DOCSLIB.ORG

Periférico Aeropuerto-Zapata-Doble Piso a Playas”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Periférico Aeropuerto-Zapata-Doble Piso a Playas” PRIMERA ETAPA DE LA VIALIDAD “PERIFÉRICO AEROPUERTO-ZAPATA-DOBLE PISO A PLAYAS” MEMORIA TÉCNICA Memoria Técnica Página 1 de 134 INDICE 1. INTRODUCCIÓN .................................................................................................... 6 2. CARACTERIZACIÓN DEL TERRITORIO ........................................................... 8 2.1. Localización ........................................................................................................ 8 2.2. Extensión ............................................................................................................ 8 2.3. Orografía ............................................................................................................. 9 2.4. Hidrografía ........................................................................................................ 10 2.5. Marco Geológico Regional ............................................................................... 10 2.5.1. Ambiente tectónico ............................................................................................. 10 2.5.2. Litología regional ................................................................................................. 11 2.6. Principales infraestructuras viales .................................................................... 12 3. ESTADO ACTUAL DE LA VÍA DE LA JUVENTUD ORIENTE ...................... 15 4. PROYECTO GEOMÉTRICO DE LA AUTOPISTA ............................................. 19 4.1. Objetivo ............................................................................................................ 19 4.2. Localización ...................................................................................................... 19 4.3. Datos de Partida ................................................................................................ 19 4.3.1. Criterios Generales .............................................................................................. 19 4.4. Configuración de la solución ............................................................................ 21 4.5. Alineamiento Horizontal ................................................................................... 23 4.6. Alineamiento Vertical ....................................................................................... 23 4.7. Secciones Transversales ................................................................................... 23 4.8. Apéndice 1 ........................................................................................................ 25 Alineamiento: EJE PRINCIPAL ................................................................................... 26 Descripción: ..................................................................................................................... 26 Alineamiento: EJE_2 ..................................................................................................... 30 Descripcion: ..................................................................................................................... 30 000Alineamiento: EJE_3 ............................................................................................... 31 Descripcion: ..................................................................................................................... 31 Memoria Técnica Página 2 de 134 Alineamiento: INCORPORACIÓN ............................................................................... 31 Descripcion: ..................................................................................................................... 31 Alineamiento: RETORNO ............................................................................................. 32 Descripcion: ..................................................................................................................... 32 4.9. Apéndice 2 ........................................................................................................ 34 5. PROYECTO GEOMÉTRICO DE ENLACES ....................................................... 43 5.1. Objetivo ............................................................................................................ 43 5.2. Localización ...................................................................................................... 43 5.3. Datos de Partida ................................................................................................ 43 5.3.1. Criterios Generales .............................................................................................. 43 5.4. Configuración de la solución ............................................................................ 45 5.5. Alineamiento Horizontal ................................................................................... 45 5.6. Alineamiento Vertical ....................................................................................... 45 5.7. Secciones Transversales ................................................................................... 45 5.8. Apéndice 1 ........................................................................................................ 46 Alineamiento: AEROPUERTO-GARITA..................................................................... 47 Descripcion: ..................................................................................................................... 47 Alineamiento: PLAYAS-GARITA................................................................................. 47 Descripcion: ..................................................................................................................... 47 5.9. Apéndice 2 ........................................................................................................ 50 6. DISEÑO SECCIÓN ÓPTIMA DEL PAVIMENTO .............................................. 53 6.1. Antecedentes ..................................................................................................... 53 6.2. Descripción del Método del Instituto de Ingeniería de la UNAM .................... 53 6.3. Datos considerados para la propuesta del pavimento ....................................... 54 6.4. Secuencia de cálculo de la estructura del pavimento ........................................ 55 7. PROYECTO DE DRENAJE ................................................................................... 62 7.1. Objetivo ............................................................................................................ 62 7.2. Localización de Obras existentes ...................................................................... 62 7.3. Criterios de Dimensionamiento y Cálculo ........................................................ 63 7.4. Elección del tipo de Obra .................................................................................. 63 7.5. Drenaje Longitudinal del Viaducto ................................................................... 63 7.5.1. Puente km 0+340.53 al 0+587.87 ........................................................................ 64 7.5.2. Viaducto km 2+100.00 AL 3+657.00 .................................................................... 65 7.5.3. Gazas salida hacia garita ..................................................................................... 68 Memoria Técnica Página 3 de 134 8. PROYECTO DE SEÑALAMIENTO ..................................................................... 70 8.1. Normativa de referencia .................................................................................... 70 8.2. Memoria descriptiva ......................................................................................... 71 8.3. Rango de encauzamiento .................................................................................. 71 8.3.1. Ruta 1. Del Aeropuerto hacia las Garitas o Playas de Tijuana............................. 71 8.3.2. Ruta 2. Desde las Playas de Tijuana o Garitas hacia el Aeropuerto .................... 73 8.4. Solución propuesta ............................................................................................ 74 8.5. Señalamiento vertical ........................................................................................ 74 8.5.1. Señales informativas de destino (SID 13-14 y 15). .............................................. 74 8.5.2. Señales restrictivas (SR)....................................................................................... 76 8.5.3. Señales informativas (SIG) ................................................................................... 79 8.5.4. Señales preventivas (SP)...................................................................................... 81 8.5.5. Indicadores de curvas .......................................................................................... 83 8.6. Señalamiento horizontal ................................................................................... 84 8.6.1. Rayas discontinuas centrales (M 2.3). ................................................................. 84 8.6.2. Rayas continuas centrales (M 2.3). ..................................................................... 84 8.6.3. Rayas continuas a la orilla de la calzada (M3.1 y M3.3). ..................................... 85 8.6.4. Rayas canalizadoras (M-5) ................................................................................... 86 8.6.5. Rayas logarítmicas (M-9) ..................................................................................... 87 8.6.6. Flechas en el pavimento .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rethinking Mexico and Its Ties to Silicon Valley Neighboring Nation’S Young Venture Capital Industry Is Growing Rapidly
    Opinion: Rethinking Mexico and its ties to Silicon Valley Neighboring nation’s young venture capital industry is growing rapidly Sean Randolph – July 3, 2021 When Americans think about Mexico many things may come to mind — immigration, cartels or perhaps beaches. Technology and innovation are probably not on that list but reflect that a new reality is taking hold across Mexico — led by investors, entrepreneurs and leaders in states and cities — that is moving Mexico onto the map of U.S. technology and innovation partners. In this transformation, Silicon Valley’s role looms large. Here’s why. Mexico’s young venture capital industry is growing rapidly. From $55 million in 2010, annual investment has grown to more than $1 billion. Softbank’s $5 billion Innovation Fund, created several years ago to invest in Latin America, was a turning point that put Mexico on the global venture map. Now the country boasts unicorns and fast-growing startups. More are on the way, supported by universities, accelerators and by large tech and startup conferences such as Talent Land in Guadalajara and INCmty on Monterrey. This activity is concentrated in a number of states and cities that are strengthening their base in R&D and are working hard to build local innovation systems. The most noteworthy are Tijuana, Juarez, Monterrey, Mexico City and Guadalajara, as well as Merida (in Yucatan) and states in the central El Bajio region. Each has distinct features: • Mexico City, home to the national government, top universities, leading companies and most of its venture capital industry is building its digital capacity and benefits from sheer size.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1 Description of Border Function
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................2 1.2 COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT .........................................................................................................4 1.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................4 1.4 PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS AND FUTURE CONDITIONS .............................................................................5 1.5 ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY RESULTS ..................................................................................................5 1.6 RECOMMENDED PROJECTS .................................................................................................................................5 1.7 FUNDING STRATEGY AND VISION .....................................................................................................................7 2.0 INTRODUCTION 8 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF BORDER FUNCTION ...............................................................................................................9 2.2 DEMOGRAPHIC DATA ...................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 CROSSING AND WAIT TIME SUMMARIES ......................................................................................................... 14 2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH,
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico Exporter Guide US-México Border Update, Mexicali, Baja California Norte/Calexico, California 2003
    “” USDA Foreign Agricultural Service GAIN Report Global Agriculture Information Network Template Version 2.09 Voluntary Report - public distribution Date: 11/21/2003 GAIN Report Number: MX3503 MX5303 Mexico Exporter Guide US-México Border Update, Mexicali, Baja California Norte/Calexico, California 2003 Approved by: Daniel A. Martinez, Director ATO Monterrey Prepared by: Edgar Ramirez Report Highlights: This report is an overview of the Mexicali/Calexico border crossing point for US food and agricultural exports to Mexico and third in a series of US/Mexico border crossing points. Whether you are a seasoned exporter or are considering exporting US food and agricultural products for the first time, the information in this report is provided to help facilitate your exporting process through the Mexicali/Calexico border crossing point to the Mexican customer. Includes PSD Changes: No Includes Trade Matrix: No Unscheduled Report Monterrey ATO [MX 3] [MX] GAIN Report - MX5303 Page 2 of 5 Disclaimer. This summary is based on personal meetings conducted with various private industry representatives and US and Mexican government officials and should not, under any circumstances, be viewed as a definitive source on border crossing procedures or implications for U.S. agricultural export trade interests. Map and Overview of US/Mexico Border Crossing Points Note: This map indicates the most important ports of entry into Northern Mexico for US food and agricultural products that are to be transported by truck or railroad. It does not show other maritime ports or airports that are also important within the Northern Mexican region. The Northern Border Region includes the States of Baja California Norte, Baja California Sur and the San Luis Rio Colorado region in the State of Sonora.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 1. Regional Location Map
    Figure 1. Regional Location Map - 2 - INTRODUCTION SCOPE AND PURPOSE OF THE PLAN The updated San Ysidro Community Plan (Plan) is a comprehensive revision of the original plan adopted in 1974 and includes the urbanized portion of the Tijuana River Valley. The update was authorized at the City Council budget hearings of July 1987 and work on the project began in December of that year. The Planning Department, with the assistance of the San Ysidro Planning and Development Group, has studied San Ysidro’s major issues and challenges and has developed alternative solutions to realize the community’s potential. Included in the Plan is a set of recommendations based upon those alternative solutions to guide the development and the redevelopment of the San Ysidro community. Formal adoption of the revised Plan requires that the Planning Commission and City Council follow the same procedure of holding public hearings as was followed in adopting the original community plan. Adoption of the Plan also requires an amendment of the Progress Guide and General Plan (General Plan) for the City, which will occur at the first regularly scheduled General Plan amendment hearing following adoption of this Plan. Once the Plan is adopted, any amendments, additions or deletions will require that the Planning Commission and City Council follow City Council Policy 600-35 regarding the procedure for Plan amendments. Although this Plan sets forth procedures for implementation, it does not establish new regulations or legislation, nor does it rezone property. The rezoning and design controls recommended in the Plan will be enacted concurrently with Plan adoption.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Organization and Gaps Summary Tijuana River Valley Needs and Opportunities Assessment
    Data Organization and Gaps Summary Tijuana River Valley Needs and Opportunities Assessment January 2, 2019 Data Organization and Gaps Summary Tijuana River Valley Needs and Opportunities Assessment Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Creation of the Spreadsheet ............................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Collecting and Filing Data ......................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Recording Data ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.3 Identifying Relevant Projects ..................................................................................................... 2 3 Data Collection Summary .................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Data Summary .......................................................................................................................... 2 3.1.1 Sewage ........................................................................................................................ 3 3.1.2 Trash ............................................................................................................................ 3 3.1.3 Sediment .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • California-Baja California Border Master Plan
    California-Baja California Border Master Plan Plan Maestro Fronterizo California-Baja California Final Report Informe Final SEPTEMBER 2008 SEPTIEMBRE 2008 SEPTEMBER 2008 SEPTIEMBRE 2008 California-Baja California Border Master Plan Plan Maestro Fronterizo California-Baja California Final Report Informe Final Submitted to Caltrans, District 11 4050 Taylor Street San Diego, CA 92110 Submitted by SANDAG Service Bureau 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101-4231 Phone 619.699.1900 Fax 619.699.1905 www.sandag.org/servicebureau The California-Baja California Border Master Plan was commissioned by the U.S./Mexico Joint Working Committee to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Secretariat of Infrastructure and Urban Development of Baja California (Secretaría de Desarrollo Urbano del Estado de Baja California or SIDUE) for the California-Baja California border region. El Plan Maestro Fronterizo California-Baja California fue comisionado por el Comité Conjunto de Trabajo de los Estados Unidos y México a Caltrans y a SIDUE para la región fronteriza de California-Baja California. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... ES-1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Study Purpose and Objectives ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Calexico East/Mexicali II Major Destinations Figure C-13
    Calexico East/Mexicali II Major Destinations Major study destinations are identified on the map below. Blue dots represent popular pedestrian destinations, while red dots represent transit facilities and orange dots represent vehicle facilities. Areas of dark blue shading indicate border- specific support services, which include facilities which cater to cross-border travelers but do not typically generate cross-border trips. The blue lines on the map represent pedestrian pathways linking destinations to the POE. This pathway system comprises the pedestrian study area for Calexico East/Mexicali II. Figure C-13 - Major Destinations at the Calexico East/Mexicali II POE Passenger Loading and Public Parking The location parking and passenger loading zones influences pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle travel patterns. Parking locations and passenger loading zones are shown in the map below. Both official and unofficial passenger loading zones are included on the map. Figure C-14 - Passenger Pick-Up, Drop-Off, and Public Parking Locations at the Calexico East/Mexicali II POE Transit Service The transit options at the Calexico East/Mexicali II POE consist of a taxi that is often at the gas station north of the POE in the United States. The map below shows transit loading, staging, ticketing, and passenger waiting facilities. Where loading, staging, ticketing, and waiting activities occur at the same location as the transit stop, or where data is not available, only the transit stop is shown on the map. Figure C-15 - Transit Facilities at the Calexico East/Mexicali II POE Andrade/Los Algodones Major Destinations Major study destinations are identified on the map below.
    [Show full text]
  • Otay Mesa – Mesa De Otay Transportation Binational Corridor
    Otay Mesa – Mesa de Otay Transportation Binational Corridor Early Action Plan Housing September 2006 Economic Development Environment TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Foundation of the Otay Mesa-Mesa de Otay Binational Corridor Strategic Plan..................................1 The Collaboration Process...........................................................................................................................1 The Strategic Planning Process and Early Actions .....................................................................................3 Organization of the Report ........................................................................................................................3 ISSUES FOR EVALUATION AND WORK PROGRAMS Introduction .................................................................................................................................................5 The Binational Study Area ..........................................................................................................................5 Issues Identified ...........................................................................................................................................5 Interactive Polling........................................................................................................................................7 Process.......................................................................................................................................................7 Results .......................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Contributing to the Takeoff of Aviation in Mexico 1999 · 2014 Investor Information
    Contributing to the takeoff of aviation in Mexico 1999 · 2014 Investor information Exchange listings: Bolsa Mexicana de Valores (BMV) Mexico Ticker symbol: GAP Share series: B series New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) United States Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V., operates 12 international airports in the Pacific Ticker symbol: PAC and Central regions of Mexico: Share series: ADS (representing 10 B shares) Guadalajara and Tijuana, serving the main metropolitan areas. Corporate Headquarters Av. Mariano Otero No. 1249-B Piso 6, Torre Pacífico, Rinconada del Bosque, Mexicali, Hermosillo, Los Mochis, Aguascalientes, Guanajuato and Morelia, serving mid-sized and Guadalajara, Jalisco C.P. 44530. developing cities. Phone: +(52) 33 3880-1100 La Paz, Los Cabos, Puerto Vallarta and Manzanillo, serving some of the country’s leading tourist Investor Relations Contact Saúl Villarreal García destinations. Chief Financial Officer [email protected] These airports, owned by the Mexican government, were assigned under concessions as part of a national +(52) 33 3880-1100 ext. 20151 initiative to privatize and improve the quality and safety of the country’s airport services in 1999. Website: www.aeropuertosgap.com.mx Table of contents GAP at a glance 02 / 15 Years in numbers 04 / Selected financial data 06 / Letter from the Chairman of the Board 08 / Interview with GAP’s Chief Executive Officer 10 / 15 Years of success 12 / Passengers: the main driver of our business 14 / Top-flight quality 17 / Focused on higher PAC profitability18 / Solid financial profile 21 / High security operations 22 / Social responsibility 25 / The challenge of constant growth 26 / Corporate structure 30 / Management team 32 / www.signi.com.mxdesign: GAP Contributing to the takeoff of aviation in Mexico The name Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico is synonymous with a history of reliability, innovation, diversification and constant expansion; with a solid Company with unique qualities.
    [Show full text]
  • Proyecto Playas Limpias Tijuana Y Rosarito: Calidad Del Agua En Las Playas De La Región Fronteriza Wildcoast
    (Available only in Spanish) (Disponible en espagnol seulement) Proyecto Playas Limpias Tijuana y Rosarito: Calidad del Agua en las Playas de la Región Fronteriza WiLDCOAST Resumen del proyecto Parte I. Descripción Organizaciones participantes en el proyecto: CESPT-Comisión Estatal de Servicios SECTUR- Secretaria de Turismo Públicos de Tijuana SALVAVIDAS DE PLAYAS DE TIJUANA Y ISESALUD- Instituto de Servicios de ROSARITO Salud Pública PROFEPA- Procuraduría Federal de CILA – Comisión Internacional de Protección al Ambiente Límites y Aguas COLEF- Colegio de la Frontera Norte IMPLAN- Instituto Municipal de IIO-Instituto de Investigaciones Planeación Oceanológicas) de UABC (Universidad SPA- Secretaria de Protección al Autónoma de Baja California Ambiente del Estado de Baja California TIJUANA CALIDAD DE VIDA A.C. CONAGUA-Comisión Nacional de Agua PROYECTO FRONTERIZO DE DPA – Dirección de protección al EDUCACION AMBIENTAL A.C. ambiente Municipal ESCUELITA DE SURF DE ROSARITO ZOFEMAT- Zona Federal Marítimo Terrestre Descripción del problema o los antecedentes (¿por qué se llevó a cabo el proyecto?) WILDCOAST/COSTASALVAJE al tener como misión la conservación de ecosistemas marinos, costeros y vida silvestre. Como miembro activo tanto del Comité de Playas Limpias de Tijuana como de Playas de Rosarito, constantemente promueve acciones encaminadas. Descripción general del proyecto (¿qué se hizo?) Los alcances durante este proyecto fueron encaminados a cumplir acciones planteadas dentro de los Planes de Gestión tanto de Tijuana como de Playas de Rosarito y los objetivos planteados para el programa de Playas Limpias Tijuana y Rosarito: Se implementó un programa de monitoreo de calidad de agua ciudadanizado para Playas de Tijuana y Rosarito esto incluye entrenamiento en muestreo y manejo de indicadores para la ciudadanía.
    [Show full text]
  • Gateway Parking
    GATEWAY PARKING STABILIZED INCOME INVESTMENT OFFERING MEMORANDUM INVESTMENT ADVISORS CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT JOSEPH LISING The information contained in the following offering memorandum is proprietary Managing Director and strictly confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it Irvine Office from Cushman & Wakefield and it should not be made available to any other person +1 949 372 4896 Direct or entity without the written consent of Cushman & Wakefield. By taking possession +1 949 474 0405 Fax [email protected] of and reviewing the information contained herein the recipient agrees to hold and Lic. 01248258 treat all such information in the strictest confidence. The recipient further agrees that recipient will not photocopy or duplicate any part of the offering memorandum. If you have no interest in the subject property now, please return this offering memorandum to Cushman & Wakefield. This offering memorandum has been prepared to provide summary, unverified financial and physical information to prospective purchasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. Cushman & Wakefield has not made any investigation, and makes no warranty or representation with respect to the income or expenses for the subject property, the future projected financial performance of the property, the size and square footage of the property and improvements, the presence or absence of contaminating substances, PCBs or asbestos, the compliance with local, state and federal regulations, the physical condition of the improvements thereon, or the financial condition or business prospects of any tenant, or any tenant’s plans or intentions to continue its occupancy of the subject property.
    [Show full text]
  • California-Baja California Border Master Plan Update
    2014California-Baja California Border Master Plan Update Actualización del Plan Maestro Fronterizo California-Baja California Technical Appendices G–H Apéndices Técnicos G–H JULY 2014 JULIO 2014 Technical Appendices G - H Table of Contents G Scoring Sheets for Ranked Projects G-1 POE Project Performance Score Sheet—New POEs ................................................................................................................2 G-2 POE Locational Criteria Score Sheet—New POEs ....................................................................................................................3 G-3 POE Project Performance Score Sheet—Existing POEs ...........................................................................................................4 G-4 POE Locational Criteria Score Sheet—Existing POEs ...............................................................................................................7 G-5 Data for Use in POE Criteria—New and Existing POEs .............................................................................................................8 G-6 Roadway Score Sheet ................................................................................................................................................................9 G-7 Interchange Score Sheet ......................................................................................................................................................... 16 G-8 Rail/Mass Transit Score Sheet ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]