SWAP Full Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SWAP Full Document Hudec et al. Front Matter 1 1 Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in 2 Southwest Washington 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Editors 33 J.L. Hudec is an ecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Gifford Pinchot 34 National Forest, Mt. Adams Ranger District, 2455 Hwy 141, Trout Lake, WA 98650; J.E. 35 Halofsky is a research ecologist, University of Washington, College of the Environment, School 36 of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100; D.L. Peterson is 37 a senior research biological scientist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific 38 Northwest Research Station, 400 N 34th St., Suite 201, Seattle, WA 98103; J.J. Ho is a research 39 economist, University of Washington, College of the Environment, School of Environmental and 40 Forest Sciences,DRAFT Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100. Hudec et al. Front Matter 2 41 Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in 42 Southwest Washington 43 44 J.L. Hudec, J.E. Halofsky, D.L. Peterson, and J.J. Ho 45 46 47 Editors 48 49 50 51 52 53 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service 54 Pacific Northwest Research Station 55 Portland, Oregon 56 General Technical Report PNW-GTR-xxxx 57 Month year 58 DRAFT Hudec et al. Front Matter 3 59 Abstract 60 61 Hudec, J.L.; Halofsky, J.E.; Peterson, D.L.; Ho, J.J., eds. 201X. Climate change vulnerability 62 and adaptation in Southwest Washington. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-xxx. Portland, OR: 63 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Xxx p. 64 65 The Southwest Washington Adaptation Partnership (SWAP) was developed to identify climate 66 change issues relevant for resource management in Southwest Washington, specifically on 67 Gifford Pinchot National Forest. This science-management partnership assessed the vulnerability 68 of natural resources to climate change, and developed adaptation options that minimize negative 69 impacts of climate change on resources of concern and facilitate transition of diverse ecosystems 70 to a warmer climate. The vulnerability assessment focuses on fish and aquatic habitat, 71 vegetation, special habitats, recreation, and ecosystem services. 72 Projected changes in climate and hydrology will have far-reaching effects on aquatic and 73 terrestrial ecosystems, especially as frequency of extreme climatic events (drought, low 74 snowpack) and ecological disturbances (flooding, wildfire, insect outbreaks) increases. 75 Distribution and abundance of cold-water fish species are expected to decrease in response to 76 higher water temperature, although effects will vary as a function of local habitat and 77 competition with nonnative fish. 78 Higher air temperature, through its influence on soil moisture, is expected to cause 79 gradual changes in the distribution and abundance of plant species, with drought-tolerant species 80 becoming more dominant. Increased frequency and extent of wildfire will facilitate vegetation 81 change, in some cases leading to altered structure and function of ecosystems (e.g., more forest 82 area in younger age classes). Special habitats such as riparian areas and wetlands are expected to 83 be especially sensitive to altered soil moisture, especially as drought frequency increases. 84 The effects of climate change on recreation activities are difficult to project, although 85 warmer temperatures are expected to create more opportunities for warm-weather activities (e.g., 86 hiking, camping) and fewer opportunities for snow-based activities (e.g., skiing, snowmobiling). 87 Recreationists modify their activities according to current conditions, but recreation management 88 by federal agencies has generally not been so flexible. 89 Of the ecosystem services considered in the assessment, timber supply and carbon 90 sequestration may be affected by increasing frequency and extent of disturbances. Native 91 pollinators may be affected by altered vegetation distribution and phenological mismatches 92 between insects and plants. 93 Resource managers convened at a SWAP workshop and developed adaptation options in 94 response to the vulnerabilities identified in each resource area, including both high-level 95 strategies and on-the-ground tactics. Many adaptation options are intended to increase the 96 resilience of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, or to reduce the effects of existing stressors (e.g., 97 removal of nonnative species). In terrestrial systems, a dominant theme of adaptation in 98 Southwest Washington is to accelerate restoration and fuel treatments, particularly in drier forest 99 types, to reduce the undesirable effects of extreme events and high-severity disturbances 100 (wildfire, insects). In aquatic systems, a dominant theme is to restore the structure and function 101 of streams to retain cold water for fish and other aquatic organisms. Many adaptation options can 102 accomplish multiple outcomes; for example, fuel treatments in dry forests reduce fire intensity, 103 which in turn reduces erosion that would degrade water quality and fish habitat. Furthermore, 104 many existingDRAFT management practices are already “climate-informed” or require minor adjustment Hudec et al. Front Matter 4 105 to make them so. Long-term monitoring is needed to detect climate change effects on natural 106 resources of concern and to evaluate the effectiveness of adaptation options that are 107 implemented. 108 109 Keywords: Adaptation, aquatic ecosystems, climate change, fire, climate-informed 110 management, ecosystem services, fisheries, recreation, science-management partnership, 111 Southwest Washington, terrestrial ecosystems, vegetation. 112 113 114 DRAFT Hudec et al. Front Matter 5 115 Summary 116 117 The Southwest Washington Adaptation Partnership (SWAP) is a science-management 118 partnership consisting of Gifford Pinchot National Forest, the U.S. Forest Service Pacific 119 Northwest Region and Pacific Northwest Research Station, and the University of Washington. 120 These organizations worked together over a period of two years to identify climate change issues 121 relevant to resource management in Southwest Washington and to find solutions that can 122 minimize undesirable effects of climate change and facilitate transition of diverse ecosystems to 123 a warmer climate. SWAP provided education, conducted a climate change vulnerability 124 assessment, and developed adaptation options for Gifford Pinchot National Forest and adjacent 125 landowners. 126 Global climate models for a high-end greenhouse gas emission scenario (RCP 8.5; 127 comparable to current emissions) project that climatic warming will continue throughout the 21st 128 century. Compared to observed historical temperature (1950-1979), average warming is 129 projected to increase from 1.3 to 2.3 °C from 2010 to 2039, 2.5 to 4.2 °C for 2040-2069, and 4.3 130 to 6.4 °C for 2070-2099. Seasonally, the largest increases in temperature are projected for 131 summer (+5.7-6.8 °C on average for June–August in 2070-2099). Mean summer precipitation is 132 projected to decrease from 162 mm historically to 87-21 mm by the end of the century, while 133 extreme precipitation events are likely to increase. 134 Projected changes in climate and hydrology will have far-reaching effects on aquatic and 135 terrestrial ecosystems, especially as frequency of extreme climatic events (drought, low 136 snowpack) and associated effects on ecological disturbance (flooding, wildfire, insect outbreaks) 137 increase. Vulnerability assessment and development of adaptation options for Southwest 138 Washington conclude the following: 139 140 Fisheries and aquatic habitat— 141 • Effects: Higher winter streamflows, decreased summer streamflows, and warmer water 142 temperature will reduce habitat quality and extent for cold-water-dependent fish species. 143 Anadromous fish species will be susceptible to higher thermal stress during summer 144 upstream migrations, reduced access to upstream spawning areas, increased pre-spawn 145 mortality rates or reduced viability of eggs and embryos, and harsher conditions due to 146 greater disturbances while juveniles rear in streams or migrate downstream. Based on 147 projected stream temperatures in a warmer climate, coho salmon, which currently access 584 148 km of streams and rivers, may lose 40-65 percent of their current habitat. Chinook salmon 149 occupy a more restricted area (approximately 359 km) within the same river systems as coho, 150 and are susceptible to the same amount of habitat loss. Steelhead occupy the largest extent 151 (900 km of streams) of the anadromous fish species. Bull trout, which require very cold 152 water, live in fragmented habitats and have relatively small populations. In addition to 153 aforementioned stressors, bull trout will be increasingly susceptible to competition with 154 brook trout and other nonnative species in a warmer climate. 155 • Adaptation options: Primary adaptation strategies for fisheries and aquatic habitat focus on 156 storing more water on the landscape, increasing resilience to disturbance, maintaining and 157 restoring riparian and wetland vegetation complexity, and maintaining and restoring natural 158 thermal conditions in streams. Strategies in response to increased peak streamflows include 159 increasing spawning habitat resilience by restoring stream structure and processes and by 160 reducingDRAFT threats from roads and infrastructure, particularly in floodplains. A key strategy to Hudec et
Recommended publications
  • Appendix B – Communications Received
    APPENDIX B – COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED This appendix contains all the communications received during the post-centerline release period from November 18, 2010 through December 31, 2011. In addition, the table below contains contact and organization names and the communication identification number assigned to each communication. The communication text in this appendix is ordered by the communication identification number. For reference, the table below is ordered by last name followed by illegible and anonymous signatures. Referenced attachments can be found by searching for the communication on the project website http://www.bpa.gov/corporate/I-5-EIS/search.cfm. Number Date Name - First Name - Last Organization 13665 7/20/2011 ANDREW ABBOTT 13665 7/20/2011 JACK ABERNATHY 13665 7/20/2011 CRYSTAL L ADAMS 13395 1/29/2011 PHIL AKELY 13667 7/20/2011 AMBER ALEXANDER 13665 7/20/2011 BOB ALEXANDER 13665 7/20/2011 CHEE ALLISON 13755 10/6/2011 ROBERT AMMONS 13683 8/3/2011 CANDICE D ANDERSON 13418 2/10/2011 CURTIS L ANDERSON 13207 12/2/2010 M. ANDERSON 13073 11/22/2010 GINA L ANDREWS STATE OF WASHINGTON, RECREATION AND 13836 12/15/2011 JIM ANEST CONSERVATION OFFICE 13665 7/20/2011 TRAVIS APP 13665 7/20/2011 BOB APPLING 13665 7/20/2011 JEREMY ARIONUS 13665 7/20/2011 CHUCK ARNST 13322 12/8/2010 DALE W AROLA 13321 12/9/2010 DALE W AROLA 13320 12/10/2010 DALE W AROLA 13527 1/28/2011 DALE W AROLA 13320 12/10/2010 DARREN F AROLA 13527 1/28/2011 DARREN F AROLA 13321 12/9/2010 DWAYNE D AROLA 13527 1/28/2011 DWAYNE D AROLA 13665 7/20/2011 BRIAN ASBURRY 13665
    [Show full text]
  • Older Forests Used by Northern Spotted Owls Functioned As Re Refugia
    Older forests used by northern spotted owls functioned as re refugia during large wildres, 1987–2017 Damon B Lesmeister ( [email protected] ) USDA Forest Service Pacic Northwest Research Station https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1102-0122 Raymond J. Davis USDA Forest Service Region 6: USDA Forest Service Pacic Northwest Region Stan G. Sovern USDA Forest Service Pacic Northwest Research Station Zhiqiang Yang USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Research Article Keywords: Northern spotted owl, Strix occidentalis caurina, wildre severity, RdNBR, climate change, re refugia Posted Date: March 12th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-280175/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/27 Abstract Background The northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) is an Endangered Species Act-listed subspecies that requires forests with old-growth characteristics for nesting. With climate change, large, severe wildres are expected to be more common and an increasing threat to spotted owl persistence. Understanding re severity patterns related to nesting forest can be valuable for forest management that supports conservation and recovery, especially if nesting forest functions as re refugia (i.e., lower re severity than surrounding landscape). We examined the relationship between re severity and nesting forests in 472 large wildres (> 200 ha) that occurred rangewide during 1987–2017. We mapped re severities (unburned-low, moderate, high) within each re using relative difference normalized burn ratios and quantied differences in severity between pre-re nesting forest (edge and interior) and non-nesting forest. We also quantied these relationships within areas of three re regimes (low severity, very frequent; mixed severity, frequent; high severity, infrequent).
    [Show full text]
  • RCFB April 2021 Page 1 Agenda TUESDAY, April 27 OPENING and MANAGEMENT REPORTS 9:00 A.M
    REVISED 4/8/21 Proposed Agenda Recreation and Conservation Funding Board April 27, 2021 Online Meeting ATTENTION: Protecting the public, our partners, and our staff are of the utmost importance. Due to health concerns with the novel coronavirus this meeting will be held online. The public is encouraged to participate online and will be given opportunities to comment, as noted below. If you wish to participate online, please click the link below to register and follow the instructions in advance of the meeting. Technical support for the meeting will be provided by RCO’s board liaison who can be reached at [email protected]. Registration Link: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_JqkQAGCrRSOwbHLmg3a6oA Phone Option: (669)900-6833 - Webinar ID: 967 5491 2108 Location: RCO will also have a public meeting location for members of the public to listen via phone as required by the Open Public Meeting Act, unless this requirement is waived by gubernatorial executive order. In order to enter the building, the public must not exhibit symptoms of the COVID-19 and will be required to comply with current state law around personal protective equipment. RCO staff will meet the public in front of the main entrance to the natural resources building and escort them in. *Additionally, RCO will record this meeting and would be happy to assist you after the meeting to gain access to the information. Order of Presentation: In general, each agenda item will include a short staff presentation and followed by board discussion. The board only makes decisions following the public comment portion of the agenda decision item.
    [Show full text]
  • THIRTY-YEAR CLUB PGION Six U.S.Copst Svicgr
    THIRTY-YEAR CLUB PGION Six U.S.cOPST SvIcGr VOL. XVII JUNE -1963 THE HEART OF THE TREE What does he plant who plant. * tree? He plants a friend of sun and sky; He plants the flag of breeea free; A shaft of beauty, towering high. He plants a home to heaven anigh, For song and mother-croon of bird In hushed and happy twilight heard. The treble of heaven's harmony - These things he plants who plants a tree What does he plant who plants a tree? He plants cool shade and tender rain, And seed and bud of days to be, And years that fade and flush again; He plants the glory of the plain; He plants the forest's heritage; The harvest of a coming age; The Joy that unborn eyes shall see - These things he plants who plants a tree. S What does he plant who plants a tree? He plants, in sap and leaf and wood, In love of home and loyalty And far-cast thoughts of civil good. His blessings on the neighborhood Who in the hollow of Hi. hand Holds all the growth of all our land. A nation', growth from sea to sea Stirs in hia heart who plante a tree. Henry- Cuyler Bunner S T I M B E R L I N E S June 1963 VOL. XVII - PUBLISHED ANNUALLY BY R-6 FOREST SERVICE 30-YEAR CLUB Editor - Frank Flack Consulting Editors Publication TH. Burgess Biographies - History....,..,.,.Kirk P. Cecil Obituaries .Leslie L. Colvill Photographs Victor H. Flach Policy J.
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Research Notes
    . , WEYERHAEUSER TIMBER Forestry R esearch N otes Tacoma, Washington BETTER TIMBER CROPS THROUGH INDUSTRIAl FOREST MANAGEMENT Fbrestry Research Note Noo 22 January 1960 DOUGLAS - FIR CONE AND SEED INSECT BI OLOGICAL AND CONTROL STUDIES: PROGRESS IN 1958 , 1959 by 'r. 1/ Norman E .. John son and Jack K. Win jum- Foresters in the Pacific Northwest a ~ e g1v1ng increased attention to use of high quality Douglas-fir seed. I nsect damage is one phase of seed investigations being conducted by our forestry resear ch staff at Centralia. The objective is to devel op a sound basis for control of ·the important cone and seed insects of D6uglas-fir. The reporting of pr ogress from these studies should prove of timely inter•est. The present paper on cone and seed insects of Douglas-fir in wester n Washington and Oregon contains sections on: ( 1) a key to seed--damaging larvae commbn i n green Dougl as-fir ·cones in western Washington, ( 2) the p·e,r iod of emergence and attack of the adults of ·these same larvae., ( 3 ) /chemical control tests and ( 4 ) · pre ... cautions on the use of insecticides. Changes in both the scientific and common names of the insects dealt with in this paper has resulted in some confusion. The following l ist of "Names usedr·r with the "Explanatory notes" is included to give the various synonyms with references where the name was originally used. The authors ., Forest Entomol ogist and Technol ogi·st, r 'espectively, express appreciation for fine cboperation that facilitated these studies: Chemical companies for ~upplying insecticides to test; members of our forestry research staff, D~.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Management Today Volume 62(3), the Article “Thirtymile Fire: Fire Behavior and Management Response” by Hutch Brown Made Some Incor- Rect Statements
    Fire today ManagementVolume 65 • No. 1 • Winter 2005 LLARGEARGE FFIRESIRES OFOF 2002—P2002—PARTART 11 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service CORRECTIONS ON THIRTYMILE In Fire Management Today volume 62(3), the article “Thirtymile Fire: Fire Behavior and Management Response” by Hutch Brown made some incor- rect statements: • p. 26, col. 1, para. 2: The statement that the fire management officers (FMOs) on Thirtymile “had no recent experience with initial and extend- ed attack” is false. In fact, the FMOs had recent experience on dozens of fires with various initial- and extended-attack resources, including smokejumpers, helirappelers, contractors, and ground resources. Those involved in formulating strategy and tactics on Thirtymile, including the FMOs, incident commander, and hotshot supervisor and foreman, had decades of fireline experience among them. • p. 26, col. 3, para. 3: The statement that engines arriving on the fire drove past the fire crew “[w]ithout checking in with the IC” has been proven to be false. The assigned incident commander remembers that engine 701 did check in at the lunch spot. • p. 29, col. 1, para. 1: The reference to media stories as “independent investigations” is misleading in a journal for the international wildland fire community. Newsprint journalism should not be confused with a formal accident investigation following a tragedy fire. We apologize to readers for the inaccuracies in the article and especially to those who might have been affected by them. Fire Management Today is published by the Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that the publication of this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the pub- lic business required by law of this Department.
    [Show full text]
  • TRI-POWER Is to Enlighten Fellow Enthusiasts by Educating, Inspiring and Informing
    FEBRUARYFEBRUARY 20142014 TRI-RI-POWEROWER Quadra Paws Fun Run 2013-Pages...10-11 Golf ball toss Wheel spin for points Cline Butte Work Party - March 22nd -2013....Pages 4-5 Lava rocks form rims and they present a perfect playground These Class II users belong to various clubs in Oregon PAID PERMIT #88 US POSTAGE GRESHAM, OR PRESORTED STD. www.pnw4wda.org 4-Wheelin’ News FEBRUARY 2014 1 PNWPNW4WDAWDA TRI-RI-POWEROWER www.pnw4wda.org / 800-537-7845 Volume 43 Number 2 February 2014 The mission of TRI-POWER is to enlighten fellow enthusiasts by educating, inspiring and informing Editor/Publisher: Ron McDonald / 360-901-8376 * Email: [email protected] 3902 NE 61st Ave, Vancouver, WA 98661 * Messages (360) 695-0595 All Rights Reserved - Printed in the USA TRI-POWER is published monthly for the Pacific Northwest 4 Wheel Drive Association. Photographs are edited and prepared with Adobe Photoshop.Layout is performed in Adobe InDesign. In house ads are created with Adobe Illustrator. Prepress product is converted with Adobe Acrobat Professional. TRI-POWER makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, with respect to the completeness, accuracy or utility of these materials or any information or opinion contained herein. Any use or reliance on the information or opinion is at the risk of the user, and TRI-POWER shall not be liable for any damage or injury incurred by any person arising out of the completeness, accuracy or utility of any information or opinion contained in these materials. These materials are not to be construed as an endorsement of any product or company, nor as the adoption or promulgation of any guidelines, standards, or recommendation.
    [Show full text]
  • HRCCWPP 2013 Draft1.1
    Table of Contents Introduction ..............................................................................................................7 Vision ..............................................................................................................8 Goals ...............................................................................................................9 Purpose ............................................................................................................9 Who 9 What 10 Where ............................................................................................................10 Why 10 When .............................................................................................................10 How 11 Organization ..................................................................................................11 Funding .........................................................................................................12 Impetus and Planning Steps ...................................................................................14 Policies and Tools .........................................................................................14 Defining the Wildland/Urban Interface ........................................................16 Planning Steps ...............................................................................................17 The 2005 Hood River CWPP Planning Process ...........................................18 Hood River CWPP Update Process ..............................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • 2.2 State Risk Assessment
    Chapter 2: RISK ASSESSMENT | State Risk Assessment | Cultural Resources Summary » Wildfire 2.2 State Risk Assessment Requirement: 44 CFR §201.4(c)(2)(i): The risk assessment shall include… (i) An overview of the type and location of all natural hazards that can affect the State, including information on previous occurrences of hazard events, as well as the probability of future hazard events, using maps where appropriate; The spatial distribution of the facilities within hazard zones is not easily viewed on a statewide map. Therefore, maps depicting hazard zones and facilities within those zones have only been created at the regional scale. Those maps can be found in section 2.3, Regional Risk Assessments. Oregon Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan | September 2020 163 Chapter 2: RISK ASSESSMENT | State Risk Assessment | Coastal Hazards Summary » Wildfire 2.2.1 Coastal Hazards The Pacific Northwest (PNW) coast of Figure 2-29. Erosion at The Capes Oregon is without doubt one of the most Condominiums, Oceanside, Oregon dynamic coastal landscapes in North America, evident by its long sandy beaches, sheer coastal cliffs, dramatic headlands and vistas, and ultimately the power of the Pacific Ocean that serves to erode and change the shape of the coast. It is these qualities along with its various natural resources that have drawn people to live along its narrow shores. However, coastal communities are increasingly under threat from a variety of natural hazards that all come together along the coastal strip. These include wave-induced coastal erosion (both short and long term), wave runup and overtopping (wave-induced flood hazards), inundation Notes: The Capes, a multi-million dollar condominium of homes by wind-blown sand, coastal complex constructed on an old Holocene dune field landslides, earthquakes, and potentially adjacent to Oceanside.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring/Fall 2001 Forestforest Historyhistory Todaytoday Message from the President by Understanding Our Past, We Shape Our Future
    A PUBLICATION OF THE FOREST HISTORY SOCIETY SPRING/FALL 2001 ForestForest HistoryHistory TodayToday MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT By understanding our past, we shape our future STEVEN ANDERSON ne of the most poignant lessons “It’s interesting that before the United from history is that the prosperi- Nations and before the World Trade ty of civilizations is based both Center, Gifford Pinchot dreamed of a Oon the availability and use of natural World Conservation Conference, which resources and on the social interactions finally resulted in the “Lake Success between people and nations. In many ways Conference.” His wife termed the confer- what man does to the land, man does to man. Gifford ence “tragic” (FHT Spring 1999, p. 41), and she describes Pinchot recognized this as he spent many of his last years for- men of little faith and many fears. Two world wars and mulating plans for an international conference on conserva- many revolutions marked the first half of the 20th century. tion that would set a foundation for permanent peace. Pinchot’s goal of a permanent peace and prudent utiliza- The world must and is responding to the attacks of tion of natural resources for the welfare of all nations has September 11, 2001, events that will be considered among the still not arrived. From images of Afghanistan seen on tele- worst atrocities in American history. It is understandable that vision lately it looks like a pretty desolate place. Pinchot’s the initial response was focused on ensuring immediate safety. vision of conservation and world policy were certainly rel- Yet, reflection to situate the crisis in a historical context also evant during his time.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in the Columbia River Gorge, Mount Hood National Forest, and Willamette National Forest
    Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in the Columbia River Gorge, Mount Hood National Forest, and Willamette National Forest Editors Jessica E. Halofsky is the director of the Northwest Climate Hub and Western Wildland Environmental Threat Assessment Center, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 3625 93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512; David L. Peterson is a professor, University of Washington, College of the Environment, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100; Rebecca A. Gravenmier is a science coordinator and regional climate change coordinator, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station and Pacific Northwest Region, 1220 SW 3rd Avenue, Portland, OR 97204. 1 Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in Columbia River Gorge, Mount Hood National Forest, and Willamette National Forest Jessica E. Halofsky, David L. Peterson, and Rebecca A. Gravenmier Editors U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, Oregon General Technical Report PNW-GTR-xxx Month year 2 Abstract Halofsky, Jessica E.; Peterson, David L.; Gravenmier, Rebecca A., eds. 2020. Climate change vulnerability and adaptation in the Columbia River Gorge, Mount Hood National Forest, and Willamette National Forest. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-xxx. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Xxx p. A science-management partnership was developed to identify climate change issues relevant for resource management in Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area, Mount Hood National Forest, and Willamette National Forest (abbreviated as CMW Adaptation Partnership, or CMWAP). This partnership assessed the vulnerability of natural resources to climate change, and developed adaptation options that minimize negative impacts of climate change and facilitate transition of ecosystems and organizations to a warmer climate.
    [Show full text]