DOCSLIB.ORG

Council of the University of the Arctic: Strides in Strategic Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Report to the Senior Arctic Officials of the Arctic Council Narvik, Norway November 28-29, 2007 University of the Arctic International Secretariat University of Lapland Report to the Senior Arctic Officials of the Arctic Council November 2007 Introduction The University of the Arctic (UArctic) is a cooperative network of universities, colleges, and other organizations committed to higher education and research in the North. UArctic constitutes 110 members from around the Arctic; 87 higher education institutions and 33 other organizations. It is now 10 years since the early idea of a University of the Arctic came from a small group of individuals at an AMAP meeting, leading to a proposal to the Senior Arctic Officials (SAOs). This proposal envisaged a geographically dispersed institution that would combine the strengths of existing establishments by bringing together students and staff. Benefits would include the sharing of Arctic knowledge, costs of expensive and/or underused facilities, and expanded opportunities for access to education among the region's residents, in particular, for the indigenous peoples of the region. The SAO’s mandated a feasibility study on the University of the Arctic, and the process led to the Iqualuit Declaration of 1998 where the Ministers, "welcome, and are pleased to announce the establishment of the University of the Arctic, a university without walls...". The official Launch of the University of the Arctic occurred in Rovaniemi, Finland, on June 12, 2001, in conjunction with the celebration of the 10th anniversary of the Rovaniemi process. In the years following the Launch, membership has increased steadily and the administrative structures to support governance and programs have been consolidated. UArctic's programs and activities have steadily progressed from the planning stage to full implementation. UArctic has since reported regularly on its development to its forefathers, the SAO's. The following presentation will give a very brief overview of new achievements, in particular focusing on upcoming events and actions that could be relevant to the work of the SAO's and the Arctic Council working groups and programs. Furthermpre, the presentation will address the need for strengthened cooperation among Arctic states in Science and Higher Education. UArctic established the UArctic Rectors’ Forum in March 2007. The next Rectors Forum will be organized in Rovaniemi, Finland, on February 27-29, 2007 in cooperation with the Standing Committee of Parliamentarians of the Arctic Region. The SAO’s are invited to send a representative to the meeting. UArctic routinely presents a written status report to the SAO’s; enclosed. In addition, the UArctic Annual Report 2006 is enclosed. Council of the University of the Arctic: Strides in Strategic Development The annual Council of UArctic meeting with The Board of Governors is UArctic’s representatives of UArctic members was held in highest decision making body. The Arkhangelsk, Russia, in June 2007. Several key members of the Board are elected decisions were made at the meeting which will influence by the Council. Board’s highest priority is to organize UArctic’s UArctic’s development in the years to come. Firstly, The fundraising activities. Council welcomed six new members to sit on the Board of Governors: • Steve Jones, Chancellor, University of Alaska Fairbanks, US • Lauri Lantto, Rector, Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Finland • Alexander Krylov, Vice-Rector, Pomor State University, Russia • Emőke J.E. Szathmáry, President, University of Manitoba, Canada • Barry Scherr, Provost, Dartmouth College, US • Andy Greenshaw, Associate Vice-President (Research), University of Alberta, Canada The Board will have its next meeting in Alaska, Fairbanks, on October 25-26, 2007, hosted by the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. The Boad will choose a chair from among its ranks at that point. The Council also elected new Officers to lead its work for the next three-year period: Claudia Fedorova from Sakha The Council of UArctic develops, State Republic as Chair, Margaret Imrie from Aurora adopts, and oversees the College, Canada, as Vice-Chair and Geir Gotaas from academic programs of the Tromso University, Norway as Secretary. University. The Council is composed of representatives of members. The UArctic membership reached 110 when the Council accepted the following new members: • Abisko Scientific Research Station, Sweden • The Barents Institute, Norway • Nordland Research Institute, Norway • Northwest Community College, Canada • The Resource Centre for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (GÁLDU), Norway • Royal Military College of Canada • State Polar Academy, Russia • University of Stockholm, Sweden • University of Winnipeg, Canada List of members by country: CAN DEN/GRN FIN ICE NOR RUS SWE UK USA TOTAL Members 29 3 10 5 17 31 6 1 8 110 Number of Member Institutions by Country for 2007, a full list is available in Annex 1. 2 UArctic membership reached 110 members in 2007; 79 are Higher Education institutions and 31 are Other Organizations. UArctic membership map The Council also took several decisions on UArctic’s strategic development. It established the UArctic Masters Program and in principle adopted the operating guidelines for the Program. Progress has already been made since the Council meeting in ensuring that the program is operational by September, 2008. An open call to all UArctic members for the lead institution for the Masters Program development resulted in five member institutions from five different countries expressing an interest in leading the Graduate area. 3 Based on the Council’s decisions, the Undergraduate Studies Program will also be undergoing administrative changes. In response to an increase in enrolment in distance education of UArctic’s Circumpolar Studies Program, the Council decided to divide its administrative operations between its three respective regions: North America, Russia, and the Nordic-Barents Region. The Council also endorsed the process for a revision of UArctic’s Strategic Plan. The existing Strategic Plan (2003-2007) has remained a relevant record of the goals and aspirations of UArctic. However, since much has changed since its creation, an up-to-date Strategic Plan will outline the direction of the UArctic for the coming years. Finally, the Council agreed that its 2008 meeting would be held in Edmonton, Canada, from the 2nd to the 8th of June. Throughout the year, much of the Council’s work is prepared by Standing Committees. The Chairs of the Standing Committees, Officers and representatives of management together form UArctic’s Executive Committee Toyon. The Committees with chairs are as follows: • Executive Committee/Toyon: Claudia Federova, Sakha State University of Russia, Russia • Indigenous Issues Committee: Bård Berg, Tromsø University, Norway • Nominations and Membership Committee: Jim McDonald, ACUNS, Canada • Academic Quality Committee: Geir Gotaas, Tromsø University, Norway UArctic Rectors’ Forum The inaugural meeting of the UArctic Rectors’ Forum was held during the Arctic Science Summit Week at Dartmouth College, Hanover, US, on March 14, 2007. The leaders from 15 UArctic member institutions who attended discussed the role of universities in the development of northern regions, as well as on the role of the governments, the science community and the International Polar Year in the current higher education and science collaboration. The next Forum will be held in Rovaniemi, Finland, from February 27-29, 2008 and is planned in conjunction with the Standing Committee of Parliamentarians of the Arctic Region (SCPAR). The thematic focus of the joint parts of the Rovaniemi meeting will be issues related to Adaptation to Climate Change in the Arctic region as well as Borders and Access to the Sea. UArctic members have been asked to develop background documents on both of the themes. In the dialogue between the Working Group of Higher Education and the University of the Arctic on March 18, 2007 the government representatives also hailed the establishment of the Rectors’ Forum and expressed their interest in further opportunities for cooperation on Higher Education policy in the Circumpolar North between Arctic government higher education and research authorities and the UArctic Rectors’ Forum. Progress Report on UArctic Programs: The north2north north2north student exchange program provides The north2north program is mainly working as intended. However, opportunities for there have been some challenges in the management of the program. students to Two of the main difficulties are the waiver allocation process and experience different northern regions funding of the program. It has been discussed that International firsthand, and to Coordination Office for north2north will have to allocate waivers for share experiences outgoing Russian Institutions since they do not have a national agency. face-to-face by allowing students to The Program Team made the decision that waivers shall not be used for study at other practical training or other kinds of activity where tuition fees are not UArctic institutions. 4 required. Despite these difficulties, participation in the program remains high, with the numbers of applicants for 2007/2008 reaching the target hoped for in its strategic plan. The goal to reach 100 yearly exchanges in 2007 was achieved in the academic year 2005/2006, when student participation reached 133. The numbers for 2007/08 again look promising, with participation reaching over the 100 mark. Below
Recommended publications
  • Bitstream – Capacity Building for Innovation

    Bitstream – Capacity Building for Innovation

    Bitstream – Capacity Building for Innovation Final Report Mikael Söderström, Umeå Universitet Ulf Hedestig, Umeå Universitet Terje Fallmyr, Universitetet i Nordland Kjell Ellingsen, Universitetet i Nordland Hallstein Hegerholm, Høgskolen i Nesna Geir-Tore Klæboe, Høgskolen i Nesna WP-14.01 ISSN:1401-4580 Department of Informatics 1 Acknowledgments The project is financed by the European Interreg Botnia Atlantica and following partners 2 Introduction The report presents the realization of and results from the Botnia Atlantica funded project BitStream – Capacity Building for Innovation. The project started March 15 2013 and ended October 31 2014. Originally the project was scheduled to end April 15 2014, but for several reasons the project applied for and was granted extension until October 31 2014. The coordinating funding receiver has been Umeå University and the other Swedish partners has been the municipalities of Sorsele and Storuman. In Norway the partners has been Nesna University College, University of Nordland, the municipal of Bodø and the Norwegian National Collection Agency in Mo i Rana. In short, Bitstream is based on the starting-point that successful development of public administration requires good understanding of how its activities are conducted and how they are perceived by its citizens/customers. This means that process mapping and subsequent process analysis and impact mapping is a fundamental condition for innovative business development aimed at creating ICT innovations in the form of, for example, mobile apps or web-based services. The main objective of the project was to create a transnational platform for capacity building and exchange of experiences in the area of innovative business development.
  • University of the Arctic: the First Year Report to the Senior Arctic Officials of the Arctic Council Oulu, Finland, May 16, 2002

    University of the Arctic: the First Year Report to the Senior Arctic Officials of the Arctic Council Oulu, Finland, May 16, 2002

    UNIVERSITY OF THE ARCTIC University of the Arctic: the First Year Report to the Senior Arctic Officials of the Arctic Council Oulu, Finland, May 16, 2002 Introduction The University of the Arctic was officially launched in Rovaniemi, Finland, in conjunction with the first Senior Arctic Officials of the Arctic Council meeting under Finland’s chairmanship and the 10th anniversary of the Rovaniemi process on June 12, 2001. Over 200 people celebrated the Launch of the new University. The guest speakers included Maija Rask, Finland’s Minister of Education, who invited all the Arctic governments to work hard at finding collaborative ways to fund the University of the Arctic and its program, and Professor Asgeir Brekke from the University of Tromsø in Norway , the Chair of the Council of the University of the Arctic since the inception of the idea, who symbolically passed on the Council’s gavel to Sally Adams Webber, President of Yukon College in Canada. The Launch marked the shift from planning of governance structures and programs to the actual implementation of programs. The first year of operation for the University of the Arctic has meant real students, real programs, and a growing enthusiasm and expectation of more to come for those students. The first evaluations of the University of the Arctic’s pilot programs, are being conducted at the time of writing this report. Preliminary results from these evaluations show that, first of all, the early enthusiasts were right in saying that we do need structural solutions to address the need for truly Circumpolar education that takes the needs of the primary client group to heart.
  • Crossing Borders Between Education and Work- Places

    Crossing Borders Between Education and Work- Places

    CROSSING BORDERS BETWEEN EDUCATION AND WORK- PLACES Hallstein Hegerholm, Nesna University College, NO, [email protected] Ulf Hedestig, University of Umeå, SE, [email protected] Geir-Tore Klæbo, Nesna University College, NO, [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper presents a case study on workplace learning were Swedish and Norwegian public authorities participated in an academic course in business process modelling. The aim has been to develop an un- derstanding of how partners in a transnational project can build bridges between the academic teaching and the students’ local learning at work. A sociocultural framework was applied in the study focusing on the use of tools, the building of knowledge and learning in the zone of proximal development, the crossing of boarders, and interaction and networking between activities. The source of data consisted of inter- views, surveys, observations, data from learning management system, and student’s reports. Analyse of the data was based on four dialogical learning mechanisms – identification, coordination, reflection and transformation. Our findings show that students’ local cases acted as key drivers for their developmental process, as the course transformed from distribution of information to case based knowledge building process at local work places. A mutual learning process occurred when teacher and students taught each other in a zone of proximal development. Further, the use of business model techniques made the inter- pretation of academic discipline easier, since it created a common language that served as a foundation for shared understanding when they discussed their local cases. Keywords: workplace learning, sociocultural framework. 1 INTRODUCTION The case in this study is the BitStream project where participants move between flexible, organized, aca- demic education and work.
  • 2011 1.Pdf (1.436Mb)

    2011 1.Pdf (1.436Mb)

    Education across borders Towards e-Didactics of International Module in Socio-cultural Aspects of ICT Editors: Beata Godejord Elzbieta Perzycka Pris kr. 120,- ISBN 978-82-7569-197-0 ISSN 1501-6889 2011, nr. 1 Om Fredrikke Tønder Olsen (1856-1931) Fredrikke Tønder Olsen ble født på handelsstedet Kopardal, beliggende i nåværende Dønna kommune. Det berettes at Fredrikke tidlig viste sin begavelse gjennom stor interesse for tegning, malerkunst og litteratur. Hva angår det siste leste hun allerede som ung jente ”Amtmannens døtre”. Kildene forteller at Fredrikke levde et fascinerende og spennende liv til tross for sine handikap som svaksynt og tunghørt. Hun måtte avbryte sin karriere som gravørlærling fordi synet sviktet. Fredrikke hadde som motto: ”Er du halt, er du lam, har du vilje kjem du fram.” Fredrikke Tønder Olsen skaffet seg agentur som forsikringsagent, og var faktisk den første nordiske, kvinnelige forsikringsagent. Fredrikke ble kjent som en dyktig agent som gjorde et utmerket arbeid, men etter 7 år måtte hun slutte siden synet sviktet helt. Fredrikke oppdaget fort behovet for visergutter, og startet Norges første viserguttbyrå. Hun var kjent som en dyktig og framtidsrettet bedriftsleder, der hun viste stor omsorg for sine ansatte. Blant annet innførte hun som den første bedrift i Norge vinterferie for sine ansatte. Samtidig var hun ei aktiv kvinnesakskvinne. Hun stilte gratis leseværelse for kvinner, inspirerte dem til utdanning og hjalp dem med litteratur. Blant hennes andre meritter i kvinnesaken kan nevnes at hun opprettet et legat på kr. 30 000,- for kvinner; var æresmedlem i kvinnesaksforeningen i mange år; var med på å starte kvinnesaksbladet ”Norges kvinder” som hun senere regelmessig støttet økonomisk.
  • Uarctic Strategic Plan 2020

    Uarctic Strategic Plan 2020

    Strategic Plan 2020 uarctic.org Who We Are Photo James David Broome UArctic (University of the Arctic) was created through an initiative of the Arctic Council (Iqaluit Declaration 1998) and was officially launched in 2001. UArctic is a cooperative network of universities, colleges, research institutes and other organizations concerned with education and research in and about the North. UArctic builds and strengthens collective resources and collaborative infrastructure, thereby enabling member institutions to better serve their constituents and their regions. Cooperation in education, research, outreach and engagement enhances human capacity in the North, promotes Our Vision 5 viable communities and sustainable economies, and engages partners from Our Mission 6 outside the region. Our Values 8 UArctic Strategic Plan 2020 How We Serve the North 12 UArctic International Secretariat University of Lapland Box 122, 96101 Rovaniemi, Finland [email protected] Tel. +358-16-341 341 Our 2020 Goals 16 Fax. +358-16-362 941 www.uarctic.org Graphic Design & Layout Background 22 Puisto Design & Advertising Printer Erweko Oy, 2014 Printed on Munken Pure by Arctic Paper Cover 240g/m2, contents 150g/m2 UArctic Strategic Plan 2020 UArctic Strategic Plan 2020 Photo Haukur Sigurðsson An Empowered North – With Shared Voices 4 UArctic Strategic Plan 2020 UArctic Strategic Plan 2020 5 Photo Haukur Sigurðsson Empower the people of the Circumpolar North by providing unique educational and research opportunities through collaboration within a powerful network
  • Uarctic : a Partnership for an Empowered North

    Uarctic : a Partnership for an Empowered North

    Outi Snellman IAU Kuala Lumpur 14 November 2018 UArctic : a partnership for an empowered north November 2018 www.uarctic.org Who we are University of the Arctic, UArctic, is a cooperative network of universities, colleges, research institutes and other organizations concerned with education and research in and about the North (204• 204 Members in 2018). UArctic builds and strengthens• Higher Education Institutions collective resources and collaborative infrastructure that enables member and Other Organizations institutions to better serve their • Arctic and Non-Arctic constituents and their regions. members Through cooperation in education, research and outreach we enhance human capacity in the North, promote viable “ communities and sustainable economies, and forge global partnerships. www.uarctic.org IAS 1987 C “The 1990 Bruntland Arctic Commission A Zone of 1987 EU Northern Peace and Dimension Cooperation” Rovaniemi Rovaniemi prosess UArctic Arctic 1998 Environmental Protection Nordic / Strategy: Nordkallott cooperation The Arctic Council 1991 www.uarctic.org The Arctic Council www.uarctic.org www.uarctic.org Empower the people of the Circumpolar North by providing unique educational and research opportunities through collaboration within a powerful network of members. www.uarctic.org • Circumpolar • Inclusive • Reciprocal www.uarctic.org UArctic benefits students, public and private sectors, and the North as a region by creating strong international collaboration among its members that: • Creates shared knowledge, competences and
  • Law, Policy and the Promotion of Cooperation

    Law, Policy and the Promotion of Cooperation

    THE 10TH POLAR LAW SYMPOSIUM 2017 13-14 NOVEMBER 2017 ROVANIEMI, ARKTIKUM HOUSE ADDRESS: POHJOISRANTA 4 GLOBAL AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE OF THE POLES: LAW, POLICY AND THE PROMOTION OF COOPERATION PROGRAMME MONDAY 13 NOVEMBER 2017 08.15 REGISTRATION 09.00 - 09.30 WELCOMING WORDS - POLARIUM Mauri Ylä-Kotola, Professor and Rector of the University of Lapland Timo Koivurova, Professor and Director of the Arctic Centre 09.30 - 10.30 KEY NOTE SPEECH – CHAIRED BY PROF. TIMO KOIVUROVA Lars Kullerud, President of the University of the Arctic (UArctic) 10.30 - 11.00 BREAK 11.00 - 12.30 CONCURRENT PANELS PANEL 1 - INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, LAND RIGHTS AND GOVERNANCE ISSUES 11.00 - 12.30 POLARIUM CHAIRED BY DR. DOROTHEE CAMBOU Øyvind Ravna Professor How Norway meets its Faculty of Law, commitments to the Sámi UiT-The Arctic University of under the ILO 169 and the Norway UNDRIP – assessed by the most recent case law Grant Christensen Associate Professor Indigenous taxation of University of North Dakota non-native activity in Alaska: the problem created by Alaska v. native village of Venetie Juris Doctor Candidate Jessica Black Jane Glassco Northern Fellowship Alumni, “We don’t want a brown University of Victoria version of the YTG” in Nän K'ałädàtth'ät Juris Doctor (Changing times, Samantha Dawson Jane Glassco Northern continuing ways) Fellowship Alumni, University of British Columbia Dwight Newman Professor of Law How international law of & Canada Research Chair in the sea issues may Indigenous Rights in constrain Arctic Constitutional and indigenous land rights International Law, University of Saskatchewan Alejandro Fuentes Senior Researcher Human rights protection of Raoul Wallenberg Institute indigenous peoples’ (RWI), Lund claims in the Americas.
  • Arctic Centre Insert

    Arctic Centre Insert

    ARCTIC Arctic Research Consortium of the United States Member Institution Winter 2006/2007, Volume 12 Number 2 Research at the University of Lapland Arctic Centre stablished in 1979 and located on the Oulu, and Helsinki, and about 50 supervi- EArctic Circle, the University of Lap- sors and associate members from multiple For more information, contact: land in Rovaniemi, Finland, enrolls about institutions. The theme of the school is Riku Lavia 4,300 undergraduate and 400 graduate stu- Social and Environmental Impacts of Arctic Centre dents and employs a staff of 650. Within Modernization and Global Change in the University of Lapland the university, the Arctic Centre was Arctic. ARKTIS students work in the social PO Box 122 established in 1989 as a multidisciplinary sciences—including sociology, political sci- FI-96101 Rovaniemi research institute and science centre. Its ence, environmental politics, international Finland multinational staff of 80 conducts a wide relations, economics, cultural studies, law, [email protected] • 358-16-3412758 range of research and education activities, and education—as well as biology and www.arcticcentre.org carries out project services, and maintains geography. Most research groups at the a science centre, information service, and Arctic Centre also include graduate stu- The Arctic Centre hosts the Finnish library. The operating budget for the Arctic dents who are funded by outside sources, National Secretariat of the International Centre (€2.34 million in 2005) comes such as the Academy of Finland and vari- Polar Year (IPY; see page XX) in coopera- from the Finnish Ministry of Education. ous foundations. tion with the Thule Institute of the Univer- Arctic Centre research projects also receive The Arctic Centre organizes and sity of Oulu.
  • The Bologna Process and Heis Institutional Autonomy

    The Bologna Process and Heis Institutional Autonomy

    Athens Journal of Education - Volume 7, Issue 4, November 2020 – Pages 364-384 The Bologna Process and HEIs Institutional Autonomy By Linda Helén Haukland The Bologna Process has made a strong impact on the development of European higher education, although the greatest impact has not been from the process itself, but from the national reforms introduced along with it. With a relatively young higher education system, Norway was ahead of most European countries in implementing the Bologna Process and reforms indirectly linked to it. Due to path dependencies and the Higher Education Institutions being, to a certain extent, autonomous and carriers of their own culture, we cannot draw conclusions at the local level without empirical studies. Therefore, the case of Nord University shows us how this process directly and indirectly affected Higher Education Institutions in Norway. The Higher Education Institutions (HEI) integrated horizontally in an education system that was increasingly hierarchical and competitive. The need for standardisation in order to secure equality and efficiency, and the demand for greater autonomy in the HEIs was answered by strengthening some and weakening other forms of institutional autonomy along with the establishment of a new accreditation system. Three dimensions of autonomy are touched on in this study. Firstly, the question of who has decision-making power in the HEIs defines whether they are ruled by professional or administrative autonomy. Secondly, the question of the HEIs’ mission is decided either by the HEI itself, representing substantive autonomy, or by external demands on production and external funding, representing what I call beneficial autonomy. Finally, the question of how the HEIs fulfil their mission decides whether they have individual autonomy or procedural autonomy.
  • Mapping an Arctic Policy Framework for the Scottish Government

    Mapping an Arctic Policy Framework for the Scottish Government

    Briefing Note Arctic connections - Mapping an Arctic policy framework for the Scottish government Tahseen Jafry, Michael Mikulewicz & Sennan Mattar Overview Historically, Scotland and the Arctic have been connected by social and cultural ties. More recently, mainly through trade and tourism, economic links have flourished. Some of this is underpinned by the expanding number of scientific and academic partnerships that have developed between Scotland and its Arctic neighbours. Scotland is also excelling in technological innovation to tackle climate change and in environmental protection. There is no doubt that Scotland has considerable expertise across many sectors and is well placed as a valuable partner in Arctic matters. The development of Arctic Connections - Scottish Government’s Arctic Policy Framework is demonstration of the significance placed on Scottish-Arctic issues in Scotland. This briefing note provides an insight into the mapping exercise carried out for the purposes of the Scottish Government’s Arctic Policy Framework, highlighting key Scottish Arctic relationships, pointing to Scottish strengths across sectors and exploring avenues for even closer cooperation. Mapping Scotland’s existing links with the Arctic region While Scotland is not located within the Arctic Circle, it is among the region’s closest neighbours and shares with Arctic countries a number of features, outlooks and challenges. In light of these similarities and opportunities for mutual cooperation, the Scottish Government has developed its own Arctic Policy Framework. This policy decision emerged from the Scottish Government’s extensive involvement in Arctic fora, including the First Minister’s participation in the Arctic Circle Assembly in 2016 and 2017. It also came in recognition of the mutual policy agendas in the face of climate change and social and economic challenges affecting rural and remote northern communities.
  • Arctic Policy &

    Arctic Policy &

    Arctic Policy & Law References to Selected Documents Edited by Wolfgang E. Burhenne Prepared by Jennifer Kelleher and Aaron Laur Published by the International Council of Environmental Law – toward sustainable development – (ICEL) for the Arctic Task Force of the IUCN Commission on Environmental Law (IUCN-CEL) Arctic Policy & Law References to Selected Documents Edited by Wolfgang E. Burhenne Prepared by Jennifer Kelleher and Aaron Laur Published by The International Council of Environmental Law – toward sustainable development – (ICEL) for the Arctic Task Force of the IUCN Commission on Environmental Law The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ICEL or the Arctic Task Force of the IUCN Commission on Environmental Law concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of ICEL or the Arctic Task Force. The preparation of Arctic Policy & Law: References to Selected Documents was a project of ICEL with the support of the Elizabeth Haub Foundations (Germany, USA, Canada). Published by: International Council of Environmental Law (ICEL), Bonn, Germany Copyright: © 2011 International Council of Environmental Law (ICEL) Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non- commercial purposes is authorized without prior permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: International Council of Environmental Law (ICEL) (2011).
  • Sweden's Strategy for the Arctic Region Cover Image Sarek National Park

    Sweden's Strategy for the Arctic Region Cover Image Sarek National Park

    Sweden's strategy for the Arctic region Cover image Sarek National Park. Photo: Anders Ekholm/Folio/imagebank.sweden.se D Photo: Kristian Pohl/Government Offices of Sweden Sweden is an Arctic country. becoming ever more necessary, especially in the climate and environmental area. We have a particular interest and The EU is an important Arctic partner, responsibility in promoting peaceful, and Sweden welcomes stronger EU stable and sustainable development in the engagement in the region. Arctic. Swedish engagement in the Arctic has for The starting point for the new Swedish a long time involved the Government, the strategy for the Arctic region is an Arctic Riksdag and government agencies, as well in change. The strategy underscores the as regional and local authorities, importance of well-functioning indigenous peoples' organisations, international cooperation in the Arctic to universities, companies and other deal with the challenges facing the region. stakeholders in the Arctic region of The importance of respect for Sweden. international law is emphasised. People, peace and the climate are at the centre of A prosperous Arctic region contributes to Sweden's Arctic policy. our country's security and is therefore an important part of the Government's Changes in the Arctic have led to foreign policy. increased global interest in the region. The Arctic Council is the central forum for cooperation in the Arctic, and Sweden stresses the special role of the eight Arctic states. At the same time, increased Ann Linde cooperation with observers to the Arctic Minister for Foreign Affairs Council and other interested actors is 1 Foreword 1 1.