DOCSLIB.ORG

Atrium 15 | 2010 15 | 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Atrium 15 | 2010 15 | 2010 Atrium Atrium 15 | 2010 15 | 2010 DESIGNING INNOVATION THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING & PLANNING Atrium Page 15 | 2010 02 | 03 THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING & PLANNING Today’s CiTy CreaTed in The PasT 04 oCCasional address: PeTer MarTin 17 designing innovaTion in ConsTruCTion 08 FaCulTy reColleCTions: Max ChesTer 18 headsPaCe ProjeCTs 10 vale anThony williaM MaTThews: neil Clerehan 19 Managing innovaTive ConsTruCTion 11 CeleBraTing ParTnershiPs 20 The PainTed deserT 12 a Change in The landsCaPe: 22 veniCe Biennale 13 CaTherin Bull reFleCTs Miegunyah dinsTinguished visiTing Fellows 14 2010 honour roll oF donors 25 auBea 2010 16 FroM The FaCulTy 26 Dean’s Message 2010 Highlights benefactors who have made the experience as we near the end of 2010 it is timely to possible and who are very keen to provide reflect upon the Faculty’s achievements and ongoing support. events of the last 12 months. it has been a year where our research, projects and our Faculty’s representation at the 12th studio activities have been increasingly venice architecture Biennale – one of the visible on a national and global stage. most significant events on the international architecture calendar - was remarkable. Forging strong connections with communities of the 17 projects selected by Creative continued in 2010, as several travelling directors, john gollings and ivan rijavec, studios journeyed to different parts of the three teams were led by members of our world. our Msd students travelled to Faculty and six consisted of our alumni. Mexico, nanjing, genoa, Papua new guinea whilst in venice for the Biennale, i had the and the south australia bush. These studios chance to hear first-hand the reaction of and field trips are ‘working laboratories’ many who experienced the now and when where both students and staff work with exhibition in the australia Pavilion. The locals to create design solutions for real-life images of australia today by john gollings problems – be it a low cost dwelling in and the possible urban futures were Monterrey, or an architectural intervention enormously powerful, wonderfully stitched in genoa. together by Flood slicer. unusually for a Biennale installation, Now and When will our design studios within australia are be touring australia in 2011. There have also an important focus of our postgraduate also been requests for the exhibition to tour programs. The ‘Bower’ series of architecture europe and north america, so the three studios, led by david o’Brien and hamish entries by our colleagues will help to further hill, have received much media attention this bring our Faculty to international attention. year and are part of the Faculty’s ongoing read more about the 12th venice Biennale engagement with indigenous communities in Peter raisbeck’s illuminating article on in the northern Territory. This work has page 13. been generously supported by several Atrium 15 | 2010 THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING & PLANNING Bringing leading and innovative Designing Innovation in this issue we celebrate the career practitioners to Melbourne to address The theme of this edition of Atrium is of Catherin Bull and announce The and work with our Faculty is part of our ‘designing innovation’ – design, theory Catherin Bull scholarship in landscape commitment to engaging with international and practice in the global environment. architecture to support students in the discourse and practice. we were delighted within this, we look at some new methods Masters of landscape architecture. This to welcome Chilean architect Mathias and technologies in design, fabrication scholarship complements the david yencken Klotz, international planner william and construction and the impact of new Phd scholarship in landscape architecture Cobbett, uK engineer jane wernick and technologies (intellectual as well as digital which will be awarded for the first time French landscape architect Catherine and physical) on design, its practice in 2011. Mosbach, as part of the 2010 dean’s lecture and management. series. we were also honoured to host Finally, we pause to reflect on the Faculty’s Professor attilio Petruccioli and Professor alan March examines the urban policy long term association with hansen yuncken. Claudio d’amato guerrieri from the innovations in the 1980s of evan walker we use this opportunity to commemorate Polytechnic of Bari in italy, both of whom and david yencken. design innovations the 20th anniversary of establishing the presented a fascinating Miegunyah lecture in landscape architecture are outlined hansen yuncken prize for construction in july. with their extensive experience by andrew saniga in his piece on his students , and to celebrate the great around the whole Mediterranean basin woomera travelling studio and Terra number of students that have gone on and beyond, they brought insight to cross Oddities exhibition. Paolo Tombesi provides to work with the firm. cultural design and construction issues. an insight into design innovation in the realm of construction in his pieces on Best wishes we have been particularly pleased to host Miegunyah visiting Fellows Professor attilio Tom Kvan a rich series of exhibitions – this year we Petruccioli and Professor Claudio d’amato image: Pattern events exhibition have held over 40 in the wunderlich gallery guerrieri. he also writes about the AUBEA by dr stanislav roudavski and other venues in our buildings. a highlight construction management conference of these was the aBP alumni retrospective hosted by the Faculty in july. Front Cover image: Photograph series, with exhibitions by architect daryl by Peter glenane jackson in april and Phooey architects (under the directorship of Peter ho) in september. we look forward to profiling more extraordinary work in this series during 2011. Atrium Page 15 | 2010 04 | 05 THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING & PLANNING Today’s City Created in the Past: Evan Walker & David Yencken AlAn MArch Present-day Melbourne is faced with Professor evan walker was dean of walker and yencken highlighted the multiple challenges and uncertainties that the Faculty between 1991 and 1995, opportunity to reverse central Melbourne demand the attention of built and natural having originally graduated with a having its back turned on the yarra environment professionals. however, Bachelor of architecture from the river. The western suburbs were under clarity as to the best urban form for our university of Melbourne in 1959. after considerable stress from unplanned city has not yet emerged between the founding a practice in Melbourne in 1963, development pressure, suffering from a multiple competing demands of population with daryl jackson joining as a partner, range of environmental quality, industrial- growth; the range and location of possible he worked as an architect until 1979. residential interface and amenity issues. building types and densities; and transport he was awarded the order of australia The state planning agency had opportunities connectivity. The ecological impacts for service to architecture, town planning to improve its monitoring and forecasting of current settlement patterns appear and the victorian parliament. abilities through the use of emerging unacceptably high, yet generating technologies such as computing and sufficient conviction to redress this david yencken, now emeritus Professor, associated methods. regulation of comprehensively at the metropolitan was head of the school of environmental change in heritage areas, beyond level remains elusive. Further, Melbourne Planning from 1987 to 1996. amongst individual sites, was poor. district centres is becoming a divided city between those his many achievements have been the were not defined clearly or planned for, who do and don’t live in well-connected establishment of Merchant Builders and leading to disjointed and variable retail, areas serviced by a range of educational, Tract Consultants, and acting in roles such transport and service provision across health and recreational facilities. as Chairman of the australian heritage the city. Planning and related legislation, Commission. he was granted the order such as that controlling the subdivision when it comes to actual practice, built of australia for service to conservation of land, was fragmented and duplicated and natural environment professionals and history. in multiple controls. Finally, the department are bound to act in the present, seeking of Planning & environment required better outcomes in the future. The in 1982, with john Cain as Premier, considerable re-skilling to keep up with Melbourne we live in today embodies evan walker became Minister for best practice and to address the certain social, environmental, economic Planning & environment, appointing challenges being identified. and physical characteristics that are david yencken as secretary for Planning. the result of important previous work. a range of highly influential planning and under the direction of walker and examination of these characteristics design policies soon began to emerge yencken, the department of Planning can draw attention to the ways that in response to identification of pressing & environment undertook a range of outcomes have been achieved, providing urban problems in victoria. while the innovative and far-reaching activities means to assess and act upon current subsequent fortunes of these policies in response to the planning challenges circumstances.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria: Stage One
    Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria: Stage One Volume 1: Contextual Overview, Methodology, Lists & Appendices Prepared for Heritage Victoria October 2008 This report has been undertaken in accordance with the principles of the Burra Charter adopted by ICOMOS Australia This document has been completed by David Wixted, Suzanne Zahra and Simon Reeves © heritage ALLIANCE 2008 Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Context ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Project Brief .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 Contextual Overview .................................................................................................................. 7 3.0 Places of Potential State Significance .................................................................................... 35 3.1 Identification Methodology .......................................................................................................... 35 3.2 Verification of Places .................................................................................................................. 36 3.3 Application
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of BOROONDARA Review of B-Graded Buildings in Kew, Camberwell and Hawthorn
    CITY OF BOROONDARA Review of B-graded buildings in Kew, Camberwell and Hawthorn Prepared for City of Boroondara January 2007 Revised June 2007 VOLUME 4 BUILDINGS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR THE HERITAGE OVERLAY TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Main Report VOLUME 2 Individual Building Data Sheets – Kew VOLUME 3 Individual Building Data Sheets – Camberwell and Hawthorn VOLUME 4 Individual Building Data Sheets for buildings not recommended for the Heritage Overlay LOVELL CHEN 1 Introduction to the Data Sheets The following data sheets have been designed to incorporate relevant factual information relating to the history and physical fabric of each place, as well as to give reasons for the recommendation that they not be included in the Schedule to the Heritage Overlay in the Boroondara Planning Scheme. The following table contains explanatory notes on the various sections of the data sheets. Section on data sheet Explanatory Note Name Original and later names have been included where known. In the event no name is known, the word House appears on the data sheet Reference No. For administrative use by Council. Building type Usually Residence, unless otherwise stated. Address Address as advised by Council and checked on site. Survey Date Date when site visited. Noted here if access was requested but not provided. Grading Grading following review (C or Ungraded). In general, a C grading reflects a local level of significance albeit a comparatively low level when compared with other examples. In some cases, such buildings may not have been extensively altered, but have been assessed at a lower level of local significance. In other cases, buildings recommended to be downgraded to C may have undergone alterations or additions since the earlier heritage studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Harbour Docklands Conservation Management
    VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS Conservation Management Plan Prepared for Places Victoria & City of Melbourne June 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xi PROJECT TEAM xii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and brief 1 1.2 Melbourne Docklands 1 1.3 Master planning & development 2 1.4 Heritage status 2 1.5 Location 2 1.6 Methodology 2 1.7 Report content 4 1.7.1 Management and development 4 1.7.2 Background and contextual history 4 1.7.3 Physical survey and analysis 4 1.7.4 Heritage significance 4 1.7.5 Conservation policy and strategy 5 1.8 Sources 5 1.9 Historic images and documents 5 2.0 MANAGEMENT 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Management responsibilities 7 2.2.1 Management history 7 2.2.2 Current management arrangements 7 2.3 Heritage controls 10 2.3.1 Victorian Heritage Register 10 2.3.2 Victorian Heritage Inventory 10 2.3.3 Melbourne Planning Scheme 12 2.3.4 National Trust of Australia (Victoria) 12 2.4 Heritage approvals & statutory obligations 12 2.4.1 Where permits are required 12 2.4.2 Permit exemptions and minor works 12 2.4.3 Heritage Victoria permit process and requirements 13 2.4.4 Heritage impacts 14 2.4.5 Project planning and timing 14 2.4.6 Appeals 15 LOVELL CHEN i 3.0 HISTORY 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Pre-contact history 17 3.3 Early European occupation 17 3.4 Early Melbourne shipping and port activity 18 3.5 Railways development and expansion 20 3.6 Victoria Dock 21 3.6.1 Planning the dock 21 3.6.2 Constructing the dock 22 3.6.3 West Melbourne Dock opens
    [Show full text]
  • Scientists' Houses in Canberra 1950–1970
    EXPERIMENTS IN MODERN LIVING SCIENTISTS’ HOUSES IN CANBERRA 1950–1970 EXPERIMENTS IN MODERN LIVING SCIENTISTS’ HOUSES IN CANBERRA 1950–1970 MILTON CAMERON Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Cameron, Milton. Title: Experiments in modern living : scientists’ houses in Canberra, 1950 - 1970 / Milton Cameron. ISBN: 9781921862694 (pbk.) 9781921862700 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Scientists--Homes and haunts--Australian Capital Territority--Canberra. Architecture, Modern Architecture--Australian Capital Territority--Canberra. Canberra (A.C.T.)--Buildings, structures, etc Dewey Number: 720.99471 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by Sarah Evans. Front cover photograph of Fenner House by Ben Wrigley, 2012. Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press; revised August 2012 Contents Acknowledgments . vii Illustrations . xi Abbreviations . xv Introduction: Domestic Voyeurism . 1 1. Age of the Masters: Establishing a scientific and intellectual community in Canberra, 1946–1968 . 7 2 . Paradigm Shift: Boyd and the Fenner House . 43 3 . Promoting the New Paradigm: Seidler and the Zwar House . 77 4 . Form Follows Formula: Grounds, Boyd and the Philip House . 101 5 . Where Science Meets Art: Bischoff and the Gascoigne House . 131 6 . The Origins of Form: Grounds, Bischoff and the Frankel House . 161 Afterword: Before and After Science .
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria
    SURVEY OF POST-WAR BUILT HERITAGE IN VICTORIA STAGE TWO: Assessment of Community & Administrative Facilities Funeral Parlours, Kindergartens, Exhibition Building, Masonic Centre, Municipal Libraries and Council Offices prepared for HERITAGE VICTORIA 31 May 2010 P O B o x 8 0 1 9 C r o y d o n 3 1 3 6 w w w . b u i l t h e r i t a g e . c o m . a u p h o n e 9 0 1 8 9 3 1 1 group CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background 7 1.2 Project Methodology 8 1.3 Study Team 10 1.4 Acknowledgements 10 2.0 HISTORICAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONTEXTS 2.1 Funeral Parlours 11 2.2 Kindergartens 15 2.3 Municipal Libraries 19 2.4 Council Offices 22 3.0 INDIVIDUAL CITATIONS 001 Cemetery & Burial Sites 008 Morgue/Mortuary 27 002 Community Facilities 010 Childcare Facility 35 015 Exhibition Building 55 021 Masonic Hall 59 026 Library 63 769 Hall – Club/Social 83 008 Administration 164 Council Chambers 85 APPENDIX Biographical Data on Architects & Firms 131 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O 3 4 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O group EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this survey was to consider 27 places previously identified in the Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria, completed by Heritage Alliance in 2008, and to undertake further research, fieldwork and assessment to establish which of these places were worthy of inclusion on the Victorian Heritage Register.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Road on the Paths
    On the road Hospice DLEY PARK EN E Is it legal to ride E H M DA NOLA N AV RA two abreast? ER Xavier D T Prep Are the road rules the S 3101 BVD LM Coll. Yes, but you must not ride 9 Hole Par 3 ST C KEW R same when you’re on a WA A 3101 GOLF COURSE C K YARRA McEVOY ST KEVIN SYLVA ST C more than 1.5 metres apart. TANTON GV bike or driving a car? SEE ADJOINING CITY OFYARR YARRA & BOROONDARA TRAVELSMART MAPS BAN N LA ST ST HO S BVD ST GIPP W.H.S. MA V YARRA BEND PARK RAVEN ST YTON i ST ST I Dickinson PHY H T T T C R ST YARRA T GV Yes, bicycles are classified und S Res E E E S S GIPPS S ST ST T R Is it OK to occupy a ST ST ST T r Sch O T M L L O E RD ST S S HODGSO MUR 16 R REEVES L D D E E M S 350 p OU LL T PEEL ST GLASSH I as vehicles under the law L H E D D A e S AEL ST CT ST RY whole traffic lane when Steine C S ST 684 A D LAVER ST O O . STEVENSON Sophia ST T RAVE ST S ST O PH D Yarra ST W S ST EL IT ST CR R R ROBERT ST MOLLISON FIN ST Ste H 246 (H (H L ST A HEN LIT.
    [Show full text]
  • RMIT Design ARCHIVES JOURNAL Vol 1 Nº 2 2011 S T EN T N CO ADDITIONS ANATOL KAGAN to the COLLECTION COLLECTION Anatol Kagan (1913–2009) Architect Michael Bogle 4–7
    RMIT DesIgn ARCHIVES JOURnAL Vol 1 Nº 2 2011 s T en T n CO ADDITIoNS ANATol KAGAN To THE COLLECTIoN COLLECTIoN Anatol Kagan (1913–2009) architect Michael Bogle 4–7 WILLIAM NANKIVELL COLLECTIoN William Nankivell (1928–2002) architect Harriet Edquist 8–13 Towards A histoRy of stuDENT activism IN LandscapE ArchitectuRE 14–15 Michael O’Connell: RESEARCH The Lost Modernist Harriet Edquist 16 icamAustralasia Symposium 2011 16 rmit design archives journal Journal Editor Editorial Assistance Design Harriet Edquist Kaye Ashton Letterbox.net.au contact [email protected] www.rmit.edu.au/designarchives issn 1838-9406 Published by rmit Design Archives, rmit University Text © rmit Design Archives, rmit University and individual authors. This Journal is copyright. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of Cover Image research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, Anatol Kagan, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted National Opera House, by any means without the prior permission of the publisher. Sydney, perspective, 1956. 2 EDIToRIAl Two collections representing the work of well-known local architectural practices have recently been donated to the rmit Design Archives, adding significant depth to our existing holdings. The Anatol Kagan Collection includes material relating to the Russian-born émigré’s Melbourne practice in the 1940s and early 1950s, and his subsequent Sydney practice from the 1960s. His post-war domestic architecture can be directly compared with that of other émigré architects whose work is represented in the Archives, including Frederick Romberg (rda Newsletter #1 2008), Ernest Fooks (some of whose drawings and books were donated to rmit a number of years ago by Noemi Fooks) and Frederick Sterne (rda Newsletter #1 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Victoria Second Container Port Advice
    Infrastructure Victoria Second Container Port Advice Port Strategic Transport Modelling Final | 2.5 4 April 2017 Todd Road / Cook Street / Webb Dock Drive / Westgate Freeway Port Strategic Transport Modelling Infrastructure Victoria Second Container Port Advice Project No: IS175000 Document Title: Port Strategic Transport Modelling Document No.: Final Revision: V2.5 Date: 4 April 2017 Client Name: Client No: Project Manager: John Richardson Author: John Richardson File Name: J:\IE\Projects\03_Southern\IS175000\06 Technical\IV Ports Advice VITM Modelling Report V2.5.docx Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 Floor 11, 452 Flinders Street Melbourne VIC 3000 PO Box 312, Flinders Lane Melbourne VIC 8009 Australia T +61 3 8668 3000 F +61 3 8668 3001 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2017 Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ Client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 1 31/01/2017 Limited to a list of model inputs for the purpose of J Richardson confirming all inputs. 2 10/03/2017 Modelling outputs added J Richardson A Newman 3 27/03/2017 Updated with Deloitte comments J Richardson A Newman 4 04/04/2017 Updated with IV comments J Richardson A Newman i Port Strategic Transport Modelling Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • UNLEASHING the POTENTIAL of NATURE DISCUSSION PAPER on CITY ECOLOGY, ECOSYSTEMS and BIODIVERSITY Join the Discussion Online at Participate.Melbourne.Vic.Gov.Au/Nature
    UNLEASHING THE POTENTIAL OF NATURE DISCUSSION PAPER ON CITY ECOLOGY, ECOSYSTEMS AND BIODIVERSITY Join the discussion online at participate.melbourne.vic.gov.au/nature Acknowledgements Many people have contributed ideas presented within this Discussion Paper including within the City of Melbourne, and researchers at the Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology (ARCUE), RMIT, University of Melbourne and the Stockholm Resilience Centre. Cover image of Blue Banded Bee, Amegilla bee Source: Museum Victoria participate.melbourne.vic.gov.au/nature CONTENTS Purpose and process 03 Key terms 04 Chapter 1: Nature in Melbourne 05 Chapter 2: How does our city contribute to the Australian landscape? 09 Chapter 3: Why should we care about urban ecosystems? 11 Chapter 4: How can we better value and manage nature? 15 Chapter 5: How can we undertake nature sensitive urban design and planning? 17 Chapter 6: Should we increase nature in the private realm? 21 Chapter 7: What symbolises nature for Melburnians? 23 Chapter 8: How can ecology help us respond to climate change? 28 Chapter 9: How can Melbourne demonstrate leadership? 31 Selected resources 33 References 34 2 participate.melbourne.vic.gov.au/nature Purpose and process Purpose Process The purpose of this discussion paper is to An indicative timeline for the process support conversation and seek comment is shown below: from our community and stakeholders to contribute to the development of a strategic policy framework for municipal ecology, biodiversity and ecosystem services, or nature within our city. February 2015 City of Melbourne has not previously Discussion paper released for public comment. formulated a comprehensive policy position on urban nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Metro Rail Project 20 April 2016 Revision: C1 MMR-AJM-PWAA-RP-NN-000815 Reference: CMS332569
    Melbourne Metro Rail Project 20 April 2016 Revision: C1 MMR-AJM-PWAA-RP-NN-000815 Reference: CMS332569 Transport Impact Assessment Melbourne Metro Rail Authority Document control record 121 Exhibition Street Melbourne VIC 3000 PO Box 23061 Docklands VIC 8012 Australia A person using AJM JV documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by AJM JV. Document control Report title Transport Impact Assessment Document ID MMR-AJM-PWAA-RP-NN-000815 Contract No. CMS332569 File path Client Melbourne Metro Rail Authority Client contact Daniel Cullen Revision Rev Date Prepared by Author/s Verifier Approver details/status Peter Hunkin Final issued for David C1 20/04/2016 Peter Hunkin & Katherine Lisa Ryan Exhibition Anderson Mitchell Current revision C1 Approval Approver Author signature signature Name Peter Hunkin Name Lisa Ryan © Copyright 2016 AJM Joint Venture. The concepts, data and information contained in this document are the property of AJM Joint Venture. No part of this document may be reproduced, used, copied, published or adapted for use except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 or with the consent of AJM Joint Venture. This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Melbourne Metro Rail Authority (“MMRA”), and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between AJM Joint Venture and MMRA. AJM Joint Venture makes no representations and undertakes no duty to any third party who may use or rely upon this report, and accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocklandsstrategy
    OCKLANDSSTRATEGY 711.5 099451 DOC strategy Reference map overleaf ELBUURNE DOCKLANDS: STRATEGY FOR REDEVELOPMENT DOCKLANDS TASK FORCE JUNE 1992 •0) 0> 'tl .... • 0) U 0) 1:1 "is -g :>- o~ Reference map o~ ... §~ [-< p.. ;:::10) ~ \ o ;::l E-<E-<~ victoria Street '" ~ortn Dynon Road ... To Foots-1-----cray ., ,. ., ,.. DoCkraUhne ~-bb ,- - • Existing road and rail network • Proposed road and rail network • Docklands 1 Spencer Street Station 2 Former Railways Administration Building 3 World Congress Centre 4 World Trade Centre 5 Museum of Victoria 6 Charles Grimes Bridge 7 Flagstaff Gardens 8 Flagstaff Station 9 North Melbourne Station 250 500 750 1000 scale of metres 11Ii\fl~ lilllllll~11 ~I~ ~11111~1\~li lili\~\ M0052705 Melbourne Docklands: Strategy for Redevelopment A guide to redevelopment of Docklands, providing a broad framework within which further detailed planning and design and, ultimately, development can be undertaken. Docklands Task Force June 1992 Infrastructure Library 711.5 8489276 099451 Melbourne docklands : DOC strategy strategy for redevelopment CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 3 4.3.3.2 The internal road network 52 1.1 THE SITE 5 4.3.3.3 Traffic impacts 56 1.2 BRIEF HISTORY 5 4.3.4 Webb Dock rail line 57 1.3 STATE GOVERNMENT 4.3.5 Cars and parking 58 OBJECTIVES 6 4.3.6 Water transport 58 1.4 DOCKLANDSTASKFORCE 6 4.4 ECONOMIC 1~5 PUBLIC CONSULTATION 7 DEVELOPMENT 59· 1.6 DOCKLANDS AUTHORITY 7 4.4.1 Entertainment, leisure and 2 THE VISION 9 tourism 60 3 EXISTING 4.4.2 Transport 60 CHARACTERISTICS 17 4.4.3 Telecommunications 60
    [Show full text]
  • Survey-Of-Post-War-Built-Heritage-In-Victoria-Stage-1-Heritage-Alliance-2008 Part2.Pdf (PDF File
    Identifier House Other name Milston House (former) 027-086 Address 6 Reeves Court Group 027 Residential Building (Private) KEW Category 472 House LGA City of Boroondara Date/s 1955-56 Designer/s Ernest Milston NO IMAGE AVAILABLE Theme 6.0 Building Towns, Cities & the Garden State Sub-theme 6.7 Making Homes for Victorians Keywords Architect’s Own Significance Architectural; aesthetic References This butterfly-roofed modernist house was designed by Ernest P Goad, Melbourne Architecture, p 171 Milton, noted Czech-born émigré architect, for his own use. Existing Listings AHC National Trust Local HO schedule Local Heritage Study Identifier House Other name 027-087 Address 54 Maraboor Street Group 027 Residential Building (Private) LAKE BOGA Category 472 House LGA Rural City of Swan Hill Date/s c.1955? Designer/s Theme 6.0 Building Towns, Cities & the Garden State Sub-theme 6.7 Making Homes for Victorians Keywords Image: Simon Reeves, 2002 Significance Aesthetic References Probably a rare survivor of the 1950s fad for decorating John Belot, Our Glorious Home (1978) houses, gardens and fences with shells and ceramic shards. This “Domestic Featurism” was documented by John Belot in the 1970s, but few examples would now remain intact. The famous “shell houses” of Arthur Pickford at Ballarat and Albert Robertson at Phillip Island are both no longer extant. Existing Listings AHC National Trust Local HO schedule Local Heritage Study heritage ALLIANCE 146 Job 2008-07 Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria Identifier House Other name Reeve House (former) 027-088 Address 21a Green Gully Road Group 027 Residential Building (Private) KEILOR Category 472 House LGA City of Brimbank Date/s 1955-60 Designer/s Fritz Janeba NO IMAGE AVAILABLE Theme 6.0 Building Towns, Cities & the Garden State Sub-theme 6.7 Making Homes for Victorians Keywords Significance Architectural; References One of few known post-war commissions of this Austrian émigré, who was an influential teacher within Melbourne University’s School of Architecture.
    [Show full text]