DOCSLIB.ORG

Town of Brant Village of Farnham Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Town of Brant Village of Farnham Master Plan Town of Brant Village of Farnham Master Plan August 2003 peter j. smith & company, inc. Buffalo, NY Nussbaumer & Clarke, Inc. Buffalo, NY Acknowledgements Master Plan Steering Committee Eugene Czyz, Chair Martin Rosiek Leonard Pero Terry Caber Anthony Krtanjek Town Board Samuel Chiavetta, Supervisor Ellen Bowman Eugene Czyz Martin Rosiek Dennis Rubeck Village Board Terry Caber, Mayor George Cordia Roger Edbauer Anthony Krtanjek Judith Pruett Consultants peter j. smith & company, inc. Buffalo, NY and Fort Erie, Ontario Nussbaumer & Clarke, Inc. Buffalo, NY August 2003 Town of Brant and Village of Farnham Master Plan Table of Contents Town of Brant and Village of Farnham Master Plan PAGE 1.0 The Plan .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Plan Defined ............................................................................................ 1 1.3 Why Do A Plan? .............................................................................................. 3 1.4 Implementing the Plan .................................................................................... 4 1.5 Adopting the Plan ............................................................................................ 5 1.6 Preparation of the Plan ................................................................................... 6 1.7 Goals, Policies and Actions ............................................................................. 8 1.8 Implementation Matrix ................................................................................... 24 2.0 The Communities .......................................................................................... 31 2.1 Population Characteristics............................................................................. 31 2.1.1 Changes in Population ............................................................................. 31 2.1.2 Age Characteristics .................................................................................. 32 2.1.3 Race and Ethnicity ................................................................................... 34 2.1.4 Urban and Rural Populations ................................................................... 34 2.2 Education Levels ........................................................................................... 35 2.2.1 Educational Attainment ............................................................................ 35 2.2.2 School Enrollment .................................................................................... 36 2.3 Housing ......................................................................................................... 37 2.3.1 Characteristics of Existing Housing ......................................................... 37 2.3.2 Housing Trends ....................................................................................... 50 2.3.3 Housing Programs and Suppliers ............................................................ 51 2.4 Findings......................................................................................................... 54 3.0 The Land ....................................................................................................... 57 3.1 Land Use ....................................................................................................... 57 3.1.1 Agricultural ............................................................................................... 58 3.1.2 Residential ............................................................................................... 59 3.1.3 Vacant ...................................................................................................... 59 3.1.4 Recreation/Entertainment ........................................................................ 59 3.1.5 Public Service .......................................................................................... 60 3.1.6 Commercial .............................................................................................. 63 3.1.7 Community Service .................................................................................. 63 3.1.8 Industrial .................................................................................................. 64 3.2 Land Use Regulations ................................................................................... 64 3.3 Future Land Use ........................................................................................... 71 3.3.1 Projections ............................................................................................... 71 3.3.2 Future Land Use Plan .............................................................................. 71 3.4 Findings......................................................................................................... 75 peter j. smith & company, inc. Nussbaumer & Clarke, Inc. i Town of Brant and Village of Farnham Master Plan 4.0 Agriculture and Natural Resources ............................................................... 77 4.1 Agriculture ..................................................................................................... 77 4.1.1 Significant Agricultural Areas ................................................................... 77 4.2 Natural Resources ........................................................................................ 83 4.2.1 Geology ................................................................................................... 83 4.2.2 Wetlands .................................................................................................. 83 4.2.3 Floodplains .............................................................................................. 84 4.2.4 Soils ......................................................................................................... 84 4.2.5 Topography .............................................................................................. 90 4.2.6 Scenic Vistas ........................................................................................... 90 4.2.7 Groundwater and Aquifers ....................................................................... 91 4.2.8 Watersheds .............................................................................................. 91 4.2.9 Surface Water .......................................................................................... 92 4.2.10 Wildlife ..................................................................................................... 93 4.2.11 Woodlands ............................................................................................... 94 4.2.12 Air Quality ................................................................................................ 95 4.2.13 Hazardous Waste .................................................................................... 96 4.3 Findings......................................................................................................... 97 5.0 Community and Cultural Resources .............................................................. 99 5.1 Educational Facilities .................................................................................... 99 5.2 Libraries ...................................................................................................... 100 5.3 Parks ........................................................................................................... 100 5.3.1 Evangola State Park .............................................................................. 100 5.3.2 Brant Town Park .................................................................................... 103 5.3.3 Steve J. Rauker Memorial Park ............................................................. 103 5.3.4 Memorial Park ........................................................................................ 103 5.4 Emergency Services ................................................................................... 103 5.4.1 Police Service ........................................................................................ 103 5.4.2 Fire Service ............................................................................................ 104 5.4.3 Ambulance Service ................................................................................ 104 5.4.4 Religious Congregations ........................................................................ 104 5.4.5 Cemeteries ............................................................................................ 105 5.5 Historic Resources ...................................................................................... 105 5.6 Findings....................................................................................................... 107 6.0 Transportation ............................................................................................. 109 6.1 Transportation System ................................................................................ 109 6.1.1 Multi-modal system overview ................................................................. 109 6.2 Vehicular System ........................................................................................ 110 6.2.1 Road Classification ................................................................................ 110 6.2.2 Designated Truck Route .......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Provincial Flhs Report
    Prepared for the MOH and the MOLTC PROVINCIAL FLHS REPORT JANUARY, 2020 POWERED BY 2 PROVINCIAL FLHS REPORT Prepared for MOH and the MOLTC TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary..................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction................................................................................................................................................. 7 Analytical Framework.................................................................................................................................. 9 Responsibility for the Provision of FLHS...............................................................................................................................10 Provincial, LHIN and Local Area Distribution.......................................................................................................................10 Sectoral Distribution.............................................................................................................................................................11 Francophone Population Density Region Distribution.........................................................................................................11 Designated Local Areas.......................................................................................................................................................11 Caveats/Limitations..............................................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Ontario Maps, Facts and Figures
    Lake Ontario maps, facts and figures A project by the FINGER LAKES-LAKE ONTARIO WATERSHED PROTECTION ALLIANCE and NEW YORK SEA GRANT 1. Origins of Lake Ontario Direct Drainage Basin 2. Population by Census Block Groups 3. Detailed Surface Water New York’s Lake Ontario . shown in maps, facts & figures Lake Ontario, the 14th largest lake in the world, is the smallest of the Great 4. Topography Lakes. Bordered to the north by Ontario, Canada, and to the south by New York State, it is the smallest in surface area, fourth among the Great Lakes in maximum depth, but second only to Lake Superior in average depth. The basin land area is largely rural with a significant forested and Lake Ontario at a glance 5. Land Use Types agricultural portion. The Lake is nestled between the mighty Niagara River Lake Ontario is the 14th largest lake in the world. to the west...and the picturesque St. Lawrence River Valley to its east. Length: 193 mi / 311 km Width: 53 mi / 85 km Almost one-third of the land area of New York State drains Published by Finger Lakes-Lake Ontario Watershed Protection Alliance (FLLOWPA) Average depth: 283 ft / 86 m 6. Wastewater Treatment Plants and New York Sea Grant. into Lake Ontario, making the wise use and management of Maximum depth: 802 ft / 244 m All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval natural resources vital to the long-term sustainability of the system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, 3 3 photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • State and Local Immigration Regulation in the United States Before 1882
    BENJAMIN J. KLEBANER STATE AND LOCAL IMMIGRATION REGULATION IN THE UNITED STATES BEFORE 1882 The absence of significant federal regulation in the area of immigration legislation until 1882 1 no more denotes a laissez-faire approach in this area than in many other aspects of American economic life. For many generations Congress had left the task of regulating the immigrant stream to the states and localities.2 The first general federal law (1882) is best understood in the context of antecedent activity on the local level. Eventually most of the seaboard states, including many without an important passenger traffic, enacted statutes dealing with immi- gration. Table I presents a brief outline of their essential features. After a consideration of certain aspects of the provisions of these laws, their administration in the major seaports will be surveyed. It will then be shown how the increasing opposition by business inter- ests to state legislation, culminating in decisions by the Supreme Court declaring such regulation unconstitutional, eventually paved the way for the 1882 Act of Congress. I. THE STATUTORY BACKGROUND Nine of the thirteen colonies reflected in their enactments the desire to protect the community from the burden of foreigners likely to 1 Federal space and sanitation requirements, however, date back to 1819. Federal legis- lation is conveniently compiled in U.S. Immigration Commission, Reports, vol. XXXIX (Washington, 1911). Cf. John Higham, Strangers in the Land (New Brunswick, N. J.; Rutgers University Press, 1955), p. 44. This article does not discuss legislation enacted in a number of states which barred foreign convicts. - The author acknowledges with gratitude the many helpful suggestions made by Professor Carter Goodrich, who super- vised his doctoral thesis "Public Poor Relief in America, 1790-1860" (Columbia University, 1952) from which much of the material for this article is taken.
    [Show full text]
  • Families Coping Without Earnings Or Government Cash Assistance
    Families Coping without Earnings or Government Cash Assistance Sheila R. Zedlewski Sandi Nelson The Urban Institute with Kathryn Edin Northwestern University Heather Koball Kate Pomper Tracy Roberts The Urban Institute Occasional Paper Number 64 Assessing the New Federalism An Urban Institute Program to Assess Changing Social Policies Families Coping without Earnings or Government Cash Assistance Sheila R. Zedlewski Sandi Nelson The Urban Institute with Kathryn Edin Northwestern University Heather Koball Kate Pomper Tracy Roberts The Urban Institute Occasional Paper Number 64 The Urban Institute 2100 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 Assessing Phone: 202.833.7200 the New Fax: 202.429.0687 Federalism E-mail: [email protected] An Urban Institute http://www.urban.org Program to Assess Changing Social Policies Copyright © February 2003. The Urban Institute. All rights reserved. Except for short quotes, no part of this paper may be reproduced in any form or utilized in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the Urban Institute. This report is part of the Urban Institute’s Assessing the New Federalism project, a multiyear effort to monitor and assess the devolution of social programs from the federal to the state and local levels. Alan Weil is the project director. The project analyzes changes in income support, social services, and health programs. In collaboration with Child Trends, the project studies child and family well-being. This study was funded by the Smith Richardson Foundation and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. The Assess- ing the New Federalism project is currently supported by The Annie E.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Child Welfare Workers
    Supporting Child Welfare Workers Invest in the workforce, invest in NYS’ children and families New York State Citizen Review Panels 2019 Annual Report Supporting Child Welfare Workers Invest in the workforce Invest in NYS' children and families NYS Citizen Review Panels The New York State (NYS) Citizen Review Panels (the Panels) for Child Protective Services (CPS) are important conduits for public sentiment and offer an external perspective on the efficacy of New York State’s child protective policies, practices, programs, and fiscal priorities. Panel members, appointed by the Governor or the NYS Legislature, are volunteers with a breadth of experience and knowledge in child welfare practice and law, social work, education, and technology, among other areas. Each of the three Panels has up to 13 members. Of those members, the Governor appoints seven, and the Senate President and Speaker of the Assembly appoint three each. The Western Panel covers the 17 counties in the western region of the State. The New York City Panel covers the five boroughs of New York City. The Eastern Panel covers the remaining 40 counties. The Panels are authorized by both State and Federal law to examine the policies, procedures, and practices of the state and local departments of social services and, where appropriate, the outcome of specific cases. The Panels are authorized to hold public hearings and to evaluate the extent to which the agencies are effectively discharging their child protection responsibilities. The Panels have reasonable access to public and private facilities receiving public funds to provide child welfare services within the Panel jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Welfare Retrenchment, 1873-1898 and 1973-2002
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2002 No Relief: The Politics of Welfare Retrenchment, 1873-1898 and 1973-2002 Stephen Pimpare Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1690 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9’ black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunger Is No Accident
    HUNGER IS NO ACCIDENT: New York and Federal Welfare Policies Violate the Human Right to Food This report is produced by the New York City Welfare Reform and Human Rights Documentation Project This report was made possible by funding from: The Ford Foundation Mazon: A Jewish Response to Hunger The Rose and Sherle Wagner Foundation The Shaler Adams Foundation The Strategic Alliance Fund For a free copy of this report, please contact the Urban Justice Center’s Human Rights Project 666 Broadway, 10th Floor _ New York, NY 10012 Tel: (212) 533-0540 _ Fax: (212) 533-4598 E-mail: [email protected] or download a copy from our website at www.ujchumanrights.org © 2000 New York City Welfare Reform and Human Rights Documentation Project Permission is hereby granted to reprint any portion of this report for any non-commercial reasons. New York City Welfare Reform and Human Rights Documentation Project The New York City Welfare Reform and Human Rights Documentation Project is a collaboration of anti- poverty organizations that work together to monitor the implementation and impact of welfare reform in New York City. Trained monitors gather quantitative and qualitative data that document the experiences of welfare applicants, recipients or former recipients throughout New York City. Using this data, the Documentation Project produces and disseminates reports in order to continue the push for a higher standard of government accountability for meeting basic human needs. The Documentation Project is coordinated by: Community Food Resource Center
    [Show full text]
  • Up from Dependency: a New National Public Assistance Strategy
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 316 592 UD 026 5a4 AUTHOR Weinberg, Daniel; Germanis, Peter TITLE Up from Dependency: A New National Public Assistance Strategy. Supplement 4: Research Studies and Bibliography. INSTITUTION Interagency Low Income Opportunity Advisory Board, Washington, DC. PUB DATE Apr 98 NOTE 200p.; For other volumes in this series, see UD 026 579-584 and UD 027 261. AVAILABLE FROM Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. PUB TYPE Information Analyses (070) -- Reference Materials Bibliographies (131) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Bibliographies; Community Programs; Employment Programs; Family (Sociological Unit); Federal Programs; Literature Reviews; Migration; Policy Formation; Poverty; *Poverty Programs; Program Development; Program Evaluation? *Public Policy; Research Methodology; Social Science Research; Social Services; State Programs; Taxes; Unwed Mothers; *Welfare Services IDENTIFIERS Aid to Families with Dependent Children; Child Support; *Dependency (Economic); Food Stamp Program ABSTRACT Twenty years after the War on Poverty was launched, dependency on public support remains widespread. Part 1 of this report summarizes current research concerning the following issues affecting welfare programs:(1) evaluating the economic effects of welfare;(2) dynamics of dependency;(3) welfare and work; (4) welfare and family structure;(5) welfare and child support; (6) elfare and migration;(7) attitudes, the upperclass, and the intergenerational transmission of welfare dependency;
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix O Consultation Letters
    APPENDIX O CONSULTATION LETTERS C e--, fC(( Ht=>/ (>-J ~I c.LoG ~'~.- New York Stafe Offlco 01 Pa r1<s, RecTsstfoh: B nd Hlaloria Preservation Histol'ic Preservattoll Field SeNle&s EI ureau Pe,ble~s Ishind, PO Box 189'. waterford. New Vork 12108-0189" 518-237-8643 June Paul L. Piciulo, Ph.D. Program Director Radioactive waste Management Program Department of Energy P.O. Box 191 West Valley, NY 14171 Dear Dr. Piciulo: Re: DOE West Valley Demonstration Project Ashford, Cattaraugus county 95PR1233 Thank you for requesting the comments of the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). We have reviewed the materials submitted in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the relevant implementing regulations. Based upon this review, it is the SHPO's op~n~on that the West Valley Demonstration project Site (the site of the former Nuclear Fuels Service Irradiated Fuels Processing Plant) is not eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. When responding, please be sure to refer to the SHPO project review (PR) number noted above. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (518) 237-8643 ext. 255. er ly, l;Y( ~.D. obert D. Historic Preservation Coordinator Field Services Bureau RDK:cm Art"Equal Opporh.mltylAflIrmativ9 Action Ag'l:lncy Department of Energy West Valley Demonstration Project 10282 Rock Springs Road West Valley, NY 14171-9799 July 18, 2008 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 3817 Luker Road Cortland,NY 13045 SUBJECT: Rare Species Consultation for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Decommissioning and/or Long-Term Stewardship at the Wesi Valley Demonstration Project and Western New York Nuclear Service Center Dear Sir or Madam: The purpose ofthis letter is to notify you that the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Society Lacks Consistently Defined Attitudes
    ‘OUR SOCIETY LACKS CONSISTENTLY DEFINED ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE BLACK BEAR’: THE HISTORY OF BLACK BEAR HUNTING AND MANAGEMENT IN ONTARIO, 1912-1987 by MICHAEL COMMITO, B.A. (HONS), M.A. McMaster University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2015) Hamilton, Ontario (History) TITLE: ‘Our society lacks consistently defined attitudes towards the black bear’: The History of Black Bear Hunting and Management in Ontario, 1912-1987 AUTHOR: Michael Commito, B.A. (Hons) (Laurentian University), M.A. (Laurentian University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Ken Cruikshank NUMBER OF PAGES: vii, 282 ii ABSTRACT What kind of animal was a black bear? Were black bears primarily pests, pets, furbearers or game animals? Farmers, conservationists, tourists, trappers, and hunters in early twentieth- century Ontario could not agree. Even as the century progressed, ideas about bears remained twisted and there was often very little consensus about what the animal represented. These varying perceptions complicated the efforts of the provincial Department of Game and Fisheries and its successor agencies, the Department of Lands and Forests and the Ministry of Natural Resources, to develop coherent bear management policies. Perceptions about black bears often conflicted and competed with one another and at no one time did they have a single meaning in Ontario. The image of Ontario’s black bears has been continuously negotiated as human values, attitudes, and policies have changed over time. As a result, because of various and often competing perspectives, the province’s bear management program, for most of the twentieth century, was very loose and haphazard because the animal had never been uniformly defined or valued. Examining the history of these ambiguous viewpoints towards the black bear in Ontario provides us with a snapshot of how culture intersects with our natural resources and may pose challenges for management.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Changes in New York Welfare and Work, Child Care, and Child Welfare Systems Lynne Fender, Carolyn O’Brien, Terri Thompson, Kathleen Snyder, and Roseana Bess
    An Urban Institute Assessing the New Federalism Program to Assess Changing Social Policies THE URBAN INSTITUTE State Update No. 12, September 2002 Recent Changes in New York Welfare and Work, Child Care, and Child Welfare Systems Lynne Fender, Carolyn O’Brien, Terri Thompson, Kathleen Snyder, and Roseana Bess Introduction gram, Safety Net Assistance (SNA). SNA, With welfare reform, New York’s cash financed with state and local funds, incor- assistance program for families underwent porates and expands Home Relief, New a substantial philosophical shift. A system York’s former General Assistance program New York’s welfare formerly focused on prompt and accurate that made cash benefits available to child- delivery of cash benefits was required to less adults for up to two years. SNA con- reform program shifted change into an employment-focused, tinues New York’s long-standing commit- work-first program. Interest in making ment to aiding poor households by provid- away from cash these changes began well before New ing cash benefits to those not eligible for York’s new welfare program was signed FA, including income-eligible families assistance and skill into law in August 1997, but the program’s exceeding the 60-month TANF time limit, final form took some time to work out. The children living apart from any adult rela- development to final legislative compromise softened some tive, families of persons refusing drug of the most dramatic plans for overhauling screening, and legal aliens during their emphasizing a strong the existing welfare system that Governor first five years in the country. After two Pataki had put forward in 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • The Traveler's Aid Society
    Molloy College DigitalCommons@Molloy Faculty Works: History and Political Science 2016 The rT aveler's Aid Society: Moral Reform and Social Work in New York City, 1907-1916 Eric C. Cimino Ph.D. Molloy College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.molloy.edu/hps_fac Part of the United States History Commons, and the Women's History Commons DigitalCommons@Molloy Feedback Recommended Citation Cimino, Eric C. Ph.D., "The rT aveler's Aid Society: Moral Reform and Social Work in New York City, 1907-1916" (2016). Faculty Works: History and Political Science. 3. https://digitalcommons.molloy.edu/hps_fac/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Molloy. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Works: History and Political Science by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Molloy. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. The Travelers’ Aid Society: Moral Reform and Social Work in New York City, 1907–1916 Eric C. Cimino, Molloy College n director James Gray’s recent film The Immigrant (2014), a Polish Iimmigrant named Ewa is awaiting deportation at Ellis Island when she encounters a man who claims to be a worker for the Travelers’ Aid Society. The man, Bruno, promises Ewa a safe place to stay and a good job if she will leave the island with him.1 Having no other options, she agrees. Bruno escorts her off the island to an apartment on the Lower East Side, where Ewa senses that something is not right. Her initial suspicions are confirmed when the next day Bruno takes her to a seedy burlesque theater where she is put to work as a seamstress.
    [Show full text]