DOCSLIB.ORG

Statement of Recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria to the Heritage Council of Victoria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statement of Recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria to the Heritage Council of Victoria Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria to the Heritage Council of Victoria Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria to the Heritage Council of Victoria Name: Fairfield Park Amphitheatre, Kiosk and Pavilion Address: 3 Fairfield Park Drive, Fairfield Registered Aboriginal Party Wurundjeri Woi Wurrung Cultural Heritage Aboriginal Corporation Local Government Authority: City of Yarra Fairfield Park Amphitheatre (March 2021) Pavilion (February 2021) Executive Director recommendation Under Part 3, Division 3 of the Heritage Act 2017 I recommend to the Heritage Council of Victoria that the Fairfield Park Amphitheatre, Kiosk and Pavilion, Fairfield should not be included in the Victorian Heritage Register (VHR). STEVEN AVERY Executive Director, Heritage Victoria DATE OF RECOMMENDATION: 21 April 2021 This report may contain images and/or names of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who are now deceased. Fairfield Park Amphitheatre, Kiosk and Pavilion 1 Hermes No: 206940 Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria to the Heritage Council of Victoria Executive Director recommendation to the Heritage Council of Victoria The Executive Director, Heritage Victoria recommends that the Heritage Council not include the Fairfield Park Amphitheatre, Kiosk and Pavilion, 3 Fairfield Park Drive, Fairfield in the Victorian Heritage Register (VHR) in accordance with section 49 of the Heritage Act 2017 by determining: That this place is not of State-level cultural heritage significance and should not be included in the VHR in accordance with s.49(1)(b) of the Act. The information presented in this recommendation suggests that the Fairfield Park Amphitheatre, Kiosk and Pavilion may be of potential local significance. This place is located within an area - Fairfield Park – which is subject to a Heritage Overlay in the Yarra Planning Scheme (HO147 - Fairfield Park). The ‘Fairfield Park’ Heritage Overlay and Yarra Council’s Statement of Significance exclusively focuses on the place as ‘a major recreational facility representing early and diverse recreational uses along the Yarra, as well as extensive plantings and landscaping typical of the Edwardian period’. The existing Statement of Significance for Fairfield Park does not refer to features such as the Amphitheatre, Kiosk or Pavilion. Under section 49(1)(c) of the Heritage Act 2017 Heritage Council may wish to: i. refer the recommendation and any submissions to the to the Yarra City Council for consideration for an amendment to a planning scheme for inclusion of the Amphitheatre, Kiosk and/or Pavilion in an individual Heritage Overlay(s). ii. determine that it is more appropriate for steps to be taken under the Planning and Environment Act 1987 or by any other means to protect or conserve the place. This might include acknowledging the Amphitheatre, Kiosk and/or Pavilion in a Statement of Significance. Fairfield Park Amphitheatre, Kiosk and Pavilion 2 Hermes No: 206940 Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria to the Heritage Council of Victoria The process from here 1. The Heritage Council publishes the Executive Director’s recommendation (section 41). The Heritage Council of Victoria will publish the Executive Director’s recommendation on its website for a period of 60 days. Submissions must be received by Heritage Council on or before Monday 21 June 2021. 2. Making a submission to the Heritage Council (sections 44 and 45) Within the 60 day publication period, any person or body can make a submission to the Heritage Council. This submission can support the recommendation, or object to the recommendation and a hearing can be requested in relation to the submission. Information about making a submission and submission forms are available on the Heritage Council of Victoria’s website: https://heritagecouncil.vic.gov.au/registrations-reviews/executive-director-recommendations/ 3. Heritage Council determination (sections 46 and 49) The Heritage Council of Victoria is an independent statutory body. It is responsible for making the final determination to include or not include the place or object in the VHR, or amend a place or object already in the VHR. If no submissions are received the Heritage Council must make a determination within 40 days of the publication closing date. If submissions are received, the Heritage Council may decide to hold a hearing in relation to the submission. If a hearing does take place, the Heritage Council must make a determination within 90 days after the completion of the hearing. 4. Obligations of owners of places and objects (sections 42 and 43) The owner of a place or object which is the subject of a recommendation to the Heritage Council has certain obligations under the Heritage Act 2017. These relate to advising the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria in writing of any works or activities that are being carried out, proposed or planned for the place. The owner also has an obligation to provide a copy of this statement of recommendation to any potential purchasers of the place or object before entering into a contract. 5. Further information The relevant sections of the Act are provided at Appendix 1. Fairfield Park Amphitheatre, Kiosk and Pavilion 3 Hermes No: 206940 Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria to the Heritage Council of Victoria Description The following is a description of the Fairfield Park Amphitheatre, Kiosk and Pavilion, at the time of site inspections by Heritage Victoria in February, March and April 2021. The whole place The Fairfield Park Amphitheatre, Kiosk and Pavilion are located in a landscaped area of 1860m2 (0.19ha) which is part of Fairfield Park. This section slopes up away from the Yarra River east to west and contains established trees, access pathways and three buildings (the amphitheatre, kiosk and pavilion) which respond to the sloping site. The amphitheatre The amphitheatre is built from rough hewn bluestone blocks (pitchers) and sawn bluestone slab steps over a concrete base and is located approximately 25 metres west of the river. It comprises a flat circular stage ten metres in diameter from which extends eleven tiers of terraced seating in a semi-circular form. A projection booth with a brown timber hatch is set into the centre top level and has an access door to the rear pathway. Several fixed lighting trees (tall metal posts) project upwards from the outermost walls of the amphitheatre and are designed to support stage lights plugged into power grids underneath them. There is power cabling under the amphitheatre. The kiosk Above the northwest side of the amphitheatre is a small circular bluestone kiosk featuring an octagonal conical corrugated iron roof, with an approximately 3 metre covered walkway on the north side leading to three square ticket-sale windows. The interior consists of a continuous curved service bench in front of the ticket windows, and a kitchen bench and sink unit built against the eastern wall. The floor is tiled, the pine beams of the conical roof are exposed and there are roller doors on the inside of the ticket windows. The pavilion At the south, approximately 45m from the Yarra River, is a two-storey tilt-slab precast concrete building (pavilion) set into the steepest part of the site. Three large sliding doors on the east open onto the ground level which comprises two large open workshop spaces. An internal staircase leads to the first floor which consists of two dressing rooms with toilet and shower facilities at the south part of the building, all internally linked. These rooms open onto an external balcony walkway which runs the length of the building offering views to the river. To the north of the balcony walkway are three toilets which were intended for public use. The balcony walkway extends approximately six metres into the parkland at the north but abruptly stops as it has never been connected to a pathway in the park as was intended. The rooftop of the pavilion is level with the main access pathway to Heidelberg Road. It consists of a flat concrete barbecue area (with no fixed facilities such as barbecues or seating) of approximately 145m2 part of which is covered to the southern end by a four-sided symmetrical gazebo of approximately 60m2. It sits on twelve posts and has a partial corrugated-iron pyramid-form roof which is completed by a cube shaped light box (ventilation chimney) featuring 27 timber slats on each side, on top of which sits a flat roof of steel tray roof decking. Fairfield Park Amphitheatre, Kiosk and Pavilion 4 Hermes No: 206940 Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria to the Heritage Council of Victoria 2021, Kiosk building at the top of the 2021, Detail of upper seating tier of amphitheatre amphitheatre with lighting/projection box F2021, Sliding door into Pavilion at ground 2021, Roof of the pavilion showing gazebo with light box (ventilation box) and level viewing fence overlooking the river Fairfield Park Amphitheatre, Kiosk and Pavilion 5 Hermes No: 206940 Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria to the Heritage Council of Victoria 2021, Changeroom in the Pavilion 2021, View from Pavilion walkway towards the amphitheatre History Amphitheatres Amphitheatres can be traced to Ancient Greece (≈800 BC to 146AD). They are circular or oval shaped venues for theatre and outdoor entertainments (semi-circular forms were originally known as ‘theatres’). The amphitheatre form was adopted by many later civilisations, such as Ancient Rome (≈ 31BC to 1453 AD) especially those aspiring to reflect a glorious classical past. In England the word first appeared in the 14th century. Shakespeare’s circular Globe Theatre in London (1576) was an amphitheatre. In modern parlance, an amphitheatre is any circular, semicircular or curved, acoustically vibrant performance space, including those with theatre-style stages, sloping seating, particularly those located outdoors. Natural formations of similar shape are sometimes known as natural amphitheatres.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria: Stage One
    Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria: Stage One Volume 1: Contextual Overview, Methodology, Lists & Appendices Prepared for Heritage Victoria October 2008 This report has been undertaken in accordance with the principles of the Burra Charter adopted by ICOMOS Australia This document has been completed by David Wixted, Suzanne Zahra and Simon Reeves © heritage ALLIANCE 2008 Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Context ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Project Brief .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 Contextual Overview .................................................................................................................. 7 3.0 Places of Potential State Significance .................................................................................... 35 3.1 Identification Methodology .......................................................................................................... 35 3.2 Verification of Places .................................................................................................................. 36 3.3 Application
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of BOROONDARA Review of B-Graded Buildings in Kew, Camberwell and Hawthorn
    CITY OF BOROONDARA Review of B-graded buildings in Kew, Camberwell and Hawthorn Prepared for City of Boroondara January 2007 Revised June 2007 VOLUME 4 BUILDINGS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR THE HERITAGE OVERLAY TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Main Report VOLUME 2 Individual Building Data Sheets – Kew VOLUME 3 Individual Building Data Sheets – Camberwell and Hawthorn VOLUME 4 Individual Building Data Sheets for buildings not recommended for the Heritage Overlay LOVELL CHEN 1 Introduction to the Data Sheets The following data sheets have been designed to incorporate relevant factual information relating to the history and physical fabric of each place, as well as to give reasons for the recommendation that they not be included in the Schedule to the Heritage Overlay in the Boroondara Planning Scheme. The following table contains explanatory notes on the various sections of the data sheets. Section on data sheet Explanatory Note Name Original and later names have been included where known. In the event no name is known, the word House appears on the data sheet Reference No. For administrative use by Council. Building type Usually Residence, unless otherwise stated. Address Address as advised by Council and checked on site. Survey Date Date when site visited. Noted here if access was requested but not provided. Grading Grading following review (C or Ungraded). In general, a C grading reflects a local level of significance albeit a comparatively low level when compared with other examples. In some cases, such buildings may not have been extensively altered, but have been assessed at a lower level of local significance. In other cases, buildings recommended to be downgraded to C may have undergone alterations or additions since the earlier heritage studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientists' Houses in Canberra 1950–1970
    EXPERIMENTS IN MODERN LIVING SCIENTISTS’ HOUSES IN CANBERRA 1950–1970 EXPERIMENTS IN MODERN LIVING SCIENTISTS’ HOUSES IN CANBERRA 1950–1970 MILTON CAMERON Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Cameron, Milton. Title: Experiments in modern living : scientists’ houses in Canberra, 1950 - 1970 / Milton Cameron. ISBN: 9781921862694 (pbk.) 9781921862700 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Scientists--Homes and haunts--Australian Capital Territority--Canberra. Architecture, Modern Architecture--Australian Capital Territority--Canberra. Canberra (A.C.T.)--Buildings, structures, etc Dewey Number: 720.99471 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by Sarah Evans. Front cover photograph of Fenner House by Ben Wrigley, 2012. Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press; revised August 2012 Contents Acknowledgments . vii Illustrations . xi Abbreviations . xv Introduction: Domestic Voyeurism . 1 1. Age of the Masters: Establishing a scientific and intellectual community in Canberra, 1946–1968 . 7 2 . Paradigm Shift: Boyd and the Fenner House . 43 3 . Promoting the New Paradigm: Seidler and the Zwar House . 77 4 . Form Follows Formula: Grounds, Boyd and the Philip House . 101 5 . Where Science Meets Art: Bischoff and the Gascoigne House . 131 6 . The Origins of Form: Grounds, Bischoff and the Frankel House . 161 Afterword: Before and After Science .
    [Show full text]
  • An Antipodean Imaginary for Architecture+Philosophy
    69 An Antipodean Imaginary for Architecture+Philosophy: Fictocritical Approaches to Design Practice Research Hélène Frichot, Julieanna Preston, Michael Spooner, Sean Pickersgill, Zuzana Kovar, Ceri Hann, Megg Evans As a collective of PhD researchers (past and fictocriticism will be ventured and reframed for archi- present) provisionally gathered within the tecture. This approach will be elaborated by Hélène Architecture+Philosophy Research Group, RMIT Frichot who has had the opportunity to offer super- University, we will present a series of design visorial guidance to researchers presenting their explorations that are representative of our design design research below. Fictocriticism for architec- practice research.1 With the conjunctive capacity ture assumes the constructive, creative and critical of architecture and philosophy we emphasize the situatedness of the thinking-designer in the midst ongoing importance of the relay between these of their problematic field.2 We place an emphasis disciplines, also activated in our work through the on critical and creative invention and the structured productive relations between critical theory and indeterminacy that manifests in the wild association practice. We assume an expanded definition of of images and ideas that procure innovative as well architectural design practice, which includes digital as politically engaged minoritarian architectures. immersive environments, unbuilt (even unbuildable) There endures an engagement with minorities, and architectures, installation and participatory perform- minor literatures (including sub-canonical architec- ance-based works, and also, importantly, includes tures), feminist approaches, queer intertextualities, the critical and creative practice of writing-architec- as well as teratological mixtures of the natural and ture, often through the deployment of fiction. These the cultural.
    [Show full text]
  • Building 8, RMIT University
    Nationally Significant 20th-Century Architecture Revised 9/01/2012 Building 8, RMIT University Address 368 Swanston Street, Melbourne 3000 Practice Edmond and Corrigan in assoc. with Demaine Designed 1990 Completed 1993 Address History & Sitting on top of John Andrew’s incomplete four storeyed Union Description building, Edmond & Corrigan’s additions to Building 8 make a 368 riotously colourful signpost for RMIT along Swanston Street. ‘Built on a tight budget and with the constraints of the the existing buildings beside and below, Building 8 is like a magic castle. A new Swanston Street lift and service core were built and account for the medieval passage accessing the upper floors. The deep floor plate was Melbourne maximised, resulting in a rabbit warren of rooms to the upper floors. Balustrade details, handrails and dadoes are built to last and the 3000 entire interior has the chaotic vibrancy of a pre-Renaisance city. From various points along Swanston Street , the expressionistic roofscape reveals more and more formal fantasy from the crystalline cornice and Darth Vader exhaust hoods over the fire escape stairs, to the corrugated Matterhorn of the lift overrun. The coloured stone facade and its knitting needle, steel pipe strut supports continue the bastion theme, whilst on the back elevation, a polychrome and polygonal brick fire stair turret acknowledges Percy Everett’s 1930s workshops and provides the visual focus for one of RMIT’s few outdoor spaces.’ (extracts from Philip Goad, Melbourne Architecture, p223) RAIA Nº Corrigan’s aim was to delight and break down the dominant and The medieval access corridor seamless city-wall 'mood' RMIT presented on Swanston Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria
    SURVEY OF POST-WAR BUILT HERITAGE IN VICTORIA STAGE TWO: Assessment of Community & Administrative Facilities Funeral Parlours, Kindergartens, Exhibition Building, Masonic Centre, Municipal Libraries and Council Offices prepared for HERITAGE VICTORIA 31 May 2010 P O B o x 8 0 1 9 C r o y d o n 3 1 3 6 w w w . b u i l t h e r i t a g e . c o m . a u p h o n e 9 0 1 8 9 3 1 1 group CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background 7 1.2 Project Methodology 8 1.3 Study Team 10 1.4 Acknowledgements 10 2.0 HISTORICAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONTEXTS 2.1 Funeral Parlours 11 2.2 Kindergartens 15 2.3 Municipal Libraries 19 2.4 Council Offices 22 3.0 INDIVIDUAL CITATIONS 001 Cemetery & Burial Sites 008 Morgue/Mortuary 27 002 Community Facilities 010 Childcare Facility 35 015 Exhibition Building 55 021 Masonic Hall 59 026 Library 63 769 Hall – Club/Social 83 008 Administration 164 Council Chambers 85 APPENDIX Biographical Data on Architects & Firms 131 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O 3 4 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O group EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this survey was to consider 27 places previously identified in the Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria, completed by Heritage Alliance in 2008, and to undertake further research, fieldwork and assessment to establish which of these places were worthy of inclusion on the Victorian Heritage Register.
    [Show full text]
  • RMIT Design ARCHIVES JOURNAL Vol 1 Nº 2 2011 S T EN T N CO ADDITIONS ANATOL KAGAN to the COLLECTION COLLECTION Anatol Kagan (1913–2009) Architect Michael Bogle 4–7
    RMIT DesIgn ARCHIVES JOURnAL Vol 1 Nº 2 2011 s T en T n CO ADDITIoNS ANATol KAGAN To THE COLLECTIoN COLLECTIoN Anatol Kagan (1913–2009) architect Michael Bogle 4–7 WILLIAM NANKIVELL COLLECTIoN William Nankivell (1928–2002) architect Harriet Edquist 8–13 Towards A histoRy of stuDENT activism IN LandscapE ArchitectuRE 14–15 Michael O’Connell: RESEARCH The Lost Modernist Harriet Edquist 16 icamAustralasia Symposium 2011 16 rmit design archives journal Journal Editor Editorial Assistance Design Harriet Edquist Kaye Ashton Letterbox.net.au contact [email protected] www.rmit.edu.au/designarchives issn 1838-9406 Published by rmit Design Archives, rmit University Text © rmit Design Archives, rmit University and individual authors. This Journal is copyright. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of Cover Image research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, Anatol Kagan, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted National Opera House, by any means without the prior permission of the publisher. Sydney, perspective, 1956. 2 EDIToRIAl Two collections representing the work of well-known local architectural practices have recently been donated to the rmit Design Archives, adding significant depth to our existing holdings. The Anatol Kagan Collection includes material relating to the Russian-born émigré’s Melbourne practice in the 1940s and early 1950s, and his subsequent Sydney practice from the 1960s. His post-war domestic architecture can be directly compared with that of other émigré architects whose work is represented in the Archives, including Frederick Romberg (rda Newsletter #1 2008), Ernest Fooks (some of whose drawings and books were donated to rmit a number of years ago by Noemi Fooks) and Frederick Sterne (rda Newsletter #1 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 179
    Page 1 of 179 FUTURE MELBOURNE (PLANNING) COMMITTEE Agenda Item 5.1 REPORT CITY OF MELBOURNE HERITAGE STRATEGY AND A HISTORY OF THE CITY OF 4 September 2012 MELBOURNE’S URBAN ENVIRONMENT Presenter: David Mayes, Manager Strategic Planning Purpose and background 1. The purpose of this report is to seek the Future Melbourne Committee’s endorsement of the draft City of Melbourne Heritage Strategy 2012 (Attachment 2) for public consultation, and for the Committee to note the Thematic History - A History of the City of Melbourne’s Urban Environment 2012 (Attachment 3). 2. The City of Melbourne Heritage Strategy 2012 is a KSA1 (Planning for Future Growth) deliverable. 3. The proposed strategy is a whole of Council policy which seeks to provide a framework for the identification, conservation and management of the city’s heritage. The Heritage Strategy will help strengthen the community’s understanding, appreciation and recognition of the city’s heritage. Key issues 4. The City of Melbourne commissioned historian Helen Doyle to write the thematic history, A History of the City of Melbourne’s Urban Environment 2012 and appointed an external reference group to assist in its development. The history describes the major themes which influenced the city’s past growth and development, and explains how and why the city looks as it does today. The document is a resource that can be used to help with the identification of historically significant places. 5. Context Planning consultants were engaged to help prepare the draft Heritage Strategy. Council’s roles and functions across the organisation in relation to heritage were reviewed and analysed.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey-Of-Post-War-Built-Heritage-In-Victoria-Stage-1-Heritage-Alliance-2008 Part2.Pdf (PDF File
    Identifier House Other name Milston House (former) 027-086 Address 6 Reeves Court Group 027 Residential Building (Private) KEW Category 472 House LGA City of Boroondara Date/s 1955-56 Designer/s Ernest Milston NO IMAGE AVAILABLE Theme 6.0 Building Towns, Cities & the Garden State Sub-theme 6.7 Making Homes for Victorians Keywords Architect’s Own Significance Architectural; aesthetic References This butterfly-roofed modernist house was designed by Ernest P Goad, Melbourne Architecture, p 171 Milton, noted Czech-born émigré architect, for his own use. Existing Listings AHC National Trust Local HO schedule Local Heritage Study Identifier House Other name 027-087 Address 54 Maraboor Street Group 027 Residential Building (Private) LAKE BOGA Category 472 House LGA Rural City of Swan Hill Date/s c.1955? Designer/s Theme 6.0 Building Towns, Cities & the Garden State Sub-theme 6.7 Making Homes for Victorians Keywords Image: Simon Reeves, 2002 Significance Aesthetic References Probably a rare survivor of the 1950s fad for decorating John Belot, Our Glorious Home (1978) houses, gardens and fences with shells and ceramic shards. This “Domestic Featurism” was documented by John Belot in the 1970s, but few examples would now remain intact. The famous “shell houses” of Arthur Pickford at Ballarat and Albert Robertson at Phillip Island are both no longer extant. Existing Listings AHC National Trust Local HO schedule Local Heritage Study heritage ALLIANCE 146 Job 2008-07 Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria Identifier House Other name Reeve House (former) 027-088 Address 21a Green Gully Road Group 027 Residential Building (Private) KEILOR Category 472 House LGA City of Brimbank Date/s 1955-60 Designer/s Fritz Janeba NO IMAGE AVAILABLE Theme 6.0 Building Towns, Cities & the Garden State Sub-theme 6.7 Making Homes for Victorians Keywords Significance Architectural; References One of few known post-war commissions of this Austrian émigré, who was an influential teacher within Melbourne University’s School of Architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Director Recommendation
    Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria, to the Heritage Council of Victoria Name: Seccull House Address: 32 North Road, Brighton Local Government Authority: Bayside City Council Provisional VHR No. PROV VHR H2406 Seccull House, 2016 Source: domain.com.au Executive Director recommendation Under Part 3, Division 3 of the Heritage Act 2017 (‘the Act’) I recommend to the Heritage Council of Victoria that Seccull House at 32 North Road, Brighton, should be included in the Victorian Heritage Register (‘VHR’) in the category of registered place. STEVEN AVERY Executive Director, Heritage Victoria DATE OF RECOMMENDATION: 15 March 2021 OFFICIAL Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria, to the Heritage Council of Victoria Executive Director recommendation to the Heritage Council of Victoria The Executive Director, Heritage Victoria (‘Executive Director’) recommends that the Heritage Council include Seccull House at 32 North Road, Brighton, in the VHR in accordance with section 49 of the Act by determining: • That Seccull House is of State level cultural heritage significance and should be included in the VHR in the category of registered place in accordance with section 49(1)(a) of the Act • That the proposed extent of registration is appropriate under section 49(1)(d) of the Act • That the proposed categories of works or activities which may be carried out in relation to Seccull House for which a permit under the Act is not required will not harm the cultural heritage significance of the place under section 49(3) of the Act. Seccull House 2 VHR No: PROV VHR H2406 Hermes No: 112134 Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria, to the Heritage Council of Victoria The process from here 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Section
    UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE CROSS-SECTION Issue No. 150. April I, 1965. IT Best Award-Winning Architecture: Victoria Architecture LOOKING FOR THE BEST Medal. 1965: Channel "O" Studios, Burwood; Hassell & McConnell, arch+s. : House, Glenard Drive, Heidelberg; Charles Duncan, arch+. 1964: New Zealand Insurance Building, 493 Bourke Street; Bates Smart & McCutcheon, archts. : House at Davey's Bay, Frankston; Guilford Bell & Neil Clerehan, archts. : House at Rye; McGlashan & Everist, archts. R.V.I.A. Street Architecture Medal (awarded 1929- 1954). 1929: Francis House, Collins Street, Melbourne, Blackett & Forster, archts. 1930: The Emily McPherson College of Domestic Economy, Russell Street, Melbourne. E. Evan Smith, archi. 1931: Lyric House, Collins Street, Melbourne, A. & K. Hen- derson, archts. 1932: A.M.P. Building, 425 Collins Street, Melbourne. Bates, Smart & McCutcheon, archts. 1933: Port Authority Building, Market Street, Melbourne. A special issue of Cross-Section produced to coincide with Sydney Smith, Ogg & Serpell, archts. the Fourteenth Annual Architectural Convention, in Mel- 1934: Buckley & Nunn's Building, 294-296 Bourke Street, bourne, March 22-April 2, 1965, and intended as a stimulant Melbourne. Bates, Smart & McCutcheon, archts. to make +hose who look at Melbourne open their eyes a 1935: Shell Corner, 163 William Street, Melbourne. A. & little wider, peer a little more keenly and seek a little more K. Henderson & Partners, archts. earnestly than is possible when lulled into the semi- 1936: Bank of New South Wales, 368 Collins Street, Mel- consciousness of the standard guided four. Melbourne is bourne. Godfrey & Spowers, archts. not an obviously dramatic city, and it is easy to find ugli- 1937: The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Spring ness, but in the following list of the "best" of this and Street, Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendment C294 – Expert Evidence – Trethowan Architecture
    Statement of Evidence and Report to Planning Panel City of Boroondara Planning Scheme Amendment C294 Regarding the properties at ‘William Carey Chapel’ – 349 Barkers Road (part), Kew 264 Cotham Road, Kew ‘McDonald Smith House’ (former) – 3 Perry Court, Kew ‘Craigmill’ – 13 Raheen Drive, Kew 35 to 37 Rowland Street, Kew 2-4 Barrington Avenue, Kew in the Schedule to the Heritage Overlay Prepared for the City of Boroondara 10 October 2019 Mark Stephenson BSc (Hons) in Architectural and Building Conservation, ABN 44168657823 47 Dove Street Telephone 613 9421 5448 Richmond Victoria 3121 Facsimile 613 9421 5449 P O Box 221 Mobile 0430 962770 East Melbourne Victoria 8002 [email protected] Australia [7954938: 25180761_1] Expert Witness Statement to Planning Panels Victoria Boroondara Amendment C294 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Instructions 1 1.2 Site Inspection 1 1.3 Sources of Information 1 1.4 Qualifications, Experience and Area of Expertise 1 1.5 Summary of Opinion 2 2. Methodology and Outcomes 3 2.1 Introduction 3 2.2 Stage 1 - Preliminary Identification of Places 3 2.3 Stage 2 – Assessment and Reporting 4 2.4 Trethowan Team, Roles and Support 8 2.5 Consideration of Submissions 8 2.6 Establishing a Threshold of Significance 9 3. Recommendations – Submitter Appearing 11 3.1 ‘William Carey Chapel – 349 Barkers Road (part), Kew 11 3.2 ‘Craigmill’ – 13 Raheen Drive, Kew 16 3.3 2-4 Barrington Avenue, Kew - Barrington Avenue Precinct (HO142) 20 4. Recommendations – Submitter Not Appearing 25 4.1 Residence – 264 Cotham Road, Kew 25 4.2 ‘McDonald Smith House’ (former) – 3 Perry Court, Kew 27 4.3 Duplex – 35 to 37 Rowland Street, Kew 29 5.
    [Show full text]