DOCSLIB.ORG

The Humanistic, Fideistic Philosophy of Philip Melanchthon (1497-1560)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Humanistic, Fideistic Philosophy of Philip Melanchthon (1497-1560) Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects The umH anistic, Fideistic Philosophy of Philip Melanchthon (1497-1560) Charles William Peterson Marquette University Recommended Citation Peterson, Charles William, "The umH anistic, Fideistic Philosophy of Philip Melanchthon (1497-1560)" (2012). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 237. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/237 THE HUMANISTIC, FIDEISTIC PHILOSOPHY OF PHILIP MELANCHTHON (1497-1560) by Charles W. Peterson, B.A., M.A., M. Div., S.T.M. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin December 2012 ABSTRACT THE HUMANISTIC, FIDEISTIC PHILOSOPHY OF PHILIP MELANCHTHON (1497-1560): Charles W. Peterson, B.A., M.A., M.Div., S.T.M. Marquette University, 2012 This dissertation examines the way Philip Melanchthon, author of the Augsburg Confession and Martin Luther’s closest co-worker, sought to establish the relationship between faith and reason in the cradle of the Lutheran tradition, Wittenberg University. While Melanchthon is widely recognized to have played a crucial role in the Reformation of the Church in the sixteenth century as well as in the Renaissance in Northern Europe, he has in general received relatively little scholarly attention, few have attempted to explore his philosophy in depth, and those who have examined his philosophical work have come to contradictory or less than helpful conclusions about it. He has been regarded as an Aristotelian, a Platonist, a philosophical eclectic, and as having been torn between Renaissance humanism and Evangelical theology. An understanding of the way Melanchthon related faith and reason awaits a well-founded and accurate account of his philosophy. Having stated the problem and finding it inadequately treated in the secondary literature, this dissertation presents an account of Melanchthon’s philosophical development. Finding that his philosophy was ultimately founded upon his understanding of and method in rhetoric and dialectics, this dissertation explicates his mature accounts of these arts. It then presents an account of Melanchthon’s philosophy as both humanistic (i.e., rhetorically based and practically rather than speculatively oriented) and fideistic (i.e, skeptical about the product of human reason alone, but finding certainty in philosophy founded upon, and somewhat limited by, Christian faith). After a final assessment of claims about Melanchthon’s philosophy from the secondary literature, this dissertation considers how such a humanistic, fideistic philosophy might be helpful for Christians in a philosophically post-modern situation. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Charles W. Peterson, B.A., M.A., M.Div., S.T.M. First, I thank God that I’ve had the opportunity to complete this dissertation, which for me has not been merely an academic or professional exercise, but an exploration of how I might move ahead in life and service with integrity and in good faith. I pray that somehow this dissertation can in some very small way advance or support the mission of the Church to the glory of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. I offer sincere thanks and gratitude to the faculty and staff of the Departments of Philosophy and Theology at Marquette University. Most especially I wish to thank Dr. James South, without whose guidance, encouragement, constructive criticism, and patience this dissertation would have been literally inconceivable. I am grateful as well to Drs. Noel Adams, Mickey Mattox, and Jennifer Hockenbery, the other members of my dissertation committee, each of whom has graciously offered their time and wisdom, not only as committee members, but throughout my years of study at Marquette. I gladly acknowledge a lifelong debt of gratitude to Dr. Richard Taylor who drew me into graduate studies in philosophy at Marquette, who was my first mentor in philosophy, and who introduced me to the fascinating world of medieval philosophy. Many thanks as well to Dr. Markus Wriedt who in his years at Marquette sharpened my understanding of the theology and history of the Wittenberg Reformation and who paved the way for a summer’s research in Mainz, Bretten, and Wittenberg; Günter Frank who shared his time and the resources of the Europaische Melanchthon-Akademie Bretten during my short visit there; and Dr. Kevin Gibson whose urging and encouragement as Director of ii Graduate Studies in the Philosophy Department at Marquette assured the timely completion of this project. I also wish to thank family, friends, and colleagues, both in ministry and in the academy, who have supported and enriched me with their insights. Special thanks here are due to St. Paul’s Lutheran Church in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and “Old” Trinity Evangelical Lutheran Church in Columbus, Ohio for encouraging, supporting, or at least humoring their pastor in what must surely have seemed to them at times a distraction from, rather than an expression of, service to God. Finally, always, I thank my wife Cheryl. To enjoy her loving partnership in life, ministry, and in thought has been one the great privileges and delights of my life. Her dedication to and care for Church, society, and academy continue to inspire and motivated me; I dedicate this dissertation to her. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………...………….……i INTRODUCTION……………………………………………...……………...……….... 1 A. Statement of the Problem…………………………….…………...….....…...... 1 B. Who Was Philip Melanchthon?....................................................... .................10 C. Goals and Motivation…………………………………….…………………. 17 D. Outline……….…………………………………………...……….………… 20 CHAPTER I: STILL UNKNOWN: MELANCHTHON’S WORKS AND RESEARCH ON MELANCHTHON …………….……..…….… 25 A. Introduction: The Still Unknown Melanchthon…………………………….. 25 B. Melanchthon Emerging From the Shadows……………………....……….... 29 1. Primary Source Material…………………………..….…….……….. 29 2. Biographies……………………………...…………….…...……...…. 31 C. Melanchthon as Theologian ……………………………………….….…….. 34 1. Melanchthon as Luther’s Anti-Type…………………………………..34 2. Melanchthon as “Light Stepper”………………………..………….… 36 3. Luther as Existentialist………………………………………….….… 38 4. Melanchthon as “Intellectualist”……………………………….…….. 40 5. Melanchthon as Systematizer…………….…………….…………… 45 D. Melanchthon as Philosopher…………………………….………..…………. 53 1. Melanchthon as Aristotelian .…………..…..……………..……...….. 53 a. As Adherent of the via antiqua.………………………….…... 54 b. As Adherent of the via moderna.............................................. 56 2. Melanchthon as Philosophical Eclectic……………...……….……… 60 iv 3. Melanchthon as Platonist and Rationalist………………………….… 62 4. Melanchthon as Turning Toward Empiricism……………………….. 68 E. Melanchthon as Renaissance Humanist……………….………………..…… 74 1. Renaissance Philosophy and Humanism…………………………….. 74 2. Melanchthon as Torn Between Humanism and Evangelical Theology……………………………...….……. 81 3. Melanchthon as Rhetorician …………….………...…..……….......... 85 F. Summary ………………………………….…………………………………. 90 II. MELANCHTHON’S PHILOSOPHICAL DEVELOPMENT………….…..…….… 94 A. Introduction……………………………………………………………….… 94 B. Melanchthon in 1518: Early Humanism in His De corrigendis asolescentiae studiis...…………………...…………….. 96 C. 1518-26: The Beginning of Melanchthon’s Evangelical Theology…..……. 105 D. 1525-1535: Melanchthon’s First Work in Moral Philosophy……………… 122 E. 1531-1540: Melanchthon’s Turn to the Ars Mathematica………………… 138 F. 1540 and following: Natural Philosophy and the Res Romana…………….. 147 1. Reply of Philip Melanchthon in behalf of Ermolao……………….... 149 2. Melanchthon’s Psychological Works………………………………. 152 G. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………. 162 III. MELANCHTHON’S RHETORIC AND DIALECTIC…………………….....…...168 A. Introduction …………………………………………………………….…...168 B. Rhetoric…………………………………………………………………….. 169 1. On the Relationship Between Rhetoric and Dialectics in Melanchthon’s Works…………………………………………..170 2. Elementoum rhetorices libri duo,1531…………………….………...175 v a. What is Rhetoric, and What Good is Rhetoric?.......................175 b. The Speeches and the Duties of the Orator…………….....…178 c. Elocutio………………………….…………..………...……. 181 d. Constructing a Speech: Inventio, Dispositio, Elocutio…....…184 e. The Genus didaskalikon……………………………………...187 C. Melanchthon’s Dialectics: Erotemata dialectices, 1547……….……………189 1. Quid est dialectices?........................................................................... 191 2. Iudicium………………………………………………………...…... 195 3. Inventio…………………………………….............................................. 198 a. What is Inventio?......................................................................198 b. Methods of Inventio……………………………………....... 201 c. Loci in Melanchthon’s Erotemata dialectices……….……….203 d. Melanchthon’s Conception of and Use of Loci.......................206 D. Summary and Conclusion……………………………………………….…..213 IV. MELANCHTHON’S HUMANISTIC, FIDEISTIC PHILOSOPHY……...…….…219 A. Introduction………………………………………………………….….…. 219 B. Dialectics and Melanchthon’s Philosophy…………………………………..220 C. The Res Romana: Melanchthon’s Rhetorical Philosophy………………...…227 D. Melanchthon’s Eclecticism…………………………………………..……. 233 1. Questions…..…………………………………………….…....…….. 233 2. Melanchthon on Philosophical Authorities…………………........... 238 a. The Sectae Praecipuae Philosophorum……………..…….....238 b. Plato………………………………………………………….243 vi c. Galen…………………………………………………………246 E. Doubt,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • People of Color Who Inspire: Additional Stories from the Communion of Saints the Center for the Theology of Childhood
    People of Color Who Inspire: Additional Stories from the Communion of Saints The Center for the Theology of Childhood Cheryl V. Minor, Director Jerome W. Berryman, Senior Fellow An imaginative method for nurturing the spiritual lives of children Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Extension Lesson ISBN: 978-1-954184-00-8 Introduction People of Color Who Inspire is a collection of stories written to supplement the collection of stories about the saints in The Complete Guide to Godly Play, Volume 7. In the collection of lessons on the saints found in Volume 7, there is a lesson called, “The Child’s Own Saint.” The lesson invites the children and Godly Play mentors in a Godly Play room to add to the lessons on the saints by writing the story of one of their own heroes. This story, and the others in this collection, serves as an example of this—a Christian person who inspires us all to strive for justice and respect the dignity of every human being. These stories are for children, so they try to minimize the distance between the child and the adult we are talking about. Some of the ways this is done is to keep the relationship informal, such as calling the person by their first name and emphasizing things about the person’s childhood. This means that the stories are somewhat open and very personal to engage the child’s intimacy and wonder with these amazing people who inspire. We are intentionally spare with the details of these stories so as not to obscure the core reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Pyrrhonism As a Sect of Buddhism? a Case Study in the Methodology of Comparative Philosophy
    Comparative Philosophy Volume 9, No. 2 (2018): 1-40 Open Access / ISSN 2151-6014 www.comparativephilosophy.org EARLY PYRRHONISM AS A SECT OF BUDDHISM? A CASE STUDY IN THE METHODOLOGY OF COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY MONTE RANSOME JOHNSON & BRETT SHULTS ABSTRACT: We offer a sceptical examination of a thesis recently advanced in a monograph published by Princeton University Press entitled Greek Buddha: Pyrrho’s Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia. In this dense and probing work, Christopher I. Beckwith, a professor of Central Eurasian studies at Indiana University, Bloomington, argues that Pyrrho of Elis adopted a form of early Buddhism during his years in Bactria and Gandhāra, and that early Pyrrhonism must be understood as a sect of early Buddhism. In making his case Beckwith claims that virtually all scholars of Greek, Indian, and Chinese philosophy have been operating under flawed assumptions and with flawed methodologies, and so have failed to notice obvious and undeniable correspondences between the philosophical views of the Buddha and of Pyrrho. In this study we take Beckwith’s proposal and challenge seriously, and we examine his textual basis and techniques of translation, his methods of examining passages, his construal of problems and his reconstruction of arguments. We find that his presuppositions are contentious and doubtful, his own methods are extremely flawed, and that he draws unreasonable conclusions. Although the result of our study is almost entirely negative, we think it illustrates some important general points about the methodology of comparative philosophy. Keywords: adiaphora, anātman, anattā, ataraxia, Buddha, Buddhism, Democritus, Pāli, Pyrrho, Pyrrhonism, Scepticism, trilakṣaṇa 1. INTRODUCTION One of the most ambitious recent works devoted to comparative philosophy is Christopher Beckwith’s monograph Greek Buddha: Pyrrho’s Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia (2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Was Shakespeare a Ramist?
    The Oxfordian Volume 22 October 2020 ISSN 1521-3641 The OXFORDIAN The Oxfordian is the peer-reviewed journal of the Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship, a non-profit educational organization that conducts research and publication on the Early Modern period, William Shakespeare and the authorship of Shakespeare’s works. Founded in 1998, the journal offers research articles, essays and book reviews by academicians and independent scholars, and is published annually during the autumn. Writers interested in being published in The Oxfordian should review our publication guidelines at the Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship website: https://shakespeareoxfordfellowship.org/the-oxfordian/ Our postal mailing address is: The Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship PO Box 66083 Auburndale, MA 02466 USA Queries may be directed to the editor, Gary Goldstein, at oxfordian@shakespeareoxfordfellowship.org Back issues of The Oxfordian may be obtained by writing to: newsletter@shakespeareoxfordfellowship.org 2 The OXFORDIAN Volume 22 2020 Was Shakespeare a Ramist? Reviewed by Michael Dudley The Rational Shakespeare: Peter Ramus, Edward de Vere, and the Question of Authorship. By Michael Wainwright. Palgrave Macmillan 2018 (324 pp.) in hardcover, paperback and Kindle. he question regarding the authorship of the Works of Shakespeare has for generations been dismissed by most of the intelligentsia as patent Tnonsense or a conspiracy theory—in short, as highly irrational—with a correspondingly dim view of its proponents’ intelligence and sanity. It is therefore singularly refreshing and impres- sive that a scholarly work that acknowledges Edward de Vere as Shakespeare should be entirely premised on an exploration of rationalism, not only in terms of the worldview apparent in the Shakespeare canon, but as a structured argument unto itself.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reform of Baptism and Confirmation in American Lutheranism
    LOGIA 1 Review Essay: The Reform of Baptism and Confirmation in American Lutheranism Armand J. Boehme The Reform of Baptism and Confirmation in American Lutheranism. By Jeffrey A. Truscott. Drew University Studies in Liturgy 11. Lanham, Maryland & Oxford: The Scarecrow Press, Inc., 2003. his book1 is a study of the production of the baptismal the church.” Thus the crafters of LBW greatly expanded T and confirmation rites contained in Lutheran Book of the “assembly’s participation in the baptismal act” (pp. Worship (LBW).2 The theology that underlies LBW 33, 205). These changes flow from a theology of action and its understanding of worship has significantly (liturgy as the work of the people), which emphasizes altered the Lutheran understanding of baptism and the fact that the church or the congregation is the confirmation. The theological foundation of LBW has mediating agent of God’s saving activity (p. 33).6 For influenced other Lutheran church bodies, contributing LBW the sacraments are understood significantly to profound changes in the Lutheran ecclesiologically—as actions of the congregation (pp. landscape. As Truscott wrote, those crafting the 205-206)—rather than soteriologically—as God acting baptismal liturgy in LBW would have to “overturn” old to give his people grace and forgiveness. This leads to an theologies of baptism, deal with “a theology that” emphasis on baby drama, water drama, and other believed in “the necessity of baptism for salvation,” and congregational acts (pp. 24–26, 220). This theology of “would have to convince Lutherans of the need for a new action is tied to an analytic view of justification, that is, liturgical and theological approach to baptism” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from the Dean
    C News fromIR the University of ChicagoC DivinityA School STAGE DIRECTIONS: SCENE TWO. MY ROOM 101. (Enter Miriam.) A woman in her early 60s strides to the front of a large lecture hall, dark wood paneling. She waits for the class to quiet down, for the school bell to fade away. MIRIAM: (holding the book up again) This is the most powerful, and the most dangerous…text… inA merican culture today. And so we’d better try to understand what’s in it, don’t you think?* Earlier this month I stood backstage at Joe’s their experiences, beliefs and values, she Pub, a venue for public performance on the goes on to share much more of her own on east side of New York City, with playwrights day one (including a recurrent childhood Lisa Peterson and Denis O’Hare, actors memory) than many teachers (myself F. Murray Abraham and Micah Stock, and Letter included) would be comfortable with. But in popular author Bruce Feiler, waiting to go the performance I did have fun with Miriam; out front and do a dramatic reading of four I camped it up a bit with “first day of the scenes from a play in progress, The Good from the semester” bravura, playing to a crowd of Book. This play, commissioned by Court ersatz students who (while eating arugula Theatre from the authors of the highly and drinking Brooklyn lager) might mistake acclaimed An Iliad, will have its world premier Dean the professor for the subject matter (and at Court on March 19, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Philip Melanchthon and the Historical Luther by Ralph Keen 7 2 Philip Melanchthon’S History of the Life and Acts of Dr Martin Luther Translated by Thomas D
    VANDIVER.cvr 29/9/03 11:44 am Page 1 HIS VOLUME brings By placing accurate new translations of these two ‘lives of Luther’ side by side, Vandiver together two important Luther’s T and her colleagues have allowed two very contemporary accounts of different perceptions of the significance of via free access the life of Martin Luther in a Luther to compete head to head. The result is as entertaining as it is informative, and a Luther’s confrontation that had been postponed for more than four powerful reminder of the need to ensure that secondary works about the Reformation are hundred and fifty years. The first never displaced by the primary sources. of these accounts was written imes iterary upplement after Luther’s death, when it was rumoured that demons had seized lives the Reformer on his deathbed and dragged him off to Hell. In response to these rumours, Luther’s friend and colleague, Downloaded from manchesterhive.com at 09/25/2021 06:33:04PM Philip Melanchthon wrote and Elizabeth Vandiver, Ralph Keen, and Thomas D. Frazel - 9781526120649 published a brief encomium of the Reformer in . A completely new translation of this text appears in this book. It was in response to Melanchthon’s work that Johannes Cochlaeus completed and published his own monumental life of Luther in , which is translated and made available in English for the first time in this volume. After witnessing Luther’s declaration before Charles V at the Diet of Worms, Cochlaeus had sought out Luther and debated with him. However, the confrontation left him convinced that Luther was an impious and —Bust of Luther, Lutherhaus, Wittenberg.
    [Show full text]
  • Adiaphora, Luther and the Material Culture of Worship Andrew Spicer
    Adiaphora, Luther and the Material Culture of Worship Andrew Spicer During the seventeenth and eighteenth century, English merchants and travellers to Germany and the Baltic were surprised by the pre-Reformation furnishings that remained in the Lutheran churches they visited, particularly commenting on the altarpieces, organs and statues.1 The survival of these aspects of late medieval worship has been attributed to the so-called ‘preserving power’ of Lutheranism. Significant numbers of images, ecclesiastical plate and vestments together with altarpieces remain even to this day through having been retained by Lutheran congregations.2 Recent scholarship, however, has acknowledged that this material culture has not always survived without some adaptation to accord with the needs of Lutheran worship.3 Furthermore, it has been questioned whether ‘preservation’ or ‘survival’ are the appropriate terms to refer to these items associated with pre-Reformation worship but with which the Lutheran faithful continued to engage.4 Adiaphora has become a convenient term to explain the retention of this ecclesiastical material culture, particularly in relation to religious art and images, within the Lutheran tradition.5 Adiaphora, a Greek term, had its origins in classical philosophy but had been adopted by the some of the Church Fathers. The meaning of the concept gradually evolved so that by the late middle ages, it had come to refer to things that were permitted because they had neither been divinely commanded nor prohibited, as determined by the New Testament. These were matters, which were not regarded as necessary for salvation. It was this understanding of the term that was applied by the Reformers in the early sixteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Antoine De Chandieu (1534-1591): One of the Fathers Of
    CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): ONE OF THE FATHERS OF REFORMED SCHOLASTICISM? A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN MAY 2013 CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 3233 Burton SE • Grand Rapids, Michigan • 49546-4301 800388-6034 fax: 616 957-8621 info@calvinseminary.edu www. calvinseminary. edu. This dissertation entitled ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): L'UN DES PERES DE LA SCHOLASTIQUE REFORMEE? written by THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy has been accepted by the faculty of Calvin Theological Seminary upon the recommendation of the undersigned readers: Richard A. Muller, Ph.D. I Date ~ 4 ,,?tJ/3 Dean of Academic Programs Copyright © 2013 by Theodore G. (Ted) Van Raalte All rights reserved For Christine CONTENTS Preface .................................................................................................................. viii Abstract ................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1 Introduction: Historiography and Scholastic Method Introduction .............................................................................................................1 State of Research on Chandieu ...............................................................................6 Published Research on Chandieu’s Contemporary
    [Show full text]
  • Palladas and the Age of Constantine Author(S): KEVIN W
    Palladas and the Age of Constantine Author(s): KEVIN W. WILKINSON Source: The Journal of Roman Studies , 2009, Vol. 99 (2009), pp. 36-60 Published by: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies constantinethegreatcoins.com Palladas and the Age of Constantine* KEVIN W. WILKINSON The poet and grammarian Palladas of Alexandria, author of more than 150 epigrams in the Greek Anthology, has remained a somewhat elusive figure. Though no epigrammatist is better represented in our two major sources for the Anthology, scarcely a trace of his exist- ence survives outside of his corpus of poems. His identity was so shadowy in the Byzantine period that he did not even warrant a mention in the Suda. By the tenth century, therefore, and presumably long before that time, 'Palladas' was merely the name of a man who had written some decent epigrams. Several clues remain, however, that allow us to locate him in a particular historical context. The history of scholarship on this problem is long and complex, but two rough timelines for his life have been proposed. The traditional estimate of his dates was c. A.D. 360-450. This was revised in the middle of the twentieth century to c. A.D. 319-400. It is my contention that the first of these is about a century too late and the second approximately sixty years too late. Such challenges to long-held opinion do not always enjoy a happy fate. Nevertheless, there are those cases in which the weight of scholarly tradition rests on surprisingly shaky foundations and in which a careful review of the evidence can result in significant improvements.1 The following argument proceeds in six stages: summary of the foundations for the traditional dates (1) and the current consensus (11); discussion of two external clues (in); challenge to the prevailing views (iv); construction of a new timeline (v); conclusions (vi).
    [Show full text]
  • 'Thejpurnal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies
    'TheJPurnal of Medieval and Renaissance studies MANAGINGEDITOR:Mareel Tetel, Duke University AsSOCIATEEDITORS:Arthur B. Ferguson, Duke University Edmund Reiss, Duke University ADVISORYBOARD:Rino Avesani, Biblioteca Vaticana Hersehel Baker, Harvard University Andre Chastel, Unioersite de Paris Myron P. Gilmore, Villa I Tatti O. B. Hardison, Jr., Folger Shakespeare Library William S. Heckscher, Duke University Hans J. Hillerbrand, City University of New York Gordon Leff, University of York Franco Simone, Unioersitä di Torino R. W. Southern, Oxford University Eugene Vinaver, University of Manchester Bruee W. Wardropper, Duke University Volume 3 Durham, North Carolina Duke University Press 1973 Melanchthon and Dürer: the search for the simple style DONALD B.KUSPIT, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill I The intensity of the living tie between Albrecht Dürer and Philipp Mel- anchthon must have reached its climax in 1525-26, when Melanchthon was resident in Nuremberg and Dürer portrayed him," but at the time Me1anchthon had little to say that we know of about Dürer's signi- ficance for him. Even at Dürer's death (1528), apart from expressing shock," he had little response to Dürer's art or person. Instead of issuing encomiums, as Dürer's friend Willibald Pirckheimer and the humanist poet Helius Eobanus Hessus did," or participating with Joachim Camerarius in the translation of Dürer's works into Latin," Melanchthon remains peculiarly silent about Dürer; peculiarly, because it was the custom of the day to mark the death of a great man with eulogies, but more particularly because of Melanch- thon's known enthusiasm for Dürer as a great German." It was only in mid-career, in the 1540'S that Melanchthon, under the pressure of his own purposes, praised Dürer specifically in his capacity as an artist rather than for the reflected glory he gave his surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiquarian, Modern & Private Press Books
    Blackwell rare books ANTIQUARIAN, MODERN & PRIVATE PRESS BOOKS CATALOGUE B 166 Blackwell Rare Books 48-51 Broad Street, Oxford, OX1 3BQ Direct Telephone: +44 (0) 1865 333555 Switchboard: +44 (0) 1865 792792 Email: rarebooks@blackwell.co.uk Fax: +44 (0) 1865 794143 www.blackwell.co.uk/ rarebooks Our premises are in the main Blackwell bookstore at 48-51 Broad Street, one of the largest and best known in the world, housing over 200,000 new book titles, covering every subject, discipline and interest, as well as a large secondhand books department. There is lift access to each floor. The bookstore is in the centre of the city, opposite the Bodleian Library and Sheldonian Theatre, and close to several of the colleges and other university buildings, with on street parking close by. Oxford is at the centre of an excellent road and rail network, close to the London - Birmingham (M40) motorway and is served by a frequent train service from London (Paddington). Hours: Monday–Saturday 9am to 6pm. (Tuesday 9:30am to 6pm.) Purchases: We are always keen to purchase books, whether single works or in quantity, and will be pleased to make arrangements to view them. Auction commissions: We attend a number of auction sales and will be happy to execute commissions on your behalf. Blackwell online bookshop www.blackwell.co.uk Our extensive online catalogue of new books caters for every speciality, with the latest releases and editor’s recommendations. We have something for everyone. Select from our subject areas, reviews, highlights, promotions and more. Orders and correspondence should in every case be sent to our Broad Street address (all books subject to prior sale).
    [Show full text]
  • Luther Leads the Reformation
    3 Luther Leads the Reformation MAIN IDEA WHY IT MATTERS NOW TERMS & NAMES REVOLUTION Martin Luther’s Nearly one-fifth of the Christians •indulgence •Peace of protest over abuses in the in today’s world are Protestants. • Reformation Augsburg Catholic Church led to the • Lutheran • annul founding of Protestant churches. •Protestant • Anglican SETTING THE STAGE By the tenth century, the Roman Catholic Church had come to dominate religious life in Northern and Western Europe. However, the Church had not won universal approval. Over the centuries, many people criti- cized its practices. They felt that Church leaders were too interested in worldly pursuits, such as gaining wealth and political power. Even though the Church made some reforms during the Middle Ages, people continued to criticize it. Prompted by the actions of one man, that criticism would lead to rebellion. TAKING NOTES Causes of the Reformation Recognizing Effects Use a chart to By 1500, additional forces weakened the Church. The Renaissance emphasis on identify the effects the secular and the individual challenged Church authority. The printing press of Martin Luther's protests. spread these secular ideas. In addition, some rulers began to challenge the Church’s political power. In Germany, which was divided into many competing states, it was difficult for the pope or the emperor to impose central authority. effect 1 cause: Finally, northern merchants resented paying church taxes to Rome. Spurred by Luther effect 2 these social, political, and economic forces, a new movement for religious protests abuses reform began in Germany. It then swept much of Europe. effect 3 Criticisms of the Catholic Church Critics of the Church claimed that its lead- ers were corrupt.
    [Show full text]