DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Arrangement for Repatriation of Mexican Nationals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Arrangement for Repatriation of Mexican Nationals ATTACHMENT 1 Points of Contact 1. Notification of detention of Mexican nationals and Consular access. Consulate General of Mexico in San Diego, California San Ysidro Port of Entry (SYS POE) Consulate of Mexico in Calexico, California 2. Names, positions and contact information of the Officers responsible for receiving Mexican nationals and coordinating repatriation activities. National Institute of Migration (INM) Port of Entry El Chaparral /W-3 Mexicali, BC Port of Entry Mexicali 3. Names, positions and contact information of the Officers responsible for receiving information about the repatriation of persons suspected of committing, or known to have committed, criminal violations and have been identified as being of special interest to the Government of Mexico. Office of the Attorney General of Mexico (PGR) Attaché in San Diego, California Copy of the notification should be sent to: Consulate General of Mexico in San Diego, California Protection Department National Institute of Migration 4. Names, positions and contact information of the Officers responsible for delivering the Mexican nationals and coordinating repatriation activities. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Office of Field Operations (OFO) San Diego Field Office San Ysidro / Otay Port of Entry San Ysidro International Liaison Unit (ILU) San Ysidro / Otay Criminal Enforcement Unit (CEU) San Diego and Calexico Attachments to Local Arrangement for Repatriation of Mexican Nationals 2 Calexico Port of Entry (West) Calexico Port of Entry (East) Andrade Port of Entry Tecate Port of Entry U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) San Diego Sector Boulevard USBP Station Brown Field USBP Station Chula Vista USBP Station El Cajon USBP Station Imperial Beach USBP Station Murrieta USBP Station Campo USBP Station San Clemente USPB Station El Centro Sector Calexico USBP Station El Centro USBP Station Indio USBP Station U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Office of Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) San Diego Field Office Management San Diego Field Office Staging Facility Otay Detention Facility El Centro Imperial San Diego Attachments to Local Arrangement for Repatriation of Mexican Nationals 3 Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) San Diego Calexico ATTACHMENT 2 Ports of Repatriation, Schedules of Repatriation and Conditions for Routine Notification of Repatriations of Mexican Nationals The identified Ports of Entry and hours of repatriation in this attachment, except where otherwise outlined in this arrangement, should be applicable to all repatriations conducted by the U.S. Border Patrol, Enforcement and Removal Operations, and Homeland Security Investigations. PORT OF REPATRIATION SCHEDULES OF REPATRIATION SAN YSIDRO / TIJUANA ADULTS AND ACCOMPANIED MINORS: 0600 to Garita 1/Whiskey 2 2200 hours daily. UNACCOMPANIED MINORS: Daily from 0800 to 1600 hours. All repatriations should be coordinated with the Consulate General in San Diego. UNACCOMPANIED / PREGNANT WOMEN: Daily between 0800 to 1800 hours. SPECIAL NEEDS PERSONS REQUIRING FOLLOW-UP MEDICAL TREATMENT: Daily between 0800 to 1800 hours. DONOVAN STATE PRISON RELEASES: Monday – Friday from 0800 to 1600 hours with prior notice to the Consulate General in San Diego and INM in Tijuana. FUGITIVES: Daily with prior notice to the PGR Regional Attaché and the Consulate General in San Diego. Daily repatriation procedures not previously noted may be made through this Port when coordinated with the Consulate General in San Diego and INM in Tijuana. ADULTS AND ACCOMPANIED MINORS: 0600 to CALEXICO WEST / 2200 hours daily. MEXICALI UNACCOMPANIED MINORS: Daily from 0800 to San Diego Attachments to Local Arrangement for Repatriation of Mexican Nationals 4 1600 hours in coordination with the Consulate in Calexico. UNACCOMPANIED / PREGNANT WOMEN: Daily from 0800 to 1800 hours. Exceptions are to be coordinated with the Consulate in Calexico. SPECIAL NEEDS PERSONS REQUIRING FOLLOW-UP MEDICAL TREATMENT: Daily between 0800 to 1800 hours. Exceptions will be coordinated with the Consulate in Calexico. CALIPATRIA AND CENTINELA STATE PRISON RELEASES: Monday – Friday from 0800 to 1600 hours with prior notice to the Consulate in Calexico and INM in Mexicali, Baja California. FUGITIVES: Daily with prior notice to the PGR Regional Attaché and the Consulate in Calexico. Daily repatriation procedures not previously noted may be made through this Port when coordinated with the Consulate in Calexico and INM in Mexicali. CALEXICO EAST / MEXICALI No Repatriations except under established exceptions with appropriate notifications to GOM. ANDRADE / ALGODONES No Repatriations except under established exceptions with appropriate notifications to GOM. Conditions for routine notifications of repatriations of Mexican nationals Consistent with Sections 6, 7 and 8 of this Arrangement, the DHS Participants should take into consideration the following conditions for routine notifications of repatriations of Mexican nationals: 1. All notifications for all returns through all ports of entry should be done at least thirty (30) minutes prior to repatriation through telephone, fax or e-mail to the applicable authorities at the ports of entry of repatriation. 2. Before or during the repatriation, the DHS Participants should provide INM a list of the persons to be repatriated from a single office on a single event, which should be stamped as San Diego Attachments to Local Arrangement for Repatriation of Mexican Nationals 5 acknowledgement and proof of formal reception by Mexican nationals. The lists should contain the basic information included in DHS form I-216. 3. When individuals who have been convicted of criminal offenses are being repatriated through formal immigration proceedings, the aforementioned list should also include, whenever possible, the following information: alias, registration number, type of removal, conviction(s), date of conviction(s), and time served. 4. The repatriation of known fugitives wanted by the Government of Mexico should be done separately from the repatriation of other Mexican nationals. These procedures should be consistent with the specific procedures that both Federal governments (Washington D.C. and Mexico City) establish. 5. If a group larger than fifty-five (55) persons is to be repatriated, the DHS Participants should notify INM at least one (1) hour before, to ensure that the appropriate number of Officers is available to reduce the period of delivery and reception of the repatriated Mexican nationals. 6. Mexican nationals to be repatriated directly from the interior of the U.S. should be exclusively delivered through San Ysidro/Tijuana or Calexico/Mexicali ports of entry. 7. Consistent with interior arrangements at originating locations, the Consulates in the interior should receive from DHS Participants lists of Mexican nationals being repatriated and the Consulates in turn should notify appropriate INM offices at the border. 8. The signatory participants should take all feasible steps to ensure that property, valuables, and money retained, are available for return to the rightful owner at the time of initial release from DHS custody. 9. Any exception to the established schedule should be properly coordinated with the appropriate authorities. Exceptions may be made for: . Assisting a vulnerable person . Law enforcement need . Operational tempo DHS Participants should make every effort to notify INM a minimum of thirty (30) minutes prior to repatriating due to exceptions. ATTACHMENT 3 Officers in charge of receiving and/or conveying information about incidents involving alleged misconduct, mistreatment or violations of human rights Consulate General of Mexico in San Diego, California Protection Department Consular office at the San Ysidro Port of Entry Consulate of Mexico in Calexico, California San Diego Attachments to Local Arrangement for Repatriation of Mexican Nationals 6 National Institute of Migration (INM) Port of Entry El Chaparral /W-3 Mexicali, Baja California Port of Entry Mexicali U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Office of Field Operations (OFO) U.S. Border Patrol U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Office of Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) ATTACHMENT 4 Repatriation of Persons with Special Needs In addition to the conditions identified in Attachment 2 about Ports and Schedules of Repatriation of persons with special needs, and consistent with Section 12 of this Arrangement, the DHS Participants should consider the following: When applicable within each category below, the DHS Participants and the Consulate should make every effort to obtain the appropriate medical records and all information about the individual, including any contact information about any known family member of the person. 4.1 Repatriation of unaccompanied minors The Consulate General in San Diego or the Consulate in Calexico should be notified to interview the minors. Interviews of unaccompanied minors at the San Ysidro Port of Entry should be held daily from 8:00AM to 3:00PM with two deliveries at 11:00AM and 3:00PM. Interviews of unaccompanied minors at the Calexico Port of Entry should be held daily from 8:00AM to 4:00PM. Interviews should be done personally, telephonically or through the videoconference system. Consular staff should accompany unaccompanied minors during repatriation. Additional interviews should be conducted when a group of at least five (5) unaccompanied minors is ready to be repatriated. DHS Participants should advise the Consulate General
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lessons from San Diego's Border Wall
    RESEARCH REPORT (CBP Photo/Mani Albrecht) LESSONS FROM SAN DIEGO'S BORDER WALL The limits to using walls for migration, drug trafficking challenges By Adam Isacson and Maureen Meyer December 2017 " The border doesn’t need a wall. It needs better-equipped ports of entry, investi- gative capacity, technology, and far more ability to deal with humanitarian flows. In its current form, the 2018 Homeland Security Appropriations bill is pursuing a wrong and wasteful approach. The ex- perience of San Diego makes that clear." LESSONS FROM SAN DIEGO'S BORDER WALL December 2017 | 2 SUMMARY The prototypes for President Trump's proposed border wall are currently sitting just outside San Diego, California, an area that serves as a perfect example of how limited walls, fences, and barriers can be when dealing with migration and drug trafficking challenges. As designated by stomsCu and Border Protection, the San Diego sector covers 60 miles of the westernmost U.S.-Mexico border, and 46 of them are already fenced off. Here, fence-building has revealed a new set of border challenges that a wall can’t fix. The San Diego sector shows that: • Fences or walls can reduce migration in urban areas, but make no difference in rural areas. In densely populated border areas, border-crossers can quickly mix in to the population. But nearly all densely populated sections of the U.S.-Mexico border have long since been walled off. In rural areas, where crossers must travel miles of terrain, having to climb a wall first is not much of a deterrent. A wall would be a waste of scarce budget resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for Regional Collaboration on the Border: Sharing the European Border Experience with the San Diego/Tijuana Region
    Opportunities for Regional Collaboration on the Border: Sharing the European border experience with the San Diego/Tijuana region Dr. Freerk Boedeltje, Institute for Regional Studies of the Californias, San Diego State University, May 2012 How to read this white paper? This white paper highlights best practices and barriers for local cross border cooperation across the European Union and will suggest policy options relevant to the San Diego-Tijuana region. The research done in Europe has been carried out as part of two large scheme EU wide projects sponsored under the 5th and 6th framework Programme of European Commission. Code named EXLINA and EUDIMENSIONS, the research consisted of a consortium of multiple universities across the European Union and took 8 years between 2002 and 2009. Both project have sought to understand the actual and potential role of cross border co-operation beyond the external borders of the EU and focused on specific local development issues, including economic development, cultural and educational matters, urban development, local democracy and environmental issues. The research was designed to address practical aspects of cross-border co- operation across and beyond the external borders of the European Union. The case studies that covered most part of the external borders of the EU centred on how changes within Europe’s political space are being interpreted and used by actors with a stake in bi-national/cross-border cooperation. This whitepaper compares and contrast the San Diego-Tijuana realities with cross border cooperation in border regions of the European Union. In addition to improving our understanding how local border regions function within a global context, the whitepaper highlight best practices and barriers for local cross border cooperation and will suggest policy options relevant to the San Diego Region and the Tijuana Tecate and Playas de Rosarito Metropolitan Zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Vier Portillo
    No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 444444444444444444444444U JAVIER PORTILLO, Petitioner, - v - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. 4444444444444444444444444U PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 4444444444444444444444444U ELIZABETH A. MISSAKIAN P.O. Box 601879 San Diego, CA 92160 (619) 233-6534 Counsel for Petitioner JAVIER PORTILLO LIST OF PARTIES [X All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. - prefix - QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Ninth Circuit’s analysis of the facts was inadequate and whether, when the entirety of facts presented at trial was considered, there was sufficient evidence that petitioner Javier Portillo had knowledge of narcotics hidden in his vehicle at the time he crossed the border from Mexico into the United States. - prefix - TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.. iii OPINION BELOW. 1 JURISDICTION. 2 CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS. 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE . 2 STATEMENT OF FACTS. 3 Government’s Case-in-Chief. 3 Defense Case. 8 Testimony of Javier Portillo. 9 REASON TO GRANT THE WRIT. 11 THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE FOR THE JURY TO CONCLUDE THAT JAVIER PORTILLO KNEW OF THE PRESENCE OF NARCOTICS WITHIN HIS VEHICLE WHEN HE CROSSED INTO THE UNITED STATES AT THE SAN YSIDRO PORT OF ENTRY.. 12 A. The Claim is Preserved.. 12 B. Standard of Review . 12 C. Evidence at Trial Was Insufficient to Prove Beyond a Reasonable Doubt that Javier Portillo Knew There Were Narcotics in his Vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Gateway Parking
    GATEWAY PARKING STABILIZED INCOME INVESTMENT OFFERING MEMORANDUM INVESTMENT ADVISORS CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT JOSEPH LISING The information contained in the following offering memorandum is proprietary Managing Director and strictly confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it Irvine Office from Cushman & Wakefield and it should not be made available to any other person +1 949 372 4896 Direct or entity without the written consent of Cushman & Wakefield. By taking possession +1 949 474 0405 Fax joseph.lising@cushwake.com of and reviewing the information contained herein the recipient agrees to hold and Lic. 01248258 treat all such information in the strictest confidence. The recipient further agrees that recipient will not photocopy or duplicate any part of the offering memorandum. If you have no interest in the subject property now, please return this offering memorandum to Cushman & Wakefield. This offering memorandum has been prepared to provide summary, unverified financial and physical information to prospective purchasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. Cushman & Wakefield has not made any investigation, and makes no warranty or representation with respect to the income or expenses for the subject property, the future projected financial performance of the property, the size and square footage of the property and improvements, the presence or absence of contaminating substances, PCBs or asbestos, the compliance with local, state and federal regulations, the physical condition of the improvements thereon, or the financial condition or business prospects of any tenant, or any tenant’s plans or intentions to continue its occupancy of the subject property.
    [Show full text]
  • Periférico Aeropuerto-Zapata-Doble Piso a Playas”
    PRIMERA ETAPA DE LA VIALIDAD “PERIFÉRICO AEROPUERTO-ZAPATA-DOBLE PISO A PLAYAS” MEMORIA TÉCNICA Memoria Técnica Página 1 de 134 INDICE 1. INTRODUCCIÓN .................................................................................................... 6 2. CARACTERIZACIÓN DEL TERRITORIO ........................................................... 8 2.1. Localización ........................................................................................................ 8 2.2. Extensión ............................................................................................................ 8 2.3. Orografía ............................................................................................................. 9 2.4. Hidrografía ........................................................................................................ 10 2.5. Marco Geológico Regional ............................................................................... 10 2.5.1. Ambiente tectónico ............................................................................................. 10 2.5.2. Litología regional ................................................................................................. 11 2.6. Principales infraestructuras viales .................................................................... 12 3. ESTADO ACTUAL DE LA VÍA DE LA JUVENTUD ORIENTE ...................... 15 4. PROYECTO GEOMÉTRICO DE LA AUTOPISTA ............................................. 19 4.1. Objetivo ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1 Description of Border Function
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................2 1.2 COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT .........................................................................................................4 1.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................4 1.4 PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS AND FUTURE CONDITIONS .............................................................................5 1.5 ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY RESULTS ..................................................................................................5 1.6 RECOMMENDED PROJECTS .................................................................................................................................5 1.7 FUNDING STRATEGY AND VISION .....................................................................................................................7 2.0 INTRODUCTION 8 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF BORDER FUNCTION ...............................................................................................................9 2.2 DEMOGRAPHIC DATA ...................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 CROSSING AND WAIT TIME SUMMARIES ......................................................................................................... 14 2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH,
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 San Diego
    BINATIONAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA AND THE CITY OF TIJUANA, BAJA CALIFORNIA January 14, 2013 Binational Hazardous Materials Prevention and Emergency Response Plan Among the County Of San Diego, the City of San Diego, California, and the City of Tijuana, Baja California January 14, 2013 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2005-Present ...................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2003 .................................................................................................... 6 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................... 10 PARTICIPATING AGENCIES................................................................................................... 17 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 23 1.0 TIJUANA/SAN DIEGO BORDER REGION ................................................................. 25 1.1 General Aspects of the Region ........................................................................................ 25 1.1.1 Historical and Cultural Background ................................................................ 25 1.1.2 Geographic Location
    [Show full text]
  • California-Baja California Border Master Plan
    California-Baja California Border Master Plan Plan Maestro Fronterizo California-Baja California Final Report Informe Final SEPTEMBER 2008 SEPTIEMBRE 2008 SEPTEMBER 2008 SEPTIEMBRE 2008 California-Baja California Border Master Plan Plan Maestro Fronterizo California-Baja California Final Report Informe Final Submitted to Caltrans, District 11 4050 Taylor Street San Diego, CA 92110 Submitted by SANDAG Service Bureau 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101-4231 Phone 619.699.1900 Fax 619.699.1905 www.sandag.org/servicebureau The California-Baja California Border Master Plan was commissioned by the U.S./Mexico Joint Working Committee to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Secretariat of Infrastructure and Urban Development of Baja California (Secretaría de Desarrollo Urbano del Estado de Baja California or SIDUE) for the California-Baja California border region. El Plan Maestro Fronterizo California-Baja California fue comisionado por el Comité Conjunto de Trabajo de los Estados Unidos y México a Caltrans y a SIDUE para la región fronteriza de California-Baja California. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... ES-1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Study Purpose and Objectives ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Otay Mesa – Mesa De Otay Transportation Binational Corridor
    Otay Mesa – Mesa de Otay Transportation Binational Corridor Early Action Plan Housing September 2006 Economic Development Environment TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Foundation of the Otay Mesa-Mesa de Otay Binational Corridor Strategic Plan..................................1 The Collaboration Process...........................................................................................................................1 The Strategic Planning Process and Early Actions .....................................................................................3 Organization of the Report ........................................................................................................................3 ISSUES FOR EVALUATION AND WORK PROGRAMS Introduction .................................................................................................................................................5 The Binational Study Area ..........................................................................................................................5 Issues Identified ...........................................................................................................................................5 Interactive Polling........................................................................................................................................7 Process.......................................................................................................................................................7 Results .......................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL San Ysidro Port of Entry Reconfiguration Mobility Study
    FINAL San Ysidro Port of Entry Reconfiguration Mobility Study Prepared for: Prepared by: January 2010 San Ysidro Port of Entry Reconfiguration Mobility Study FINAL Concept Plan Report Table of Contents 1.0 STUDY PURPOSE..................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 EXISTING SETTING ................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Border Area Transportation Facilities and Services ............................................................................................ 7 2.1.2 Border Crossings .............................................................................................................................................13 2.1.3 Area Traffic Analysis ........................................................................................................................................15 2.1.4 Existing Conflicts and Deficiencies....................................................................................................................20 2.2 PROJECTED 2030 SETTING ......................................................................................................................................29 2.2.1 General Services Administration (GSA)
    [Show full text]
  • Gateway Parking
    GATEWAY PARKING STABILIZED INCOME INVESTMENT OFFERING MEMORANDUM INVESTMENT ADVISORS CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT JOSEPH LISING The information contained in the following offering memorandum is proprietary Managing Director and strictly confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it Irvine Office from Cushman & Wakefield and it should not be made available to any other person +1 949 372 4896 Direct or entity without the written consent of Cushman & Wakefield. By taking possession +1 949 474 0405 Fax joseph.lising@cushwake.com of and reviewing the information contained herein the recipient agrees to hold and Lic. 01248258 treat all such information in the strictest confidence. The recipient further agrees that recipient will not photocopy or duplicate any part of the offering memorandum. If you have no interest in the subject property now, please return this offering memorandum to Cushman & Wakefield. This offering memorandum has been prepared to provide summary, unverified financial and physical information to prospective purchasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. Cushman & Wakefield has not made any investigation, and makes no warranty or representation with respect to the income or expenses for the subject property, the future projected financial performance of the property, the size and square footage of the property and improvements, the presence or absence of contaminating substances, PCBs or asbestos, the compliance with local, state and federal regulations, the physical condition of the improvements thereon, or the financial condition or business prospects of any tenant, or any tenant’s plans or intentions to continue its occupancy of the subject property.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Borderline: Abuses at the United States - Mexico Border
    ON THE BORDERLINE: ABUSES AT THE UNITED STATES - MEXICO BORDER US-Mexico Border Program American Friends Service Committee San Diego Area Office 3850 Westgate Pl. Bld.100| San Diego, CA 92105 t. 619-233-4114 f. 619-233-6247 usmexborder@afsc.org http://afsc.org/office/san-diego-ca © 2017 American Friends Service Committee The American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) is a Quaker organization that includes people of various faiths who are committed to social justice, peace, and humanitarian service. Our work is based on the principles of the Religious Society of Friends, the belief in the worth of every person, and faith in the power of love to overcome violence and injustice. AFSC was founded in 1917 by Quakers to provide conscientious objectors an opportunity to aid civilian war victims. AFSC’s San Diego office, the US-Mexico Border Program, was established in 1977 and focuses on uplifting the rights and dignity of border residents, migrants, and refugees in the region. About the Authors Sofia Sotres is the Human Rights Program Associate for the American Friends Service Committee’s US- Mexico Border Program in San Diego, California. She has worked with AFSC since 2016, focusing on documenting border abuse cases. Sotres has a Bachelor’s degree in Law from the Autonomous University of Baja California. Pedro Rios is the Program Director for the American Friends Service Committee’s US-Mexico Border Program in San Diego, California. He has worked at AFSC since 2003, focusing on border and immigration issues. Rios has a Bachelor’s degree in English from the University of San Diego and a Master’s degree in Ethnic Studies from the College of Ethnic Studies at San Francisco State University.
    [Show full text]