Foreign Military Studies Office
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Human Rights Violations and Abuses in the Context of Protests in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela from 1 April to 31 July 2017
Human rights violations and abuses in the context of protests in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela from 1 April to 31 July 2017 Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Geneva, August 2017. Cover photo: An opposition protestor, draped in a flag, stands in front of military police in Caracas, 31 May 2017. Cover photo credit: © EPA/Miguel Gutiérrez Human rights violations and abuses in the context of protests in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela from 1 April to 31 July 2017 Report by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Executive summary On 6 June 2017, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) established a team to document and report on human rights violations in the context of mass protests in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela between 1 April and 31 July 2017. In the absence of authorization from the Government to enter the country, the OHCHR team conducted remote monitoring activities in the region that included 135 interviews with victims and their families, witnesses, representatives of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), journalists, lawyers, doctors, first responders and the Attorney- General’s Office. OHCHR received written information from the Ombudsperson’s Office and the Permanent Mission of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela to the United Nations in Geneva. OHCHR’s findings detailed in this report point to an increasingly critical human rights situation since the protests began, with mounting levels of repression of political dissent by national security forces, and increasing stigmatization and persecution of people perceived as opposing the Government of President Maduro. -
Iran to Build New Missile System?
MIDDLE EAST, NORTH AFRICA Iran to Build New Missile System? OE Watch Commentary: In the accompanying excerpt from “This system…destroyed many of the missiles that Tasnim News, an agency affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Mahmud Ebrahimnejad, the deputy were fired into Syria.” commander of the IRGC’s air defense wing (in Iran, air defense is a separate branch of the military, distinct from the air and ground forces), spoke about developing a domestic version of the Russian Pantsir missile system. Russia builds several variants of the Pantsir, a medium range surface-to-air missile and anti-aircraft weapon. Ebrahimnejad cited the Pantsir’s supposed success in shooting down missiles launched against regime targets in Syria. While there have been only limited airstrikes against Syrian bases and on Iranian facilities and encampments inside Syria, the openness with which Ebrahimnejad talks about copying systems for domestic production is noteworthy. Many Iranian weapons systems today come from Russia, but it is uncertain to what degree the Russian government tolerates the Iranian military industry’s reverse- engineering of its products. If Moscow disapproves of the potential Iranian Pantsir system, greater Russo-Iranian tension could be on 96K6 Pantsir-S (Military-technical forum ARMY-2018 - Demonstration). the horizon. End OE Watch Commentary (Rubin) Source: Vitaly Kuzmin Blog, https://www.vitalykuzmin.net/Military/ARMY-2018-Demonstration-part-2/i-Cbv5R3q, CC 4.0. Source: “Iran ‘Pantsir’ Misazad (Iran to build Pantsir),” Tasnim News, 14 September 2018. https://goo.gl/Sc3uZW This system, which has two 30 mm auto cannons and 12 missile launch pads has performed well in recent wars in the region, as it destroyed many of the missiles that were fired into Syria. -
NACHBRENNER 2020 Wissenswertes Aus Dem Bereich Militärluftfahrt Und Luftkriegsführung Nr
NACHBRENNER 2020 Wissenswertes aus dem Bereich Militärluftfahrt und Luftkriegsführung Nr. 122 vom 31. Mai 2020 «Air2030: Folgenschwere Konsequenzen bei einem NEIN zum Grundsatzentscheid» Divisionär Bernhard Müller, Kdt Luftwaffe im Interview mit Oberst i Gst Hans-Peter Erni, SC NKF LW in der Juni Ausgabe der ASMZ Sie sind jeweils an die jährliche International Air Chiefs Conference geladen. Wie wird die Beschaffung des Schweizer NKF beobachtet? Was sind Meinungen bei einem allfällig negativen Ausgang der Abstimmung? „Die europäischen Air Chiefs schauen mit viel Interesse auf die Schweiz und ihren speziellen politischen Prozess. Verständlicherweise werben sie für die Vorzüge der eigenen Wahl, jedoch sind keine Druckversuche oder Einmischung spürbar. Ausnahmslos sind alle überzeugt, dass die Erneuerung der Kampfflugzeugflotten von hoher Dringlichkeit ist, weil sich die Sicherheitslage an den Rändern von Europa eindeutig verschlechtert. Ich bin überzeugt: Falls die «reiche» Schweiz zukünftig keinen Beitrag mehr zu ihrer eigenen Verteidigungsfähigkeit leistet, würde dies unsere internationale und hoch angesehene Position negativ beeinträchtigen.“ (Vollständiges Interview siehe Meldung NACHBRENNER 122-156) Farbcode Meldungen: Pflichtlektüre Besondere Beachtung verdient: Schweiz oder entsprechender Bezug Hot Spot: Nutzen Sie die PDF-Suchfunktion mit Hilfe von Stichwörtern, z.B. dem Ländercode für das rasche Auffinden von Sie besonders interessierenden Informationen! Quelle: Ländercode: Schlüsselinformationen: Datum: Artikelname: Nr. Mdg: Air2030 -
Operation Odyssey Dawn SPEND MORE TIME in the AIR - the Collapse of Libya’S Relic Air Defence System
DEFENCEFOCUS. SAVING MONEY ON THE GROUND SO HE CAN Operation Odyssey Dawn SPEND MORE TIME IN THE AIR - the collapse of Libya’s relic air defence system Dr Carlo Kopp Gaddafi’s timing in terms of having a civil war in Libya was ‘impeccably bad. Had Odyssey Dawn been initiated in 2 to 3 years time, NATO aircraft would have been seriously challenged, especially by the five-minute ‘shoot and scoot’ SA-20B batteries with long range jam resistant SAMs. ’ SA-6 Gainful SAM system. WHEN public unrest in Libya exploded The public debate surrounding these events, Libya’s most active fighter base, Ghardabiya AB into civil war Libya was only months especially in Washington and Europe, has largely near Surt, was attacked on March 20 by three B-2A been predictable. The Russians have objected Spirit bombers operating with tanker support from away from launching a deep upgrade loudly over the NATO action, as they have just Whitman AFB in Missouri. Jamming support was and rebuild of its relic 1980s Soviet- lost billions of dollars in military hardware sales provided by US Navy EA-18G Growlers. Concrete style air defence system, using the and tens of billions in long term support business, piercing GBU-31/BLU-116/B 2,000 lb JDAMs were upgrades and follow-on sales. delivered against the Hardened Aircraft Shelters latest Russian technology. When the In Washington, apologists for Secretary of Defence destroying these and aircraft in situ. United Nations declared a no-fly zone Robert Gates argued loudly that there is no need At this point Libya’s IADS was declared inoperative, and NATO nations and the United for advanced upper tier air power, and that and NATO aircraft swung to interdiction operations States responded in earnest, Libya’s aircraft such as the Joint Strike Fighter and Super against Gaddafi’s loyalist forces, with most attacks Hornet are more than adequate for expeditionary against armour, logistics, and naval vessels. -
Safe Havens in Syria: Missions and Requirements for an Air Campaign
SSP Working Paper July 2012 Safe Havens in Syria: Missions and Requirements for an Air Campaign Brian T. Haggerty Security Studies Program Department of Political Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology [email protected] Copyright © July 15, 2012 by Brian T. Haggerty. This working paper is in draft form and intended for the purposes of discussion and comment. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies are available from the author at [email protected]. Thanks to Noel Anderson, Mark Bell, Christopher Clary, Owen Cote, Col. Phil Haun, USAF, Col. Lance A. Kildron, USAF, Barry Posen, Lt. Col. Karl Schloer, USAF, Sidharth Shah, Josh Itzkowitz Shifrinson, Alec Worsnop and members of MIT’s Strategic Use of Force Working Group for their comments and suggestions. All errors are my own. This is a working draft: comments and suggestions are welcome. Introduction Air power remains the arm of choice for Western policymakers contemplating humanitarian military intervention. Although the early 1990s witnessed ground forces deployed to northern Iraq, Somalia, and Haiti to protect civilians and ensure the provision of humanitarian aid, interveners soon embraced air power for humanitarian contingencies. In Bosnia, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO’s) success in combining air power with local ground forces to coerce the Serbs to the negotiating table at Dayton in 1995 suggested air power could help provide an effective response to humanitarian crises that minimized the risks of armed intervention.1 And though NATO’s -
IHRC Submission on Bolivia
VIOLATIONS OF THE RIGHT TO LIFE, RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, RIGHT TO ASSEMBLY & ASSOCIATION, AND OTHERS: ONGOING HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BOLIVIA Submission to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions from Harvard Law School’s International Human Rights Clinic Cc: Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers Special Rapporteur on the f reedom of opinion and expression Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and association Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous peoples Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism The International Human Rights Clinic (IHRC) at Harvard Law School seeks to protect and promote human rights and internation-al humanitarian law through documentation; legal, factual, and stra-tegic analysis; litigation before national, regional, and internation-al bodies; treaty negotiations; and policy and advocacy initiatives. Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations to the U.N. Special Rapporteurs ........................................................................... 2 Facts ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Background on the Current Crisis ........................................................................................................ 3 State Violence Against Protesters -
East Asian Strategic Review 2019
East Asian Strategic Review 2019 East Asian Strategic Review 2019 The National Institute for Defense Studies, Japan ISBN978-4-86482-074-5 Printed in Japan East Asian Strategic Review 2019 The National Institute for Defense Studies Japan Copyright © 2019 by the National Institute for Defense Studies First edition: July 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced in any form without written, prior permission from the National Institute for Defense Studies. This publication is an English translation of the original Japanese edition published in April 2019. EASR 2019 comprises NIDS researchers’ analyses and descriptions based on information compiled from open sources in Japan and overseas. The statements contained herein do not necessarily represent the official position of the Government of Japan or the Ministry of Defense. Edited by: The National Institute for Defense Studies 5-1 Ichigaya Honmura-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8808, Japan URL: http://www.nids.mod.go.jp Translated and Published by: Urban Connections Osaki Bright Core 15F, 5-15, Kitashinagawa 5-chome, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141-0001, Japan Phone: +81-3-6432-5691 URL: https://urbanconnections.jp/en/ ISBN 978-4-86482-074-5 The National Institute for Defense Studies East Asian Strategic Review 2019 Printed in Japan Cover photo Japan-India joint exercise (JIMEX18) (JMSDF Maritime Staff Office) Eighth Japan-Australia 2+2 Foreign and Defence Ministerial Consultations (Japan Ministry of Defense) F-35A fighter (JASDF Air Staff Office) Preface This edition of the East Asian Strategic Review (EASR) marks the twenty-third year of the flagship publication of the National Institute for Defense Studies (NIDS), Japan’s sole national think tank in the area of security affairs. -
European Cybersecurity Journal
European Cybersecurity Journal 1 The European yersecurity Journal E European is a specialised publication devoted to cybersecurity. The main goal of the Journal is to provide concrete Cybersecurity policy recommendations for European decision-makers Journal and raise awareness on both issues and problem- -solving instruments. Strategic perspectives on cybersecurity management and public policies Editorial Board Chief Editor: Associate Editors: Barbara Sztokfisz ESE roramme Izabela Albrycht hairperson Director, the Kosciuszko Institute the Kosciuszko Institute Executive Editors: Marta Przywała – Non-resident Research Fellow, the Kosciuszko Institute Faustine Felici ESE roject anaer the Kosciuszko Institute Design & DTP: Michał Rekowski Strateic artnerships anaer Joanna Świerad-Solińska the Kosciuszko Institute Proofreading: Honorary Members Adam Ladziński Of The Editorial Board: Dr James Andrew Lewis irector and Senior ISSN: 2450-21113 ellow o the Strateic Technoloies roram Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) Citations: This journal should be cited as follows: European yersecurity ournal Dr Joanna Świątkowska roramme irector Volume 6 (2020) Issue 1, page reference European yersecurity orum ESE Senior Fellow, the Kosciuszko Institute Members Of The Editorial Board: Published by: The Kosciuszko Institute Alexander Klimburg irector loal ommission ul. Feldmana 4/9-10 on the Stability of Cyberspace Initiative and 31-130 Kraków Secretariat irector yer olicy and esilience roram The aue entre or Strateic Studies Phone: 00 48 12 632 97 24 E-mail: [email protected] Helena Raud emer o the oard European Cybersecurity Initiative Printed in Poland Keir Giles – Director, Conflict Studies Research entre S Disclaimer: The views expressed in articles are the authors' and not necessarily those of the Kosciuszko Institute. -
Interdisciplinary Group of Independent Experts
Report on the violent events Report on the violent events that took place that took place between between April 18th and May 30th, 2018. April 18th and May 30th, 2018 Interdisciplinary Group of Independent Experts GRUPOINTERDGRUPO I SCIPLINARY INTERDISCIPLINARIOGROUPINTERDISCIPLINARIO OF DEINDEPENDENTDE EXPERTOS EXPERTOS INDEPENDIENTESEINDEPENDIENTESXPERTS InformeReportInforme sobre onsobre the los los violent hechos hechos events de de violencia violencia that ocurridos tookocurridos place entre entre between el el 18 18 de de April abril abril 18 y y thel el and30 30 de de May mayo mayo 30 de deth, 2018 20182018 2 3 4.2. Escalation of protests and violations of rights (April 19th to 22nd) INDEX 4.3. Continuous popular dissatisfaction and repression. Institutional responses to the crisis (April 23rd to May 16th) 4.4. Beginning of dialogue and international presence (May 16th to 29th) 4.5. International agreement and upsurge of repression (May 30th) 4.6. Process of negotiations PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS 16 VI. VIOLENT EVENTS BETWEEN APRIL 18th AND MAY 30th 63 CONTENTS OF THE REPORT 18 A. DESCRIPTION I. 1. Events examined by the GIEI B. EVENTS EXAMINED BY THE GIEI II. COMPOSITION AND MANDATE OF THE INTERDISCIPLINARY 22 1. Demonstrations in public spaces 80 GROUP OF INDEPENDENT EXPERTS (GIEI) 1.1. April 18th, 2018 - Protests in the city of León - Protests at Camino de Oriente, Managua - Protests at Centro-Americana University, Managua III. COOPERATION AND LIMITATIONS TO THE 27 - Conclusion 1.2. Attacks during protests and fires in León WORK OF THE GIEI - Beginning of protests on April 18th A. STATE DID NOT COLABORATE AND DENIED THE INFORMATION - April 19th: “we are going to destroy you” REQUESTED BY THE GIEI - April 20th: coordinated action between the National Police 1. -
Protecting Russia 25 6.1 Pre-Nuclear Deterrence 26 6.2 Pre-Nuclear Deterrence in Escalation Dominance 28
FFI-RAPPORT 17/00979 Russia in the Precision-Strike regime – military theory, procurement and operational impact - Roger N. McDermott Tor Bukkvoll Russia in the Precision-Strike regime – military theory, procurement and operational impact Roger N. McDermott Tor Bukkvoll Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI) 1 August 2017 FFI-RAPPORT 17/00979 1 Keywords Russland Presisjonsvåpen Kryssermissiler Raketter FFI-rapport FFI-RAPPORT 17/00979 Prosjektnummer 1350 ISBN P: 978-82-464-2950-2 E: 978-82-464-2951-9 Approved by Sigurd Glærum, Research Manager Espen Skjelland, Director 2 FFI-RAPPORT 17/00979 Summary This is a report about Russian thinking on the use of conventional high-precision weapons. It explains how this debate has developed in Russia since its inception in the mid-1980s, and analyses what Russian military theory has to say about high-precision weapons today and what their significance is likely to be for future warfare. Russian military and military analysts were in fact some of the most important pioneers internationally in this regard. Their problem was that they had little chance to implement their ideas in their own armed forces. Because of the fall of communism and the Soviet Union, Russia entered an economic crisis that meant there was no money for arms purchases. In addition, political relations with the West in the 1990s and early 2000s were good. This meant that in terms of Russian security there was not that much need for high-precision weapons. There were programs for the development of such weapons throughout this period, but the Russian armed forces started to actually achieve operational conventional cruise missiles only in 2010. -
Environment Scan 01-13 May 2019 China
ENVIRONMENT SCAN 01-13 MAY 2019 CHINA (Geo-Strat, Geo-Politics & Geo-Economics) Brig RK Bhutani (Retd) US – China Trade War: Both Sides Facing Growing Domestic Pressures. On 13th May, China’s announced higher tariffs on US$60 billion in US goods – in response to the Trump administration’s 25 per cent tariffs on US$200 billion in Chinese goods on 10 May – suggests that both sides are facing growing domestic pressures, reducing room to manoeuvre and increasing uncertainty, say analysts, farmers and industrialists. According to Bonnie Glaser, senior Asia adviser at the Washington-based Centre for Strategic and International Studies think tank, “Both sides are analysing their own economies, domestic pressures, the global situation and both think they have the upper hand, which doesn’t bode well for an agreement.” He further added, “The longer this goes on, the more global the impact is going to be, not just affecting the US economy.” China had appeared close to agreeing on a deal a week ago that included an inventory of laws and regulations Beijing must revise before it reversed and changed the terms, according to Trump administration officials who accused Beijing of reneging. However, China’s top negotiator, Vice-Premier Liu He, denied any bad-faith moves in an interview with the Hong Kong-based Phoenix Television, stating, “So we don't think that China has backtracked or ‘reneged’,” Liu said. “It’s just that there was some disagreement over how certain things should be worded on paper.” The sudden reversal by China, however, suggests that the administration of President Xi Jinping is increasingly worried that it would look weak domestically if it appeared to cave in to US demands, some analysts said. -
Computational Conflict Research
Computational Social Sciences Emanuel Deutschmann Jan Lorenz Luis G. Nardin Davide Natalini Adalbert F. X. Wilhelm Editors Computational Con ict Research Computational Social Sciences Computational Social Sciences A series of authored and edited monographs that utilize quantitative and compu- tational methods to model, analyze and interpret large-scale social phenomena. Titles within the series contain methods and practices that test and develop theories of complex social processes through bottom-up modeling of social interactions. Of particular interest is the study of the co-evolution of modern communication technology and social behavior and norms, in connection with emerging issues such as trust, risk, security and privacy in novel socio-technical environments. Computational Social Sciences is explicitly transdisciplinary: quantitative methods from fields such as dynamical systems, artificial intelligence, network theory, agent- based modeling, and statistical mechanics are invoked and combined with state-of- the-art mining and analysis of large data sets to help us understand social agents, their interactions on and offline, and the effect of these interactions at the macro level. Topics include, but are not limited to social networks and media, dynamics of opinions, cultures and conflicts, socio-technical co-evolution and social psychology. Computational Social Sciences will also publish monographs and selected edited contributions from specialized conferences and workshops specifically aimed at communicating new findings to a large transdisciplinary audience. A fundamental goal of the series is to provide a single forum within which commonalities and differences in the workings of this field may be discerned, hence leading to deeper insight and understanding. Series Editors: Elisa Bertino Larry S.