universities (8) 1. Oslo and Akershus university college of applied sciences 1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU, 3 campuses) 2. Saami University College 2. Norwegian University of Life sciences (NMBU) 3. Bergen Academy of Art and Design 3. University of Oslo 4. Oslo National Academy of the Arts 4. University of Bergen 5. Bergen University College 5. University of Stavanger 6. Buskerud and Vestfold University College (Kongsberg) 6. University of Tromsø The Arctic University of Norway 7. Gjøvik University College 7. University of Agder (Kristiansand) 8. Harstad University College 8. University of Nordland (Bodø) 9. Hedmark University College 10. Lillehammer University College Specialized University Colleges (5) 11. Narvik University College 1. The Oslo School of Architecture and Design 12. Nesna University College 2. Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration 13. Nord-Trøndelag University College (Steinkjer) (Bergen) 14. Sogn og Fjordane University College 3. Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (Oslo) 15. Stord/Haugesund University College 4. Norwegian State Academy of Music (Oslo) 16. Sør-Trøndelag University College (Trondheim) 5. Molde University College - Specialized University in 17. Telemark University College Logistics . 18. Volda University College 19. Østfold University College (Halden) Source: Ministry of Education and Research Wesbsite. 20. Ålesund University College www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/kd/organisation/kunnska psdepartementets-etater-og- NB: 23 private higher education institutions receive virksomheter/Subordinate-agencies-2/state-run- government support. universities-and-university-co/id434505/ What Is Free Education? Free education refers to education that is open for all and which is funded through state taxation system rather than charging students tuition fees Rationale For Free Education • Sustainable Dev.
    [Show full text]