The Library of Congress. Part 2. the Librarian
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Library of Congress. Part 2. The Librarfmt Number 10 March 5, 1979 I met Daniel J. Boorstin for the staff of the Library of Congress (LC) first time when we both par- shortly after he took Office as the ticipated in a conference on quality 12th Librarian of Congress: based information systems, spon- sored by the Rockefeller Founda- We have lived through a tion. 1We had our first conversation technological revolution more in- during a walk to and from the timate and more pervasive than any before... .Photography, mo- Union Church in Pocantico Hills, tion pictures, and sound produc- New York. The conference group tion have been newly elaborated. walked there from the Rockefeller Television has entered our living Archive Center to see the church’s rooms and incited new uses for stained-glass windows created by the radio, newspapers, and Marc Chagall. magazines. Novel forms of book There are rare and special occa- production and reproduction— sions in life when you establish an microform, xerography, and immediate rapport with a colleague near-print-have multiplied. The or friend. This was one of those oc- disintegration of paper, once only casions. Before that time, Boorstin a threat, has become an im- mediate menace. The computer had been a name I had seen in has suddenly revealed a whole library journals. new science and technology for Shortly after this first encounter I storing and retrieving informa- read Boorstin’s new book, The tion . ... No part of the L]brary of Republic of Technology. I was Congress has been untouched by deeply impressed by this work. Co- these transformations ... incidentally, I had just read a book The Library of Congress has by actress Liv Ullmann called been given a vast range of new statutory responsibilities. Our di- Changing. 2 This too is a main theme rect services to the Congress... of Boorstin’s book. It was hearten- have been enlarged, made more ing to find a leader of an institution subtle and more complex by the as old and stable as the Library of Legislative Reorganization Act of Congress who recognizes the need 1946, and by the Act of for and the inevitability of change.3 1970... .Our legal mandate to And so it is not surprising that he serve the blind and physically made the following remarks to the handicapped has been widened. 62 Our obligations under the copyright law.. are enormously enlarged. Our Congressionally authorized assistance to the na- tion’s libraries and to the world of scholarship and of science has been extended, increased, and modernized. Plainly the time has come for a review. The arrival of a new Librarian and the near comple- tion of the Madiion Building make such a study especially ap- propriate now. ~ With these words Daniel Boorstin set the tone of his administration. It is one of openness and willingness Daniel J. Boorstin: Librarian of to revitalize and redirect a Library Congress otherwise headed towards burial under its own treasures. For a brief time, he served as a Born in Atlanta in 1914, Daniel J. lawyer with the Lend-Lease Ad- Boorstin grew up in Tulsa, Oklaho- ministration. However, settling on a ma. A 1934 graduate of Harvard career in history, he accepted a College, Dan became a Rhodes position as assistant professor at Scholar from Oklahoma, traveling Swarthmore College in 1942. In to England to study at Oxford’s 1944, he moved on to the University Balliol College. In 1936, he was of Chicago where he spent the next awarded a B.A. in Jurisprudence 25 years. During this time he wrote from Oxford and a year later, a his award winning books The Bachelor of Civil Laws. At age 23 Amen”cans: The CoIoniaI Ex- he passed the English bar examina- perience (Bancroft Prize) and The tion becoming a Barrister-at-Law, Amen”cans: The National Ex- one of the few Americans qualified perience (Parkman Prize). These to practice before the Queen’s were the first two parts of a trilogy courts.5 to be completed later. By the time When Dan returned to the he left the University in 1969, he United States, he studied American had reached the rank of Sterling law as a Stirling Fellow at Yale Morton Distinguished Service Pro- University Law School. After fessor of American History. 5 receiving his doctor of juridical Boorstin left Chicago to accept a science degree in 1942, he moved great challenge as Director of the on to Harvard where he taught National Museum of History and history and literature and, in the Technology of the Smithsonian In- law school, legal history. He was stitution. During his four years as admitted to the Massachusetts bar director, he supervised many major in 1942.3 exhibits. b He then resigned to 63 become Senior Historian and ad- creator of problems and the means viser to the Institution on all pro- of solving them. A selected jects. While at the Smithsonian, he bibliography of Dan’s books and ar- completed his trilogy with The ticles accompanies this essay. Amen”cans: the democratic ex- One aspect of Boorstin’s genius is pem”ence. For this he won a Pulitzer his perception of the seeming con- Prize for history in 1974.7 He was tradictions in American history. In nominated for Librarian of Con- The Genius of American Po[itics gress while at his Smithsonian posi- ( 1953), he observed, “The ablest tion. defender of the Revolution—in Boorstin’s appointment faced op- fact, the greatest political theorist position from the library establish- of the American Revolution—was ment because of his lack of also the greatest theorist of British “formal” library credentials and conservatism, Edmund Burke. .. from special interest groups who Ours was one of the few conser- disapproved of his opposition to vative colonial rebellions of modern quotas for minorities in faculty hir- times.”lz ing. q He was among 74 signers of a It is significant that a person with letter to President Ford. 10 Never- a marvelous sense of history, and a theless, he was confirmed to the skeptical respect for technology, post and has proved an able leader. heads the Library of Congress at Robert Wedgeworth, who pre- this time in its history. While LC by sented the Statement of the itself cannot harness the informa- American Library Association tion explosion, it can provide the against the nomination, now stat es spiritual and practical leadership that Boorstin seems to understand necessary for the task. the library community’s concerns. By the time Boorstin came to the In a telephone interview, he in- Library of Congress it was the dicated that Boorstin has demon- largest library in the world, Its strated this understanding by “in- operations, however, had not been volving the library community” in closely examined since the days of his plans for and review of LC. Archibald MacLeish (1939-1944). Dan is well respected among Having determined a review was in historians. His writings have shown order, he appointed a task force to how technology has democratized conduct a study of the America. One reviewer of The organization. q Democratic Experience noted, His task force, headed by John Y. “Boorstin is concerned...with the Cole, a Library of Congress veteran growing commonality of experience with more than ten years ex- in the United States over the past perience in many phases of LC’S hundred years, a social change work, ret urned with many sugges- whose principal agent, of course, tions. Dan told the members of the has been technology.”11 His latest group to “emphasize what the book, The Republic of Technology, Library .~hou(d be without worrying views technology both as the about budgetary restraint s.” 10They 64 did so. The resulting document puter terminals to look up catalog presented both sweeping recom- information. mendations and specific solutions. The task force noted that an One of the major problems, as organization as complex as the they saw it, was a lack of coordina- Library of Congress needs planning tion between the departments to cope with the future. They within the Library, impeding the recommended that a permanent operations of the Library as a planning office be established to whole. Many of the recommenda- guide the Library through the tions proposed that coordinating reorganization of many of its committees or liaison offices be departments and the realigning of established. Reasoning that “im- its services. They also stated that a proving service to Congress means research office was badly needed to improving service to all,” the task improve the Library’s capabilities to force proposed that a coordinator perform research into technical be appointed to better mesh the ac- matters central to its own opera- tivities of the Congressional tions. 13When I visited Dr. Boorstin Research Service with those of recently, I expressed surprise that other departments. 13 A coordina- there was no one in the institution tion office to help other libraries designated as the Director of use the resources of the Library of Research. I said the same thing to Congress was also suggested. “The Vemer Clapp about twenty-five Library must establish new, formal years ago. I believe he thought of channels of communication be- the Council of Library Resources as tween itself and other libraries and a kind of research department for encourage suggestions and criti- the Library. cism.”ls The task force report contained One of the most frustrating prob- some thirty-three recommendations lems for readers at the Library is the for change, and over a hundred length of time it takes to have books specific suggestions for implemen- delivered to them.