QUATERNARY SEA LEVEL CHANGE in the CARIBBEAN: the IMPLICATIONS for ARCHAEOLOGY Sherri Baker Littman
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
QUATERNARY SEA LEVEL CHANGE IN THE CARIBBEAN: THE IMPLICATIONS FOR ARCHAEOLOGY Sherri Baker Littman ABSTRACT Human habitation of previously subaerial land surfaces is well documented. Geophysical and geological meth ods have been applied to elucidate the presence of associated geomorphic features. Records from varved sediments of bottom, anoxic waters yield clues to ancient climate records stored at the bottom of the Cariaco Basin. A sea level curve based upon uranium series (230TH) for Acropora palmata corals off the island of Barbados provides high precision chronology of sea level change since the last glacial maximum. The prograding delta of the Orinoco River has tremendously impacted sites on the island of Trinidad. Tectonic settings, isostasy, coastal hydrodynamics, fluvial and sediment discharge and accumulation rates, along with biostratigraphy and lithos- tratigraphy are necessary to build a valid chronostratigraphy when examining once subaerial archaeological sites. These combined methods provide valuable clues to the "peopling" of the Caribbean and should be employed when searching for prehistoric sites and evaluating settlement models. INTRODUCTION Evidence for Quaternary sea level change has been, at best, tenuous. Since scientific methods for determining sea level change are becoming more widely applied, this scenario is finally beginning to change. Studies show that although sea level has fluctuated eustatically, generalizations regarding specific regions, such as the Caribbean, cannot be made. Hence, this study will briefly examine the regional affects of sea level change on three areas within the Caribbean; the offshore area surrounding the island of Barbados, the Cariaco Basin (offshore Venezuela) and the Orinoco River delta and its affects on the island of Trinidad. Several models used in attempting to gauge sea level have been suc cessful, but must be applied on a regional basis. This paper is presented as a model or primer to be used for the purposes of determining the extent of sea level change and what the implications are for prehistoric archaeological sites. The most widely used methods that measure sea level change are varied, but combined, they can help build a valid picture for prehistoric environments. Examining coastal sediment accumula tion and erosion is crucial when measuring sea level change. Pollen sampling is another important tool. Marine fossil identification and corals can be used to help build a valid chronostratigraphy, much like dendrochronology. Corals and speleothems exhibit annual growth bands, thus providing calendar year chronologies. However, fossil corals can provide more specific data through C14 and U/TH230 dating. The combination of these methods allows for an accurate reading of sea level trans gressions and regressions. Additionally, geophysical methods, such as side scan sonar and sub bot tom profiling, can accurately detect prehistoric site locations. The above methods help to 'ground truth' or verify geophysical studies for site localities. 58 It is necessary that local environmental events be considered when predicting the location of archae ological sites, which is why regional variations on sea level change are crucial. Global geostrophic events affect gravity, force and pressure on the geoid, thereby resulting in regional variations such as hurricanes, eolian deposition, tectonics, isostasy, subsidence, fluvial sediment accumulation rates and varying ocean currents, such as ENSO (El Nino Southern Oscillation). Since coastal geomorphology throughout the Caribbean varies greatly, a detailed discussion of each regions geologic history is beyond the scope of this paper. Based upon what we do know, both geologically and archaeologically what types of environ mental changes occurred that affected island coastlines, resulting in paleoshorelines? What does the location of littoral archaeological sites tell us about sea level, and did sea level fluctuate enough dur ing the Quaternary to inundate prehistoric coastal habitation areas? As we can see from present-day settlement patterns, people have always migrated to coastlines. Certainly, during prehistoric periods, an abundance of marine fauna and proximity to waterways were key factors for settlement location. Recent geological and geophysical studies show that that indeed, prehistoric humans settled along now submerged paleo river channels and coastlines. Technically speaking, the late Pleistocene marked the movement of humans into the New World. Recent articles on New World migration suggest that the correlation of radiocarbon dates, cal ibrated into calendar years, pushes back earliest settlement date to 13,000 (cal BP). Scientists have retested atmospheric levels of radiocarbon since new evidence has been introduced into the study of paleoclimatology. This new evidence comes from pollen imbedded in Greenland ice cores, in addition to Caribbean corals and sediments from lakebeds that have aided in dating sea level changes. Late Quaternary climate was highly unstable and prone to large, rapid oscillations that occurred with in a few decades. This climatic variability was particularly pronounced during the last Ice Age when ice sheets, that covered northern latitudes, led to exposure of the continental shelves. Global climate variations, indicated by Milankovitch and Daansgard/Oescher (D/O) cycles, are primary causes of changes in the geosphere. Additionally, the Great Ocean Conveyor and thermohaline circulation of the North Atlantic cause variations in climate cycles. Milankovitch cycles, confirmed by Greenland ice cores, are gravitational pulls from planets, which have caused subtle changes in the orbit of the Earth. These alterations have resulted in differing intensities of sunlight that lead to dramatic variations in climate. Milankovitch cycles show oscillations in climate roughly every 20, 40 and lOOka and are con comitant with glacial and interstadial periods in geologic history. The more obvious intervals are those that occur approximately every lOOka, with the shorter oscillations occurring at 20 and 40ka intervals. Much like Milankovitch cycles that show variations in climate, D/O cycles show warm phas es (interstadials). These D/O cycles are punctuated by the cold conditions of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and are demonstrated by their bistable behavior. The Great Ocean Conveyor and thermohaline circulation of the North Atlantic provide valuable data for D/O cycles through the analysis of marine organisms such as benthic formanifiera. These foraminifera show dextral and sinis tral coiling of benthic marine organisms (such as N. pachyderma), in response to warming and cool ing ocean temperature variations. D/O cycles show that warm, interstadial climates alternated 59 between cool stadial climatic episodes, and resulted in a severely cold Heinrich event approximately 7,200 years ago. These climatic changes do appear to be synchronous between Greenland (shown by ice cores) and the Cariaco Basin off the coast of Venezuela, where annual laminations or varves, can be preserved in both marine and lucustrine sediments. Marine varved chronologies are limited in that they usually only represent fragments of temperature change within the last 80 ka (for example, 9-15 ka ago in the Cariaco Basin). However, lacustrine environments are ideal for preservation for the length of duration of a lakebed. All of these cycles can be used as paleoenvironmental proxies that are vital when attempting to reconstruct and predict the locations of prehistoric archaeological site. METHODS Geophysical methods that help to identify landscapes that were ideal for human settlement involve the use of high resolution acoustic reflection and side scan sonar. Seismic data from these are processed using standard geophysical methods to delineate hard ground surfaces and drainage sys tems that were subaerially exposed during the Pleistocene. Side scan sonar is an acoustic technique that records topographic images of the sea floor, thus creating sonogram mosaics. Sonar is a good device for mapping the topography of an area because boulders and rocks are good reflectors. A typical sonar frequency is 100 kHz. However, sonar leaves an acoustic shadow, hence, the need to use an additional method such as sub bottom profiling. This is an acoustic profil ing technique (seismic reflection) that is utilized to penetrate the sub-sea floor and then image geo- morphic and geologic features. The technique relies on the contrast of the acoustic impedance of sub- bottom features. For example, sediment layering, outcrops and incised valleys are routinely detected with this method. Most sub-bottom profiling uses a very low frequency, such as 3.5 kHz. The lower the frequency, the better the penetration of the sea floor fades. A higher frequency could give overall accuracy, but would cause rapid attenuation, thus decreasing penetration due to considerable lag time in layers of clay. Basically, the shortest pulse length that does not sacrifice resolution is best. Subsurface investigations of areas presumed to contain cultural deposits can help to determine whether they are allogenic in nature. This is why 'ground truthing' is crucial to any seismic explo ration. Coring is the preferred method of 'ground truthing', whether coring is conducted on a terres trial landscape or a submerged one. Coring permits the recovery of significant volumes of sediment so that their character can be ascertained without alteration. In addition, coring can isolate