DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Recovery Plan for the Tidewater Goby

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Recovery Plan for the Tidewater Goby Draft Recovery Plan For the Tidewater Goby (Eucyclogobius newberryi) (October 2004) Pacific Region U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Manager, California/Nevada Operations Office Region 1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: _______________________________________ DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, publish recovery plans, sometimes preparing them with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than our own. They represent our official position only after they have been signed by the Regional Director, Director, or California/Nevada Operations Manager as approved. Approved Recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature citation should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. Draft Recovery Plan for the Tidewater Goby (Eucyclogobius newberryi). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. vi + 163 pp. An electronic version of this recovery plan will also be made available at http://www.r1.fws.gov/ecoservices/endangered/recovery/plans.html and http://endangered.fws.gov/recovery/index.html. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Primary Authors Chris Dellith of the Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura, California served as the Recovery Team Manager and prepared this draft recovery plan, with assistance from Bill McIver of the Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office. Recovery plan preparation was supervised and edited by Diane Noda, Carl Benz, and Mike McCrary of the Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office. Each member of the tidewater goby recovery team contributed valuable information and assistance. In particular, we gratefully acknowledge the efforts of Dr. Camm Swift, Dr. Kevin Lafferty, and Dr. David Jacobs, for being generous with their technical assistance and time throughout the development of this recovery plan. We thank them also for their thorough editorial review. Drawings of Eucyclogobius newberryi are reproduced by permission of Camm Swift, from Swift et al. (1989). The following individuals contributed significant information/assistance during recovery plan development (tidewater goby recovery team members are italicized): Ed Ballard David Jacobs Larry Williamson Roger Bloom Kevin Lafferty Jill Terp Ray Bosch Bill McIver Mark Helvey Diane Elam Jack Malone Rick Farris Bridget Fahey Mike Nepstad Lilian Carswell Darren Fong Carl Page Kurt Roblek Nancy Francine Ramona Swenson Grant Canterbury Greg Goldsmith Camm Swift David Anderson Gjon Hazard Anna Toline Bob Hoffman Christopher White ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Current Species Status: The tidewater goby (Eucyclogobius newberryi) is listed as endangered. It is a small fish that inhabits coastal brackish water habitats entirely within California, ranging from Tillas Slough (mouth of the Smith River, Del Norte County) near the Oregon border south to Agua Hedionda Lagoon (northern San Diego County). The tidewater goby is known to have historically inhabited at least 124 localities. Presently 28 (23 percent) of the 124 documented localities are considered extirpated and 55 to 70 (45 to 55 percent) of the localities are naturally so small or have been degraded over time that long-term persistence is uncertain. Habitat Requirements: Tidewater gobies are uniquely adapted to coastal lagoons and the uppermost brackish zone of larger estuaries, rarely invading marine or freshwater habitats. The species is typically found in water less than 1 meter (3.3 feet) deep and salinities of less than 12 parts per thousand. Principal threats to the tidewater goby include loss and modification of habitat, water diversions, predatory and competitive introduced fish species, habitat channelization, and degraded water quality. Recovery Objective: Downlist to threatened status, then delist. The primary objective of this recovery plan is to eliminate the threats to and improve the population status of the tidewater goby sufficiently to warrant reclassification (from endangered to threatened status) or delisting. Recovery Priority Number: The tidewater goby has a recovery priority number of 7C (on a scale of 1 to 18), per criteria published in the Federal Register (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1983). This number indicates a species with moderate threats and a high potential for recovery. The letter C indicates that there is some degree of conflict between the species’ recovery efforts and economic development. Recovery Criteria: We subdivide the geographic distribution of the tidewater goby into 6 recovery units, encompassing a total of 26 Sub-Units defined according to genetic differentiation and geomorphology. The tidewater goby may be considered for downlisting when: 1) An analysis based on scientifically credible monitoring over a 10-year period projects a 75 percent chance of all Sub-Units within each recovery unit persisting for a minimum of 100 years. This projection would incorporate a metapopulation viability analysis using a complex suite of information. A partial list of information needed for the metapopulation viability analysis includes: presence/absence data; population estimates; observed rates of extirpation and natural recolonization; results of introduction efforts to new localities and reintroduction to sites of known or suspected extirpation; and the relationships between climate variation and extinction and recolonization probabilities. This projection will also require incorporating information on new threats at the time of downlisting, such as any new exotic predator introductions that may have occurred. 2) All goby metapopulations are managed so that threats from habitat destruction and alteration (e.g., coastal development, upstream diversion, channelization of rivers and streams, discharge of iii agriculture and sewage effluents), introduced predators (e.g., centrarchid fishes), and competition with introduced species (e.g., yellowfin and chameleon gobies) are reduced to the extent that each metapopulation is not at risk of extirpation. The tidewater goby may be considered for delisting when downlisting criteria have been met and: 1) An analysis based on scientifically credible monitoring over a 10-year period projects a 95 percent chance of all Sub-Units within each recovery unit persisting for a minimum of 100 years. This projection would incorporate a metapopulation viability analysis using a complex suite of information. A partial list of information needed for the metapopulation viability analysis includes: presence/absence data; population estimates; observed rates of extirpation and natural recolonization; results of introduction efforts to new localities and reintroduction to sites of known or suspected extirpation; and the relationships between climate variation and extinction and recolonization probabilities. This projection will also require incorporating information on new threats at the time of delisting, such as any new exotic predator introductions that may have occurred. Actions Needed: 1. Monitor, protect and enhance currently occupied tidewater goby habitat. 2. Conduct biological research to enhance the ability to integrate land use practices with tidewater goby recovery and revise recovery tasks as pertinent new information becomes available. 3. Evaluate and implement translocation where appropriate. 4. Increase public awareness about tidewater gobies. Estimated Total Cost of Recovery: $1,505,000 over the next 10 years, with costs yet to be determined for securing and protecting coastal wetlands and for assurance of successful establishment of additional populations of tidewater goby. Funding opportunities and management will need to be developed between landowners, regulatory agencies, nonprofit organizations, and other interested parties. Date of Recovery: If recovery criteria are met, reclassification to threatened status could be initiated in 2015. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................ 1 A. Brief Overview ...................................................................................................................... 1 B. Description and Taxonomy....................................................................................................1 C. Distribution and Habitat......................................................................................................... 5 D. Critical Habitat .................................................................................................................... 10 E. Life History .......................................................................................................................... 10 F. Abundance and Trends......................................................................................................... 12 G. Reason for Decline and Current Threats ............................................................................. 13 1. The present or threatened destruction,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Diablo Canyon Power Plant
    ASSESSING POWER PLANT COOLING WATER INTAKE SYSTEM ENTRAINMENT IMPACTS EPORT R Prepared For: California Energy Commission Prepared By: ONSULTANT ONSULTANT JOHN STEINBECK, Tenera C Environmental Inc. JOHN HEDGEPETH, Tenera Environmental Inc. PETER RAIMONDI, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Center for Ocean Health, Long Marine Lab GREGOR CAILLIET, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories DAVID MAYER, Tenera Environmental Inc. OCTOBER 2007 CEC-700-2007-010 Prepared By: Tenera Environmental Inc. John Steinbeck San Luis Obispo, California Contract No. 700-05-002 Prepared For: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Rick York Project Manager Paul Richins Manager ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE Terrence O’Brien Deputy Director ENERGY FACILITIES SITING DIVISION B. B. Blevins Executive Director DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as the result of work sponsored by the California Energy Commission. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Energy Commission, its employees, or the State of California. The Energy Commission, the State of California, its employees, contractors, and subcontractors make no warrant, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report; nor does any party represent that the uses of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. This report has not been approved or disapproved by the California Energy Commission nor has the California Energy Commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information in this report. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It should be obvious that large studies like these require the coordinated work of many people. We would first like to thank the California Energy Commission, especially Rick York and Dick Anderson, for funding this study and recognizing the importance of publishing this work so it could be used by other researchers and decision makers.
    [Show full text]
  • Chevron-Shaped Accumulations Along the Coastlines of Australia As Potential Tsunami Evidences?
    CHEVRON-SHAPED ACCUMULATIONS ALONG THE COASTLINES OF AUSTRALIA AS POTENTIAL TSUNAMI EVIDENCES? Dieter Kelletat Anja Scheffers Geographical Department, University of Duisburg-Essen Universitätsstr. 15 D-45141 Essen, Germany e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Along the Australian coastline leaf- or blade-like chevrons appear at many places, sometimes similar to parabolic coastal dunes, but often with unusual shapes including curvatures or angles to the coastline. They also occur at places without sandy beaches as source areas, and may be truncated by younger beach ridges. Their dimensions reach several kilometers inland and altitudes of more than 100 m. Vegetation development proves an older age. Judging by the shapes of the chevrons at some places, at least two generations of these forms can be identified. This paper dis- cusses the distribution patterns of chevrons (in particular for West Australia), their various appearances, and the possible genesis of these deposits, based mostly on the interpretations of aerial photographs. Science of Tsunami Hazards, Volume 21, Number 3, page 174 (2003) 1. INTRODUCTION The systematic monitoring of tsunami during the last decades has shown that they are certainly not low frequency events: on average, about ten events have been detected every year – or more than 1000 during the last century (Fig. 1, NGDC, 2001) – many of which were powerful enough to leave imprints in the geological record. Focusing only on the catastrophic events, we find for the last 400 years (Fig. 2, NGDC, 2001) that 92 instances with run up of more than 10 m have occurred, 39 instances with more than 20 m, and 14 with more than 50 m, or – statistically and without counting the Lituya Bay events – one every 9 years with more than 20 m run up worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Ocean Intake Effects Study
    City of Santa Cruz Water Department & Soquel Creek Water District scwd2 Desalination Program Open Ocean Intake Effects Study December 2010 Submitted to: Ms. Heidi Luckenbach City of Santa Cruz 212 Locust Street Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Prepared by: Environmental ESLO2010-017.1 [Blank Page] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Tenera Environmental wishes to acknowledge the valuable contributions of the Santa Cruz Water Department, Soquel Creek Water District, and scwd² Task Force in conducting the Open Ocean Intake Effects Study. Specifically, Tenera would like to acknowledge the efforts of: City of Santa Cruz Water Department Soquel Creek Water District Bill Kocher, Director Laura Brown, General Manager Linette Almond, Engineering Manager Melanie Mow Schumacher, Public Information Heidi R. Luckenbach, Program Coordinator Coordinator Leah Van Der Maaten, Associate Engineer Catherine Borrowman, Professional and Technical scwd² Task Force Assistant Ryan Coonerty Todd Reynolds, Kennedy/Jenks and scwd² Bruce Daniels Technical Advisor Bruce Jaffe Dan Kriege Thomas LaHue Don Lane Cynthia Mathews Mike Rotkin Ed Porter Tenera’s project team included the following members: David L. Mayer, Ph.D., Tenera Environmental President and Principal Scientist John Steinbeck, Tenera Environmental Vice President and Principal Scientist Carol Raifsnider, Tenera Environmental Director of Operations and Principal Scientist Technical review and advice was provided by: Pete Raimondi, Ph.D., UCSC, Professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology in the Earth and Marine Sciences Dept. Gregor
    [Show full text]
  • DINÂMICA EVOLUTIVA DO Dnar EM CROMOSSOMOS DE PEIXES DA FAMÍLIA ELEOTRIDAE E REVISÃO CITOGENÉTICA DA ORDEM GOBIIFORMES(OSTEICHTHYES, TELEOSTEI)
    DINÂMICA EVOLUTIVA DO DNAr EM CROMOSSOMOS DE PEIXES DA FAMÍLIA ELEOTRIDAE E REVISÃO CITOGENÉTICA DA ORDEM GOBIIFORMES(OSTEICHTHYES, TELEOSTEI) SIMIÃO ALEFE SOARES DA SILVA ________________________________________________ Dissertação de Mestrado Natal/RN, Fevereiro de 2019 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO NORTE CENTRO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM SISTEMÁTICA E EVOLUÇÃO DINÂMICA EVOLUTIVA DO DNAr EM CROMOSSOMOS DE PEIXES DA FAMÍLIA ELEOTRIDAE E REVISÃO CITOGENÉTICA DA ORDEM GOBIIFORMES (OSTEICHTHYES, TELEOSTEI) Simião Alefe Soares da Silva Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sistemática e Evolução da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Mestre em Sistemática e Evolução. Orientador: Dr. Wagner Franco Molina Co-Orientador: Dr. Paulo Augusto de Lima Filho Natal/RN 2019 Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN Sistema de Bibliotecas - SISBI Catalogação de Publicação na Fonte. UFRN - Biblioteca Central Zila Mamede Silva, Simião Alefe Soares da. Dinâmica evolutiva do DNAr em cromossomos de peixes da família Eleotridae e revisão citogenética da ordem gobiiformes (Osteichthyes, Teleostei) / Simião Alefe Soares da Silva. - 2019. 69 f.: il. Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Centro de Biociências, Programa de Pós-Graduação em 1. Evolução cromossômica - Dissertação. 2. Diversificação cariotípica - Dissertação. 3. Rearranjos cromossômicos - Dissertação. 4. DNAr - Dissertação. 5. Microssatélites - Dissertação. I. Lima Filho, Paulo Augusto de. II. Molina, Wagner Franco. III. Título. RN/UF/BCZM CDU 575:597.2/.5 SIMIÃO ALEFE SOARES DA SILVA DINÂMICA EVOLUTIVA DO DNAr EM CROMOSSOMOS DE PEIXES DA FAMÍLIA ELEOTRIDAE E REVISÃO CITOGENÉTICA DA ORDEM GOBIIFORMES (OSTEICHTHYES, TELEOSTEI) Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sistemática e Evolução da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, como requisitos para obtenção do título de Mestre em Sistemática e Evolução com ênfase em Padrões e Processos Evolutivos.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Geologic Investigations Series I-2761, Molokai and Lanai
    Molokai and Lanai Molokai and Lanai are the least populated and smallest of the main Hawaiian Islands. Both are relatively arid, except for the central mountains of each island and northeast corner of Molokai, so flooding are not as common hazards as on other islands. Lying in the center of the main Hawaiian Islands, Molokai and Lanai are largely sheltered from high annual north and northwest swell and much of south-central Molokai is further sheltered from south swell by Lanai. On the islands of Molokai and Lanai, seismicity is a concern due to their proximity to the Molokai 71 Seismic Zone and the active volcano on the Big Island. Storms and high waves associated with storms pose a threat to the low-lying coastal terraces of south Molokai and northeast Lanai. Molokai and Lanai Index to Technical Hazard Maps 72 Tsunamis tsunami is a series of great waves most commonly caused by violent Amovement of the sea floor. It is characterized by speed (up to 590 mph), long wave length (up to 120 mi), long period between successive crests (varying from 5 min to a few hours,generally 10 to 60 min),and low height in the open ocean. However, on the coast, a tsunami can flood inland 100’s of feet or more and cause much damage and loss of life.Their impact is governed by the magnitude of seafloor displacement related to faulting, landslides, and/or volcanism. Other important factors influenc- ing tsunami behavior are the distance over which they travel, the depth, topography, and morphology of the offshore region, and the aspect, slope, geology, and morphology of the shoreline they inundate.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Coastal Marine Fishes of California
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 157 GUIDE TO THE COASTAL MARINE FISHES OF CALIFORNIA by DANIEL J. MILLER and ROBERT N. LEA Marine Resources Region 1972 ABSTRACT This is a comprehensive identification guide encompassing all shallow marine fishes within California waters. Geographic range limits, maximum size, depth range, a brief color description, and some meristic counts including, if available: fin ray counts, lateral line pores, lateral line scales, gill rakers, and vertebrae are given. Body proportions and shapes are used in the keys and a state- ment concerning the rarity or commonness in California is given for each species. In all, 554 species are described. Three of these have not been re- corded or confirmed as occurring in California waters but are included since they are apt to appear. The remainder have been recorded as occurring in an area between the Mexican and Oregon borders and offshore to at least 50 miles. Five of California species as yet have not been named or described, and ichthyologists studying these new forms have given information on identification to enable inclusion here. A dichotomous key to 144 families includes an outline figure of a repre- sentative for all but two families. Keys are presented for all larger families, and diagnostic features are pointed out on most of the figures. Illustrations are presented for all but eight species. Of the 554 species, 439 are found primarily in depths less than 400 ft., 48 are meso- or bathypelagic species, and 67 are deepwater bottom dwelling forms rarely taken in less than 400 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Chart Standardization & Paper Chart Working Group
    INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC ORGANISATION HYDROGRAPHIQUE ORGANIZATION INTERNATIONALE CHART STANDARDIZATION & PAPER CHART WORKING GROUP (CSPCWG) [A Working Group of the Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee (HSSC)] Chairman: Peter JONES Secretary: Andrew HEATH-COLEMAN UK Hydrographic Office Admiralty Way, Taunton, Somerset TA1 2DN, United Kingdom CSPCWG Letter: 03/2012 Telephone: UKHO ref: HA317/010/031-08 (Chairman) +44 (0) 1823 337900 ext 5035 (Secretary) +44 (0) 1823 337900 ext 3656 Facsimile: +44 (0) 1823 325823 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] To CSPCWG Members Date 24 January 2012 Dear Colleagues, Subject: Draft revision of S-4 Section B-300 to B-330 – Round 2 Thank you to the 21 WG members who responded to Letter 03/2011; I apologise for the delay in progressing this. As usual, Andrew and I have consolidated the responses, including all the comments, into Annex A. As you will see, there was a good consensus on most of the questions we asked (even where the answer was „no‟). Some other answers were less clear cut, but usually the associated comments guided us in an outcome which we hope will be acceptable. There were lots of other helpful comments, and I have responded to all these, many of them resulting in some adjustments to the proposed text. We have now prepared a „round 2‟ version of the section, as Annex B (although because of size, we have converted this to PDF and attached as a separate document). As usual, those changes which were not challenged in the first round have now been converted to blue text.
    [Show full text]
  • ALPHABETICAL LIST of CERTAIN LOCAL COMMON GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES APPEARING on MARINE CHARTS WHICH ARE GENERALLY NOT TRANSLATED. Prep
    ALPHABETICAL LIST OF CERTAIN LOCAL COMMON GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES APPEARING ON MARINE CHARTS WHICH ARE GENERALLY NOT TRANSLATED. Prepared by the International Hydrographic Bureau. INTRODUCTION. We have grouped below, in an alphabetical list, a collection of geographical common names and adjectives which, in practice, are generally not translated but are retained, in any case，in a form of transcription conforming* more or less to the original orthography, and which appear on the marine charts published or reproduced by the various countries. Lists of this kind are sometimes given in the topographical atlases on the charts of which a large number of geographical names are preserved in the form and with the orthography of the country to which they belong. The list which we have prepared from documents in the possession of the International Hydrographic Bureau, by adding the signification in French and English to each term, does not constitute a dictionary or a vocabulary. We have simply sought to avoid the omission of the most important terms relating to hydrography and for which terms a translation is generally not required on the reproductions. No special rule has been followed with regard to the transcription of names, owing to the lack of any common orthographic rule applicable to the phonetic transcription of all the languages, whether they use latin characters or not. Thus, one finds in the list, for instance, the Arabic word for m ountain given indiscriminately under the form of Jebel (English orthography) or D jebel (French orthography) or also Gebei (Italian orthography) etc. In order to partially remedy this defect it will suffice to invite attention to certain approximate phonetic equivalents, such as those indicated later on in our note.
    [Show full text]
  • LANDSCAPE STUDY of the ISLAND of CRES Local Development LOCAL DEVELOPMENT Pilot Project ISLAND of PILOT PROJECT “ISLAND CRES of CRES”
    Local development pilot project LANDSCAPE STUDY OF THE ISLAND OF CRES Local Development LOCAL DEVELOPMENT Pilot Project ISLAND OF PILOT PROJECT “ISLAND CRES OF CRES” PROJECT IMPLEMENTED BY: OTRA d.o.o. PROJECT FINANCIALLY SUPPORTED BY: Council of Europe Ministry of culture Primorje-Gorski kotar County Town of Cres ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document would not have been possible without cooperation and contribution of all the stakeholders involved in this project: Institutions: Ministry of culture of the Republic of Croatia │ Ministry of environmental and nature protection of the │ Republic of Croatia │ Oikon d.o.o. │ 3e projekti d.o.o. Members of the coordination team: dr. sc. Tatjana Lolić │ dr. sc. Ugo Toić │ Tanja Kremenić, mag. geogr. │ Mirna Bojić, dipl. ing. agr. │ dr. sc. Goran Andlar │ dr. sc. Biserka Dumbović-Bilušić │ mr. sc. Ksenija Petrić, dipl. ing. arh. │ Višnja Šteko, mag. ing. prosp. arch. Narrators: Inhabitants of the island of Cres and experts involved in this project LANDSCAPE STUDY OF THE ISLAND OF CRES Mentors: dr. sc. Goran Andlar, mag. ing. prosp. arch. Tanja Kremenić, mag. geogr. Miran Križanić, mag. ing. arh. Marija Borovičkić, mag. hist. art. et ethnol. et anthrop. Council of Europe consultant Alexis Gérard, krajobrazni arhitekt Executive team: Nikolina Krešo, mag. ing. prosp. arch. Marija Kušan, stud. prosp. arch. Ana Knežević, stud. prosp. arch. Anita Trojanović, stud. prosp. arch. Jure Čulić, mag. ing. prosp. arch. Mateja Leljak, mag. ing. prosp. arch. Dijana Krišto, stud. prosp. arch. Tanja Udovč, mag. ing. prosp. arch. Cres, December 2015 4 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................7 4.2. Landscape Unit Of The Town Of Cres .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Cyprinid Fish
    DFO - Library / MPO - Bibliotheque 01005886 c.i FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Biological Station, Nanaimo, B.C. Circular No. 65 RUSSIAN-ENGLISH GLOSSARY OF NAMES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL AND RELATED TERMS Compiled by W. E. Ricker Fisheries Research Board of Canada Nanaimo, B.C. August, 1962 FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Biological Station, Nanaimo, B0C. Circular No. 65 9^ RUSSIAN-ENGLISH GLOSSARY OF NAMES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL AND RELATED TERMS ^5, Compiled by W. E. Ricker Fisheries Research Board of Canada Nanaimo, B.C. August, 1962 FOREWORD This short Russian-English glossary is meant to be of assistance in translating scientific articles in the fields of aquatic biology and the study of fishes and fisheries. j^ Definitions have been obtained from a variety of sources. For the names of fishes, the text volume of "Commercial Fishes of the USSR" provided English equivalents of many Russian names. Others were found in Berg's "Freshwater Fishes", and in works by Nikolsky (1954), Galkin (1958), Borisov and Ovsiannikov (1958), Martinsen (1959), and others. The kinds of fishes most emphasized are the larger species, especially those which are of importance as food fishes in the USSR, hence likely to be encountered in routine translating. However, names of a number of important commercial species in other parts of the world have been taken from Martinsen's list. For species for which no recognized English name was discovered, I have usually given either a transliteration or a translation of the Russian name; these are put in quotation marks to distinguish them from recognized English names.
    [Show full text]
  • 61661147.Pdf
    Resource Inventory of Marine and Estuarine Fishes of the West Coast and Alaska: A Checklist of North Pacific and Arctic Ocean Species from Baja California to the Alaska–Yukon Border OCS Study MMS 2005-030 and USGS/NBII 2005-001 Project Cooperation This research addressed an information need identified Milton S. Love by the USGS Western Fisheries Research Center and the Marine Science Institute University of California, Santa Barbara to the Department University of California of the Interior’s Minerals Management Service, Pacific Santa Barbara, CA 93106 OCS Region, Camarillo, California. The resource inventory [email protected] information was further supported by the USGS’s National www.id.ucsb.edu/lovelab Biological Information Infrastructure as part of its ongoing aquatic GAP project in Puget Sound, Washington. Catherine W. Mecklenburg T. Anthony Mecklenburg Report Availability Pt. Stephens Research Available for viewing and in PDF at: P. O. Box 210307 http://wfrc.usgs.gov Auke Bay, AK 99821 http://far.nbii.gov [email protected] http://www.id.ucsb.edu/lovelab Lyman K. Thorsteinson Printed copies available from: Western Fisheries Research Center Milton Love U. S. Geological Survey Marine Science Institute 6505 NE 65th St. University of California, Santa Barbara Seattle, WA 98115 Santa Barbara, CA 93106 [email protected] (805) 893-2935 June 2005 Lyman Thorsteinson Western Fisheries Research Center Much of the research was performed under a coopera- U. S. Geological Survey tive agreement between the USGS’s Western Fisheries
    [Show full text]