WGSST 2550 HISTORY of FEMINIST THOUGHT Class Meetings: Wednesdays and Fridays 11:10 Am-12:30 Pm University Hall 86 Fall Semester 2013 (August 21-December 3, 2013)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WGSST 2550 HISTORY of FEMINIST THOUGHT Class Meetings: Wednesdays and Fridays 11:10 Am-12:30 Pm University Hall 86 Fall Semester 2013 (August 21-December 3, 2013) WGSST 2550 HISTORY OF FEMINIST THOUGHT Class meetings: Wednesdays and Fridays 11:10 am-12:30 pm University Hall 86 Fall Semester 2013 (August 21-December 3, 2013) University Documented DisABilities Students with a university-documented disability certified by the Office of Disability Services should discuss with me any special accommodations needed for the course. Please make me aware of your needs as soon as possible. The Office of Disability Services, located at 150 Pomerene Hall, offers services for students with documented disabilities. Contact the ODS at 2-3307292-3307, TDD 292-0901; http://www.ods.ohio-state.edu/. Instructor: Dr. Debra Burrington, Senior Lecturer in Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies Office: TBA Email: [email protected] or [email protected] Office Hours: By appointment in office or more flexibly via email or phone (310) 592-0854 Course Description and Objectives The primary objective of this course is to provide students majoring and minoring in Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies with a foundation in the history of feminist thought, a category of inquiry that is both an intellectual and a political construction. However, this enterprise is not as straightforward as it may sound, and the construction of this singular sounding entity called ‘history of feminist thought’ is fraught with at least a few difficulties. Thus, while attempting to understand developments in feminist thinking about key concepts and experiences we must also take up the project of recasting the central terms – ‘history’ (singular), ‘feminist’ (singular) and ‘thought’ (singular) – to consider who has written the narratives of intellectual history, who benefits from these narratives, and who has been excluded. This will require that we be open to deconstructing the predominant wave narrative of feminism and its white, western centrality while at the same time considering the historical voices in feminist thought beginning roughly in 19th century Europe and continuing into the early 21st century. We will engage in our endeavors with an eye focused on feminist thinking within the context of histories of imperialism, colonialism, racism, heterosexism, classism and increasing globalization in an effort to weave a richer tapestry comprised of multiple, intersectional narratives, Western-influenced though they may be. No matter how we approach this enterprise we will encounter gaps, flaws, exclusions, erasures and injustices, but we will take our best shot at approaching our material from a variety of angles while also recognizing that each is incomplete by itself. Our approach to the course will emanate from the structure of our primary required text, Feminist Theory Reader: Local and Global Perspectives (2013), edited by Carole R. McCann and Seung-kyung Kim. Rather than being another attempt to contain the diversity of feminist thought within a historical-chronological frame that implicitly accepts the ‘wave metaphor’ for understanding developments in feminist thought over time, this newly available text anchors the material included in the anthology in key theoretical concepts that are central to feminist thinking, places them into conversations and debates within ‘multiracial and transnational U.S. feminism’ and in turn situates these within a global perspective. As the editors state in their introduction to the text, “…our guiding principle has been to make the theoretical foundations of U.S. women’s studies intelligible to contemporary students by including a mixture of old and new material, which represent pivotal moments of intellectual insight.” This material will be supplemented by readings that provide important touchstones to primary writings from particular periods of time, location and perspective. Course Texts Required: Carole R. McCann and Seung-kyung Kim, eds. Feminist Theory Reader: Local and Global Perspectives (Routledge, 2013) ISBN 978-0-415-52102-4 (Shown As FTR on reading list) Angela Y. Davis, Women, Race and Class (Vintage, 1983) ISBN 0-394-71351-6 (Shown as AngelA Davis on reading list) Estelle B. Friedman, ed. The Essential Feminist Reader (Modern Library, 2007) ISBN 978-0-8129- 7460-7 (Shown As EFR on reading list) Emma Goldman, Anarchism and Other Essays (CreateSpace, 2013) ISBN 9-781456-494872 (Shown as Emma Goldman on reading list) (These texts all have been ordered from SBX.) Note: A small handful of readings can be accessed via Carmen and are designated as such by ‘(Carmen)’ after the article title. Assignments And ResponsiBilities ParticipAtion (200 pts = 20%): This is defined as your physical and intellectual presence. Please arrive at each class session on time and fully prepared to take part in our ongoing discussion. Being fully prepared means that you will have completed the assigned readings, reflected upon them, and formulated some questions and themes to contribute to the conversation. In addition to lecture-discussion where participation opportunities will be plentiful, we will also engage in small group activities to help us address aspects of the topics. Attendance will not be taken in the class; it is your responsibility to choose to be here. However, you will be asked for your own self-assessment of your presence and overall contributions to the class around the mid-point and end of the semester. The mid-point self-assessment will enable you to target areas where you feel your participation could be improved, and the end-point self-assessment will allow you to evaluate whether you met your own targets for participation. Important note: You may be called upon randomly from the course roster at any time to comment upon or respond to a question about an assigned reading. TAke Home Mid-Term Exam (300 pts = 30%): This will be a cumulative exam of several short essay questions through Part II of the syllabus. It will be distributed in class on Friday 10/4 and will be due via the Carmen Dropbox on Friday 10/11 by 5:00pm. Late exams will be accepted only under really, really extenuating circumstances. ProposAl for FinAl EssAy (200 pts = 20%): A one-page proposal will be submitted identifying your final paper topic, key questions you plan to investigate, and a bibliography of at least five possible research sources you intend to employ. This is due in class on Wednesday 10/23. If you have to miss class on this date the proposal is still due but can be submitted via email by 5:00pm. FinAl EssAy (300 pts = 30%): Your final paper for the course is to be a 7-10 page essay that explores the genealogy of a contemporary feminist issue, tracing its conceptual framework and situating its key assumptions and aims in the various histories of feminist thought we engage in this course. The essay must pay careful attention to both differences from and transformations of previous theories/ways of thinking about this issue. This is due by 5:00pm Wednesday December 4th in the Carmen Dropbox. Late essays will not be accepted. Course GrAding Grading A = 93-100% B- = 80-82% D+ = 67-69% A- = 90-92% C+ = 77-79% D = 63-66% B+ = 87-89% C = 73-76% D- = 60-62% B = 83-86% C- = 70-72% F = below 60% AcAdemic Integrity/PlAgiArism Students are expected to maintain complete academic integrity. Please become familiar with the Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Department’s statement on plagiarism: As defined by University Rule 3335-31-02, plagiarism is “the representation of another’s works or ideas as one’s own; it includes the unacknowledged word for word use and/or paraphrasing of another’s work, and/or the inappropriate unacknowledged use of another person’s ideas.” Plagiarism is one of the most serious offenses that can be committed in an academic community; as such it is the obligation of this department and its instructors to report all cases of suspected plagiarism to the Committee on Academic Misconduct. After the report is filed a hearing takes place and if the student is found guilty, the possible punishment ranges from failing the class to suspension or expulsion from the university. Although the existence of the Internet makes it relatively easy to plagiarize, it also makes it even easier for instructors to find evidence of plagiarism. It is obvious to most teachers when a student turns in work that is not his or her own and plagiarism search engines make documenting the offense very simple. You should always cite your sources (I can help you with this if you are unfamiliar with proper styles of documentation). Always ask questions before you turn in an assignment if you are uncertain about what constitutes plagiarism. Always see your TA or professor if you are having difficulty with an assignment. To preserve the integrity of OSU as an institution of higher learning, to maintain your own integrity, and to avoid jeopardizing your future, DO NOT PLAGIARIZE! Writing Center The Writing Center allows you to make appointments to get assistance from trained writing tutors. To utilize this university-sponsored service, contact the Writing Center at (614) 680-4291 or visit their website at http://cstw.osu.edu/writingcenter. Please also note that the Resources section of the Writing Center website contains a variety of extremely helpful materials on topics such as source citation, drafting and style, editing and grammar. Course Topic Outline and Reading Schedule Introduction to the Class “…how and why did things get to be the way they are?” “…there are many histories of feminist theory…” W 8/21 The course framework; key concepts, issues and questions that are our focus Read: “Introduction” (FTR, 1-10) Part I: Feminist Thought in Times And SpAces “As A frAmework for telling feminist histories, the wAve metAphor oBscures more thAn it illuminates.” A Few ‘Pre-Feminist’ Beginnings “…because of doubt and a low opinion of myself and because of diverse sayings of men, I refused for a long time a call to write…” F 8/23 Scheherazade as an early feminist: http://www.npr.org/2013/06/09/189539866/scheherazade-from-storytelling-slave-to-first- feminist Hildegard von Bingen (1098-1179): http://www.hildegard.org/documents/flanagan.html http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/med/hildegarde.asp Female Troubadors (Trobairitz) ca.
Recommended publications
  • Multiple Injustices Critical Issues in Indigenous Studies
    MULTIPLE INJUSTICES CRITICAL ISSUES IN Indigenous STUDIES Jeffrey P. Shepherd and Myla Vicenti Carpio series editors advisory board Hokulani Aikau Jennifer Nez Denetdale Eva Marie Garroutte John Maynard Alejandra Navarro-Smith Gladys Tzul Keith Camacho Margaret Elizabeth Kovach Vicente Diaz R. AÍDA HERNÁNDEZ CASTILLO MULTIPLE INJUSTICES Indigenous Women, Law, and Political Struggle in Latin America TUCSON The University of Arizona Press www.uapress.arizona.edu © 2016 The Arizona Board of Regents All rights reserved. Published 2016 Printed in the United States of America 21 20 19 18 17 16 6 5 4 3 2 1 ISBN-13: 978-0-8165-3249-0 (cloth) Cover design by Leigh McDonald Cover illustration produced in Pilar Hinojosa’s Sumi-e workshop in the Feminine Prison of Atlacholoaya, Morelos. Publication of this book is made possible in part by the proceeds of a permanent endowment created with the assistance of a Challenge Grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities, a federal agency. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data [to come] This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). CONTENTS List of Illustrations vii Acknowledgments ix Introduction 3 1 Activist Research on Justice and Indigenous Women’s Rights 33 2 Multiple Dialogues and Struggles for Justice: Political Genealogies of Indigenous Women in Mexico, Guatemala, and Colombia 67 3 Indigenous Justices: New Spaces of Struggle for Women 123 4 From Victims to Human Rights Defenders: International Litigation and the Struggle for Justice of Indigenous Women 163 5 From the Multicultural State to the Penal State: Incarcerated Indigenous Women and the Criminalization of Poverty 190 Final Thoughts 229 Appendix 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Maya Knowledge and the Possibility of Decolonizing Education in Guatemala
    Indigenous Maya Knowledge and the Possibility of Decolonizing Education in Guatemala by Vivian Michelle Jiménez Estrada A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University of Toronto © Copyright by Vivian Michelle Jiménez Estrada 2012 Indigenous Maya Knowledge and the Possibility of Decolonizing Education in Guatemala Vivian Michelle Jiménez Estrada Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education University of Toronto 2012 Abstract Maya peoples in Guatemala continue to practice their Indigenous knowledge in spite of the violence experienced since the Spanish invasion in 1524. From 1991 until 1996, the state and civil society signed a series of Peace Accords that promised to better meet the needs of the Maya, Xinka, Garífuna and non-Indigenous groups living there. In this context, how does the current educational system meet the varied needs of these groups? My research investigates the philosophy and praxis of Maya Indigenous knowledge (MIK) in broadly defined educational contexts through the stories of 17 diverse Maya professional women and men involved in educational reform that currently live and work in Guatemala City. How do they reclaim and apply their ancestral knowledge daily? What possible applications of MIK can transform society? The findings reveal that MIK promotes social change and healing within and outside institutionalized educational spaces and argues that academia needs to make room for Indigenous theorizing mainly in areas of education, gender, knowledge production, and nation building. I analyze these areas from anticolonial and critical Indigenous standpoints from which gender and Indigenous identities weave through the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist International Relations and “Epistemic Blank Spots”: Entrenching Hegemony?
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2016 Feminist International Relations and “Epistemic Blank Spots”: Entrenching Hegemony? Jasmine Underwood Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the International Relations Commons Repository Citation Underwood, Jasmine, "Feminist International Relations and “Epistemic Blank Spots”: Entrenching Hegemony?" (2016). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 1679. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/1679 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FEMINIST INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND “EPISTEMIC BLANK SPOTS”: ENTRENCHING HEGEMONY? A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts By JASMINE UNDERWOOD B.A. International Studies, The Ohio State University, 2009 2016 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL November 8, 2016 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Jasmine Underwood ENTITLED Feminist International Relations and “Epistemic Blank Spots”: Entrenching Hegemony? BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Arts. ______________________ December A. Green, Ph.D. Co-Director ______________________ Hope E. Jennings, Ph.D. Co-Director ______________________ Laura M. Luehrmann, Ph.D. Director, Master of Arts Program in International and Comparative Politics Committee on Final Examination: Approved by Thesis Committee: ________________________ December A. Green, Ph.D. Department of Political Science ________________________ Hope E.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Criticism: the Importance of Sharing the Native Female Journey
    Feminist Criticism: The Importance Of Sharing The Native Female Journey A Senior Project Presented to The Faculty of the Communication Studies Department California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Arts By Michelle Newfield Dr. Richard Besel Senior Project Advisor Signature Date T. C. Winebrenner Department Chair Signature Date © 2010 Michelle Newfield Table of Contents Feminist Criticism: The Importance of Sharing the Native Female Journey..................... 1 Understanding Sister Nations from a Feminist Perspective............................................... 3 The Female Native American Role and the Importance of Storytelling............................ 5 Feminist Criticism Used to Decode Female Native Rhetoric............................................ 7 Native American Authors Bring the Struggle “Back Home” to Life................................. 8 The Use of Tragic Native Humor to Address Cultural Tensions...................................... 12 Sister Nations Reveals Stereotypes and Distortion of the Female Image......................... 16 Stereotypes and Prejudice................................................................................................. 18 Conclusion........................................................................................................................ 21 Works Cited...................................................................................................................... 25 Newfield 1 Feminist
    [Show full text]
  • Mainstream Feminism
    Feminist movements and ideologies This collection of feminist buttons from a women's museum shows some messages from feminist movements. A variety of movements of feminist ideology have developed over the years. They vary in goals, strategies, and affiliations. They often overlap, and some feminists identify themselves with several branches of feminist thought. Groupings Judith Lorber distinguishes between three broad kinds of feminist discourses: gender reform feminisms, gender resistant feminisms, and gender revolution feminisms. In her typology, gender reform feminisms are rooted in the political philosophy of liberalism with its emphasis on individual rights. Gender resistant feminisms focus on specific behaviors and group dynamics through which women are kept in a subordinate position, even in subcultures which claim to support gender equality. Gender revolution feminisms seek to disrupt the social order through deconstructing its concepts and categories and analyzing the cultural reproduction of inequalities.[1] Movements and ideologies Mainstream feminism … "Mainstream feminism" as a general term identifies feminist ideologies and movements which do not fall into either the socialist or radical feminist camps. The mainstream feminist movement traditionally focused on political and legal reform, and has its roots in first- wave feminism and in the historical liberal feminism of the 19th and early- 20th centuries. In 2017, Angela Davis referred to mainstream feminism as "bourgeois feminism".[2] The term is today often used by essayists[3] and cultural analysts[4] in reference to a movement made palatable to a general audience by celebrity supporters like Taylor Swift.[5] Mainstream feminism is often derisively referred to as "white feminism,"[6] a term implying that mainstream feminists don't fight for intersectionality with race, class, and sexuality.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Indigenous Feminist Relational Sovereignty: Feminist Conversations, Non-Colonizing Solidarities, Inclusive Nations
    Exploring Indigenous Feminist Relational Sovereignty: Feminist Conversations, Non-colonizing Solidarities, Inclusive Nations Carol Lynne D'Arcangelis is a PhD student Introduction in Adult Education and Community Thus, I came to understand pedagogies in multiple Development at OISE/UT. Her research ways: as something given, as in handed, revealed; as draws from critical pedagogy, Indigenous, in breaking through, transgressing, disrupting, inverting post-colonial, critical race and feminist inherited concepts and practices, those psychic, literatures to consider the theoretical and analytic and organizational methodologies we deploy to practical possibilities for fostering know what we believe we know so as to make different non-colonizing solidarities between conversations and solidarities possible. Indigenous women and allies. Carol Lynne (Alexander 2005, 7) comes to her studies from an extended period of social justice activism and human rights Following Jacqui Alexander, I advocacy in Central America. endeavour to stimulate feminist conversations and solidarities by exploring points of Abstract engagement between Indigenous feminist This article juxtaposes Indigenous feminist notions of relational sovereignty and relevant perspectives on sovereignty with related ideas aspects of non-Indigenous feminist thought. of feminist scholars Jacqui Alexander and My reasons are two-fold - a blending of theory Nandita Sharma in order to further feminist and practice: to simultaneously further theorizations of sovereignty and nationhood feminist theorizations of sovereignty and that reject neo-liberalism, and to forge a nationhood that reject neoliberalism and to "non-colonizing feminist solidarity" with forge a "non-colonizing feminist solidarity" Indigenous peoples, particularly Indigenous (Mohanty 2003) with Indigenous peoples, women, in their struggles for particularly Indigenous women, in their self-determination.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction Reading Indigenous Women's Life Writing in Australia and North America
    Introduction Reading Indigenous Women’s Life Writing in Australia and North America: A Twenty-first Century Perspective The main goal of this introductory section is to outline some of the general characteristics of Indigenous women’s life writing 1 in Australia and North America and indicate the motives for a comparative structural and thematic analysis of the chosen narratives. Although it is not my intention to give the impression that Indigenous women’s life writing is a homogenous textual group, I want to foreground certain parallels this genre offers in both regions. These parallels derive first and foremost from the common histories of European invasion of the two continents and the subsequent process of colonization of 1 Throughout this work, I use the term “life writing,” rather than “auto/biography,” to refer to the genre of personal narratives. Generally speaking, I understand the term “auto/biography” as being closely related to the Euroamerican literary tradition which has developed its own theory of auto/biography. I use the term “life writing” as a broader term, which can incorporate auto/biographical accounts, as-told-to auto/biographies, collaborative oral history projects, confessional and trauma narratives, testimonies, as well as collective and communal life narratives. In my view, this term is particularly relevant as it is often positioned as challenging the foundations of Western auto/biography of portraying one’s own or the other’s individual life and self. In Australia, the term “life writing” is used almost exclusively to designate Indigenous women’s life stories, hence the rationale provided by Moreton-Robinson: “The term ‘life-writing’ has been used because Indigenous women’s texts that have been analysed do not fit the usual strict chronological narrative of autobiography, and they are the products of collaborative lives” ( Talkin’ Up to the White Woman 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Decolonial Feminist Research on Indigeneity in Contemporary Peru
    Toward a Decolonial Feminist Research on Indigeneity in Contemporary Peru ______________________________________________ CARMEN VALDIVIA UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS Abstract This paper proposes a decolonial feminist framework for doing research on the representation of Indigenous women in contemporary Peruvian cultural and media production. It argues for an analytical methodology that recognizes Indigenous women gendered experience of colonialism—of being subjected to violence, made invisible and muted throughout historiography, and reduced to stagnant and degrading stereotypes in current cultural representations. It appositionally reads both the modern Peruvian nation-state and Western academic research as structures of colonial figurations that obscure the gender complexity of Indigenous identity, engaging a gender perspective that considers the contested relationship between Indigeneity and Peruvian identity, while centering Indigenous women’ political and cultural mobilities shed light on the complexities of identitarian politics and the role of hetero—and ethnonormative neoliberal regimes. Keywords: Decolonial feminism, Indigenous women, cultural representation, colonialism and academic complicity, nation-state’s heteronormativity and ethnonormativity 108 | Valdivia, C. Transmodernity. Fall Issue, 2020 The word itself, “research,” is probably one of the dirtiest words in the Indigenous world’s vocabulary… it stirs up silence, it conjures up bad memories, it raises a smile that is knowing and distrustful. —Linda Tuhiwai-Smith Social
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Feminism and Native American Literature Leah Sneider
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository English Language and Literature ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2-9-2011 Decolonizing Gender: Indigenous Feminism and Native American Literature Leah Sneider Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/engl_etds Recommended Citation Sneider, Leah. "Decolonizing Gender: Indigenous Feminism and Native American Literature." (2011). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/engl_etds/9 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Language and Literature ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DECOLONIZING GENDER: INDIGENOUS FEMINISM AND NATIVE AMERICAN LITERATURE BY LEAH MAIA SNEIDER B.A., English, University of Michigan, 1998 M.A., English, San Diego State University, 2005 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy English The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico December, 2010 ii © 2010, Leah Maia Sneider iii DEDICATION To my maternal grandparents, Rose and Varkes Tavtigian, who have taught me so much about the meaning of love and family. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am extremely grateful to all of my committee members for their guidance and patience during this process. Dr. Scharnhorst, my chair, graciously took this project on and taught me the rigor of revision. Dr. Washburn bore the burden of helping me to develop my argument fully and clearly. As my outside reader, Dr. Glenn consistently offered extremely valuable (and timely) feedback and suggestions. Dr. Goldstein provided critical questions that will help me to shape this project into a manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cycles of Violence Against Native Women: an Analysis of Colonialism, Historical Legislation and the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013
    PSU McNair Scholars Online Journal Volume 12 Issue 1 Beyond the Nation-State: Decolonial, Liberatory, and Critical Essays Imaging an Article 1 Otherwise 2018 The Cycles of Violence Against Native Women: An Analysis of Colonialism, Historical Legislation and the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 Genevieve M. Le May Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/mcnair Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Le May, Genevieve M. (2018) "The Cycles of Violence Against Native Women: An Analysis of Colonialism, Historical Legislation and the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013," PSU McNair Scholars Online Journal: Vol. 12: Iss. 1, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15760/mcnair.2018.1 This open access Article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). All documents in PDXScholar should meet accessibility standards. If we can make this document more accessible to you, contact our team. Portland State University McNair Research Journal 2018 Cycles of Violence Against Native Women: An Analysis of Colonialism, Historical Legislation and the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 By Genevieve Marie Le May Faculty Mentor: Dr. Brook Colley (Eastern Cherokee/Wasco) Citation: Le May, Genevieve M. The Perpetuating Cycles of Violence Against Native Women: An Analysis of Colonialism, Historical Legislation and the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013. Portland State University McNair Scholars Online Journal, 2016: 17 1 Cycles of Violence Against Native Women: An Analysis of Colonialism, Historical Legislation and the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 By Genevieve Marie Le May Faculty Mentor: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Culture Through an Unconventional Feminist Lens
    Graff 1 Native American Culture through an Unconventional Feminist Lens Yankton Sioux author Zitkala-Ša’s American Indian Stories illustrates the complexities ​ ​ of the shift in Native American identity due to forceful and violent white integration institutions and the toll they have on family relationships, as illustrated through the author’s autobiographical account of her relationship with her mother. The author’s personal memories, thoughts, and emotions from an early childhood emphasize the harsh, cruel nature of such establishments and the flawed justification behind them. These integration institutions alter who Zitkala-Ša is as a writer and as a Native American, a prime example of modern colonialism. Such colonialism also forces a feminist view onto the intellectual production of indigenous women; as scholar of Native American literature Nancy Marie Mithlo asserts, “Native women's lives and bodies have historically been incorporated into the Western feminist movement as an expedient means of advancing predetermined theoretical aims, but not often as a viable alternative dimension of gender analysis” (Mithlo 8). Mithlo’s statement defends the idea that feminism, in its contemporary form, is not native to Indian culture, however, it continues to provide insight into the critical conversation surrounding the movement. Native women, especially in the early 20th century, didn’t describe themselves as particularly feminist, but there are instances where Native American culture collides with feminist values and affect the movement as a whole. One such instance is the work of Yankton Sioux author Zitkala-Ša. Specifically within the scope of her writings in Impressions of an Indian Childhood, ​ ​ Zitkala-Ša’s writing style transforms, mirroring the structure of the feminist movement, which existed outside her native culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Decolonizing Feminism: from Reproductive Abuse to Reproductive Justice
    Decolonizing Feminism: From Reproductive Abuse to Reproductive Justice There is presently much discussion among Karen Stote is an Assistant Professor of Women and scholars, activists, and social policy researchers over the Gender Studies at Wilfrid Laurier University. She teach- meaning, methodology, and theory of intersectionality. es courses on the history of Indian policy and Indig- What began as a critique by women of colour and Indig- enous-settler relations, feminism and the politics of enous women of social movements that overlooked the decolonization, and issues of environmental and repro- realities of life for those marginalized because of their ductive justice. She is the author of An Act of Genocide: gender, but also because of their race, class, sexuality, Colonialism and the Sterilization of Aboriginal Women indigeneity and/or (dis)ability (Crenshaw 1991; Com- (Fernwood 2015). bahee River Collective 1983; Collins 2000; Davis 1983; Smith 2000; Smith 2005c; Lorde 1984), has expanded Abstract to include a vast literature on the multifaceted aspects This paper asks why reproductive gains have sometimes of oppression and how laws, policies, and social struc- amounted to reproductive abuse for Indigenous women tures are experienced differently based on the social in Canada. Guided by an intersectional and decolonial location one occupies. Intersectionality is now increas- approach, it provides a historical material critique of ingly incorporated into Women’s and Gender Studies the individualized rights discourse and reformist goals programs as a legitimate approach to social theory and that tend to underlay feminist struggles in Canada. It is being adopted by mainstream scholars and activists explores how Western feminism might support decolo- as a tool guiding research, organizing, and analysis nization and reproductive justice.
    [Show full text]