DOCSLIB.ORG

Upper Quinault River Salmon Restoration NEPA Compliance; Environmental Assessment – FINAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

7/19/2011 Upper Quinault River Salmon Habitat Restoration NEPA Compliance FINAL This National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance document, in the form of an Environmental Assessment (EA) addresses the restoration of salmon habitat of the Upper Quinault River located within the geologic floodplain of the Quinault River (coastal Washington State, in the west slope of the Olympic Mountains). This EA considers the preferred alternative of installing Engineered Logjams and restorative planting of conifer and hardwood trees to meet the goals of improving river processes and salmon habitat,habitat, especially for BluebackBlueback salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). This NEPA Compliance document has been prepared by the Quinault Indian Nation with the Bureau of Indian Affairs servingserving as the Lead Federal Agency Quinault Indian Nation | FINAL William E. Schlosser, William E. Armstrong, Birgit R. Schlosser Quinault Indian Nation Quinault Indian Nation 7/19/2011 2 Upper Quinault River Salmon Habitat Restoration NEPA Compliance Quinault Indian Nation | FINAL This Quinault Indian Nation Environmental Assessment is completed in cooperation with the Bureau of Indian Affairs for the fulfilment of National Environmental Policy Act requirements to implement salmon habitat restoration in the Upper Quinault River in Coastal Washington State of the Olympic Mountains. Quinault Indian Nation William E. (Bill) Armstrong, B.S. Salmon Resources Scientist, Department of Fisheries, Division of Natural Resources P.O. Box 189 1214 Aalis St. Building C Taholah, WA 98587 Planning services and document lead authorship provided by William E. (Dr. Bill) Schlosser, Ph.D. Kamiak Ridge, LLC 1515 NW Kenny Dr. Pullman, WA 99163 www.Resource-Analysis.com This planning effort has been completed with the consultation of a Planning Committee comprised of representatives of administrative Divisions from the Quinault Indian Nation, representatives from adjacent government agencies including the offices of Congressman Norm Dicks, Olympic National Forest, Olympic National Park, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Survey, NOAA Restoration Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Ecology, Jefferson County, Grays Harbor County, The Nature Conservancy, The Wild Salmon Center, Upper Quinault River Committee, and planning consultants from Kamiak Ridge, LLC. Quinault Indian Nation | FINAL ii Upper Quinault River Salmon Habitat Restoration NEPA Compliance Epigraph Joe DeLaCruz, President, Quinault Indian Nation (Storm, et al. 1990) Quinault Indian Nation | FINAL Upper Quinault River Salmon Habitat Restoration NEPA Compliance iii Significant Analyses Incorporated by Reference Two notable guiding documents have been developed to address the Upper Quinault River, the historical process of resource degradation, potential restoration activities to recover the sockeye (Blueback) salmon, and other salmonid species in the river ecosystem, and both are hereby incorporated in this document by reference. These documents, along with others, are cited within this Environmental Assessment to provide the scientific basis for implementing actions intended to achieve the desired future condition. These two documents provide the foundation for analyzing the expected outcomes of the river restoration and salmon habitat restoration in the Upper Quinault River. Bureau of Reclamation. (2005). Geomorphic Investigation of Quinault River, Washington; 18 Km Reach of Quinault River Upstream from Lake Quinault. Denver, Colorado: US Bureau of Reclamation. Quinault Indian Nation. (2008). Salmon Habitat Restoration Plan; Upper Quinault River. Quinault Indian Nation, QDNR, Department of Fisheries. Taholah, Washington: Including contributions by Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. The Geomorphic Investigation of Quinault River conducted by the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) identified and examined the causes and scale of habitat loss; the restoration plan identified the restoration strategy and approach necessary to achieve salmon habitat restoration. The BOR evaluated the current large-scale physical river processes (its past and present shape, or morphology) against the background of available historical data, and analyzed the rates of change in that morphology as influenced by the river’s hydrology, its sediment supply, existing vegetation, human impacts, and geological controls on the valley system. These were evaluated with the final conclusion that further degradation of the river is inevitable due to its inability, if left on its own, to heal itself, thus providing a necessary basis for the identification and implementation of the recommended integrated restoration strategies on the Upper Quinault River that will lead to a more self-sustaining system. The Salmon Habitat Restoration Plan – Upper Quinault River, describes in detail the scientific basis and a procedural framework initiated in the wake of the BOR geomorphic study for actions, local in nature and short-term in perspective, which are aimed at sockeye spawning habitat restoration, along with what is described as the long-term ultimate objective involving the entire floodplain: To recapture the initially existing natural balance within the river system, the essence of which lies in tying together physical and biological processes of the entire floodplain that results in a healthy functioning ecosystem. Quinault Indian Nation | FINAL iv Upper Quinault River Salmon Habitat Restoration NEPA Compliance Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................1 1.1. Background ........................................................................................................................4 1.2. Purpose and Need for Action ...............................................................................................7 1.3. Desired Future Condition.....................................................................................................9 2. Alternatives ...................................................................................................................... 11 2.1. Alternatives Considered but Not Analyzed in Detail............................................................. 11 2.1.1. Infrastructure Modification / Improvement ................................................................... 11 2.2. Alternatives Considered .................................................................................................... 12 2.2.1. No Action Alternative ................................................................................................... 12 2.2.2. Action Alternative 1 (Preferred Alternative) ................................................................... 13 2.2.2.1. Engineered Logjam Structural Design .......................................................................... 15 A. Log Jam Materials.............................................................................................. 17 B. Labor Recruitment............................................................................................. 18 2.2.2.2. Floodplain and Terrace Forest Restoration .................................................................. 18 A. Reforestation Designs ........................................................................................ 19 B. Seedling Materials ............................................................................................. 21 C. Labor Recruitment............................................................................................. 21 2.2.2.3. Access, Storage Sites, and Staging Areas ..................................................................... 21 2.2.2.4. Combining Restoration Components........................................................................... 22 2.2.3. Action Alternative 2 ..................................................................................................... 25 2.2.4. Action Alternative 3 ..................................................................................................... 26 3. Description of Affected Environment.................................................................................. 27 3.1. Land Resources ................................................................................................................. 27 3.1.1. Geologic Setting ........................................................................................................... 27 3.1.2. Climate........................................................................................................................ 28 3.1.2.1. Global Climate Change ............................................................................................... 29 3.1.2.2. Post-Glaciation Climate Change .................................................................................. 31 3.1.2.3. Precipitation and Ecosystems ..................................................................................... 34 3.1.3. Topography ................................................................................................................. 35 Quinault Indian Nation | FINAL Upper Quinault River Salmon Habitat Restoration NEPA Compliance v 3.1.4. Soil Resources .............................................................................................................. 36 3.1.4.1.
Recommended publications
  • Socioeconomic Monitoring of the Olympic National Forest and Three Local Communities

    Socioeconomic Monitoring of the Olympic National Forest and Three Local Communities

    NORTHWEST FOREST PLAN THE FIRST 10 YEARS (1994–2003) Socioeconomic Monitoring of the Olympic National Forest and Three Local Communities Lita P. Buttolph, William Kay, Susan Charnley, Cassandra Moseley, and Ellen M. Donoghue General Technical Report United States Forest Pacific Northwest PNW-GTR-679 Department of Service Research Station July 2006 Agriculture The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the National Forests and National Grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all pro- grams.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rdv: 8-W5) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See Instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the Instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name Mickelson, Die, CJabm other names/site number IN/A 2. Location street & number Lot 4o, soutn snore Lalce Uumauit EH not for publication city, town Qumault 0 vicinity state Washington code WA county TJrays Harbor code U2T zlpcodefy57r 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property B3 private ES building(s) Contributing Noncontributing CU public-local D district 2 _ buildings D public-State D site _ _ sites B3 public-Federal O structure _ _ structures CH object objects 2~ U~ Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously N/A listed in the National Register N/A 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this C3 nomination d request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
  • Outline of United States Federal Indian Law and Policy

    Outline of United States Federal Indian Law and Policy

    Outline of United States federal Indian law and policy The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to United States federal Indian law and policy: Federal Indian policy – establishes the relationship between the United States Government and the Indian Tribes within its borders. The Constitution gives the federal government primary responsibility for dealing with tribes. Law and U.S. public policy related to Native Americans have evolved continuously since the founding of the United States. David R. Wrone argues that the failure of the treaty system was because of the inability of an individualistic, democratic society to recognize group rights or the value of an organic, corporatist culture represented by the tribes.[1] U.S. Supreme Court cases List of United States Supreme Court cases involving Indian tribes Citizenship Adoption Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989) Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 530 U.S. _ (2013) Tribal Ex parte Joins, 191 U.S. 93 (1903) Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978) Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989) South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993) Civil rights Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 435 U.S. 191 (1978) United States v. Wheeler, 435 U.S. 313 (1978) Congressional authority Ex parte Joins, 191 U.S. 93 (1903) White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980) California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987) South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993) United States v.
  • 1 CLIMATE PLAN for the QUILEUTE TRIBE of the QUILEUTE RESERVATION La Push, Washington, 9/30/2016 Prepared by Katherine Krueger

    1 CLIMATE PLAN for the QUILEUTE TRIBE of the QUILEUTE RESERVATION La Push, Washington, 9/30/2016 Prepared by Katherine Krueger

    1 CLIMATE PLAN FOR THE QUILEUTE TRIBE OF THE QUILEUTE RESERVATION La Push, Washington, 9/30/2016 Prepared by Katherine Krueger, Quileute Natural Resources, B.S., M.S., J.D. in Performance of US EPA Grant Funds FYs 2015‐2016 TABLE of CONTENTS Preface 2 Executive Summary 4 Introduction to Geography and Governance 6 Risk Assessment 8 Scope of the Plan 10 Assessment of Resources and Threats, with Recommendations 14 Metadata and Tools 14 Sea Level Change 15 Terrestrial (Land) Environment 19 Fresh Water (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) 21 Marine Environment 32 Impact on Infrastructure/Facilities 46 Cultural Impacts 49 Appendix 50 Recommendations Summarized 50 Maps 52 Research to Correct the Planet 56 Hazard Work Sheets 57 Resources and Acknowledgements 59 2 Preface: It is important to understand the difference between weather and climate. Weather forecasts cover perhaps two weeks, and if extending into a season, a few months, or even a few years, but climate is weather over decades or even centuries. The National Academies of Sciences put on a slide show about this in March of 2016, in anticipation of their book to be published later this year entitled Next Generation Earth System Prediction. Researchers want to extend weather forecasting capacity, based on modeling, using vast accumulations of prior data, because weather affects so many aspects of our economy. So when we have a summer of unusual drought or a year of constant rain that extends all summer long, it is premature to call this climate change. But when we measure increases of global temperature averages over decades, or see planet‐wide loss of continental ice over decades, we can make statements about climate.
  • 2018-05-21 Makah Cert Petition and Appendix

    2018-05-21 Makah Cert Petition and Appendix

    No. _______ In the Supreme Court of the United States MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE, Petitioner, v. QUILEUTE INDIAN TRIBE AND QUINAULT INDIAN NATION, ET AL., Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI GREGORY G. GARRE MARC D. SLONIM BENJAMIN W. SNYDER Counsel of Record LATHAM & WATKINS LLP ZIONTZ CHESTNUT 555 Eleventh Street, NW 2101 Fourth Avenue Suite 1000 Suite 1230 Washington, DC 20004 Seattle, WA 98121 202 637-2207 (206) 448-1230 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner QUESTION PRESENTED On the same day in 1859, the Senate ratified several treaties between the United States and Indian tribes in western Washington. The Treaty of Neah Bay secured to the Makah Indian Tribe the “right of taking fish and of whaling or sealing at usual and accustomed grounds and stations.” The Treaty of Olympia secured to the Quileute Indian Tribe and Quinault Indian Nation, the southern neighbors of Makah along the Washington coast, the “right of taking fish at all usual and accustomed grounds and stations.” Unlike the Treaty of Neah Bay, the Treaty of Olympia expressed only a “right of taking fish”; it did not reference “whaling or sealing.” In this case, the Ninth Circuit held the “right of taking fish” in the Treaty of Olympia includes a right of whaling and sealing. Then, the Ninth Circuit held Quileute and Quinault’s “usual and accustomed” fishing grounds under the treaty extend beyond the areas in which the Tribes customarily fished to areas in which they hunted “‘marine mammals—including whales and fur seals.’” App.
  • Where the Salmon Run: the Life and Legacy of Billy Frank Jr

    Where the Salmon Run: the Life and Legacy of Billy Frank Jr

    LEGACY PROJECT A century-old feud over tribal fishing ignited brawls along Northwest rivers in the 1960s. Roughed up, belittled, and handcuffed on the banks of the Nisqually River, Billy Frank Jr. emerged as one of the most influential Indians in modern history. Inspired by his father and his heritage, the elder united rivals and survived personal trials in his long career to protect salmon and restore the environment. Courtesy Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission salmon run salmon salmon run salmon where the where the “I hope this book finds a place in every classroom and library in Washington State. The conflicts over Indian treaty rights produced a true warrior/states- man in the person of Billy Frank Jr., who endured personal tragedies and setbacks that would have destroyed most of us.” TOM KEEFE, former legislative director for Senator Warren Magnuson Courtesy Hank Adams collection “This is the fascinating story of the life of my dear friend, Billy Frank, who is one of the first people I met from Indian Country. He is recognized nationally as an outstanding Indian leader. Billy is a warrior—and continues to fight for the preservation of the salmon.” w here the Senator DANIEL K. INOUYE s almon r un heffernan the life and legacy of billy frank jr. Trova Heffernan University of Washington Press Seattle and London ISBN 978-0-295-99178-8 909 0 000 0 0 9 7 8 0 2 9 5 9 9 1 7 8 8 Courtesy Michael Harris 9 780295 991788 LEGACY PROJECT Where the Salmon Run The Life and Legacy of Billy Frank Jr.
  • Seattle Times Building Complex—Printing Plant 1930-31; Addition, 1947

    Seattle Times Building Complex—Printing Plant 1930-31; Addition, 1947

    Seattle Times Building Complex—Printing Plant 1930-31; Addition, 1947 1120 John Street 1986200525 see attached page D.T. Denny’s 5th Add. 110 7-12 Onni Group Vacant 300 - 550 Robson Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 2B7 The Blethen Corporation (C. B. Blethen) (The Seattle Times) Printing plant and offices Robert C. Reamer (Metropolitan Building Corporation) , William F. Fey, (Metro- politan Building Corporation) Teufel & Carlson Seattle Times Building Complex—Printing Plant Landmark Nomination, October 2014 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 7 THROUGH 12 IN BLOCK 110, D.T. DENNY’S FIFTH ADDITION TO NORTH SEAT- TLE, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 202, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; AND TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF THE DONATION CLAIM OF D.T. DENNY AND LOUIS DENNY, HIS WIFE, AND GOVERNMENT LOT 7 IN THE SOUTH- EAST CORNER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 25, RANGE 4 EAST, W. M., LYING WEST- ERLY OF FAIRVIEW AVENUE NORTH, AS CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 204496, AS PROVIDE BY ORDINANCE NO. 51975, AND DESCRIBED AS THAT PORTION LYING SOUTHERLY OF THOMAS STREET AS CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 2103211, NORTHERLY OF JOHN STREET, AND EASTERLY OF THE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 110; AND TOGETHER WITH THE VACATED ALLEY IN BLOCK 110 OF SAID PLAT OF D.T. DENNY’S FIFTH ADDITION, VACATED UNDER SEATTLE ORDINANCE NO. 89750; SITUATED IN CITY OF SEATTLE, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Evan Lewis, ONNI GROUP 300 - 550 Robson Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 2B7 T: (604) 602-7711, [email protected] Seattle Times Building Complex-Printing Plant Landmark Nomination Report 1120 John Street, Seattle, WA October 2014 Prepared by: The Johnson Partnership 1212 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-6724 206-523-1618, www.tjp.us Seattle Times Building Complex—Printing Plant Landmark Nomination Report October 2014, page i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.
  • Implementation on the Tribal Self-Governance Demonstration Project, Hearing Before the Committee on Indian Affairs, United

    Implementation on the Tribal Self-Governance Demonstration Project, Hearing Before the Committee on Indian Affairs, United

    DEPOSITORY — JUSTICE DEPT. LIBRARY S. HRG. 103-441 IMPLEMENTATION ON THE TRIBAL SELF­ GOVERNANCE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED THIRD CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON OVERSIGHT HEARING ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SELF-GOVERN­ ANCE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ACT BY THE BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS AND THE INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE DO NOT REMOVE OCTOBER 20, 1993 WASHINGTON, DC DEPOSITORY U.S. Dept. of Justice Main Library DEPT. OF JUSTICE APR 28 1994 MAIN LIBRARY U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 73-594 WASHINGTON : 1994 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 ISBN 0-16-043987-6 COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii, Chairman JOHN McCAIN, Arizona, Vice Chairman DENNIS DeCONCINI, Arizona FRANK MURKOWSKI, Alaska THOMAS A. DASCHLE, South Dakota THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi KENT CONRAD, North Dakota SLADE GORTON, Washington HARRY REID, Nevada PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico PAUL SIMON, Illinois NANCY LANDON KASSEBAUM, Kansas DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii DON NICKLES, Oklahoma PAUL WELLSTONE, Minnesota MARK O. HATFIELD, Oregon BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado PATRICIA M. ZELL, Staff Director DANIEL N. LEWIS, Minority Staff Director (II) CONTENTS __________ Page Statements: Allen, William Ron, chairman, Jamestown Band of S'Klallam Indians, Sequim, WA 10 Anderson, Marge, chairperson, Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians, Onamia, MN 25 Campbell, Hon. Ben Nighthorse, U.S. Senator from Colorado
  • QIN Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report

    QIN Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report

    Quinault Indian Nation Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report Quinault Indian Nation Taholah, Washington March 2017 Quinault Indian Nation Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report Project Information Project: QIN Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report Prepared for: Quinault Indian Community Development and Planning Department Charles Warsinske, Planning Manager Carl Smith, Environmental Planner Jesse Cardenas, Project Manager American Community Enrichment Reviewing Agency Jurisdiction: Quinault Indian Nation, made possible by a grant from Administration for Native Americans (ANA) Project Representative Prepared by: SCJ Alliance 8730 Tallon Lane NE, Suite 200 SCJ Alliance teaming with AECOM Lacey, Washington 98516 360.352.1465 scjalliance.com Contact: Lisa Palazzi, PWS, CPSS Project Reference: SCJ #2328.01 QIN Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report 03062107 March 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Purpose ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Shoreline Analysis Areas (SAAs) Overview ................................................................. 3 1.3 Opportunities for Restoration .................................................................................... 4 2. Methodology .............................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Baseline Data
  • Butler Hansen a Trailblazing Washington Politician John C

    Butler Hansen a Trailblazing Washington Politician John C

    Julia Butler Hansen A trailblazing Washington politician John C. Hughes Julia Butler Hansen A trailblazing Washington politician John C. Hughes First Edition Second Printing Copyright © 2020 Legacy Washington Office of the Secretary of State All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-889320-45-8 Ebook ISBN 978-1-889320-44-1 Front cover photo: John C. Hughes Back cover photo: Hansen Family Collection Book Design by Amber Raney Cover Design by Amber Raney and Laura Mott Printed in the United States of America by Gorham Printing, Centralia, Washington Also by John C. Hughes: On the Harbor: From Black Friday to Nirvana, with Ryan Teague Beckwith Booth Who? A Biography of Booth Gardner Nancy Evans, First-Rate First Lady Lillian Walker, Washington State Civil Rights Pioneer The Inimitable Adele Ferguson Slade Gorton, a Half Century in Politics John Spellman: Politics Never Broke His Heart Pressing On: Two Family-Owned Newspapers in the 21st Century Washington Remembers World War II, with Trova Heffernan Korea 65, the Forgotten War Remembered, with Trova Heffernan and Lori Larson 1968: The Year that Rocked Washington, with Bob Young and Lori Larson Ahead of the Curve: Washington Women Lead the Way, 1910-2020, with Bob Young Legacy Washington is dedicated to preserving the history of Washington and its continuing story. www.sos.wa.gov/legacy For Bob Bailey, Alan Thompson and Peter Jackson Julia poses at the historic site sign outside the Wahkiakum County Courthouse in 1960. Alan Thompson photo Contents Preface: “Like money in the bank” 6 Introduction: “Julia Who?” 10 Chapter 1: “Just Plain Me” 17 Chapter 2: “Quite a bit of gumption” 25 Chapter 3: Grief compounded 31 Chapter 4: “Oh! Dear Diary” 35 Chapter 5: Paddling into politics 44 Chapter 6: Smart enough, too 49 Chapter 7: Hopelessly disgusted 58 Chapter 8: To the last ditch 65 Chapter 9: The fighter remains 73 Chapter 10: Lean times 78 Chapter 11: “Mrs.
  • Environmental Assessment for 2020 Ocean Salmon Management

    Environmental Assessment for 2020 Ocean Salmon Management

    Preface to the Final Environmental Assessment for 2020 Ocean Salmon Fisheries Management Measures (RIN 0648-BJ48) The development of annual management measures for West Coast salmon fisheries is a well-documented and public process. Alternatives for annual management measures are developed at the March meeting of the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council). At this meeting, the previous year’s fisheries are reviewed, and alternatives are developed for the current year’s fisheries after considering projected stock abundances, conservation objectives in the Fishery Management Plan (FMP), and compliance with the Endangered Species Act (ESA), Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), and other relevant laws, as well as international agreements under the Pacific Salmon Treaty (PST). Public meetings are held in Washington, Oregon, and California in late March to give the public the opportunity to provide comments on the alternatives. The Council meets again in April to consider public and agency input on the alternatives and to develop and adopt a preferred alternative. Environmental impacts of the preferred alternative are within the range of impacts analyzed for the preliminary alternatives, although new fisheries data developed between March and April, especially regarding fisheries north of Cape Falcon, may require modification of the range of impacts. During this process, the Council and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) develop a series of documents that describe the development and analysis of the alternatives. These documents collectively form the basis for the Environmental Assessment (EA) for NMFS’ analysis of the proposed action of adopting the 2020 ocean salmon fisheries management measures under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
  • Economic Options for Grays Harbor

    Economic Options for Grays Harbor

    ECONOMIC OPTIONS FOR GRAYS HARBOR A Report by The Evergreen State College class “Resource Rebels: Environmental Justice Movements Building Hope,” Winter 2016 CONTENTS Preface 3 Zoltán Grossman Background 6 (Lucas Ayenew, Jess Altmayer) I. Ports and Industries 12 (Roma Castellanos, Nicole Fernandez, Jennifer Kosharek) II. Tourism and Transit 27 (Jess Altmayer, Emily Hall, Megan Moore, Lauren Shanafelt) III. Forestry and Forest Products 47 (Lucas Ayenew, Kelsey Foster, Aaron Oman) IV. Fisheries and Energy 61 (Tiffany Brown, Kris Kimmel, Kyle Linden) V. Community Issues 71 (Emily Hall, Jess Altmayer) Common Themes 81 (Roma Castellanos, Emily Hall, Kelsey Foster, Kyle Linden) Background Resources 84 Evergreen students with Quinault Indian Nation Vice President Tyson Johnston (second from right) and Quinault staff members, at Quinault Department of Natural Resources in Taholah. 2 PREFACE Zoltán Grossman In January-March 2016, students from The Evergreen State College, in Olympia, Washington, studied Economic Options in Grays Harbor, looking beyond the oil terminal debate to other possibilities for job-generating development in Aberdeen, Hoquiam, and other Grays Harbor County communities. The class worked in collaboration with the Quinault Indian Nation, the Aberdeen Revitalization Movement, and community organizations. The students were part of the Evergreen program “Resource Rebels: Environmental Justice Movements Building Hope,” which explored the intersections of environmental issues with social issues of race, class, and gender. The program was taught by myself, a geographer working in Native Studies, and Karen Gaul, an anthropologist working in Sustainability Studies. In fall quarter, the class focused on Native American environmental justice issues, and hosted the 1st annual Indigenous Climate Justice Symposium at the Evergreen Longhouse, which included Quinault Indian Nation President Fawn Sharp.