Dishing the Dirt

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dishing the Dirt Dishing the Dirt SHERBURNE COUNTY MASTER GARDENERS NOVEMBER 2020 From the Potting Shed… IN THIS ISSUE Well, that was different. If you are like me, the snow and Potting Shed 1 cold that descended upon us in the second half of October Too Good to be True 1 were unexpected. If you are like me, you were caught off Weed of the Month 5 guard and didn’t have all of your fall clean up chores done. What’s Coming Up 6 And if you are like me, you used the warm days of early November to quickly catch up. Autumn’s weather has not been cooperative for those of us scrambling to finish larger outdoor projects, or at least make them winter ready so that we can start up again in the spring. If you still have leaves to rake, you are not alone. Despite the snow, this is still a good time to work on buckthorn. What else are you going CONNECT WITH to do this time of year? This month is the second in a two-part series about the nasty stuff. US! Last month, we learned why it is such a threat and how to identify it. This month, we learn about how to get rid of it. I have several acres and it’s everywhere on my property so I can Horticulture Hotline: relate to those of you who battle to remove it. 763.765.3080 Just because your gardens are hibernating for the winter doesn’t mean you should too. There are lots of learning opportunities online, virtual garden tours, and you probably Email: mnext- have a gardening book or two that you want to read. This is a great time to educate [email protected] yourself about your favorite flower or veg, a troublesome weed, or better soil. Extension Office: Get gardening and get growing, 763.765.3075 The Sherburne County Master Gardeners Website: www.sherburnecounty mastergardeners.org/ Facebook: Click Image! Too Good to be True - Part 2 By Brigette Gatzke Now that you know how to identify buckthorn, what do you do about it? More importantly, how do you get rid of it? The Minnesota Department of Agriculture classifies buckthorn as a Restricted Noxious Weed meaning the plants are so widespread that Editor: Brigette Gatzke elimination is not realistic. However, in order to prevent further spread it cannot be Sherburne County imported, sold, or transported. If you have it and want to get rid of it, or at least bring it to Master Gardener a manageable level you must accept that this will be an ongoing battle. Buckthorn is tough to get rid of once established and requires patience and persistence. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA EXTENSION PAGE 2 OF 6 DISHING THE DIRT – SHERBURNE COUNTY – OCTOBER 2020 Buckthorn’s Strategies Why is it so difficult to remove? It uses three main strategies to persist in the environment and you will need to address all three in order to get rid of it. Super seeds - The berries contain many seeds, the seeds have a high rate of germination, are unaffected by digestive systems of wildlife and birds and finally they remain viable for years. Allelopathy – A large female tree (remember there are male and female plants) will exude a chemical so even other buckthorn seeds will not germinate; when the female tree is cut down, all those seeds germinate. This chemical also prevents other plants such as natives, from growing around the buckthorn. Resilience – The plants re-sprout after cutting if the stump is exposed to sunlight allowing photosynthesis to occur. The cut stump must be covered or treated with an herbicide. Your Strategies Adjust your expectations - This will be a multi-year effort that requires hard work. If there is buckthorn in the area, then as long as birds fly, buckthorn will appear in your yard. Sometimes the best hope is to keep it at a manageable level instead of complete elimination. Manage seed production – Cut down the large female trees (called queens by buckthorn warriors) first, then smaller females, then the males; this should cut into seed production and reduce the number of new plants. Manage seedlings - After cutting down a large queen, follow up several times that year and subsequent years to eradicate the seedlings, either by removing them or spraying with an herbicide. Look for seedlings in other places where birds perch such as tree rings, power lines, and fence lines. Hand pull or spray these when they are small before they can get established. Remove established plants – Smaller plants can be either dug or cut with loppers or hand saws; larger plants will need to be cut down with hand saws or chainsaws. The stumps need to be handled properly to prevent them from re-sprouting and creating what buckthorn warriors call a Medusa which is even harder to remove. Digging – The one weakness, if it can be called that, is that the root system is shallow. It’s fibrous and extensive but relatively shallow and bends off to the side of the tree, looking much like a hockey stick or the letter “L”. The roots can be loosened with a shovel or spading fork and the tree pulled out. Sapling pullers can also be used. Inquiries with other buckthorn warriors found mixed reviews. Some loved them and some thought they were ineffective. I found a sapling puller difficult to use in loose, sandy soils, but easier in more firm soils. Digging disturbs the soil potentially bringing more seeds to the surface so continuous follow up will be required. Cutting – Loppers, hand saws and chainsaws are all used to cut buckthorn, depending on the size of the tree. Regardless of how it is cut, the stump needs to be treated with an herbicide or covered to prevent re-sprouting. o Herbicides – The cut stump needs to be treated quickly (preferably within an hour) before it dries and seals otherwise the herbicide will be ineffective. Regular herbicides are not strong enough, use one labeled for “tree and brush” removal which has a stronger percentage of the active ingredient. The two active ingredients most effective against buckthorn are glyphosate and triclopyr. Always read and follow the directions on the label of any herbicide. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA EXTENSION PAGE 3 OF 6 DISHING THE DIRT – SHERBURNE COUNTY – OCTOBER 2020 o Covering the Stump – If you are averse to herbicides or you want to double down on your elimination strategies, covering the stump keeps the sunlight off of the stump. Stumps can be covered with tin cans, black plastic baggies or sheets of black plastic. Reusing tin cans is inexpensive. Experts recommend nailing from both the top and the side to prevent them from coming loose. I use double-headed nails for easy removal later and I’ve been known to spray paint the cans with brightly colored paint to find them more easily. Black plastic baggies can be zip tied into place (available on the internet). For a small area without other trees or plants, a heavy black plastic sheet on the entire area (weighted around the perimeter) prevents re- sprouting. Regardless of how the stumps are covered, they need to remain covered for at least one year. Commercial removal – There are any number of companies that will gladly come in and remove buckthorn for a fee. This can be expensive depending on the level of infestation. Animal assisted removal – There are a few companies that use goats and pigs to remove buckthorn by allowing the animals to eat all the plants, including the roots. This too can be expensive, and some indicate it can also be messy. Disposal Now that you’ve dug it up or cut it down, what do you do with the stuff? Minnesota laws make it illegal to put noxious weeds in a trash bin. They prefer the plants be destroyed on site to prevent further spread. If you have a larger property an area can be set aside where the buckthorn can be piled up and decay naturally. This would be separate from any compost pile used to amend the soil. Follow up for seedlings will be required in this area. I know one person who is shredding buckthorn into mulch. I have doubts about this idea since any berries/seeds that get into the mulch would germinate when the mulch is spread. If you have a yard waste pickup or a community yard waste disposal site, check with their regulations; some will take buckthorn, and some will not. Personally, I and other buckthorn warriors, find buckthorn bonfires extremely satisfying. Something Positive Are there any bright spots in this nightmare of a plant? First, the allelopathic chemical in buckthorn is not the same as black walnut and does not linger in the soil for very long. Once buckthorn is removed, natives re- emerge quickly. Replanting with natives also helps to discourage it from coming back. The Soil and Water Conservation District has information and programs for re-establishing native understory plants. Second, I have found several woodworkers who claim the grain of buckthorn wood is rather pretty and easy to work. One of our Master Gardener guest speakers was a woodworker who made wooden spoons and cribbage boards. I’ve seen trinket boxes and turned candle sticks as well. My other half includes woodworking as a hobby and currently has several larger sections of tree trunks drying out for future use. He’s also interested in log furniture so there is a joke about buckthorn barstools for my kitchen counter. I’ll let you know how that goes.
Recommended publications
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Other Species to Watch.Indd
    Other Families to Watch Boraginaceae (Borage Family) Caryophyllaceae (Pink Family) Chenopodiaceae (Goosefoot Family) Clusiaceae (Mangosteen Family) Convolvulaceae (Morning-glory Family) Plantaginaceae (Plantain Family) Ranunculaceae (Buttercup Family) Family: Boraginaceae Bluebur Lappula squarrosa (Retz.) Dumort. Alternate Names stick-tights, beggar-ticks, stickseed, sheepbur, European sticktight, bur forget-me-not, European stick- weed Synonyms Lappula echinata Gilib., Lappula myosotis Moench Description Bluebur is an annual plant that is pro- fusely branched with stems up to 2 feet tall. The entire plant is covered with stiff, white hairs and has a mousy odor. The hairs usually lie flat against the stems and leaves. Leaves are alternate, 3/4 to 4 inches long, and covered with stiff white hairs on both surfaces. The lower leaves are oblong, Mrkvicka by Alexander Photo stalked, and blunt-tipped, whereas the upper leaves are stalkless. Flowers are blue with a yellow throat, resembling forget- me-not flowers but smaller, about 1/8 of an inch across. They appear near the ends of stems in leafy clusters. Each flower pro- duces 4 small nuts with 2 rows of hooked prickles that have star-shaped tips. Fruit stalks are straight and erect. Similar Species Western bluebur (L. occidentalis (S. Wats.) Greene) is a weedy annual plant, native to Alaska, that can be distin- guished from bluebur by its nuts. Western bluebur nuts have 1 row of hooked prickles, while the exotic bluebur nuts have 2 rows. Stick-seed (Hackelia floribunda (Lehm.) I.M. Johnson) is native to British Columbia and resembles Family: Boraginaceae Bluebur both bluebur species, but the fruiting stalk of stick-seed is curved or bent downwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Evolution of Asterids!
    Diversity and Evolution of Asterids! . mints and snapdragons . ! *Boraginaceae - borage family! Widely distributed, large family of alternate leaved plants. Typically hairy. Typically possess helicoid or scorpiod cymes = compound monochasium. Many are poisonous or used medicinally. Mertensia virginica - Eastern bluebells *Boraginaceae - borage family! CA (5) CO (5) A 5 G (2) Gynobasic style; not terminal style which is usual in plants; this feature is shared with the mint family (Lamiaceae) which is not related Myosotis - forget me not 2 carpels each with 2 ovules are separated at maturity and each further separated into 1 ovuled compartments Fruit typically 4 nutlets *Boraginaceae - borage family! Echium vulgare Blueweed, viper’s bugloss adventive *Boraginaceae - borage family! Hackelia virginiana Beggar’s-lice Myosotis scorpioides Common forget-me-not *Boraginaceae - borage family! Lithospermum canescens Lithospermum incisium Hoary puccoon Fringed puccoon *Boraginaceae - borage family! pin thrum Lithospermum canescens • Lithospermum (puccoon) - classic Hoary puccoon dimorphic heterostyly *Boraginaceae - borage family! Mertensia virginica Eastern bluebells Botany 401 final field exam plant! *Boraginaceae - borage family! Leaves compound or lobed and “water-marked” Hydrophyllum virginianum - Common waterleaf Botany 401 final field exam plant! **Oleaceae - olive family! CA (4) CO (4) or 0 A 2 G (2) • Woody plants, opposite leaves • 4 merous actinomorphic or regular flowers Syringa vulgaris - Lilac cultivated **Oleaceae - olive family! CA (4)
    [Show full text]
  • Diversidad Y Composición De La Familia
    BOTÁNICA www.unal.edu.co/icn/publicaciones/caldasia.htm CaldasiaBarajas 27(2):151-172.-Meneses 2005et al. DIVERSIDAD Y COMPOSICIÓN DE LA FAMILIA BORAGINACEAE EN EL DEPARTAMENTO DE SANTANDER (COLOMBIA) Diversity and Composition of the borago family in the Department of Santander (Colombia) FABIOLA BARAJAS-MENESES Universidad Industrial de Santander, Escuela de Biología, Bucaramanga, Colombia. [email protected] JOSÉ LUIS FERNÁNDEZ-ALONSO Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Apartado 7495, Bogotá, Colombia. [email protected] ROBINSON GALINDO-TARAZONA Regional Norandina, Unidad Administrativa Especial del Sistema de Parques Nacionales Naturales (UAESPNN), MAVDT, Av. Quebrada Seca No. 30-12, Bucaramanga, Colombia. [email protected] RESUMEN Se presenta una sinopsis comentada de la familia Boraginaceae para el departamento de Santander (Colombia), que incluye claves para géneros y especies, nomenclatura actualizada e información sobre distribución geográfica y altitudinal de las especies. Además se incluyen observaciones taxonómicas y corológicas críticas e información ocasional sobre nombres vernáculos y usos conocidos para estas plantas en el departamento. En total se registran 38 especies pertenecientes a ocho géneros, tres de ellas adventicias en Colombia. Cordia diversifolia y Tournefortia glabra se citan por primera vez para Colombia. Palabras clave. Boraginaceae, Colombia, corología, diversidad, Santander, taxonomía. ABSTRACT A synopsis of the borago family for the department of Santander (Colombia), including keys to genera and species, and information about nomenclature and geographical and altitudinal distribution of the species is presented. Taxonomic observations, remarkable chorological data, vernacular names and known uses for these plants in the departament are also included. In total, 38 species belonging to 8 genera are cited, three of them naturalized in Colombia.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Washington Baltimore Area
    Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plants of the Washington - Baltimore Area Part I Ferns, Fern Allies, Gymnosperms, and Dicotyledons by Stanwyn G. Shetler and Sylvia Stone Orli Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History 2000 Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0166 ii iii PREFACE The better part of a century has elapsed since A. S. Hitchcock and Paul C. Standley published their succinct manual in 1919 for the identification of the vascular flora in the Washington, DC, area. A comparable new manual has long been needed. As with their work, such a manual should be produced through a collaborative effort of the region’s botanists and other experts. The Annotated Checklist is offered as a first step, in the hope that it will spark and facilitate that effort. In preparing this checklist, Shetler has been responsible for the taxonomy and nomenclature and Orli for the database. We have chosen to distribute the first part in preliminary form, so that it can be used, criticized, and revised while it is current and the second part (Monocotyledons) is still in progress. Additions, corrections, and comments are welcome. We hope that our checklist will stimulate a new wave of fieldwork to check on the current status of the local flora relative to what is reported here. When Part II is finished, the two parts will be combined into a single publication. We also maintain a Web site for the Flora of the Washington-Baltimore Area, and the database can be searched there (http://www.nmnh.si.edu/botany/projects/dcflora).
    [Show full text]
  • Flora-Lab-Manual.Pdf
    LabLab MManualanual ttoo tthehe Jane Mygatt Juliana Medeiros Flora of New Mexico Lab Manual to the Flora of New Mexico Jane Mygatt Juliana Medeiros University of New Mexico Herbarium Museum of Southwestern Biology MSC03 2020 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA 87131-0001 October 2009 Contents page Introduction VI Acknowledgments VI Seed Plant Phylogeny 1 Timeline for the Evolution of Seed Plants 2 Non-fl owering Seed Plants 3 Order Gnetales Ephedraceae 4 Order (ungrouped) The Conifers Cupressaceae 5 Pinaceae 8 Field Trips 13 Sandia Crest 14 Las Huertas Canyon 20 Sevilleta 24 West Mesa 30 Rio Grande Bosque 34 Flowering Seed Plants- The Monocots 40 Order Alistmatales Lemnaceae 41 Order Asparagales Iridaceae 42 Orchidaceae 43 Order Commelinales Commelinaceae 45 Order Liliales Liliaceae 46 Order Poales Cyperaceae 47 Juncaceae 49 Poaceae 50 Typhaceae 53 Flowering Seed Plants- The Eudicots 54 Order (ungrouped) Nymphaeaceae 55 Order Proteales Platanaceae 56 Order Ranunculales Berberidaceae 57 Papaveraceae 58 Ranunculaceae 59 III page Core Eudicots 61 Saxifragales Crassulaceae 62 Saxifragaceae 63 Rosids Order Zygophyllales Zygophyllaceae 64 Rosid I Order Cucurbitales Cucurbitaceae 65 Order Fabales Fabaceae 66 Order Fagales Betulaceae 69 Fagaceae 70 Juglandaceae 71 Order Malpighiales Euphorbiaceae 72 Linaceae 73 Salicaceae 74 Violaceae 75 Order Rosales Elaeagnaceae 76 Rosaceae 77 Ulmaceae 81 Rosid II Order Brassicales Brassicaceae 82 Capparaceae 84 Order Geraniales Geraniaceae 85 Order Malvales Malvaceae 86 Order Myrtales Onagraceae
    [Show full text]
  • Study 140 Populations, Representing All Species and Varieties, Were Transplanted to the Greenhouse for Study Under Controlled Conditions
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF ROBERT LEROY CARR for theDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Name) (Degree) in SYSTEMATIC BOTANY presented on\430/ 7 (Major) 0 (Date) Title: A TAXONOMIC STUDY IN THE GENUS HACKELIA IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA Abstract approved: Signature redactedfor privacy. Kenton Lee Chambers A biosystematic study was made on the species of Hackelia of northwest America and adjacent Canada.During the course of the study 140 populations, representing all species and varieties, were transplanted to the greenhouse for study under controlled conditions. Chromosome counts were made for all 14 taxa studied, and intra- and interspecific hybridizations were attempted.For the study over 3000 specimens were borrowed from 21 herbaria in the United States and Canada. Only two chromosome levels were found: 2n24 and 2n48. Chromosome counts were obtained only from mitotic cell divisions, as some difficulty was encountered in making usable pollen-mother cell smears.This was especially true in the tetraploids, where normal chemical techniques for fixation of buds resulted in the chromosomes tending to stick together.Because none of the species have chromosome numbers higher than tetraploid,it was felt that polyploidy, although present, has not been a dominant evolutionary mechanism in this section of the genus.The tetraploid taxa under study probably evolved from one or two original tetraploid ancestors which underwent speciation during the Quaternary period. It was found that nutlet features were of limited value as taxonomic characters in some species of Hackelia.The nutlets of some species are highly variable with regard to surface texture, number and size of intramarginal prickles, and the length and de- gree of fusion of the marginal prickles,The features of the fornix of the corolla are also variable and must be used with care.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora of Worcester, Massachusetts
    Vascular Flora of Worcester, Massachusetts Robert I. Bertin Special Publication of the New England Botanical Club Availability of this Publication: Electronic or paper copies are available at cost. Direct inquiries to the Special Publications Committee, New England Botanical Club, Harvard University Herbaria, 22 Divinity Ave. Cambridge, MA 02138-2020 About the Author: Robert I. Bertin is a professor of biology in the Biology Department at the College of the Holy Cross. He teaches a variety of courses, including ecology, environmental biology and field botany. His academic interests include the flora and natural history of New England, the sexual systems of flowering plants, and the ecology of invasive species. Additions and Corrections: Communications concerning mistakes in this flora or potential additions to the species list are welcome. Any substantive modifications will be posted under the author’s name on the Biology Department web page at the Holy Cross web site. The author can be contacted through the Biology Department or at [email protected]. Cover Illustrations: Pictured are three species portraying different aspects of the Worcester flora. Acer platanoides, or Norway maple, is a non-native species and the most commonly planted street tree in Worcester. It is prominent in many City woodlands, where it competes with native species. The grass Elymus villosus is a state threatened species. The Worcester record is the only known occurrence of the species in Worcester County. The orchid Calopogon tuberosus, a native bog species, is known in the City only from historical records. Figures reprinted from Holmgren et al. (1998) Illustrated Companion to Gleason and Cronquist’s Manual, with the kind permission of the New York Botanical Garden.
    [Show full text]
  • Pres2015-0123.Pdf
    JAHRES-BEHICHT des offentlichen STIFTS-0BER6YMNASIUMS der Benediotiner ZU BBAVHAU in BOHMBfi am Schlusse des Schuljahres 1901. INHALT: i. Die opizische Periode in der floristischen Erforschung Bohmens. Von Prof. P. V. Maiwald. .2. Schulnachrichten, vom Director. BRAUNAU. Selbstverlag des Benedictinerstiftes. — Druek vou J. Swirak. 1901. h v Benutzte Hauptquelleu. (Die einzelnen Werke wurden den in den Klammern angefuhrten Bibliotheken entlehnt.) 1. Flora oder botanisclie Zeitung, Regensburg I.—LXIX. Jg. 1818— 1886. (Bibl. des Ferdinandeums in Innsbruck und [I. und V. Jg.] k. k. Univ.-Bibl. in Wien.) 2. Kratos, Zeitschrift fiir Gymnasien. Prag, G. Haase Sohne, I.—III. Jg. 1819—1821. (Bibl. St. Margaret.) 8. Okonomisch-technische Flora Bohmens, 8 Bande. Prag, Job. Pospischil (1. Bd.) und Th. Thabor (2., 3. Bd.), 1836—1843. (Bibl. Braunau.) 4. Lotos, Zeitschrift fiir Naturwissenschaften. Prag, I.—XXIV. Jg. 1851—1874. (Bibl. Braunau.) 5. Osterreichisches botanisches Wochenblatt. Wien, I.—VII. Jg. 1851—1857.— Osterreichische botanische Zeitschrift, Wien, VIII.—L. Jg. 1858—1900. (Bibl. der k. k. zool.-bot. Ges. in-Wien und Bibl. Braunau.) 6. Verhandlungen des zool.-botan. Vereines, Wien, I.—VII. Bd. 1851 —1857. — Verh. der k. k. zool.-botan. Gesellschaft, Wien, VIII.—XXX. Bd. 1858—1880. (Bibl. des Ferdinandeums in Innsbruck.) 7. Archiv fiir die naturwissenschaftliche Landesdurchforschung von Bohmen, Prag, Fr. Rivnac. (Bibl. Braunau.) V .a) Celakovsky, Dr. Lad., Prodromus der Flora von Bohmen. 4 Theile. 1867—1881. b) Hansgirg, Dr. Ant., Prodromus der Algenflora von Bohmen. I. Theil 1886-1888. II. Theil 1892. -c) Dededek Josef, Die Lebermoose Bohmens. 1886. ■v •d) Celakovsky, Dr. Lad. jun., Die Myxomyceten Bohmens. 1893.
    [Show full text]
  • Boraginaceae.Published.Pdf
    Flora of China 16: 329–427. 1995. BORAGINACEAE 紫草科 zi cao ke Zhu Ge-ling1; Harald Riedl2, Rudolf Kamelin3 Herbs perennial, biennial, or annual, less often lianas, shrubs, or trees, usually bristly or scabrous-pubescent. Leaves simple, exstipulate, alternate, rarely opposite, entire or serrate at margin. Inflorescences often double scorpioid cymes, rarely solitary; bracts present or absent. Flowers bisexual, actinomorphic, rarely zygomorphic. Calyx usually 5-parted or lobed, mostly persistent. Corolla tubular, campanulate, rotate, funnelform, or salverform; tube appendages 5, rarely more, mostly trapeziform, rarely absent, sometimes a ring of hairs present; limb usually 5-parted; lobes overlapping, rarely twisted in bud. Stamens 5, inserted on corolla tube or rarely at throat, included or rarely exserted; anthers introrse, 2-loculed, usually dorsifixed at base, less often medifixed, dehiscence longitudinal. Nectaries at base of corolla tube or on disc below ovary. Ovary superior, 2-carpellate; locules 2 and each with 2 ovules, or 4 and each with 1 ovule; ovules nearly atropous, semianatropous, or anatropous. Style terminal or gynobasic, branched or not. Gynobase flat, fastigiate, or subulate. Fruit 1–4-seeded drupes or nutlets (mericarps); nutlets mostly dry, often ornamented with wings, prickles and/or glochids (stiff bristles with barbed or anchorlike tips). Seeds vertical or oblique, coat membranous; embryo straight, less often curved; cotyledons flat, fleshy. About 156 genera and 2500 species: temperate and tropical regions, centered in the Mediterranean region; 47 genera and 294 species in China, of which four genera and 156 species are endemic. Anchusa italica Retzius, A. officinalis Linnaeus, and Borago officinalis Linnaeus are cultivated. Borago officinalis is uncommon and not naturalized, and because its seeds contain quality oil, it is probably more commonly grown than previously.
    [Show full text]
  • FERNS and FERN ALLIES Dittmer, H.J., E.F
    FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Dittmer, H.J., E.F. Castetter, & O.M. Clark. 1954. The ferns and fern allies of New Mexico. Univ. New Mexico Publ. Biol. No. 6. Family ASPLENIACEAE [1/5/5] Asplenium spleenwort Bennert, W. & G. Fischer. 1993. Biosystematics and evolution of the Asplenium trichomanes complex. Webbia 48:743-760. Wagner, W.H. Jr., R.C. Moran, C.R. Werth. 1993. Aspleniaceae, pp. 228-245. IN: Flora of North America, vol.2. Oxford Univ. Press. palmeri Maxon [M&H; Wagner & Moran 1993] Palmer’s spleenwort platyneuron (Linnaeus) Britton, Sterns, & Poggenburg [M&H; Wagner & Moran 1993] ebony spleenwort resiliens Kunze [M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] black-stem spleenwort septentrionale (Linnaeus) Hoffmann [M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] forked spleenwort trichomanes Linnaeus [Bennert & Fischer 1993; M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] maidenhair spleenwort Family AZOLLACEAE [1/1/1] Azolla mosquito-fern Lumpkin, T.A. 1993. Azollaceae, pp. 338-342. IN: Flora of North America, vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. caroliniana Willdenow : Reports in W&S apparently belong to Azolla mexicana Presl, though Azolla caroliniana is known adjacent to NM near the Texas State line [Lumpkin 1993]. mexicana Schlechtendal & Chamisso ex K. Presl [Lumpkin 1993; M&H] Mexican mosquito-fern Family DENNSTAEDTIACEAE [1/1/1] Pteridium bracken-fern Jacobs, C.A. & J.H. Peck. Pteridium, pp. 201-203. IN: Flora of North America, vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. aquilinum (Linnaeus) Kuhn var. pubescens Underwood [Jacobs & Peck 1993; M&H; W&S] bracken-fern Family DRYOPTERIDACEAE [6/13/13] Athyrium lady-fern Kato, M. 1993. Athyrium, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of a Conference on Native Plant Restoration and Management on Public Lands in the Pacific Northwest
    Proceedings of a Conference on Native Plant Restoration and Management on Public Lands in the Pacific Northwest: Rare Plants, Invasive Species and Ecosystem Management LaSells Stewart Center, Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon Feb. 11-13, 2003 Edited and compiled by Thomas N. Kaye, Melanie Gisler, and Rob Fiegener A symposium co-sponsored by: USDI Bureau of Land Management, Institute for Applied Ecology, USDA Forest Service, Native Plant Society of Oregon Proceedings of a Conference on Native Plant Restoration and Management on Public Lands in the Pacific Northwest: Rare Plants, Invasive Species, and Ecosystem Management , Corvallis, Oregon, Feb. 11-13, 2003 Preface: Native plant conservation is a multi-disciplinary field and its success requires an integrated approach. Plant restoration and management on public lands in the Pacific Northwest face many challenges but also present opportunities for cooperative projects, research, on-the- ground action, and community outreach. On February 11-13, 2003, 300 people joined together for a symposium on native plant management in the Pacific Northwest to share information and discuss experiences. Topics covered rare and endangered species conservation and reintroduction, invasive plants, species and habitat restoration, ecosystems, and policy. The meeting featured talks by experts in these fields, and the audience included biologists, land managers, non-profit organizations, and the general public. Michael Way, a member of the International Team for the Millennium Seed Bank Project from the Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, was our keynote speaker. Mr. Way is the International Coordinator for the Americas and is responsible for the development of seed conservation projects with partners in Mexico, Chile, and the USA.
    [Show full text]