Astronomical Metronome of Geological Consequence COMMENTARY Linda A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
' Or ''Long'' Rhaetian? Astronomical Calibration of Austrian Key Sections
”Short” or ”long” Rhaetian ? Astronomical calibration of Austrian key sections Bruno Galbrun, Slah Boulila, Leopold Krystyn, Sylvain Richoz, Silvia Gardin, Annachiara Bartolini, Martin Maslo To cite this version: Bruno Galbrun, Slah Boulila, Leopold Krystyn, Sylvain Richoz, Silvia Gardin, et al.. ”Short” or ”long” Rhaetian ? Astronomical calibration of Austrian key sections. Global and Planetary Change, Elsevier, 2020, 192, pp.103253. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103253. hal-02884087 HAL Id: hal-02884087 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02884087 Submitted on 29 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Galbrun B., Boulila S., Krystyn L., Richoz S., Gardin S., Bartolini A., Maslo M. (2020). « Short » or « long » Rhaetian ? Astronomical calibration of Austrian key sections. Global Planetary Change. Vol. 192C. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103253 « Short » or « long » Rhaetian ? Astronomical calibration of Austrian key sections Bruno Galbruna,*, Slah Boulilaa, Leopold Krystynb, Sylvain Richozc,d, Silvia Gardine, Annachiara -
PHANEROZOIC and PRECAMBRIAN CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY 2016
PHANEROZOIC and PRECAMBRIAN CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY 2016 Series/ Age Series/ Age Erathem/ System/ Age Epoch Stage/Age Ma Epoch Stage/Age Ma Era Period Ma GSSP/ GSSA GSSP GSSP Eonothem Eon Eonothem Erathem Period Eonothem Period Eon Era System System Eon Erathem Era 237.0 541 Anthropocene * Ladinian Ediacaran Middle 241.5 Neo- 635 Upper Anisian Cryogenian 4.2 ka 246.8 proterozoic 720 Holocene Middle Olenekian Tonian 8.2 ka Triassic Lower 249.8 1000 Lower Mesozoic Induan Stenian 11.8 ka 251.9 Meso- 1200 Upper Changhsingian Ectasian 126 ka Lopingian 254.2 proterozoic 1400 “Ionian” Wuchiapingian Calymmian Quaternary Pleisto- 773 ka 259.8 1600 cene Calabrian Capitanian Statherian 1.80 Guada- 265.1 Proterozoic 1800 Gelasian Wordian Paleo- Orosirian 2.58 lupian 268.8 2050 Piacenzian Roadian proterozoic Rhyacian Pliocene 3.60 272.3 2300 Zanclean Kungurian Siderian 5.33 Permian 282.0 2500 Messinian Artinskian Neo- 7.25 Cisuralian 290.1 Tortonian Sakmarian archean 11.63 295.0 2800 Serravallian Asselian Meso- Miocene 13.82 298.9 r e c a m b i n P Neogene Langhian Gzhelian archean 15.97 Upper 303.4 3200 Burdigalian Kasimovian Paleo- C e n o z i c 20.44 306.7 Archean archean Aquitanian Penn- Middle Moscovian 23.03 sylvanian 314.6 3600 Chattian Lower Bashkirian Oligocene 28.1 323.2 Eoarchean Rupelian Upper Serpukhovian 33.9 330.9 4000 Priabonian Middle Visean 38.0 Carboniferous 346.7 Hadean (informal) Missis- Bartonian sippian Lower Tournaisian Eocene 41.0 358.9 ~4560 Lutetian Famennian 47.8 Upper 372.2 Ypresian Frasnian Units of the international Paleogene 56.0 382.7 Thanetian Givetian chronostratigraphic scale with 59.2 Middle 387.7 Paleocene Selandian Eifelian estimated numerical ages. -
A Middle to Late Holocene Record of Arroyo Cut-Fill Events
A MIDDLE TO LATE HOLOCENE RECORD OF ARROYO CUT-FILL EVENTS IN KITCHEN CORRAL WASH, SOUTHERN UTAH by William M. Huff A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Geology Approved: _________________________ _________________________ Dr. Tammy M. Rittenour Dr. Joel L. Pederson Major Professor Committee Member _________________________ _________________________ Dr. Patrick Belmont Dr. Mark R. McLellan Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2013 ii Copyright © William M. Huff 2013 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT A Middle to Late Holocene Record of Arroyo Cut-Fill Events in Kitchen Corral Wash, Southern Utah by William M. Huff, Master of Science Utah State University, 2013 Major Professor: Dr. Tammy M. Rittenour Department: Geology This study examines middle to late Holocene episodes of arroyo incision and aggradation in the Kitchen Corral Wash (KCW), a tributary of the Paria River in southern Utah. Arroyos are entrenched channels in valley-fill alluvium, and are capable of capturing decadal- to centennial- scale fluctuations in watershed hydrology as evidenced by the Holocene cut-fill stratigraphy recorded within near-vertical arroyo-channel walls. KCW has experienced both historic (ca. 1880-1920 AD) and prehistoric (Holocene) episodes of arroyo cutting and filling. The near- synchronous timing of arroyo cut-fill events between the Paria River and regional drainages over the last ~1 have led some researchers to argue that arroyo development is climatically driven. However, the influence of allogenic (climate-related) or autogenic (geomorphic threshold) forcings on arroyo dynamics are less clear. -
And Correlation to the Late Triassic Newark Astrochronological Polarity Time Scale
Tethyan magnetostratigraphy from Pizzo Mondello (Sicily) and correlation to the Late Triassic Newark astrochronological polarity time scale Giovanni Muttoni† Department of Earth Sciences, University of Milan, Via Mangiagalli 34, I-20133 Milan, Italy Dennis V. Kent Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, New York 10964, USA and Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA Paul E. Olsen Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, New York 10964, USA Piero Di Stefano Department of Geology and Geodesy, University of Palermo, Corso Tukory 131, I-90134 Palermo, Italy William Lowrie Stefano M. Bernasconi Fátima Martín Hernández Departement Erdwissenschaften, ETH-Zentrum, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland ABSTRACT early part of the Newark APTS. We prefer marine stages, historically based on ammonoid option #2 in which the Carnian-Norian biostratigraphy, to continental successions. For We present the magnetostratigraphy and boundary based on conodonts, as well as the Late Triassic, an astrochronology anchored stable isotope stratigraphy from an expanded its closely associated positive δ13C shift, cor- to magnetostratigraphy and radiometric dates is (~430-m-thick) Upper Triassic marine lime- respond to Newark magnetozone E7 at ca. available from the Newark continental section stone section at Pizzo Mondello, Sicily, and 228–227 Ma (adopting Newark astrochronol- (Kent et al., 1995; Kent and Olsen, 1999; Olsen review published biostratigraphic informa- ogy), implying a long Norian with a duration and Kent, 1999), while magnetostratigraphy is tion that can be used to defi ne the location of ~20 m.y., and a Rhaetian of ~6 m.y. dura- thus far available in conjunction with marine of the conodont Carnian-Norian and Norian- tion. -
Chronostratigraphy
Dr. Maha Al-Hasson Stratigraphy Lectures Chronostratigraphy An elements of stratigraphy that deals with the relative time relations and ages of rock bodies. Chronostratigraphic classification: The organization of rocks into units on the basis of their age or time of origin. Inferential UNITS Groups of strata recognized as being formed during a specific interval of geological time .These units are not self-evident nor directly observable; Chronostratigraphic units: Are bodies of rocks(layered orunlayered), that were formed during a specified interval of a geologic time,they are bounded by synchronous horizons. synchronous horizons(chronohorizon):A stratigraphic surface or interface that is chronous, everywhere of the same age. position within chronostratigraphic unit is expressed by adjectives of position such as; basal, lower, middle, upper, etc.; position within a geochronologic unit is expressed by temporal adjectives such as: early, middle, late, etc. e.g.: lower Cambrian strata/Early Cambrian age middle Cambrian strata/ middle Cambrian strata upper Cambrian strata / late Cambrian strata. 1 Dr. Maha Al-Hasson Stratigraphy Lectures Ranks or types (Hierarchy) of inferential stratigraphic units Chronostratigraphic (Time rock) units Geochronologic (geologic time units) Eon Eonotheme Era Eratheme Period System Epoch Series Age Stage Chron Chronozone Many scientists believe systems & series are units of strata bounded by time surfaces. Stage & Age: all rocks that formed during an age.its a lowest rank of chronostratigraphic unit below series.Age: its' equivalent geochronologic unit, represents their times during rock' deposition . Series & Epochs: Series is achronostratigraphic unit ranking above a stage and below a system,subdivition of System,while Epoch its' equivalent geochronologic unit, representstheir times during rock deposition . -
Magnetochronology of the Entire Chinle Formation (Norian Age) in A
RESEARCH ARTICLE Magnetochronology of the Entire Chinle 10.1029/2019GC008474 Formation (Norian Age) in a Scientific Drill Core From Key Points: Petrified Forest National Park (Arizona, USA) and • Chinle Formation as recovered extends from ~224 to 209 Ma Implications for Regional and Global Correlations (Chrons E9n to E17r) • Base of Sonsela Member at ~216 Ma (Chron E14n) places older age limit in the Late Triassic ‐ on Adamanian Revueltian faunal Dennis V. Kent1,2 , Paul E. Olsen2, Christopher Lepre1,2 , Cornelia Rasmussen3,4 , transition 5 6 6 3,7 • Published high‐precision U‐Pb Roland Mundil , George E. Gehrels , Dominique Giesler , Randall B. Irmis , detrital zircon ages from the lower John W. Geissman8 , and William G. Parker9 Sonsela and Blue Mesa members tend to be anomalously old by 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2Lamont‐Doherty Earth comparison Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA, 3Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 4Institute for Geophysics, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, Supporting Information: USA, 5Berkeley Geochronology Center, Berkeley, CA, USA, 6Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, • Supporting Information S1 AZ, USA, 7Natural History Museum of Utah, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 8Department of Geosciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA, 9Petrified Forest National Park, Petrified Forest, AZ, USA Correspondence to: D. V. Kent, fi ‐ [email protected] Abstract Building on an earlier study that con rmed the stability of the 405 kyr eccentricity climate cycle and the timing of the Newark‐Hartford astrochronostratigraphic polarity time scale back to 215 Ma, we extend the magnetochronology of the Late Triassic Chinle Formation to its basal unconformity in scientific Citation: ‐ fi ‐ ‐ Kent, D. -
2009 Geologic Time Scale Cenozoic Mesozoic Paleozoic Precambrian Magnetic Magnetic Bdy
2009 GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE CENOZOIC MESOZOIC PALEOZOIC PRECAMBRIAN MAGNETIC MAGNETIC BDY. AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE PICKS AGE . N PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE EON ERA PERIOD AGES (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) HIST. HIST. ANOM. ANOM. (Ma) CHRON. CHRO HOLOCENE 65.5 1 C1 QUATER- 0.01 30 C30 542 CALABRIAN MAASTRICHTIAN NARY PLEISTOCENE 1.8 31 C31 251 2 C2 GELASIAN 70 CHANGHSINGIAN EDIACARAN 2.6 70.6 254 2A PIACENZIAN 32 C32 L 630 C2A 3.6 WUCHIAPINGIAN PLIOCENE 260 260 3 ZANCLEAN 33 CAMPANIAN CAPITANIAN 5 C3 5.3 266 750 NEOPRO- CRYOGENIAN 80 C33 M WORDIAN MESSINIAN LATE 268 TEROZOIC 3A C3A 83.5 ROADIAN 7.2 SANTONIAN 271 85.8 KUNGURIAN 850 4 276 C4 CONIACIAN 280 4A 89.3 ARTINSKIAN TONIAN C4A L TORTONIAN 90 284 TURONIAN PERMIAN 10 5 93.5 E 1000 1000 C5 SAKMARIAN 11.6 CENOMANIAN 297 99.6 ASSELIAN STENIAN SERRAVALLIAN 34 C34 299.0 5A 100 300 GZELIAN C5A 13.8 M KASIMOVIAN 304 1200 PENNSYL- 306 1250 15 5B LANGHIAN ALBIAN MOSCOVIAN MESOPRO- C5B VANIAN 312 ECTASIAN 5C 16.0 110 BASHKIRIAN TEROZOIC C5C 112 5D C5D MIOCENE 320 318 1400 5E C5E NEOGENE BURDIGALIAN SERPUKHOVIAN 326 6 C6 APTIAN 20 120 1500 CALYMMIAN E 20.4 6A C6A EARLY MISSIS- M0r 125 VISEAN 1600 6B C6B AQUITANIAN M1 340 SIPPIAN M3 BARREMIAN C6C 23.0 345 6C CRETACEOUS 130 M5 130 STATHERIAN CARBONIFEROUS TOURNAISIAN 7 C7 HAUTERIVIAN 1750 25 7A M10 C7A 136 359 8 C8 L CHATTIAN M12 VALANGINIAN 360 L 1800 140 M14 140 9 C9 M16 FAMENNIAN BERRIASIAN M18 PROTEROZOIC OROSIRIAN 10 C10 28.4 145.5 M20 2000 30 11 C11 TITHONIAN 374 PALEOPRO- 150 M22 2050 12 E RUPELIAN -
QUATERNARY SEA LEVEL CHANGE in the CARIBBEAN: the IMPLICATIONS for ARCHAEOLOGY Sherri Baker Littman
QUATERNARY SEA LEVEL CHANGE IN THE CARIBBEAN: THE IMPLICATIONS FOR ARCHAEOLOGY Sherri Baker Littman ABSTRACT Human habitation of previously subaerial land surfaces is well documented. Geophysical and geological meth ods have been applied to elucidate the presence of associated geomorphic features. Records from varved sediments of bottom, anoxic waters yield clues to ancient climate records stored at the bottom of the Cariaco Basin. A sea level curve based upon uranium series (230TH) for Acropora palmata corals off the island of Barbados provides high precision chronology of sea level change since the last glacial maximum. The prograding delta of the Orinoco River has tremendously impacted sites on the island of Trinidad. Tectonic settings, isostasy, coastal hydrodynamics, fluvial and sediment discharge and accumulation rates, along with biostratigraphy and lithos- tratigraphy are necessary to build a valid chronostratigraphy when examining once subaerial archaeological sites. These combined methods provide valuable clues to the "peopling" of the Caribbean and should be employed when searching for prehistoric sites and evaluating settlement models. INTRODUCTION Evidence for Quaternary sea level change has been, at best, tenuous. Since scientific methods for determining sea level change are becoming more widely applied, this scenario is finally beginning to change. Studies show that although sea level has fluctuated eustatically, generalizations regarding specific regions, such as the Caribbean, cannot be made. Hence, this study will briefly examine the regional affects of sea level change on three areas within the Caribbean; the offshore area surrounding the island of Barbados, the Cariaco Basin (offshore Venezuela) and the Orinoco River delta and its affects on the island of Trinidad. -
North American Stratigraphic Code1
NORTH AMERICAN STRATIGRAPHIC CODE1 North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature FOREWORD TO THE REVISED EDITION FOREWORD TO THE 1983 CODE By design, the North American Stratigraphic Code is The 1983 Code of recommended procedures for clas- meant to be an evolving document, one that requires change sifying and naming stratigraphic and related units was pre- as the field of earth science evolves. The revisions to the pared during a four-year period, by and for North American Code that are included in this 2005 edition encompass a earth scientists, under the auspices of the North American broad spectrum of changes, ranging from a complete revision Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature. It represents of the section on Biostratigraphic Units (Articles 48 to 54), the thought and work of scores of persons, and thousands of several wording changes to Article 58 and its remarks con- hours of writing and editing. Opportunities to participate in cerning Allostratigraphic Units, updating of Article 4 to in- and review the work have been provided throughout its corporate changes in publishing methods over the last two development, as cited in the Preamble, to a degree unprece- decades, and a variety of minor wording changes to improve dented during preparation of earlier codes. clarity and self-consistency between different sections of the Publication of the International Stratigraphic Guide in Code. In addition, Figures 1, 4, 5, and 6, as well as Tables 1 1976 made evident some insufficiencies of the American and Tables 2 have been modified. Most of the changes Stratigraphic Codes of 1961 and 1970. The Commission adopted in this revision arose from Notes 60, 63, and 64 of considered whether to discard our codes, patch them over, the Commission, all of which were published in the AAPG or rewrite them fully, and chose the last. -
2. Late Quaternary Paleomagnetic Secular Variation and Chronostratigraphy from Odp Sites 1233 and 12341
Tiedemann, R., Mix, A.C., Richter, C., and Ruddiman, W.F. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results Volume 202 2. LATE QUATERNARY PALEOMAGNETIC SECULAR VARIATION AND CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY FROM ODP SITES 1233 AND 12341 Steve P. Lund,2 Joseph Stoner,3 and Frank Lamy4 ABSTRACT During Ocean Drilling Program Leg 202, detailed shipboard paleo- magnetic measurements at Sites 1233 and 1234 identified a reproduc- ible high-resolution record of paleomagnetic secular variation (PSV) at each site. These records also contained evidence for three magnetic 1Lund, S.P., Stoner, J., and Lamy, F., field excursions. This paper summarizes the complete paleomagnetic 2006. Late Quarternary paleomagnetic record from Site 1233 and the paleomagnetic record for the uppermost secular variation and chronostratigraphy from ODP Sites 30 meters from Site 1234. We also establish a detailed PSV correlation 1233 and 1234. In Tiedemann, R., between the two sites, located ~500 km apart. Twenty-seven accelerator Mix, A.C., Richter, C., and Ruddiman, mass spectrometry radiocarbon dates permit us to develop time-depth W.F. (Eds.), Proc. ODP, Sci. Results, 202: plots and detailed PSV time series for the last ~50,000 yr at both sites. College Station, TX (Ocean Drilling Based on our chronostratigraphy, the most recent excursions occur at Program), 1–22. doi:10.2973/ α odp.proc.sr.202.208.2006 ~35,000 cal. yr before present (BP) (Excursion 3 ) and ~41,000 cal. yr BP 2Department of Earth Sciences, (Excursion 3β). The excursions were named for the oxygen isotope University of Southern California, Los stages within which they occur. -
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 399 (2014) 246–259
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 399 (2014) 246–259 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo A Middle–Late Triassic (Ladinian–Rhaetian) carbon and oxygen isotope record from the Tethyan Ocean Giovanni Muttoni a,⁎, Michele Mazza a, David Mosher b, Miriam E. Katz b, Dennis V. Kent c,d, Marco Balini a a Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra “Ardito Desio”, Universita' di Milano, via Mangiagalli 34, 20133 Milan, Italy b Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA c Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA d Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY 10964, USA article info abstract Article history: We obtained bulk-sediment δ18O and δ13C data from biostratigraphically-constrained Tethyan marine sections at Received 4 October 2013 Aghia Marina (Greece), Guri Zi (Albania), and Brumano and Italcementi Quarry (Italy), and revised the published Received in revised form 15 January 2014 chemostratigraphy of the Pizzo Mondello section (Italy). We migrated these records from the depth to the time Accepted 18 January 2014 domain using available chronostratigraphic tie points, generating Ladinian–Rhaetian δ13C and δ18O records span- Available online 29 January 2014 ning from ~242 to ~201 Ma. The δ18O record seems to be affected by diagenesis, whereas the δ13C record appears ‰ ‰ Keywords: to preserve a primary signal and shows values increasing by ~1 in the Ladinian followed by an ~0.6 decrease Carbon isotopes across the Ladinian–Carnian boundary, followed by relatively constant (but oscillatory) Carnian values punctuat- Oxygen isotopes ed by a negative excursion at ~233 Ma in the early Carnian, a second negative excursion at ~229.5 Ma across the Conodonts early–late Carnian boundary, and a positive excursion at ~227 Ma across the Carnian–Norian boundary. -
Paleontology of the Bears Ears National Monument
Paleontology of Bears Ears National Monument (Utah, USA): history of exploration, study, and designation 1,2 3 4 5 Jessica Uglesich , Robert J. Gay *, M. Allison Stegner , Adam K. Huttenlocker , Randall B. Irmis6 1 Friends of Cedar Mesa, Bluff, Utah 84512 U.S.A. 2 University of Texas at San Antonio, Department of Geosciences, San Antonio, Texas 78249 U.S.A. 3 Colorado Canyons Association, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 U.S.A. 4 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706 U.S.A. 5 University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90007 U.S.A. 6 Natural History Museum of Utah and Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Utah, 301 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108-1214 U.S.A. *Corresponding author: [email protected] or [email protected] Submitted September 2018 PeerJ Preprints | https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3442v2 | CC BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 23 Sep 2018, publ: 23 Sep 2018 ABSTRACT Bears Ears National Monument (BENM) is a new, landscape-scale national monument jointly administered by the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service in southeastern Utah as part of the National Conservation Lands system. As initially designated in 2016, BENM encompassed 1.3 million acres of land with exceptionally fossiliferous rock units. Subsequently, in December 2017, presidential action reduced BENM to two smaller management units (Indian Creek and Shash Jáá). Although the paleontological resources of BENM are extensive and abundant, they have historically been under-studied. Here, we summarize prior paleontological work within the original BENM boundaries in order to provide a complete picture of the paleontological resources, and synthesize the data which were used to support paleontological resource protection.