DOCSLIB.ORG

'09I-80 Corridor Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'09I-80 Corridor Study ’09I-80 CORRIDOR STUDY I-80 CORRIDOR STUDY MARCH 2009 Prepared for: Prepared by: In association with: AECOM Transportation Dawood Engineering, Inc. A.D. Marble & Company U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Design Support Services, LLC 'FEFSBM)JHIXBZ"ENJOJTUSBUJPO 'FEFSBM)JHIXBZ"ENJOJTUSBUJPO Table of Contents Final Report Executive Summary i Study Conclusions – Existing Conditions of the Roadway ii Study Conclusions – Transportation Solutions Part I Introduction to the I-80 Corridor Study 1 Study Goals 1 Coordination with Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Part II Needs 3 Need #1: Congestion 4 Need #2: Safety 5 Need #3: Deteriorating Pavement and Bridges Part III Environmental Overview 7 Natural Resources 9 Cultural Resources 11 Community Resources Part IV Public Involvement 13 Program Overview 13 Stakeholder Interviews 15 Public Meetings Part V Transportation Solutions 17 A. TSM, ITS and Transit Initiatives 17 – TSM (Transportation Systems Management) 18 – ITS (Intelligent Transportation Systems) 21 – Transit I-80 Corridor Study | I Final Report Table of Contents List of Maps Final Report B. Highway Improvement Solutions 22 Transportation Solutions Part V Exit 302 46 Option 1 (Snydersville/Bartonsville) – Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission 22 48 Option 2 Committed Improvements 50 Option 3 – I-80 Corridor Study Improvements 24 52 Option 4 – Mainline Widening 24 – Interchange Improvements 36 – Exit 293 (I-80/I-380) 36 Exit 303 58 Option 1 (Ninth Street) – Exits 298 and 299 (Scotrun/ 37 60 Option 2 Tannersville) 62 Option 3 – Exit 308 (East Stroudsburg) 39 – Exit 309 (Marshalls Creek) 40 – Exit 310 (Delaware Water Gap) 40 Exits 304, 305 and 306 74 Option 1 (Southbound US 209, Business 209/ – Exit 302 (Snydersville/Bartonsville) 42 76 Option 2 Main Street, and Dreher Avenue) – Exit 303 (Ninth Street) 56 78 Option 3 – Exits 304, 305 and 306 68 80 Option 4 (SouthboundUS 209, Business 209/ Main Street, and Dreher Avenue) 82 Option 5 – Exit 307 (Broad Street/ 88 Park Avenue) Congestion Priorities 105 Conclusion Exit 307 92 Option 1A Part VI (Broad Street/Park Avenue) Safety Priorities 106 94 Option 1B Other Interchanges 108 96 Option 2 Deteriorating Pavement and Bridges 108 98 Option 3 Priorities 100 Option 4 Conclusion 108 II | I-80 Corridor Study I-80 Corridor Study | III WYOMING LACKAWANNA LYCOMING SULLIVAN SCRANTON WAYNE LUZERNE PIKE NEW YORK WILKES-BARRE Final Report MONROE EAST PENNSYLVANIA STROUDSBURG MONTOUR STROUDSBURG COLUMBIA CARBON NEW JERSEY NORTHUMBERLAND NORTHAMPTON EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NEWARK SCHUYLKILL LEHIGH nterstate 80 (I-80) is a vital Wilkes-Barre/Pocono region. From the economic backbone of Monroe County municipalities resulted in a series of Turnpike Commission (PTC) and projects, bridge replacements, geometric deficiency survey and 2. Safety component of our national and Delaware River Water Gap crossing, and the Stroudsburg-Pocono region. proposed transportation improvements DAUPHINthe Pennsylvania Department of interchangeBERKS improvements and ITS public involvementBUCKS to illustrate and Istate transportation system. It I-80 connects the Monroe County designed to address safety issues Transportation (PennDOT) was improvements. As a result of this characterize the deficiencies of the The existing roadway system features also satisfies regional and local region to I-380, US 209, I-476 and The I-80 Corridor Study is a and mobility needs. In addition, study signed into law. The Act created agreement, the I-80 Corridor Study existing system. Three (3) basic design elements from 40 years ago transportation needs for mobility, I-81; and PA Route 33. transportation planning study intended team members met with legislative and a “public-public” partnership in team coordinated the prioritization of corridor-wide needs categories were that do not conform with the safety recreation and commerce. The eastern to provide the required background municipal officials, and engaged in a which the PTC was directed to seek the roadway improvements in Monroe documented: characteristics of high speed, high end of the I-80 corridor in Pennsylvania As the region’s population and information for programming specific robust media campaign in advance of approval from the Federal Highway County with the PTC’s engineering volume modern roadway design. is the gateway to over 300 miles of one economy grow, the I-80 corridor will environmental/preliminary engineering public meetings held at two different Administration to convert I-80 into a consultant. 1. Congestion As a consequence, there are of the most important transportation continue to play an important role in studies and design/construction locations in Monroe County. toll facility in order to pay for necessary operational safety concerns with the and goods-movement corridors in the region. The focus of this corridor projects throughout the I-80 corridor. transportation improvements along The existing roadway configuration existing mainline and interchange the state. study and planning effort is the 18-mile The study involved extensive During the I-80 Corridor Study, the the I-80 statewide corridor. As part STUDY CONCLUSIONS – will not accommodate existing configurations. stretch of I-80 from the Borough of environmental field work, traffic Pennsylvania Legislature passed Act of the lease agreement, the PTC is EXISTING CONDITIONS OF traffic volumes at some locations Regionally, I-80 is the transportation Delaware Water Gap (Exit 310) to analysis, engineering and coordination 44. Under this initiative, a 50-year currently developing a capital plan THE ROADWAY and will fail system-wide with projected link between the New York/New Jersey I-380 (Exit 293) in Monroe County. with the public. Coordination with lease and funding agreement between of infrastructure improvements for future increases in traffic. Metropolitan area and the Scranton/ This section of I-80 supports the various stakeholders and area the Pennsylvania the length of I-80 in Pennsylvania, The I-80 Corridor Study included including pavement rehabilitation traffic studies, crash data analysis, i | I-80 Corridor Study I-80 Corridor Study | ii 3. Deteriorating pavement and end of their available life span and n The I-80 roadway corridor will n The I-80 study corridor was n Interchange improvement n TSM, transit and ITS strategies n Traffic Analysis Summary Report In the end, the I-80 Corridor Study bridges are rated Structurally Deficient. need to be reconstructed evaluated to determine a concepts were developed need to accompany any planned n Analysis of Transportation Needs is intended to be a comprehensive mainline widening concept highway capacity increases n Geometric Deficiency Survey transportation planning tool The western portion of the study The I-80 mainline and ramps will for the roadway The study team also looked n Environmental Overview designed to assist the rural planning area has relatively new pavement, STUDY CONCLUSIONS – require reconstruction to correct at individual interchanges to TSM and transit strategies have n Historic Resource Survey organization − the Northeastern especially in the area of the I-80/ TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS the problem of deteriorating The 18-mile corridor was divided develop improvement concepts the potential to reduce peak hour n Archaeological Resource Pennsylvania Alliance (NEPA) − as I-380 interchange which is nearing pavement, to add capacity, and into two distinct sections based that could provide measurable volumes on the highway and ITS Reconnaissance Investigation well as PTC and PennDOT in the the end of a total reconstruction The study team explored a wide to apply current design criteria to on geometric and environmental benefits and be funded and initiatives can maximize the n Public Involvement Summary planning and programming of future project. However, the eastern range of transportation solutions to the roadway geometry. Each characteristics: 1. the western constructed independent of the efficiency of the highway facility n Preliminary Environmental transportation projects on the I-80 portion of the study area has improve the overall mobility on the solution is designed to provide rural section and 2. the eastern mainline widening. Geometric by pro-actively managing traffic Evaluation corridor. 1 1960s vintage concrete pavement I-80 corridor. Transportation Systems minimum operational urban section. In each section, deficiencies and environmental flow. that has been overlain numerous Management (TSM), Intelligent requirements, which include mainline widening concepts were features were identified at key These reports and other technical files times with bituminous (blacktop) Transportation Systems (ITS) and current interstate standards, developed and key environmental interchange areas and preliminary During the course of this study, supporting this I-80 Corridor Study pavement. In addition, many of transit improvements were considered 60 mph design speed on the features were identified. costs were estimated for each a substantial amount of technical have been digitally archived and can be the bridges along this 18-mile in context with the traditional capacity- mainline, and three through concept. information was acquired and accessed by contacting: Brian Graver, section of I-80 are reaching the adding roadway improvements. The lanes in each direction between documented. This technical information PennDOT District 5 Project Manager at results of this investigation were that: interchanges. serves as back-up data and includes:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Route 30 Corridor Implementation Plan
    Draft for Discussion Purposes Only Route 30 Corridor Implementation Plan Village of New Lenox | January 11, 2013 New Lenox Route 30 Corridor Implementation Plan Existing Conditions Synthesis Report Table of Contents Section 00: Introduction i Section 01: Past Plans & Studies 01 Section 02: Community Outreach 03 Section 03: Existing Land Use & Development 16 Section 04: Current Zoning & Regulatory Controls 19 Section 05: Transportation & Mobility 22 Section 06: Character Zones, Streetscape, & Urban Design 25 Section 07: Issues & Opportunities 29 Introduction This Synthesis Report presents the existing physical condi- Predominately a commercial corridor dating back to before tions, identifies the issues and opportunities, and summarizes Regional Setting World War II, Route 30 has long served as a center for retail Corridor Planning Process the first steps of the planning process for the New Lenox U.S. The Village of New Lenox is located approximately 40 miles and office activity. Today, the corridor boasts approximately The planning process for this study entails six different steps. Route 30 Corridor Implementation Plan. Since there has al- southwest of downtown Chicago. It is a predominantly resi- 90 businesses. A relatively high automobile traffic volume on This report contains documentation for steps one through ready been a Route 30 Corridor Revitalization Plan developed dential suburban community of approximately 25,000 people, Route 30 helps accommodate and attract a range of com- three. for the Village back in 2006, this interim report is not meant and its municipal boundaries encompass approximately 16 mercial activity. The Study Area is adjacent to the New Lenox Step 1: Project Initiation – the “kick-off ” for the project to be an exhaustive inventory of all the conditions and issues, square miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Our Altoona, PA Facility
    Directions to Our Altoona, PA Facility Exit From Interstate 80 Exit 161 Exit 161 158 • Follow Route 220 South Bellefonte (It immediately becomes 4 lanes) Milesburg • Approaching State College merge into the lane for 220 South and 322 West • Continue on as the road turns into 2 lanes over Skytop Mount. • At the bottom of Skytop follow the ramp State College for 220 South Port Matilda • Continue south to Bald Eagle • Turn left onto Interstate 99 I-99 Construction Bald Eagle • Travel 21 miles south to Altoona 21 Miles South to Altoona From Interstate 80 Exit 158 North • Follow ALT Route 220 South to Bald Eagle • Turn left onto Interstate 99 EMS • Travel 21 miles south to Altoona 50th S Note: This is t. a Residential Area From PA Turnpike I-76 and I-70 ve. • Follow Exit 145 to the toll booth A • Leaving the toll booth turn left on to Kissel Business Route 220 ve.. A • Follow Business 220 a short distance to the Railroad Sixth entrance to I-99 (on the left) Sheetz Road Plank • Get into the right lane and follow the ramp Logan Valley for I-99 North Mall • Continue on I-99 for 31 miles to Altoona. 58th S Exit 31 treet s Lane On Interstate 99 in Altoona Good’ Exit 31 • Take Exit 31 (Coming from the north turn right at the end of the ramp - Coming from the south turn left at the end of the ramp) Get into the left lane 31 Miles North to Altoona • At the bottom of the hill turn left onto Good’s Lane • Follow Good’s Lane as it turns right and becomes 58th Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 80 Corridor Memorandum of Understanding (Mou) Between Local and Regional Agencies and the California Department of T
    INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN LOCAL AND REGIONAL AGENCIES AND THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) FOR INTEGRATED CORRIDOR MOBILITY STRATEGIES IN ALAMEDA AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTIES This MOU is a compilation of the goals, policies, and procedures intended to be followed by the parties working together in a coordinated manner to enhance traffic operations along the Interstate 80 (I-80) corridor in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. This MOU is intended to identify the overall commitment and responsibilities regarding ownership, operations, and maintenance of the various equipments installed as part of the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project. 1 Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND .................................................................................... 3 II. DEFINITION AND EXPLANATION OF TERMS ................................... 5 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE OF MOU ......................... 7 IV. PROJECT GOALS & OBJECTIVES .................................................... 9 V. OPERATIONS STRATEGIES AND PRINCIPLES ............................. 10 VI. EQUIPMENT OWNERSHIP & MAINTENANCE ................................. 15 VII. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES ........................................ 15 VIII. COSTS & FUNDING ........................................................................... 21 IX. FUTURE MOU MODIFICATIONS ...................................................... 22 ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT B ATTACHMENT C 2 I. BACKGROUND Interstate
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Area Freeway Service Patrol
    BAY AREA FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN July 2021 Updated August 2020 SERVICE START END WEEKEND TOW TRUCKS Annual Total Hours (4 BEAT ID COUNTY ROUTE BEAT LIMITS MILEAGE WEEKDAY AM WEEKDAY MID WEEKDAY PM TRUCKS NOTES DATE DATE Sat & Sun REQUIRED** Hours years)* REQUIRED ALA 980 Interstate 580 to Interstate 880 2.03 ALA 24 Interstate 580 to Contra Costa County Line 4.39 7/1/21 6/30/25 06:00-10:00 15:00-19:00 f 1 CC 24 Contra Costa County Line to Oak Hill Road 6.25 2 1 6120 24480 CC/ALA 13 State Route 24 to Redwood Road(on call) 4.23 d ALA 80 Powell Street to Central Ave. 8.59 7/1/21 6/30/25 06:00-10:00 10:00-15:00 15:00-19:00 12:30-19:00 a, c, e, f 2 ALA/CC 580 Interstate 80 to Western Drive/Point Molate (no mid-day,weekend coverage) 6.01 2 1 8015 32060 ALA 880 7th Street to Interstate 238 10.55 7/1/21 6/30/25 06:00-10:00 10:00-15:00 15:00-19:00 a, f 4 ALA 238 Interstate 880 to Interstate 580 2.11 2 5360 21440 SM 101 State Route 92 to San Francisco City Limit 14.10 7/1/21 6/30/25 06:00-10:00 10:00-15:00 15:00-19:00 2 1 7400 29600 a, f, d 6 SM 92 Highway 101 to Foster City Blvd. (on call) 1.40 8 SCL 101 Bailey Ave to Ellis Street 23.90 7/1/21 6/30/25 06:00-10:00 15:00-19:00 3 1 8160 32640 f 12 CC 80 Central Ave to Cummings Skyway 8.39 7/1/21 6/30/25 06:00-10:00 10:00 - 15:00 15:00-19:00 2 5360 21440 a, b SCL 880 State Route 237 to Interstate 280 8.42 19 SCL 17 Interstate 280 to State Route 85 4.60 7/1/21 6/30/25 06:00-10:00 10:00-15:00 15:00-19:00 2 1 7400 29600 a SCL 237 Interstate 880 to Maude Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Springs; C.N
    NH-80-2(113) Colorado Line – Big Springs; C.N. 61658 NH-80-2(104) Big Springs West Crossover; 61566A PROJECT INFORMATION FACT SHEET December 2017 NH-80-2(100) Big Springs West; 61566 NH-80-2(113) Colorado Line – Big Springs; C.N. 61658 NH-80-2(104) Big Springs West Crossover; 61566A ACCOMMODATION OF TRAFFIC: The proposed projects NH-80-2(100) Big Springs West; 61566 would be constructed under traffic with lane closures controlled with approved temporary traffic control devices and practices; however, two low volume ramps (I-80 LOCATION: The proposed Colorado Line – Big Springs doweled concrete pavement on a foundation course, eastbound to I-76 westbound and I-76 eastbound to I-80 and Big Springs West Crossover projects would repair and constructing temporary crossovers. Additional westbound) would be closed to traffic during construction pavement and construct a temporary crossover to work would include shoulder, guardrail, and culvert of the Big Springs West project. A designated detour would accommodate reconstruction work at the Big Springs work, lighting and Intelligent Transportation Systems be provided utilizing I-80 and the Big Springs Interchange West interchange. Improvements made during the (ITS) Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) work, and (Exit 107), where travelers can exit and re-enter the Colorado Line – Big Springs project would be limited to removal and replacement of existing bridges with interstate to their destinations. It is anticipated that the the eastbound lanes only. The proposed Big Springs new structures, as needed. ramps would be closed for the entire length of construction West Crossover would be constructed at the Colorado/ TRAFFIC VOLUMES: for the Big Springs West project.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 30 Corridor Implementation Plan Adopted June 24, 2013
    80 LINCOLN HWY 30 NELSON RD NELSON VETERANS PKWY VINE ST CEDAR RD CEDAR 30 LINCOLN HWY Village of New Lenox Route 30 Corridor Implementation Plan Adopted June 24, 2013 Acknowledgements Mayor Village Staff Steering Committee Consultant Team Timothy A. Baldermann Robin Ellis Rob Ayers Houseal Lavigne Associates, LLC Community Development Director Gary Berner 134 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1100 Annette Bowden Chicago, Illinois 60602 Trustees Nancy Hoehn Todd Mensik (312) 372-1008 Economic Development Director Jack Pfingston (CMAP) www.hlplanning.com Annette Bowden Sue Stinnett Dave Butterfield Jeff Smith Senior Planner with technical assistance provided by: Nancy Dye Ruettiger, Tonelli & Associates, Inc. Keith Madsen Kate Andris 2174 Oneida Street Dave Smith Assistant to the Village Administrator Joliet, IL 60435 Ray Tuminello (815) 744-6600 www. ruettigertonelli.com CMAP Go To 2040 Plan A Special Thanks to Those Who Participated The Go To 2040 Plan, completed by the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Thank you to all the residents, business owners/operators, stakeholders, and service provid- (CMAP), is a comprehensive regional plan that seeks to maintain and strengthen the ers that participated in development of the Route 30 Corridor Implementation Plan. The region’s economic, environmental, and general livability through leveraging human capital, input provided by those who participated has been incorporated into the Plan’s recom- creating a more efficient government, and enhancing regional mobility. mendations and will serve as a guide for future development along Route 30. As a big picture policy document, the plan sets forth land use, transportation, housing, environmental sustainability, economic development, and local government finance recom- mendations for government officials to consider when conducting planning efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Time Sunday Drive on Old Hwy 40 Scenic Byway
    Old Time Sunday Drive on Old Hwy 40 Scenic Byway Rocklin to Donner Pass and Truckee Think back to Grandma and Grandpa. Think back to the old days when cars had lots of chrome and huge tail fins. Water bags hung from their fronts for the radiators. Burns and Allen or Jack Benny and Rochester were on the radio. There were Burma Shave signs along the roads and lots of billboards. There was plenty of time to read them too because traffic went more slowly. There were roadhouses and fruit markets and meat markets. There were even service stations with real service and air! Take an old time Sunday drive at slow speed along Old Highway 40 from Rocklin to Truckee. And be sure to take Grandma and Grandpa! The route has been set up in “legs” so that you can do any parts you want without having to do the whole. Each “leg” begins and ends at an easy to find location and each could make an interesting trip. Leg 1: Rocklin to Old Town Auburn and the Auburn courthouse. Leg 2: Old Town Auburn to Colfax. Leg 3: Colfax to I-80 at Baxter Leg 4: Cisco Grove to Donner Summit and Truckee. GPS coordinates are in (parentheses). Mileage from the start of each leg is in [brackets]. Be sure to pick up the museum list if you are interested in visiting the various historical societies and museums along the route. Their approximate locations are noted with “M’s” on the maps here. Leg 1: Rocklin to Old Town Auburn Leave I-80 at Rocklin Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • I‐80 Tolling Impact Study
    I‐80 Tolling Impact Study Tracy C. Miller, Associate Professor of Economics, Grove City College 10/2/2009 1 INTRODUCTION0B The proposal to implement tolls on Interstate 80 was borne out of legislation commonly known as Act 44. Residents of the Interstate 80 corridor and of the Northern Tier have testified during numerous public events that the plan will impose high costs on businesses and households located within the Interstate 80 corridor. Economic logic implies that it will have a negative impact on some residents of other parts of the state as well. Proponents argue in favor of tolls on 80 because they claim that most of the costs will be borne by drivers of vehicles from other states. This report begins with an economic model of the impact of tolls on businesses and consumers. It identifies some of the major Pennsylvania industries that are likely to be affected by tolls and highlights the costs to people who work in those industries, workers who commute along 80, and consumers. Using information on industry location and goods shipments, it compares the effect of tolling 80 on different regions of the state. It also explores some of the indirect impacts of tolls. These include costs to state and local governments resulting from possible business closings, unemployment, and declining property values as well as the impact on highway safety of more cars and trucks traveling on secondary roads to avoid tolls on 80. This report also discusses the income distributional effects of tolls by comparing income and unemployment rates of the counties that will bear most of the costs of tolls with income and unemployment in the rest of the state and the Pittsburgh and Philadelphia metropolitan areas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Context and Methodology for Evaluating Trails, Roads, and Highways in California
    A HISTORICAL CONTEXT AND METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING TRAILS, ROADS, AND HIGHWAYS IN CALIFORNIA Appendices C-K Appendix C. Timeline for Development of Engineering for Highways in California 1895-2009 ..1 Appendix D. Historic Roads and Highways in California .............................................................17 Appendix E. Designated California Legislature Roads in California ............................................22 Appendix F. Scenic Highways in California .................................................................................23 Appendix G. Interstate Highways throughout California ..............................................................24 Appendix H. California Tolls Roads and Turnpikes .....................................................................25 Appendix I. Oregon-California Trail Guidelines and Classification System ................................29 Appendix J. Evaluated Roads and Highways in California ...........................................................31 Appendix K. Caltrans Evaluated Roads and Highways ................................................................42 Appendix L. Highway Route Numbers and Date of Construction ................................................48 Prepared for: Cultural Studies Office Division of Environmental Analysis California Department of Transportation Sacramento 2016 http://www.dot.ca.gov/ser/guidance.htm#highway Appendix C Timeline for Development of Engineering for Highways in California 1895-2009 1895 The Bureau of Highways is created with the
    [Show full text]
  • Draft NHMRR Federal Register Notice
    State: California State Agency: CA Highway Patrol FMCSA: CA FMCSA Field Office POC: Tian-Ting Shih FMCSA POC: CA Motor Carrier Division Administrator Address: Commercial Vehicle Section Address: 1325 J Street, Suite 1540 P.O. Box 942898 Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 94298-0001 Phone: (916) 843-3400 Phone: (916) 930-2760 Fax: (916) 322-3154 Fax: (916) 930-2778 Web Address: www.chp.ca.gov California – Restricted HM routes Desig- Route Restriction(s) nation Route Description City County Order (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,i) Date 10/28/92 A No person shall drive or permit the driving of 1 any vehicle transporting commodities listed in Section 13 CCR 1150 upon any highway not designated by this article. For pickup and delivery not over designated routes, the route selected must be the shortest-distance route from the pickup location to the nearest designated route entry location, and the shortest-distance route to the delivery location from the nearest designated route exit location. 01/01/95 B State 75 [Coronado Toll Bridge] from Mile Post San Diego San Diego 1,2,3,4 20.28 to Mile Post R22.26 Junction 5 [San Diego County] No flammables/corrosives or explosives on Coronado Bay Bridge (otherwise route is terminal access) 06/29/00 C Sepulveda Blvd. [tunnel] from Interstate Los Angeles Los Angeles 1,2,3,4,5,6,8 105/Imperial Highway to W. Century Blvd. [Restriction for Tank Vehicles] 10/28/92 D State 118 from State 232 [Oxnard] to Los 1 Angeles [western county line] 01/01/95 E State 154 from State 246 [MP 8.11- Santa Ynez] Santa Barbara 0 to US 101 [near Los Olivos] No hazardous materials or waste except pickup and delivery (otherwise, from R8.11 to R9.97 is Terminal Access and from R9.97 to 32.29 is California Legal) 1968 F Monterey Traffic Underpass from Washington Monterey Monterey 0 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 80 Freight Corridor Analysis
    FINAL REPORT FHWA-WY- 09/09F Interstate 80 Freight Corridor Analysis Current Freight Traffic, Trends and Projections for WYDOT Policy-makers, Planning, Engineering, Highway Safety and Enforcement R Prepared by: & R&S Consulting S Consulting PO Box 302 Masonville, CO 80541 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration State of Wyoming Department of Transportation December 2008 Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s) who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Wyoming Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The United States Government and the State of Wyoming do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objectives of the document. Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. ii Report No. FHWA – WY-09/09F Government Accession No. Recipients Catalog No.
    [Show full text]