DOCSLIB.ORG

Otay Mesa – Mesa De Otay Transportation Binational Corridor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Otay Mesa – Mesa De Otay Transportation Binational Corridor Otay Mesa – Mesa de Otay Transportation Binational Corridor Draft Strategic Plan Housing March 2007 Economic Development Environment TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Foundation of the Otay Mesa-Mesa de Otay Binational Corridor Strategic Plan................................ 1 The Collaboration Process......................................................................................................................... 1 The Strategic Planning Process ................................................................................................................ 3 Institutional Approval Process ................................................................................................................. 3 The City of Tijuana ............................................................................................................................. 3 San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) ......................................................................... 4 Organization of the Report ..................................................................................................................... 5 ISSUES FOR EVALUATION AND WORK PROGRAMS Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 7 The Binational Study Area ..................................................................................................................... 7 Issues Identified ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Interactive Polling ................................................................................................................................... 9 Process ............................................................................................................................................... 9 Results ............................................................................................................................................... 10 Strategic Plan Work Program ................................................................................................................ 10 Transportation .................................................................................................................................. 10 Economic Development ................................................................................................................... 11 Housing ............................................................................................................................................. 12 Environment ..................................................................................................................................... 12 POPULATION, HOUSING, LAND USE, AND EMPLOYMENT Population ............................................................................................................................................... 13 Current Population .......................................................................................................................... 13 Projected 2030 Population .............................................................................................................. 14 Housing .................................................................................................................................................... 14 Current Housing Units ..................................................................................................................... 14 Forecasted Housing Units ................................................................................................................ 15 Land Use .................................................................................................................................................. 17 Current Land Use .............................................................................................................................. 17 Planned Land Use ............................................................................................................................. 18 Otay Mesa Community Plan Land Use Scenarios ........................................................................... 21 Employment ............................................................................................................................................ 22 Current Employment ........................................................................................................................ 22 Forecasted 2030 Employment ......................................................................................................... 22 Draft Otay Mesa-Mesa de Otay Binational Corridor Strategic Plan i Table of Contents INTERREGIONAL TRAVEL Otay Mesa Port of Entry: Key Findings of Crossborder Travel Surveys ................................................ 23 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................................. 26 TRANSPORTATION Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 27 Existing Setting ....................................................................................................................................... 27 Otay Mesa-Mesa de Otay POE ......................................................................................................... 27 Highways ........................................................................................................................................... 32 Transit ............................................................................................................................................... 33 Airports ............................................................................................................................................. 34 Freight Rail ........................................................................................................................................ 36 Future East Otay Mesa – Otay II POE and Connecting Roads .............................................................. 37 Status of the Proposed East Otay Mesa-Otay II POE ...................................................................... 37 Improvements to Otay Mesa-Mesa de Otay POE and Connecting Roads ........................................... 39 Background ....................................................................................................................................... 39 Proposed Improvements to Otay Mesa-Mesa de Otay Commercial POE ..................................... 40 Crossborder and Regional Public Transportation Services ................................................................... 40 South Bay BRT ................................................................................................................................... 40 Otay Mesa POE Paseo de la Amistad Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Alternatives Study ..... 40 City of Tijuana’s Draft Public Transportation Plan ............................................................................... 44 Strategies.................................................................................................................................................. 44 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 59 Existing Setting ....................................................................................................................................... 59 Existing Plans and Programs .................................................................................................................. 60 San Diego Regional Economic Evaluation and Prosperity Strategy ............................................. 60 Otay Mesa Community Plan Update ............................................................................................... 62 Development Plans for the City of Tijuana and the State of Baja California .............................. 63 Crossborder Innovation and Competitiveness Initiative ............................................................... 63 Strategies.................................................................................................................................................. 65 HOUSING Existing Setting ....................................................................................................................................... 69 Housing Characteristics..................................................................................................................... 69 Tijuana and San Diego Home Prices ............................................................................................... 70 Tijuana and San Diego Housing Markets ....................................................................................... 71 Tijuana and San Diego Housing-Related Infrastructure and Irregular Developments ............... 72 Existing Plans and Programs .................................................................................................................. 73 City of San Diego – Otay Mesa Community Plan ........................................................................... 73 Smart Growth ..................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Overall Finish Results 189 Entries Inaugural Lucenra SCORE Baja
    Inaugural Lucenra SCORE Baja 400 Page 1 of 5 Ensenada Printed: 11/12/2019 8:53 pm * Penalty Applied September 21, 2019 Overall Finish Results 189 Entries Place Racer City, State Nbr Class Pos. Brand Laps Elapsed Group: A 1 Ryan Arciero Huntington Beach, CA 32 SCORE Trophy Truck 1 HEF 1 08:26:31.918 2 Andy Mc Millin San Diego, CA 31 SCORE Trophy Truck * 2 CHV 1 08:28:08.863 3 Tavo Vildosola Mexicali, BC 21 SCORE Trophy Truck * 3 CTM 1 08:28:55.694 4 Justin Lofton Brawley, CA 41 SCORE Trophy Truck 4 FOR 1 08:30:14.965 5 Alan Ampudia Ensenada, BC 10 SCORE Trophy Truck * 5 FOR 1 08:30:47.564 6 Cameron Steele San Clemente, CA 16 SCORE Trophy Truck 6 GEI 1 08:30:50.372 7 B. J. Baldwin Las Vegas, NV 97 SCORE Trophy Truck * 7 TOY 1 08:31:25.754 8 Justin Morgan El Cajon, CA 1X Pro Moto Unlimited 1 HON 1 08:32:29.892 9 Santiago Creel Mexico City, MX 66X Pro Moto Unlimited 2 KTM 1 08:32:36.032 10 Chris Miller Rancho Santa Fe, CA 40 SCORE Trophy Truck * 8 TOY 1 08:33:20.350 11 Ricky Jonson Lake Elsinore, CA 6 SCORE Trophy Truck 9 MAS 1 08:35:30.957 12 Bobby Pecoy Anaheim, CA 14 SCORE Trophy Truck 10 FOR 1 08:35:57.490 13 Bryce Menzies Las Vegas, NV 7 SCORE Trophy Truck 11 FOR 1 08:39:35.123 14 Luke Mc Millin El Cajon, CA 83 SCORE Trophy Truck 12 FOR 1 08:40:17.860 15 Mike Walser Comfort, TX 89 SCORE Trophy Truck 13 MAS 1 08:43:02.295 16 Robby Gordon Orange, CA 77 SCORE Trophy Truck * 14 CHV 1 08:44:07.231 17 Dave Taylor Page, AZ 26 SCORE Trophy Truck * 15 FOR 1 08:44:22.550 18 Troy Herbst Huntington Beach, CA 54 SCORE Trophy Truck 16 HEF 1 08:45:44.371
    [Show full text]
  • Port of San Diego
    Port of San Diego The Port of San Diego manages San Diego Bay and its 34 miles of beautiful, natural waterfront for the people of California. The Port was established in 1962 under the Port Act and is charged with implementing the Tidelands Trust Doctrine. For over fifty years, the Port’s five-member cities - Chula Vista, Coronado, Imperial Beach, National City and San Diego - have worked together to develop and promote LEGENDPort of commerce, navigation, recreation and fisheries on and BNSFSan Diego UP/SP Trackage Rights Handling Carrier LEGEND around San Diego Bay. Self-funded, the port contributes Haulage Agreement BNSF billions annually to San Diego’s economy, benefiting the UP/SP Trackage Rights Handling Carrier community, local businesses and employees. The port’s Haulage Agreement cargo maritime business includes two cargo terminals. TERMINAL CAPABILITIES • Harbor: One (San Diego Bay) • Berths: 15 • Cranes: 1 mobile harbor crane • Depth: 30 ft. - 43 ft. • Facilities: Two marine cargo terminals • Rail-Served: On-dock terminal rail • Cargo Handled: Breakbulk Project Cargo Refrigerated Ro-Ro (Roll-on/Roll-off) Alex Williamson Brian Johnston Connie Le Fevre Greg Borossay Sales Manager Sales Manager Sr Trade Representative Maritime Commercial BNSF Railway BNSF Railway Port of San Diego Port of San Diego [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Office: 612-380-8852 Office: 817-304-6425 619-756-1949 619-686-6242 Port of San Diego TERMINAL CAPABILITIES OVERVIEW TENTH AVENUE MARINE TERMINAL • Depth: 30 ft. – 43 ft. • Berth(s): Eight, equaling 4,347 ft. • Cargo Handling Capabilities: • Port owned - 100 Ton Gottwald Crane • Stevedore owned and operated - Reach stackers, rail pusher (leased), utility trucks, fork lifts and heavy lifts • Rail-Served: On-dock rail adjacent to BNSF yard • Main yard: Seven spurs, equaling 9000 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Carrico Department of American Indian Studies, San Diego State University
    CLANS AND SHIMULLS/SIBS OF WESTERN SAN DIEGO COUNTY RICHARD L. CARRICO DEPARTMENT OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDIES, SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY In San Diego County and northern Baja California the social and political make-up of the Kumeyaay (Ipai and Tipai) is fairly well documented for the settlements and villages east of the western foothills of the Cuyamaca Mountains and into the western Imperial Desert. By contrast, the traditional and historical distribution and names of the coastal and inland valley clans is far less documented. This paucity of data for the western clans is largely a function of the removal of these clans from the region by European colonialists and their settlement in the interior of San Diego County by 1875. The goal of this study is to fill in the gaps in our knowledge of the precontact and early proto-historic coastal and inland valley clans through the use of Spanish mission records and early historic documents. As a result of this study 10 coastal and inland valley clans have been identified and their general area of distribution plotted. The combination of earlier studies with the current study provides a much clearer and more complete depiction of the Kumeyaay clans of San Diego County. The Kumeyaay people of San Diego County trace their family lineage back to a distant past and often to animals and creatures from another time. In spite of decades of study, traditional Kumeyaay social organization remains unclear. The basic unit appears to have been kin groups referred to by a variety of names including sib, shimulls, cimuLs, gens, and gentes.
    [Show full text]
  • Comisi6n Estatal De Servicios P0blicos De Tijuana
    COMISI6N ESTATAL DE SERVICIOS P0BLICOS DE TIJUANA Jullo2008 www.cuidoelagua.or 1- www.cespt.gob.mxg INDICE 1.- ANTECEDENTES CESPT (Cobertura de Agua y Eficiencia) 2.- EL AGUA COMO PROMOTOR DE DESARROLLO 3.- PROBLEMÁTICA BINACIONAL 4.- CERO DESCARGAS 5.- PROYECTO MORADO Y CERCA 6.- METAS CESPT 2013 1.-ANTECEDENTES CESPT I www.cespt.gob.mx ANTECEDENTES CESPT • Empresa descentralizada del Gobierno del estado encargada del servicio de agua potable y alcantarillado para las ciudades de Tijuana y Playas de Rosarito. • Más de 500,000 conexiones. • 1,764 empleados. • 7 Distritos de operación y mantenimiento. • 13 Centros de atención foráneos y 5 cajeros automáticos. • 3 Plantas potabilizadoras. • 13 plantas de tratamiento de aguas residuales operadas por CESPT y una planta de tratamiento operada por los Estados unidos. • Arranque de una nueva planta de tratamiento de aguas residuales (Monte de los Olivos). • 90 % del suministro de agua proviene del Río Colorado (250 Kms de distancia y 1060 mts de altura) Cobertura de Agua y Eficiencia 50 46 43.9 41.9 42.2 42.2 40 41 40.1 38.9 38.2 CR EDIT 33.5 JA O P 31.5 PON LAN ES MAE 30 B STR ID 25 NA O, -BA 26.4 27.3 %-2 DB NO 2% ANK- 3 B 25.5 25.2 24.2 EPA 5%- RA 26.1 20% 25% S 24.8 23.5 20 21.7 21.5 19 . 2 19 18 . 8 18.5 10 0 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 CRECIMIENTO DE LA POBLACIÓN Eficiencia Física desde 1990 hasta 2009 1990 to 2009 58.1 % hasta 81.5 % 773,327 - 1,664,339 hab (115.3%) Promedio Anual 6.4 % COMUNICADO Fitch Rating• conflnna Ia callflc:aciOn de A+(mex) de Ia ComlsiOn Estatal de Servlclos P&lbllcos de Tijuana (CESPT) N.L.
    [Show full text]
  • March 19, 2012 by SDPTA Chair Jim Unger
    March 19, 2012 By SDPTA C hair Jim Unger Overview– Jim Unger Overview– Jim Unger Port of San Diego Facts: Port includes Five Member Cities: Chula Vista, Coronado, Imperial Beach, National City, San Diego Board of 7 Port Commissioners: Chairman Lou Smith, Coronado Commissioner Vice Chair Ann Moore, Chula Vista Commissioner Secretary Lee Burdick, San Diego Commissioner Commissioner Dan Malcolm, Imperial Beach Commissioner Bob Nelson, San Diego Commissioner Dukie Valderrama, National City Commissioner Scott Peters, San Diego Overview The San Diego Unified Port District a nd Tidelands businesses contributes 30% of Gross Regional Product 77,000 Jobs Partnership with the Port and its tenants Overview The Port is self-sustaining from revenues collected from the Port Tenants with NO TAX DOLLARS FROM CITIZENS Overview Partnership with the Port of San Diego – Participation on the Following Port/Tenant Committees: Maritime, Marketing, Real Estate, Cruise Ship, Public Art, Environmental, Accessibility, Port with no Borders Scholarship & Tidelands Forestry. Downsizing of Port - new President/CEO Wayne Darbeau 13 departments down to 6 & decreased employee headcount by 100 without lay-offs. Background California Statelands Commission Public Trust Policy (2 excerpts below t aken from Public Trust Policy) Lands are owned by t he public and held in trust for the people by t he State of California. Uses of trust lands are generally l imited to those that are water dependent or related, and include commerce, fisheries, and navigation, environmental
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego Unified Port District San Diego, CA 92101
    Page 1 of 215 3165 Pacific Hwy. San Diego Unified Port District San Diego, CA 92101 Special Meeting Minutes Board of Port Commissioners Wednesday,January16,2019 9:30 AM Don L. Nay Port Administration Boardroom Closed Session A. Roll Call. Present: 7 - Commissioner Bonelli, Chairperson Castellanos, Commissioner Malcolm, Commissioner Merrifield, Commissioner Moore, Commissioner Valderrama, and Commissioner Zucchet Excused: 0 Absent: 0 Commissioner Moore was excused until she arrived at 9:36 am. Officers Present: Coniglio, DeAngelis, Monson, Morales, and Russell B. Public Communications. The following member(s) of the public addressed the Board with non agenda-related comments: None CLOSED SESSION Thomas A. Russell, General Counsel, announced the Closed Session items as follows: 1. Closed Session Item No. 1 PERSONNEL EVALUATION: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT/CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Government Code Section 54957 No reportable action was taken on this item. San Diego Unified Port District Page 1 Page 2 of 215 Board of Port Commissioners Special Meeting Minutes January 16, 2019 2. 2019-0020 Closed Session Item No. 2 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: SDUPD - Chula Vista Bayfront parcel consisting of approximately 74.7 acres of land at H Street and Marina Parkway, Chula Vista Negotiating Parties: RIDA Chula Vista, LLC,- Ira Mitzner and Luke Charlton; City of Chula Vista - Gary Halbert; SDUPD - Shaun Sumner, Tony Gordon, Adam Meyer, Stephanie Shook and Sean Jones. Under Negotiations: Price and Terms
    [Show full text]
  • WCCC Board of Directors Quarterly Meeting
    WCCC Board of Directors Quarterly Meeting Tuesday, April 21 – Wednesday, April 22, 2009 Hosts: Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities and the Alaska Railroad Corporation 327 W Ship Creek Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99501 (Note: All Times as Alaska Daylight Time – 1 Hour Earlier than WA, OR, CA) SANDAG Staff Contact: Linda Culp, (619) 699-6957; [email protected] Conference Call Information For All Meetings: 1-877-356- 9437, Access Code 9805119 Tuesday, April 21, 2009 2:00 pm ITS, Operations, and Environment Committee Alternative Fuel Corridor Program Climate Change Activities Alaska Environmental Strategies Best Practices Manual Wednesday, April 22, 2009 8:30 am WCCC Board of Directors Coalition Business Plan Outreach Program Funding Opportunities Goods Movement Committee Federal Relations Committee Marad Port and Intermodal System Report Goods Movement in Alaska 2:00 pm Adjourn www.westcoastcorridors.org MEETING LOCATION Meetings are being hosted by the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities and the Alaska Railroad Corporation. The physical location will be at the Railroad Corporation: Alaska Railroad Corporation 327 W Ship Creek Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Offices are about 7 miles from the Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport. Please RSVP for the meeting as we may have transportation arranged to and from the airport and we’ll need your name for security reasons at the office. 2 ITS, Operations and Environment Committee Tuesday, April 21, 2009 2:00 PM Bruce Agnew, Rex Burkholder, Co-Chairs Agenda ITEM # ACTION 1. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS (Bruce Agnew, Co-Chair) 2. ALTERNATIVE FUEL CORRIDOR PROGRAM: +2A. INTERSTATE CLEAN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR INFORMATION (Cliff Gladstein, President, Gladstein & Neandross) This program, started in 1996, has led to $50 million for alternative fueling stations on parts of I-5, CA-99, I-10, I-15, and I-80 in California, Nevada, and Utah.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of San Francisco Maritime Cargo and Warehouse Market Analysis
    PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO MARITIME CARGO AND WAREHOUSE MARKET ANALYSIS January 5, 2009 FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Port of San Francisco Prepared by: CBRE Consulting, Inc. Martin Associates EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 3 II. ASSESSEMENT OF EXISTING MARKETS............................................................................ 4 1 HISTORIC MARINE CARGO ACTIVITY AT WEST COAST PORTS............................................ 4 2 ASSESSMENT OF COMPETING BAY AREA PORTS ................................................................... 6 2.1 Port of Redwood City ........................................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Port of Richmond .............................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Port of Stockton ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.4 Port of Sacramento........................................................................................................................... 8 2.5 Port of Benicia................................................................................................................................... 8 3 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
    [Show full text]
  • Periférico Aeropuerto-Zapata-Doble Piso a Playas”
    PRIMERA ETAPA DE LA VIALIDAD “PERIFÉRICO AEROPUERTO-ZAPATA-DOBLE PISO A PLAYAS” MEMORIA TÉCNICA Memoria Técnica Página 1 de 134 INDICE 1. INTRODUCCIÓN .................................................................................................... 6 2. CARACTERIZACIÓN DEL TERRITORIO ........................................................... 8 2.1. Localización ........................................................................................................ 8 2.2. Extensión ............................................................................................................ 8 2.3. Orografía ............................................................................................................. 9 2.4. Hidrografía ........................................................................................................ 10 2.5. Marco Geológico Regional ............................................................................... 10 2.5.1. Ambiente tectónico ............................................................................................. 10 2.5.2. Litología regional ................................................................................................. 11 2.6. Principales infraestructuras viales .................................................................... 12 3. ESTADO ACTUAL DE LA VÍA DE LA JUVENTUD ORIENTE ...................... 15 4. PROYECTO GEOMÉTRICO DE LA AUTOPISTA ............................................. 19 4.1. Objetivo ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I-15 Corridor System Master Plan Update 2017
    CALIFORNIA NEVADA ARIZONA UTAH I-15 CORRIDOR SYSTEM MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2017 MARCH 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The I-15 Corridor System Master Plan (Master Plan) is a commerce, port authorities, departments of aviation, freight product of the hard work and commitment of each of the and passenger rail authorities, freight transportation services, I-15 Mobility Alliance (Alliance) partner organizations and providers of public transportation services, environmental their dedicated staff. and natural resource agencies, and others. Individuals within the four states and beyond are investing Their efforts are a testament of outstanding partnership and their time and resources to keep this economic artery a true spirit of collaboration, without which this Master Plan of the West flowing. The Alliance partners come from could not have succeeded. state and local transportation agencies, local and interstate I-15 MOBILITY ALLIANCE PARTNERS American Magline Group City of Orem Authority Amtrak City of Provo Millard County Arizona Commerce Authority City of Rancho Cucamonga Mohave County Arizona Department of Transportation City of South Salt Lake Mountainland Association of Arizona Game and Fish Department City of St. George Governments Bear River Association of Governments Clark County Department of Aviation National Park Service - Lake Mead National Recreation Area BNSF Railway Clark County Public Works Nellis Air Force Base Box Elder County Community Planners Advisory Nevada Army National Guard Brookings Mountain West Committee on Transportation County
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1 Description of Border Function
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................2 1.2 COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT .........................................................................................................4 1.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................4 1.4 PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS AND FUTURE CONDITIONS .............................................................................5 1.5 ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY RESULTS ..................................................................................................5 1.6 RECOMMENDED PROJECTS .................................................................................................................................5 1.7 FUNDING STRATEGY AND VISION .....................................................................................................................7 2.0 INTRODUCTION 8 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF BORDER FUNCTION ...............................................................................................................9 2.2 DEMOGRAPHIC DATA ...................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 CROSSING AND WAIT TIME SUMMARIES ......................................................................................................... 14 2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH,
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This Chapter Presents an Overall Summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the Water Resources on Their Reservations
    4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This chapter presents an overall summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the water resources on their reservations. A brief description of each Tribe, along with a summary of available information on each Tribe’s water resources, is provided. The water management issues provided by the Tribe’s representatives at the San Diego IRWM outreach meetings are also presented. 4.1 Reservations San Diego County features the largest number of Tribes and Reservations of any county in the United States. There are 18 federally-recognized Tribal Nation Reservations and 17 Tribal Governments, because the Barona and Viejas Bands share joint-trust and administrative responsibility for the Capitan Grande Reservation. All of the Tribes within the San Diego IRWM Region are also recognized as California Native American Tribes. These Reservation lands, which are governed by Tribal Nations, total approximately 127,000 acres or 198 square miles. The locations of the Tribal Reservations are presented in Figure 4-1 and summarized in Table 4-1. Two additional Tribal Governments do not have federally recognized lands: 1) the San Luis Rey Band of Luiseño Indians (though the Band remains active in the San Diego region) and 2) the Mount Laguna Band of Luiseño Indians. Note that there may appear to be inconsistencies related to population sizes of tribes in Table 4-1. This is because not all Tribes may choose to participate in population surveys, or may identify with multiple heritages. 4.2 Cultural Groups Native Americans within the San Diego IRWM Region generally comprise four distinct cultural groups (Kumeyaay/Diegueno, Luiseño, Cahuilla, and Cupeño), which are from two distinct language families (Uto-Aztecan and Yuman-Cochimi).
    [Show full text]