DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Administration in Germany

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Administration in Germany Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät Karl-Peter Sommermann | Nathalie Behnke | Sabine Kropp | Hans Hofmann | Julia Fleischer | Hans-Heinrich von Knobloch | Dieter Schimanke | Ludger Schrapper | Kay Ruge | Klaus Ritgen | Werner Jann | Sylvia Veit | Jan Ziekow | Veith Mehde | Christoph Reichard | Eckhard Schröter | Gisela Färber | Hellmut Wollmann | Sabine Kuhlmann | Jörg Bogumil Public Administration in Germany Suggested citation referring to the original publication: Kuhlmann, S., Proeller, I., Schimanke, D. & Ziekow, J. (eds) (2021). Public Administration in Germany. Part of: Governance and Public Management. Springer Publishing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53697-8 ISSN (print) 2524-728X ISSN (online) 2524-7298 ISBN: 978-3-030-53697-8 Postprint archived at the Institutional Repository of the Potsdam University in: Postprints der Universität Potsdam Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe ; 140 ISSN 1867-5808 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-504637 DOI https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-50463 Public Administration in Germany Edited by Sabine Kuhlmann · Isabella Proeller Dieter Schimanke · Jan Ziekow Governance and Public Management Series Editor Paul Joyce INLOGOV University of Birmingham Birmingham, UK IIAS Series: Governance and Public Management International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS) – Setting the Governance Agenda Worldwide Website: http://www.iias-iisa.org Edited by Paul Joyce To cover the diversity of its members, the IIAS has set up four sub-entities: – The EGPA (European Group for Public Administration) – The IASIA (International Association of Schools and Institutes of Administration) – The LAGPA (Latin American Group for Public Administration) – The AGPA (Asian Group for Public Administration) Governance and Public Management Series This IIAS series of books on Governance and Public Management has a focus and breadth that refects the concerns of the International Institute of Administrative Sciences. The Institute, which was set up in 1930, involves academics and governments from all around the world. The Institute’s work involves supporting both practitioners and academics, which it does by encouraging the production of relevant knowledge on public governance and public management and by facilitating its dissemi- nation and utilization. It is the intention of the series to include books that are forward-look- ing, have an emphasis on theory and practice, are based on sound under- standing of empirical reality, and offer ideas and prescriptions for better public governance and public management. This means the books will include not only facts about causes and effects, but also include ideas for actions and strategies that have positive consequences for the future of public governance and management. The books will offer a point of view about responses to the big challenges facing public governance and man- agement over the next decade, such as sustainable development, the cli- mate crisis, technological change and artifcial intelligence (A.I.), poverty, social exclusion, international cooperation, and open government. All books in the series are subject to Palgrave’s rigorous peer review pro- cess: https://www.palgrave.com/gb/demystifying-peer-review/792492 More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/15021 Sabine Kuhlmann • Isabella Proeller Dieter Schimanke • Jan Ziekow Editors Public Administration in Germany Editors Sabine Kuhlmann Isabella Proeller University of Potsdam University of Potsdam Potsdam, Germany Potsdam, Germany Dieter Schimanke Jan Ziekow Ministry of Labour, Women, Health, German Research Institute for Social Affairs of the German Land Public Administration Saxony-Anhalt Speyer, Germany Magdeburg, Germany ISSN 2524-728X ISSN 2524-7298 (electronic) Governance and Public Management ISBN 978-3-030-53696-1 ISBN 978-3-030-53697-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53697-8 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2021. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifc statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the ­publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and ­institutional affliations. This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG. The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland FOREWORD Governments act in an increasingly multilateral and international environ- ment. However, making this cooperation work still depends heavily upon the capacities of national administrations. In many cases, their basic pro- fles have been shaped by long traditions, while others have undergone a process of transformation. In the context of the European Union, it is vital for member states to realize that European policies work effectively only when public administration is able to meet all new challenges. As an aid to understanding how we act, we decided to offer to the international public administration community an up-to-date edition of articles presenting and analysing the German system, including recent challenges and reforms. We have chosen the context of the European Public Administration Network (EUPAN), a forum for EU intergovernmental cooperation which includes member states and the European Commission, for launch- ing the open access version of the book. The fora and this book consider the basis and standards for an effective and effcient public administration that is citizen-oriented and fosters trust in public institutions. This can support European initiatives for improving the implementation of public programmes and cooperation in the frst place between the EU and its member states. In the international community of public administration scholars and practitioners, there is a growing need for knowledge and information, analyses, reviews and evaluations of present-day Germany’s administrative system and recent reforms. German researchers and practitioners are often asked for a publication to meet this need, especially in the arena of the International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS) and its regional v vi FOREWORD institution, the European Group of Public Administration (EGPA), as well as in the world-wide public administration projects of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH. The pres- ent volume is intended to respond to research and teaching needs and to provide information on the actual practices and reforms. No English-language publication about the German administrative sys- tems has been on the market since 2001, when the German Section of the IIAS successfully met the demand for such a publication nearly 20 years after the frst, published in 1983. However, as these two works were pro- duced before and after German unifcation, much of their content is now outdated and in need of major revision.1 I am grateful to all the authors represented in this volume, who are leading academics and practitioners in the feld and who cooperated with great enthusiasm to bring forth the new edition within a short period of time. They all take full responsibility for the content they have contributed. The German Section of the International Institute of Administrative Sciences is deeply grateful to Professor Sabine Kuhlmann (Potsdam), Professor Isabella Proeller (Potsdam), State Secretary Dieter Schimanke (ret., Magdeburg/Hamburg) and Professor Jan Ziekow (Speyer) for developing the idea for this publication and realizing it together with a group of high-level experts in the German public administration. State Secretary, Hans-Georg Engelke Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community President, German Section of the IIAS NOTE 1. See König, K., von Oertzen, H.J., Wagener, F. (eds.) (1983). Public Administration in the Federal Republic of Germany. Deventer: Kluwer. König, K., Siedentopf, H. (eds.) (2001). Public Administration in Germany. Baden-Baden: Nomos. ACKnOWLEDGEMEnTS We would like to thank the German Section of the International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS) for their confdence in the editors in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Federal of Republic of Germany Is a Democratic and Social Federal
    The Federal Republic of Germany Jutta Kramer The Federal Republic of Germany “is a democratic and social federal state” (Basic Law, Art. 20I). It was founded in 1949, after the Western Allies gave the prime ministers of the Länder (i.e., the constituent states), which were reestablished after the Second World War, the task of drafting a new constitution with a federal character in order to prevent a strong central state from arising in Germany again. However, the federal order in Germany does not follow the example of the United States Constitution, which emphasizes a division of powers between governments, but rather the German tradition, which is characterized by mutual connections, interconnections, and overlapping of the centralized and decentralized state units.1 When it was founded, the Federal Republic of Germany consisted of 11 Länder (without Berlin, which was a city-state under Allied control) that did not conform to the boundaries of the former Weimar Republic. Since reunification in 1990, Germany has consisted of 16 Länder, including three city-states: Hamburg, Bremen, and Berlin. Germany’s population is spread across 357,000 square kilometres. The highest population density is in Berlin, which has 3,800 inhabitants per square kilometre; the lowest is in the Land Brandenburg, which has only 88 inhabitants per square kilometre. Länder sizes differ considerably as well. The smallest Land, Bremen, consisting of two cities (Bremen and Bremerhaven), has 680,000 inhabitants; the largest Land, North Rhine-Westphalia, has more than 17.9 million inhabitants. The ethnicity of Germany’s population of 82.1 million people is largely homogeneous.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany (1950-2018)
    Germany Self-rule INSTITUTIONAL DEPTH AND POLICY SCOPE Germany has two-tiered regional governance consisting of sixteen Länder and (Land)Kreise. Several Länder have a third tier between these two, Regierungsbezirke (administrative districts). Two Länder have a fourth tier of regional governance, Landschaftsverbände in North-Rhine Westphalia and Bezirksverband Pfalz in Rhineland-Palatinate.1 The 1949 Basic Law of the German Federal Republic granted eleven Länder extensive competences, which include legislative powers for culture, education, universities, broadcasting/television, local government, and the police (C 1949, Art. 74; Council of Europe: Germany 1999; Hrbek 2002; Swenden 2006; Watts 1999a, 2008). Länder also exercise residual competences (C 1949, Art. 70). In addition, the Basic Law states that Länder are responsible for the implementation of most federal laws (C 1949, Arts. 83–85). The federal government may legislate to preserve legal and economic unity with respect to justice, social welfare, civil law, criminal law, labor law, and economic law (C 1949, Art 72.2), and it has authority to establish the legislative framework in higher education, the press, environmental protection, and spatial planning (C 1949, Art. 72.3; Reutter 2006). The federal government exercises sole legislative authority over foreign policy, defense, currency, and public services (C 1949, Art. 73; Council of Europe: Germany 1999; Hrbek 2002; Swenden 2006; Watts 1999a, 2008). It also has exclusive authority over immigration and citizenship (C 1949, Arts. 73.2 and 73.3), though Länder administer inter-Land immigration and have concurrent competence on residence (Bendel and Sturm 2010: 186-187; C 1949, Arts. 74.4 and 74.6).2 However, this is not enough to qualify for the maximum score on policy scope.β The constitutional division of authority was extended to the five new Länder after unification in 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Commander's Guide to German Society, Customs, and Protocol
    Headquarters Army in Europe United States Army, Europe, and Seventh Army Pamphlet 360-6* United States Army Installation Management Agency Europe Region Office Heidelberg, Germany 20 September 2005 Public Affairs Commanders Guide to German Society, Customs, and Protocol *This pamphlet supersedes USAREUR Pamphlet 360-6, 8 March 2000. For the CG, USAREUR/7A: E. PEARSON Colonel, GS Deputy Chief of Staff Official: GARY C. MILLER Regional Chief Information Officer - Europe Summary. This pamphlet should be used as a guide for commanders new to Germany. It provides basic information concerning German society and customs. Applicability. This pamphlet applies primarily to commanders serving their first tour in Germany. It also applies to public affairs officers and protocol officers. Forms. AE and higher-level forms are available through the Army in Europe Publishing System (AEPUBS). Records Management. Records created as a result of processes prescribed by this publication must be identified, maintained, and disposed of according to AR 25-400-2. Record titles and descriptions are available on the Army Records Information Management System website at https://www.arims.army.mil. Suggested Improvements. The proponent of this pamphlet is the Office of the Chief, Public Affairs, HQ USAREUR/7A (AEAPA-CI, DSN 370-6447). Users may suggest improvements to this pamphlet by sending DA Form 2028 to the Office of the Chief, Public Affairs, HQ USAREUR/7A (AEAPA-CI), Unit 29351, APO AE 09014-9351. Distribution. B (AEPUBS) (Germany only). 1 AE Pam 360-6 ● 20 Sep 05 CONTENTS Section I INTRODUCTION 1. Purpose 2. References 3. Explanation of Abbreviations 4. General Section II GETTING STARTED 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Litigious Paranoia: Sense of Justice, Bureaucracy, and Media
    ADMINISTORY ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR VERWALTUNGSGESCHICHTE BAND 3, 2018 SEITE 201–217 D O I : 10.2478/ADHI-2018-0037 Litigious Paranoia: Sense of Justice, Bureaucracy, and Media RUPERT GADERER Sense of Justice ›Quarrelers‹, according to the president of the German justice in connection with the Anglo-American law-and- Federal Administrative Court between 1958 and 1969, emotion debate,3 which in German-speaking countries should not be judged with the same standards as a has been discussed for the most part under the concept common citizen.1 People who take excessive legal action ›Rechtsgefühl‹ (sense of justice). In Germany, most of the and fle countless complaints are – in his opinion – contributions have come from the feld ›legal sociology‹ usually sick. Still today forensic psychiatry assumes that and in recent years research has been carried out in such querulous behavior is the result of a pathological the cultural and literary sciences.4 The present media- increase in an emotion, or more specifcally a pathological historical investigation of litigious paranoia takes these increase in a person’s ›sense of justice‹.2 Litigious results into consideration and emphasizes three aspects paranoia is said to be an obsessive endeavor to realize in particular. First, the question of the historicity of justice and a concept of justice – the origin of which can emotions is pursued, the temporally and spatially be found in the human psyche. It is precisely the legal dependent power derived from emotions to take action system and psychiatry that, in the history of litigious and the social contextualization of emotions.5 Second, paranoia or paranoia querulans, have dealt extensively those media are shifted from the periphery to the center with this behavior, after all they, as the observers of of cognitive interest which are brought into play to society and the authorities for pronouncing judgments, transfer the fury, the hate, but also the desperation and were and are most afected by it.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018/19 of the German Council of Economic Experts (GCEE)
    1 © 2019 Institute for Monetary and Financial Stability Goethe University Frankfurt House of Finance Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 3 60323 Frankfurt am Main Tel.:+49 (0)69 798-33805 www.imfs-frankfurt.de PHOTOS IMFS / Hannelore Förster, German Council of Economic Experts, Hoover Institution / Tim Griffith, Kronberger Kreis DESIGN www.werbe-freiheit.com 2 Table of Contents 5 Highlights 2018 10 Institute and Staff 11 I. The Institute 15 II. The IMFS in Numbers 16 III. Macroeconomic Model Comparison Initiative (MMCI) 18 IV. External Research Funding 21 V. Member of the European Banking Institute 22 VI. The Researchers 35 VII. Organization Chart 36 Conversations with IMFS Researchers and Alumni 42 Teaching Concept and Activities 51 Publications and Presentations 52 I. IMFS Working Papers 54 II. IMFS Interdisciplinary Studies 55 III. Publications 60 IV. Speeches and Conference Presentations 67 Events 69 I. Conferences 82 II. Working Lunches 86 II. Distinguished Lectures 88 Research-Based Policy Advice 91 Public Outreach and Press 3 Editorial Dear friends of the IMFS, Having obtained financing for another 10-year At the same time, this open platform, where period in the preceding year, the IMFS made scientists can share formulas and code and another leap forward in 2018: Roland Broemel replicate models, represents the nucleus of and Alexander Meyer-Gohde were appointed a key international research initiative: the as IMFS professors and now contribute their Macroeconomic Model Comparison Initiative expertise in public law and financial regulation (MMCI), a joint project led by the Hoover and in macroeconomics and financial markets, Institution at Stanford University and the IMFS.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Teil Einwohnerverzeichnis Nach Strassen Geordnet A
    kinwolmerverzeiclmig von Linz B flach Straßen geordnet Mehr auch A alphabetifch geordnet] Gegründei 1880 Fett-ruf 3301 OBEtHAUS ANTON GATTERBAUER Link, nur-Graben Kompleiie Braufauzsiattungen in allen Frei-lagen. Ersfltlassige Polsiermöbel IIIII II AKTlENGEsELLSCHAFT Zenkralbiiko : I.I N Z - U R FA IsI R Lucien-fresse Nr. 20 Tel. Nr. 70-O9, 72-79 Hocn- UND Hinz-w Neuzsinuchn musswa schossemtzrk und Zemcnfwarenekzeugung Speziåliaehx Ausführung von gas- uns bombenslchetåp luttschuhtäumen GRABDENKMÄLER und » sämtliche BAUFfElNMEIZARBEUEN zot.Linler Wähne am drum-Friedhof J Fernruksosö -.J Erklärungen .zum-Sinwol1nerverzeichnis B, das nach straßem beziehungs- « weisesiedlungggruppen geordnet ausscheint o Jn diesem Verzeichnis-erfolgte die Reihung der Namen nach ganz anderen Gesicht3puntten, ale beim CinwohnerverzeichnissA Die Namen Maier und Schmied, einschließlich der Zufannnensetzungen (wie Maierhofer, Schmiedbauer usw.),- scheinen hier-mach ihrer verschiedenen wirklichen-Schreibweise aus. Die den Namen links vorgestellte Ziffer bedeutet die jeweilige hausnummer der betreffenden Straße; ist dieser Ziffer ein »V« darübergestellt,·besagt dies, daß die Zifferngebung zum Zwecke der Boltgzäljlung vorläufig erfolgt, eine amtliche Numerierung aber noch nicht vorhanden ift. Die Reihung der Vornamen der Mitglieder der einzelnen haughalte ist nicht alphabetifchz hier ist meist der haushaltsvorftand vorangestellt. Der Vorteil dieser Beihung liegt darin,«daß auch bei Kenntnis der deiläufigen Schreibweise des Namen-S und der Straße der zu suchenden Person sich das Auffinden derselben leicht ermöglichen läßt. (Veispiel: Mayer sName der'Straßef. Da es Mayer mit ai, ay,«aier, ayr, ey, ei, eier, eyer gibt, ist der einzige Anhalts- puntt die Straße, die der Suchen-de kennt. Nun ist es an hand dieser Reihung leicht-möglich, den Betreffenden zu sinden.) IW .
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Evaluation of the Judicial Systems (2016-2018 Cycle) Germany Generated on : 29/08/2018 11:17
    1. Evaluation of the judicial systems (2016-2018 cycle) Germany Generated on : 29/08/2018 11:17 Reference data 2016 (01/01/2016 - 31/12/2016) Start/end date of the data collection campaign : 01/06/2017 - 31/12/2017 Objective : The CEPEJ decided, at its 28th plenary meeting, to launch the seventh evaluation cycle 2016 – 2018, focused on 2016 data. The CEPEJ wishes to use the methodology developed in the previous cycles to get, with the support of its national correspondents' network, a general evaluation of the judicial systems in the 47 member states of the Council of Europe as well as two observer states (Israel and Morocco). This will enable policy makers and judicial practitioners to take account of such unique information when carrying out their activities. The present questionnaire was adapted by the Working group on evaluation of judicial systems (CEPEJ-GT-EVAL) in view of the previous evaluation cycles and considering the comments submitted by CEPEJ members, observers, experts and national correspondents. The aim of this exercise is to increase awareness of judicial systems in the participating states, to compare the functioning of judicial systems in their various aspects, as well as to have a better knowledge of the trends of the judicial organisation in order to help improve the efficiency of justice. The evaluation questionnaire and the analysis of the results becomes a genuine tool in favour of public policies on justice, for the sake of the European citizens. Instruction : The ways to use the application and to answer the questions are guided by two main documents: -User manual -Explanatory note While the explanatory note gives definitions and explanations on the CEPEJ evaluation questionnaire and the methodology needed for replying, the User manual is a tool to help you navigate through this application.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance by Committee: the Role of Committees in European Policy Making and Policy
    Governance by Committee: The Role of Committees in European Policy Making and Policy Research Paper 00/GHA Return to Introduction STATE OF THE ART REPORT CONTRACT NUMBER: HPSE-CT-1999-00019 PROJECT NUMBER: SERD-1999-00128 TITLE: GOVERNANCE BY COMMITTEE, THE ROLE OF COMMITTEES IN EUROPEAN POLICY-MAKING AND POLICY IMPLEMENTATION MAASTRICHT, MAY 2000 Table of Contents 1. General Introduction ................................................................................................................ 4 Subproject 1: The Standing Committees in the European Parliament 2.1..................Introduction ............................................................................................................... 6 2.2..................The Evolution of the European Parliament: From Consultative ............................... 6 Assembly to Co-legislator 2.2.1...............The EP as a Legislative Actor after Maastricht......................................................... 7 2.2.2...............EP and Council on an Even Footing after Amsterdam.............................................. 8 2.2.2.1. ..........The Streamlining of the Co-decision Procedure........................................................ 9 2.3..................The Role of EP Committees in the Legislative Process ............................................ 10 2.3.1...............Membership in EP Committees.................................................................................12 2.3.2...............Powers and Competences of EP Committees...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bundesministerium Für Landesverteidigung 1
    w-M—F“—_h—In—q—H—mmu—Hm_—h——q—_ _—_—_——_———_-—.cfl———_—_—n_flu—l—_Ing-In“. Ausmusterung 17.8.1918 (die letzte). Rang 1.8.1918 Alberti Karl9 geb. 22.9.1898 in Szentlöringz, Sohn eines Tafel» richters9 Lt I.R.52‚ lebte in Budapest .Apitsch Robert, geb. 26.8.1899 in Neutitschein, Schn eines Regierungsrates,.Lt 1.3.49, 5.7.1919 a.D.‚ lebte als DiSpcnent (Später Prokurist) in Dornbirn, dann in einer FeinmechanikA.G. in’Wien Attems Frh.v. Heiligenkreuz Anton Graf Dr.jur.9 geb. 11.2.1899 in Baden bei Wien, Sohn eines Großgrundbesitzers‚ Lt D.R.7‚ später Rechtsanwalt in _ 50.6.1920 a.D.9 lebte in Baden b. Wien9 Wien, in der Deutschen Wehrmacht Hauptmann Sohn 'Balla von Irregh Valentin, geb. 25.10.1899 in Neusatz, eines Obergespans, Lt H.R.16‚ lebte in Budapest, nach 1945 geflüchtet, lebte in Schlcß Flammhof bei St. Nicolai (Stmk). Bardiö Alexander, geb. 28.9.1899 in Sümeg, Sohn eines Notars. Lt H.R.15‚ in die ungarische Armee übernommen, wurde Rittmeister in Szombathely Bartalis von Lengyelfalva Kolcman, geb. 16.5.1899 in Szamcsa Ujvär, Sohn eines Oberkontrollors9 Lt H.B.15‚ in die ungarische Armee übernommen, Später Rittmeister in Budapest BUNDESMINISTERIUM FÜR LANDESVERTEIDIGUNG 1. 2 _ Bedini Kajetan, geb. 8.11.1898 in Eszeg, Sohn eines Honved— Majors,-Lt I.R.78, soll in Jugoslawien leben, Weiteres unben kannt Begic Zdenko, geb. 20.2.1898 in Karlstadt, Sohn eines Gendarmeriew Oberstleutnants, Lt I.R.96, lebte in Novska (Jugoslawien) Beill Rudolf, geb.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany
    0855_Cover_GG-Englisch_DBT_RZ.in1 1 20.10.2010 11:59:06 Uhr Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany Print version last amended on 23 December 2014 Translators: Professor Christian Tomuschat and Professor David P. Currie, Professor Donald P. Kommers in cooperation with the Language Service of the German Bundestag Contents Preamble 13 I. Basic Rights 14 Art. 1 [Human dignity – Human rights – Legally binding force of basic rights] 15 Art. 2 [Personal freedoms] 15 Art. 3 [Equality before the law] 15 Art. 4 [Freedom of faith and conscience] 15 Art. 5 [Freedom of expression, arts and sciences] 16 Art. 6 [Marriage – Family – Children] 16 Art. 7 [School system] 17 Art. 8 [Freedom of assembly] 17 Art. 9 [Freedom of association] 18 Art. 10 [Privacy of correspondence, posts and telecommunications] 18 Art. 11 [Freedom of movement] 19 Art. 12 [Occupational freedom] 19 Art. 12a [Compulsory military and alternative civilian service] 19 Art. 13 [Inviolability of the home] 21 Art. 14 [Property – Inheritance – Expropriation] 22 Art. 15 [Socialisation] 22 Art. 16 [Citizenship – Extradition] 23 Art. 16a [Right of asylum] 23 Art. 17 [Right of petition] 24 Art. 17a [Restriction of basic rights in specific instances] 24 Art. 18 [Forfeiture of basic rights] 25 Art. 19 [Restriction of basic rights – Legal remedies] 25 II. The Federation and the Länder 26 Art. 20 [Constitutional principles – Right of resistance] 27 Art. 20a [Protection of the natural foundations of life and animals] 27 Art. 21 [Political parties] 27 Art. 22 [Federal capital – Federal flag] 28 Art. 23 [European Union – Protection of basic rights – Principle of subsidiarity] 28 Art.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 30.9.2020 SWD(2020) 304 Final
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 30.9.2020 SWD(2020) 304 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT 2020 Rule of Law Report Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Germany Accompanying the document COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS 2020 Rule of Law Report The rule of law situation in the European Union {COM(2020) 580 final} - {SWD(2020) 300 final} - {SWD(2020) 301 final} - {SWD(2020) 302 final} - {SWD(2020) 303 final} - {SWD(2020) 305 final} - {SWD(2020) 306 final} - {SWD(2020) 307 final} - {SWD(2020) 308 final} - {SWD(2020) 309 final} - {SWD(2020) 310 final} - {SWD(2020) 311 final} - {SWD(2020) 312 final} - {SWD(2020) 313 final} - {SWD(2020) 314 final} - {SWD(2020) 315 final} - {SWD(2020) 316 final} - {SWD(2020) 317 final} - {SWD(2020) 318 final} - {SWD(2020) 319 final} - {SWD(2020) 320 final} - {SWD(2020) 321 final} - {SWD(2020) 322 final} - {SWD(2020) 323 final} - {SWD(2020) 324 final} - {SWD(2020) 325 final} - {SWD(2020) 326 final} EN EN ABSTRACT The German justice system is characterised by the country’s federal structure and the important role of the Länder in the administration of justice. The level of perceived judicial independence is high. Safeguards for the independence of prosecutors have recently been under discussion. The German justice system is mostly performing efficiently, although some indicators have been showing a decline in overall performance. Particular efforts are ongoing to further develop the digitalisation of the justice system, which would contribute to enhancing its efficiency and quality.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Supreme Finance Court
    Der Bundesfinanzhof The Federal Supreme Finance Court (English Edition) Contents I. Introduction 4 II. The history of the Federal Supreme Finance Court 1. The period up to 1918 7 2. Establishment of the Reich Supreme Finance Court 8 3. The period from 1933 to 1945 12 4. The Presidents of the Reich Supreme Finance Court 12 5. The Supreme Fiscal Court 13 6. Establishment of the Federal Supreme Finance Court 13 7. The Presidents of the Federal Supreme Finance Court 14 III. The structure of fiscal jurisdiction 1. The arrangement of courts in the Federal Republic of Germany 16 2. Fiscal jurisdiction 17 IV. The organisation of the Federal Supreme Finance Court 1. The individual senates 20 2. The Large Senate 22 3. The Joint Senate of the Supreme Federal Courts 23 V. Procedure at the Federal Supreme Finance Court 1. The individual remedies a) Revision 24 b) Appeals against denial of leave to appeal 25 c) Objections 25 d) Applications 26 2. Compulsory representation 26 3. Parties to the proceedings 26 VI. How cases are handled at the Federal Supreme Finance Court 1. Registration and preliminary handling 29 2. Preparation of proceedings 29 3. Deliberation and voting 30 4. Decisions 30 5. Announcements of the decisions 33 VII. The workload of the Federal Supreme Finance Court Settlement and duration of cases 34 VIII. Significance of Federal Supreme Finance Court decisions; their publication 1. Adjudication on specific cases 36 2. Leading decisions 36 3. Publication a) Decisions bound for publication 37 b) Decisions not bound for publication 38 c) Pending proceedings 39 IX.
    [Show full text]