DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of the Social Sciences in Norway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of the Social Sciences in Norway Evaluation of the Social Sciences in Norway Report from Panel 4 – Sociology Evaluation Division for Science and the Research System Evaluation of the Social Sciences in Norway Report from Panel 4 – Sociology Evaluation Division for Science and the Research System © The Research Council of Norway 2018 The Research Council of Norway Visiting address: Drammensveien 288 P.O. Box 564 NO-1327 Lysaker Telephone: +47 22 03 70 00 [email protected] www.rcn.no The report can be ordered and downloaded at www.forskningsradet.no/publikasjoner Graphic design cover: Melkeveien designkontor AS Photos: Shutterstock Translation by: Allegro Språktjenester AS Oslo, June 2018 ISBN 978-82-12-03696-3 (pdf) Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................... 10 Sammendrag ......................................................................................................................................... 11 1 Scope and scale of the evaluation ................................................................................................. 12 1.1 Terms of reference ................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 A comprehensive evaluation ................................................................................................. 13 1.3 The evaluation process and panels ....................................................................................... 14 1.4 Data available to the panels .................................................................................................. 19 1.5 Evaluation process and assessment tools ............................................................................. 21 1.6 Panel’s comments to the evaluation ..................................................................................... 23 2 The context: social sciences research and sociology in Norway ................................................... 24 2.1 The research system .............................................................................................................. 24 2.2 Sociology in Norway .............................................................................................................. 28 3 Fafo Institute for Labour and Social Research ............................................................................... 31 3.1 Sociology at the institutional level ........................................................................................ 32 3.2 Research group: Nordic Model on Labour Research ............................................................. 35 3.3 Research group: Migration and Integration .......................................................................... 36 3.4 Research group: Evaluation of Pension systems, Retirement behaviour and Active ageing policy......................................................................................................................................... 38 4 Hedmark University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Public Health ............................................... 41 4.1 Sociology at the institutional level ........................................................................................ 42 5 Institute for Social Research .......................................................................................................... 44 5.1 Sociology at the institutional level ........................................................................................ 45 5.2 Research group: Equality, inclusion, migration ..................................................................... 48 6 Institute of Transport Economics .................................................................................................. 51 6.1 Sociology at the institutional level ........................................................................................ 52 7 IRIS International Research Institute of Stavanger ....................................................................... 54 7.1 Sociology at the institutional level ........................................................................................ 55 8 Lillehammer University College ..................................................................................................... 57 8.1 Sociology at the institutional level ........................................................................................ 58 8.2 Research group: Public Innovation at the Centre for Innovation in Services ....................... 60 9 NINA The Norwegian Institute for Nature Research ..................................................................... 63 9.1 Sociology at the institutional level ........................................................................................ 64 10 NIPH Norwegian Institute of Public Health ............................................................................... 69 10.1 Sociology at the institutional level ........................................................................................ 70 11 Nordland Research Institute...................................................................................................... 74 11.1 Sociology at the institutional level ........................................................................................ 75 11.2 Research group: Welfare Service Innovation ........................................................................ 77 12 Nord University, Faculty for Social Sciences.............................................................................. 79 12.1 Sociology at the institutional level ........................................................................................ 80 12.2 Research group: Environment, Resource Management and Climate ................................... 82 12.3 Research group: Governance and Policy Development ........................................................ 84 12.4 Research group: Welfare Research ....................................................................................... 85 13 Norwegian School of Sport Sciences ......................................................................................... 87 13.1 Sociology at the institutional level ........................................................................................ 88 13.2 Research group: Bio-medical performance enhancement and the values of sport ............. 91 14 Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences93 14.1 Sociology at the institutional level ........................................................................................ 94 14.2 Research group: Norwegian Centre for Child Research ........................................................ 97 14.3 Research group: CHAIN ....................................................................................................... 100 14.4 Research group: The Nordic Model in Work Life and Welfare State .................................. 102 15 Oslo and Akershus College of Applied Sciences, Centre for Welfare and Labour Research ... 104 15.1 Sociology at the institutional level ...................................................................................... 105 15.2 Research group: Active Citizenship, Welfare and Solidarity ............................................... 108 15.3 Research group: Ageing Research ....................................................................................... 109 15.4 Research group: Public Sector Service Innovation .............................................................. 111 15.5 Research group: Housing and Urban Studies ...................................................................... 112 15.6 Research group: Young People at Risk ................................................................................ 113 16 Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences .......... 115 16.1 Sociology at the institutional level ...................................................................................... 116 16.2 Research group: Informasjon og samfunn .......................................................................... 120 16.3 Research group: Society, Welfare and Policy ...................................................................... 121 17 UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics ......... 124 17.1 Sociology at the institutional level ...................................................................................... 125 17.2 Research group: Sociology .................................................................................................. 127 18 UiT The Arctic University of Norway - Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education 129 18.1 Sociology at the institutional level ...................................................................................... 130 19 UNI Research Rokkan Centre .................................................................................................. 134 19.1 Sociology at the institutional level ...................................................................................... 135 19.2 Research group: Health and Welfare .................................................................................. 138 20 University College of Southeast-Norway,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bitstream – Capacity Building for Innovation
    Bitstream – Capacity Building for Innovation Final Report Mikael Söderström, Umeå Universitet Ulf Hedestig, Umeå Universitet Terje Fallmyr, Universitetet i Nordland Kjell Ellingsen, Universitetet i Nordland Hallstein Hegerholm, Høgskolen i Nesna Geir-Tore Klæboe, Høgskolen i Nesna WP-14.01 ISSN:1401-4580 Department of Informatics 1 Acknowledgments The project is financed by the European Interreg Botnia Atlantica and following partners 2 Introduction The report presents the realization of and results from the Botnia Atlantica funded project BitStream – Capacity Building for Innovation. The project started March 15 2013 and ended October 31 2014. Originally the project was scheduled to end April 15 2014, but for several reasons the project applied for and was granted extension until October 31 2014. The coordinating funding receiver has been Umeå University and the other Swedish partners has been the municipalities of Sorsele and Storuman. In Norway the partners has been Nesna University College, University of Nordland, the municipal of Bodø and the Norwegian National Collection Agency in Mo i Rana. In short, Bitstream is based on the starting-point that successful development of public administration requires good understanding of how its activities are conducted and how they are perceived by its citizens/customers. This means that process mapping and subsequent process analysis and impact mapping is a fundamental condition for innovative business development aimed at creating ICT innovations in the form of, for example, mobile apps or web-based services. The main objective of the project was to create a transnational platform for capacity building and exchange of experiences in the area of innovative business development.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Thesis Cross Sectional Study Comparing the Quality of Life
    Master Thesis Cross sectional study comparing the Quality of Life, Academic stress, Ethnic identification and Alcohol use of Norwegian and international students and examining the relationship between these variables By Mohammad Owais Hadi Master of Applied Social Sciences (International Social Welfare and Health Policy) Faculty of Social Sciences Oslo Metropolitan University 1 Acknowledgements Firstly, I acknowledge the blessings, mercy and grace of Allah who has helped me complete my thesis project as Allah has given me the courage and capability to conduct my survey and write this thesis with the best of my efforts. In addition to that, I would like to acknowledge the efforts of all those people who have helped me conduct my research and write this thesis. The most important amongst them was my supervisor Ashley Muller who guided me throughout my study from advising me to compare the quality of life of international and Norwegian students in a very ethical way to doing data analysis and correcting my thesis. Secondly, I thank all those Norwegian and international students who participated in my study by not only filling my questionnaire but also by promoting it to other students and the Norsk studentorganisajon who agreed to promote my survey to the best of their abilities. Thirdly, I thank the Norwegian data protection official Norwegian Centre for Research Data for providing me the ethical clearance to pursue data collection and Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research who provided me the questionnaire to measure the alcohol use of participants of my study. Finally, I am most thankful to my parents, sisters and friends whose wishes, prayers and support helped me complete this thesis project.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing Borders Between Education and Work- Places
    CROSSING BORDERS BETWEEN EDUCATION AND WORK- PLACES Hallstein Hegerholm, Nesna University College, NO, [email protected] Ulf Hedestig, University of Umeå, SE, [email protected] Geir-Tore Klæbo, Nesna University College, NO, [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper presents a case study on workplace learning were Swedish and Norwegian public authorities participated in an academic course in business process modelling. The aim has been to develop an un- derstanding of how partners in a transnational project can build bridges between the academic teaching and the students’ local learning at work. A sociocultural framework was applied in the study focusing on the use of tools, the building of knowledge and learning in the zone of proximal development, the crossing of boarders, and interaction and networking between activities. The source of data consisted of inter- views, surveys, observations, data from learning management system, and student’s reports. Analyse of the data was based on four dialogical learning mechanisms – identification, coordination, reflection and transformation. Our findings show that students’ local cases acted as key drivers for their developmental process, as the course transformed from distribution of information to case based knowledge building process at local work places. A mutual learning process occurred when teacher and students taught each other in a zone of proximal development. Further, the use of business model techniques made the inter- pretation of academic discipline easier, since it created a common language that served as a foundation for shared understanding when they discussed their local cases. Keywords: workplace learning, sociocultural framework. 1 INTRODUCTION The case in this study is the BitStream project where participants move between flexible, organized, aca- demic education and work.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 1.Pdf (1.436Mb)
    Education across borders Towards e-Didactics of International Module in Socio-cultural Aspects of ICT Editors: Beata Godejord Elzbieta Perzycka Pris kr. 120,- ISBN 978-82-7569-197-0 ISSN 1501-6889 2011, nr. 1 Om Fredrikke Tønder Olsen (1856-1931) Fredrikke Tønder Olsen ble født på handelsstedet Kopardal, beliggende i nåværende Dønna kommune. Det berettes at Fredrikke tidlig viste sin begavelse gjennom stor interesse for tegning, malerkunst og litteratur. Hva angår det siste leste hun allerede som ung jente ”Amtmannens døtre”. Kildene forteller at Fredrikke levde et fascinerende og spennende liv til tross for sine handikap som svaksynt og tunghørt. Hun måtte avbryte sin karriere som gravørlærling fordi synet sviktet. Fredrikke hadde som motto: ”Er du halt, er du lam, har du vilje kjem du fram.” Fredrikke Tønder Olsen skaffet seg agentur som forsikringsagent, og var faktisk den første nordiske, kvinnelige forsikringsagent. Fredrikke ble kjent som en dyktig agent som gjorde et utmerket arbeid, men etter 7 år måtte hun slutte siden synet sviktet helt. Fredrikke oppdaget fort behovet for visergutter, og startet Norges første viserguttbyrå. Hun var kjent som en dyktig og framtidsrettet bedriftsleder, der hun viste stor omsorg for sine ansatte. Blant annet innførte hun som den første bedrift i Norge vinterferie for sine ansatte. Samtidig var hun ei aktiv kvinnesakskvinne. Hun stilte gratis leseværelse for kvinner, inspirerte dem til utdanning og hjalp dem med litteratur. Blant hennes andre meritter i kvinnesaken kan nevnes at hun opprettet et legat på kr. 30 000,- for kvinner; var æresmedlem i kvinnesaksforeningen i mange år; var med på å starte kvinnesaksbladet ”Norges kvinder” som hun senere regelmessig støttet økonomisk.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012
    Annual Report 2012 For Nord-Norge SpareBank 1 Nord-Norge in short SpareBank 1 Nord-Norge Design: Rød Tråd AS - Photo: Arthur AS - Photo: Arnesen Design: Rød Tråd SpareBank 1 Nord-Norge in short Operations 126 History 3 Group Management 128 Organizational charts 4 Main Board of Directors 130 Group key figures 6 Governing bodies 132 Important events in 2012 8 Corporate Governance 134 Vision and business concept 9 Risk management, internal control and capital management 140 The Bank’s history 10 Localization 11 Ownership structure 153 CEO’s report 12 Business description – Retail and corporate markets, SNN Markets 156 SpareBank 1-Alliance 162 Report and results 14 Corporate Responsibility 164 Annual Report 2012 16 Together we get things to happen 166 Annual Accounts - Income Statement 40 Spaceship Aurora 168 Annual Accounts - Balance Sheet 41 On a campervan tour with Hekla Stålstrenga 170 Annual Accounts - Changes in equity 42 Andsnes opens the Storm 172 Annual Accounts - Cash flow statement 44 Tromsø students receive Sirkus Eliassen Annual Accounts - Notes 45 as a donation from the Bank 174 Annual Accounts - Group profit analysis 121 Statement from the Main Board of Directors and the CEO 122 Report from the Control Committee 123 Auditor’s Report 124 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 40 SpareBank 1 Nord-Norge is the result of the merger of about 40 savings banks in Nordland, Troms and Finnmark. 75 SpareBank 1 Nord-Norge has an extensive network with a total of 75 branches, whereof 73 are in the region, including one in Svalbard. The Bank also has two branches in Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017 Content
    Annual report 2017 Content Point Resources Pro-forma key figures 4 in brief A platform for further growth established 6 Our history 8 Five core strategic activities 10 A diversified portfolio focused on four proven core areas 12 Material remaining potential in the Balder and Ringhorne area 14 Reserves and resources 27 Executive Management 28 From the Board of Directors 32 Board room Corporate governance 34 Board of Directors’ report 2017 36 Responsibility statement 42 Financial Consolidated Financial Statements 44 Statements Alternative Performance Measures 93 Financial Statements Point Resources AS (Parent Company) 94 Auditor's report 129 In the section Point Resources in brief, pro-forma numbers are used mainly to illustrate the operational and financial effect of the acquisition of ExxonMobil’s operated NCS portfolio in 2017 by use of the economic date of the transaction, 1 January 2017, rather than the date for closing of the transaction, 1 November 2017. It is in the Board of Director’s opinion that use of pro-forma numbers for 2017 is a representative way of showing Point Resources’ underlying performance for 2017. The Consolidated Financial Statements prepared according to IFRS are based on the completion date 1 November 2017, and numbers for 2017 in this section may therefore differ from the Consolidated Financial Statements. All production, reserve and resource data in this annual report are net to Point Resources AS. Point Resources AS has an ambition to become a leading, independent E&P company on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
    [Show full text]
  • Status for Fusjonsarbeidet
    Soft Nano Science/Technology Jon Otto Fossum Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU Trondheim Norway Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU Trondheim Oslo-Trondheim ~45 min by plane Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU Foto: Carl-Erik Eriksson Norwegian University of Science and Technology STUDIES 14 University-level institutions in Norway 1) NTNU – Norwegian University of Science and Technology 13 2) University of Oslo 3) Norwegian University of Life Sciences 4) Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration 5) Norwegian School of Sport Sciences 16 6) The Oslo School of Architecture and Design 7) The Norwegian Academy of Music 8) The Norwegian School of Veterinary Science 9) UniK – University Graduate Centre, Kjeller 1 10) The Norwegian Lutheran School of Theology 11) University of Stavanger 12) University of Bergen 12 13) University of Tromsø 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 14) The University Centre in Svalbard 11 15) University of Agder 15 16) University of Nordland Norway has ~ 5 million inhabitants May 2013 Academic history 1217 Schola Cathedralis Nidrosiensis 1760 Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters 1910 Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTH) 1922 Norwegian Teachers’ College [in Trondheim] (NLHT) 1950 SINTEF (the Foundation for Technical and Industrial Research at NTH) 1955 Norwegian Academy of Technological Sciences (NTVA) (Trondheim) 1968 University in Trondheim (UNIT)
    [Show full text]
  • The Bologna Process and Heis Institutional Autonomy
    Athens Journal of Education - Volume 7, Issue 4, November 2020 – Pages 364-384 The Bologna Process and HEIs Institutional Autonomy By Linda Helén Haukland The Bologna Process has made a strong impact on the development of European higher education, although the greatest impact has not been from the process itself, but from the national reforms introduced along with it. With a relatively young higher education system, Norway was ahead of most European countries in implementing the Bologna Process and reforms indirectly linked to it. Due to path dependencies and the Higher Education Institutions being, to a certain extent, autonomous and carriers of their own culture, we cannot draw conclusions at the local level without empirical studies. Therefore, the case of Nord University shows us how this process directly and indirectly affected Higher Education Institutions in Norway. The Higher Education Institutions (HEI) integrated horizontally in an education system that was increasingly hierarchical and competitive. The need for standardisation in order to secure equality and efficiency, and the demand for greater autonomy in the HEIs was answered by strengthening some and weakening other forms of institutional autonomy along with the establishment of a new accreditation system. Three dimensions of autonomy are touched on in this study. Firstly, the question of who has decision-making power in the HEIs defines whether they are ruled by professional or administrative autonomy. Secondly, the question of the HEIs’ mission is decided either by the HEI itself, representing substantive autonomy, or by external demands on production and external funding, representing what I call beneficial autonomy. Finally, the question of how the HEIs fulfil their mission decides whether they have individual autonomy or procedural autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Social – Unlimited Faculty of Medicine (Pdf)
    Ski em al nfo rmasj on Skjema SFU Referanse 1006647 lnnsendt 1205.2013 17:25:15 Host information about host institution and center Name of centre Health and Social - Unlimited Host institution Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo P0 Box address 1078 BUndern Postal code I City/place 0316 OSLO Telephone 22845300 E-mail address [email protected] Contact person -Contact person Name Professor Kristin M. Heggen Title Vice dean for education Telephone work I mobile 22845376 99575450 E-mail address k. m. heggen®rnedisin. uio. no About the centre About the centre Is the centre already No established at the time of application Describe briefly the plans for establishing the centre (maximum 1500 characters) The consortium consists of the following institutions: Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo (UiO) (host institution); Faculty of Health and Faculty of Social Sciences at Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Science (HiOA); and the Faculty of Health, Care, and Nursing at University College at Gjøvik (GUC. The consortium brings together institutions that have demonstrated excellence in the areas of medical, health, and social education, along with their fields of practice. The consortium and its collaborating partners together cover the core issues in health and social education and practice. Based on the R&D plan, we aim to disseminate excellence and develop new educational and learning models in both education and work settings. The main aim is to create a bi-directional relationship between education and practice.We have selected the following problem areas in which educational innovation will be developed and spread in and outside the consortium: child care and welfare, care of persons with chronic lung disease, chronic musculoskeletal diseases, and elderly citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Web Portals and Internationalisation: a Survey of Norwegian Academic, Research and Special Libraries
    1 World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery" August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway Conference Programme: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla71/Programme.htm juli 13, 2005 Code Number: 158-E Meeting: 136a Quality Issues in Libraries DG Web portals and internationalisation: a survey of Norwegian Academic, Research and Special Libraries Maria-Carme Torras Senior Academic Librarian, University of Bergen Library Robert W. Vaagan Associate Professor, Faculty of Journalism, Library and Information Science, Oslo University College Abstract Norway currently has 362 academic, research and special libraries, most of which have developed web portals to provide a variety of online services to users, including part time and distance education users. While most web portals and most services are provided in Norwegian only, the globalisation forces of the information society are pushing institutions to provide an increasing range of services also in English. Based on an analysis of all 362 libraries and web portals, defined in a broad sense, including three illustrative case studies based on typical case sampling (Patton 2002), the article argues that an increasing amount of information will be made available in English on library web portals, but that the process will stop short of full bilingual provision. 1. Introduction 2. Research questions and methodology 3. Overview of Norwegian academic, research and special libraries and web portals 2 4. Range of web portal services in English 5. User education on the web portals: Bibliographic instruction and information literacy 6. The issue of web quality 7. Some typical cases a. Web portals in English only (3): Christian Michelsens Institute, Bergen b.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty for Biosciences and Aquaculture Annual Report 2016
    FACULTY FOR BIOSCIENCES AND AQUACULTURE ANNUAL REPORT 2016 We educate for the future! MILESTONES IN 2016 NEW UNIVERSITY FIRST CLASS TO GRADUATE AS DOCTORS Nord University was established on 1 January 2016 as OF VETERINARY MEDICINE AT UVMP a result of a merger between the former University of The cooperation with the University of Veterinary Nordland, Nesna University College and Nord-Trøn- Medicine and Pharmacy (UVMP) in Slovakia is part of delag University College. It was a big milestone. The FBA’s international profile. The joint degree of Joint Board adopted a new faculty structure with five Bachelor in Animal Science constitutes the corner- faculties in June 2016. The “old FBA” in Bodø and stone of the cooperation. The first 11 veterinarians the “green” sectors in animal science and nature graduated in 2016. They started their studies in Bodø management at Steinkjer became a new Faculty of in 2010 and completed their bachelor’s degree in Biosciences and Aquaculture (FBA). Formally, the 2013. In June 2016 they got their degree in veteri- new faculty was established on 1.1.2017, and gave nary medicine, and were ready to start practice in FBA a solid growth both in number of employees Norway or other countries they wish to work. All and students. graduates had relevant work to go to the day they received their diploma. In the coming years, this Several processes and meetings among new collea- cooperation between FBA and UVMP, with study gues were carried out at both university and faculty starting in Bodø, will educate ± 25 veterinarians - a level during 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Systems and Their Effects on Higher Education Systems
    Funding Systems and Their Effects on Higher Education Systems NATIONAL STUDY – NORWAY November 2006 Nicoline Frølich NIFU STEP – Studies in Innovation, Research and Education Funding Systems and their Effects on Higher Education Systems – Norway Executive Summary In 2002 Norway introduced a new performance-based funding model for higher education in response to growth in the number of students and costs of higher education. The model aims to improve education as measured by the credits and graduates produced, increase research as measured by research publications, and enhance external relevance as measured by external funding. The model is still being developed. Formal explicit links between the fund- ing system and national higher education policies have been established as a result of a re- cent reform in Norwegian higher education (the Quality Reform). The various stakeholders have identified several intended and unintended effects of the funding system on higher education and on the core tasks of teaching and research. Accord- ing to the Ministry of Education and Research, the performance-based funding system will improve the quality of research and higher education, as these are best safeguarded by means of a funding system that emphasises results. The Norwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions (the Rectors’ Conference) has identified several elements in the financing system that contribute to the development of HEIs. Incentives are viewed as a means of encouraging institutions to increase the quality of their educational programmes and research and to implement more structural changes. However, the Rectors’ Conference acknowledges that a funding model with financial rewards could produce unintended effects and advocates monitoring the consequences.
    [Show full text]