DOCSLIB.ORG

West of Hudson Draft Unit Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
West of Hudson Draft Unit Management Plan West of Hudson UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT Towns of Saugerties, Esopus, Plattekill, Ulster, Hamptonburgh, Montgomery, Warwick, and New Windsor Counties of Orange and Ulster October 2018 DIVISION OF LANDS AND FORESTS Bureau of Forest Resource Management NYSDEC Region 3 21 South Putt Corners RD New Paltz, NY 12561 www.dec.ny.gov This page intentionally left blank 1 West of Hudson Unit Management Plan A planning unit consisting of approximately 8,000 acres encompassing 7 State Forests in Orange and Ulster Counties: Mt. Peter Hawk Watch, Stewart State Forest, Pochuck Mountain State Forest, Highwoods MUA, Hemlock Ridge MUA, Turkey Point State Forest, Black Creek State Forest October 2018 Prepared by the West of Hudson Unit Management Planning Team: Matthew C. Paul, Senior Forester Patrick Miglio, Real Property Surveyor Nathan Ermer, Wildlife Biologist Michael Disarno, Fisheries Biologist William Bernard, Operations Manager Evan Masten, Forester I Pine Roehrs, Senior Natural Resource Planner Acknowledgments The West of Hudson Unit Management Planning Team would like to gratefully acknowledge the efforts of all those who contributed to this plan. We particularly would like to thank the following organizations for the information they provided: Stewart Park and Reserve Coalition (SPARC), Stewards of Stewart (SOS), The John Burroughs Association, Fats in the Cats Bicycle Club, and Scenic Hudson New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Lands and Forests Bureau of Forest Resource Management Region 3 2 This page is intentionally left blank 3 DEC’s Mission "The quality of our environment is fundamental to our concern for the quality of life. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the State of New York to conserve, improve and protect its natural resources and environment and to prevent, abate and control water, land and air pollution, in order to enhance the health, safety and welfare of the people of the state and their overall economic and social well-being." - Environmental Conservation Law 1-0101(1) Vision Statement State Forests within the West of Hudson Unit will be managed in a sustainable manner by promoting ecosystem health, enhancing landscape biodiversity, protecting soil productivity and water quality. In addition, the State Forests on this unit will continue to provide the many recreational, social and economic benefits valued so highly by the people of New York State. DEC will continue the legacy which started more than 80 years ago, leaving these lands to the next generation in better condition than they are today. This plan sets the stage for DEC to reach these ambitious goals by applying the latest research and science, with guidance from the public, whose land we have been entrusted to manage. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS STATE FOREST OVERVIEW Table of Contents WEST OF HUDSON ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Counties of Orange and Ulster ............................................................................................................. 1 DEC’S MISSION ........................................................................................................................................... 2 VISION STATEMENT ................................................................................................................................... 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... 3 PREFACE ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 STATE FOREST OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................................... 5 Legal Considerations ............................................................................................................................ 5 CP-42 Contact Cooperation, and Consultation with Indian Nations .................................................... 5 MANAGEMENT PLANNING OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................ 6 Public Participation ............................................................................................................................... 6 Strategic Plan for State Forest Management ....................................................................................... 6 DEC’S MANAGEMENT APPROACH AND GOALS .............................................................................................. 7 Forest Certification of State Forests ..................................................................................................... 7 Ecosystem Management Approach ..................................................................................................... 8 Ecosystem Management Strategies ..................................................................................................... 8 State Forest Management Goals ......................................................................................................... 9 LOCATION MAP ........................................................................................................................................ 11 INFORMATION ON THE WEST OF HUDSON UNIT ................................................................................ 12 STATE LANDS IN THE UNIT ......................................................................................................................... 12 Facilities Not Included in this UMP ..................................................................................................... 12 SOILS ....................................................................................................................................................... 14 WATER RESOURCES ................................................................................................................................. 15 Major Streams, Rivers and Water Bodies .......................................................................................... 16 BIODIVERSITY ........................................................................................................................................... 19 Common Species ............................................................................................................................... 19 Habitat ................................................................................................................................................ 21 Representative Sample Areas ............................................................................................................ 21 At-Risk Species .................................................................................................................................. 25 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ...................................................................................................... 36 History of the Unit ............................................................................................................................... 36 Inventory of Resources ...................................................................................................................... 41 Historic and Archaeological Site Protection ....................................................................................... 42 Archaeological Research ................................................................................................................... 42 REAL PROPERTY ....................................................................................................................................... 42 Exceptions and Deeded Restrictions ................................................................................................. 43 Land Acquisition ................................................................................................................................. 44 INFRASTRUCTURE ..................................................................................................................................... 44 Roads and Trails ................................................................................................................................ 45 Signs / Kiosks ..................................................................................................................................... 46 Boating and Fishing Facilities ............................................................................................................. 48 Dams .................................................................................................................................................. 48 Designated Campsites and Lean-tos ................................................................................................. 49 Utility Transmission and Collection Facilities ..................................................................................... 49 Buildings ............................................................................................................................................. 50 AGRICULTURE ........................................................................................................................................... 50 NON-RECREATIONAL USES: ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Ontario Maps, Facts and Figures
    Lake Ontario maps, facts and figures A project by the FINGER LAKES-LAKE ONTARIO WATERSHED PROTECTION ALLIANCE and NEW YORK SEA GRANT 1. Origins of Lake Ontario Direct Drainage Basin 2. Population by Census Block Groups 3. Detailed Surface Water New York’s Lake Ontario . shown in maps, facts & figures Lake Ontario, the 14th largest lake in the world, is the smallest of the Great 4. Topography Lakes. Bordered to the north by Ontario, Canada, and to the south by New York State, it is the smallest in surface area, fourth among the Great Lakes in maximum depth, but second only to Lake Superior in average depth. The basin land area is largely rural with a significant forested and Lake Ontario at a glance 5. Land Use Types agricultural portion. The Lake is nestled between the mighty Niagara River Lake Ontario is the 14th largest lake in the world. to the west...and the picturesque St. Lawrence River Valley to its east. Length: 193 mi / 311 km Width: 53 mi / 85 km Almost one-third of the land area of New York State drains Published by Finger Lakes-Lake Ontario Watershed Protection Alliance (FLLOWPA) Average depth: 283 ft / 86 m 6. Wastewater Treatment Plants and New York Sea Grant. into Lake Ontario, making the wise use and management of Maximum depth: 802 ft / 244 m All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval natural resources vital to the long-term sustainability of the system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, 3 3 photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • State and Local Immigration Regulation in the United States Before 1882
    BENJAMIN J. KLEBANER STATE AND LOCAL IMMIGRATION REGULATION IN THE UNITED STATES BEFORE 1882 The absence of significant federal regulation in the area of immigration legislation until 1882 1 no more denotes a laissez-faire approach in this area than in many other aspects of American economic life. For many generations Congress had left the task of regulating the immigrant stream to the states and localities.2 The first general federal law (1882) is best understood in the context of antecedent activity on the local level. Eventually most of the seaboard states, including many without an important passenger traffic, enacted statutes dealing with immi- gration. Table I presents a brief outline of their essential features. After a consideration of certain aspects of the provisions of these laws, their administration in the major seaports will be surveyed. It will then be shown how the increasing opposition by business inter- ests to state legislation, culminating in decisions by the Supreme Court declaring such regulation unconstitutional, eventually paved the way for the 1882 Act of Congress. I. THE STATUTORY BACKGROUND Nine of the thirteen colonies reflected in their enactments the desire to protect the community from the burden of foreigners likely to 1 Federal space and sanitation requirements, however, date back to 1819. Federal legis- lation is conveniently compiled in U.S. Immigration Commission, Reports, vol. XXXIX (Washington, 1911). Cf. John Higham, Strangers in the Land (New Brunswick, N. J.; Rutgers University Press, 1955), p. 44. This article does not discuss legislation enacted in a number of states which barred foreign convicts. - The author acknowledges with gratitude the many helpful suggestions made by Professor Carter Goodrich, who super- vised his doctoral thesis "Public Poor Relief in America, 1790-1860" (Columbia University, 1952) from which much of the material for this article is taken.
    [Show full text]
  • Report: 13% of Hudson Valley Bridges in Poor Condition
    Report: 13% of Hudson Valley bridges in poor condition FRONT PAGE lower-weight vehicles, that can have an impact on everyone from emergency responders to school buses, commercial vehicles and farm equipment, who will all need to make longer trips to get The Mill Street bridge, over Quassaick Creek in where they need to Newburgh/New Windsor, is the second-worst go. ranked bridge among the 25 cited in the Hudson Valley as poor/structurally deficient [KEELY “Good MARSH/FOR THE TIMES HERALD-RECORD] infrastructure is also the cornerstone of By Michael Randall bringing in good Times Herald-Record jobs,” said Mike GOSHEN – A new report from a nonprofit group Oates, president that researches and evaluates the conditions of and CEO of Hudson the roads we travel on says 13 percent of the Valley Economic Hudson Valley’s bridges are in poor, structurally Development deficient condition. Corporation. “I hope Another 64 percent are in fair condition, while this (report) leads to only 23 percent are in good condition. action, so we’re not At a news conference Tuesday at the Orange at a competitive County Chamber of Commerce office, Carolyn disadvantage with Bonifas Kelly, associate director of research for other states.” the nonprofit, The Road Information Project New York ranks (TRIP), said those structurally deficient bridges 12th among the 50 6. Pine Hill Road over the Thruway, Woodbury carry almost 2.6 million vehicles per day. states, with 10 percent of its bridges in poor or 12. South Street over Wawayanda Creek, Warwick Her study included 2,551 bridges in Orange, structurally deficient condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Ski Area Ticket Discount?
    Ski Area Ticket Discount? Season Pass Discount? Age of Discount Notes Belleayre Mountain Yes No 70+ Discounts on ticket window rates Brantling Yes Yes 60+ Bristol Mountain Yes Yes 70+ Buffalo Ski Club NONE Catamount Yes Yes 70+ 70+ Discount / 80+ Free Dry Hill Ski Area Yes Yes 65+ Four Seasons NONE NONE Gore Mountain Yes Yes 65+ Different discounts for 65+ and 70+ Greek Peak ? ? Holiday Valley Yes Yes 65+ Holiday Valley offers the following for senior discounts and programs. Classic Passes (full season passes) 1. Age 70+ get a 50% discount if they’ve had a pass for the past 5 years 2. Age 70+ get a 10% discount for new members 3. Age 65+ get a 25% discount if they’ve had a pass for the past 5 years 4. Age 65+ get a 5% discount for new members And new this season, Grandparents can add their grandchildren up to age 18 to their family pass at the second member rate. Lift tickets 1. Seniors age 70+ pay the junior rate for weekdays and nights. Holimont Yes NA 70+ Hunt Hollow Ski Club Yes No 65+ Hunter Mountain Yes No 65+ Kissing Bridge Yes 62+ Labrador Mountain Yes Yes 65+ Maple Ski Ridge McCauley Mountain Yes Yes 60+ Two different discounts depending on the age Mount Peter Yes Yes 70+ FREE lift ticket/area pass at all times. Oak Mountain Yes Yes 65+ 70+ Ski Free,65-69 Discounted Tickets Peek 'n Peak Resort Yes 65+ Plattekill Mountain Yes No 65+ Royal Mountain Yes No 70+ Song Mountain Yes Yes 65+ Snow Ridge Yes Yes 65+ Swain Yes - 20% Yes - 20% 65+ Senior Day Thursday - Anyone 65 and over can get an all day lift ticket on Thursdays for only $29.
    [Show full text]
  • Families Coping Without Earnings Or Government Cash Assistance
    Families Coping without Earnings or Government Cash Assistance Sheila R. Zedlewski Sandi Nelson The Urban Institute with Kathryn Edin Northwestern University Heather Koball Kate Pomper Tracy Roberts The Urban Institute Occasional Paper Number 64 Assessing the New Federalism An Urban Institute Program to Assess Changing Social Policies Families Coping without Earnings or Government Cash Assistance Sheila R. Zedlewski Sandi Nelson The Urban Institute with Kathryn Edin Northwestern University Heather Koball Kate Pomper Tracy Roberts The Urban Institute Occasional Paper Number 64 The Urban Institute 2100 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 Assessing Phone: 202.833.7200 the New Fax: 202.429.0687 Federalism E-mail: [email protected] An Urban Institute http://www.urban.org Program to Assess Changing Social Policies Copyright © February 2003. The Urban Institute. All rights reserved. Except for short quotes, no part of this paper may be reproduced in any form or utilized in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the Urban Institute. This report is part of the Urban Institute’s Assessing the New Federalism project, a multiyear effort to monitor and assess the devolution of social programs from the federal to the state and local levels. Alan Weil is the project director. The project analyzes changes in income support, social services, and health programs. In collaboration with Child Trends, the project studies child and family well-being. This study was funded by the Smith Richardson Foundation and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. The Assess- ing the New Federalism project is currently supported by The Annie E.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Met Council
    Ski Club Guide 2016-2017 ZZZ'H%RRWHUFRP ARAPAHOEBASIN.COM | 888.ARAPAHOE The locals favorite. 70 Legendary Years. Keystone lift tickets are valid here. Take the FREE Summit Stage from anywhere in Summit County to Arapahoe Basin PERSPECTIVE CHANGES HERE 7,748 SKIABLE ACRES PURPOSE CHANGES HERE 125 MILES OF TRAILS SKI CHANGES HERE LIFE CHANGES HERE SKI CANADA’S BANFF NATIONAL PARK THREE RESORTS | TWO TOWNS | ONE LIFT PASS SKIBIG3.COM | 844-762-7191| CONTACT YOUR PREFERRED TOUR OPERATOR 4 # 1 BEST OVERALL SKI RESORT* KICK IT UP WITH MNYSC IN BIGSKY FEB. 4-11, 2017 ALL YOU NEED IS ONE! Minimum of one guest....YOU! SPORTOURS 800.HANG.TEN 800.426.4836 [email protected] *Ski Magazine's 2016 Pick for Best Overall Resort in the Northern Rockies 5 THE MOST ADVANCED TRANSPORT SYSTEMS FOR BOOTS, HELMET AND GEAR HEATED BOOTTM PRO: Start Your Day with Warm Dry Boots BOOT TECHNOLOGY TRVTM PRO: For the World Traveler TECHNOLOGICALLY REVOLUTIONARY HARD CASES PROTECT YOUR SKIS OR SNOWBOARDS SHIP IT! ROLL IT! Check skis or snowboards on a plane or ship with confidence. HARD CASE JETTM: Double Ski or Snowboard Rolling Carrier HARD CASE SHUTTLETM: Single Ski Rolling Carrier For Store Locations or Product Information - www.transpack.net . (914) 472-8080 6 Welcome to the METROPOLITAN NEW YORK SKI COUNCIL, INC. The Metropolitan New York Ski Council, known as the Met Council, has serVed ski clubs since 1934. Celebrating our 82nd Year. This not-for-profit organization is dedicat- ed to promoting amateur skiing through its member clubs. The Met Council provides a forum for information exchange, offers timely news on skiing and ski club activities, secures lift ticket discounts and other special deals, and advertises club ski trips and inter-club race competitions whenever possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inside Edge Continued on Page 4 2
    The Official Publication of the SnowProfessional Ski Instructors of America Eastern / Education Foundation ProSPRING 2013 Yes, Virginia – we do have scholarships* *and other myths busted by the 2013 spring membership survey by Michael J. Mendrick, PSIA-AASI Eastern Division Executive Director es, Virginia – we do have scholarships! And The Good News: we recognize that we need to get more of you to that applies to New Hampshire, New Jersey First and foremost, we consider it very good attend events when you DON’T have to because you and every other corner of the Eastern Divi- news that 2,569 of you took the time to contribute WANT to and feel the value in doing so is well worth sion. The surprising lack of awareness of the your valuable feedback. In addition, more than 5,500 the time and money. Yscholarships available to members via the Eastern additional comments were written by you as well. 77% of respondents either disagree or strongly Division Education Foundation was just one of many That gives us a tremendous amount of first-hand disagree with the statement: “I believe the general revelations of the Spring 2013 Membership Survey and high-quality information to utilize in planning public has a good awareness of PSIA & AASI mem- – completed by more than 2,500 Eastern Division our future priorities (that is, for us to make sure that bers.” This remains a major challenge and after more PSIA and AASI members. In fact, 38% of respondents your priorities remain OUR priorities) and programs than 50 years of existence we’d like to think you stated that they don’t know we have Eastern Division to better meet your needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan February 2009 This Blue Goose, Designed by J.N
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan February 2009 This blue goose, designed by J.N. “Ding” Darling, has become the symbol of the National Wildlife Refuge System. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is the principal federal agency responsible for conserving, protecting, and enhancing fi sh, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefi t of the American people. The Service manages the 97-million acre National Wildlife Refuge System comprised of more than 548 national wildlife refuges and thousands of waterfowl production areas. It also operates 69 national fi sh hatcheries and 81 ecological services fi eld stations. The agency enforces federal wildlife laws, manages migratory bird populations, restores nationally signifi cant fi sheries, conserves and restores wildlife habitat such as wetlands, administers the Endangered Species Act, and helps foreign governments with their conservation efforts. It also oversees the Federal Assistance Program which distributes hundreds of millions of dollars in excise taxes on fi shing and hunting equipment to state wildlife agencies. Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffi ng increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan February 2009 Submitted by: Edward Henry Date Refuge Manager Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge Concurrence by: Janet M.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCAL IMPACTS and COSTS Exhibit IX. A.2.B Traffic and Roadway
    LOCAL IMPACTS AND COSTS Exhibit IX. A.2.b The proposed Resorts World Hudson Valley is a mixed use development that will incorporate a 600‐room hotel with a full‐service gaming facility and a conference center, along with associated, complementary amenities on an approximate 373‐acre site. Potential impacts include those to traffic and noise, watershed impacts from stormwater and wastewater discharge, and hydrologic impacts to surface waters and wetlands. The design for Resorts World Hudson Valley has been developed in conjunction with LEED® measures to minimize impacts to the greatest extent possible. Where impacts cannot be avoided, RW Orange County LLC has developed a cohesive mitigation strategy as detailed in Exhibit IX.A.3 Mitigation of Impact to Host Municipality and Nearby Municipalities. Traffic and Roadway Infrastructure Preliminary Transportation Demand Impacts Development of the proposed Resorts World Hudson Valley would generate substantial numbers of new vehicular trips by auto, taxi and bus on the roadway system providing access to the project site. The majority of these trips (approximately 90 percent) would arrive and depart via I‐84, with Route 17K, Route 747 and Route 207 providing local access. Most vehicles destined to/from I‐84 would use the I‐84/Route 747 interchange located immediately to the southeast of the project site which was designed to accommodate future demand from expanded use of the nearby Stewart International Airport. As this airport demand has not been realized, the I‐84/Route 747 interchange typically functions with available capacity during peak periods. A new signalized intersection on Route 17K and a new roundabout on Route 747 would provide access to the proposed project’s internal roadway system.
    [Show full text]
  • John Burroughs for ATQ: 19Th C
    THE HUDSON RIVER VA LLEY REviEW A Journal of Regional Studies MARIST Publisher Thomas S. Wermuth, Vice President for Academic Affairs, Marist College Editors Reed Sparling, writer, Scenic Hudson Christopher Pryslopski, Program Director, Hudson River Valley Institute, Marist College Editorial Board Art Director Myra Young Armstead, Professor of History, Richard Deon Bard College Business Manager Col. Lance Betros, Professor and deputy head, Andrew Villani Department of History, U.S. Military Academy at West Point The Hudson River Valley Review (ISSN 1546-3486) is published twice Susan Ingalls Lewis, Assistant Professor of History, a year by the Hudson River Valley State University of New York at New Paltz Institute at Marist College. Sarah Olson, Superintendent, Roosevelt- James M. Johnson, Executive Director Vanderbilt National Historic Sites Roger Panetta, Professor of History, Research Assistants Fordham University Elizabeth Vielkind H. Daniel Peck, Professor of English, Emily Wist Vassar College Hudson River Valley Institute Robyn L. Rosen, Associate Professor of History, Advisory Board Marist College Todd Brinckerhoff, Chair David Schuyler, Professor of American Studies, Peter Bienstock, Vice Chair Franklin & Marshall College Dr. Frank Bumpus Thomas S. Wermuth, Vice President of Academic Frank J. Doherty Affairs, Marist College, Chair Patrick Garvey David Woolner, Associate Professor of History Marjorie Hart & Political Science, Marist College, Franklin Maureen Kangas & Eleanor Roosevelt Institute, Hyde Park Barnabas McHenry Alex Reese Denise Doring VanBuren Copyright ©2008 by the Hudson River Valley Institute Tel: 845-575-3052 Post: The Hudson River Valley Review Fax: 845-575-3176 c/o Hudson River Valley Institute E-mail: [email protected] Marist College, 3399 North Road, Web: www.hudsonrivervalley.org Poughkeepsie, NY 12601-1387 Subscription: The annual subscription rate is $20 a year (2 issues), $35 for two years (4 issues).
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliography of the Wallkill River Watershed
    wallkill river watershed alliance we fight dirty A Bibliography of the Wallkill River Watershed Many of the documents listed below will eventually be found in the documents section of the Wallkill River Watershed Alliance’s website at www.wallkillalliance.org/files Amendment to the Sussex County Water Quality Management Plan, Total Maximum Daily Load to Address Arsenic in the Wallkill River and Papakating Creek, Northwest Water Region. (2004). New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management, Bureau of Environmental Analysis and Restoration. Barbour, J., G. (undated manuscript). Ecological issues of Glenmere Lake, Town of Warwick, New York. Barringer, J. L., Bonin, J. L., Deluca, M. J., Romagna, T., Cenno, K., Marzo, A., Kratzer, T., Hirst, B. (2007). Sources and temporal dynamics of arsenic in a New Jersey watershed, USA. Science of the Total Environment, 379, 56-74. Barringer, J. L., Wilson, T. P., Szabo, Z., Bonin, J. L., Fischer, J. M., Smith, N. P., (2008). Diurnal variations in, and influences on, concentrations of particulate and dissolved arsenic and metals in the mildly alkaline Wallkill River, New Jersey, USA. Environmental Geology, 53, 1183-1199. Bugliosi, E. F., Casey, G. D., Ramelot, D. (1998). Geohydrology and water quality of the Wallkill River valley near Middletown, New York. United States Geological Survey, Open File Report 97-241. Dwaar Kill, Lower and Tribs Fact Sheet. (2007). Waterbody Inventory/Priority Waterbodies List. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Water. Dwaar Kill, and Tribs Fact Sheet. (2007). Waterbody Inventory/Priority Waterbodies List. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Water.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space Preservation Partners in Sussex County
    Open Space Preservation Partners in Sussex County Photo by Donna Traylor “We in Hampton Township would like to help other communities get their (open space ) programs going.” Mayor Philip Yetter of Hampton Township at a municipal outreach meeting on April 30, 2003. Each government agency or non-profit organization that manages land, or represents a partnership opportunity for funding, preservation or land stewardship and management in Sussex County is presented. The information in this section will help Sussex County enlist partners to help achieve the goals of the Open Space and Recreation Plan. The section separates agencies and programs into two groups—landowners and non- landowners. The following information is provided for many of these organizations: • Overview - Discusses the mission and role of the agency with a brief description of the lands they manage. • Funding opportunities and grant programs – Provides a description of funding and grant programs administered by the agency, along with contact information. • Acquisition partnership opportunities –Derived from two meetings held as part of the open space planning process. Land areas with potential for preservation partnerships with government agencies or non-profits are discussed in the context of each agency’s land holdings and any future expansions of the holdings. The meeting with nonprofit land conservation organizations was held on January 30, 2003. The meeting with public land managers was held on February 13, 2003. A complete description of these meetings appears in the companion document to the Plan, “Summary of the Outreach Process for the 2003 Sussex County Open Space and Recreation Plan.” • Stewardship partnering opportunities – Addresses stewardship programs and opportunities to work with other agencies on ecological and land management issues.
    [Show full text]