Matters of Light. Ways of Knowing in Enlightened Optics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Institute of Advanced Insights Study MattersMatters ofof Light.Light. WaysWays ofof KnowingKnowing inin EnlightenedEnlightened OpticsOptics Fokko Jan Dijksterhuis Volume 7 2014 Number 8 ISSN 1756-2074 Institute of Advanced Study Insights About Insights Insights captures the ideas and work-in-progress of the Fellows of the Institute of Advanced Study at Durham University. Up to twenty distinguished and ‘fast-track’ Fellows reside at the IAS in any academic year. They are world-class scholars who come to Durham to participate in a variety of events around a core inter-disciplinary theme, which changes from year to year. Each theme inspires a new series of Insights, and these are listed in the inside back cover of each issue. These short papers take the form of thought experiments, summaries of research findings, theoretical statements, original reviews, and occasionally more fully worked treatises. Every fellow who visits the IAS is asked to write for this series. The Directors of the IAS – Veronica Strang, Rob Barton, Barbara Graziosi and Martin Ward – also invite submissions from others involved in the themes, events and activities of the IAS. Insights is edited for the IAS by Barbara Graziosi. Previous editors of Insights were Professor Susan Smith (2006–2009) and Professor Michael O’Neill (2009–2012). About the Institute of Advanced Study The Institute of Advanced Study, launched in October 2006 to commemorate Durham University’s 175th Anniversary, is a flagship project reaffirming the value of ideas and the public role of universities. The Institute aims to cultivate new thinking on ideas that might change the world, through unconstrained dialogue between the disciplines as well as interaction between scholars, intellectuals and public figures of world standing from a variety of backgrounds and countries. The Durham IAS is one of only a handful of comparable institutions in the world that incorporates the Sciences, Social Sciences, the Arts and the Humanities. The focal point of the IAS is a programme of work associated with, but not exclusive to, an annual research theme. At the core of this work lies a prestigious Fellowship programme. This programme gathers together scholars, intellectuals and public figures of world standing or world-promise to address topics of major academic or public interest. Their mission is to anticipate the new and re-interpret the old, communicating across and working between disciplinary boundaries. Every year, the Institute invites as many as twenty highly creative individuals to spend up to three months in Durham. They are located in Cosin’s Hall, a magnificent and spacious 18th century mansion which, together with Durham Cathedral and Durham Castle, forms part of Palace Green, dominating the World Heritage Site of Durham Peninsula. During their stay, Fellows engage with departments and colleges, deliver public lectures and seminars, and, above all, join an international community of researchers to address the theme selected for that year. Further details of the IAS and its Fellowship programme can be found at www.durham.ac.uk/ias/fellows Copyright The design and contents of Insights are subject to copyright. Copyright and Reproduction Rights in all submitted contributions remain with the authors, as described in the Author’s Copyright Agreement. Copyright and Reproduction Rights of all other material remain with Insights. Except under the terms of Fair Dealing (UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988), the user may not modify, copy, reproduce, retransmit or otherwise distribute the site and its contents (whether text, graphics or original research concepts), without express permission in writing from the Institute. Where the above content is directly or indirectly reproduced in an academic context under the terms of Fair Dealing, this must be acknowledged with the appropriate bibliographical citation. The opinions stated in the Insights papers are those of their respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Institute of Advanced Study, Durham University, or the staff and students thereof. Institute of Advanced Study Insights MATTERS OF KNOWING. WAYS OF KNOWING IN ENLIGHTENED OPTICS Research in optics was a multifaceted affair in the Enlightenment that produced all kinds of ideas about light and colour and practices to employ it. They provide a mirror for present-day practices and concepts of optics that seem to evade basic notions of light and optics and are much richer than the basic textbook theories. This paper discusses three cases of enlightened optics. They came right after the classic formulations of the wave theory by Huygens and the particle theory by Newton; but these theories were largely irrelevant for these pursuits. The three-colour printing that Le Blon invented presented an alternative understanding of the nature and mixing of colours, based on visual perception. The burning lenses of Tschirnhaus showed the material effects of light, and consequentially its material nature. The barometric light displayed by vacuum glass spheres evaded every explanation but gave rise to the invention and investigation of electricity. These original inroads into optics may inspire present-day researchers to think anew about light and colours. n secondary school the physics of light was saved until last. The dual nature of light offered Ia glimpse into the strange world of modern physics that lay well beyond the A-levels. Light showed how physics could grasp the impalpable: being two things at the same time. The true nature of particle/wave duality was in the mathematical physics of sophisticated modelling and experimentation. That was well beyond our reach, but we had got the idea. The chosen few who would go into university physics might hear that a photon is a wave packet and a wave is a set of photons that go around together, and might learn to work them through. It remains to be seen whether this promise of higher understanding is fulfilled. Conceptions of what a photon is vary widely among physicists.1 At the end of the day the particle/wave probably gives no answer at all as to the question of what light is. The aspiring student will be disappointed even further (Lange, 2002). Many physicists are not particularly interested in the nature of light (and other natural entities). In modern physics the question ‘what is the nature of light?’ is generally not considered a scientific question at all. The quest for the nature of things ended with the advent of energy physics: science was no longer about essences, it was about conversions and effects (Kuhn, 1959; Smith, 2003). Rather than asking what heat is, in 1848 William Thomson, the later Lord Kelvin, asked what it can do; answering that it can do work (Thomson, 1848). With Einstein all attempts at understanding the ether were put aside: no sensible thing can be said about the nature or existence of the world beyond our instruments. The ignoramus and ignorabimus of du Bois-Reymond was expanded to an epistemic imperative ‘we should not want to know’ (du Bois-Reymond, 1912). Reality should not be written off from modern science too soon, however. Concepts of the nature of things are important for devising experiments, concocting hypotheses and interpreting effects. Picturing things as real helps in getting to intellectual grips with phenomena. Scientists need epistemic tools to investigate phenomena (de Regt, 2009). How do inquirers comprehend light when thinking about its properties, creating effects, manipulating experiments? This article addresses this question in an oblique manner, by making a detour to the optics of the 2 Institute of Advanced Study Insights eighteenth century. The creative ways in which Enlightened students of optics got to grips with various phenomena gives us an idea of the diversity, inventiveness and profusion of the epistemic tools employed by natural inquirers then and now. Beginnings ccounts of the nature of light usually refer to Huygens and Newton for the origins of wave Aand particle conceptions. Basically this is correct; regarding light, the new mechanistic understanding of nature of the seventeenth century crystallised in their theories. In Traité de la Lumière (1690) Christiaan Huygens (1629–1695) elaborated the idea that light consists of waves in an all-pervading ether. The key to his theory was his principle of wave propagation: an exact mathematical description that allowed for the explanation of the properties of light by means of geometrical derivation (Dijksterhuis, 2004). Newton’s Opticks (1704/1717) was an entirely different affair: rather than expounding an explanatory model for the properties of light it contained an experimental investigation of a range of new phenomena of light and colour. Central to it was the discovery that Newton had presented to the world in 1672: white light is a mixture of colours that can be separated into a spectrum by means of refraction in a prism – or raindrop for that matter. In Opticks, Newton extended his experimental account of light and colours to the interference patterns in thin layers of oil, soap, glass and air, as well as diffraction. Newton regarded claims about the unobservable nature of things, such as Huygens’s waves, to be speculations that should not be allowed to enter into proper science. As a result, in Opticks he defined the nature of light in terms of the rays that one sees. Only as an afterthought, in a series of probing ‘queries’ at the back of Opticks, did he reflect upon the nature of light. He made his private thoughts clear to his readers in the form of a rhetorical question: ‘Are not the Rays of Light very small Bodies emitted from shining Substances?’ (1717, p. 345). Newton considered a particle conception of light a better option than the ethereal waves of Robert Hooke, Christiaan Huygens and others: ‘Are not all Hypotheses erroneous, in which Light is supposed to consist in Pression or Motion, propagated through a fluid Medium?’ (p.