DOCSLIB.ORG

| Book Reviews |

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
| Book Reviews | | Book Reviews | Resurgence of the Warfare State: ernment. Certainly, these statutes and the Washington Post on Nov. 4, 2001, The Crisis Since 9/11 the supporting court decisions created advocating reinstating the draft in order the dangerous notion prevalent today: to fight the war on terror. Higgs op- By Robert Higgs that civil liberties may be sacrificed in a poses the draft on libertarian grounds. The Independent Institute, Oakland, CA, 2005. time of war (whether the war is real or These two essays are so limited in their 252 pages, $12.95. imagined). If you need any further per- focus that, unless you have read the suading on this point, Higgs painfully underlying article, you can safely skip reminds us that approximately 160,000 these two short pieces. REVIEWED BY CA R OL A. SIGMOND Japanese-Americans were interned dur- The fourth section discusses the ing World War II, none of whom were way in which the unhealthy relation- “Cry ‘Havoc,’ and let slip the dogs guilty of anything except being of Japa- ship of the military-industrial complex of war”—a line from Shakespeare’s Ju- nese extraction. That these acts were with the Department of Defense results lius Caesar—sums up the disturbing approved of by contemporary society in powerful imperatives favoring war premise of Resurgence of the Warfare and sustained by the courts at that time (real or imagined). The title of one es- State, which is that the so-called war demonstrates the value of war to any say says it all: “Suppose You Wanted on terror is less about battling terror- government that seeks to restrain pub- to Have a Permanent War.” In this sec- ism than about government augment- lic discourse, individual freedom, and tion, Higgs makes three basic points. ing its domestic power at the expense personal privacy. (1) By focusing public attention on a of individual liberty and personal pri- There is a sometimes implicit, some- common enemy, war blurs the social, vacy. Most unsettling is that the book’s times overt, theme that hangs over the class, and political differences within implicit thesis—that throwing out the book—the war on terror is a fraud. society; for example, Higgs notes, the bums in the present administration will According to Higgs, terror by its very United States’ battle with communism do nothing to stop relentless govern- nature is ad hoc, and it is not possi- was a unifying force in this country for ment intrusion into our privacy and ble to wage war against an idea or a 50 years. (2) Government uses periodic liberty—is true. small group in pursuit of an idea, even “crises” attributed to the common en- Resurgence of the Warfare State is if that pursuit is by suicide bombings. emy to maintain a level of fear among a collection of 47 writings by Robert A war requires more—a nation, a ter- the public that allows the government Higgs (assisted by occasional interview- ritory, organized armies, and the like. to continue its power grab at the ex- ers and co-authors) produced between A war on terror, Higgs writes, is by its pense of the people. One needs to Sept. 28, 2001, and Dec. 21, 2004, in- nature a war against individual thought look no further than the Bush admin- cluding interviews, essays, columns, and liberty (and not only that of people istration’s claims of a pending catastro- and a poem. The book is organized by overseas). Higgs’ point is well taken: if phe to distract opponents, such as the topic into eight sections, with the writ- the Bush administration had chosen the bogus claims of the threat of a terrorist ings in chronological order within each right battle, it might have called it the attack that it made just as John Kerry section. Albeit occasionally repetitious, “war against Al Qaeda,” but the Bush began to climb in the 2004 presidential the book works. administration abandoned the hunt for polls. (3) There is always a group that In the first section, titled “Crisis Bin Laden in order to attack Iraq. is financially interested in permanent and Leviathan, Again” (alluding to the The second section of the book, war. As an example, Higgs cites Vice author’s earlier book, Crisis and Le- “Airport (In)Security,” presents a fairly President Dick Cheney’s relationship viathan), Higgs, in his first interview conventional but well-reasoned ar- with Halliburton or the love of public after 9/11, introduces the book’s the- gument about the ineffectiveness of spending by members of Congress in sis: 20th- and 21st-century U.S. gov- government, when compared to pri- their respective districts. ernment leadership has used—and vate enterprise, in delivering the mail For those who do not approve of even sought out—crises in order to or making purchases. But Higgs’ basic the current President, the fifth section expand its powers. Higgs reminds point—that the government is com- of the book is a delight. Higgs consid- us that President Woodrow Wilson, pletely ineffective when it comes to ers whether George W. Bush is “un- with his own versions of the current airport security—has been proved by hinged,” is pursuing a “faith-based for- PATRIOT Act—the Espionage Act of recent reports from the Transportation eign policy,” or has a “crackpot” view 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918—de- Safety Administration that its investiga- of reality. Some will find the author’s finitively put government power ahead tors were able to move bomb-making assessments amusing and others will of public discourse. These statutes frank- parts through airport screening. find them offensive, but Higgs’ real ly sought to stop all criticism of World The third section deals with the pos- point is that Bush’s war on terror and War I and resulted in the conviction of sible revival of the Selective Service and war in Iraq are of a piece with Presi- some 2,000 people who were guilty of the military draft. In one essay, Higgs dent John F. Kennedy’s Bay of Pigs nothing more than criticizing the war, reacts to an opinion piece by Charles disaster and the Cuban Missile Crisis: the draft, the armed forces, or the gov- Moskos and Paul Glastris, published in both resulted from power-hungry nov- 60 | The Federal Lawyer | March/April 2008 ice leaders overdosing on testosterone therefore, this administration has been networks, transportation systems, utili- and using contrived crises and for- no different from any other. ties, and other vital parts of the nation’s eign enemies for domestic purposes. Resurgence of the Warfare State infrastructure. Viewed through Higgs’ lens, I can visu- is intellectually stimulating, and— It is thus fitting that Michael Sheetz, alize the current front-runners for the whether you agree with its thesis or the author of Computer Forensics: An 2008 Democratic and Republican presi- not—you will be challenged by Higgs’ Essential Guide for Accountants, Law- dential nominations making the same meticulous research and compelling yers, and Managers, has a law en- mistakes. Higgs’ point is that the use logic. When you finish the book you forcement background as well as a of crises and foreign enemies is a prac- will be reminded, as I was, of Marc law degree. A frequent contributor to tice that is common to both political Antony’s call: “Cry ‘Havoc,’ and let slip magazines such as Law and Order, Po- parties, and both parties pose the same the dogs of war.” TFL lice Chief, and Police Officer Quarterly, danger to our privacy and freedom. Sheetz has a special interest in com- The sixth section, “Road to War,” Carol A. Sigmond is a partner at Dun- puter crime and served as the sergeant deals with the run-up to the war in nington, Bartholow & Miller, New York, of an investigative team in Ft. Stewart, Iraq. In the period before the war, NY, and is a member of the New York Ga., during Operation Desert Storm in Higgs was generally critical of the idea County Lawyers’ Board of Directors 1991. of a war with Iraq. In hindsight, Higgs and of the New York State Bar House The National Institute of Justice at had it right: Iraq did not pose a threat of Delegates. the Department of Justice also has an to the United States; therefore the war interest in computer crime. In April was unjustified. He makes the point Computer Forensics: An Essential 2004, the institute issued an outstand- best in his parody, “Nuke France.” As Guide for Accountants, Lawyers, ing report on the subject: “Forensic Ex- readers may recall, France was a vigor- and Managers amination of Digital Evidence: A Guide ous opponent of the Iraq war, and an for Law Enforcement.” Sheetz’s book anti-French hysteria arose in this coun- By Michael Sheetz measures up to the standards of this re- try. Against this backdrop, Higgs paro- John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2007. 152 port and delivers much useful informa- dies the administration’s “logic” for the pages, $50.00. tion in fewer than 150 pages of text. war against Iraq by arguing that France, For novices to the field, Computer with its large number of nuclear weap- Forensics covers the essential stages of ons and its proven delivery system as REVIEWED BY HEIDI BOG H O S IAN the seizure and analysis of computer well as its opposition to the Bush ad- Digital detectives are becoming evidence—namely, collecting and pre- ministration’s war policy, was a more the frontline soldiers of law enforce- serving the evidence and rendering an dangerous enemy of the United States ment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 20 Ap® Focus & Annotated Chapter Outline Ap® Focus
    CHAPTER 20 AP® FOCUS & ANNOTATED CHAPTER OUTLINE AP® FOCUS Period 7: 1890–1945 AP U.S. History Key Concepts 7.2 A revolution in technology created a new mass culture and spread “modern” values amid increasing cultural conflicts. • Wartime tensions and xenophobia led to legislation restricting immigration. • World Wars I and II contributed to increased migration, both internally and to the United States. 7.3 Global conflicts led to debates over the United States’ increasingly dominant role in the world. • American expansionism led to overseas involvement and acquisitions in the Western Hemisphere and the Pacific. • World War I increased debates over the proper role of the United States in the world. ANNOTATED CHAPTER OUTLINE The following annotated chapter outline will help you review the major topics covered in this chapter. I. From Expansion to Imperialism A. Foundations of Empire 1. Historians used to describe turn-of-the-twentieth-century U.S. imperialism as something new. Now they emphasize continuities between foreign policy in this era and the nation’s earlier, relentless expansion across the continent. 2. Policymakers beginning in the 1890s went on a determined quest for global markets. Industrialization and a modern navy provided tools for the United States to flex its muscle, and the economic crisis of the 1890s provided a spur. 3. Confronting high unemployment and mass protests, policymakers feared that American workers would embrace socialism or communism. The alternative, they believed, was overseas markets that would create jobs and prosperity at home. 4. Intellectual trends also favored imperialism. As early as 1885, Congregationalist minister Josiah Strong urged Protestants to proselytize overseas.
    [Show full text]
  • Espionage Act of 1917
    Communication Law Review An Analysis of Congressional Arguments Limiting Free Speech Laura Long, University of Oklahoma The Alien and Sedition Acts, Espionage and Sedition Acts, and USA PATRIOT Act are all war-time acts passed by Congress which are viewed as blatant civil rights violations. This study identifies recurring arguments presented during congressional debates of these acts. Analysis of the arguments suggests that Terror Management Theory may explain why civil rights were given up in the name of security. Further, the citizen and non-citizen distinction in addition to political ramifications are discussed. The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 are considered by many as gross violations of civil liberties and constitutional rights. John Miller, in his book, Crisis in Freedom, described the Alien and Sedition Acts as a failure from every point of view. Miller explained the Federalists’ “disregard of the basic freedoms of Americans [completed] their ruin and cost them the confidence and respect of the people.”1 John Adams described the acts as “an ineffectual attempt to extinguish the fire of defamation, but it operated like oil upon the flames.”2 Other scholars have claimed that the acts were not simply unwise policy, but they were unconstitutional measures.3 In an article titled “Order vs. Liberty,” Larry Gragg argued that they were blatantly against the First Amendment protections outlined only seven years earlier.4 Despite popular opinion that the acts were unconstitutional and violated basic civil liberties, arguments used to pass the acts have resurfaced throughout United States history. Those arguments seek to instill fear in American citizens that foreigners will ultimately be the demise to the United States unless quick and decisive action is taken.
    [Show full text]
  • Spooky Trades/Corporate Fraud an Introduction to Corporate Scandals Brainteaser Problem
    Spooky Trades/Corporate Fraud An introduction to corporate scandals Brainteaser Problem: You and I are to play a competitive game. We shall take it in turns to call out integers. The first person to call out '50' wins. The rules are as follows: –The player who starts must call out an integer between 1 and 10, inclusive; –A new number called out must exceed the most recent number called by at least one and by no more than 10. (if first number is 5, the next number can be anything 6 to 15) Do you want to go first, and if so, what is your strategy? Brainteaser Solution: • Winning number must be just out of reach of other player • 50 -> 39 -> 28 -> 17 -> 6 Market Update • Eurozone - draghi came out with a more dovish tilt on the announcement regarding their QE program • Fed – Chairman still up in the air, but Powell is expected as of now • 19th party congress – People looking at to see what will happen with China going forward Fraud What is fraud? Death Arbitrage • Initially designed as an estate planning tool • If one joint-owner dies, the other is able to redeem the bond at par • Death put option on bonds + terminally ill patients = arbitrage • Banks would get mad and refuse to redeem to a hedge fund • “Fair exploit of a wall street loophole” Ponzi Scheme • Old investors are (falsely) told about great returns, while new investors’ capital is used to fulfill old investors’ capital withdrawals as needed • Essentially robbing Friend A to pay Friend B • Works until the money runs out Original Ponzi Scheme • Named after Charles Ponzi for his postal stamp arbitrage • Buy stamps cheap in Italy and exchange them for a higher value in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The War to End All Wars. COMMEMORATIVE
    FALL 2014 BEFORE THE NEW AGE and the New Frontier and the New Deal, before Roy Rogers and John Wayne and Tom Mix, before Bugs Bunny and Mickey Mouse and Felix the Cat, before the TVA and TV and radio and the Radio Flyer, before The Grapes of Wrath and Gone with the Wind and The Jazz Singer, before the CIA and the FBI and the WPA, before airlines and airmail and air conditioning, before LBJ and JFK and FDR, before the Space Shuttle and Sputnik and the Hindenburg and the Spirit of St. Louis, before the Greed Decade and the Me Decade and the Summer of Love and the Great Depression and Prohibition, before Yuppies and Hippies and Okies and Flappers, before Saigon and Inchon and Nuremberg and Pearl Harbor and Weimar, before Ho and Mao and Chiang, before MP3s and CDs and LPs, before Martin Luther King and Thurgood Marshall and Jackie Robinson, before the pill and Pampers and penicillin, before GI surgery and GI Joe and the GI Bill, before AFDC and HUD and Welfare and Medicare and Social Security, before Super Glue and titanium and Lucite, before the Sears Tower and the Twin Towers and the Empire State Building and the Chrysler Building, before the In Crowd and the A Train and the Lost Generation, before the Blue Angels and Rhythm & Blues and Rhapsody in Blue, before Tupperware and the refrigerator and the automatic transmission and the aerosol can and the Band-Aid and nylon and the ballpoint pen and sliced bread, before the Iraq War and the Gulf War and the Cold War and the Vietnam War and the Korean War and the Second World War, there was the First World War, World War I, The Great War, The War to End All Wars.
    [Show full text]
  • Agencie Name Address 1 Address 2 City State Zip License
    Massachusettes Division of Insurance Massachusetts Licensed Property and Casualty Agencies 9/1/2011 Agencie Name Address 1 Address 2 City State Zip License 12 Interactive, LLC 224 West Huron Suite 6E Chicago IL 60654 1880124 20th Century Insurance Services,Inc 3 Beaver Valley Rd Wilmington DE 19803 1846952 21st Century Benefit & Insurance Brokerage, Inc. 888 Worcester St Ste 80 Wellesley MA 02482 1782664 21st Century Insurance And Financial Services, Inc. 3 Beaver Valley Rd Wilmington DE 19803 1805771 21st Insurance Agency P.O. Box 477 Knoxville TN 37901 1878897 A & K Fowler Insurance,LLC 200 Park Street North Reading MA 01864 1805577 A & P Insurance Agency,Inc. 273 Southwest Cutoff Worcester MA 01604 1780999 A .James Lynch Insurance Agency,Inc. 297 Broadway Lynn MA 019041857 1781698 A Plus Blue Lion Insurance Agency, LLC. 1324 Belmont Street Suite Brockton MA 02301 1887320 A&B Insurance Group, LLC 239 Littleton Road Suite 4B Westford MA 01886 1856659 A&R Associates, Ltd. 6379 Little River Tnpk Alexandria VA 22312 1847232 A. Action Insurance Agency Inc 173 West Center Street West Bridgewater MA 02379 1898416 A. B. Gile, Inc. P.O. Box 66 Hanover NH 03755 1842909 A. F. Macedo Insurance Agency, Inc. 646 Broadway P. O. Box C Raynham MA 02767 1781769 A. Gange & Sons, Inc. P.O. Box 301 Medford MA 02155 1780731 A. M. Franklin Insurance Agency, Inc. 300 Congress Street Ste. 308 Quincy MA 02169 1878527 A. Regan Insurance Agency, Inc. 213 Broadway Street (Rear) Methuen MA 01844 1872103 A. W. G. Dewar, Inc. 4 Batterymarch Park Ste 320 Quincy MA 021697468 1780211 A.A.Dority Company, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • World War I - on the Homefront
    World War I - On the Homefront Teacher’s Guide Written By: Melissa McMeen Produced and Distributed by: www.MediaRichLearning.com AMERICA IN THE 20TH CENTURY: WORLD WAR I—ON THE HOMEFRONT TEACHER’S GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS Materials in Unit .................................................... 3 Introduction to the Series .................................................... 3 Introduction to the Program .................................................... 3 Standards .................................................... 4 Instructional Notes .................................................... 5 Suggested Instructional Procedures .................................................... 6 Student Objectives .................................................... 6 Follow-Up Activities .................................................... 6 Internet Resources .................................................... 7 Answer Key .................................................... 8 Script of Video Narration .................................................... 12 Blackline Masters Index .................................................... 20 Pre-Test .................................................... 21 Video Quiz .................................................... 22 Post-Test .................................................... 23 Discussion Questions .................................................... 27 Vocabulary Terms .................................................... 28 Woman’s Portrait .................................................... 29
    [Show full text]
  • Rights and Responsibilities in Wartime AUTHOR: NICHOLAS E
    HOW WWI CHANGED AMERICA Rights and Responsibilities in Wartime AUTHOR: NICHOLAS E. CODDINGTON, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY CONTEXT Although the United States is a nation with defined rights protected by a constitution, sometimes those rights are challenged by the circumstances at hand. This is especially true during wartime and times of crisis. As Americans remained divided in their support for World War I, President Woodrow Wilson’s administration and U.S. Congress pushed pro- war propaganda and enacted laws meant to deter anti-war protesting. When war protests did arise, those who challenged U.S. involvement in the war faced heavy consequences, including jail time for their actions. Many questioned the pro-war campaign and its possible infringement on Americans’ First Amendment freedoms, including the right to protest and freedom of speech. Using World War I as a backdrop and the First Amendment as the test, students will examine the Sedition Act of 1918 and come to realize that Congress passed laws that violated the Constitution and that the Supreme Court upheld those laws. Additionally, students will be challenged to consider the role President Wilson had in promoting an anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States and how that rhetoric emboldened Congress to pass laws that violated the civil rights of all Americans. The lesson will wrap up challenging students to consider the responsibilities of citizens when they believe the president and Congress promote legislation that infringes on First Amendment rights. PRIMARY SOURCES Eugene Debs
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming Liberty Group and the Goldwater Institute Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation in Support of Appellant on Supplemental Question
    No. 08-205 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- CITIZENS UNITED, Appellant, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Appellee. --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- On Appeal From The United States District Court For The District Of Columbia --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE THE WYOMING LIBERTY GROUP AND THE GOLDWATER INSTITUTE SCHARF-NORTON CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL LITIGATION IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANT ON SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTION --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- BENJAMIN BARR Counsel of Record GOVERNMENT WATCH, P.C. 619 Pickford Place N.E. Washington, DC 20002 (240) 863-8280 ================================================================ COCKLE LAW BRIEF PRINTING CO. (800) 225-6964 OR CALL COLLECT (402) 342-2831 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ........................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ................................ 2 ARGUMENT ........................................................... 3 I. Historic Truths: The Powerful Few Forever Seek to Silence Dissent ................................ 5 II. This Court Cannot Design a Workable Standard to Weed Out “Impure” Speech ..... 11 III. A Return to First Principles: Favoring Unbridled Dissent .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • *1573 the Limits of National Security
    Jamshidi, Maryam 8/15/2019 For Educational Use Only THE LIMITS OF NATIONAL SECURITY, 48 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1573 48 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1573 American Criminal Law Review Fall, 2011 Symposium: Moving Targets: Issues at the Intersection of National Security and American Criminal Law Article Laura K. Donohuea1 Copyright © 2012 by American Criminal Law Review; Laura K. Donohue *1573 THE LIMITS OF NATIONAL SECURITY I. INTRODUCTION 1574 II. DEFINING U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY 1577 III. THE FOUR EPOCHS 1587 A. Protecting the Union: 1776-1898 1589 1. International Independence and Economic Growth 1593 2. Retreat to Union 1611 3. Return to International Independence and Economic Growth 1617 a. Tension Between Expansion and Neutrality 1618 b. Increasing Number of Domestic Power-Bases 1623 B. Formative International Engagement and Domestic Power: 1898-1930 1630 1. Political, Economic, and Military Concerns 1630 a. Military Might 1637 b. Secondary Inquiry: From Rule of Law to Type of Law 1638 2. Tension Between the Epochs: Independence v. Engagement 1645 © 2019 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1 Jamshidi, Maryam 8/15/2019 For Educational Use Only THE LIMITS OF NATIONAL SECURITY, 48 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1573 3. Expanding National Spheres of Influence 1650 C. The Ascendance of National Security: 1930-1989 1657 1. A New Domestic Order 1658 a. Re-channeling of Law Enforcement to National Security 1661 b. The Threat of Totalitarianism 1665 c. The Purpose of the State 1666 2. Changing International Role: From Authoritarianism to Containment 1669 3. Institutional Questions and the National Security Act of 1947 1672 a.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Liberties in the Time of Influenza
    76 Articles 77 Traces: Te UNC-Chapel Hill Journal of History of the Spanish Flu and remains infuential due to its exhaustive statistical analyses and Civil Liberties in the Time of Infuenza Denton Ong thorough research from numerous localities. It remains the authoritative text on the Spanish Infuenza in the United States, focusing on the efects, scale, and spread of the Te Spanish Infuenza pandemic of 1918-1919 was one disease. Te statistics provided on mortality rates, infection rates and the disease’s spread of the deadliest outbreaks in the history of mankind, killing are still some of the most expansive in the literature. John Barry’s Te Great Infuenza over 50 million people worldwide and as many as 675,000 in (2004) compares the disease to the threat of avian fu in the twenty-frst century and 1 the United States in less than two years. Overall, the dis- covers the role of wartime censorship on the epidemic. However, Barry primarily wants ease’s mortality rate was approximately 2,500% greater than to paint a rough narrative history of the disease and the important individuals involved. 2 the average mortality rate for normal infuenza. In total, By taking a broad view of the infuenza epidemic in the United States, Te Great Infuen- the fu aficted over a quarter of all Americans and dropped za loses some of its punch, as it fnds itself trying to be several diferent kinds of histories 3 the average life expectancy in the US by 12 years. Despite all at once. the US government’s best eforts to assure the public that In Flu: A Social History of Infuenza (2008), Tom Quinn covers the efects infuenza there was no reason to panic, panic set in around the coun- outbreaks have had on society throughout history, so he only focuses on the 1918-19 try.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Chairman
    Dear Chairman Boardroom Battles and the Rise of Shareholder Activism JEFF GRAMM Chairman_xxiv_296_Final.indd 3 11/30/15 4:19 PM Contents Introduction . ix ". Benjamin Graham versus Northern Pipeline: The Birth of Modern Shareholder Activism . " #. Robert Young versus New York Central: The Proxyteers Storm the Vanderbilt Line . #$ %. Warren Bu&ett and American Express: The Great Salad Oil Swindle . '( '. Carl Icahn versus Phillips Petroleum: The Rise and Fall of the Corporate Raiders . )* (. Ross Perot versus General Motors: The Unmaking of the Modern Corporation . *( ). Karla Scherer versus R. P. Scherer: A Kingdom in a Capsule . "## +. Daniel Loeb and Hedge Fund Activism: The Shame Game . "'+ ,. BKF Capital: The Corrosion of Conformity . "+$ Conclusion . "*# Appendix: Original. Letters . #$% Acknowledgments . #(" Notes . #(( Index . #++ Chairman_xxiv_296_Final.indd 7 11/30/15 4:19 PM % Warren Buffett and American Express: The Great Salad Oil Swindle “Let me assure you that the great majority of stockholders (although per- haps not the most vocal ones) think you have done an outstanding job of keeping the ship on an even keel and moving full steam ahead while being buffetted by a typhoon which largely falls in the ‘Act of God’ category.” — !"##$% &'(($)), *+,- -../0 1233/44 5-6/7 809/7480: sound easy. Part of his investment philosophy comes directly from Benja- Wmin Graham: He views shares of stock as fractional owner- ships of a business, and he buys them with a margin of safety. But unlike Graham, when Bu&ett ;nds a security trading at a large discount to its intrinsic value, he eschews diversi;cation and buys a large position. To Warren Bu&ett, with his superhuman gift for rational thinking, this value investing strategy is easy.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedition in WWI Lesson Plan Central Historical Question: Were Critics Of
    Sedition in WWI Lesson Plan Central Historical Question: Were critics of World War I anti-American? Materials: • Copies of Documents A-D • Copies of Graphic Organizer and Guiding Questions Plan of Instruction: 1. Do Now. Free-write in response to the following questions: What does patriotism mean to you? Do you think it’s important for people to be patriotic? Why or why not? Is it patriotic or anti-American to criticize the United States government? Elicit student responses. Introduce lesson. Today we are going to think about these questions in the historical context of World War I by exploring the question: Were critics of World War I anti-American? 2. Mini-lecture. [Note: The lesson should follow a more thorough lecture on WWI.] Public opinion on WWI was divided in the U.S. Some Americans, notably socialists, Christian pacifists, anarchists, women’s groups, unionists, and intellectuals, opposed the war. Some of these pacifists believed war was immoral, while “radicals” believed the government was entering war not to “make the world safe for democracy,” as Wilson claimed, but rather to serve the interest of capitalists. Other Americans strongly supported U.S. entry into the war in light of the Zimmerman telegram and the sinking of the Lusitania. In 1916 President Wilson won re-election running on the slogan “He Kept Us Out of War.” After the revelation of the Zimmerman telegram and Germany beginning a program of unrestricted submarine warfare that threatened U.S. commercial shipping, Congress declared war in April 1917. That same month Wilson established the Committee on Public Information, a propaganda agency that galvanized public support for U.S.
    [Show full text]